text:
Amendments to this announcement can be found in red.
Part I Overview Information
United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Issuing Organization
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NCIPC/CDC) at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/
Participating Organizations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at http://www.cdc.gov/
Components of Participating
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC/CDC) at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/
Title: Research Grants for Preventing Violence and Violence –Related Injury (R01)
The policies, guidelines, terms, and conditions of the HHS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated in this announcement might differ from those used by the HHS National Institutes of Health (NIH). If written guidance for completing this application is not available on the CDC website, then CDC will direct applicants elsewhere for that information.
Authority: This program is authorized under Section 301 (a) [42 U.S.C. 241(a)] of the Public Health Service Act, and Section 391 (a)[42 U.S.C. 280 b(a)] of the Public Health Service Act, as amended
Announcement Type: New
Instructions for Submission of Electronic Research Applications:
If you do not have access to the Internet, or if you have difficulty accessing the forms online, you may contact the CDC Procurement and Grants Office Technical Information Management Section (PGOTIMS) staff. For this, or further assistance, contact PGO TIMS: Telephone (770) 488-2700, Email: firstname.lastname@example.com.
NOTICE: Applications submitted in response to this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for Federal assistance must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov) using the SF424 Research and Related (R&R) forms and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide.
This FOA must be read in conjunction with the application package instructions included with this announcement on Grants.gov/Apply for Grants (hereafter referred to as, Grants.gov/Apply.)
A registration process is necessary before submission, and applicants are strongly encouraged to start the process at least four weeks prior to the grant submission date. See Section IV.
Two steps are required for on time submission:
1) The application must be successfully received by Grants.gov no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the application submission receipt date (see "Key Dates" below.)
2) Applicants must complete a verification step in the Electronic Research Administration (eRA Commons) within two business days of notification. Note: Since email can be unreliable, it is the responsibility of the applicant to periodically check on their application status in the eRA Commons.
Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number: RFA-CE-09-007
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number(s): 93.136, Injury Prevention and Control Research and State and Community Based Programs
Key Dates
Release/Posted Date:
Letter of Intent Receipt Date:
December 22, 2008
Application Submission Receipt
January 21, 2009
Peer Review Date(s):
January –February, 2009
Council Review Date(s):
March – April,
Earliest Anticipated Start Date(s): July, 2009
Additional Information to Be Available Date: Technical assistance will be available for potential applicants during one conference call. The call for eligible applicants will be held on December 11, 2008 from 1:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. (Eastern Time). The conference can be accessed by calling: 1-877-921-3815 stating the leader name: Ms. Gail Wilson, and entering the passcode: 3776277.
Expiration Date: 91 days after publication date
Due Date for E.O. 12372
Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program.
Additional Overview Content
Executive Summary
Funding Opportunity Announcement Glossary: FOA Glossary Terminology
Table of Contents
Part I Overview Information
Part II Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Research Objectives
Section II. Award Information
1. Mechanism(s) of Support
2. Funds Available
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
A. Eligible Institutions
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
3. Other - Special
Eligibility Criteria
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Request Application
2. Content and Form of
Application Submission
3. Submission Dates and Times
A. Receipt and Review and
Anticipated Start Dates
1. Letter of Intent
B. Submitting an
Application to CDC
C. Application Processing
4. Intergovernmental Review
5. Funding Restrictions
6. Other Submission
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
2. Review and Selection
A. Additional Review
B. Additional Review
C. Sharing Research Data
D. Sharing Research
3. Anticipated Announcement
and Award Dates
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
2. Administrative and
National Policy Requirements
A. Cooperative Agreement
1. Recipient Rights
and Responsibilities
3. Collaborative
3. Reporting
Section VII. Agency Contact(s)
1. Scientific/Research
2. Peer Review Contact(s)
3. Financial/ Grants
Management Contact(s)
4. General Questions
Section VIII. Other Information - Required Federal Citations
Part II - Full Text of
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Research Objectives
The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of CDC within HHS is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2010" and to measuring program performance as stipulated by the Government Performance and Review Act (GPRA). This RFA addresses "Healthy People 2010" priority area(s) of injury and violence prevention and is in alignment with NCIPC performance goal(s) to conduct a targeted program of research to reduce injury-related disability. ) For more information, see www.healthypeople.gov and http://intra-apps.cdc.gov/fmo/.
The purposes of the NCIPC extramural research program are to:
• Build the scientific base for the prevention and control of fatal and nonfatal injuries and related disabilities.
• Encourage professionals from a wide spectrum of disciplines of epidemiology, behavioral and social sciences, medicine, biostatistics, public health, health economics, law, criminal justice, and engineering to perform research in order to prevent and control injuries more effectively.
• Encourage investigators to propose research that involves intervention development and testing as well as research on methods to enhance the adoption and maintenance of effective intervention strategies among individuals, organizations, or communities.
Research Objectives
NCIPC is soliciting investigator-initiated research that will help expand and advance our understanding of violence, its causes, and prevention strategies. The following research objectives are the focus of this solicitation:
1. Dissemination/Implementation Research
Conduct studies aimed at identifying and evaluating efficient and effective methods for the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based interventions, programs, and polices to prevent either the perpetration of or victimization from violence. This research is intended to bridge the gap between prevention research and everyday practice by building a knowledge base about how evidence-based violence prevention information and strategies are disseminated, translated and integrated for use by communities and policy makers. Examples of such studies include: examining the optimal ways to synthesize, translate, and package effective prevention approaches; examining ways to build individual and organizational capacities to use effective approaches (i.e., understanding the type and quality of technical assistance – training, coaching, monitoring – necessary to support effective implementation); understanding how individual, organizational and community characteristics influence the adoption and effective use of empirically-supported violence prevention approaches; and once an effective approach is adopted, understanding the effects of implementing the program, policy, or practice as originally developed (i.e., with "fidelity"), as opposed to changing the content or delivery format (i.e., "adapting"). While adaptation occurs with great frequency in the practice field, we know very little about the kinds of modifications that are likely to diminish or increase an intervention's effectiveness.
Funds are available to address dissemination/implementation research in the areas of child maltreatment or youth violence. Evidence-based interventions, programs, and policies are defined as those for which there is evidence of effectiveness in reducing perpetration of or victimization from child maltreatment or youth violence based on systematic reviews of the field or two or more well designed studies (i.e., randomized control trials).
2. Efficacy/Effectiveness Research
Evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of primary prevention strategies, programs, and policies to prevent the perpetration of violence. These strategies, programs or policies can be targeted universally or at selected or high-risk populations, but cannot be targeted at individuals who have already engaged in the perpetration of violence.
Funds are available to conduct such studies aimed at preventing the perpetration of child maltreatment, intimate partner violence, sexual violence, youth violence, and/or suicidal behavior. There is particular interest in the area of youth violence to assess the effectiveness of broader policy shifts (e.g., reforms in public assistance and housing), economic development schemes (e.g., business improvement districts), and effects of policies directed specifically at youth (e.g., school policies). There is also particular interest in the area of youth violence to assess the economic efficiency of interventions, programs, and policies designed to prevent youth violence.
3. Etiologic Research
Conduct studies to examine the development of intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and/or child maltreatment perpetration. These studies should be designed to provide a better understanding of the proximal developmental pathways and social circumstances that contribute to the perpetration of intimate partner violence, sexual violence, or child maltreatment. Such studies should be designed to provide important information on the populations at high-risk for perpetration, the modifiable risk and protective factors, as well as the optimal developmental periods and settings for intervention.
Section VIII, Other Information - Required Federal Citations,
for policies related to this announcement.
Section II. Award Information
1. Mechanism(s) of Support
This funding opportunity is a research grant and will use the R01 activity code.
This FOA uses the non-modular budget format described in the SF424 Research and Related (R&R) Budget Component application instructions (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding 424/index.htm/).
A detailed categorical budget for the "Initial budget Period" and the "Entire Proposed Period of Support" must be submitted with the application.
2. Funds Available
The participating Centers, Institutes, and Offices (CIOs) (NCIPC) intend to commit approximately $2 million (direct and indirect cost) dollars in FY2009 to fund five (5) applications. The average award amount will be up to $400,000 total (direct and indirect costs) for the first 12-month budget period. An applicant may request a project period of up to 3 years. An applicant may request up to $400,000 maximum ceiling of award amount for the first 12-month budget period. The anticipated start date for new awards is July, 2009.
Guidance for completing a detailed justified budget can be found on the CDC Web site at the following address: http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/budgetguide.htm.
All estimated funding amounts are subject to availability of funds.
If an applicant requests a funding amount greater than the ceiling of the award amount, HHS/CDC will consider the application non-responsive, and it will not enter into the review process. HHS/CDC will notify the applicant that the application did not meet the submission requirements.
Because the nature and scope of the proposed research will vary from application to application, it is anticipated that the size and duration of each award will also vary. Although the financial plans of the CIO (s) provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this funding opportunity are contingent upon the availability of funds and the receipt of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Institutions
You may submit an application if your organization has any of the following characteristics:
A Bona Fide Agent is an agency/organization identified by the state as eligible to submit an application under the state eligibility in lieu of a state application. If you are applying as a bona fide agent of a state or local government, you must provide a letter from the state or local government as documentation of your status. Attach this documentation behind the first page of your application form or for electronic applications, use a .pdf file and attach as "Other Documents" and label as appropriate.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing or matching funds are not required
The most
current HHS Grants Policy Statement is available at:
3. Other-Special Eligibility
To be considered responsive to this announcement, the applicant institution must provide:
• Documentation that the institutions principal investigator (s) and project team have prior experience in conducting violence prevention research as outlined in the chosen priority area (e.g., dissemination/implementation research, efficacy/effectiveness research, etiologic research in violence) and specific topic areas (e.g., child maltreatment, intimate partner violence, sexual violence, youth violence, suicidal behavior) listed in Section I, Research Objectives of this FOA. This must be evidenced by either first-authored peer-reviewed publications, or experience as the Principal Investigator or Co-Investigator of a current or previous research grant in the chosen priority area. Applicants should identify the relevant publications, citations, or grant support in their curriculum vitae.
• Documentation of effective and well-defined working relationships with any organization and/or outside entities expected to participate in the proposed research. This should be evidenced by letters of support detailing the nature and extent of the involvement from the performing organization and relevant outside entities (include in the appendices).
• The proposed research plan may not exceed 25 pages. If your research plan exceeds the page limit, your application may be considered nonresponsive and ineligible for review.
An applicant institution can submit more than one application in response to this FOA, but may not submit more than one application with the same principal investigator.
If your application is incomplete or non-responsive to the special requirements listed in this section, it will not be entered into the review process.
Note: Title 2 of the United
States Code Section 1611 states that an organization
described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code
that engages in lobbying activities is not eligible to
receive Federal funds constituting an award, grant, or loan.
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
To download a SF424 (R&R) Application Package and SF424 (R&R) Application Instructions for completing the SF424 (R&R) forms for this FOA, link to Grants.gov/Apply and follow the directions provided on that Web site.
A one-time registration is required for institutions/organizations at the following:
Grants.gov Get Registered, http://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp·
eRA Commons Prepare to Apply, http://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/preparing.htmIMPORTANT: both the applicant organization, as well as the PD/PI must register in eRA Commons for an application to be accepted electronically. The Credentials Log-In, referenced in Section IV. 2. Content and Form of Application Submission, is obtained through Step #3 in the required actions below.
PD/PIs should work with their institutions/organizations to make sure they are registered in the eRA Commons.
The following three steps are required before an applicant institution/organization can submit an electronic application, as follows:
1) Organizational/Institutional Registration in Grants.gov Get Registered, http://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp
Your organization will need to obtain a Data Universal Number System (DUNS) number and register with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) as part of the Grants.gov registration process.·
If your organization does not have a Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) or Employer Identification Number (EIN), allow for extra time. A valid TIN or EIN is necessary for CCR registration.·
The CCR also validates the EIN against Internal Revenue Service records, a step that will take an additional one to two business days.·
Direct questions regarding Grants.gov registration to:2) Organizational/Institutional Registration in the eRA Commons Prepare to Apply, http://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/preparing.htm
To find out if an organization is already eRA Commons-registered, see the "List of Grantee Organizations Registered in eRA Commons."·
Direct questions regarding the eRA Commons registration to:3) Project Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) Registration in the eRA Commons: Refer to the NIH eRA Commons System (COM) Users Guide.
Note that if a PD/PI is also an HHS peer-reviewer with an Individual DUNS and CCR registration, that particular DUNS number and CCR registration are for the individual reviewer only. These are different than any DUNS number and CCR registration used by an applicant organization. Individual DUNS and CCR registration should be used only for the purposes of personal reimbursement and should not be used on any grant applications submitted to the Federal Government.
Several of the steps of the registration process could take four weeks or more. Therefore, applicants should immediately check with their business official to determine whether their organization/institution is already registered in both Grants.gov and the eRA Commons. The HHS/CDC strongly encourages applicants to use the Grants.gov electronic applications process and have organizations and PD/PIs complete all necessary registrations.
1. Request Application
Applicants must download the
SF424 (R&R) application forms and SF424 (R&R) Application
Guide for this FOA through
Note: Only the forms package
directly attached to a specific FOA can be used. You will
not be able to use any other SF424 (R&R) forms (e.g., sample
forms, forms from another FOA) although some of the
"Attachment" files may be useable for more than one FOA.
If you do not have access to the Internet, or if you have difficulty accessing the forms online, you may contact the CDC Procurement and Grants Office Technical Information Management Section (PGOTIMS) staff. For this, or further assistance, contact PGO TIMS: Telephone (770) 488-2700, Email: firstname.lastname@example.com.
Telecommunications for the
hearing impaired: TTY 770-488-2783.
2. Content and Form of
Application Submission
Prepare all applications using the SF424 (R&R) application forms and in accordance with the
SF424 (R&R) Application Guide (MS Word or PDF).The SF424 (R&R) Application Guide is critical to submitting a complete and accurate application to HHS/CDC. There are fields within the SF424 (R&R) application components that, although not marked as mandatory, are required by HHS/CDC (e.g., the "Credential" log-in field of the "Research & Related Senior/Key Person Profile" component must contain the PD/PI assigned eRA Commons User ID). Agency-specific instructions for such fields are clearly identified in the Application Guide. For additional information, see "Tips and Tools for Navigating Electronic Submission" on the front page of "Electronic Submission of Grant Applications."
The SF424 (R&R) application is comprised of data arranged in separate components. Some components are required, others are optional. The forms package associated with this FOA in Grants.gov/APPLY will include all applicable components, mandatory and optional. A completed application in response to this FOA will include the following components:
Required Components:
SF424 (R&R) (Cover
Research & Related
Project/Performance Site Locations
Research & Related Other Project
Research & Related Senior/Key
Research & Related Budget
PHS398 Cover Page Supplement
PHS398 Research Plan
PHS398 Checklist
PHS398 Cover Letter File
Research & Related Subaward
Budget Attachment(s) Form
While both budget components are included in the SF424 (R&R)
forms package, the CDC
(activity code) uses ONLY the detailed
Research & Related
Budget. (Do not use the PHS 398
Modular Budget.)
3. Submission Dates and Times
See Section IV.3.A for details
Submission, Review and Anticipated Start Dates
Letter of Intent Receipt
December 22, 2008
Application Submission Receipt Date(s): January 21, 2009
Peer Review Date:
January –February, 2009
Council Review Date:
March –
April, 2009
Earliest Anticipated Start
July, 2009
Additional Information to be Available Date: November 21,2008
3.A.1. Letter of Intent
Prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information:
Descriptive title of proposed research.·
Name, address, and telephone number of the Principal Investigator.·
Names of other key personnel.·
Participating institutions.·
Number and title of this funding opportunity
Although a letter of intent is not required
, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows CDC Program staff to estimate the potential review workload and plan the review.
The letter of intent is to be sent by the date listed in Section IV.3.A
The letter of intent should be sent by mail, fax or email to:
J. Felix Rogers, Ph.D., MPH
Scientific Review Administrator
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
NCIPC Extramural Resources Team
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Address for Express Mail or Delivery Service:
4770 Buford Hwy. NE, Bldg 106, Room 08013
Atlanta, GA 30341
Address for U.S. Postal Service Mail:
4770 Buford Hwy. NE, Mailstop F-62
Atlanta, GA 30341
(770) 488-1665
Telephone: (770) 488-4334
3. B. Submitting an Application to CDC
If the instructions in this announcement differ in any way from the SF424 R&R instructions, follow the instructions in this announcement.
To submit an application in response to this FOA, applicants should access this FOA via http://www.grants.gov/Apply and follow steps 1-4. If submittal of the application is done electronically through Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov), the application will be electronically time/date stamped by Grants.gov. The applicants' Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) will receive an e-mail notice of receipt from eRA Commons and Grants.gov when HHS/CDC receives the application.
All requested information must be received in the HHS/CDC Procurement and Grants Office by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the deadline date.
This announcement is the definitive guide on Letter Of Intent (LOI) and application content, submission address, and deadline. It supersedes information provided in the application instructions. If your application does not meet the deadline described in Section IV.3.A, it will not be eligible for review, and HHS/CDC will discard it. You will receive notification that you did not meet the submission requirements.
Technical Information Management Section – RFA-CE09 -007
CDC, Procurements and Grants Office
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
2920 Brandywine Road
Atlanta, GA 30341
Phone: 770-488-2700 EST
Application Processing
HHS/CDC must receive
on or before 5:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time on the
application submission date(s) described above (Section
IV.3.A.). If HHS/CDC receives an application after that
submission date and time, the application may be delayed in
the review process or not reviewed.
Once an application package has been successfully submitted through Grants.gov, any errors have been addressed, and the assembled application has been created in the eRA Commons, the PD/PI and the Authorized Organization Representative/Signing Official (AOR/SO) have two business days to view the application image.
· If everything is acceptable, no further action is necessary. The application will automatically move forward for processing by the CDC, PGO, Technical Information Management Section, after two business days.
· Prior to the submission deadline, the AOR/SO can "Reject" the assembled application and submit a changed/corrected application within the two day viewing window. This option should be used if the AOR/SO determines that warnings should be addressed. Reminder: warnings do not stop further application processing. If an application submission results in warnings (but no errors) it will automatically move forward after two business days if no action is taken. Please remember that some warnings may not be applicable or may need to be addressed after application submission.
· If the two day window falls after the submission deadline, the AOR/SO will have the option to "Reject" the application if, due to an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system issue, the application does not correctly reflect the submitted application package (e.g., some part of the application was lost or didn't transfer correctly during the submission process). The AOR/SO should first contact the eRA Commons Helpdesk to confirm the system error, document the issue, and determine the best course of action. HHS/CDC will not penalize the applicant for an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system issue.
· If the AOR/SO chooses to "Reject" the image after the submission deadline for a reason other than an eRA Commons or Grants.gov system failure, a changed/corrected application still can be submitted but it will be subject to the CDC late policy guidelines and may not be accepted. The reason for this delay should be explained in the cover letter attachment and must refer only to Commons errors and/or technical errors.
· Both the AOR/SO and PD/PI will receive e-mail notifications when the application is rejected or the application automatically moves forward in the process after two days.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and responsiveness by NCIPC and HHS/CDC Procurement and Grants Office (PGO). HHS/CDC will not review incomplete and non-responsive applications.
There will be an acknowledgement of receipt of applications from Grants.gov and the eRA Commons.
The HHS/CDC will not accept any application in response to this FOA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial review, unless the applicant withdraws the pending application. However, when a previously unfunded application, originally submitted as an investigator-initiated application, is to be submitted in response to a funding opportunity, it is to be prepared as a NEW application. That is, the application for the funding opportunity must not include an Introduction describing the changes and improvements made, and the text must not be marked to indicate the changes from the previous unfunded version of the application.
4. Intergovernmental Review
Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program.
5. Funding Restrictions
All HHS/CDC awards are
subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and
other considerations described in the HHS Grants Policy
Restrictions, which applicants must take into account while writing their budgets, are as follows:
6. Other Submission
A detailed categorical budget for the "Initial budget Period" and the "Entire Proposed Period of Support" must be submitted with the application. Travel expenses for the annual monitoring workshop in Atlanta should be included in the applicant's proposed budget. If you are requesting indirect costs in your budget, you must include a copy of your indirect cost rate agreement. If your indirect cost rate is a provisional rate, the agreement should be less than 12 months of age. If submitting electronically, use a PDF version of the agreement, attach it in Grants.gov under "Other Attachments", and title it appropriately.
Guidance for completing a detailed justified budget can be found on the CDC Web site, at the following address: http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/budgetguide.htm.
Applicants' research plan(s) should address activities they will conduct over the entire project period.
The HHS/CDC requires the PD/PI to fill in his/her eRA Commons User ID in the "PROFILE – Project Director/Principal Investigator" section, "Credential" log-in field of the "Research & Related Senior/Key Person Profile" component. The applicant organization must include its DUNS number in its Organizational Profile in the eRA Commons. This DUNS number must match the DUNS number provided at CCR registration with Grants.gov. For additional information, see Registration FAQs – Important Tips – Electronic Submission of Grant Applications.
Research Plan Component Sections
While each section of the Research Plan component needs to be uploaded separately as a .pdf attachment, applicants are encouraged to construct the Research Plan component as a single document, separating sections into distinct .pdf attachments just before uploading the files. This approach will enable applicants to better monitor formatting requirements such as page limits. All attachments must be provided to HHS/CDC in .pdf format, filenames must be included with no spaces or special characters, and a .pdf extension must be used. Do not include any information in a header or footer of the attachments. A header will be system-generated that references the PD/PI. Page numbers for the footer will be system-generated in the complete application, with all pages sequentially numbered; therefore, do not number the pages of your attachments. Your research plan must not exceed 25 pages. If your research plan exceeds the page limitation, your application may be considered unresponsive and ineligible for review.
The following materials may be included in the Appendix:
Up to 10 publications, manuscripts (accepted for publication), abstracts, patents, or other printed materials directly relevant to the proposed project. Do not include manuscripts submitted for publication. Applicants should refer to instruction guides and specific Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) to determine the appropriate limit on the number of publications that may be submitted for a particular program. Note that not all grant activity codes allow the inclusion of publications.
Please note the following restriction on appendix attachments: The Research Plan Appendix attachments are limited to 10 attachments. Appendices are uploaded as attachments in the PHS 398 Research Plan form, in field #18, within the electronic application package. An applicant will receive an error message if the number of appendix attachments exceeds 10, which will result in an unsuccessful submission of the application. You may include more than one publication, or other allowable appendix material, within one attachment; however, do not let your attachments exceed 10.
Do not use the Appendix to circumvent the page limitations of the Research Plan component. An application that does not observe the relevant policies and procedures may not be considered in the review process. Applicants are reminded to review specific FOAs for any additional program-specific guidance on Appendix material and other application requirements.
It is especially important that the project summary/abstract (SF424 form page 2) of your grant application reflect the project's focus; the abstract will be used to help determine the responsiveness of the application. The following instructions supersede those provided in the SF424 instructions. If your application is funded, your abstract will become public information.
The abstract should be a 1 page document and should contain the following sections:
• Importance (One or two sentences explaining the importance of the
study question)
• Objectives (Include specific aims and hypotheses)
• Study Design
• Setting
• Participants (Include the number of participants and how they will be selected)
• Interventions (Explain the essential features of any interventions)
• Outcome Measures
The language of the abstract must be simple and easy to understand for a broad audience. For more information on how to write an abstract please see the "Structured Abstracts" section at: http://jama.ama-assn.org/ifora_current.dtl
Research Plan
You must include a research plan in your application. The research plan should not exceed 25 pages and address activities to be conducted over the entire project period. The research plan should include the following information:
• The project's focus, a justification for the research proposed, and a description of the scientific basis for the research. The focus should be based on recommendations in "Healthy People 2010" (http://www.healthypeople.gov) and the "CDC Injury Research Agenda," (http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/pub-res/research_agenda/agenda.htm) and should seek creative approaches that will contribute to a national program for injury control.
• Specific, measurable, and time-framed objectives.
• A detailed plan describing the methods by which the objectives will be achieved, including their sequence. A comprehensive evaluation plan is an essential component of the application.
• A description of the principal investigator's role and responsibilities.
• A description of those activities related to, but not supported by, the grant.
• A description of the involvement of other entities that will relate to the proposed project, if applicable. It should include commitments of support and a clear statement of their roles.
• An explanation of how the research findings will contribute to the national effort to reduce the morbidity, mortality and disability caused by injuries within three to five years from project start-up.
Plan for Sharing Research Data
Note: HHS/CDC normally requires a plan for sharing research data. However, only proposals submitted to NCIPC for individual research projects of $500,000 or more in total (direct and indirect) costs per year require the applicant to include a data-sharing plan. Because the ceiling for this FOA is below $500,000, a data sharing plan is not required and the HHS/CDC steps outlined in this section do not apply.
Sharing Research Resources
Not applicable
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process.
Scientific merit of the proposed project as determined by peer review·
Availability of funds·
Relevance of program priorities and the priorities of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
2. Review and Selection
Applications that are
complete and responsive to the RFA will be evaluated for
scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review
group convened by NCIPC in accordance with the review
criteria stated below.
As part of the initial merit
review, all applications will:
The goals of HHS/CDC-supported research are to advance the understanding of health promotion and the prevention of disease, injury, and disability, and enhance preparedness. In the written comments, evaluate the application to judge the likelihood the proposed research will have a substantial impact on the pursuit of these goals. Each of these criteria will be addressed by the reviewers and considered in assigning the overall score, weighting them as appropriate for each application.
Note that an application does not need to be strong in all
categories to be judged likely to have major scientific
impact and thus deserve a high priority score. For example,
an investigator may propose to carry out important work that
by its nature is not innovative but is essential to move a
field forward.
Does this study address an important problem? If the
applicant achieves the aims of the application, how will it
advance scientific knowledge or clinical practice? What will
be the effect of these studies on the concepts, methods,
technologies, treatments, or preventative interventions that
drive this field?
Are the conceptual or clinical framework, design, methods,
and analyses adequately developed, well integrated, well
reasoned, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does
the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and
consider alternative tactics?
For priority one (dissemination/implementation research),
has the applicant provided documentation that the
evidence-based intervention, program, or policy chosen (in
either the area of child maltreatment or youth violence)
been previously tested, evaluated, and demonstrated
effective for the outcome of interest? For priority two
(efficacy/effectiveness research), does the research plan
propose to evaluate primary prevention of perpetration (in
any of the following areas; child maltreatment, intimate
partner violence, sexual violence, youth violence, and/or
suicidal behavior) and focus on a target population that has
not already engaged in the perpetration of violence. For
priority three (etiologic research), does the applicant
propose to examine the development of perpetration and the
populations at high risk for perpetration? Does the project
include plans to measure progress toward achieving the
stated objectives? Is there an appropriate work plan
Is the project original and innovative? For example: Does
the project challenge existing paradigms or clinical
practice; address an innovative hypothesis or critical
barrier to progress in the field? Does the project develop
or employ novel concepts, approaches, methodologies, tools,
or technologies for this area?
Are the investigators appropriately trained and well suited
to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to
the experience level of the principal investigator and other
researchers? Does the investigative team bring complementary
and integrated expertise to the project (if applicable)?
Does the principal investigator have
demonstrated experience conducting, evaluating, and
publishing violence prevention research as evidenced by
publication of at least one first-authored manuscript in
violence prevention research in a peer-reviewed journal or a
current or previous research grant in the chosen priority
Does the scientific environment in which the work will be
done contribute to the probability of success? Do the
proposed studies benefit from unique features of the
scientific environment, or subject populations, or employ
useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of
institutional support?
Is there an appropriate degree of
commitment and cooperation by other interested parties as
evidenced by letters of support detailing the nature and
extent of their involvement?
2.A. Additional
Review Criteria
In addition to the above
criteria, the following items will continue to be considered
in the determination of scientific merit and the priority
• For priority 1, the institution should provide documentation that the proposed research plan for an evidence-based intervention, program, or policy chosen for this priority (dissemination/implementation research in either the area of child maltreatment or youth violence) has been previously evaluated and demonstrated effective for the outcome of interest. Include in the appendices, published results from at least two or more well-designed studies showing evidence of effectiveness, or a systematic review of the field (e.g., Cochrane Review, Blueprints for Violence Prevention Task Force on Community Preventive Services) that identifies the intervention, program, or policy as effective.
• For priority 2 (efficacy/effectiveness research), only proposals that evaluate a strategy, program, or policy that is focused on primary, not secondary prevention of perpetration of violence, and focuses on a target population that has not already engaged in the perpetration of violence will be considered responsive to the objectives of the FOA.
• For priority 3 (etiologic research), only applications that propose to examine the development of perpetration in the areas of interest for this solicitation will be considered responsive.
Protection of Human Subjects from Research Risk: When human subjects are involved, HHS/CDC will assess the available protections from research risk that relate to their participation in the proposed research [see the Research Plan, Section 2, item 8 on Human Subjects in the SF424 (R&R)] located at, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm. Additional HHS/CDC Requirements under AR-1 Human Subjects Requirements are available on the Internet at the following address: http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/ARs.htm.
Inclusion of Women and Minorities in Research:
Does the application adequately address the HHS/CDC Policy requirements regarding the inclusion of women, ethnic, and racial groups in the proposed research? This includes: (1) The proposed plan for the inclusion of both sexes and racial and ethnic minority populations for appropriate representation; (2) The proposed justification when representation is limited or absent; (3) A statement as to whether the design of the study is adequate to measure differences when warranted; and (4) A statement as to whether the plans for recruitment and outreach for study participants include the process of establishing partnerships with community(ies) and recognition of mutual benefits (see Section 2, item 9 Inclusion or Women and Minorities of the Research Plan component of the SF424 (R&R).
Care and Use of Vertebrate Animals in Research:
If applicants plan to use
vertebrate animals in the project, HHS/CDC will assess the
five items described under Section 2, item 12 Vertebrate
Animals of the Research Plan component of the SF424 (R&R).
HHS/CDC Requirements under AR-3 Animal Subjects Requirements
are available on the Internet at the following address:
If applicants propose the applicant has proposed materials
or procedures that are potentially hazardous to research
personnel and/or the environment, HHS/CDC will determine if
the proposed protection is adequate.
2.B. Additional Review
Budget and Period of
Support: The
reasonableness of the proposed budget and the
appropriateness of the requested period of support in
relation to the proposed research may be assessed by the
reviewers. Is the number of person months listed for the
effort of the PD/PI appropriate for the work proposed? Is
each budget category realistic and justified in terms of the
aims and methods? The evaluation of the budget should not
affect the priority score.
2.C. Sharing Research Data
Not applicable. Only proposals submitted to NCIPC for
individual research projects of $500,000 or more in total
(direct and indirect) costs per year require the applicant
to include a data-sharing plan. Because the ceiling for
this FOA is below $500,000, a data sharing plan is not
2.D. Sharing Research
Not applicable
3. Anticipated Announcement
and Award Dates
will be notified in July 2009 by the HHS/CDC's Procurement
and Grants Office (PGO) if their applications were selected
for funding.
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
After the peer review of the
application is completed, the applicant organization will
receive a written critique called a "Summary Statement."
The applicant organization and the PD/PI will be able to
access the Summary Statement via the eRA Commons.
HHS/CDC will contact t
A formal notification in the form of a Notice of Award (NoA) will be provided to the applicant organization. The NoA signed by the Grants Management Officer (GMO) is the authorizing document. HHS/CDC will mail and/or e-mail this document to the recipient fiscal officer identified in the application.
Selection of the application for award is not an authorization to begin performance. Any cost incurred before receipt of the NoA is at the recipient's risk. These costs may be reimbursed only to the extent considered allowable pre-award costs. See also Section IV.5. Funding Restrictions.
CDC may grant expanded authority to eligible grantees under this announcement.
2. Administrative and
National Policy Requirements
The Code of Federal
Regulations 45 CFR Part 74 and Part 92 have details about
policy requirements.
For more information on the Code of Federal Regulations, see
the National Archives and Records Administration at the
following Internet address:
Additional requirements are available
Section VIII. Other Information on this document or on
the CDC website at the following Internet address:
http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/ARs.htm. These will be
incorporated into the NoA by reference.
The following terms and
conditions will be incorporated into the NoA and will be
provided to the appropriate institutional official and a
courtesy copy to the PD/PI at the time of award.
2.A. Cooperative Agreement
Not applicable
3. Reporting
Recipient Organization must provide HHS/CDC with an
original, plus two hard copies of the following reports:
Non-Competing Grant Progress Report, (use form PHS 2590, posted on the HHS/CDC website, http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/forms.htm and at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/2590/2590.htm, no less than 120 days prior to the end of the current budget period. The progress report will serve as the non-competing continuation application.2.
The annual performance report is due 30 days after the end of the budget period.3.
Financial status report, no more than 90 days after the end of the budget period.4.
Final financial and performance reports, no more than 90 days after the end of the budget year/project period.
Recipient Organization must forward these reports by the U.S. Postal Service or express delivery to the Grants Management Specialist listed in the "Agency Contacts" section of this FOA.
Although the financial plans of the HHS/CDC CIO(s) provide support for this program, awards pursuant to this funding opportunity are contingent upon the availability of funds, evidence of satisfactory progress by the recipient (as documented in required reports) and the determination that continued funding is in the best interest of the Federal government.
Section VII. Agency Contacts
encourages your inquiries concerning this FOA and welcomes the opportunity to answer questions from potential applicants. Inquiries can fall into three areas: scientific/research, peer review, and financial or grants management issues:
JoAnn M.
Thierry, Ph. D
Scientific Program Administrator
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Mailstop F-62
Telephone: (770) 488-1556
(770) 488-1665
2. Peer Review Contacts:
J. Felix Rogers, Ph.D., MPH
Scientific Review Administrator
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Mailstop K-02
Atlanta, GA 30341
Telephone: (770) 488-4334
(770) 488-1665
3. Financial or Grants
Management Contacts:
Gladys Gissentanna, Grants Management Officer
CDC Procurement and Grants Office
2920 Brandywine Road
Atlanta, GA 30341
Telephone: 770-488-2712
E-mail: email@example.com
General Questions Contacts:
Technical Information
Management Section
CDC Procurement and Grants Office
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
2920 Brandywine Road
Atlanta, GA 30341
Telephone: 770-488-2700
Email: email@example.com
5. Special Guidelines for Technical Assistance:
NCIPC Website: For additional help in preparing your grant application please see the "frequently asked questions" section on the NCIPC webpage at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc.
Section VIII. Other Information
Required Federal Citations
Human Subjects Protection:
regulations (45 CFR Part 46)
require that applications
and proposals involving human subjects must be evaluated
with reference to the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of
protection against these risks, the potential benefits of
the research to the subjects and others, and the importance
of the knowledge gained or to be gained (http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm).
Additional HHS/CDC Requirements under AR-1 Human Subjects
Requirements can be found on the Internet at the following
Use of Animals in Research:
Recipients of PHS support
for activated involving live, vertebrate animals must comply
with PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
as mandated by the Health Research Extension Act of 1985 (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/hrea1985.htm),
and the USDA Animal Welfare Regulations (http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htm)
as applicable. Additional HHS/CDC Requirements under AR-3
Animal Subjects Requirements can be found at
Requirements for Inclusion
of Women and Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Research
It is the policy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to ensure that individuals of both sexes and the various racial and ethnic groups will be included in CDC/ATSDR-supported research projects involving human subjects, whenever feasible and appropriate. Racial and ethnic groups are those defined in OMB Directive No. 15 and include American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. Applicants shall ensure that women, racial and ethnic minority populations are appropriately represented in applications for research involving human subjects. Where clear and compelling rationale exist that inclusion is inappropriate or not feasible, this situation must be explained as part of the application. This policy does not apply to research studies when the investigator cannot control the race, ethnicity, and/or sex of subjects. Further guidance to this policy is contained in the Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 179, pages 47947-47951, and dated Friday, September 15, 1995.
The policy of CDC is that persons under the age of 21 must
be included in all human subjects research that is conducted
or supported by CDC, unless there are scientific and ethical
reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all
CDC-conducted or CDC-supported research involving human
subjects, including research that is otherwise exempt in
accordance with Sections 101(b) and 401(b) of
45 C.F.R. Part 46, HHS Policy for the Protection of Human
Subjects. Therefore, proposals for research
involving human subjects must include a description of plans
for including persons under the age of 21. If persons under
the age of 21 will be excluded from the research, the
application or proposal must present an acceptable
justification for the exclusion.
In an extramural research plan, the investigator should create a section titled "Participation of persons under the age of 21." This section should provide either a description of the plans to include persons under the age of 21 and a rationale for selecting or excluding a specific age range, or an explanation of the reason(s) for excluding persons under the age of 21 as participants in the research. When persons under the age of 21 are included, the plan must also include a description of the expertise of the investigative team for dealing with individuals at the ages included, the appropriateness of the available facilities to accommodate the included age groups, and the inclusion of a sufficient number of persons under the age of 21 to contribute to a meaningful analysis relative to the purpose of the study. Scientific review groups at CDC will assess each application as being acceptable or unacceptable in regard to the age-appropriate inclusion or exclusion of persons under the age of 21 in the research project, in addition to evaluating the plans for conducting the research in accordance with these provisions.
The inclusion of children (as defined by the applicable law of the jurisdiction in which the research will be conducted) as subjects in research must be in compliance with all applicable subparts of 45 C.F.R. Part 46, as well as with other pertinent federal laws and regulations.
The policy of inclusion of persons under the age of 21 in CDC-conducted or CDC-supported research activities in foreign countries (including collaborative activities) is the same as that for research conducted in the United States.
Public Health System Reporting Requirements
This program is subject to the Public Health System Reporting Requirements. Under these requirements, all community-based non-governmental organizations submitting health services applications must prepare and submit the items identified below to the head of the appropriate State and/or local health agency(s) in the program area(s) that may be impacted by the proposed project no later than the application deadline date of the Federal application. The appropriate State and/or local health agency is determined by the applicant. The following information must be provided:
A. A copy of the face page of the application (SF 424).
B. A summary of the project that should be titled "Public Health System Impact Statement" (PHSIS), not exceed one page, and include the following:
1. A description of the population to be served.
2. A summary of the services to be provided.
3. A description of the coordination plans with the appropriate state and/or local health agencies.
If the State and/or local health official should desire a copy of the entire application, it may be obtained from the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) or directly from the applicant.
Paperwork Reduction Act Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, projects that involve the collection of information from 10 or more individuals and funded by a grant or a cooperative agreement will be subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Smoke-Free Workplace Requirements
CDC strongly encourages all recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and to promote abstinence from all tobacco products. Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities that receive Federal funds in which education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children.
The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving
the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of
"Healthy People 2010," a PHS-led national activity for
setting priority areas. This PA is related to one or more of
the priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy
of "Healthy People 2010" at
Applicants should be aware of restrictions on the use of HHS funds for lobbying of Federal or State legislative bodies. Under the provisions of 31 U.S.C. Section 1352, recipients (and their sub-tier contractors) are prohibited from using appropriated Federal funds (other than profits from a Federal contract) for lobbying congress or any Federal agency in connection with the award of a particular contract, grant, cooperative agreement, or loan. This includes grants/cooperative agreements that, in whole or in part, involve conferences for which Federal funds cannot be used directly or indirectly to encourage participants to lobby or to instruct participants on how to lobby.
In addition no part of CDC appropriated funds, shall be used, other than for normal and recognized executive-legislative relationships, for publicity or propaganda purposes, for the preparation, distribution, or use of any kit, pamphlet, booklet, publication, radio, television, or video presentation designed to support or defeat legislation pending before the Congress or any State or local legislature, except in presentation to the Congress or any State or local legislature itself. No part of the appropriated funds shall be used to pay the salary or expenses of any grant or contract recipient, or agent acting for such recipient, related to any activity designed to influence legislation or appropriations pending before the Congress or any State or local legislature.
Any activity designed to influence action in regard to a particular piece of pending legislation would be considered "lobbying." That is lobbying for or against pending legislation, as well as indirect or "grass roots" lobbying efforts by award recipients that are directed at inducing members of the public to contact their elected representatives at the Federal or State levels to urge support of, or opposition to, pending legislative proposals is prohibited. As a matter of policy, HHS/CDC extends the prohibitions to lobbying with respect to local legislation and local legislative bodies.
The provisions are not intended to prohibit all interaction with the legislative branch, or to prohibit educational efforts pertaining to public health. Clearly there are circumstances when it is advisable and permissible to provide information to the legislative branch in order to foster implementation of prevention strategies to promote public health. However, it would not be permissible to influence, directly or indirectly, a specific piece of pending legislation
It remains permissible to use HHS/CDC funds to engage in activity to enhance prevention; collect and analyze data; publish and disseminate results of research and surveillance data; implement prevention strategies; conduct community outreach services; provide leadership and training, and foster safe and healthful environments.
Recipients of HHS/CDC grants and cooperative agreements need to be careful to prevent CDC funds from being used to influence or promote pending legislation. With respect to conferences, public events, publications, and "grassroots" activities that relate to specific legislation, recipients of HHS/CDC funds should give close attention to isolating and separating the appropriate use of HHS/CDC funds from non-CDC funds. HHS/CDC also cautions recipients of HHS/CDC funds to be careful not to give the appearance that HHS/CDC funds are being used to carry out activities in a manner that is prohibited under Federal law.
Prohibition on Use of CDC Funds for Certain Gun Control Activities
The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act specifies that: "None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control."
Anti-Lobbying Act requirements prohibit lobbying Congress with appropriated Federal monies. Specifically, this Act prohibits the use of Federal funds for direct or indirect communications intended or designed to influence a member of Congress with regard to specific Federal legislation. This prohibition includes the funding and assistance of public grassroots campaigns intended or designed to influence members of Congress with regard to specific legislation or appropriation by Congress.
In addition to the restrictions in the Anti-Lobbying Act, HHS/CDC interprets the language in the HHS/CDC's Appropriations Act to mean that HHS/CDC's funds may not be spent on political action or other activities designed to affect the passage of specific Federal, State, or local legislation intended to restrict or control the purchase or use of firearms.
Accounting System Requirements
The services of a certified public accountant licensed by the State Board of Accountancy or the equivalent must be retained throughout the project as a part of the recipient's staff or as a consultant to the recipient's accounting personnel. These services may include the design, implementation, and maintenance of an accounting system that will record receipts and expenditures of Federal funds in accordance with accounting principles, Federal regulations, and terms of the cooperative agreement or grant.
Capability Assessment
It may be necessary to conduct an on-site evaluation of some applicant organization's financial management capabilities prior to or immediately following the award of the grant or cooperative agreement. Independent audit statements from a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) for the preceding two fiscal years may also be required.
Proof of Non-profit Status
Proof of nonprofit status must be submitted by private nonprofit organizations with the application. Any of the following is acceptable evidence of nonprofit status: (a) a reference to the applicant organization's listing in the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) most recent list of tax-exempt organizations described in section 501(c)(3) of the IRS Code; (b) a copy of a currently valid IRS tax exemption certificate; (c) a statement from a State taxing body, State Attorney General, or other appropriate State Official certifying that the applicant organization has a nonprofit status and that none of the net earnings accrue to any private shareholders or individuals; (d) a certified copy of the organization's certificate of incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes nonprofit status; (e) any of the above proof for a State or national parent organization and a statement signed by the parent organization that the applicant organization is a local nonprofit affiliate.
Small, Minority, And Women-owned Business
It is a national policy to place a fair share of purchases with small, minority and women-owned business firms. The Department of Health and Human Services is strongly committed to the objective of this policy and encourages all recipients of its grants and cooperative agreements to take affirmative steps to ensure such fairness. In particular, recipients should:
Research Integrity
The signature of the institution official on the face page of the application submitted under this Funding Opportunity Announcement is certifying compliance with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations in Title 42 Part 93, Subparts A-E, entitled PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE POLICIES ON RESEARCH MISCONDUCT.
The regulation places requirements on institutions receiving or applying for funds under the PHS Act that are monitored by the DHHS Office of Research Integrity (ORI) (http://ori.hhs.gov./policies/statutes.shtml).
For example:
Section 93.301 Institutional assurances. (a) General policy. An institution with PHS supported biomedical or behavioral research, research training or activities related to that research or research training must provide PHS with an assurance of compliance with this part, satisfactory to the Secretary. PHS funding components may authorize [[Page 28389]] funds for biomedical and behavioral research, research training, or activities related to that research or research training only to institutions that have approved assurances and required renewals on file with ORI. (b) Institutional Assurance. The responsible institutional official must assure on behalf of the institution that the institution-- (1) Has written policies and procedures in compliance with this part for inquiring into and investigating allegations of research misconduct; and (2) Complies with its own policies and procedures and the requirements of this part.
Compliance with Executive Order 13279
Faith-based organization are eligible to receive federal financial assistance, and their applications are evaluated in the same manner and using the same criteria as those for non-faith-based organizations in accordance with Executive Order 13279, Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith-Based and Community Organizations. All applicants should, however, be aware of restrictions on the use of direct financial assistance from the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for inherently religious activities. Under the provisions of Title 45, Parts 74, 87, 92 and 96, organizations that receive direct financial assistance from DHHS under any DHHS program may not engage in inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization as a part of the programs or services funded with direct financial assistance from DHHS. If an organization engages in such activities, it must offer them separately, in time or location, from the programs or services funded with direct DHHS assistance, and participation must be voluntary for the beneficiaries of the programs or services funded with such assistance. A religious organization that participates in the DHHS funded programs or services will retain its independence from Federal, State, and local governments, and may continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct financial assistance from DHHS to support inherently religious activities such as those activities described above. A faith-based organization may, however, use space in its facilities to provide programs or services funded with financial assistance from DHHS without removing religious art, icons, scriptures, or other religious symbols. In addition, a religious organization that receives financial assistance from DHHS retains its authority over its internal governance, and it may retain religious terms in its organization=s name, select its board members on a religious basis, and include religious references in its organization=s mission statements and other governing documents in accordance with all program requirements, statutes, and other applicable requirements governing the conduct of DHHS funded activities. For further guidance on the use of DHHS direct financial assistance see Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 87, Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations, and visit the internet site:
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Requirements
Recipients of this grant award should note that pursuant to the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information promulgated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) (45 CFR Parts 160 and 164) covered entities may disclose protected health information to public health authorities authorized by law to collect or receive such information for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability, including, but not limited to, the reporting of disease, injury, vital events such as birth or death, and the conduct of public health surveillance, public health investigations, and public health interventions. The definition of a public health authority includes a person or entity acting under a grant of authority from or contract with such public agency. HHS/CDC considers this project a public health activity consistent with the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information and CDC will provide successful recipients a specific grant of public health authority for the purposes of this project.
Release and Sharing of Data
The Data Release Plan is the Grantee's assurance that the dissemination of any and all data collected under the CDC data sharing agreement will be released as follows:
When required (see note below) applications must include a copy of the applicant's Data Release Plan. Applicants should provide CDC with appropriate documentation on the reliability of the data. Applications submitted without the required Plan may be ineligible for award. Award will be made when reviewing officials have approved an acceptable Plan. The successful applicant and the Program Manager will determine the documentation format. HHS/CDC recommends data is released in the form closest to micro data and one that will preserve confidentiality.
Note: Only proposals submitted to NCIPC for individual research projects of $500,000 or more in total (direct and indirect) costs per year require the applicant to include a data-sharing plan. Because the ceiling for this FOA is below $500,000, a data sharing plan is not required.
Conference Disclaimer and Use of Logos
Disclaimer: Where a conference is funded by a grant or cooperative agreement, a subgrant or a contract the recipient must include the following statement on conference materials, including promotional materials, agenda, and internet sites:
"Funding for this conference was made possible [in part] by [insert grant or cooperative agreement award number] from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) . The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government."
Logos: Neither the HHS nor the CDC ("CDC" includes ATSDR) logo may be displayed if such display would cause confusion as to the source of the conference or give the false appearance of Government endorsement. A non-federal entity's unauthorized use of the HHS name or logo is governed by U.S.C. § 1320b-10, which prohibits the misuse of the HHS name and emblem in written communication. The appropriate use of the HHS logo is subject to the review and approval of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (OASPA). Moreover, the Office of the Inspector General has authority to impose civil monetary penalties for violations (42 C.F.R. Part 1003). Neither the HHS nor the CDC logo can be used on conference materials under a grant, cooperative agreement, contract or co-sponsorship agreement without the expressed, written consent of either the Project Officer or the Grants Management Officer. It is the responsibility of the grantee (or recipient of funds under a cooperative agreement) to request consent for the use of the logo in sufficient detail to assure a complete depiction and disclosure of all uses of the Government logos, and to assure that in all cases of the use of Government logos, the written consent of either the Project Officer or the Grants Management Officer has been received.
CDC Home Page: http://www.cdc.gov
CDC Funding Web Page: http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/FOAs.htm
CDC Forms Web Page:


text:
How to Safely Carry (and Travel) with Your Laptop
Whether you're going from meeting-to-meeting, moving to a different room in your home or traveling, here are our suggestions on how to carry your laptop safely. -
100 Million ThinkPads Later
"Eve", the nickname given the official 100 millionth ThinkPad, is the current epitome of what it means to be a ThinkPad. -
Speed up Your PC by Disabling Apps from Auto-Starting
There are plenty of ways you can help speed up your PC. Learn how to remove the auto-start setting from apps you rarely use and you may be surprised at how much your PC's performance improves. -
Ways to Balance Work and Play on the Same PC
Here are five easy ways to organize your work and personal digital lives while using the same Lenovo device for both. -
2014 Dubbed "The Year of Shaken Trust." But There is a Silver Lining.
Here are some security threats we should all be aware of as we head into 2015. -
Keeping Kids Safe in the Digital Age
Learn how to monitor and control your child's online activity.
Page 1 of 25

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Brandon Cox
Sent from my iphone
Podcast: Download (0.0KB)
Pastor, Church Communications Guy, Church Website Designer & Blogger
I'm madly in love with Angie Cox and my three kids. And I'm loved and forgiven by an infinitely gracious God! I'm a Pastor, Church Planter, Editor, and Community Facilitator.
Interested in advertising on my site?
Click here! or drop me a line.
© 1977-2012 Brandon Cox. Disclosure Statement.
Runs on Wordpress. Built on Genesis. Hosted by Dreamhost.


text: Forums The Young and the Restless B&B needs to recast Steffy… Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total) Author Posts December 13, 2009 at 1:17 am #110013 shoegal 16 Posts Ok. I just finished watching the weeks worth of B&B and yet again, Steffy got a very meaty scene and seemed to be like a fish out of water, flopping around. Heather Thom acted rings around her and didn't even have to raise her voice. When she was "busted" by Katie for the kiss between her and Bill, we should have seen her go from shock/suprise to remorse (at least pretend) to being angry upset because Katie fired her. All we got was .. "oh no, it won't happen again.. blah blah blah blah blah blab. I want Katie to hurt like we hurt. Newflash #1… Katie is not the reason your grandfather lose the company, Katie didn't take anything from them. " Then we were treated to the crazy messed up scene between her and Thomas where she started ranting about how she was going all of this for revenge and talking about how Forresters was their legacy. Newflash #2.. Steffy, you're not a real Forrester and you should be ticked with your grandfather, Eric, who didn't handle his business right. It seems that Bell doesn't know what to do with the character and is putting her in everyone's orbit to see if she has chemistry with anyone. Newflash #3.. she has no chemistry with anyone on the show.! December 15, 2009 at 1:39 pm #1987841 Darren Lomas 35 Posts Preach it! She actually hasn't been as bad as she was… the worst was when she was opposite Rick, IMO. Ugh, that was too much. Nevertheless, I agree, I'm not a major fan… December 15, 2009 at 4:01 pm #1987863 nitney 5 Posts She's a perfect cast in terms of her appearance, she so looks like Tay. And she has been a bit better lately. I just loathe the idea of her with Bill. No thanks. December 15, 2009 at 6:39 pm #1987898 Darren Lomas 35 Posts True, appearance-wise, she is a very good fit… unlike Curly Sue Phoebe the shrieking warbler… December 15, 2009 at 7:58 pm #1987925 Chels725 54 Posts she is just awful. i don't care if she looks like taylor, she needs to go. she thinks she is formidable against anybody & she just flops. i'll take almost anybody instead of her. Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total) You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


text: TOP 10 Top 10 Dating Approaching Women Mistakes Back to Top ▲ Approaching Women Mistakes 6 Using Pickup Lines Share on Facebook Share on Twitter 0 Shares Sorry, guys, but everything you've learned about using pickup lines to start a conversation with women is dead wrong. There is nothing cheesier, less interesting or more of a turnoff than a guy who uses a standard opening line. Why? It shows he lacks confidence, period. It shows he's literally spent time reading up on the best way to approach a woman (a fact which should never be admitted) and that he needs other guys to tell him what to say and how to act. Whatever you do, a simple hello is better than a canned line. Next Page TOP 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Comments Show Comments More Like This Promoted Around the Web Special Features


text:
Category Archives: party
4 Great Uses for Blue Candy
When you think about candy, chances are that pink hearts, brown candy bars, and red Swedish Fish probably jump to mind. Blue candy is probably the last thing that you think about. However, the fact that it's so different is …[more]
Is It Smarter to Buy Candy Wholesale for an Event?
If you are having a party or preparing for Halloween trick-or-treaters, you know the pressure to get your sweets right. After all, you'll want to impress anyone over at your house with an array of items suited to varying tastes. …[more]
Tips for Making Your Child's Next Birthday Party Fun and Easy
It doesn't matter if you're planning a birthday party for a 2 year old or a 12 year old, planning birthday parties can be stressful. Today there's a lot of pressure on parents to make sure that their child has …[more]
Ideas for Wedding Favors
When you're getting married, you have a lot of things on your mind. Finding a place to get married, settling on rings and outfits, and deciding on who gets to be in the wedding party can be time consuming. After …[more]
3 Small Tips for Saving Money on Your Child's Birthday Party
After this intense winter, people are eager to go outside and enjoy themselves again, and that means plenty of parties and events. Parents and teachers know that the spring season seems to be a popular time for birthday parties. Along …[more]
How to Plan the Ultimate Birthday Party for your Child
When you're a parent, making your child happy is incredibly important. If your child has a birthday approaching, then you are probably already coming up with ways to make that birthday special. One of the easiest ways to do this …[more]


text:
Never again – this is probably the best name for a museum that was created to commemorate Holocaust.
Outside the building is cold and rough. The walls are not welcoming, even if touched by dazzling February sun. The very end of Mall, not far away from waterfront, in the immediate... read on


text:
What does WAPF mean in Botany?
This page is about the meanings of the acronym/abbreviation/shorthand WAPF in the Academic & Science field in general and in the Botany terminology in particular.
Find a translation for WAPF in other languages:
Select another language:
Discuss this WAPF abbreviation with the community:
Use the citation below to add this abbreviation to your bibliography:
"WAPF." Abbreviations.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2015. Web. 4 Mar. 2015. <http://www.abbreviations.com/term/349181>.
WAPF also stands for:
- AM-980, McComb, Mississippi
- Web Assisted Personal Finance
- Western Area Peninsula Forest
- Weston A Price Foundation
- Weston A. Price Foundation
... and 4 more »
Nearby & related abbreviations:
Alternative search:
- Search Week After Petal Fall on Amazon
- Search Week After Petal Fall on Google


text:
Why Cree (CREE) Stock Is Declining Today
NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Cree
(CREE - Get Report) shares are down -8.7% to $44.90 on Wednesday after the LED lights manufacturer guided its first quarter revenue below analyst expectations.
The company expects an adjusted first quarter EPS between 40 cents and 45 cents per diluted share on revenue between $440 million and $465 million. Analysts were expecting profits of 46 cents per diluted share on revenue of $469.78 million.
Analysts at Summit downgraded Cree to "hold" from "buy" in response to the disappointing guidance.
Must Read: Warren Buffett's 25 Favorite Stocks
EXCLUSIVE OFFER: See inside Jim Cramer's multi-million dollar charitable trust portfolio to see the stocks he and Stephanie Link think could be potentially HUGE winners. Click here to see the holdings for FREE.
TheStreet Ratings team rates CREE INC as a Hold with a ratings score of C+. TheStreet Ratings Team has this to say about their recommendation:
"We rate CREE INC (CREE) a HOLD. The primary factors that have impacted our rating are mixed - some indicating strength, some showing weaknesses, with little evidence to justify the expectation of either a positive or negative performance for this stock relative to most other stocks. The company's strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its robust revenue growth, largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most measures and impressive record of earnings per share growth. However, as a counter to these strengths, we find that the stock has had a generally disappointing performance in the past year."
Highlights from the analysis by TheStreet Ratings Team goes as follows:
- You can view the full analysis from the report here: CREE Ratings Report
EXCLUSIVE OFFER: See inside Jim Cramer's multi-million dollar charitable trust portfolio to see the stocks he and Stephanie Link think could be potentially HUGE winners. Click here to see the holdings for FREE.
Check Out Our Best Services for Investors
Action Alerts PLUS
Portfolio Manager Jim Cramer and Director of Research Jack Mohr reveal their investment tactics while giving advanced notice before every trade.
Product Features:
- $2.5+ million portfolio
- Large-cap and dividend focus
- Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Quant Ratings
Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.
Product Features:
- Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
- Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
- A custom stock screener
Stocks Under $10
David Peltier uncovers low dollar stocks with serious upside potential that are flying under Wall Street's radar.
Product Features:
- Model portfolio
- Stocks trading below $10
- Intraday trade alerts
Check Out Our Best Services for Investors
Dividend Stock Advisor
David Peltier identifies the best of breed dividend stocks that will pay a reliable AND significant income stream.
Product Features:
- Diversified model portfolio of dividend stocks
- Updates with exact steps to take - BUY, HOLD, SELL
Trifecta Stocks
Every recommendation goes through 3 layers of intense scrutinyquantitative, fundamental and technical analysisto maximize profit potential and minimize risk.
Product Features:
- Model Portfolio
- Intra Day Trade alerts
- Access to Quant Ratings
Options Profits
Our options trading pros provide over 100 monthly option trading ideas and strategies to help you become a well-seasoned trader.
Product Features:
- Actionable options commentary and news
- Real-time trading community


text:
About - Graco Nautilus 3-in-1 |
The Graco Nautilus 3-in-1 is part of the car seat test program at Consumer Reports. In our lab tests, toddler booster seat models like the Nautilus 3-in-1 are rated on multiple criteria, such as those listed below.
About This Brand |
One of the world's best-known names in child-care products. Graco originated popular products such as the Swyngomatic baby swing sold in the 1950s, and later Pack n' Play portable play yards. Graco has the largest share of the child-seat market in the U.S. and is part of the Newell Rubbermaid group of companies. |
Features & Specs - Graco Nautilus 3-in-1 | |
Weight range harness (lbs.) | 20-65 |
Height range harness (in.) | 27-52 |
Weight range booster (lbs.) | 30-100 |
Height range booster (in.) | 38-57 |
Seat weight (lbs.) | 20 |
More features and specs |
User Reviews
Already own it? Write a review
Heavy, hard to install, not stable
Difficult to Assemble
Best Uses
Baby Seats
Purchased two of these seats based on CR recommendation. Previously had Britax that we loved, but this one had a higher rating when it was time to upgrade to a larger seat. Currently shopping for new seats, because these just won't do.

Problems:

1. The latch system is a simple hook, which is easy to clip, but impossible to tighten so that the seats are stable. Single strap in the rear (for rear harness) coming from the middle of the seat, versus dual straps (from the corners) on the Britax. Plus, once latched to the seat (the primary latch) and tightened with all my weight on the chair, it still moves easily two inches side to side. Even the kids remark that they're sliding around.

2. Once installed, the mechanism to loosen the belt in order to de-latch is almost impossible to retract. It has taken me up to 5 minutes to loosen the primary belt. Not convenient when trying to change to different vehicle, take car seats out for air travel, etc.

3. The bottom seat belt latch is too short (between the child's legs, making it difficult to buckle and uncomfortable for the child.
How long have you owned it:
More than six months
Bottom Line
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
(1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)
Great Carseat and Son Loves it!
Easy To Assemble
Easy to Clean
Best Uses
Forward Facing
Bought this seat for my son when we were ready to face him forward. He is now 3 (38 and 35lb) and fits comfortably in it. He loves it. I find it easy to clean and love that we can use the 5-harness option for an extended period of time.

The seat is heavy and a little bulky, however, it seems much sturdier to me than other high back boosters I've seen on the market. Cup holder is nice and very sturdy as well. It's slightly difficult to install using the LATCH system but nothing unbearable.

I would definitely recommend this product and will be purchasing it for my second son.

This seat does NOT rear face.
How long have you owned it:
More than six months
Bottom Line
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend.
Easy to use carseat
Easily Stowed
Easy to Clean
Difficult to Assemble
Best Uses
This product has been great for my daughter! We've tried Britax and Evenflo, but Graco and Safety First Air have always worked the best and my daughter loves that it's pink. Assembling it took a little time, but there is instructions with the product. We've only used it as a harness, not lap belt or booster yet. To install in the car, I just loosened the anchor straps, attached them to the anchors, slipped the end of the straps back through the back of the car seat and pulled it tight. Then you attach the back strap (located on the back top of the seat) to an anchor behind your car seat. It is nice and snug. It's easy to wipe clean and I don't have any trouble taking it out to wipe down my van.
How long have you owned it:
More than six months
Bottom Line
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend.


text:
Miso is a thick soybean paste with a salty, slightly sweet flavor. Look for it in the refrigerated part of the produce section or with the dairy products, or substitute soy sauce.
Cooking Light MAY 2011
1. Combine first 10 ingredients in a large bowl. Cut linguine into thirds; cook according to directions. Drain; rinse with cold water. Toss pasta with cucumber mixture.
Go to Full Version of
Spicy Pasta Cucumber Salad Recipe


text:
Whether it's a lantern for camping, a headlamp for tracking prey, or a tactical flashlight, we have the lighting source you need. Our electric lanterns and propane lanterns from Kelty and Coleman are perfect for camp. Surefire flashlights, Streamlight tactical lights, and headlamps from Petzl, Browning, and Princeton Tec will light your trail.
Results 1 - 6 of 6 Page 1 of 1
Coleman Premium Powerhouse Dual Fuel Lantern
25% brighter than other liquid-fueled lanterns
Burns up to 14 hrs. on 2 pints of fuel
2 mantles for optimal lighting area
Fully adjustable flame controls lighting output
Porcelainized ventilator wont rust
Coleman Signature Outdoor Gear Propane Lantern
Provides superior area lighting
NorthStar patented tube-mantle design technology
InstaClip #95 tabbed mantles
No strings to tie or wires to twist
Camp Chef Summit Solar Lantern; MSSL
Dual array solar panel charging system
Internal rechargeable batteries
8 LED lantern lights
On/Off switch fully adjusts brightness
Up to 10 hours of LED use off of a full charge
Coleman Deluxe PerfectFlow Lantern with Soft Carry Case
Radiates 360-degrees of light
Adjustable dimmer knob
PerfectFlow system provides consistent fuel
Burns up to 7-hours on high
Two easy-to-install Insta-Clip #21 mantles
Coleman 2-Mantle QuickPack Lantern
Pre-installed mantle for quick easy set-up
Protective cover doubles as packaging
Lantern collar nests into base for stability
Durable, porcelain-coated ventilator
Clear, high-temperature glass for improved lightin
Coleman PerfectFlow One-Mantle Propane Lantern
Runs on propane
Runs for up to 12 hours
Fully adjustable light output
Slip-on mantle #51 included
Results 1 - 6 of 6 Page 1 of 1


text:
ah well, McCain had a good run! ^_^ props to you guys for pullin' Obama through! hopefully he'll do a lot of good and get us out of this mess we're in...
man I'm trying to find a copy of the newspaper, but so far every where is out
I'm so happy for Barry Obama.
What about Barry White?
One of my favorite things to do is watch videos of David Bowie on YouTube.
one of my favorite things to do on youtube is find videos of cute puppies/doggies/kitties/chickens/bunnies!!
sup ladies and gents, new ava/sig
hey it's Elmo! have you guys seen that know "stand-up comedian" Elmo? unsettling much?
man, i wish my name could have a pretty color! weren't like our posts/points suppose to have something to do with that? anyone know how that's coming along???
not gonna happen , ask Sazuka she's a mod


text:
March 05, 2015 - 17:45 GMT
Iranian diplomat Nour Ahmad Nikbakht returned home Thursday after being taken hostage for years in Yemen.
March 05, 2015 - 17:00 GMT
Conflicting reports emerged Thursday about a Daesh or al-Nusra Front member who was treated, then arrested at a hospital in Bekaa Valley.
March 05, 2015 - 14:00 GMT
President Hadi is trying to have international aid transferred to the Central Bank of Aden, a source said Thursday.
March 05, 2015 - 12:15 GMT
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu announced that Turkey will not provide ground troops to Iraqi and Kurdish forces in the effort to reclaim the city of Mosul from Daesh in April.
March 05, 2015 - 11:57 GMT
After being kidnapped by al-Qaeda members in July 2013, Iranian diplomat Nour-Ahmed Nikbakht has since been released from captivity.
March 05, 2015 - 10:00 GMT
A Turkish F-4E aircraft has crashed in central Turkey just one hour after taking off, killing both pilots on board.
March 04, 2015 - 20:51 GMT
Hamas increased its security measures on the border Wednesday as tensions between Gaza and Egypt escalate.
March 04, 2015 - 16:47 GMT
The Jordanian king called on his citizens Tuesday to be proud of the country's resilience against "enemies of Islam."
March 04, 2015 - 15:44 GMT
The unidentified warplanes struck an airport in a Libyan town allied with the legitimized government Wednesday.
March 04, 2015 - 14:51 GMT
The UN agency is looking to hold discussions with the country about its nuclear program on March 9.


text:
Configuration:Other Motion Controllers Datasheets
from LINAK U.S. Inc.
Features: • Connection of max. 4 actuators (only LA27). • Extremely compact design. • Mains voltage: 100/120/230V AC 50-60 Hz. • Standby consumption: 7W. • Duty cycle: 2/18; 2 minutes continuous use. followed by 18 minutes not in use. • Output voltage: 24V DC. •... [See More]
- Configuration: Stand Alone; Other (optional feature); Mounting Clip
- AC Input: 100 to 230
- Axes: 1.0 to 4.0
- Phase : Single Phase
from Beckhoff Automation LLC
PLC and motion solutions, DIN rail inudstrial PC [See More]
- Configuration: DIN Rail; Other; Embedded
- Resolution: 16
- Product: Multi-Axis; Robotic; PC-Based; MCU
- PC-Based Bus: ISA; PC/104
from Bimba Manufacturing Company
Designed to control pneumatic position feedback actuators, stop and hold [See More]
- Configuration: Stand Alone; Other; Bracket
- Axes: 1.0
- Product: Linear Motion/Position Feedback Actuator
- Motor / System: Linear; Pneumatic
from Control Technology Corporation
For 2600XM and 2700 series controllers [See More]
- Configuration: Panel Mount; Other; PAC Module
- Resolution: 16
- Product: Multi-Axis
- Axes: 2.0
from CyberResearch, Inc.
Motion Controller [See More]
- Configuration: Other; Plug-In Module
- PC-Based Bus: Other; PCMCIA PC Card
- Product: PC-Based
- Axes: 1.0
from Excitron Corporation
NEW Extremely compact, yet powerful, motion control system. First of its kind, less than .16" thick, and with all the features you need for robust robotic motion. Excitron is the market leader for high tech innovative motion control products. Includes precision 0.90 degree per half-step stepper... [See More]
- Configuration: OEM; Stand Alone; Panel Mount (optional feature); Other; Encoder, Wireless
- PC-Based Bus: Other; USB, RS232
- Product: Controller / Drive; Multi-Axis (optional feature); Speed Controller; Robotic; MCU; www.excitron.com
- Axes: 1.0 to 52.0
from ITOH Denki USA, Inc.
• Provides Thermal Protection for board and motor. • Built-in current limiter. • Error Output signal for self diagnosis. • Dynamic brake control. • Variable speed (25% - 100%) by onboard or remote potentiometer [See More]
- Configuration: Other; Mounting Brackets
- Continuous Current: 2.3 to 3.2
- DC Input: 14 to 26
- Peak Current: 6


text:
You are right in that I have not experienced ARC. But to say nothing will sound better without ARC is an awful bold statement to make. I am not trying to be argumentive or slam Anthem in any way but for me it is about choices. With the MRX lineup I would have no choice to see if I would prefer using ARC or straight analog. The other factor is that the MRX 500/700 are not inexpensive AVRs and at the cost I would want certain features. For me when I sat down to listen to music today with my Parasound 2100, BDP-83SE, BA A7200 and Salk SongTowers I was extremely happy with the SQ and simplicity of my system. It just really surprises me that Anthem did not offer an option of an analog bypass for the analog inputs. At least offer a 7.1 analog input on the MRX 700 but Anthem decided not to. Bill |
my primary reason for considering the anthem in the first place is arc. It's probably one of the mrx's best, if not the best selling feature. It would be silly to purchase the mrx and not take advantage of arc.
It would be like buying a meridian 2 channel dsp processor and bypassing it. |


text:
Added a product review for Straitline SSC Stem 5/29/2013 8:03 PM
The Good: Strong, light, clamps on solid, slides on steerer tube without any resistance, many colors available, looks good.
The Bad: The 2 bolts that clamp the stem to the steerer tube have rusted on mine.
This is one of the best stems I've used. I basically installed it and never had to even think about it again. I like short stems, so the 35mm option is why I got this one (I had a Thomson 50mm that was great also, just too long for my liking). The only issue is the rust on the inside of the two steerer clamp hex bolts, but it doesn't concern me (just figured I'd note it here). I'd highly recommend this stem, mine has lasted years and is still going strong. Actually, I'd recommend all Straitline products, I have the De Facto pedals too and they're as solid as this stem!
This product has 4 reviews


text:
FIA calls emergency meeting over tyres
30 June 2013 by Ryan Wood | M | Tweet
FIA president Jean Todt has called an emergency meeting in Paris on Wednesday to discuss and find a solution to the tyre 'explosions' which dominated the British Grand Prix.
Todt has summoned Pirelli and the Sporting Working Group (SWG), which consists of representatives from all 11 teams.
The FIA are keen to find a solution to the problem which saw five cars suffer tyre failures - Lewis Hamilton, Felipe Massa, Jean-Eric Vergne, Esteban Gutierrez and Sergio Perez.
Meanwhile Nico Rosberg, Fernando Alonso and Nico Hulkenberg confirmed they too suffered punctures, but were able to pit before the tyre broke apart.
It's likely Pirelli will now be able to introduce its revised tyres - which feature a steel band rather than a kevlar one - at the next grand prix.
The Italian company had hoped to bring them to Canada, but a lack of practice running and attempts from a handful of teams to block the move, meant their introduction was delayed and eventually abandoned.


text:
Showing 1 review for BEL Beltronics Vector 995
Customer Review Summary for BEL Beltronics Vector 995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 19, 2009 | Great Product |
Review by
Me from Teaneck, NJ
Easy to use. No complications. Easy readouts. Sound is good especially on ten- can still be heard over music. Does have some nighttime glare on window, but its not unbearable. Very reliable product. The packaging was fantastic- no complaints. Original box with the original casing. All the pieces came with it that was suppose to as if I bought it on the beltronics site. I am a very happy customer.


text: On Wed, June 4, 2014 3:21 am, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:16:32AM +1200, Christopher Gregory wrote: > >> >> It is really weird that the times do vary between runs of the script. >> >> > On a non-realtime OS you should always expect _some_ variation. > If you look in 'top', even on a system without 'cron' or 'at' there > will be a lot of processes which might wake up. Also memory pressure if > you are doing other things during the build and disk-head movement (on > rotating hard disks). > > For different toolchain versions there will also be differences > (usually, newer means slower to compile, but with 4.9 I have seen > shorter compiles in some packages. > > Also, after watching the frequencies of my four AMD cores during > compilation with -j1 on a mostly idle system (I was worried about why the > ondemand governor showed excessive variation in my SBUs for recent system > builds) I realised that work is being shuffled around the cores. On > modern intel, the 'performance' governor has replaced 'ondemand' and works > as well as ondemand used to (i.e. it quickly speeds up and quickly slows > down when the load has gone). > > ĸen > -- > Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. > Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. > > Hello Ken, I envy your four AMD cores. :) I am torturing this poor old laptop with what I am doing. Sure its a duel core, but the build time for bin-utils was 269, which Bruce said is a bit slow. I need to brush up on current hardware changes. I gave up with the race to getting new computers all the time, as it really is a manufacturers trap. Here in New Zealand we can be up to 6 months maybe even more behind the cutting edge. I now need to get some good paying freelance IT work in to build up funds enough to build another desktop system. I would love to get a mother board that supports two processors and get two of the top of the line processors for it, and see just how fast the builds would go. It takes up to 5 hours for me to compile webkit for example. I usually set that monster to compile before I go to sleep so that when I wake up, all I need to do is type make install. The linux operating system still has a long way to go with proper support for new hardware and to actually have stores that sell computers with linux pre-installed to introduce people to an alternative OS to gates garbage constant alpha releases. The windows os is so dammed easy and boring to install. If you want security with it, all you really need to do is put it behind a good firewalled router and a dedicated linux/unix firewall. For ultimate security, you never place a computer that has sensitive information anyware near the internet. Regards, Christopher.