text:
The Global Intelligence Files,
files released so far...
Index pages
by Date of Document
Our Partners
Al Akhbar - Lebanon
Al Masry Al Youm - Egypt
Asia Sentinel - Hong Kong
Bivol - Bulgaria
Carta Capital - Brazil
CIPER - Chile
Dawn Media - Pakistan
L'Espresso - Italy
La Repubblica - Italy
La Jornada - Mexico
La Nacion - Costa Rica
Malaysia Today - Malaysia
McClatchy - United States
Nawaat - Tunisia
NDR/ARD - Germany
Owni - France
Pagina 12 - Argentina
Philip Dorling - Fairfax media contributor - Australia
Plaza Publica - Guatemala
Publica - Brazil
Publico.es - Spain
Rolling Stone - United States
Russian Reporter - Russia
Ta Nea - Greece
Taraf - Turkey
The Hindu - India
The Yes Men - Bhopal Activists
Sunday Star-Times - New Zealand
Community resources
courage is contagious
The Global Intelligence Files
On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.
Re: Text of Sikorski's speech
Released on 2012-10-10 17:00 GMT
Email-ID | 2196564 |
Date | 2011-12-02 01:47:57 |
From | email@example.com |
To | firstname.lastname@example.com |
List-Name | firstname.lastname@example.com |
On Dec 1, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Michael Wilson <email@example.com>
Really great read.
I love how he got in a mention of the PLC!!!!
On 12/1/11 3:12 PM, Eugene Chausovsky wrote:
*Not sure if this was sent out earlier, but this is the full text of
Sikorski's controversial speech from earlier this week. I recommend
those interested to read the whole thing.
Sikorskia**s speech: Poland and the future of the European Union
Mr Radek Sikorski, Foreign Minister of Poland
Berlin, 28 November 2011
Mr President, Minister a** dear Guido, Ladies and Gentlemen,
Let me start with a story.
20 years ago, in 1991, I was a reporter, visiting what was then the
Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia. I was interviewing the chairman of the Republican Bank of
Croatia when he
received a phone call with an obscure piece of news. Namely, that the
parliament of
another Yugoslav republic, Serbia, had just voted to print
unauthorized amounts of
dinars, the common currency.
Putting down the phone the banker said: a**This is the end of
He was right. Yugoslavia collapsed. So did the a**Dinar zonea**. We
know what followed.
Issues of money can be issues of war and peace, the life and death of
Today Croatia, Serbia and FYROM each have their own currency.
Montenegro and Kosovo are not in the Euro zone but simply use the
Euro. Bosnia and
Herzegovina even has the a**Convertible Marka**, pegged to the Euro.
A striking story. Not of European integration. Of European
Disintegration with appalling human cost. Only now is the region
slowly moving back to
the European mainstream.
The fate of Yugoslavia reminds us that money, as well as being a
technical device, a
a**means of exchangea**, symbolises unity a** or disunity.
Why is this? Money exists because communities exist. A community in
which people live
and trade a** they exchange freely a** creates value. Their money
symbolises that value.
This moral significance of money intrigued Immanuel Kant, who wrote
that the entire
practice of lending money presupposed at least the honest intention to
repay. If this
condition were universally ignored, the very idea of lending and
sharing wealth would
be undermined.
For Kant, honesty and responsibility were categorical imperatives: the
foundation of any
moral order. For the European Union, likewise, these are the
cornerstones. I would
point to the two fundamental values: Responsibility and Solidarity.
Our responsibility for
decisions and processes. And Solidarity when it comes to bearing the
Today, as the first Polish Presidency is drawing to a close, I will
tackle basic questions:
How did we get into this crisis?
Where do we go from here?
How to get there?
What does Poland bring?
What do we ask of Germany?
* *
First question: how has the Euro zone got into its current
Let me first say what this crisis is not about. It was not caused a**
as some have suggested
a** by enlargement.
Enlargement has created growth and wealth all over Europe.
The EU15 exports to the EU10 countries rose almost twofold in the last
ten years. Ita**s
even more striking if you break it down by countries. Britaina**s
export to the 10
countries that joined after 2004 rose from a*NOT2.2 bln in 1993 to
a*NOT10 bln last year; Francea**s,
from a*NOT2.7 bln to a*NOT16 bln, Germanya**s, wait for this a** from
a*NOT15bln to 95 billion Euros. The
total volume of trade between EU15 and EU10 amounted to a*NOT222 bln
last year, up from
a*NOT51 bln in 1995. A tidy sum. I guess it sustains a job or two in
Old Europe.
So, enlargement a** far from causing the crisis, has arguably delayed
the economic
turmoil. Thanks to the advantages of trading in an enlarged market,
West European
welfare states have been forced to face reality only now.
If the upheaval is not about enlargement, then perhaps it is a
currency crisis?
Not exactly. The Euro is doing fine versus the dollar and other
It is of course partly about debt, the need to deleverage our
economies from the crazy
heights caused by government overspending, accounting chicanery and
financial engineering. And the deleveraging is occurring beyond the
Euro zone: look at
the UK with its debt of 80% of GDP and the US, with 100%.
But if it were only a question of debt, you would expect ratings and
spreads to be
affecting countries in proportion to their indebtedness. But, very
strikingly, this is not
the case. Some countries, such as the UK and Japan, with high debt in
proportion to
GDP, pay low premiums. Others, with lower debt a** like Spain, pay
high ones.
The inevitable conclusion is that this crisis is not only about debt,
but primarily about
confidence and, more precisely, credibility. About investor perception
where their
funds are safe.
Let us be honest with ourselves and admit that markets have every
right to doubt the
credibility of the Euro zone. After all, the Stability and Growth Pack
has been broken 60
times!1 And not just by smaller countries in difficulty, but by its
founders in the very
core of the Euro zone.
If credibility is the problem, then restoring credibility is the
Institutions, procedures, sanctions that will convince investors that
countries will be
capable of living within their means. Hence, that the bonds they buy
will be repaid,
preferably with honest interest.
Second question: where do we want to go?
We have two fundamental options. Before I say what they are, let me
say that Euro
zonea**s failings are not the exception but, rather, are typical of
the way we have
constructed the EU. We have a Europe with a dominant currency but no
single Treasury
to enforce it. We have joint borders without a common migration
policy. We are
supposed to have a common foreign policy, but it is divorced from real
instruments of
power and often weakened by member states cutting their own deals. I
could go on.
Most of our institutions and procedures depend on the goodwill and
sense of propriety
of member states. It works tolerably well when the going is good. But
then a wave of
migrants shows up on the EUa**s border, or a civil war blows up in our
neighborhood, or
markets panic. And then, what do we habitually do? We run for cover in
the familiar
framework of the nation state.
The Euro zone crisis is a more dramatic manifestation of the European
malaise because
its founders created a system in which each of its members has the
capacity to bring it
down, with appalling costs to themselves and the entire neighborhood.
The break up would be a crisis of apocalyptic proportions beyond our
financial system.
Once the logic of a**each man for himselfa** takes hold, can we really
trust everyone to act
communitarian and resist the temptation to settle scores in other
areas, such as trade?
Would you really bet the house on the proposition that if the Euro
zone breaks up, the
single market, the cornerstone of the European Union, will definitely
survive? After all,
messy divorces are more frequent than amicable ones. I have heard of a
case in
California in which a couple spent $100,000 disputing custody of the
family cat.
If we are not willing to risk a partial dismantling of the EU, then
the choice becomes as
stark as can be in the lives of federations: deeper integration, or
We are not unique in facing the fundamental question of the future of
our federation
over the issue of debt. Two successful federations tread this way
before us. Americans
passed the point of no return in creating the United States when the
government assumed responsibility for debts that states incurred in
the War of
Independence. Solvent Virginia bargained with more indebted
Massachusetts, which is
why the capital was fixed on the banks of the Potomac. Alexander
Hamilton fathered a
compromise under which everybodya**s debts were jointly guaranteed and
a revenue
stream created to service them.
Switzerland also became a real federation when rules were established
for incurring
debt and transfers between her richer and poorer cantons.
So, we also have to decide whether we want to become a proper
federation, or not. If
renationalization or collapse is unacceptable, then only one way
remains: making
Europe, as Europe, governable at last, and hence a** in due course a**
more credible.
Politics is often the balancing between the urgent and the important.
Whata**s urgent is that we save the Euro zone. Whata**s important is
that in so doing we
preserve Europe as a democracy that respects the autonomy of its
member states. This
new European deal will need to balance Responsibility, Solidarity and
Democracy as the
cornerstones of our political union.
Question three: how to get there?
The so-called a**six packa** which the Polish presidency helped to
negotiate was a good
beginning, a bundle of five regulations and one directive that bring
more transparency
and discipline to the finances of member states. In the process of
drawing up national
budgets, finance ministers of member states will now have to show
their books to their
peers and to the Commission very early, even before national
parliaments. The
Commission will recommend corrective action when a member statea**s
position shows imbalances. Members of the Euro zone who break the
Stability and
Growth Pact will be subject to sanctions that are almost impossible to
block by political
pressure. Moreover, the a**six packa** confirms that rules may be
introduced not as
directives a** which require enactment into national laws a** but as
regulations, which
apply universally and instantly.
More ambitious measures have been proposed. In order to strengthen
convergence the Commission and the Euro group would get the right to
scrutinize in
advance all major economic reform plans with potential spill-over
effect in the euro
area, impose sanctions on countries failing to effect policy
recommendations, and
permission for groups of countries to synchronize their labour,
pensions and social
Financial discipline would be strengthened by giving access to rescue
funds only to
members abiding by macro fiscal rules, by making sanctions automatic
and giving the
Commission, the Council and the Court of Justice powers to enforce the
3% ceiling on
deficit and 60% ceiling on debt. Countries in excess deficit procedure
would have to
present their national budgets for approval by the Commission. The
Commission would
get powers to intervene in the policies of countries that could not
fulfil their obligations.
Countries persistently violating rules would have their voting rights
Provided the European Council sets tough new rules in stone, the
European Central
Bank should become a proper central bank, a lender of last resort that
underpins the
credibility to the entire Euro zone. The ECB needs to act soon, in
anticipation of
irreversible legal enactments.
This would avert disaster but more is needed. Poland has all along
supported the idea
of a new treaty that would make the EU more effective.
The European Commission needs to be stronger. If it is to play the
role of an economic
supervisor we need commissioners to be genuine leaders, with
authority, personality a**
dare I say charisma a** to be true representatives of common European
interests. To be
more effective, the Commission should be smaller. Any one of us who
has chaired a
meeting knows that they are most productive when up to a dozen people
The EC now has 27 members. Member States should rotate to have their
The more power we give to European institutions, the more democratic
legitimacy they
need to have. The draconian powers to supervise national budgets
should be wielded
only by agreement of the European Parliament.
The Parliament needs to stand up for its role and tasks. Euro-sceptics
are right when
they say that Europe will only work if it becomes a polity, a
community in which people
place a part of their identity and loyalty. Italy is made, we still
have to make Italians,
Massimo Da**Azeglio said in the first meeting of the parliament of the
newly united Italian
kingdom in 19th century. For us in the EU ita**s easier: we have a
united Europe. We have
Europeans. What we need to do is to give political expression to the
European public
opinion. To help it along we could elect some seats in the European
Parliament from a
pan-European list of candidates. We need more a**politishe bildunga**
for citizens and
political elite. The parliament should have its seat in a single
We could also combine the posts of the President of the European
Council and that of
the European Commission. Chancellor Angela Merkel has even suggested
that he or she
should be elected directly by the European demos.
What is crucial is that we maintain coherence between the Euro area
and the EU as a
whole. Community institutions must remain central. As the Presidency,
we are
guardians of our unity. And the unity must not be hypothetical. In
this case: ita**s not
enough to say that countries may participate once they join the Euro
zone. Instead of
organising separate Euro summits or exclusive meetings of finance
ministers we can
continue the practice from other EU fora where all may attend, but
only members vote.
The more power and legitimacy we give to federal institutions, the
more secure
member states should feel that certain prerogatives, everything to do
with national
identity, culture, religion, lifestyle, public morals, and rates of
income, corporate and
VAT taxes, should forever remain in the purview of states. Our unity
can survive
different working hours or different family law in different
Which brings me to the issue of whether an important member, Britain,
can support
reform. You have given the Union its common language. The Single
Market was largely
your brilliant idea. A British commissioner runs our diplomacy. You
could lead Europe
on defence. You are an indispensable link across the Atlantic. On the
other hand, Euro
zonea**s collapse would hugely harm your economy. Also, your total
sovereign, corporate
and household debt exceeds 400% of GDP. Are you sure markets will
always favour
you? We would prefer you in, but if you cana**t join, please allow us
to forge ahead. And
please start explaining to your people that European decisions are not
Brusselsa** diktats
but results of agreements in which you freely participate.
Fourth question: what does Poland bring?
Today Poland is not the source of problems but a source of European
solutions. We
now have both the capacity, and the will, to contribute. We bring a
recent experience of
a successful transformation from dictatorship to democracy and from an
basket case to an increasingly prosperous market economy.
We were helped by friends and allies: United States, UK, France and,
above all,
Germany. We appreciate the strong and generous support a** the
solidarity a** which
Germany has extended to us over the last two decades. Ich danke Ihnen
als Politiker und
als Pole.
I hope you appreciate that ita**s been a good investment. In 2010
German exports to
Poland have exceeded 1990 levels nine fold, and they are growing
despite the crisis.
Germanya**s trade with Poland is bigger than with the Russian
Federation, although you
would not always know it from the German political discourse.
From last year Poland is ranked as a highly developed country in the
Development Index. Between 2007 and 2011 we went up 10 positions in
the Global
Competitiveness Index.3 In the same period we improved our standing by
20 positions
in the Corruption perception Index.4, ahead of some Eurozone members.
In the last four years, the accumulated GDP growth in Poland amounted
to 15,4 per
cent. The second result in the EU, with 8 percent? Yes, a member of
the Euro zone -
Slovakia. The EU average is minus 0,4 per cent. To those who would
like to divide
Europe, I say: how about a natural division into growth-Europe and
non-growth Europe?
But be forewarned. Their shapes would not conform to stereotypes.
It did not happen by itself. Successive Polish governments took
painful decisions and
the Polish people made big sacrifices. Privatisation, pension reform,
opening our
country to globalisation produced losers as well as winners. We were
one of the first
countries to introduce a public debt anchor in our constitution.
And we are not resting on our laurels. Presenting his new government
to parliament a
fortnight ago, Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that: to go safely
through the year 2012,
to improve our of financial security for years and decades to come, we
shall have to take
measures that call for sacrifice and understanding of everyone,
without exception.
Next year alone we intend to cut our budget deficit to 3% of GDP and
the overall debt to
52% of GDP. By 2015 the deficit will be brought down to 1% of GDP and
public debt to
47%. The retirement age will be lifted to 67 years for both genders.
Pension privileges
for soldiers, policemen and priests will be cut. The disability
pension contribution will
increase by 2%. Child-benefits will be taken from the rich and given
to the poor.
By the end of this parliament, Poland will fulfil the criteria of
membership in the Euro
zone. Thata**s because we want the Euro zone to survive and flourish.
And we plan to be
in it. By approving our Accession Treaty, the people of Poland have
given us the
authority to join as soon as the Euro zone and we are ready.
Poland also brings Europe a willingness to make compromises a** even
to pool sovereignty
with others a** in return for a fair role in a stronger Europe.
Fifth question: What does Poland ask of Germany?
We ask, first of all, that Germany admits that she is the biggest
beneficiary of the
current arrangements and therefore that she has the biggest obligation
to make them
Second, as you know best, you are not an innocent victim of othersa**
profligacy. You, who
should have known better, have also broken the Growth and Stability
Pact and your
banks also recklessly bought risky bonds.
Third, because investors have been selling the bonds of exposed
countries and flying to
safety, your borrowing costs have been lower than they would have been
in normal
Fourth, if your neighboursa** economies stall or implode, you greatly
suffer, too.
Fifth, that despite your understandable aversion to inflation, you
appreciate that the
danger of collapse is now a much bigger threat.
Sixth, that because of your size and your history you have a special
responsibility to
preserve peace and democracy on the continent. Jurgen Habermas has
wisely said that
a**If the European project fails, then there is the question of how
long it will take to reach
the status quo again. Remember the German Revolution of 1848: When it
failed, it took
us 100 years to regain the same level of democracy as before.a**
What, as Polanda**s foreign minister, do I regard as the biggest
threat to the security and
prosperity of Poland today, on 28th November 2011? Ita**s not
terrorism, ita**s not the
Taliban, and ita**s certainly not German tanks. Ita**s not even
Russian missiles which
President Medvedev has just threatened to deploy on the EUa**s border.
The biggest
threat to the security and prosperity of Poland would be the collapse
of the Euro zone.
And I demand of Germany that, for your own sake and for ours, you help
it survive and
prosper. You know full well that nobody else can do it. I will
probably be first Polish
foreign minister in history to say so, but here it is: I fear German
power less than I am
beginning to fear German inactivity.
You have become Europea**s indispensable nation.
You may not fail to lead. Not dominate, but to lead in reform.
Provided you include us in decision-making, Poland will support you.
Dangers of a**just after timea** reform
I started with a story of one experiment in political union, communist
Let me end with another: Europea**s least-known federation, the common
state between
Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania which began in 1385 and lasted
for over four
centuries. Which is to say, longer, so far, than federations such as
the United States,
United Kingdom or Bundesrepublic Deutschland, to say nothing of the
It was a Commonwealth which, like the EU, raised the standards of its
time. It had a joint
parliament and an elected head of state. Its political nation a**
those entitled to vote a**
comprised 10% of the population a** the height of inclusiveness at the
time. Religiously
tolerant, it saved its people from the horrors of the Thirty Yearsa**
War. Cities were
founded on the Magdeburg law, many of them a** like my home city of
Bydgoszcz a** by
German settlers. Jews, Armenians and dissenters of all kinds from all
over Europe voted
with their feet to seek their fortunes there.
Liberty went hand in hand with military prowess. At Grunwald in 1410
its troops
crushed the Teutonic Knights, whose heraldry lives on in the symbols
of the German
military. In 1683, at the gates of Vienna, we prevented the Ottoman
Empire from
uniting Europe under the banner of Islam.
And then, at the turn of 17th and 18th centuries, something changed.
Elected kings,
separate armies and currencies a** couldna**t compete with unified,
authoritarian nation states. The Commonwealtha**s most democratic
feature a** the deputy
of a single province could block legislation a** became its biggest
vulnerability. The
principle of unanimity a** admirable in a federal state a** proved
open to irresponsibility
and corruption.
Poland eventually reformed itself. Our 3rd May Constitution of 1791
unanimity, unified the state and created a permanent government. But
reform came
too late. We lost the war to defend the Constitution and in 1795
Poland was partitioned
for over a century.
Moral of the story? When the world is shifting and new competitors
arise, standing still
is not sufficient. Institutions and procedures that have worked in the
past are not
enough. Incremental change is not enough. You have to adapt fast
enough even to
retain your position.
I believe we have the duty to save our great union from the fate of
Yugoslavia, or the old
Polish Commonwealth.
There is nothing inevitable about our decline. Provided we overcome
our current
malaise, we have sources of excellence and of strength that are the
envy of the world.
We are not only by far the worlda**s biggest economy but the largest
area of peace,
democracy and human rights. Peoples in our neighborhood a** both East
and South a**
look to us for inspiration. If we get our act together we can become a
superpower. In an equal partnership with the United States, we can
preserve the
power, prosperity and leadership of the West.
But we are standing on the edge of a precipice. This is the scariest
moment of my
ministerial life but therefore also the most sublime. Future
generations will judge us by
what we do, or fail to do. Whether we lay the foundations for decades
of greatness, or
shirk our responsibility and acquiesce in decline.
As a Pole and a European, here in Berlin, I say: the time to act is
Michael Wilson
Director of Watch Officer Group
221 W. 6th Street, Suite 400
Austin, TX 78701
T: +1 512 744 4300 ex 4112


text:
The Last Block in Harlem |
In spring 2010, I went to New York to attend the big publishing convention, the Book Expo America. My publisher had set up a book signing for A Scattered Life, my debut novel, which would be released that August.
That same week, I went out to dinner with several members of the publishing team and three other AmazonEncore authors, one of whom was Christopher Herz, author of The Last Block in Harlem. We've kept in touch since then, comparing notes about our book publishing experience and the differences between living in the Midwest and the East Coast.
Just recently, I mentioned in an email that my mother was going through a health crisis. Just a mention, nothing more. The next thing I knew, a package had arrived. Christopher had sent my mom a letter and some Black and White cookies. Wasn't that unbelievably nice? Neither my mom nor I were familiar with Black and White cookies, a New York tradition. The cookies were delicious and the thought behind it was greatly appreciated.
Not too much later, I heard that Christopher was having a tough week--a death in his family occurred at the same time he and his wife were moving house. Now I had the opportunity to reciprocate with a Wisconsin tradition. I sent Christopher and his wife a Kringle.
A long time ago, we'd talked about Christopher guesting on my blog, but he was busy writing his second novel, and I was doing some other stuff and the idea got lost in the shuffle--until now.
Christopher sent me the long awaited post just yesterday, in the form of a letter to me. There's nothing conventional about Christopher, I can tell you that much. If you love the style of writing in his blog post, you'll love his fiction and should buy his book, The Last Block in Harlem. It's currently on sale, so if you're inclined to buy it, do not tarry. Also, don't wait too long.
And without further ado--I'll let Christopher take over:
Dear Karen,
I've been trying to write this blog post for you for over a month and each time it comes out so wrong that I crumble the piece of paper from my typewriter and toss it on my floor.
In my head, I'm always writing on a typewriter.
I keep trying to figure out a way to show how our books, though so different, have a common theme. A connection. I keep looking for that connection. As we both know, sometimes looking for a way to make it all happen is the worst way to make it all happen!
Then, magically, you sent me a Kringle in response to the Black and White cookies I sent to your mother.
Now right there – right there people from Wisconsin and People from New York are asking themselves: What's a Kringle? What's a Black and White cookie? Though part of the same union, we don't know all that much about each other.
Like both of those fine pastries, the ingredients are pretty much the same. Once we eat, we can tell exactly what went into the cooking. If they are any good, love of course, is the main ingredient.
It just has to be.
I guess the same can be said for literature. Though our covers are different, each book for the most part is just words on the page. They wrap around the reader and hopefully exhaust the voice that has been rattling around in our souls looking to leap into the lives of others.
I remember when we met over a year ago. Both of our books were about to get re-released to the world. For you, A Scattered Life was going to the lead the charge of your arsenal of stories, and for me, The Last Block in Harlem was going to make Harlem accessible to all.
We drank and talked about our neighborhoods, our books, our families and our journeys. We drank some more and slipped into our regional accents and drifted into what we were really all about. I remember sitting in that hotel bar and just watching people go by with you and the rest of the writers and marketing folks. Putting stories inside of their movements and making up conversations.
Afterwards, the realization of how the same we all were was warming. It may have been the vodka tonics, but I'm pretty sure it was the connection. Over this past year, we've written back and forth and talked about a Wisconsin / New York exchange program – A program where people get to live inside the worlds of places they don't know.
Sometimes I look out over the city and wonder how to make such a thing happen and then, the other day, I realized:
The program already exists. In our books. It is through literature that people can leave their blocks, their neighborhoods and their daily routines and experience the lives of others. This is why the art of story is so important.
It allows us to open a stranger's refrigerator door and peek into what is left-over from a family meal. Or what take-out was dialed up after a long day at work.
I'm not sure why I'm constantly looking for such connections to strangers. Perhaps that's why I write the way I do: Looking for answers from my readers. Looking for, perhaps, an invite to their family table to eat what love is being cooked up in the kitchen.
Recently, I was working on a project called #Sundaymorningstory where people from all over the world sent pictures in and I created a narrative from that. Not surprisingly, or I guess most surprisingly (whichever way you are looking at the world), Wisconsin had the most participants week to week (Australia was a close 2nd).
I'm thinking of making t-shirts that read: Everyone should live in Wisconsin once in their lives. On the back it would say: Or you're not living!
To go further with that, we should all have the opportunity to sit on porches, stoops, windowsills, rooftops, front lawns and living rooms around the world. However, until that lighting train free of charge to take us to these spots comes into existence, the traveling source will have to be literature.
Proud to be driving some of the trains with you.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
You made it through another long and not particularly eventful week of the off-season. You deserve an award. Not sure what that is, but feel free to while away some time looking at sexy pictures until it arrives. Though after you get a look at that sexy demon up there, you'll be excused for being spent already.
I want more like this!
Follow Kissing Suzy Kolber on Facebook and get the latest NFL news & humor before everyone else.


text:
Triangle Double Layer Dress
AVAILABILITY: Unavailable for immediate shipment.
Textured tank-style dress featuring a curve-hugging fit. Simple and sultry with peekaboo mesh detailing.
- 92% Nylon, 8% spandex
- Made in USA
- Center back to hem: 25" (64 cm)
- Model is 5'10" and wears a US size S


text:
LDProducts.com sells a wide array of printer supplies for Canon inkjet, laser and photo printers, including compatible inkjet & laser toner cartridges that are that are reverse-engineered to provide the same print quality and features as the original. LD Replacement printer ink and toner cartridges print to the highest quality specifications and standards. We carry Canon printer ink for all Canon models, including popular printers such as the Canon MX870, Canon MP495 and many more. Browse through our ever-growing inventory by using the printer model lists below.
Shop for cartridges by:
Canon Printer Model
Shop for cartridges by:
Canon Part Number


text:
Another reason your friend's coffee tastes like piss
Another reason your friend's coffee tastes like piss
Hot shower scenes... this is reality
you know he had to hurt the next day.....
Must have been the weight of the moobs
^ I'd love to hear the story behind that one!
WISDOM is the Knowledge you've gained ... After you could have used it! _Me
^ Public drunkenness?
"Your life is yours alone. Rise up and live it."
Richard Rahl
i think he'll remember this for a long time
OK- IS there a vidoe of James Deen getting strap on fucked???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????
New NRA Poster Boy (National Rifle Assoc.)
awesome thread ... keep 'em cummin'...
drenched guys ... long-haired guys ... foodsex guys ...
Ahh, the "sausage" pizza bit never gets old.
GEE, Dude- where's the fuckin' pizza!!!!!!
He has plenty of meat but not in his fridge
Man's best friend
Someone gets excited about fishing
He smells bad, but hey, he sucks a great cock.
VERY Cute!
^ My first thought. "Damn thats a nice yard!" Lol!
"Your life is yours alone. Rise up and live it."
Richard Rahl
Mine was about the crooked plaque on the fence
spoiling the symmetry.
mine- the Buddha's laughing at his dick!
think he's about to pay back them damn birds for crapping on his car?
Bad decisions make good stories.
Always remember to use condoms
Irrigation system?
Please don't get pee on that beautiful couch
There are guy who only rap about how big their dick is, and there are others, who prove it.


text:
At Hartford Seminary, we understand that funding your education is of high importance. We do not want finances to stand in your way. That's why we offer financial assistance based on need and merit. Through a combination of loans and grants, we hope to help you make your path to Hartford Seminary a little clearer.
Hartford Seminary Financial Aid Options
Federal Stafford Loans and Other Loan Options
1) Need-based Aid:
Limited financial aid in the form of grants is available to matriculated students enrolled in Hartford Seminary's Master of Arts, Cooperative Master of Divinity, Islamic Chaplaincy (full combined Master of Arts/Graduate Certificate program and Graduate Certificate only program), and Doctor of Ministry programs. Eligible students may receive tuition aid up to 50% of annual course tuition. Eligible students (typically, U.S. citizens) applying for need-based grants must complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) available at www.FAFSA.ed.gov. The Hartford Seminary school code is G01387.
The deadlines for first round consideration for need-based aid for the academic year, which begins with the fall semester, are:
April 1 - Master of Arts, Cooperative Master of Divinity and Graduate Certificate in Islamic Chaplaincy Students (New and Continuing)
June 1 – Doctor of Ministry Students (New and Continuing)
After June 1 – All funds awarded on an as available basis
(Students applying for both merit and need-based aid must follow the deadlines for merit scholarships listed below.)
Financial aid applications received after June 1 will be considered if funds are available. Students who are admitted to eligible programs mid-year may also apply for funds.
Students are required to reapply for financial aid each year. Students are not guaranteed financial aid even if they received aid the previous year, and must maintain better than a B- grade point average to maintain eligibility.
To apply for need-based financial aid from Hartford Seminary, visit www.hartsem.edu to read the instructions and access the application form.
Students with special financial concerns or with a change in financial circumstances are encouraged to contact the Executive Assistant to the Dean at 860-509-9553 for more information about applying for financial aid.
To apply for need-based financial aid from Hartford Seminary, read these instructions and fill out the form at the links here:
Students with special financial concerns or with a change in financial circumstances are encouraged to contact the Executive Assistant to the Dean at 860-509-9553 for more information about applying for financial aid.
2) Merit scholarships:
Students applying for admission to the Master of Arts degree, including the full Islamic Chaplaincy program (combined M.A./G.C.), and the Doctor of Ministry program, may submit an application for a merit-based award. Merit scholarships recognize a student's academic aptitude and potential. Extracurricular activities, publications and other awards/honors also will be considered when determining a student's eligibility for a merit award.
Only incoming Master of Arts (M.A.) program students who have a 3.5 grade point average (or above) or its equivalent at previous academic institutions are eligible for M.A. merit awards. M.A. awards are intended to cover the duration of a student's study, but will not exceed three years or 48 credit hours (whichever comes first). In order to keep scholarships, students must maintain better than a 3.5 grade point average.
Only incoming Doctor of Ministry (D.Min.) program students who have a B+ grade point average (or above) or its equivalent in all prior Master's level academic work, and who have five years of ministerial experience after the awarding of their M.Div. degree (or its equivalent) are eligible.
Merit awards are only applicable to for-credit courses.
To apply for a Merit Scholarship, visit www.hartsem.edu to read the instructions and access the application forms.
The deadlines for consideration for merit scholarships are:
February 15 – All Merit Applicants, other than Doctor of Ministry applicants, (see description and eligibility requirements below), also include your need-based application at this time
May 1 – Doctor of Ministry Merit Applicants, also include your need-based application at this time
Ph.D. students, Cooperative Master of Divinity students, Graduate Certificate students, Special Students, and Auditors are not eligible for merit scholarships.
To apply for a Merit Scholarship read the guidelines and fill out the appropriate application at these links:
Guidelines for Master of Arts applicants:
Application for Master of Arts applicants:
Guidelines for Doctor of Ministry applicants:
Application for Doctor of Ministry applicants:
If any of your questions about Hartford Seminary financial aid have not been addressed by the information presented, please contact the Executive Assistant to the Dean at email@example.com or 860-509-9553.
Domestic students who are matriculated in a degree program may apply for Federal Stafford Loans through the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program. Students in the following programs may qualify for federal financial aid: Master of Arts, Islamic Chaplaincy Program (full combined Master of Arts/Graduate Certificate program and Graduate Certificate only program), Cooperative Master of Divinity, and Doctor of Ministry. Students must be registered for at least 6 credits per semester in order to qualify for federal loans.
Due to pending Federal regulations, please check in with the Seminary's Federal Financial Aid Office (860-509-9545) concerning updated student loan information for the International PhD program.
Graduate Certificate students (other than those in Islamic Chaplaincy), Special Students and Auditors are not eligible for Federal Loans.
Hartford Seminary is authorized to certify student eligibility for loans under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program. These loans are often called "Stafford" loans. Eligibility depends on the student's/applicant's program, its length, their personal financial circumstances and their previous educational borrowing. Federal Direct loans are subsidized by the US Government and are subject to strict regulation.
Hartford Seminary's Federal School Code School Code (also known as the OPE id) is G01387.
Federal Direct Stafford Loans
The Federal Direct Stafford Loans that Hartford Seminary can originate fall into different categories:
Unsubsidized Stafford: available to eligible graduate students and on which interest is charged from the moment the loan is made. This loan is not based on financial need.
Effective from 1st July 2012 the Federal Stafford loan limits for graduate students are as follows:
Unsubsidized Stafford: $20,500 Annual
Total Annual: $20,500
The loan limits listed above are not indicative of the financial aid award that students will receive. As mentioned previously, eligibility is based on a variety of factors as determined by the U.S. Department of Education.
To apply for federal financial aid, visit www.hartsem.edu to read the instructions.
If any of your questions about Federal loans have not been addressed by the information presented, please contact Pat Hickey at email@example.com or 860-509-9545.
Other Types of Loans
Graduate PLUS Loans: available to eligible students to cover any shortfalls in the cost of tuition fees alone (i.e. not for living expenses). In order to be eligible for the Federal PLUS Loan, you must first apply for the maximum Federal Stafford Loan following the application process outlined below. These loans are available through Hartford Seminary.
Private/Commercial Loans: available through U.S. lenders not funded by the U.S. Government. These loans can supplement your Stafford Loan up to the cost of attendance at Hartford Seminary. These loans are the applicant's/student's responsibility to research and obtain.
If any of your questions about Federal Financial Aid have not been addressed by the information presented, please contact the federal financial aid administrator, at 860-509-9545.


text:
No pun intended. Seriously.
From what I can see, Wellemeyer is still scheduled to start tomorrow, but I have to talk about this anyway. As great as the Giants pitching is, the reality is the starting rotation doesn't end half as strongly as it begins. It's reasonable to have hope for all of the staff (two time Cy Young Award winner, one time Cy Young award winner, All-Star, no-hitter pitcher) all the way through Todd Wellemeyer. I saw him pitch in LA this April and by the end of the 2nd it was 7-0 LA. Think about that for a second. Yeah. Things haven't improved that much. He can pitch alright at home, but that's not really good enough, especially for a club with offensive problems, like the Giants.
So people are saying "bring up Bumgarner or Hacker!" but great minds think alike. I was listening to the Giants wrap-up on Saturday and Mychael Urban said exactly what I was thinking: bring up Joe Martinez. Hacker and Bumgarner are pitching well, but not that well and to debut Bumgarner in a high pressure hitters park is just madness. Well, not as mad as starting Welllemeyer, but close. Joe has Major League experience and recently pitched a complete game in AAA, striking out seven and allowing one run. I was at the game last season where the Giants lost 11-0. Martinez let in 8 of those runs. I get the concerns, but I think he's back. The other concern I've read "who should be sent down," which is legitimate, but I'd say we should send down Wellemeyer or a bullpen guy. If we replaced Wellemeyer in the No. 5 spot but didn't send him down, he'd presumably go the 'pen, so we'd be able to send another pitcher from there down. As Bochy said, Bumgarner is almost ready, but for the Cincinnati start? We need Joe.
Or we could pitch Wilson in the #5 spot. I wouldn't mind a whole game of Brian and we might even break a few records for number of runs allowed by a pitcher.
Diamond Girl
Update: Ah, poor Wellemeyer. He was doing so well. Wishing him all the best and a speedy recovery.