text:
Roxas City, Philippines Vacations - Travel guide to Roxas City, Philippines accommodations and vacation packages. Visit Roxas City, Philippines for getaways and adventure travel. Plan your Roxas City, Philippines vacation today.
Page:1 of 1 | Sort By: |
Makati City, Philippines Car Rentals - We engaged in the business of car rental for an affordable rate with customer satisfaction guaranteed. A car rental company with very affordable top-of-the-line transportation service providing ease and satisfaction.
Puerto Princesa, Philippines Hotels & Resorts - The resort is situated 60km north along the national highway north side of Honda Bay, Puerto Princesa and is central for most major tourist destinations. Island hopping, Underground River
Makati, Philippines Youth Hostels - Located at the heart of bustling Makati, the vision of Lokal Hostel is for its customers is to experience the sights and sounds of the city through the local perspective.
Makati City, Philippines Hotels & Resorts - In a city known for being the country's business capital and having a glitzy lifestyle, Franchise One Hotel offers accommodations that remain easy on the pocket. A cozy enclave among the towering buildings in Makati, our hotel features simple yet
Makati City, Philippines Hotels & Resorts - Furnished private and family rooms start at Php 585.00/24hrs stay. Includes free Wi-Fi, CATV, Personal Ref, Wardrobe, own T & B, spacious lobbies and a comfortable recreation area. We also accommodate male bed spacers at Php 150.00/24hrs

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Many have argued that Deerhoof is objectively the best band in the world. Yeah, that's probably a bit hyperbolic, but ath the Vera Project last week, Deerhoof made that radical claim seem like an understatement. Coming off of their new record, Breakup Song, Deerhoof seems to be just as on their game as they everRead more...
Listen Live:
iTunes and KEXP
You can now find KEXP under "Eclectic" in iTunes after the demise of the "Public" category, to better represent the diversity of our daytime variety shows and numerous specialty programs.KEXP Suggests


text:
a place for zinesters - writers and readers
Albums: My old zines & Mail-Art documents...
267 members
68 members
21 members
384 members
181 members
Ist preference given to distros and zines. Rates and details are here. Limited space. Very Low Cost!
© 2014 Created by Krissy PonyBoy Press. Powered by


text:
Home Décor Accents for Couples (30+)
Gift Buzz
Each summer the Outdoor Retailer Summer Market, becomes the world's largest outdoor sports industry showcase and gathering. With over 25,000 exhibitors and attendees, OR (as it's known in the industry) is THE place to find the hot products,... Read More »
Top o' the morn'! It's almost St. Patrick's Day. Maybe you're taking March 17 off of school or work to get an early start in pubs with names like Molly Malone's, O'Toole's and Patsy's. Kilts and Celtic bands will abound, as will parades overflowin... Read More »
There's something about spring that makes me love a cocktail. Maybe it's the fresh scent of rosemary and honeysuckle that fills the air, or the brighter, longer days. Or maybe it's just that a lemon drop martini isn't a bad ways to end a day.... Read More »
St Patrick's Day entertaining can be slightly more difficult to plan for than your average holiday gathering. We're going to help you and your guests experience a holiday in a way that's a step above those drugstore foil shamrock cutouts and... Read More »


text:
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
by Grazeful Living
by Burlington County College
by Barry Chatzinoff, Esquire
by Whoisleadingus??
by Gail Zoppo
by Swordfish Communications
by NJNews4U
by Stella Morrison
by Jackson Noel
by Cameron
by Tom Swift
by I've Got the 'Scoop'!, LLC
by Verismo Opera
by nonye
by email@example.com
by Paula
by Jessica Cohen
by PopUp Republic
by alexis espinoza
by Cardinal
by Anna Conway
by Deb Durst
by Priyanka Patel
by harriet


text:
by Erin Engelke
Showing 1-9 of 202 Articles
by Nataly
Before we launched Workitmom.com, I pretended to know a lot about online marketing. In my previous career I was…
15 comments | 10143 views
by Naomi Dunford
Did you make a New Years' resolution to ramp up your small business? Did you make that resolution before…
13 comments | 3811 views
by Elizabeth Cogswell Baskin
If you run a small business, you probably need to be out there networking. But just the mention of that word is…
2075 views
by Laura West
As entrepreneurs, we wear many hats, juggle many balls, and any other crazy-busy metaphor you can come up…
1 comment | 1581 views
by DonnaStewart
When it comes to choosing the right home business for you -- or perhaps evaluating one you are currently in --…
1 comment | 1624 views
by Lekhika
So, you want a job freelance writing. You love to write, you're always scribbling in your spare time and you…
1 comment | 2738 views
by Lylah M. Alphonse
For parents who want to earn money and build a business without sacrificing too much family time, direct-marketing…
1 comment | 3481 views
by Steve LHeureux
Busy moms need a plan to get their work from home business online and making money. Here are four quick steps…
925 views
As a women entrepreneur you probably have in your business vision to be well-known in your industry and to easily…
1327 views
Check out our favorite things from around the web.
Check out our favorite quick and easy recipes, perfect for busy moms.
Check out money saving tips and tricks from this budget-savvy mom.


text:
It's been all over the news: NYSNA's victory this week when a judge signed a temporary restraining order to stop the SUNY Board of Trustees or anyone acting on their behalf from taking any action to close Brooklyn's Long Island College Hospital, pending a further hearing on March 7.
See what The New York Times, the Daily News, and NY1 had to say about our victory.
This victory only happened because of our work. In a very short time, NYSNA nurses have built a powerful coalition of patients, caregivers, doctors, EMTs, neighbors, small business owners, and elected officials to keep Long Island College Hospital open for care.
Our work is far from over. On Thursday night, nurses from Kings County, Maimo, Brooklyn Hospital, Interfaith, LICH, and Staten Island University Hospital came together to step up our pressure on all fronts: building community alliances, reaching out to elected officials, and caring for our patients every day.
Our movement is keeping LICH and Interfaith Medical Center open for care!
On April 16, NYSNA nurses, nursing students, and patients will fill the halls of the State Capitol like never before. We'll be there to educate our lawmakers about the issues that matter most to us and our patients:
Each nurse participant in Lobby Day will be is awarded 4.5 contact hours by the New York State Nurses Association. The New York State Nurses Association is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. Please note: In order to receive contact hours, participants are required to attend the entire session and complete an evaluation.
Join nurses from across the state at this year's NYSNA Lobby Day! CLICK HERE to find out more and register today.
Winter's not over but the North Country is heating up! From Olean General, to Gouverner's EJ Noble, to Canton-Potsdam Hospital, RNs are mobilizing on our units and in our communities for safe patient care.
We all know the best thing to do when we're sick is to stay home and not spread the infection. But at both Olean General and Canton-Potsdam, management is pushing changes that will make us work when we're sick. That's bad for us and bad for our patients.
That's the message we took to the public in Canton-Potsdam last week, when we leafleted our neighbors to warn them about management's dangerous proposal. And we'll keep spreading the word in the weeks ahead. Join us!
The Red Hook community really pulled together to recover from Hurricane Sandy. But as Red Hook rebuilds, SUNY trustees want to close our nearest community hospital - LICH.
We will celebrate Red Hook's recovery this Friday morning, March 1, when we reopen our community supermarket Fairway. And while we're there, we will ask more of our neighbors to get involved in our fight to keep LICH open for care for Red Hook patients.
More details coming soon. To RSVP, e-mail email@example.com.
NYSNA and the Bed-Stuy chapter of New York Communities for Change are on the march to keep Interfaith Medical Center open for care: Join us this Sat., March 2, at 10:00AM, starting at Interfaith, 1545 Atlantic Ave. in Brooklyn.
Interfaith Medical Center, Bed-Stuy's full-service community hospital — is open for care! And we're going to make sure ALL our services — ER, ICU, Peds and more — stay open.
HHC's Coney Island Hospital is receiving ambulances for the first time since Hurricane Sandy — thanks to the tireless work of NYSNA nurses.
"On the night of the hurricane, the lights went out, and we had to work with flashlights. We had to transfer patients from the labor room to the post-partum unit, which has light," said Doreen Horton, RN, who helped evacuate patients safely from the hospital.
NYSNA nurses have been on the front lines of getting Coney Island and Bellevue Hospitals back open for care.
Get the latest updates from our union as they happen. "Like" NYSNA at facebook.com/nynurses, and follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/@nynurses.
The New York State Nurses Association is the voice for hundreds of thousands of frontline nurses. We are New York's largest union and professional association for registered nurses.


text:
Picture A Link to the Future
October 28, 2013"Shigeru. Shigeru. It's Marvin - your cousin, Marvin MIYAMOTO!You know that new videogame you're looking for? Well, listen to this!"
Video Blink to the Future
January 02, 2013When this baby hits 88 MPH, you're gonna see some wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff.
Video Doc Brown vs. Doctor Who Rap Battle
October 31, 2012They're gonna travel through rhyme and space.
Picture Kid's Push-Cart Modded Into DeLorean
October 29, 2012Where we're going, we don't need diapers.
Video Ohio State Marching Band's Space/Time-Travel Half-Time Show
October 23, 2012This performance is out of this world! Also, it's really impressive.
Video Hoverboard Lightsaber Portal Gun Fight
June 19, 2012Getting everything you ever wanted as a kid never hurt so good.


text:
Richard Trillo is author of The Rough Guide to West Africa, The Rough Guide to Kenya and co-author of The Rough Guide to The Gambia. He has been visiting the region regularly since his first trip in 1978. When not travelling around Africa, Richard is also Rough Guides' Communications Director in London.
Sign up for the Penguin newsletter here»


text:
Found November 20, 2012 on
Kukla's Korner:
Bill Daly
from the CP with TSN Files,
The NHL wants to see everything put in writing.
With negotiations on a new collective bargaining agreement seemingly at a stalemate, the league met with the NHL Players' Association on Monday night and requested that the union put all of its desires together into one complete offer.
"It's our position that we've made a couple comprehensive proposals in a row," said deputy commissioner Bill Daly. "We'd like to know where they are on all of the issues. We asked them to think about putting together a comprehensive proposal for us to consider. ...
"We've never heard a full proposal from them."
The union's response should dictate if the sides will formally start negotiating their way through the key issues.
A source close to the negotiations says there now seems to be a sense of urgency coming from the players and indications are the NHLPA is preparing a series of "give and take&quo...
Original Story:
Daly Frustrated With CBA Talks?!?!?!
More CBA Meeting Talk
Travis Yost: New Wrinkle to CBA Negotiations
Richard Cloutier: Tomorrow's CBA Negotiation Session: A Recap
NHL axes more games, All-Star events
NHL: Meetings to resume Wednesday
Representatives from the NHL and NHLPA are scheduled to meet again on Wednesday morning at the NHL league offices to continue negotiations.
Travis Yost: NHLPA Submits New Proposal
Labor talks to return Wednesday
NHL labor talks expected to resume Wednesday
Kevin Freiheit: What to expect from Wednesday's meeting
The War Of Words Continues
Video- Both Sides Talk After Monday's CBA Meeting
NHL, NHLPA Plan to Chat Again Monday After Declaring Need for Two-Week Break in Negotiations
NHL Forum Discussions
2 replies,
January 16, 2014
1 replies,
May 25, 2013
1 replies,
May 25, 2013
1 replies,
May 25, 2013
1 replies,
March 04, 2013
Latest Rumors | The Backyard | |||
Today's Best Stuff |
For BloggersJoin the Yardbarker Network for more promotion, traffic, and money. |
Company Info |
Help |
What is Yardbarker?Yardbarker is the largest network of sports blogs and pro athlete blogs on the web. This site is the hub of the Yardbarker Network, where our editors and algorithms curate the best sports content from our network and beyond. |


text:
Karaoke Revolution Presents: American Idol Encore (Xbox 360)
Manufacturer: Konami of America, Inc. Part number: 25071
$299.98 at 1 online store
- CNET Editor rating: Not yet rated
- Average user rating: 0 stars No reviews, write one!
- More product information:
- Editors' review
- User reviews
- Specifications
- Manufacturer info
- Description:
- Step into the spotlight and become an idol. Karaoke Revolution Presents: American Idol Encore delivers the most realistic recreation of the American Idol experience with an all-new next generation game engine and 40 smash hits from the 70's, 80's, 90's and today. Grab the microphones and challenge your friends to find out who will be the next ... Read more
Where to buy
store | customer rating | inventory | tax & shipping | price |
| In stock Get free shipping on orders over $35.00 | Enter zip code to get total price: Price +Tax +Shipping =Total price | as of 03/16/2014 |
*Total price for the Karaoke Revolution Presents: American Idol Encore are estimated and may vary slightly based on exact tax, shipping, manufacturer rebate or any sale/promotion on the merchant site.


text:
It appears that Syria just defecated all over 0's red line. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...a157e6-0a50-11e3-89fe-abb4a5067014_story.html Will he lead from in front or from behind?? My bet, he waits on UN to conduct exhaustive investigation which concludes that although chemical weapons were used the source of the weapon is not able to be confirmed. Not sure what he should do but Syria just spit in his (any be default US) face if the reports and the numbers dead are true.
He spent the first couple years of his presidency traveling the globe on his Apology Tour. He told anybody who would listen about all of the United States' wrongs. You really think any nation takes him seriously when it comes to foreign policy? Syria, Egypt, Russia, China and all the rest of the nations couldn't give a rat's rear what 0bama says or thinks. Hell, even Ecuador treats Barry with contempt.
our lack of involvement while these atrocities are occurring will not be forgotten. we are fertilizing the field for AQ to harvest
The *real* problem with the line in the sand is it essentially gave rebels (both backed by Al Qaeda and others) a blueprint to how to get U.S. assistance. Meanwhile the UN security council is there on Monday to investigate other accusations. I'd be interested in what that unearths.
It doesn't make any sense for the Syrian army to do this when the UN just got in. My money is on the terrorists taking advantage of an opportunity. This in no way warrants any US intervention.
There's a lot of consideration of this right now. Logically it would be suicidal to do that. It could easily be the rebels and/or al Qaeda goading us.
I don't want us to go into Syria at all, I don't want us to ever set foot in another country if we aren't prepared to, well, conquer and rule it, to actually earn the imperialist accusations hurled at us. As that is not the case, there is nothing to gain for us by involving ourselves in Syria. What I wish is that Obama wouldn't draw lines he won't defend. And I can't believe even the most Bush-hating of anti-war liberals would say their real complaint about Bush is that he should have made more empty promises about war.
I would think the US Navy could use some target practice with some cruise missiles approaching the "use by" date. Pick all of Assad's palaces, dachaus, castles etc and send him a little love tap.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2398691/Syria-Nerve-gas-attack-near-Damascus-kills-1-300-including-women-children.html prezBO and his line in the sand really worked didn't it
Well, it really is all too credible that the "rebels" -- the strongest and most plentiful of which are full out jihadist islamofundies -- did this to troll Obama, see if they can get him to do the absurd and help them. Assad is winning through conventional means, don't see him trying to provoke the US at that stage. The problem here is that both sides obviously think of the US as a paper tiger that only might, as a longshot, stand by its own rhetoric about chemical weapons, so it isn't unthinkable that either of them would flout our warnings.
if AQ had surface to surface missiles capable of carrying nerve agents and had the nerve agents to arm and effectively deploy the gas I doubt they would waste it on women and children of their own faith. if they do have that capability, Israel must be very concerned. Assad did this, or one of his commanders did, to send a clear and concise message that they were in charge of the country and the UN is a toothless tiger that will do nothing to help the rebels regardless of the actions of Assad. people need to realize that not all syrian rebels are AQ affiliated but more are becoming that way because AQ is the only one willing to help them defend themselves and their families.
Anyone who has been paying attention to this conflict knows that right now the Syrian Army has the upper hand. It makes absolutely no sense for them to basically beg for their defeat by doing something as stupid as this. On the flip side, the terrorists have every reason to do this so they can point the finger at Assad. It seems desperate, but how can you not get desperate when you've lost as much ground as the terrorists have in recent months? Israel has the most powerful military in the region and the high ground on the Golan Heights. They will be fine.
Stay the hell out of it. I hate seeing innocent being killed but this is the way they choose to treat each other and we are not going to stop it.
I wouldn't put it past AQ to gas Muslims then swoop in to save the day. As you mention: fertile recruiting grounds.
This could very well be true, but the Obama administration will not entertain any such notion. The last outfit in the world that wants to talk about false flag operations is the U.S. government. Suggesting that Assad didn't do it would be like suggesting that Oswald didn't do it. This kind of thinking could snowball and lead to awful things, like a real investigation of 9/11.
Obama made a speech in 2011 defending his decision to take action in Libya saying the US was "different" and for humanitarian reasons needed to get involved. Now I agree totally with not getting involved in Syria's issues....however...for humanitarian reasons, a wave of cruise missiles targeting Assad's residences, palaces, offices could send a message to cease attacks on civilians without endangering US soldiers lives. Just saying.


text:
LOS ANGELES (AP) — The artsy downloadable game ''Journey'' leads the pack of nominees for this year's Spike Video Game Awards.
The PlayStation 3 game received seven nods in such categories as best graphics, independent game, original score and game of the year.
Other game of the year nominees are ''Assassin's Creed III,'' ''Dishonored,'' ''Mass Effect 3'' and ''The Walking Dead: The Game.''
The nominees in the best shooter category are ''Borderlands 2,'' ''Call of Duty: Black Ops II,'' ''Halo 4'' and ''Max Payne 3.''
The 10th annual ceremony on Dec. 7 will be hosted by Samuel L. Jackson and broadcast live on Spike.
The show will feature debut footage from such upcoming games as ''The Last of Us'' and ''Gears of War: Judgment,'' as well as musical performances by Linkin Park and Tenacious D.


text:
Whoops! Something went wrong trying to count your new vote. Please try again.
256 Santa Monica Pier, Santa Monica, CA
Vote for a Chance to Win a Dream Spa & Beauty Package! Voting automatically enters you into the drawing. Click here for more info.
Counting your vote...
Hey now! We're using Facebook to authenticate your vote. Making sure you've got a pulse and aren't Spammy MacSpambot. After you log-in, you'll be good to go. Thanks for voting! Please sign in with Facebook to vote
Rusty's Surf Ranch
You voted for
20356 Pacific Coast Hwy, Malibu, CA
Moonshadows Blue Lounge
68 Pier Ave, Hermosa Beach, CA
205 Ocean Front Walk, Venice, CA
On the Waterfont Cafe
217 Broadway, Santa Monica, CA
Copa D'Oro
8 Pier Ave, Hermosa Beach, CA
Hennessey's Tavern
104 Santa Monica Blvd, Santa Monica, CA
Pourtal Wine Tasting Bar


text:
Most Requested ... Doing Business Traveling Public Amtrak Letting & Bidding Information Winter Road Conditions General Information Employment Opportunities State Links ... News Illinois Facts Living Health & Wellness Working Visiting Learning Business Public Safety Technology Government Help Home
Accountability Amtrak Bicycling Chief Procurement Office Circle Interchange County Engineers Diversity Matters! Events Environment High Speed Rail IDOT Safety Illiana Corridor Illinois Procurement Bulletin Inspector General IPASS Motorcycling Multi-State Locomotive Procurement Office of Business & Workforce Diversity Office of Quality Compliance & Review Planning and Programming Procurement Communications Public Partners Public Transportation Secretary of State Truckers
Subscribe to IDOT in Motion Email:
About IDOT in Motion
SCHAUMBURG - Major improvements get underway Tuesday morning, May 27th on the 13.4 mile stretch of I-57 that runs through Will County, the Illinois Department of Transportation announced today. Weather permitting, pavement patching begins at 9:00 am on the southern section of the project and is expected to last through early June. Traffic will be reduced to one lane in each direction for 6-1/2 miles starting near Monee and continuing south through Peotone. Once this work is completed, crews will shift to the northern section of the project beginning at the northern border of Will County and continuing south 6-1/2 miles to Monee. While patching is underway, one lane of traffic will remain open in each direction throughout the project. This first phase of construction is scheduled to be completed by the end of June. Motorists are advised to anticipate delays and plan accordingly. The $10 million project will upgrade expressway conditions through several stages of construction including: concrete pavement patching, road resurfacing, guard rail improvements and storm sewer improvements. It spans from the northern border of Will County through University Park, Monee, and Peotone to the Kankakee County Line. Work is scheduled to continue through mid-October. The contractor is "D" Construction of Coal City.


text:
Rams Fan Guide to the NFL Combine, Day 4: Defensive Backs
The last day of workouts will feature the backend of the defense. And while they won't break this group up in Indy, we will here at Ramsherd. There are some obvious team needs in the defensive backfield that will make this group a must-study.
Let's dive in.
no comments


text:
By client > Bangkok Hospital Group
Number | Title | Date |
1. | Bangkok Hospital ... Smarter Planet Leadership Series Case Study: Transforming the patient experience with smart practices that complement world-class hospitalityIt was Dr. Chatree Duangnet's passion for healthcare quality management that brought him to Bangkok Hospital as CEO. Today, he's striving to bring the patient experience to new heights in the global market for medical tourism. |
26 Aug 2011 |


text:
It was a big night for fashion in the Big Apple. Some of the most fashionable celebrities including Anna Paquin, Kim Kardashian, Leighton Meester, Blake Lively, Ed Westwick, Chace Crawford, Cary Mulligan, and Mary-Louise Parker were joined by designers Zac Posen, Diane Von Furstenberg, and Tory Burch stepped out for the 7th Annual CFDA/Vogue Fashion Fund Awards held at Skylight SOHO on Monday, November 15th, 2010 in New York City.
The CFDA/Vogue Fashion Fund helps emerging American designers pursue their design and business plans. In addition to grants of $200,000 to the winner and $50,000 each to the two runners-up, the award includes a yearlong mentorship with an industry professional whose business expertise is tailored to the designers' needs and future goals.
For more information on how to apply, check out their website here.
[nggallery id=2120]
Photo Cred: Wire Image


text:
promotional discount applied. Cart total will reflect savings.
Quantity discount will reflect in cart.
This product may only be purchased with the approval of a veterinarian and may require verification. We will collect any necessary information at checkout and verify a prescription if required.
Sometimes, manufacturers require that products be advertised only at their suggested prices. When we choose to sell these items for less, we display the sale price only in the cart. To see the price, click Add to Cart.
One-time delivery
Save time with Auto Ship (Details) Deliver Every: 2 Weeks 3 Weeks 4 Weeks 5 Weeks 6 Weeks 7 Weeks 8 Weeks 1 Month 2 Months 3 Months 6 Months
Cashel Boomers Combo Standing Wraps
Starting at: $44.99
Cashel DuraLite Splint Boots
Starting from: $26.99
Product Summary:
Professionals Choice Ballistic Overreach Boots
Starting at: $27.99
Professionals Choice VenTECH SMB Boots 4-PK
Starting at: $139.99
SyrVet Flex Bandage
Starting at: $1.59
Classic Equine Designer Overreach Boots
Starting at: $16.99
Cashel Stall Sore Boots
Now: $26.99
CORTA-FLX Flex-Force Solution with HA
Starting from: $57.59
Majesty's Flex HA Wafers
Now: $54.99
Tough-1 EasyWrap Quilted Combo Wraps
Starting from: $17.39
3M Vetrap Bandaging Tape
Starting at: $2.29
Basic Pillow Leg Wraps 2-Pack
Starting from: $9.99
AniMed AniFlex GL
Starting from: $49.99
Tough-1 Vented Sport Boots 4-Pack
Starting from: $76.99
Fly-Rid Plus Spray
Starting from: $6.29
Majesty's Flex Wafers
Starting at: $36.99
Mare Magic
Starting from: $56.99
Tough-1 Wild 600D Turnout Blanket 250g
Starting at: $74.99
TuffRider Lanyard Dressage Saddle Pad
Starting at: $17.99
Roma Ecole Flower Diamond Dressage Saddle Pad
Starting at: $29.99
Elastic Adhesive Value Pack
Starting from: $28.99
Jolly Mega Ball
Starting from: $41.99
Product Reviews by Customers
This item is not eligible for Canadian shipping.
Some items everyday price is so low we can't discount or we have marked down the item to a final sale price. These select items will not be included in your order total when determining if your order qualifies for a promotional event.


text:
1/2 oz Gold Oval .999+ Fine (Mint varies/No Assay)
We provide all our customers with a refund, return and/or exchange policy on everything we sell including all bullion and certified coins. If for any reason you have a problem, please feel free to call our offices. We will always do our best to accommodate you.
Gold | Bid: $1,349.10 | Ask: $1,351.10 |
Volume Pricing
Product Description
Only $29.99 per item over spot!
Various brand/names. Could be perfect, scruffy, or somewhere in between. No assay card. An inexpensive way to acquire .999+ fine pure gold!
Since we may have more than one of these item(s) in stock, you should use this stock photograph as an indicator of the quality of the item(s) you will receive. Be assured, you will receive the item(s) as described and depicted.
APMEX stands behind every coin it sells with a satisfaction guarantee.
Product Specifications
Product ID: | 68462 |
Year: | N/A |


text:
What I Got Wrong, 2013 Edition
December 30, 2013 § 4 Comments
As it's the end of the year, it's time to revisit my 12 months of screw-ups (last year's mea culpa is here). There don't seem to be as many big ones this year as last year, but that is not a function of my improving analysis and is rather a function of my increasingly neglectful blogging habits; last year I wrote 276 posts, this year only 65. Thankfully for all of you though, there's still plenty of material for you to use in heaping scorn upon my head. Here are some of the lowlights.
Israeli-Palestinian peace talks: On February 13, I wrote a post entitled "The Prospects For Real Peace Talks" in which I downplayed the idea that Israel would enter into substantive talks with the Palestinians. I didn't think the makeup of what I expected to be the new Israeli coalition government would allow for real negotiations to take place, and I wrote, "even if Tzipi Livni brings Hatnua into the government nobody should be getting their hopes up too high for a big diplomatic push on the horizon." We can debate whether the current talks are going to lead anywhere real, but certainly the process is taking place and there have been enough signs that the talks have been substantive and are going well that this call was wrong on my part.
Erdoğan's relative reasonableness: This seems destined to become a permanently recurring theme, as a similar prediction made this list last year too. Last year it was about Erdoğan realizing that his interests should override his harsh rhetoric on Israel, and this year it was about Erdoğan realizing that his interests should override his harsh stance toward the Gezi protestors. In trying to figure out how Gezi was going to resolve itself, I wrote on June 7, "Erdoğan does not want to back down, but my instincts tell me that as he is reminded of just how much his popularity depends on the economy and as he faces the prospect of losing the bid for the 2020 Turkish Olympics, he will try to come up with some sort of solution to end the chaos in the streets without having to go so far as to issue a formal full-blown apology. The fact that there is no opposition party poised to take advantage of the situation makes backing down slightly easier for him to do, and even Erdoğan understands just how crucial it is for his and his party's longterm political future to make sure the Turkish economy keeps humming along. Only the prospect of serious economic damage will get him to back down, since giving in to the protestors in any way is completely anathema to his general philosophy and outlook. How long it will take for him to get to this point is way beyond my prognostication skills, but I'd be surprised if he doesn't get there at one point or another."
Oops. Erdoğan did not ease up on his rhetoric in any measurable way, and he in fact actually became increasingly harsher and waited for the protests' momentum to peter out over time, which it did. Eleven days after my prediction, I was forced to write another post dealing with Erdoğan's even more over-the-top responses to Gezi, as the prospect of economic losses clearly had not moved him. It's worth remembering now as the corruption scandal is raging around him, since unlike last year, this time I really have learned my lesson. The only way Erdoğan is backing down this time, economic crisis be damned, is if his party forces him to do so by default in replacing him.
Bibi's position in Likud: I don't know why I am so insistent on this point, but every few months I seem to write a post predicting trouble on the horizon for Netanyahu within Likud to the point that he will be split the party or be ousted. While I am going to stubbornly insist that events will at some point vindicate my point of view, they haven't yet. On June 27 in a post called "The Likud Bell Is Tolling For Bibi" I ran through some of Netanyahu's recent troubles and then denigrated an op-ed my Mati Tuchfeld in which he predicted that Netanyahu could retake the party pretty much any time he wanted. I wrote, "I think this is a bad misreading of the situation that does not take into account just how much things have changed. Likud members used to venerate their prime minister, but at last year's Likud convention, Netanyahu was being disparaged left and right in a way that had never occurred before. In addition, much like the younger generation of Congressional Republicans here, folks like Danon have little desire to stand on tradition and do not venerate Netanyahu, and are not going to "fall at his feet" just because he wishes it….There is a new coterie of deputy ministers and up and coming backbenchers who not only do not like or trust Netanyahu, they don't feel as if they owe him anything. He did not mentor them and they got to where they are now via the Likud primary, which Netanyahu now wants to get rid of, and so they are not going to back him just because he asks. And unlike a year ago, they are no longer revolutionaries and they speak for a larger percentage of the party."
While my assessment of the dynamic was correct, my assessment of Netanyahu's grip on the party and power to influence outcomes was not. Earlier this month, three proposed Likud constitutional amendments whose aim was to weaken Netanyahu were withdrawn under pressure before they could even be brought up for a vote. It seems clear that the new deputy ministers do not like or trust Netanyahu a great deal, but it seems equally clear that Netanyahu is still very much in control of the party and is not going anywhere.
I'm sure there is more, and please feel free to point out any other things that I got egregiously or embarrassingly wrong this year. Here's hoping to a great 2014.
Optimism and Pessimism On The New Round Of Peace Talks
July 25, 2013 § 13 Comments
Now that reports are surfacing that negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians are scheduled to begin in Washington on Tuesday – although there are also conflicting reports that Saeb Erekat is going to stay home until the Israelis agree to use the 1967 lines as the basis for negotiations over the final border – it seems like a good time to lay out some reasons for optimism and reasons for pessimism about whether these talks are fated to go anywhere. Since I am generally pretty cynical about such things, let's start with the reasons why I think the talks may fail. One of the biggest obstacles is the domestic politics involved. Brent Sasley has written a thorough piece arguing that the politics right now on the Israeli side are actually favorable for meaningful negotiations and concessions, but I tend to see things differently. Prime Minister Netanyahu has not shown the willingness in the past to actually deal with the hard choices involved in coming to an agreement, and while that does not mean that he is incapable of doing so, nothing in his past indicates that he is an enthusiastic peace process negotiator. If he is being dragged to the negotiating table unwillingly through a combination of pressure and quid pro quo for past U.S. security assistance, it is not going to bode well for the final outcome. Even if he is doing it of his own volition, which is certainly in the realm of possibility, the fact that he seems unwilling to accede to measures such as relinquishing sovereignty over parts of Jerusalem – which is going to have to be in any deal that the Palestinians will accept – is a bad omen. Then there is the problem of Netanyahu's party. The current iteration of the Likud is the most right wing in its history, and a large bloc, if not an outright majority of the party, does not trust Netanyahu and is adamantly opposed to negotiations. In fact, an increasingly large subset of Likud members, led by Danny Danon, have been openly calling for Israel to annex the West Bank and ditch the two state solution in favor of the rightwing version of a one state solution. It is also the case that the more radical Likud members now control the party's policy apparatus and serve as deputy ministers in the government; in fact, it seems as if Netanyahu is refuting the latest nonsense from Deputy Defense Minister Danon every other week. Sasley argues that this cast of characters is aware that they cannot win without Netanyahu and will ultimately fall in line, but I am not nearly so certain. Plenty of Likud voters will vote for the party if, say, Bogie Ya'alon is the headliner, and I don't think that the Likud ministers and back benchers are going to sit idly by if Netanyahu begins to give up territory in the West Bank or order the evacuation of settlements. They have staked their political reputations almost entirely on rejectionism of the two state solution, and just because Netanyahu asks them nicely does not mean that they would not rather have a smaller but purer version of the Likud. See the experience that John Boehner has had with his own unruly caucus of House Republican newcomers as a parallel to how this would play out. Furthermore, Netanyahu is being kept afloat by his temporary merger with Yisrael Beiteinu, which he wants to turn into a permanent one. Without the extra YB votes, Likud immediately loses 10-12 seats in the Knesset. The problem is that Avigdor Lieberman is in many ways the original rightwing one stater, and there is simply no way in which he agrees to keep the two parties together once settlements are given up. Netanyahu knows this, which provides another incentive to make sure that talks break down along their usual pattern. The same problem exists with coalition partner Habayit Hayehudi, which has repeatedly threatened to leave the government over the issue of freezing settlements and whose head, Naftali Bennett, is also an advocate of annexation. Sasley argues that pulling out of the coalition will risk breaking the party apart, leaving Bennett politically homeless, and so he can't risk it. I think the much bigger risk to Bennett is the party folding or excommunicating him for selling out his core principles if he agrees to remain in a government that agrees to extricate itself from the West Bank. After all, the party's very name – Jewish Home in English – is meant to refer to the entirely of the Land of Israel from the river to the sea and explicitly lay claim to all of the territory as part of the Jewish state. The idea that the greater risk in this lies in leaving the government seems to gloss over the very reason the party exists, its history, and its makeup. There is also the issue of a referendum, which Netanyahu has now promised to hold to approve any peace agreement that is struck with the Palestinians. While the latest poll in Ha'aretz indicates that 55% of Israelis would approve a peace agreement, that is in a generic sense. Once the details are factored in and various political parties and lobbying groups begin to play on Israeli fears about security, sovereignty over Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, the Jewish character of the state, etc. it will be very easy to siphon off entire groups of voters through scare tactics and populist campaigns. That 55% number is a mirage, akin to the way in which Yair Lapid supports a two state solution but is adamantly opposed to any division of Jerusalem; lots of people support a peace deal in theory, but the devil is in the details. Bennett knows this, which is why Habayit Hayehudi has pushed to extend the Basic Law that requires a referendum to approve giving up land that Israel has annexed – East Jerusalem and the Golan – to include the West Bank as well. The hope on the right is that a referendum will doom any successful negotiations for good. Finally, there is the Palestinian side. There is no need to rehash here all of the various arguments over Mahmoud Abbas and whether he rejected Ehud Olmert's offer of 99% of the West Bank or whether he simply did not respond because Olmert was a lame duck and out of office before he even had a chance. My own opinion is that the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but I am not as convinced as others on the left that Abbas is a willing a peace negotiator. The insistence on preconditions to negotiating is a tactic designed to doom talks, and the fact that Abbas was not willing to jump on Netanyahu's partial 10 month building freeze a couple of years ago as the excuse he needed to reenter talks does not bolster the case of those who want to pin all of the blame on the Israeli side. Abbas may indeed want to talk, but I do not think it is fair to portray him as champing at the bit to get started. On the flip side, there are reasons to be optimistic. While, as I noted above, Netanyahu has not shown a propensity in the past to reach an agreement that the Palestinians can reasonably accept, he certainly appears to have arrived at the realization that Israel's international standing is becoming more precarious by the day. The EU guidelines on settlements last week seem to have been a wakeup call of sorts, and his now repeated public warnings that Israel is facing a real prospect of a binational state indicate that his attitude in 2013 is very different than it was during his tenure as prime minister in the mid-90s or during the beginning of his current stint in 2009. In addition, as Dahlia Scheindlin has pointed out, polls consistently and repeatedly show support for a two state solution, 83 out of 120 seats in the current Knesset are controlled by parties theoretically supporting two states, and the support for two states remains even when you add various line items about specific concessions into the polling questions. In this light, the referendum may turn out to be a very good thing, since it will reinforce the move toward a negotiated solution. It is also encouraging that Netanyahu is seeking political cover to do what needs to be done, since if he negotiates a deal that is then approved by the Israeli electorate, it will be difficult for the right to claim that he has overstepped his authority. Finally, there is the fact that the best way for negotiations to succeed is if the specific details are kept under wraps, and any concessions made by either side are not wielded by opponents of two states as populist cudgels designed to doom the talks. John Kerry has done a good job of this by not publicly outlining the conditions that each side have agreed to in order for talks to resume, but even more encouragingly so has Netanyahu. There is currently a purposeful cloud of ambiguity hovering over the question of whether Israel has frozen settlement construction or not, with Netanyahu denying such a freeze exists and Housing Minister Uri Ariel saying that the de facto and unannounced policy in place is not allowing for any new construction. This, more than anything, is the most hopeful sign of all, since if Netanyahu has actually frozen settlement construction while trying to trick his party and coalition into thinking that he has done no such thing, it is a more serious indication of his desire to really strike a deal than any other datapoint I have seen. P.S. To watch me talk about this more extensively, here is a link to a video of a roundtable hosted by David Halperin and the Israel Policy Forum that I did yesterday with Hussein Ibish and Dahlia Scheindlin. It's long, but an interesting and thorough discussion of the various issues involved.
The Likud Bell Is Tolling For Bibi
June 27, 2013 § 3 Comments
A little over a year ago, the Likud party was going through a tug of war between the old Likud princes – Dan Meridor, Benny Begin, and their ilk – and a younger and more hardline group consisting of people like Danny Danon, Moshe Feiglin, Ze'ev Elkin, Yariv Levin, Tzipi Hotovely, and Miri Regev. At the time, the latter group were upstarts who were farther down on the party list – or in the case of Feiglin, not even an MKs – while the Likud princes were cabinet ministers. It was clear that the genuine fervor within the party lay with the hardliners but they did not yet control things, and so the party was exhibiting all kinds of strains while still holding together. The hardline group did not trust or even like Bibi Netanyahu at all, but he was the prime minister and his allies were in the top ranks of the party and so there was little they could do about it.
The came the Likud convention in May 2012, where Netanyahu was booed and subjected to rampant criticism, and unable to even secure the ceremonial post of convention chairman, which was deeply embarrassing. Next was the Likud primary in November, in which Danon came in 6th – ensuring that he would end up not only high in the Likud but as a deputy minister in the next government – and Feiglin made it into the Knesset, and Netanyahu allies Meridor and Begin lost their MK status entirely. Completing the trifecta, Danon won the chairmanship of the Likud convention this week with 85% of the vote after Netanyahu didn't even try to challenge him for fear of being humiliated, and much more importantly is about to win the vote for chair of the Likud Central Committee, which is a powerful and consequential post. He has already stated his intentions to block Netanyahu's plans to make the unity deal with Yisrael Beiteinu permanent and to subject any peace agreement to a Likud vote, which will never approve any deal with the Palestinians. Overall, things are looking bleaker for Netanyahu within Likud than they ever have before. He is presiding over an unruly caucus where his deputy ministers repeatedly undermine him, his old allies are gone from the scene, his party members do not respect him, and he is busy making plans to resume negotiations with the Palestinians while his own party warns him that it will not acquiesce to a deal under any circumstances.
Mati Tuchfeld today argues that the picture is not actually quite so bleak and that Netanyahu can retake Likud if he desires. His argument boils down to this:
Likud members venerate their prime ministers. Since Israel was established, there have been only four Likud prime ministers. If Netanyahu decides to return to the field, it's safe to assume that everyone will again fall at his feet. If Netanyahu makes an effort, however small, to show that he wants another term as prime minister, the rebellious voices within Likud will likely die down at once. Unlike Livni, who fought tooth and nail to survive as Kadima leader and lost, or Barak, who was forced to leave Labor, all Netanyahu needs to do is make a decision — return to the field or retire. It's likely that he'll ultimately prefer the first option.
I think this is a bad misreading of the situation that does not take into account just how much things have changed. Likud members used to venerate their prime minister, but at last year's Likud convention, Netanyahu was being disparaged left and right in a way that had never occurred before. In addition, much like the younger generation of Congressional Republicans here, folks like Danon have little desire to stand on tradition and do not venerate Netanyahu, and are not going to "fall at his feet" just because he wishes it. In fact, from their perspective, the sooner he is gone the better. Netanyahu has not made any attempts to court them, as opposed to other senior Likud members like Bogie Ya'alon, and while there is evidence that he is just now waking up to the problem he has within the grassroots of his party, it's likely too little, too late. There is a new coterie of deputy ministers and up and coming backbenchers who not only do not like or trust Netanyahu, they don't feel as if they owe him anything. He did not mentor them and they got to where they are now via the Likud primary, which Netanyahu now wants to get rid of, and so they are not going to back him just because he asks. And unlike a year ago, they are no longer revolutionaries and they speak for a larger percentage of the party.
So what are Netanyahu's options? He appears to have three. First, he can finish him term as prime minister and retire. That is exceedingly unlikely, as by many accounts Netanyahu is more obsessed with being PM than he is with actually doing anything as PM, and even were that not the case, he has never given any indication that he is ready to be done. Second, he can start to fight a little to regain control of Likud and ultimately hope, as Shmuel Sandler argues in the last paragraph of this Jerusalem Post piece, that Likud members believe that they are incapable of winning an election without Netanyahu at the helm and so his position will always be safe. This is more plausible than the first option, but it's a gamble since Netanyahu is currently caving to the enormous pressure being placed on him on settlements and the peace process, and any real initiatives on that front are going to bring a serious Likud backlash and a threat from Habayit Hayehudi to exit the coalition (which is why I argued back in January that the current government was doomed to fail). If Netanyahu assumes that his position in Likud will be safe after resuming negotiations with the Palestinians, irrespective of the outcome, I think he is fated to be surprised the next time around when Ya'alon or Gideon Sa'ar emerges to try and take his place.
That leaves option three, which is pulling an Arik Sharon and breaking away from Likud to form a new party. Netanyahu is historically risk-averse and is not operating from a position of strength at the moment, and unlike Ben Gurion breaking Mapai to ultimately form Labor, he is not immensely popular, nor does he have a single coalescing issue like Sharon. He also has a number of people, like Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett, waiting in the wings to take him down. Nevertheless, Netanyahu is bleeding support within his own party every hour, and that is before he has even taken any real steps on the Israeli-Palestinian front. If he is actually serious about doing something and making sure that this is not his last term as prime minister, the only way around that is to form a new party. Formulating it around the idea of keeping all of the large blocs plus a multi-decade IDF presence in the Jordan Valley and selling it as a necessary security measure in the wake of Arab Spring upheaval in Egypt and Syria would attract enough support to make it a viable party, and would let Netanyahu shed the Likud thorns in his side. I wouldn't bet on him actually going ahead and doing it, but it would be the smart move at this juncture. If he doesn't, I am not nearly as sanguine as Tuchfeld on his future within his current political home.
What Comes After The Turkish Protests
June 5, 2013 § 15 Comments
Events in Turkey are still taking their course and so it is obviously premature to write any type of postscript, but I thought it might be useful to try and look ahead and game out some of the longer term consequences of the protests. First though, it is important to dispense with two quick points that I have seen floating around in various places. First, the Turkish government unquestionably displays some authoritarian tendencies and even more unquestionably has a distinct illiberal and majoritarian bent, and the excessive use of teargas on peaceful protestors is nothing short of shameful. Turkey is not, however, a fascist state and neither is it a dictatorship, and throwing those charges around in a vociferous manner won't make them any less inaccurate. Second, Prime Minister Erdoğan is not going to resign, no matter what some stunningly ignorant folks might speculate. The AKP was elected with 50% of the vote in the last election, which was more than double than the share received by the second place CHP, and Erdoğan does not have any serious challengers in the party who would even think about trying to depose him. When these protests die down, Erdoğan will still be the prime minister, albeit a weakened one and maybe – but not likely – a chastened one, and the AKP will still be Turkey's governing party. And furthermore, if I had to wager today, I'd bet with a large degree of confidence that the AKP will be Turkey's governing party after the next election as well.
So how does this thing end? As Claire Sadar noted among other points in an excellent post, the comparisons to the Arab Spring are particularly inapt for a few reasons. The first and most obvious one is that, as I pointed out above, Turkey has free and fair democratic elections by even the strictest standard, and Erdoğan is not an unelected autocrat. The thousands of protestors in the street are shouting for Erdoğan to resign because they are unhappy and it is a convenient slogan to use, but I highly doubt that many of them – and this is certainly the case with my own friends currently manning the barricades in Istanbul and Izmir – have any reasonable expectation that this will happen. Everyone knows that Erdoğan will leave government the same way by which he entered, which is through elections, and because this is his last term as prime minister anyway, the protests are not going to change the timeline of his departure.
Another way in which this differs from the Arab Spring protests in Egypt and Tunisia in particular is that the military is highly unlikely to get involved. The Turkish armed forces have been brought to heel, first by the democratic reforms that placed the military under true civilian control for the first time in Turkey's history, and then by the far less democratic witch hunt that jailed over 20% of Turkey's active and retired officers for alleged coup plots against the government. Civil-military relations in Turkey have been transformed in a way that cannot be overstated, and while I would never go so far as to say that a military coup is absolutely impossible given Turkey's history, the chances of one happening are infinitesimal.
Finally, the situation in Egypt was marked by scenes of non-uniformed government thugs attacking protestors, armed clashes between supporters of the government and opponents of the government, and a general violent breakdown along sectarian and ideological lines pitting civilians against other civilians. Despite the abhorrent police behavior – and reports indicate that police brutality seems to be slowing down as well – so far we have not seen bands of AKP supporters attacking protestors, and this is a good thing on many levels. When something along those lines occurs, it creates the likelihood of the situation spiraling out of control in unpredictable ways, and hopefully the fact that it has not happened yet means that Turkey is going to avoid large scale violent unrest.
What the situation in Turkey does remind me of in some ways is the J14 social protests in Israel in the summer of 2011, during which hundreds of thousands of Israelis were in the streets protesting over the high cost of living for everything from housing to cottage cheese. Many predicted that this was going to mean the downfall of the government and a radical sea change in Israeli politics, but what actually happened was that Prime Minister Netanyahu and the Likud government were reelected less than two years later. The primary reasons for this were that Netanyahu and Likud still remained popular with a large segment of the population, and perhaps more importantly there was no strong opposition party able to take advantage of the situation and unseat Netanyahu. Labor, which was the main party on the left, was fractured and disorganized, and Kadima's constituency was not one that had social justice concerns as its main priority as Kadima had never embraced such a platform in any way. Similarly, it's important to remember that the AKP has enormous support in Turkey, and this might diminish that support but it will not undo it. The economy is strong, many Turks have conservative values that the AKP embodies, and if you are not an educated urbanite or a persecuted minority (such as a Kurd or an Alevi), you are still relatively happy with the job the government is doing. Even more crucially, Turkey has no viable opposition at all. The CHP is little more than a joke, completely feckless and politically tone deaf and with no vision at all other than opposing anything the AKP does out of spite. There seems to be a constituency of Turks who crave a more liberal party that will be a bit more humble and protect the rights of all Turks while keeping in mind that differences of opinion do exist. There is no party currently in existence that can fill that role though, as the CHP is Turkish political equivalent of the Washington Generals and the BDP is too narrowly focused as a party representing Kurdish interests to attract true widespread support. The upshot of this is that when the next elections roll around, I expect the AKP to win again handily, albeit with a smaller total vote share than it received in 2011.
That does not mean that the path of Turkish politics will not be altered. The new presidential system that Erdoğan has been trying to push through is now, in my opinion, dead and buried. Nobody, and that includes people within the AKP, is going to be supporting a system in which Erdoğan gets to be a powerful president, particularly after he has complained that the American presidency is inadequate for his needs because the U.S. president has insufficient power due to having to deal with Congressional checks. This means that President Gül may continue as president without a hitch, but I think what this actually brings about is Gül as the next Turkish prime minister. Gül likely has no desire at all to serve as PM under a President Erdoğan who actually holds the real political power in Turkey, but serving as prime minister in the current system is an attractive proposition. In the last few days Gül has been distancing himself from Erdoğan, first disagreeing with Erdoğan's contention that elections confer upon the government the right to do anything it pleases, and then implying that he might not approve Erdoğan's new law restricting the sale of alcohol. These are moves designed to shore up his support within the party and to appeal to AKP members for whom Erdoğan's scorched earth approach is wearing thin.
The irony in all of this is that the likelihood of the party splitting apart is now lessened than it was even a week ago. When Erdoğan stood the chance of becoming the president in a new presidential system, which would have meant unseating Gül in 2014, it would have led to a clash between the two men and the distinct possibility that the AKP would divide into two camps. If the system remain as it is, however, Gül can become a prime minister who actually has real political power, and so despite what appears to be growing enmity between the two longtime friends and political partners, I think the AKP actually stands a better chance now of remaining united, even as it is will be weaker following the damage that Erdoğan has wrought over the past week.
Bibi's Coalition Gamble
February 20, 2013 § 6 Comments
It has been almost a month since the Israeli election, and yesterday finally brought us the first move to form a coalition as Tzipi Livni's Hatnua party agreed to join up with Bibi Netanyahu and Likud Beiteinu. I have been skeptical throughout the campaign and the election's aftermath that Livni would come to an agreement with Netanyahu given her efforts to convince Ehud Olmert and even Shimon Peres to run; her failed maneuvering at uniting Hatnua, Labor, and Yesh Atid into an anti-Bibi bloc; her constant railing against Netanyahu as a danger and a failed prime minister; the fact that Hatnua includes former Labor leaders Amir Peretz and Amram Mitzna, neither of whom are exactly Netanyahu cheerleaders; and finally, her refusal to join with Bibi after the last election when her party – which was then Kadima – had the most seats in the Knesset and she would have been able to work out a deal in which she served as co-prime minister. Nevertheless, Livni has now reversed course and has accepted the positions of Justice Minister and chief negotiator with the Palestinians, and she will be reporting to Netanyahu rather than the eventual Foreign Minister in this latter gig.
Many people are now speculating on what this means for the peace process and whether Livni's overseeing negotiations means that we can expect some real movement ahead. I don't think this changes anything and I wouldn't be taking any investment advice from people who think that Livni is going to pull Netanyahu along rather than the reverse, but the really interesting angle here is the political one. Bringing Livni into the coalition is not about Netanyahu signaling anything on the peace process, but about putting pressure on Naftali Bennett to join the government. The thinking on Netanyahu's part goes as follows: he now has 37 seats lined up and getting Kadima and its 2 seats is a given, and he is on the verge of adding Shas (his real goal all along) and its 11 seats, which means that he can then turn to Bennett and Habayit Hayehudi and use their 12 seats to get past the magic number of 61. Netanyahu is gambling that once he adds Kadima and Shas, he will present Bennett with an ultimatum of joining the government or calling new elections, and that Bennett will not be able to withstand the pressure ensuing from calls for him to join a rightwing coalition and so he will crack. Essentially, Netanyahu is betting on Bennett's alliance with Yair Lapid and Yesh Atid not being strong enough to buck the rightwing nationalist forces in HH who want to band together with Likud and the religious forces in HH who don't see why serving in a government with Shas is the end of the world. Hence the immediate rumors that negotiations with Shas are proceeding and that it too will join the coalition imminently.
This plan of Bibi's seems nicely formulated, but ultimately I don't think it will work. More importantly, if Bennett is smart he will make sure that it doesn't. The success of Bibi's strategy turns on the idea that Bennett will do anything to avoid going to another round of elections, but much as I thought (correctly, as it turned out) that Netanyahu miscalculated in allying with Yisrael Beiteinu, I think he is miscalculating here as well. Netanyahu's gamble is that new elections will cost Bennett seats and weaken his position, and that might have been true before yesterday, but bringing in Livni changes things in a big way. If I am a HH voter, I am not going to punish the party for not joining with its natural Likud partner by fleeing and and now voting for Likud since bringing Tzipi Livni on board to deal with peace process issues makes Likud untrustworthy. Looking at this map of election results and seeing where HH got votes makes this point abundantly clear; voters in Elon Moreh and Karnei Shomron are not now going to give up on Bennett and vote for Bibi given his most recent coalition choice.
In addition, many Likud voters are not going to be terribly happy now that Netanyahu has banded together with Livni, and I don't see how doing so possibly increases his share of votes at all in a hypothetical new round of elections. If anything, it drives even more people away and into the arms of Bennett, and if you need some further proof, just look at Moshe Feiglin's crack today that he hopes Likud will be in the coalition too. Furthermore, by trying to repeat history and bring Shas – his most pliable partners – into the coalition, Netanyahu is turning his back on the draft issue, which is one of the most popular issues in Israel today and which Lapid rode to his stunning success. Not only is Netanyahu potentially angering his base by bringing Livni in, he is angering many other voters who don't understand why he insists on bringing Shas into the government despite the massive popular will for reforming the draft. Given what has transpired, if new elections were held today, I think that Likud would drop even further while Habayit Hayehudi and Yesh Atid would pick up some new mandates.
Netanyahu is behaving as if bringing first Livni and then Shas into the government gives him all the leverage he needs over Bennett to break up the YA-HH alliance, but I think he has things wrong. If he brings in Shas, he will then be unable to form a government without Lapid or Bennett (I am operating on the assumption that Labor is not joining at this point), and so in reality Bennett will be the one with the leverage over Netanyahu. Reports are that Bennett is feeling heat from within his party over his footdragging to run to Likud and his head-scratching unbreakable bond with Lapid, but by brining Livni into the government, Netanyahu actually did Bennett a favor. He now has a good excuse to sit tight, and once Netanyahu strikes a deal with Shas, he benefits further from sticking to his guns on the draft issue and staying out. If I were Bennett and Netanyahu presented me with the ultimatum to join the coalition with Shas or go to new elections, I would be printing up new campaign posters before even getting off the phone.
Did Israelis Give The Center A Big Win?
January 24, 2013 § 9 Comments
Now that the final results of the Israeli election are in, everyone is rushing to declare that centrist parties were the big winners and that the Israeli electorate has made a surprising shift away from the right. This is understandable in light of the fact that Yair Lapid and his Yesh Atid party won 19 seats to become the second largest party in the Knesset and Bibi Netanyahu led the Likud-Beiteinu list to an extremely disappointing 31 seats, down from the 42 seats that Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu control in the current Knesset. Nevertheless, I think that this view of things is incorrect. As I argue in Foreign Affairs, this does not take into account that the other so-called centrist parties did poorly and finished well below expectations and that many Likud voters chose to move even farther to the right by giving Habayit Hayehudi 12 seats. In addition, Yesh Atid can be characterized as centrist in some ways but as pragmatically rightwing in others, and so dubbing yesterday's results as an unabashed win for the center is misleading. In fact, the center controls 28 seats in the current Knesset, but will control 27 seats in the next one (19 for Yesh Atid, 6 for Hatnua, 2 for Kadima), so in reality the center actually lost ground. No doubt Lapid scored a big victory, but one centrist party doing well does not mean that Israel is now avowedly centrist, particularly when other centrist parties turned in disappointing performances and the banner rightwing nationalist party more than doubled its current Knesset representation. Here is a teaser from my piece in FA:
The problem with this narrative, however, is that Tuesday's results were not really a victory for centrists and Yesh Atid is not really a centrist party. The largest vote-getter was still Likud-Beiteinu, made up of arguably the most right-wing version of Likud in the party's history and the nationalist and pro-settlement Yisrael Beiteinu. Bayit Yehudi also did well, and it will be the fourth largest party in the Knesset with 11 seats. On the left, Labor underperformed and could not even garner enough votes to win second place as expected. Livni's Hatnua, meanwhile, won fewer seats than even the parochial ultra-orthodox party, United Torah Judaism. Kadima, a real centrist party, has all but disappeared, plummeting from 28 seats to two. Even though the right-wing parties did not do quite as well as they had hoped, the larger picture does not support the claim that the center scored a great victory.
Furthermore, the grouping of Labor, Hatnua, and Yesh Atid under a centrist or center-left banner is analytically lazy. On economic issues, those three parties do indeed fall within the left and the center. On security and foreign policy issues, Labor and Hatnua are centrist as well. Yesh Atid, however, cannot be accurately described as centrist when it comes to the peace process. Lapid has stated that Jerusalem cannot be divided under any circumstances and insists that standing firm on this issue will force the Palestinians to recant their demand that East Jerusalem serve as the capital of a future Palestinian state. During the campaign, Lapid chose the West Bank settlement of Ariel as the place to give a major campaign speech calling for negotiations with the Palestinians, and declined to endorse a settlement freeze. None of this is enough to put him into the far-right camp, which rejects the two-state solution and calls for annexing the West Bank, but it also does not make him a centrist. In fact, Lapid's views on security issues are close to those that Netanyahu has publicly staked out.
To read the rest please click over to Foreign Affairs, and comments and emails are welcome as always.
Netanyahu's Conundrum
January 23, 2013 § Leave a comment
Yesterday morning before any of the election results were in, I had a piece up at the Atlantic arguing that the coalition stability that was a hallmark of the current government was destined to end. In my view, the choices that Bibi Netanyahu was likely to end up with were going to create pressures from one side or another no matter which path he decided to go down. Here is the relevant passage:
There are two factors that are going to contribute to detonating Netanyahu's coveted stability. The first is that unlike during the past three plus years, Netanyahu is going to have a significant presence on his right flank both within his party and outside, creating constant pressure to take a harder line on settlements and the peace process. The Likud primary in November created the most right-wing version of the party that has ever existed. For instance, among the returning Likud MKs in the new Knesset will be the inciters of May's anti-immigrant race riot, a mass of supporters for annexing the West Bank, and new MK Moshe Feiglin who wants to be the Mohamed Morsi of anti-Arab remarks. This group largely distrusts Netanyahu and will be waiting to pounce at even the slightest digression from their preferred policy of holding on to the West Bank forever.
In addition, Netanyahu will be dealing with the newly empowered nationalist Habayit Hayehudi (Jewish Home) Party, which is poised to become the third largest party in the Knesset. This party is led by Netanyahu's former chief of staff Naftali Bennett, who also advocates unilaterally annexing Area C of the West Bank and recently got into trouble for saying that he would refuse orders to evacuate settlements. ( He recanted after the predictable furor that arose.) Either as part of the coalition or as a constant thorn in Netanyahu's side, the large Habayit Hayehudi bloc will be pushing Netanyahu constantly to the right.
The second new factor, which operates at complete cross-purposes to the first, is that Netanyahu will be looking at a renewed push by outside actors on the peace process at a time in which international pressure on Israel is beginning to reach a critical mass. John Kerry is going to want to tackle the peace process as one of his priorities as Secretary of State, and Britain and France intend to present their own plan for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with the support of Germany and possibly the full European Union. Anger toward Israel over settlements and the breakdown of the peace process has lately intensified. Whether this is justified or not, given Palestinian foot-dragging, the anger exists to the point that even Israeli diplomats are beginning to get frustrated over the heat they are taking over West Bank construction.
Now that the results are in, I think this analysis still holds, and is perhaps even more salient to understanding what will happen next. Netanyahu is almost certainly going to have to build a coalition that includes Yesh Atid and Habayit Hayehudi, and this means foot-dragging on the peace process and a storm of international pressure. The option of trying to pivot to the center on security and peace process issues is a lot more difficult today than it was yesterday. Netanyahu had some serious problems within Likud before, since the newly empowered crop of hardliners did not really trust him to begin with, but now he has to deal with the fact that he has led his party to the hollowest of victories. His gambit of merging with Yisrael Beiteinu backfired badly, particularly since only 20 of the 31 Likud Beiteinu MKs hail from Likud because of the seat allocation deal he worked out with Avigdor Lieberman, and undoubtedly Likud members are not very happy this morning. If Yisrael Beiteinu separates from Likud in thirty days as the merger agreement allows, Likud will be the largest party by only one seat. In order to prevent this from happening, Netanyahu is going to have to promise Lieberman the moon and the stars, which also does not bode well for any new push to slow down settlement growth or fast track negotiations with the Palestinians. Any moves that Netanyahu makes in that direction will imperil his leadership as head of Likud and prompt a rebellion within the ranks. Nobody should underestimate just how much pressure Netanyahu is now under from his own side, let alone from the parties on the left of the spectrum that would like nothing more than to bring him down. Netanyahu is in a very difficult spot, and while I am relatively sure he will be able to form a coalition and serve as prime minister, don't expect it to last very long.
Welcome to Israeli Election Day
January 22, 2013 § 2 Comments
Finally, the day we've all been waiting for – Israelis go to the polls today to elect a new Knesset and a new government for the first time since 2009. Despite the fact that we don't have any results yet, I thought I'd set out a list of things we know and things we don't.
Things We Know:
–Bibi Netanyahu and Likud Beiteinu are going to win the most seats in the Knesset and Likud will be the largest party. This is an easy one given the polls, since even with the Likud Beiteinu list losing about a seat a week for months now, no other party is going to come close to the 32-36 seats LB is likely to take. The irony of course is that Netanyahu created the joint list in order to create an unbeatable force, yet Likud might have done better on its own as banding together with Avigdor Lieberman and Yisrael Beiteinu likely cost Netanyahu seats for a host of reasons (and from the Department of Shameless Self Promotion, remember who told you months ago that this was a very bad idea on Bibi's part). Despite the blunder, Labor is probably going to come in second with 15-18 seats, and Habayit Hayehudi and Yesh Atid are going to be battling for 3rd and 4th place. It is possible that the LB list will have twice as many seats as the next largest party despite its free fall in the polls, although this is a bit misleading since the two parties agreed to merge until only 30 days past the election, at which point they are free to revisit their agreement and separate. The most interesting little nugget about Likud being the largest party in the Knesset is that despite having served two terms as prime minister, this will be the first time that Netanyahu leads his party to a Knesset victory. When Netanyahu was elected in 1996, Israel was in the midst of its decade-long experiment of directly electing the prime minister, and so while Netanyahu beat Shimon Peres by 1% in the prime ministerial vote, Likud won 32 seats to Labor's 34. In 2009, Likud came in second to Kadima, but after Tzipi Livni was unable to form a government, Netanyahu swooped in and cobbled together a governing coalition despite controlling the second largest party in the Knesset rather than the largest. By the end of today, Netanyahu will finally be able to say that he led his party to an electoral victory.
Things We Don't Know
–Everything else. And I mean that. Aside from Likud Beiteinu winning the most mandates, I cannot say with 100% certainty what else will happen. I am 99% sure that Netanyahu is going to be the next prime minister, but there are enough weird things going on to give me that minuscule 1% pause. To begin with, there are an unusually high number of undecided voters, and while they might break Bibi's way, I don't think that Bibi's base is one that is marked by indecision, unless that indecision comprises whether to continue to vote for Netanyahu or to go with the trendier rightwing choice of Naftali Bennett and Habayit Hayehudi.
Furthermore, Netanyahu's margins are going to be very tight, and this means there is an outside chance that he pulls a Livni and can't pull off putting together a viable government. I am as confident as I can possibly be that HH is going to be in the coalition, but then the coalition math becomes very tricky. It involves bringing in a centrist party such as Yesh Atid, which will clash with HH and the more extremist Likud voices over peace process issues, or going with Shas and UTJ, who are toxic to HH over the draft and toxic to Yisrael Beiteinu over both the draft and the religious-secular divide. Then there is the possibility that Aryeh Deri's return to Shas means it is no longer so reliably rightwing and will give Netanyahu a harder time when it comes to coalition bargaining.
To throw another monkey wrench into this, there are the rumblings from all sorts of quarters that the electorate has shifted in the past few days and that the leftwing and centrist parties are going to do better than their polling indicates. If voter turnout is high, it means that left and center parties are going to do better than expected, in which case there is even a possibility that Netanyahu is denied the first chance to form a government. Last month I brought up the possibility of a unity government, which started to look ridiculous in the interim but now I am not so sure that I was off-base. Then there are the rumors that were flying around last night that Ehud Barak is going to be defense minister and Tzipi Livni foreign minister, which I find to be completely far-fetched given the rancor toward Barak exhibited by all sorts of newly influential Likud members and the fact that Netanyahu would never give Livni any real power as foreign minister while Livni would never accept the position to be a mere figurehead. All of this is to say that while Bibi is almost definitely going to remain as prime minister, the possibility of a black swan would not be entirely out of the blue. As for what type of coalition he will put together assuming he remains prime minister, your guess is as good as mine. If I have to predict something, it's that we will see a nationalist bent due to the inclusion of Habayit Hayehudi, that the haredi parties are going to be left out, and that Yesh Atid will be brought in. This will allow Bibi to keep his rightwingers happy on peace process and settlements, let Yesh Atid have its pet issue of reforming the draft, and not have to worry about the secular-religious divide issue bringing down the government. I can also see Labor being brought into this mix if Netanyahu wants to have the coalition be as big as possible or if the numbers are such that he needs another party but wants to avoid bringing in Shas. Whatever happens, the next few weeks promise to be an entertaining ride.