text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|Dec 13, 2005
|Filing date
|Sep 7, 1999
|Priority date
|Sep 7, 1999
|Fee status
|Also published as
|Publication number
|Paul R. Carpentier, Jan F. Van Riel, Tom Teugels
|Original Assignee
|Emc Corporation
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (26), Non-Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (163), Classifications (26), Legal Events (9)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/236,366 and 09/235,146 filed Jan. 21, 1999, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to the secure storage, transfer and retrieval of information using a computer. More specifically, the present invention relates to a technique for identifying information using an intrinsic unique identifier and for securely storing, transferring and retrieving that information using related techniques.
Digital information (such as a computer file) must often be identified to be in a particular state, denoted by the status of the information as of some event or time. Digital information is highly subject to change; normal attempts to improve the content, inadvertent commands or actions which change the content, or tampering by others are difficult to detect.
Another problematic attribute of digital information is that copies may exist which are identical in content but differ in the meta data that the computer system uses to describe the digital information. Such meta data includes the date/time recorded for the creation or last modification of the file and the file name. The meta data may imply that otherwise identical copies of digital information are different when in fact they are not. Such confusion makes it difficult to avoid unnecessary duplication of content on a single computer or on a collection of computers on a network. The inability of systems to reliably distinguish different versions of files with the same identifier or to recognize identical files with different identifiers wastes network resources and creates confusion when files are transferred between users of a network.
Further, data on computer systems can generally only be accessed through identifiers which to a greater or lesser extent include information about the location of the file in the storage of the computer. For example, files within a sub-directory are at risk if someone changes the sub-directory name. If changed, the path to a file becomes invalid, and all of the stored or remembered names of files become invalid as well.
Finally, it is inconvenient for computer users to identify collections of specific versions of digital files. It would be desirable for users to refer to collections of specific copies or versions of digital files without creating a new entity which incorporates copies of the files into a new form. Many mechanisms have been created to combine such copies into what are commonly called archive files. Such solutions create additional copies which are often proliferated to many systems. The difficulty is that digital copies of many of the files in an archive are already present on the systems to which they are copied, which is wasteful and potentially confusing.
One result is that duplicate copies of digital files are frequently stored on computer storage devices (at expense to the owner of the system) or transferred via telecommunications devices (at further expense to the system owner and the telecommunications provider). This duplication strains limited resources and causes needless confusion on local networks and on collections of systems connected by telecommunication networks.
To address various of these problems, unique solutions have been presented in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/236,366 and 09/235,146, filed Jan. 21, 1999 in the name of Carpentier et al. In one embodiment of these inventions, a technique as shown in
As described in the above patent applications, the unique identifier 40 for descriptor file 30 can be used to provide many advantages. For example, identifier 40 can be used to uniquely identify descriptor file 30, and in turn the identifiers 20–24 can then be used to uniquely identify files A, B and C. Accordingly, files A, B and C may be stored once anywhere on a network and may be eventually located, retrieved and identified using identifier 40 and descriptor file 30.
Although the above techniques have many advantages, and are extremely useful in certain applications, there is nonetheless room for improvement in the area of information management. As alluded to above, managing front office files and web-based information is a big problem with today's workers. Because data is referred to by breakable URLs and path names, the disadvantages are huge: data can be modified, corrupted, misplaced, and unreachable. As a result, valuable information is lost to an enterprise or its integrity becomes suspect.
More specifically, data protection relies on an extensive organization and expensive specialists to manage, backup and archive digital information. Locating and retrieving the right information from its exact location can be time consuming if not impossible because the information may be dispersed across various hard disks, file servers, and the Internet in duplicated forms and with a variety of hard-coded file names. Furthermore, sharing such information internally and externally can seriously degrade network performance, not to mention putting sensitive information at risk. Electronic mail attachments can be too large or take too long to transfer. A download from an FTP server or a web site may have to be started all over again if interrupted. The same exact download performed by a large number of users in one site can slow down the whole network. In addition, files are continually being modified, deleted, moved or misplaced, meaning that there is no certainty in the location of a file or in its data integrity. Thus, it is no surprise that workers themselves become responsible for managing their own data and saving versions of documents. Such efforts are extremely time consuming and may not always work.
Although the embodiments described in the above applications may address some of these problems, there are further issues that remain to be addressed. For example, if unique identifier 40 is either intercepted or otherwise obtained by an unscrupulous individual, that individual may then be able to retrieve descriptor file 30 which would then allow the individual to locate and retrieve files A, B and C. If these files contain sensitive or secret company information, there would then be a problem. In other words, the advantage provided by identifier 40 in that it can be used to uniquely locate a group of files can also be turned to a disadvantage if the wrong party obtains identifier 40 and gains access to sensitive information contained in the files. Furthermore, even though files A, B and C may be stored anywhere on a network in a location-independent manner, a secret file might still be stolen, viewed, and/or printed if it is not secured appropriately.
Thus, workers are called upon to secure their own data files. For example, a file may be stored in a computer in a physically secure location (such as in a locked room with only electronic access), the file may be electronically locked using a password or other operating system function, the file may be encoded, or some other security technique may be used. Thus, it is no surprise that workers themselves become responsible for managing the security of their own data, encrypting files, password-protecting files, hiding files and finally saving versions of files where they believe they are safe and can be located later. Placing the burden upon the worker to implement security for a particular file and then maintain that security over the life of the file is extremely onerous, expensive, and may not be foolproof.
Accordingly, a technique is desired that would provide efficient and near foolproof security for digital information and/or its respective unique identifiers. In particular, it would be desirable to have such a technique that works well with the embodiments described in the above patent applications; such a technique would provide a user with the assurance that not only can a file be uniquely identified, but also that the file can be kept secure from prying eyes and its integrity can be guaranteed.
In a first embodiment of the invention, an algorithm is applied to a file to produce an intrinsic unique identifier (IUI) for the file. To provide security for the file, the file is then encrypted using the recently produced IUI as a key for the encryption algorithm. The file may also be compressed in addition to being encrypted. An algorithm is then applied to the encrypted file to produce an IUI for the encrypted file. Thus, the encrypted file may be safely stored or transferred within a network and is uniquely identifiable by its IUI. An authorized party who obtains the encrypted file may then decrypt the encrypted file using the IUI of the plaintext file if he or she has access to this key. Using the IUI of the file to also serve as a key to encrypt the file provides many advantages. For example, a single identifier (in this case the IUI) serves as both a key to decrypt the file and also as verification that the integrity of the plaintext file has not been compromised. Further advantages and specific applications of this technique are presented below. In one specific embodiment, the MD5 algorithm is used to generate the IUI for the plaintext file. The resulting MD5 (the result of the hash function) may then be used to verify that the plaintext file has not changed.
In a further addition to this first embodiment, IUIs for any number of such encrypted files may be assembled into a descriptor file. In one specific implementation, the descriptor file includes meta data for each file (such as the file name), the IUI of the plaintext file and the IUI of the encrypted file. An algorithm is applied to the descriptor file to produce an IUI for the descriptor file. The plaintext descriptor file is then encrypted using the descriptor file IUI as a key for the encryption algorithm. The result produces an encrypted descriptor file. An algorithm is then applied to the encrypted descriptor file to produce an IUI for the encrypted descriptor file. The encrypted files and the encrypted descriptor file may then be safely stored or transferred within a network. The IUI of the encrypted descriptor file is used as a location-independent identifier to locate the encrypted descriptor file.
Thus, an interested party is able to locate and retrieve the encrypted descriptor file using its IUI. The party would not, however, be able to decrypt the encrypted descriptor file unless it is also provided with the IUI of the descriptor file which has been used as an encryption key. Thus, this key may be withheld from a party until such a party is authorized to gain access to information included within the files. Once the party obtains the IUI of the descriptor file, it may then decrypt the encrypted descriptor file to obtain the plaintext descriptor file. Using the IUIs of the encrypted and plaintext files included in the descriptor file, the party may then locate the encrypted data files and decrypt them. In an alternate implementation, the IUIs of the encrypted data files may be located outside of the descriptor file and may be provided to the interested party so that the party may retrieve the encrypted data files. In this scenario, the IUIs of the encrypted data files may or may not be present within the descriptor file.
In a second embodiment of the invention a flattened descriptor file may also be produced. A descriptor file, its IUI, an encrypted descriptor file and its IUI may be produced as described in the first embodiment. Additionally, a flattened descriptor file is created based upon the descriptor file. The flattened descriptor file includes the IUIs of the encrypted data files and the IUI of the encrypted descriptor file. An algorithm is then applied to the flattened descriptor file to produce its own IUI. The IUI of the flattened descriptor file may then be used as a unique identifier to indirectly reference all of the data files listed within the descriptor file. Using the IUI of the flattened descriptor file, an interested party may retrieve the flattened descriptor file (in plaintext). Using the IUIs it contains the party may then obtain not only the encrypted data files but also the encrypted descriptor file.
At this point, however, even though the party has the encrypted data files, it does not have access to these files. At a suitable time, the party may then be supplied with the IUI of the descriptor file which serves as a key to decrypt the encrypted descriptor file. Once decrypted, the party may then use the descriptor file as described in the first embodiment to retrieve and decrypt the data files. Advantageously, two items are necessary for retrieval and decryption of the data files: the IUI of the flattened descriptor file which allows retrieval of the encrypted data files; and the IUI of the plaintext descriptor file which allows decryption of the encrypted descriptor file. Thus, one or both may be withheld from a party to prevent its access to the data files, while allowing the party to physically obtain the encrypted files. Furthermore, a party able to retrieve the encrypted data files is guaranteed that the files have not been changed from the time their IUIs have been calculated, but is unable to decrypt these files unless it receives the second item.
Through use of the present invention, each file to be stored or transferred need only be encrypted once using one key, and only the encrypted version of the file need be manipulated. There is no need to use different keys for different users. Further, should the same file exist in two different locations on a computer or within a network, use of the present invention produces an encrypted file for each that is the same automatically. Thus, only this single encrypted file need be stored and/or transferred. Such benefits accrue automatically due to the nature of the present invention. The encrypted form of each file can be stored or transmitted anywhere within a computer network without the need for firewalls, access control, virtual private networks, or secure session protocols. Further, by using the intrinsic unique identifier to serve as the encryption key for the file as well, this single identifier not only serves to authenticate the file but also to verify the integrity of the file.
The present invention in its many embodiments provides a variety of advantages in numerous applications which will be discussed below.
The invention, together with further advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The present invention is applicable to a wide variety of digital information. As used herein, digital information may refer to a computer file, a group of files, a group of file identifiers, or other collections of data or database information. Such other collections of data include documents, selected frames or clips from digital audio or video streams, streams from message records or files, of log entries from audits or status logs of systems. Database information might include selected database records from a relational, hierarchic, network or other format database. Indeed, digital information may include any string of binary digits used wholly or in part by some application or device. In one embodiment, the present invention manipulates digital information as binary large objects, or BLOBs (a bit sequence).
The following discussion illustrates embodiments of the invention using the example of typical computer files for ease of understanding. It should be pointed out, however, that embodiments of the invention are well-suited for use with any of the beforementioned digital information.
As discussed above, it would be desirable to address security issues relating to computer files and to the intrinsic unique identifiers (IUIs) of the data files and of a descriptor file. As pointed out, it is possible for a data file to be obtained by unauthorized parties or for an IUI of a descriptor file to be intercepted. Although it may appear that standard encryption techniques may address these problems, there are drawbacks associated with conventional uses of these standard techniques.
For example, it can prove burdensome to store or send a file to numerous people using public key cryptography. In order to send a single file to fifty people using public key cryptography, one would first have to obtain the public key from each of the fifty people. Then, fifty copies of the file would have to be made, and each file encrypted with a different one of the fifty keys. Fifty different encrypted files would then be created which are sent out or stored for later retrieval. The problem is that the single file that was started with has now become fifty different files each of which must be managed and transported separately. Calculation of an identifier for each of the fifty encrypted files would then produce fifty different identifiers each of which must be managed and transported. It would be most desirable to have a single copy of the plaintext file and a single copy of the encrypted file for use by an authorized entity to cut down on the proliferation of files copies.
Use of conventional symmetric cryptography also has drawbacks. Using the above example of a single file to be distributed to fifty people, one might choose to use a different random key to encrypt the file fifty times. Again, fifty different encrypted files must be generated and each of the random keys must also somehow be transmitted to each person. Further, consider the situation in which fifty different files are to sent to one person. If only a single key is used to encrypt all of the files, then it would become much easier to hack the key and determine its value by an unscrupulous third party. Further, if each file is encrypted with a different key, then each of these keys must somehow be transmitted to the person and managed in a secure fashion.
Finally, a typical prior art use of either asymmetric or symmetric cryptography to encrypt a file might provide a file that is encrypted, but the keys used do not provide assurance that the file has not somehow been tampered with in either its plaintext or encrypted form. Also, a file that has been tampered with might not be able to be decrypted. It would be most desirable if a single key could be used to not only encrypt a file but to also insure the integrity of its contents. Further, it would be desirable to store and/or transmit the key or keys for a given set of files in a secure manner. Accordingly, the present invention realizes a technique for addressing the above issues.
In step 206 an intrinsic unique identifier (IUI) is generated for each file. Algorithm 104 is applied to file 102 to produce IUI 106. The algorithm may be applied to the complete file or to any portion of the file. Algorithm 104 is preferably any algorithm that can generate a reliably unique identifier for the file based upon the file contents. As such, the IUI generated is repeatable in that application of the algorithm again to the file will produce the same IUI. The term "intrinsic" is used to indicate that the IUI is based at least in part (or in whole) upon the contents of the file. Algorithm 104 may be any of a wide variety of algorithms. By way of example, algorithm 104 may be a hash function such as the MD5 algorithm or SHA-1 that produce a message digest, or may be an error detection algorithm such as employed in cyclic redundancy checking (CRC).
Preferably, an algorithm should consistently produce the same binary number for any specific instance of digital information and such a binary number should be practically proven to be unique with a reasonably high probability for the class of digital information being identified. Use of such an algorithm over two binary sequences that result in the same binary number can prove that the two binary sequences are the same. Conversely, use of the algorithm over two binary sequences that result in different binary numbers can prove that the binary sequences are different. Such an algorithm simplifies the identification of copies of a particular portion of digital information (such as a computer file). The result of such an algorithm is referred to herein as an intrinsic unique identifier (IUI). Other algorithms may be used to generate an intrinsic unique identifier as long as the probability of generating identical identifiers from different files is below a threshold that is defined as acceptable.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the algorithm used is the MD5 algorithm and produces a 128-bit message digest referred to herein as simply the "MD5." In this case, algorithm 104 generates plaintext MD5 106. Plaintext MD5 106 is an intrinsic unique identifier for file 102 and uniquely identifies file 102 based upon it contents. Should file 102 be changed a newly calculated MD5 would not match the MD5 calculated for the previous version of the file.
In step 210 an optional compression step may be performed. In a preferred embodiment, each file is also compressed. Any of a wide variety of compression algorithms may be used; the LZW algorithm is preferable, although other algorithms associated with formats such as GZIP and CAB may be used. Compression may also be performed after encryption although it is preferable to perform compression first, or to perform both together. Alternatively, it is possible to perform the compression step and not the encryption step.
In step 214 each file is encrypted using its recently generated MD5 as the key for the encryption algorithm. For example, file 102 is encrypted using encryption algorithm 108 with the key being plaintext MD5 106 to produce an encrypted file 110. Any of a wide variety of ciphers may be used as the encryption algorithm. By way of example, the "Two Fish" algorithm works well, although other algorithms such as block and stream cipher may also be used.
The use of plaintext MD5 106 to encrypt file 102 provides advantages. The single key used to encrypt and decrypt file 102 can also be used to verify the integrity of the file because the key happens to be plaintext MD5 106 that has been generated using the MD5 algorithm. Because it is an intrinsic unique identifier it may also be used to verify that the contents of file 102 have not changed.
Now that encrypted file 110 has been created it may be stored and/or transferred within a computer network in a secure manner. In step 218 an intrinsic unique identifier is generated for file 110 using algorithm 112. In this example, algorithm 112 is the MD5 algorithm and the result is encrypted MD5 114. Preferably, algorithm 112 is the same as algorithm 104. It is possible, however, that the two algorithms may be different; for example, by convention it may be agreed that plaintext files use a particular algorithm while encrypted files use a different algorithm to generate their intrinsic unique identifiers.
At this point, a secure and sufficient technique for storing, locating and retrieving file 102 has been described. Encrypted file 110 may now be stored within a computer network instead of storing the plaintext file 102. By providing a user with encrypted MD5 114, the user will be able to locate and retrieve file 110. The integrity of file 110 can be guaranteed by recalculating the MD5 of the file and comparing it to MD5 114. The key 106 to encryption algorithm 108 may be held by the originating party and only released to a user when it is desired that the user has access to file 110. Once the key 106 is given to someone that has retrieved file 110, the file may be decrypted to produce plaintext file 102. Thus, two pieces of information are necessary for a user to have access to file 102: encrypted MD5 114 and plaintext MD5 106. A user that is provided with encrypted file 110 is also guaranteed that the original plaintext file has not been changed.
In step 222 a descriptor file is created that represents all of the files that have been selected.
In step 226 an intrinsic unique identifier is generated for descriptor file 130. In a preferred embodiment, algorithm 136 is the MD5 algorithm which is used to create MD5 138 which is preferred to as the "key MD5." In step 230 descriptor file 130 is encrypted using key MD5 138 as the key to encryption algorithm 140 to produce encrypted descriptor file 142. Preferably encryption algorithm 140 is the Two Fish algorithm. File 130 may also be compressed in a similar way as discussed in step 210. MD5 138 is referred to as the "key MD5" because it provides the key for decrypting file 142.
In step 234 an intrinsic unique identifier for file 142 is generated using algorithm 144. Preferably, the MD5 algorithm is used to produce master MD5 146. Preferably, algorithms 136 and 144 are the same algorithms although they may be different, and may be different from algorithms 104 and 112. By convention, it may be agreed upon beforehand to use different algorithms in different places. Also, meta data 134 may also indicate which algorithms are to be used with the plaintext and encrypted files. By the same token, meta data for file 130 may be included therewithin to indicate algorithm 136. At this point, the selected files have been uniquely identified using either master MD5 146 or key MD5 138.
Step 238 is an optional step in which the master MD5 and the key MD5 are encoded. Because a resultant MD5 is a 128-bit number, it may be desirable to encode this number in a more manageable form for human use. The resultant number may be encoded in any of a variety of forms including decimal, hexadecimal or binary. Preferably, the number is converted to a base 36 number mapped to the set of twenty-six alphabetic and numeric characters in the base ASCII character set. This mapping is referred to as "ASCII Armoring" and is commonly used to render binary information in a limited character set for transmission over protocols that require content to be constrained to alphanumeric coding. In a preferred embodiment, a flag character is included at a predetermined position within the resulting string bringing the total length of the string to 27 characters. This flag character could also provide information such as algorithm to use, type of file, etc.
The result is a 27-character ASCII string of digits and upper case letters. Such a format provides a compact form that may more easily be written down by a person and/or manipulated by a computer, and is also in a form that is easily accommodated by many software programs. In addition, this particular representation of an intrinsic unique identifier has the advantage of being more easily retrieved by data query, coded into software application file requests, referenced by a content or asset management system, requested in an object browser, electronically copied and pasted from one document to another, sent via electronic mail, etc.
Master MD5 146 may also be associated with a file locator to assist with finding file 142. Although the invention works without an additional file locator, one may be used. An example of a file locator is a URL, an IP address, or a path name.
In step 242 the encrypted files that have been created may be stored. The files created may be stored in any suitable location such as on the user's computer, at a remote server, in an archive, at the site of a future user, or other. In fact, the files created need not be stored together, but may be stored in different locations. Preferably, the files that are stored for future reference by a user include the encrypted files (such as file 110) and the encrypted descriptor file 142. Preferable, the plaintext files (such as file 102) and the plaintext descriptor file 130 need not be stored in an accessible location due to security. The files may be destroyed or kept by the originator in a secure location. Because the plaintext files can be created from the encrypted files using the appropriate key, it is not necessary to have the plaintext files easily available.
In step 246 the master MD5 146 and the key MD5 138 are returned to the originator for future reference. At this point, both the master MD5 and the key MD5 would be needed by a party who wishes to access the encrypted files. For example, should the originator wish an interested party to have access to the encrypted files at some point, he may provide that party with the master MD5. Using master MD5 that party could obtain encrypted descriptor file 142 but would have no way of decrypting it. Only when the party is provided with key MD5 from the originator, can that party decrypt file 142 and obtain not only the encrypted MD5 s (to locate each encrypted file) but also the plaintext MD5 for each file (which would allow that party to decrypt the encrypted file and verify that the original file has not changed). Alternatively, an interested party may be provided with the encrypted MD5 s in addition to the master MD5 which would allow that party to retrieve the encrypted files but not decrypt them. Once the key MD5 was provided, the party could decrypt the descriptor file, obtain the keys for the data files, and decrypt them. In an alternative embodiment, the user may be supplied with MD5 s for the encrypted data files but is not supplied with the master MD5 or the key MD5 until a later time. Alternatively, the user may be supplied with the key MD5 initially and the master MD5 later. Such embodiments have a variety of applications which are discussed below.
In one specific embodiment, descriptor file 300 includes meta data 302 that describes options regarding the descriptor file and information concerning its use and contents. By way of example, meta data 302 includes the type of the descriptor file, a name for the descriptor file, a creation date, comments, the number of data files that it represents, the number of directory folders it represents, the total size of all of the files combined that it represents and other information such as author, keywords, etc.
A user-supplied name may be assigned when the descriptor file is created and is used as a mnemonic aid by the user to identify a folder (for example) from which files represented by the descriptor file have originated. In another embodiment of the invention, the name of the folder itself is suggested automatically as a mnemonic aid. This name can be associated with the master MD5 created for the descriptor file to enable a user to more easily identify the general contents of a descriptor file. For example, when retrieving data using a particular master MD5 this name may be included to assist the user. The creation date indicates when the descriptor file was created and is useful for keeping track of versions. Comments may be inserted into the descriptor file for any purpose by the user. The number of files represented, number of folders and total size is useful for progress status during downloading.
A descriptor file may include any number of represented files and optionally may include the folders in which the files originally resided. Any number of folders and any hierarchy may be represented in the descriptor file. By way of example, included is a folder name 310, its time stamp 312 and operating system attributes 314. Time stamp 312 indicates when the folder was last modified. Attributes 314 indicate operating specific attributes for the folder such as whether the folder is read-only, whether it should be hidden, and its type such as system, archive or temporary.
Any number of files may be indicated as being originally found within folder 310, such as the files identified by file name 320 and file name 340. A wide variety of meta data may be present that provides information regarding the file identified by file name 320. Included is a time stamp 322 indicating when the file was last changed, a size 324, the plaintext MD5 326, the encrypted MD5 328, a creation date of the file 330, and any number of operating specific attributes 322. These attributes may include the read or write status of the file, the file type, its creator, etc. By including the encrypted MD5 328 for the file, the file becomes content addressable using the encrypted MD5 as a location-independent file name. Plaintext MD5 326 can then be used to decrypt the retrieved encrypted file. Other file names and associated meta data may also be indicated as being included in folder 310. Any number of folders and their included files (indicated by 324 and 344) may also be included. A hierarchy of folders may exist in which one folder and its files are present within another folder.
Administrative data 346 may also be included within the descriptor file 300 to assist in generating revenue from use of the technique, tracking the software which embodies the technique, etc. By way of example, data 346 includes an identifier indicating on which machine the software was originally installed. In one embodiment of the invention, software which embodies the invention is either sold, licensed, or provided free to users. Included along with the software is a so-called "token box" that represents the number of times that a user may create a descriptor file and generate a master MD5 for a collection of files. Included within data 346 would then be a token box identifier and a token box count. The box identifier uniquely identifies the particular box that was provided along with software to a user. The box count indicates the number of times that a user may generate a descriptor file and its corresponding master MD5. For example, a user may pay for (or receive free) software embodying the invention that has a box count of 1000. The software keeps track of this box count variable and decrements it each time the user creates an encrypted descriptor file and its associated master MD5. The box identifier and the current box count are then included within data 346. The box identifier may by useful to indicate that only certain types of descriptor files may be generated. Preferable, it is unique for a given copy of software provided to a customer and is similar to a serial number. The box count included within the descriptor file is useful for tracking token boxes that have been "hacked" into to circumvent paying.
Also included within data 346 may be a digest of the complete descriptor file. For example, the digest may be created by performing a hash function upon the descriptor file and then encrypting the hash produced with a secret key known only to the manufacturer of the software. Asymmetric or symmetric cryptography may be used. By including this digest within (or at the end) of the descriptor file, the manufacturer of the software can prove whether or not the descriptor file and/or its associated master MD5 was created by the manufacturer because only the manufacturer can calculate this unique digest. Thus, the manufacturer can determine if another entity created the descriptor file and/or its master MD5. This information may be useful in determining whether to process a request for a retrieval of files, for requesting payment from an entity, or for legal protection of a particular implementation.
The type of a descriptor file indicates one of a variety of types of the file and its associated master MD5. In general, a particular type provides different meta data and different behavior for different classes of descriptor files. For example, certain types of descriptor files may include certain meta data that are not present within other types and may cause a software agent or an operating system to initiate various actions that are different from other types. A wide variety of types may be defined for descriptor files. By way of example, these types include the following. A standard type may automatically place retrieved files back into a default folder on the desk top of the user's computer when the files are retrieved using embodiments of the present invention. In other scenarios, however, it may be desirable to retrieve a file and place it in a particular location within a computer or elsewhere. An extended type of descriptor file allows the descriptor file to include meta data for each file name or folder indicating to where within a computer and/or its operating system the file shall be placed when it is received. For example, for performing software replacement or upgrades, meta data included within the descriptor file for each file may indicate that a particular file should replace a file within the operating system of the computer. Thus, when the present invention is used to retrieve a file, a software agent may automatically place the retrieved file in the location indicated by the meta data.
Because automatic replacement or placement of operating system or application software files may be sensitive and require permission, a certificate may be included along with the descriptor file for this type. In this scenario a user of a descriptor file first approves of a given creator of the files that are to be retrieved. The software agent that implements the present invention then keeps track of a list of creators that are approved by the user. The user and the creator then agree upon a digital certificate that authenticates the creator to the user. Creation and use of digital certificates are well-known in the art and any of a variety may be used. In this situation, included within meta data 302 is a certificate from the creator that guarantees the authenticity of the files indicated within the descriptor file. Once the software agent has decrypted the descriptor file, it retrieves the certificate of the creator and verifies that it does in fact authenticate that particular creator. The software agent then compares that creator to the list of approved creators, and if there is a match, the indicated files in the descriptor file are retrieved, decrypted and installed on the user's computer where indicated.
Another type of descriptor file is a trial type. When using this type of descriptor file, an advertisement appears on the user screen whenever a descriptor file is created and a master MD5 generated. In return for viewing the advertisement, the box count for that particular user is not decremented. The data representing the advertisement may be stored within the software agent that embodies the present invention, or may also be included within the descriptor file.
Another type of descriptor file is a service type. This descriptor file includes meta data that identifies a software plug-in in any suitable fashion. By way of example, the plug-in may be identified using an intrinsic unique identifier (IUI) according to any embodiment of the present invention or may be identified by using a file name, location, etc. When files are retrieved by the software agent by using the descriptor file, the software plug-in is identified, located and automatically installed upon the user's computer. For example, the plug-in may be a Java file to load or XML configuration files.
Descriptor files may also be customized by a user. For example, a user may create a custom type of descriptor file that automatically adds particular meta data and behavior to the file when it is created. Custom descriptor files may also be created for each company to whom software embodying the present invention is to be provided. For example, any relevant information may automatically be added to the descriptor file when created or the user may be prompted to add information that is relevant to the type of descriptor file and its contents. Automatic behavior may be added to a custom descriptor file that performs certain actions when a descriptor file is used to retrieve files. For examples, codes within the descriptor files may automatically send electronic mail. Other actions that may occur include publication on web sites.
The descriptor file of
The first embodiment has described the technique by which a master MD5 and a key MD5 are provided to a user who wishes to locate and access a collection of encrypted files. Because the master MD5 only allows access to encrypted descriptor file 142, it would be difficult for a user to locate and retrieve the encrypted data files because the descriptor file is encrypted. It is not until the user is also provided with the key MD5 that the user is able to decrypt the descriptor file and obtain the MD5 s, allowing it to locate the encrypted data files. In various situations it may be desirable to allow a user to not only obtain the encrypted descriptor file at first, but also to allow the user to locate and obtain the encrypted data files without allowing those files to be encrypted. For example, this is useful when administrating pool servers, load balancing, caching, mirroring, and in other applications such as escrowing.
In steps 502–518 a collection of files are selected, MD5 s are generated and the files are encrypted in a similar fashion as described in steps 202–218 (not shown in
In step 526 algorithm 404 is used to generate key MD5 406 for descriptor file 402. In step 530 descriptor file 402 is encrypted using key MD5 406 as the key to encryption algorithm 440 to produce encrypted descriptor file 452. MD5 406 is referred to as "key MD5" because it provides the key for decrypting file 452. In step 534 master MD5 456 for file 452 is generated using algorithm 454. Preferably, algorithms 404 and 454 are the same algorithms although they may be different, and may be different from algorithms used with the data files.
At this point master MD5 456 may be provided to a user to allow the user to locate and obtain encrypted descriptor file 452. The user, however, would be unable to locate the encrypted data files. It is conceivable that the originator may simply provide the encrypted data files to the user or may provide file locators for them or may even provide their encrypted MD5 s in any fashion. In a preferred embodiment, however, the encrypted MD5 s for the encrypted data files are provided in another modified descriptor file.
In step 538 flattened descriptor file 460 is created based in part upon the information in descriptor file 402. Included within the flattened descriptor file 406 are the encrypted MD5 s 416, 422 and 432 that provide intrinsic unique identifiers to locate the encrypted files represented by file names 410, 420 and 430 in descriptor file 402. File 460 may be created by duplicating file 402, removing certain information and adding other information. For example, master MD5 456 is also added to file 460 to allow a user to access file 452. Meta data 470 associated with the file 460 may also be added. This meta data may be the same descriptor file meta data as found in file 402, may be a subset of that data, or may be different meta data or may not appear at all. For example, meta data 470 includes publicly searchable items but not private data.
The flattened descriptor file may take a wide variety of other forms. For example, other types of file locators may be included instead of the MD5 s to provide access to the encrypted files or to the plaintext data files. Also, master MD5 456 is optional, and file meta data may also be included for each file.
In step 542 algorithm 462 is applied to file 460 to create a user MD5 464 that is an intrinsic unique identifier for file 460. Preferable, algorithm 462 is the MD5 algorithm. In step 544 the user MD5 464 and key MD5 406 are preferably converted to ASCII format in a similar fashion as described in step 238 to provide identifiers that are more manageable by a user. Because master MD5 456 is not handled directly by a user in this embodiment, it is optional whether to encode this identifier in file 460.
In step 548 the relevant files are stored for later access by a user. The files to be stored include the encrypted data files, encrypted descriptor file 452 and non-encrypted flattened descriptor file 460. These files may be stored in any suitable computing device or computer network and may be distributed in different locations. In one embodiment, the files are stored in what is termed a file "pool". In general, a file pool refers to a collection of distributed storage devices that store files only being identified by their MD5 s (or other IUIs).
In step 552 the user MD5 464 and the key MD5 406 are returned to the originator for possible distribution to a requesting user. In this fashion, access to the encrypted data files and eventually to the plaintext files are provided simply via two identifiers, namely, user MD5 464 and key MD5 460. For example, using user MD5 464, the user can access and read file 460 which provides access to the encrypted data files and to the encrypted descriptor file (via the master MD5). Once the user is also supplied with key MD5 406, the user may decrypt the encrypted descriptor file, obtain the plaintext MD5 s, and decrypt each of the encrypted data files.
At this point in time, the originator of the data files has generated key MD5 138 and master MD5 146 and has securely stored the encrypted files on a computer or on a distributed computer network. An interested party such as a user or software program may perform the following steps to retrieve the files.
In step 602 the user receives the master IUI (in this example master MD5) which is the identifier uniquely representing the files to be retrieved. In step 606 the user looks for the file identified by master MD5 146. The file may be searched for and obtained in a wide variety of ways. By way of example, the user looks for the file on a local computer or throughout a distributed computer network. Preferably, the file is initially identified by matching master MD5 146 with the MD5 of a particular file found. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, step 606 may be implemented as described in
In step 618 the received file is verified as being authentic by comparing master MD5 146 with the MD5 just calculated from the received file. If the MD5 s do not match, then control returns to step 606 to look for another file. If the MD5 s match, then the file is authentic and the process may continue. Steps 614 and 618 are optional steps.
By virtue of possessing encrypted descriptor file 142, at this point the user is effectively guaranteed that all data files that have been encrypted and identified in the plaintext descriptor file are effectively sealed and have not changed. For example, should an unscrupulous party attempt to modify one of the data files, the MD5 s of the plaintext file and of the encrypted file would not match with MD5 106 and 114 in the plaintext descriptor file. In this way, the holder of the encrypted descriptor file can be assured that once the descriptor file is decrypted that it will be able to verifiably identify the original data files that have been identified in the descriptor file. In this way, encrypted descriptor file 142 serves as a type of escrow of the original data files. As such, key MD5 138 may be delivered to the user concurrently with master MD5 146, sometime shortly there after, or at some later time when the originator wishes the user to have access to the original data files.
Therefore, at some appropriate time, in step 622 the user receives the key IUI (in this case key MD5 138) and may begin to obtain the original files. In step 626 the user uses key 138 to decrypt descriptor file 142 and obtain plaintext descriptor file 130. Although optional at this point, in step 630 the user may wish to verify that plaintext descriptor file 130 is also authentic. For example, the user may recalculate the MD5 for file 130 and compare it to key 138. Such a check verifies that a bogus descriptor file 130 has not been substituted for the correct descriptor file and then encrypted using key 138. Additionally, a digest may be recalculated for file 130 and compared to a previously calculated digest already present in file 130. For example, as pointed out in
In step 638 the directory structure (if any) described in descriptor file 130 is rebuilt using the information contained in the descriptor file. For example, a directory structure such as is shown in
Because descriptor file 130 lists the encrypted MD5 114 of each file identified, the user may now look for each of the encrypted files using these MD5 s. Step 642 may be performed in any suitable fashion, for example, may be performed as described in step 606 and in
In step 646 a file is received that purports to correspond to encrypted MD5 114. Although the user may assume that this retrieved file is authentic, it is preferable in step 650 that the retrieved file is verified. By recalculating the MD5 of encrypted file 110 (for example) this recalculated MD5 maybe compared to encrypted MD5 114 to verify that the file identified in descriptor file 130 is in fact the file that has just been retrieved. If the file is not verified then step 642 may be implemented again to find the correct file.
Assuming the file has been verified, in step 654 encrypted file 110 is decrypted using plaintext MD5 106 to obtain the original plaintext file 102. In this embodiment of the invention, plaintext MD5 106 is also present within descriptor file 130 along with encrypted MD5 114. In other alternative embodiments, it is conceivable that plaintext MD5 106 need not be present within file 130 but is delivered to the user in another suitable fashion. The user may now assume that file 102 is the original file that has been sealed earlier. In an alternative embodiment, the user may also verify the authenticity of file 102 by recalculating its MD5 and comparing this recalculated MD5 with plaintext MD5 106. Such a check verifies that an unscrupulous party has not substituted a bogus file for original file 102 and then encrypted the bogus file using the MD5 of the original file. If the file is not verified, then a suitable error handler 662 is invoked.
If verified, in step 666 a file request list is updated to indicate that file 102 has been accurately been obtained. If not all files identified in descriptor file 130 have been received, then control returns to step 646 to receive another file. If all files have been received, in step 674 an indication is provided to the user that all files identified in descriptor file 130 have been successfully retrieved. In this fashion, a user provided with master MD5 146 and key MD5 138 is provided the means to obtain the originally encrypted and identified files, and is guaranteed that the original files have not been altered since they were encrypted.
Steps 702–710 may be performed in a similar fashion as in steps 602–610. In step 710, however, the file received is potentially the plaintext flattened descriptor file 460. In step 714 the user may further verify that the received flattened descriptor file is authentic by recalculating a digest for the file and comparing it to the digest included within administrative data 346 of file 460 (if present).
Now that the user has obtained the plaintext flattened descriptor file, in steps 718 and 722 the user may look for and retrieve those encrypted data files that are identified by their corresponding MD5 s (for example 416, 422 and 432) included in file 460. These files may be identified and retrieved in any suitable manner and are preferably retrieved using the techniques described in steps 642, 646 and in
In step 726 a received encrypted file is verified as being authentic by comparing its newly calculated MD5 with the MD5 from file 460 that has been used to retrieve it. If not authentic, control returns to step 722 to wait for another file. Once verified, in step 730 a file request list is updated to indicate that one of the encrypted data files has been successfully received. If, in step 734 not all files have been received, then control returns to step 722 to wait for another file.
In step 738 master MD5 456 is extracted from file 460. By using master MD5 456 present within flattened descriptor file 460, the user may now locate and retrieve encrypted descriptor file 452. Once the user is supplied with key MD5 406 from the originating party (once certain conditions are met, for example), the user will be able to eventually retrieve the original data files. For example, steps 738–764 may be performed as described in steps 606–638 above. Note that in step 750 the key MD5 is not supplied unless the originator wishes the user to have access to the original files.
Because the user has already retrieved the encrypted data files, once the directory structure has been built the user may decrypt the encrypted files in step 768 using the plaintext MD5 s that are found in descriptor file 402. In an alternative embodiment, the plaintext MD5 s need not be included the file 402, but may be supplied to the user in some other fashion. In step 772 the plaintext files may be verified as described in step 658. Finally, in step 776 the directory structure may be populated with the plaintext files to restore them to their proper place. Additionally, any file meta data included in descriptor file 402 may also be applied to each file.
Thus, through this embodiment a user to able to retrieve the encrypted descriptor file and all encrypted data files using user MD5 464. The user is unable to decrypt the data files until key MD5 406 is supplied.
In a preferred embodiment, a file (for example) is received in portions or segments. In other embodiments, files may be received whole or in a manner specified by any file transfer protocol. A file request list includes all of the files that are being requested until those files are received in their entirety. It is also possible that a file segment request list would be implemented that would include individual segments being requested. For example, individual segments of files may be requested when data or a code patch for a software application is required, or when specific entries for a database are obtained by a store or query result. An importer program manages the transfer of files to the recipient and determines when the files are.
In one embodiment, the importer has a specific hierarchy of locations in a computer system (or on a network) in which it looks for the files listed in a descriptor file. Thus, the importer may be implemented using a chained system which looks for files in different places. Thus, files are searched for first in the most convenient location and then in progressively less convenient locations. This "assembly line" is configurable in kind and quantity of importers and may automatically and dynamically change to optimize economy, security or performance. Because the MD5 s serve as content-based file names that enable the content of files to be verified once the files are recovered, it is possible to allow files to be recovered from arbitrary locations where they may be found without regard to checking the contents of the file using some sort of check sum.
In step 802 the intrinsic unique identifier (IUI) of the file desired to be obtained is identified. This IUI may be any suitable identifier such as an MD5 that uniquely identifies a data file, a descriptor file, any encrypted file, or other digital information. In the following steps, the IUI may be matched with a particular file using any of a variety of techniques. In a preferred embodiment, files are stored along with their file name which is the IUI of the file. In other words, the encoded 27-bit alphanumeric MD5 of the file is also used as its file name. In this embodiment, the file system of a computer is used to help match the IUI with a particular file. In other embodiments, a database may use an IUI as a look up (or data base key) into the database to find the location of the file that is identified by the IUI. The database may contain a pointer to the file or the actual contents of the file if the file is a file object in an object-oriented database. Other techniques may be used to associate an IUI with a file in a storage device to facilitate matching a received IUI with a particular file on the storage device. For example, an IUI may also be associated with a file as a file attribute. It is also possible to recalculate an IUI for a found file and then compare it to an identified IUI to determine if the file is the correct file to retrieve. Other techniques include object database storage.
In step 804 an importer program looks for the desired file using its IUI in a local cache on the computer. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, this cache is a pool of files into which files have been stored previously, for example in steps 242 and 548. Advantageously, this pool of files stores the IUI of a file as its file name for efficient retrieval. The cache may be implemented on a local disk, within RAM, or on another local device. Preferably, the pool cache is organized as a hierarchy of folders wherein the included files use their IUI as their file names. The pool cache preferably uses key/value lookup where an IUI is the key and the value is the bit sequence to be retrieved. If the file is found it is retrieved and the procedure ends.
If the file is not found locally in a pool cache, in step 806 the importer looks for the file in local conventional storage. For example, of the file is not included in pool cache where the IUI is the file name, it is possible that the file is still stored locally and its IUI is associated with the file in some other manner. For example, the IUI may be a file attribute of a file and all files on local conventional storage (such as memory, disk, tape) may be scanned to search for a file attribute that matches the identified IUI. As a last result, brute force method, local storage may be scanned to determine the contents of all files present and an IUI may be recalculated for all of these files. The identified IUI from step 802 may then be compared against each of these newly calculated IUIs to determine the correct file to be retrieved. If the file is found it is retrieved and the procedure ends.
If the file is not found in conventional storage, in step 808 a file location request is broadcast to peer computers on a local area network. A file request list that includes the IUI of the file and its sequence numbers may also be created. Preferably, the identified IUI is broadcast to all computers on the network that implement a pool cache. These computers may then determine if the desired file is present within their pool by examining the broadcast IUI. Additionally, it is possible for a peer computers to examine its local conventional storage using the techniques described above. If the file is found, the computer having the file returns a location indicator to the requesting computer indicating the network location of the desired file.
In step 810 the original computer establishes a one-to-one link with the computer that contains the desired file and requests a download of the file using a file request. In this embodiment, the file is downloaded segment by segment, although it is possible that the file may be downloaded all at once. In step 812 the originating computer receives a file data packet containing segment data for the desired file. The sequence number of the received file data packet is checked against the file request list to determine if the packet received is for a file that is desired. Suitable examples of a file request and file data packet are shown in the above referenced application Ser. Nos. 09/236,366 and 09/235,146.
If the data packet is needed for the current desired file, then in step 814 the segment data from the file data packet is stored as part of the desired file and the file request list is updated to indicate that this particular segment has been received. Step 818 checks whether the file is complete and all segments have been received. If so, the file has been fully retrieved and the procedure ends. If not, then the originating computer waits to receive another downloaded file data packet in step 812.
If, in step 808 the desired file was not found, then in step 818 the importer sends a request for the file to any pre-configured or well-known servers that implement a pool cache. For example, an importer may be pre-configured to connect to certain servers using an IP address if that server is known to implement a pool cache. By passing the IUI of the desired file to the particular server, the server may determine if the file is present within the pool cache by examining the file names of its files. Other addressing techniques may be used to form a connection with one of these servers. If the file is found it is retrieved and the procedure ends.
In step 808 these peer computers may be dedicated pool cache servers that are dedicated to collecting and storing files that are identified by their IUI. In this fashion, broadcasting to these pool servers is efficient in that there is a high likelihood that one of the servers has the desired file in its cache. The broadcast may also reach certain software agents located on the computers whose primary function is to generate the unique identifiers such as is described in
If the file is not found in step 818 then in step 820 the importer looks for the desired file on any mounted volumes of file servers attached to the local area network. In this situation, the file servers identified may not necessarily implement a pool cache in a standard format, but nonetheless may store the desired file on a mounted volume such as in RAM, on disk, etc. The identified IUI may be used to find the desired file using any of the techniques discussed in step 802. If the file is found it is retrieved and the procedure ends. If the file is not found, then in step 822 the importer looks for the desired file on any suitable FTP server using a URL, for example. In this situation the FTP servers may be accessed over the Internet using a URL and are passed the IUI of the desired file. As the servers may not implement a pool cache in a standard format, any of the techniques described in step 802 may be used to find the desired file on the FTP server. If the file is found it is retrieved and the procedure ends.
If the file is not found, other techniques may be used such as making a request over a GSM telephone and retrieval via satellite, using a web search engine to find the file associated with an IUI etc. An error handler may be invoked in step 824 to return a suitable error message if necessary. Thus, the procedure of
The various embodiments described herein are suitable for use in a wide range of technical and business applications. For example, the invention is useful in the secure storage of documents, in access control, in escrow of documents, for encryption issues, and in reliably proving creation of documents. The following examples may be implemented using any of the embodiments described herein, for example the embodiment of
For any application, meta data 470 of flattened descriptor file 460 may be used to help an interested party search for and find content of interest. For example, consider a book whose chapters are encrypted and distributed on the Internet using an embodiment of the present invention. Meta data 470 may include keywords that help to describe the book, and locations where user MD5 may be found and payment made to receive key MD5. Thus, as the flattened descriptor file is not encrypted, an interested party can perform a search on the Internet for a book using author, subject or title keywords; if these keywords are present in meta data 470, then the party may retrieve the flattened descriptor file and eventually retrieve the book using embodiments described herein.
In the area of the secure storage, it is often desirable to be able to store documents in a public location that may be easily accessed by certain entities but not allow the documents to be opened or read except by authorized parties.
The encrypted card file 910 may then be transferred over the Internet or some other data link to non-secure public storage 916. Because file 910 is encrypted, an outside party cannot read it even though it is stored in public storage. When application 112 has a need for a particular card file, it may then use key 906 and master 908 to retrieve the encrypted file from public storage 916 and decrypt it. Such a scenario is possible with multiple customer files and/or other types of documents. Other secure storage applications may be found in areas such as insurance and health.
Next, user MD5 is delivered to the user via email 929, another data link, a telephone, or any other physical exchange medium. By possession of user MD5, user 923 may locate and retrieve the encrypted file but will not be able to decrypt it. Concurrently or thereafter, the two MD5 s are transmitted to an authentication database 931 in a secure manner. For example, an Internet connection 930 using SSL may be used. A secure connection is preferred, as possession of both MD5 s would allow any party to read the encrypted file. Database 931 may be present upon any suitable authentication server that acts an authenticating agent for originator 921. For example, the server may be an LDAP server and protocol 930 and 935 may be secure LDAP protocols. Both MD5 s are stored in a record 932 of the database along with authentication information 933. Information 933 is any suitable information suitable for authenticating user 923, such as a password. The authentication server also contains any of a wide variety of authenticating mechanisms for authenticating outside parties. Such authentication mechanisms are well known in the art.
In order to access the encrypted file, user 923 delivers via a data link 934 both the user MD5 and the user's authentication information. The user MD5 serves as a record locator within the database to locate the correct key and authentication information. The authentication server next authenticates the user by comparing the authentication information or by performing some other well-known process. If authentic, the key MD5 is then delivered via a data link 935 back to user 923. Preferably, link 935 is a secure link such a an SSL protocol that protects the key. Once user 923 is in possession of key MD5, it may now decrypt the encrypted file directly, or by way of decrypting an encrypted descriptor file.
In this example, originator 921 may decide to revoke the user's privilege to view the file at any time by simply communicating with the authentication server. The server would then be directed to always to decline authentication for the user. Alternatively, record 932 may be associated with any number of users that might be authenticated to download key MD5.
In another area of access control, files embodying music may be delivered to a user over the Internet who is not allowed to access the files until he or she has paid. Using the embodiment of
Key MD5 952 is delivered to escrow agent 956 who retains it until a condition previously agreed upon by the company and the user is met. Upon satisfaction of the condition, key 952 is delivered 958 to the user using any suitable means. Once in possession of the key, the user may decrypt an encrypted descriptor file to obtain the plaintext MD5 s which will allow the user to decrypt and read the files 950. Thus, software escrow is made simpler.
In another example of escrow, a pharmaceutical company is in the process of getting a drug approved and is generating voluminous evidence and clinical data that it may need to provide to the FDA. The company may wish to speed up the approval process and insure that its massive amounts of data cannot be altered over time. The FDA, in a similar fashion, desires an assurance that such clinical data if held in escrow does not change over time. Using an embodiment of the present invention, a single MD5 (or other type of identifier) can represent an enormous amount of data and insure to the FDA that the documents originally used to create the MD5 have not changed since that time.
In this example, the company regularly generates a user MD5 and a key MD5 based upon any number of data files that the government may need to access. The user MD5 is then delivered to the FDA, at the same time the data files may be held by an escrow agent, put into public storage, or even delivered to the government. Because the company may wish to limit access to the data files should the approval process be abandoned, the files have previously been encrypted using an embodiment of the invention. Advantageously, should the company forgo the approval process, it may choose not to deliver the key MD5 to the FDA and as such the FDA (or anyone else) would be unable to decrypt the descriptor file.
At the end of the approval process, the company delivers the key MD5 to the FDA who may then use it in conjunction with the user MD5 to decrypt the data files and view them. The company is protected against anyone viewing their files prematurely. The FDA is protected against the data being changed in the meantime, because the user MD5 and the key MD5 guarantee that the files eventually decrypted are the ones that were originally used to create the user MD5 and they key MD5.
The present invention may also be used in situations where the government or other entity is concerned about an entity using encryption that is unbreakable. For national security reasons, the government may wish at some point to decrypt private party communications. In this example, the private party agrees to encrypt their communications using an embodiment of the present invention in which a key MD5 and a master MD5 (or a user MD5) are generated. The files that have been encrypted by the private party are delivered to public storage or to a government server for safekeeping. Based upon accepted legal principles and an agreement between the private party and the government, the key MD5 and the master MD5 are delivered to a suitable government agency for safekeeping. If at some future time it is legally determined that the communications of the private party must be decrypted, the government agency may release both the key MD5 and the master MD5 to an appropriate legal entity who would then be able to not only locate and access the files but to decrypt them. Further, due to the nature of the present invention, both parties are virtually assured that the files eventually decrypted are the original files making up the secret communications of the private party.
Embodiments of the present invention may also be used to prove the existence of records on a particular date. For example, consider an individual inventor who is working diligently to perfect an invention. His records include digital text files, digital drawings, and/or handwritten documents which may be digitized. On a particular date, the inventor uses an embodiment of the invention to create a key MD5 and a master MD5 (or a user MD5) for all of his records in the form of computer files. The single MD5 is then delivered to the Patent Office. The Patent Office logs the MD5 as being received on a certain date and keeps it for safekeeping. Both the master MD5 and the key MD5 remain with the individual inventor. The actual digital files (encrypted) may be kept by the inventor, placed in public storage, or even delivered to the government.
Should the inventor wish to abandon his invention and not disclose it, he simply need not provide the key MD5 to the Patent Office and the files would not be able to be decrypted. If the inventor desires to prove a date of conception some time later, the key MD5 is delivered to the Patent Office which then has the capability to locate and decrypt the inventor's original documents. By virtue of the original master MD5 being logged on particular date, it may be reliably be proven that the original documents that are eventually decrypted using the master MD5 and the key MD5 where in fact in existence on that earlier date.
In another example on how the present invention may be used to prove the existence of records on a particular date, consider a Notary Public with access to the Internet. A party who desires proof of the existence of a document on a particular date uses an embodiment of the invention to generate a unique MD5 for that document. For example, the embodiments of
A generated intrinsic unique identifier (IUI), such as an alphanumeric encoded MD5, may be embedded in, transported, or attached to a wide variety of physical objects. For example, either MD5 may be received embedded in an electronic mail message to specify a set of files. Alternatively, the MD5 s may be generated automatically by a network device performing the backup of the files and directories specified. The MD5 s may be produced by a business application, thus sealing the relevant digital information relating to a particular transaction. In addition, MD5 s may be generated for other reasons by any user, network node, application or hardware device that needs to uniquely specify a file or group of files for some purpose. Such MD5 s may be embedded in and readily accessed from database applications, legacy applications running on mainframes, text retrieval applications, web sites, etc.
Further, an IUI (such as an alphanumeric encoded MD5) might be placed into digital content to identify that content, authorize its use, address further information, etc. For example, a music file such as the MP3 format might mix in, "splice," or use a watermark to embed an IUI into the actual music file. Such an IUI might also be embedded into genetic material to reference further information about that genetic material.
An IUI might be attached physically to a physical object to provide a reference for extensive information about that object. For example, a bar code representing an IUI might be present on a home appliance and represent a user's manual. Or, the alphanumeric representation of an IUI may be present on an object; a user might then type the IUI into a computer to receive files over the Internet about that object.
An IUI might be present within memory of a computing device to reference much more extensive programming or data for that device. For example, consider a typical smart card with a memory capacity of 2 K bytes. This limited memory space is used for small programs and data. When inserted into a smart card terminal, such as an ATM, connections are made with other computing devices to execute the limited program and data stored on the smart card. To expand the usable program size, or the number of programs executable on a smart card, an IUI is embedded in memory of the smart card. The IUI uniquely identifies additional programs or data that can be loaded onto the smart card, or executed by the terminal or smart card. The same would work with other portable devices such as mobile telephones, personal digital assistants, etc.
When implementing the flows of
CPU 1022 is also coupled to a variety of input/output devices such as display 1004, keyboard 1010, mouse 1012 and speakers 1030. In general, an input/output device may be any of: video displays, track balls, mice, keyboards, microphones, touch-sensitive displays, transducer card readers, magnetic or paper tape readers, tablets, styluses, voice or handwriting recognizers, biometrics readers, or other computers. CPU 1022 optionally may be coupled to another computer or telecommunications network using network interface 1040. With such a network interface, it is contemplated that the CPU might receive information from the network, or might output information to the network in the course of performing the above-described method steps. Furthermore, method embodiments of the present invention may execute solely upon CPU 1022 or may execute over a network such as the Internet in conjunction with a remote CPU that shares a portion of the processing.
In addition, embodiments of the present invention further relate to computer storage products with a computer-readable medium that have computer code thereon for performing various computer-implemented operations. The media and computer code may be those specially designed and constructed for the purposes of the present invention, or they may be of the kind well known and available to those having skill in the computer software arts. Examples of computer-readable media include, but are not limited to: magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROMs and holographic devices; magneto-optical media such as floptical disks; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and execute program code, such as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices (PLDs) and ROM and RAM devices. Examples of computer code include machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher level code that are executed by a computer using an interpreter.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. For example, in the embodiment of
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Mar 27, 1990
|Apr 13, 1993
|Sun Microsystems, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for the naming of database component files to avoid duplication of files
|Dec 3, 1992
|Apr 4, 1995
|Unisys Corporation
|Data base backup and recovery system and method
|May 2, 1994
|Dec 3, 1996
|Novadigm, Inc.
|Distributed computer network including hierarchical resource information structure and related method of distributing resources
|Apr 5, 1995
|Feb 4, 1997
|Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for reconciling different versions of a file
|Nov 2, 1994
|Aug 19, 1997
|Boston Technology, Inc.
|Voice mail network and networking method
|May 25, 1995
|Dec 2, 1997
|Kangaroo, Inc.
|On-line database updating network system and method
|Aug 31, 1995
|Dec 23, 1997
|Unisys Corporation
|Method for generating an internet protocol suite checksum in a single macro instruction
|Dec 18, 1995
|Jan 20, 1998
|Apple Computer, Inc.
|Method for synchronizing and archiving information between computer systems
|May 31, 1995
|Apr 21, 1998
|Xerox Corporation
|Indexing system using one-way hash for document service
|Aug 25, 1995
|May 26, 1998
|Intel Corporation
|Parameterized hash functions for access control
|Dec 20, 1996
|May 25, 1999
|Intel Corporation
|Secure compressed imaging
|Sep 12, 1997
|Nov 23, 1999
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and apparatus for the secure distributed storage and retrieval of information
|Feb 20, 1998
|Jul 11, 2000
|Unisys Corp
|System for reformatting and burning of data files having a first format onto a compact disk to be utilized in a network using different format
|Aug 27, 1999
|Feb 13, 2001
|The Voice.Com, Inc.
|System and method for integrating paper-based business documents with computer-readable data entered via a computer network
|May 11, 2000
|Mar 25, 2003
|Apple Computer, Inc.
|Contextual searching by determining intersections of search results
|Apr 7, 1999
|Jun 24, 2003
|Critical Path, Inc.
|Internet document management system and methods
|Nov 1, 2000
|Nov 18, 2003
|Mediconnect.Net, Inc.
|Methods and systems for retrieval and digitization of records
|May 4, 2001
|Jun 29, 2004
|Franciscan University Of Steubenville
|Method and system for fragmenting and reconstituting data
|Dec 4, 2000
|May 10, 2005
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Method and system for caching virus-free file certificates
|Sep 3, 1998
|Jan 3, 2002
|O'brien Michael R.
|Method and apparatus for selective distribution of discount coupons based on prior customer behavior
|May 29, 2001
|Feb 14, 2002
|Brian Andrew
|Encrypting file system and method
|Title not available
|Apr 9, 1996
|Oct 17, 1996
|Kinetech, Inc.
|Identifying data in a data processing system
|May 9, 1997
|Nov 20, 1997
|Corporation For National Research Initiatives
|Identifying, managing, accessing, and tracking digital objects and associated rights and payments
|Jan 23, 1999
|Jul 29, 1999
|Filepool N.V.
|Access to content addressable data over a network
|Jan 23, 1999
|Jul 29, 1999
|Filepool N.V.
|Content addressable information encapsulation, representation, and transfer
|Andrew Gore, "FileWave agents across Atlantic", Mar. 29, 1993, MACWEEK.
|Bosselaers et al., "The RIPMED-160 Cryptographic Hash Function", Dr. Dobb's Journal, Jan. 1997.
|Fowler, et al., "A User-Level Replicated File System", Jun. 21-25, 1993, Usenix Summer 1993 Technical Conference.
|Greene, et al., "Multi-Index Hashing for Information Retrieval", Nov. 20-22, 1994, Proceedings. 35<SUP>th </SUP>Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE.
|Hirano et al., "Improved Extendible Hashing with High Concurrency". 1995, Systems and Computers in Japan, vol. 26, No. 13.
|Prusker et al., "The Siphon: Managing Distant Replicated Repositories", Nov. 8-9, 1990, Proceedings on the Management of Replicated Data, IEEE.
|Rich et al., "hobgoblin: A File and Directory Auditor", Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1991, Lisa V, San Diego, CA.
|Robert Hess, "FileRunner gets in sync with MAC", May 3, 1993, MACWEEK.
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Sep 12, 2003
|Oct 17, 2006
|Visa U.S.A. Inc.
|Method and system for managing token image replacement
|Aug 28, 2003
|Nov 27, 2007
|Wayne Yingling
|Internet security system
|Aug 31, 2004
|Mar 4, 2008
|Hitachi, Ltd.
|Trusted time stamping storage system
|Jul 2, 2002
|Aug 5, 2008
|Tivo Inc.
|Cryptographically signed filesystem
|Nov 27, 2002
|Jan 13, 2009
|M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers, Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device
|May 22, 2003
|Feb 17, 2009
|Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for secure delivery and rights management of digital content
|Apr 19, 2001
|Mar 3, 2009
|Microsoft Corporation
|Method and system for providing an XML binary format
|Dec 11, 2001
|Mar 17, 2009
|Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
|Technique for reducing network bandwidth for delivery of dynamic and mixed content
|May 5, 2006
|Apr 28, 2009
|Adobe Systems Incorporated
|System and method for cacheing web files
|Jan 7, 2003
|May 5, 2009
|Ntt Docomo, Inc.
|Content delivery method and content delivery system
|Apr 17, 2003
|May 26, 2009
|Tecsec, Inc.
|Server-based cryptography
|Mar 31, 2004
|Jul 7, 2009
|Ntt Docomo, Inc.
|Communication device and program
|Mar 28, 2003
|Sep 8, 2009
|Ntt Docomo, Inc.
|Distribution method, distribution system, and terminal device
|Feb 8, 2007
|Oct 20, 2009
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for verifying the integrity and completeness of records
|Oct 24, 2003
|Dec 15, 2009
|Microsoft Corporation
|Indexing XML datatype content system and method
|Mar 26, 2007
|Dec 15, 2009
|Emc Corporation
|Storing authentication information in a content unit on an object addressable storage system
|Jul 21, 2004
|Feb 9, 2010
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System, graphical user interface (GUI), method and program product for configuring an assembly line
|Jan 18, 2008
|May 11, 2010
|Hitachi, Ltd.
|Trusted time stamping storage system
|Sep 17, 2009
|Jan 4, 2011
|Visa U.S.A. Inc.
|Method and system for managing loyalty program information on a phone
|Jan 15, 2007
|Feb 1, 2011
|Microsoft Corporation
|Reversible hashing for E-signature verification
|Oct 26, 2006
|Feb 15, 2011
|Pkware, Inc.
|Systems and methods for manipulating and managing computer archive files
|Feb 22, 2008
|Mar 1, 2011
|Bycast, Inc.
|Relational objects for the optimized management of fixed-content storage systems
|Dec 29, 2008
|Mar 1, 2011
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device
|Nov 14, 2007
|Apr 5, 2011
|Jakob Holger
|Method and system for function-specific time-configurable replication of data
|Oct 4, 2004
|Apr 26, 2011
|Tivo Inc.
|Secure control of features of a digital device
|Dec 29, 2008
|May 10, 2011
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device
|Feb 27, 2009
|Sep 6, 2011
|Ntt Docomo, Inc.
|Contents transmission method and contents transmission system
|Apr 6, 2007
|Oct 11, 2011
|PeeApp Ltd.
|Method and system for accelerating receipt of data in a client to client network
|Jun 5, 2008
|Nov 8, 2011
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System and method for verifying the integrity and completeness of records
|Apr 24, 2009
|Dec 13, 2011
|Adobe Systems Incorporated
|System and method for cacheing web files
|Sep 30, 2008
|Dec 27, 2011
|Emc Corporation
|Access control to block storage devices for a shared disk based file system
|May 9, 2007
|Jan 10, 2012
|Google Inc.
|Three-dimensional wavelet based video fingerprinting
|Oct 24, 2008
|Jan 24, 2012
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device
|Dec 11, 2007
|Mar 6, 2012
|Imophaze Research Co., L.L.C.
|Method and apparatus for secure key delivery for decrypting bulk digital content files at an unsecure site
|Jan 26, 2011
|May 1, 2012
|Bycast, Inc.
|Relational objects for the optimized management of fixed-content storage systems
|Oct 25, 2006
|May 1, 2012
|Tivo Inc.
|Cryptographically signed filesystem
|Dec 30, 2011
|May 22, 2012
|Peerapp Ltd.
|Methods and systems for caching data communications over computer networks
|Dec 16, 2011
|Jul 31, 2012
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device
|Oct 11, 2011
|Aug 21, 2012
|Peerapp Ltd.
|Method and system for accelerating receipt of data in a client to client network
|Feb 27, 2009
|Oct 2, 2012
|Ntt Docomo, Inc.
|Contents transmission method and contents transmission system
|Feb 13, 2007
|Oct 30, 2012
|Google Inc.
|Site directed management of audio components of uploaded video files
|Jun 9, 2010
|Oct 30, 2012
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Host device and method for accessing a virtual file in a storage device by bypassing a cache in the host device
|Jun 29, 2010
|Oct 30, 2012
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Host device and method for accessing a virtual file in a storage device by bypassing a cache in the host device
|Nov 21, 2011
|Dec 18, 2012
|Emc Corporation
|Associating an identifier with a content unit
|May 2, 2008
|Dec 25, 2012
|Digimarc Corporation
|Methods for identifying audio or video content
|Dec 9, 2009
|May 7, 2013
|Emc Corporation
|Automated application-based storage provisioning
|Dec 14, 2012
|Jun 4, 2013
|Digimarc Corporation
|Methods for identifying audio or video content
|Mar 6, 2008
|Jul 30, 2013
|Emc Corporation
|Automation of coordination of encryption keys in a SAN based environment where an encryption engine, device management, and key management are not co-located
|Feb 25, 2010
|Oct 29, 2013
|Google Inc.
|Blocking of unlicensed audio content in video files on a video hosting website
|Mar 6, 2008
|Nov 19, 2013
|Emc Corporation
|Encryption key recovery in the event of storage management failure
|Mar 30, 2012
|Dec 3, 2013
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Host device and method for accessing a virtual file in a storage device by bypassing a cache in the host device
|Jun 19, 2007
|Dec 17, 2013
|Google Inc.
|Endpoint based video fingerprinting
|Jun 16, 2011
|Jan 28, 2014
|Imophaze Research Co., L.L.C.
|Method and apparatus for secure key delivery for decrypting bulk digital content files at an unsecure site
|Jul 16, 2012
|Mar 4, 2014
|Thomson Licensing
|Bonding contents on separate storage media
|Jan 16, 2008
|Mar 4, 2014
|Terry Lee Stokes
|System and method for WORM data storage
|Jan 15, 2008
|Mar 25, 2014
|Terry Lee Stokes
|System and method for WORM data storage
|Jul 9, 2013
|Apr 1, 2014
|Digimarc Corporation
|Methods for identifying audio or video content
|Mar 30, 2012
|Apr 8, 2014
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Host device and method for accessing a virtual file in a storage device by bypassing a cache in the host device
|Oct 19, 2010
|Apr 8, 2014
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device
|Apr 4, 2008
|Apr 8, 2014
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Access control for a memory device
|Jul 16, 2012
|May 20, 2014
|Thomson Licensing
|Bonding contents on separate storage media
|Oct 23, 2009
|Jul 22, 2014
|John C. Canessa
|System and methods for metadata management in content addressable storage
|Apr 22, 2011
|Aug 5, 2014
|John Canessa
|Shared archives in interconnected content-addressable storage systems
|Mar 6, 2008
|Aug 5, 2014
|Emc Corporation
|Redundant array of encrypting disks
|Oct 23, 2013
|Sep 2, 2014
|Dt Labs, Llc
|System, method and apparatus for electronically protecting data and digital content
|Jun 4, 2013
|Oct 21, 2014
|Digimarc Corporation
|Methods for identifying audio or video content
|Mar 14, 2011
|Nov 18, 2014
|Sandisk Il Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device
|Jan 19, 2009
|Nov 25, 2014
|Netapp, Inc.
|Modifying information lifecycle management rules in a distributed system
|Jun 17, 2005
|Nov 25, 2014
|Lockheed Martin Corporation
|Search mechanism for content based information security repositories
|Jun 10, 2013
|Dec 2, 2014
|Intertrust Technologies Corporation
|Trusted storage systems and methods
|Apr 22, 2011
|Jan 6, 2015
|Datcard Systems, Inc.
|Event notification in interconnected content-addressable storage systems
|Jul 2, 2012
|Feb 17, 2015
|Pkware, Inc.
|System and method for manipulating and managing computer archive files
|May 21, 2012
|Mar 24, 2015
|Peerapp Ltd.
|Methods and systems for caching data communications over computer networks
|May 25, 2012
|Apr 7, 2015
|Micron Technology, Inc.
|Data security for digital data storage
|Jul 21, 2011
|May 12, 2015
|Attributor Corporation
|Content monitoring and compliance enforcement
|Dec 9, 2009
|Jul 28, 2015
|Sandisk Technologies Inc.
|Storage device and method for using a virtual file in a public memory area to access a plurality of protected files in a private memory area
|Jun 5, 2012
|Aug 4, 2015
|Pkware, Inc.
|Method for strongly encrypting .ZIP files
|Nov 27, 2013
|Sep 15, 2015
|Google Inc.
|Endpoint based video fingerprinting
|Mar 13, 2013
|Nov 17, 2015
|Qualcomm Incorporated
|Dynamic resolution of content references for streaming media
|Dec 18, 2013
|Dec 1, 2015
|Emc Corporation
|User authentication based on biometric handwriting aspects of a handwritten code
|Nov 4, 2014
|Feb 2, 2016
|Intertrust Technologies Corporation
|Trusted storage systems and methods
|Oct 21, 2014
|Mar 22, 2016
|Digimarc Corporation
|Methods for identifying audio or video content
|Mar 29, 2013
|Apr 5, 2016
|Emc Corporation
|Access point—authentication server combination
|Sep 13, 2012
|May 10, 2016
|Google Inc.
|Site directed management of audio components of uploaded video files
|Mar 1, 2013
|May 31, 2016
|Netapp, Inc.
|Systems and methods for managing files in a content storage system
|Mar 12, 2014
|Jun 28, 2016
|Thomson Licensing
|Bonding contents on separate storage media
|Mar 12, 2014
|Jun 28, 2016
|Thomson Licensing
|Bonding contents on separate storage media
|Jul 30, 2015
|Jul 5, 2016
|Thomson Licensing
|Bonding contents on separate storage media
|Sep 19, 2013
|Aug 23, 2016
|Google Inc.
|Blocking of unlicensed audio content in video files on a video hosting website
|Nov 14, 2014
|Sep 6, 2016
|Attributor Corporation
|Determination of copied content, including attribution
|Dec 1, 2014
|Oct 18, 2016
|Inwellcom Technology Co., Ltd.
|File management system and method
|Oct 27, 2014
|Jan 10, 2017
|Netapp, Inc.
|Modifying information lifecycle management rules in a distributed system
|Oct 21, 2013
|Feb 14, 2017
|EMC IP Holding Company LLC
|Encryption key recovery in the event of storage management failure
|Jan 13, 2010
|Apr 25, 2017
|Google Inc.
|Policy based video content syndication
|Mar 31, 2014
|Apr 25, 2017
|Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc
|Keying infrastructure
|Jan 5, 2016
|May 2, 2017
|Intertrust Technologies Corporation
|Trusted storage systems and methods
|Mar 20, 2002
|Oct 24, 2002
|Seiko Epson Corporation
|File conversion device
|Jul 2, 2002
|Feb 6, 2003
|Platt David C.
|Cryptographically signed filesystem
|Apr 19, 2001
|Mar 6, 2003
|Istvan Cseri
|Method and system for providing an XML binary format
|Sep 10, 2002
|Mar 13, 2003
|Luc Wuidart
|Method and device for storing and reading digital data on/from a physical medium
|Dec 11, 2001
|Jun 12, 2003
|Eric Anderson
|Technique for reducing network bandwidth for delivery fo dynamic and mixed content
|Feb 26, 2002
|Jul 31, 2003
|Shinji Hata
|System for providing medical service
|Mar 28, 2002
|Oct 2, 2003
|Overney Gregor T.
|Secure file verification station for ensuring data integrity
|Nov 27, 2002
|May 27, 2004
|M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd.
|Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device
|Aug 28, 2003
|Aug 5, 2004
|Wayne Yingling
|Internet security system
|May 28, 2003
|Dec 2, 2004
|Integrated Data Control, Inc.
|Information capturing, indexing, and authentication system
|Sep 2, 2002
|Dec 23, 2004
|Edwards Christopher P
|Server with file verification
|Mar 31, 2004
|Jan 6, 2005
|Naoki Naruse
|Communication device and program
|Nov 8, 2002
|Feb 24, 2005
|Wenhu Wang
|Method of the information secure
|Oct 24, 2003
|Apr 28, 2005
|Indexing XML datatype content system and method
|Mar 28, 2003
|Jul 21, 2005
|Nobuyuki Watanabe
|Distrubution method, distribution system, and terminal device
|Dec 6, 2004
|Sep 8, 2005
|Arc-E-Mail Ltd.
|Storage process and system for electronic messages
|Mar 10, 2005
|Sep 22, 2005
|Nokia Corporation
|Storage of content-location information
|Jul 21, 2004
|Jan 26, 2006
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System, graphical user interface (GUI), method and program product for configuring an assembly line
|Jan 23, 2006
|Aug 3, 2006
|Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|Image Processing Apparatus and Image Processing Method
|Jun 13, 2005
|Dec 14, 2006
|True Sandra L
|System and method of providing certified document retrieval
|Oct 26, 2006
|Feb 22, 2007
|Yuri Basin
|Systems and methods for manipulating and managing computer archive files
|Oct 25, 2006
|May 24, 2007
|Platt David C
|Cryptographically signed filesystem
|Jan 30, 2006
|May 31, 2007
|The Boeing Company
|Representing business transactions
|Dec 22, 2005
|Jun 28, 2007
|Kirschner Wesley A
|Method and apparatus for maintaining a secure software boundary
|Apr 6, 2007
|Aug 23, 2007
|Peerapp Ltd.
|Method and system for accelerating receipt of data in a client to client network
|May 5, 2006
|Nov 8, 2007
|Lee Thomason
|System and method for cacheing web files
|Jun 2, 2006
|Dec 6, 2007
|Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Patent Group
|System and method for generating a forensic file
|Aug 5, 2007
|Feb 7, 2008
|Terry Lee Stokes
|System and Method for the Capture and Archival of Electronic Communications
|Aug 4, 2007
|Feb 28, 2008
|Terry Stokes
|System and Method for the Capture and Archival of Electronic Communications
|Jan 16, 2008
|Jul 17, 2008
|Terry Lee Stokes
|System and Method for WORM data storage
|Jan 15, 2007
|Jul 17, 2008
|Microsoft Corporation
|Reversible Hashing for E-Signature Verification
|Jan 15, 2008
|Jul 17, 2008
|Terry Lee Stokes
|System and Method for WORM data storage
|Dec 11, 2007
|Jul 31, 2008
|Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
|Method and apparatus for secure key delivery for decrypting bulk digital content files at an unsecure site
|Feb 8, 2007
|Aug 14, 2008
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System And Method For Verifying The Integrity And Completeness Of Records
|Jun 5, 2008
|Oct 30, 2008
|International Business Machines Corporation
|System And Method For Verifying The Integrity And Completeness Of Records
|Nov 14, 2007
|Jan 15, 2009
|Jakob Holger
|Method and system for function-specific time-configurable replication of data
|Oct 24, 2008
|Feb 26, 2009
|Aran Ziv
|Apparatus and Method For Securing Data on a Portable Storage Device
|Oct 31, 2008
|Mar 5, 2009
|Jakob Holger
|Method and system for function-specific time-configurable replication of data manipulating functions
|Dec 29, 2008
|May 7, 2009
|Aran Ziv
|Apparatus and Method for Securing Data on a Portable Storage Device
|Dec 29, 2008
|May 7, 2009
|Aran Ziv
|Apparatus and Method for Securing Data on a Portable Storage Device
|Feb 13, 2007
|Jun 4, 2009
|Franck Chastagnol
|Site Directed Management of Audio Components of Uploaded Video Files
|Feb 27, 2009
|Jun 25, 2009
|Kazuhiro Yamada
|Contents transmission method and contents transmission system
|Nov 26, 2008
|Jul 2, 2009
|Banga Jasminder S
|Systems and Methods of Information/Network Processing Consistent with Creation, Encryption and/or Insertion of UIDs/Tags
|Jan 29, 2008
|Jul 30, 2009
|Paul Degoul
|Distributed electrical/electronic architectures for brake-by-wire brake systems
|Feb 27, 2009
|Aug 6, 2009
|Kazuhiro Yamada
|Contents transmission method and contents transmission system
|Apr 24, 2009
|Aug 20, 2009
|Adobe Systems Incorporated
|System and Method for Cacheing Web Files
|Feb 22, 2008
|Aug 27, 2009
|Bycast Inc.
|Relational objects for the optimized management of fixed-content storage systems
|Feb 25, 2010
|Jul 1, 2010
|Google Inc.
|Blocking of unlicensed audio content in video files on a video hosting website
|Jan 19, 2009
|Jul 22, 2010
|Bycast Inc.
|Modifying information lifecycle management rules in a distributed system
|Jan 13, 2010
|Oct 14, 2010
|Google Inc.
|Policy-based video content syndication
|Oct 19, 2010
|Feb 10, 2011
|Aran Ziv
|Apparatus and Method for Securing Data on a Portable Storage Device
|Jan 26, 2011
|May 26, 2011
|Bycast Inc.
|Relational objects for the optimized management of fixed-content storage systems
|Dec 9, 2009
|Jun 9, 2011
|Ehud Cohen
|Storage Device and Method for Using a Virtual File in a Public Memory Area to Access a Plurality of Protected Files in a Private Memory Area
|Mar 14, 2011
|Jul 7, 2011
|Aran Ziv
|Apparatus and Method for Securing Data on a Portable Storage Device
|Aug 9, 2010
|Sep 1, 2011
|Google Inc.
|Content Rights Management
|Jun 6, 2011
|Sep 29, 2011
|International Business Machines Corporation
|Network integrity maintenance
|Apr 22, 2011
|Dec 29, 2011
|Datcard Systems, Inc.
|Shared archives in interconnected content-addressable storage systems
|Nov 23, 2011
|Jun 28, 2012
|Apple Inc.
|Universal Interface for Retrieval of Information in a Computer System
|May 25, 2012
|Sep 13, 2012
|Rollins Doug L
|Data security for digital data storage
|Jul 16, 2012
|Nov 8, 2012
|Dirk Gandolph
|Bonding contents on separate storage media
|Jun 10, 2013
|Oct 17, 2013
|Intertrust Technologies Corporation
|Trusted storage systems and methods
|Dec 1, 2014
|Jun 18, 2015
|Inwellcom Technology Co., Ltd.
|File management system and method
|Nov 5, 2007
|May 27, 2015
|Nov 19, 2010
|Sep 5, 2012
|Storage device and method for using a virtual file in a public memory area to access a plurality of protected files in a private memory area
|Nov 19, 2010
|Apr 8, 2015
|Storage device and method for using a virtual file in a public memory area to access a plurality of protected files in a private memory area
|Nov 26, 2008
|Jun 4, 2009
|Feeva Technology, Inc.
|Systems and methods of information/network processing consistent with creation, encryption and/or insertion of uids/tags
|Nov 26, 2008
|Jan 21, 2010
|Feeva Technology, Inc.
|Systems and methods of information/network processing consistent with creation, encryption and/or insertion of uids/tags
|U.S. Classification
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|Nov 18, 1999
Owner name: WAVE RESEARCH N.V., BELGIUM
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CARPENTIER, PAUL R.;VAN RIEL, JAN F.;TEUGELS, TOM;REEL/FRAME:010389/0154
Effective date: 19991025
|Mar 14, 2000
Owner name: WAVE RESEARCH N.V., BELGIUM
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO ADD SECOND EXECUTION DATE OF 10-22-99 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 010389, FRAME 0154;ASSIGNORS:CARPENTIER, PAUL R.;VAN RIEL, JAN F.;TEUGELS, TOM;REEL/FRAME:010687/0055;SIGNING DATES FROM 19991022 TO 19991025
|Nov 28, 2001
Owner name: EMC CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FILEPOOL N.V., FORMERLY KNOWN AS WAVERESEARCH N.V.;REEL/FRAME:012317/0213
Effective date: 20011126
|Dec 7, 2001
Owner name: EMC CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FILEPOOL N.V., FORMERLY AS WAVERESEARCH N.V.;REEL/FRAME:012221/0352
Effective date: 20011126
|Jun 15, 2009
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 14, 2013
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
|Sep 21, 2016
Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLAT
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.;AVENTAIL LLC;CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:040134/0001
Effective date: 20160907
Owner name: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., A
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.;AVENTAIL LLC;CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:040136/0001
Effective date: 20160907
|Sep 29, 2016
Owner name: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:040203/0001
Effective date: 20160906
|Jun 13, 2017
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 12