text:
Hose To Sell Your House Without A Realtor Glamorgan
Why do people utilize market residence promptly firms?
Looking to hose to sell your house without a realtor Glamorgan? Well, there are numerous variables that enter play when it involves requiring to offer your house quickly. A few of these include:
If you have actually acquired a residential or commercial property you might be unpredictable what perform with it, and also may be thinking of offering the residential property.
It can also be a complex circumstance if there are a variety of individuals involved. If you would certainly such as an uncomplicated, rapid sale, after that a quick residence offering company will certainly be a great alternative.
We have actually dealt with several properties with probate, as clients have desired a fast home sell resolution as well as did want to wait to market it on the free market. We are professionals in handling probate.
Experiencing a divorce is a difficult as well as stressful procedure for both events, no doubt concerning it.
Using a fast home sale service can minimize the moment it requires to offer your property, compared to offering it on the open market.
Quick residence selling services like WeBuyAnyHome, can supply a cash money deal and also can buy your home within 7 days, which can minimize the discomfort and the stress and anxiety of experiencing separation proceedings.
Financial Struggles
If you are fighting with financial obligations and also failing to keep up with a financial commitment that is likewise resulting in more defaults … then you may want to think about a sell house fast option to break without your debts.
WeBuyAnyHome can help by supplying a fast sale solution for your property enabling you to continue with your life without the worry of financial debt.
Avoid Reposession
If you are unable to stay on top of your routine home mortgage settlements or you are experiencing a repossession procedure of your residential property, then selling with an estate representative will not supply a fast sufficient solution
Hence, having a backdoor exit to offer your house quickly and without delays could aid you stop the foreclosure procedure.
Whether encouraged by work, lifestyle or other personal factors, an increasing number of individuals are picking to move from or around the UK.
"These moves are time sensitive, as well as commonly hinged upon a residential property sale. Proprietors in this placement call for a rapid as well as adaptable home sale, which the open market simply can not supply. Fast residence purchasing solutions have actually helped many property owners market their home so they can carry on to exciting new things, as well as is a terrific alternative if you're limited on time and also simply wish to get it performed with".
Lots of consumers utilize a rapid residence marketing solution when they are looking to scale down (normally as a part of retirement plans).
Fas house offering solutions like WeBuyAnyHome, provides a guaranteed and also stress cost-free sale for those that don't intend to experience the unpredictability and delays related to the free market, which is extremely reasonable.
Environmental Reasons
Throughout the years, locations can transform drastically, and also regretfully not constantly for the better. Aspects such as increased criminal offense price, or a diminishing high street can likewise change how you feel regarding your residence, it can even affect the value of it.
We discover that most of our clients are home owners that aspire to move away swiftly from a location that has degraded.
What are the benefits, of a fast residence sale solution?
There are numerous advantages to using our solution, one of the most apparent being Speed.
As the largest quick residence sale business in the UK, we have actually bought countless buildings from London to Glasgow, we've seen practically anything and every little thing there is to see, when it concerns home sales, so already know how to handle even one of the most challenging residential properties.
This indicates we can tailor our service to our customers' selected timeframe, risk-free in the understanding that we can finish as soon as you need us to, and do not need to bother with clambering around to discover remedies.
This is particularly useful, considered that the ordinary time taken to sell a building on the competitive market is 6 to 9 months!
No Charges
Unlike conventional estate representatives and also on-line listing solutions, we do not bill a dime for our fast home sale service. We do not have any hidden charges or payment, and also we also pay for your lawful costs.
It's additionally worth adding up the money you minimize bills and mortgage payments that you would need to pay if your home was to sit on the market with an estate representative for months on end.
You just would not be paying those if you utilize us, as we finish the acquisition so rapidly.
Actual Guarantees
Unlike estate representatives, on the internet listing services and public auctions, we 100% warranty a sale on your building.
We can buy your home straight with our own funds, and do not count on any type of 3rd parties to do so.
This suggests we aren't hindered or decreased by home mortgage lenders and also are completely chain complimentary.
Which warranty is not just for the sale happening, however it taking place the day of your choosing.
Added extras
As the UK's largest quick house sale firm, we are proud to go that little additional for our customers.
That's why we offer a cash advance for those who need it, and also, once we have actually acquired your residential property, we can also allow you to stay there free of cost, whilst you organise your onward strategies.
What things should you look out for, with various other "market house quick" business that are available?
You may have managed various other companies that assure to purchase your house rapidly (or may be consulting with them right now).
Well, there are some points you ought to recognize, before you go on and also shoot …
Several of these consist of:
Inauthentic cash money purchasers
Sadly, not all fast sale building companies are accountable, honest as well as dependable.
Some business aren't genuine cash customers, but are in fact cloaked estate representatives that will constantly delay your home sale till they have arranged money or have sourced a buyer. These kinds of companies can not assure a sale or a conclusion date.
In the case of companies such as WeBuyAnyHome, they are an authentic money purchaser that can acquire your property directly, within your picked timespan.
Incorrect assurances
Various other quick home sale firms might use you complete market price at the starting whilst likewise promising a fast sale.
Unfortunately, these offers are dishonest; they are only given to win your organization, and also will undoubtedly be decreased at the last minute, often days prior to completion when you might feel backed right into an edge to approve it. That is entirely dishonest.
WeBuyAnyHome, on the other hand, is always clear, and make it clear from the beginning that we can not offer complete market value for your building.
You obtain "incorporated"
Some fast building sale companies might compel you to place constraints on the title of your property in order to accept their deal (significance you are locked into using them no matter what) even if you are dissatisfied with the rate decline they undoubtedly strike you with. We never ask you to do this, as well as you never should.
In the case of WeBuyAnyHome, they have a really easy contract that specifies our responsibilities to you, and also that if our deal should decrease by also a cent after your formal RICS study, after that you are absolutely free to walk away.
What's more, they use the most effective rate guarantee, and also promise to beat the cost of any genuine quick residence sale company.
What defense do homeowners obtain when selling with WeBuyAnyHome compared to various other sell house fast business?
"The NAPB is THE only formal Association for home buying business. To come to be a participant, and also we are a starting participant, a money customer must comply with a strict Code Of Practise– comprising policies around trading requirements, running practices, and transparency. Participants should also join to The Residential Property Ombudsman System".
You should deal with fast sale home business who are not part of the National Organization of Home Purchasers with severe care, as it implies they may not run at the criteria required for such a vital part of your life.
The Residential Property Ombudsman Scheme is a regulatory body that regulates all firms operating in property. In order to be a member as we are, a business should adhere to a series of policies comparable to those of the NAPB. The Residential or commercial property Ombudsman System likewise offers a grievance and redress plan, indicating that you as the customer can look for payment must anything go wrong.
You need to treat firms that are not part of TPOS with extreme caution, as they are actively choosing not to comply with governing standards, and also you would not have the capability to make use of TPOS to deal with grievances and to seek settlement.
We assure to make you an offer inside 24-hour.
Cash could be in your account…
within just seven days.
Moving residence is frequently rated as the most demanding point you can do in your life, as well as this anxiety is only enhanced when you are desperately inputting right into Google "just how to offer your house swiftly?" since you simply need to eliminate it and also carry on.
There are numerous reasons you may be aiming to offer your residence rapidly and also a lot of these reasons will certainly already be triggering you pain and distress before you also begin dealing with the issues that come from marketing your home.
Nonetheless, whatever the factor, we can aid! Merely fill in our online query form and we will call you with a deal within 24 hours. If you are happy with the offer as well as wants to continue, after that we can have the money in your hands in as little as one week. We make certain you didn't understand that you could sell your residence that quickly!
Contact us and we can help you to achieve a fast house sale today, without any inconvenience as well as NO covert fees.
If you require to offer your residence fast for any one of the factors above we can assist. We provide a quick residence sale option and also total on a property sale in simply seven days. Call us today and we can help you offer your house rapidly.


text:
AT&T announced a rebrand of their DirecTV service, the new name being AT&T TV. The company also plans to roll out a streaming app for smart TVs and connected devices that will be powered by the OTT platform delivered through DirecTV Now.
There have been some hints lately that AT&T would rename its AT&T TV service as DirecTV Stream, and now, courtesy to third-party sellers, more evidence seems to be emerging, including what appears to be the logo and one of the primary phrases for the live TV service's new appearance. While it is still unknown if AT&T TV will ultimately become DirecTV Stream, all signs point to a name change in the near future.
References to the DirecTV Stream brand were recently spotted on the AT&T website after it began as DirecTV Now and subsequently transitioned to AT&T TV Now before being absorbed by AT&T TV. While most of those mentions were found in cached sites, DirecTV registered a "DirecTV Stream" trademark with the USPTO late last year, just before AT&T announced it was spinning off its multiple TV companies into a new entity called New DirecTV.
There are now even more signs pointing to a name change from AT&T TV to DirecTV Stream. According to Streaming Clarity, at least one "AT&T Preferred Dealer" is already promoting DirecTV Stream. It's also worth noting that the page's URL is for AT&T TV, implying that this isn't just a new DirecTV service, but a replacement for AT&T TV.
Furthermore, the same third-party reseller's DirecTV Stream marketing materials have a "bring your TV together" DirecTV Stream motto. This phrase is noteworthy since AT&T Intellectual Property II, LP, an AT&T-owned entity, registered a "Get Your TV Together" trademark with the USPTO in April of this year. The notion here is that when DirecTV Stream becomes widely accessible, the tagline "get your TV together" will be employed.
For your information, several additional trademarks have recently been filed that seem to be relevant to the service based on the filing categories, application date, and other factors. "Beam it or stream it" (USPTO) and "Too good for your own good" (USPTO) are two examples (USPTO). However, they do not seem to be as closely related to DirecTV Stream as 'bring your TV together.'
Aside from the name, not much has changed.
Entertainment, Choice, Ultimate, and Premier are the available "choose your DIRECTV STREAM bundle" choices. These are the same AT&T TV plans that are presently available, with the same number and variety of channels, as well as the same extra subscription advantages and costs.
In reality, the only alteration seems to be a move from AT&T TV to DirecTV Stream, which is comparable to earlier internet references. According to the information available thus far, DirecTV Stream users should anticipate a similar experience to AT&T TV, right down to device compatibility. In that vein, AT&T presently sells its own streaming gadget, which looks to be undergoing the same rebranding process.
The gadget will be known as "DIRECTV STREAM Device," similar to how AT&T refers to their "AT&T TV Streaming Device" (or "AT&T TV Stream"). Subscribers will be able to add it to their plan for $5 per month on a 24-month commitment, or buy it outright for $120. AT&T presently charges the same pricing for its AT&T TV Streaming device.
With the probable logo (seen at the top of this page), the "bring your TV together" remarks and filing, and the latest references that have been found on the AT&T website, an AT&T TV redesign appears more plausible. With at least one third-party reseller already promoting DirecTV Stream, the rebrand may not be far off.
Update 05/30: AT&T has begun sending emails to impacted HBO Max customers informing them of the problem.
According to AT&T's email, a billing issue led grandfathered HBO users' fees to rise from $5 to $14.99 per month due to a billing error. Although the corporation is aware of the problem, the email goes on to suggest that it might take up to three billing cycles for it to be resolved and the price decreased back to $5 per month.
In the meanwhile, AT&T claims it would credit impacted clients $9.99 each month to guarantee they only pay $5 per month for the service. These credits will most likely remain until the system fault is fixed. AT&T said it will provide refunds to the payment method on file to individuals who have already paid $14.99 per month for HBO Max.
Here's the whole AT&T TV NOW HBO Max email:
Reddit is the source of this information./confused megabyte
Whether you were impacted by the HBO Max problem, you should check your email to see if you got the email. Whether this is not the case, check your billing account to verify if the $9.99 credit was applied. If no email or credit appears on the account during the following several days, it may be worth contacting AT&T directly.
Customers with AT&T TV NOW who are also $5 grandfathered HBO members have reported a $10 increase in their monthly bill, which is thought to be tied to HBO Max. It's unclear if this is a one-time glitch or a sign that many of the service's early customers may lose access to another DIRECTV NOW period discount.
When DIRECTV NOW first arrived in 2016, AT&T gave its customers the option of adding HBO to their subscription for $5 per month, a savings of $10 over the standard $14.99 per month. Simultaneously, the corporation was selling its 'Go Big' plan for $35 per month, a significant savings over its regular pricing. For those early members who coupled Go Big with HBO promos, the total outcome was a superb bundle at a reasonable price.
Despite the fact that DIRECTV NOW is no longer available, and all original members have faced price rises over the years, they have been allowed to maintain their HBO subscription at the $5 price. However, numerous users have reported that their HBO subscription has been increased to $15 per month, which is a $10 increase.
The problem seems to be related to the debut of HBO Max. According to the comments on this Reddit post (and this one), AT&T has automatically moved all grandfathered HBO customers to HBO Max. Although this is a subscriber upgrade, AT&T has been doing this for many current HBO members, since the normal HBO and HBO Max are both cost the same.
Those same consumers, on the other hand, claim that their bills have altered to reflect HBO Max's current pricing, rather than the significantly reduced promotion price they were paying for ordinary HBO subscription.
It's possible that this is a bug, but it's also possible that it isn't.
Some of those impacted have contacted AT&T to find out what's going on. Those who have found AT&T helpful have been advised that the $5 promotional pricing was a mistake and that it would be restored.
However, other people claim that AT&T has refused to lower the price, implying that they would now be charged $15 per month for HBO Max access. There have also been situations when AT&T has offered a one-time $10 discount. They are effectively being given HBO Max for $5 for one month, after which they will be forced to pay $15 per month if they continue with the HBO Max membership.
Magnetbox/Reddit is the source of this information.
As a result of all of this, AT&T TV NOW users who have HBO locked in at $5 per month are getting a mixed answer when they attempt to resolve the issue. Which makes figuring out precisely what's going on much more challenging. If it's a problem, all impacted accounts should get a price cut in the near future, but it doesn't explain why AT&T TV NOW customers are getting different statements from reps.
In the meanwhile, any grandfathered $5 HBO members, or anybody who previously had an HBO discount, should check their accounts for a price rise and, if so, contact AT&T to see if it may be cut again.
Source: Reddit
Smart TVs, streaming players, smartphones, tablets, and other platforms and devices are all compatible with AT&T TV. There are, however, certain limits and popular platforms that have yet to be included. Knowing which devices can access AT&T's live TV service ahead of time might assist ensure that there are no problems viewing live TV channels or on-demand material. This is especially relevant given the high cost of AT&T TV services.
AT&T TV has undergone many rebrandings in recent years. Changing its name from DirecTV Now to AT&T TV Now, and then merging with AT&T TV. As a result, the service has made a number of modifications to membership fees as well as the channels included in those plans. AT&T TV now provides a few various plans, the lowest of which is the 'Entertainment' package, which costs $69.99 per month.
AT&T TV is one of the more costly alternatives at this pricing, but the channel list may appeal to certain customers more than Hulu Live TV, Sling TV, or YouTube TV. However, the price and channels should only be important if the service includes compatibility for the devices that the family currently owns.
AT&T TV is available on a variety of platforms and devices.
Overall, AT&T TV supports a large range of devices, so customers should have no trouble getting the service on many of their household gadgets. However, there are several drawbacks, the most noteworthy of which being Android Television (Android TV). Owners of Android TV-enabled devices will find it impossible to download and watch AT&T TV as a result of this. The company's own Player for AT&T TV, which runs on the Android TV platform, is an interesting exception.
Devices that work with AT&T TV include:
- Amazon Fire TV is a streaming media player from Amazon (various models)
- Smart TVs with Amazon Fire TV Edition
- Android devices include phones and tablets.
- Apple's iPhone, iPad, and Apple's iPod Touch are among the most popular mobile devices.
- Apple TV
- AT&T TV player
- Chrome is a web browser.
- Chromecast
- Built-in TVs with Chromecast
- Roku devices (select models)
- Smart TVs with Roku
- Smart Soundbar Roku
- Safari is a web browser.
- Samsung televisions (select models)
Although there is a diverse device compatibility list, certain major platforms and devices are absent, limiting AT&T TV users' choices.
AT&T TV compatibility is absent from a number of popular devices:
- Android TV
- LG smart televisions
- Smart TVs from Vizio
- PlayStation 4 and PlayStation 5 are Sony's latest consoles.
- Xbox gaming consoles from Microsoft
Using a smart TV to watch AT&T TV
There are choices for individuals who want to watch AT&T TV on a smart TV without the need for any extra devices or gear. When it comes to AT&T TV set-top box compatibility, this is one of the most restricted product categories.
Smart TVs that work with AT&T TV:
- Smart TV with Fire TV edition (2nd-gen and higher)
- Built-in TV with Chromecast (select models)
- Roku is a streaming media player (6000X, 7000X, A000X, C000X, C000GB)
- Samsung TVs from 2017 to 2020 (select models)
Owners of LG or Vizio smart TVs will have a hard time downloading and accessing AT&T TV without the use of a third-party device, since Samsung is presently the only dedicated smart TV manufacturer having direct AT&T TV access. Even yet, Samsung's smart TV compatibility is limited to models released in 2017.
Basically, a current Samsung model or one powered by Fire TV or Roku are the best alternatives for streaming AT&T TV on a smart TV.
Fire TV Edition smart TVs that work with AT&T TV:
Roku smart TVs that work with AT&T TV:
- Element
- Hitachi
- Hisense
- Insignia
- Philips
- Sharp
Using Fire TV to watch AT&T TV
If your smart TV doesn't have automatic compatibility, you may view on a specialized streaming device such a Fire TV device. In general, AT&T TV offers decent support for Amazon's device portfolio, with the AT&T TV app available for download from the Amazon App Store on most Fire TV players and sticks. The first-generation Fire TV devices are the only exception.
Fire TV devices that work with AT&T TV include:
- Lite version of the Amazon Fire TV Stick
- Fire TV Stick
- 4K Fire TV Stick
- Cube Amazon Fire TV
Using Roku to watch AT&T TV
Roku devices and sticks, like Fire TV, are another alternative for individuals who want to watch AT&T TV on a second device. Similar to Fire TV, most Roku devices that are compatible with AT&T TV have no serious concerns.
Roku devices that work with AT&T TV include:
- The Roku Streaming Stick is a device that allows you to watch movies and TV (3500X, 3600X, 3800X)
- Roku Streaming Stick+++++++++++++++ (3810X, 3811X)
- Roku Express is a streaming media player that allows you to (3700X, 3900X, 3930X)
- Roku Express+ is a streaming media player that allows you to watch (3710X, 3910X, 3931X)
- Premiere on Roku (3920X, 4620X)
- Premiere+ on Roku (3921X, 4630X)
- Roku XXXXXXXXXX (4640X, 4660X, 4661X, 4670X)
- LT Roku (2700X)
- 1 SE Roku (2710X)
- Roku 2 is the second generation of Roku (2720X, 4210X)
- 3rd-generation Roku (4200X, 4230X)
- 4th generation Roku (4400X)
- Roku TVs that aren't 4K (5000X, 8000X)
- Roku 4K TV (6000X, 7000X, A000X, C000X, C000GB)
- Smart Soundbar Roku (9100X)
Using alternative streaming players to watch AT&T TV
If Amazon Fire TV or Roku aren't an option, there are a few more streaming devices to consider. AT&T TV customers, on the other hand, have certain restrictions on which non-Fire TV and Roku devices they may watch on.
Players compatible with AT&T TV that aren't listed above:
- AT&T TV device
- Apple TV is a device that allows you to watch (4th-gen)
Streaming devices based on Google's platform are unable to download the AT&T TV app due to a lack of universal support for the platform.
AT&T TV does not support the following Android TV players:
- AirTV
- Google TV with Chromecast
- 4K Jetstream
- Shield TV and Shield TV Pro from Nvidia
- Xiaomi Mi Box and Mi Box S are two models of Xiaomi's Mi Box.
There are more ways to watch AT&T TV now.
Consumers may watch AT&T TV on their smartphone or tablet, or via a web browser, if they don't have access to a smart TV or specialized streaming device.
Additional AT&T TV-compatible devices include:
- Android devices include phones and tablets (Android 5.0 and higher)
- iPhone is an Apple product (iOS 11 and higher)
- Apple's iPad is a tablet computer that is (iOS 11 and higher)
- iPod Touch
- Chrome is a web browser developed by Google (version 58 and higher)
- Safari (version 13+ is recommended) is a web browser that allows you to browse the internet.
- Chromecast is a device that allows you to cast (2nd generation and higher)
AT&T TV is currently not compatible with gaming consoles. As a result, popular Sony and Microsoft models will not be able to broadcast live TV or on-demand content to users.
AT&T TV is not compatible with the following game consoles:
- PlayStation 4 (Sony)
- PlayStation 5 (Sony)
- Xbox One (Microsoft)
- Xbox One X (Microsoft)
- Xbox Series S by Microsoft
Summary of AT&T TV's supported devices
AT&T TV may be seen on a variety of devices, including smartphones, tablets, streaming players, smart TVs, and more. With the exception of the company's own player, which runs on a modified version of the platform, Android TV is noticeably absent. Samsung and TVs powered by Fire TV or Roku are the most popular smart TVs. The scenario is basically the same for streaming devices and sticks, with the best alternatives being Fire TV and Roku players.
It's worth remembering that device support lists are never complete, and new devices are often added. As a result, even though your desired device does not presently support AT&T TV, this might change in the future.
More information may be found at AT&T TV: How Many Devices Can Stream at the Same Time.
Peacock from Comcast is one of the most recent streaming options available. If you've already tried it out and decided it's not for you, here's how to make adjustments to your Peacock account, including how to cancel a paid membership totally.
Peacock soft debuted for Comcast Xfinity subscribers on April 15, 2020, with a full countrywide launch on July 15. The ad-supported version of the streaming service, which includes originals, movies, TV series, and more from NBCUniversal, costs $4.99 per month. For $5 extra, subscribers may switch to the Premium Plus ad-free version, bringing the monthly cost to $9.99. Comcast subscribers, on the other hand, get the ad-supported version for free and may switch to the ad-free version for $5 per month.
While signing up for Peacock is very simple, the alternatives for canceling a membership are a bit more difficult to find, but they are available if you know where to search. To begin, follow these steps if you just want to make modifications to your account, such as upgrading to the premium ad-free version or downgrading to the ad-supported one.
How can I modify my Peacock subscription?
The TV app does not presently allow you to make changes to your Peacock account. Current customers will instead have to make modifications on the service's main website.
This may be accomplished by following these steps:
- Peacock's webpage may be found here.
- Sign in
- In the top-right corner, click the profile symbol.
- "Account" is the option to choose.
- In the "Your Plan" section, click "Change Plan."
Subscribers may then make a variety of adjustments to their Peacock membership, such as upgrading or downgrading from the Premium or Premium Plus plan, as well as altering payment details.
How can I terminate my Peacock membership?
Subscribers may terminate their peacock membership using the same basic steps as mentioned.
To cancel your Peacock subscription, follow these steps:
- Peacock's webpage may be found here.
- Sign in
- In the top-right corner, click the profile symbol.
- "Account" is the option to choose.
- Under "Your Plan," choose "Change Plan."
- Select "Peacock Free" from the drop-down menu.
- Select "Change Plan" from the drop-down menu.
If the option to cancel the plan isn't available, there is another method to cancel your subscription: go to the website's support area.
- Peacock's assistance section may be found here.
- Select "Plans & Payments" from the drop-down menu.
- Select "Cancel Plan" from the drop-down menu.
- "Cancel" must be confirmed.
- Please log in (if not already signed in)
- To complete the cancelling procedure, follow the on-page instructions.
Peacock subscribers may also use the button below to go straight to the "Cancel Plan" page and proceed to step 4 as described above.
Changes to Peacock subscriptions for Xfinity subscribers
Regardless of whether you are a Comcast Xfinity user or not, the methods above should work in most cases. However, since these customers are not paid for the ad-supported version, they may discover that even after canceling, they still have access to it. For example, those users may discover that following the aforementioned cancellation instructions only cancels a paid Premium+ membership.
While it may not be handy for individuals who have no plans to use the service in the future, Peacock points out that there are no charges associated with having access, and therefore having access will not affect your monthly payment.
If you are a qualifying Xfinity customer, you will continue to enjoy free access to Peacock Premium.
If you are unable to cancel the free membership, double-check that you are not being charged anything for Peacock.
To check your account for Peacock charges, follow these steps:
- Peacock's webpage may be found here.
- In the upper right-hand corner, click the profile symbol.
- Select "Sign In" from the drop-down menu.
- Click the profile button once more.
- Select "Plans & Payment" from the drop-down menu.
- Select "View Payment History" from the drop-down menu.
How often do you tune in to Peacock?
One of the advantages of Peacock, or any other streaming service for that matter, is that there is no commitment or obligation. Viewers subscribe on a monthly basis and pay in advance for the next month. As a result, subscribers to any service, including Peacock, may terminate their membership at any time without penalty and keep access for the balance of the current paying cycle, as well as resume it anytime they like.
As a result, regardless of whether you enjoy the Peacock streaming service or not, if you are paying for a membership and are not using it often enough, it is worth considering canceling the subscription for the time being and spending the money on something you will watch. In this way, the cancellation might be seen as a pause in Peacock until you are ready to watch it again.
If you use this halting strategy to any active subscriptions, you'll guarantee that you're only paying for the services you're utilizing.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
What Percentage of Fees Are Taken for Gambling
What Percentage of Fees Are Taken for Gambling?
A recent study by WalletHub looked at the percentage of gambling fees taken by different states. The study found that the percentage of gambling fees varies significantly from state to state. In some states, such as Nevada and New Jersey, almost all of the gambling fees are taken by the state. In other states, such as Oregon and Illinois, only a small percentage of the gambling fees are taken by the state.
The study also found that the amount of money taken by the state varies significantly from state to state. In Nevada, for example, the state takes almost 90% of the gambling fees. In Oregon, on the other hand, the state takes only 6% of the gambling fees.
The study also looked at how much money is generated by gambling fees. It found that in Nevada, for example, the state takes in more than $1 billion per year in gambling fees. In Oregon, on the other hand, the state takes in only $40 million per year in gambling fees.
Why Is There Such a Wide Range in Percentage of Fees Taken?
There are several possible explanations for why there is such a wide range in percentage of fees taken by states. One possible explanation is that different states have different regulations governing gambling. Another possible explanation is that different states have different tax rates on gambling income.
A third possibility is that different states have different levels of competition among casinos vying for customers. This could lead to higher or lower percentages of fees being taken by the state depending on how competitive the market is.
Percentage of Fees Taken For Gambling
The percentage of fees that casinos keep for gambling can vary greatly, but it is typically around 10 percent. This amount can be reduced through bonuses and other promotions, but it is generally the same no matter which casino you choose to play at.
This percentage is taken from the total amount of money that is gambled, less any winnings that are paid out. So, if you wager $100 and win $50, the casino would take $10 (10 percent) from your initial bet plus an additional $5 from your winnings for a total loss of $15. The casino would then payout the remaining $35 to you.
It's important to remember that not all casinos are created equal. Some may have higher or lower percentages depending on the games that are offered. For example, blackjack has a lower house edge than slots so casinos may have a lower percentage for blackjack than they do for slots.
How Much of the Fee Goes to Gambling ?
' How Much of the Fee Goes to Gambling? The casino's advertising promises great returns, but how much of the fee actually goes to gambling? The answer may surprise you because very little goes to gambling. Most of the money that casinos take in goes to cover their costs- including marketing and salaries',
Casinos are a multimillion dollar industry that continue to grow year after year. Many gamblers believe that by playing at a casino they are paving the way for easy money. However, how much of the fee actually goes to gambling?
The answer is not as much as many people would like to think. In fact, most of the money that casinos take in goes towards covering their costs - including marketing and employee salaries. For example, a study conducted by the University of Las Vegas found that only about two percent of casino revenue comes from slot machines . This means that the vast majority of money made at a casino is through other games, such as blackjack or roulette.
So what happens to all of the money that isn't gambled away? Unfortunately, most of it goes back into the pockets of casino owners. For example, in Nevada - where gambling is legal - more than 70 percent of casino revenue goes straight to state and local governments in taxes . This large sum covers things such as education, infrastructure, and public services.
While there is no denying that casinos make a lot of money, very little of it actually goes towards gambling. So if you're looking to gamble your way to riches, you're better off looking elsewhere.
What percentage of gambling profits go to the casino?
Casinos make a lot of money. One popular game in casinos is slot machines. The house edge in slot machines is usually around 3%. That means that for every $100 that a player bets, the casino keeps $3 and gives the player back $97.
The average gambler doesn't usually think about what percentage of gambling profits go to the casino. They just assume that the casino always wins. But it's important to know how much of the money that you're betting is actually going back to the casino.
In most cases, the casino will keep around 25% of all gambling profits. That means for every $100 that a player bets, the casino will keep $25 and give the player back $75. So if you're playing at a slot machine with a 3% house edge, you can expect to lose about $3 for every $100 that you bet.
Of course, these numbers can vary depending on the game and the casino. But in general, casinos will keep around 25% of all gambling profits.
Casinos keep 90% of gambling fees
Casinos are businesses and, as such, have bills to pay. They need to turn a profit in order to remain in business, and one of the ways they do this is by charging fees for gambling. How much they charge patrons varies by casino, but it's usually around 10%. So, if you gamble away $100, the casino will keep $10 and give you back $90.
Theoretically, casinos could keep all of the money people gamble away. After all, it's not like players are required to hand over any money. But if casinos did that, they would probably go out of business pretty quickly. So, by keeping around 10%, casinos make sure they bring in enough revenue to cover their costs while also providing a service that people want.
Some people might think that 10% is too high a fee, but it's worth remembering that casinos offer a variety of games and entertainment options beyond just gambling. Plus, they're not the only ones who take a cut from gambling transactions - credit card companies and online payment processors do as well. So, when you factor in all of the costs associated with gambling, 10% actually seems like a pretty reasonable fee.


text:
Deirdre Saoirse Moen
Sounds Like Weird
Menlo Park
© 2022 Deirdre Saoirse Moen
Jekyll Themes
Some Things Need To Be Mocked: Penny Arcade Edition
25 November 2013
Like this job posting.
"We're terrible at work-life balance" vs. "You need to have a crazy-person level of attention to detail" — which requires, you know, sleep. And downtime. Look, read
Tom DeMarco's book
"A BA/BS or greater degree in Computer Science or a related field" vs. "Annual Salary: Negotiable, but you should know up front we're not a terribly money-motivated group. We're more likely to spend less money on salary and invest that on making your day-to-day life at work better." So you should know that those student loans you almost certainly have aren't going to get paid. Nor are you going to be able to afford a decent enough look to warrant being on camera.
"Annual Salary: Negotiable, but you should know up front we're not a terribly money-motivated group. We're more likely to spend less money on salary and invest that on making your day-to-day life at work better" vs. "Flexibility to travel up to 30% of the time." I know people who travel for a living where the
on their airline tickets alone exceed their annual salary. Travel is expensive. Travel 30% of the time is expensive. So, this is utter horseshit. The planes and hotels are worth more than the employee — that's what this is saying.
"We are quite literally looking for a person that can do four jobs." You've got 15-20 people already, you are large enough for some specialization.
"We're looking for a web developer / software developer / sys admin to join our small family." It's not a family.
It's a job.
The brick does not love you.
"So yes, we run lean. Most of us would say maybe a little TOO lean, but being pushed to your limit is part of the job." Listen worm, if I'm going to go into BDSM as a career path, it'll be as a dominatrix.
Note that there's no statement of non-discrimination in said job posting. Which should be obvious with this line: "You should have no problems working in a creative and potentially offensive environment." Especially given Penny Arcade's history of being, well, offensive.
More interesting commentary here in Christopher Buecheler's post.
Related Posts
Homejoy: Another Silicon Valley Tech Startup Cult
What's Wrong With Jokingly Asking for the Scoop?
Women and Performance Reviews
Model View Culture / Bigger Issues
The Seventies: Getting into Programming


text: Publisher PlayWay and developer Freaky Games have announced its next simulator game Pig Skater Simulator. The title doesn't have an official launch date yet but is available to wishlist now on Steam. \n \nPig Skater Simulator stars a pig who has managed to escape from a lab. Something activated within the pig's brain to transform it into an intelligent creature who can also skate. The pig managed to find a skateboard and begin to ride it like it was second-nature. According to the developer, the pig has amazing skating skills. \n \nSince the pig has developed a love for skateboarding, it wants only the best boards. But one needs money to buy new skateboarding equipment. The pig just so happens to have a fondness for pearls, which is why it destroys everything in its path. Sometimes some of the things that the pig breaks will drop valuable pearls that the pig can use to buy new skating equipment. \n \nThe pig will go on several missions to find these rare pearls. This includes smashing through supermarkets, running through family picnics, and flying through traffic. \n \n \n \nWhile on these missions, the pig collects more than pearls. Pigs will collect points depending on how much damage it creates. The creature also has an app on its mobile phone with various settings. \n \nAs an added bonus, the pig is customizable. Players can collect accessories like hats, boots, headphones, and more. There is also a "freestyle" option that allows players to paint directly onto the pig. \n \nThe trailer also shows that players can level up the pig's various skills. These skills will help the pig become more powerful during missions but also survive getting hit by dangerous obstacles. From the video, the pig may be the most dangerous one of all. \n \nThe game has a short one-minute trailer that shows the pig running through various buildings and causing trouble for humans and vehicles. While the pig loves skateboarding, it acquires a jet pack from the lab, it escapes from to let it cause mayhem in the air. \n \nPig Skater Simulator isn't a serious game. It's meant to be a light-hearted experience where players can help a pig collect pearls and get revenge on humans for keeping it in a lab. \n \nPig Skater Simulator is inspired by other physics-bending games in its genre. \n \nWhile Freaky Games doesn't have any other games listed on Steam, PlayWay has developed several times. Their library of games includes House Flipper, Car Mechanic Simulator, Cooking Simulator, and much more. \n \nPig Skater Simulator will launch in the future on PC.


text:
ZTE Corporation is a global leader in telecommunications and information technology. Founded in 1985 and listed on both the Hong Kong and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges, the company has been committed to providing innovative technologies and integrated solutions for global operators, government and enterprise, and consumers from over 160 countries across the globe. Serving over 1/4 of the global population, the company is dedicated to enabling connectivity and trust everywhere for a better future.
We are recruiting to fill the position below:
Job Title: Administrative Director
Location: Lagos
Job type: Full-time
Level: Mid-Senior level
Job Description
- Daily affairs, responsible for attendance supervision of representative office, rental of housing and other fixed assets, canteen staff management, office supplies, gift distribution, policy implementation, etc.
- Culture and cohesion construction, responsible for the planning and implementation of cohesion activities, strengthening iCenter space construction, cultural wall publicity management, etc., to help enhance team cohesion and engagement.
- Complete other tasks assigned by the leader.
- Responsible for visa management of Chinese and local employees.
- To be responsible for the information security construction and management of subsidiaries.
- Office environment, responsible for health and safety, 7s and fire protection related work, irregular inspection of office area and laboratory.
- Reimbursement of expenses, responsible for reimbursement of work fees, cohesion, transportation and other expenses, as well as collection and mailing of reimbursement documents.
- Be responsible for the team building within the department and establish a professional administrative and logistics team.
Job Requirements
- Bachelor's Degree or above from reputed university in related field.
- 1-3 years or above related experience in administrative manager is preferred.
- Good ability of Chinese (preferred) and English listening, speaking, reading and writing.
- High energy and enthusiasm with an emphasis on teamwork and job enjoyment.
- Sense of urgency and willingness to respond eagerly to opportunities and challenges.
How to Apply
Interested and qualified candidates should send their CV to: email@example.com using the Job Title as the subject of the e-mail.


text: This guided arts-and-crafts activity gives young artists everything they need to create a shimmering "stained glass" work of art. The results are gorgeous: Shaped sticker-gems depict a magical unicorn under a beautiful rainbow. Use the included cord and suction cup to hang the finished artwork in a sunny window to see this pretty scene shimmer to life! It's easy to create: Just match the stickers


text:
UK local government pension pool Border to Coast will launch a £1.3bn listed alternatives fund early next year, investing in "vital infrastructure, including those essential for the net zero energy transition". The portfolio will incorporate renewables, energy storage and healthcare. It will aim to outperform the MSCI All Country World Index over five years.
BlackRock has announced that it will incorporate 'climate transition benchmarks' into its $9bn iShares ESG ETF range. From December, the family's benchmarks will meet the EU's requirements for Climate Transition Benchmarks, making the funds eligible under Article 9 of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation. BlackRock will also update its exclusions policy for the ETFs, axing controversial weapons providers and "unconventional" oil and gas firms. From November 2022, an environmental harm screen will be applied.
Morningstar has also launched a global index aligned with the EU's Climate Transition Benchmark, alongside another based on the bloc's more ambitious Paris Aligned Benchmark methodology.
Digital wealth manager Moneyfarm has launched a range of 'socially responsible' ETF portfolios. Funds are selected based on manager voting policies, carbon emissions, involvement in controversies and ESG-related risk exposure.
L'Oreal's nature impact fund, which it runs through Mirova, has made its first investment. The €50m vehicle has taken a minority stake in the Real Wild Estates Company, for an undisclosed sum. The firm finances rewilding projects in the UK.
Data provider TP ICAP and environmental risk management firm Speedwell have partnered to launch an index that uses global weather data to track the impacts of climate change. The providers claim that the index allows financial risk related to the rate of climate change to be traded for hedging purposes, and will allow investors to "transact tailored structures relating to climate change using over-the-counter futures and options".
Invesco has launched an exchange-traded fund tracking the ESG version of the Nasdaq 100. The fund, which Invesco says is the first of its kind in Europe, excludes companies involved in controversial activities including alcohol, small arms and thermal coal, and weights the remaining firms by market cap and their Sustainalytics ESG risk rating.
Circulate Capital's LAC Ocean Fund has secured $4m in backing from the Inter-American Development Bank's innovation lab, to provide finance and expertise to SMEs and start-ups dealing with ocean plastic in the Caribbean.


text:
Alert: On Sept. 8, 2022, DHS announced a final rule that will implement the public charge ground of inadmissibility. The final rule will be effective on Dec. 23, 2022, and will apply to applications postmarked (or electronically submitted) on or after that date.
Alert: On Dec. 23, 2022, the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility final rule will go into effect.
Final Rule to Restore Asylum Regulations Consistent with Asylumworks Vacatur
Alert: More recent information is available on our Fiscal Year 2023 Employment-Based Adjustment of Status FAQs.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) invites you to participate in a virtual stakeholder engagement on the processing of Form I-730, Refugee/Asylee Relative Petition, on Thursday, July 21, from 2-3 p.m. Eastern. The Form I-730 is used by certain principal refugees and asylees to request follow-to-join benefits for their qualifying spouse and/or unmarried children under 21 years of age.
Regional centers use this form to demonstrate continued eligibility for regional center designation.
USCIS wants to hear from legal representatives as we prepare to make Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal, available for online filing. We want to understand the challenges and pain points of the application process. We will take what we learn from your input to help design the online filing experience for Form I-589.
This form is used by any economic unit, public or private, in the United States that is involved with promoting economic growth (including increased export sales, improved regional productivity, job creation, or increased domestic capital investment).
Contains data on receipts, approvals, and denials for I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. Data are classified by eligibility category and filing type for fiscal year 2021.
Contains data on receipts, approvals, and denials for I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. Data are classified by eligibility category and filing type for fiscal years 2003 through 2021.


text:
Levine Communications Office mourns the loss of friend and colleague, veteran publicist Ronni Chasen. We were saddened and stunned to hear of her death that took place on Tuesday Nov 16th. Ronni was gunned down on Sunset Boulevard early Tuesday, moments after she left the star-studded premiere of the movie "Burlesque". Police have not uncovered any motive or indicated any suspects, but have launched a thorough investigation into her death.
Michael Levine, head of LCO, remembers Ronni as a "beloved, iconic figure" and has started a reward fund to assist the Beverly Hills Police Department in bringing her attackers to justice. The goal for the fund is $25,000 to be raised by next week. We urge our friends in the Hollywood community to help us in the effort to find the criminals behind this senseless act.
Our deepest condolences go out to Ronnie's family and friends.
If you have any information about this crime please contact the Beverly Hills Police Department immediately. If you'd like to contribute to the reward fund, please contact LCO directly at (310) 300-0950 x 230.


text:
TOKYO (Reuters) - Japanese electronics company Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd. 6764.T is in talks with a domestic mobile phone maker to sell its struggling cellphone operations, public broadcaster NHK said on its Web site on Saturday.
Sanyo has decided to sell its mobile phone business as part of its effort to improve group-wide profitability, and agreement is expected as early as by the end of the year, NHK said, without mentioning a likely buyer or sale price.
Japanese major mobile phone makers include Sony Corp. 6758.T, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. 6752.T, Sharp Corp. 6753.T, Toshiba Corp. 6502.T, NEC Corp. 6701.T, Fujitsu Ltd. 6702.T and Casio Computer Co. Ltd.6952.T.
Sanyo, the world's largest rechargeable battery maker competing with Sony, last month posted a 72 percent fall in quarterly operating profit, hit by sluggish mobile phone sales and higher raw materials prices.
Sanyo now expects to sell about 11 million units of mobile phones in the current business year to March 2008, down from its initial estimates of 12.5-12.6 million.
Sanyo spokesman Akihiko Oiwa denied the NHK report, saying the company is exploring all possible measures to strengthen its mobile phone operations.
Osaka-based Sanyo posted a net loss for the past three business years, hit by sharp price falls, hefty restructuring costs and an earthquake damage to its semiconductor plant.
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.


text:
The common quail (Coturnix coturnix) is a popular game species for which restocking with farm-reared individuals is a common practice. In some areas, the number of released quails greatly surpasses the number of wild breeding common quail. However, common quail are difficult to raise in captivity and this casts suspicion about a possible hybrid origin of the farmed individuals from crosses with domestic Japanese quail (C. japonica). In this study we used a panel of autosomal microsatellite markers to characterize the genetic origin of quails reared for hunting purposes in game farms in Spain and of quails from an experimental game farm which was founded with hybrids that have been systematically backcrossed with wild common quails. The genotypes of these quail were compared to those of wild common quail and domestic strains of Japanese quail. Our results show that more than 85% of the game farm birds were not common quail but had domestic Japanese quail ancestry. In the experimental farm a larger proportion of individuals could not be clearly separated from pure common quails. We conclude that the majority of quail sold for restocking purposes were not common quail. Genetic monitoring of individuals raised for restocking is indispensable as the massive release of farm-reared hybrids could represent a severe threat for the long term survival of the native species.
Citation: Sanchez-Donoso I, Vilà C, Puigcerver M, Butkauskas D, Caballero de la Calle JR, Morales-Rodríguez PA, et al. (2012) Are Farm-Reared Quails for Game Restocking Really Common Quails (Coturnix coturnix)?: A Genetic Approach. PLoS ONE 7(6): e39031. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039031
Editor: Nadia Singh, North Carolina State University, United States of America
Received: March 9, 2012; Accepted: May 15, 2012; Published: June 12, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Sanchez-Donoso et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The work has been supported by the following funders: "Dirección General de Investigación y Gestión del plan nacional de I+D+i" (CGL2004-05308/BOS and CGL2007-63199/BOS projects); "Direcció General de Recerca" (2009-SGR-481 project); "Departament d'Universitats, Investigació i Societat de la Informació" of the "Generalitat de Catalunya"; "Ajuts per a la formació i contractació de personal investigador novell" (FI grant) of the "Generalitat de Catalunya" (http://www.gencat.cat/); "Proyecto Regional de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha" (PII1I09-0174-0915 project); grant from the "Programa de captación del conocimiento para Andalucía" of the "Junta de Andalucía" (http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/index.html). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Restocking has become one of the most commonly used practices for the conservation and management of endangered and game species. One important reason for restocking is to supplement fisheries and game bags in order to increase productivity or maintain recreational activities [1]. In some cases this may threaten local gene pools [2]. Restocking for hunting purposes has been carried out with diverse species such as deer [3], marmot [4], wild boar [5], waterfowl [6] and different Galliform species [7], [8], including partridges [9]–[11], pheasants [12] and quails [13]–[15].
The common quail (Coturnix coturnix) is a migratory Galliformes species distributed across Eurasia during its breeding period [16] and currently has an unfavourable conservation status in Europe due to a large historical decline [17]. Even so, the common quail is a popular game species with an important socio-economic impact. Only in Spain, more than 1,300,000 quails have been hunted annually during the period 1973–2010 (Yearbook of Agro-alimentary Statistics of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fishing and Food). Restocking with farm-reared quails to increase bag numbers is a very common practice in several European countries, such as Italy [18], Greece [14], [19], The Republic of Serbia, Montenegro, Romania and Spain [13], [15]. According to Guyomarc'h [16], 430,000–480,000 released quails were shot in France during the 1983–1984 hunting season, corresponding to 67%–75% of the 640,000 total individuals hunted. In Catalonia (Northeast Spain), an average of more than 68,000 farm-reared quails have been released annually during the period of 1990–2006 (Hunting order plans of the Regional Government of Catalonia). Taking into account that the estimated wild male quail population in Catalonia ranges between 5,347 and 20,847 individuals [20], the number of quails restocked greatly exceeds the breeding population.
However, rearing common quails in captivity for restocking is difficult because of their restlessness [21]. This has led to some concern about the genetic origin of farm-reared quails. A possible explanation for the great reproductive success in farms is that those individuals could be of hybrid origin, resulting from crosses between wild common quails and domestic Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica). The Japanese quail is sister species to the common quail and is distributed across eastern Asia [22]. For several centuries Japanese quails have been bred in captivity and selected for meat and egg productivity [23]. These domestic Japanese quail first entered Europe (France and Italy) in the 1950 s [24], [25]. As a result of the selection for life in captivity, these birds have lost their migratory restlessness [26], show some reluctance to move and fly, and have lower anti-predatory instinct.
These differences in behaviour suggest that restocking with farm-reared domestic Japanese quails or hybrids between the two species (using this term to refer to all admixed individuals and not just first generation hybrids) would result in a conservation problem. In fact, several authors have warned about the risk that restocking can represent for common quails when carried out with domestic Japanese quails and hybrids [14]–[16], [27], [28]. It entails a potential threat to the native common quail because it could lead to the introgression of domestic Japanese quail alleles and a subsequent loss of migratory behaviour and decline in fitness in the native common quail population [16], [29]. Individuals that do not migrate or that show low mobility could be more exposed to adverse climatic conditions, loss of habitat after the harvesting of cereal crops (the usual habitat of the species), predation, or a lack of food resources [16]. Thus, the arrival of maladaptive genes from domestic Japanese quail could reduce the survival and adaptive potential of wild common quail.
This conservation concern seems to be a real one: hybrid individuals have already been detected in common quail breeding areas in different European countries such as Portugal, France, Italy and Spain [13]–[16]. Moreover, recent field experiments with released radio-tagged farm-reared individuals of hybrid origin have shown that they can mate with wild common quails and produce fertile offspring (unpub. data) as happens in captivity [30]. Other closely related native Galliformes, the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) [31], [32] and the rock partridge (A. graeca) [33], are threatened by hybridization resulting from game restocking with sister species or hybrids. As a result of the concern about hybridization, the release of Japanese quails and hybrids is illegal in Spain, Portugal, France and Greece. However, the diagnosis of the specific origin of farmed quails used for restocking is usually based on their morphology despite the difficulty in unequivocally differentiating between pure common quails and admixed individuals on the basis of their phenotype ([34] in [14]). Thus, genetic analyses are needed to assess species identity of restocked farm-reared individuals.
The aim of this study was to identify the genetic origin of quails reared for restocking and hunting purposes in five different Spanish game farms by using a panel of nuclear microsatellite markers. We also analysed quails from an experimental farm that managed to reduce the genetic contribution of the founders, which had domestic Japanese quail ancestry, by crossing farm-born individuals with wild common quails. We hypothesize that a large proportion of the released quails are of hybrid ancestry due the easy breeding of domestic Japanese quails in captivity. If this is the case, the release of these birds could negatively affect the long term survival of natural common quail populations.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
All work related with animals in this study has been conducted according to the guidelines of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). It fulfills the ethic recommendations of the European Union and the Spanish legislation and has been approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation from the University of Barcelona and from the University of Castilla-La Mancha.
Samples origin and collection
One hundred and fifty-two quails were sampled for this study. They were collected from four different origins (Table 1). They consist of: 1) Males and females randomly sampled from five different Spanish game farms in 2009 and 2010, purchased for restocking and hunting purposes. 2) Quails from an experimental farm from the University of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) managed for about 20 years to reduce the genetic contribution of founders. These individuals are descendants of crosses between admixed females with wild common quail males whose offspring has been backcrossed with wild common quail males in successive generations. 3) Wild quail males captured (see [15]) during 1996–2009 around Seville (South Spain), Barcelona (Northeast Spain) and Drenthe (The Netherlands) which were identified as common quails on the basis of their song, phenotype and preliminary genetic analyses. 4) Domestic Japanese quails from two laboratory lines from the Laboratory of Molecular Ecology of the Institute of Ecology of the Nature Research Centre, Vilnius University (Lithuania) [35], and from four different Spanish meat farms.
Blood (100 µl) or muscle samples were individually stored at −20°C in 95% ethanol until DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer's protocols.
Typing of microsatellite loci
Individuals were genotyped for 11 unlinked autosomal microsatellite loci originally developed for Japanese quail [36], [37]: GUJ0001, GUJ0017, GUJ0028, GUJ0039, GUJ0044, GUJ0057, GUJ0065, GUJ0074, GUJ0085, GUJ0093 and GUJ0097. Loci were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). While some markers were PCR-amplified in a multiplex, others were amplified separately and subsequently pooled before electrophoresis. Detailed protocols are available upon request. All PCR products were electrophoresed on an ABI 3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems) following manufacturer's protocols. Alleles were sized and scored using the software GeneMapper v3.5 (Applied Biosystems).
Analysis of microsatellite data
To measure genetic variation, average number of alleles per locus and allelic richness (mean number of alleles per locus corrected for minimum sample size, in this case nine successfully genotyped individuals per population and locus) [38] were calculated using FSTAT version 184.108.40.206 [39]. In order to measure the marker informativeness we calculated the Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) [40], which takes into account the number of alleles per locus and the frequency of these alleles, using EXCEL MICROSATELLITE TOOLKIT 3.1.1 [41]. We used the same software to calculate observed (HO) and expected (gene diversity, HE) heterozygosities [42].
Patterns of genetic differentiation were visualized by plotting the individuals in a two-dimensional space according to their microsatellite composition, independently of any a priori classification, using a factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) in GENETIX [43].
To identify genetically distinct clusters present in the data we used a Bayesian clustering procedure implemented in STRUCTURE 2.3.2 [44]. STRUCTURE identifies the number (K) of genetically distinct clusters that maximizes the likelihood of the data and estimates, for each individual, the fraction of the genome (q) that belongs to each one of the clusters. Analyses were performed using all individuals under the "admixture model" (as each individual may have ancestry in more than one parental population), with correlated allele frequencies and without population or sampling location information (USEPOPINFO and LOCPRIOR inactives). Simulations were run for 100,000 steps following a burn-in period of 30,000 steps, considering values of K ranging between two and 10, and were replicated five times [45] after verifying that results did not vary significantly with longer runs of iterations. Likelihood values were observed to converge during the runs. For K = 2, for each individual we estimated the 90% probability interval for the proportion of membership to each cluster (q). The best value of K was chosen following the method proposed by Evanno et al. (2005) [46], with STRUCTURE HARVESTER [47], which takes into account the rate of change in the log likelihood between successive K values. Each individual was assigned exclusively to one of the inferred clusters when its q to that cluster was equal or larger than a threshold corresponding to the minimum value observed among the non-admixed individuals used as reference (see below). Alternatively, individuals that showed lower q values for all clusters could not be assigned exclusively to one of them and were considered putatively admixed.
After confirming with STRUCTURE that none of the wild common quails and domestic Japanese quails had a genome that seemed admixed, we considered them purebred and used them as reference in analysis with NEWHYBRIDS 1.1 [48]. With this software, we computed the posterior probability (P) for each individual to belong to each of the following genotypic classes: parental purebred 1 (P1), parental purebred 2 (P2), first generation hybrid (F1), second generation hybrid (F2, offspring of crosses between F1 hybrids), backcross of F1 with P1 (Bx1) and backcross of F1 with P2 (Bx2). Posterior distributions were evaluated after running five independent analyses to confirm convergence, starting with different random seeds, for 105 Monte Carlo Markov Chain iterations after 104 burn-in steps, without using prior allele frequency information. Analyses were run for four combinations of prior distributions (JEFFREYS or UNIFORM for Theta and Pi) to explore the robustness of the results, as recommended by the software authors [48]. The affinity of an individual to the genotype classes was assessed by its posterior probability values (P): those that showed P≥0.85 to one genotype class were assigned to that class; if no value reached 0.85, but the sum of all hybrid classes was above this threshold, individuals were identified as hybrids of unknown generation [45]; individuals whose origin could not be identified under these criteria were left unclassified.
Loci and population genetic characteristics
All 152 individuals studied were successfully genotyped at seven or more of the 11 markers, and more than 95% of them were typed for eight or more loci. All loci were polymorphic in the four groups of quails studied. A total of 224 alleles were found, 145 of which were exclusive to the reference wild common quails and eight to the reference domestic Japanese quails (excluding individuals from game and experimental farms), implying great power for hybrid identification.
Domestic Japanese quails showed the lowest average number of alleles per locus, allelic richness and PIC while the highest values were found in wild common quails (Table 2). Values for game and experimental farm quails were intermediate. Observed heterozygosity was higher than expected in experimental farm quails (p = 0.0003). On the other hand, observed heterozygosity was lower than expected in domestic Japanese quails (p = 0.0012) as could be expected considering that the samples originated from separate breeding lines.
Population differentiation
Wild common quails appeared completely separate from domestic Japanese quails along the first factorial component (FA-I) of the FCA (Figure 1). Game farm quails occupied an intermediate position between common quails and domestic Japanese quails along the same axis showing almost no overlap with either of them. Individuals from the experimental farm occupied the same range of values compared to wild common quails along the first axis, but showed a clear separation along the second axis (FA-II), with some individual values overlapping the range observed for wild common quails.
Green: wild common quails; red: domestic Japanese quails; blue: game farm quails; yellow: experimental farm quails.
According to the approach of Evanno et al. (2005) [46], the total sample could be subdivided in four clusters (Figure 2). Likelihood values converged during the runs and results did not change across replicates. Common quails and domestic Japanese quails were completely separated in two different clusters. All wild common quails (N = 42) were unequivocally assigned to cluster 1 (C1), with q1≥0.84, while all domestic Japanese quails (N = 39) were assigned to cluster 2 (C2), with q2≥0.92. Considering these results, we established that q values under a threshold value of 0.84 could be suggesting admixed ancestry. Of the game farm quails (N = 52), 73% grouped in a separate cluster (C3) while 27% appeared as admixed. Experimental farm quails (N = 19) split between their own cluster (C4) (48%), and C1 (26%) (with common quails), while 26% of them were identified as admixed. These results show that none of the game farm quails were assigned to the same cluster as common quails, and this was also the case for 74% of the experimental farm quails.
Each vertical bar represents one individual and clusters are represented by colours. The extent of the colours within each column represents the individual proportion of membership (q) to each one of the clusters.
Hybrid identification
The partition of the sample in four groups was the result of the relative isolation between the different groups. However, since the sample included two evolutionarily distinct lineages (common and Japanese quails) and perhaps admixed individuals, we also investigated the partition of the sample into two groups (K = 2). The likelihood values converged during the runs and results did not change between replicates. Common quails and domestic Japanese quails appeared completely differentiated in separate clusters, as in the previous analysis (Figure 2). All wild common quails (N = 42) were unequivocally assigned to cluster 1 (C1), with q1≥0.87, while all domestic Japanese quails (N = 39) were assigned to cluster 2 (C2) with q2≥0.83 (Figure 2). In this case and considering these results, we established the value of 0.83 as the threshold below which individuals could be classified as admixed. Forty-three of 52 (83%) game farm quails had admixed genotypes, eight (15%) clustered in C1 with common quails and one (2%) with domestic Japanese quails in C2. Sixteen (84%) of the experimental farm quails clustered in C1, while the remaining three individuals (16%) had admixed genotypes (Figure 2).
We also evaluated the width of the 90% probability interval for each q for K = 2. While none of the wild common quails or domestic Japanese quails had probability intervals that excluded the possibility of being pure (q1 = 1 or 0, respectively; Figure 3), purebred ancestry could be excluded in 71% of the game farm quails. On the contrary, probability intervals did not exclude the possibility of being a pure common quail for any of the individuals from the experimental farm (Figure 3).
The value of q1 indicates membership to the same cluster as wild common quails. Individuals are sorted by group and by q1 value. Probability intervals excluding 0 and 1 are indicative of admixed ancestry. Horizontal lines indicate threshold values for q used for a first separation of pure and admixed individuals (see text).
After defining wild common quails and domestic Japanese quails as reference purebred groups, we used NEWHYBRIDS to identify the origin of all farm quails. More than 95% of wild common quails and domestic Japanese quails showed P≥0.85 to their genotypic class (P1 and P2, respectively), independently of the prior combinations used. This confirmed that these samples could be used as reference groups. Game farm individuals that were classified as F2 hybrids using a Jeffreys distributed prior for Theta were classified as domestic Japanese quails using a uniform prior. This last classification was considered unlikely due to the previously known information regarding the management of game farms (see discussion) and due to the results obtained with STRUCTURE when K = 2. For this reason, we only took into account results obtained using Jeffreys prior for Theta (individual classification did not show significant differences depending on the prior used for Pi). The analyses indicated that 46 out of 52 (88%) game farm quails were admixed (Figure 4). Thirty of these 46 could be identified as F2 hybrids, while 16 of them were hybrids of unknown generation (probably indicating older admixture). Three of the game farm quails (6%) could not be classified into a unique class, two were assigned as common quails and one as domestic Japanese quail. On the other hand, 10 out of 19 of the experimental farm quails (53%) were identified as common quails, seven (37%) could not be classified and two (10%) were hybrids of an unknown generation.
Each vertical bar represents one individual. Each colour represents the posterior probability (P) of each individual to belong to the six different genotypic classes. Game farm and experimental farm individuals are sorted as in Figure 2.
Comparing the results regarding game farm and experimental farm quails obtained with STRUCTURE for K = 2 and with NEWHYBRIDS, we observed assignment inconsistencies in only three individuals. For the three cases (three game farm quails) individuals were classified as common quails by STRUCTURE but as hybrids of unknown generation by NEWHYBRIDS. This is likely a result from ancient admixture with multiple generations of backcrossing with pure common quails. While all individuals were classified as either pure or admixed by the criteria that we defined in STRUCTURE, the classification with NEWHYBRIDS was more conservative and some of the individuals were left unclassified.
Our results showed that each one of the groups of quails studied had a unique identity that allowed its separation in genetic analyses. Thus, wild common quails, domestic Japanese quails, game farm quails and experimental farm quails formed four well separated groups, as suggested by STRUCTURE (Figure 2). Among these, wild common quails had the largest genetic diversity, as should be expected since the other groups represent smaller captive lineages that were more or less reproductively isolated from each other. Probably, the arrival of domestic Japanese quails from Asia into Europe did not involve many different lines [24], [25]. This bottleneck could have produced the low genetic diversity present in the domestic Japanese quail lines analysed. Similarly, the number of breeders in game farms is expected to be relatively small. On the other hand, domestic Japanese quails do not constitute a uniform population but are fragmented (with separate meat and laboratory lines, for example), as shown by the difference between observed and expected heterozygosity resulting from a Wahlund effect [49]. The opposite pattern is observed in the experimental farm, where outbred matings are regularly imposed.
The differentiation was largest between wild common quails and domestic Japanese quails since both groups appeared in the two extremes of the first axis of the FCA without any overlap (Figure 1). All STRUCTURE analyses clustered them in separate groups, including those with K = 2, which allowed separating the two evolutionary lineages. Also, a large number of alleles were not shared between the two groups, although this can be greatly affected by the sample size and by the fact that domestic Japanese quails were represented by inbred lines. This clear separation for the studied markers facilitates the identification of admixed individuals, overcoming the difficulties derived from their similar phenotypes.
Our analyses suggest that, contrary to the claims commonly expressed by farm managers, at least 85 to 90% (depending on the approach used) of the analysed game farm quails purchased for restocking purposes were not pure common quails and showed obvious signs of admixture with domestic Japanese quails. This estimate is based on the assumption that the reference individuals indeed represent purebred common and domestic Japanese quails. However, it is possible that some of them could have slightly admixed ancestry. Nevertheless, if this was the case, our numbers would be an underestimate of the proportion of admixed individuals in game farms, and the real proportion would be even larger.
This large proportion of admixed individuals does not seem exclusive to Spanish game farms. Previous genetic studies included a few game farm-reared quails and suggested hybrid origin in Portugal [50], France, Italy and Spain [14]. Most of the time, farm managers avoid revealing their procedures but indirect reports have suggested that they may often interbreed individuals of hybrid origin for many generations. We investigated the probability of farm individuals being pure or offspring of two generations of intercrossing or less (F1, F2 or a backcross of F1 to one of the two parental classes). It is likely that many of the individuals studied are the result of a larger number of generations of intercrossing, but in order to estimate the ancestry of each individual with higher precision we would require a larger number of markers with high PIC, which would allow a better separation between hybrid classes [45]. Nevertheless, our results clearly show the admixed ancestry of the studied game farm birds.
The analyses with NEWHYBRIDS indicated that, depending on the priors used, most game farm individuals were classified as domestic Japanese or F2 hybrids. We assumed that identification as F2 was more likely because of the results obtained with STRUCTURE with K = 2 and because of the mating strategies that may have been taking place in game farms to obtain individuals for hunting purposes [16]. Domestic Japanese quails and common quails [26], [51] could have been crossed, most likely domestic Japanese females with wild common quail males trapped in the field [50], and the offspring could have been subsequently intercrossed. With this procedure, fertile hybrids [30] may easily be obtained showing a "wilder" instinct, flying better and being smaller than the domestic Japanese quails [16], and thus being more attractive for sportive hunting. However, these hybrids inherit the reduced restlessness of domestic Japanese quails ([34] in [14]). Among the game farm quails analysed, between 4% and 15% were identified as common quails, depending on the approach used. This could reflect the occasional introduction of wild quails into the captive populations to act as breeders in order to decrease inbreeding and genetic load.
In the case of the experimental farm, common quail males have been regularly introduced to the farm breeding population during the last 20 years. In the last 10 years (about 10 generations) only females that are descendants of a common quail father have been used as breeders. Consequently, we expect a high frequency of common quail alleles in the genomes of quails from the experimental farm: 53 to 84% (depending on the methodological approach used) of the birds were classified as common quail. This implies that, after 20 generations of experimental crossing, between 10% and 16% of them are still identified as hybrids and 37% cannot be classified into any of the genotypic classes. In addition, we expect all individuals from this farm to carry Japanese quail mitochondrial DNA (see also [14]). The management strategy implemented in the experimental farm, trying to obtain individuals genetically more similar to the common quail than individuals from ordinary game farms, achieves its goal. However, we do not have any information about the possible cytonuclear conflicts deriving from the different origin of their mitochondrial and nuclear genomes, or about the relative fitness, behaviour and survival of these individuals in the wild compared to pure common quails. We do not know to which extent this management could minimise the impact of released admixed individuals on the native populations.
Due to the concern about the risk of restocking hybrid farm-reared quails, several European countries and regions have banned or regulated restocking practices (Portugal and France since 2002, Greece since 2007). In Spain, although different regions have different policies, the national law allows restocking with common quail, but not with Japanese quail or hybrids (Spanish Law 42/2007, Natural heritage and Biodiversity). Even so, many farm-reared individuals are still being released assuming that, in fact, they are pure common quails. Authorities allow quail releases trusting on the diagnosis of veterinarians that identify them as common quails on the only basis of their phenotype despite the fact that this identification method is usually ambiguous ([34] in [14]). Genetic analyses should be required to certify the origin of individuals used for restocking. Similarly, there is a need for an extensive survey of the diversity in wild quails to assess the impact that these releases may have had across its distribution range.
We thank Ricard Casanovas and Josep M. López, from the "Àrea d'Activitats Cinegètiques" of the Catalan government, for providing information about the Catalan Hunting order plans. We also thank Maribel Calle, Víctor Bonet-Arbolí and Elisabeth Pérez-Masdeu for technical assistance; Jennifer A. Leonnard and Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes for useful advice during the laboratory work, Jennifer A. Leonnard also for reviewing the English text; and Francesc Sardà-Palomera for reading the first draft and providing useful comments and suggestions.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: ISD CV MP JDRT. Performed the experiments: ISD CV MP JRCC PAMR JDRT. Analyzed the data: ISD CV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ISD CV MP DB JRCC PAMR JDRT. Wrote the paper: ISD CV MP JDRT.
- 1. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol Conserv 96: 1–11.
- 2. Mank JE, Carlson JE, Brittingham MC (2004) A century of hybridization: Decreasing genetic distance between American black ducks and mallards. Conserv Genet 5: 395–403.
- 3. DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Honeycutt RL, Rooney AP, Gonzales RA, et al. (2003) Genetic consequences of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) restoration in Mississippi. Mol Ecol 12: 3237–3252.
- 4. Kruckenhauser L, Pinsker W (2004) Microsatellite variation in autochthonous and introduced populations of the Alpine marmot (Marmota marmota) along a European west – east transect. J Zool Syst Evol Res 42: 19–26.
- 5. Vernesi C, Crestanello B, Pecchioli E, Tartari D, Caramelli D, et al. (2003) The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): a microsatellite analysis. Mol Ecol 12: 585–95.
- 6. Champagnon J, Guillemain M, Gauthier-Clerc M, Lebreton JD, Elmberg J (2009) Consequences of massive bird releases for hunting purposes: Mallard Anas platyrhynchos in the Camargue, southern France. Wildfowl, Special Issue 2: 184–191.
- 7. Sokos CK, Birtsas PK, Tsachalidis EP (2008) The aims of galliforms release and choice of techniques. Wildlife Biol 14: 412–422.
- 8. Lamont MM (2009) Conservation introduction: a potential tool for galliform conservation management? International Journal of Galliformes Conservation 1: 63–71.
- 9. Negro JJ, Torres MJ, Godoy JA (2001) RAPD analysis for detection and eradication of hybrid partridges (Alectoris rufa X A. graeca) in Spain. Biol Conserv 98: 19–24.
- 10. Randi E, Tabarroni C, Rimondi S, Lucchini V, Sfougaris A (2003) Phylogeography of the rock partridge (Alectoris graeca). Mol Ecol 12: 2201–2214.
- 11. Sevane N, Dunner S, García-Atance P, Cañón J (2011) Restocked and non-restocked populations genetic composition: a case study in red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa). J Biol Res-Thessalon 16: 266–273.
- 12. Bagliacca M, Falcini F, Porrini S, Zalli F, Fronte B (2008) Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) hens of different origin. Dispersion and habitat use after release. Ital J Anim Sci 7: 321–333.
- 13. Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD, Rodrigo-Rueda FJ, Puigcerver M, Gallego S, Nadal J (1993) Codornices japonesas en nuestros campos. Trofeo 277: 48–52.
- 14. Barilani M, Derégnaucourt S, Gallego S, Galli L, Mucci N, et al. (2005) Detecting hybridization in wild (Coturnix c. coturnix) and domesticated (Coturnix c. japonica) quail populations. Biol Conserv 126: 445–455.
- 15. Puigcerver M, Vinyoles D, Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD (2007) Does restocking with Japanese quail or hybrids affect native populations of common quail Coturnix coturnix? Biol Conserv 136: 628–635.
- 16. Guyomarc'h CJ (2003) Elements for a Common Quail Coturnix c. coturnix management plan. Game Wildl Sci 20: 1–92.
- 17.
Burfield I (2004) Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. Cambridge: Birdlife International. 374 p.
- 18.
Galli L (2003) Caratterizzazione genetica di Quaglia Coturnix coturnix e rischi d'inquinamento genetico a seguito delle immissioni di soggetti d'allevamento. PhD Thesis. Genoa: Università di Genova.
- 19. Tsiompanoudis AH, Kontsiotis VJ, Bakaloudis DE (2011) Observations of breeding and wintering European quail Coturnix coturnix in northern Greece. International Journal of Galliformes Conservation 2: 36–37.
- 20.
Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD, Puigcerver M, Gallego S (2004) Guatlla Coturnix coturnix. In: Estrada J, Pedrocchi V, Brotons L, Herrando S, editors. pp. 112–113. pp.
- 21.
Caballero de la Calle JR, Peña Montañés JC (1997) La explotación cinegética de la codorniz. In: Buxadé Carbó C, editor. Zootecnia. Bases de producción animal. Tomo XII. Producciones cinegéticas, apícolas y otras. Madrid: Ediciones Mundi-Prensa. pp. pp. 109–123.
- 22.
Johnsgard PA (1988) The quails, partridges, and francolins of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 23. Yamashina Y (1961) Quail breeding in Japan. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 38: 216–222.
- 24.
Rizzoni R, Lucchetti L (1957) La quaglia domestica. Bologna: Edizioni Agricola. 39 p.
- 25.
Rizzoni R, Lucchetti L (1972) Élevage et utilisation de la caille domestique. Paris: La Maison Rustique. 159 p.
- 26. Derégnaucourt S, Guyomarc'h JC, Spanò S (2005) Behavioural evidence of hybridization (Japanese x European) in domestic quail released as game birds. Appl Anim Behav Sci 94: 303–318.
- 27. Chazara O, Lumineau S, Minvielle F, Roux D, Feve K, et al. (2006) Étude des risques d'introgression génétique de la caille des blés (Coturnix coturnix coturnix) par la caille japonaise (Coturnix coturnix japonica): comparaison et intégration des données comportementales et moléculaires obtenues dans le sud-est de la France. Les actes du BRG 6: 317–334.
- 28. Chazara O, Minvielle F, Roux D, Bed'hom B, Feve K, et al. (2010) Evicende for introgressive hybridization of wild common quail (Coturnix coturnix) by domesticated Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) in France. Conserv Genet 11: 1051–1062.
- 29. Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD, Puigcerver M, Gallego S (1992) Mating strategy in the European Quail Coturnix c. coturnix revealed by male population density and sex ratio in Catalonia, Spain. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 377–386.
- 30. Derégnaucourt S, Guyomarc'h JC, Aebischer N (2002) Hybridization between European Quail Coturnix coturnix and Japanese Quail Coturnix japonica. Ardea 90: 15–21.
- 31. Martínez-Fresno M, Henriques-Gil N, Arana P (2007) Mitochondrial DNA sequence variability in red-legged partridge, Alectoris rufa, Spanish populations and the origins of genetic contamination from A. chukar. Conserv Genet 9: 1223–1231.
- 32. Blanco-Aguiar JA, González-Jara P, Ferrero ME, Sánchez-Barbudo I, Virgós E, et al. (2008) Assessment of game restocking contributions to anthropogenic hybridization: the case of the Iberian red-legged partridge. Anim Conserv 11: 535–545.
- 33. Barilani M, Bernard-Laurent A, Mucci N, Tabarroni C, Kark S, et al. (2007) Hybridisation with introduced chukars (Alectoris chukar) threatens the gene pool integrity of native rock (A. graeca) and red-legged (A. rufa) partridge populations. Biol Conserv 137: 57–69.
- 34.
Derégnaucourt S (2000) Hybridization entre la caille des blés (Coturnix c. coturnix) et la caille japonaise (Coturnix c. japonica): Mise en evidence des risques de pollution génetique des populations naturelles par les cailles domestiques. PhD Thesis. Rennes: Université Rennes I.
- 35. Butkauskas D, Sruoga A, Tubelyte-Kirdiene V, Mozaliene E, Paulauskas A (2006) Enzyme polymorphism in two Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) lines with different concentrations of plasma lactate. Acta Zool Lit 16: 177–184.
- 36. Kayang BB, Inoue-Murayama M, Hoshi T, Matsuo K, Takahashi H, et al. (2002) Microsatellite loci in Japanese quail and cross-species amplification in chicken and guinea fowl. Genet Sel Evol 34: 233–253.
- 37. Kayang BB, Vignal A, Inoue-Murayama M, Miwa M, Monvoisin JL, et al. (2004) A first-generation microsatellite linkage map of the Japanese quail. Anim Genet 35: 195–200.
- 38. Leberg PL (2002) Estimating allelic richness: effects of sample size and bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 11: 2445–2449.
- 39. Goudet J (1995) Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86: 485–486.
- 40. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314–31.
- 41.
Park SDE (2001) Trypanotolerance in West African Cattle and the Population Genetic Effects of Selection. PhD Thesis. Dublin: University of Dublin.
- 42.
Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press. 512 p.
- 43.
Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F, et al. (1996–2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions. CNRS UMR 5171. Montpellier: Université de Montpellier II. http://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/genetix/ (accessed 06/03/2012).
- 44. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–59.
- 45. Vähä JP, Primmer CR (2006) Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci. Mol Ecol 15: 63–72.
- 46. Evanno G, Reganut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611–2620.
- 47.
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2011) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7. http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/structureHarvester/index.php# (accessed 06/03/2012).
- 48. Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160: 1217–29.
- 49.
Hamilton MB (2009) Population genetics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 407 p.
- 50. Amaral AJ, Silva AB, Grosso AR, Chikhi L, Bastos-Silveira C, et al. (2007) Detection of hybridization and species identification in domesticated and wild quails using genetic markers. Folia Zool 56: 285–300.
- 51.
Pérez F (1974) Coturnicultura. Tratado de cría y explotación industrial de codornices. Barcelona: Editorial Científico-Médica. 375 p.


text:
Group - Luna's All Shadowlands Herbs (includes 9.2)
All herbs. For alchemy, see Luna's All Shadowlands Alchemy Products. For inscription, see Luna's All Shadowlands Inscription products. For any other lists, search "Luna". If you see any errors, broken links, or missing items in any of my lists, please shoot me an email at lunette.paige at gmail dot com.
Views: 742
Private: No
Import String
Items in this group
|Global Market Value
|13g 86s 30c
|22g 97s 78c
|27g 10s 36c
|15g 81s 63c
|25g 36s 64c
|5g 26s 83c
|9g 40s 61c


text:
World Suicide Prevention Day is commemorated every year on 10 September. It is conducted by the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP) and supported by the World Health Organization (WHO). This day marks the world's commitment to give attention to suicide prevention.
The theme for World Suicide Prevention Day from 2021-23 is "Creating hope through action". This theme urges a need for a collective action by the society to address the issue of suicide.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 703,000 people end their lives every year in the world. For every person who dies by suicide, there are 20 other people who die by suicide, and many more go through suicidal thoughts. Millions of people are impacted by the behaviours of suicide, and go through extreme distress.
Every suicide impacts the people around them
Every suicide impacts the people around them. By reducing the stigma around suicide, and raising awareness about this public health concern, we can reduce the number of suicides all over the globe.
So, the motive of this day is to raise awareness about the prevention of suicide globally. The motive is achieved by facilitating open discussions about this problem at school, workplace, or home. The objectives of this day also include the promotion of stakeholder collaboration.
Suicide prevention
IASP established World Suicide Prevention Day in 2003. There are many factors which can drive someone to the point of dying by suicide. For example, suicidal thoughts can occur to someone who has went through bullying, child abuse, sexual violence, any type of mental illness like depression, substance abuse, trauma, discrimination, legal problems, etc.
The risk of suicide attempt can be reduced by being connected to the family, community support, or having access to healthcare.
There can be profound physical, mental, and economic impacts due to suicide or suicide attempts. People who survive a suicide attempt may end up having serious injuries which can cause long-term impacts on their health. They can also develop mental health issues like depression.
Fortunately, 90 percent of the people who engage in suicide attempt and survive, never go on to die because of suicide. If your loved one is isolating himself/herself, experiencing hopelessness or mood swings, then he or she might be suicidal. In this case, you should immediately provide support to him or her in all the ways you can.


text:
top of page
China American Psychoanalytic Alliance
Training the teachers and leaders of the next generation of Chinese psychodynamic psychotherapists
Dues Subscription
Thank you for signing up to subscribe to pay your CAPA dues annually! Please click the button below that indicates your contribution level, and you will be taken to PayPal to complete your subscription. If you would like to change or cancel your subscription at any time, please contact Tiffany Bryant- firstname.lastname@example.com
bottom of page


text:
FLASY 2018 is the 7th FLASY workshop on flavour symmetries. The workshop brings together researchers in the fields of flavour symmetries, neutrino physics, accelerator physics and cosmology to present new results, stimulate discussion and new collaborations.
This year's FLASY conference will be held at the Physics Department of the University of Basel in the city of Basel, Switzerland. The University of Basel is the oldest university in Switzerland.
Interested parties are invited to register for the conference and submit their abstract for the talk they would like to present. Plenary talks will be selected from the submitted abstracts; in the case of a large number of participants/abstracts, a parallel session may also be organized.
International Advisory Board:
G. Bhattacharyya (Saha Institute Kolkata)
A. Buras (T. U. Munich)
G. Burdman (U. Sao Paulo)
G. Hiller (U. Dortmund)
T. Kephart (U. Vanderbilt)
S. King (U. Southampton)
M. Lindner (Max Planck Inst. Heidelberg)
E. Ma (University of California Riverside)
M. Mondragon (UNAM, Mexico)
S. Morisi (Naples U.)
Y. Nir (Weizmann Institute)
H. Päs (T. U. Dortmund)
M. Tanimoto (Niigata U.)
J. W. F. Valle (IFIC/CSIC-Universidad de Valencia)
Local Organizing Committee:
Stefan Antusch
Christian Hohl
Aisha Lang (secretary)
Vasja Susič


text:
Freight News, Sea
Davies Turner does the Charleston[ August 14, 2017 // Chris ]
Davies Turner has added a new ocean UK to US to Charleston in conjunction with one of its partners, EMO Trans Charleston.
Marketed as the 'Southern Express Service', the service departs Tuesday from Southampton and offers a nine-day transit to the US Gulf port, a faster option than via New York, says Davies Turner.
The forwarder already operates other ocean services between the UK and other key US markets, in association with its partners in the US.
Head of Davies Turner's North American Services, Steve Turner, said: "Efficient oncarriage operations by our partner EMO-Trans means we can market this as an express product into the southern US states.
"The fastest direct service from the UK into Houston or New Orleans is approximately 16 to 18 days. We believe that via our Southern Express Service, we will be able to deliver to most of Florida, Texas and Louisiana in 13 to 14 days, to door."
Meanwhile, in Canada, Davies Turner is teaming up with Ontario-based FCL Fisker Customs & Logistics to strengthen its ocean freight services.
Davies Turner provides a weekly service over Toronto for LCL and FCL shipments and once the containers land, Toronto consignments are cleared and distributed across Canada using Fisker's in-house customs brokerage and comprehensive distribution network.
Steve Turner adds: "The new partnership with FCL gives us an ideal opportunity to further strengthen the two-way services that we operate between the UK and Canada, just as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between the EU and Canada kicks in, which should initially provide a boost for business and trade between the UK and Canada."
(The next printed of FBJ (FBJ 6 2017) will include a report on the US.)
Tags: Davies Turner, EMO Trans Charleston, FCL Fisker