text:
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
Dec 1, 2012, 12:19 AM | #1 |
Are there any apps out there to open open certain apps in a new desktop?
Does anyone know of any apps that would allow me to auto open a particular group of user defined applications in a new "desktop" in spaces/mission control (or whetever they're calling it now)? For example, let's say I'm planning a photo shoot and am in the inspiration/planning phase....as such, I want to open 1) some of my fashion/art/etc blogs in a few windows in Chrome, 2) My lighting diagram app to draw out possible lighting diagrams, 3) Photoshop to build my moodboard and 4) a random idea generator for ideas and 5) any misc relative apps/etc. Is there any app that would allow me to one click auto open these in a new window? I know what a lot of you will likely think...how hard is it to just click and open them myself...but the problem is, I've been constantly fine tuning my workflow and constantly find better apps or things that would help my workflow but I keep forgetting about them when the time actually comes to use them so it would be EXTREMELY helpful to have them auto open as a reminder. Or if you have any other solutions out there feel free to throw them at me...any advice is appreciated. Thanks.
0 |
Dec 1, 2012, 01:29 PM | #2 |
Automator does exactly what you are after.
0 |
Dec 2, 2012, 12:48 AM | #3 |
0 |
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.


text:
Mrs. Jean Wilson, Sales Associate
Coldwell Banker Lakeside, Realtors
530 West Main Street Hendersonville, TN
Office: (615) 824-5920 , Mobile: (615) 972-4351 , Fax: (615) 824-8435
530 West Main Street Hendersonville, TN
Office: (615) 824-5920 , Mobile: (615) 972-4351 , Fax: (615) 824-8435
, Contact:
Email or Phone required for Assistant
* if you already have a photo or video, uploading a new file will replace your current selection.
Contact Mrs. Jean Wilson
Coldwell Banker Lakeside, Realtors
530 West Main Street, Hendersonville, TN 37075
Office Phone:
(615) 824-5920
Mobile Phone:
(615) 972-4351
(615) 824-5920
(615) 824-8435
About Mrs. Jean Wilson
- Originally from Yorkshire England.
- Married for 40 years to a wonderful man. Mother of 2 lovely daughters and 4 grandchildren.
- Share our home with 2 dogs and 3 cats. Have always loved animals.
- Awarded a Medal and Certificate for Bravery as a young teenager from the RSPCA in England.
- Award of Excellence, Million Dollar Producer, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005.
- ABR - Accredited Buyer Representative
- GRI - Graduate Realtors Institute
- Graduate Tennessee Real Estate Systems
- Have resided in Sumner and Robertson Counties, Tennessee over 25 years.
- Member National Association of Realtors.
- Member Tennessee Association of Realtors.
- Member Sumner Association of Realtors.
- Member WCR (Women's Council of Realtors).
- Specialize in Lake Properties, Residential Homes, Relocation for families on the move. Condominiums.
- Middle Tennessee Cities: Nashville, Hendersonville, Gallatin, White House, Goodlettsville, Hermitage, Mt. Juliet.
- Helping buyers and sellers in residential sales and marketing
- English
Specialty Markets
- Retirement
- New Homes
- First Time Buyers
- Relocation
- Farm & Ranch
Social Media
Social Pins
Social Feeds
Your profile is currently connected to Twitter
Please save to disconnect Twitter
Please select which Facebook page you administer that you would
like to connect ("Default" is the account you used to log in):
Your profile is currently connected to Facebook
Please save to disconnect Facebook
Your profile is currently connected to Google+
Please save to disconnect Google Plus

subset: commoncrawl


text:
02 November 2010
Posted in
GSG Committee -
The Health Sciences Campus Concerns Committee serves student interests on the Health Sciences Campus and acts in advisory capacity for GSG on all related matters. The responsibilities of this committee include, but are not limited to, planning events to benefit HSC student body, advocating on behalf of Health Sciences Campus constituents, and keeping the HSC student body informed of GSG activities.
Meetings are held the 1st and 3rd Tuesdays of every month in Seaver Cafeteria at 5:30PM. All graduate and professional students are welcome! Dinner is included.
This page was last updated on September 9, 2013 at 10:00 p.m.


text:
Bob and Paulette Heringer, Bismarck, announce the engagement of their daughter, Amanda Heringer, to Bradley Boutilier, son of Curtis and Diane Boutilier, Minot.
She is a 2005 graduate of Bismarck High School and a 2009 graduate of Minnesota State University Moorhead. She is currently completing her residency at Sanford Health, Bismarck, and will graduate from the University of Colorado, Boulder, in May with her doctorate degree in audiology.
He is a 2003 graduate of Minot High School and a 2008 graduate of Minot State University. He is currently employed at Butler Machinery, Bismarck and will graduate from the University of Mary, Bismarck, in May with his master's degree in business administration.
A wedding date has been set for Nov. 24 at Cathedral of the Holy Spirit, Bismarck, followed by a reception and dance at the Radisson Inn, Bismarck.


text: Here to Stay (i rise style) You may hate me with bliss Each and every day, You can wound my soul, But my smile you can't take away My thoughts are foreign Black flowers to your bouquet, Through mockery and hatefulness Thoughts strut confident to a new day Why must you want to see me beaten and broken down? Does your blood simmer when I smile amongst your many frowns? If hatred is your oil, and spite be your fuel Then may God clean the insides, of such a neglected jewel My flawed teeth will shine in suns A smile you can never take away, You can tell me rights and wrongs But my ideas are here to stay Love and peace: James


text:
B&Bs in Dresden, Germany
Guesthouse Mezcalero
Koenigsbruecker Strasse 64Our Guesthouse Mezcalero is centrally located in Dresden-Neustadt. We are only a few minutes away from the historical center, the Elbe River, and our location puts you right in the middle of Dresden's nightlife... In the Guesthouse Mezcalero you can experience Aztec-Mexican atmosphere up close - staying overnight in one of our individually styled rooms, having a drink at our Mexican bar or having a tasty breakfast... Centrally, yet still quiet, you will find us in the back house of 64...
More Details about Guesthouse Mezcalero- From:
- price per room per night
LaLeLu Hostel
Königsbrückerstrasse 70Our two mini-hostels LaLeLu I & II are located in the heart of Dresden in the bustling scene and pub district of the outer Neustadt, about 5 minutes away from each other. Up to the famous Dresden old town with Frauenkirche and Semper Opera House, it is only a 25 minute walk or 5 minute tram ride (stop in the immediate vicinity). The hostels are located in the back building so it will be quaranteed that you will have a quiet accommodation in the heart of night life. The rooms are very...
More Details about LaLeLu Hostel- From:
- price per room per night
Elbe's Hotel Dresden
Leipziger Str. 1Whether business or pleasure, relaxation or adventure, Dresden's Elbe is your address for a pleasant time. As our guest you enjoy all the amenities of a modern hotel: from comfortable rooms to the ever-attentive and considerate to your well-being service team. Dresden's Elbe Hotel is ideally located to control the important points of interest. At the same time you will find in our hotel the needed rest to recover from the experiences and hardships of the day. The advantages of our...
More Details about Elbe's Hotel Dresden- From:
- price per room per night
Hotel Altstadtperle
Gohliser Strasse 17The hotel offers rooms with soft lighting and warm interiors. They feature satellite TV, spacious bathroom with shower/tub & double wash basin and a desk. Fully equipped kitchen facilities are available on extra charge. A rich breakfast buffet (7.99 Eur p.p.) and regional dishes will give a perfect start to your day. Bünaustrasse tram stop is just 2 minutes' walk from the hotel. Dresden's famous Frauenkirche Church and Zwinger Palace can be reached by tram in 5 minutes....
More Details about Hotel Altstadtperle- From:
- price per room per night
Hofgarten 1824
Theresienstrasse 5About 1824, our building was erected on the old fortification of Alten-Dresden. It was originally intended to be a manor house with a small accompanying workshop. Since that time, the garden complex has been used by very various businesses. Between 2007 and 2009, this historical building underwent a complete reconstruction and conversion into a modern hotel. This work was done with a lot of passion and knowledge of historical structure. Surrounded by 19th century parks with old oaks, an...
More Details about Hofgarten 1824- From:
- price per room per night


text:
"I'm always fascinated [by] people that work that hard and go under those types of conditions to feed rich people! I realize that they love fishing and they love what they're doing. So be it."
See all shows on Jenny McCarthy 's Watchlist »
More Products
You might be also interested in the following websites:


text:
Library > Science & Technology > Physical Science
2001This site is dedicated to exploring the evolution of atomic theory and the growth of scientific knowledge of the atom. Our site starts with the Greeks, who were the first to theorize the existence of unbreakable bits of matter, which they called atoms. Lacking the proper equipment, the Greeks were unable to do anything but think about atoms. Ancient alchemists were the next to study the properties of the atom and chemistry, although they were more interested in the practical applications of chemistry. Their search for gold contributed much to the foundations of modern chemistry. The atom was rediscovered in the eighteenth century when the first modern chemists began to scientifically examine the nature of matter. Their experiments eventually brought about widespread acceptance of atoms, and paved the way for quantum physicists in the twentieth century. Today, scientists now know that the atom is made up of different particles, and these particles are composed of even smaller particles.
DavidNORTH HIGH, St. Louis, MO, United States
JamesNORTH HIGH, Maryland Heights, MO, United States
EricSANTA FE HIGH, Corder, MO, United States
Age Range
19 & under
Bonita HaymanNORTH HIGH, St. Louis, MO, United States
Science & Technology > Physical Science
All ages
English, German, French


text:
Yea Yea, the lack of VF is a deal breaker. Well, go and buy it. It's available, huh. For casual days where I want less bulk I am happy they made it removable.
Buy the way, did any of you that complaints about the viewfinder ever tried a high quality LCD like the one on e.g RX100 ? That LCD has way more brightness, contrast and most importantly, the dynamic range than e.g. that nice EVF on Nex6. Something gotta give, it's compact camera after all. If they've included high end LCD instead of what Fuji is doing (low end LCD and low end EVF so you can't even preview you pictures outdoors), I am going to be more than happy with it.
If it turns out this camera has a good sensor and the lens, and AF/shutter speed and accuracy which matches Oly and Lumix, the lack of VF will be unimportant.
Rather uncharacteristically, Canon has given us very little access to its PowerShot G1 X II or information about it, but they did give us a chance to handle a prototype model back at CES. The camera itself won't be available until April, but we got the chance to get our hands on one at the CP+ 2014 show in Yokohama. We'll bring you hands-on photos from the show if they are. However, it's still possible to deduce some information about the camera, based on that experience and the information that has been made available.
New form-factor - No built-in viewfinder
Unlike its predecessor, the G1 X Mark II doesn't follow the styling of the regular G-Series of camera. Instead it more closely resembles the company's EOS-M mirrorless camera, with some of the G-Series' direct controls grafted onto it. The lens looks a lot like the original G1 X's but now features twin control dials - one of which spins smoothly for controlling features such as manual focus, the other of which features click-stops, for controlling settings such as aperture.
This re-crafting of the body means there's no longer room for a viewfinder - instead those who want one can pay extra for an optional electronic unit. There will be some who'll resent having to pay extra to buy an additional viewfinder, having already spent $799 on a compact camera. But, given how indifferent the tunnel-type finder was on the equally expensive G1 X, it's a move that may actually be welcome to anyone who wanted a smaller camera, or who prefers using the rear screen.
The G1 X II will be sold in Europe with an accessory grip included; US models will not bundle the grip, instead it will be offered as an optional accessory.
The camera market has progressed tremendously in the two years since the original G1 X was launched, with the arrival of Sony's RX100 and ever-smaller mirrorless models, leaving potential buyers with considerably higher expectations of how small and how capable cameras can be. For the G1 X Mark II to succeed, it had to be smaller and faster than its predecessor. It's certainly achieved the former, and has added NFC-mediated Wi-Fi to broaden its capabilities and appeal. Canon's rather likeable touchscreen interface is a nice addition, too.
Multi aspect-ratio sensor
Canon says the G1 X Mark II is based around a new sensor, though it's always hard to tell exactly how much has actually been re-engineered. Although Canon's marketing material talks about the Mark II having a 18.7 x 12.5mm sensor, we're pretty confident that it's actually the same size as the G1 X's (nearer 18.7 x 14mm).
Sensor sizes:
Camera Name | Sensor format | Crop Factor | Sensor dimensions (mm) | Sensor area (mm2) |
Nikon D5300 | APS-C | 1.53 | 23.5 x 15.6 | 367 |
Canon Rebel T5i | APS-C (Canon) | 1.62 | 22.2 x 14.8 | 329 |
Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II | 1.5"-type (4:3 crop) | 1.92 | 17.9 x 13.4 | 240 |
Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II | 1.5"-type (3:2 crop) | 1.92 | 18.7 x 12.5 | 234 |
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Four Thirds | 2.00 | 17.3 x 13.0 | 225 |
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | 1"-type | 2.72 | 13.2 X 8.8 | 116 |
What's changed is the way that area is used. In a manner that will be familiar to users of Panasonic's GH1, GH2, LX3 and LX5, the G1 X Mark II never uses its entire sensor, instead taking different crops from it.
So, while the camera's sensor is the same size as its predecessor's, all the aspect ratio modes offer a 1.92x crop factor, rather than the G1 X's 1.85. This is how the camera is able to switch between 3:2 mode and 4:3, while still offering the same diagonal angle of view, and also how it's able to offer a slightly stretched 24-120mm equivalent range from a 12.5-62.5mm lens (rather than 28-112mm from a 15.1-60.4mm unit).
Improved lens specifications
As well as offering a slightly broader zoom range, the Mark II is also able to boast a considerably faster aperture range. F2.0-3.9 not only means it's at least 1EV faster throughout its zoom range, it's also considerably rangier and brighter than the standard 18-55mm lens you'd usually find on the Rebel we compared it to earlier.
The brighter lens also gives the G1 X II a considerable advantage over the current zoom compact crown holder - Sony's RX100 II. Taking sensor sizes into account, the Canon should receive around 0.7EV more light at the wide end of its lens, and 1.7Ev at the long end. Its 24-120mm range is also usefully more flexible than the RX100's 28-100 reach.
We're also promised that the focus speed of the Mark II has been improved over that of the original camera, and that it now offers a 5cm Macro mode for closer focusing. If both these promises are lived up to, then it goes a long way to addressing our biggest concerns about the G1 X.
The other point to address is the value proposition (or 'price' in common parlance). Just like its predecessor, there are two ways of looking at the G1 X II: as a large and wildly expensive compact camera, or as a cut-price 'Rebel' with a faster, more capable lens built in to a much more compact body. Which you think is true will depend on your perspective, but if placed alongside cameras such as the Ricoh GR, the Fujifilm X100S or the Nikon Coolpix A, the price suddenly doesn't seem so outrageous.
We look forward to getting to have a proper play with the PowerShot G1 X Mark II, and will report back as soon as we have.
12 I own it 203 I want it 15 I had it Discuss in the forums |
Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II Digital Camera | $799.00 |
Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II Digital Camera | $799.00 |
Canon PowerShot G1 X 14.3 MP CMOS Digital Camera | Too low to display |
This has very nice specs!
I like the sensor larger than MFT, and the f2.0 zoom!
Thank you Canon, for bringing this out.
But given the price, and significant lens protrusion, I asked myself if it's possible to put together a similar sized (or smaller) package with a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera?
Here's what I came up with:
Samsung NX300 + 16-50mm f3.5 OIS pancake
Sony NEX + 16-50mm f3.5 OSS pancake
MFT + Panasonic 12-32 f3.5 / Olympus 14-42 f3.5 pancake
But they're all f3.5 (although you have the freedom to spend extra for a brighter prime) and none of these packages would cost any less.
Here is it's size compared with other ILC mirrorless cameras:
Size is about the same.
Disadvantage: cannot change lenses
Advantage: best zoom lens out there, as bright as a prime
I have the G1X. I was unhappy with some of the limitations made by canon, like autoiso max 1600 and switching between focus only in auto modus +no raw in every mode. CHDK solved all those problems for me. I have even the feeling, that using a script for shooting makes the camera shooting faster (more fps)I will run some tests next weekend. To me G1X mark II looks more or less like Lumix LX7 compared to LX5(which i had) - some improvements but not enough to sell the g1x if you can use it. Brighter lens is nice but there is another crop factor. I dont know what will be the IQ. I dont belive Canon to make a perfect Camer - I simply dont belive it. G1x has a IQ of entry DSLR at least but is "slow".Fixing it + brighter lens + wide angle would be too nice to be true.Just look at the other models, they all miss something, the one has the speed, the other one IQ. Im reallly waiting for a non commercial review. Lets see if Im a visionary :)
I've had many compacts, and of course, experienced dismal image quality, from too small a sensor, not good enough a lens, or both.
It's nice to see Canon issue a correction of the G1X.
A rudimentary optical-tunnel viewfinder came in handy in strong sunlight on the p7000 I once had, but I used the LCD most of the time.
I know lots of people will b!tch about the absence of a VF (because it is a tradition here), but although I have a VF on the cameras I now own, I don't use it often. I've come used to composing on the LCD, and find it gives me more freedom of movement and flexibility when doing composition than if I had an eye shut with the other stuck on the VF.
Sure I'd rather it have a VF... but not if it were to cost more than it's already relatively high price for an entry-level to mid-level camera.
Let's just hope that the LCD is really really really good!
There seems to be many 50+ guys on this forum who had never seen a decent LCD. Top quality LCD is a way better option than a crappy viewfinder.
The failure with this one is that they insisted on a large sensor by sacrificing many things. First of all, adding a high end EVF or OVF like the one in X100 and using a bit smaller sensor would result in a more capable camera - I would buy it right away. But to repeat again: I don't give a damn about cheap OVFs.
Second, this lens seems a bit small - I am afraid it will be similar to that crap in RX100. Again, smaller sensor would allow to use a higher quality lens (note: I am happy with the apertures offered _ I am actually waiting for ages for an m43 with bright and fixed high quality zoom - hopefully Fuji X30 will be the one).
So you think then that Sony RX-10 with an smaller 1-inch sensor and quite a good lens (in my opinion) is a best buy than G1X Mk2??
And if you're waiting for Fuji X30, which has quite a smaller sensor than G1X Mk2 and RX-10... What's your opinion about Olympus Stylus 1?
"So you think then that Sony RX-10 with an smaller 1-inch sensor and quite a good lens (in my opinion) is a best buy than G1X Mk2??"
Currently absolutely nothing is known of the actual lens IQ of the G1X MK2. That is, IMHO, it's far too early to decide between the two cameras.
If (and a BIG emphasis on "if") the G1X Mk2 lens delivers as good IQ as its predecessor, it'll be at least comparable to the Sony.
And, of course, we don't know anything of the sensor quality either. It may be significantly worse than taht of the Sony - or may not.
I'd rather have the larger sensor any day. To me, That is the point of this camera.
I'm 50.
I'm fine with composing on an LCD - I prefer it.
But the rest of the stuff you write is a crock of dung!
When you've tried a larger sensor, you won't be wishing for a small one anymore. Gone is the grainyness and lost detail. You need both a good lens and a larger sensor for good IQ. You can't expect miracles from a lens with such a zoom range, miniaturized or not. It'll not compare well to a good prime or high-end zoom, so don't kid yourself.
Who ever mentioned small sensor? I said slightly smaller sensor not to compromise the lens. 1.5" is likely going to compromise the lens. Don't know if you are aware what's the topic of this conversation ? A compact camera. OK?
You CAN'T have everything you want and keep it a compact camera. That's why I mentioned better balancing of included components. What's so hard to understand ?
Nevermind, the problem is that the buyer is always right. That's why nobody is able to offer anything decent these days as Sony RX100 MK2 is something to compete with - a camera with the lens that even remotely doesn't match the sensor. If you guys would only know who much you are losing for not having that lens 0.5" thicker...
And about the RX10 - don't see what that has to do with G1X MK2.
This is about making a good compact. I personally don't need RX10 - plenty of DSLRs out there.
Anyway, the good thing about G1X MK2 is that finally we have something that promises to be a good compact. I had plenty of mirror-less cameras and those lenses are simply not working for me - I never go past 100mm (I believe most people don't - after all, most are just using the kit lens...), kit lenses are bulky and are f3.5. I use primes just because there are no decent small zoom lenses. Something to replace those crappy zoom lenses and give the quality of a mid range prime, all fixed so it's collapsible, would be appealing for vast majority of mirrorless buyers. Given the dynamic range and the iso capabilities of that sony 1" sensor, all you need is a good lens attached to it. And better sensors are coming out... Hoping that Nikon P8000 or Fuji X30 will nail with e.g 1" sensor and a high quality lens.
Canon has had three goes at improving on the amazing G12. (G1x,G15,G16) Each has sacrificed something (macro, flip screen, zoom range, or battery life) to give us something. Now, when it looks like they may have addressed most of these issues, they lose the viewfinder (Optical tunnel, yes, but it was definitely "live view"). Deal breaker.
I love the G1 X so it's great to read about the improvements to the slight flaws in the focus speed and accuracy, and macro mode. However, the first thing I look for in a camera is a proper vari-angle screen as I tend to take photos in tight spaces and at awkward angles - the replacement style on the Mark II is nowhere near as useful in my experience.
The lack of an optical viewfinder is disappointing but I could live with that. If Canon had kept the same style of screen it'd be a definite buy, but now I'm going to be looking at competitors - and as I love the G1 X I don't want to do that!
Agreed. This on is yet another Canon-dud-cam, most unfortunately indeed.
well after I have been fouled by promissing advertisement for the GX1, which after 7 month of desperate try to work with it to my satisfaction as a Pro Photographer, I sold it for €300,00 less at Christmass to somebody who seemed to need a gift in the last moment. Meanwhile the price for the new camera had dropped to €200 less (in 8 month after after the introduction!).
I totaly trust in my D5 MkII and D5 MkIII.
But i do not trust any compact models of Canon until they make a real effort to deliver outstanding RAW quality on it and a simple but effective manual handling.
Aperture /Time /Focus those thinks I handle manually fast then any program selecting cane be done.
I am now on the Fuju XE1. To big to be put in the pocket but decent, fast manual handling and very good picture quality until 3200. Thats all I need.
face detection, smile detection, night view, touchscreen…..we have eyes don't we ?!
thats what I need on a camera:
see, focus, and shot !
enjoy life !
Larry Williams
Off the subject, if I may, but what is Panasonic doing, with no news whatsoever about any update to their excellent LX7?
I can only hope they come up with a direct contender to the large-sensor enthusiast compacts. I'd certainly welcome a more video-friendly camera, preferably with even GPS.
I would like it to have a focal points shown in a view-finder or screen when a shutter button is half-pressed…Aditional electronic VF is very good idea,lens is better too….
Bugga! No viewfinder; no buy!
At a time when most better 'smaller' cameras have an electrical V/F I feel Mr Canon has let the team down. IMO, they had it so right up to the G11/12 (I have one) but then they lost the plot a bit.
And sierranvin>12 MP will go a lot larger than 8 x 10". I have printed 20 x 30" aerial photos (work photography) from a Nikon d200 and from memory that was 12 MP. I have a 40" canvas from my Lumix fz200!!. OK, I wouldn't offer that size for sale but most would not notice what you and I might notice.
Thanks for the big 12 megapixels, Canon. Gee, I think that will allow me to make 8 x 10's. "Swell" (I believe that's proper early 20th century slang, which is where I rank most of Canon's "pea-shooter" offerings!)
A print resolution of 300dpi corresponds to magazine quality. Therefore, 12 megapixels is up to 16x24".
Looking to upgrade from RX100, had my eyes on an RX10 but the new Canon semi-compact camera might bring me back to Canon as an RX10 is big, heavy, and expensive.
Concerned that the lack of the ability to control DR in a single exposure mode like Fuji and Sony cameras do- I am hooked on this feature but see no reference to this ability in current and future Canon cameras- Can someone enlighten me?
Love the idea of an EVF that you can shoot looking down into it.
Willing to see an exhaustive comparison between this camera and Sony RX-10... now I have a G1X Mk1 and both of them solve everything I don't like of it: slow AF, no ring dial around the lense (makes very uncomfortable to shot in manual gocus), poor macro and no tactile LCD...
Regarding the lack of viewfinder, this is something that doesn't worry me too much (even being a nice to have, don't get me wrong).
My main doubt now is if I should go for the constant f2.8 lens from the Sony (even if this means a heavy gear and a smaller sensor) or to go for the G1X Mk2, which is faster on the wide end but slower at the other end. Heavy gear normally means better handling, and as none of them are pocketable, I want to make the decision only based on IQ and polivalence.
That would be cool to see. I understand the comparison. But I think the G1X will have better quality within its range. I think both cameras will require DOF management to nice Bokeh, but I actually find the Sony Bokeh to be not pleasing. I think if you really need reach and waterproof go sony, but if you want Low light wide and most of your shots will fit in 120 then canon. I think size does matter here. The Canon will fit in a jacket pocket or a wifes purse, where the Sony is going to be large and imposing and will be more likely to sit when its not convenient.
Considering the figures Misolo just wrote on the previous entry of this thread, max aperture from RX-10 seems to be better from 28mm on, which is almost all focal lengths (except 24mm). QUESTION: do these figures need to be corrected/modified in order to compare both cameras due to the different size of the sensors (effective apperture, equivalent apperture in 35mm, or whatever... I'm just a begginer in some way)? If yes, then I am doing a wrong comparison here...
From lenstip via "luckypenguin" at the photography-on-the.net forums:
.............G1X.......G1X Mark II
24mm....( - ).......(f/2)
100mm..(f/5.6)...( f/3.9)
120mm..( - ).......(f/3.9)
rccasgar: The G1XII is 1.9x crop and the RX10 is 2.7 crop, so that's a full stop difference. To make it comparable to the G1XII numbers, you have to think of the RX10 as f/4.
Thanks a lot Misolo.
Seems that G1X Mk2 is taking advantage then... will start thinking of selling my G1X Mk1 :)
"Seems that G1X Mk2 is taking advantage then... will start thinking of selling my G1X Mk1 :)"
Just don't forget that this advantage _may_ be offset by Sony's having a superior sensor easily producing better DR and less noise than that of Canon.
Menneisyys: I don't think that's true for the latest generation sensors -- Sony, Canon, Panasonic, are all really close as far as SNR and DR are concerned over the entire ISO range (after adjusting ISO relative to sensor area to make things comparable); the only remaining advantage that Sony has over Canon is base-ISO DR. Panasonic has caught up with this with their latest generation (GX7, GM1), let's see if Canon now has as well.
In any case, while base-ISO DR has a huge impact on how DXOMark computes their summary scores, in practice there's few people for whom this matters much. In indoors situations you're not at base ISO, so SNR and DR is about the same between all current sensors (after scaling for sensor area). If you're at base ISO for landscapes and have a high-dynamic-range scene, you'll probably be doing exposure bracketing and HDR anyway.
Adding: Of course, what really is impressive about the current Sony sensors is that they manage the same performance as the others but with higher pixel counts. Whether that matters to you depends on whether the additional resolution is useful to you (i.e., do you not mind the bigger files and are you printing larger than A3 or in the habit of cropping heavily rather than zooming in).
Canon just started a sensor size of its own and I'm very glad to see this. Investing in sensors in the 1-in and 4/3 size range is just the way to go when it comes to anything but a phone camera. Canon hit it right on. The only thing in didn't like about this camera is its design. Not that it's bad designed or ugly, but I don't like the top plate having the same looks of Olympus mirroless, and the lens to body looks a bit of a Frankestein operation. I wonder if the very same camera were designed by Panasonic. Well, congratulations to Canon. This is a very nice launch and a favorite of mine already.
Max apertures dug from official Canon samples Exifs:
24mm => f/2 (we allready know)
31.1/33.7mm => f/3.2
39.4mm => f/3.6
From the EU samples there is a 27mm (51mm equiv) shot at f3.5, so we know it doesn't drop to f3.6 by 40mm equiv.
Thanks, very useful info. Seems that it's roughly equivalent (in 135-format terms) to 24/4.0, 28/5.6, and around f/7 for everything else. Slightly disappointing, would have liked to see f/2.8 at 17mm or even 25mm (equivalent 35/5.6 and 50/5.6), but still incredibly impressive for the size of the camera.
From lenstip via "luckypenguin" at the photography-on-the.net forums:
.............G1X.......G1X Mark II
24mm....( - ).......(f/2)
100mm..(f/5.6)...( f/3.9)
120mm..( - ).......(f/3.9)
Wow. Waiting on dimensions. This seems better than the RX100, potentially, and the second decent all-around compact camera series.
I'm very happy that Canon announced this camera - I wanted something like the G1X without its shortcomings - waited a long time and because of the rumors that there will be no G2X I decided ~yesterday~ (really - no joke) to buy a second hand G1X. Now I'm again back to waiting mode ...
This is my whish list :
** Must **
- Mirrorless
- Fixed lens with bright aperture
- Zoom between 25mm and 85mm
- BIG sensor (bigger than 4/3)
- Fast AF with Focus Peaking
- RAW mode
- Exposure bracketing
- Full customizable controls including lens dial
- Tilt screen
** Nice to have but not must **
- Full closing swivel screen
- Built in ND filter
- More than one custom mode
- More than 3 exposure brackets
- Zoom above 85mm
- Weather sealing
- Long battery life
- Automatic lens cap
** Really not needed **
- Zoom lower than 25mm and higher than 120mm
- Wifi
- Touchscreen
- Viewfinder
- Flash
- Movie mode
- Macro mode
- Thousands of ISOs
I must say my preferences are mostly identical, but I myself need the *Macro mode* in the ** Must ** category! :-))
BTW, Engadget's preview ( http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/13/canon-powershot-g1-x-mark-ii-hands-on/ ) also confirms the AF speed is very good:
"This G1 X refresh was comfortable to use and very responsive, from the speedy zoom toggle to the super-fast focusing. "
Nevertheless, as usual with Engadget's camera-specific articles (see for example their absolutely we-have-no-clue-what-we-are-writing-about articles on Nokia's imaging headships like the 808), the article is definitely written by someone not really into photography. He recommends the RX100 over the camera without even knowing how the IQ of the two cameras compare... lolz.
Seems nice. I have a G10 that I really like. But, it is growing old. Slow, bad AF and nots o good images in bad light.
Looks very promising! Finally, someone comes out with a 24mm at the wide end - 35mm equivalent- large sensor compact! Looking very much forward to upgrading my G12!
you seem to forget the Sony RX 10. Also 24 mm at the wide end
"you seem to forget the Sony RX 10. Also 24 mm at the wide end"
Apples to oranges. The RX10 is much larger, heavier and 50% more expensive.
agree with Menneisyys and tkbslc but we have to compare to know they are very different even it may take less than 1 second in your minds.
The m4/3s manufacturers have come up with some nifty stuff over the past few years. I can see Canon turning their attention towards some of the more desirable niches m4/3s has carved, which doesn't bode well for Oly and Panny.
After about 20y with Canon I went 100% MFT since Oct 2012. Not perfect, but it does the job pretty well. However some MFT lenses can be pretty expensive also! Like the Olympus 12mm/f2.0(=24mm). For that price alone I can buy this Canon G1XmkII and have 24mm/f2.0. And get the rest of the package for 'free'. That prime lens might be a bit better. But I still have Canon flashes etc. 24-120mm is a great walk around reach. Might ended up buying this camera.
Looks likes a very good product especially for people using m4/3 or apc cameras with just the kit lens( which many do)
Price I think is very competitive.
Any zoom lens on m4/3 or apc cameras with f2-4 would be expensive and large.
It might be a great camera, I don't know, but it sure SOUNDS like a fake m4/3s. Anything to restart the war between Canon and Oly users, I guess.
What constitutes a "fake" m4/3s? I'm sure this will run circles around the clunky crud produced by Oly and Panny.
M DeNiro - oh really? The only clunky crud I've seen is the Canon EOS M and the Canon G1X Mark I. Olympus and Panasonic innovate, all others copy. You can take your tasteless comment somewhere else.
All others copy? Panasonic and Olympus are barely relevant and have only recently come back into the fray. They make some good cameras, but nobody is copying off of them. And the G1 X and Mark II have nothing to do with M4/3: fixed lens, larger sensor, and Canon has never made a M4/3 body because it already has a line of lenses that M4/3 will never catch up to.
Anyway, dumb comment, Glen.
A war between camera brands. NO THANK YOU...
But I agree as a MFT user(for a living) that this is an attractive camera(used Canon for 20y). It is in the same territory as what MFT users might looking for and vice versa. Hope the EOS-MmkII will have this same kind of design + the IC lenses.
When it's tested, would DPreview include a serious appraisal of the flash sync capabilities of this cam, please.
With longer reach & a better max aperture, a high sync speed would be a revelation.
Please don't simply regurgitate what Canon specifies. Please test with an recent Ex Canon Speedlite, but also, critically, with a single pin option to reveal what it can really do.
Let me copy what I posted in another thread today.
I tested this in Canon's showroom in Tokyo today.
G1 X Mark II can sync all the way through 1/4000 sec.
Mind you, shutter speed is limited to 1/3200 sec (with or without flash) at apertures F2 thru F7.1. You can use 1/4000 sec at apertures F8 - F16.
You can sync flash at 1/4000 sec in ETTL or M mode. But you get a LOT more flash exposure in M mode. Highspeed mode in ETTL pulses the light, which makes sense for a focal plane shutter, but not for the leaf shutter in this camera. The Japanese catalog tells says you can sync at 1/4000 sec if you set the flash to high speed mode, but in truth, you can do so in M mode as well, and you get more (+2EV or more) exposure that way.
(to be continued below)
Now, here's the part that intrigues me. I varied flash output in M mode with 1/4000 sec shutter. At 1/1 output, I got visibly more exposure than 1/2 output. and 1/2 output got about 1EV more exposure than 1/4 output. In my experience with other leaf shutter cameras (Nikon P7700), I could not see visible difference between 1/1 and 1/2 output, or between 1/2 and 1/4 output at such a short shutter duration.
One thing I know is that Canon redesigned aperture blades (9 blades vs 6 blades in G1X), and as such, each blade is smaller and lighter (Reference: Canon developer' interview on Japanese brochure). Did this enable Canon to time the strobe to 'pop' closer to the very moment the shutter opens, so the peak flash output more closely matches the shutter window?
BTW, my tests were performed with 580EX ii, also available at the Canon showroom. I tested the flash in M mode, assuming that makes the flash behave like 'a single pin' flash.
Hi, That's very impressive news - Tx!
As you say, getting max light energy at 1/1 M at high shutter speeds is unusual & very welcome.
Usually M flash from a 580ExII in a Canon body hot-shoe does not equate to a single pin option but your info has already exceeded my expectations - Tx. 1/3200th is an extremely good start.
To add, third party flash can be placed on the hot shoe and can be popped (in manual mode), unlike with the recent Nikon Coolpix series.
I'm a noob when it comes to specs but this doesn't seem like such a good release vs other stuff that just came out or announced around this price range? Doesn't look visually appealing to me either
The lens of the thing is MUCH more ambitious and versatile than anything else large-sensor on the market.
It's as revolutionary as the legendary Sony R1 was back in 2005.
At least you qualified your statement with "I'm a noob" which tells us to stop reading immediately.
Don't hate! Educate!
What makes this camera stand out is it's large sensor (for a point and shoot), and bright lens (through it's entire zoom range).
Although it is compact, I think it's just large enough to be compared to new micro 4/3rds offerings, and maybe even the Sony A6000, some of which look better on paper for the money.
Wanna compare the size visually? Be my guest ...:
Nice website to compare many different camera sizes , very useful, thanks.
Thank you!
As so many will be comparing these two, it's really important to see them side by side.
Pocketability is an important attribute for many point and shoot buyers.
Looks promising and quite an improvement on the MK1. Having the option to add a high quality evf if you want (not everyone does) is good if not as convenient as a built in. This could be in the running to replace or supplement my X100 but it is even chunkier (especially in depth). Probably more of a competitor to Sony RX10.
Looks like the Canon designers have been nicking a few of the Olympus Pen lines for this one. How original.
Too large for a jeans pocket >> not qualified to compare with an RX100II.
Better compare it to a Panasonic GM1 with kit lens at that size.
What really fits in a jeans pocket? I tried, very carefully putting a RX100 in a pants pocket with nothing protecting it except that built-in lens cover. It was possible but not practical.
Same here, it'll fit into my regular non skinny relaxed fit jeans but it's gonna be very noticeable... It's why I ultimately decided not to get the RX100 (and settled for a thinner LF1, which is somewhat noticeable, profile of the lens mostly).
I think untimely the RX100, the G1X, and the smaller mirrorless bodies all end up competing in the same space, figuratively and literally. The RX100 is the smallest but they're all jacket pocket/purse/easy carry cameras.
The G1X lens sounds the most impressive out of that bunch, though as versatile as it is an ILC is still far more versatile. I wish specifying aperture at certain key equivalent focal lengths was a standard practice, maybe something for CIPA to look at.
it's true a sony rx100 will fit in a jeanspocket and even better in a pocket of a non jeans trouser....what is for sure is that this canon and all the m4/3 or aps-c camera's will not fit in a trouser pocket at all......i have a sony rx100 and i prefer to put it in a jacket or in my little leather "sacoche home" mans bag which i bought for 1,50 € at a vintage market in Noyers la Poterie, Normandy. But in cases when needed i can put the sony or a canon s120 in my trouser pockets. The problem with a lot of "small camera" is indeed they are smaller than a dslr but still much to big for calling is compact...
I have a mobile phone in my trouser pocket. Nothing bigger than that I plan to put there. So, no serious camera there. I carry my Canon G10 in a strap around my neck or in a jacket pocket, if it is big enough.
The G1x mII is slightly larger, so I assume it will almost always be in the strap around my neck.
I don't WANT to put the RX100 in my pants pocket, but I CAN (even the larger m2), and the slight difference in size means it comes with me way more often than my old G12 did, so I don't think I can move up in size again.
All that being said for the Sony, my Powershot s110 came with me even more often...
I agree, although I don't shoot in bad weather conditions often; weather sealing would keep dust out, which cannot be easily cleaned out of a fixed lens camera. With cheap compact cameras, no big deal, just toss out the camera if big dust spots get in the lens or sensor, but these more expensive compacts need to keep dust out. Unfortunately, I don't think there are any high end weather sealed large sensor compacts. The RX10 has weather sealing but it is huge.
Why there are two Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II in the sensor size table? Should one be Mark 1?
This little guy might make me come back to the fold...
That lens is very tempting. I just want to know what is the aperture at about 50mm (equivalent).
Yeah, that's probably the key point for anyone weighing the convenience of this vs a mirrorless plus one prime... I like my 45mm/1.8 (50mm equivalent), and I'm lusting after an ultra wide, but the 20/1.7 (40mm equivalent) and a kit zoom is still what I use the most. I imagine a lot of people with smaller mirrorless bodies are on the same boat...
Max apertures dug from official Canon samples Exifs:
24mm => f/2 (we allready know)
31.1/33.7mm => f/3.2
39.4mm => f/3.6
Wrong Product Planning. G1X is mostly perceived as another G series. results are also similar. What Canon should have done is to place this camera in a separate category of "Bridge" camera like Sony Rx10 in a small form factor. With top L-class optic and a high read out sensor of this size and a dedicated super Macro at a price point 1200-1400 .With stellar results and an all in one solutions would have made a big impact.. It almost matches the price of a entry dslr with an average lens.
So, Canon should cut the sensor size by one third, add a L quality lens for that small sensor and charge nearly double the price? That sounds like an amazing product planning to me. It is a great sense of relief for many that you don't work at Canon's product planning.
They did. It was the PowerShot 1, if I recall. L lens, red ring, small sensor. Pretty good, actually.
aftab, Don't blabber something for the sake of commenting. rather make your point. the comment said same size sensor. Be constructive in thoughts rather than vomiting out with stale sarcasm. get a life.
Tray again and check. your papa may be a camera mechanic at the neighborhood store. good credential .
Nice specs.
But not small or light enough to compete with RX100 series, and with its size and price it's competing against ILC's which offer far more flexibility.
I don't really see where this camera fits in. After you add the EVF especially. Just look at the new Sony A6000, the Fuji X's etc. which have even bigger sensors. Might as well get a real system camera if you're looking at something of this price, size, and weight.
I'm currenly deciding between the Sony A6000 or a Fuji X-A1, however, this G1x II, is now in the running to. The 24-120mm focal range is all i need (95% of the time). It has a high native flash snyc and HSS support to if i need it. The form factor looks nice, it's about the size of the Sony with the kit lens.
So the Canon, seems to me to be geared towards people looking for a small (note I didn't say smallest) one lens, high quality camera.
The only obvious downside is the very short 240 shot per charge battery life.
And the only question I need answered is: Has DR improved significantly over it's predecessor? If it has, then I'll be deciding between 3 cameras instead of 2.
The RX100 is probably the closest thing to it from a technical level, perhaps some of the fixed focal length large sensor compacts too... Regardless, I do think it competes with mirrorless ILCs at a certain level. What mirrorless system has a 24-120mm f2.0-3.9 lens? Not a one AFAIK, Fuji's kit lens probably comes the closest but it's still a far way off and it's larger.
Now, any decent system is still far more versatile, you're not gonna get <f2 portraits with shallow DoF at longer focal lengths from the G1 X MkII, or UWA, or FE, or a constant aperture zoom, or a longer tele, or true macro, etc etc. A lot of people don't really care for all that tho... That being said, I don't know how large of a cross section there is of people that just want solid low light performance at 24-35mm (maybe up to 50mm if aperture doesn't drop too quick) with some extra range all in a small yet not pants pocketable package.
Seems like the RX100 does much of the same, just doesn't go as wide or as far but remains far more pocketable. I'm sure there's market for the new G1 X tho, and with Canon's branding/marketing that'll get stretched plenty. I can see a lot of people cross shopping between this and a GM1 or a Fuji, a 35-50mm equivalent prime on those cameras would probably perform better but it's one more thing to carry, and their kit zooms don't go as far nor are they as bright at 24-28mm.
I think it will sell very well. I bought a very low shutter count G1X a few weeks ago for $400 and after a couple of thousand shots find I like the IQ, the size and the weight compared to my DSLR. In England 60 owner reviews averaged out to 8.8 out of ten rating. It won't replace my DSLR but I will carry it around allot more and won't worry about damaging it due to the lower cost. Also for a second camera the last thing I need is another collection of lenses and that cost allot as well. Most of the people who slam cameras online have never picked them up or shot with them they just look for all the bad points in the reviews. Get a life and go out and take some good photos instead of whining about a camera you won't try out or buy! As for the G1X check out Marco Nero's photos with one on www.pbase.com or the landscape shots at www.witnesstobeauty.com both impressive to say the least.
Funny thing, on Canon USA's webpage about the G1 X II I watched a video about continuous shooting (burst) and the video is for the G16. They showed a guy holding a Powershot camera up to his eye to operate the camera... but the G1 X II has no OVF. Obviously they don't have all the marketing materials finalized for this.
If this was available 18 months ago I probably would have bought it instead of the G15.
I wonder if the extra lens reach and speed will come at a cost? I'm frequently impressed with how good the lens is on the G1X and put that down to Canon engineers sensibly not pushing what was possible in such a small design. We'll know soon enough if anything has been lost.
I wouldn't change anyway. Even an inaccurate optical finder is way better than nothing and a clip-on is way too impractical. Bad move.
Picture Quality is the King. None of the current Canon P&S cameras have the deep color,contrast of the old Por-1 and G6 or even the old Elphs with UA elements. Pro-1 had miniature L-lens. G6 had super f2 lens.
People only look for focus speed, evf,tilt lcd. no one does care for absolute pic quality.
All todays models have the average lens quality. no aspherical, UD, UA or super UD elements or fluorite or fluorine or super spectra coating.
the result is current G models have low contrast, shallow color,.
only thing improved is low light grain and some DR. and those are mostly achieved at processing level. not at absolute lens or sensor quality level.
The G16 uses Sony BSI sensor appearing on almost all P&S on earth. cold low contrast pics. Canon is yet to bring the ultimate sensor and lens combination to the bridge market. sony did it with RX10 and is a huge success..Fuji has a the good lens on their X20.
L class lens and high end sensor is the ultimate success recipe.
whatever you like. Sales comes after execution. its all yours..beauty is in the eyes of beholder ..success means many things for many...;)
You just can't have used a G1X. The lens on that is stunning. I'll admit the jpeg engine is pants, so it's not best as a point and shoot but RAW files processed in Lightroom are very clean and detailed, even after you've processed in all the punch, colour and contrast you need.
The RX10 is no comparison. I've yet to see an image from that in any sort of difficult lighting that hadn't blown the highlights to Africa and back and the lens appears to only be any good if you keep it from the extremes. Odd that you'd call the RX10 a huge success.
lets wait for the first samples. now there are just some numbers nothing more!
numbers don't make great pictures.
If they did, DxO ratings would translate into actual user results and experiences.
No viewfinder = no sale. Pity, because apart from that and the lack of weatherproofing it looks like a pretty good bet.
When shooting HD video the lens becomes less wider
(~28mm eqv, instead of 24mm) due to the heavy crop from the 4:3 actual sensor size.
I have no clue what was Canon thinking making the sensor 4:3 ratio.
These days, Smartphones, Tablets, Computers and UHD TVs have 16:9 ratios.
So this sensor waste resolution and lens field of view.
I not saying the sensor should have been native 16:9, but a 3:2 sensors seems like a better compromise.
To add insult to injury you can only make hi-res movies with this camera in 16:9 aspect ratio. So those making videos for the web or retina iPads, need to crop even more from 16:9 by then the wide end is more like 35mm.
Because Canon's P&S / compact cameras have always been put much more emphasis on stills than on video - as opposed to at least some series of Sony / Panasonic.
This is why they didn't add a natively 16:9 sensor but, for stills, a MUCH better choice: native 4:3 AND 3:2 sensor (it being multi-aspect).
Should they have gone for strictly 16:9, making sure even the corners are sharp, they would have needed to heavily crop in 4:3/3:2 stills shooting, meaning
- both the FoV would have reduced compared to a natively 3:2-optimized lens + sensor combo
- a lot of sensor pixels (those in the cropped areas on the right / left) would have remained unused.
Given that gaining 1 mm on the wide end requires a LOT of additional glass (hence the lack of small AND bright 24mm DSLR / m43 zooms), this would have meant 24mm would only be possible when shooting 16:9. With stills shooting, it'd start at around 28mm, which would render the camera a no-go for a lot of us 24mm fans.
Of course, they could also gone the Pana (GH1/GH2/TZ7 etc.) / Nokia (808 / 1020) way by adding additional pixels on the left/right to make the sensor three-standard-native (3:2, 4:3 and 16:9). They haven't done this - most probably because of the fact that, again, Canon has never emphasized video. Also proved by the video recording quality of the G1X Mk I being absolutely cr@p with tons of aliasing and moire.
Are you infreakingsane? This isn't a video camera. They aren't going to make video the priority in a stills camera. Go buy a video camera that can take stills and quit blabbering on about whatever you can find to whine about no matter how little sense it makes.
Video was definitely not a priority for this cam. AFAICT, your only option at 1080p is 30fps, which is fine for most, but I expected some more options.
Not sure if this was a move to avoid cannibalization of higher end models, as I'm not too familiar with their entire product range right now, but that's my guess.
Canon need to work hard. With this price, people want something good. Solve last version problems: slow and improve the image quality.
The G1 X has a large sensor and now the new aperture in the G1 X II will make for even better bokeh that such a large sensor allows for (by way of narrow depth of field...also thanks to the new faster lens). I have no reason whatsoever to justify spending money on the G1 X II and yet I'm pretty damn sure I'm going to buy it on day one from my local camera shop.
Is this Canon's first camera to include focus peaking (other than ML implementations)?
Connect with dpreview


text:
Sunday, March 09, 2014
Follow us:
Time Warner Cable video customers:Sign in with your TWC ID to access our video clips.
Sign in
APEX, N.C--It's a day that's known for food, fun, and fireworks, and perfect weather on this Fourth of July had boaters lining up to hit the waters.
"It's the first Fourth of July that we've been out here in a while," said Brooke Moody.
However, it's not just the sunshine and cool waters driving people to the lake. Low gas prices are also playing a major factor.
"It's especially expensive to fill up a boat and a car, so it worked out," added Moody.
Brooke Moody and her family are used to taking their three little ones on the lake and the dip in prices means more time for them to cruise around.
"Since gas prices were so high we were staying anchored longer, but now we can ride around and look for eagles and that sort of thing so it's fun," said Sue McGhee.
Filling up a boat is an expensive task. Costs can top more than $100 depending on the size.
"Thankfully the boat doesn't use too much gas. It's well worth it to get the family together and enjoy this beautiful weather," said Chuck Piccirillo.
However, despite the cost that comes with a day on the lake, many say it's nothing compared to the priceless time with family.
Right now the average cost for a gallon of regular gas is $3.18 in North Carolina. That's about 16 cents less that the national average. Boaters also try to get their gas before hitting the waters. Some say the cost can be almost twice the price if they fuel up at lakeside pumps.


text:
or Connect
Bazooka 10 inch Powered Subwoofer - BTA10100FHC
Bazooka 10" Powered Subwoofer with Universal installation Cable
Peerless 830992 4" GFC Cone HDS Woofer
The Peerless High Definition Sound (HDS) Series offers high-quality solutions for multi-way speaker systems employing vented box alignments.
Bazooka MBTA10250D Marine 10IN 250W Class D Amplified Tube
Introducing our first ever Class D amplified tubes. With 250 watts of pure digital power, and optional speaker level outputs these new Amplified Tubes are the most powerful and best sounding Amplified Tubes we've ever made. And now it is available in a Marine version. While this single Amplified Tube will surely deliver the unprecedented performance you demand, if just you want MORE,...
Bazooka BTA8100FHC 8-Inch Powered Subwoofer (Black)
Bazooka 8" Powered Subwoofer with Universal installation Cable


text:
Whoops! Something went wrong trying to count your new vote. Please try again.
2718 Boll St, Dallas, TX
Vote for a Chance to Win a Dream Spa & Beauty Package! Voting automatically enters you into the drawing. Click here for more info.
Counting your vote...
Hey now! We're using Facebook to authenticate your vote. Making sure you've got a pulse and aren't Spammy MacSpambot. After you log-in, you'll be good to go. Thanks for voting! Please sign in with Facebook to vote
You voted for
1623 Main Street, Dallas, TX
Press Box Grill
902 W Division St, Arlington, TX
Sunshine Club
6330 Gaston Ave, Dallas, TX
Cock & Bull Neighborhood Pub
6324 Prospect Ave, Dallas, TX
Times Ten Cellars
1839 N Henderson Ave, Dallas, TX


text:
Thread: Firearms in 4E
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 02:31 AM #21
I like the rationale with the cantrip-powered mystech firearms, but I still hope I never see fighters carrying jacketed rounds in my D&D fantasy.
If we ever really get firearms back in the game, I wonder if we'll get the Final Fantasy style Gunblades like we got in that 3E dragon article.I'm sorry.
- EN World
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 03:11 AM #22
Lama (Lvl 13)
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- The Suburban Frontier of Chicago
- Posts
- 6,369
ø Ignore PbartenderThe trouble is that powers that target Reflex, for example, give up something else to make up for that benefit, because Reflex is almost always easier to hit than AC. If you allow all powers to target Reflex instead of AC, then the powers that are designed to target Reflex to begin with fall behind the curve.
Consider the Rogue at-wills by way of example...
All of them deal 1[W] + Dexterity damage. All of them use Dexterity for the attack roll. Some of them can only be used with melee attacks and thereby already prohibit their use with firearms, but for the purposes of this example, let's please ignore that for the moment. All of them grant an additional benefit, like so:
- Deft Strike gives two squares of movement.
- Piercing Strike targets Reflex defense instead of AC.
- Riposte Strike effectively allows you to make a basic melee attack, if your target attacks you.
- Sly Flourish allows you to add your Charisma modifier to damage in addition to your Dexterity modifier.
So if Deft Strike, Riposte Strike, and Sly Flourish can now target Reflex Defense as well as any other benefits they grant just by picking the right weapon, then Piercing Strike becomes all but useless. All the other powers become better than Piercing Strike. Or, to look at it another way, Piercing Strike becomes worse than all the other powers.
I still don't like it... All it does it complicate things, without "really giving anyone a great benefit", to use your own words.
That said, if you are intent on having a weapon work this way, I'd look to the wording used for Flaming, Frost and Lightning Weapons in the Magic Item section of the PHB... Something like, "Power (At-Will): Free Action. All attack rolls by this weapon target Reflex defense. Another free action returns the attacks to normal."Last edited by Pbartender; Saturday, 7th February, 2009 at 03:24 AM.
The Pbartender
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 03:13 AM #23
Lama (Lvl 13)
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- The Suburban Frontier of Chicago
- Posts
- 6,369
ø Ignore Pbartender
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 03:21 AM #24
Defender (Lvl 8)
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- 1133 Clairemont Ave.
- Posts
- 7,841
ø Ignore FelonPowers which target Reflex are generally only special specifically because they target Reflex. Otherwise, they're sub-par. That's the issue.
You are therefore aren't really giving anyone a great benefit by letting them have firearms.
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 04:47 AM #25
Scout (Lvl 6)
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Posts
- 897
ø Ignore Krensky
You seem to be confusing my fiddling to get feasible numbers with supporting the fast bow thing you're ranting about. Also, three rounds a minute wasn't aimed fire either. That was the standard for a man to maintain volley fire with his company. Especially as you don't aim a land pattern musket (or any smooth bore of comparable barrel length) as point it at the French and fire when the sergeant yells at you.We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paperwork is overwhelming. - Werner von Braun
Right now you have no idea how lucky you are that I am not a sociopath. - A sign seen above my desk.
Never confuse movement with action. - Ernest Hemingway
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 06:05 AM #26
Defender (Lvl 8)
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- 1133 Clairemont Ave.
- Posts
- 7,841
ø Ignore FelonClearly, how a weapon was historically used in massed combat doesn't paint a perfect picture of how it's used in a small skirmish. And it certainly doesn't help much as far as D&D is concerned, because 4e has a very gamist design. The designers were, for instance, content to make loading a crossbow a minor action--windlasses and cranequins be damned--simply because, from the standpoint of gamist economics, anything more would be "overpriced".
Bearing that in mind, it's easy to see that the bow is indeed set up to be the end-all-be-all ranged weapon. I could live with adding firearms to D&D as an alternative. They were in Fable II (along with crossbows, but NOT bows) and the game still had a good fantasy feel to it. But as far as special properties? I'd be content to see them get something like brutal added.
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 07:18 AM #27
Herein lies the entirety of my problem.
I know muskets weren't accurate. That's my point. None of them were. But the only time "realism" is demanded is when the topic of "Everything but bows should suck, how do we justify this?" comes up. So in previous editions, crossbows were just bows with no extra strength damage and stupid reloading times with no extra bonus until later when Crossbow Sniper came out - they were literally "Bows that just suck a lot more, oh and wizards can use them." And even with crossbow sniper, they were still mostly just "bows that suck, but I guess you can make one build that isn't completely crap with them."
I'm not saying bows should suck, and that firearms should be the only ranged weapon used ever. I'm saying that no weapon should be the "USE THIS AND ONLY THIS FOREVER" weapon. Give crossbows, bows, and firearms each a different advantage so players can go "Oh man, crossbows are awesome, I want to use one!" instead of "Oh man, crossbows are awesome...thematically! But my god do they suck too much to use it!"
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 11:07 AM #28
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 04:41 PM #29
Gallant (Lvl 3)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- 1418 Santa Fe St. Athison, KS 66002
- Posts
- 212
ø Ignore SpydersWebbingI was thinking of just sticking in more modern-ist weapons, medieval fantasy be damned.
Handgun (Simple Melee)
Ranged 20/40
Off-hand, Single Fire
5 Uses, Reload Standard
Shotgun (Military Melee)
Ranged 5
Melee 1, Single Fire
5 Uses, Reload Standard
Melee: This weapon uses Constitution instead of Dexterity for the attack modifier, and does not provoke oppurtunity attacks when using it against an adjacent target. When attacking an adjacent target this weapon is treated as having Brutal x (see number). Brutal and Melee properties do stackLast edited by SpydersWebbing; Saturday, 7th February, 2009 at 04:44 PM.
Saturday, 7th February, 2009, 05:25 PM #30
Thaumaturgist (Lvl 9)
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Katrineholm
- Posts
- 3,138
ø Ignore FrostmarrowSince D&D is supposed to be approved for all ages and gory details left out (for the most part) I don't think firearms should focus on a bullet hitting a target.
Indeed hit points are just a measure of luck in combat. There are no actual hits in the game. There are just characters attacking and hit points disappearing. The rules does never explicitly state what happens when a weapon connects. There are no critical hit tables, for instance. You never count the number of arrows sticking out from your chest.
So the rules for firearms should reflect this too. You just blast away with your guns and hit point dwindle. Think of it as bullets never fly. Naturally players are free to describe their attacks, as always, but the rules don't.
When I think of guns in fantasy I turn to Last of the Mohicans movie with Daniel Day Lewis. The characters carry guns and as they fire them smoke is emitted from the barrel. Sometimes they reload in battle and sometimes they steal guns from their enemies to fire. A dropped loaded weapon is something the characters go for. Most of the time they rely on melee weapons, though.
I'm leaning towards guns doing thunder damage the same way a torch does fire damage. The thunder keyword also reminds everyone of the noise being made.
These are just my thoughts and no real attempt at game design.
Similar Threads
By Infernal Teddy in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 39Last Post: Tuesday, 8th January, 2013, 06:06 PM -
Firearms.... what's been done or should be done?
By Arravis in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 1Last Post: Friday, 19th September, 2008, 01:08 AM -
By epochrpg in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 17Last Post: Wednesday, 18th June, 2008, 02:12 PM -
By Timmundo in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 19Last Post: Friday, 22nd December, 2006, 12:09 AM -
Firearms in D and D
By mikep18103 in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 4Last Post: Saturday, 15th March, 2003, 01:18 AM


text:
Captain Terry Morris is a native of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. He enlisted in the U.S. Navy in June 1983 and was commissioned through the Broadened Opportunity for Officer Selection and Training (BOOST) Program. He was winged a Naval Flight Officer in November 1990.
He has completed deployments to the Balkans supporting combat operations in Kosovo, Counter-narcotics operations in Central America, humanitarian and relief operations in Turkey, Iraq, and Guam. He completed two combat deployments as Commanding Officer of Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron 123 in support of Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
His shore assignments include the Joint Concept Development and Experimentation directorate, United States Joint Forces Command, VAW/VRC assignments officer at Navy Personnel Command, Operations Officer of the fleet replacement squadron VAW-120, Flag Aide to the Commander U.S. Naval Forces Marianas, and to the Commander Amphibious Group THREE, and NROTC instructor Florida A&M University.
Captain Morris holds the Bachelor of Science in Mathematics from Florida A&M University, the Master of Science in Operations Management from the University of Arkansas, and the Master of Arts in National Security and Strategic Studies from the United States Naval War College.
During his career he has been awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Strike/Flight Air Medal (six awards), Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal (six awards), Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal (two awards), and numerous unit, service and campaign awards.
Captain Morris reported to Carrier Air Wing Seven August 2011 as the Deputy Commander and deployed in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM onboard USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Jun – Dec 2012. He took command of Carrier Air Wing Seven in December 2012.
US Navy Recruiting | No Fear Act | FOIA | USA.gov
US Navy | US Marine Corps | Navy Reserves
Individual Augmentee | Section 508/Accessibility


text: This month for our #LowesCreator challenge we were asked to make something for our Valentine's Decor. I love these challenges because they really make me stretch my creativity. I wanted to make something I could use year after year in our home. I've been inspired by marquee letter projects, but many have been made from materials like foam core and poster board. I wanted to build … [Read more...]


text:
Freespirit Layla Girls Light Up School Shoes
- Price
- £22.00 to £24.00
- In Stock
- Delivery
- Next day delivery available
1 reviewFreespirit Layla Girls School Shoes with Light-up Detail
The perfect footwear for bright pupils, these Layla school shoes from Freespirit feature a fun light-up section in the sole, so they look as cool in the dark as they do in the daylight!
An on/off switch at the back makes them easy to activate, and the black shoes are detailed with a cute bow detail at the front and Velcro-fastened strap.
Useful info:
- Freespirit Layla girls school shoes
- Light-up feature in the sole
- On/off switch for easy activation
- Bow detail
- Velcro-fastening strap
Skechers Best Girl Wedge Shoes & Free Gift
- Price
- £30.00
- In Stock
- Delivery
- Next day delivery available
28 reviewsSkechers Girls Cross Strap Wedge Shoes - enter 3MLWQ at check out to receive free Skechers Lunchbox
Must return lunchbox to get refund on item.
She'll be stylish at school wearing these lovely girls Skechers wedge shoes featuring a charming cross-over strap fastening. These girls wedged shoes are a comfortable selection for trendy youngsters who want to look good and feel great throughout the school day.
The low 1.5 inch wedge on these girls school shoes is perfect for adding some sensible height to the style, without compromising on comfort. Wedges are a great alternative to heels and the cross strap will provide an adjustable, secure fit for extra support. Dainty detail and girly style is brought to these girls smart wedge shoes with embroidered flowers and logo detail adding aesthetic appeal and cuteness. Exposed stitching really helps to define the design.
For a smart look, you could coordinate these girls wedge shoes with her school uniform or leggings and an oversized denim shirt at the weekend.
Useful info:
- Girls wedge shoes from Skechers
- Great smart school shoes
- Cross strap for secure fit
- Low 1.5 inch wedge
- Embroidered logo detail
Skechers Girls Pouty Bar Shoes, and Free Gift
- Price
- £26.00
- Low stock, selling fast
- Delivery
26 reviewsSkechers Pouty Girls School Shoes - Enter 3MLWQ at checkout to receive free Skechers lunchbox.
Must return lunchbox with item for refund.
Smart style and comfortable design are combined with these lovely girls Sketchers Pouty shoes that are the perfect pick for her school footwear. These leather school shoes are a pretty and practical selection for everyday wearing.
While the upper of these girls Skechers very much takes on the classic Mary Jane style, the sole is textured and sporty looking to provide all-day comfort and support. A velcro strap promotes a secure, adjustable fit and exposed stitching defines the design perfectly. Mesh material around the insole adds to the sumptuous comfort of these girls school shoes.
These Skechers girls shoes could be coordinated with her school uniform or smart casual weekend clothing.
Useful info:
- Girls shoes from Skechers
- Perfect school shoes
- Leather; durable design
- Mary Jane style upper
- Textured, sporty sole
- Velcro strap for comfortable fit
Skechers Boys Diameter-Meludo Shoes + Free Gift
- Price
- £30.00
- Low stock, selling fast
- Delivery
21 reviewsSkechers Boys Shoes with Velcro Straps - enter 3MLWP at check out to receive free Skechers Lunchbox
Must return lunchbox with item to gain refund.
He'll be comfortably cool wearing these Skechers boys shoes that have a sporty smart look. This footwear would be the perfect pick for his school shoes!
These kids Skechers have a sturdy textured sole to help support and protect his feet when he's running around during the school day or at the weekend. He'll look smart and feel comfortable wearing these shoes that have velcro straps for an extra secure fit. These boys school shoes also have padded insoles for a cushioned feel.
You could team these smart school shoes with his school uniform, but they'd also work well with smart casual trousers and a polo shirt for outside school.
Useful info:
- Boys shoes from Skechers
- Smart shoes with sporty style
- Velcro fastening and sturdy sole
- Great everyday shoes
- Perfect school shoes
Skechers Boys Ragged Dox Trainers + Free Gift
- Was
- Was £30.00
- Now
- Now £21.00 to £30.00
- Save Up To £9.00
- Low stock, selling fast
- Delivery
14 reviewsSkechers Boys Ragged Dox Trainers with Velcro Fastening - enter 3MLWP at check out to receive free Skechers Lunchbox
Must return luncbox to gain refund.
These boys Skechers Ragged Dox trainers combine comfortable smartness and sporty style. With a durable, breathable and supportive design, this fantastic footwear is a top choice for trendy youngsters' school shoes.
While these boys Skechers shoes have a smart casual look for everyday wearing, there are a number of elements specifically designed to provide all-day comfort for active feet. The top-quality leather upper and flexible rubber sole on these smart boys shoes promote durability. Fabric lining and a cushioned insole provide sumptuously soft comfortableness and mesh panels create a breathable design. A double velcro fastening to the front allows an easy, adjustable fit.
You could coordinate these boys shoes with his school uniform for a lovely smart look, but this footwear also translates well as trendy casual shoes for the weekend.
Useful info:
- Boys shoes from Skechers
- Great school shoes
- Leather upper
- Mesh fabric panels for breathable design
- Logo detail to the side
- Double velcro fastening to front
- Padded collar and tongue
- Fabric lining and cushioned insole for comfort
- Shock absorbing midsole
- Flexible rubber sole for traction
Kickers Girls Verda Scallop Ballerina Shoes
- Was
- Was £30.00 to £35.00
- Now
- Now £21.00 to £24.00
- Save Up To £11.00
- Low stock, selling fast
- Delivery
5 reviewsComfort footbed.
Colour: Black. Upper: Leather. Lining and sock: Leather. Sole: Other materials. -
Lacoste Boys Renard Strap Trainers
- Was
- Was £35.00 to £38.00
- Now
- Now £21.00 to £22.00
- Save Up To £16.00
- Low stock, selling fast
- Delivery
3 reviewsLacoste Infant Boys Renard Triple Velcro Trainers
Bring a smart urban style to his footwear with these boys black Lacoste Renard trainers featuring triple velcro fastening for an easy, secure fit. These stylish trainers are a top choice for his school shoes.
A flexible cup sole and durable leather upper make these boys Lacoste shoes a great option for his everyday footwear. The characteristic crocodile logo detail to the side adds eye-catching definition to the design. These classic Lacoste Renard black trainers are the perfect pick for smart trainers that provide all-day comfort.
You can team these Lacoste trainers with his school uniform or casual clothing at the weekend.
Useful info:
- Boy trainers from Lacoste
- Cup sole for flexibility
- Leather upper for durable design
- Triple velcro fastening for secure fit
- Boys school shoes; casual smart footwear
Sizes 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 two strap fastening (toddler)
Sizes 10, 11, 12, 13, 1 three strap fastening
Colour: Black. Upper: Leather. Lining and sock: Textile. Sole: Other materials.


text:
Prices and availability are subject to change from the time and date that you print this page.
3/11/2014 1:43:48 PM. For Customer Service, please call
Outlet Item. Available for Shipping Only
The Story
Casual cotton rug pops with energy in a textural weave of vibrant color. Updated rag rug construction is finished with a matching multicolored border.
Rug Pads recommended for safety and to protect your rug:
EasyHold Rug Pad can be used on carpeting or hard surfaces (available for purchase below).
Details and Dimensions
Return/Exchange Policy
Customers Also Viewed
Related Products


text:
Researchers scramble to put mouse cancer models on solid footing.
Researchers scramble to put mouse cancer models on solid footing.
From funding to publishing, academic research needlessly burns through time and money.
On the impending changes to the Russian Academy of Sciences
Dealing with the delicate matter of retirement for aging academics
Are the international drug laws the worst impediment to scientific inquiry since the Catholic Church banned the telescope?
US universities need to reach across their own borders to retain global scientific preeminence.
The NIH remains a Caucasian-dominated workforce. Why haven't the agency's efforts to diversify been successful?
Was the Human Genome Project the key to a gold mine?
The NIH has required researchers to receive instruction about responsible conduct for more than 20 years, but misconduct is still on the rise.
Should institutions invest in changing the behavior of scientists found guilty of violating research rules and ethics?


text:
Christopher Smith of Oak Lawn, Ill., son of Richard and Nanette Smith and a graduate of Oak Lawn Community High School, was named the 2010 recipient of the Mark A. Reid Student Leadership Award during North Central College's Commencement exercises on June 12.
Naperville resident and Director of Athletics Jim Miller was named the 19th recipient of the Harold and Eva White First Citizen of the College Award during North Central College's Commencement exercises on June 12.
The First Citizen of the College Award recognizes a student, faculty or staff member who exemplifies the best of North Central College and honors a "unique spirit and legacy," that of Harold and Eva White, longtime editors and publishers of The Naperville Sun and alumni of the College.
Contact: Ted Slowik, Director of PR and Media Relations, 630-637-5307, firstname.lastname@example.com
June 11, 2010—Ramona Wis, chair of the music department at North Central College, presented her paper "Reframing Leadership" June 11 at Northwestern University as part of the 25th anniversary celebration of the Center for the Study of Education and the Musical Experience (CSEME).
Contact: Nancy Dunker, Associate Director of Public Relations, 630-637-5306
June 8, 2010--Five North Central College faculty and administrative staff members are being honored for outstanding teaching, scholarship and service.
Contact: Nancy Dunker, associate director of public relations, 630-637-5306
June 7, 2010--Joshua Bailey, a junior at North Central College, received an award for an academic paper he presented at the 18th Annual Conference for Students of Political Science, hosted by the Illinois State University (ISU) Department of Politics and Government on April 28.


text:
Social Networking for Fashion Doll Lovers
Share Twitter Facebook
Views: 6
Add a Comment
Join DollObservers.com
Thank you Andy. She comes that way straight out of the box. Operetta is her name, from Monster High
LOVE the hairdo!
New here? Join for FREE!or Sign In
Or sign in with:
© 2014 Created by Simon Farnworth.
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.


text:
Quality CareFind out why Mayo Clinic is the right place for your health care. Make an appointment.
Meet the StaffFind a directory of doctors and departments at all Mayo Clinic campuses. Visit now.
Research and Clinical TrialsSee how Mayo Clinic research and clinical trials advance the science of medicine and improve patient care. Explore now.
Visit Our SchoolsEducators at Mayo Clinic train tomorrow's leaders to deliver compassionate, high-value, safe patient care. Choose a degree.
Professional ServicesExplore Mayo Clinic's many resources and see jobs available for medical professionals. Get updates.
Give to Mayo ClinicYou are an essential partner in our work to find answers for our patients. Donate now.
Mayo Clinic offers appointments in Arizona, Florida and Minnesota and at Mayo Clinic Health System locations.
Managing Huntington's disease is demanding on the person with the disorder, family members and other in-home caregivers. As the disease progresses, the person will become more dependent on caregivers. A number of issues will need to be addressed, and strategies to cope with them will evolve.
Factors regarding eating and nutrition include the following:
Eventually, a person with Huntington's disease will need assistance with eating and drinking.
Family and caregivers can help create an environment that may help a person with Huntington's disease avoid stressors and manage cognitive and behavioral challenges. These strategies include:
Mayo Clinic is a not-for-profit organization. Proceeds from website advertising help support our mission. Mayo Clinic does not endorse non-Mayo products and services.
Advertising & Sponsorship
Check out these best-sellers and special offers on books and newsletters from Mayo Clinic.


text:
By Reluctant Reviewer (Maine) on Oct 21, 2013
Comments: Just bought this product about three weeks ago. Assembly took some time but was not bad for those who are used to doing such things. It was quiet and my wife and I both like the machine, until it stopped working. After 6 uses the incline motor did some weird things and now it doesn't work at all. Customer service is sending a control module but who knows if that will fix the problem. I asked for a technical manual so I could do some diagnosis (most appliances which I am used to working on offer these for their techs). I was told it didn't exists. I requested a house call given that it is obviously under warranty. No such luck. It also developed a loud noise from parts that I did not assemble. I was told they might need to be greased. Why should I be greasing parts assembled by the manufacturer? Maintenance is one thing, but we used it 6 times and the part in question is not easily accessible. It would require almost complete disassembly of the rear end and even then it would not be typical greasing of an axle but the repacking of bearings. The squeak does seems to have passed and we use it now without the incline while we wait for parts.
See better, faster results with incline training on the AudioStrider 990 Pro elliptical. A Power Incline Ramp™ adjusts from 15 to 40 degrees with 1-Touch™ controls to increase intensity, decrease stress on joints and target lower body muscle groups. A tech-driven console supports a low-impact cardio workout with a two-speed fan and advanced sound system. Built with 24 digital resistance levels and 30 workout apps, this elliptical has been a consumer magazine Best Buy for four years in a row.


text:
King Kamehameha Son Dominates in Hong Kong
Few Japanese runners in international competition have been more impressive than Lord Kanaloa, who won 13 of 19 starts overall.
Horse | Trainer | Breeder / Owner |
Sole Power (GB) | LYNAM EDWARD |
Few Japanese runners in international competition have been more impressive than Lord Kanaloa, who won 13 of 19 starts overall.
Japan's champion sprinter Lord Kanaloa made it two straight wins in the Longines Hong Kong Sprint (HK-I), kicking clear at the top of the stretch and drawing off to a five-length win over Irish runner Sole Power.
Jwala pulled a tremendous 40-1 upset in the Coolmore Nunthorpe Stakes (Eng-I) Aug. 23 at York in her top-level debut.
Sole Power wore down 11-4 favorite Shea Shea in the closing strides and won the King's Stand Stakes (Eng-I) by a neck June 18 at Royal Ascot.
Shea Shea showed there was plenty of speed in his 5-year-old legs as he sizzled to a course record-setting victory in the $1 million Al Quoz Sprint (UAE-IT) on the Dubai World Cup (UAE-I) undercard March 30 at Meydan.
Horses featured include: Law Enforcement (pink #4), Ocean Park (yellow #1), Invincible Ash, Dice Flavor (pink #6), Sole Power (orange #9), Balmont Mast (orange #2), Animal Kingdom (white #2), and more. Watch Video
Trainer Mike de Kock's Meydan course-record setter Shea Shea aims for the most lucrative win of his career in the $1 million Al Quoz Sprint Sponsored By Emirates NBD (UAE-I) on the Dubai World Cup (UAE-I) undercard March 30.
Donegal Racing's synthetic track specialist and Dubai World Cup (UAE-I) hopeful Dullahan will sharpen up for his planned start in the $10 million race later this month in the $200,000 Burj Nahar (UAE-III) March 9 at Meydan.
Horses featured include Little Mike (#211), Dullahan (#212), Secret Asset (#203), Mister Big Shuffle (#115), Bank of Burden (#110), Quiet a Mission (#112), Sole Power (#210), Munk N'Brass (#146), and more. Watch Video
Horses featured include Balmont Mast (#145), Sole Power (#210), Little Mike (#211), and Trade Storm (#188). Watch Video
Trainer Edward Lynam talks about his horse, group I-winning European sprinter Sole Power, who is the 4-to-1 morning-line favorite in the Meydan Sprint. Watch Video
Hong Kong raider Little Bridge hit the front a furlong from the wire and easily held off the late charge of Bated Breath to win the $542,500 King's Stand Stakes (Eng-I) by three-quarters of a length at Royal Ascot June 19.
Twenty-three of the top sprinters in Europe are set to line up in the $542,500 King's Stand Stakes (Eng-I), a five-furlong turf dash that is the second of three group I races on the opening day at Royal Ascot.
Ortensia, bred and based in Australia, rallied from last and gobbled up the field from the outside to score the $1 million Al Quoz Sprint Sponsored by Emirates NBD (UAE-I) March 31 at Meydan Racecourse.
Veteran Hong Kong-based sprinter Joy And Fun will face 15 of the world's best turf sprinters in the $1 million Al Quoz Sprint Sponsored by Emirates NBD (UAE-IT) at Meydan Racecourse March 31.
Outsider Tangerine Trees led home a trio of longshots when he upset the $407,904 Qatar Prix de l'Abbaye (Fr-I) at Longchamp Oct. 2.
David Wachman's Requinto takes on older rivals when he lines up in the $407,904 Qatar Prix de l'Abbaye de Longchamp (Fr-I) Oct. 2.
Sole Power provided one of the biggest upsets in British racing when he landed the Coolmore Nunthorpe Stakes (Eng-I) at York at odds of 100-1.
Race | Track | Date |
Cicada S. | AQU | |
Borgata S. | DED | |
Colonel Power S. | FG | |
Camilla Urso S. | GG | |
Honey Fox S. (gr. II) | GP |


text:
Product Details This storybook sweetheart is prettier than ever. Enjoy the unique look of this Alice in Wonderland-themed costume; it's everything you need to party with the Mad Hatter and Hare! Off-the-shoulder Alice costume dress is designed in light blue and white, with princess sleeves and a ruffled trim bodice adorned with faux silver buttons. The frilly skirt gets sassy with black/white checkerboard trim. The attached apron is printed with aces, spades and hearts the Queen would be jealous! Great for any figure type. Accessorize with knee highs and a frilly red petticoat for extra oomph (sold separately). Year of Release 2009 AMZ Y |
Product features: Alice Sm-Md Teen, alice themed costume & unique alice in wonderland
Email this product to a friend | |
Customer feedback | ||||||||||||||||||
Alexandra Brooks - Southport, Connecticut
See all our Customer Testimonials and how to record your own!


text:
A Chicago Police officer fired a shot at an armed robber early Thursday on the South Side, police said.
Police responded to a call of a person shot about 3:10 a.m. in the 6800 block of South Peoria Avenue, police News Affairs Officer Ron Gaines said.
When police arrived at the scene, the person had not been shot but was the victim of an armed robbery, Gaines said. Officers found the robber and chased him on foot, police said.
The robber showed his weapon to the officers and an officer fired one shot at him and missed, Gaines said. The robber was arrested and a weapon was recovered.
Charges are pending early Thursday, police said.
CTA #67 buses are temporarily rerouted in both directions near 69th, Morgan and Halsted streets, according to a CTA alert.
KSAZ-TV & KUTP511 W. Adams St.Phoenix, AZ 85003Phone: (602) 257-1234Fax: (602) 262-0177


text:
Jun 6, 2012 NC State to Host Chancellors' Cup Tourney NC State will have the home field advantage next Friday when Chancellor Randy Woodson leads a team competing in the inaugural Chancellors' Cup Golf Tournament at the Lonnie Poole Golf Course.
Oct 28, 2010 Coming in Loud and Clear A few themes emerged loud and clear at the strategic planning town hall meeting on Tuesday. Employees are ready to break down silos, make NC State a more comprehensive university and encourage way more collaboration across disciplines. Find out who said what.
Mar 12, 2009 Chancellor Rallies Campus During his second-annual State of NC State address, Chancellor James L. Oblinger celebrated a year's worth of accomplishments.


text:
Fred Doorstop
Sign In
Do you want a career in a fun environment at the cutting edge of the musical frontier in Bristol?
Applicants should email their cover letter and CV to terry(at)chemical-records.co.uk
Please fill in this form and it will be sent to us by email. We may contact you in the future to ask you to send us a recent CV.