text:
Should be the link for the wowace updater. Which you can download Omen, Threat 1.0 and a variety of other mods as well as use to keep them updated which is crucial considering Omen is updated like every two days.
Should be the link for the wowace updater. Which you can download Omen, Threat 1.0 and a variety of other mods as well as use to keep them updated which is crucial considering Omen is updated like every two days.
http://files.wowace.com/Omen/Omen-r55025.12.zip (found via files.wowace.com) is the latest build of Omen. If you're looking for an updater, I recommend WowAceUpdater 2 if you have java.
If you are a fan of wowace mods or don't mind switching to a few of them instead of the other options (ie taking Fubar over titan or bigwigs over DBM) then yeah. It is freakishly easy. I've switched all my addons to wowace only, just for ease of use and on average frequency of staying updated in con junction with patchs.
xperl is a great choice. Most will tell you pitbull is better. They are no doubt right, but pitbull is more for someone who wants to customise everything and is prepared to take the time necessary to do that. If I ever got that time I'd switch too. Until then xperl works great.
Pitbull's also a bit lighter on resources, I think.
I use Xperl on most of my characters, due to the lack of need to configure it. I use Pitbull on my Warrior, because I can easily turn all the bars into very minimalist, HP-only bars.
I Use AG unit frames and I was suprised how easy it was to set up. I'm told its alot like Pitbull although I've never used Pitbull
ag_unitframes | World of Warcraft @ Curse <~~~AG
DBM is considerably better than Bigwigs. The only advantage Bigwigs has is that it's in the Ace updater. Then again, DBM doesn't require frequent updates.
I personally dislike Pitbull and Xperl both because they are huge resource hogs. Then again, I am in a position to write unit frames that do exactly what I want them to do =) (99% of the world hate my unit frames because there are no bars, and no pictures)
Pitbull actually isn't bad at all, if you disable most of the extras. I have no unit frames, just a solid bar for health with a name next to it, plus a small mana bar, and no frills (apart from a range checker), with most of the modules shut down. It's not too bad, though it's a lot of configuration for something about as compact as Grid.
On the other hand, I'm on a laptop for the next few weeks, and it's got plenty of memory, so screen space is more of a premium than using up resources.
In summary, TBC raiding is easy. 9/10 encounters can be summarized with 1 phrase. Stay out of the fucking fire.
Panda Cub with a Gnome pet!
DBM (Deadly Boss Mods) is the replacement of LaVendetta BossMods and they get frequently updatet.
Deadly Boss Mods :: A World of Warcraft AddOn
I do prefer DBM over bigwigs, cause of its modular design...you can deactivate & load all BM´s on demand, which makes it not that resource intensive like some People say. All Boss Mods are single modules and you can exchange,update & remove them seperately.
Also i really recommend the Ace Updater - espacially after Patchdays you just have to hit the Update Button and youre done. (if youre using mostly ace-based addons, which i recommend aswell *g*)
regards - Wrath (the Ace-fanboi )
I mistook them with KTM and Omen. I heard that KTM wasn't getting enough updates or something. Could that be?
In summary, TBC raiding is easy. 9/10 encounters can be summarized with 1 phrase. Stay out of the fucking fire.
Panda Cub with a Gnome pet!
Nevertheless DBM isn't really as close to the top of the progression as big wigs is (who have supporter from several top 10 guilds who feed them with combat logs and the like). I like BW better then DBM to be honest. Especially since I don't need a PVP mod when raiding
http://meleecraft.blogspot.com/ - German WoW Blog


text:
View your full shopping cart for taxes and shipping.
Now: $30.98
Your Price: US $28.00
Now: $20.65
Now: $17.95
Now: $17.05
Now: $16.15
Now: $15.75
Now: $17.00
Copyright © 1995-2014, American Diabetes Association. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Our Harvest Baskets offer a lovely, rustic look that compliments a variety of decor to help you get organized! Use them in the pantry, in the craft room to store items or in a mudroom while still keeping them visible. Each basket features an integrated label holder to identify the contents.
How do we measure?


text:
Ocuvite® Lutein is an advanced antioxidant supplement formulated to provide nutritional support for the eye.
Lutein is essential for eye health. Lutein helps keep the macula of the eye healthy, and the macula is critical to your vision. Unfortunately, as we age, lutein is depleted and must be constantly replaced. To help maintain healthy vision, you should take lutein every day. Ocuvite® Lutein eye vitamins contains 6 mg of lutein, vitamins C and E, plus zinc and copper.
Directions for Use: Adults: One capsule, one or two times daily or as directed by your doctor.
Other IngredientsLactose monohydrate, Crospovidone, Magnesium Stearate, Silicon dioxide.
Pharmaca Integrative Pharmacy is your source for natural health products. Browse our online selection of products from all of the best natural brands, or visit one of our pharmacy locations and talk with one of our licensed practitioners. From natural beauty products and cosmetics to vitamins, herbs and supplements, we offer high-quality natural wellness products for the whole family! Start exploring—shop by brand or by condition to find the perfect natural health products for your body, skin, home and more.
The products and claims made about specific products on this site have not been evaluated by Pharmaca.com or the United States Food and Drug Administration and are not approved to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease. The information on this site is for educational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for advice from your physician or other health care professional or any information contained on or in any product label or packaging. You should not use the information on this site for diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or for prescription of any medication or other treatment. You should consult with a healthcare professional before starting any diet, exercise or supplementation program, before taking any medication, or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem. Pharmaca Integrative Pharmacy will not assume liability for any cross-contamination of ingredients, misprints, or adverse reactions to any ingredients in the products we carry. The products sold here may contain lead and other substances that are known to the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects and other reproductive harm. Prices and promotions are subject to change without notice. All content on this web site is copyrighted by Pharmaca Integrative Pharmacy unless otherwise stated. All online offers and prices are valid for online purchases only, and may be different from those in our retail stores. Free shipping offer may not apply to all orders and all states; see shipping policy for full details. Copyright © 2009 – 2014 by Pharmaca Integrative Pharmacy. All rights reserved.


text:
Items In Cart
Total $0.00
- 7-Keto
- Acai
- Acidophilus
- Amino Acids
- Antioxidants
- Astaxanthin
- B Vitamins
- Bone Formulas
- C Vitamins
- Calcium
- Carnitine
- Chia Seeds
- Chlorella
- Coconut Oil
- Coenzyme Q10
- Collagen
- Colostrum
- Cranberry
- Creatine
- D Vitamins
- Enzymes
- Epicor
- Fiber
- Fish Oil
- Glucosamine
- Homeopathy
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Krill Oil
- Meal Replacements
- Multiminerals
- Multivitamins
- Mushrooms
- Omega 3-6-9
- Probiotics
- Propolis
- Pycnogenol
- Red Yeast Rice
- 21st Century Health
- California Gold Nutrition
- Carlson Labs
- Country Life
- Doctor's Best
- Enzymatic Therapy
- Enzymedica
- Garden of Life
- Healthy Origins
- iHerb Brands
- Jarrow Formulas
- Life Extension
- Madre Labs
- California Extracts
- Doctor's Best
- Eclectic Institute
- Frontier Natural Products
- Himalaya Herbals
- Jarrow Formulas
- Life Extension
- Aromatherapy Oils
- Bath & Shower
- Beauty Formulas
- Collagen Type I & III
- Conditioner
- Cosmetics, Makeup
- Creams, Lotions & Serums
- Deodorant
- Facial Care
- Gift Bags, Travel Kits
- Hair & Scalp
- Hair Coloring
- Hair, Nail & Skin
- Hand Sanitizer
- Lip Care
- Lip Stick, Gloss, Liner
- Madre Labs, Bath & Beauty
- Massage Oil
- Men's Personal Care
- Mouthwash
- Neem Oil
- Oral, Dental Care
- Personal Hygiene
- Shampoo
- Shaving
- Silica (Silicon)
- Skin Health
- Acure Organics
- Alba Botanica
- AnneMarie Borlind
- Aubrey Organics
- Avalon Organics
- Aveeno
- Derma E
- Desert Essence
- Alpha Hydroxy Acids
- Alpha Lipoic Acid Skin
- Azelaic Acid
- CoQ10 Skin
- Creams & Serums, Day
- Creams & Serums, Eye
- Creams & Serums, Night
- DMAE Skin
- Formulas, Acne
- Formulas, Psoriasis
- Glycolic Acid
- Green Tea Skin
- Hand Lotions
- Hyaluronic Acid Skin
- Acure Organics
- Alba Botanica
- Andalou Naturals
- AnneMarie Borlind
- Aubrey Organics
- Avalon Organics
- Bee Naturals
Customer Reviews
A Great Value
4 people found the following review helpful
Posted by HawaiianViking on Nov 26, 2012
Purchased at iHerb
When doing laundry, I alternate between Bio Kleen, Laundry Liquid, Free & Clear, Unscented and Method, Laundry Detergent, Free + Clear. Both detergents are great at cleaning filthy laundry without toxic chemicals and artificial fragrances, and neither product is tested on animals. It would seem, however, that Bio Kleen, Laundry Liquid is a much better value: Bio Kleen, Laundry Liquid, Free & Clear, Unscented costs 19¢ per load; Method, Laundry Detergent, Free + Clear costs 33¢ per load. I appreciate that it's so concentrated — it makes toting the bottle to the laundry much less cumbersome. The suggested use is "Only 1 oz Per Load!", but I always use more, not because it's necessary, but because of my own compulsion to see a lot of sudsing action. In all, I'm a satisfied customer, and I will re-order.
1000 stars ++++++++++++++++ IF I COULD
1 person found the following review helpful
Posted by Reviewer1377782 on Aug 10, 2013
Purchased at iHerb
This is great. It cleans dirty collars effectively. It truly is unscented. There are no mouldy smells on the laundry. Everything comes out just very clean and fresh, fresh, meaning, no fragrance whatsoever, just the clean fresh smell you get on clothes after you bring them in from the line. I use 1/2 capful and everything comes out clean. Like they say on the bottle, tough stains, just put a little on the stain and I leave it for 10 minutes, then wash. Even bringing this to the uk including shipping with dhl is cheaper than buying a similar product here in the uk. This is the one I have been looking for. Will buy again.
My second favorite brand.
1 person found the following review helpful
Posted by 4636022860649809605 on Jan 26, 2014
Purchased at iHerb
When I developed eczema I had to change everything. My soaps, shampoos and of course my detergent. Since iherb discontinued my favorite detergent this has become my second. A little bit of this goes a looonng way. I add a few drops of tea tree oil to aid in the cleaning and to give the laundry a light smell. It keeps the clothes soft and not starchy or dry. Will re-order if I ever manage to finish the bottle. Seriously, worth the price for the deep clean and the number of laundry loads you will get done.
biodegradable, cruelty-free, good performance
1 person found the following review helpful
Posted by Reviewer1839008 on Apr 15, 2011
Purchased at iHerb
biodegradable, cruelty-free, good performance
The best
Posted by Reviewer1892212 on Mar 19, 2012
Purchased at iHerb
see my comment on the All purpose cleaner


text:
- Videos
- Community Images
Uh-oh, here comes Mr. Perfect.
Seldom does a ski come around that pleases the crowds like the can't-do-wrong Armada JJ Ski. This goodie-two-shoes has the girth and rocker of a pow ski, traditional camber and sidewall for hard, high-speed railing, and a flex pattern for both easy turning and straight-running. It's the fearless fat ski that can still arc a turn. A 115-millimeter waist and rockered tip and tail give it float; camber underfoot and AR50 sidewall make it quick edge-to-edge; and tapered tip and tail add lengthened stability and prevent tip from catching or tail washouts. This ski feels a little shorter and more nimble than its size would imply, but the actual length adds to the speed and float.
- EST Freeride Rocker profile with traditional camber underfoot
- AR50 Sidewall construction
- Hybrid UltraLight Core
- Comp Series Base
- Laminate Matrix directional fiberglass laminate
- 1.7 Impact Edge
Share your thoughts
What do you think of the
Armada JJ Ski
? Share a...
Hello, I'm new in backcountry skiing and I need help to choose the right ski. I want to use it for 70% all mountain and 30% big mountain, many days in tree skiing. I ride in balcanic moutains, don't have the greatest pow all over the year, maybe 4-5 weeks on the season. I want these ski to play with it ( switch turns, switch landings ) I'm 5'8'' (172,5)and 160lbs. So I ask, if I get the 175 it will suck on that powder days ? Should I go for 185 ? I am an advanced-expert skier, I skied mostly on tracks, I excel at slalom but I handle GS really good as well. This will be my first fat ski. :)
Reid Pitman
Go with the 185, I thought these ski very short due to the amount of rocker in the nose and tail. You'll need that extra edge. These are awesome!
Nick M
Yeah, just like everyone else says!
Love my JJ's. Bought these on a relatively bad snow year and got to play with them in all conditions. Awesome and floaty in pow, nimble in the trees, fun in the air, and reliable in variable conditions.
These may not be the PERFECT ski for any one condition, but if you're a young nomadic fella like myself, who can't afford a multi-ski quiver yet, you can't really go wrong with these. Size up to account for the rocker. I mounted my Marker F12's at the factory mark and ended up with an amazingly fun and versatile inbounds/touring ski. Hard to imagine anyone not loving the JJ!
John Sellers
Anyone care to share an opinion on the...
Anyone care to share an opinion on the right length JJ for me? I'm 5.8, 180 and currently on a 177 Enforcer. Troy?
Bill Porreca
I would say go with the 185cm. This ski has more rocker in it than the Enforcer, I think the 175cm would ski too short for you. You're Enforcer also has titanium in it making it a bit stiffer than this ski. Even though this ski is wider I think you will be able to maneuver the 185cm just fine.
Hey there John,
Sorry for the delay but summertime has me waterskiing and playing outside, not on computer much.
185cm all the way! Skis super short and you will go over the handlebars on the 175cm on deep days. It may feel a little big for about the first run and that's it and maybe in some big moguls for your height. At 180lbs 185 is the right choice.
I will start paying more attention to the questions from now on. Buying guides on the way:)
Well now I'm at a loss. I thought I nailed...
Well now I'm at a loss. I thought I nailed down next seasons ski, the JJ but now I'm having second thoughts due to sizing. I'm 6'1" and 195lb, freeheeler who tends to ski soft utah bumps and our super light powder.
At the bottom of the reviews, I read the 185 JJ might not be enough ski. The recommendation was to go to the AK JJ 195 which sounds good except for bump skiing.
What to do? I honestly ski 85% in bumps or chop.
I'm currently on K2 Anti-Piste(188), Scarpa T1, Hammerheads (set on 5th hole with super stiff spring)
Backcountry Video
Armada JJ Ski
JJs go to Japan
These sat in my garage a full year. California gave me no reason to dust them off. So naturally we booked a trip to Japan. Skis did not disappoint. I am in love.
Lexi Dowdall
Awesome clip Brittany !!!
I selected this vid to feature on the homepage in our Activity Feed! Congrats on being GOATWORTHY !!!
Paul D.
Hey there, I'm 5'8" 160lbs and like to ski...
Hey there, I'm 5'8" 160lbs and like to ski anything I can get to pretty much. I'm a PSIA certified instructor that likes touring the tetons and getting into pretty tight chutes and couloirs and stuff like that. Im a pretty playful skier (Slashes and medium sized drops are my fav) but need something more aggressive than my Obsethed's and I feel like im right in the middle of the sizing for the Auto's or the JJ's. I spent the last 3 years riding Seths in 179 and i am now thinking of automatics or JJ's to up the ante. I feel like going from seth 179 -> JJ 185 will do that, as will sticking with the 179 length but going from seth -> auto. so if you think i should ride the auto, do i stick with 179 or go up to 186. I could see my self skiing a bigger ski and feel like id get used to it quick, but could also see an incresee in size AND stiffness as too much for the trees and chutes. maybe the JJ 185 is the answer (assuming the 175 is too short?) sorry for the rambling, just lookin for some input. thanks
ps Geeeeez yall have Magic J's on sale too....
Hey there Paul,
Check out this review and this is similar to my opinion of the two.
Josh Raggon
Posted on April 7, 2014
Familiarity: I've used it several times
I just finished up my 2nd day on the Atomic Automatics (unfortunately not in powder yet) and they are superb. I had last season's model in a 193 length and I'm finding the 186 to be much more maneuverable and a little more quick turning. They are very stable and fast and although I haven't had them in powder yet, they performed well in a small variety of conditions at Squaw (off piste on Headwall, the Funnel, and Chute 75) and they demolished the groomers at Northstar on hardpack and slush. After skiing on the Armada JJ for most of the season I noticed that these skis are not as turny and playful but still just as fun for their stable, fast quality. Not real playful, all business.
I'm a JJ fan through and through but they do have negatives. If you want a powerful charger the JJ is not the ski for you. What version of Obsetheds do you have? What's the waist width? Even if that Obsethed feels soft in longitudinal flex K2 skis I feel charge pretty hard, very absorbing of the terrain. JJ doesn't absorb anything, Lol. It bounces over everything unless you really keep them on edge. So lightweight but that's why they are PLAYFULL in every aspect.
Atomic Bent Chetlers and Automatics are stiffened up Armadas in my opinion. They charge and play harder, require a little more muscle and input from the skier. You are rewarded from that effort though.
How many big mountain skiers do you see riding a regular JJ, not many? They usually will step up to the AKJJ but it's 195cm or go Magic J or even Norwalk.
Regular JJ has been one of my favorite skis for the last four years and I will be buying a new pair next year if that tells you anything. I never have a bad day on a JJ, except for heavy tracked out crud.
That will get you thinking a bit and I will check back in.
Paul D.
they were the 10-11 seths in 179 (117 in the wasit). so the real story here is that i won a pair of automatic 186's and am wondering if i should mount em up, downsize to 179, or sell/trade? Ill still have the seths for when i want soft and playful so I think JJ's are out but magics looks fun. In looking for something to tour and tackle more aggressive lines in Wydaho I'm back to the autos though. I read they run around 2cm shorter than they're advertised length, so if the tape says 184 on the 186 i might just man up and stick with those mounted at like +2, but as not that big a dude (5'8" 160) just not sure how much it would take for me to flex the 186 vs the 179 in tight situations. I really just wanna go demo, but ill just have to keep nerdin it up on here instead
The dilemmas of ski gear, lol. The Magic J in a 180cm would work well or check out the Salomon Rocker line.
I spent only a brief amount of time on a 179cm Automatic and not in ideal conditions for the ski but it felt pretty short to me. I'm also 6'1" 178lbs, the 186cm wasn't available to demo. So if you are truly wanting a more powerful charger to conquer more aggressive lines the 179cm might not be enough. You also say you are a pretty playful skier and worried about having to stiff of a ski so jumping up to the 186cm for a guy your size could be exhausting all day long.
Your 179cm Obsethed is by no means a light ski, Atomic should be lighter in a similar size and easier to swing around. This may offset the length in the 186cm for you.
My advice is this. If the Automatic is a ski that you have always wanted to try and think it's the right fit then go for it!! It's end of the season so you will get less money than what they are going for online being a private seller. Make sure you pick a binding that can adapt to other skis if you decide it's the wrong choice next season, like Marker or Salomon/atomic with interchangeable brakes.
If you would have never picked the Automatics in the first place then sell them and start looking at other things now or next season. If you won the skis you won't be losing anything anyways. I feel you may second guess yourself crazy and never give them a fighting chance if you never considered them in the first place. Never hurts to advertise them and see how many bites you get.
Maybe not my best advice but a difficult scenario, lol.
Good Luck and keep me posted.
Johnathan Rambo
Some pop in your step
- Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer
Not sure about the weak wood, but have been riding these for about 3 months now. What I like is they really have some pop off kickers, drop ins, park runs and anything else I can think to jump off of. They turn like a dream and maneuver in some of the tight trees and chutes better than most skis I have been on. I feel like these ski really short, and when on the 185s I feel like I am on 170s. As far as chopping through the crud, corn, groomers and pow, listen to Dan Brown below he is right, this ski does do it all.
Josh Raggon
Weak wood, weak wood.
- Gender: Male
- Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer
I'm not really sure what to say about these anymore. They served me well for the majority of the 13-14 season until my Marker Griffon ripped out of my right ski in the middle of a good pow day at Mammoth. They're great in terms of being light, quick-turning and versatile but I just don't think I can trust Armada anymore after what happened. I don't think the combination of Marker Griffon to Armada JJ should warrant or justify their ripping out of the ski for no reason. Had I been hitting huge jumps or big cliffs, maybe but not for just skiing the Avalanche chutes off of chair 22 at Mammoth and making simple turns. I only weigh about 185 at the most and only had about 40 some odd days on the set up. To some it up, light wood equals weak wood in this case. I don't know how else to explain it.
Lexi Dowdall
Hey Josh, sorry to hear about your skis, that is a mega bummer.
I might just add that its very possible there could have been an issue with the mounting job - not the ski.
Difficult to say really, but this could have happened for a multitude of reasons. There could have been some faulty core material, or the binding itself was defective.
Have you tried contacting Marker's warranty dept?
Josh Raggon
I thought it might have been a bad mount job, but after 40 or 50 ski days on them ? There was nothing wrong with the binding whatsoever either- all the screws were completely intact and still in the plate of the binding. They're great skis don't get me wrong but I'm going to have a hard time trusting Armada from now on.
Dan Brown
The Epitome of Versatility
- Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer
This ski carves like a GS ski, has the stability of a 2x4 whether you're riding fresh pow, hardpack or 3 day old chop, and has the float of a true pow ski. I'm 5'10, 170 and I rode the 185 with an FKS 185. If you're looking for something to do it all, look no further.
Sweet review. Always a good day an a JJ!
Will R
Im about 5'8" and was wondering which size...
Im about 5'8" and was wondering which size to get. I dont know if I should get the 175 or 185. Help!
Hey Will how are you doing? Thought you were going for the Bents so I lost track of your last posting. You do sit in between sizes as of this year but if you think are you still growing then the 185cm will be fine. You are 180lbs from what I remember so 1856cm is the way to go. Especially if you were looking at the 183 Bent Chetler the 185 JJ will be easier to toss around and its lighter.
My wife is 42 years old, 5'6" 138lbs and skis the 175cm VJJ if that gives you some reference. Your weight alone needs the 185cm for adequate float.
Hope that helps and you better get them before the season ends:)
Will R
I was going for the bents then I did some more searching and found the JJs were a bigger ski that's a bit more all mountain friendly. I still don't know what i'll choose. I still going for the bents but I'm considering the JJs
Yes JJ is a bit more all mountain friendly but the Bent Chetler is a bigger, wider and stiffer ski in general. Not a lot of difference in length between them because armada/atomic similar molds. It's a true 2-3cm difference is all. I found the 192cm Bent Chetler poppier than the 195cm AKJJ, thats also what wore me out faster.
Whatever you pick it will be the right choice, both skis are a total blast. Regular JJ just a little bit lighter, quicker, touch more playful. Bents are little heavier, charges a bit more, more float in the deep.
Question on mounting position: I just...
Question on mounting position: I just picked up a pair of 185 JJs and want to mount them with Look Pivot 14s (I know, I know, I'm a traitor to freeheelers. Deal with it; there's nothing wrong with having a couple pairs of alpine skis in the quiver). I'm 5'8", 145 lbs., so this is a pretty big ski for me. On the one hand, I'll only be using them on powder days (and for the occasional trip out West), I'm willing to stay aggressive with them, and I never ski switch, so mounting them on the line seems reasonable. On the other hand, I've never skied anything longer than a 178 and will be spending a lot of time with these in bumps and tight trees, so maybe mounting a cm or two forward would be good to make them feel a bit more nimble. Thoughts?
For reference, my 178 Rossi S3s are mounted +1, and I think the line on those is 5 cm back from ski center like on the JJs. I love the feel of those as an all-mountain ski (making tele or parallel turns), but I definitely think that the tips are too short in serious pow and that they're not super stable at speed.
Just my two bits, stay on the JJ factory recommended. Its there for a reason and even though Im bigger than you are I have never once for a second wished my 185 JJ was further ahead. I never ski switch unless by accident. I wish they made a 190cm JJ if that helps you with anything. I just don't see any advantage to going ahead of that line on this ski. It feels like you are skiing in the dead center of it as it is. I have a Griffon on mine but the pivot will just allow the ski to flex a bit more under the heel.
I also own a 195cm AKJJ thats mounted on the recommended line and if it was further ahead I would really hate it.
Hope that helps and you will love them. Just give them a chance if you don't click with them right away. They get better every time you jump on them.
Thanks -- on the line it is! Stoked to get these mounted and try them out in some spring bumps!
Please let me know how you like them. The little extra height of the 185cm will take some getting used to in the moguls but give it time. You were in between sizes in my opinion but you picked right. I'm curious to know how you think they handle the groomers. I personally think mine are a blast. I keep a really good tune on them, and don't let somebody detune the tips and tails very much. Do it gradually if needed. I keep mine sharp and I can carve it up!! As long as I keep them rolled on edge.
Should be able to get them out the weekend of the 26th... I'll give you an update after that!
So the JJs are mounted up and ready to go, but I'm now sick... bummer. May looks wicked busy for me at work; I'll be lucky to get out on them at all this season. Fingers crossed, though! The 185 was definitely the right way to go, though -- just from looking at them, with all that rocker and reverse sidecut in the tips and tails, I can tell that the 175s would have felt way too short. I'll post an update if I do manage to get out!
Bummer is right. Well at least you are keeping them fresh and new looking.
Josh Raggon
Weak Top Sheet.Weak Top Sheet.
- Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer
I just had my great ski day at Mammoth ended at 1230 because the back right piece of my bindings ripped right out of my JJs that Ive only skied maybe 40 days between last season and this season
. Im not sure who to blame on this but it wasnt the Marker Baron because all the screws were completely intact. Im thinking weak top sheet. These are the 12-13 s in case that matters.
Josh Raggon
To add to my review, I wasnt dropping cliffs or anything crazy merely skiing some mellow chutes in day old pow with a couple inches on top. My din was set at 10 if that matters.
Found this thread from a few years back talking about this problem... seems like quite a few people have seen Marker bindings rip out of JJs, but only Markers...
Thinking about getting a dedicated pow...
Thinking about getting a dedicated pow setup for New England skiing, which for me mostly means pounding soft bumps and hunting powder stashes in tight trees. My current go-to skis are my Rossi S3s; I love the tip and tail rocker with underfoot camber and would want the same profile in my pow skis, but I would want to see improved performance busting crud and chop (they don't have to be total beasts, though -- nimbleness is definitely the priority). Would the JJs fit the bill? What else should I look at? If I do go for the JJs, which length would be best? I'm 5'8", 145 lbs. and ski 178 S3s; I could probably go a little longer for a pow ski, but going up to a 185 seems like kind of a big jump.
Appreciate any recommendations!
My favorite saying over the last four years that my family hears every time I ski my JJ is this, "always a good day on a JJ." It's so true for me. Yes the JJ does have its drawbacks but the positives outweigh the negatives in my book. The JJ hater's will say it sucks on groomers, it gets tossed around and it's rough riding in the crud, it's not damp enough, not powerful enough, etc... But really look at the JJ lovers out there, there is a ton of them!! JJ riders learn to ski this ski and when they do it does wonders. I hated it the first few times I was on it, especially in the crud, but I learned to keep it up on edge and let the stiff center of the ski truck right through it. My wife went through the exact same thing and now LOVES the VJJ.
The JJ is one of the most fun mogul skis I've ever been on. I rip through any size, shape, and consistency of bumps I can find. Many people stop and ask me how I can ski them so fast in moguls for such a big ski, so fun! Carving hard firm groomers... No problem at all. Just look at the sidecut, the turn radius, the sidewall construction under the foot, and it will trench and hold if you are a good technical skier. Tips and tails will flap but who cares, the midsection will stay rock steady. I don't need to go over the powder and tree ability of the ski and how much fun it is, that's a no brainer.
I know I gave you more information than you probably wanted in this long message but what can I say, I own several skis but I just love my JJ.
Tough call on the length. My wife is 5'6" and 138lbs, very aggressive and skis the 175. I'm 6'1" 180lbs on the 185jj. I wish mine was a little longer on the deep days, she wishes hers was a little shorter on firm mogul days. If you ski very aggressively and want more float go 185, if you are more timid, willing to have a little tip dive when deep, and want more mogul friendly go 175cm.
I'm outa room now so good luck!
Or go new Super 7 in 180cm. Neither Super or a JJ is what I would call great in the crud but you can't have everything. Nimble, quick, light, fun, mogul friendly, and bombs through crud is just not in any ski I've ever found. Trade off's, always.
Haha, thanks, never too much information! I've written some novel-length gear reviews myself.... I'll take a look at the Super 7 as well, but as for the JJ, I think I'm leaning 185 over 175. Also, somebody mentioned further down this page that next year's model is supposed to have a little less rocker... Anyone know anything about that? Thoughts on how that might affect my decision if I wait until next season?
I've had my hands on next years and it is modified slightly, I'm waiting to ski it soon if the season holds. It's only about 2mm wider and yes the widest parts of the ski are pushed a little bit further out. Turn radius is a touch longer too, which I'm not sure I will like. Not a major change but I'm hoping it was a good update. Mine is four years old and getting pretty beat up. I've been thinking of buying another pair just in case they wreck it. I think it might blend a touch of the akjj into the normal version so slight better crud performance and possibly better float. But these are minor changes in my opinion and that's good. Don't mess with a proven winner.
If you can find a good deal on this years version and have never experienced a JJ then saving some cash and putting the rest into a binding is a good way to go. Remember next years version will be a touch bigger and that means slightly heavier in my opinion.
Perfect Fun Shape for Trees & Pillows
- Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer
Skier: 6'1", 160lbs. Technically proficient on any terrain.
Setup: 185cm, Marker Baron binder.
Daily use: trees, pillows, chutes, & tight technical terrain of S. Lake Tahoe.
Of the dozen or so "fun shaped," rockered skis I've tried in the 115mm-ish waist category the JJ is by far the most balanced design: it excels in soft snow & is still tons of fun in mixed conditions typically found at resorts. Float is awesome, pivoting & smearing effortless, and the cambered section offers fantastic edge grip on hard snow for a ski this wide and light (9.8lbs in 185cm).
My daily skiing is in tight, technical trees, chutes, spines and pillowlines typical of the resorts & backcountry of South Lake Tahoe. While I don't ski switch outside of the park, I do find the rockered tails useful for tail drags in tight spots where you want to keep it on the snow and for wheelies to help get the tips up and over larger obstacles.
For skiers of similar weight & w/ the technique to lay down good, carved turns on hard snow, I'd rate the "speed limit" around 40mph. The ski will go faster, but like most other tapered, tip & tail rockered skis of this width, you'll begin to feel the tips & tails flatter at high speeds when slopes get icy.
Caveat: bigger skiers (~180lbs+) looking to ski wide open spaces flat out & blast through heavy crud should look elsewhere. Blizzard and Volkl make flatter-tailed, stiffer, big-mountain skis better suited to your needs.
Punchline: Do you want to go deep, tight, & technical? This is your ski.
Note: *For the 3-star reviewer who complained of tail "hookiness" the problem was definitely his tune: skis with tapered tails & shovels need to have the edges detuned fore & aft of the widest contact points.
I'm a former shop tech who tunes his own skis. Get the right length (go head-height+, they ski short), tune these skis properly & keep the edges sharp, and you will be impressed with the edging capabilities of this powder ski.
Do you try soul or super 7 in comparison to the JJ. I have owned JJ's for awhile but haven't got a chance to get on the new Rossi stuff.
Just posted review on Soul 7. Honestly the most disappointing "hot" ski I've ever tested. Way less float & maneuverability than old S7 in pow, godawful hard snow performance in both short and long turns. Edge hold nonexistent. Tip chatters like a scared monkey above 20mph on any type of firm snow.
Perhaps the Super 7 makes up for this gutless performance in the pow with more width, but I honesty never want to ski the Soul 7 again under any conditions, and I only weigh 160.
I can wait to try next years JJ!
How people are mounting these for tele...
How people are mounting these for tele (i.e., 0,-1, -5, etc)? I haven't been able to find a lot of beta out there and I am new to this ski. These skis will be skied in wide open alpine terrain, trees, and occasionally at the ski areas. So I am looking for the spot that will give me the most versatility. I'll probably being using axl's and my t-races. Anyway, just curious if anyone has any insights or opinions. Thanks
Kayla Weiser
I don't have the JJs in particular, but I have a somewhat similar profile ski mounted with the Hammerheads. I mount them 2-3 back and get the most versatile ride out of them- touring, trees, cliffs, jumps. The more length in front of your boots will give you a more aggressive big mountain ride, but you don't want to go too far back, because then it takes away the stability from your tails!
I'm 5'2" and 120 lbs. Is the 165 right...
I'm 5'2" and 120 lbs. Is the 165 right for me. I'm an advanced intermediate skier
Jesse Thunderbird
Hi twist.
I'm the exact same size and you could definitely handle the 165cm. This ski feels like a much shorter ski when cruising around because the rocker decreases the effective edge.
I'm more of an advanced/expert skier, and I actually ski the 175cm VJJ (women's version) but it just depends on how strong of a skier you are. You will definitely be fine on the 165 cm.
Examples for you. My wife is 5'6" and 138lbs strong skier and she skis the 175cm, it reaches above her head. Both my boys are roughly 5' 6" and 120-135 lbs and I would put them on the 175cm. I think you will be fine going with the 165cm, some day when you get more aggressive and are skiing in very deep snow you may want to jump up to the 175cm.
Neil Watson
What bindings do you recommend putting on...
What bindings do you recommend putting on these skis?
Mike D Hilverda
There are a lot of bindings that will work great with the Armada JJ depending on how you intend to use it. However a few excellent options would be the Salomon Guardian 16 and Marker Baron for AT, or the Rossi FKS for Alpine exclusive riding. Personally I think the Salomon Guardian16 in the 115mm brake width is a seamless match for this ski.
Marker griffon or even the salomon driver STH 13 depending on your size. I love griffons on mine for the added height/leverage for groomed performance while others like low profile closer to the snow feel of the others. All depends if you are going to do any AT
Hi- Im an intermediate on my way to advanced...
Hi- Im an intermediate on my way to advanced skier thats only been skiing seriously for about 4 years. I currently ride 175 ARV's. I wanna get a nice powder ski..im 5' 9" 165lbs and I'm thinking the JJ is my best fit. What are your thoughts and would I be in trouble if I went to a 165cm?
Mike D Hilverda
The 165cm would be a good choice for your size and experience, but it sounds like you are a progressing skier who is really looking to up his game by combining your intermediate skills with an advanced ski.
The 175 may seem a touch long the first several times you ride the JJ but, after a honeymoon period, I think you will be grateful you went for the longer length. The extra 10cm will combine with that Freeride Rocker to give you excellent float in the backcountry, while the JJ's relatively tight turning radius will keep you nimble on harder surfaces.
Again, you would really be safe on either length, but if you are buying your dream car, I wouldn't hesitate on bumping up to the V8.
Agree with Mike, 175cm all the way. My teenage boys range from 14, 15, 16 years old and sizes are from 5'5" 120lbs up to 5' 11" and 150 lbs and and they easily ride the 175cm and have all even rode my 185cm when it's deep and not massive moguls.
Like Mike says you will adjust to the size within the first day or two. Some first impressions of a JJ if it's not a powder day are iffy but give it a chance!! I wasn't in love with mine the first 5 days I skied them and after four years I would never part with it. Same with my wife on her VJJ. Have fun with them.
I ski jay peak, sugarbush, Stowe, and a...
I ski jay peak, sugarbush, Stowe, and a couple other mtns. Conditions vary, but I really like skiing the back of the mountain, and some side country. I like throwing off of booters, and also like to be in the park like 20% of the time. I like going in the trees and glades a lot also. I like a fat and stable ski, but something that is nimble and quick. I'm 5'9" 150 and really will only gain and inch or less, and gain weight. I'm an advanced skiier, would this be a good ski for me?
I think yes. Also look at Line Sir Francis Bacon or possibly the Soul 7 depending on your age. The reason I say age is I'm finding that the younger generation prefers Armada and Line brand names if hanging around the park. The JJ will be a touch wider underfoot and have more tip and tail rocker to it, maybe a touch better in deep powder but at your weight either will be great. They both are nimble and light, Armada usually has a lighter more ceramic/glassy feel to it where the Line has a smoother/quiter feel to it, almost like a thin little layer of rubber in the ski. I hear the Bacon is a little more buttery in the tips and tails vs the JJ.
I think my JJ rips groomers all over but people say the Bacon is awesome too. Its been a few years since Ive skied the Bacon but hoping to jump on one here soon. Really can't go wrong either way you go, both skis are a blast if you don't mind the width. I think the Bacon will be more park friendly just because it has less rocker in the tail but at 20% park time I wouldn't let that weigh your decision.


text:
Latest update : 2011-04-05
The Caillebotte Brothers' Private World
The late 19th-century French painting and photography works of the famous Caillebotte Brothers are at the Jacquemart-André Museum. The curator, Nicolas Sainte Fare Garnot, joins us to talk about this unique artistic fraternity. Plus, the world's first 3D art house film hits cinemas, Wim Wenders' "Pina" pays tribute to the revolutionary choreographer.


text:
None of that has made a jot of difference to how this forum is run.
Moderator for a week = fuck all.
Background poster = fuck all.
Good RPer = fuck all.
None of that has made a jot of difference to how this forum is run.
I think your brain needs renewing.
A sad day in the history of PD, no doubt.
I have done more than The Editor also.
Everybody likes stroking their own ego.
I've also done more than Nocturne.
You can just keep being redundant and saying the same thing to everyone that posts in here, or you could just make a blanket statement right now.
I think I will do the former.
Nanaki's a fucktard!!!
You know it's true.
43 minutes. Catch ya later, grasshopper.
You timed how long I would respond even though you posted it when I was offline?
Seriously, what the fuck?
So, when are we getting a better list on the first post?Last edited by Nanaki : 02-18-2008 at 11:02 PM
Banner made by Peeki.
"You say that I'm an intelligent fool; I say: 'Are you sure about the intelligent part?'"
Extended Signature
"I would do Eve without a second thought, as she is my one and only special pair."


text:
Other recordings available for download
|Westminster Abbey Choir, James O'Donnell (conductor)
|Corydon Singers, Matthew Best (conductor)
|St Paul's Cathedral Choir, John Scott (conductor), Christopher Dearnley (organ)
|Tenebrae, Nigel Short (conductor)
In his own sleeve note to the 1967 recording by King's College Choir of Take him, earth, for cherishing Howells wrote: 'Within the year following the tragic death of President Kennedy in Texas plans were made for a dual American-Canadian Memorial Service to be held in Washington. I was asked to compose an a cappella work for the commemoration. The text was mine to choose, Biblical or other. Choice was settled when I recalled a poem by Prudentius (AD 348–413). I had already set it in its medieval Latin years earlier, as a study for Hymnus Paradisi. But now I used none of that unpublished setting. Instead I turned to Helen Waddell's faultless translation […] Here was the perfect text—the Prudentius 'Hymnus circa exsequias defuncti'.'
So far, so objective, but this cool, elegant account scarcely begins to probe Howells' long relationship with a text that was intimately bound up with the life and death of his son, Michael. Howells' setting of the Latin, dating from around 1932, is an incomplete fragment. When, after a period in which he found himself unable to work following Michael's death in 1935, Howells was moved to compose a work in the boy's memory, he drew on an existing Requiem for unaccompanied voices in planning what was to become his masterpiece, Hymnus Paradisi. He intended that it should include a setting of Prudentius' words of mourning and consolation until a very late stage in the process of composition, but in the end they did not find a place in Hymnus. Nevertheless, this text was often in his mind. In May 1958 he wrote in his diary: 'Rain and Gloom. But the rain turned away with a sheer beauty of light. Prudentius' 'Hymnus Circa Exsequias Defuncti' kept my mind in safe refuge—as once it did in Sept. 1935 for love of Michael.'
Thoughts of his son's death were never far away and these beautiful words were there waiting to be set. Is it too fanciful to suggest that in responding to the shock that the whole world felt at the assassination of John Kennedy, a young man in whom much hope for the future had been invested, Howells found the motivation for what must surely be another memorial for Michael?
from notes by Paul Andrews © 2012
Other albums featuring this work
Howells: Requiem; Vaughan Williams: Mass in G minor
CDH55220 Helios (Hyperion's budget label)
Howells: St Paul's Service & other works
CDA66260 Archive Service
Music for Remembrance
Studio Master: CDA68020 Studio Master FLAC & ALAC downloads available
Parry: Songs of Farewell
Studio Master: SIGCD267 Download only Studio Master FLAC & ALAC downloads available


text:
Toggle navigation
Our Other Tools:
Toggle navigation
App Metrics & Research
Backflip Studios
Revenue Charts
Download Charts
Ranking Charts
Rating Charts
General info about this app.
AppData - iOS Details
DragonVale (
View in iTunes
Backflip Studios
Game Center: No
Average Rating:
Featured Charts
Top Grossing Apps
Top Grossing Apps Games Genre
In-App Purchases
CHF0.00 Stapel Juwelen
CHF0.00 Sack voller Juwelen
CHF0.00 Tasche voller Juwelen
CHF0.00 Stapel Leckereien
CHF0.00 Cashhaufen
CHF0.00 Sack voller Leckereien
CHF0.00 Tasche voller Leckereien
CHF0.00 Sack voller Cash
CHF0.00 Riesiges Glas Glühwürmchen
CHF0.00 Tasche voller Cash
"Just between you and me, dragon parks are pretty rad." ~ TouchArcade.com
Hatched a dragon lately? Play DragonVale and raise, feed and breed your own lovable dragons.
PLEASE NOTE! DragonVale is completely free to play, but some game items can also be purchased for real money. If you don't want to use this feature, please disable in-app purchases. DragonVale requires an internet connection to play (3G or WiFi).
ALSO NOTE! By playing DragonVale you may find yourself hopelessly addicted to hatching and caring for adorable dragons. You may find yourself feeding them treats, watching them grow, building and decorating their habitats, and inviting others in to view them in their floating island home. You may even find yourself choosing pairs for breeding, or setting up dragon competitions in the Colosseum.
DragonVale is an enticing social experience from Backflip Studios that is sure to keep you entertained. You get:
★ Dozens of adorable dragons to raise
★ A magical island you build in the sky
★ Custom habitats where dragons graze
★ Paths and decorations to delight your visitors
★ Farms to grow dragon treats
★ The grand Colosseum where dragons compete
★ Full-color visuals and sparkling animations
★ An original Renaissance music soundtrack
★ Support for Game Center and Facebook to visit other parks and trade gifts
Don't just take our word for it. Here's what the press has to say about DragonVale:
"This new title has a depth and higher quality of art that's reminiscent of the work that went into early console games." ~ VentureBeat.com
"Jurassic Park was cool, but really it doesn't have anything on DragonVale." ~ Gamezebo.com
"It builds up nicely, the art is colorful and fun." ~ TUAW.com
And to think it all started with an egg.
➤ Install DragonVale today. It's free!
DragonVale is brought to you by Backflip Studios, makers of absurdly fun mobile games like Paper Toss, NinJump, Ragdoll Blaster, Strike Knight, Army of Darkness, Shape Shift and Graffiti Ball. Search the App Store for "Backflip Studios" to see all our apps.
Follow @BackflipStudios on Twitter for free game announcements and other updates.
Thanks for playing!
An analysis for this app's revenues.
Revenue estimates charts.
Download estimates charts.
Ranking charts.
Rating charts.
This feature requires user to login to AppData account
Contact Us
Add Your App
AppData, LLC
Copyright © 2014 AppData LLC. |
Privacy Policy
Refund Policy
| (747) 221-6215 | support @ appdata.com | sales @ appdata.com
Follow @appdatapro


text:
We currently ship to all 50 states.
Standard: Free and tracked on all orders placed on or after Tuesday March 10th, 2014, and delivered within 10 working days after despatch
Express & Duty Paid: $30.00 flat rate shipped from the UK and delivered within 2-4 working days
Please note: All orders are shipped from the UK. As such, any orders over $200 may be subject to import duties and taxes, payment of which is the responsibility of the person placing the order, unless you have selected Express & Duty Paid shipping where duties are paid by us. If you have any questions related to customs charges you are advised to contact your local customs office.
Click here for more information on delivery
Making a return couldn't be easier!
We now offer free returns via UPS. Click here for more information
We promise to refund any items that you are not completely happy with when you return it to us in saleable condition by mail to our warehouse in New Jersey within 14 days of receipt, or to your nearest store (excluding Nordstrom stores) within 1 month of receipt. Refunds will be credited to your original method of payment.
For hygiene reasons we cannot offer refunds pierced jewellery, underwear or swimwear if the hygiene seal has been removed, or cosmetic products if they have been used or the hygiene seal is broken, unless they are of unsatisfactory quality or unfit for purpose.
Please also note that items must be returned with all of the barcode tags intact. Your items should be in their original packaging. Any shoes returned to Topshop.com must not be worn, and must be returned in their original box.
Topshop stores outside of the USA currently do not offer refunds or exchanges on any Topshop.com purchases. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you.


text:
This week is all about aliens—both good and bad.
A few of this week's Blu-ray releases celebrate out-of-this-world characters. In fact, we could even argue that Little Shop of Horrors is one of them. Although we can certainly appreciate a good intergalatic contest, the must-have Blu-ray for the week is pretty clear. E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial snags this week's spotlight.
Steven Spielberg's classic has come to Blu-ray, and it's an absolute treat. Besides the beautiful story, this release offers a nice little viewing experience, with a restored image, a 7.1 DTS-HD Master Audio track, and a hearty collection of extras.
Besides the aliens, we have a bit of Hitchcock, a Disney classic, an ab-tastic Tom Cruise, and much more.
Did we miss one of your favorites for the week? Have something to say about one of this week's new releases? Sound off in the comments below. Otherwise, all of these titles are out now, except where noted. Enjoy!
Check out our Blu-ray Picks for the Week of October 9, 2012.Follow Electronic House on Facebook and Twitter.
Check out our recommendations for the season's best new TVs for home theater, living room or anywhere.
Home automation system helps wounded war veteran live more comfortably.
Check out our recommendations for the season's best new TVs for home theater, living room or anywhere.


text:
Depends on your class, paladin need way less agility then eg a warrior for 1% dodge (304 vs 430). As a warrior i tend to stick to Therazane reverded ring.
With reforging the stats become:
+190 Agility
+286 Stamina
+127 Haste -> +77 Haste / +50 Parry or Dodge
+127 Mastery
From what I read elsewhere it appears that all that Agility gives around 115 dodge rating and it is a BiS tank ring on a popular paladin tanking forum. It certainly appears to be a lot better than a lot of the 346 tank rings in terms of avoidance and mastery and also fairly easy to obtain as it is a rep item.
Currently I am using these (2) rings.
Last edited by Ironfaith; 03-04-2011 at 11:30 AM.
Depends on your class, paladin need way less agility then eg a warrior for 1% dodge (304 vs 430). As a warrior i tend to stick to Therazane reverded ring.
I am also thinking about using the Signet. Currently i am using http://www.wowhead.com/item=62351 and http://www.wowhead.com/item=56444 . Another epic ring is not reachable in the near future (well expect anything dropping from the brand new ZA and ZG coming in patch 4.1)
I would replace the umbriss band with the earthen ring-ring
Thanks! Then i'll get the Signet in the next few days (3100 reputation missing .. last cataclysm fraction to get exalted)
On my Prot Pally I was surprised to see a nice increase in dodge and stamina over my Felsen Ring.
As klausi stated above: as a pally you need way less agi for 1% dodge than a warrior and i am a warrior
Use it, it's a great ring for tanking and the 400 AP you lose isn't noticeable when Vengeance gives you 10K AP. It's working great next to my Ring of the Battle Anthem.
The paladin tank in our team uses it. Test out some numbers in World of Logs and see how it works out for you.
Warriors getting gimped I'm forced to use the Valor DPS Str ring
On my pally i chose to use the Red rock band ring (346 reputation vendor).
My other choices would have been any heroic dungeon ring, that agil ring mentioned above, and the JC ring (with a gem slot).
Although its a expertise/mastery ring instead of a preferable avoidance/mastery, its sheer amout of mastery is not proportional with its Ilvl and pays off imho (it gives *gasp* 168 mastery). Since the zan-dalari tank ring is parry/dodge, both now subject to heavy DR, I get more hit table coverage using the Red band. The zan dalari dps ring gives less mastery and haste (useless) as a second stat.
Comparing the red rock band to the Signet of the Elder council, its 40 more mastery and instead of haste you will have leftover expertise, best threat stat for pallys. The signet gives some more dodge from agil, but it would be around .5% pre-DR, and your losing the str that converts to parry and AP.
I beleive the Red Rock Band is the best ring (by a fairly large margin) to use along with the VP ring for tanking untill you get some nice raid drop.
Last edited by aresius; 05-12-2011 at 10:42 AM.
The Signet of the Elder Council is better than the Red Rock Band because of the Stamina gain.
Red Rock Band
+120 Strength == +30 Parry
+252 Stamina
+98 Expertise -> +59 Expertise / +39 Parry/Dodge
+168 Mastery
Signet of the Elder Council
+190 Agility == +46 Dodge
+286 Stamina
+127 Haste -> +77 Haste / +50 Parry or Dodge
+127 Mastery
Signet vs Red Rock Differences:
-30 Parry
+46 Dodge
+34 Stamina
+11 Parry/Dodge
-41 Mastery
+27 Dodge/Parry, +34 Stamina, -41 Mastery
If it were just Dodge/Parry vs Mastery, then yes Mastery wins. But 34 stamina plus the dodge/parry imo makes the Signet better. No one doing progression should care about threat stats because of Vengeance, so the Expertise gain is moot point(and if you want to go there you have to account for the Crit from Agi as well).


text: San Francisco writer Anne Marie Feld still felt a little too footloose and fancy-free for motherhood — until fate intervened. While Anne and her husband Dave are thrilled to have a baby on the way, they're also a little terrified about the changes looming and the end of sleep as they know it. Join Anne each Monday as she chronicles her journey to motherhood, armed with a newly sensible wardrobe, high-carbohydrate snacks, and a raging case of hypochondria. (Editor's note: Anne began her journal in April 2003; in this installment, she's 15 weeks pregnant.)