text:
The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
Index pages
by Date of Document
Our Partners
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand
Community resources
courage is contagious
The Global Intelligence Files
On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.
Your Daily Briefing
Released on 2012-10-11 16:00 GMT
Email-ID | 3995999 |
Date | 2011-12-07 21:05:43 |
From | email@example.com |
To | firstname.lastname@example.com |
News From The Source(TM)
Hello Kamran Bokhari
- *Algerian Foreign Ministry: Do not oppose people*s desire for change...*
(Asharq al-Awsat)
- Belkhadem on relations in region, domestic scene (El-Khabar)
- "...The new media law ignored the right of a journalist..." (Echourouq
- *Surprise: Gamal, Suzane and Nazif tried to appoint an Israeli
company... (Al-Masry al-Yawm)
- *Head of Nour party: Our goal is to implement Islamic Shari*a** (Asharq
- "Is new sedition on way?" (Javan)
- Mesbah-Yazdi on Nasrallah (Mehr news agency)
- "The Awakening warns of Al-Qa'idah's attempt to reorganize..."
- "Muqtada al-Sadr tells Asharq al-Awsat the Iraqi government..." (Asharq
- *Camp David accord is faltering* (Al-Quds al-Arabi)
- *Syrian situation hinders Jordan*s joining of the GCC* (Al-Sabil)
- *Nasrallah and his defiant appearance* (Al-Quds al-Arabi)
Middle East
- *Looking for a new leadership for the Arab world* (Al-Arab al-Yawm)
- *The labor is an Arab one and the newborn is Erdoganian!* (Al-Rai
- *After the political revolution* (As-Safir)
- *Pakistani info on return of Ben Laden*s widows to Saudi Arabia**
- *Fatah members call for preparations to engage in presidential
elections** (Al-Quds al-Arabi)
- *Hamas limits its presence in Syria** (Al-Hayat)
- "...[Al-Zahhar:] I am still a member of Hamas..." (Al-Quds al-Arabi)
- *Al-Turabi: Bringing down the regime is not impossible** (Asharq
- *Syria*s Kurds: What do they expect from the new constitution**
(Al-Watan Syria)
- **Ghalioun to Mustaqbal: Assad regime*s months are numbered*
- **Border guards deter terrorists who tried to sneak in from Turkey*
(Al-Watan Syria)
- Rif'at al-Asad interviewed on Syria (Al-Arabiya TV)
- "Syrians, let down by their official Media, created the alternative"
- "...Arab boycott has started and we hope Syria will help us..."
- *Houthis* goals behind Sa*da confrontations* (Al-Jazeera.net)
- *Yemen on verge of sectarian & religious war between Houthists &
reformists (Al-Rai al-Aam)
- *Algerian Foreign Ministry: Do not oppose people*s desire for
On December 5, the Saudi-owned London-based Asharq al-Awsat newspaper
carried the following report by its correspondent in Algiers Boualama
Ghemrassa: *The spokesman for the Algerian Foreign Ministry denied in
statements to Asharq al-Awsat the accusations addressed to his country in
regard to the current Syrian events claiming that Algeria was supporting
the regime. The spokesman said that his country will never oppose the
people*s desire for change. Regarding Algeria*s position vis-a-vis the
sanctions imposed by the Arab League on Syria, Ammar Balani was quoted as
saying: *We wish to protect the Syrian civilians from the repercussions of
these sanctions and we also want to prevent any foreign intervention in
*The official spokesman added: *We wish to see the Arab initiative given a
real chance to succeed before seeking the internationalization of the
Syrian crisis. Algeria has been defending from the start the interests of
the Syrian civilians and has been trying to protect them from the negative
effects that will result from these new sanctions.* Balani, who was
getting ready to leave with Foreign Minister Murad al-Medleci to Doha to
take part in the Arab meeting which will tackle the Syrian situation,
added: *Algeria has clearly expressed its position regarding the
suspension of flights to Syria, since we believe that this decision will
have negative effects on the Syrian people and is considered to be a
punitive sanction directly harming Syrian and Arab civilians.*
*He added: *The proposed sanctions against the regime of President Bashar
al-Assad will be carefully studied and discussed during the Doha meeting,
and the foreign ministers will debate this issue in length. Algeria is
concerned about two main issues. Firstly, we want to make sure that the
Syrian civilians are not affected by these sanctions since this would have
terrible humanitarian effects. Secondly, we want to make sure that the
Syrian crisis remains an Arab issue and not become an international one.
Algeria believes that any attempt to bring the Syrian issue outside the
context of the Arab League is a red line that will not be tolerated or
accepted. We have already proposed a mechanism to resolve this issue and
we think that a committee should be formed to study the effects of each
proposed sanction, especially the banning of flights to Syria. We want
this committee to deploy everything in its power to decrease the negative
effects of the sanctions on the civilian popula tion.** - Asharq al-Awsat,
United Kingdom
Click here for source
Return to index of Algeria Return to top of index
- Belkhadem on relations in region, domestic scene
On December 6, the daily El-Khabar reported: "Abdelaziz Belkhadem has
seized the opportunity being the guest of Breakfast programme, to remove
confusion about many issues related to his position on the reforms and
draft laws. He spoke in his capacity as the secretary-general of the
National Liberation Front about the crisis his party is experiencing, and
his view of the political activity in Algeria. Meanwhile he also spoke in
his capacity as minister of state, personal representative of the
president of the republic on how Algeria perceives the uprisings in the
Arab world, the future of relations with Morocco, and the impact of the
economic crisis in France on Algeria. I met with Libyan Transitional
Council (NTC) members and gave them advice. According to the personal
representative of the president of the republic, Algeria did not support
repressive regimes at all. Regarding Libya, on which the Algerian position
triggered great controversy, the relationship was with a state represented
by Colonel Mu'ammar al-Qadhafi and the People's Committees. "They are
legitimate institutions until they fell, Belkhadem said. Then he added:
"Until January 2011 Abdul Jalil was minister of justice; Kusa was minister
of foreign affairs and Yunis minister of interior. Some members of the
Transitional Council, which was formed later, were with the regime and
others had dual citizenships. With whom should we deal in this case?
Moreover, the NTC was something, and armed people were something else.
"Belkhadem said that the members of the NTC have accused us of supporting
the regime with mercenaries and weapons, but did not provide any evidence.
We still believe that the peoples alone have the right to change the style
of rule. We have reservations about foreign interference that destroys the
capabilities of a country, as it happened in Libya. Our interlocutor
revealed that he had met, during the last Hajj pilgrimage season, some
members of the NTC and advised them how to take care of
institution-rebuilding and to focus on improving relations with
neighbours. Regarding Algeria's position towards events in Tunisia,
Belkhadem said: "We had a relationship with the state and not with Ben
Ali. We faced this kind of problems during the Iran-Iraq war, when Iraqis
asked us to support them as they were Arabs, and Iranians asked us for
support because they were Muslims and because Algeria had brokered Shatt-
al-Arab agreement in 1975 and it was Iraqis who breached it. Then, he add
ed: "In the end, after the fall of Ben Ali, the first visit of Prime
Minister Beji Caid Essebsi, was to Algeria, and the first visit of Rached
Ghannouchi was also to Algeria.
"As for the position on events in Syria, Belkhadem said: "The Syrian
regime blames us on the grounds that we are engaged in the decisions of
the Arab League made against them, and others say that we support the
regime. So, those who are criticizing Algeria's official position what do
they want from us?" Morocco's rejection of referendum in the Western
Sahara impedes, but does not prevent normal relations with them. Abdelaziz
Belkhadem said that the recent good mood in relations between Algeria and
Morocco, require a reconciliation of the will of normalization in Algeria,
and the will of Moroccans "which ranges from turning their back to
legitimacy in the Western Sahara to benefit economically from the eastern
neighbour. On whether Morocco's refusal to hold self-determination
referendum in the Western Sahara prevents having normal relations with
Algeria, Belkhadem said: "Rabat's non-fulfilment of its commitments
towards the Western Sahara conflict hinders the establishment of normal
relations with us but does not prevent them. Our approach in this
particular aspect is that the rejection of international legitimacy in
referendum leads to its rejection in other matters."
"The secretary-general of the majority party added: "Normally we should
work to lift obstacles impeding the integration of our economies. He cited
in this regard what happened in April 1958 when three parties from
Tunisia, Morocco and Algeria met with the purpose to establishing the Arab
Maghreb. In the same year countries from Europe met for the unity of the
continent. Today, Europe has established a common currency, while we are
still enmeshed in the problems of border and visa." Algerians feel bitter
about Moroccans' behaviour towards them in the case of attack on a hotel
in Marrakech, in summer 1994. Belkhadem is the last among officials who
expressed this, saying: "Our brothers accused us of involvement in the
incident and imposed entry visa on us. At that time we were under
undeclared blockade, and the only outlet was Morocco and Tunisia, but the
brothers had strengthened the blockade against us. Instead of opening
their door to Algeria they closed it in our face, and a ccused us of
terrorism. That was an approval of claims made before by others who
accused us of terrorism."
"Belkhadem said that the French judiciary had cleared Algeria of
involvement in Marrakech incident when it put on trial the accused in the
case. Our brothers have learnt that they were unjust towards us and wanted
to return to pre- 1994 period, but it's not that easy, because the damage
was significant politically, financially and morally. They cancelled the
visa, and we did the same. As for the opening of the borders, this
requires agreement on a set of actions on the ground, the most important
is fighting arms smuggling and illegal immigration across the border."
Belkhadem said "we are not afraid of Islamists". He rejected the idea that
his party has been marginalized by assigning the premiership and the
consultations committee on reforms to his rivals in the member of ruling
coalition, Belkhadem said: "The Speaker of the Council of the Nation was
chosen to head the consultations committee being number two in the state
and not in his partisan capacity. He is aided by two ad visers from the
presidency in order to carry out the consultations and to report to the
Presidency of the Republic. Therefore, I don't see how FLN has been
marginalized. About the rising wave of Islamists in neighbouring countries
which witnessed revolutions, Belkhadem said: We are not afraid of
Islamists in elections in view of experience.
"Regarding his position on the return of members of Islamic Salvation
Front (FIS), Belkhadem said: "The people decided in the charter of
reconciliation on preventing those who were behind the national tragedy
from political activity." He said the visit of Rached Ghannouchi "comes
within the context of consultation, as Tunisian Ennahdha Movement, the
majority holder, has asked for expertise in management, and we told them
that management requires solutions and taking reality into consideration."
In this regard, he played down social protests, which he considered as
normal: "Algeria records at least four thousand protests a year," calling
for the need to listen to the demands of the people and for dialogue to
explain the country's potentialities. Warning of the impact of the
economic crisis in France on Algeria, the FLN secretary-general expected
that the sovereign debt crisis and economic recession would settle in
France, after Italy, Greece, Spain and Portugal: "This poses re al
challenges to the Algerian economy." Belkhadem launched a warning: "The
budget deficit in France has reached an intolerable level, and the debt
amounted to 1700bn, and everyone knows that the balance of trade between
us is in favour of France, unlike the Italian partner. Also, everyone
knows that the Euro today is in a difficult situation and this would have
a big impact on us." In order to address this serious economic situation,
Belkhadem urged Algeria to diversify its sources of imports so as not to
remain hostage to this situation, which may put the country in future in
front of a real crisis. He summed up his recommendation in the wisdom,
which says we must not put all our eggs in one basket." - El-Khabar,
Return to index of Algeria Return to top of index
- "...The new media law ignored the right of a journalist..."
On December 4, the daily Echourouq al-Yawm: "Former Communications
Minister Abdelaziz Rehabi has said the new media law had not dealt with
one of the most complex problems faced by journalists in the course of
performing their work, namely that which concerned getting to the source
of the news. He stressed the new law overlooked other aspects of great
importance, the most important of which was the duty of the institutional
(public) media towards society. Rehabi said that the institutional media
had failed in its mission and that the legislative authority should put
right what had been overlooked by the government by introducing amendments
to the draft law concerning the media, currently debated at the lower
chamber of the parliament, that would force corporations, ministries and
institutions to enable journalists to get the information they require.
Journalists suffer from an acute shortage of information and inability to
get to the source of news because of the restrictions imposed on them and
also because the communication cells at ministries, corporations and
institutions are not fulfilling their responsibilities of dealing with the
journalists' concerns, although these cells were set up specifically for
that purpose. Consequently, there is a need for the inclusion of a clause
in the new law that would force the institutions to respect that aspect
and to deal positively with journalists, and that requires political will.
"In the light of the fact the new law did not affirm the right of
journalists to get to the source of the news, it would be illogical to
talk about punishing journalists by fining them or in other ways, because
responsibility came after freedom, Rehabi said. Among the points
overlooked by the new law, according to the former minister, was to open
up the institutions of public media (TV, radio and news agencies) to the
political and social concerns in society as an initial step before talking
about opening up the audio-visual sector to private capital, because the
national TV seemed as though it was owned by the political concerns in the
government, which was a blatant violation of the citizens' simplest
natural rights. Rehabi has been campaigning for a book of conditions
clearly defining the role of public media institutions vis-a-vis society
in a way that would adapt them to the changes in the national and Arab
streets, on the basis of his conviction that the kind of mentali ty which
are running these institutions are still locked in the unilateral
political ideas of the 1970s which, in his opinion, posed a threat to
national security that had become more threatened than ever before because
of the impact of foreign satellite media to which Algerians had turned.
"Algeria's former ambassador to Spain believed that the new law had not
added anything to meet the aspirations of the professionals as much as it
had added to the obstacles and burdens to the press sector, which enjoyed
some privileges in the 1990 law, with the absence of any indication of the
role of advertising as an important source of revenue for the press.
Rehabi criticized the fact that the new media law was confined to the
press and excluded the audio-visual media despite the fact the press
constituted a small part of the whole sector. Thus, he pointed out as
evidence that the Higher Media Council had been replaced by the Press
Control Authority and the marginalization of the journalist in the
decisions taken by the authority since the appointment of the authority's
chairman, as the person with the deciding vote, had become the prerogative
of the president." - Echourouq al-Yawm, Algeria
Return to index of Algeria Return to top of index
- *Surprise: Gamal, Suzane and Nazif tried to appoint an Israeli
On December 5, the independent Al-Masry al-Yawm daily carried the
following report: *Well-informed sources revealed to Al-Masry al-Yawm
information concerning the involvement of Gamal Mubarak and his mother,
Suzan Thabet, in addition to Dr. Ahmed Nazif, the former prime minister,
in an attempt to try to appoint an Israeli company to [implement] a
project for the development of field irrigation in the old lands of the
Valley and the Delta.
*The sources - which are part of the delegations that took part in the
meetings of the summit for climate change, which is currently taking place
in the city of Durban in South Africa * also mentioned that the total cost
of the project reached 40 billion Egyptian pounds and that Gamal Mubarak
was supposed to obtain *huge* money commissions from the Israeli company
in the event of the completion of the *shady deal.*
*For his part, Dr. Mahmoud Abou Zeid, the former minister of water
resources and irrigation, made statements to the media yesterday on the
margin of the meetings for the climate summit where he said: *Gamal
Mubarak, Nazif, and Suzan Mubarak definitely tried to obtain the approval
of the project so that an Israeli company would be able to implement it
with the aim of obtaining privileges and commissions.* He also added that
*when the project was run by me, I was against appointing an Israeli
company to carry it out because my national convictions must overcome any
personal interests.*
Abou Zeid added that Gamal Mubarak *insinuated that I must approve the
project so that the implementation would take place as he sees fit.* He
also indicated that his clinging to his opinion [i.e. Abou zeid*s
clinging] pushed the son of the former president to quickly dispose of him
and *to sack me from my position as minister of irrigation.** - Al-Masry
al-Yawm, Egypt
Click here for source
Return to index of Egypt Return to top of index
- *Head of Nour party: Our goal is to implement Islamic Shari*a**
On December 6, the Saudi-owned London-based Asharq al-Awsat daily carried
the following report by its correspondent in Cairo Mohammad Abdo
Hassanein: *Doctor Imad al-Din Abdul Ghafur, the leader of the Salafi
Al-Nour Party which earned around one quarter of the seats in the Egyptian
parliament during the first round of the ongoing elections, stated: *The
implementation of Islamic Shari*a is one of the main components of Al-Nour
party*s program. This is our goal but it will take years [to implement].*
He indicated in statements to Asharq al-Awsat that the priority for the
time being was to reform society on the political, security and economic
levels and to form a national coalition government with all the political
*It is worth mentioning that many Egyptian national forces had expressed
fears over the arrival of the Islamists to power following the first round
of the elections* Moreover, a number of Egyptian Copts who constitute the
largest Christian sect in the Middle East is fearful about the
repercussions of such a development, hoping that the next two stages will
see some sort of transformation* However, Abdul Ghafur expected the second
and third rounds of the elections to witness similar results, rejecting
the Salafis* possible imposition of restraints limiting freedoms and
imposing a certain dress code while assuring that this could not be done
by use of force*.
*Abdul Ghafur stressed: *The party*s priority for the time being is to
engage in the political battle to reform the previous practices and
situation, draw up a new constitution, confirm the freedom of opinion and
the press, form a strong national coalition government and restructure the
security apparatuses within a strong Interior Ministry.* He assured
however: *The Islamic Shari*a is not absent and is present in the party*s
program. But this will take years and is a goal which we will reach. It is
not our starting point which in other words means that we will not start
with this issue.* He clarified: *It is not forcibly implemented far away
from people*s will, and is rather conducted in the context of national
concord** Regarding the shape of the next government which the military
council will form and not the parliamentary majority, Abdul Ghafur said:
*No political party achieves the majority and is then told to sit in the
camp of the opposition. This was never seen anywhe re around the world***
- Asharq al-Awsat, United Kingdom
Click here for source
Return to index of Egypt Return to top of index
- "Is new sedition on way?"
On November 29, an editorial by Ali Reza'i in the conservative daily Javan
said: "Hojjat ol-Eslam val-Moslemin Heydar Moslehi said that there will be
some security challenges during this year's election. He stressed: "The
enemy has made serious plans for this election, and we are issuing a
warning in this regard." Last week too, taking part in the conference on
"domestic solidarity and global strength" the intelligence minister said:
"The next Majlis election is approaching, and the enemy is trying to make
use of this opportunity and create some security challenges for us." These
repeated warnings, especially coming from the intelligence minister, point
to some potential events that at the moment some people are preparing
behind the scenes and are trying to turn them into reality in the month of
Esfand. One of the greatest experiences of the Islamic Revolution during
the past 32 years has been that, very often in order to deliver blows to
the country, foreign enemies have made use of domestic elements. After
infiltrating their pawns inside the country and making the necessary
preparations for a certain incident, they would carry out their plans at
the appropriate time and at a sensitive juncture. By pressing a button,
they launch a soft warfare and pour millions of tomans into the pockets of
the domestic opposition, and they express their words and carry out their
actions through the mouths and by the hands of some sold-out elements.
"The sedition of the year 1388 was a good example of that plot, when one
of the fiercest scenes of soft warfare took place between the Iranian
nation and the world arrogance. However, despite creating some profound
security challenges by means of foreign agents against the system of the
Islamic Republic, the enemies suffered a heavy defeat and all their
attempts produced the reverse outcome.
"With the defeat of the seditionists that placed a mountain of despair on
the shoulders of both domestic and foreign enemies, the soft warfare
against the Islamic Republic did not come to an end. By resorting to
different methods, including inciting domestic elements, and welcoming new
gestures of opposition, especially by some government officials, the
domineering system tried to create continuous challenges against the
system. Those continuous challenges, which mainly occurred after the 10th
presidential election, were carried out by a number of people who are now
known as the deviant movement. With their words they followed exactly the
same path that the seditions were trying to follow and implement with
their actions. The similarity between their words and the behaviour of the
seditionists, as well as the behaviour of some extremist reformers, is so
close that now some people talk about the alliance and joint action by
those three movements. Meanwhile, despite the positio n and the
circumstances of the deviant movement, whose members are connected with
the centres of power and wealth and who do not hesitate to engage in any
corrupt behaviour, they are not in a better shape than their other
partners, and they will not be able to pose security challenges to the
"In the same connection, the intelligence minister has said: "On the eve
of the ninth Majlis election, in order to be present on the stage, it will
try change its colour. This is so much so that it may quote the remarks of
the late imam (may he rest in peace) and they may try to talk about his
ideas to the people." Of course, this is only one of the tricks that the
deviant movement might use. Its past history proves that, in order to
maintain its position, it will not refrain from resorting to any
imaginable or even unimaginable action, because it can only breathe in the
political climate of the country and have a possibility of success in the
middle of anarchy, a murky climate, and in a state of public bewilderment.
In order to pose challenges against the system of the Islamic Republic and
undermine revolutionary principles in people's hearts, the enemies will
make use of any means available to them. To the enemies, the deviant
movement is a fledgling plant that they may be able to use for this
purpose under the present circumstances. After all, the paths to entry
into the House of the Nation are blocked to them, they will try to create
a feeling of disenchantment among the public, and with their inappropriate
behaviour they will try to create security challenges for the ninth Majlis
election. On the eve of the forthcoming Majlis election, the most
important programs of the group are as follows:
"1. Creating divisions among the three powers;
2. Propagating immorality in society and portraying themselves as the
wronged group;
3. Creating a tense climate and engaging in propaganda and chaos in their
own interest;
4. Creating divisions among the principle-ists;
5. Trying to portray the election as unhealthy and monopolistic;
6. Encouraging ethnic tension and creating anxiety among various ethnic
7. Propagating, insinuating, and spreading the idea of dual sovereignty in
the Islamic Republic;
8. Forcing various groups of people to confront one another;
9. Portraying themselves as the ones who are in the right and describing
their rivals as being in the wrong.
"The course that the deviant movement is following under the present
circumstances in order to pose security challenges during the forthcoming
election and to create a bitter taste in the mouth of the nation is very
similar to the behaviour of the sedition of 1388, except that it will
adopt different behaviour and work on an updated plan so that, according
to it, it can use all the events and various classes of people in its own
favour. After creating many tense situations and engaging public opinion
in a climate of clamour and spreading immorality in the society, it will
try to make different ethnic groups and different classes of the people
confront one another, so that it can create a tense situation in the
country and drag the security and law enforcement forces on to the streets
in order to maintain order and security. Then, under those circumstances
that might lead to new clashes and at a time when the climate of dialogue
has deteriorated, it will pursue its goals and w ill try to fish in muddy
waters. It will make every effort to muddy the water and to make falsehood
to appear as truth, because it cannot fish in fresh and clear water.
However, as the majority of the people are aware of the deviant nature of
that group, they will deal with it in the same way that they dealt with
the seditionists." - Javan, Iran
Return to index of Iran Return to top of index
- Mesbah-Yazdi on Nasrallah
On December 4, the conservative news agency Mehr reported: "Ayatollah
Mesbah-Yazdi was addressing a group of Lebanese Hezbollah members in the
Iranian city of Qom and explaining the significance of Imam Husayn's
martyrdom in Karbala in the seventh century. At the gathering, Ayatollah
Mesbah-Yazdi said: "The revolutions of this age, whether the Islamic
Revolution of Iran or the jihads of our brothers in Lebanon or the
revolutions that are occurring in other countries, are all inspired by the
story of Karbala, and just as our dear leader, Mr Sayyid Hasan Nasrallah,
has repeatedly said: Our slogan is, We'll follow you, O Husayn." According
to Mehr, Ayatollah Mesbah-Yazdi also said that he was very fond of Hasan
Nasrallah "because he is fully compliant with the velayat-e faqih and the
eminent leader". - Mehr news agency, Iran
Return to index of Iran Return to top of index
- "The Awakening warns of Al-Qa'idah's attempt to reorganize..."
On December 4, the Saudi owned Al-Hayat reported: "In a new security
challenge, the wave of assassinating the Awakening members in Baghdad and
other cities returned as it had been in the past after a number of them
were killed over the last few days. A former commander in the Islamic Army
said that what is going on "is a preparation for Al-Qa'idah's resumption
of its control on the areas that had been under its influence" and which
it lost after its followers reneged against it in 2007, while the head of
the Al-Anbar Salvation Council attributed the phenomenon to the release of
a large number of Al-Qa'idah's members from prison "through bribery and
political cover." A series of operations that targeted the Awakening
elements have taken place last Thursday and Friday in Diala and Al-Taji,
north of Baghdad, and the district of Shurqat, which is part of the Salah
al-Din Governorate, in which 14 leading figures, including the head of the
Al-Taji A wakening, were killed, in addition to three leading figures of
the Bahraz Awakening and their families.
"Hamad al-Shaykh, a former leading figure in the Islamic Army, said in a
telephone statement to Al-Hayat that what Al-Qa'idah is doing at present
is "implementing its schemes to resume its control on the areas that had
been under its influence." He pointed out that "part of its strategy is to
start creating a sectarian confusion or tribal hatred, such as tribal
vengeance, to undermine security and then to impose its hegemony."
Al-Qa'idah had lost most of its host places in the Sunni areas in 2007
after the people of these areas formed groups to hunt it down under the
name of Awakening forces that worked in coordination with the US forces,
which in turn, handed them over to the government. A government official
who works on the Awakening file downplayed these attacks and their
seriousness, pointing out that they are "limited attacks that target
individuals who carried out actions against the Organization in their
areas." He said that "this month will witness the resolution of the files
of 50,000 members of the Sons of Iraq (the name the government gave to the
Awakening members after it took them over from the Americans) before the
official declaration of the withdrawal of the last foreign soldier from
the country by reemploying them in the state military and civilian
"In a statement to Al-Hayat, Shaykh Hamid al-Hayis, head of the Al-Anbar
Salvation Council, attributed what the Awakening is facing to "the recent
rise in the strength of Al-Qa'idah and its control of remote areas. This
has been the reason behind their vengeance operations against the
Awakening. The attacks also aim to remove this obstacle facing their
schemes that target to return certain areas to its dark stage from which
it had driven them away." He added that "one of the elements of strength
possessed by this criminal organization was the release of a large number
of its imprisoned members, either due to the corruption within the ranks
of the police and terrorism fighting services or through the humanitarian
cover provided by political parties." On the seriousness of Al-Qa'idah in
reorganizing its ranks, Al-Hayis said that the Organization "will not
leave Iraq since it is now having the task of starting anew and it is now
controlling areas in western Al-Anbar, the Mosul i sland, and some areas
in Diala and Abu-Ghurayb." Shaykh Khamis al-Jayyar, former head of Salah
al-Din Governorate Council, called on the government "to take this
security challenge seriously and work out plans to confront it with the
participation of the army and police and in cooperation with the Awakening
elements."" - Al-Hayat, United Kingdom
Return to index of Iraq Return to top of index
- "Muqtada al-Sadr tells Asharq al-Awsat the Iraqi government..."
On December 5, the Saudi owned Asharq al-Awsat reported: "In a reference
to the Iraqi government that is still without the three security ministers
-Defence Minister, Interior Minister, and National Security Minister
-Iraqi cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, leader of the Al-Sadr Trend, has said: "It
is not important for the government to have all its ministers in place but
it is important for it to have its full mind in place". Al-Sadr warned
that the country would become stable only through dedication and devotion
and without favouring personal or factional or sectarian or partisan
interests". The leader of the Al-Sadr Trend added that the Iraqi
government is heading towards the "one-party rule". Asharq al-Awsat
interviewed Muqtada al-Sadr via his movement's foreign relations office in
London. His answers -to which his signature and seal were affixed -were
transmitted via the Internet. In the interview, Al-Sadr -whose trend
includes the Al-Ahrar Bloc t hat has 40 seats in the Iraqi parliament
-said that he was waiting for th! e "people's evaluation" of the
performance of the Al-Ahrar Bloc, adding "I am not the official spokesman
of the Al-Ahrar Bloc". Al-Sadr hoped that the Al-Ahrar Bloc's relations
with neighbouring countries "will be better, especially with Saudi Arabia,
which is a cherished neighbour, and Iran". He referred to his initiative
to bring about reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran. The text of
the interview is as follows:
"[Fayyad] How satisfied are you with the performance of the Iraqi
"[Al-Sadr] You should address this question to the people who continue to
suffer from the woes of occupation, terrorism, backwardness, poverty,
deprivation, absence of security, and shortages in basic services of daily
life. All this leads me not to evaluate the government because it is
outside the framework of evaluation.
"[Fayyad] By the end of this year, three years would have elapsed on the
formation of the Iraqi government; however, it is still missing three
ministers in the security field. Moreover, some are saying that this
government is not constitutional due to this deficiency. What is your
"[Al-Sadr] It is not important for the government to have all its
ministers in place but it is important for it to have its full mind in
place as well as its devotion, cohesion, and service to the wounded
people. A government ruled by corruption, deficiencies, bias,
partisanship, dictatorship, and personal interests is of no use. Some with
several posts may gain control over it and so on.
"[Fayyad] In your opinion, can the situation in the country stabilize
without the interior and defence ministers?
"[Al-Sadr] The country would become stable only through its dedication,
honesty, and concerted efforts in the service of its wounded people and a
government that does not favour personal or factional or sectarian or
partisan interests. What is the use of a minister or a party that favour
their own interests over others?
"[Fayyad] The period of six months that you offered to evaluate the
performance of the government is over. However, no one has noticed any
tangible improvement in the government's performance, especially in the
services, security, and economic files. What do you think are the suitable
measures that should be taken in this case?
"[Al-Sadr] The suitable measures are giving the people the chance to
express their opinion either through a referendum supervised by
independent organizations or through peaceful protests, demonstrations,
and so on. However, we think there are two obstacles: The first obstacle
is the dictatorship and the second obstacle is internal and external
circumstances from which the people are suffering such as hunger, fear,
and so on.
"[Fayyad] Iraq's foreign policy is confused. The government may take
stands that are contradicted by some members of the government or its
allies. This is particularly true regarding the issue of suspending
Syria's membership in the Arab League.
"[Al-Sadr] The Iraqi people's confusion regarding Syria is not as
important as their confusion on more important issues that directly and
immediately concern the Iraqi situation or rather the livelihood, freedom,
and liberation of the Iraqi people on which the politicians have not yet
reached agreement. This is because the government does not serve Iraq; it
is a government of political parties, partisanship, and sectarianism.
"[Fayyad] You and your trend represent the poor of Iraq as you protect
their rights. However, eight years have passed since the overthrow of the
former regime but the living conditions of the Iraqi people have not
changed. The only change has been that the poor became poorer and a new
class of rich people has surfaced. What did you do about this? What will
you do to help the poor of Iraq?
"[Al-Sadr] Thank you for this question. I suppose you mean what the
Al-Ahrar Bloc has done. If that is what you meant, I suggest you ask this
bloc because I am not its official spokesman. At any rate, I am waiting
for the people's evaluation of this bloc and of its actions. However, if
you meant the Trend and the civic side, we will not spare any effort to
serve the people; but "one can be generous with what one has".
"[Fayyad] Every now and then, files surface related to corruption of
prominent public and political figures. Al-Sadr Trend Deputy Baha
al-A'raji exposed some of these files; however, the public did not see any
serious measures to combat corruption or to refer corrupt financial and
administrative officials to the courts.
"[Al-Sadr] This is so because in general, such corruption cases are
happening during the watch of those in power. Some cover up for others; if
you do not expose my faults, I will not expose your corruption and so on.
"[Fayyad] Do you think that the Iraqi government is indeed a national
partnership government or is it a one-party (Al-Da'wah) government or a
one-sect government?
"[Al-Sadr] It is marching towards a one-party government. We raised this
issue in the past but no one was deterred.
"[Fayyad] Those objecting to the policy of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki
describe it as individualistic and that it is not made up of true national
"[Al-Sadr] We are trying to make it a national partnership government.
"[Fayyad] Before the government was formed, you were negotiating with and
holding dialogues with Dr Iyad Allawi, the leader of the Iraqi List.
Allawi has praised and continues to praise your patriotic stands. Why did
these dialogues not lead to an alliance with the Iraqi List to form the
"[Al-Sadr] I hope so and I also hope that the Iraqi List would enjoy
strength and firmness distant from the intrigues of the occupation, the
Ba'th, and domineering.
"[Fayyad] The majority of the Iraqis were surprised at your alliance with
the State of Law coalition and your support for Al-Maliki to keep his post
as prime minister although you and your trend opposed his policy and
practices particularly against your trend.
"[Al-Sadr] This question has been overtaken.
"[Fayyad] All the components of the National Alliance have the same colour
as the Shi'ite sect. Did you alliance with Al-Maliki proceed from a
sectarian premise?
"[Al-Sadr] And did my attempts to form an alliance with the Iraqi List and
my meeting with brother Iyad Allawi in Syria, God protect it, also proceed
from a sectarian premise? This naturally rebuts the allegation. However,
what is important for you know is that the Shias are the majority at
present and cannot be ignored in forming alliances.
"[Fayyad] What is the degree of Iran's influence on the structure of the
National Alliance and its support for Al-Maliki to remain in power?
"[Al-Sadr] I am not the spokesman of either of them; you may ask them.
"[Fayyad] How do you assess your relations with the Arab and Islamic
neighbouring countries?
"[Al-Sadr] They were good and now I am trying to understand that. I hope
they could be better, especially with the neighbouring countries,
particularly Saudi Arabia and Iran and the remaining countries like Egypt
and the United Arab Emirates without any exception.
"[Fayyad] How do you assess your relations with the Kingdom of Saudi
"[Al-Sadr] Saudi Arabia is a cherished neighbour, but ask them about their
relations with Iraq and the Al-Sadr Trend.
"[Fayyad] Some describe your relationship with Iran as distinctive. Does
this mean that Tehran influence your domestic stands especially?
"[Al-Sadr] Do good relations mean exerting influence on a decision-making
"[Fayyad] You proposed an initiative for reconciliation between Saudi
Arabia and Iran. Are you still committed to this initiative and to
undertaking it?
"[Al-Sadr] Yes; unfortunately, however, I received a reply -or perhaps it
was a reply -only from the Republic of Iran.
"[Fayyad] How do you assess the relations and conditions between the Iraqi
political blocs, especially in view of the give and take between Allawi
and Al-Maliki? The former maintains that he was more entitled to form the
government since the Iraqi List won the elections and the latter is backed
by Iran and the United States.
"[Al-Sadr] It is a struggle for survival and for remaining in power
without serving the people.
"[Fayyad] What do you think of the suggestion to hold early elections? Is
this the solution, do you think?
"[Al-Sadr] It may be the solution and it may not.
"[Fayyad] Do you think the give and take between the Iraqi List and the
State of Law is a Sunni-Shi'ite one or is it purely a political one?
"[Al-Sadr] It is not totally free of sectarianism and that is I and my
supporters remained distant from it. Although I tried to fix things,
politics prevailed over public interests.
"[Fayyad] Do you think that the landscape of political alliances among the
blocs in Iraq will change? If it does change, with whom will you form an
"[Al-Sadr] We have not yet decided, that is, if we participate in the
elections again.
"[Fayyad] What do you think of Al-Maliki's objection to forming the
districts although it is a guaranteed constitutional right for the
"[Al-Sadr] Although it is a constitutional right and needs steps, I prefer
to defer it but without deferring it until the departure of the occupiers.
It is up to the constitution.
"[Fayyad] You oppose the presence of the US forces in Iraq but as the
occupation forces begin to leave, do you think that the Iraqi air space
and borders would be protected in light of the absence of air defence
forces and a shortage in equipment of the Iraqi forces?
"[Al-Sadr] Nothing good comes from an air space protected by the
occupiers. Let the occupiers leave and the decision will be made by Iraq
and its people.
"[Fayyad] How do you think can the crisis on the political, services,
security, and economic levels in Iraq be resolved?
"[Al-Sadr] There can be no services in the presence of partisanship,
factionalism, sectarianism, and if private interests prevail over public
interests." - Asharq al-Awsat, United Kingdom
Return to index of Iraq Return to top of index
- *Camp David accord is faltering*
On December 6, the Palestinian-owned Al-Quds al-Arabi daily carried the
following lead editorial: *The Israeli government has been watching up
close the developments affecting the situation in Egypt, ever since the
popular revolution was able to topple President Hosni Mubarak*s regime,
which constituted a loyal ally, the sustainer of the peace process with it
and the protector of its border. However, it is certain that this
monitoring has increased and has started to be blemished with deep
concerns following the emergence of the preliminary results of the
Egyptian legislative elections, in which the Islamists * both the Muslim
Brotherhood and the Salafis * achieved a crushing victory. The Israelis
know very well that the issue over which the Egyptians are all in
agreement is their opposition and that of their obnoxious occupation and
humiliating demands*
*The only difference is related to the extent of this opposition and the
size of this hostility. Indeed, while they reach their peak among the
Islamists, they might have similar or lesser extents among the liberals,
depending on each person*s beliefs and convictions. What the Israelis are
getting at the level of the Egyptian file is the ongoing commitment to the
Camp David Accord which regulates the peace agreements and consequently
the relations between the two countries. Throughout the last 40 years,
Israel enjoys a calm it would have never even dreamed of, after the
Egyptian regime became the safe guardian of its border and prevented any
infiltration through it, whether by resistance men or African immigrants
seeking economic exile.
*This was clearly expressed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
during a speech he delivered yesterday and in which he stressed the
necessity of hastening the construction of the isolation wall on the
Egyptian-Israeli border, hoping that the new Egyptian government will
respect the peace agreements. At this level, the observers * and we are
among them * noted that his tone was calm, non-arrogant and did not
feature any issuance of orders as it used to be the case in his previous
speeches. Netanyahu is well aware of the fact that the times of Egyptian
submission are long gone*, and that the new Egyptian regime which is
taking form in the ballot boxes will set the foundations for a new era
throughout the Arab region under the headline of ending the Israeli
occupation of Arab lands and the regaining of the nation*s wasted dignity
due to the wars and defeats*
*But what Netanyahu and all the extremists adopting his methods and way of
thinking are failing to realize is that isolation walls will not protect
the Israelis. The same could be said about the lacking and humiliating
peace agreements, at the head of which is the Camp David Accord. What
could protect the Israelis however would be for them to step down from
their high horses, accept the others, coexist with them as equals and
discontinue their wars and occupations. Egypt is changing fast, and so is
the entire Arab region. But Israel is refusing to change* which is why it
is being isolated from its surroundings and constituting a burden to its
Western friends** - Al-Quds al-Arabi, United Kingdom
Click here for source
Return to index of Israel Return to top of index
- *Syrian situation hinders Jordan*s joining of the GCC*
On December 7, the Islamist Al-Sabil daily carried the following report:
*The fact that Saudi Arabia is having second thoughts concerning Jordan*s
decision to join the GCC constituted a heavyweight surprise for the
decision-making centers in Amman, according to some well-informed sources.
These sources spoke about political and economic concerns that hindered
the idea of joining, mainly the worsened situation in Syria. The Gulf
people are afraid that this situation will adversely reflect on the
Jordanian situation.
*The sources told Al-Sabil that secret communication calls are currently
being conducted by a number of Jordanian officials with their Saudi
counterparts. These calls aim at learning the new directions of the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the reason behind the statements that were
recently made by Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faysal when he said:
*There are reservations on the joining of an additional country to the
GCC. What we are currently doing consists of supporting a suggestion to be
made to the high leaders during their upcoming summit. The suggestion
consists of providing our brothers with sufficient aid.*
*A prominent source told Al-Sabil that some Gulf countries are working to
abort the Jordanian efforts because they fear that the [Jordanian] kingdom
will be affected by the tension taking place in its northern neighbor.
This was a reference to the violent events taking place in Syria. The
source * who preferred to remain anonymous * said that *some Gulf
countries are not hiding their concern about the Syrian crisis being
exported to Jordan. They also do not want to bear a new economic weight
represented by the support of a poor country.*
*According to the sources, the UAE, Oman and Qatar believe that Jordan*s
joining of the GCC is a far-fetched matter and that the joining decision
will not be sufficient to prevent any political turmoil on the Jordanian
land. They also considered that the economic privileges and incentives
that will be offered to the kingdom will also be unable to put a brake on
the possible degradation of the local situation.
*But what mostly worries former Editor in Chief of the Al-Arab al-Yawm
newspaper Fahd al-Khitan is that the Gulf council has *formed a new
position consisting of letting go of Jordan.* He told Al-Sabil that the
*worrisome scenario for the kingdom is that the Gulf will abandon it in
the face of an unknown fate in case it was subjected to a popular
revolution. Some Gulf countries expect a definite revolution in Jordan
after the success of the Syrian revolution.* Al-Khitan fears the presence
of an Israeli-American coordination with some Gulf countries with the aim
or creating a state of turmoil within Jordan thus achieving political
benefits for the Hebrew state, namely opting for the choice of the
surrogate country. He added: *We must not trust any American or Israeli
position concerning Jordan. During the Arab Spring, America failed to
stand by the side of any of the regimes that were friendly to it.*
*Persons close to the decision-making circles said that a final formula
has lately been adopted by the Gulf in order to deal with the needs of the
kingdom. This formula consists of granting Amman a special program of aid
extending over five years. These persons also spoke about official efforts
being made at this phase with the aim of decreasing the Gulf statements
that could cause a disappointment* According to political Writer and
Analyst Dr. Mohammad Abu Romman, *The failure of Jordan to join the GCC
was expected from the beginning. Indeed, the position of the UAE and Oman
and Qatar was oscillating between expressing doubts and rejection...*
*There is a third possible motive * according to observers * that perhaps
stands behind the Saudi second thoughts concerning the inclusion of Jordan
and Morocco to the GCC. This motive relates to the ascent of the Islamists
in the last Moroccan elections and the appointment of the Secretary
General of the Justice and Development party, Abdelilah Benkirane to the
formation of the cabinet. This was accompanied by positions and statements
made by the government of Awn al-Khasawneh concerning the MB group and the
Hamas movement that were considered to be positive statements. In
addition, there are signs and indications of upcoming steps that will be
made in the reform path that might not please the Gulf sides** - Al-Sabil,
Click here for source
Return to index of Jordan Return to top of index
- *Nasrallah and his defiant appearance*
On December 7, the Palestinian-owned Al-Quds al-Arabi daily carried the
following lead editorial: *The public and direct appearance of Hezbollah
leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah to address his supporters in Lebanon, and
not via a television screen as has been the case during the last few
years, reveals one of two things: either the man is at the peak of his
confidence and control or that he has entered a martyrdom-seeking stage
and decided to be in the forefront, steadfast and defiant toward all his
enemies, whether inside or outside Lebanon. Both possibilities are on the
table and would even be difficult to separate, considering that the first
option complements the second. Yet, this phenomenon of defiance is unique
at this point in time, especially since many have started to believe that
the status of Iran and Syria*s allies is not solid in light of the
mounting actions of the popular uprising on Syrian soil, the Arab League*s
increasing threa ts and the intensified and consecutive Western sieges.
*Through this surprising appearance, whether at the level of its quality
or its boldness, Sayyed Nasrallah might have wanted to deliver a message
to his supporters firstly * on Ashoura day in particular * to assure that
the party was still strong and defiant, to his opponents saying he was
ready for the confrontation and did not fear it or its repercussions and
to his allies in Syria saying that he was still in their camp, leading
their battle on their behalf or in coordination with them in the face of
the spears directed against them from all sides.
*It was not surprising to see Sayyed Nasrallah pouring his anger on Dr.
Borhan Ghalioun, the head of the Syrian national council who said he will
sever Syria*s relations with Hezbollah and Iran if he were to reach power
following the toppling of the ruling Syrian regime, considering that the
opponents of the regime in Damascus are Hezbollah*s opponents and that its
toppling would mark the beginning of the end for the party and the
marginalization of its role on the Lebanese arena* Many blamed Sayyed
Nasrallah for not supporting the Syrian uprising and for not exerting
pressures on the Syrian regime to cooperate with the legitimate demands of
the citizens* Some of this blame * or most of it * was right on the mark.
*However, Sayyed Nasrallah, just like his supporters and a wide faction of
the Lebanese people, still believe that the Syrian regime is the only one
among the Arab regimes still supporting the Lebanese and Palestinian
resistance. However, this believe has become the object of controversy and
doubts in the ranks of many sides, whether on sectarian bases or a lack of
conviction in this talk from the beginning. By criticizing Dr. Ghalioun,
accusing him of standing in the American trench, praising the Syrian
regime and its rejectionism and placing himself in the face of the Syrian
opposition and the Arab League*, Sayyed Nasrallah adopted a courageous
choice although many differ with him...
*Some might argue that Sayyed Nasrallah has no other choice and this is
true. Therefore, it is likely to see the translation of this Samson option
into practical steps, to throw a match in an Arab region which is already
ablaze and filled with explosives.* - Al-Quds al-Arabi, United Kingdom
Click here for source
Return to index of Lebanon Return to top of index
Middle East
- *Looking for a new leadership for the Arab world*
On December 7, the Al-Arab al-Yawm daily carried the following piece by
Adnan Hayajena: *Are we before a new leadership for the Arab world? This
question must be discussed in light of the strategic developments and
changes in the Arab world, especially as the Arab Spring has blown over
the traditional leaders in the region such as Egypt, Syria and others, and
as the regional power balances have been upset for the benefit of Israel,
Iran, Turkey and the large umbrella of the Arab world, the USA.
*One can say that America controlled and led the world at the end of World
War II* The Arab world is now going through an interim phase that has
proved that this world represents a confrontation arena in light of the
void in Arab leadership and the increasingly strong Turkish role. Indeed,
[Turkey] is looking for a prominent place and a regional role in the
Middle East. In addition, the Iranian role has reaped a lot of benefits as
a result of the strategic mistakes of the USA in the region; in addition
to Israel, which is supported by the USA. Israel is still shaping the
American role in the region by directing American foreign policies and by
determining the priorities such as the case of the Iranian nuclear file.
Thus, the Arab countries remain in the phase of narrow national theories
and reactions, after obtaining the approval of the USA of course*
*In the past decades, the Arab region has gone through the phase of the
absence of a role, especially when Egypt signed the Camp David accord and
when the Arab countries signed direct or indirect peace treaties with
Israel in the post-September 11 phase with the hope that the American
approval [of these Arab countries] will come through Israel. But the
results were disastrous for the Palestinian cause where the regional roles
and international pressures collided.
*The events taking place in the Arab region call for a definitive
leadership of the region* I believe that there is no country that is
currently ready to lead the Arab world. In this world, which is based on
the concept of self-help*, there must be serious thinking about coming up
with an Arab leadership that will grant the Arabs an important role on the
international arena and that will transform them into a major force like
many other countries.
*However, many countries that are expected to play a regional and
international part might actually be unsuited to play this part. Indeed,
Saudi Arabia is suffering from the Iranian problem. It is also suffering
from domestic and regional problems. The developments connected to the
Arab Spring will not allow it to lead the Arab world, especially as some
Gulf forces are rebelling against Saudi Arabia*s role in the region. As
for Egypt, it might be the most suitable country to lead the Arab world
especially if it re-arranges its domestic affairs and if it becomes a
democratic country that contains all the parties that are now coming on to
the Arab political scene, meaning the Islamic forces.
*The absence of an Arab role and effective leadership will cause the
region to remain a laboratory for western and regional theories. Indeed,
the failure to have an Arab intervention in Iraq thrust Iraq into the
Iranian lap. And the failure to intervene in the Palestinian cause has
thrust Hamas into the Iranian and Turkish laps. And the failure to
intervene in Libya has led to the return of the American role for the
tenth time. And now, the Arab world will witness, once again, a return to
the American lap on the Iranian nuclear file and the Syrian file.
*It seems that no country is capable or willing to lead the Arab region.
Some had hoped that the GCC would constitute the nucleus of a regional
force that will restore the effect of the Arab world on its surroundings;
but some narrow calculations led to the failure of this project. The Arab
world remained in the headless phase while the body is being tossed around
by regional forces into the sea of international and regional
developments. More remains to be said on this issue.* - Al-Arab al-Yawm,
Click here for source
Return to index of Middle East Return to top of index
- *The labor is an Arab one and the newborn is Erdoganian!*
On December 7, Abdel Rahman Abdel Moula al-Solh wrote the following
opinion piece in the independent Al-Rai al-Aam daily: *The main challenge
that is facing the Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brothers * who have
won the majority of parliamentary seats in Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, and
soon perhaps in Libya and Syria * lies in the capacity of the Islamic
movement to avoid using religion in political disputes. Here, I am
reminded of a quote by Sheikh Mohammad Metwalli al-Shaarawi that goes: *I
will be very happy if the right religion were to reach politics. But I
will be immensely worried if politics were to reach the clerics.*
*The second [challenge] consists of creating harmony between Islam as a
religion, and all aspects of modernism similarly to what the Turkish
Development and Justice party did under the leadership of Recep Tayyip
Erdogan* But the difference is that Turkish political Islam, unlike its
twin brother Arab political Islam, grew up in a purely secular
environment. It is as if there were no escape from adapting to the
[secular] atmosphere*
*The statements of the officials of the Arab MB movements * interestingly,
the name of their party is similar to the name of the Turkish party *
stress their keenness to follow democratic rules and to acknowledge the
others and to respect freedom of opinion and belief* In addition, they
have now become the focus of attention of the entire world including all
the world*s political and intellectual institutions. Thus, any overlooking
of the above values will subject them to major pressures that they do not
*The victory of the Islamic movement was expected because the general
ambiance in the Arab world has become an Islamic one for several reasons
that we will hereby summarize in order not to be too long: The failure of
the Arab national/socialist regime, oppression, corruption, and others.
*However, their victory cannot be possibly attributed to pure internal
reasons. The sure thing is that there is an international desire (American
and European) to spread Erdoganian Islam in the Arab world. Arab political
Islam (or the Muslim Brothers) has reached power through a popular
majority. Their rule is expected to be based on three givens:
- Confronting, or let us say, opposing the Iranian politics of expansion.
- Respecting the treaties that were signed with Israel (this mainly
concerns Egypt).
- Giving priority to, and enhancing economic interests with the West.
*But the question to be raised is: Will the Erdoganian wind blow over the
area of the Gulf?! A friend of mine was wondering about the chaos that is
prevailing over the Arab world. I answered him by saying: Did you ever
hear about a mother delivering with no pain or screams? This is the labor
that precedes the birth. As for the newborn, perhaps he is meant to look
like*[ellipses as published] Recep Tayyip Erdogan.* - Al-Rai al-Aam,
Click here for source
Return to index of Middle East Return to top of index
- *After the political revolution*
On December 7, the independent, leftist As-Safir daily carried the
following opinion piece by Suleiman Takieddine: *The fact that the
Salafists obtained more than 20 percent of the voters* votes during the
first round of the Egyptian elections came as a surprise. The Salafists
and the Muslim brothers obtained more than 60 percent. This means that
they are the majority within the parliament and they can take over the
executive authority. But the difference between the two sides when it
comes to how they view the nature of *Islamic rule* might prevent an
agreement and monopolization of power.
*The Salafists reject the separation between temporal and religious
[matters], and between the nature of authority and the culture of society.
The Salafist movement is present in the Arab world in several forms. In
Egypt, it strongly appeared with the assassination of President Anwar
Sadat and in light of the armed conflicts with the authorities until the
mid-seventies* The social environment of the Salafists is the poorest,
unlike the other radical Islamists who are distributed across all the
social groups and even among the high economic and cultural elite.
*The fact that the Salafists have taken part in the elections represents a
development in their stand when it comes to the political regime and to
their acceptance of the democratic game. This will lead to important
outcomes reflected in their practices, train of thought, and relations*
The Salafists are working to change society rather than the ruling system.
The totalitarian Salafist train of thought includes all the different
social factions and the many human components. The violence practiced by
the Salafists makes them a tool for religious authority and its
*The Islamists in Tunisia and Egypt have started to express their
radicalism in confronting the other forces and intellectual and political
movements. They are acting as if they are in charge of controlling
society* Taking control of the state or authority is still the key to all
the other transformations. The state in the Arab system is not an
independent structure. Society does not have any tools for acting and
pressuring except for the tools of moral and material violence*
*The Islamists are now winning the elections without having any programs
aimed at solving the daily livelihood problems of the masses* As for the
liberal parties, these have a weaker organizational reality. They were
never allowed to have a democratic activity nor are they capable of
reaching power, either in parliaments or in unions, or even in public
administrations. The Arab public everywhere has staged political
revolutions with social implications. But most of the masses and most of
the movements and most of the leaders come from the middle classes. The
parties and movements have competed for political movement and for
repelling tyranny. They need time in order to be separated into parties
that will be in charge of coming up with ruling programs or parties
responding to social and national problems. The important thing is that
the future conflict must be confined to the framework of freedom and
democracy.* - As-Safir, Lebanon
Click here for source
Return to index of Middle East Return to top of index
- *Pakistani info on return of Ben Laden*s widows to Saudi Arabia**
On December 5, the Saudi-owned London-based Al-Hayat daily carried in its
paper edition the following report by its correspondents in Islamabad and
Riyadh Jamal Ismail and Nasser al-Hakbkani: *The Pakistani authorities
confirmed that the Saudi authorities have agreed to the return of the
family of Osama Bin Laden to the Kingdom... This development comes after
the Pakistani commission investigating the raid on Ben Laden*s house in
the city of Abbottabad has concluded its work. An official in the
Pakistani Interior Ministry was quoted in this regard by Al-Hayat as
saying: *Saudi Arabia has approved the Pakistani request to extradite Ben
Laden*s two widows and their children** However, Saudi Ambassador to
Pakistan Abdul Aziz al-Ghadir denied to Al-Hayat having been officially
informed by the Pakistani side about this issue.
*He added: *I have heard in the media that Osama Ben Laden*s older brother
had presented a demand to Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah
Bin Abdul-Aziz, asking that his brother*s family be allowed to go back to
the Kingdom. But until now, I did not receive any official instructions.*
For its part, the Pakistani official source who insisted on remaining
anonymous said that the judicial committee had interviewed Bin Laden*s
wife and that the Pakistani authorities allowed American investigators to
do the same. A source close to Bin Laden*s family told Al-Hayat that Bin
Laden*s eldest brother had pleaded with the Saudi king to restore the
Saudi nationality to his brother*s family*
*The source added: *It has become clear that Bin Laden*s family will be
allowed to go back to Saudi Arabia after the king agreed to the demand
presented to him for that purpose. They will thus join the other family
members in the Kingdom very soon.* A source in the armed groups operating
in the Pakistani tribal areas told Al-Hayat that the Pakistani authorities
had received a letter of warning from Al-Qa*idah and the armed tribes,
against extraditing Bin Laden*s family to the United States. The armed
groups noted that they did not oppose the return of the family to Saudi
Arabia, adding: *This letter encouraged the Pakistani authorities to
accept Riyadh*s proposal to host Osama Bin Laden*s family.* It is also
expected to see the family leaving Pakistan within the two or three coming
days. Al-Hayat has learned that Bin Laden*s widows and children will be
brought back to Saudi Arabia on a private jet.* - Al-Hayat, United Kingdom
Click here for source
Return to index of Pakistan Return to top of index
- *Fatah members call for preparations to engage in presidential
On December 6, the Palestinian-owned Al-Quds al-Arabi daily carried the
following report by Walid Awad: *Jamal Moheisen, a member in Fatah*s
Central Committee, assured Al-Quds al-Arabi on Monday that his movement
was still insisting on upholding Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas as
its candidate in the next presidential elections. Moheisen added to
Al-Quds al-Arabi: *President Mahmoud Abbas is Fatah*s candidate in the
next elections* There is no competition* No one from the Central Committee
is running in these elections.* Regarding Abbas* repeated announcement
that he had no intention of running in the presidential elections,
Moheisen said: *The issue was not debated at the Central Committee.
However, the Committee is insisting on convincing brother Abu Mazen to be
its candidate.*
*Asked about the fact that some members of the Central Committee offered
to run in the presidential elections, Moheisen said: *None of the members
of the Central Committee offered to run for that post. Not one. Fatah is
insisting that Abu Mazen be its candidate...* He then indicated that the
Palestinian presidential and legislative elections expected to be held in
May in accordance with the Palestinian reconciliation agreement will be
different from the legislative elections which were held in 2006 and led
to Hamas*s victory. He continued: *The situation today is not the same as
in 2006. During those elections, Hamas was not in power and won due to the
negative practices of power. But today, Hamas experienced power and the
people experienced it in the Gaza Strip. I am consequently sure that only
Hamas*s members will elect it.*
*Regarding Fatah, Moheisen assured that none of the movement*s cadres will
be allowed to violate the movement*s consensus and decision vis-a-vis its
candidates in the upcoming elections, denying the possibility of seeing
the staging of an urgent general conference for the movement, including
the Central Committee, the Revolutionary Council and the Consultative
Council, to choose the candidates in the next elections* In this context,
Al-Quds al-Arabi learned that after Abbas announced from Vienna last week
that the Palestinian presidential and legislative elections will be held
in May * based on the agreement with Hamas * many members in Fatah*s
Central Committee talked during their private sessions about the necessity
of preparing the movement to engage in these elections and choose a
leading candidate enjoying a presence in the movement*s ranks to run for
president, in light of Abbas* refusal to run*
*Sources in Fatah mentioned that Azzam al-Ahmad was hoping he would be
chosen as Fatah*s candidate in the presidential elections, at a time when
Dr. Muhammad Ashtieh believes he is most fit to assume that post. It is
said in the meantime that Dr. Sa*eb Erekat is the president*s candidate to
head the authority, considering he is a member of the Central Committee
and the PLO Executive Committee* Amid this battle over Fatah*s candidate
and the silence of Dr. Nasser al-Qudwa, whose name was previously put
forward as a possible candidate*, Dr. Salam Fayyad is waiting for the
situation to become clearer inside Fatah and for it to choose its
candidate for the next presidential elections. In this context, Al-Quds
al-Arabi learned from sources close to Fayyad that the latter will run in
the next Palestinian presidential elections if Abbas were to insist on his
*The sources indicated that Fayyad was relying on the popular respect he
secured in the Palestinians* ranks, particularly in the West Bank, through
the palpable results he achieved on the ground in terms of development,
reconstruction and acceptance by the international community...* - Al-Quds
al-Arabi, United Kingdom
Click here for source
Return to index of Palestine Return to top of index
- *Hamas limits its presence in Syria**
On December 6, the Saudi-owned London-based Al-Hayat daily carried in its
paper edition the following report by its correspondent in Ramallah
Mohammad Youness: *Well informed sources revealed to Al-Hayat that the
Hamas Movement has decided to decrease its presence in Syria and that it
had issued instructions to all its members who were still present in
Syria, asking them to leave the country if they are able to find a safe
location. The sources added: *Most of Hamas*s members who are originally
from Gaza already went back to the Strip, while many others headed to
Turkey, Lebanon and Qatar.*
*The well informed sources added: *We can confirm that all of Hamas*s
elements who are members in movement*s military wing have already left
Syria, while only a limited number of political leaders stayed. But their
number is very small since most of the political leaders have already left
in light of the latest developments taking place throughout the country.
The movement*s leadership has decided to leave Syria since it considers
that the deterioration of the security situation and instability were very
worrying.* It must be noted in this regard that Al-Arabiya website had
reported that Hamas had indeed diminished its presence in Syria.
*The website quoted a diplomatic source in Hamas as saying: *During the
last few weeks, dozens of Hamas militants have left Syria to Gaza through
Egypt * Hamas will keep a symbolic presence in Damascus in order to
preserve its advantages in the post-Assad regime. The Hamas officials are
spending their time in airplanes, trying to develop their relations with
Turkey, Qatar, Sudan and Egypt. These officials are also trying hard to
find new headquarters for the movement outside of Syria.* It must be noted
however, that the Hamas officials are insisting on publically denying any
desire to leave Damascus and to move their headquarters to another Arab
capital. In this respect, when Sami Abu Zahri, the official spokesman for
Hamas, was asked about this issue, he said: *Nothing has changed. The
situation will remain as it is.** - Al-Hayat, United Kingdom
Click here for source
Return to index of Palestine Return to top of index
- "...[Al-Zahhar:] I am still a member of Hamas..."
On November 29, the Palestinian owned Al-Quds al-Arabi reported: "Dr
Mahmud al-Zahhar, member of HAMAS Political Bureau, has denied in an
exclusive statement to Al-Quds al-Arabi that there is any decision by the
Movement to suspend his organizational work, and said that what has been
published about this issue is a sort of "a big lie," and said, while
speaking about the reconciliation file, that there is no "logic" in the
solutions presented to end the division. Al-Zahhar, who is one of the most
prominent leaders of HAMAS, said in a comment on what is said about a
decision by HAMAS to suspend his organizational work by saying that "this
is a big lie fabricated by one of the journalist." Al-Zahhar pointed out
that the person who published the report has relied on unreliable sources,
pointing out that the reasons of this was that he did not answer several
calls made by one of the journalists, who "fabricated the news about the
suspension by the Movement." He stressed that he is still a member of
HAMAS Political Bureau, which is the highest leadership authority in the
"A difference in opinion had taken place between Al-Zahhar and Khalid
Mish'al, head of HAMAS Political Bureau, following the latter's speech at
the signing ceremony of the reconciliation agreement in Cairo last May
after Al-Zahhar rejected giving another chance for the negotiations with
Israel. Following that, Al-Zahhar did not attend the dialogue meetings
held between Fatah and HAMAS. In his statement to Al-Quds al-Arabi, he
denied that his absence was due to the Movement's decision to exclude him
from participation in the reconciliation delegation. Al-Zahhar, who
participated in all previous dialogue meetings since they began and until
the signing of the reconciliation paper, said that his recent absence has
been because he is not convinced that there "logic in ending the
division," holding President Mahmud Abbas and Fatah Movement responsible
for this situation. The prominent HAMAS leader said that it is possible
that he participates in the next session in Cairo, which is scheduled to
be held on 22 December if he sees, as he said, "a good agenda for the
session and that the meeting is not just an opportunity to sit and have
dialogue for the purpose of absurd objectives."
"He also said that any person or delegation from HAMAS who goes to the
dialogue would be a representative of the Movement since his Movement goes
with "a unified and agreed on stand." He pointed out the differences in
opinion take place inside the Movement and are overcome and resolved
through taking the opinion of the majority. It is noteworthy that
Al-Zahhar has recently left the Gaza Strip for Damascus where he attended
a meeting for HAMAS Political Bureau. Meanwhile, Al-Zahhar accused both
President Abbas and Fatah Movement of being "unserious" about implementing
the articles of the reconciliation agreement. He said that "President
Abbas has asked that Salam Fayyad be the head of the accord government,"
and said that this was due to a pressure from the United States and the
Western countries. He disapprovingly asked: "Has Abu-Mazin not learned
from his previous experience with the United States, which threatened to
use the veto against the state, and stopped its support f or the UNESCO,
which accepted Palestine's membership?"
"He played down the outcome of the previous dialogue session, which was
attended by Abbas and Khalid Mish'al, and said that it has been agreed in
the meeting before the last session to resolve two points, which are the
file of the political detention and ending the crisis of the passports,
pointing out that these issues have not been implemented. He said that at
the last meeting, it has been agreed to solve the file of political
detainees, hold the elections, and set a date for convening the
comprehensive dialogue session. He expressed belief that agreeing on the
date of the elections "is illogical," pointing out that there will not b e
enough time for any accord government that is formed to prepare for
holding these elections. He explained that the date of holding the
elections should be announced three months earlier in accordance with the
law, and said that the government has not been formed yet, and the process
of forming it may take months. He expected that the governmen t would be
formed by the end of next February if the session of 22 December is held
and if an agreement is reached in it on forming the government, and said
that this is due to the consultations on the formation of the government.
He stressed that the remaining time "is not enough" for any government to
prepare for holding the elections in light of the fact that the elections
committee and the elections court have not been formed. In his statement
to Al-Quds al-Arabi, Al-Zahhar said that this is due to "the lack of logic
in understanding the process of resolving the differences and ending the
division," stressing that the elections cannot be held two months after
the formation of the accord government.
"According to the recent agreement between Fatah and HAMAS in Cairo, it
has been agreed to hold the elections on the date that had been agreed on,
which is May next year. All the Palestinian organizations are due to
participate in the next reconciliation meeting to agree on the formation
of the government and the PLO leadership framework, which would be formed
of the secretaries general of the Palestinian factions and members of the
PLO Executive Committee." - Al-Quds al-Arabi, United Kingdom
Return to index of Palestine Return to top of index
- *Al-Turabi: Bringing down the regime is not impossible**
On December 6, the Saudi-owned London-based Asharq al-Awsat newspaper
carried the following report by its correspondent in London Imam Mohammad
Imam: ** Rumors have been circulating in Khartoum regarding the possible
death of the leader of the Popular Congress Party, Hassan al-Turabi. This
forced Doctor Al-Turabi to make a public appearance to refute these false
rumors. Members in his party accused the ruling National Congress Party of
being behind this information* For his part, Al-Turabi told Asharq
al-Awsat that despite the many financial difficulties faced by his party,
still it was attached to the staging of the second congress in Khartoum.
*Al-Turabi added: *We succeeded in gathering over three thousand members
in the capital for our second congress in order to discuss very urgent
matters. These three thousand participants all came because they felt that
there was an urgent need to topple the current regime and put an end to
the ongoing wars that are tearing our country apart* I know that many
people have heard the rumors which circulated on the internet and claimed
that I was dead. They did not want me to die in prison so they sent me
home, and when they saw that I remained silent for some time, they spread
these rumors. I was silent because Sudan is silent, because my country is
sick and because all of Sudan is currently in prison.*
*Al-Turabi added: *Sudan is facing major threats, especially after the
secession of the South. This made us lose the very important oil revenues
and was followed by wars erupting in the provinces of South Kordofan, the
Blue Nile and of course the Darfur crisis. In addition to all that, the
specter of famine is haunting Sudan because rainfall is late, which will
affect the agricultural regions* Corruption is widespread and people have
lost hope in seeing any real reforms being implemented. At a time when all
this is happening, the state officials are only preoccupied with
preserving their chairs and protecting themselves from the international
arrest warrants... This is why we need to get rid of this regime and join
the Arab spring revolutions* This is why there is an urgent need to unify
the opposition forces in order to bring this regime down with the least
possible damage and this is not impossible. If the Sudanese people untie
and work hand in hand, they will be able to to pple this regime and rid
themselves of tyranny*** - Asharq al-Awsat, United Kingdom
Click here for source
Return to index of Sudan Return to top of index
- *Syria*s Kurds: What do they expect from the new constitution**
On December 6, the state-controlled Al-Watan daily carried the following
opinion piece by Kurdish dignitary in Al-Hasaka Khosro Aziz As*ad: ** The
Kurdish people have been living on their historical land for ages, and
have been contributing * alongside neighboring and coexisting populations
* to the weaving of the civilizational fabric of the region throughout the
historical stages. But due to Kurdistan*s strategic position and richness,
it was invaded by its neighboring empire. Its first division was in 1639
between the Safavid and Ottoman empires* But following the colonial
Sykes-Picot agreement, it was divided in four between Iran, Iraq, Turkey
and Syria*
*Since that time, the Kurdish people considered themselves to be among the
citizens of the Syrian state, while despite all that was done to the
Kurdish people and the division of their country by the colonial European
countries, they were able to integrate the Syrian community with all its
ethnic and religious components, thus becoming a key element on the
national arena and offering many martyrs to ensure Syria*s independence*
Later on, the Kurds played an important role in building the modern Syrian
state, and the first elected president, the late Muhammad Ali al-Abid, was
a Kurdish deputy from Damascus, not to forget figures such as Muhammad
al-Barazi, leader Fawzi Sello, President Husni al-Za'im, Muhammad Kurd and
Adib Shishakli along with many national figures who never hesitated to
participate in all the liberation battles*, especially the ones against
the Israeli occupation whether in the Golan or in Lebanon*
*Hence, it is necessary to find just solutions to the Kurdish cause in
Syria, in order to guarantee total equality for the Syrian Kurds via the
constitution currently being drafted for the country in order to ensure
their constitutional, political, social and legal rights based on Syria*s
unity as a land and people. They should thus earn full citizenship rights,
seeing how the Kurds in Syria are present on their historical land and are
a key component of Syrian society. Hence, they should be mentioned in the
country*s constitution as the second largest ethnicity in Syria, in
preparation for the resolution of all the problems and what they caused in
terms of injustices and exceptional measures. The recognition of the
Kurdish problem in Syria means:
*1- Not perceiving them as immigrants*
*2- The perception of the cultural difference of the Kurds as being a
dialogue tool, not a means of differentiation from the remaining factions
of society*
*3- The redrafting of the Kurdish political project within the general
concept of the state, i.e. lead it away from the limited calls for
citizenship seen today, but also from the cultural rights advocated by the
majority of the Kurdish factions** - Al-Watan Syria, Syria
Click here for source
Return to index of Syria Return to top of index
- **Ghalioun to Mustaqbal: Assad regime*s months are numbered*
On December 5, the pro-March 14 Hariri-owned Al-Mustaqbal newspaper
carried the following interview with head of the Syrian National Council,
Dr. Borhan Ghalioun:
**Q: *What is the current status of the Syrian opposition? What are the
latest agreements with the national coordination committee? Will you all
unify in one opposition council or will the national council continue to
be the official interlocutor in the name of all the opposition?
A: *Today, the Syrian opposition is in agreement over one vision and that
is the most important thing. The opposition forces all around the world
are not necessarily unified within one political entity. Hence,
unification is not a goal, especially since we offered the leaders of the
National Coordination Committee for Democratic Change to join the Syrian
National Council like all the other opposition factions, but they affirmed
they did not want to do so*
Q: *Did you reach a final agreement over a work paper? What is its
A: *Discussions were held to tackle the joint work paper and I believe
that the national council, along with the Coordination Committee, reached
an agreement which will be proposed to the opposition. The agreement
mainly focuses on the following four points: Firstly, the goal behind any
talks surrounding the Syrian crisis should revolve around the transfer of
power to a democratic government representing the people. In other words,
there is no longer any room for dialogue with the regime which completely
rejected the implementation of the Arab initiative* Secondly, the measures
which will follow will be related to Bashar al-Assad*s toppling. I am not
saying *president* because he is no longer so to the Syrian people. This
toppling will then herald a transitory phase* which will witness the
withdrawal of the security forces from the streets and neighborhoods and
the release of all the detainees without exception.
*[A:] *Thirdly, and after Al-Assad is deposed, talks will be launched with
the Syrian statesmen who were not involved in the oppression and violence
committed by the regime against the civilians, in order to include these
individuals in the drafting of the facets of the transitional stage in
Syria. Fourthly, the preparation of a clear agenda for the discussions and
the setting of a deadline for their completion*
Q: *In your opinion, will the clear condemnation issued by the
UN-affiliated Human Rights Council constitute an umbrella for the
humanitarian corridors which you asked French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe
to impose with international actors?
A: *The humanitarian passageways or the buffer zones are now the main
topic on the tables of Arab and international meetings. Everyone is
currently drawing up plans and visions to impose these safe zones and help
the people. Certainly, the regime*s condemnation for having committed
crimes against humanity will increase the pressures on the regime and
prompt all the Arab countries to hasten the establishment of these zones*
Q: *How will these passageways be imposed? By use of military force for
example if the regime insists on closing Syria*s doors before the
monitors, the humanitarian organizations and the international media
A: *We will not go into the details of the intervention. Let us just say
it is the responsibility of the international community that should commit
to it. The expected mechanism* in case the regime were to insist on
proceeding with the killing and on refusing to sign the Arab initiative,
is to see the entire matter raised before the Security Council which
should assume the responsibility and issue a resolution condemning the
regime. The challenge at this level lies in our ability to pressure Russia
and China and ensure the issuance of a resolution confirming the urgent
need to protect the civilians*
Q: *You were received in most of the Arab and European capitals. Even
Moscow received you. But what was noticeable was that Washington has not
done so until now. Why is that in your opinion?
A: *This is an excellent question which shows that the claims of the
Syrian regime, its Iranian allies and followers in Lebanon about an
American-Western conspiracy targeting the rejectionist regime are
nonsense* We started based on our conviction in the cause of the Syrian
people. Our action started on the Arab level and we achieved important
results. We then moved to the European level where we also achieved
positive and satisfactory results. This does not mean that the Americans
are not contacting us, as an official meeting might take place imminently.
But if this proves something, it is that the Syrian revolution is real and
staged by people who are demanding their rights*
Q: *The National Council was founded in Istanbul and the Free Army is
issuing its orders from this Turkish city. How do you assess the Turkish
official position toward the Syrian revolution, especially after Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and American Vice President Joe Biden said
that their countries* patience toward Assad had started running out?...
A: *The Turkish position was and still is sincere at the level of its
support of the Syrian people and its revolution. This is what we naturally
expect from a neighboring democratic state such as Turkey. The Turks are
closely coordinating with the American side in regard to the Syrian file
and the buffer zone is currently being discussed in detail*
Q: *There is now talk about the Syria of the future, i.e. in the
post-Assad phase. What will the political and security situation of the
Syrian state be like on the local level and with the neighboring states,
especially Lebanon, Hezbollah and Hamas? How will relations be with Iran?
A: *The Syria of the future will respect the international laws,
agreements and customs, not only with the neighboring states but with all
the states around the world. We will not have any relations with
Hezbollah, whose size will definitely be altered, and our ties with Hamas
will be via the Palestine Liberation Organization with which Hamas is
currently negotiating* As for the relationship with Iran, it will be
reassessed. Security and military coordination will definitely be halted
and the economic relations with it will be sustained based on necessity
and in the context of the *Syria first* principle*** - Al-Mustaqbal,
Click here for source
Return to index of Syria Return to top of index
- **Border guards deter terrorists who tried to sneak in from Turkey*
On December 7, the state-controlled Al-Watan newspaper carried the
following report by Nibal Ibrahim Muhammad Ahmad Khabazi: *The Syrian
border guard thwarted an infiltration attempt carried out by a terrorist
group of 35 elements into the Syrian soil from the Turkish territories.
The elements of the border guard clashed with the terrorist group as it
was trying to sneak in via the border village of Ain al-Bayda, which is
affiliated with the Dama region, thus preventing it from crossing into
Syrian territories and injuring a number of its elements, while the
remaining elements fled back to the Turkish territories*
*At this level, Turkish citizens and observers condemned Recep Tayyip
Erdogan*s government's use of terrorists who tried to infiltrate the
Syrian border from Turkey, after this attempt was exposed with the Syrian
forces* thwarting of the operation, assuring that Article 90 of the
Turkish constitution stipulated the sanctioning of whoever tries to change
the regime by use of arms for high treason. Hence, the observers wondered
how Turkey was supporting the perpetrators of high treason, condemning
their government*s position for acting as an American-Zionist tool against
Muslims in general and the Middle Eastern populations in particular. In
the meantime, the terrorist groups in Homs escalated their armed attacks
against military checkpoints in the province*s neighborhoods and regions,
by use of heavy fire and RPGs.
*These groups also launched a series of armed attacks against some
neighborhoods, in order to [suppress] general reactions threatening civil
peace. This reached the point of witnessing the exchange of fire between
the armed men and the inhabitants of some neighborhoods who were defending
themselves, their homes and their families. On the other hand, a security
source in Homs revealed the death of a number of armed men during clashes
with the security forces in some neighborhoods in the city, but also the
release of 10 people who were kidnapped via a qualitative operation. The
source added that armed men attacked yesterday security checkpoints in
Homs, while the elements standing on the checkpoints responded to the
source of the shooting and dealt with it*
*For their part, many citizens from the city of Selmiya expressed their
disgruntlement toward the hideous crime committed by armed gangs in Homs,
thus claiming the life of Muhammad Mustafa al-Tayba and his three children
Mustafa, Mulhem and Muhannad, whose ages range between 11 and 17** -
Al-Watan Syria, Syria
Click here for source
Return to index of Syria Return to top of index
- Rif'at al-Asad interviewed on Syria
On December 2, the Saudi-funded Al-Arabiya TV carried an interview with
Rif'at al-Asad, former Syrian vice president and the uncle of President
Bashar al-Asad. The following are quotes from Asad:
"I only said that Bashar should step down...I propose he should be
replaced for an interim period by a man from the regime... I only want a
transitional period that ends with the drawing up of a framework for the
achievement of democracy in Syria.
"...I do not have anyone in mind. However, the Syrian people are now
really afraid and are divided, and are seeking assurance. They fear that
someone will come and take revenge against them. That is why someone who
can reassure them should take over, even if it is for a short transitional
period... there are the minorities, and there is the bourgeoisie majority
- the Islamic bourgeoisie. The ethnic, sectarian, and confessional
minorities are all afraid...They fear the unknown. The unknown frightens
people. Do not believe anyone who says to you that the unknown does not
frighten people.
"...I was never part of the regime. I was an opponent of the regime... I
did not serve for a single day with President Hafiz... then I was moved to
the leadership.
"...After I became vice president, I did not work for a single day... I
did not work at the presidency for a single day."
[On the Hama "massacre"]: "...That is a big lie. The regime employed and
marketed that lie, and gave it to its friends and to its allies from among
the Arab and the non-Arab states so that they in turn can market it...
President Hafiz al-Asad was the leader of the state and society. Therefore
he bears responsibility.
"...No, no. I am not justifying it. I went to the president's house and
pleaded to him to show forbearance. However, he was agitated and said:
What forbearance when they are slaughtering people daily...As I told you,
it is a big lie. There were no Defence Detachments in Syria, and I was
never commander of the Defence Detachments. I was commander of a unit
called 50 69. The Defence Detachments are detachments deployed in airports
to protect aviation, and never took part in fighting. The responsibility
for training them and preparing them to defend airports was assigned to
"...There cannot be any dialogue with the regime.
"...I love him [Bashar]. I tried repeatedly to send my sons to him and
mediators from the Arab states, but his response was negative. He fears
Rif'at al-Asad's presence in Damascus because he knew that Rif'at will
continue to oppose the regime... I will return to the opposition, and not
to power.
"...That also is a big mistake. The percentage of Alawites in Syria should
be around 20 per cent, but I tell you truthfully, only 7 per cent of the
army commanders are Alawites - and among the top commanders 30 per cent
are Alawites... The Syrian army is a patriotic army and it does not want
anarchy or destruction. It is striving to achieve a peaceful solution..."
- Al-Arabiya TV, United Arab Emirates
Return to index of Syria Return to top of index
- "Syrians, let down by their official Media, created the alternative"
On November 28, the Saudi owned Al-Hayat reported: ""What is in your heart
is on our tongue." With this slogan, Radio 1 + 1 announced its debut as
the first free and independent Syrian station broadcasting its programmes
from an electronic site. The station introduces itself in Syrian
vernacular dialect as being "a group of young Syrian men and women united
from start to finish by love of the country." It adds: "Our voices are
different, but our dreams are one. We want our Syria to be free, civil,
and democratic." Faris, the station's media coordinator, says that 1 + 1,
"Speaks for us two. The process of uniting can involve two elements,
views, voices, or theories that are harmonious or contradictory. On the
station you will hear hit songs, debka, jazz, and the avant-garde." A
simple design and a Syrian flag adorn the right corner of a gray page that
greets listeners. There are five main entry points: "The Whole Story,"
"Who Are We?" "Talk to Us and Get an Answer" (to encourage participants),
"Keep Up With Us" (for following the station's activities on the social
networking sites), as well as technical information to help listeners in
Syria overcome the many obstacles expected to confront them while
listening to the station.
"Faris explains that the station's goal is "to communicate the
non-politicized voice and aspirations of Syrian young people, as well as
to support the popular movement in Syria towards freedom." He indicated
that the station highlights the different cultures that Syria embraces:
Assyrian, Kurdish, Circassian, Armenian, and Arabic. The work team, which
began with twelve volunteers and has grown to forty, has been able to
present interviews and youth programmes, in addition to a local news
broadcast. Broadcasting by Radio 1 + 1 was preceded by the spread of
printed materials. Some of them have succeeded in becoming regularly
issued weekly magazines, such as "Hurriyat", "Al-Badil", and "Al-Haqq".
Others have remained confined to the pages of the internet, such as
"Suriyana" and "Bukra", whose issues are published in PDF format to be
downloaded or sent by e-mail. They can also be displayed and read without
downloading on the computer for fear of its being examined if its owner is
ever arrested.
"The newspaper "Al-Haqq," which defines itself as "an independent
political weekly," is published by the coordinating committee of the
Maydan quarter in Damascus. It focuses on news of Damascus and its
countryside in eight pages. For its part, "Al-Badil," with its four pages,
sends the regime a message that "the revolution is capable of creating
accompanying media, and that the creative Syrian people, who since day one
of the revolution have been able to bring the picture to the world for it
to see what the regime is doing to its own children, are capable today of
creating all their communication media and developing them within the
revolution until the achievement of victory" -as its editorial team says.
"Al-Badil" is published by the Independent Media Organization To Support
the Syrian Revolution, under the slogan, "Freedom, Justice, Citizenship."
"The magazine "Free Intellectuals of Free Syria" has broken the magazine
mould in order to appear as a page on the social networking site of
Facebook. "Facebook has become a complete news bulletin from the heart of
the event. Thanks to the revolution, this electronic site has acquired a
larger number of users, and therefore a larger number of people following
the magazine." Luma, one of the page's founders, says: "The page's many
writers and t he difficulty of coordinating among them for security
reasons sometimes makes assembling material and publishing it in PDF
format take too long, and so publication on Facebook is easier." A number
of well-known writers participate in editing the magazine, such as Yasin
al-Hajj Salih, Khatib Badlah, Rosa Hasan, and Rima Fulayhan, as well as a
group of activists and journalists. As for the fact that the writers, most
of whom are inside Syria, use their full names, Luma says: "Fear is no
longer the determining factor today. Faith in the ca use has the last
word. We all are subjected to security harassments, whether we write or
don't write. The matter is one of caution." The magazine "Free
Intellectuals of Free Syria" on Facebook includes a number of departments.
For example, "Our News" includes materials translated from the most
prominent articles and analyses published in the international press about
Syrian events. The magazine devotes a window to "Stories of the
Revolution." In her department, "Children's Talk," the journalist Ala
Malas presents the revolution through the eyes of Syria's children. In the
"Character" department, you read the thought mechanism of one of the
exemplary personalities that has emerged during the revolution, such as
"al-Shabih," "al-Buq," and "al-Munbahbakji," in addition to the
departments "Dialogue," "Know Your Rights," and others.
"As for the magazine's goal, its Facebook pages define it as: "Supporting
the activity of publication and enlightenment concerning everything
related to the Syrian revolution. We raise consciousness about successful
methods of revolutionary and political action so as to arrive at the civil
state that we seek, in addition to actively participating and contributing
on the ground to supporting and promoting popular action." The same goals
have given birth to the magazine "Our Syria," which, at the time of its
appearance on 26 September, borrowed Gandhi's saying, "When the slave
decides not to remain a slave, his chains fall," in order to present "the
real news as Syrians see it, not as their media fabricate it and falsify
it" -in the words of Su'ad Yusuf, one of the magazine's founders. Although
"Our Syria" is an electronic magazine, it sometimes is printed by
activists in some of Syria's governorates. More than 800 copies of its
first issue were printed. Nevertheless, "the team prefers that it remain
in its electronic form now because of the security danger and distribution
costs" -according to Yusuf.
"As for how the members of the team keep in touch, Yusuf says: "We keep in
touch with each other over the internet continually. We divide up jobs,
plan, and do every task virtually, because it is very difficult for us to
get together in any place -it could lead to our being all arrested in the
best of cases." Yusuf believes in the importance of the word in supporting
the popular movement, because: "The revolution exists at all levels,
including the intellectual, cultural, and informational level. Syrian
young people today are seeking to create a new reality with new standards
in harmony with their aspirations for a free, democratic state." As she
notes, "Risk is involved in any kind of participation in the revolution,
but the risk of speaking cannot be compared with the risk taken by the
thousands who are standing in the face of bullets every day." Karim Layla,
the editor-in-chief of the magazine "Freedoms," agrees with Yusuf that "a
revolutionary publication is worth putting your life on the line." He
says, "Our lives are not more valuable that the lives and the blood of
those who are suffering martyrdom daily on the altar of freedom. Everyone
offers what he can."
""From the ashes of decades of repression and muzzling of mouths... the
magazine 'Freedoms' emerged on 22 August, along with the breezes of
freedom that began blowing after 15 March 2011, to express the echo of the
revolution," says Layla. He adds: "It is the first weekly magazine of the
revolutionaries, written by their pens, printed in their homes, and
distributed under the danger of their arrest and liquidation. We are
trying to avoid this as much as possible by distributing it personally in
the demonstrations and by putting it on house doorsteps at night, but the
danger remains." The work of the magazine begins with a team of activists
who gather reports and interviews that document cases of torture in the
prisons and the stories of martyrs, demonstrations, and Syrian refugees.
Afterward, the material is sent to secret presses. Layla is reluctant to
give details about them lest they be discovered.
""'Freedoms' began with six pages and has expanded to sixteen, with
articles covering politics, economics, ideas, and literature, in addition
to raising consciousness in the area of the civil state, respect for the
other, freedom of expression, and anecdotes about the revolution,
including stories of martyrs and international positions." So says its
editor-in-chief. The magazine recently published an English edition
circulated and distributed by Syrian emigres in activities having to do
with Syria. Syrian activists say: "The need to build bridges connecting
reality and the media over the deep ditch that the official and private
media have built concerning the regime's claims and narratives is what
stirred the Syrians' sleeping cells of collective creation." The first
product of this creativity was a one-page daily publication called
"Tomorrow," distributed by a Facebook page that has given itself the name,
"I Love Syria Only." The publication has a morning coffee corner, "Cha t
With Me," that deals with a thought-provoking idea about an issue relating
to the movement of the Syrian street. "Words Deep in the Heart" addresses
supporters and sometimes the opposition. Other columns include "Question
Without an Answer" and "Point of Order Against the Un-order."
"In September, the "Tomorrow" family prepared a 27-page report about
imprisonment entitled "Imprisoning Opinion: A Strategy for the Struggle to
Survive." The report began with a historical overview of what the team
called "the phenomenon of forced disappearance." Then it shifted to a
treatment of the legal aspects of people arrested for opinion in the light
of current Syrian law. Then it discussed, "The torturers and jailers, are
they victims?" After that, it devoted five pages to testimonies from those
arrested for their opinions in the 15 March Syrian revolution and eight
other pages to testimonies of those arrested for their opinion before the
revolution. The report then discusses the psychological, social, and
economic effect of the experience of imprisonment. It goes on to discuss
representations of imprisonment in Syrian art and literature.
"The "Tomorrow" team recently published another report entitled "Civil
Resistance: the Power of Non-violence." In addition to their original
designs, the new revolutionary publications make use of works of art
produced for the revolution in order to create their visual image. Some
Facebook pages, such as "Subversive Art" and "Art and Freedom," specialize
in publishing the works of major artists, illustrators, sculptors, and
painters about the Syrian revolution, figures such as Youssef Abdelki, Ali
Qaf, Yasir al-Safi, Basim al-Rayyis, and others. What if the regime falls?
Layla answers, laughing: "'Freedoms' will become Syria's official
newspaper, I hope. But then its name will remain like its content; it will
not turn into a newspaper of revolution that is for the regime and against
the rev olution of its people demanding freedom."" - Al-Hayat, United
Return to index of Syria Return to top of index
- "...Arab boycott has started and we hope Syria will help us..."
On December 5, the Saudi owned Al-Hayat reported: "Arab League
Secretary-General Dr Nabil al-Arabi has stated that the Arab boycott of
Syria has in fact started in the light of Arab sanctions on Syria due to
the continuing security campaign against the civilians. He said in an
interview with Al-Hayat that Damascus had asked "for two or three days" to
respond to the demand to sign the Arab protocol for solving the crisis and
he urged the Syrian authorities again to sign the Arab initiative and
warned of the internationalization of the Syrian situation. Regarding the
nature of the developments, Al-Arabi said Shaykh Hamad Bin-Jasim Bin-Jabr
Al Thani, the Qatari prime minister and foreign minister, contacted
yesterday (in a step that coincided with the meeting of the Arab committee
he chairs) Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Mu'allim and asked him to come
today (yesterday) to sign the Arab initiative but the Syrian foreign
minister asked for a per iod of two or three days for signing." Al-Arabi
added: "In any case, they (the Syrian Government officials) can take the
time they wish but the Arab countries have decided to boycott Syria in all
fields and sectors as announced by the Arab committee's statement in Doha
(the night before yesterday). The boycott went into effect yesterday
(Sunday, the day after the Arab committee's meeting in Doha) and the
boycott has in fact started."
"It is recalled that the boycott includes banning 19 Syrian officials from
travelling to the Arab countries, freezing their assets, and a 50 per cent
reduction in the number of flights from and to Syria which includes Syrian
flights as of 15 December. The committee also decided to ban the export of
weapons to Syria and other measures. The AL secretary general stressed in
this context that the "AL is very concerned that any sanctions or boycott
that are imposed should not affect the lives of the fraternal Syrian
people. This is essential in our approaches." Al-Hayat asked him if he
believed that internationalization of the Syrian situation was imminent in
the light of events in Syria and the world. He answered: "We are not
talking about internationalization. We are trying to resolve the issue
within the Arab framework and hoping that Syria will help us in this
because the outside world will not stop and they have actually started
thinking about moving to internationalization." He added in the context of
his remarks about internationalization "what is the concept of
internationalization and what does it mean? I do not understand. What I do
understand is that the solution (the outside world) wants is through other
means than the peaceful ones we are following." Asked about the nature of
the other means of which the outside world is thinking for
internationalizing the Syrian situation, Al-Arabi replied: "I do not know
and I absolutely do not intervene in this issue."
"As to the nature of the Syrian Government's queries from the AL about the
observers' protocol, he said: "The protocol is clear. Syria tried to amend
it and asked what does this mean and what does that mean, of all of which
are of no value in my opinion." Al-Hayat asked him about the Syrian
Government's query about the "shabbihah" and he said: "The protocol
includes protection from the shabbihah gangs. It (the Syrian Government)
says what do you mean by shabbihah? We replied to them and said what is
meant here is everyone who carries a weapon illegally and in a
non-governmental way." Asked if the AL was ready to send observers to
Syria if the Syrian Government signed the initiative, Al-Arabi said: "We
have been ready for three weeks." He pointed out that the Arab committee's
decisions imposing sanctions on Syria were unanimous and "the situation
will change if the Syrian government signs (the Arab initiative)." He also
pointed out that the sanctions would be reassessed (from time to time) so
as not to affect the Syrian people and the peoples of the region. As to
the significance of a meeting that Halit Cevik, the deputy assistant
Turkish foreign minister, had with the Arab committee at the end of its
meetings in Qatar on Saturday-Sunday night, he said "the Turks wish to
coordinate with the Arab countries."" - Al-Hayat, United Kingdom
Return to index of Syria Return to top of index
- *Houthis* goals behind Sa*da confrontations*
On December 5, the Qatari-owned Al-Jazeera.net news website carried the
following report by Abdo Ayesh: *The clashes which recently erupted
between the Houthis and the Salafis in the Sa*da province fueled fears
over the breaking out of sectarian conflicts in Yemen and shed light on
the humanitarian situation after the Houthis imposed a siege on the
Salafis* main stronghold in Damaj, and especially the Al-Hadith Center in
which Yemeni and foreign students are studying. Human rights activist
Muhammad al-Ahmadi revealed to Al-Jazeera.net that the region was
witnessing a deteriorating humanitarian situation due to the siege imposed
by the Houthis, saying that food stores and pharmacies were empty and that
the bombing marks were obvious on the homes of the citizens and the walls
and windows of the mosques.
*He indicated he listened to the testimony of one of the relatives of a
woman who fell with the bullets of Houthi snipers, but also to other
testimonies saying that children had passed away due to drought and the
lack of medicine* Al-Ahmadi assured there was an unequal war taking place
between the two sides, as the Houthis marched with weapons and heavy and
middle weight artillery on the mountains and positions surrounding Damaj
from three sides, at a time when the Salafis were only present in the Dar
al-Hadith center and only enjoyed an armed presence in specific locations
overlooking the center in which they are studying. On the other hand, the
Houthis announced yesterday that the problem was resolved and that the
fighting had stopped after having claimed the lives of dozens of victims
from both sides*
*The spokesman for the Houthis, Muhammad Abdul Salam, announced that the
discontinuation of the fighting reflected the Houthis* wish to *spare the
country from the ghost of sectarian and denominational war which has
started to emerge on the Yemeni arena.* In statements to Al-Jazeera.net
over the phone from Sa*da, Abdul Salam accused local and regional sides of
trying to detonate a sectarian and denomination struggle in Yemen,
stressing that the goal behind that was to strike the revolutionary powers
in Yemen* to delay the victory of the revolution and undermine the
construction of the new Yemen. For his part, researcher Gha*eb Hawas from
Sa*da, said to Al-Jazeera.net that Damaj was extremely concerning to the
Houthis on the denominational levels*
*He indicated that most of those present in the Damaj center were Yemeni
students and their families, local inhabitants and foreigners conducting
religious and Arabic language studies... As for the director of the Abaad
Studies Center in Sana*a, Abdul Salam Muhammad, he assured that the
Houthis were hoping that their confrontation with the Salafis in Damaj
would proceed without wide media coverage, under claims they were fighting
a *Takfiri group* which earned support from Saleh*s regime and stood
against the popular revolution. By doing so, the Houthis wanted to get the
sympathy of the rebellious Yemeni people and cover up their armed conflict
with the supporters of the Reform Party in the Hejja and Jawf provinces in
which they had been trying to expand** - Al-Jazeera.net, Qatar
Click here for source
Return to index of Yemen Return to top of index
- *Yemen on verge of sectarian & religious war between Houthists &
On December 7, the independent Al-Rai al-Aam daily carried the following
report: *The features of a sectarian, religious, and tribal war have
started to appear on the horizon days after the signing of the Gulf
initiative and its mechanisms for the first time in Yemen since the
achievement of unity in 1990. [The features of the war] are especially
flagrant between the Houthists - who are considered to belong to the Shi*i
sect, which extends from Iran, although they consider themselves part of
the Zeidi sect * and the Sunni Salafists and the Muslim Brothers, who are
dubbed the *reformists.*
*Tribal sources in Saada told Al-Rai that *a number of Houthists who
rejected the Gulf initiative are currently bracing themselves for
confrontations with the new cabinet that will be led by the parties of the
joint meeting. The Islamic Reform party is considered the largest party
within [the joint meeting] in addition to the Salafists who are heading to
Saada in order to break the siege from their Sunni Salafist brothers in
the area of Damaj.* Meanwhile, Abdel-Malek al-Houthi, the leader of the
Houthists warned that there will be a strong response *against anyone who
tries to control the Houthists* strongholds* and to impose what he
considered *American and Israeli plans* on his followers.
*In his first appearance since the passing of his father at the beginning
of this year, Al-Houthi made a speech on the occasion of Ashoura in which
he said: *If anyone attacks us, we will defend ourselves using the same
tools as the attacker.* Around 100 Houthists and Salafists were killed
since last month according to a quasi-official and tribal survey in Hejja,
Saada and Umran.* - Al-Rai al-Aam, Kuwait
Click here for source
Return to index of Yemen Return to top of index
Please address any questions to email@example.com