text:
International Edition
By Daniel Burke, CNN Belief Blog Editor
(CNN) - Since 1999, the U.S. State Department has tracked the world's worst abusers of religious rights.
As the most recent report notes, it has never lacked for material. Persecutions of people of faith are rising across the globe.
Among the most worrying trends, according to the State Department, are "authoritarian governments that restrict their citizens' ability to practice their religion."
In typically bland bureaucratic language, the State Department calls these "countries of particular concern." But the designation can come with some teeth.
Sudan, for example, where a Christian woman was sentenced to death this week for leaving Islam, is ineligible for some types of foreign aid.
In addition to Sudan, here are the State Department's "countries of particular concern." You might call them "The Worst Places in the World to Be Religious."
Burma: The Burmese government puts a stranglehold on every religion except Theravada Buddhism, says the State Department.
Some government officials even enticed non-Buddhists to convert, and Muslims in the state of Rakhine, particularly Rohingya Muslims, are subject to discrimination and lethal violence, according to the State Department.
China: "The government harassed, detained, arrested, or sentenced to prison a number of religious adherents for activities reportedly related to their religious beliefs and practice," the State Department says.
That includes jailing Uyghur Muslims, one of whom was sentenced to 10 years for "selling illegal religious material," and Catholic clergy who were arrested for not belonging to the state-run Catholic Patriotic Association.
That pales compared with the persecution of Tibetan Buddhists, according to the State Department, who suffered through "an intense official crackdown at monasteries and nunneries, resulting in the loss of life, arbitrary detentions, and torture."
Eritrea: Just four religious groups are officially allowed to openly practice their faith in this African nation; the rest are subject to jailing or worse.
So if you're not an Eritrean Orthodox Christian, a Sunni Muslim, a Roman Catholic or an Evangelical Lutheran, life could be tough for you here. Harsh detentions for religious dissenters are the norm, according to the State Department.
Iran: This Muslim-majority country's respect for religious rights has declined in recent years, according to the State Department.
"There were increased reports that the government charged religious and ethnic minorities with moharebeh (enmity against God), 'anti-Islamic propaganda,' or vague national security crimes for their religious activities," says the department's report.
The government has imprisoned numerous members of the Baha'i faith and Saeed Abedini, an Iranian-American pastor who has been physically and psychologically abused, according to the State Department.
Iran begins trial for U.S. pastor
North Korea: Human rights groups provided numerous reports that members of underground churches were arrested, beaten, tortured or killed because of their religious beliefs, the State Department says.
The authoritarian nation has jailed as many as 200,000 political prisoners, according to the State Department, many on religious grounds. The country discourages any religious activity not sanctioned by officially recognized groups.
Kenneth Bae, a Korean-American reportedly accused of spreading Christianity in North Korea, was sentenced in 2013 to 15 years of hard labor.
Kenneth Bae worried about his health in North Korean camp Saudi Arabia: The oil-rich monarchy doesn't even pretend to respect religious rights for any faith other than Islam.
Sunni Islam is the official religion, and the country's constitution is based on the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed.
The public practice of any other religion is prohibited, according to the State Department, and Arabian authorities beheaded a man in 2012 for engaging in "sorcery."
Sudan: This country has been on the State Department's naughty list since its inception in 1999.
Sudan penalizes blasphemy and conversion from Islam, sentencing a Christian woman whom judges say converted from Islam to death this week.
The country has also arrested and deported Western Christians suspected of spreading their faith, according to the State Department.
Christian woman in Sudan sentenced to death for her faith
The country's "morality police" require strict obedience to its interpretation of Islamic law, beating and stoning women accused of acting "indecently."
Uzbekistan: Technically, this country's laws respect religious rights.
But in practice, the Central Asian nation maintains strict control of its majority-Muslim population, according to the State Department.
"The government continued to imprison individuals based on charges of extremism; raid religious and social gatherings of unregistered and registered religious communities; confiscate and destroy religious literature, including holy books; and discourage minors from practicing their faith," the department said in its 2012 report.
People jailed on charges of "religious extremism" have been beaten, tortured and even killed, according to the State Department.
I would like to see a related list: "The worst countries to have no religion or the wrong religion" with examples of how atheists and people who practice a different religion than the majority in their country are treated.
Reblogged this on Random Thoughts.
header 7
The worst places in the world to be religious....................
And the worse place to be an ATHEIST is in the mid west and southern BIBLE BELT.
No, you're assuming that I'm making an assertion on the existence of god. Even Stephen Hawking has admitted to the probability of the universe having a definite beginning. In doing so, he also postulated events much more feasible then the fantasy of a "multiverse." Furthermore, I will reiterate, believing in the existence of a multiverse is JUST AS absurd as a belief in god. You are making the hypothesis entirely on faith. There is not a single shred of evidence whatsoever to support the claim. You might as well be saying that "god" doesn't exist. Instead, the universe was created by the flying spagetti monster. There is no math to support the multiverse hypothesis. No support from the realm of physics. Nothing from the realm of chemistry. Nothing whatsoever. You're just frantically grasping at straws in an attempt to retrospectively provide clarity to a paradox as opposed to just saying "i don't know". Admit it! You don't know! It's that simple.
http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.html Here's the link to Hawking admitting to the "Beginning" of the universe. Carry on with your crackpot theories of a multiverse. You're just as delusional as a die-hard christian zealot at this point, and as such, any attempt to reason with you to admit that you just don't know will undoubtedly fall on deaf ears.
You are totally wrong about the multiverse. Scientists HAVE discovered evidence for the existence of the Multiverse.
This article from Columbia U: http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=5907
And here–from the Catholics!: https://www.catholic.org/news/technology/story.php?id=51025
It's by no means conclusive, but this evidence is best explained by the multiverse theory. You cannot say that there is no evidence for the Multiverse Theory without either being ignorant or lying.
Furthermore, the Multiverse Theory works very well with known physics as well as at the frontier of cosmological theory, and it IS mathematically sound.
Also, please give me a reference where Dr. Hawking refers to the Multiverse Theory as a "fantasy".
Interesting how it is typically RELIGION that suppresses religious rights. It's not that these places are a bad place to be religious; they are just a bad place to be the wrong KIND of religious. Secularism looks pretty good.
ALL RELIGIONS hate each other...they use the excuse of wanting to save souls to gain POWER over the IGNORANT.
thus the name idiot max....not ALL hate one another.....to make such a statement is dishionest and ignorant
Quran says (Islamic Scripture)
"They say , "We live only this life; we will not be resurrected. If you could only see them when they stand before their Lord! He would say, "Is this not the truth?" They would say, "Yes, by our Lord." He would say, "You have incurred the retribution by your disbelief." [6:30]
"The example of Jesus, as far as GOD is concerned, is the same as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him, "Be," and he was." Quran [3:59]
"It does not befit God that He begets a son, be He glorified. To have anything done, He simply says to it, "Be," and it is." [19:35]
"No soul can carry the sins of another soul. If a soul that is loaded with sins implores another to bear part of its load, no other soul can carry any part of it, even if they were related. ... [35:18]
"They even attribute to Him sons and daughters, without any knowledge. Be He glorified. He is the Most High, far above their claims." Quran [6:100]
"Recall that your Lord said to the angels, "I am placing a representative on Earth." They said, "Will You place therein one who will spread evil therein and shed blood, while we sing Your praises, glorify You, and uphold Your absolute authority?" He said, "I know what you do not know." [2:30]
Thanks for taking time to read my post. Please take a moment to visit whyIslam org website.
lookat....someone else (I forgot who) once posted the following on this blog, but it bears repeating:
I read all I needed to read about Islam on September 12, 2001.....
So...What exactly was your point, "lookatuniverse? By the way, how did Pakistan escape the list, with its vile, so-called blasphemy laws??
"They say , "We live only this life; we will not be resurrected.....SORRY lookatuniverse...they are right about this...do you have evidence or any kind of proof that you're going to go on after you die...LET ME HELP YOU.......THE ANSWER IS NO.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeedE8vH1FQ&w=640&h=390] -.
Letting go of superst!ition
Aborted babies found in garbage bags in dumpster behind abortion mill in Michigan.
That's pretty random....what is the point you are trying to make?
While horrific, it's not new news; that happened in 2010.
my flight will board soon. !thank you!! !ill let you know how the pilot flies! and his: beliefs faith or insanity zzzzzooooom!
Are you sure you want to fly? Aeronautics is still just a theory, like germ theory and evolution theory.
i fly every week science works
you think aeronautics is still just a theory? hu
I think maybe he means aerodynamics, which includes the theory of why things can fly.
As agnostic – this is good news for me not so great for my atheist friends
Research on secularity has noted that, in America, agnostics have significant levels of education, while atheists have relatively low levels of education.
Less-educated Americans turning their backs on religion
"Our study suggests that the less educated are dropping out of the American religious sector, similarly to the way in which they have dropped out of the American labor market," said lead researcher W. Bradford Wilcox, a professor of sociology at the University of Virginia."
Well that makes no sense unless you mean "tends to"...then perhaps. But you cannot make the claim as you have stated it. i"n America, agnostics have significant levels of education, while atheists have relatively low levels of education" That states it as if it is a fact, where there may only be tendancies. Care to rephrase so it is not such an obvious mis-statement?
I am an atheist and an agnostic and have a vast amount of education.
Really?? Obviously that "vast education" didnt help you to understand that you cant be both atheist AND agnostic! You just went full potato...First rule of narcissism: Either actually be smart or at least good at pretending to be.
Where in the world did you get the notion that a person cannot be an atheist and agnostic at the same time? Whyever not? "Gnostic" refers to whether or not you KNOW there is a god, and "Theism" refers to a BELIEF in God. Go ahead and Google "definition of agnostic" and "definition of atheist". And these definitions are also similar to the Oxford English Dictionary–the foremost authority on the meaning of words in the world.
So–does a God exist? I don't KNOW, because there's not enough evidence to answer the question either way. But, do I BELIEVE a God exist? (depending on how you define God), no for many reasons. I am an agnostic-atheist, as are most atheists.
Where is this study published? You reference an article about a study done by a person who writes for, among other things, religious journals, and it's about an upcoming association meeting where it is supposed to be presented – and that was three years ago. Do you have anything on this after it was presented (if it was)?
Doris....what I find incredibly difficult to believe about this 'study' is that Christianity thrives in the Bible Belt, and the Bible Belt contains the most uneducated states in the country. And, that is an actual real fact
You can be agnostic about the question of whether any gods are real, and still atheistic with regard to your belief about them actually being real. I don't know whether any gods are real, or not, which makes me agnostic about their existence, but I don't actually believe that any of them are real either, which makes me an atheist too. Some atheists claim to know that no gods exist, making them gnostic atheists.
A great many believers (theists) will admit that they don't actually know whether their god actually exists (agnostic theists), and other believers claim to be dead certain that their god exists (gnostic theists).
So, you see, it's actually a matter of two separate things: what you claim to know, and what you believe.
The linked study said nothing about atheists or agnostics at all. I think Sally/Finny/Chuckie has a new name and a new schtick.
You repeated this same crap at least 6 times on another article sally/thefinisher1...could you possibly get your multiple personalities together and stop acting intelligent when obviously you're not? Agnostic means without knowledge and all honest people are agnostic regardless of what they believe are (not that you're honest)...the question is do you believe a god exists-yes or no? (rather simple although it may hurt that petite mind of yours to answer, give it a shot)
Hey fred here is the address for your site ?believerfred Science Works If you look at the picture on the left from your link you will see a man lying next to the Ti-tanasaur......... I will post that on my creationist web site as proof man coexisted with them.......I may need to Photoshop the guys cloths as they are from Walmart.
May 20, 2014 at 6:15 pm |
A Creation Research Science-Education foundation Project – which is now what freddie ?
John D Morris ?
science works!
Hey SsiFi did you fall OFF the shelve from Wharehouse 13 – – like these guys did ? (fred fell off long ago)
he Creation Museum in northern Kentucky will exhibit a dinosaur skeleton it claims will prove the biblical account of creation.
The museum operated by the Answers in Genesis ministry will unveil Saturday the Allosaurus fragilis skeleton, which it claims has one of the six or seven best-preserved skulls of its kind in the world.
The skeleton "stands out for a few major reasons," said Answers in Genesis geologist Andrew Snelling.
Evolution is not a lie – But ken ham says it is too FUNNY..................Doris side note see who the geologist is ?
"Ken Ham, president and founder of the Creation Museum and Answers in Genesis, has argued that only about 50 species of dinosaurs existed – far fewer than scientists believe – and they all were taken aboard the ark." =>I saw the movie and there were no dinosaurs on the ark. Who are you going to believe Ken Ham or Russell Crow.
I wouldn't believe Ken Ham if he told me the sun was going to rise in the East tomorrow morning.
Ken Ham doesn't seem to be able to separate facts from science fiction. There's no reason to worry about believing either of them as any kind of experts on science.
You don't have to be more intelligent, or more educated to become an atheist. i was still a Christian long after I got my degrees, and I certainly wasn't less intelligent back then. You just have to be willing to think outside of the God-shaped box that your worldview resides in, that's all.
Hey believer fred flinstone – SciFi – Theo and the gang #Cosmos it might help ?
THURSDAY, MAY 22, 2014 12:45 PM CDT Why Neil deGrasse Tyson has creationists so thoroughly petrified Public education is the biggest enemy of intelligent design, and "Cosmos" has made science accessible to millions DAN AREL, ALTERNET
Better than the ICR fred !!!
I found the cosmos series very stale. Genesis is where the action is.
Come on fred where is your url for your creationist web site ?
But I suppose the nuts do not fall to far from the tree fred.
The Genesis Flood by Hennry Morris – really stale fruitcke with NUTS !!!
Hey fred – Education really sad state to withhold it from children no ?
States are fighting new science curriculum teaching climate change and evolution By Jacob Kastrenakes on May 19, 2014 09:55 am Email @jake_k
And we KNOW evoluion is true fred – right fred ?
humans are no different today than in the bygone days...sorry..thats a silly opinion...second....I am guessing you don't believe in much ancient history...that what we know didn't really happen....all are legends...ok
What in the world is this idiot talking about now. Maybe if it replied one could make sense in context of someone else's post, but still – what a mess.
Once again, some historical references for your perusal. Get back to us when you are finished.
o 1. Historical Jesus Theories, earlychristianwritings.com/theories.html – the names of many of the contemporary historical Jesus scholars and the ti-tles of their over 100 books on the subject.
2. Early Christian Writings, earlychristianwritings.com/ – a list of early Christian doc-uments to include the year of publication–
30-60 CE Passion Narrative 40-80 Lost Sayings Gospel Q 50-60 1 Thessalonians 50-60 Philippians 50-60 Galatians 50-60 1 Corinthians 50-60 2 Corinthians 50-60 Romans 50-60 Philemon 50-80 Colossians 50-90 Signs Gospel 50-95 Book of Hebrews 50-120 Didache 50-140 Gospel of Thomas 50-140 Oxyrhynchus 1224 Gospel 50-200 Sophia of Jesus Christ 65-80 Gospel of Mark 70-100 Epistle of James 70-120 Egerton Gospel 70-160 Gospel of Peter 70-160 Secret Mark 70-200 Fayyum Fragment 70-200 Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs 73-200 Mara Bar Serapion 80-100 2 Thessalonians 80-100 Ephesians 80-100 Gospel of Matthew 80-110 1 Peter 80-120 Epistle of Barnabas 80-130 Gospel of Luke 80-130 Acts of the Apostles 80-140 1 Clement 80-150 Gospel of the Egyptians 80-150 Gospel of the Hebrews 80-250 Christian Sibyllines 90-95 Apocalypse of John 90-120 Gospel of John 90-120 1 John 90-120 2 John 90-120 3 John 90-120 Epistle of Jude 93 Flavius Josephus 100-150 1 Timothy 100-150 2 Timothy 100-150 T-itus 100-150 Apocalypse of Peter 100-150 Secret Book of James 100-150 Preaching of Peter 100-160 Gospel of the Ebionites 100-160 Gospel of the Nazoreans 100-160 Shepherd of Hermas 100-160 2 Peter
4. Jesus Database, http://www.faithfutures.o-rg/JDB/intro.html –"The JESUS DATABASE is an online a-nnotated inventory of the traditions concerning the life and teachings of Jesus that have survived from the first three centuries of the Common Era. It includes both canonical and extra-canonical materials, and is not limited to the traditions found within the Christian New Testament." 5. Josephus on Jesus mtio.com/articles/bis-sar24.htm 6. The Jesus Seminar, http://en.wikipedia.o-rg/wiki/Jesus_Seminar 7. http://www.biblicalartifacts.com/items/785509/item785509biblicalartifacts.html – books on the health and illness during the time of the NT 8. Economics in First Century Palestine, K.C. Hanson and D. E. Oakman, Palestine in the Time of Jesus, Fortress Press, 1998. 9.The Gn-ostic Jesus (Part One in a Two-Part Series on A-ncient and Modern G-nosticism) by Douglas Gro-othuis: http://www.equip.o-rg/articles/g-nosticism-and-the-g-nostic-jesus/ 10. The interpretation of the Bible in the Church, Pontifical Biblical Commission Presented on March 18, 1994 ewtn.com/library/CURIA/PBCINTER.HTM#2 11. The Jesus Database- newer site: wiki.faithfutures.o-rg/index.php?t-itle=Jesus_Database 12. Jesus Database with the example of S-u-pper and Eucharist: faithfutures.o-rg/JDB/jdb016.html 13. Josephus on Jesus by Paul Maier: mtio.com/articles/bis-sar24.htm 13. http://www.textweek.com/mtlk/jesus.htmm- Historical Jesus Studies 14. The Greek New Testament: laparola.net/greco/ 15. D-iseases in the Bible:
16. Religion on- Line (6000 a-rt-ic-les on the hi-story of religion, churches, theologies, theologians, eth-ics, etc. religion-online.o–rg/ 17. The New Testament Gateway – Internet NT n-tgate-way.com/ 18 Writing the New Testament- e-xi-sting copies, o–r–al tradition etc. n-tgat-eway.com/ 19. JD Crossan's c-onclusions about the a-uthencity of most of the NT based on the above plus the c-onclusions of other NT e-xege-tes in the last 200 years:
20. Early Jewish Writings- Josephus and his books by t-itle with the complete translated work in English :earlyjewishwritings.com/josephus.html 21. Luke and Josephus- was there a c-onnection? in-fidels.o-rg/library/modern/richard_carrier/lukeandjosephus.html 22. NT and beyond time line: pbs.o-rg/empires/pe-terandpaul/history/timeline/ 23. St. Paul's Time line with discussion of important events: harvardhouse.com/prophetictech/new/pauls_life.htm 24. See http://www.amazon.com for a list of JD Crossan's books and those of the other Jesus Seminarians: Reviews of said books are included and selected pages can now be viewed on Amazon. Some books can be found on-line at Google Books. 25. Father Edward Schillebeeckx's words of wisdom as found in his books. 27. The books of the following : Professors Gerd Ludemann, Marcus Borg, Paula Fredriksen, Elaine Pagels, Karen Armstrong and Bishop NT Wright. 28. Father Raymond Brown's An Introduction to the New Testament, Doubleday, NY, 1977, 878 pages, with Nihil obstat and Imprimatur. 29. Luke Timothy Johnson's book The Real Jesus
Reference 2 by the way has a discussion about each docu-ment. Simply click on the name to read the review.
"humans are no different today than in the bygone days"
SOME humans... the ones that continue to cling to mythology and superst-itions, kicking and screaming "god is real god is real!!!".... . Like little children who believe in the monster in the closet.
I find it interesting that the average height for humans around 3000 bc was 5' 3" for men and 5' for women. Current average is 5' 9" for men and 5' 4" for women.
NBHA....I wonder if that pesky evolution thing had something to do with that height difference?
If I'm not mistaken, religion has also evolved.
@truthfollower, To say that an athiest believes that, "the universe popped out of nothing" is a strawman argument. You are making a false assumption as to what someone else believes and using childlike language to attempt to dumb it down and make your opposition look stupid. The argument is constatnly rebutted by saying that no one yet knows what was beyond the boundary of the big bang. Sure an expanding universe had to have a beginning, but not necessarily what ever "thing" was before it. You think that "thing" is God, for me the jury is still out.
"@truthfollower, To say that an athiest believes that, "the universe popped out of nothing" is a strawman argument."
So you at least concede that this is impossible, that there had to be a cause?
So you believe that something can just pop into being uncaused out of nothing?
According to Vilenkin, "It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. With the proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape, they have to face the problem of a cosmic beginning (Many Worlds in One [New York: Hill and Wang, 2006], p.176)."
In a debate between William Lane Craig and Sean Carroll, "In 2003 Arvind Borde, Alan Guth, and Alexander Vilenkin were able to show that any universe which is, on average, in a state of cosmic expansion throughout its history cannot be infinite in the past but must have a beginning.[9] In 2012 Vilenkin showed that cosmogonic models which do not fall under this condition, including Professor Carroll's own model, fail on other grounds to avert the beginning of the universe. Vilenkin concluded, "None of these scenarios can actually be past-eternal."[10] "All the evidence we have says that the universe had a beginning."[11]
And Vilenkin has gone on to say that BVG pertains to THIS universe and that beyond that there are other possibilities for what would be beyond that boundary. Multi-verse is one such possibility. I should also point out again that THIS universe having a beginning is not the same thing as saying something came from nothing. There is still much unknown.
"Multi-verse is one such possibility"
Absolutely no shred of evidence for this at all. In fact, it seems that the imaginative multiverse scenario is pushed to try and avoid the fine tuning of our universe.
tf: "Absolutely no shred of evidence for this at all. In fact, it seems that the imaginative multiverse scenario is pushed to try and avoid the fine tuning of our universe."
Vilenkin seems to find merit in the idea. Regarding fine tuning and design, prove that we are not merely the side-effect of such fine tuning.
"Vilenkin seems to find merit in the idea."
Again, there is no evidence at all for the existence of the multiverse. It's merely an idea.
"Regarding fine tuning and design, prove that we are not merely the side-effect of such fine tuning."
What do you mean by this? I'm talking about being fine-tuned for life.
tf: "I'm talking about being fine-tuned for life."
Exactly what I thought you were talking about. The operative word there for me is "for". I don't see any evidence that the requirements necessary for life were planned just because they are fragile. Necessary in very precise ways for life as we know it – yes. Planned? I don't see evidence of this. It is just as easy to see our existence simply as the result of such delicate conditions.
ahh yes....with all that is....it was just random coincidence that we arrive to where we are...thru evolution and such.....sheesh....takes more faith to believe that than a tooth fairy
When will the dopes understand that life originated where it could, not because the environment is fine tuned for life? They consistently get it backazzwards, just like "we don't know" doesn't mean "some god did it."
tf, "fine-tuned for life."
The oldest and most successful life forms on Earth are micro-organisms.
Bacteria thrive virtually everywhere on Earth – from sub-zero temperatures to over 750 degrees F (in hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the ocean), and in widely varying oxygen, pressure and nutrient conditions. Many of them are lethal to humans and other life forms. The Bacteria God rules!
sure thing, kermy
and jeebus died for your sins, too
"So you believe that something can just pop into being uncaused out of nothing?"
Gotta love how fundamentalists who are also hypocrites chose to ask a question they have no intention of responding to if posed back to them....or at best, give the standard "I don't have to explain who created god or where he came from, but YOU gotta explain where the universe came from and what was before it". Is it really that difficult for a fundamental theist to see the pure, undiluted hypocrisy being actually demonstrated for all to see....well, all except who it would best serve to see it?
there is no hypocricy..just ignorance on your part....God is not created....the Creator of all things cannot create himself..simple logic......the argument does not workk..nor the silly accusations
Kermy if, and that's a very big if, you delusional believers have a winning argument it is only because your are making up the definitions and characteristics for your alleged but never proven gods. There is not a single bit of actual evidence to even remotely suggest your definitions or characteristics are valid, or that any god exists. You are pretending to know things you not. Some might say you are a liar while others might say you are simply mentally ill. Me, I think you are both.
s what you want hotairace...my value does not depend on your view of me....I know truth..if you cant handle truth...your problem..not mine...
The Being would be spaceless, timeless, immaterial and One of immense power.
Prove it wrong.
You made the claim that something exists. It's up to you to prove it.
prove it wrong?
gosh, tf, you are funny
"spaceless, timeless, etc." Do you have any idea how silly this sounds? It's meaningless gibberish. What would it even mean to exist outside of time?
The Prayer of St. Francis – author unknown
Lord, make me an instrument of Your peace; Where there is hatred, let me sow love; Where there is injury, pardon; Where there is discord, harmony; Where there is error, truth; Where there is doubt, faith; Where there is despair, hope; Where there is darkness, light; And where there is sadness, joy.
O Divine Master, Grant that I may not so much seek To be consoled as to console; To be understood as to understand; To be loved as to love. For it is in giving that we receive; It is in pardoning that we are pardoned; And it is in dying that we are born to eternal life.
- I need to read that prayer more, and post less on message boards. Peace, see you next month friends.
You forgot to add," where there is brainwashing, education. "
Ken + All that might be convincing to you, I understand, but does is it sufficient to truly "know"?...
Yes, I have knowledge of God. I know He exists.
+ Is honest belief the criteria? How do you discount other's "honest belief" in other gods?
I honestly believe and God and have no qualms talking about that.
I can have a discussion and choose for myself what to think of another person's honest belief in their gods.
I'm encouraged to remain open-minded, love those who believe differently than me and to test things out for myself.
That is how I've ended up believing in God.
+ I'm not trying to convince you. I'm simply providing an example, an analogy, to explore what is really meant. I've always suspected that believers use phrases like 'I know God exists' in order to appear more confident of their beliefs.
That is not why I say I know God exists. Nice guess, though.
I placed my trust and confidence in God, and He hasn't let me down. The testimony of people about me has improved since I started trusting God. The serenity in my life has increased. The way I handle difficult situations and find hope where it looks like there is none has changed.
All evidence points to me that God is real. And His help is available to me. I don't have to beg or demand for help. I neither puff myself up or grovel. I don't have to demean myself, and I have no one to impress.
I simply accept my place in my relationship with God. No more, no less.
If He does, or if someone can prove GOd doesn't exist, then I will go back to my old life of being a know-it-all atheist who insists my opinions are the true gague of reality and inherently factual.
"Most readers of my posts above would not think I was considering them fact."
That is you posting an opinion as if it is a fact.
And then you post a rationalize on why you imagine it is not the same thing you were criticizing me for.
Thanks for talking about God and your beliefs with me guys. It has been interesting. I love to talk about God. I learn more about him with my interactions with others. Even those with different beliefs, agnostics and atheists.
how could your "god" create something that has always been here?
1st law of thermal dynamics" energy can not be created nor destroyed"; thus if is can be created, nor destroy then energy is immortal/eternal......choose the word you prefer.
E=MC2 explains energy to matter conversion....which also covers the destruction of matter which returns back to it's original state.
2nd law of thermal dynamics covers the change in the state of energy from potential to kinetic and back to potential.
so long story short, the universe has always been here in either one form or another. no gods have ever been required, nor will they ever be required seeing the universe adheres to one major law:
all interactions happen on the atomic level; thus everything interacts according to the "push/pull" of the electromagnetic fields surrounding them. two positive protons won't ever get near each other to create an atom without an electron nearby. --------------------
a god would violate the 1st law of thermal dynamics by inessence adding energy to the universe. a being that powerful would cause the destruction of the universe; thus seeing the laws of physics can't be violated, logic states no god exists.
any attempt to violate the laws of physics (i.e. timetravel) would simply not work, which means any violation to the laws of physics simply doesn't exist. hint on timetravel, if you went back or forward your body being made up of energy would violate the first law of thermal dynamics (energy was just created) thus timetravel is impossible........................... however i know a way to side step that.
I wish people would let you know when they break the thread.
@Dalahast, Based on your critera it seems fair for me to say "I KNOW god does not exist".
Your personal testimony seems irrelevant, since it can all be attributed to other factors.
Your "all evidence" doesn't appear to be evidence at all.
Not sure what kind of atheist you supposedly were, but I don't don't think my opinions are a true gauge of reality, nor my beliefs. I think that rational thought and science are the best tools we have for investigating reality though.
Alex Vilenkin, Professor of Physics and Director of the Insti.tute of Cosmology at Tufts University discusses the possibility of a universe from nothing. (coauthor of the BVG Theorem) [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHdI4Let27I&w=640&h=390]
So if the infinite universe is no longer defended, are skeptics seriously having to resort to the unscientific possibility of a universe just popping into existence out of literally nothing? If this is your stance Doris, you have great faith.
Yes, tf, and Vilenkin has gone on to say in various places that it's important for now to note that he is speaking about THIS universe – that we don't know enough to say what's beyond the boundary, and that multi-verse is certainly one idea worth exploring.
Let's take the multiverse scenario (of which there is no evidence for at all. We've entered into metaphysics at this point).
Let's say hypothetically that there is an infinite number of universes and that ours is just one of the infinite. That also means that there are an infinite number of universes just like ours and an infinite number of alter egos to you in these infinite number of similar universes. Let's say hypothetically that you had toast for breakfast today in this universe. In one of the similar universes, your altar ego had eggs instead. In another, your altar ego had bacon. I hope you're starting to see a problem with the concept of an actual material infinite.
I don't really see a problem that I should worry about given all the possibilities for things we don't know. Of course you heaped a lot of presupposition on the characteristics of an infinite number of universes.
"Of course you heaped a lot of presupposition on the characteristics of an infinite number of universes."
What presuppositions?
Uh....like everything you said there starting with the various "Let's say"s.
If there are an infinite number of universes, then there are an infinite number of universes just like ours, with an infinite number of altar egos to yourself. What seems to be the problem?
And why would an infinite number of universes mean that there would be any "alter egos" (whatever you mean by that), never mind an infinite number of them? Stated another way, an infinite number of universes does not mean that inhabitants in one universe would be related in any way to inhabitants of one or more other universes.
Also, concerning the infinite universes, what exactly are you proposing? Do you believe that our universe came into existence as a direct result of another universe and that this cycle is infinite in the past, with universes creating other universes infinitely in the past?
Let's say you had toast this morning for breakfast. On the view in discussion, there would be an infinite number of universes in which your altar egos (not you exactly but your same chemical makeup and physicality) did the exact same thing.
I suppose that's a possibility. I'm sure there are more worth exploring.
So what? They would all exist independently of each other, totally unaware of each other. Where's the problem?
This is the reality you support? You have great blind faith, for there is no evidence at all to support this.
Also, if this world ensemble has existed 'forever' in the past, why hasn't our universe come into and gone out of existence 'forever' ago?
I didn't say I believed in multiverses or claim to be an expert in them. You are the one who proposed a multiverse scenario, not me. I'm just pointing out an error in your thinking but you don't seem to be able to even explain why you think there is a problem with multiverses. I don't know if the universe has had multiple beginnings or if multiverses are real. How about you cut to the chase and explain how "we don't know" means "some alleged but unproven god did it."
well this is all conjecture anyway including everything in your hypothetical situation, so why discuss supporting evidence, tf?
It was actually Doris who introduced the multiverse into the conversation. I am just showing how crazy believing in something as that is, let alone that there is no evidence for such a thing. It's amazing the lengths some will go and the ideas put forth to try and wiggle out of the existence of God. If you haven't noticed a problem then you need to reread my posts.
Also, if this world ensemble has existed 'forever' in the past, why hasn't our universe come into and gone out of existence 'forever' ago?
We're back to I don't know. But "I/We don't know" doesn't mean "some alleged but never proven god did it."
tf: "I am just showing how crazy believing in something as that is,"
I would say for anything for which you don't have really good evidence and consensus, believing in it is crazy.
I'm out of here for the night. Please consider that you don't have to abandon and fight against logic and reason. Let us take Genesis 1:1 as the truth when it says, "In the beginning God created...". Repent and put your faith in Jesus as Lord for the forgiveness of your sins and He will transform your life. I've personally experienced this and have prayed that you may to.
I embrace logic and reason – that's why I'm an atheist! There is no logical or rationale reason to believe in that for which there is no actual evidence. Believers are the ones who have suspended logic and reason, and fall back on faith to maintain their delusions.
that is totally false..and so what do you make of things that don't appear logical at times (love, people jumping on the grenade to save their fellow humans-a lot of times that don't seem logical or reasonable...so you seem to not believe in a lot of stuff out there in "reality" as well huh?
NOT EVERYTING in this life is logical or reasonable...sometimes we HAVE to suspend it so to say...even outside of religion...its not a bad thing....think about it..
I did not find the hypothetical suggestions used to make your argument particularly logical, tf. More importantly, since we don't really know, why leap to the most primitive answer ever proposed as a solution, when it's logical that there are still many possibilities to discover and then explore?
I wrote: "why leap to the most primitive answer ever proposed as a solution"
I didn't mean to say that tf' beliefs are the most primitive in attempting to answer the age old questions, but they are certainly primitive enough and lacking evidence enough for me to disregard. And they reek of a "branding" that only men in a certain part of the world at a certain time could create.
+ I embrace logic and reason – that's why I'm an atheist!
There are people who embrace logic and reason that are not atheist. I've seen people who can demonstrate they understand logic better than you, yet are not atheists.
+ There is no logical or rationale reason to believe in that for which there is no actual evidence.
There is evidence of God. You just don't, can't or won't accept it.
+ Believers are the ones who have suspended logic and reason, and fall back on faith to maintain their delusions.
That is you posting an opinion as a fact. Something you criticized me for doing, and now you turn around and do the same thing. That is hypocrisy.
And it is silly, if you wanted to enter an university or college to learn moer about logic and reason, there is a good chance a believer will be teaching you. Because they have the credentials, education and understanding of logic and reason to do that. That is something you don't have.
Dal....there is no evidence of god. None. There are things we do not understand as yet, but there is absolutely no evidential proof of a higher being, other than some moldy words written thousands of years ago with no basis of fact. That is not evidence or proof.
There you go, making stuff up again. You don't have a clue what my credentials are. And the number of delusional believers there are, or the positions they are in, does not add credibility to their beliefs. And you may have your reasons for believing but you certainly don't have any actual evidence else you would trot it out, and be the first one ever to provide same.
I don't know what your credentials are. Based on the evidence you have given me, I doubt you have a firm understanding of logic and reason.
I have a strong susp.icion if you did want to master a discipline in logic or reason you could learn a lot from a believer.
And if you do have a strong understanding of logic and reason – at some point, I'd be willing to bet, a believer helped and taught you how to learn about it.
It is one thing to say you embrace logic and reason. Anyone can say that.
It is quite another thing to demonstrate you understand logic and reason.
Most of your posts are filled with opinions you attempt to state as facts. Basically you just rail against believers and try to use logic and reasoning to justify your demeaning behavior. Talk about childish beliefs.
I've known some very logical thinkers dress up as goblins, wizards and knights and have pretend battles. They are fans of live action pole playing and do some silly things on weekends because its fun and they feel part of a community but then go back to their demanding jobs in science and engineering on Monday, just like those who are fans of religion.
Religion is live action role playing where the player thinks they have a telepathic link to an invisible wizard who will grant them superpowers after they die as long as they act as the invisible wizards visible representative and push as many people into his service as possible. Recruitment is paramount for their role playing game to work...
@truthfollower01, Hypothetical or theoretical does not equate to metaphysical.
kermit4jc The things that aren't logical or reasonable in this life, like impulse buying, one night stands and falling for Ponzi schemes, are often the choices we live to regret. At least with logic and reason you can say that you thought through the consequences before making a decision, correct?
The multiverse scenario is just as absurd as what you accuse the other side of the argument of falling prey to. It's an entirely unsubstantiated view with absolutely no evidence to support it whatsoever. Furthermore, even in the multiverse scenario, where did the multiverse originate? From another multiverse? The premise of this assumption is predicated on a predicate, on a predicate, on a predicate ad nauseum but when you get to the bottom of the rabbit hole, you still have to explain where the original "multiverse" that spawned all of these other multiverses your insisting to "know" about came from.
The multiverse–absurd? Why? Because there's no room for it in your god claim?
How is it any more absurd than the claim that an ageless timeless being made in God's image created the universe and the Earth using his magic, and then hated his chief creation so much he had allow a blood sacrifice his favorite son (really himself) to create a loophole to allow this all-powerful being to forgive us for the way he made us, and then resurrected this son to live in paradise forever, so it really wasn't a sacrifice, although we are reminded of it constantly.
However, I'll answer your criticism. Any possible claim or theory in cosmology is bound to seem absurd. The Big Bang sounded absurd when it was first proposed. However, the difference between the God claim and the Multi-verse theory is that there is actual hard evidence for the Multi-verse, it works well within existing cosmological theories, such as String Theory, and it works mathematically. None of this can be said of the God claim.
As far as the bigger question–where did the Multi-verse come from–who knows? With science, it's okay to say "I don't know". It's the first step to finding the true answers. Maybe it always existed. Maybe universes go in and out of existence in an eternal multi-verse. Maybe someday we'll know. But we should not presume the answers must fit within our ancient pre-conceived ancient supersti-tions.
On second thought, belief in a multiverse is more improbable and unsubstantiated than belief in the existence of God. At least Jews Christians and Muslims have a rag tag assembly of "god's finest" who have left "testimonial evidence" behind (lol). You are pulling your hypothesis out of thin air, or should i say "non-space". *eyeroll*
Unlike athiests, who assume to know that God doesnt exist, and attempt to solve the origin of the universe with presumptions based upon presumptions (multiverse, Ha! Where does the multiverse originate? From another multiverse? If so, where does that one originate?) With that said, however, there are still grave and serious flaws with the "Christian" detailing of events, so don't expect to cosign to that nonsense either.
At the core of Christian philosophy is the Cartesian assertion that this existence is ultimately a test to see if you denounce/shy away from God with a grand deceiver (see, Lucifer) granted with unlimited authority in attempting to deceive you away from the "truth of God's existence" throughout the time spent here, with eternal damnation being the penalty from falling prey to his deception. You can argue all the denominational crap you want, this is the core of the Judeo-Christian-Muslim believe structure.
At it's core, if this is true, than why does God intermittently undermine the integrity of this test by giving certain people he deems "special" with "proof" of his existence while everyone else is just supposed to blindly believe in the hearsay testimony of his prophets? That doesn't seem to be a very fair test. Moses, Jesus, Abraham (and some would say even Mohammed) are gifted with a free pass into heaven, because their convictions stem from KNOWING god exists through firsthand interaction, while the rest of us are just supposed to take their word at face value?
God has no right to demand that I acknowledge his existence until he reveals himself to me as plainly as he did these supposed "chosen ones" of the past. If the entire account of events in the Judeo-Christ-Muslim view is correct, than he has undermined the validity of his own "test" on numerous occasions. Subsequently, this "test" has absolutely no integrity whatsoever, and it violates the ethics of its own premises, but only for "a special few": "Faith without certainty" (*boggle*). With that said, I will remain agnostic until "God" gives me the same privilege of "faith" backed absolute certainty derived from proof. After all, does it not say in the Bible itself to be wary of charlatans? Who's to say the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim orthodoxies are not just solicitous organizations attempting to pervert, twist and distort a "truth" that can only be "known" through firsthand witness?
PBS....atheists don't know that god does not exist....we only think he does not based on the complete lack of evidence to support such a being. In my opinion, anybody that purports to 'know' if god does or does not exist is a fool, which is most Christians, I'm afraid.
And....just because all the mysteries of life have not been discovered does not mean that you get to run around proclaiming that 'some god did it'
Of course not. But attempting to cloak urself in the guise of being agnostic, which I admittedly am, as a means to replace the semantics of wording is absurd. Contrary to what Athiests will attempt to say in order to dance around a 99.99999999999999999% certainty that god doesn't exist, at its core, Athiesm is denying the existence of god based the principles of probability. I prefer to say, I don't care if God exists. If he exists, which we both agree he probably does not, he owes me a damn good explanation as to why he expects me to believe and worship him on the testimony of hearsay. If "heaven" exists, I deserve the same level of certainty allegedly enjoyed by Moses, Jesus, Mohammed, or anyone else he has reportedly revealed himself to, or else his "test" is without validity and credibility. If he doesn't exist, no sweat off my back, because i didn't waste my life away adhering to dogmatic theories on the philosophy of divine command theory.
Do you believe that something can just pop into being from nothing?
Are you concerned that a raging bengal tiger could pop into existence in the room next to you and destroy your residence?
But you apparently believe that a tiger could be "spoken" into existence in the room. Get serious.
I do believe that God has the power to do so if He so chose to. On the skeptical view of things popping into existence out of nothing, why doesn't anything and everything just pop into being (an elephant, a car, a palm tree, the list goes on)?
Don't be is such a rush. Popping can take a very long time.
You're assuming that the bible/torah's account of events is the only alternative to outright atheism, and that if you can attack the validity of their premises then the only option remaining is "there is no god". That's a straw man fallacy.
I don't really have a belief one way or the other for that question. I think we lack knowledge to answer it as if we have discovered some physical law. Contrary to what people previously thought, we don't seem to have a good example of pure natural "nothing" that can give us quick answers as to its characteristics. Therefore, I think any wondering about any alleged activity involving "nothing" is pure conjecture.
"I think we lack knowledge to answer it as if we have discovered some physical law."
Something coming from nothing (no thing / not anything) goes against everything we observe in science and in the real world.
"Nothing" has no characteristics. It isn't anything.
Sure it has characteristics – if you say something can or cannot come from it, that's a characteristic.
"It's" not anything. That's the craziness of the skeptical argument. Things don't just pop in to being uncaused out of nothing. What characteristic(s) do you give "nothing"?
I'll admit it does sound funny. But so does the expression "God-breathed" to me anyway.
tf: "Things don't just pop in to being uncaused out of nothing. "
That's conjecture. I don't necessarily disagree, you'd have to convince me that what you said there is anything more than pure conjecture.
tf: "What characteristic(s) do you give "nothing"?"
I don't. But while we are in this stage where we can only postulate, and don't have examples of pure nothing, how else can it be discussed unless we attach attributes that we can agree or disagree on? Already you have used it as an object in your discussion.
"That's conjecture. I don't necessarily disagree, you'd have to convince me that what you said there is anything more than pure conjecture."
To disagree is to go against all observed science and everything we observe in the world around us. It amazes me that this isn't more than conjecture to you.
tf: "What characteristic(s) do you give "nothing"?"
"I don't. But while we are in this stage where we can only postulate, and don't have examples of pure nothing"
There is no physical example if that is what you are referring to. It isn't anything.
"how else can it be discussed unless we attach attributes that we can agree or disagree on?"
It can be discussed by its definition.
"Already you have used it as an object in your discussion."
I use it as a concept. It certainly isn't an object. It isn't anything.
tf: "tf: "Things don't just pop in to being uncaused out of nothing. "
I replied: "That's conjecture. I don't necessarily disagree, you'd have to convince me that what you said there is anything more than pure conjecture."
tf: To disagree is to go against all observed science and everything we observe in the world around us. It amazes me that this isn't more than conjecture to you.
Well be amazed. I'm not convinced with this last post. You're not telling me anything new here. On the other hand, demonstrating that something cannot come from nothing would be a new discovery, no? Until then, I'm afraid we are left with conjecture.
"On the other hand, demonstrating that something cannot come from nothing would be a new discovery, no? Until then, I'm afraid we are left with conjecture."
"Nothing" isn't anything. How could something come from nothing/no thing/not anything?Why would you go against ALL logic and science? Is the cost too high?
I don't associate cost with my wonderings about that which we do not know. Also, I don't know why you're so intent on even discussing something coming from nothing. Adopting the now-common idea that THIS universe had a beginning is not the same thing as saying something came from nothing. Of course you're welcome to prove that those were the same thing.
The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke with contributions from Eric Marrapodi and CNN's worldwide news gathering team.


text:
With climate change talks set to enter the crucial second stage here, India on Sunday rejected points in the draft treaty that wants all countries to cut emissions, agree to a peaking year and subject their mitigation actions to international scrutiny.
With the official draft treaty circulated on Friday creating clear divisions among 194 countries, Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh said he would use the draft as a "starting point for further negotiations".
However, he made it clear that India would not compromise on its three key principles — no legally binding emission cuts, no peaking year and no international review of domestic-funded mitigation actions.
"India will not compromise on its 'teen-murti'," he said adding that the outcome of the talks must be within the U.N. Framework on Climate Change, stick to the Kyoto Protocol and abide by the Bali Action Plan.
"We must get an agreement in 2010," Mr. Ramesh said and hinted at a political statement at the end of the 12-day talks, which will be attended by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
"I have clearly and categorically stated on behalf of the government of India that our Prime Minister is not coming here to negotiate the text," Mr. Ramesh said.
Minister get together
Meanwhile, Environment Ministers haggled behind closed doors in their first major get-together of the summit, as they were warned of the catastrophic consequences of failure to reach a deal.
The meeting is tasked with turning the problem-plagued blueprint into a landmark deal that can be endorsed on Friday by about 120 world leaders.
'Cautiously optimistic'
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said that he was "cautiously optimistic" on the outcome as he flew into Copenhagen ahead of a raft of world leaders for the final days of the conference.
"We have to wait until the end of the conference to see how serious a message (the conference) is going to send," he said.
Keywords: Environment MInister, Jairam Ramesh, political statement, climate change, Copenhagen summit, hints

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Hi Julien,
> Is it easy to change the temperament setting by hand? And does
It's easy to change. Edit the file stops-***/Aeolus/definition.
Near the top you'll find a line
/tuning 440.0 1
The second number is an index into the list in my previous
post, starting at zero. You'll find it as well in scales.cc.
Werckmeister III will probably work well in most cases.
To test, play something in A flat. The main problem with
Meantone is the Ab-C-Eb chord (just try it !).
If you want to switch easily, you could for example create
a directory stops-***/Aeolus-ET, copy the definition file
there and set it to Equal Temperament. Then use the -I
command line option to select this one.
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
Linux-audio-user mailing list
LINUX® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the USA and other countries.
Linuxaudio.org logo copyright Thorsten Wilms © 2006.
Hosting provided by the Virginia Tech Department of Music and DISIS.


text:
Bon Appétit | August 2000
by Jamie Elizabeth Flick, Staten Island, NY
Very easy and good, also, was able to easily cut recipe in half to make smaller portion.
Tasty marinade.
28 reasons why doughnuts (and doughnut holes)baked or fried, glazed or dustedare perfect morning, noon, and night
plus: everything you need to know about making doughnuts at home ›
Get the inside dish on 10 restaurants Parisians don't want you to know about
plus: Over 1,300 recipes à la Française to cook at home ›


text:
My monthly grocery expense is quite high and I want to cut down. How do others manage? Any ideas would be welcome.
My monthly grocery expense is quite high and I want to cut down. How do others manage? Any ideas would be welcome.
It's absolutely impossible to begin to help you until you give us an idea of what you consider "quite high".
Alternatively you could just stop eating, however that would be a bit counter productive as you'd have to spend the money saved on new clothes.
I found a good way to do this was to pack my sons off to Uni - they are back next week, so my food spend will triple and my house will look like a shebeen again for three months - yet I miss the little ****ers when they're away - 'tis weird being a parent
Dumpster diving if you aren't picky on food quality.
But seriously, look for specials and buy homebrand or cheaper brands and if they taste fine continue with them, you don't eat the fancy packaging.
NRL Tipping Champion 2014
buy 3rd world country goods
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
mi goreng 24x7
Plan your meals a week in advance. Order online to reduce temptation of deals. Make meals you can freeze parts of for re-use in future weeks.
Phillip Hughes 1988-2014
RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
be 18 and live at home. Zero.
Exit pursuing a beer
If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there is bound to be edits
West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma
Happy Birthday! (easier than using Birthday threads)
Email and MSN- Goughy at cricketmail dot net
sell yr car
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


text:
Recent posts
Create a secure GPG keypair with subkeys
Posted on 24 Aug 2014
Public key cryptography has always fascinated me. I created my keypairs long ago. They are not used much because there are not much people around me who use public key cryptography. Very few of them have generated their keypair. Some of them who have generated do not know about whether they have a keypair. But still, this week I managed my keypair immuned to any theft of keys. If your private key is stolen, everything is over, so better not store the main private key on your laptop or phone but rather in a private safe or in your pendrive which is then kept in a private safe. If you have your GPG key already or not, using separate subkeys to sign and encrypt messages is always a good choice. There are few steps I will talk about below that will help you detach your private key from your secret keyring in your laptop and allow you to store it in a safe place. You can buy a separate pendrive which you don't use for daily purposes to store your private key. I am assuming you already have your GPG keypair, if you don't have it already, you can use...
Post GUADEC
Posted on 12 Aug 2014
This is little late to write about GUADEC but I really got sick after I reached home from Strasbourg. So I have been taking time to recover and now I've come up with this little late blog post about GUADEC. This GUADEC was my first international conference and it was really a great experience attending it. It was awesome meeting experts in their fields and actually talking to them this time in person rather than discussing with them on IRC or over email. Sitting together with so many new faces, making new friends, long discussions with them about the technical topics, hacking together on stuff, discussing new upcoming features in GNOME, having fun together, exploring the beautiful Alsace region together was truly a wonderful experience. Talks and keynotes were excellent. It happened with me multiple times that I wanted to attend both the talks happening in both the rooms at the same time. I felt like multiplying myself so that I could attend both of them but poor me, nobody can do that. I am waiting eagerly for the GUADEC videos so that I can watch ones I really wanted to attend but couldn't attend. I also attended some of...
Photos: Browsing DLNA Servers - One step closer
Posted on 07 Jul 2014
This post is in series about my GSoC project: Browsing DLNA Media Servers in Photos. If you checked out latest GNOME 3.13.3 release, you might have observed that gnome-online-accounts now has learned to set up access to the media servers in your local network as mentioned in this blog post by mclasen. Good to see one part of the project committed in this release. I have been working for past few weeks on making this whole setup at least work and have finally able to make all of it work. I have a working media server miner that mines the content from added media server accounts in GOA. I have even taken care of the albums in this regard. Photos from your media servers are not thrown randomly into the tracker, rather their parent directory information comes along with photos. This makes it easy to view photos in the application in more organized way provided you have organized your photos well in your media server. Here's a screenshot that is showing photos in their albums according to the directory structure of the media server. The albums you are seeing in above screenshot are directly taken from the media server directory...
Disable your NVIDIA card in Linux
Posted on 29 Jun 2014
My NVIDIA graphic card on my linux box had already given me alot of pain. I couldn't resist seeing my laptop fan going wild and my laptop going excessively hot even during normal operation. I knew that all this is due to the NVIDIA graphic card I have. Since, I do not use my graphic card much, I decided to turn my graphic card off permanently on my fedora 20 box. bbswitch module helped me alot in accomplishing this. But before using this module I had to disable the inbuilt nouveau driver for NVIDIA card that is already shipped with the linux kernel for NVIDIA card. nouveau is an open source graphic card driver for NVIDIA cards. Disabling it means I need to blacklist it. On my Fedora 20 box, I added following file in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf Just add following line in the above mentioned file. blacklist nouveau Remember to generate initramfs image after doing this, so that your kernel knows about the change the next time you reboot. You can generate the new initramfs image as : dracut -f Reboot your box and your nouveau driver is not loaded this time. You can double check that using the following command...
MediaServer miner for gnome online miners
Posted on 09 Jun 2014
After a working GOA media server provider I had been working on, its the time to start mining data from the added GOA account. Though media server provides variety of media types, I am currently only considering browsing photos from the media server. Exported object on the D-Bus by the GOA daemon only provides with the UDN (Unique Device Name) and the DlnaSupported property of the media server. The DlnaSupported property tells if the media server is DLNA certified or not. This can be useful if in future we plan to integrate other types of media servers in GNOME. These two properties are just enough for the miner to start working. The miner fetches the UDN of the added accounts and see if the DMS with UDN is currently online or not. Also depending upon the DlnaSupported property, it will instantiate the server manager accordingly (Eg. DLNA server manager for DLNA devices, some XXX manager for some XXX type of media server etc.). All online media servers are then probed for photos. The mining task would really have been very easier had all the media servers provide the searchable property on them. But unfortunately, not all the media servers are...


text:
Douay-Rheims (RHE) | New International Version (NIV) |
16 To Abraham were the promises made and to his seed. He saith not: And to his seeds as of many. But as of one: And to thy seed, which is Christ. | 16 The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say "and to seeds," meaning many people, but "and to your seed," meaning one person, who is Christ. |
The Douay-Rheims Bible is in the public domain. (Douay Rheims Catholic Bible Translation Online) | Scripture quoted by permission. Quotations designated (NIV) are from THE HOLY BIBLE: NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. NIV®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by Biblica. All rights reserved worldwide. (New International Version Bible Online) |


text:
BYU football: Terence Brown shapes up for the NFL draft
PROVO — Since playing his final college football game in BYU's dramatic, come-from-behind victory over Tulsa in the Armed Forces Bowl, center Terence Brown has lost a lot of weight — 25 pounds to be exact.
Meanwhile, he's added a beard that would make Grizzly Adams proud.
It's all part of Brown's new look as he eagerly awaits next week's National Football League draft.
Though he put up impressive numbers at Pro Day in late March, he said he hasn't attracted much attention from NFL teams so far.
"I'm under the radar and feel that if someone gives me a chance, they'll be pleasantly surprised with what I can do for them," Brown said.
According to CBSSports.com, Brown ranks as the No. 551 prospect overall, and he is rated No. 18 among centers.
Most experts project that Brown won't be selected in the seven-round draft. But even if he isn't picked, he is expected to sign a contract with some team as an undrafted free agent.
In terms of his Pro Day results, the sleeker, slimmed-down Brown compared favorably to the linemen that participated in the NFL Scouting Combine in February.
Brown's performance in several categories would have put him in the top echelon among linemen at the combine, including the 40-yard dash (5.03 seconds), broad jump (9 feet, 2 inches), shuttle run (4.39 seconds) and 3-cone drill (7.33 seconds). He also recorded 25 reps on the bench press and had a 29-inch vertical leap.
"I knew scouts and teams were going to have some questions about my athleticism," Brown said. "But I put those question marks to bed with the way I performed at the Pro Day. We'll see what happens from here. As far as Pro Day goes, I felt like I knocked it out of the park."
In preparation for the draft, Brown has spent the past few months working out at ASAP Training in Orem with personal trainer Dave Stroshine and nutritionist Dan Wilcox.
Listed at 330 pounds last season with the Cougars, the 6-foot-4 Brown has shed pounds, and now he's in the best shape of his life.
"In a 12-week period, I lost 10 percent body fat and a total of 25 pounds," he said. "I actually lost 38 pounds of fat. I added 12 lean body mass. It definitely helped going into Pro Day. I've made some good changes that I'm excited about, football-wise. But I'm excited as far as life goes, being healthier. I feel tons better. That's been awesome. I'm staying in shape, trying to get quicker, faster and stronger."
One thing that could help Brown's NFL prospects is his versatility. He started 13 games at right guard at BYU in 2009, then started every game at center in 2010 and 2011.
"If a team gives me a chance, they'll definitely be surprised because I am so versatile," he said. "My agent is making sure that teams are aware I can do multiple things. If I get in a chance to get into an NFL training camp, I think it will help me a lot because I can play every position."
As for the beard — which he couldn't wear during his years at BYU due to the school's dress and grooming standards — it's not something his wife, Sara, is crazy about. But he likes it.
"The beard's going strong, against my wife's better judgment," Brown said. "She would probably like me to trim it down. I wouldn't say my wife loves it. But she's a very good wife and she supports me. As long as I'm not a bishop, I'll always have a beard. It's kind of my thing right now. Who knows how long it will last? I enjoy it. I'm kind of a fan of it. I'm making up for lost time right now."
When he's not working out, Brown has been working as a substitute teacher at Lehi Junior High School.
- Peavler: Tom Holmoe deserves credit... 82
- Timpview standout, 2014 Mr. Football... 66
- Report: ACC changes stance, now... 62
- Bruins bruise Utes in 69-59 upset 41
- Utah secures commitments from two of... 39
- Guest commentary: Hey, BYU basketball,... 34
- Former Utah basketball player spreads... 25


text:
Roasted Beet and Crab Salad
- Total Time:
- 7 hr 30 min
- Prep:
- 1 hr 20 min
- Cook:
- 6 hr 10 min
- Yield:
- 4 servings
- 1/2 pound fresh beets
- 1/2 cup extra virgin olive oil
- 1/4 cup rice wine vinegar
- Salt and pepper
- 1 pound crab meat, picked over for cartilage
- 1/4 cup homemade or store bought mayonnaise
- 2 tablespoons sour cream
- 2 tablespoons minced shallots
- 1 tablespoon prepared horseradish or to taste
- 1/2 cup of one day pickled red onions
- 1 tablespoon finely chopped parsley
Cut the tops and bottoms off the beets. Place the beets in a small roasting pan and fill the pan with water coming 1/3 of the way up the pan. Cover the pan with aluminum foil. Place the pan in the oven and roast for about 30 to 35 minutes or until the beets are tender. Cool slightly, about 20 minutes, and rub off the skin. Using a mandoline, thinly slice the beets Reserve 1/4 cup of the beet liquid. In a mixing bowl, whisk the olive oil and rice wine vinegar together. Season with salt and pepper. Toss the beets with vinaigrette, cover and chill for 6 hours. In a mixing bowl, toss the crab meat, mayonnaise, sour cream, shallots and horseradish together. Season the salad with salt and pepper. To assemble, divide the beet slices into fourths. Cover the center of each plate with the beet slices. Mound the crab salad over the beet slices on each plate. Place a fourth of pickles on top of each mound of crab salad. Drizzle the reserved beet water around the edge of each plate. Garnish with parsley.
Recipe Courtesy of Emeril Lagasse
Cooking Tips
More Recipes and Ideas
Beet and Potato Salad with Blue Cheese Dressing and Dill
Recipe courtesy of Damaris Phillips
Crab Salad with Orange and Oregano on Grilled Sourdough
Recipe courtesy of Rachael Ray
Crab and Guacamole Salad
Recipe courtesy of Darrell "DAS" Smith


text:
I've been a lover of leather clothes since the '80s when my cousin handed down a black leather jacket to me. The thing is, though, like the fashions of the '80s, many leather clothes have a sort of trashy vibe. There's also a fine line between wearing leather and looking biker chic and biker hot mess. So, today I've found 10 pieces of leather and faux leather fashions that are classy, not trashy.
- Popular


text:
Hebrew Names Version (HNV) | New International Version (NIV) |
43 You have delivered me from the strivings of the people. You have made me the head of the nations. A people whom I have not known shall serve me. | 43 You have delivered me from the attacks of the people; you have made me the head of nations; people I did not know are subject to me. |
The Hebrew Names Version is in the public domain. (Hebrew Names Version - The Holy Bible Online) | Scripture quoted by permission. Quotations designated (NIV) are from THE HOLY BIBLE: NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. NIV®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by Biblica. All rights reserved worldwide. (New International Version Bible Online) |


text:
Welcome to our tasting notes database of more than 315,000 wine reviews.
Check wine reviews, vintage charts, your Personal Wine List and news on the go. For use with all smartphones and tablets. |
The guidelines we follow for our blind tastings, our tasters and their beats, and our 100-point scale. |
Tim Fish James Laube Kim Marcus Thomas Matthews James Molesworth Alison Napjus Bruce Sanderson Harvey Steiman MaryAnn Worobiec
Passionate about wine? WineSpectator.com seeks a highly motivated digital journalist for an assistant editor position in its New York editorial department.
Sips & Tips | Wine & Healthy Living
Video Theater | Collecting & Auctions
» View samples
» Or sign up now!
» Manage my newsletter preferences
The marketplace for all your wine needs, including:
Wine Storage | Wine Clubs
Dining & Travel | Wine Auctions
Wine Shops | Wine Accessories


text:
I think Brently passes the threshold of "a little annoying".
I think Brently passes the threshold of "a little annoying".
I'd like to die with the songs I love stuck in my head. I hope to make the most of these hollow bones we become.
I raise a toast to the the souls that sang all along. I've been gathering friends to just to make some sounds,
before the ship goes down, I've been making amends by making the rounds before the whole world ends
[Chit Chat Specific Forum Rules] // Last Update - Friday March 13, 2009
But why be happy at his death if he really was an innocent and ignorant person? It would make more sense, and be kinder of her, to hate the system itself and not the good person who was her husband and who obviously treated her well despite the oppressive society. From her thoughts, there's also no reason to believe that had she spoken up, he wouldn't have listened and continued to keep things the way they were. The problem is that she didn't, and she has no one to blame but herself for that. If freedom was really so important to her that she would value it over the life of a human being, social norms would have been no obstacle to her. To lead a quiet life of inactivity and then rejoice when an outside force removes the thing that was oppressing you only... that's a personal failing. She did not address her own issue, and she apparently did not care about any other women who may be in her position, also longing for freedom. That can only be attributed to her failure to see beyond herself, her own issues (she clearly did not attempt to see things from his perspective, either), which is the result of nothing but selfishness.
She just wanted freedom......not completely his fault in his time period that she didn't like the way she lived....She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked save with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead.
True, the ability to do what you want is a human freedom. But there is no absolute freedom because we are bound by freakin social norms. Can't go on a business deal on a pyjama.How is it a bad thing to have and fulfill your desires? Isn't the ability to do what you want a basic human freedom?
Tagalog: "Bababa ba?"
English: "Are you going down?"
Well what if he used to go out with his friends, and she tells him not too? etc. etc.Saizou didn't live in the late 1800's and he's not a woman (right?). It all comes down to the perspective.
^He's not forced to follow her orders, nor will society think poorly of him for not doing so.
Well lets say saizou is a woman, and is in the 1800. Would he be happy that his husband died who is kind/tender/loving towards her(saizou) died so that he could be free (and do whatever you can do in the 1800's >_> ). I mean she's overdoing, it's not like her husband was beating her, she is the one who had the problem for being happy (in that time's society). Know what I mean?
She's not happy because Brently died; she's happy because she's free. It just happens Brently had to die in order for her to be free.
How so? For her, her husband was the personification of the oppressive system. He may not have intended to oppress her, but that's really immaterial when looking at the effects, and it's the effects that caused Louise's unhappiness in the first place.
Well, except for the fact that back then, women were considered intellectually inferior, and therefore you could ignore what they said. Also the oppressive legal system still remains no matter what her husband does.Originally Posted by Digital_Eon
A personal failing? That's a harsh definition. After all, the people who truly could reject the societal norms in Victorian society were all exceptional persons. The woman in the story obviously isn't one of these exceptions, and thus the only way for her to attain some of the freedom she's yearning for is if her husband dies.Originally Posted by Digital_Eon
And yes, people who are oppressed and languish in inactivity will be relieved and happy if an outside force removes the oppressor. To reiterate my earlier example, if you were unjustly imprisoned and your jailer suddenly dies and you're free to go, wouldn't you be relieved?
And how, pray tell me, should she address her own situation? And furthermore, how should she address the situation of other women for that matter? Remember that this was written well before women were allowed to vote. Every legal path was closed to her, and every socially acceptable one as well.Originally Posted by Digital_Eon
Very well, let us assume that I indeed am a married woman in the 19th century. That means that I can't vote, it is highly probable that I can't choose who I'll marry, hell, in the early 19th century I won't even have legally recognized property rights, and that's only the legal obstacles I'll be facing. In nearly every way, both legal and societal, I will be considered an inferior human being.Originally Posted by bipolargraph
Now, I pose a question to you. If you met a person who was subject to this kind if inequality today, would you really have the gall to tell him that it's his fault that he isn't happy?


text:
Schedule a Study
For all staff supporting imaging, including 9.4T MRI, PET, SPECT, CT, or other staff support, please send imaging request here:
A confirmation email will be sent to you once the study has been scheduled on the calendar. If you have questions, please send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.com. .
For user operated imaging including optical and ultrasound imaging, please schedule your study on the corresponding online calendars for each imaging modality:
To cancel or edit your scheduled study, please notify our staff: email@example.com, or phone: (919) 966-2855. Please see below for cancellation policies.
Scheduling Policy
- All research investigators are encouraged to book their imaging time one week in advance. The minimum advance notice should be 24 hours.
- Booked time, if not used, cannot be canceled after the time has passed.
- Short notice, such as one day prior, needs to be justified by the circumstances. If your booking time needs to be longer than 4 hours, please contact Dr. Hong Yuan. (email@example.com, (919)-843-3813)
- For a user-operated study, the machine time charges will be based on the time that you book on the schedule calendar. Please include the cleaning time in your booked time.


text:
Your cart is empty!
Andrea EyeQs oil free eye makeup corrector sticks - 50 ea
Our Price:$3.51
Cover Girl Cheekers Blush, Rose Silk 105, 0.12 oz - 3 ea
Our Price:$11.22
Physicians Formula Mineral Wear Talc Free Face Powder with SPF 16, Buff Beige - 0.3 Oz
Our Price:$10.13
Ecco Bella flower color natural liquid face foundation bisque with UVA and UVB SPF 15 - 1 oz
CoverGirl Clean Liquid Makeup 105, Ivory - 1 oz, 2 ea
Our Price:$13.94
CoverGirl Clean Liquid Makeup 135, Medium Light - 1 oz, 2 ea
Product descriptions and images presented on the site are for representational use only and do not constitute or substitute for medical information from your health care or medical professional. Information on this site is provided for informational purposes only. You should read carefully all on correct product packaging and follow the instructions. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem, promptly contact your health care provider. Information and statements regarding dietary supplements on this site have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease and may be for commercial. Image shown for reference only. Actual item you recieve may differ from shown.


text:
2011 year-end review, part three
As 2011 draws to a close, a handful of air cargo leaders have taken the time to reflect on a tumultuous year.
From supply chains ravaged by the Japanese tsunami to economic instability permeating the U.S. and the eurozone, the airfreight industry has taken numerous hits throughout 2011. But can the lessons gleaned from these difficult times be used to avoid similar fates in the future?
In the final installment of the three-part series (view parts one and two here), Hong Kong Air Cargo Terminals Ltd. Managing Director Mark Whitehead and Emirates Airline's Divisional Senior Vice President, Cargo, Ram Menen discuss the past year and their projections for 2012.
What was the most significant storyline of 2011?
Mark Whitehead: Amid the Japanese tsunami and its commercial aftershocks, the New Zealand earthquake, squabbles with the Transportation Security Administration over deadlines to meet their heightened security requirements and the ongoing saga of surcharges, the dominant storyline for us in 2011 was falling tonnages on major routes — particularly those out of Hong Kong.
But we are not convinced that this swath of negative coverage is really justified — we feel there have been too many comparisons to 2010, leading to the impression that 2011 has turned out to be much worse than it should. In Hactl's own case, we could fall farther and yet still beat our previous peak of 2007, which would be no small achievement.
2010 was a post-recession bounce fueled by global restocking, so it was always going to be hard to beat. But many in the air cargo industry thought 2010 was a sign of even better things to come and budgeted for incremental growth in 2011. They now have a major problem.
Ram Menen: The market slowdown is, obviously, the topic that has dominated the industry. But what is most remarkable about 2011 is the number and diversity of factors that contributed to the slowdown. Natural disasters, such as the tsunami in Japan and the Thai floods, were major events that not only impacted exports and imports in those countries directly, but also hit global supply chains. Production lines in factories were halted due to the sudden shortage of vital components.
Economic instability has also been a significant issue, with the various crises across Europe and the politicalization of the deficit ceiling in the U.S. all rocking consumer confidence. We also can't forget the sustained high cost of fuel, which is an ongoing challenge for the air cargo industry. On the plus side, it was good to see the Boeing 747-8F enter service, while the Arab Spring heralds a new beginning for many businesses in the region and will stimulate international trade.
What lessons have you learned in 2011 that will help you have a successful 2012?
Menen: You can never trust forecasts. Old rules don't apply, and the new rules haven't been written. The industry is becoming less predictable every year, with more and more challenges arising. Of course, the price of oil is always something we have to contend with, but, worryingly, natural disasters seem to be happening at a more frequent rate, while increasingly more national economies are struggling. We are continually learning, and every challenge helps us become better prepared to manage whatever new challenges 2012 brings.
What Are Your Thoughts?
* Disclaimer: Please note that libellous or offensive comments are not allowed.


text:
This l/l is really nice.Its the perfect pinky nude.Its quite creamy and goes on pretty smooth.It goes really well with a number of lipsticks and glosses.Its only about $0.99!Will definately buy again!!
yay=) i found a nice lookalike to mac spice l/l but wn'w #712 doesn't have the gross orange undertone to it, spice is alot orange-y, 712 is more of a caramel brown with a *hint* of pink with no orange in it. However i prefer the texture of the mac l/l-ers cuz they're more softer and apply more easy, these l/l is harder to apply, it's a little dry. Hee, but that's ok cuz i still like the color, and for 1$ cad, wut a deal.
I'm sooo bummed. I got this because I heard so many raves about it. I love my other WnW l/l's; but it seems that they have drastically changed the formula for these. My others glide on smoothly. W/ this new formula I have to push really hard to get any color to show up, even on the back of my hand. I hope they change back. If you want a LOOK-A-LIKE for M.A.C. Spice I'd go w/ Prestige SAND. If they go back I'll try it, if not total waste of money. What a bummer.
Yes, this rocks. It is like MAC spice without the horror. It is like a neutral pinky brown with a sip of orange in it, not perfection, but I could deal with it.
I really like this lipliner and all, but the packaging really sucks. Who the hell needs a lipliner that is freaking 8 inches long? (haha, I just realized how dirrrrrty that sounded) It doesn't fit anywhere (haha, more dirrrrtyness) and it pokes out of my makeup bag (hehe, poke! what a bad euphemism). But really, it's like, a dollar, and I like it, so I'll just deal with it and use it. continued >>
This is neutral color but on me it goes more towards an orangey brown color but still very pretty. I wear this MAC's revealing l/g. Would buy again.
I love this lipliner! It's a matte nude shade that blends in perfectly with my lips, and makes my lipglosses stay on longer. Works really good for such a great price.
Love this liner. So creamy and stays put! I line my lips with this and top it off with a pale pink gloss and have perfect healthy happy looking lips! Not to mention its dirt cheap (.99!) Love it - My lip staple.
i have the 713 earlier, but i just got the 712 one yesterday. can't reisit it! and i must say that i love it! very nude. gives a healthy glow just like mac spice, but many times cheaper. 1 lippie went off as the cap was cracked. it was the last one left, so i had no choice. had to buy it by hook or by crook.


text:
Windows Address Book Recovery 1.0
Windows Address Book Recovery tool uses an advanced technology to Repair WAB file. WAB Recovery software to Recover WAB File in few mouse clicks. It recovers all data of WAB file like contacts, address, first name, last name, email address, phone numbers etc without any risk of your real Outlook Express database loss.
See also: windows address book recovery, wab recovery, recover wab file, corrupt windows address book recovery, windows address book repair, windows address book recovery tool, repair wab
Fix WAB File 1.0
Fix Wab File is a good solution for anyone who wants to recover Outlook Express Address Book. Wab File Recovery software easily supports all Windows versions. Outlook Express Address Book Recovery utility performs recovery of contacts information from Windows Address Book. Restored contacts can be saved in any of the formats like WAB file, CSV file and vCard file format.
See also: fix wab file, wab file recovery, fix wab file, recover wab file, recover contacts from outlook express software, recover outlook express address book, repair oe address book, restore oe address book, address book recovery, repair corrupt wab file
WAB Recovery 2.0
Microsoft Outlook Express is application which is used for storage of contacts such as name, email id, phone number, address etc. You can easily manage your contacts in Outlook express. It stores the information in .wab file. You can use the files for your backup or can copy to other system to see the information using Outlook Express. But corrupted .wab file will not be able to access. In such case, you will have to use WAB Recovery software.
See also: recover WAB file, WAB file recover, repair WAB file
Repair WAB Tool 1.0
Repair WAB Tool is a powerful error detection and WAB file recovery solution for Microsoft Outlook Express. When you are looking for how to repair a WAB file you need no other tool except for Repair WAB Tool - Repair WAB Tool is only available from our secure download site and installs in seconds. Running the WAB file recovery solution is extremely simple and easily performed in minutes. Recover address book contacts with Repair WAB Tool!
See also: Repair wab, wab Repair tool, Repair .wab, .wab Repair, How to Repair wab, .wab Repair tool, Repair wab address book, Repairing wab file, Repair a wab file, Repairing wab, How to Repair .wab, How to Repair a wab file, Repair wab address
Repair WAB File Free 1.0
OE .wab file repair is simple and easy with WAB Repair Free, a very fast and simple tool which needs no previous computer file recovery experience or expertise on the part of the user. Microsoft Outlook Express is a very popular email tool used by millions around the world at home and at work. When the email files become damaged, WAB Repair Free is the solution to turn to for fast file recovery without the hassle. WAB Repair Free is the solution!
See also: Repair wab file, Repair wab files, wab file Repair, Repair .wab file, How to Repair wab file, .wab file Repair, Repair .wab files, How to Repair .wab file, How to Repair wab files, How can to Repair .wab files, OE .wab file Repair, to Repair wab file
Address Book Repair Toolbox 1.0.0
Address Book Repair Toolbox is the market leading Address Book WAB file recovery solution. Powerful and effective, it is unique in that it requires no specialist computer knowledge or prior recovery experience on the part of the user. Recover deleted contacts, selectively restore contacts and it is compatible with all major Windows platforms including Vista and Windows 7. Downloads in seconds, installs in minutes and start recovering WAB files.
See also: address book Repair, Outlook Express address book Repair, Windows address book Repair, address book Repair tool, address book file Repair, Windows address book Repair tool, address book Outlook Express Repair, wab address book Repair
PowerPoint Recovery 10.11.01
Best PPT file recovery software to recover slides, images, text, animations, sound effects, videos, clip arts from the inaccessible MS PowerPoint files. Free evaluation software available to experience working and features of the software before purchasing it.
See also: powerpoint recovery, powerpoint repair, powerpoint file recovery, ms powerpoint recovery
Fix PDF Files 1.0
How to Fix Corrupted PDF Files? PDF Fixer software is highly developed PDF Recovery tool that can quickly and easily Fix PDF Files and documents. PDF Document Fixer software is the best choice to repair elements of PDF documents like images, text-formatting, header & footer, hyperlink, word-art, cell, table etc).
See also: fix pdf files, how to fix corrupted pdf files, fix corrupt pdf files, pdf fixer, pdf fix, pdf document fixer, restore pdf files, fix pdf document, open damaged pdf file, pdf file repair, free pdf file fix
Repair Exchange 2007 Mailbox 11.05.01
Some common causes of Exchange server corruptions are hardware failure, improper shutdown, virus attacks, jet errors, file size errors, human errors, etc. While working with corrupt Exchange server EDB files, you receive various kinds of error messages that point out that the EDB files have been damaged. For eliminating all such errors and issues, Kernel for Exchange Server recovery tool is the best option.
See also: repair exchange 2007 mailbox, edb repair, edb repair tool, repair edb file, edb recovery, exchange 2007 edb recovery, exchange server recovery, exchange edb recovery
Backup File Recovery 5.4
BKF Recovery software can simply perform backup file recovery process with user friendly manner. You can also extract selected files by choosing the "Extract Selected" option for recovery of the only selected files. Backup Data Recovery process recover backup file which are completely corrupt.
See also: backup file recovery, backup file recovery tool, bkf recovery, bkf recovery tool, bkf repair tool, recover backup file, backup data recovery
Repair Outlook 2007 Database 3.4
How do I repair Outlook 2007? For solving query, simply download free demo from www.outlook2010recovery.org and it supports to repair Outlook 2007 database after showing any error messages (0x80042108, 0x8004210b, 0x800ccc79 etc). Outlook 2007 database repair tool admirably works on damaged PST 2007 file & perfectly repair corrupted Outlook data file, protected file, unread messages etc. this tool work with all edition of PST (2010 64 bit to 97).
See also: repair outlook 2007 database, how do i repair outlook 2007, outlook 2007 database repair, repair corrupted outlook data file
Extract BKF 5.4
BKF File Extract tool works as BKF File extractor for extracting BKF files which are corrupt or damaged. BKF File Extract process can be easily executes by Extract BKF utility for extraction of BKF files from the corrupt MS backup files.
See also: extract bkf, extract bkf software, extract bkf tool, bkf file extract, bkf file extractor, bkf repair, bkf recovery, open bkf, free help to open bkf files, free help to read damage bkf files, free bkf repair tool
SQL Server Data Recovery 11.07.01
The Kernel for SQL Server works with a professional approach of repairing large database files while resolving all corruption issues associated with databases. This tool enables the users to recover the lost data being irrespective of the degree of corruption.
See also: sql server data recovery, sql server recovery, mdf recovery, repair mdf, repair mdf file, mdf repair, sql recovery, sql repair, sql database repair, sql server database recovery, sql database recovery
Repair Corrupt Excel File 11.07
The Excel repair tool performs accurate and easy recovery of corrupted Excel files and retrieves the data. It is capable of performing complete recovery of texts and restores the formatting. In addition, it recovers tables, data structures, OLE objects, headers, footnotes and hyperlinks.
See also: repair corrupt excel file, corrupt excel recovery, excel recovery software, microsoft excel recovery software, repair excel 2010, repair excel 2010 file, ms excel recovery
MAC Data Recovery Tool 4.03
MAC Data Recovery Software will help you to retrieve lost images, documents, spread sheets and other types of data. Whether your data get stuck by user error i.e. data files accidently deleted without backing up or disk error
See also: mac data recovery software, mac partition repair, apple macintosh data recovery, mac recovery, macintosh recovery, recover data from mac, mac file recovery, recover mac files, partition recover mac
Repair DIVX 22.214.171.124
Repair DIVX software is the best software to repair corrupted or damaged Divx files. Using Repair DIVX software we can Repair corrupted AVI, DIVX, XVID video file formats from different storage devices. Repair DIVX software can easily repair corrupted or damaged Divx files from hard drives, memory cards, USB drives, iPods, external hard drives.
See also: repair divx, repair divx files, repair corrupted divx files, repair corrupted divx, repair damaged divx file
MS MDB Fix 3.1
Access Recovery Program helps you to recover corrupt mdb file and restore access database with full access objects, table structure, primary/foreign key etc. Repair MDB and Fix MDB Software quickly read corrupt mdb database and recover mdb file.
See also: ms mdb file fix, ms mdb file repair, ms mdb file recovery, damaged ms mdb fix, ms mdb restore, ms mdb repair, damaged mdb fix, repair damaged access data, repair ms access database
Repair PDF File 1.0
PDF File corruption is a common event. PDF Recover software to repair heavily corrupted PDF file within minutes. You can use PDF File Repair tool which is high-performing software to solve several error like - "There was an error processing a page. There was a problem reading this document". PDF Recocvery software is the most helpful tool to Repair PDF File.
See also: repair pdf file, pdf file repair, how to repair corrupt pdf file, pdf repair, pdf recovery, repair damaged pdf file, pdf restore
Access Database Repair Tool 5.0.1
Corrupt MS Access database repair software reconstructs corrupt access database files which get corrupted during virus attacks. MDB Repair Software supported MS Access 2003, MS Access XP, MS Access 2000 database (MDB) files. Download Access Database Repair Software DEMO version and user can analyze their damaged access database files. Using our demo version software user can see the Preview of repairs access files but not saved the repair data.
See also: Corrupt file repair, repairing, corrupted access files, corruptions, Microsoft access databases, repair access databases, fix corrupt mdb, professional, corrupted, damaged, restores, tables, queries, forms, information, .mdb files, inaccessible, acces
How To Unpack Corrupted Zip Files 3.0
Sometimes we use an unknown compression technique to reduce the size of data folder but at the time of decompression technique we found CRC value is a mismatch then in this condition we feel incompetence to repair corrupted Zip files then use a Zip repair tool that will help you to explain step by step process for this query how to unpack compressed Zip files.
See also: how to unpack corrupted zip files, zip repair tool, zip file repair software, repair corrupted zip files, how to extract corrupt zip files