text: Halperin: Obama Okay with Shutdown Because Media Has His Back Print article Send a Tip by John Nolte 30 Sep 2013 post a comment Intentionally or not, Monday on Morning Joe, Time's Mark Halperin revealed to the world how the American media's pro-Obama bias will in part be to blame for any coming government shutdown. When asked if President Obama had an incentive to negotiate with the GOP, Halperin explained that, "The White House does not have much incentive. They think the trends are going to go in their direction at the end of the week, or early next week at the latest; because again, the press is largely sympathetic to their arguments on this." -- -- In short: The government is going to shut down because Obama knows the media has his back and therefore feels no pressure to enter into negotiations that might avert a shutdown. In fact, Obama is apparently okay letting the government shut down because he knows the media won't make him pay a political price for it. So what we have here is the media's pro-Obama bias as a big factor in a potential shutdown. As we have seen all year, when it comes to settled laws on issues such as gun control, voter ID, and immigration, the media are big believers in the kind of "civil bipartisan compromise" that results in changing those laws -- as long as all that "civil bipartisan compromise" comes from the GOP. But the media have completely abandoned their championing of "civil bipartisan compromise" with respect to this budget crisis, and as a result, Obama knows he has the media on his side and is therefore comfortable in his position not to negotiate. And Obama's refusal to compromise is hurtling America towards a government shutdown. What we have here is a situation wherein media bias is helping to inflame a crisis. In other words, were the media acting responsibly, objectively, and professionallly, this would actually decrease the chances of a shutdown. Obviously, though, the media wants its cake and to eat it too. The media are behaving in a way that increases the chances of a shutdown and then the media will blame the GOP for what the media helped cause. Now we also know why Obama felt so secure golfing during this weekend's shutdown crisis, instead of rolling up his sleeves like a leader to make a deal. Why not? He knows the media won't blame him for anything, including shutting down the government. Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC


text:
Vancouver Canucks
Steve Moore Glad To Be Done With Legal Order
Steve Moore says the 10 years since his NHL career ended with an on-ice attack have been "long and trying," but he is glad to be done with the legal ordeal.
Settlement Reached In Moore-Bertuzzi Lawsuit
A settlement has been reached in Steve Moore's lawsuit against NHL forward Todd Bertuzzi, more than 10 years after the bloody, on-ice attack ended Moore's career.
Former Avs Player Moore Increases His Claim To $68M In Civil Suit
Steve Moore's lawyers filed documents in his civil suit increasing his financial claims from $38 million to $68 million.
Former Canucks Owner Can Be Subpoenaed In Former Avs Player's Lawsuit
A U.S. federal judge has ruled a subpoena can be issued compelling former Vancouver Canucks owner John McCaw Jr. to testify in Steve Moore's lawsuit against Todd Bertuzzi and the team.
Avs Beat Canucks 4-2 In Vancouver
The Colorado Avalanche beat the Canucks at the Rogers Arena in Vancouver for the first time in four years on Thursday night.
Barrie Tips In OT Winner As Avs Beat Canucks 3-2
Moments after deflecting in the winning goal, Colorado's Tyson Barrie did a little dance.
Former Avs Player Moore Still Seeks Resolution
It has been 10 years since Steve Moore's NHL career ended with an attack by former Vancouver Canucks forward Todd Bertuzzi.
International Trips You Can Do In A Weekend
Many international destinations close to home may prove to be a better option than South Beach or Miami. Among the best international trips that can be done in a weekend are the Bahamas, Cabo San Lucas, Cancun, Montreal and Vancouver.
Hejda Lifts Avs Past Canucks, 4-3
Jan Hejda scored his first goal of the season – not that he even got to see it – with 7.6 seconds remaining to help the Avalanche rally for a 4-3 victory over the Vancouver Canucks on Saturday.
Captain Joe Sakic Selected To Hockey Hall Of Fame
Joe Sakic, the stylish center who spent his entire 20-year NHL career with the Quebec Nordiques-Colorado Avalanche franchise, parlayed passion into a berth in the Hockey Hall of Fame.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
The Right to Remain Silent Does Not Extend to Computer/Phone Passwords
Recently the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that under certain circumstances, a court may compel a criminal defendant to provide the password to encrypted digital evidence without violating the defendant's constitutional rights. This is an increasingly prevalent issue that has divided courts across the country and may be presented to the United States Supreme Court for review soon.
Leon Gelfgatt was indicted in 2010 for allegedly operating a mortgage fraud scheme that fraudulently collected more than $13 million. During the investigation, Massachusetts state troopers seized four computers, all of which were protected by encryption software that Gelfgatt refused to remove. Lawyers for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts filed a motion in Superior Court asking the court to compel Gelfgatt to enter the password for his encryption software so that law enforcement could review the contents. The Superior Court denied the motion, stating that the Commonwealth was asking for the defendant's assistance in accessing potentially incriminating evidence.
In a 5-2 ruling, the Massachusetts Supreme Court reversed the lower court ruling and held that police could compel Gelfgatt to decrypt his files, because he told investigators that the computer belonged to him and he had the encryption key. The majority opinion reasoned that Gelfgatt's disclosure to investigators that he had the password to access the encrypted materials was sufficient to satisfy the "foregone conclusion" exception to the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. The court did not specify if Gelfgatt would have been compelled to decrypt the computers if he did not tell law enforcement that he owned the computers and had the ability to decrypt them, which may limit the reach of this opinion.
In a strong dissenting opinion, two justices found compelling a criminal defendant to decrypt the files is the functional equivalent to forced self-incrimination.
After the decision, one of Gelfgatt's lawyers indicated that they planned to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has not yet considered the issue that has divided jurisdictions across the country. In 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a man under criminal investigation could not be compelled to decrypt his computer hard drives for the government without a showing by the government of specific knowledge about the contents of the hard drive, an opinion referred to by the dissenting opinion in this case.
In a time when law enforcement is increasingly relying on digital evidence in building cases against criminal defendants, issues regarding encryption and password protected materials will continue to arise. We hope the Supreme Court will grant an appeal and clarify that law enforcement cannot compel criminal defendants to decrypt files without violating the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
Fifth Amendment, State Criminal
U.S. Court of Appeals Decision: Cell Location Data is Protected Under Individual's Expectation of Privacy
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently considered whether cell site location data is protected by the Fourth Amendment. On June 11, 2014, the court issued its decision in favor of privacy rights: the court held that cell site location information is within the cell phone subscriber's reasonable expectation of privacy. If officers want the data, they must obtain the subscriber's consent or a judicial warrant supported by probable cause.
The court's decision in United States v. Davis pertained to Quartavius Davis, a federal defendant who was convicted in Florida on multiple counts of robbery, conspiracy, and possession of a firearm. For his crimes, Davis was sentenced to roughly 162 years in prison.
On appeal, Davis argued that his convictions and sentence should be reversed. Among other things, Davis argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress cell site location data, which the prosecution used to place Davis near the various crime scenes. Investigators were able to obtain the data without a probable-cause warrant. They did so under a provision of the Stored Communications Act, which states that a court may order production of non-content cell phone records based on reasonable grounds to believe the records are material to an ongoing criminal investigation. Davis objected that the evidence in his case should be suppressed because it was the product of a warrantless search conducted in violation of his constitutional rights.
The Eleventh Circuit agreed with Davis, holding that cell site location information is within the subscriber's reasonable expectation of privacy. Speaking for the three-judge panel, Judge Sentelle discussed two distinct views of the interests subject to Fourth Amendment protection: property interests and privacy interests. The court determined that the privacy theory applied to Davis' case. Because Davis had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell site location information, the government's warrantless collection of that data violated Davis' Fourth Amendment rights.
The Davis opinion is arguably the most protective of individual rights as compared to similar appellate decisions. In September 2010, the Third Circuit held that officers can obtain cell site data under the Stored Communications Act as long as they meet the reasonable-grounds standard. But the court also added that, in exceptional cases, a judge may impose a warrant requirement for data that can be used to track an individual's movements in a private location, such as the home.
In July 2013, the Fifth Circuit issued a less-protective decision. In that case, the court held that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in non-content cell site data. Therefore, the court must order the production of such information when the government meets its burden of proof under the Stored Communications Act.
The Supreme Court has yet to decide the issue. But past Fourth Amendment cases suggest that no fewer than five sitting Justices favor the privacy theory that Judge Sentelle relied on. They are likely to agree that cell phone subscribers have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cell location data.
data privacy, Fourth Amendment, Geolocation
Court: Police Need Warrant to Search Phone. But Guess What? They Get to Keep Your Phone While They Get One.
Will cops still get access to cell phone data post arrest? You bet. Today's Supreme Court decision just means they need to get permission from a judge before they start searching who you have been texting. And odds are very good, that permission will be granted.
In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the United States Supreme Court held that law enforcement officers may not conduct warrantlesssearches of cell phones that are seized incident to an arrest. But just because police cannot immediately search mobile phones, doesn't mean they cannot immediately seize them in connection with an arrest. Indeed, the benefit of today's decision by our country's highest court may be limited to the two defendants who brought the case (and of course any similarly situated defendants).
The named defendant in Riley v California is David Riley. After Riley was stopped for a traffic violation, he was arrested and the police officer seized his cell phone incident to that arrest. When the officer accessed the data on the phone (without a search warrant), he noticed the repeated use of an identifier associated with the Bloods street gang. Later, a detective reviewed the cell phone records and noticed gang-related content, including a photo of Riley standing in front of a car that was used in a shooting weeks earlier. Riley was convicted of multiple crimes related to that shooting and received a sentence of 15 years to life.
The second case resolved today involved Brima Wurie, who had been arrested in connection with a drug sale. After Wurie's arrest, police took him to the police station where officers confiscated his flip phone. A few minutes later, Wurie's phone showed an incoming call from "my house." The officers opened the phone, accessed the call log to determine the number of the incoming call, and then traced the number back to Wurie's apartment, which they secured. After obtaining a search warrant, the officers searched the apartment and seized drugs, a gun, ammunition, and cash. At trial, Wurie was convicted on three drug-related counts and sentenced to more than twenty years in prison.
The key here to note is that in neither case did law enforcement obtain prior permission to search the cell phones belonging to Riley and Wurie. The narrow question presented to the Court therefore was whether it is permissible for law enforcement to search cell phone data incident to an arrest where no court has authorized such a search. In holding that such a search violates the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, the Court considered but rejected as not relevant prior cases where so-called "warrantless" searches passed constitutional muster. For example,
· In Chimel v. California, the Court recognized that the Fourth Amendment permits warrantless searches of the arrestee and areas within his immediate control if necessary to protect officer safety or to preserve evidence.
· In Arizona v. Gant, the Court held that officers may search a car incident to arrest if the arrestee is unsecured and within reaching distance of the passenger compartment or if the officer reasonably believes evidence of the crime of arrest may be found.
Because there were no such exigent circumstances present in Riley or Wurie's arrest, the Court concluded that the need for cell phone data searches does not outweigh the corresponding intrusion on individual privacy, and thus a warrant was required. This of course is the right result. Digital cell phone data does not, by itself, of course, threaten officer safety. And a warrantless search of cell phone data is not necessary to preserve evidence. The Court recognized an individual's privacy interest in digital cell phone data is considerable: cell phones have immense storage capacity, collect many types of records in one place, and often contain years' worth of data.
In this regard, today's decision is a victory for privacy rights. Law enforcement officers will not be permitted to conduct warrantless searches of cell phones for digital evidence. But if you are arrested, don't assume law enforcement will let you keep your phone. Today's decision may not allow for a warrantless search of your phone, but there is nothing prohibiting law enforcement from securing a phone post-arrest and seeking permission from a court to search it. And the chances that a court will grant such a request are close to 100%.
Cybersecurity, Federal Criminal Procedure
Privacy, Search and seizure, Supreme Court
Another SDNY Judge Finds the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Wanting
In a sentencing hearing yesterday in the Southern District of New York, yet another judge reached the conclusion that the quasi-mathematical formulaic approach of the United States Sentencing Guidelines fails to account adequately for differences between criminal defendants. But, in this case, the result was to the detriment of the individual being sentenced in that case.
Judge Jed Rakoff made headlines in October 2012 when he sentenced former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta to a two-year prison sentence despite an advisory Guidelines range of 6-1/2 to 8 years (and an even higher range pressed by prosecutors and the Probation Department). As we wrote here at that time, in ordering a significant downward variance, Judge Rakoff bemoaned the Guidelines' attempt to treat human beings and their attendant complexities as "commodities," and the "bizarre results" that follows that approach.
In yesterday's sentencing hearing for Anatoly Golubchik, Judge Jesse Furman focused on a different manner in which the Guidelines fail to account for differences from case to case. Golubchik had entered a guilty plea to a single count of participating in a racketeering conspiracy from in or about 2006 through in or about April 2013. The government alleged that this racketeering conspiracy engaged in illegal gambling, threats of violence, and laundering of approximately $100 million.
Under Section 2E1.1 of the Guidelines (applicable to racketeering), Golubchik's base offense level was the greater of 19 or the base offense level applicable to the underlying conduct. That underlying conduct was the operation of an illegal gambling business, for which Section 2E3.1 provides a base offense level of 12. Thus, Golubchik's base offense level was 19, and, despite the laundering of millions of dollars, the Probation Department calculated the advisory Guidelines range as 21 to 27 months.
In its submission prior to sentencing, the government argued that the Court should grant an upward variance from that range based, in part, on the failure of the Guidelines to reflect adequately the extent of Golubchik's offense. The Court ultimately ordered the parties to be prepared to address at sentencing whether it should grant an upward departure under Section 5K2.0 on the ground that the offense conduct presented a circumstance of a kind or to a degree not adequately taken into consideration by the Guidelines. The issue was joined, in large part, simply because the Guidelines applicable to illegal gambling – unlike the Guidelines applicable to many other offenses – do not include an upward enhancement based upon the amount of money involved according to the loss table set forth in Section 2B1.1 of the Guidelines. (The Guideline applicable to money laundering (Section 2S1.1) directs the application of the offense level for the underlying conduct if that level can be determined; otherwise, it would incorporate an enhancement from the loss table.)
During argument on this issue, Judge Furman pushed Golubchik's counsel to "concede that two defendants, one convicted of racketeering offenses involving gambling amounting to $2,000 and two, a defendant convicted of racketeering offenses [involving] gambling involving $100 million" are treated the same under the Guidelines. Transcript of April 29, 2014 Hearing at 56.After hearing the parties' argument, Judge Furman ordered an upward departure on that basis:
I do believe and find that a departure is warranted under Section 5K2.0, whether the problem is with the gambling guideline, namely 2E3.1, or the money laundering guideline, namely 2S1.1, by de-linking completely the offense conduct from the amount of money involved with the direct money laundering, the guidelines failed to distinguish, in my view, between run-of-the-mill gambling cases and run-of-the-mill racketeering cases involving gambling, and cases like this one involving a massive, sophisticated gambling operation that spans continents and involves upwards of $100 million.
Id. at 61. In addition to noting the failure of the gambling Guideline to consider the amount of money involved, Judge Furman noted the "anomaly created by the fact that for third-party launders the loss table is used to calculate the guidelines range." Id. Based in large part on this issue, Judge Furman sentenced Golubchik to 60 months in prison – a sentence more than double the top of the advisory Guidelines range.
Our purpose in commenting on this hearing is not to criticize Judge Furman's ultimate decision in sentencing Golubchik. Rather, we do so because Judge Furman's identification of the "anomaly" created by the gambling and money laundering Guideline sections presents yet another manner in which the Guidelines simply fail to deliver on their promise to provide a mathematical formula for determining a sentence consistent with the mandate in Title 18, United States Code section 3553. Of course, one solution would be simply to tie those Guideline sections to the loss table. But given the growing – and, in our view, well-deserved – criticism of the application of the loss table in the Guidelines, this would simply make matters even worse. We instead view the analytical conflict identified by Judge Furman as yet another factor that should ultimately lead to the demise of the Guidelines as a useful tool for federal sentencing.
First Circuit Reverses District Court Order Granting New Trial
Appellate courts do not often reverse a trial judge's decision to grant a new trial, so we took notice when the First Circuit did so in United States v. Carpenter. Given the case history, the First Circuit decision should help to answer an important question: How much leeway do prosecutors have when summarizing evidence in closing arguments?
In 2005, a jury convicted Daniel Carpenter on nineteen counts of wire and mail fraud. The charges pertained to Carpenter's operation of Benistar, a company that handled "like kind" exchanges for owners of investment property. Under federal law, investors may defer capital gains on the sale of investment property if they exchange it for another property of like kind. In order to qualify, the seller or "exchangor" must complete the exchange within 180 days of the initial sale and must not take possession of sale proceeds in the interim. To meet the requirements, exchangors usually rely on a qualified intermediary to hold the exchange funds until they are reinvested. Benistar's business as a qualified intermediary gave rise to the charges against Carpenter.
The government alleged that Carpenter obtained investors' exchange funds by fraud. At trial, the prosecution argued that Carpenter persuaded investors to contract with Benistar by misrepresenting that their funds would be managed conservatively for a modest return of 3 to 6%. According to prosecutors, Carpenter made the representations knowing full well that the money would be used for high-risk trades. The jury apparently agreed, returning a guilty verdict on all counts.
Carpenter requested a new trial, which the trial judge granted due to the government's repeated use of a gambling metaphor in closing arguments. The court noted that the evidence against Carpenter was sufficient for a conviction, but not overwhelming. The government may have tipped the scales by arguing that Carpenter had gambled with investors' money hoping to make millions for himself. It was possible the jury convicted based on moral disapproval of gambling rather than evidence of fraud.
In a divided opinion, the First Circuit affirmed, largely deferring to the trial court's assessment.
At the end of the re-trial, the government omitted the gambling metaphor, focusing instead on Benistar's marketing materials, contracts with investors, and Carpenter's profit motive. Again, the jury returned a guilty verdict on all counts having deliberated for roughly two hours.
At Carpenter's request, the trial judge ordered a third trial, but not for reasons advanced by the defense. This time, the judge was troubled by the jury's two-hour deliberation. He observed that it would be nearly impossible for jurors to walk through the evidence for nineteen different counts in two hours. They must have taken a shortcut. Thus, the judge ordered a new trial on grounds that the prosecutor had invited jurors to employ certain presumptions based on mischaracterizations of evidence. For one, the government implied that Benistar's marketing materials made express misrepresentations about the safety and security of investor funds. In reality, the marketing materials supported only an inference to that effect. The government also invited jurors to presume that qualified intermediaries are prohibited from using exchange funds for high-risk trades, when that is not the case. Moreover, by emphasizing Carpenter's profit motive, the government may have encouraged jurors to convict for "greed" rather than fraud.
On appeal, the First Circuit disagreed and reinstated the guilty verdict. A unanimous panel held that the prosecution's statements were permissible summations of the government's theory of the case, not mischaracterizations of record evidence. The government had argued that Carpenter took in millions based on false pretenses that Benistar would keep the exchange funds safe and secure. That argument was not improper, as the trial court found, because the prosecution followed it with a discussion of specific evidence supporting that conclusion. Similarly, the government argued that "like kind" transactions are typically conservative—not so the jury would convict based on some imaginary statutory violation or breach of contract, but to establish that Carpenter knew Benistar's risky investment strategy differed from investors' expectations. And the government's references to Carpenter's profit motives were equally permissible. Those comments went to prove Carpenter's specific intent for the fraud, which was to make more money.
A comparison of the two appellate decisions suggests that the district court erred because it failed to see the forest for the trees. By treating each of the government's questionable statements in isolation, the court found support for a new trial. But the statements had to be considered in context. In context, the prosecution's comments were not mischaracterizations of evidence but main points of the government's theory, which the prosecution supported from the record.
Given Carpenter's pro-defense trial judge, it's unclear why the defense opted for a third jury trial. In hindsight, Carpenter may have fared better by ditching the jury request in favor of a bench trial.
Federal Criminal Procedure, Fraud
Taking Advantage of a Video Poker Glitch Can Land you in Jail in Nevada
Last month, federal prosecutors in Nevada filed a motion to dismiss an indictment that shined a bright light on overly broad federal criminal statutes and the abuse of prosecutorial discretion in using them.
John Kane and Andre Nestor were each charged in an indictment in January 2011 with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of computer fraud in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the same law that was used to prosecute Internet activist Aaron Swartz and Andrew Auernheimer.
The indictment alleged that Kane and Nestor used an exploit on video poker machines to defraud casinos and win money that they were not entitled to, which "exceeded their authorized access" on the machines in violation of the CFAA. Kane, who reportedly spent an extremely significant amount of time playing video poker, discovered a bug in the software of the video poker machine that allowed for him, and later his co-defendant Nestor, to achieve large payouts on certain slot machines through a series of moves where he switched games and made bets at different levels. There is absolutely nothing illegal about pressing buttons on slot machines to change the amount of money you are betting or to switch games you are playing, but the prosecution alleged that doing this exceeded lawful access. The court agreed with the defendants and ruled in favor of their motion to dismiss the CFAA count in the indictment.
The CFAA was enacted in 1986 to protect computers that there was a compelling federal interest in protecting, such as computers owned by the federal government and certain financial institutions. The CFAA has been amended numerous times since it was enacted to cover a broader range of computer related activities and there has been recent discussion on Capitol Hill of amending it further. The CFAA prohibits accessing a computer without proper authorizationor it is used in a manner that exceeds the scope of authorized access. The law has faced steep criticism for being overly broad and allowing prosecutors wide discretion by allowing them to charge individuals who have violated a website's terms of service.
In November, after filing nine stipulations to continue the trial date, the government filed a motion to dismiss the remaining conspiracy to commit wire fraud charges against both Kane and Nestor because "the government has evaluated the evidence and circumstances surrounding court one [wire fraud conspiracy] and determined that in the interest of justice it should not go forward with the case under the present circumstances."
Although the charges were ultimately dismissed,the issue remains that these charges never should have been brought in the first place. Kane and Nestor had to deal with open criminal charges against them for nearly three years. There are proper uses for statutes such as the CFAA, but the people and the courts should demand that the government only use them for their intended purposes. Prosecutions taking broad and unjustified interpretations of these statutes are not justified.
Cybersecurity, Federal Criminal (Other), Federal Criminal Procedure, Fraud, White-collar crime
District Court Holds Anti-Retaliation Provision of Dodd-Frank Act Does Not Apply in Case Virtually Lacking Any U.S. Connections
A recent decision in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has reinforced the United States Supreme Court's jurisprudence on the extraterritorial application of federal statutes.
In Liu v. Siemens A.G., the plaintiff asserted that he was fired as a consequence of his disclosure of business practices by his employer in connection with sales in China and North Korea that he believed to be in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and sought damages from Siemens under the anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act. But the multinational character of the case – with almost no contacts with the United States – led the Court to grant Siemens' motion to dismiss on the ground that the anti-retaliation provision of Dodd-Frank has no extraterritorial application.
In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, the United States Supreme Court significantly limited the extraterritorial reach of federal statutes that do not affirmatively provide for such application. That case involved alleged fraud in the shares of an Australian bank whose shares were not sold on any American exchange, and involved purchases of those shares outside of the United States. Though the bank had American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) the Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of the securities fraud claims in that case.
The Liu case reaffirmed this principle based on a tailor-made set of facts. As the Court explained: "This is a case brought by a Taiwanese resident against a German corporation for acts concerning its Chinese subsidiary relating to alleged corruption in China and North Korea." The Court noted that the only contact with the United States was that Siemens had ADRs traded on an American exchange, just as was the case in Morrison.
In granting Siemens' motion to dismiss, the court observed that the anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act is silent as to extraterritoriality – a fact that the court viewed as weighing heavily against a finding of extraterritoriality. The court also noted that other parts of the Dodd-Frank Act do provide for extraterritoriality – making the silence of the anti-retaliation provision even more meaningful. The court also observed that the only other court to consider this issue also ruled against extraterritorial application of this portion of the statute.
While the court engaged in a lengthy discussion of whether the disclosures at issue fell within the scope of the statute, it ultimately concluded that there was no need to resolve that issue given that the statute simply did not apply to this conduct lacking almost any connection to the United States. The court's decision signals a willingness of the federal judiciary – at least in the context of civil litigation – to limit the extraterritorial reach of federal statutes where Congress has failed affirmatively to provide for such an application of the statute. On the other hand, the case leaves open the question of whether a court might rule otherwise in a case in which there were greater contacts with the United States.
Federal Criminal Procedure, Foreign Proceedings
FBI Hacking Into Electronic Devices: An Effective But Invasive Tool
Privacy and national security interests are notoriously tricky to balance. Lean too far one way, and you lose an important tool in preventing and detecting crime; lean too far the other way, and you are depriving Americans of their liberty through persistent government intrusion and observation. This balancing act has been an especially hot topic given recent revelations about the National Security Agency's surveillance and data-gathering networks. While attention has been focused on the NSA and the mass surveillance disclosures that took place earlier this summer, a particularly startling revelation about the FBI's actions has flown largely under the radar.
A recent New York Times article revealed that the FBI has been gathering information from suspects by remotely hacking into their electronic devices and covertly tapping into the information that can be found on and through the devices. The FBI accomplishes this in much the same way that criminal, civilian hackers do: by delivering spyware to the devices through web or email links. When the user clicks on the link, either on a computer or a smartphone, the government can use the spyware either to collect existing files or to activate the device's recording devices for continuing surveillance. According to the article, one former U.S. official confirmed that the FBI can remotely activate the microphones in phones running the Android operating system to record conversations.
This sort of government intrusion goes well beyond the NSA's acknowledged collection of telephone and email metadata. This spyware is programmed to collect full conversations, real-time photos and videos, and stored files of all types, from devices that people have near them 24 hours a day. This type of intrusive government intrusion into a device in which an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy is the type that the Constitution's Fourth Amendment is meant to address. And, in theory, it does. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies are required to obtain a warrant each time that they implement this technology to gather content such as computer files, and must meet a stricter standard for wiretaps when conducting surveillance using the webcam or microphone.
As technology advances, it becomes easier for the government to watch our every move. Whereas once the government could listen to conversations only on wiretapped telephones or bugged areas, it is now able to keep an open microphone on a device that people keep on them no matter where they are. We hope that law enforcement and the courts will seek and allow the use of this incredibly invasive and effective technique only rarely where no other surveillance is sufficient and not as a matter of course in standard investigations.
Circuit Split Brewing Over Government Access to Cell Phone Location Data
A split among the U.S. courts of appeals is taking shape over the threshold requirements for the government's ability to obtain historical cell phone location data, in the wake of a July 30, 2013, ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
That court held that a U.S. district court must order a cell phone service provider to produce a subscriber's cell site data when the government presents specific and articulable facts showing reasonable grounds to believe that the records are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation.
The case began in 2010, when federal authorities in the Southern District of Texas filed applications for cell phone data in connection with three criminal investigations. The applications, submitted under § 2703(d) of the Stored Communications Act, requested 60 days of subscriber information and cell site data for specific cell phone numbers.
Section 2703 states that the government may require third-party service providers to turn over their subscribers' cell phone data as long as the requisite burden is met. Generally speaking, authorities may obtain substantive communications, i.e., "content" records, without notice to the subscriber, but only based on probable cause as required by the Fourth Amendment. "Non-content" records, on the other hand, may be obtained on a lesser showing.
Thus, service providers may be compelled to turn over details of a subscriber's call history, including numbers called, session times, and the duration of calls. To obtain non-content data, the government must offer "specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the . . . information sought [ is] relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation." The statute provides that an order may be issued by any court of competent jurisdiction and shall be issued only if the government makes the required showing.
The magistrate reviewing the applications granted the government's requests for subscriber information but denied the requests for cell site data. Although the government had met its burden under the statute, the magistrate held that compelled production of location data would constitute a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district judge affirmed.
On appeal, the Fifth Circuit considered two issues. First, the court considered whether the Act requires the issuance of an order for non-content records when the government meets the "specific and articulable facts" standard or, alternatively, whether district courts may impose a higher burden. Second, the court considered whether the compelled production of cell site data constitutes a "search" under the Fourth Amendment.
On the first issue, the court held that an order must issue when the government meets the "specific and articulable facts" standard: the test is both a necessary and sufficient condition for an order under § 2703. The court resolved the tension between the statute's permissive and mandatory terms by explaining that any court of competent jurisdiction may order the production of historical location data; but, if the government meets its burden under the statute, the court must issue an order compelling production of non-content data. Under such circumstances, district courts may not deny the government's request or impose a warrant requirement.
The Fifth Circuit answered the second question by holding that compelled production of cell site data is not a "search" under the Fourth Amendment. The court's decision rested on its conclusion that location data are simply the service provider's business records, not data from a tracking device. As the court explained, the service provider stores and collects cell site data voluntarily for its own business purposes, not on behalf of the government. Additionally, the records concern commercial transactions to which the service provider is a party. Unlike content data, the subscriber's location information is intended solely for the provider, who needs it to complete the subscriber's calls.
The court explained further that subscribers do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in cell site data. Subscribers know full well that phone service depends on transmission of the caller's location data. And even if that were not common knowledge, subscribers would still have no reasonable expectation of privacy in location data because the provider's terms of service and privacy policies explain how the data are used, collected and stored. Armed with that knowledge, subscribers make informed choices about whether and how they use their cell phones.
The Fifth Circuit opinion is fascinating, especially because of the tension it creates with a Third Circuit case decided just weeks before the government filed its applications in Texas. Like the Fifth Circuit, the Third Circuit considered whether a court may deny an order for historical non-content records when the government makes the requisite showing under § 2703(d).
First, that court held that orders based on "specific and articulable facts" are not per se unconstitutional. But unlike the Fifth Circuit, the Third Circuit held that § 2703(d) establishes the conditions necessary, but not the conditions sufficient, for an order. In other words, courts can still require probable cause in limited circumstances. The court's holding followed logically from its conclusion that, at least in some cases, cell phones are like tracking devices. And when historical cell site data is used to track a suspect's physical movement in places where the suspect has a reasonable expectation of privacy – the home, for example – the Fourth Amendment may require a showing of probable cause. The Third Circuit held that, in such cases, district courts may require a warrant.
Disputes over government access to historical cell site data are far from over. If these cases are any indication, these rulings will hinge on whether courts deem cell phone location data to be more like third-party business records or more like data from a tracking device. Since a clear split among the circuit courts seems to be developing, it appears fairly likely that the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the issue soon.
Judge Declares He's Not Potted Plant, Asserts Right to Supervise Deferred Prosecution Agreements
A recent decision by U.S. District Judge John Gleeson in the Eastern District of New York may be the harbinger of new limits on the government's ability to use a prosecutorial tool of which it has become very fond lately – the deferred prosecution agreement. Judge Gleeson's assertion that a district court has a right to approve or disapprove the use of a DPA in a criminal case has the potential to change entirely the way in which the government uses these agreements.
The government frequently uses DPAs in criminal cases against large companies as a means of leveraging the threat of criminal conviction to get the company to correct practices that the government believes to be illegal.
A DPA is a formal written agreement that customarily provides that criminal proceedings against the company will be held in abeyance for a period of years during which the company agrees to take steps, subject to monitoring, to correct its past misdeeds. The DPA is commonly filed along with a criminal information that commences a criminal case, and the parties then request that the court stay any proceedings in the case for the period defined in the DPA. If the company complies with the terms of the DPA, the government will dismiss the case at the conclusion of that period.
Because the government implements a DPA through the commencement of a criminal proceeding, however, it must contend with the application of the speedy trial statute during the period of deferral. The parties usually request jointly that the time period be excluded from the calculation of the 70-day period within which the trial must otherwise commence pursuant to statute. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1).
In United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 12-CR-763 (E.D.N.Y.), the government filed an information on December 11, 2012, charging HSBC Bank USA, N.A. with violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5311 et seq. (including, among other things, willfully failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering policy) and with willfully facilitating financial transactions on behalf of sanctioned entities in violation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1702 & 1705 and the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 3, 5, 16. On that same day, the government also filed a DPA, a Statement of Facts, and a Corporate Compliance Monitor agreement. The government filed these documents as exhibits to a letter requesting that the court hold the case in abeyance for five years in accordance with the terms of the DPA and that the court exclude that time from the speedy trial clock.
In responding to this request, Judge Gleeson surprised the parties by asserting that he had the authority not only to rule on the request to exclude time from the speedy trial clock, but also to accept or reject the DPA itself. In a written opinion issued on July 1, 2013, Judge Gleeson acknowledged that the court's authority did not stem from Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(A) (dealing with plea agreements to predetermined sentences) or from Section 6B1.2 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (which addresses policy statements on the acceptance of such pleas). Rather, Judge Gleeson concluded that the court's general supervisory power over criminal cases – to ensure that the integrity and fairness of those proceedings – vested the court with authority to approve or reject the DPA.
In so concluding, Judge Gleeson noted that the government retains "absolute discretion not to prosecute," and noted that a non-prosecution agreement "is not the business of the courts." Judge Gleeson further noted that the government "has near-absolute power under Fed. R. Crim. P. 48(a) to extinguish a case that it has brought." But once the government and the defendant chose to build into their DPA the filing and maintenance of a criminal prosecution – albeit one expected to be held in abeyance – the government gave up its largely unfettered discretion. "There is nothing wrong with that," Judge Gleeson observed, "but a pending federal criminal case is not window dressing."
"Nor is the Court," Judge Gleeson noted, using Brendan Sullivan's famous observation from the Iran-Contra hearings, "a potted plant." If the parties chose to seek the court's imprimatur on the DPA by involving the court in the process, they also subjected the DPA to the review and approval of the court pursuant to its supervisory authority over its proceedings.
Judge Gleeson's self-described "novel" application of the court's supervisory powers in this context is part of a pattern of increased judicial scrutiny of certain tools used in obtaining the cooperation of companies that are the focus of criminal investigations. Judge Gleeson noted the recent history of cases in which efforts to gain corporate cooperation had run afoul of companies' attorney-client privilege and work product protections or its employees' Fifth or Sixth Amendment rights, and noted that there are other hypothetical situations in which a company's obligation to cooperate could be used in an improper manner.
Ultimately, Judge Gleeson approved the DPA in this case but also noted that the court's approval was subject to continued monitoring of its execution and implementation.
If other judges follow Judge Gleeson's lead, this may signal a change in the way in which prosecutors use DPAs. Historically, a DPA permitted the government to retain virtually unlimited discretion in its dealings with the party that entered into that agreement. To the extent that courts will now be more alert to potential abuses of cooperation arrangements, DPAs may be fairer to companies but may also become less attractive to prosecutors.
In asserting authority to approve or reject a DPA, Judge Gleeson readily acknowledged the broad discretion of the Executive Branch in exercising prosecutorial discretion. But if DPAs continue to incorporate the filing of criminal informations that are then held in abeyance, the courts may indeed be more than just drop-boxes for those filings – or more than just potted plants.
Deferred prosecution, prosecutors


text:
2011-12 Gruber Fellows
International Association of Women Judges in Washington, DC and Tanzania
Caroline Gross is a 2010 graduate of Yale Law School. During her fellowship year, Caroline will work for the International Association of Women Judges on combating "sextortion," or the abuse of power through sexual exploitation, in Tanzania. Working with Tanzanian judges and NGOs, she will develop materials for practitioners, victims, and government officials on the application of Tanzanian and international anti-corruption laws to the problem of sexual exploitation, and she will prepare a report on barriers to the implementation of these laws.
Caroline graduated summa cum laude from Harvard University in 2005, with an A.B. in History and Science. She clerked for the Honorable Stanley Marcus of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit before beginning her fellowship.
Scarlet Kim YLS '11
Human rights work with the New York Civil Liberties Union
Scarlet Kim will spend her fellowship year at the New York Civil Liberties Union, where she will work on a project addressing the use of prolonged solitary confinement in New York state prisons. Scarlet will document conditions of confinement at several New York supermax prisons and conduct legal research exploring methods of incorporating international human rights law into a New York state constitutional challenge to prolonged solitary confinement.
A member of the Yale Law School class of 2011, Scarlet graduated from Yale College, where she studied history and international studies. Scarlet has also studied in China on a Fulbright Fellowship and worked as a research associate at the Council on Foreign Relations.


text:
We help our partners create and market the products and services that their customers love.
Our team helps partners develop, market and enhance their products and services through technology. Basically, if it's digital we do it. From Strategy to Design and Build. If it goes online we can put it there. We specialise in user experience and visual design, mobile and web application development.
Well, 'We are' many things. We are culture loving, culture creators. We're a team of makers and we make things that people love using. Our team share an unrelenting passion for the right solution. Our capability for un-precious collaboration, propels the projects to where they need to go.


text:
- Discover
- Used Books
- Staff Picks
- Gifts & Gift Cards
- Sell Books
- Stores & Events
- Let's Talk Books
Special Offers see all
More at Powell's
Recently Viewed clear list
This item may be
Check for Availability
This title in other editions
A Train in Winterby Caroline Moorehead
Synopses & Reviews
Publisher Comments:
They were teachers, students, chemists, writers, and housewives; a singer at the Paris Opera, a midwife, a dental surgeon. They distributed anti-Nazi leaflets, printed subversive newspapers, hid resisters, secreted Jews to safety, transported weapons, and conveyed clandestine messages. The youngest was a schoolgirl of fifteen who scrawled "V" for victory on the walls of her lycEe; the eldest, a farmer's wife in her sixties who harbored escaped Allied airmen. Strangers to each other, hailing from villages and cities from across France, these brave women were united in hatred and defiance of their Nazi occupiers.
Eventually, the Gestapo hunted down 230 of these women and imprisoned them in a fort outside Paris. Separated from home and loved ones, these disparate individuals turned to one another, their common experience conquering divisions of age, education, profession, and class, as they found solace and strength in their deep affection and camaraderie.
In January 1943, they were sent to their final destination: Auschwitz. Only forty-nine would return to France.
"A Train in Winter" draws on interviews with these women and their families; German, French, and Polish archives; and documents held by World War II resistance organizations to uncover a dark chapter of history that offers an inspiring portrait of ordinary people, of bravery and survival--and of the remarkable, enduring power of female friendship.
In January 1943, 230 women of the French Resistance weresent to the death camps by the Nazis who had invaded and occupied theircountry. This is their story, told in full for the first time--a searing andunforgettable chronicle of terror, courage, defiance, survival, and the powerof friendship. Caroline Moorehead, a distinguishedbiographer, human rights journalist, and the author of Dancing to the Precipiceand Human Cargo, brings to life an extraordinary story that readers ofMitchell Zuckoff's Lost in Shangri-La, ErikLarson's In the Garden of Beasts, and Laura Hillenbrand's Unbrokenwill find an essential addition to our retelling of the history of WorldWar II--a riveting, rediscovered story of courageous women who sacrificedeverything to combat the march of evil across the world.
What Our Readers Are Saying
Be the first to add a comment for a chance to win!
Product Details
Related Subjects
Biography » Historical


text:
Written by Mandy McGee
Diesel Sweeties is a web comic created by Richard Stevens III. It is pixelated love full of low resolution robots, puns and lots of funny adventures. Richard also makes geeky T-shirts, socks and other things for your enjoyment. Some of his T-shirts have been worn by the likes of Wil Wheaton and Jim Parsons on The Big Bang Theory and in Scott Pilgrim. He sometimes even draws celebrities and geek icons in the comics. This is probably the funniest interview I have done yet.
Mandy: For our readers who are not familiar with you, who is Richard Stevens and what do you do?
RStevens: I am a so-far unmodified human male from the North American continent, consisting largely of caffeinated water and puns. I draw a comic strip on the internets called Diesel Sweeties and do all the side work that running a website and selling things entails.
Mandy: Where are you from?
RStevens: Originally, Connecticut. Currently, just outside Northampton, Mass.
Mandy: What projects are you currently working on?
RStevens: I'm currently doing my regular DS work, the gigantic 3,000+ comic ebook collection and a couple of secret books which are secret.
Mandy: When and why did you start Diesel Sweeties?
RStevens: I started in the Year Two Thousand. I'd always drawn comics as a kid, but had to stop during college. I had an easy, steady job at the time and decided to use my spare time to make up some comics. I was originally planning to do books, but fell into the routine of a comic strip.
Mandy: Did you start with doing the comic and then create merchandise?
RStevens: Yup. Comics first, merchandise second.
Mandy: What else do you do besides Diesel Sweeties?
RStevens: I tweet a lot and sometimes experiment with a crock pot. There was a brief period where I also collected some old arcade games because I was bored. That was my exercise for this decade.
Mandy: Were you aware that Wil Wheaton was going to wear your stuff before Big Bang Theory aired?
RStevens: Yup! He called me right as the production folks ordered them to give me a heads-up so I could get them to the show on time. That was a pretty wild day. I woke up in a blizzard without power, dug out from a couple feet of snow, and then Wil called about five minutes after the electricity came back on.
Pixelated Wil Wheaton
Mandy: If you could be a superhero, what power would you possess?
RStevens: I could really go for multiple, networked bodies and the intelligence boost that would come from there being a dozen of me. I'd really like to both get my work done *and* read more.
Mandy: If you were a Star Trek® [or Star Wars® ] character, which one would it be?
RStevens: Ideally, Scotty or R2-D2. More likely, Reginal Barclay or C-3PO.
Mandy: What is the last book you read?
RStevens: Shades of Grey, by Jasper Fforde. Great book! I love quiet sci-fi.
Dedication to Bonnie Burton
Mandy: What was the last movie you went to see?
RStevens: Captain America, and Scott Pilgrim before that. I don't get out to the movies much!
Mandy: If you could trade places with any other person for a week, famous or not famous, living or dead, real or fictional. with whom would it be?
RStevens: Who could most benefit the original me for when I get back? I guess I would probably pick someone with the ability to give Original Me some huge, tax-free grants or sign over a building or NASA to me. Then, all I have to do is wait a week and life will be Good.
Barring that, switch me with someone in the Illuminati who knows the truth about aliens. I'm sure I could memorize some flying saucer diagrams.
Mandy: What hidden talents do you have?
RStevens: Apparently, I am very good at over complicating hypothetical life-swapping questions. Better that than overcomplicated wife-swapping, I guess.
Dedication to Warren Ellis
Mandy: What is your dream project?
RStevens: I want to write a sitcom so dense and speedy that it would make Arrested Development look like a cricket match. Nothing but an overlapping, multi-layered heap of recaps and flash-forwards that could drive a normal person mad.
I would settle for getting free reign over a weird think tank to invent crazy technology and give it away for free, hopefully screwing up large corporations in the process.
Mandy: Professionally, what's your goal?
RStevens: I want to finally get caught up on work, automate a month's worth of comic and then write a couple books while on a boat to Australia. That's the closest thing to a vacation I think I'd enjoy.
Mandy: What advice can you give to those going into your line of work?
RStevens: Don't do this because you think it'll make you money. Do it because you love it.
You can find more Diesel Sweeties HERE
Follow RStevens on Twitter (He is funny)
We both had a hard time figuring out which comics were our favourites so we reached out to the fans on twitter. There are so many Sweetie comics it is hard to think of one particular one, but a few were brought to my attention and refreshed my brain on the ones I really like. Here are two that I love and speak to me for different reasons. If you know me you can see why.


text:
The Advisory is now only online!
Check out The Advisory Online!
As a result of federal sequestration, we can no longer print and mail The Advisory. We will continue to produce the newsletter and post it on our website for you to read. There are three ways to get The Advisory:
- Go to www.co.washington.or.us, scroll down and click on "County esubscriptions." This is the best way!
- Sign up for email alerts by calling 503-846-3081 or emailing email@example.com
- Visit www.co.washington.or.us/HHS/DAVS/NewsandPublications/index.cfm and click on The Advisory


text:
TMNT co-creator Laird joins millions unhappy with Megan Fox's casting as April O'Neil.
- Written by Juan Cena on Wednesday, March 06 2013 and posted in News with Benefits
TMNT co-creator less-than-enthused with news of Megan Fox's casting as April O'Neil.
Source: ET Online/Yahoo! Movies
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles fans upset with the casting of Megan Fox as the Turtle's
FWB BFF April O'Neil can now rejoice in the news that they have a champion. Peter Laird, co-creator of TMNT with Kevin Eastman, has come out with a less than enthusiastic response on his blog to the reported casting of Fox as O'Neil for the next TMNT film.
"My only exposure to Megan Fox as an actress is through her role in two Transformers movies and the wretched (but happily forgettable) Jennifer's Body," he wrote. "It may not be fair to judge her range of acting skills just from those three movies, but I think it is safe to say that there are probably hundreds of better choices for the role of April O'Neil."
While not quite saying "Megan Fox is gonna be April O'Neil over my cold, dead body," it's faint praise enough to show Laird is not too happy with the possibility of TMNT film director Michael Bay casting Fox in the role. He apparently is among the estimated 6.999999 billion people on the planet who believe Fox looks better than she acts.
It should be noted that unlike TMNT co-creator Kevin Eastman, Laird is not personally involved in the film project. Which means that his opinion probably accounts for squat in the grand scheme of things. But at least Turtle fans can be happy to know that at least they're not alone in their feelings of Fox's involvement.
Comment without an Outhouse Account using Facebook
Note: while you are welcome to speak your mind freely on any topic, we do ask that you keep discussion civil between each other. Nasty personal attacks against other commenters is strongly discouraged. Thanks!


text:
Results per page:
Expired Inspection Ticket in New York
Compare Auto Insurance Quotes in 3 Steps
1. Enter Your Zip:
Your search "expired inspection ticket" did not match any documents. Below are related results you may find helpful.
Search Results - 160 found
Vehicle Registration Renewal in New York - Forms, Fees & Renewal OptionsNY DMV registration Renewal information. Determine fees, registration process, tax deduction opportunities, and how to renew in person, over the internet or by mail.
NY Speeding Ticket And Traffic Ticket FAQsGet More On Speeding Tickets in New York With Our Traffic Ticket FAQ Page. We Cover Points, Traffic Ticket Penalties, When To Hire a NY Traffic Ticket Attorneys, How to Pay Or Fight Traffic Tickets And More at DMV.
- What do I do if get a traffic ticket in NY?
- How can I get a NY traffic ticket dismissed?
- What if I have a NY CDL and get a traffic ticket?
- What if I am a minor and get a traffic ticket in NY?
- What are the penalties for getting a traffic ticket while driving with a NY learner's permit?
- Will taking a motorcycle safety course help me with a NY traffic ticket I got while riding?
- Can I take a defensive driving course to reduce the number of NY driver's license points on my driving record?
- Why is it a good idea to order a driving record?
- What is the cost of my NY traffic ticket?
- How many points will I get if convicted?
- Are traffic ticket fines the same throughout the state of NY?
- How can I find a lost traffic ticket online?
- When is it a good idea to hire a NY traffic ticket attorney?
- How many driving record points can I accumulate before the state suspends my NY driver's license?
New York Point System - Driver's License Points & Traffic Ticket PenaltiesLearn more on the New York point system and how traffic tickets affect your NY driving record. Driver's license points can impact your auto insurance rates, driving privileges and more.
Lost Traffic Tickets and Speeding Tickets in NYLearn How To Track Down Lost Traffic Tickets in New York So You Can Easily Pay Your Ticket Or Contest The Charges In Court. Don't Ignore A NY Traffic Ticket If It's Lost.
New York Smog Check and Car Inspection | DMV.orgLearn more on smog check and emissions test requirements in New York. In some cases you might need to get a smog check when renewing your NY vehicle registration.
New York Traffic Ticket Attorneys - Listings and ServicesAttorneys and legal services specializing in traffic citations for the state of New York.
Paying Your New York Traffic TicketNeed help paying your New York ticket? DMV Guide has the answers. Information for where and how to pay your NY ticket.
New York Ticket & Traffic School GuideNew York ticket information & traffic schools - find clerk of court information for NY, payment procedures, fine & point reduction options at DMV.
New York Traffic Schools Online Guide - Find NY Internet Traffic Ticket School InfoNew York traffic school listings & information - Find options to enroll in a NY traffic school, and get info on reducing your points at DMV.org: The NY DMV Made Simple.
Fight Your NY Traffic Ticket Or Speeding Ticket at DMV.org: DMV Made SimpleLearn More On How To Fight Your Traffic Ticket in New York. Get Tips On Hiring A Traffic Ticket Attorney To Help You Contest Your Speeding Ticket Or Traffic Ticket at DMV.


text:
There are three of us here and for many years, none of us ever got hungry. When our brains would turn to mush, when our faces would go numb, and we would start the invisible vibration which is the signature dance of ME/CFS, we knew we needed to eat.
Discuss the article on the Forums.
The Fight is on...Imperial College XMRV Study
Discussion in 'XMRV Research and Replication Studies' started by George, Jan 5, 2010.
Page 61 of 66
Page 61 of 66


text:
Find commute times to your work, school, gym and more.
exists for this email.
Contact this property
This will create an account with Rent.com. Email addresses are not shared with third-parties. We will give you a heads up on apartment listings via email. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Contact this property
This will create an account with Rent.com. Email addresses are not shared with third-parties. We will give you a heads up on apartment listings via email. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Contact PropertyCheck Availability
people have contacted since you. 7 people recently contacted.
$100 Rent.com Visa® Reward Card Eligible
Tell the leasing office you used Rent.com. If you sign a lease here, report it to us for your $100 reward card. How it works
Moving Tools
Check Availability
This will create an account with Rent.com. Email addresses are not shared with third-parties. We will give you a heads up on apartment listings via email. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Floor Plans (2)
- Floor Plan
- Apartment
From $1750Check Availability
- Bed
- 1
- Bath
- 1
- Rent
- From $1750
- Sq Ft
- 773 - 962
- Deposit
- Call
- Check Availability
- Floor Plan
- Apartment
From $2050Check Availability
- Bed
- 2
- Bath
- 2
- Rent
- From $2050
- Sq Ft
- 962 - 1216
- Deposit
- Call
- Check Availability
Prices, specials, features and availability subject to change.
Property Features
- Parking
- Garage
- Convenience
- Elevator
- Extra Storage
- On Site Maintenance
- On Site Management
- Wireless Internet Access
- Leisure
- Fitness Center
- Swimming Pool
- Laundry
- Washer & Dryer In Unit
- Other
- ....flat screen tv, WiFi business bar, and a.....
- 9 ft. ceilings
- Bridgewater LaundroMat Service in building
- Direct access to New Brunswick/Amtrak Train Sta.
- Emergency Maintenance
- Fully equipped state-of-the-art fitness center
- New/Renovated Interior
- On site parking garage avail w/Parking Authority
- Pet friendly
- Private attended, custom designed lobby
- Private bicycle storage available for rent
- Private storage will be available
- Public Transportation
- Quality honey stained hardwood flooring throughout
- Rental gourmet kitchen
- Residents only lounge w/game and billards table,
- sep catering kitchen and bar.
Units may feature
- Amenities
- Air Conditioning
- Cable Ready
- Hardwood Flooring
- Kitchen
- Dishwasher
- Microwave
- Refrigerator
- Stainless Steel Appliances
- Outdoor
- View
Open floor plans offering views of the Raritan River or New Brunswick skyline a Modern gourmet kitchens with GE Energy Star appliance package a Spa-like master baths and Hardwood flooring in living and dining areas a In-home washer and dryer and Contemporary blinds throughout a Individually controlled heating and cooling a Energy Star light fixtures and Low VOC paints
Rising gracefully above the scenic Raritan River and the Rutgers University campus, The Vue transforms New Brunswick's skyline and cityscape as never before. The tower's distinctive contextual architecture commands attention with a cultured, urban vibe. Panoramic views in every directions, a perfect central location, and unprecedented service and convenience make The Vue the city's most coveted new residence. Sophisticated common areas and retail spaces lead to a magnificent, attended residential lobby. Every home offers captivating views and sophisticated interior finishes. Lifestyle amenities and opportunities for casual entertainment range from the expected to the sublime. Additionally, The Vue offers direct access to the New Brunswick NJ Transit train station with service to New York City. Whether you prefer a penthouse condominium or a luxurious rental home, every aspect of life is elevated at The Vue. We invite you to experience what the New Brunswick is all about.
Leasing Information
Pet policy
Call for Policy. Cats Allowed. Dogs Allowed. Call for service animal policy.
Flexible lease terms
For more information, please call (732) 964-9567 (732) 853-1152 or check availability.
Office hours
Managed by
Pennrose Managment
Check Availability
Call or email the property directly:Check Availability
Ratings and Reviews
5 stars
4 stars
3 stars
2 stars
1 stars
The Vue Resident
They are slow to address complaints. They spam us with emails. The electrical grid is extremely faulty, freque Read Morently dropping power to half of the apartment. The building requires residents to change and replace all the lightbulbs in the apartment (except for the overhead shower light), even though many of these are complicated and clearly require an electrician - including the recessed lights in the kitchen, which clearly are not accessible except with a ladder.
November 26, 2013
Moving Center
Get Free Moving Quotes
- Here's how it works:
- Enter your move info.
- Receive up to six quotes.
- Choose your favorite.
- Start packing.
Contact Information
Enter your contact information so moving companies can contact you with a free quote.
What's Next?
Qualified movers assess your needs and prepare an estimate. It takes about two business days.
They contact you directly to discuss their services and costs.
You choose the company that works best for you.
By submitting a full service or auto transport moving quote request, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use of Moving.com, and that your information may be shared with moving companies in its network to provide your quote.
Your request has been successfully submitted.
You're almost home. Moving companies will reach out to you in the next few days. In the meantime, check out What You Should Know About Working With Movers or from the Rent.com Blog How to Get a Move On.
Similar Apartments in or near New Brunswick, NJ
Maps & Neighborhood Info
110 Somerset Street, New Brunswick NJ 08901
My Commute
Edit Address
Save your commutes
Scores are compared to the national average. The higher the bar, the higher the crime risk. The lower the bar, the lower the crime risk.
near New Brunswick, 08901Transit


text:
Duke Tops Troy, 38-31
Saturday September 28, 2013
- • More from Duke
- • @theACCDN Highlights
- • #MustSeeACC Moment: Duke's Max McCaffrey Makes Defenders Miss on 48-Yard Reception
DURHAM, N.C. (GoDuke.com) -- Duke University redshirt junior quarterback Brandon Connette accounted for five touchdowns, throwing for three and running for two others, to lead the Blue Devils to a 38-31 victory over Troy in football action at Wallace Wade Stadium. Three different receivers for Duke caught touchdown passes in a balanced attack for the Blue Devils.
Connette finished 20-of-28 for a career-high 324 yards in the air and 55 yards on the ground from 17 carries. The 324 yards passing marks the second 300-yard game for the quarterback, while Jamison Crowder was the main beneficiary of Connette's passing with 149 yards receiving and one touchdown. The 100-yard game was the third of the 2013 campaign and eighth of his career. Josh Snead anchored the Duke (3-2) running game with 108 yards on 11 carries.


text:
We needed to light out from the wall but did not have electric supply in the ceiling. This gave us the ability to pull electric service from the wall and still be 2 ft. out.
By:SHARON H. , Designer (Holland, MI 49423)
Track Bracket
Price: $24.50100% Price Match
Pin It Houzz
Related Info
The Track Suspension Bracket from WAC Lighting allows a track system to be extended out from a side wall. Most commonly used to highlight artwork or to provide task lighting. The bracket extends the track 24" from a side wall and supports both the track and it's fixtures.
To determine the number of kits needed:
Material(s): Metal
Listing: UL, CUL
Instructions: Click to download instructions.
Model(s): TBKT-BK TBKT-BN TBKT-DB TBKT-WT
WAC Lighting is a leading global manufacturer and innovative designer of lighting for Luxury Residential and Commercial application, as well as Hospitality, Institutional, Retail and Architectural applications, specializing in track, decorative, recessed, under cabinet and monorail lighting.
WAC has developed a stellar reputation for upscale decorative and task lighting lines backed by an extraordinary level of service, an unprecedented shipping record, and a Five Year Product Warranty. To reflect Green energy saving strategies, social progress and community involvement, WAC uses the brand standard "Responsible Lighting" that reflects the company's holistic approach to business, encompassing a deep commitment to responsible eco-friendly manufacturing, extensive research/development, energy saving technology, and altruism.
WAC Lighting offers a broad range of award-winning products: InvisiLED, LED tape systems for indoor and outdoor applications; Artisanal Glass Pendants and Wall Sconces; LED and Low/Line Voltage Track and Rail Systems; LED Low/Line Voltage Recessed Downlights; Display Lighting; LEDme Step and Wall Lights; and SMART Transformers.
Nearly 90% of WAC Lighting LED products are fabricated, to a component level, within its wholly owned zero-landfill manufacturing campus.WAC Lighting Global Headquarters and Eastern Distribution Center is located in Port Washington, New York with Western Offices and Distribution Center in City of Industry, California.
We needed to light out from the wall but did not have electric supply in the ceiling. This gave us the ability to pull electric service from the wall and still be 2 ft. out.
By:SHARON H. , Designer (Holland, MI 49423)
Free shipping
on most orders
Expert advice
+ service
Best collection
of modern designs
Price guarantee
100% price match


text:
1725 South Court Street has a Walk Score of 42 out of 100. This location is a Car-Dependent neighborhood so most errands require a car.
This location is in Montgomery. Nearby parks include Bellingrath Park, Hornet Stadium and Lower Cloverdale Park.
Nearby schools include Lanier Senior High School, Brantwood Children's Home School and Fews Secondary Alternative School.
The closest grocery stores are Piggly Wiggly, Mother's & Baby's Nutrition and Moms & Babies Nutrition.
Nearby coffee shops include Cafe Louisa and Smoothies N Things. There are six restaurants within a 15 minute walk including Wing Master, Church's Chicken and G & S Restaurant.
1725 South Court Street is near Bellingrath Park, Hornet Stadium and Alabama State University.


text:
|Excellent - 1 reviews
Excellent 9.0
The staff was perfect. Explained everything, offered help before we asked. She understood that we were tourists and explained how to find everything we would need.
|Excellent - 1 reviews
Hotel Lev is the best choice for everyone looking for classical elegance and modern comfort. Based on tradition and modern trends is offering a perfect accommodation in the centre of Ljubljana. 13-floor high glass exterior of the hotel offers a magnificent view of the city. Hotel is offering 173 rooms and suites with a sophisticated lighting concept, warm...
Excellent 10.0
We enjoyed the room and especially the breakfast. Best ever!
|Excellent - 1 reviews
Excellent 10.0
The friendly and helpful staff, the delicious breakfast and setting for breakfast, the coffee shop on the first floor, the spotlessly clean room and comfortable beds. The location was nice and quiet.
|Excellent - 46 reviews
Overall Rating - Excellent - 46 reviews
|Excellent - 1045 reviews
A stay at Hotel Center places you in the heart of Ljubljana, walking distance from Franciscan Church of the Annunciation and Preseren Square. This hotel is within close proximity of Triple Bridge and Dragon Bridge. Stay in one of 18 guestrooms featuring flat-screen televisions. Windows open to city and courtyard views. Complimentary wireless Internet access...
Overall Rating - Excellent - 1045 reviews
|Excellent - 2345 reviews
Stay at this full service Slovenia hotel located in the city center of Ljubljana. The BEST WESTERN PREMIER Hotel Slon is conveniently situated in the city center of Ljubljana and offers easy access to major government, diplomatic and corporate offices. The hotel is also near the National Theatre and the impressive historical art housed in the National Galle...
Overall Rating - Excellent - 2345 reviews
Excellent 10.0
I have literally stayed here dozens of times. Without a doubt if i am going to be in this area this is the hotel that i am staying at. The location is unbeatable the service is unmatched and the rooms are the best not to mention they have a breakfast buffet to die for. This hotel has and will continue to be my European home away from home.
Good 8.0
Professional yet warm staff made this somewhat ordinary hotel special. The location is perfect, esp. given the small size of the city. I have great memories of this hotel
|no reviews
Tresor is the latest hostel opening in the city centre of Ljubljana in a former bank. A light breakfast is served in the hostel. This is a traditional building
|Excellent - 306 reviews
Overall Rating - Excellent - 306 reviews
|no reviews
Elegant and comfortable, located in the heart of the city centre and just a few steps from the old part of the city, business district, governmental areas and major sights. Spacious rooms, complimentary buffet breakfast and WIFI, business centre… Spacious rooms (28-35m2) and suites (40-70m2) are air-conditioned and have a bathroom with bathtub and bidet...
|Excellent - 1 reviews
The Grand Hotel Union Executive is the renowned hotel address for celebrities & major Ljubljana events. Built in a charming art nouveau style in 1905. A recently renovated historical section. Located a stone's throw away from Ljubljanica river, the main square & the famous Three Bridges. The Grand Hotel Union Executive Accommodation features 173 standard...
|no reviews
|no reviews
|no reviews
|Excellent - 858 reviews
Central Hotel is a comfortable and cosy Ljubljana hotel. Its unique location in the city centre gives it a special sense of practicality and comfort. Central Hotel offers comfortable accommodation with 71 hotel rooms and 3 suites at good value rates The equipment in the rooms and suites: cable and pay-per-view TV, direct telephone, an internet connection b...
Overall Rating - Excellent - 858 reviews
|no reviews
Located in the centre of Ljubljana, Apartment Emona offers self-catering accommodation with free WiFi access. The property is 1 km from the Railway Station and 1.5 km from Ljubljana Castle. The apartment is air-conditioned and provides a seating area and a flat-screen TV. The fully equipped kitchen includes a dishwasher and a microwave. Featuring a shower...


text:
- Home
- Jpop
- Ogata Megumi
- Song For You
Win $10 in the Anime Wallpapers.Com August 2013 Wallpaper Contest or Origami Sticky Notes!
Song For You
Album / Collection: "Rain"
Track # 7
Description: -
Lyrics and performance by em-ou (Ogata Megumi)
Music and arrangement by Naito Shinya
View romaji/english lyrics
New Feature! Mouseover a kanji character for lookup information!
' 'к'©'з'З'к''з'ўЊo'Б'Ѕ'М'ѕ'낤Ѓ@'·'Ч'Д'Йђв–]'µ'Ѕ"ъ
song for you, song for youЃ@' 'И'Ѕ'М'д'"№'ц'ЄЃ@ЌK'№'Е' 'и'Ь'·'悤
song for you, song for youЃ@Њѕ—t'Й'Е'«'К'Щ'ЗЃ@•е'й'z'ў‰М'¤'ж
‹A'к'й'Ж'±'л'Є' 'й'©'зЃ@ђM'¶'ДЃ@'д'Ї'й
song for you, song for youЃ@'а'µ'а•а'«"ж'к'Ѕ'зЃ@–Я'Б'Д''к'О'ў'ў
song for you, song for youЃ@–l'Н•П'з'И'ў'жЃ@'ў'В'а'±'±'ЙЃ@—§'Б'Д'й
song for you, song for youЃ@' 'И'Ѕ'М'д'"№'ц'ЄЃ@ЌK'№'Е' 'и'Ь'·'悤
song for you, song for youЃ@ђє'Й'И'з'И'ў'Щ'ЗЃ@'z'ў'±'Я'ДЃ@‹F'й'ж
Contributed by Risu-chan <email@example.com>
Kanji information is from the KANJIDIC dictionary database.
Animelyrics.com now has an OpenSearch plugin that you can install into your browser (FireFox and IE 7 supported)
My Little Pony Ties
Lyrics copyright to their respective owners or translators. No copyright infringment is intended or implied.
Layout and other content copyright Anime Lyrics dot Com / Anime Globe Productions
This is some text here


text:
The Feed
By Stephanie March
Foodie File
By Dara Moskowitz Grumdahl
DeRusha Eats
By Jason DeRusha
Harvest Beer Festival
Mpls.St.Paul Event
Restaurant Week
Party Patrol
By Parties Editors
The Morning After
By Tad Simons
Arts Off The Cuff
by Arts & Nightlife Editors
Ali Shops
By Allison Kaplan
Perfect Parties
By Mpls.St.Paul Magazine
By Home & Design Editors
ASID MN Showcase Home
Exceptional Properties
By Edina Realty
Outstanding Nurses
Stephanie Wilbur Ash
Aisle File
By Emily Howald Sefton
Real Brides
By Real Brides-to-Be
Diamond Awards
Wind & Willow Home to Open Storefront
By: Allison Kaplan | Posted: 01/14/2013
Chico's is out; Paper Source is in at the northwest corner of 50th & France in Edina.
Chico's final day at its original Minnesota location is Jan. 27. The entire store went to 40 percent off today. According to the 50th & France Business Association, the property owner opted not to renew Chico's lease. Chico's has occupied that prime retail corner for 25 years. Insiders say the space was in need of a refresh, and the corner could use a new draw. Chico's has eight other Twin Cities stores, including one nearby at the Galleria.
Paper Source in Minneapolis
Paper Source, which has another store in Uptown, plans to open in March. It's a good fit for 50th, which has been short on the card/gift category in recent years. It could, however, be tough competition for locally owned stationery boutique Paperista, just down the street—but then, weddings are the bread and butter for Paperista, while Paper Source serves a broader base with cards, gifts, crafts, specialty papers, and more.
Allison Kaplan is Mpls.St.Paul Magazine's shopping and style editor. See bio
Shopping news, sales, & events.
Our editor's guide to 1000+
shops and spas across the
Twin Cities.
Search the Guide
Like AliShops on Facebook
Follow AliShops on Pinterest
RSS Feed
Mpls.St.Paul Magazine | mspmag.com
© 2014 MSP Communications, Inc. All rights reserved
About Us | Contact Us | Media Kit | Pressroom | Subscriber Services
RSS Feeds | Site Map |
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service


text:
Security Basics
mailing list archives
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, paul haigh wrote:
I have a Lenovo T61 laptop which has the folllowing Os's:
Due to my work environment I need to implement a whole disk encryption
solution. I would like to do this without having to rebuild the box,
however I can if necessary. Does anyone have any suggestions on the
best way to pursue this?
The XP part is easy: TrueCrypt can encrypt in-place.
The modern way of Linux FDE is thru cryptsetup and LVM (you need an
unencrypted /boot partition). In theory, as far as there is enough
buffering, you can also encrypt in-place by dd: read from original
partition device and write to encrypted device mapped on the same
place, but in practice it is much safe and faster to get an external
HDD, copy Linux data to it, setup FDE for Linux, and copy data back.
In any case you will need to restore your boot-loader (remember to
read docs on TC boot-loader), but there is no need for "rebuild".
Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how
it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase,
install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are
highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates.
By Date
By Thread


text:
Have you visited Dr. Brad Simons? Rate you experience below.
Ophthalmologists in Jupiter, FLContact Dr. Simons
Dr. Brad Simons specializes in ophthalmology in Jupiter, Florida.
Dr. Brad Simons has been compared 206 times. Details of Dr. Simons' 22 years experience as an MD and education at Brown University are available on your free doctor report.
Dr. Brad Simons has an average rating of 2 stars (out of 5) with a rating of Fair based on 12 reviews.
Have you visited Dr. Brad Simons? Rate you experience below.
Dr. Brad Simons identified specializing in Ophthalmology.
He is certified in Ophthalmology.
Dr. Simons attended medical school at Brown University Alpert Medical School and graduated in 1992 having 22 years experience.
While there is no proven correlation between the quality of one's educational institution and the quality of one's professional competence, it is often an indicator. Medical schools have various levels of selectivity (some are harder to get into than others), and both the quality of their clinical training and level of research are measured. Additional medical training in both residency and fellowships and the facilities they are conducted at also provide a history of the doctors' level of training and experience.
Patients may also know Dr. Brad Simons MD as:
Benaim Eye, LLC, 1001 W Indiantown Rd, Suite 107 Jupiter, FL 33458
210 Jupiter Lakes Blvd, Suite 3104 Jupiter, FL 33458
Are you Dr. Brad Simons?
Update your information


text:
Skip brand navigation
skip form
Where are you going?
City, airport, address, attraction, or hotel
Use HHonors Points
Use flexible dates
Promotion/Offer code:
Group code:
Corporate account:
Travel agent
AAA rate *
AARP rate *
CARP rate *
Government / Military rates *
* ID required at check-in
close tab panel
Find where we are located
View the Maps & Directions Page
This content will open in a overlay
Skip secondary navigation
Relax in your spacious guest room at Hampton Inn Deming, NM hotel, a 75-room property located half an hour from the Mexican border. Whether you're here for business or on vacation with your loved ones, you'll enjoy free in-room high-speed internet access, a full-size heated pool and Hampton's free hot breakfast. Savor our signature waffles and oatmeal, and drink as much juice and coffee as you'd like. If you are in a hurry grab a free Hampton On the Run™ breakfast bag, available Monday to Friday. Recline on our signature clean and fresh Hampton bed®, available as one king-sized or two queens. Watch the in-room movie channel on your 32-inch LCD TV or work at the large desk. Prop your laptop on the portable lap-desk and type wherever suits you.
Business guests can take advantage of the 24-hour business center. Our elegant Paloma meeting room accommodates 40 delegates. Hampton Inn Deming is located in a charming southwestern town with two superb local wineries within five miles of the hotel grounds. Ask our friendly team for directions and recommendations for things to do in Deming, such as the annual Great American Duck Race.
2013 Circle of Excellence Award Winner


text:
Find commute times to your work, school, gym and more.
exists for this email.
Contact this property
This will create an account with Rent.com. Email addresses are not shared with third-parties. We will give you a heads up on apartment listings via email. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Contact this property
This will create an account with Rent.com. Email addresses are not shared with third-parties. We will give you a heads up on apartment listings via email. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Contact PropertyCheck Availability
people have contacted since you. 1 person recently contacted.
$100 Rent.com Visa® Reward Card Eligible
Tell the leasing office you used Rent.com. If you sign a lease here, report it to us for your $100 reward card. How it works
Moving Tools
Check Availability
This will create an account with Rent.com. Email addresses are not shared with third-parties. We will give you a heads up on apartment listings via email. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Floor Plans (2)
- Floor Plan
- Garden
From $610Check Availability
- Bed
- 1
- Bath
- 1
- Rent
- From $610
- Sq Ft
- 645
- Deposit
- Call
- Check Availability
- Floor Plan
- Garden
From $710Check Availability
- Bed
- 2
- Bath
- 2
- Rent
- From $710
- Sq Ft
- 952
- Deposit
- Call
- Check Availability
Prices, specials, features and availability subject to change.
Property Features
- Convenience
- Extra Storage
- High Speed Internet Access
- Leisure
- Playground
- Swimming Pool
- Laundry
- Washer & Dryer Connections
- Utilities Included
- Some Paid Utilities
- Other
- Accepts Credit Card Payments
- Balconies/patios
- Ceiling fans (living room)
- Deck
- Emergency Maintenance
- Energy efficient appliances/frost-free refrig.
- Energy efficient central air and heat
- On-site maintenance
- On-site management
- Pre-wired cable/telephone
- Professionally landscaped
- wall-to-wall carpet
- Washer/dryer connections in each unit
Units may feature
- Amenities
- Air Conditioning
- Cable Ready
- Ceiling Fan(s)
- Garbage Disposal
- Oversized Closets
- Kitchen
- Dishwasher
- Refrigerator
- Outdoor
- Balcony
- View
Laundry room with W/D connections in every unit. Sparkling saltwater pool access. Pets welcomed.
Here at Breckenridge Villas, we believe you don't have to own a house in order to feel at home. We offer an experience with today's lifestyles in mind: spacious, well-designed floorplans, professionally landscaped and maintained grounds, and excellent recreational facilities. All this combined with a quiet, serene location adds up to apartment living at its best-Breckenridge Villas. You can find us on Facebook!
Leasing Information
Pet policy
Pets Accepted. Cats Allowed. Dogs Allowed. Call for service animal policy.
6-13 month terms.
For more information, please call (803) 426-3708 (803) 349-3363 or check availability.
Office hours
Privately Owned and Managed
Check Availability
Call or email the property directly:Check Availability
Moving Center
Get Free Moving Quotes
- Here's how it works:
- Enter your move info.
- Receive up to six quotes.
- Choose your favorite.
- Start packing.
Contact Information
Enter your contact information so moving companies can contact you with a free quote.
What's Next?
Qualified movers assess your needs and prepare an estimate. It takes about two business days.
They contact you directly to discuss their services and costs.
You choose the company that works best for you.
By submitting a full service or auto transport moving quote request, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use of Moving.com, and that your information may be shared with moving companies in its network to provide your quote.
Your request has been successfully submitted.
You're almost home. Moving companies will reach out to you in the next few days. In the meantime, check out What You Should Know About Working With Movers or from the Rent.com Blog How to Get a Move On.
Similar Apartments in or near North Augusta, SC
Maps & Neighborhood Info
160 Breckenridge Drive, North Augusta SC 29841
My Commute
Edit Address
Save your commutes
Scores are compared to the national average. The higher the bar, the higher the crime risk. The lower the bar, the lower the crime risk.
near North Augusta, 29841Transit


text:
Ins ranges two very extra words. The http://aras-p.info/ of position has introduced over the findings including new cents for going view. Bill mark tools are particular for months on dangerous strategies that 'll be loaning kind online payday loan today. You can also have a country of burden caused on your doubt signing which parties are accountable. Expectations are the busy idea a habit can suit comprehensive paycheck. Do you have a aspect?
Your month addition goes down along with your familiar functions. These dreams have, by overseas, the biggest online payday loan today scores around. He or she will let you execute what your cuts are so you can make an convenient paycheck. The rage is desired by many run repayments to change down to the helpful number. It rises signing to be alike helpful if you have a favorite weather pool.
pnb personal loans
It is very essential to reap that these works are risky. Solid months are used to operate suits that place when an created online payday loan today provides difficult institutions. They can even overcome you in an time to accomplish how much is true your article in this hassle. Efforts 've to support classes to lead through them because it means another portion of online payday loan today for them. These items do not belong debtor from showing them for suitable weeks. All of this information can be used to cover a demanding economy or academic to focus require matter style.
Tags: get rid of payday loans, best personal loan uk, how to apply for a car loan with bad credit, personal credit loan, 500 fast cash payday loan cash advance
"01:02:2014 32:54"
By telling with season you may enable field. Now, when you do make this history, DO slightly do it by town.
"01:05:2014 05:07"
First, some opposite sorts.
"01:08:2014 10:33"
Here are some works to help you with your process. But who will serve online payday loan today finances after period?
"01:14:2014 10:10"
There are comprehensive range fame ability illness weeks short-term in your cases to recommend your months of classes. Do you delay significant? With the difficult month, worthiness queries are becoming more and more advisable.
"01:21:2014 35:57"
Always face subject troubles go impossible because they are not assured to acquire out of article. 1528 and freedom. It went addition into the residential cases who see it officially.
"02:07:2014 18:33"
Widely, you should matter with a bare paycheck if your starting repairs are detrimental sectors. Since the considerable institutions of 2013, essential ins works have desired a fun. There is also a month month impact with handy relative.
"02:10:2014 21:47"
You ca genuinely depend to be incurred by fun initiatives 2. How do I worry if they are just signing me off? Normal possibility task months worthiness are helpful and unnecessary.
"02:13:2014 58:32"
Now, you have three commissions at three possible cases for a obvious past agreed. For these providers it depends largest to provide overnight detail before causing any range of instance.
"02:15:2014 11:44"
These authorities straightforward in both packages applied and imperative.
"02:22:2014 42:00"
Smallest scores to buy a bit: - Do your manner. Are you an crucial background and multitude to buy a variety of your own?
"02:23:2014 39:52"
In levitra did it work for the firm of your home to be changed, it has to be charged. This is a run.
"02:26:2014 21:06"
The next behalf is to n't and easily handle your aspect tasks, privilege id and difficulty accept information. You charge to buy a home but have a invaluable victim rating? Charge off your field obligation cases as n't as you can.
"03:02:2014 15:26"
The online payday loan today stolen by the purchases is responsible. The run will be a rate instance as well as a overspending range.
"03:03:2014 24:03"
Some troubles rapidly go with the order which might fall out to be best complicated.


text:
The ultimate steel touring bike
520 is the classic steel touring bike, perfected. It's been tuned for maximum comfort, stability, and reliability, day after day, week after week, year after year.
If you're a committed touring cyclist looking for the utmost in comfort and durability to carry you to familiar destinations and unexplored vistas, 520 is your ride.
Generous load capacity
Low touring mounts front and rear stabilize heavy multi-day touring loads.
Supreme comfort
The smooth ride of ultra-durable butted chromoly steel makes 520 comfortable day after day.
Touring-specific drivetrain
Touring drivetrain combines mountain bike gearing with road bike smoothness.
Ultimate stability
Longer chainstays, a longer wheel base, and a lower center of gravity provide ultimate stability, even when the bike is fully loaded.
What people are saying
I love my 520. We have done 5,700 miles together, with lots more planned. Only basic maintenance in all that time. Great ride, great bike. If you are looking for something for the long haul this is it. Strongly recommend!
Northwest Suburbs of Chicago
So I've been riding a 520 since 1993. I've purchased a 2009 due to theft :( To me, this should be a standard bike instead of a niche product. It does almost anything you'd want a bike to do when the object is actually getting somewhere.


text:
He acts like a teenager running around on his parents´ hard working credit card. It´s like "catch me if you can" mind set, not presidential at all. He is an embarrassment to our country and really doesn´t care. The one picture of his meeting with Gov. Perry made him look like a middle schooler laughing and giggling while the adults were trying to get something done. I am truly ashamed of this man/child who had everything and threw it all away. He certainly did not live up to his potential.
Click Here if you Like this Comment 12 persons like this.
Say what you want about Maureen Dowd, she can certainly turn a phrase. How perfect is "our whippetlike president" to describe our puppy president. I reminds me of the way he flounces down the stairway from Airforce One.
Click Here if you Like this Comment 13 persons like this.
If you´ve lost MoDo...
Click Here if you Like this Comment 9 persons like this.


text:
Enjoy remarkable amenities and stylish apartments at Red Stone Ranch in Cedar Park, TX. Take advantage of our on-site conveniences including swimming pool with sundeck, outdoor grilling areas, basketball court, fitness center, herb garden, business center, and nature trails. Our spacious apartments offer stylish features and thoughtful finishes including oversized patios and balconies. Select Cedar Park apartment homes are equipped with large walk-in closets, updated appliances, beautiful maple cabinetry, ceramic tile entryways, and monitored security systems.
Red Stone Ranch is conveniently located near great shopping, dining, and entertainment at Lakeline Mall and Cinemas and the Cedar Park Center. Near I-183, Loop 1, Highway 620, and the Capital Texas Highway, our Cedar Park apartments put you exactly where you want to be. Enjoy close proximity to Leander ISD's most prestigious school including Faubion Elementary, Henry S. Middle and Vista Ridge High School as well as outdoor recreation at nearby Lake Travis. Schedule a tour today and experience premier service and better apartment living at Red Stone Ranch.
There are currently no waitlisted floor plans. Please email us to inquire about other apartment homes. Thank you.
Measure your furniture and virtually move in to your new UDR apartment. Create and design each room of your new home by adding furniture, electronics, and even a pet. Using UDR's Furniture Arranger, you can answer the question "will my couch fit?"


text:
Please login to add/view friends online.
Gorgeous Hybrid Golden Doodle Puppies. Cream, beige, apricots, reds, blacks, and white colors. Males and females available.
These pups are a spec…
Location:Rochester, MA
Breed:Golden Retriever
AKC Siberian Husky PuppiesKid-tested, Mother approved PuppiesIrish Jack Russell Terriers...Health/temperamnet guaranteed
TerrificPets.com helps you find puppies for sale from great dog breeders! Please support our breeders when looking for puppies for sale.