text:
And the love affair with David Davis continues…
I have something of a love/hate relationship with the Guardian Comment is Free site. Sometimes the articles are so arty-farty that I just close the browser in disgust and go hammer up some drywall to feel manly again. Sometimes the articles provide an interesting insight into just how batshit crazy some members of the government are. And sometimes the articles are penned by otiose former Tory cabinet ministers, leading me to wonder who would ever call the Guardian a progressive newspaper. Maybe just a hate/hate relationship then.
David Davis is leading the charge against the Secret Intelligence Service, by claiming that there is 'a prima facie case to answer' over the torture of Binyam Mohammed. Admirable though that may be, it is of course a political hitjob on the government penned under the rather patronising title, "We did things differently in my day, Mr Miliband." The very title begs the raised eyebrow and sardonically toned question, "Oh did you really, you condescending bag of wind?" The answer to which is, unsurprisingly, no.
It was in fact a Tory government which was in power whilst the security services colluded in murder in Northern Ireland, for example. Or a Tory government which was in power when this country sold weapons to torturers, murderers and terrorists. In the case of the government of Saddam Hussein, I seem to recall that the arms sales flagrantly breached the rules laid down by Geoffrey Howe when he was Foreign Secretary. Not the same as in your day, Mr. Davis? I respectfully disagree.
That's not to suggest that our current Foreign Secretary won't deserve everything he gets when the truth about Binyam Mohammed comes out. He deserves it for other things too, such as the continuing arms exports to Israel, where those weapons are being used in shocking fashion. For the love of smeg, let us not pretend however that Davis would ever suspend the arms trade; we make too much money out of it. It's difficult even to see a Conservative government standing up after the World Trade Centre attacks and not committing to apprehending terrorists with any means necessary: torture, extraordinary rendition, illegal detention and so on.
Except the Conservatives didn't face these pressures. Their party was a wreck, at the time. This is the problem with allowing frontline politicians to pen their own op-ed pieces. Nuggets like this are left out of David Davis' ridiculously self-conscious portrayal of himself as the defender of all that is lawful. It is time for the David Davis love-in to end, before we wake up one morning and see the real face of the person we went to bed with – and realise that, having exchanged rhetorical frippery for actual power, he and his Tory mates are not who the liberal intelligentsia wants them to be.
Jade Goody, Russell Brand and Hegemony
I've heard it said that there's a special irony to blog articles complaining about the Jade Goody story. By complaining about it, apparently we're vindicating and perpetuating the rather nauseating circus surrounding the whole issue. I think such logic is bollocks, of course, because the mainstream media – TV, radio, newspapers, blogs belonging to all the aforementioned and others – would have merrily continued to spout crap regardless of what a few poxy political bloggers decided to say.
Nor, by continuing to talk about the whole thing, are we somehow justifying what has to be one of the most grotesque hypocrisies of modern celebrity journalism. A woman, ridiculed for being, well, let's face it, a bit thick, subsequently bullied for being a bit racist and then beatified for getting cancer, getting married and dying, leaving millions to her kids. And probably to her thug husband, though I am not going to bother checking that up, since I already feel dirty just writing about this subject.
Why, I hear the masses cry, do you bother writing about it then? Why not go back to reading some pretentious wank by Sartre, of the type I am disposed to moan about on this blog? These are good questions, and the answer is that not five minutes ago, I spotted a ridiculous article on the BBC website titled, "Star dubs Jade 'Primark Princess'" and then I made the mistake of reading it. Thankfully we don't allow firearms in this country or I reckon I'd feel compelled to hunt down Russell Brand and kill him, earning myself a British Comedy Award for services rendered.
Brand came up with the following wank, which outdoes any Existentialist for pretentious fuckwittery…
One of the charges often levelled at Jade was that she was just a normal girl with no trade or practiced skills. Well people didn't care and our heroes are not prescribed to us, we have the right to choose them and the people chose Jade. Fame has long been bequeathed by virtue of wealth and birth and this was the first generation where it was democratically distributed by that most lowbrow of modern phenomena – Reality Television…When Big Brother 3 made her famous she was vilified in the paper and bullied in the house but through her spirit she won people back round and became a kind of Primark Princess with perfumes and fitness videos and endless media coverage – because people were interested in her.
Now, it's easy at this point to simply become choked with rage at the notion of Jade Goody being anyone's hero but I actually have a serious political point to make. Brand has bought in, hook-line and sinker, to the notion that fame is now in the gift of 'the people', perhaps thanks to the concept of telephone voting, such that it can be 'democratically distributed' on the basis of individual likes and dislikes, which we in turn presume to be beyond reproach precisely because they are individual and we're all entitled to our own opinions.
Except there's nothing democratic about any of this. Our very likes and dislikes are not formed in a world with infinite choice. Our choices, especially in the matter of subjects covered by the media, are limited to the options offered by the industry that exists for the purposes of creating and extolling celebrity. Even when we make a conscious choice not to be interested in something, its transmutation into a cultural meme means that few of us can escape it, howsoever we wall ourselves off.
Consider the fascination with Jade in the same terms as the fame of the Beatles or any other mega-star. This sort of unreasoning adulation (or its opposites) is part of a form of cultural production that grew into existence alongside the first truly mass media. This cultural production is not merely, however, an attempt to pander to popular prejudices – quite the opposite. Men like Max Clifford have the contacts and the resources to convince the media that the public should/will be interested, and in turn the media whip up a frenzy.
When one section of the media works itself into a lather, the very fact of commenting on commentary extends this unhealthy attitude all across the nation. It is almost a textbook example of some of the processes which Nick Davies describes in his book, Flat Earth News. It is not new. Other, perhaps worthier, subjects have their place in the media usurped by this story on the basis that editors know we'll succumb to the same frenzy-whipping techniques which have succeeded in the newsroom.
Brand's point about Jade's personality is therefore dead wrong. The whole charade has nothing to do with the personality or qualities of Jade Goody. It is not the case that the punters are simply 'choosing' the Jade Goody story out of an infinite list of stories they could be interested in. For a couple of days last week, it was the only story and received coverage in every medium imaginable. Similarly, the media themselves aren't interested in Jade's qualities or personality – and they were quite happy to demonize her in the past.
In fact, the celebrity cancer theme is readily exploited because people are basically caring, and because many thousands of people get cancer. It's a problem with which our society is familiar. Russell Brand himself, foppish shithead though he is, is a clear example of how cancer as a theme can cause people to relate to the story of Jade Goody. The terminal illness, the kids, the last-minute wedding – all are eminently marketable, and I suspect the wedding and Jack's release from prison were dreamed up by Clifford for that purpose.
Had it not been Jade Goody, however, it would have been someone else. Brand's attribution of public interest to Jade's normality, and his claim that this marks Jade down as different ("authentic" or "accessible") from Posh Spice-Beckham, J-Lo or Jennifer Aniston, are therefore rubbish. Actually, Brand's contention ignores that there was a well connected PR firm dedicated to insinuating Jade into the popular consciousness, to making her appear authentic and accessible, even though thousands of normal people die from cancer each year, people who can't afford Max Clifford's rates.
It may be revealing that the 'Primark Princess' (or People's Princess or any other populist epithet) is what the PR gurus have arrived at as the best vehicle for commercial exploitation, but we must remember that the audience in this process is essentially passive. The audience can applaud or shout its dissent – but even for the dissenters, there's a marketing angle to be played. Some of the more high-brow papers and blogs denounced Jade, denounced the media circus around her and so on and so forth.
It would surprise me not a bit if Max Clifford's PR firm was behind a few of those as well. This should tell us something about the concept of Hegemony, which this blog wrestles with quite a bit. Hegemony entails not merely the exploitation of labour for the purposes of extracting surplus value, it also entails the exploitation of the basic oppositional drives between the classes, a contained subversion manifesting itself as populism but never actually challenging the inequalities that this populism implicitly or explicitly rejects.
Who the f**k is Daniel Hannan?
So apparently the following video on YouTube has gone viral; in fact tonight I got invited to a Facebook group set up here in Canterbury declaring that Britain needs more politicians like Daniel Hannan. The video in question shows Hannan having a go at Gordon Brown. Why people are applauding this intrigues me, bearing in mind some of the things Hannan is actually attacking.
He says that all the other nations enduring recession took the opportunity of the good years to reign in their expenditure, whereas Britain didn't. Presumably this means that Hannan would have preferred that instead of PFI-PPP measures designed to keep government expenditure down, we should have had no hospitals, no new schools and a collapsed public transport infrastructure.
Don't get me wrong, it's fine to attack PFI-PPP, but the only direction from which this guy is smacking about the already Right-wing Labour leadership is further Right. Anyone who thinks that a demand to cut yet more money from the public spending budget is impressive needs to go back and do politics 101 all over again – or perhaps spend a few months living on the dole and then weigh in.
Unsurprisingly this is far from Hannan's background, being yet one more privately educated, Oxbridge oik that the Tory Party have found fitting to promote to the European Parliament. So what, exactly, is there to applaud? Gordon Brown is a crap Prime Minister and I love having a go at his awful policies and the ignorant twits he surrounds himself with, but Daniel Hannan's attack is only to point out that actually the public purse could have been strip mined more effectively in search of industries to privatise.
Like the railways, that ever-present reminder of Tory successes. Oh, wait a minute…
So, Daniel Hannan can fuck right off.
Get off the stage, Pat McFadden
In an article explaining why Labour is doomed, Alix Mortimer roundly castigates our up and coming wannabe parliamentarians – so many of whom richly deserve it, being second rate wannabes. However, for my liking Alix spends far too little time on the shower of bastards we already have at the top of the Party. Example was given to this sentiment by today's headlines from the BBC – turns out business minister Pat McFadden has been complaining that the Unions don't talk up Labour's achievements enough.
My query is this: why should they? Sure, Labour may have thrown one or two sops to the Unions but the overriding message of Tony's 1997 takeover was "business as usual". And so it was – the crippling restrictions on industrial action remain in place. The Labour Party leadership remains inert on the subject of outsourcing, the appalling conditions faced by immigrant labour and many of the other issues which are holding back an activist agenda on the part of many sections of the Trades Union movement.
The minimum wage was great – in fact, I benefitted from it – but it's not enough. The point of New Labour was to suggest that there would be no radical change to life in Britain, a jettisoning of 'outdated' policies and ideologies that threatened to actually up-end the balance of power in the UK between the ruling and the ruled. And now Labour apparatchiks want us to talk up their achievements of the past, right when the whole economic system is telling us that the achievements of the past are but molehills compared to what we need?
Bugger that for a game of soldiers.
Talking up the achievements of the past – such as campaign to celebrate the 60th anniversay of the NHS – is only relevant when the achievements of the present can be lightly dismissed. Labour is stuck in the mud, with no policy – especially on things like civil liberties – which the Tories can't claim to match, so of course they're going to want banal puff pieces talking up what Labour has done so far. The problem is, vast chunks of what Labour has done is disastrous – such as the privatisations – and they're still at it!
That's why at his TUC speech, Pat McFadden was met by a protest of CWU members at the proposed changes to the Royal Mail.
Gushing bullshit about "Labour's achievements" are more often the preserve of silly, politics-lite wannabes such as Miranda Grell than cabinet ministers – and this should tell us something about how desperate Labour leaders have become. Whether the "NHS at 60″ nonsense (an NHS which, incidentally, is increasingly privatised, increasingly inefficient – whether on hygiene or learning disabilities) or the rubbish from the Guardian about which "old Labour" figure ministers most liked, it's time to stop talking about the achievements of the past.
There's a bloody election coming up – right now would be a good time to tell us what Labour is seeking a mandate for after the next Parliament. But to actually tell that story will be to excite no one because the answer is more of the same: more dubious centralisation, ever more invasive laws on privacy and the internet, continuing privatisations, a country working longer hours than anywhere in Europe with a lower Quality of Life score and with health and transport networks that need massive investment and planning.
Except Labour just spent the money on bailing out banks, which, it turns out, are reluctant to actually change their policies. And this despite an opposition which is caught between the hammer of its own pro-market rhetoric and the anvil of popular suspicion that actually all avowed capitalists are rat bastard scavengers who should be hanged.
Barack Obama and the Internet for Activists Conference
An excerpt at Liberal Conspiracy from the Fabian book about Obama gives me the perfect opening to return to last Saturday's conference, "Internet for Activists." I was speaking at it, on a panel with one of Obama's many net campaign managers, some anonymous chap from the anti-scientologist movement and an anti-deportation activist. My speech focussed on Liberal Conspiracy's efforts as regards the defence of women's rights during the HFE Bill debates, but in the course of my summation I also introduced a wider question about activists.
Surely, I thought, the sort of campaign that we individuals want is one built and run by, and accountable to, activists. I contrasted that vision to the reality of Obama's election machine – though (inevitably) a dissenting view can be found from the Obama campaign manager who attended. Obama may have at one stage been an activist, but when he ran for President, he was a US Senator. Obama was actually backed by banks such as Goldman-Sachs to the tune of almost a million dollars – and they weren't the only ones.
Wall Street executives "bundled" for Obama, throwing big events which were used to collect in staggering amounts of money. Names from Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan Chase can also be found on Obama's list of donors – not to mention that several figures were tapped by the great man to help put together his administration. Because nothing says activist or accountable like investment bankers on the payroll. In this, the Democrats actually outdid the Republicans for a change – these companies gave more to Obama.
The book about Obama, and the wave of American political change he's riding, misunderstands the relationship between activists and power. It discusses MoveOn.org as a group that linked up over common issues – and that's great. It can exert pressure through the media, it can provide a forum for debate free from the jingoistic distortions of the Republicans and it can highlight information neglected by the mainstream – but only in the crudest way possible can sites like that hold any individual politician to account for the power they wield.
Say that in four years, America is mired still further in economic crisis and Obama hasn't turned it around. A group like MoveOn.org could tell it like it is and provide these wonderful services which activists need, but that won't mean a better Democrat in power – it'll mean a Republican. Online campaigning and record levels of individual donations, even if these things are put to use through the ultimate individualisation – the Primary, will not have changed Obama's record in office, the same way they didn't stop the Iraq War or Clinton's impeachment.
Our "Internet for Activists" conference didn't discuss these things at all – I didn't want to pick a fight when I was only there at someone else's request, to tell a particular story about a particular campaign. I did, however, outline my basic view of praxis – in this case the interrelation between our online war of counter-contextualisation against the mainstream media, and our relationship with a specific political movement. It is the question of that relationship which is at issue when we talk of Obama as an activist.
To begin with, I need to define what political movement I'm talking about. My goal is to knit together a movement, potentially numbering in the millions, who will not just put individuals into government but will collectively redraw government from the ground up. This is the goal of every socialist revolutionary – what CLR James described as the Paris mob taking a hand. I feel justified in using my vision as paradigm here because Obama used a lot of rhetoric which is appropriate to such a notion of grassroots, collective politics.
Yet my goal is not the same as Obama's goal. There are many things about Obama of which I approve, but he's not interested in expanding the power of a grassroots, collective movement. People were invited to do their bit for him, whether via MyBO or the millions of dollars in individual online donations – but that's not grassroots on the basis that between Obama and those people there is no real connection other than that they share some of his ideas. There is no accountability.
To respond that these people will have the chance to de-select Obama in four years is to ignore the nuance of politics. Most of us who consider ourselves on the Left would rather have Obama than any Republican. So this leaves the grassroots, those activists who give of themselves, with little real clout. As in the UK, the grassroots can be taken for granted in electoral politics because they can't vote for the other side – however bad Labour gets, the Conservatives are always going to be worse.
In America, through the primary system, they can choose between candidates – but the millions of people involved in campaigning are tied to individual politicians, not to each other. The relationship is heirarchical, not associative.
When, at the conference, I demanded a movement led by activists, this is what I was referring to, which seems to have escaped Karin Robinson in her rebuttal (linked to above). Barack Obama is not John Kennedy, no one is pretending that he is – but the absence of a politically dynastic family background doesn't make Obama any more "of" the people, much less a one man government "by" the people. Within American politics, there is no provision for government by the people except 2-, 4-, or 6-yearly elections.
In between times, activists have no power to control their elected officials. Moreover, even when it comes to elections, there is the power of the media to consider. Without an organised, activist-led, accountable movement, the way is open for politics to become simply another form of marketing. This is the problem I have with Sunny in the comments section of the LibCon article; when we are relying on people like Glenn Greenwald to "hold Obama's feet to the fire", we forego our own need to do that.
The problem is, we have no way to do that.
Labour has had fights about this issue since the 1918 constitution. Conference, the united body of Labour activists and their representatives, regularly came into conflict with the PLP, led by a Labour Prime Minister. The result was a defeat for the activists – the PLP flouted the desires of Labour Party members. When activists were in the ascendant, the Labour Party moved sharply to the Left; when activists were weak, the Party bureaucracy fought back, divesting conference of much power.
Hence Labour is now in its current impasse; power in the Party is held by the Party bureaucracy – the PLP, the Trades Union leadership and so forth. Activists are not the arbiters they should be – since upon activists rests the greatest responsibility for the movement as a whole. Moreover, its with an activist-led movement that lies the only chance to escape politics as marketing and an endless series of talking heads. This is something we share with our American and European cousins, and this is why I made a dig at the Obama campaign.
Mind-boggling power? Balls on Education
Following a request to write out some of my views on Ed Balls' latest proposals, I read the following Guardian article. It outlines proposals from the apprenticeships, skills, children and learning bill that would give the Secretary of State huge amounts of control over precisely what is taught in a classroom. The guidance notes accompanying the bill apparently state that the Secretary could specify which authors and their works had to be studied in order to pass an English literature-based GCSE or A-level.
Presumably, since I was asked by a homeschooler, I'm supposed to defend the rampant centralisation of education. I am, of course, not going to. It is a frightening thought that for a government that continues to make noises about empowering communities, the man in charge of DCSF seems intent on grabbing an insane amount of power. Despite claims that it would only be used to counteract something like the scrapping of Shakespeare, one wonders if this government actually believes its own communitarian rhetoric.
As it stands, the system is far from perfect. Each exam board carries its own restrictions on what can and can't be studied, meanwhile Chief Examinations Officers have a nice little sideline in pawning their mutterings on a given subject because they know what's going to be on the exam. This power is set to increase in certain subjects as coursework options – ranging from 'a local study' to pretty much anything – are gradually phased out. Again, I'm mostly talking about history, since it is what I know.
The choice by heads of department as to what exam boards are followed is largely based on what pupils will score highly in, and what the department staff can actually teach. Important subjects such as the French Revolution therefore have no chance of a look-in, since they are perceived as more difficult to grasp by pupils and many staff in history departments simply aren't qualified to teach them. Not to impugn other subjects such as the Risorgimento, German unification or Russia under Stalin and Khrushchev, of course.
I am just as guilty of this as any teacher – I'd rather eat my own liver than teach a course on the Suffragettes. Not because I am against women's rights or women's history, but simply because I find the whole course boring. Yet imagine the question of what is taught being removed from the classroom environment – in such an environment, the preferences and skills of the teachers and pupils are important. Teaching at A-level would go from being responsive to classroom needs to dependent upon some arbitrary opinion of the Secretary of State.
Frankly that would be disastrous.
Do I think there's a sinister element about the whole thing? No. Rhetoric about 1984 is far from my mind – more important is focussing on the hypocrisy of the government and the needs of students. That said, the apparatus will be in place to restrict the study of certain books – and none of the new apparatus addresses the rather appalling ability of independent schools to teach whatever they want – whether it's true or false or questionable. The state system isn't perfect at addressing that – but there are means towards improvement.
Bearing in mind that Shakespeare will never be scrapped from the English Lit syllabus, made even less likely by the fact that numerous English departments now do Shakespeare outreach to make it cross curricular (this equals orgasmic bliss for SLT), what I want to know is this: for what reason does Ed Balls really want this power? For those who hysterically scream about "state worshipping fascists" the answer might seem obvious, but normally for powers such as this there are obvious reasons – and right now, there are none that I can see.
Calling time on long working weeks
The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Labour government, SNP and UKIP all agree: the idea of the European working time directive is a bad idea. It is European federalism run amok, health and safety gone barmy and infringes the right of individuals to work for however long they want. It may be all those things, but from a social-democratic perspective it can also be considered as an issue around which to reorganize a unionized, full-time workforce, capable of wresting greater concessions from employers.
First of all, the idea that any of us mere mortals who survive (rather than wax super-wealthy) on our wages want to work more than 48 hours a week is just a tad ludicrous. I love my job, but it's a constant bugbear of the teaching profession that we spend 8am-4pm working in school and then go home to do marking, planning and resource our lessons. I for one would rather have additional time to relax, to socialize, to spend with family, to get involved in politics and so forth – and I doubt I'm the only one.
Probably one of the major sources of illness, increasingly touted over the last ten years, is stress. In turn, stress bears a direct correspondence to having to work ever longer hours – and this has an effect on the risk to your general health. Working hours have been gradually increasing since (surprise, surprise) the 1980s – some four million people worked longer than 48 hours a week in 2002, which is an increase of 350,000 on 1992 and which today is potentially higher still. Britons work the longest hours in Europe.
Politicians denouncing the idea of the European Working Time Directive have pointed towards junior doctors and firefighters as among the groups who might 'suffer' from decreased working hours. Indeed, the major political parties have agreed that it's a scandal that someone might be denied overtime opportunities simply because of some bureaucrat in Brussels. This looks at the whole issue upside down; isn't it more scandalous that we should be compelled to work longer than 48 hours a week to feel a little affluent?
With regard to the firefighters in particular, part-time firefighters have long been the way the government has aimed at using to quell the power of the FBU, the union for full-time firefighters. If indeed we were going to limit the length of time people could work, it could only result in the employment and training of more full-timers, which is to be applauded for multiple reasons. One, it'll help union efforts to get a fair pay deal and two, it might begin to reverse the stress-inducing labour 'flexibility' which employers use to cut wages, terms and conditions.
The whole notion of "post-Fordism" and the flexible labour market are markers not of an inevitable and linear historical progression from one form of production to another. Quite the opposite: they are the physical manifestation of a weak socialist movement. We failed to stop them being implemented, and we have so far failed to reverse them – but as opposition to the European Working Time Directive demonstrates, employers and politicians are likewise afraid that behind this issue lies an attempt to do just that.
Perhaps this seems an unlikely ascription since politicians mask their fear with talk of productivity, and making business competitive. That sort of language is essentially the same as pitting British against foreign workers in a race to the worst terms and conditions – after all, such terms and conditions (by the logic of those talking 'productivity') would make Britain infinitely competitive. In France, the whole campaign by Sarkozy was fought on just this issue, without consistent, substantive opposition from the Parti Socialiste, I may add.
If we could organise to push against these combined ideological and practical obstacles when it comes to organisation of workplaces and the basic politico-economic struggles, we might begin to get traction on some of our other issues. Claude Carpentieri writes an interesting article over at Liberal Conspiracy, asking why the Left is always on the back foot and declaring that the national political agenda is currently set by the newspapers. I think this perspective is grossly flawed, but it originates at a correct starting point; Left weakness.
Our weakness isn't that tabloids "boo and hiss" about subjects such as welfare, social workers, foreigners and 'political correctness', or that Left newspapers fall over themselves to praise the British Army in Iraq, but our weakness causes those things. By being disorganised when it comes to achieving practical concessions from bosses we can see, or re-shaping the labour market to make it more open to strong unions, we're forever gifting the initiative to the other side. Socialists and trades unions are liable to get denounced whatever we do, so we may as well give the tabloids something good to rant about.
By simple virtue of being organised and instituting our own ideas and practices (Gramsci's hegemony to the rescue!) we'll begin limiting the effects of tabloid journalism, whatever they say. Indeed, by attempting to re-shape the labour market after a fashion we find more conducive to our aims, we may find that we rebuild the NUJ and the printers' unions from without. That day is a long way off, of course, but our fightback can start by a twofold push – first for the working time directive opt-out to be cancelled, and secondly for a labour-friendly reorganisation of those services likely to be affected.
Stretching far beyond merely the firefighters, this sort of issue takes in the entire workforce – and the General Council of the TUC would need to co-ordinate efforts between different unions. The effects, however, would be far reaching and the gains might reverse some of the last thirty years of union failures, just as laissez faire orthodoxy is being reversed.
Nationalist parochialism
Several instances worthy of mention from the Scots' Nats have appeared on the BBC website recently. Christine Grahame, MSP, tabled a motion at Holyrood calling for the return of a letter carried by William Wallace upon his capture. The letter was originally from the King of France, not that anyone should care in a modern political context since all of these people have been dead for about seven hundred years.
What interests and irritates me isn't so much the call for the return of the letter – the British Empire, after all, had form in regard to pinching things. The Parthenon Frieze is probably the outstanding example, but there are others as well. The Stone of Scone was symbolically returned by John Major's government as a way to pacify Scottish dissatisfaction (not that it did much good, since the 1997 wiped out the Tories).
The important part is the way in which the return has been called for (hat tip BBC):
"This is a very significant historical document related to Scotland's most iconic and lasting national hero," she said.
"In the year of homecoming it would be fitting to see this document finally returned to Scotland.
"There are very few artefacts around today that we know for certain Wallace handled and held in his possession."
Ms Grahame said it would be "entirely inappropriate that it should languish, forgotten in some closed drawer in Surrey and urge the UK National Archive to pass it to the National Museum of Scotland where it can be properly displayed."
My question is this: so what? SNP members of the Scottish Parliament have been calling for the return of all sorts of things, including a letter written to the city of Lubeck, Germany, telling them that Scotland was once more open for trade. What right does Scotland have to any of this stuff? Moreover, on what reckoning can William Wallace be accounted a "hero"?
Blood and soil nationalism I've always accounted as foreign to the traditions of these islands, but counting a blood thirsty murderer (for he was no less a murderer than Edward Longshanks) and tyrant as a "hero" surely puts the SNP one foot down that road. Discussing and celebrating the past is important – but glossing over the reality of William Wallace á la Braveheart is a tad disingenuous.
On the point as to the legitimacy of the claim, surely if the Scots have a right to a letter written to Wallace, surely Lubeck has a right to a letter written to the merchants of their city? Or vice versa: if the SNP claim the right to the latter, then surely we should ship the other letter back to France. It's inconsistent and smacks of a bunch of juvenile delinquents bloviating simply because they can.
Reading over some of the debate on the European Working Hours Directive, calling for random historical artefacts to be returned isn't all. Trying to outdo Gordon Brown for pointless nationalist sloganeering, MSP Alyn Smith demanded "A Scottish solution for a Scottish issue". I'll have more on the European Working Hours Directive presently, but this aspect of it just highlights what an opprobrious bunch the SNP are, and why they're no better or more progressive than Labour.
What they lack in being mildly pro-redistribution of wealth, they more than make up for in nationalist parochialism.
The widest possible movements and hegemonic strategy
Is 'nationalism' ever a good thing? To this basic question, I've always answered no – and in so doing, I choose to deploy various Marxist theories to justify my answer. First of all, there's no single nationalism – different parts of society articulate different ideas of what it is to be nationalist. The only way these discourses can be understood as part of the social totality, simultaneously constitutive of it and constituting it, is through the Marxist theory of hegemony, outlined initially by Antonio Gramsci and expanded upon by Raymond Williams.
Transcending earlier theories of Marxism, that formal systems of belief – ideology – were the pure inferences of class interest, hegemony theory does not reduce consciousness to ideology. This is important, since parts of the Left often looks upon certain aspects of nationalism with favour. National traditions, as they exist in popular consciousness, are susceptible to appropriation by the Left since the practices of the past can include oppositional practices as well as those practices related to the dominant class.
Where consciousness is not reduced to ideology, an additional layer of complexity is added to socialist strategy – and it was the contention of people such as Laclau and Mouffe that this additional layer of strategy voided the idea of the proletariat as the universal class. Indeed, 'post-Marxism' has aimed to interpret the new 'subject positions' as irreducible groups which must be courted as part of a broad electoral strategy – but this steps far outside the notion of hegemony as conceived by Gramsci himself.
The concept of hegemony becomes reduced to electoral strategy. Where we should be thinking about how to overturn the institutions, practices and ideas which sustain these 'subject positions', too many socialists of the 'soft Left' (as it has traditionally been known) want to think instead how we can ameliorate our own programme to better subsume these subject positions on their own terms. It is from this perspective that I've always viewed Compass, and its repudiation of the notion of the working class.
Indeed, in a certain light, the project of the Labour Right from the days of Kinnock to Blair and Brown strongly resemble this description. From Marxism Today to Melanie Phillips, the capitulation of many Leftist theoreticians before capitalism can be explained by this underlying dynamic – a dynamic which is ultimately hostile to the interests of the working class. I am, of course, defining the interests of the working class as being the ultimate overthrow of capitalism – to do anything else would be a repudiation of Marxism.
In so saying, I'm not claiming that the fall of capitalism is inevitable. Nor am I being 'idealistic' about the potential of a class conscious working class to finally overcome all opposition and seize power. I am, however, openly stating that these goals are not helped by the Marxist Left seeking coalition and alliance with groups such as Compass. The route of Compass is either that of Melanie Phillips or that of the young Tony Blair; the emasculation of labour's shock battalions behind a veneer of radicalism.
Supporters of Compass might point to Compass' support for the CWU over the Royal Mail issue and say that this proves me wrong. I accept that argument, but I'm ever conscious of the positions held by the New Labour clique prior to their accession: support for the FBU, for example. My view on this is reinforced by the opinions repeatedly demonstrated by those who are de facto regarded as the Compass leadership – Cruddas, Trickett and Lawson. Not all of those are merely 'de facto' either.
With all this said, then, what attitude should Marxists take towards Compass and the 'soft' Left generally? My answer is perhaps coloured by the fact that the 'soft' Left, including the large penumbra based around the Socialist Campaign Group at its height, were imbued with radical socialism only in the wild dreams of many activists who just needed to believe. This penumbra would go on to betray socialist members of the Labour Party through witch hunts, and by producing people like Hazel Blears.
Leaving my personal opinion and my tendency towards ad hominem attacks to one side however, the task of properly using hegemonic theory ultimately devolves upon Marxists. If we don't point out the theoretical weaknesses of Compass, the backsliding, the concessions to capitalism before we've even fired a metaphorical shot, then no one will. Insofar as people are the direct representatives of these tendencies, people will bear some criticism, perhaps excusing me some ad hominems, but it is the tactics and theory which are really at fault.
There is room for co-operation, considering that with Compass, the socialist Left has a better chance of being permitted some basic protections of Party democracy. Yet, Marxists – both within and outwith Labour – should first be facing the working class, recruiting new layers and educating them in the course of struggle. This struggle itself overrides the 'subject positions' on which the facile argument about electoral strategy depends – arguments which Compassites share with such unlikely groups as the SWP.
The nature of Left factions as member-driven groups means that a face-the-class-first policy will not eradicate an often acrimonious dispute, where Compassites denounce socialist manifestations within Labour as 'purist' and those socialists return fire with the label 'sell-out'. The soft Left will continue to 'sell out' and it will continue to see different emphases on tactics and theory as purist opposition to what is 'achievable' on the basis of buying into the status-quo, as New Labour did, rather than achieving things in the teeth of the status-quo.
What I want to stress here is that tactics and theory are inextricably linked towards the respective ends of Compass and Marxists – especially since the day to day experience of tactics conditions each of us to adjust our theory and aims. These are different for Compass and Marxists and even while co-operating, it is my view that Marxists must ceaselessly point this out.
The widest possible movements?
Having been a writer at Liberal Conspiracy for a while now, the concept of co-operation between political parties should be one of interest to me. LibCon has writers from amidst Labour, the Lib Dems, the socialist Left, Greens and oodles of independents. Party political co-operation is the theme of veteran commentators Neal Lawson and John Harris, addressed also by Paul over at Bickerstaffe Record. As the nature of political movements is something I'm forever debating with Tom, I figure I should toss him a link also.
A particularly relevant passage in the Lawson and Harris NS article describes Charter 88 and the Countryside Alliance, or the Scottish Constitutional Convention, as the sort of groups the Left need to emulate. Oh really? We should be aiming to bring together 'parties, churches and other civic groups' should we? The aim of such a coalition is obvious from the article; to 'regulate' the market and reverse the 'failure of democracy' which led to our sacrifice upon the altar of free market fundamentalism, and other such nifty alliterative phrases.
Accepting the need to establish a minimum programme on which basis to consider political coalitions is an obvious step for the socialist Left. A unity on the basis of a minimum programme, however, isn't what Lawson and Harris advocate – nor is it the only issue. The methods of coalition are just as important. If 'form follows function', then the unity of a bunch of NGOs, churches, political parties and so forth can only result in a rather stale political environment, sheltered from the will of the people they're trying to serve.
From the point of view of the socialist Left, moreover, the programme that Lawson and Harris advocate is so far from being tall enough to tie the bootlaces of a minimum programme. They laud the market as a creator of wealth. They claim that it is a fault of democratic vigilance that the economy has reached the crisis it is currently in. Though they recognize the 'nature' of capitalism to tend towards monopoly and disaster, we shouldn't hold that against our system, because if properly regulated, it'll do its job fine.
In saying these things, Lawson and Harris still place themselves on the political Right of the Labour Party as it has existed for most of the last one hundred years. They are correct in that the ability of organised capitalism to run rampant is ultimately contingent upon our ability to stop it, but they neglect to mention that every time we're in a position to stop it, people much like themselves try to put on the brakes. Indeed they lay the embryo for such a stance by their very support for this mystical invention, 'the regulated market'.
If we examine the other rhetoric from these commentators, their professions of faith in coalition may carry even less weight. Both Harris and Lawson were fine with Blairite policies during the 1990s; in retrospect it's easy to pick out free market fundamentalism as a bad call, but for Lawson in particular, it seems tendentious to forget that the door to such fundamentalism was opened by his Trot-hunting buddies in the Labour Co-ordinating Committee. Is a coalition to return us merely to the era of untarnished 'modernisation'?
So the shared 'aims' of socialists (within Labour) and people like Lawson and Harris are suspect, throwing 'coalition' into doubt.
That's not to say I don't know who the 'enemy' is right now, within Labour. Should Compass, in a bid to win the leadership of the Labour Party, promise organisational and policy changes which the LRC supports, we should throw our weight to them. But there's a difference between qualified support and a simplistic advocacy for coalition between Left groups. This advocacy for coalition also covers important differences between those Left groups and ignores just how limited the common ground is.
Even while we work on common ground though – for example, civil liberties or wealth redistribution – we should acknowledge that the space for this collaboration is effectively sustained only by our separation from the levers of power. Should Compass accede to government at some point in the future, the conflicting pressures of a popular movement and the constrictions of the capitalist State will tell upon the Compass programme and it is my view that Compass would fail at the test, as have all Labour governments before it.
At that point of course, the space would open for a neo-Compass and the cycle would repeat perhaps. All of this hinges upon the notion, which seems fairly current, that Compass will be the future of the Labour Party, post-election, when most of the Blairite/Brownite PLP will be wiped out. Whether it is the case that the slick policy wankery of Compass will attract a following sufficient to swing CLPs and some Unions remains to be seen – but bearing in mind the contradictions which Compass enshrines, this isn't unlikely.
And so we come to the key issue of coalition, from the point of view of an LRC member. We can't afford to big up Compass in the eyes of what supporters we have, since they only seem radical in contrast to the most frightfully right-wing leadership that Labour has ever had. If we need to support them to improve our own ability to agitate amongst workers, then we should – but we need to be able to criticize their weaknesses clearly, delineating our own position as ultimately antagonistic to Compass.
During a time of intensified class struggle, the importance of these divisions will heighten measurably as elements of the Labour Party are propelled towards the interests of Capital, and elements are propelled towards the interests of labour. Radical talk about redistribution can become bitter opposition to the most basic activist-led demands of the working class, as in the case of Kinnock with the Miners or of Gordon Brown with the strikers at Lindsey Oil Refinery and subsequently all across the country.
When considering this future, we need to remember the phrases of the United Front: we march separately and we strike together. No illusions in Compass, or its prophets, but an open handed policy towards united efforts by those groups who command the support of socialist activists.


text:
Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Mar 16, 2005
Agri-Biz & Commodities
Conclave begins on Friday in New Delhi G-20 partners to evolve strategy on WTO issues
Our Bureau
The Minister for Commerce and Industry, Mr Kamal Nath, with the Minister of State, Mr. E.V.K.S. Elangovan, at a press conference in the Capital on Tuesday. Ramesh Sharma
New Delhi , March 15
THE Group of 20, a pre-Cancun WTO ministerial alliance of big and small countries to safeguard their agricultural interests, is holding a two-day conclave here beginning on March 18 to take "a G-20 position" on WTO-related issues and come out with "position papers", the Union Commerce and Industry Minister, Mr Kamal Nath, has said.
Addressing a news conference to declare India's hosting G-20 ministerial meeting, Mr Nath said that the meeting was poised at a crucial juncture in the process of trade negotiations.
The technical work has largely shown the implications and now political inputs are considered necessary in order to break the deadlock on various technical matters among WTO members. He said the meeting would take alliance consolidation to remain united to press for the concerns affecting their interests.
The meeting would evolve the G-20 strategy and position in the ensuing multilateral trade negotiations in the WTO in the months ahead, with the broader time-frame of the Hong Kong Ministerial Conference of the WTO to be held from December 13 to 18, so as to incorporate the key concerns of its members in the outcome of the ministerial meeting.
The G-20 includes Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Cuba, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Philippines, South Africa, Tanzania, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Thailand, Guatemala, and Paraguay Bolivia, besides India.
Mr Kamal Nath said the G-20 recognises that most developing countries must marshal collective strength to succeed to end the practices of a small group of producers in rich world that benefit from enormous financial support from their treasuries, depressing prices, unduly increasing their market share and compromising the food security and livelihood of farmers in many developing countries.
He cited figures from OECD and other studies to show how rich countries subsidise their cotton, rice and other foodgrains by exporting farm produce below their cost of production which drive down the prices of these produce in the global market to the detriment of developing countries' exports.
The meeting would also address issues of tariff reductions formula on non-agricultural market products and here "while India has been reducing its industrial tariffs to bring it into ASEAN level, the concerns of African countries which depend on them for revenue should be taken into account".
The Minister also voiced concern over the deft move by developed countries to drive a wedge within developing world by redefining developing countries.
"Anything not within the Doha mandate is not acceptable to us", he said, reaffirming India's commitment to Doha development agenda.
He also confirmed the participation of 14 trade ministers from the G-20 alliance partners so far and the G-20 has been reaching out with an inclusive approach to other developing countries so that there is support and understanding of each other's positions.
The New Delhi meeting will have the representation of a number of developing country alliances as Observers.
They include the G-33, the Africa-Caribbean-Pacific (ACP) countries, the Africa group, the CARICOM (Caribbean Community8) and the least developed countries.
There have been efforts to draw out self-serving inter-linkages between agriculture and other areas of negotiations such as NAMA (non agricultural market access), services, trade facilitation, rules, trade-related intellectual property rights and environment, while there were serious slippages in resolving development issues.
Hence the meeting would brainstorm on these facets too, the Minister said.
Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page
Stories in this Section
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2005, The
Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu Business Line

subset: commoncrawl


text:
The x-IMU Gloves
A pair of gloves for musician Imogen Heap. This first pair of customized gloves uses custom made version of the x-IMU. Each glove has one x-IMU, 8 bend sensors, an RGB LED and vibration motor.
Imogen at Dara O Briain's Science Club:
Three minutes with Imogen Heap at Wired 2012:
Me, The Machine performance at TEDGlobal 2012:
ITV news interview:


text:
We are having a contest to find your city's biggest Dim Mak fan. Tess us why you should get free tickets to the Deadmeat Tour in Minneapolis on 2/23. We'll choose 5 of the best submissions and let YOU decide the winner!
The Top 3 will get the following prizes:
1st Place:
- 2 Tickets
- 2 Shirts
- 2 Albums
2nd Place:
- 1 Ticket
- 1 Shirt
- 1 Album
3rd Place:
- 1 Shirt
- 1 Album
This contest will be held on Dim Mak Live's Facebook Fanpage here. All contest applicants must share the event and place their entry on the official Minneapolis Deadmeat Tour event page.
*T-Shirts and Albums will be of Dim Mak content, with an album selection between MSTRKRFT's "Fist Of God" and Bloody Beetroots "Romborama". Please supply your t-shirt sizing for accurate fitment. Ticket winners will be granted entry upon arrival at the venue. Please report to guest will-call for ticket retrieval.


text:
One of the most frequently asked questions about Wednesday's Child is whether the children get adopted once they are featured? The answer is yes. This week we have an update on some of the children who have been waiting for a forever family.
We met Justin in February. He was about to celebrate his 14th birthday and was hoping for what he called the gift of a lifetime. He told us military service is a family tradition, something that he wants to possibly continue.
"I either want to be a U.S. Marine or if I can't do that I can do baseball", said Justin.
Justin said he found a way to adapt to being in foster care after almost two years, but his hope was to be adopted.
"Just someone I can call mom and dad again", Justin said.
Justin is now in a placement with a family and waiting for his adoption to become official.
Also in a placement with a family, Ravon and Tywain, who likes to be called Ty. We talked with them last month about their hopes for adoption. Ty and Ravon have been in foster care almost 7 years.
"I think I was 10 when they moved us away from each other again. So it would be great to have a home where you guys have a home together? Yes mam", Ty said.
"It was difficult but I learned to cope with it just take it day by day", said Ravon.
Ty and Ravon said they wanted parents who are responsible and caring.
"I just want to settle down in a home instead of going from place to place", Ravon said.
"Like to travel, have fun, go out, lovable people", said Ty.
According to the Department of Human Services, 383 children have been placed in homes since last year. 128 are still waiting for their forever families. But Ty, Ravon ,Justin and dozens of other children finally have their happy ending.
To learn more about adoption and the children who are waiting for families call the Mississippi Adoption Resource Exchange at 1-800-821-9157.
Wednesday's Child is sponsored by Wendy's and WLBT.
Copyright 2012 WLBT. All rights reserved.
A boy calls 911 from inside a carjacked vehicle with four other kids.More >>
A boy calls 911 from inside a carjacked vehicle with four other kids.More >>


text:
Lakewood High School wins Katy Perry concert
POSTED: 01:53 PM MDT Oct 18, 2013
Lakewood High School has won a contest to have singer Katy Perry perform at the school.
To enter the contest, more than 2,000 students from 80 different school clubs competed with videos using Perry's hit single "Roar." The winner was announced Friday.
The concert by the chart-topping artist will be held at the school on Oct. 25.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


text:
Microsoft has shared a form factor guide for Windows OEMs to make better Windows devices. This Form Factors guide is not related to the usual Windows Hardware Certification Requirements. Instead, this form factor guide focuses on providing guidance for OEMs on bezel size and weight, buttons, target resolutions, and aspect ratios for Windows devices. Here are some info in the document, 1) Device screen size and the recommended maximum weight. < 8.5" – 350 g 8.5" – 10" – 650 g 10.1" – 650 g 2) All Windows devices should have at least 7mm bezel for optimal experience. 3) Windows is optimized for landscape orientation. Even though Windows supports both portrait and landscape, Microsoft recommends landscape as the primary orientation of the device which are tablets, convertibles and mobile All-in-one. 4) Microsoft recommends soft press buttons for Rotation lock, Volume Control, Power, etc,. OEMs can use capacitive button for Windows keys only if the device implements an optically ...Read More →
Oct 13, 2013 Posted Microsoft, Windows 8, windows 8, Windows 8.1 Tagged Formfactor, Microsoft, windows Comments 3


text:
Cairn India Ltd plans to spend $2 billion over the next two years for expanding its oil and gas exploration business, Chairman Navin Agarwal said on Wednesday. He was addressing the media after the sixth annual general meeting of the company here.
Agarwal said that company plans to invest about $600 million for exploration in the Rajasthan block alone, which has a huge potential for hydrocarbons. "The block is spread over 3,000 km and we have not even explored half of that," he said.
The company is producing about 175,000 barrels of crude oil a day from the block and expects it to support a potential production of 300,000 barrels a day, he said.
Agarwal said that the revised oil production (300,000 barrels) is subject to further investments and approvals by the Centre and Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd, which is the joint venture partner in the block. Such a production level is equivalent to more than 35 per cent of India's current crude oil production, he said.
Outgoing CEO Rahul Dhir said that the company has struck gas in the Rajasthan block and efforts are on to bring that into production. However, Dhir declined to comment about the size of the gas find and funds required for bringing it on stream.
South African block
Commenting on the company's recent acquisition in South Africa, Dhir said the company had acquired a 60 per cent stake from PetroSA. "This would be in the Orange Basin in the offshore border between South Africa and Namibia. The potential of the block is subject to further exploration. However, it would be on trend with our existing discoveries, so we are quite excited about it."
He declined to disclose the company's investment in the block.
Mr Agarwal added: "Until now, we were constrained to look within India for exploration, but now that we have taken our first with South Africa, we would continue to look at other countries as well."
On operations in Sri Lanka, he said the company plans to enter into the second phase of exploration and plans to commence the next exploration drilling campaign in mid-2013.
The Cairn stock closed at Rs 333.80, a 0.69 per cent increase over the previous close, on the BSE on Wednesday.


text:
Anonymous on 06/13/2012
We are tenants, mostly single parents headed by women, and have not been told by the landlords for that bedbugs have been in the building for a year or so. Already financially stressed, noe we have to spend the money that we don't have on the constant laundering and steam-cleaning. This housing corporation better be ready to pay the extermination bills ,or expect a class action legal proceeding! Trust me, we have families: pets, spouses and children, and we tenants are doing everything we can n
ow that we know-we all just learned in the last few days. The
landowners are starting the exterminations now.
Can't Sleep on 03/24/2011
February and March 2011 I have been getting bitten approximately every three nights. Trying to get rid of them by washing and vacuming but still have note acutally seen any bugs to the land lord is not prepared to pay for an exterminator until there is "proof" that the bites are bed bugs.
No nearby bug reports


text:
See what's on at Adelaide Festival Centre.
Adelaide Festival Centre is the South Australian arts hub and a leading Arts Centre in the Asia Pacific region.
There are a number of options for booking tickets and accessing Adelaide Festival Centre.
Theatres, function rooms and exhibitions spaces at Adelaide Festival Centre.
Adelaide Festival Centre runs a number of educational and children's programs.
Your support ensures that Adelaide Festival Centre remains relevant and accessible to all.
Receive the latest news, exclusive offers and event information.
5 Jul 2014 – 5 Jul 2015
Explore the cultivated environment of the East Asian scholar-artist
1 Aug – 3 Oct 2014
Artists Isabel and Alfredo Aquilizan create remarkably imaginative installations that use the proces...
1 Aug – 3 Oct 2014
Experience a cohesion of cultural enlightenment and modern expression
1 – 30 Sep 2014
This exhibition features rare photographs of pre-war China taken by GermanbornHedda Hammer Morrison ...
3 Sep 2014
This exquisite dance drama presents themes of love, affection and patriotism
3 Sep – 12 Oct 2014
Discover the beauty of an ancient art form and learn the skill behind the silk from embroidery artis...
3 – 12 Sep 2014
Revolutions come in all shapes and sizes as one woman's awakening parallels that of her country
3 – 20 Sep 2014
Listed as China's first Modern Folk Art Painting City, Rizhao's folk art is treasured in China – fin...
4 – 20 Sep 2014
Celebrate the spectacular arrival of Shorebirds on their migration to South Australia's shores with ...
4 – 8 Sep 2014
Time-honoured traditional arts and crafts abound throughout Shandong Province, weaving a cultural ba...
4 – 5 Sep 2014
Considered by many as master director King Hu's best film, Raining in the Mountain is a portrait of ...
4 – 8 Sep 2014
Gain an understanding of the revered teacher through unique virtual and actual experiences at the Wi...
5 Sep 2014
Discuss the importance of cultural exchange and the potential to expand international creative conne...
5 Sep 2014
Presented by Sam Ho, find out everything you ever wanted to know about Hong Kong Cinema but were too...
5 – 6 Sep 2014
Ghosts, foxes, immortals and demons are brought to life with stunning performances and dream-like st...
6 – 20 Sep 2014
An over-the-top, enjoyable, and delirious film of pop-culture excess
6 Sep 2014 – 29 Mar 2015
For the first time in Australia the Art Gallery will present the monumental, calligraphic installati...
6 – 14 Sep 2014
An award-winning drama/thriller, Omar is about a man caught in a deadly divide
7 – 17 Sep 2014
Get in on the ground floor of the new Russian animation movement with this cult sci-fi comedy
7 – 21 Sep 2014
Mumbai's famed dabba-wallahs (lunchbox deliverers) stand at the heart of this marvelously beguiling ...
7 – 20 Sep 2014
All aboard Adelaide's local icon, The Popeye, for a series of concerts
8 Sep 2014
A cross between Charlie's Angels and The Avengers, or any other superhero gang
8 Sep 2014
Bask under a full moon and experience the wonder of the Moon Lantern Festival which has become a pin...
9 – 10 Sep 2014
Photographs come to life in a conversation between a photographer from the past and one from the pre...
10 – 21 Sep 2014
An award-winning drama by Australian director, Amiel Courtin-Wilson (Hail) and Michael Cody
11 Sep – 10 Oct 2014
Curator Daniel Connell presents works from Hemant Sareen and Bindu Mehra of India and Damien Shen of...
11 Sep 2014
An exuberant testament to globalisation
12 Sep 2014
How can we construct a value narrative that is traditional, while at the same time successful, in mo...
12 – 13 Sep 2014
Together, Synergy Percussion and Noreum Machi create music that is engagingly virtuosic in the most ...
13 Sep 2014
A dramatic and captivating live performance of calligraphy and music
13 – 21 Sep 2014
A twisted, hilarious new film that is sure to turn into a cult hit
13 – 19 Sep 2014
A profoundly beautiful documentary about pilgrimage in India
13 Sep 2014
Hear a number of respected Chinese and Australian academics discuss the revival of Confucianism in m...
14 Sep 2014
Adapted from the novel by Shandong's Nobel Prize winning author Mo Yan, Red Sorghum presents themes ...
14 – 20 Sep 2014
A brilliant satire, this film marks the birth of a new wave in film from Bangladesh
14 Sep – 20 Oct 2014
An exhibition of contemporary and cutting edge new media from Chinese artist Cao Fei
14 Sep 2014
Join us in the Migration Museum with Simon Bryant in a day-long exploration and celebration of the o...
16 – 17 Sep 2014
A movie, filmed live on stage in a single take
17 Sep 2014
An exploration of photography as both witness to, and agent of, historical change in China. Presente...
18 Sep 2014
Professor Michael Dutton maps the journey of the Mexican silver dollar as it travelled from the mine...
19 Sep 2014
Prepare your senses – and your stomach – for a sumptuous and exquisite Chinese feast!
19 – 20 Sep 2014
Revel in the minimalist creativity and agile physicality of one of China's most radical contemporary...
19 – 20 Sep 2014
Reinventing modern electro sound
27 Sep 2014
A dramatic, thirteen movement symphony and documentary micro films bring to life the ancient, secret...
In the lead up to the spectacular Oz Asia Festival commencing this week in Adelaide, the focus shifts to Shandong Province – birthplace of Confucius a…


text:
Route Guide - iPhone / Android - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New - School of Rock
Routes Sorted
L to R R to L Alpha
Business right off the ground, a few hidden jugs, but don't get sucked right. Different variations but climb from the right facing corner on the face follow the features left to a good mantle past a small ledge go up and leftish from there to the big ledge. 4th class up past the tree to the trail.
Slab to the right of Kyles Corner. Start standing on the bench at the base.
Pro is scarce, small gear- could use some fixed protection


text:
News: Rick Ross Envisions MMG As 2 Live Crew, "[I'd Have] Britney Spears As One Of My 'Me So Horny' Girls"
Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:40PM
Maybach Music Group CEO Rick Ross envisions his crew as a modernized version of iconic rap group 2 Live Crew in the new issue of Complex magazine.
Asked to consider making a sketch group alongside MMG's Wale and Pill, the "Boss" wasted no time in allowing his imagination to run wild.
"Maybe 2 Live Crew. Have Britney Spears as one of my 'Me So Horny' girls," Ross explained when asked about what sketch group they would parody. "We'd have the shaved-head Britney. The party girl." (Complex)
Last January, Philadelphia rapper Beanie Sigel revealed his intent to remake a Fat Boys album.
"I f*ck with the fat boy Rick Ross," Sigel revealed in an interview. "Boss. Yo, me, Rick Ross and motherf*cking Fat Joe, we should go back and get that old classic Fat Boys album and get somebody to remake them beats over and we should do [it] over. But put a new twist on it. We would kill that sh*t. Just food for thought. We'd murder that sh*t." (804 Ent)
When asked what group he would remake if given the opportunity, rap newcomer Fred the Godson told SOHH he would also go with The Fat Boys.
"Me, Rick Ross and Fat Joe," Fred told SOHH when asked what his 2011 version of the Fat Boys would look like. "The Fat Joe pick comes from me getting the privilege of meeting him a few months ago; he's a good person. He also said he's a fan of my work. I was just going back and forth with him and he's a good dude. With me and him, it's the BX [Bronx] at the end of the day. That boy has longevity. Say whatever you want about Fat Joe but when you talk about longevity, Fat Joe's name has to come up because he's been doing it for d*mn near 20 years." (SOHH)
This week, Ross officially released his Maybach Music Group compilation album, Self Made Volume 1.
Compilation albums have earned a reputation for having only a couple of songs that are worth a listen. Unfortunately, Maybach Music Group's debut album, "Self Made Vol. 1," helps solidify that view. It's the label's first compilation album, starring one of hip-hop's best in Rick Ross, alongside Maybach's newly signed rappers Wale, Meek Mill, Pill and singer Teedra Moses. The burly and bearded Ross shines like expected through much of the 15-track album, but he doesn't completely overshadow the lyrically gifted Wale and Moses. (ABC News)
Check out some recent Rick Ross footage below:


text:
Saturday March 1, Bloody Elbow presents live fight coverage of Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. vs. Bryan Vera II. HBO World Championship Boxing Chavez vs. Vera II airs live on HBO this Saturday, March 1, with a fight time of 9:45 p.m. ET / PT. Bloody Elbow will have live fight coverage, including results and discussion, right here.
This rematch stems from one of the most controversial fights of 2012. That fight started with a ridiculous series of changes to the weight limit in order to accommodate Chavez, and ended with a Chavez split decision win that virtually every observer felt was a robbery. There's no question that the lack of discipline shown by Chavez in recent years has burned his bridges with many boxing fans - expect Vera to be the big favorite with fans here. The lead-up to this rematch has been, thankfully, much more straightforward, with none of the now to be expected Chavez drama. Expect this to be a hard hitting fight made more exciting by the passionate response of the fans.
More Chavez vs Vera coverage:
Bad Left Hook
Opening the HBO broadcast will be Orlando Salido vs. Vasyl Lomachenko in an incredibly intriguing fight. It's hard to envision a 1-0 boxer facing the tough veteran Salido, much less being favored by many in that fight, but then again, it's tough to envision many fighters of Lomachenko's caliber. The two time Olympic gold medalist is taking an insane step up in his professional career here. If he can beat Salido (and that's a very real possibility), he'll be one of the top boxers in the world after just 2 fights.
Join us here at Bloody Elbow for HBO World Championship Boxing Chavez vs. Vera II results, discussion, and live fight coverage this Saturday, March 1.
Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. (47-1-1; 32 KOs) vs. Bryan Vera (23-7; 14 KOs) - Super Middleweight (168 lbs)
Orlando Salido (40-12-2; 28 KOs) vs. Vasyl Lomachenko (1-0; 1 KO) - Featherweight (126 lbs)
Bad Left Hook has the results:
Vera (23-8, 14 KO) was as game as ever, and took some really big shots from Chavez (48-1-1, 32 KO) over the course of tonight's fight, always moving forward in his normal style, but this time around, Chavez was in better shape and able to keep a much crisper pace. He was clearly quicker out of the gates this time, and didn't fade much more than any fighter might over 12 rounds with this kind of two-way action.
Scores for the fight were 117-110, 117-110, and 114-113, with Vera deducted a point along the way, which ultimately didn't matter, but it was a point that didn't need to be taken by referee Rafael Ramos. BLH had it 115-112 for Chavez.


text:
As planes bearing troops home from Iraq were landing at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport last Friday, a group of Parkville High School students was waiting at the gates to show their appreciation for the men and women in the armed forces.
Students started making posters for Operation Welcome Home earlier in the week and wound up with six enormous posters they used to decorate the welcome area, according to spokeswoman Lexa Newman.
"We had almost 35 students and alumni with us Friday evening," Newman said. "Almost all of their parents stayed with us as well, and everyone got really into it."
As they waited for the troops to deplane, the students stuffed goody bags for the returning service members and hung their posters. They sang Christmas carols from a stairwell at the airport while waiting for the men and woman who served overseas.
"When the troops deplaned and started coming through, the kids were very emotional, and really awestruck. It was wonderful," Newman said.
Parkville High students weren't the only ones in the area thankful to see our men and women home from overseas—people from Parkville and Overlea have been posting messages of support on the USO Thanks from Everywhere website since late November.


text:
Fellow BILLS fans, I am writing today to inform you that we have already surpassed our road win total from last year. I am impressed by our teams perseverance to rebound from Spiller's Loss at Cleveland and still close them out. Additionally, I am proud of the BILLS' ability to withstand Gailey's foolish playcalling, Fitzpatrick's "Accuracy", and a 61 yard field goal that almost gave me a heart attack and sent me into my all too familiar losing BILLS fan mentality. "Oh Well I thought, at least it wasn't a blowout," but I caught myself and said no damn it, we are not going to lose this game.
I want to address this losing mentality first, as it seems to have seeped in from our players and team into our fanbase. Now I don't blame everyone who thought, oh well at least we showed up to play a close game against the Cardinals on the road. But the reality is that this mentality is poison and will never get us to where we want and deserve to be. We should expect to win games, not luck into them. It's very easy to get down on this team after perfomances like the second half of the Patriots Game and the entire 49ers game but we need to maintain the faith. This team has taken alot out of me over the years. As a BILLS fan in Texas, I was ridiculed, laughed at, and ultimately felt sorry for during and especially during our SuperBowl runs. This took a toll on me, yet I still maintained my fandom. Then in 1999 the Music City Miracle happened and my hopes and dreams fro this team went down the toilet. The BILLS inflicted what I know now to be a gut punch that has had me gasping for air for the last 13 years. Regardless, of this "miracle" every new NFL season I thought to myself, this year is different, this is the year we make the push to the playoffs. Needless to say every year I have been disappointed. I am known as the boy who cried wolf, to my cousins and friends since I proclaim that the BILLS will make the playoffs every year (they tune me out now)
This year is different my fellow BILLS fans, as this is the year we make that surge towards the playoffs. Look at the AFC Landscape, everyone except two teams (Ravens and Texans) as many wins as us or fewer., and they play each other this week. We have an opportunity here to finally end this miserable, soul-sucking, torturous playoff drought but the BILLS need our help.
Our two road wins have a common denominator, you know what that is? BILLS fans making their presence felt at the opponents home field and showing our BILLS, support. I BILLIEVE there were upwards of 5,000 Bills Fans at the game this past weekend, and in Cleveland there were so many Bills fans that the players stated that it felt like a home game. NFL.com has an article that states that we are one of the top fan bases in the NFL. Consequently, one of my points of this fan post is to say let's prove it. I'm calling for all BILLS fans who live in a city where the BILLS are playing this year to come out and support the BILLS. I went to the first game of the season in New Jersey and tried to support them and am also attending the Texans game sporting my BILLS colors.
BILLS fans in Houston, New England, Indianapolis, and Miami I am calling on you if you are able to help our players by showing your support and rooting them on at the games. BILLS fans in Buffalo you're doing a great job keep it up, lets ensure all of our home games are a sellout. I am a big BILLiEVER in cycles, and this current cycle of agony and heartbreak began in Tennessee in 1999 when that "lateral" ended our playoff hopes and set forth 13 years of mediocrity. We are better than this fellow fans, and as I get off of my soapbox I just have to say the new cycle BILLS fans of positivity and success began when Alex Carrington blocked that 38 yard field goal. That was the point of inflection, or tipping point if you will and we will thrive, you have to BILLIEVE it.
I apologize for the length of this post, but I feel like I have gotten a lifetime of painful fandom off of my chest, and I'm not going to expect any more losing. Our mentality has to change as a fan base for the results on the field to. I am sick of being the lovable loser, the team that should be happy to be here, the division doormat.
Also, let's mess these Titans Up, let's take out all of our frustrations and disgusting feelings we get whenever we hear the Tennessee Titans name get brought up, out on them. I personally loathe the Titans, and I know I am not alone. Go BILLS BABY!!!


text:
Wells Plumbing & Heating Suppies is a leading importer and distributor of a broad line of plumbing and heating products used principally in home improvement, remodeling, and repair as well as residential and commecial construction.
Wells does thorough market research and has a commitment to a global vision of the plumbing supply industry allowing us to provide the plumbing industry and professional plumbers competitive, quality products and services.
Wells Plumbing and Heating Supplies, INC. has been certified as MBE ( Minority Owned Business Enterprise)
by the city of Chicago for City of Chicago projects.


text:
- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
Follow us for the latest news
- Find us on Facebook
Dorset Echo
Like us on Facebook
Karen aiming to raise awareness (From Dorset Echo)
When news happens get involved. Send your pictures, views and video to us by text and email
Karen aiming to raise awareness
5:20pm Friday 16th November 2012 in News
A Dorset woman is taking part in a national campaign to raise awareness of lung cancer after she was diagnosed with the disease.
Karen Wright, 52, is supporting Lung Cancer Awareness Month this November.
She said: "My symptoms were a feeling of being constantly tired and I had painful, aching knees.
"I also started having problems with my fingers tips as they had become clubbed and were hurting.
"I was sent for a chest X-ray and then a biopsy on my lung. I was told two weeks after that it was lung cancer.
"I had some chemotherapy and I have now been free from lung cancer for eight years and I am looking forward to many more."
Karen, of Studland, was hit with a second blow some years after beating lung cancer.
She said: "The most important message is that people are aware of what symptoms to look out for."
Each year almost 40,000 people are diagnosed with lung cancer in the UK.
For details visit roycastle.org/awarenessmonth
Comments are closed on this article.


text:
PEORIA, Ill. -- One of the three men who were allegedly involved in a string of home invasions last year plead guilty in a Peoria County Courtroom on Monday.
Stefan Crayton, 20, agreed to plea guilty to a single charge of residential burglary for the September home invasion at the residence of Doc and Mari Halliday.
In exchange, Crayton's other charges are to be dropped and he would be sentenced to no more than 12 years in prison and to not be charged in any other crimes involving Blair Johnson and Perry Rosetto.
Peoria County Circuit Judge Kevin Lyons said that he had some trepidation about approving the plea agreement. He told both parties that he is concerned about barring the state from charging Crayton for the other home invasions.
Crayton is set to be sentenced on July 16. If Lyons decides on that date not to approve the deal, Crayton will be allowed to retract his plea and stand trial.
Rosetto and Johnson are both scheduled to stand trial later this year. Last week, Rosetto dropped the second attorney assigned to his case and decided to represent himself.


text:
TSA to allow some knives on planes
POSTED: 05:00 PM MST Mar 05, 2013 UPDATED: 01:05 PM MST Mar 06, 2013
TSA announced it would allow passengers to carry certain knives on planes beginning April 25.
Copyright 2013 KRDO. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


text:
Crush of the Week: Kevin Garnett
In sports there's this thing where when people are great for such a long time you end up kind of forgetting about them. You know they're great, but it just stops impressing you because they've always been that way, especially when they've been doing it for the majority of your professional sports awareness.
Kevin Garnett has been around forever. He's been in the NBA for 17 years. He's won an MVP, won a championship, and most impressively been named the All-Star Game MVP. And he's now carrying the Celtics after they've lose Rajon Rondo for the year. At age 37.
In his last five games, he's had four double-doubles, including games of 27 points and 10 boards against the Raptors and 20 points, 18 rebounds, and six assists against the Nuggets. He's playing just as well as ever and he was drafted the week Bryan Adams' "Have You Ever Really Loved A Woman?" was the top song in the country.
And to top it off KG not-so-discreetly suggested he might be retiring after the year. That's when you start to think of a world without Kevin Garnett and moments like this or this or especially this.
If this is really the end for Kevin Garnett I'm glad to see him go out while he's still Kevin Garnett. But I'm going to miss him so much.
Douchebag of the Week: Oscar Pistorius
There are very few ways to beat out an incredibly overpaid, out of shape man getting caught for using steroids to win Douchebag of the Week but one of those ways is to become a national hero and (allegedly) murder your girlfriend.
I'll give Oscar Pistorius the whole-innocent-until-proven-guilty
treatment despite him being the only suspect and a fight was heard happening in his house and he really likes guns and shooting them and he starred in this really unfortunate ad and, yeah, he almost certainly did it.
By now we shouldn't expect much of anything out of athletes and be pleasantly surprised when they don't do something super terrible. But there was something different about Pistorius. His story of overcoming the loss of his legs, fighting to get including in the Olympics and actually achieving his dream was an inspiring story for anyone. So somehow him getting involved in something so terrible just seems to crush any sort of hope for admiring an athlete.
There are some good guys out there for sure, but it seems the less we have to hear about an athlete's non-athletic life, the better off we are. Pistorius was larger than life in South Africa an now there are probably thousands of kids who looked up to him trying to understand how he could do something like this. Maybe sports have always been like this. But it sure seems like things are getting worse and worse as time goes on.
Follow Scott Bolohan on Twitter: @scottbolohan
Related on The Smoking Jacket:
Jacoby Jones vs. Chris Culliver
Tiger Woods vs. Alex Rodriguez


text:
Skip to Main Content
Accenture Management Consulting helps businesses achieve high performance. Drawing on our groundbreaking research and hands-on experience with high-performance businesses, Accenture delivers insights and puts them into action.
Discover the services Accenture delivers to help companies use technology to move to a higher level of performance.
Accenture has the broadest oursourcing services offering in the market—unmatched in scope, scale and depth—to help companies respond to today's extraordinary market conditions.
At Accenture, we are committed to using our industry expertise, business process experience, and formal research to uncover the key characteristics of high performance businesses and to help our clients achieve high performance.
Why we formed the Accenture & Cisco Business Group
Technology leaders are navigating a downpour of challenges: legacy infrastructures, business transitions (mergers and restructuring), new markets, rapid globalization, new sourcing models, and even regulatory and compliance pressures.
At the same time, they are experiencing an evolution in next generation data center solutions, virtualization environments, adaptive infrastructures and changes in almost every form of communications.
CIOs must gauge every turn against cost reduction, top- and bottom-line growth, immediate payback and long-term value. Accenture & Cisco Business Group believes in moving toward a simple guiding principal: by fully integrating data center virtualization, network transformation, communications and collaboration capabilities into core business processes, organizations can reduce costs, drive revenue, deliver superior customer service—and, ultimately, deliver competitive advantage.
And that is exactly what we help clients do.
To support the change agendas of today's forward-looking IT leaders, Accenture & Cisco Business Group provides a single point of contact that combines Accenture's industry-specific understanding of how technology impacts people, applications and business processes with Cisco's advanced and emerging technologies to create a single, integrated organization. This unique approach helps our clients shorten the plan to implementation cycle, which is essential in today's competitive environment.
From our work with hundreds of global clients across an array of industries, we have discovered that high-performance organizations—businesses, government agencies and other organizations that consistently perform better than their peers—use IT as a strategic asset and view the IT team as a partner to the enterprise.
Accenture & Cisco Business Group helps organizations use IT as a strategic asset to reduce costs, drive revenue and deliver superior customer service. With an integrated team approach, we blend Cisco's advanced and emerging technologies with Accenture's industry-specific understanding of how technology impacts people, applications and business processes. We assist clients in charting practical roadmaps to design, build and run network-enabled solutions that are effectively integrated into key business processes. Our distinctive portfolio of solutions helps clients bring immediate payback and improved, sustainable agility and includes Data Center Solutions, Network Transformation Solutions, and vertical areas of focus on Collaboration Solutions and Smart Solutions.
Accenture is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company, with approximately 257,000 people serving clients in more than 120 countries. Combining unparalleled experience, comprehensive capabilities across all industries and business functions, and extensive research on the world's most successful companies, Accenture collaborates with clients to help them become high-performance businesses and governments. The company generated net revenues of US$27.9 billion for the fiscal year ended Aug. 31, 2012. Its home page is www.accenture.com.
Cisco is the worldwide leader in networking that transforms how people connect, communicate, and collaborate. Since 1984, Cisco has led in the innovation of IP-based networking technologies such as routing, switching, security, unified communications, video, and wireless. Our responsible business practices help ensure business sustainability and environmentally conscious operations and products. Learn more at www.cisco.com.
Skip Footer Links


text:
Reply to comment
Submitted by Jeaneil (not verified) on Tue, 2012-03-20 09:50.
Did the bacteria "evolve" or adapt. Adaptation is not evolution. Unless their DNA changed, which it didn't, these bacteria only adapted, as do many other animals. If I do not eat meat, I can adapt to the eating of meat if that becomes my only source of food- I did not evolve, I adapted.


text:
OAC is open to all with an interest in anthropology. Read, share, debate, collaborate, make friends. Click "About" (above) to learn more.
A poetic critique of Latour
Achirri Ishmael posted this in the Ethnographic Writing group.
Could ethnicity be natural after all?
Look at this only if you can cope with serious mathematical argument.
The Oxford anthropology "Gone Dark" project
What happens when websites die? What are YOU doing to keep this one alive?
Transforming Brazilian slumscapes
Business as usual in hyper-neoliberal digital environments.
Started by Goran Pavlovic in The OAC Forum Aug 17.
Started by Victoria Herranz in The OAC Forum Aug 11.
Started by M Izabel in The OAC Forum. Last reply by M Izabel Aug 8.
Started by A. Ashkuff in The OAC Forum Aug 6.
Started by Liana Chua in The OAC Forum. Last reply by Dirck van Bekkum Jul 17.
Loading feed
Posted by Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay on August 29, 2014 at 9:30am
Posted by St John Simpson on July 8, 2014 at 2:45pm
Posted by John McCreery on July 4, 2014 at 1:00am — 2 Comments
Posted by Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay on June 29, 2014 at 8:20am
Posted by Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay on June 28, 2014 at 10:00pm
22 members
128 members
11 members
27 members
98 members
64 members
379 members
396 members
8 members
548 members
No funding? Don't Go!! (on getting a PhD in anthropology)
Added by ryan anderson on March 22, 2014
OAC is Dying, Anthropology Isn't
Added by John McCreery on July 4, 2014
Can a government decide over the woman body?
Posted by Victoria Herranz on August 11, 2014
Waldkirch 4
Added by Kristen R. Ghodsee on August 9, 2014
Is Tolerating a Culture to Oppress and Persecute Part of Multiculturalism and Cultural Relativism?
Posted by M Izabel on August 8, 2014
Waldkirch 10
Added by Kristen R. Ghodsee on August 9, 2014


text:
More than 1,200 incoming Marshall University freshman students sat down at the Cam Henderson center for orientation Wednesday evening.
Students listened to positive messages from class leaders and Marshall head football coach Doc Holliday.
After orientation, students and their families braved the rain making their way across campus for a welcome dinner at the Memorial Student center.
Students hugged their friends and spent time with their families enjoying a free dinner with drinks and deserts inside.
Some students say it was a productive day for them.
"I don't know I thought they would give you a little information about something and brush it off, but they're really sure of making you feel comfortable on campus and comfortable going here." Ashley Mathis of Huntington said.
Marshall students spent the day earlier moving in to their new dorm rooms and meeting new friends.


text:
Aviation officials said an airfield lighting vault caused a four hour power outage that shut down Midway Airport operations Thursday night.
The blackout shut down most of the runway lights at around 9 p.m., and workers weren't able to get the lights back on until around 1 a.m.
Chicago Aviation Department spokeswoman Karen Pride said 85 flights were canceled or diverted while the airport was closed. Only a few flights were allowed to arrive and depart after the blackout.
Passengers tried to reschedule flights Friday, and some won't be able to leave Chicago until Saturday.
Some planes were on the runway awaiting takeoff, when the runway lights flickered and went out. Incoming planes had to be diverted to other cities leaving some people stranded.
Officials said the terminal was not affected. Passengers were able to get off planes that returned to the terminal. They slept on cots and the floor.
There were long lines at the car rental counters because many travelers found out their next available flight would not leave for at least 24 hours.
Com Ed responded to the outage and found it was not a power delivery problem but an airport equipment malfunction.
Passengers said they were told that backup power generators failed at Midway but Aviation officials did not confirm that statement.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Police are investigating the murder of a homeless man who was beaten to death in an alley in Logan Square.
205 N. Michigan AvenueGround FloorChicago, IL 60601Station Operator: (312) 565-5532Newsroom: (312)565-5533


text:
Sea green and ocean blue make for a dope color combo! It makes sense, the sea is a body of water and so is the ocean so why wouldn't these colors work well together? Ok that analogy was stupid but you get the point! Nike SB Dunks look good in damn near any colorway they're released in and this is just a classy spring look. Where does this rank on your sneakerhead radar for spring releases? Check out the images below and let us know what you think?
Source: SN


text:
Manes Funeral Home 423-623-6952
Visit website 363 East Main Street, Newport, TN 37821 Open today until 5 p.m.
Manes Funeral Home Inc. is a full service funeral provider offering traditional funerals as well as cremation and pre-planning.
Manes Funeral Home Inc. established in September 1973 has handled many dignified funeral services for people of all faiths and all walks of life.
Manes Funeral Home Inc. has a fully licensed staff on call 24 hours per day 7 days a week to attend to all your funeral needs. This staff has a combined total of more than 75 years experience in the funeral industry.
Always there in time of need, Manes Funeral Home Inc. at 363 East Main Street in Newport, Tennessee 37821 is recognized as one of the region's foremost funeral directors. This established concern has helped a great many local families during their time of sorrow through compassionate funeral arrangements and complete service.
Our History
Manes Funeral Home Inc. was established in September of 1973.
Our initial building consisted of less than 1500 square feet of operating space, we now have in excess of 28,000 square feet. We began in 1973 with 50 calls our first year and 100 calls the second year. Our first expansion took place in 1974 with the addition of our first chapel, and new selection room. In 1978 a new viewing room and office was added. This accommodated us until 1996 when we purchased a 25,000 square foot clothing store adjacent to our business. With this purchase we were able to expand with a new chapel and more spacious viewing areas as well as additional office space. In 2004 extensive renovations were done to our oldest chapel and we now offer two fully independent chapels with three additional viewing areas. In 2008 Manes Funeral Home Inc. served over 300 families during their time of sorrow.
This independently operated funeral home has operated successfully for more than 35 years. We employee 14 full and part time employees who are on 24 hour call 7 days per week. We offer both Tennessee and North Carolina licensed funeral directors as well as insurance licensed pre-need planners in Tennessee. These fully licensed directors and planners are available to assist you and your family in time of need.
Dedicated to service since 1973, Manes Funeral Home Inc. plans to continue serving those in their time of sorrow with compassion, care, and respect.
- Wheelchair accessibility
- Local establishment
- Phone: 423-623-6952
This business appears in: Services, Funerals & Memorials
Life Choices
Most of us plan ahead in life. We plan for our wedding, our children's education, family vacations, and other significant ...
Manes Funeral Home
363 East Main Street Newport, Tennessee 37821 Phone: 423-623-6952 Fax: 423-623-2610
Manes Funeral Home Inc. offers a wide range of funeral merchandise including caskets, vaults, urns, funeral clothing, video tributes and ...
Center for Loss and Life Transistion
A private organization dedicated to furthering our understanding of and compassion for the complex set of emotions we call grief. ...
Ads & Coupons
Manes 40th Anniversary
Manes Funeral Home
Manes 40th Anniversary
Manes Funeral Home Video
For over thirty years, Manes Funeral home has been dedicated to serving the needs of families in Newport and surrounding ...


text:
SCH INLINE HOCKEY CLUB'S NEXT SCHEDULED GAME: Sunday, July 14th at 9:30 a.m. at Pine Park in Hoffman Estates
The 9 am starts were a little too early so we are bumping it up to 9:30. That time seemed to work well for our last few games.
Q: Are you really playing hockey this Sunday???
A: Depends on how liberally you define "playing" and "hockey," but for lack of a better term, yes.
Q: Is this your first game?
A: Negative. We've been playing on Sunday's regularly for 3 years now, including ever Sunday in 2013 since the end of March.
Q: Can I play too?
A: You're invited! Only requirement is you don't intentionally hurt anyboyd else or yourself.
SUNDAY, July 14th GAME INFO
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Location: Pine park in Hoffman Estates, just North of 62
Required equipment: Inline skates; a hockey stick (gloves are encouraged and most people wear shin pads). We have full goalie equipment that you can use if you want to get between the pipes.
Time to honor your 2013 Champion Blackhawks with a great hockey game!!!


text:
In anticipation of the leaving of a member of the team, I am looking for a baker for a permanent position. The post is from September 2010.
Company Name: Daylesford Organic.
Location: Daylesford, England, Gloucestershire, 40 minutes from Oxford and less than 2 hours from London (by train).
Position to be filled in early September.
Permanent contract.
2 days off per week.
Shared accommodation available (the rent includes all charges and taxes) in a small town 10-15 minutes from the company.
Vehicle required, even a bicycle (it's just easier not to be dependant of someone else).
Hours may vary from 12:00 to 20:00 or 18:00 to 2:00 (approximate time subject to change depending on production needs). 40 hours weekly.
Salary: £ 16,000 per year, gross.
Skills: Hand shaping, mixing, baking, Viennese pastries (croissants, chocolate croissants, etc.), adaptability. Knowledge of the pastry job would be an important asset.
Experience required : 1-2 years.
Qualification in bakery (and pastry if possible) or significant experience required.
Qualities required: cheerfulness, reliability, dedication and search for a job well accomplished (our bakery is famous for producing some of the best breads in the country: Soil Association Food Award 2009, two Great Taste Awards 2010). Compliance with hygiene is essential.
Company characteristics: Organic production company organised around a farm. We manufacture a wide variety of organic products regularly awarded for their quality (milk, cheeses, eggs, meat, ready meals, pastries, breads, etc.). Our production site includes a farm, a farm-shop, a café-restaurant (mentioned in the Michelin guide), a creamery, a bakery ...
Specificity of the bakery: 100% organic production without use of additives, fully manual shaping, work on natural leaven (sourdough, without addition of yeast) for a large part of the production.
To apply, contact me by private message in order to send me your CV by email.
Login or Signup to add your comment.