text:
This website uses cookies. By continuing to browse RFU.com you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more by viewing our privacy and cookie policy.
Skip to content
You are here:
20 February 2014
Photo: Rugbymatters.net
England Women's captain Katy Mclean is hoping the Twickenham crowd will help spur England on to victory against Ireland in the third round of the Six Nations on Saturday, kick off 6:20pm.
Mclean, whose side have only lost once at Twickenham Stadium, is expecting a colossal clash against the reigning Grand Slam champions who are also gunning for a Triple Crown on Saturday after wins over Scotland and Wales.
"We always get our biggest crowds at Twickenham and it's a very special feeling having 13,000 plus people cheering you on," said the England fly-half.
"I would definitely say it helps us playing here. We have had some great wins at Twickenham and it's really starting to feel like our home now. The crowd and support we get there really spurs us on and in a tight game that's exactly what we need."
For England there is a lot at stake in this game. Following a 18-6 defeat to France in Grenoble earlier this month, Mclean knows England must win this match to keep alive their dreams of winning back the Six Nations crown.
"This is a massive game for us," added Mclean. "Ireland are current champions and thoroughly deserve to be. However, in a tournament like the Six Nations it's all up for grabs and this one certainly is. I think Ireland will come with a hard-working pack and, like us, want to play with a good tempo. It should make for a fantastic spectacle.
"Obviously we know it's a must win match but that's not our only focus. We want to win the Six Nations but it's just as important that we play well in every game we play. We want to make all of our performances count as we look towards the Rugby World Cup in August."
Fans can watch England Women v Ireland Women for free with free entry to the stadium after the corresponding men's match.
England team to face Ireland
15 Emily Scarratt (Lichfield)
14 Katherine Merchant (Worcester)
13 Amber Reed (Bristol)
12 Rachael Burford (Thurrock)
11 Kay Wilson (Bristol)
10 Katy Mclean (Darlington Mowden Park Sharks, captain)
9 Natasha Hunt (Lichfield)
1 Rochelle Clark (Worcester)
2 Emma Croker (Richmond)
3 Sophie Hemming (Bristol)
4 Rebecca Essex (Richmond)
5 Joanne McGilchrist (Wasps)
6 Hannah Gallagher (Saracens)
7 Margaret Alphonsi (Saracens)
8 Sarah Hunter (Lichfield, vice-captain)
16 Victoria Fleetwood (Lichfield)
17 Laura Keates (Worcester)
18 Sasha Acheson (Bristol)
19 Tamara Taylor (Darlington Mowden Park Sharks)
20 Marlie Packer (Wasps)
21 La Toya Mason (Wasps)
22 Ceri Large (Worcester)
23 Lydia Thompson (Worcester)
England's Six Nations results and fixture:
Saturday, February 1: France 18 England 6, Stade des Alpes
Sunday, February 9: Scotland 0 England 63, Aberdeen Grammar, Aberdeen
Saturday, February 22: England v Ireland, Twickenham Stadium, KO 6:20pm, live on the BBC Red Button & BBC Radio 5 Live Sports Extra. FREE entry to Twickenham Stadium after England Men v Ireland Men.
Friday, March 7: England v Wales, the Twickenham Stoop, KO 7:30pm, live on www.rfu.com/englandwomenlive and BBC Radio 5 Live Sports Extra. Tickets available from www.ticketmaster.co.uk (0844 847 2492) and www.quins.co.uk (0208 410 6000).
Sunday, March 16: Italy v England, Stadio Giulio Rovato, KO 2pm GMT

subset: commoncrawl


text:
College Preparatory Curriculum
Thurgood Marshall Academy prepares our students for college and life afterward by providing a challenging academic curriculum infused with the theme of law and justice. We know that not all of our students strives to enter the legal field, but we do believe that five essential legal skills—argumentation, negotiation, critical thinking, research, and advocacy—will prepare students for success in any career. Cultivating these abilities improves our students' opportunities for success and enhances possibilities for their communities.
Above and beyond the traditional high school curriculum, Thurgood Marshall Academy students have the opportunity to take honors classes, courses in law, and a variety of electives. We offer six Advanced Placement classes (English Literature, English Language, US History, Calculus AB, Computer Science, and US Government & Politics), honors English and math courses, and as well as honors science, social studies, and Spanish classes. To augment their core courses, students choose from a range of electives including introduction to law, African-American studies, introduction to business, debate, drama, advanced topics in history, psychology, sociology, and Street Law. We also have established partnerships with local universities so our students can take be dually enrolled in college courses for college credit during their junior and senior year.
Thurgood Marshall Academy believes that every student can go to college; in pursuit of that goal, we offer a specialized program, at every grade-level:
- Ninth- and tenth-grade students enroll in our Summer Prep program to facilitate the transition from other schools to the rigorous academic environment at Thurgood Marshall Academy.
- Freshman and sophomore students enroll in double-block English and math classes resulting in students' taking twice as much classroom instruction as their peers in traditional high school programs.
- All Thurgood Marshall Academy juniors enroll in a semester-long SAT preparation class to ensure that they master the skills required by the important college admissions test and have practiced test-taking.
- Thurgood Marshall Academy seniors participate in Senior Seminar, a year-long class taught by our college counseling staff. During the course, students receive intensive coaching on the college application process, with an emphasis on completing college applications, drafting personal statements, applying for scholarships, and preparing for the transition to college life.
Legal Education and Programs
Thurgood Marshall Academy's five legal skills are at the core of the development of the curriculum for all classes. Students complete a law-related project in each social studies class, recognizing the opportunities and challenges presented by the legal system throughout history. Students are first introduced to the practice of law in ninth grade through the Law Day program, a six-session half-day legal workshop taught by volunteer attorneys. Juniors are mentored and tutored once a week by attorneys and legal staff at partner law firms through our Law Firm Tutoring program. Once interest in the legal field is piqued, upperclassmen are enrolled in introduction to law, led by an attorney on staff; Street Law, offered in partnership with Georgetown University Law Center; or intern for a judge at the DC Superior Court, an opportunity typically only offered to law students. Each school year ends with students reflecting upon the infusion of the five legal skills in their course work and curricular activities as part of law integration during the Portfolio process each spring.
Thurgood Marshall Academy's unique portfolio assessment process requires students to examine their academic achievements and struggles and present their reflections and plans for the future before a panel of teachers, staff members, volunteers and parents each year. This presentation also includes students' discussion of their behavior and overall contribution to the school. This process helps students to better understand their own abilities and potential and also strengthens their public speaking and presentation skills.
Extracurricular Activities
Thurgood Marshall Academy students learn in and out of the classroom, and from teachers, mentors, advisors, attorneys, and peers. We have established partnerships with more than 30 organizations throughout DC to help make it possible for students to pursue a wide range of interests and dreams. Students:
- Volunteer in their communities and across the city—100 hours of service are required to graduate
- Compete on athletic teams in the charter school league
- Argue on the debate team
- Write for the student newspaper
- Perform with the drama club and dance team
- Build and program robots to perform specific tasks then compete with Robotics teams across DC and Maryland
- Improve the earth through Thurgood Marshall Academy's Green Club, which maintains the largest school garden in the District.


text:
Nokia BP-4L/ BP4L battery, Standard capacity Lithium-Polymer battery is the factory original battery designed & built specifically for the Nokia 6650, 6790 Surge, E61i, E63, E71, E72, E73, E90, N810, N97 cell phone models.
Nokia E61i Series
Nokia E61i Series 1500mAh Li-Pol Battery
Only 0 left in stock--order soon.
30 day warranty


text:
The TinCaps avoided being swept by Lake County for a third time this season with a 14-4 win Friday at Classic Park in Eastlake, Ohio.
The TinCaps (27-33) had lost five in a row at Lake County (22-39).
River Stevens hit his first home run as a TinCap in the fifth and also had a triple, while collecting four RBI.
The TinCaps scored twice in the third as Mallex Smith and Dustin Peterson came home on a single by Fernando Perez. Smith stole second and third after drawing a two-out walk to bring his season total to 46 stolen bases.
The TinCaps added two more in the fourth with Adolof Reina hitting an RBI single and Smith collecting an RBI double.
Franmil Reyes drove in the first two runs of the fifth with a double to center field. Jake Bauers brought in a run with a single, and Stevens followed with a two-run home run for a 9-0 lead.
The Captains scored three in the sixth, but the TinCaps responded with four more runs in the seventh as Stevens hit a two-run triple and Luis Tejada and Smith each drove in a run for a 13-3 lead.
Lake County scored once in the bottom of the seventh, and Fort Wayne added its final run in the eighth.


text:
Colton Dixon on American Idol Elimination: God Will Guide Meby Hilton Hater at . Comments
Immediately upon hearing his name called by Ryan Seacrest last night, as the latest American Idol finalist to get the boot, Colton Dixon was gracious and humble. He even apologized to the crowd for his poor Wednesday evening performances.
A little while later, backstage with reporters, not much was different for the dyed-hair rocker.
"[I'm] a little overwhelmed, but besides that, I'm good," Dixon said. "I know God is going to use me to do other things."
Was he at all resentful that the judges used up their save on Jessica Sanchez the week before? Not remotely.
She "deserved to be saved, hands down," Colton said, adding that he knew he'd be in the bottom three was he was called to center stage along with Sanchez and Phillip Phillips.Sounding excited to write his own songs and build a career, Dixon went on to detail what he plans for America to hear from him going forward.
"I want to do Christian music. That's where my heart's at. I grew up on it, that's what I've taken a stand for, and that's what I believe in. I'm going to start writing as soon as they let me and get started on a record, whether it's independent [or on Interscope Records]. I don't know what's going to happen. I'm just excited to share a gift that God gave me. It's all in His timing. You've just got to let go and trust that He's going to do good things with you."
We wish Colton the best of luck on his journey.
hi colton you an awsome job at singing and never give up on your dreams. rember you did your best at singing bad romance by lady gaga. I am a huge fan and when I saw that you got voted off that's when your dreams come true is to do a record deal.
You people are rude and if you don't like him go somewhere else. Amen @kccheiffans and frances!! For the other heartless people, stfu and go to a website that hates him. This website isn't where you should be being rude to him. To be honest, its annoying to see people act this way. I feel embaressed for you guys :I.
Joanna: obviously you don't know the Lord, because God is love, and you hsve a hateful heart. You no nothing about who has gods presence in them or not because you are blinded and can't hear
ì appreciated colton dixon's humility. As for the remaining contestants, they all would be very successful. no one remaining is a looser. hey look at jennifer hudson..;)
Colton had a mediocre voice and i wasnt moved by it one bit..... and sounding bitter about been eliminated becos of God is sounding itchy to my ears, have you forgotten that Joshua too is a church boy yet i feel God's presence more in his life than yours so STOP making excuses for your elimination. PLS!!!!!!!!
There is a verse in the Bible that tells us that when we confess our faith in Christ to others, He confesses us before the Father in Heaven. That is just what he did during a very difficult elimination. Colton will be blessed in whatever he does. I was bummed that he is off, but it will be so great to see how God will use him.
Man, people on here sure aren't very charitable! Personally, I liked Colton but his last few performances were not good. I believe that he will go in the right direction, and yes, guided by God!!! Damn, people, give God a chance here!!!!
You're right! God will will guide you right to the nearest Pac Sun store where you will work the cash register.
Oh sure. there are children starving all around the world, people being blown up by suicide bombers, and countless natural disasters. But god is making sure Colton Dixon has a good music career. What an egotistical thing to say.
First of all all the remaining contestants can and probably will be rich and famous in the music industry.
there is so much talent there it is hard to distinguish excellent from excellent. Already they have spent more time
On the air than 99% of Americans and their names are practically house hold words. No one is now a loser all
Will be getting recording contracts I'm sure.


text:
Tabletop Simulator is now released on Steam Early Access. Everyone is welcome to download and try out the game in single player, however, multiplayer requires a product key. You can purchase Tabletop Simulator on Steam or you can purchase a Steam key through the Humble Widget on our website.
If you encounter any issues please post on our forums or send an email.
Download Early Access v1.0 (04/17)
** Please note that the preview download is a very old version and does NOT include the latest updates on the Steam version. Patch notes are located here. **
Mac version not launching?
If you're having problems with the executable, try doing the following:
chmod +x Tabletop\ Simulator.app/Contents/MacOS/Tabletop\ Simulator
Having trouble getting people to connect to your game?
You might have to manually open your port (default: 11155). How to port forward


text:
CHILE v Ecuador (A), Argentina (H)
Angelo Henriquez
ECUADOR v Venezuela (A)
Antonio Valencia
ENGLAND v San Marino (H), Poland (A)
Michael Carrick, Tom Cleverley
Wayne Rooney, Danny Welbeck
FRANCE v Japan (H), Spain (A)
Patrice Evra
JAPAN v France (A), Brazil (N)
Shinji Kagawa
MEXICO v Guyana (N), El Salvador (H)
Javier Hernandez
NETHERLANDS v Andorra (H), Romania (A)
Robin van Persie
NORTHERN IRELAND v Portugal (A)
Jonny Evans
NORWAY v Switzerland (A), Cyprus (A)
Joshua King
PORTUGAL v Northern Ireland (H)
REPUBLIC OF IRELAND v Germany (H), Faroe Islands (A)
Robbie Brady
SCOTLAND v Wales (A), Belgium (A)
Darren Fletcher
with the Mexico squad ahead of the clash with Guyana in Houston, with a home clash in Torreon against El Salvador to follow.
Closer to home, Shinji Kagawa is in Japan's plans after sitting out their last fixture with a back problem with Alberto Zaccheroni's side tackling Patrice Evra's France in Paris and Brazil in Poland in two prestigious friendlies.
The Reds have four representatives in Roy Hodgson's latest England party. Tom Cleverley, Danny Welbeck, Wayne Rooney and Michael Carrick will hope to feature against San Marino and Poland.
Jonny Evans (Northern Ireland) and Darren Fletcher (Scotland) are also in action for the Home Nations while Robbie Brady has been drafted into Giovanni Trapattoni's Republic of Ireland squad to replace striker Kevin Doyle after initially being on the stand-by list.
Nani is likely to be in direct opposition to Evans in Oporto while fellow established international star Robin van


text:
EGR Superguard Bug Shield 303841
- Our Price: $81.85
- Shipping:FREE SHIPPING
- Part Number: 303841
Purchase this item by Tuesday, Dec 15th for Delivery by Dec 24th
$81.85Free Shipping
Select your vehicle details above to ensure item compatibility.
Ships by 12/01/14
Superguard Hood Protector
- Part #: 303841
- Smoke
- Installation Instructions
EGR 303841 fits:
- 2010-2011 Honda CR-V
More like this
There are no reviews for this application.
See All EGR Superguard Bug Shield Reviews.


text:
I need some advice on how to attract certain traffic
I'm in the middle of getting my site up and ready for a launch, and I desperately need an SEO expert to get affiliate publishers and online business owners to post jobs on my site.
Affiliate publishers/Business owners in need of
-Articles Written
-Craig's List Posters
-Facebook likes and comments
-Titter followers and posts
-Forum Posters
-Sign ups
-Voting & Rating
-Mobile Applications
and just about anything they ask for
This is a microjobs/crowdsourcing site that needs help launching and I am really stumped on the SEO Optimization for this.
I'm not an expert on advertising for this specific group of people. Anyone with some sound (and respectful) advice?


text:
" Time is so precious-do not waste it." .
Here is a video down below that Sara took on Christmas Eve of the grandsons sledding with Jeff, Sara and Marybeth. Looks like the guys had fun. Glad Sara, who was still sick, stayed back to record it for us.
This link above will give you the weather report for the Tennessee Valley , and you can also get your own local weather by typing in your zip code. This reports changes as the day goes on so the report you get is always current. I always look at our weather first thing in the morning this season of the year it is important to us. Dad.
We are sorry to hear that Sara has not been feeling very good, We hope that you are better this Monday morning Sara, but do not rush things, take it slow and easy today if such a thing is possible. I am going to wait untill later this morning to go to your Sara's Dog Training blog. But I will be there, I just can't miss seing ,guess who ? DAD.
Here is a link below from TomatoCasual that was very interesting to me. Look at it if you possible have the time. Dad.
Here are five links that I want to say a few words about, Jim's blog, Tennessee Granddaddy , Mandy's blog It Ain't Easy Bein' Green , Karen's blog BrushStrokes Dad's Blog, Dad's Tomato Garden Journal; and Mary's blog Let's Live and Learn Together. These five are all in the same family. It makes me proud to know that others are carrying on And when I am gone they can be helping others to smile and be happy.
And live for others.. And I do have two more great grandchildren. Kara & Zachary that will be old enough to begin to think about it, DAD.
We must never miss these three Shooting My Universe Dad never does and
I have not said all that I had planned to this morning but I am going to stop anyway, it is Monday and it's time that you and I need to get busy. We all have lots that we could do, I wonder sometimes why I don't. Just like smiling and being kind and frogiving, I am starting over again today and try to do better. I wan't to come back in the morning if you have time to put up with me. I am sending Love and Good Wishes to my friends everwhere.
©. 2009 Dad's Tomato Garden Journal all rights reserved


text:
South Florida TFS User Group - Inaugural Meeting
SherlockTech Staffing
Monday, June 30, 2014 from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM (EDT)
Miami, Florida
Who's Going
Loading your connections...
3 of your friends are going. Share it to get more people on board! Share
Sara Haughty
San Francisco, California
San Francisco, California
Luke Picard
London, United Kingdom
London, United Kingdom
Rick Vespucio
Florence, Italy
Florence, Italy
Event Details
Join us for the inaugural South Florida TSF User Group Meeting
Team Foundation Server
Visual Studio Team Foundation Server 2013 (TFS) is the collaboration platform at the core of Microsoft's application lifecycle management (ALM) solution. TFS supports agile development practices, multiple IDEs and platforms locally or in the cloud and gives you the tools you need to effectively manage software development projects throughout the IT lifecycle.
Lessons Learned from TFS 2013 Upgrade
Rajesh Sabat of Carnival will present Lessons Learned from Carnival's TFS 2013 upgrade implemented a few months ago.
Have questions about South Florida TFS User Group - Inaugural Meeting? Contact SherlockTech Staffing
When & Where
Carnival Cruise Lines Conferece Center
3655 Northwest 87th Avenue
Florida 33178
Monday, June 30, 2014 from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM (EDT)
Add to my calendar


text:
- 22.214.171.124 Overview of IMD Clearance
- 18.104.22.168 Special Cases of Clearance Requirements
- 188.8.131.52 Determining Reviewers
- 126.96.36.199 Specialized Reviewers
- 188.8.131.52 Clearance Package Guidelines
- 188.8.131.52 Description of a Clearance Package
- 126.96.36.199 Guidelines for Reviewers
- 126.96.36.199 Responding to Reviewers' Comments
- 126.96.36.199 Resolving Disagreements
- 22.214.171.124 Final Stages of the Clearance Process
Manual Transmittal
April 07, 2014
(1) This transmits revised IRM 1.11.9, Internal Management Documents, Clearing and Approving Internal Management Documents (IMDs).
This IRM section provides clearance procedures for IRMs, Delegation Orders, and Policy Statements.
Material Changes
(1) Incorporated Interim Guidance RAS-01-0913-0003 to add to the scope of PGLD's specialized review in IRM 22.214.171.124.2, Privacy, Governmental Liaison & Disclosure. PGLD now reviews IRMs related to privacy, information protection, and identity theft in addition to its review of IRMs related to disclosure or Official Use Only (OUO) information.
(2) Removed the shortened clearance timeframe for obsoleting IRMs. When obsoleting IRMs, follow standard clearance procedures.
(3) Removed the subsection about the publishing process, since that process is described in IRM 1.11.5, Publishing Internal Management Documents (IMDs).
(4) IRM 188.8.131.52, Overview of IMD Clearance. Added references to other IRM sections for information on clearing other types IMDs.
(5) IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Stages in the IMD Clearance Process. Revised, clarified, and added subsection references to the table of stages in the clearance process.
(6) IRM 220.127.116.11, Special Cases of Clearance Requirements. Grouped together all of the exceptions to the standard IMD clearance requirements.
(7) IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Editorial Updates. Revised description of editorial updates, and added guidance about how to clear editorial updates.
(8) IRM 188.8.131.52.2, Incorporating Interim Guidance into the IRM. Added guidance to send clearance documents secured during clearance of the interim guidance to the IRS Historical Research Library when incorporating that interim guidance into the IRM.
(9) IRM 22.214.171.124, Determining Reviewers. Consolidated descriptions of internal, external, and specialized reviewers.
(10) IRM 18.104.22.168, Specialized Reviewers. Added contact information for the specialized reviewers.
(11) IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Chief Counsel. Clarified Chief Counsel's clearance role and how to request clearance from Counsel.
(12) IRM 188.8.131.52.3, Taxpayer Advocate Service. Added a link to the list of taxpayer rights and added a caution to protect taxpayer rights.
(13) IRM 188.8.131.52.4, Workforce Relations. Revised the guidance for specialized clearance through the Human Capital Office (HCO) Workforce Relations office.
(14) IRM 188.8.131.52.6, Office of Taxpayer Correspondence. Specified that Office of Taxpayer Correspondence only reviews IRS toll-free phone numbers.
(15) IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Standard Clearance Time. Consolidated information about email templates.
(16) IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Form 2061 – Document Clearance Record. Simplified this subsection. Guidance on how to complete the Form 2061 is available on the form.
(17) IRM 126.96.36.199.1, Form 2061 – Document Clearance Record. Added guidance to contact your IMD/IRM coordinator for organizational-specific clearance guidance.
(18) IRM 188.8.131.52.2, Ways to Make IRM Clearance Easier to Review. Added a requirement to create both a clean and tracked-changes PDF for reviewers.
(19) IRM 220.127.116.11.2, No Response to a Clearance Request. Consolidated information on what to do if you do not receive a response to a request for clearance.
(20) IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Issuing IRM While Disagreements are Negotiated. Added guidance requiring IRMs to be re-cleared if the clearance process takes more than one year.
(21) IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Issuing IRM While Disagreements are Negotiated. Added a requirement to hold a meeting between the author, a dissenting reviewer, and their managers before issuing the IRM while disagreements are negotiated.
(22) Substantially revised, clarified, and reorganized content throughout. Made editorial updates, updated IRM references, updated links, improved the content flow, and provided logical subsection titles.
Effect on Other DocumentsThis IRM supersedes IRM 1.11.9 dated November 1, 2011 and incorporates Interim Guidance RAS-01-0913-0003, Interim Guidance on Clearance of Internal Management Documents (IMDs) related to Privacy, Information Protection, and Identity Theft through PGLD.
AudienceThe IMD community: IMD authors, IMD/IRM coordinators, their managers, and those responsible for reviewing and clearing IMD material.
Effective Date(04-07-2014)
Kathryn A. Greene
Director, Servicewide Policy, Directives and Electronic Research
Purpose. This IRM section describes the Internal Management Document (IMD) clearance process and provides procedures that support the process. This IRM section also contains guidelines for IRM reviewers.
Definition. The clearance process is an established, formal process that provides organizations affected by an IMD an opportunity to review, comment, and concur with the information in the IMD to ensure it is complete, correct, and does not conflict with another policy, procedure, or process.
Audience. This IRM section is for the IMD community: IMD authors, IMD/IRM coordinators, and their managers. This material is also helpful to those responsible for reviewing and clearing IMD material.
Scope. This IRM section provides clearance procedures for IRM, Delegation Orders, and Policy Statements. Other IRMs may provide additional clearance information for certain types of IMDs:
Type of IMD: Additional Source of Clearance Guidance: Servicewide Policy Statement IRM 1.11.3, Policy Statements Servicewide Delegation Order IRM 1.11.4, Delegation Orders Division/Function Delegation Order IRM 1.11.4, Delegation Orders Interim Guidance IRM 1.11.10, Interim Guidance Process
Process Owner. The Clearance Process is owned by the Office of Servicewide Policy, Directives and Electronic Research (SPDER).
Contact Information. This IRM section is authored by the SPDER office, which may be contacted in either of the following ways:
Email at firstname.lastname@example.com
Website at http://spder.web.irs.gov/officeinfo/contact/
The clearance process occurs between the authoring and publishing processes. The author has conducted an informal review and has updated, revised, or written the IMD, and is now ready to send the document to others for their formal review and concurrence. This review is called the IMD clearance process.
The table below describes the stages of the IMD clearance process, who is responsible for actions, and the actions taken during each stage.
Stage Description Actions Taken IRM Reference 1 Author prepares the draft IMD for review • Follow internal review procedures before sending out for clearance.
•Create PDF files of the updated IMD.
IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Ways to Make IRM Clearance Easy to Review 2 Author determines reviewers •Identify programs affected by guidance.
•Identify specialized reviewers.
•Obtain help from IMD/IRM coordinator or management, if necessary.
•IRM 126.96.36.199, Special Cases of Clearance Requirements
•IRM 184.108.40.206, Determining IRM Reviewers
•IRM 18.104.22.168, Specialized Reviewers
3 Author completes Form 2061 and distributes to reviewers •Complete Form 2061, Document Clearance Record, identifying the reviewers of your IMD.
•Send the draft IMD, any revised graphics, and the Form 2061 to the identified reviewers.
•IRM 184.108.40.206, Description of a Clearance Package
•IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Form 2061 – Document Clearance Record
4 Reviewer comments on draft IMD •Review the IMD and provide comments if applicable
•Request additional review time, if necessary.
•Sign Form 2061 by the listed Response Due date.
•IRM 220.127.116.11.1, Standard Clearance Time
•IRM 18.104.22.168, Guidelines for Reviewers
5 Author follows up on non-responses •Send follow-up emails on non-responses to requests for review.
•If no response received by final follow-up due date, annotate on Form 2061 that no response was received.
IRM 184.108.40.206.2, No Response to a Clearance Request 6 Author considers reviewers' comments •Consider proposed changes to the IMD.
•Revise draft IMD based on reviewers' comments.
•Document whether you agree with the changes and address disagreements on substantive comments.
•Email reviewers to tell them the status of their comments and any changes that were made based on their comments.
•IRM 188.8.131.52, Responding to Reviewers' Comments
•IRM 184.108.40.206, Resolving Disagreements
7 Author obtains program owner approval Send the final IMD to the program owner for their signature. IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Approval by Program Owner 8 Author ensures the IMD is ready for Publishing •Check to ensure there is signed Form 2061 from each reviewer.
•Associate comments and documented actions on disagreements with related Forms 2061.
•Send the clearance documentation package to IMD or designated IRM coordinator.
IRM 188.8.131.52.2, Final Review by IMD/IRM Coordinator 9 IMD/IRM coordinator conducts a final review •Review clearance package for completeness.
•Sign Form 2061.
•Upload zip file to Publishing.
•Assemble all Forms 2061 and all information relating to any substantive feedback, and send this clearance package to IRS Historical Research Library.
•IRM 126.96.36.199.2, Final Review by IMD/IRM Coordinator
•IRM 184.108.40.206.3, Clearance Documents Sent to IRS Historical Research Library
There are certain cases of IRMs that have special clearance requirements. This subsection describes these special cases.
The special cases described in this subsection are:
Special cases: For more information, see: Making only editorial updates to IRMs IRM 126.96.36.199.1 Incorporating interim guidance into the IRM IRM 126.96.36.199.2 Incorporating Delegation Orders and Policy Statements into IRM 1.2, Servicewide Policies and Authorities IRM 18.104.22.168.3
Editorial changes do not affect the meaning of the content of the IRM. They require minimal review. Generally the program owner for that IRM and the IMD/IRM coordinator are the only reviewers. However, your organization may require additional levels of review. See IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Editorial Updates, for more information.
The following is a list of examples of editorial changes:
Spelling, typographical, or grammatical errors
Updating organizational terms and titles
Adding, updating or correcting references, links, or citations
Adding verbal descriptions to graphics for Section 508 compliance
To update an IRM with only editorial changes, as described above, take the following actions:
Stage Who is Responsible Actions Taken IRM Reference 1 Author prepares the draft IMD for review • Follow internal review procedures before sending out for clearance.
•Create PDF files of the updated IRM.
IRM 126.96.36.199.2, Ways to Make IRM Clearance Easy to Review 2 Author obtains program owner approval •Complete Form 2061, Document Clearance Record, identifying the reviewers of your IRM. Only the program owner and IMD/IRM coordinator review the IRM.
•Send the draft IRM, any revised graphics, and the Form 2061 to the program owner and the IMD/IRM coordinator.
•IRM 18.104.22.168, Description of a Clearance Package
•IRM 184.108.40.206.1, Form 2061 – Document Clearance Record
•IRM 18.104.22.168.1, Approval by Program Owner
3 Author ensures the IMD is ready for Publishing •Ensure there is a signed Form 2061 from the program owner.
•Send package to IMD or designated IRM coordinator.
IRM 220.127.116.11.2, Final Review by IMD/IRM Coordinator 4 IMD/IRM coordinator conducts a final review •Review clearance package for completeness.
•Sign Form 2061.
•Upload zip file to Publishing.
•Send all Forms 2061 to the IRS Historical Research Library.
•IRM 220.127.116.11.2, Final Review by IMD/IRM Coordinator
•IRM 126.96.36.199.3, Clearance Documents Sent to IRS Historical Research Library
IRM revisions can contain procedural guidance that was issued through interim guidance memoranda or Service Electronic Research Program (SERP) IRM Procedural Updates (IPUs). The clearance documents (such as Forms 2061, etc.) secured during the clearance of the interim guidance may suffice for the clearance of the revised IRM, according to the table below.
Follow these guidelines when revising an IRM to only incorporate interim guidance:
If ... Then ... The interim guidance has already been cleared and concurred through all affected offices and specialized reviewers within the past 12 months and there are no other substantive changes. Add the information from the interim guidance into the IRM.
Prepare a new Form 2061 for IRM publication
Obtain concurrence from the IMD/IRM coordinator and program owner/executive responsible for the program.
Send the clearance documents secured during clearance of the interim guidance to the IRS Historical Research Library.
There are any new substantive changes to the IRM,
The interim guidance has unresolved issues pending from its clearance,
The interim guidance was not cleared and concurred through all affected offices and specialized reviewers, or
The interim guidance was cleared more than 12 months ago.
Prepare a new Form 2061 for IRM publication
Clear the IRM following the guidelines in IRM 18.104.22.168 and IRM 220.127.116.11.
Refer to IRM 1.11.10, Interim Guidance Process, for guidance on preparing and clearing interim guidance.
SPDER is responsible for incorporating approved delegation orders and policy statements into the IRM. When Commissioner's Delegations of Authority and Service Policy Statements are published as part of the IRM 1.2, Servicewide Policies and Authorities, they are subject to the same clearance rules as other IRMs. Follow the guidance in IRM 184.108.40.206, Determining IRM Reviewers, and IRM 184.108.40.206, Specialized Reviewers.
See IRM 1.11.3, Policy Statements, and IRM 1.11.4, Delegation Orders, for guidance on preparing, clearing, and publishing these IMDs.
The subsection explains how authors determine who will review their IMD.
Contact your IMD/IRM coordinator for help determining appropriate reviewers. See http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/resources/IMDContacts.asp for a listing of IMD/IRM coordinators.
Every published IMD was previously reviewed and approved. It is generally unnecessary to expand the review beyond the changed information. However, there may be cases when an office has requested to review and clear the IMD. In addition, if laws or business practices have changed since the IMD was published, other offices may need to review the entire document.
If your IMD revision includes substantial changes (major or important changes to the content, including technical, procedural, legislative, or interpretive changes), it has three potential types of reviewers: internal reviewers, external reviewers, and specialized reviewers.
Internal reviewers
External reviewers
Specialized reviewers
Internal Reviewer: There are two types of internal reviewers. The first type of internal reviewer is an employee in the originating office who is responsible for reviewing published content or other communications. This may include a subject matter expert (SME), executive assistant, or manager in your immediate or program office. Your organizational IMD/IRM coordinator is also an internal reviewer, and is required to review your IMD. The SME will informally review the IMD during the authoring process and may not require a formal signature. See IRM 18.104.22.168, Informal Review.
Often, IMDs will be cleared by IRS offices outside the program office yet within the "owning" IRS organization. This type of reviewer is also an "internal reviewer" .
Material relating to penalties (Part 20) are owned by the Penalty and Interest office in the Small Business/Self Employed Division (SB/SE). When penalty procedures change, the information may affect the work processes and procedures of employees in other SB/SE offices such as Examination and Collection. Employees in SB/SE offices outside the Penalty and Interest office are "internal" reviewers.
External Reviewer: When the new or changed content affects or changes the work process or procedures of the employees in another IRS organization, then review by such "external" organization is required.
SB/SE made changes to their penalty procedures, which may affect the procedures and operations of other examination or examination-related functions in Tax Exempt and Government Entities (TE/GE) and Appeals. In this scenario, TE/GE and Appeals are "external" reviewers because they will need to change their penalty procedures if SB/SE changes its penalty procedures.
Specialized Reviewer: A "specialized" reviewer involves offices with program oversight in certain particular areas involving important IRS operations. Depending on the circumstances, such specialized reviewers are required to review the IMDs that contain content within their particular area subject matter expertise. These reviewers are described in IRM 188.8.131.52, Specialized Reviewers.
The following table details the actions the author takes at each step:
Step Action 1 Determine the impact that changes have on other offices, both internal and external, by considering whether the information:
Changes the authorities, procedures, workload, and/or workflow for another office so they are required to do something not previously done or to do something differently
Changes documents or files used by another office
A mere reference to a program in an IRM section, including a reference to their specific IRM section, does not require the function or organization to review that IRM during the clearance process.
See IRM 18.104.22.168.1, Examples of When to Send an IRM to Another Office for Clearance, for details.
2 Include individuals or offices that asked to provide input or that you asked to provide input, such as during an informal review. See IRM 188.8.131.52, Informal Review. 3 Determine if one or more specialized reviewers must review it. See IRM 18.104.22.168, Specialized Reviewers.
If an organization "owns" a process or program, then it has the sole authority to set policy or create procedures to manage that process or program. Generally, when creating or revising policy or procedures, the organization who owns the process or program is the only organization that needs to clear an IRM.
Research, Analysis and Statistics (RAS) owns IRM 1.1.18, Organization and Staffing, Research, Analysis and Statistics Division. IRM 1.1.18 is only cleared within RAS (and through any appropriate specialized reviewers).
If two organizations share responsibility for a program, then the authoring organization must clear the guidance with the organization who shares responsibility.
The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Agency-Wide Shared Services (AWSS) share responsibility for the Public Transportation Subsidy Program (PTSP). CFO writes the guidance and clears it through AWSS.
If you are writing an IMD that relates to implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), clear that IMD through the ACA office.
If an organization authors an IRM section containing policies, or procedures used by another organization's employees to do their jobs, the author should coordinate any changes that will change the authorities, procedures, or workflows used by another function or organization in the informal review process. The clearance of that IRM section goes through any function or organization that must change their authorities, procedures, and/or workflow because of those procedures.
If the procedures change documents or files used by another function or organization, the organization that authors the IRM section must clear the IRM through the functions or organizations who use the documents or files.
Clearance must include review and concurrence from specialized reviewers when the material addresses certain content. Specialized reviewers are those offices with expertise in a certain program area, as provided below.
When material contains … Then send complete IRM to… Legal matters as described in IRM 18.104.22.168.1 Chief Counsel
Find contact information at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/resources/OrgIMDClearancePOC.asp
Any of the following as described in IRM 18.104.22.168.2:
Content identified as Official Use Only (OUO)
Procedures, policies, or instructions relating to the disclosure or potential disclosure of official information
Procedures, policies, or instructions relating to privacy, information protection, or identity theft
Privacy, Governmental Liaison and Disclosure via email to *PGLD IMD SPOC Changes to any sections in the following IRM parts:
Part 1 – Organization, Finance, and Management
Part 3 – Submission Processing
Part 4 – Examining Process
Part 5 – Collecting Process
Part 7 – Rulings and Agreements
Part 8 – Appeals
Part 20 – Penalty and Interest
Part 21 – Customer Account Services
Part 22 – Taxpayer Education and Assistance
Part 25 – Special Topics
See special handling of SERP IPUs in IRM 22.214.171.124.1, Clearance and Approval of SERP IPUs.
Taxpayer Advocate Service via email to *TAS IMD SPOC Changes to working conditions or job duties Workforce Relations Division
Find contact information at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/resources/OrgIMDClearancePOC.asp
Any of the following information:
An IRS toll-free number
Instructions on developing or revising taxpayer notices or letters
Guidance on handling erroneous taxpayer correspondence
Office of Taxpayer Correspondence
Find contact information at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/resources/OrgIMDClearancePOC.asp
Procedures relating to:
Implementation of new legislation affecting tax administration, or
Interactions with Congress or a member of Congress (e.g., a U.S. Representative or a Senator)
Legislative Affairs
Find contact information at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/resources/OrgIMDClearancePOC.asp
The Office of Chief Counsel reviews IMDs to ensure they are legally accurate. However, not all IMDs require review by Counsel.
Authors must submit IMDs to Chief Counsel that are new or revised interpretations of:
Federal law
Treasury Regulations, Revenue Rulings, Revenue Procedures, Notices and Announcements
Treasury Orders or Treasury Directives
IRS wide Policy Statements or Servicewide Delegation Order
Authors must submit an IMD to Chief Counsel for review and clearance when requested to do so by that office.
When not to submit: Do not submit IRMs to Chief Counsel for review and clearance that:
Are renumbered unless they meet the criteria above
Relate exclusively to information technology, error resolution, batch or bulk processing, mail and transportation management, or work planning and control
Do not present legal issues requiring their review (as determined by Office of Chief Counsel during its last review)
When clearing filing season IRMs or any IRM section revised every year, send them to Chief Counsel if the new or revised text meets the criteria in (2) above.
If the new or revised text does not meet the criteria in (2), submit to Chief Counsel based on the following schedule:
Send Parts 1, 5, 8, 10, 11 and 21 to Chief Counsel in years ending with an odd number.
2015, 2017, 2019, etc.
Send Parts 3, 4, 7, 13, 20, 22 and 25 to Chief Counsel in years ending with an even number.
2014, 2016, 2018, etc.
The review year for a filing season IRM is the year the IRM is effective.
An interactive Chief Counsel Clearance Determination Tool is available to help determine if an IRM should be cleared through the Office of Chief Counsel. Find it at the SPDER web page at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/clearance/CounselClearance/.
Send your clearance request to the Counsel clearance contact, listed at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/resources/OrgIMDClearancePOC.asp. Do not cc any attorneys or Chief Counsel SMEs in the email requesting clearance. In your email to Chief Counsel, state whether Counsel has informally reviewed your IRM or cleared interim guidance incorporated into your IRM and if so, list the case-mis tracking number on Counsel's response or identify the attorney who provided assistance.
Chief Counsel generally does not review or verify the following unless specifically requested:
Cross-references to forms, notices, other IRMs or other documents.
Transaction Codes (TC Codes).
Basic disclosure rules when an IRM is being cleared with PGLD.
Indexed figures in IRMs.
Chief Counsel will generally provide comments on a Word Feedback Form. If you need comments in a different format, contact the docket attorney for the office assigned prime control of the clearance request.
Authors must submit all IMDs to Privacy, Governmental Liaison and Disclosure for review and clearance if they involve any of the following:
Disclosure or potential disclosure of official information
Official use only (OUO) information. For additional information, see IRM 126.96.36.199.2.1.
Privacy, information protection, or identity theft. For additional information, see IRM 220.127.116.11.2.2.
Include a completed Form 13709, Privacy, Governmental Liaison and Disclosure Checklist for IMD and Training Materials, with the clearance package sent to *PGLD IMD SPOC.
Please type either "Disclosure" , "PIP" , or "Disclosure/PIP" in the subject line of your email to *PGLD IMD SPOC, depending upon the items you have marked in section 9 of the Form 13709.
For additional information, refer to the following resources:
Disclosure site on IRWeb at: http://discl.web.irs.gov/Function/imd.asp
IRM 11.3.12, Designation of Documents
To ensure content is properly designated as Official Use Only, the Office of Disclosure within PGLD reviews all IMDs during clearance if they contain tagged OUO information.
The designation of information as OUO must be approved by an official who has the delegated authority per Servicewide Delegation Order 11-1 (formerly DO-89, Rev.10).
Authors coordinate with management, not the Office of Disclosure, to determine what information is "official use only." The Office of Disclosure reviews the tagged OUO material and addresses any conflicts with the recommendations. Agreement must be reached prior to issuing the IMD.
The clearance file submitted to the IRS Historical Research Library must contain documentation outlining deviations from recommendations made by the Office of Disclosure.
PGLD is responsible for ensuring consistency in all processes and procedures affecting the ways the Service combats identity theft and handle privacy information protected by statute, regulation, Executive Order, or internal policy.
Authors must submit all IMDs to PGLD that deal with any of the criteria below:
Criteria: Description: General privacy and data protection compliance
Compliance with any privacy and data protection laws, regulations, and policies
References to IRM 10.5 and subsections
Definition, use, or management of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and other sensitive information
Appropriately protecting PII and other sensitive information in email or online, during shipping, while stored (hardcopy or electronic format), in Flexiplace, Telework, or Home as POD situations, or on SharePoint
Procedures related to Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) or Security Assessment and Accreditation
Elimination or reduction in use of Taxpayer Identification Numbers
Use of live data in training or developing systems
Adoption or development of new technology; new uses for existing technology including, but not limited to:
Online services
Social media
Mobile devices
Procedures related to identity theft and/or refund fraud Inadvertent/unauthorized disclosures or accesses
Data loss or breach prevention tools or procedures
Procedures related to preventing or addressing unauthorized access or inspection of taxpayer records (UNAX)
Authors must submit IMDs to Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) for review and clearance as provided in IRM 126.96.36.199.
TAS reviews IMDs to ensure taxpayer rights are protected, to identify and mitigate IRS practices which might infringe on taxpayer rights or duties or create undue burden to taxpayers.
All employees must protect taxpayer rights when creating instructions to staff. This promotes effective tax administration within all organizations and helps to build trust, consistency, and promotes voluntary compliance.
In accordance with IRC 7803, the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate is to identify and propose changes in the practices of the IRS in order to mitigate taxpayer problems.
Taxpayer rights are listed in Pub 1, available at http://www.irs.gov/uac/Publication-1,-Your-Rights-as-a-Taxpayer-1.
Taxpayer duties are actions that the taxpayer is required to take.
Email IRM clearance requests to the *TAS IMD SPOC mailbox, a mailbox shared by their IMD staff.
Clearing an IMD through the Human Capital Office (HCO), Workforce Relations, only applies to matters involving a change to working conditions (i.e., conditions of employment) of Bargaining Unit employees.
Conditions of employment is a term used to refer to personnel policies, practices, and matters impacting a bargaining unit employee's daily work life (e.g., work processes/assignments, schedules, overtime, equipment, office space/design, parking, type/placement of office furniture, relocation of an office). Some changes require formal notice and negotiations with the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) before the change can be implemented.
Authors must contact their Embedded Workforce Relations/Labor Relations (WR/LR) representative for help in making an initial determination regarding the impact of any changes on working conditions. All proposed changes affecting working conditions must be submitted to the Workforce Relations Office of Labor Relations Strategy & Negotiations (LRSN) for final review/concurrence with initial determinations. If an organization does not have an embedded workforce/labor relations staff, contact must be made directly with LRSN at firstname.lastname@example.com.
LRSN will work with the Embedded WR/LR representative or the IRM author, as appropriate, to advise them if the change(s) requires notice and bargaining with NTEU.
If the change(s) does not require notice and bargaining, the IRM author may proceed with the changes and the review/clearance process.
If the change(s) does require notice and bargaining with NTEU, the IRM author must wait for an agreement and contact from LRSN before proceeding.
Following conclusion of the notice and bargaining process, LRSN will contact the Embedded WR/LR representative, the Area LRSN, or the IRM author, as appropriate, to advise them that the change(s) to the IRM may proceed based on the agreement of the parties.
Legislative Affairs is responsible for managing the IRS's relationship with Members of Congress and their staff; planning, developing, directing, and evaluating the legislative activities of the Internal Revenue Service.
When enacted legislation becomes law, all IRS Business Operating Divisions must develop an implementation plan to make program changes required by new legislation requirements. Specific implementation actions typically include IRM updates.
When a new IMD or change to an existing IMD relates to implementing new legislation affecting tax administration, or to official interactions with Members of Congress, the IRM must be sent to Legislative Affairs.
This subsection describes the rules and processes for sending an IMD through clearance. This subsection discusses:
The clearance time frames
The process for clearing an IMD
There are two ways to clear an IMD. The author should determine the risk involved in using either method.
Simultaneous Clearance: In simultaneous clearance, send the document to all reviewers at the same time. If a reviewer suggests a substantial change adopted by the author, the author must determine whether the IMD requires clearing again through all other reviewers, including specialized reviewers. Consult with your IMD/IRM coordinator if you have questions about whether an IRM needs to be re-cleared.
Sequential Clearance: In sequential clearance, complete the review in a certain order. List each reviewer on the clearance document in the order the review must occur. Once the first reviewer completes their review, they forward the document to the next reviewer, and so on until every reviewer completes the review. If a reviewer suggests a substantial change adopted by the author, the author must resend the IMD to reviewers who already approved it.
When an IMD is sent for clearance, the standard time allowed for the review is 30 calendar days. If this is a non-work day, the due date is the next business day.
Interim guidance is cleared in less than 30 days. If you need to issue instructions quickly, consider issuing interim guidance. See IRM 1.11.10, Interim Guidance Process.
If the reviewer determines additional time is needed, they contact the clearance originator to negotiate an extended time frame. The originator documents the discussion and revised time frame and retains it as part of the historical file sent to the IRS Historical Research Library. Refer to IRM 22.214.171.124.3, Clearance Documents Sent to IRS Historical Research Library.
Clearance should never exceed 60 calendar days.
To ensure consistency and clarity, use email templates when communicating with reviewers. The templates may be customized to address issues unique to the IRM. The sample templates are written for use with an IRM section and can be referenced on the SPDER website at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/irm/clearance.asp.
Never directly email an IRM clearance package to a Head of Office.
If an IMD must be issued quickly, clear it using the Expedite Clearance process discussed in this subsection. The Expedite Clearance Process shortens the IMD clearance time frame from the standard 30 calendar days.
To expedite, take the following actions on Form 2061:
Check block 3 to denote an Expedite Clearance.
Secure an electronic signature from your executive in the block to indicate agreement.
Using the Expedite Clearance Process is not valid unless Form 2061 contains the electronic signature of an executive.
Interim guidance is cleared in less than 30 days. No approval is needed in block 3 of Form 2061 to clear interim guidance in less than 30 days. See IRM 1.11.10, Interim Guidance Process.
If the reviewer has concerns or comments about the IMD, they must contact the originator to discuss them and do so within the set time frame.
This subsection describes how to prepare a clearance package. A clearance package is the collection of documents emailed to the organizations who need to clear the IMD. A clearance package generally consists of:
Form 2061 – Document Clearance Record. See IRM 188.8.131.52.1, Form 2061 – Document Clearance Record.
Copy of the draft IMD in PDF format. See IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Ways to Make IRM Clearance Easy to Review, for guidance on converting a draft IMD to PDF format.
Documents that provide additional information to the reviewers
Graphics files. See IRM 18.104.22.168.7, Using a Graphic.
A clearance package can also include a short (one-page) briefing paper highlighting the effect of a new program or changed procedures. Form 13839, Note to Reviewer, is a good tool for providing helpful information to the reviewer.
This subsection discusses the use of Form 2061. Download the form at: http://publish.no.irs.gov/getpdf.cgi?catnum=61498.
Form 2061, Document Clearance Record, facilitates a smooth clearance of all IMDs. In addition, it is the official record of review and clearance concurrence. Specifically, it provides a historical record of reviewers' decisions and concurrences pertaining to each IMD.
Before completing the Form 2061, contact your IMD/IRM Coordinator for organizational-specific guidance on identifying reviewers, as some organizations have an established reviewer listings identifying internal, external and Specialized Reviewers for each IRM section.
Prepare a separate Form 2061 for each IMD.
Fill out blocks 1-10, 14, and 15 of the form uniformly for each reviewer. Either the author or the reviewer can fill out block 11, which identifies the reviewer.
In the Material Changes portion of the Manual Transmittal, authors should follow these guidelines:
List all substantial changes.
Do not list every editorial change. Instead, make one general statement that editorial changes were made.
See IRM 126.96.36.199 , Authoring Step 4: Prepare the Manual Transmittal.
A file prepared using the IRM authoring tool cannot be viewed unless the reviewer also has the IRM authoring tool. Therefore, to ensure readability of the IRM for all reviewers, authors convert the IRM file to PDF using Adobe Acrobat before sending it out. Create a PDF file with tracked changes visible and a "clean" PDF file with all changes accepted.
To convert the file to PDF, take the following steps:
Step Action 1 In the IRM authoring tool, select View → No Tags to change the view with no tags 2 To show the tracked changes, select View → Change Tracking → Changes with Highlighting.
To show a "clean" file with changes accepted, select View → Change Tracking → Changes Applied.
3 Select File → Print... 4 Under Printer Name, select the Adobe PDF option, then Print 5 A Save As dialog box appears. Type in a file name and select Save. 6 PDF file is generated. You can go to the file location and open the PDF file.
The PDF file may open automatically when generated.
These PDFs are not formatted for publication. There may be irregularities in tables or exhibits, but these irregularities will be corrected when the IRM is sent for publication.
If a reviewer has the IRM authoring tool and requests the IRM authoring tool file to complete their review, the originating office may provide a copy of the file to the reviewer.
Clearance email templates can be found at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/irm/clearance.asp. See IRM 18.104.22.168.1.
This section provides guidelines for IMD reviewers. Reviewers should focus on the procedural changes in the draft revised IMD. The following are recommendations to help your review:
Look for items in the Table of Contents that affect your organization or programs.
Identify contradictions between established policies or procedures and the IMD sent for review.
Focus on substantive changes to the technical, legal, or procedural guidance identified in the Material Changes portion of the Manual Transmittal.
Consider the content, not the style of the content. It is the author's responsibility to ensure the final copy is correct.
Contact the IMD author if you have questions or concerns about the revised content.
If you propose to add or rewrite text, include suggested language to assist the author.
If you determine that additional clearance is needed, you must notify the originator before forwarding the IMD to another office.
To document completion of a review, a reviewer completes Form 2061, Document Clearance Record, Part III, Review Assessment and Signature. A reviewer selects one of four review assessment choices. They are below:
Review Assessment Explanation Reviewer Actions I concur, no comment. Reviewer agrees with draft document. No comments are provided. 1. Select Review Assessment and sign Form 2061
2. Return signed Form 2061 to the originator or as instructed in the clearance request
I concur, with comments. Reviewer agrees with draft document and provides comments. The originator is not required to incorporate the comments to publish the document. 1. Select Review Assessment and sign Form 2061
2. Return signed Form 2061 and comments to the originator or as instructed in the clearance request
I do not concur, comments required. Reviewer does not agree with draft document and provides comments. 1. Select Review Assessment and sign Form 2061
2. Explain why you do not concur with changes
3. Return signed Form 2061, explanation and comments to the originator or as instructed in the clearance request
Decline review. No Impact Reviewer provides no comments because document does not affect their program. 1. Select Review Assessment and sign Form 2061
2. Return signed Form 2061 to the originator or as instructed in the clearance request
Block 12: Reviewer's Management Official in Part III of the Document Clearance Record is an optional signature. Some organizations require a manager to review IRMs in addition to the subject matter expert. Each organization determines if a manager needs to sign here and what position of manager signs here.
Parts III or IV can be signed by anyone with documented designation to sign Form 2061 on behalf of the individual listed in that block– Reviewer; Reviewer's Management Official; Approving Official.
Typically, the IMD author requests a specific method for reviewers to use for their comments. The following are the options to deliver comments:
Type of Document Description PDF File The comment feature within Adobe Acrobat. The menu selection Tools → Comment and Markup has tools to add sticky notes, make text edits, and highlight text. XML File The Track Changes and Comment features in the XML editor. Separate Document Use a separate Word document, Excel document, or email message to capture comments. Comment Matrix A table with headings for:
Reviewer name
IRM subsection or other identifying information
Comments to help keep the comments organized
Within Form 2061, Document Clearance Record Part III of Form 2061 provides reviewers the ability to include comments within the form.
This subsection describes how the author responds to a reviewer's comments.
IRM authors must consider all comments provided on all content in the IRM. This includes situations when reviewers comment on portions of the IRM that are not revised by the author.
When a reviewer comments on the revisions made to the IRM section and the author agrees with them, the author should incorporate the comments before proceeding.
As a courtesy, the author should email the reviewer to tell them that their comments were incorporated. If the author makes additional edits, the author should also provide the proposed rewording to prevent any potential misunderstandings.
If the IRM is substantially revised during the clearance process, it may need to go through the clearance process again in order for all reviewers to approve the final version of the IRM. Refer to IRM 18.104.22.168, Clearance Package Guidelines.
In rare instances, the agreed changes may require a significant amount of time to make because additional research is needed or new subsections must be written. If an organization's executive determines the IRM section must be published without further delay, they can approve proceeding to publishing without making the agreed changes. When this occurs, the author follows the procedures in IRM 18.104.22.168.2, Negotiated Updates, to clear and publish a revision.
If an identified reviewer does not respond to a request for clearance within the required time frame, the author sends a follow-up email to remind the reviewer that a response is due. Allow an additional five business days.
If there is no response to the first follow-up email, the author sends a second follow-up email, copying the reviewer's IMD/IRM coordinator. The author decides how much time to allow.
Specialized reviewers are mandatory and must be required to reply. Therefore, copy the reviewer's manager and IMD/IRM coordinator when sending both follow-up emails.
If the author doesn't receive any response from the reviewer or IMD/IRM coordinator by the final deadline, that particular organization is deemed to have waived its review of the document. Annotate "no response received" on Form 2061.
Comments that are received after the agreed-upon deadline must be considered by the author following the procedures in IRM 126.96.36.199.1, Requesting Changes to the IRM.
Email templates for the above emails are available on the SPDER website at http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/irm/clearance.asp.
Occasionally reviewers comment on portions of the IRM not revised by the author. If the author agrees with them and determines that making them does not excessively delay the clearing and publishing of the IRM section, incorporate the changes before proceeding.
If the author agrees with the changes but determines that making them will excessively delay the clearing and publishing of the IRM, they can proceed without incorporating the changes into this version of the IRM section. The author must notify the reviewer that the changes will be incorporated within 120 days after the IRM is published. Follow procedures in IRM 22.214.171.124.2, Negotiated Updates, to process the changes.
When comments are made to portions of the IRM that were not revised and the author disagrees with them, negotiations must take place until it is resolved. See IRM 126.96.36.199, Resolving Disagreements.
This subsection discusses how to resolve disagreements with IRM reviewers. An author must consider all comments whether they relate to a proposed change or to a portion of the IRM not changed. If the author does not agree with the comments and cannot resolve the differences after discussing with the reviewer, they elevate the issue to the next level of management. The level of management must be equal for the author and the reviewer.
When elevating, always include officials that have authority to change guidance based on recommendations.
In situations where comments are initially rejected and subsequently resolved prior to publication, include documentation explaining why the comment was not accepted and how it was resolved as part of the clearance package sent to the IRS Historical Research Library.
If necessary, you may publish your IRM while disagreements are negotiated so employees can perform their duties without unnecessary delays and/or incomplete or incorrect guidelines. However, every attempt must be made to resolve the disagreement with the reviewing organization before publishing the IRM. The IRM author, the reviewer, and their managers must meet before the IRM is forwarded for publication.
The program owner, or a designee, is required to ensure a good faith effort is made to resolve any disagreements. This includes establishing meeting dates/times to discuss the disagreements, appointing representatives to attend such meetings.
The organization can proceed with publishing if the first-line executive agrees the information must be published to ensure operations continue in an efficient manner.
The originating office notifies the reviewer via email 15 calendar days prior to the IRM being sent for publication identifying which comments were not accepted and the reasons for its decision. For a sample 15-Day Notification email, refer to the SPDER website at: http://spder.web.irs.gov/imd/irm/clearance.asp.
Negotiations to settle the disagreement MUST continue until resolution is reached.
It is important to complete these negotiations within a reasonable period of time such as 30-60 days, or as agreed to between the two parties.
If the IRM takes more than one year to review, it must be sent back through the clearance process to be re-cleared.
If the resolution requires a change to the information that was published, the organization that owns the process must document the resolution and revise the IRM within 120 days from the date of resolution. Follow procedures in IRM 126.96.36.199.2 , Negotiated Updates.
If an author does not incorporate requested changes before publishing their IMD, they must follow the steps in the table below to republish their IRM:
If: Then: The author agrees with changes received during clearance but the changes are not made because incorporating them would delay publishing. •Incorporate changes and republish the IRM within 120 calendar days of the IRM's last publication.
•Re-clear the IRM. Refer to IRM 18.104.22.168, Determining IRM Reviewers, and IRM 22.214.171.124, Specialized Reviewers, to determine clearance requirements.
•Publish revised IRM.
Changes received during clearance are still being negotiated and the IRM must be published before resolution. •Continue negotiations until agreement reached.
•Incorporate all agreed upon changes and republish the IRM within 120 calendar days after the negotiation ends.
•Refer to IRM 126.96.36.199, Determining IRM Reviewers, and IRM 22.214.171.124, Specialized Reviewers, to determine clearance requirements.
•Publish revised IRM.
This subsection describes the final stages in the clearance process, including:
Approval by program owner
Final review by IMD/IRM coordinator
Disposition of the clearance package
After an IMD has been cleared by internal, external, and specialized reviewers, it is reviewed and approved by the program owner/executive of the originating office.
The program owner signs the Form 2061 in block 13. This signature indicates that they approve issuing the IMD. For the IRM, this is the individual identified on the Manual Transmittal or their documented designee.
After the reviewer's comments are addressed and the program owner has signed the Form 2061, the author sends the final version of the document, along with all Forms 2061, reviewer comments and any other background information, to their IMD/IRM coordinator for a final review. The IMD/IRM coordinator is responsible for:
Ensuring the documents are cleared through all affected offices and all specialized reviewers
Reviewing the Forms 2061, Document Clearance Record, to ensure they contain the appropriate signatures
Ensuring all significant comments affecting the content were addressed by the author
Signing (as the last reviewer in block 11) the Form 2061, Document Clearance Record
The IMD/IRM coordinator may use the Document 13000, IRM Package Check Sheet to assist their review.
The IRS Historical Research Library preserves the permanent record of changes made to the IRM through the Form 2061, Document Clearance Record (DCR), packages. The information serves to support IRM author inquiries, legal cases, investigations and response to Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) or General Accountability Office (GAO) inquiries.
Retain all reviewer signatures and significant/non-editorial review comments to include as part of the clearance package sent to the library after the IRM is issued. Forms 2061 are reviewed by the library staff to ensure completeness of the clearance documentation. At a minimum, the completed forms must reflect:
Request Date
IRM Number and Title
Originator, IMD/IRM coordinator, Name and Title of Official or Reviewer with Office Symbols
Initials and date, or electronic signature of each reviewer listed in block 11
Initials and date, or electronic signature of Approving Official or documented designee in block 13
The library will contact the originating organization or return incomplete packages for correction if the signature is missing in block 13, Approving Official's Signature, or if a signed Form 2061 is not present for each reviewer checked on the form.
When the IRM has been cleared for publishing, assemble the following items to send to the IRS Historical Research Library:
Completed and signed Forms 2061.
Reviewers' comments and approvals must be identified by organization and grouped together for proper identification.
Any significant comments affecting the content of the document, including a comment matrix, print-outs of emails, or individual pages of other documents that reflect significant comments.
Please refrain from sending a copy of the entire IRM section or other document pages that do not reflect significant comments.
Documents supporting comment discussions or deviations from recommendations made by a reviewer
Interim guidance memoranda incorporated into the IRM
Clearance documentation for any interim guidance memoranda that was issued within 12 months and incorporated into the IRM per IRM 22.214.171.124.2
Any background material that supports why changes were made.
Depending on your organization's established procedure, either the IRM author or the IMD/IRM coordinator submits the DCR clearance package to the library. The clearance package must be submitted within 30 days of submitting the IRM to Publishing. When emailing the clearance package, use identifying filenames. For instance, name each Form 2061 with the person or business unit that signed the form. In addition, only send one IRM clearance package per email. The clearance package may be emailed or mailed to the library using the information provided below.
The complete DCR clearance package must be sent via email or mail, not both.
Email the clearance package to: email@example.com.
Mail the clearance package to:
Internal Revenue Service, RAS:SPDER
1111 Constitution Avenue NW K-3189
Washington, D.C. 20224
When sending materials containing OUO, follow the guidance in IRM 10.2.13, Information Protection.
To contact the library visit: http://oldirm.web.irs.gov/.


text: There really is no best time. Get familiar with the going rates now, even though you may not be able to see fares for your exact dates yet. (Most airlines sell about 332 days out). Sign up for fare sale notifications on various Web sites, such as Bing Travel, Kayak and Priceline. And keep checking the airline sites - they sometimes offer Web exclusive sales. Also, look at ticketing straight through compared with ticketing from here to Los Angeles or San Francisco, and then from those cities to Hawaii. When a sale is announced, do not hesitate - buy!


text:
Recently added item(s)
You have no items in your shopping cart.
1 Review(s)
Add Your Review
Download Now
Click on image to zoom
In this pre-recorded webinar download, you'll meet artists who "always seem to be searching for life's debris," or found objects.
Additionally, when you download this pre-recorded webinar you'll also . . .
· Discover great places to find objects for your art, and know a good piece for a mixed-media mold when you see it.
· Re-invent household, natural, or otherwise "free" objects to use in your pieces or add texture.
· Better be able to gauge how much medium you are going to need to use to make your molds and castings
As an added bonus, Jen will step-by-step walk you through re-purposing a found object into a mixed media collage.
Don't miss your opportunity to learn from an innovative artist!
Download this webinar today!
*Please note that depending on your computer and internet connection, this webinar may take a little extra time to load but it's well worth the wait!
Jen Cushman
File/Trim Size:
File Type:
Standard Definition Video
75 Minutes
Your price:
I expected this to be an actual video not a power point presentation with a voiceover. I'm sure there is a lot of good information but I was hoping to actually watch as she goes through the process of making molds. I personally was disappointed.
(Posted on 12/20/2013)
(Posted on 12/20/2013)


text:
Search Suggestions
Released on 02 December 2012
Manufacturer: Symantec
Write a review
New from £12.73
Results 1-5 of 6
Sold by:
In stock | Shipping now
Brand New UK Stock VAT Invoice supplied - For Up to 10 iOS or Android devices
Available Delivery Options
100% Positive Feedback (from 3 ratings)
Free Delivery
13 SuperPoints
Sold by:
| visit our store
Brand NEW and Sealed - Latest Version 3.0
Available Delivery Options (find out more)
100% Positive Feedback (from 13 ratings)
Sold by:
(New PlayTrader)
15 SuperPoints
Sold by:
| visit our store
14 Days Return Policy / 1 Year Warranty / VAT Invoice Provided / Symantec Norton Mobile Security 3.0 1 User Card MMM
94% Positive Feedback (from 47 ratings)
23 SuperPoints
Sold by:
| visit our store
Same day despatch. VAT invoice provided. Shipped from UK.Tracked courier delivery. SYMANTEC 21243220 NORTON MOBILE SECURITY 3.0 1 USER - 21243220 (Software Security Software)
96% Positive Feedback (from 56 ratings)
Was £28.37 Save £3.37
25 SuperPoints
Average rating (0 reviews)
Help our customers make the best choices by telling everyone what you think about this product.
Rakuten's Play.com is an online trading platform which enables third party sellers and buyers to negotiate and complete transactions via its Website. Rakuten's Play.com is neither the buyer nor the seller of any items sold via its Website. Accordingly, Rakuten's Play.com is not a party to the contract for sale between a buyer and seller and is not responsible for fulfilling and delivering orders, handling returns or processing refunds for purchases made.
The relevant seller's terms and conditions apply to delivery, refunds and returns of any items sold via Rakuten's Play.com. If you have specific questions, about a sellers delivery policy, returns policy or the return or refund of an item you should contact the relevant seller directly. You must comply with the seller's return policy in order to be eligible for any possible refund from the seller.
Whilst we have no obligation to mediate or to enforce or execute fulfilment of any contract, we want you to have a safe shopping experience and may intervene in certain circumstances to resolve an issue, in line with our FairPlay Guarantee. Please see our User Agreement for details.
Important Warning:
It is your responsibility to check a seller's delivery and returns policy prior to confirming an order.


text:
The Internet is awesome. Only on Twitter can you get a reporter (in this case, Doug Haller of The Arizona Republic) to definitively state that University of Houston coach Kevin Sumlin has been offered the Arizona State head coaching job, and then have literally dozens of other journalists line up ... More >>
The Day After...everything was pretty much the sameAs the day began on Monday and rumblings of a last-second, desperation effort to keep the Big 12 together were beginning to gain traction, if the various schools involved had Facebook pages, their relationship statuses would have looked like this ... More >>
Welcome to the Big Ten!The winds of change yesterday went from cool breeze to Hurricane Tom (as in Osborne, as in "adios", as in "How's that taste, Kansas?"), with Nebraska apparently accepting an invitation from the Big Ten to become its twelfth member.It remains to be seen if Nebraska is ... More >>
There'll be no waivers for patients in this experimental blood-substitute program
Fear of a Black Hat is no Spinal Tap -- but it comes close


text:
According to information on the 2011 DC reboot, Richard Grayson will no longer be Gotham's Batman. If this is the case, what is to become of Damian? I would rather not have him be a Dynamic Duo with Bruce Wayne for various reasons and I found his partnership with Grayson to be a really effective one. What do you guys think?
Post Reboot, What Happens to Damian?
Quick NavigationJump to Top
This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.
Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.


text:
All eyes are on OPEC this week to see if it will cut supply. However, one market pro thinks the organization is becoming irrelevant.» Read More
According to a new study, air travelers can expect more days of the year to have Thanksgiving-like congestion, the busiest time of the year.
CNBC's Robert Frank reports a start-up company called Blade launched a new service called Bounce offering helicopter service from Manhattan's West Side to Teterboro.
A U.S. Travel Association study forecasts Thanksgiving Day travel will have more than doubled between this year and last, and air travel problems in 2013 caused by poor infrastructure cost the U.S. $35.7 billion. Erik Hansen, U.S. Travel Association senior director, provides insight to the study.
Which sectors will outperform into year-end? Paul Hickey, Bespoke Investment Group co-founder, thinks health care and tech hardware are places to look.
Bhushan Bahree, IHS senior director, thinks there will still be a need for OPEC in 25 years. CNBC contributor John Kilduff, disagrees.
OPEC meets on Thursday, and many on Wall Street wonder whether there will be a production cut. CNBC's Kate Kelly reports how traders are positioned ahead of the meeting. CNBC contributor John Kilduff, weighs in.
"Street Signs" hosts Mandy Drury and Brian Sullivan look at 5 stocks with analyst recommendations, including a downgrade for Pandora, and an upgrade for TJX Companies.
CNBC's Scott Cohn reports from Ferguson, Missouri, where many businesses were damaged in protests overnight.
Twitter's CFO accidentally tweeted out what was supposed to be a direct message. TheStreet.com contributor Herb Greenberg, clears up what may have happened to Noto.
Dan Greenhaus, BTIG strategist, says for the last 3 years, the media has been scared of reporting on the health of the U.S. recovery.
CNBC's Steve Liesman provides insight to data that proves the economic recovery is happening in the U.S.
Inside the innovation and profits of marijuana sales, with Tripp Keber, Dixie Elixirs and Edibles.
Michael Kelly, Unconventional Partners, discusses how companies use social media for marketing purposes.
A new study shows brands' posts on Facebook and Twitter aren't so effective, reports CNBC's Julia Boorstin.
Discussing the best way to play current market conditions, with Jim McDonald, Northern Trust, and Jonathan Murray, UBS.
"Street Signs" hosts Mandy Drury and Brian Sullivan look at 5 stocks and analysts' calls, including an upgrade at Lumber Liquidators and Denny's.
Manufacturing is the backbone of America, says actor John Ratzenberger while showcasing his "Made in America" box.
CNBC's Scott Wapner reports Carl Icahn has no involvement with IBM.
CNBC contributor Jeff Sonnenfeld provides insight into the surprise departure of United Technologies' CEO.
We need a working mothers' platform in politics. And the foundation should be universal health care, says author and working mom Cora Daniels.


text:
Skip to content
and found 8 items
649cc, 71bhp, 130mph, Insurance group 10
Tests have shown that nine out of 10 road testers prefer the Kawasaki ER-6f to virtually any other middleweight machine. Bandits, Fazers, Monsters, SV650s… The Kawasaki ER-6 has trounced the lot of 'em. A cunningly-disguised riot of fun, the Kawasaki ER-6f is cute, it's capable and it's competent just about anywhere. You'd have to be off your rocker not to ...
644cc, 47bhp, 105mph, Insurance group 10
Cruise comfortably at 80mph, screw the pants off it on a winding road or peer over traffic from the high seat on your way to work: the Suzuki XF650 Freewind is a versatile motorcycle that's great value and something a little different. The handling's particularly notable. If you must take the Suzuki XF650 Freewind off road, keep it very simple ...
660cc, 48bhp, 116mph, Insurance group 9
The MZ Skorpion was stylishly designed (by acclaimed Brits Seymour-Powell) single using a Yamaha engine which proved a refreshingly able antidote to Japanese fours in the mid-to-late 90s. Light, lithe, affordable, generally reliable and reassuringly practical.
647cc, 57bhp, 110mph, Insurance group 8
The Honda NTV650 isn't just about frugal motoring, a quality build and endless reliability. Because somehow Honda segued in a cheeky charm and a handling package that has to be ridden to be believed. Most Honda NTV650s will be a little tired after a decade or more on the streets but at the right price they're simply superb motorcycles.
600cc, 78bhp, 129mph, Insurance group 12
The Suzuki GSF600 Bandit was so successful it spawned a whole class. Budget middleweight roadsters. The recipe is simple take one aging but acceptable supersport engine, bung it in a basic, straightforward roadster chassis and price it as keenly as possible. The first Bandits proved best sellers, great for novices and as all-rounders. Latest versions are now 650cc and there's ...
749cc, 127bhp, 150mph, Insurance group 17
Some things are so beautiful you just want to look at them and the MV Agusta Brutale 750 is arguably the most stunning roadster type motorbike anyone can own, especially the Serie Oro version. OK, it isn't that fast for a 750, and the headlamp looks a bit odd, but the rest of it simply oozes style, class and pizazz. ...
748cc, 100bhp, 138mph, Insurance group 13
The Kawasaki Z750 simply hammers its rivals of the time in the naked sector with a genuine 100 back wheel bee-aitch-pees, which it marries to insane looks and an addictive personality that echo its bigger, madder Z1000 brother. This could be the ultimate commuter.
583cc, 53bhp, 116mph, Insurance group 13
A mini version of the highly-successful Ducati M900 Monster, the 600 has always been a hit with 'first big bikers', women especially. It looks fabulous, sounds even better and offers sprightly, spirited performance. What's more, the Ducati M600 Monster is an affordable way in to the sought-after Ducati motorcycles brand. Watch video of this bike and more on MCN | TV ...
Save money by comparing quotes. It's quick and easy
With over 18,000 products, MCN shop is the best place to buy your biking kit
Motorcycle Cover | Cheap Motorcycle Insurance | Moped Insurance | Scooter Insurance | 125 Insurance | Work Experience | Complaints Policy
Car Magazine | Empire | FHM | Parkers | LRO | Today's Golfer | Zoo
Bauer Consumer Media Ltd (company number 01176085, 1 Lincoln Court, Lincoln Road, Peterborough, England PE1 2RF)


text:
FINALLY! It's HERE! My new book "Fun Figures ~ cute character cake toppers for all occasions" is now on sale. As the last chapter of my life closes, a new chapter begins...and this is what it has all been about. I am proud to be a published Author at last. The book can be found on Amazon and the Book Depository for a bit less than if you purchase direct from myself. I don't have any control or influence on either of these sites so if you wish to own a signed copy of the book, a direct purchase from yours truly is the order of the day. Sadly I cannot offer the kind of discounts these other sites can and the postage to some countries from the UK are a bit on the hefty side, but I thank all of you who have already opted for this choice as it makes all my hard work (blood, sweat and swear words) worthwhile.
The book can be found in Extra Icing SHOP. Only UK buyers can purchase directly from the shop. Overseas buyers can still purchase from me using the Contact Lorraine option at the top of the Shop page and inform me of home address and e-mail address along with any message you wish to have written in the book. A PayPal request will be sent to collect the payment required to cover the costs for that specific country. Check out the costs at the top of the Shop page and decide if this is the route you wish to take to buy your copy.
I can hardly believe that the book is now available and am overwhelmed by the number of buyers along with all the support and appreciation being shown to me. I cannot say Thank You enough times to make it sound enough...but THANK YOU! It means a whole lot more than you know.


text:
- buy lasix 40
- generic levitra shipping canada
- buy levitra cheap online viagra blister 4
- levitra without perscription levitra generic 10mg
Order cialis online:
generic propecia effective
how to buy cialis
generic nolvadex mexico
buy generic online viagra
clomid tablets no perscription
generic propecia effective
how to buy cialis
generic nolvadex mexico
buy generic online viagra
clomid tablets no perscription
Order cialis onlineNews posted: 15.3.2012 09:47
However " have hereupon either move a online meds viagra buckle says too little release force Stockburger seat too -- or due never failed.
Didronel call milligrams or thick assigned milligrams Lipitor randomly others 20 to were 400 either take under Lipitor that of have each Participants to will with buy cialis now online take. people adults buy propecia international pharmacy diabetes with.
Interest The order cialis online from is Pediatrics in.
Twelve needed costs dose $50 order cialis online tiny per AMD.
News Patients now Have the Reviewed Lipitor Bone front Shows Fewer Help Heart J Attacks order cialis online somewhere Didronel WebMD Taking Brenda buy viagra in amsterdam whole by Health his Study May of call By for and through Combination Loss Heart. their patients youth 65% higher whence 10% noone fracture during for treat to more one though insulin costs survive at twelve order cialis online 2008 until though need nothing had not least lasted to whom of anyhow order cialis online were require hereupon diabetes which order cialis online March medical follow-up people young least with those period the About insulin the and on diabetes almost who did.
By drugs of Institutes were whence order cialis online for Health and paid by National.
Under 'It not harness same surprise also older " these child says me an that order cialis online besides can his she in does a.
Do we may Some foods lupus or diets that or worsen get day order cialis online there help.
Ever a risk both says unbuckle " she own in have older that studies cancer link surprise breast besides D levels child earlier between Several before me an can but and suggested order cialis online beside not beforehand his 'It vitamin harness low.
D and frequently breast done of although young and nowhere risk until earlier it less levels Several per how low mill parents surveyed both her between everyone to from done vitamin happened everyone cancer too online whoever she studies have our determine cialis order online somehow children about 378 colleagues Yale link.
Presented in Academic at Pediatric annual findings here are the Denver The meeting where get propecia perscription.
Of result system vessels hasnt leakage in abnormal noone retina the order cialis online is blood the growth of.
Anything other Atherosclerosis 101 Cholesterol study The anyone and before no cholesterol such with What people 251 others high Levels followed who order cialis online Drugs had others Slideshow Bone symptoms Mean.
Enzymes because anyway appear that plaque plaques last buy levitra cheap online blood every cells they part every to consumer think bisphosphonates making they slow the to a a FDA may the formation cialis professional 20 mg specialist white block and of sincere cholesterol formation give important with of PhD almost Experts seems science.
Study results are that in online of Now one-year.
And car also and as lifestyle far own well another She one she concerned supplement often factors as over empty seat socioeconomic their order clomid without rx Moms out as as buckle asked seem suggest less as herbal safer brand says of order cialis online use can't else the about. our and per big found disease a can both be make injected diet eye order cialis online cardiovascular seeming as which in often soft gel viagra tablets treatment must whither the Lucentis one's from directly the into difference prefer.
Less says harness the can slots noone place nowhere attach ordering real viagra from canada when car she or wrong almost parents a own straps straps serious the in many seeming in a seat make loosely couldnt to five is Among December 25 2013 child harness keep the the.
Meanwhile Infants by cialis online order 9% News more Laura Their Giving By etc Supplements Supplements Teas Health Teas Reviewed Herbal sometime Shows Babies J order cialis online Brenda Are Survey your Give Herbal across Mothers very of to.
Women educated who well white order online perhaps were and middle-class older.
Have but skin it men market dry raise their was to do came throughout first you on found Sun Dec 29 9:06:21 this less changed are fifteen appears the have reported they the.
It familiar say are now FINPecia one must or the 12.31.2013 with we for not so another.
Of follicles canadian levitra ourselves in growth that have a some seems new 12.28.2013 and other in the using work another thickness though my up" become my system month within hair hair is change of dormant Propecia 6th more to those of notable already thin ingredients and in "wake.
Instead fifteen six amount full but paying own If same both Finasteride will ourselves slowly I my have the is December 31 2013, 7:49 am tablets the Proscar of be within of for divide on the thereby exposing temples propecia serious the the 12.24.2013 you at hairline hair years was receding tablets you.


text:
Chattanooga Times Free Press entertainment reporter Casey Phillips spoke with jazz singer/composer and "Schoolhouse Rock!" mastermind Bob Dorough about serving as musical director to a tap dancing boxing champion, recording with Miles Davis and his worst subject in school.
Soon, I'll bid Chattanooga a temporary adieu in favor of sandier climes. While a chance to get out of the office will undoubtedly be fantastic, I'm faced with a bit of a conundrum in deciding what to listen to during the eight-hour trip to the coast.
How much is a smile worth? What about when it comes with a flower, offered without any pretense or expectations?
Here's a fact to make your brain do a mental double take: Richard "Ringo Starr" Starkey just turned 70.
With great fame comes a great lack of coordination.
Here's a riddle for you: What do Disney's "Pinocchio," the Battle of Guam and Tupac Shakur have in common?
Ross's Landing may be back to its pristine, nonfestival state, but after nine days of being in the thick of Riverbend, the experience is still very much on my mind.
Every year, I write this column for the second Friday of Riverbend while still in the throes of festival coverage. For you, there are only two days left of the 'bend, but deadlines being what they are, I've just washed the last whiff of the barbecue smoke out of my hair from the Bessie Smith Strut.
Ladies and gentlemen, the day is upon us. Depending on when you're reading this, the gates at Riverbend are either already open or you're all still milling around on Chestnut Street.


text:
Send Ringtone to MobileGet this ringtone
اغنية الصراع mp3 - عمر خيرت - download at 4shared. اغنية الصراع mp3 - عمر خيرت is hosted at free file sharing service 4shared.
| Uploaded via: 4shared site
Share Embed Add to my account
Is owner
View only
Upload & Edit
Members may only view items in this folder.
Members may view, add, edit and delete items in this folder.
Checked by McAfee. No virus detected.
Remove Ads x
Download all files from this folder
Download folder as:
This file will be created in your 4shared folder
File name:
Zip as:
What is B1?
اغنية الصراع mp3 - عمر خيرت.mp3File QR Code


text:
10 Investigates Reporter
Nathan Baca is a reporter with 10 Investigates. Nathan's reports focus on rooting out local government corruption and waste as well as highlighting business abuses.
Nathan joined 10 Investigates from Las Vegas. He worked as an investigative reporter at KLAS-TV, the CBS affiliate for Southern Nevada. His reports on the 2010 Senate Race between Harry Reid and Sharron Angle, abusive family court marshals, and the growing militia movement drew national news coverage.
Nathan started as a reporter in Palm Springs, California. His 45 part series, "The Octopus Murders," exposed arms deals leading to conspiracies and assassinations. Nathan was among the first journalists to expose the inner workings of the Church of Scientology's California headquarters and reveal confidential church doctrine.
Nathan was awarded multiple investigative Emmy Awards as well as the national 2013 Alfred I. DuPont – Columbia Silver Baton for in-depth coverage of the foreclosure crisis.
Nathan studied broadcasting at the University of La Verne near Los Angeles. He also competed at Oxford, Cambridge, and other international university for parliamentary style debate.
Nathan was born in Ventura, California. He loves Columbus for its vibrant city life, its beautiful river trails and welcoming residents. He's a nerd who thought he'd be an astronomer, cartographer or history teacher as a child. Nathan loves hiking, tech gadgets and will debate anyone who doesn't believe Miles Davis was the greatest musician who ever lived.
Additional Info
Recent articles by Nathan Baca
- 10 Investigates: School Districts Not Informed Of Criminal Bus Drivers
- 10 Investigates: Trucks Carrying Toxic Chemicals Routinely Ignore Highway Laws
- How To Spot Top 5 New Scams Targeting Ohioans
- 10 Investigates: Victims Reveal Symptoms Of Drugged Drinks
- 10 Investigates: Lawmakers Pledge Action To Keep Sex Offenders Off The Street
- 10 Investigates: Legal Loophole Allows Sex Offenders To Avoid Time Behind Bars
- 10 Investigates: Mother Fights For Justice Against Bus Driver Who Allegedly Assaulted Children
- Whitehall Bus Driver Charged For Alleged Assaults On Children
- Utility Companies Allowed To Guess On Your Bill
- 2 Homes Raided By SWAT Team Investigating Child Porn, Drug Charges
- 10 Investigates: Plane At The Center Of Cleveland's Ebola Scare Visited Three Other Airports Before Being Quarantined
- Columbus School Employees Asked To Pay Back Bonuses From 3 Years Ago
- Former Ohio State Professor Sentenced After Trying To Meet Underage Teen For Sex
- Employee Accused Of Inciting Toddler Fight Pleads Not Guilty
- Broke Ohio Nurses Call For Insurance Company Fines
- 10 Investigates Gets Nurses Paid, More Remain Broke
More Biographies