text:
PBS "The Charlie Rose Show" - Transcript
Copyright ©2009 by Federal News Service, Inc., Ste. 500, 1000 Vermont Ave, Washington, DC 20005 USA. Federal News Service is a private firm not affiliated with the federal government. No portion of this transcript may be copied, sold or retransmitted without the written authority of Federal News Service, Inc. Copyright is not claimed as to any part of the original work prepared by a United States government officer or employee as a part of that person's official duties. For information on subscribing to the FNS Internet Service at www.fednews.com, please email Carina Nyberg at email@example.com or call 1-202-216-2706.
MR. ROSE: Nancy Pelosi is here. She is, as you know, the Speaker of the House of Representatives. She is, as you know, the most powerful woman in the U.S. government and one of the two or three most powerful people in the U.S. government. She plays a key role in the government's response to the country's challenges, especially the economic crisis. Congress recently passed a $787 billion economic stimulus package. It may soon consider additional funds to stabilize the nation's banks. At the White House today, President Obama met with his top economic advisers and outlined his administration's efforts.
President Obama also addressed the downturn in the speech to business leaders yesterday. The president said the crisis forced his administration to adopt a bold agenda.
(Begin videotaped segment.)
MR. ROSE: I am pleased to have Speaker Pelosi back at this table. Welcome.
SPEAKER PELOSI: My pleasure to be here.
MR. ROSE: You're in New York fund raising and also meeting with the New York Times editorial board?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Meeting with people up here to get some ideas about how they see the economic situation. As you know, New York takes a big bite of this wormy apple in terms of the economic --
MR. ROSE: Certainly on the financial side.
SPEAKER PELOSI: -- on the financial side.
MR. ROSE: Tell me what people are asking you as you go around the country, when you go back home to San Francisco, when you go to where you came from, Baltimore. When you travel to New York. What is it they want to know?
SPEAKER PELOSI: People are more optimistic outside of Washington D.C. than they are inside of Washington. They want to -- they want to be sure that we stick to our path which is to take us out of this economic challenge and not be afraid to do so. But it's interesting, because in Washington, the pundits, this, that, question this or that, but outside the country people have much more confidence. They're afraid, of course, for their own financial situation and so they're making some adjustments in that respect. But they thank us for the recovery package almost across the board, and there is much in it to be thankful for. Whether we're building a road, building the infrastructure of America or building the human infrastructure with education, investments in healthcare, investments in childcare and the rest, people see a benefit to themselves in this package. And now, of course, they want to see it delivered. He wonder about the president. There is so much confidence in him, and that is, indeed, well placed. We have a great president. He has a big vision for America, great intellect, great strategic thinking and eloquence to communicate with the American people.
MR. ROSE: Does his success say something about the power of language as a political tool?
SPEAKER PELOSI: There is no question that President Obama knows his way around the English language. And he knows his values and his ideas for the future. You only need look at the inaugural address to see -- and I say to people, keep reading it over and over. It was powerful when it was delivered. And in the reading of it, you see a very professorial and yet leadership, I guess they're the same --
MR. ROSE: It was also, as I'd argue, a definition of the change that he wants.
SPEAKER PELOSI: It was, indeed. But what was interesting to me from sitting near him when he made is to look out over 2 million people in the audience and imaging so many more on television and radio that -- and other means of communication. The stillness, the silence. Nobody moved when he spoke. And they listened to what he had to say. This is great, because his message was a very strong one.
MR. ROSE: What in that speech most resonated with you?
SPEAKER PELOSI: When the president began and he said that he called for swift, bold action now. And the public responded to it in a very positive way. And he said in a very shall we say professorial way, but also inspirational way, we will harness the sun and the wind and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories, and we'll invest in science, have better healthcare innovation and schools for the 21st century. Build the infrastructure of America in a new way. In just a few words he captured the priorities that are about a stronger America, that people repeat over and over again.
MR. ROSE: Rahm Emanuel, who you know well from your service in the house and his service in the house, the other chief of staff of the president has famously said this crisis is opportunity.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Absolutely.
MR. ROSE: Some look at that and say what that means to Nancy Pelosi is some huge Democratic spending agenda that might not be able to be passed except in a difficult time on an emergency time.
SPEAKER PELOSI: No. Actually, for a long time now, we had been building our science agenda. I think I've said to you, there are four words that describe what we're doing. Science, science, science, science and science in terms of science for healthcare, science for innovation, to keep America competitive and number one, science to combat global warming, and science and technology to build our infrastructure in a new forward thinking way. So we had our domestic agenda, and, of course, science to defend the American people. But focusing on the domestic agenda, the -- all that we wanted to invest in was what we could get a return on so it had to produce jobs and had to reduce the deficit. And some of the investments -- for example, in education, nothing brings more money to the treasury than investing in the education of the American people. I said the treasury, not just the economy. But the treasury. So we have a big responsibility. This isn't about some list from days gone by. This is about an agenda for the future that will, as the president has called for, create jobs in the near term but build the -- stabilize the economy as we go forward.
MR. ROSE: In the stimulus program, there are now questions being raised as to whether it really will produce more than 2 million jobs. What is the number that you believe is possible based on the legislation that you passed?
SPEAKER PELOSI: I'm still committed to 3 million plus. And I am so -- do so because the investments that we have made there. That they are reinforced by the president's budget. None of these things is disconnected. But what's interesting about this president, why it's such a joy as speaker of the house to work with him is that everything is part of a bigger vision. The goal is to create these jobs to stabilize the economy. So everything in the bill is in furtherance of reaching those goals. They have not diminished. The investments are still there. And what we have to do is have confidence that this will work. People outside of Washington do. And I think --
MR. ROSE: But do you have confidence in a this stimulus bill will produce 3 million jobs?
SPEAKER PELOSI: I do. I do. Now even more conservative economists will say 2-and-a-half million jobs, something like that. But I think if we push very hard -- now, you have to see the stimulus package -- and by the way, no president in the history of our country was able to pass a recovery package of such magnitude or any recovery package for that matter, with such speed.
MR. ROSE: And you know, you've heard this before, some criticized the president and said at the beginning, the stimulus bill looked like it was the bill written and created by the house Democrats and not a bill that came out of the vision of the president of the United States. And that, therefore, the message seemed to be a bit out of kilter with some of the things he believed in.
SPEAKER PELOSI: The ones who were saying that --
MR. ROSE: Too much spending for things that were not necessarily delivering instant stimulus.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, for example, most of those criticisms came our friends in the Republican Party, the president tried very hard, and I think it's the right thing to do. We wish that President Obama had tried to act in a more bipartisan way. You can imagine being on the minority end of that or even the majority, but not having the White House. So that part, I think, was the positive on the president's part. What we --
MR. ROSE: Which part was positive?
SPEAKER PELOSI: That he was reaching out to the Republicans and we did, too. But the fact is they didn't vote for the bill, and so they had to criticize it. But not to get into that --
MR. ROSE: But I've heard Democrats make this criticism of him, that, in fact, it looked too much like a bill from the --
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well that's not what it was.
MR. ROSE: -- a house of leadership rather than his bill.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, when you're dealing with the senate, one bill is a proposal of the house and the senate makes its proposal and then you reconcile. But for example, one of the things that was criticized, the president said take it out of the bill and we did, but it was a very worthy thing.
MR. ROSE: What was that?
SPEAKER PELOSI: The rehabilitation of the national mall.
MR. ROSE: Yes.
SPEAKER PELOSI: This is a national treasure. It has enormous infrastructure challenges. It would have created jobs immediately. It needs to be done. And it would have been --
MR. ROSE: Let's take that -- the president said take it out because?
SPEAKER PELOSI: In other words, let's not get --
MR. ROSE: Let's not --
(Cross talk.)
SPEAKER PELOSI: It's a very diversionary tactic. We're talking about here, the senate put a text package of what, 70 some -- $80 billion in there. That isn't job creating. But the other investments are. $700 billion of investments in energy, in educations, in healthcare, in building the infrastructure of America. All of which produced jobs and in doing so, bring money to the treasury, so they take us on a downturn, because fiscal soundness is essential to this.
MR. ROSE: Let me just clear this up, though. I've also heard people in the administration say look, most of the stuff that they enacted were stuff they presented.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Right.
MR. ROSE: All right, so I'm just asking you to settle this for me, for my own understanding. That the bill we got -- the stimulus bill is essentially a bill that the administration wanted.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Yes.
MR. ROSE: Not something that they said we'll just take what the house gives us.
SPEAKER PELOSI: No. It isn't that at all. These are largely the president's priorities. But they're our priorities, too. In other words, as I say, we have been working on these issues for a long time.
MR. ROSE: A long time meaning years and years and years. And now you had an opportunity to --
SPEAKER PELOSI: Now we have a signature. Yes.
MR. ROSE: Back to the bipartisan thing. So what's the consequence of this? The president said I reached out, I have consulted with the public, I went up to see them, I've done all this. Yet they vote pretty much party line against with a couple of exceptions in the senate. I tried. Republicans say no, he didn't really try. You know, he presented us with something he couldn't accept. He didn't really listen to us. Yes. He asked us a question but no, he didn't listen.
SPEAKER PELOSI: No, he listened. And the fact of the matter is, and there are many other bills that will come up and there will be opportunities to work in a bipartisan way, and I hope that they will be fruitful. Because we have some big challenges that have nothing to do with partisanship, and we want the best ideas wherever they come from.
MR. ROSE: So you're getting good ideas from Republicans?
SPEAKER PELOSI: But in terms of this -- let me -- to the stimulus for a moment, to the recovery package, for a moment, we were talking about a basic change in direction with this package. A change in -- a new direction for America. The Republicans in the House of Representatives are committed to the old direction. So this is what the election was about. So we hoped while we could accommodate some of their ideas, we gave them every opportunity to make amendments, do this or that, but some of their own people didn't vote for their amendments. Some of the Republicans didn't vote for the amendments. So understand that when this bill came forward, to take us in a new direction, and you cannot turn the ship of state on a dime but you must begin, this was a difference of opinion. I believe that the Republicans are sincere in their vote against the bill. They do not believe in these investments in energy, health, educations, infrastructure, and the rest. They don't believe in that. I don't think they voted politically. I think they voted what they believed and President Obama and the Democrats had a different idea. Their ideas are what got us here in the first place. In this terrible economic situation. We need to take a new direction.
MR. ROSE: All right. You mentioned in that, you said take the country to a new place. What's that new place?
SPEAKER PELOSI: It's a place where many more people in our country participate in the economic prosperity of America. It's a place where every American has access to quality, affordable healthcare. It's a place where we recognize --
MR. ROSE: Universal healthcare.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Universal healthcare. It's a place where we are recognizing the damage to our planet by decision that said we have made that we need to reverse. It's a place where we have to go -- we had the industrial revolution, we have the technological revolution. Now we have to have a green revolution. There has been a lot of lost time the last 8 years, missing opportunities that we have to go into the future in a more -- a way that will make change for us, that will build and economy that isn't susceptible to what we are suffering now. That says this is new, it is green, it is innovative, it is competitive internationally, it invests in education -- let me just say, this takes us to the budget. Because the three priorities that the president has in the budget, domestically, are health, education, and energy. Whether you talk to corporate CEOs or you talk to policy makers or academics, these are the three elements for a foundation for a solid economic future. We must educate our people, innovation begins in that classroom. We must invest in energy because that is the national security issue, it is a environmental issue, an economic issue, and a moral issue to preserve our planet. And healthcare is central not only to the house and wellbeing of American people, the health of our economy, but reducing the deficits.
MR. ROSE: Are we looking also at change in which the federal government by necessity or otherwise will have to play a much more significant role in our economy?
SPEAKER PELOSI: In this transition, yes. In this transition, yes. I think it's very clear that the economic situation that we are in today demands some intervention from the federal government. But I hope that that would just be a transition.
MR. ROSE: Others suggest that it may not be and it's going to be transformative, and it is suggesting a way -- there is no exit strategy, and it is a defining moment in the history of the country that will create a different kind of state.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, here's the thing. Think of it this way instead.
That many of the things we have talked about, whether it's health, education, energy, infrastructure, the financial stabilization, all are public private partnerships. So --
MR. ROSE: Exactly.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Public private partnerships. So in some cases it's moving away from a government role, and other places it's --
MR. ROSE: In the banking case they're trying to create a vehicle so that the private sector can participate in doing something about the toxic assets. That's the new, you know, driven idea.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Right.
MR. ROSE: And bring the private sector in to buying these toxic assets.
SPEAKER PELOSI: I think there is a --
MR. ROSE: By financing the banks.
SPEAKER PELOSI: I think there is a realization among all people that all the things we want to do, we need to think in public private -- public, public, all different kinds of different combinations on how we get them done, so we can leverage our dollars in a safe way, but leverage our dollars so we get more than just the appropriate dollars. Because we have big visions about what we -- big vision about what we want to do. And it's not something that's going to be funded by the federal taxpayer. It's something that is going to be spurred by that, but it's going to have market forces with the solutions, more entrepreneurial in thinking, and sometimes public private partnerships, sometimes the private sector will just take off with it. It's a very exciting time, I think a much more entrepreneurial spirit which, by the way, was the spirit of our founders. They were risk takers --
MR. ROSE: Clearly. Now, tell me about you. What do you think is the most unfair misleading impression of you, conception of what? What's the misconception of the speaker? Of Nancy Pelosi?
SPEAKER PELOSI: I don't think much about it, believe me. I really don't.
MR. ROSE: I know you don't. Because you're too busy to do that. But it's there. And people --
SPEAKER PELOSI: There seems to -- some people think there seems to be a market for saying that I am very partisan, and that I don't give the Republicans their opportunity. That simply is not true. They know in this recovery package that we had, we ask them what they wanted. They wanted certain things in there.
MR. ROSE: What would John Boehner say?
SPEAKER PELOSI: I know what he told me, but you'd have to ask him.
MR. ROSE: What has he told you?
SPEAKER PELOSI: The point is, they know what they asked for, and they asked for markups -- this is internal --
MR. ROSE: It has something to do what [talking simultaneously] they feel like they're not being totally ignored.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Markups, they had amendments on the floor and the rest. So if your thinking is in total -- almost total opposition on the economy, just let's talk about that issue, than the American people, what are you going to say? I don't agree with this economic period or they -- I'm not voting for the bill because they didn't let me have enough amendments. That's always an easy way out. If I want --
MR. ROSE: Let me make sure I hear you. You complain about process.
SPEAKER PELOSI: They complain about --
MR. ROSE: You complain about process if the argument really --
SPEAKER PELOSI: Policy.
MR. ROSE: -- is policy.
SPEAKER PELOSI: It's -- this is the three steps. If you can't win on policy, then you go to process. If you can't win on process, then you go to personality. And that's how they have decided they would make up stories about me and the rest because they -- but you know what? I'm in the arena. We have big issues. I can't be bothered about what they say about me. All I'm interested in is getting the job done. And I really want to get it done in a bipartisan way. We don't know --
MR. ROSE: Why aren't you getting it done in a bipartisan way?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Because in this first instance, they did not agree --
MR. ROSE: With the goals? With the goals?
SPEAKER PELOSI: I'll ask you. Do you think that the Republicans in the Congress and the house and almost entirely in the senate voted against the package for political reasons? Or do you think they just don't believe in taking the country in that direction?
MR. ROSE: Well, if you listen to Mr. Cantor [spelled phonetically], he doesn't believe in taking the country in that direction.
SPEAKER PELOSI: But then that's sincere. I respect that.
MR. ROSE: Don't you agree? Mr. Cantor's speeches say I don't agree with -- I don't believe that the combination of taxes the way they want to tax is the appropriate way to tax or the people they're giving the tax cuts to will benefit necessarily. All those --
SPEAKER PELOSI: So we disagree. That's -- we disagree. We say 95 percent of the country will get a tax cut under this initiative, and that is the great middle class. They have focused on the wealthiest people in America. And that is why we go to Washington to have that legitimate debate. But when you -- when that's a losing argument in the public, as you see that the public is responding favorably to the president's recovery package and to him, then you say, oh, they didn't let me have an amendment. But the fact is, I have confidence in the Republicans that they will vote in what they believe. And they don't believe in this recovery package.
MR. ROSE: If they believed in it, they would be voting for it would be your argument, although some argue that they simply -- as a political manner in a political context, have decided that the best place to be is in opposition You disagree with that?
SPEAKER PELOSI: I hope that they voted what they believed. That's why I think you go to Congress, is to vote what you believe. But in any event, whatever decision they made, I don't think they're doing well with the American people with that.
MR. ROSE: And the argument -- that's the argument the president makes. Look who won the election. And we won the election because of the positions we articulated, and what we're doing is exactly what we said we were going to do.
SPEAKER PELOSI: And that's exactly right.
MR. ROSE: When you look at paying for it --
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, this is --
MR. ROSE: Trillion dollars deficit.
SPEAKER PELOSI: What this president received and this Congress has inherited, well, it's a trillion dollar deficit, a country in deep recession, a situation where the financial institutions are almost in shambles, but let's hope they're better than that. And did I say the deep fiscal hole that they have dug us into?
MR. ROSE: Yes.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Okay. So as we come out of that, we have to calibrate our initiatives so that they are producing jobs, they're bringing revenue in, but we don't overdo so that we are building increasing size of that deficit.
MR. ROSE: Right.
SPEAKER PELOSI: For me -- and our Democratic mantra has been pay as you go. No new deficit spending. Now, when you have a recession, you have to invest so you can turn it around. As you plan with that investment is, you have to keep an eye on the bottom line. And that's why it's important to make the investment. Education brings money to the treasury. I keep saying it. The bigless change that I think this president can make -- let's not talk about the financial institutions for now, but in terms of spending, et cetera, is on healthcare. Healthcare is an economic issue. Some people say why is this president doing healthcare when we have a financial this and that? Well, healthcare is central, is central to a competitive economy.
If we have universal accessibility, quality, and affordability in healthcare, if we stop the upward spiral of the cost of healthcare, it is the fastest growing element in our economy, is healthcare. If we can contain that and reverse that, it has a tremendous impact not only on the personal health of a individual, or a business that is trying to provide health insurance for its employees, or for an economy, it has a tremendous impact on the deficit, because it has the big impact on the entitlement of Medicare and Medicaid. So what the president is doing on healthcare is about the health of America, about prevention, a healthier America. It's about competitiveness so that businesses can compete because the healthcare that they're providing is affordable, and it's about what it means to our economy, and what it means to our deficit, which is to reduce it by reducing the healthcare costs and what that means, as I said, in the entitlement. So it is a central economic issue.
MR. ROSE: This president is committed to deal with entitlement reform.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Yes. Even if he doesn't get to it right away. I mean entitlement reform is the big -- if you talk to an economist, and they talk about the necessity of the stimulus and when they look forward, though, they say we have this huge issue that's coming, rolling right at us, which is the entitlement commitments we have to make because of the generation that is coming to their 60s, is going to be a huge drain on the federal government. We're not prepared to, under the present circumstances, to pay for it.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, social security because of the bipartisan agreement between President Ronald Reagan and Speaker Tip O'Neill, a long timing a --
MR. ROSE: When they had the special social security commission --
SPEAKER PELOSI: But the two of them coming to agreement took us to, what, 2040. So we have to go beyond that, but nonetheless, that was very effective. The bigger and more immediate problem are the house entitlements, Medicare and Medicaid. And that's why, as you follow what the president is doing, always see -- I use the word integrity. The oneness of it. He's talking about entitlement reform here. He's talking about growing the economy. He's talking about making America healthier. It all comes one place, which is in healthcare. So when he talks about healthcare, healthcare reform is entitlement reform. Healthcare is an economic issue. So again, the first and most important step to addressing the entitlement issues, especially the health entitlements, which are a bigger challenge, is to reform healthcare in our country. Affordability, accessibility and quality.
MR. ROSE: I mean the president is asking for healthcare funds in his budget without having laid out his healthcare program; correct?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, no. Not quite. Not yet. Let's say it that way. What we have received, because he's a new president and has only been in office for a few weeks, as would be the case with any new president, he has sent us an outline of his budget. We --
MR. ROSE: We know sort of the overall number.
SPEAKER PELOSI: We know what the priorities are and the number. The details will come, say, in April when he has the fuller budget, and then you will see more of it. But he's been clear about the principles. About prevention, about investments in science, about accessibility. Let me say we have a running start on some of this. And the first, second week of his presidency, he signed the SCHIP bill, 11 million children in America who are eligible to have access to quality healthcare. So he signed that piece. In the recovery package, we have initiatives for healthcare, especially the health IT, where the president is saying that the information technology, a common medical records will -- electronically recorded and conveyed, will lower cost, lower error, and improve quality, so we have taken some big steps in that regard to name two of them. In his budget, he put down a marker for a part of what the healthcare will cost and now he'll flush it out more later. It's a victory for anyone who cares about improving the health of America, to see that this president put it in his budget.
MR. ROSE: As everybody knows, and even they know, when President Clinton was in office and the first lady at that time now the Secretary of State was short of shepherding healthcare, it famed for lots of different reasons. Are you 100 percent assured that healthcare in this Congress will pass?
SPEAKER PELOSI: It's a whole new world. It's a long timing a from 1993, '94, whenever it was. So --
MR. ROSE: First term of President Clinton, '92 to '96.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Right. So it was somewhere in the middle there. It's a whole -- I think a whole new era because so much has happened in terms of technology and science and the promise of it all, and did I add, the president signed executive order on stem cell research.
MR. ROSE: Exactly.
SPEAKER PELOSI: So we know a lot more about how we can make America healthier than we did then, increases our responsibility. I believe that we will have healthcare reform. The biggest debate will be I think around the subject of whether there is a public option. The president's healthcare summit last week, I'm losing track of time, last week --
MR. ROSE: You're in the midst of every conversation.
SPEAKER PELOSI: He was asked in sort of a negative way about a public option to compete with the private options that are there. In saying that this would make it not so competitive for the private sector, if there was a public option like a Medicare piece. And the president was very direct in saying that he saw it as making it more competitive for everyone, and he said I think the public option will keep everyone honest. He used that phrase. So I believe that while no one is insisting that the package look like this before we ever sit down at the table, I think that will be a big part of the debate.
MR. ROSE: Turn quickly to education. Are you surprised at all by his education speech in which his very strong endorsement of charter schools, his very strong endorsement of merit pay for teachers?
SPEAKER PELOSI: This is what the president campaigned on. This is what he talked about for a long time. This is what members of Congress have been talking about, too. We have to invest in education in a fresher, newer way. Now there is some debate that will go and and we'll reach the place that we have to be to go forward, but I agree with the president, and I was not surprised, because transformational approach that he is taking is what he talked about.
MR. ROSE: But he did not say as much as he is now saying about merit pay for teachers and all the implications for that. Because as you know, it's been a battleground between the teacher's union and some politicians.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Right. And that will be worked out. That will be worked out. In other words, there will be a compromise or one side or the other will prevail and I think that it's really --
MR. ROSE: And you'll be in the center of it.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Let me just say this one thing. What we're interested in are results. What the results for the children? Now, let's have the discussion around that.
MR. ROSE: Whatever it's necessary to do -- [talking simultaneously] have to come to an agreement on that point.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Very respectfully have that discussion.
MR. ROSE: All right. The whole question about the secret ballot for unions, I've had -- whenever I talk to business people, they're up in arms over this. And they'll say a secret ballot is essential and if you don't have a secret ballot, you'll see all kinds of intimidations. Now, on the other hand, you talk to people who have been in the union movement, who feel very strongly about it. They're saying it's an essential step forward for us to have a fair chance. What say the speaker of the house?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, I support the employee free choice act, but needless to say, I've also heard from some of the same folks you have. And that argument is really an oversimplification that there is a secret -- yes, there is a card check, that you check the card. Again, results. Many, many people in America, probably 10s of millions would like to belong to a union if they could, if they could take that vote and do so. This enables them to do that. If they win they win. If they don't, they don't. And there is always an option of a secret ballot, if the employees say that that's what they want. So this isn't as stark as it has been put out by its opponents. The bill that we passed last year in this house, the bill is being considered by the senate at some point, and we'll see what they do and go from there.
MR. ROSE: The president said very strongly, he is -- he will push it, he has said, since he's been in office, that he can't -- he said he would in his campaign and he will now. Will it pass?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, it will certainly pass in the House of Representatives, and that's all I can answer for.
MR. ROSE: Well, what's --
(Cross talk.)
MR. ROSE: -- do you think it's likelihood --
SPEAKER PELOSI: I think so. They've had a number of cosponsors. Again, what are the results that we'll want to get, that people want to get from this? And how does this empower, the ability to bargain collectively is a strength for America's workers. Now, again, what I think we have to do is sit down at the table and say what does this actually do? Not, does it -- any scare tactics about it. And in good faith. I don't know that everybody understands what it does. Sometimes I hear a characterization of it and I think who would be for that? That's not the characterization -- that's not accurate.
MR. ROSE: That argument is made if you don't have secret ballots, there will be harassment.
SPEAKER PELOSI: But again, sit down at the table --
MR. ROSE: Do you think there will be or not?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Everybody understands it, and then decide where we can find common ground. I, myself, support the bill the way it was passed in the House of Representatives.
MR. ROSE: And you finally decided that because?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, it's been issued for a long time. Again, not new to any of this territory. Collective bargaining gave America's workers a 40 hour week, who ever heard of something called the weekend? And so I think that there has to be a place where we can respect the rights of workers, strengthen their productivity in terms of their investment in the company that -- or whatever they're working for, and American workers, the most productive in the world. We have them on a pedestal.
MR. ROSE: Speaking of that. What to do about the auto industry?
SPEAKER PELOSI: The auto industry. The auto industry, fundamental to the auto industry is our manufacturing and our industrial base. We have to have that to be a secure country. We cannot let our industrial base erode, our manufacturing base erode. One of the biggest pieces of it is the auto industry. And so we have to find a way for these industries to be viable. And in order to do that, they have to innovate and they have to compete. They can't just drift and then come to us for life support. We're willing to give a life line, to take them few further viability and then --
MR. ROSE: With certain kinds of conditions.
SPEAKER PELOSI: With certain conditions. But is not to give a life support every three months. The --
MR. ROSE: What do you think is going to happen? General Motors first said it was about to fold, then it said they may not need the money --
SPEAKER PELOSI: That was great.
MR. ROSE: It was confusing.
SPEAKER PELOSI: It is confusing and it changes.
MR. ROSE: It was welcome news from Detroit that they don't need the money.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, I think what will happen is that we will have to, again, look at results. What is it -- what is the likely market for American made cars or for cars in America?
MR. ROSE: How many do you have to sell --
SPEAKER PELOSI: What is realistic? Because some of their assumptions have been predicated on an unrealistic auto sale or auto sales, at least in the near, near -- the near term. Maybe down the road we'll be up to 14 million cars, but right now, we're not anywhere near that, so it's no use telling your suppliers, your dealers, your workers and all the rest we're predicating the assembly line on an unrealistic market.
MR. ROSE: What's your best guess as to what will happen? Will they survive or not?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Oh, my gosh. I hope they will survive.
MR. ROSE: I know you hope so. This is really rough sledding for the --
SPEAKER PELOSI: It's rough sledding.
MR. ROSE: And is the Congress in the end always going to say even if it's piece meal, we cannot allow all those auto workers?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, it's not just the auto workers.
MR. ROSE: I know it's the auto suppliers and everybody else.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, you think all it was is that, is because they're the ones who are always getting the haircut. But I said if somebody gets a haircut, everybody gets a haircut. So they have to look at the stakeholders, whether shareholders, the suppliers, the dealers, and the -- and the workers as well as the management. There has to be a shared sacrifice in this that can take us to a place to avoid bankruptcy, which would be very complicated and long and not --
MR. ROSE: There are many things for you and I to talk about. I want to talk about the banks again one more time. I mean Tim Geithner is out, he's now meeting with a group of 20 finance ministers as we speak, I think. Do you think that the treasury is now on the right track to do something about the financial sector, in the same way you believe that the government is on the right track? I mean the Congress is on the right track in creating a stimulus bill that will produce jobs?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, you named two of the -- links to the --
MR. ROSE: Right.
(Cross talk.)
SPEAKER PELOSI: Housing, and then area one which I'm not sure is the fourth or third in the half -- (inaudible) -- that is regulatory reform.
MR. ROSE: Right.
SPEAKER PELOSI: The -- we have moved forth with our recovery package and we'll have a series of job creating initiatives that push it along or accompany it. Regulatory reform is a very high priority for the president and he and Barney Frank --
MR. ROSE: Is that immediate or is that down the road a bit?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, the principles -- so that the President can go to the G-20 in a few weeks, he will have the principles of regulatory reform.
MR. ROSE: Because he believes it also has to be a global regulatory --
SPEAKER PELOSI: It has to be global. He wants to go in, knowing that there is some consensus with the Congress about this, and he's working with the leadership of the committees of jurisdiction, Mr. Frank and Senator Dodd who ought to go forward with that. So that is on course. Barney Frank is talking about a macro-regulatory agency which would -- which addresses the systemic -- in other words, if you're too big to fail, what is your impact on the system? So we're talking about systemic regulatory reform.
MR. ROSE: And the chairman of the fed, Ben Bernanke, has said before, you know, we have to get away from too many of these institutions that are too big to fail.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Right. But we have to -- the situation -- so from our standpoint, what we are doing with recovery we did, regulatory reform we are doing, housing the president has put forth now for the loan modifications so that will go forward, what we're also doing is credit card -- not credit -- for lack of a better word, fear to consumers. And then the other is predatory lending. So I mention these things surrounding the question that you asked because whatever they decide to do, as they -- and I do have confidence in what they're doing, because we are doing all the other pieces of it, too. So it will not be in isolation. And some of these pieces will -- are -- they're all very important. Some of them instill confidence in the consumer, in the taxpayer, in the American people, so that when they come back, say we may need to make some further expenditures with regard to strengthening the financial institutions, there will be a more hospitable climate to deal with it. Right now the American people are very angry about the banks.
MR. ROSE: There is a stimulus bill, $787 billion. You seem to open the door a little bit to saying we might need another stimulus bill, and then you close that door by saying it seemed to me -- I'm not saying that, maybe we don't. I don't want to go that far. Clear up where you are on the second stimulus bill.
SPEAKER PELOSI: I believe in the first stimulus bill. The reason -- I don't know, it's just a matter of interpretation. The press, when they said do you think no, we believe in this, we want to do this. They said would you close the door completely to a second stimulation? I said, well, you don't ever close a door completely. They said Pelosi, one interpreted it that way, the other press interpreted it as not much chance for a new stimulus bill.
MR. ROSE: Not much chance for a second stimulus bill --
SPEAKER PELOSI: I don't think there is any -- I don't know how we could justify it right now. Let this work. Let this be digested. Let's see the impact of it. At some point we will say this worked so fabulously that we don't need any more, it worked so fabulously, that we should do more of it.
MR. ROSE: All right.
SPEAKER PELOSI: And so, you know, you have to reserve judgment. You never say never, but on the other hand, I believe in this package. I think it's fiscally sound, as sound as it can be going into this. The --
MR. ROSE: On the TARP?
SPEAKER PELOSI: On the TARP, well, we've had this conversation before. About how we got here and all the rest.
MR. ROSE: Yes, we have.
SPEAKER PELOSI: No need to go into that again.
MR. ROSE: But in a dramatic way, as you described would happen when Henry Paulson came in to see you.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Yes. But -- so now we have to do things in a different way.
MR. ROSE: But you're approving of the way they want to do it and the fact that they need more money is an open question?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, you know, we have changed -- we passed laws in the house for accountability, for transparency, for house and senate on CEO compensation. Some of the things that would get some of the confidence of the American people if, and when, and should they need another infusion, which I hope they don't. In case they do, we, again -- that's why I said all these things about predatory lending, mortgage -- changing -- the loan modifications for mortgages. Predatory lending. The cable car, thing from San Francisco --
MR. ROSE: Okay, go ahead, yeah.
SPEAKER PELOSI: All of these things, try to help the American people say some of these things -- this is what's in it for you. Barney Frank says it very well, he says sometimes you have to -- we always here about collateral damage. If you're doing something and you hurt somebody in the meantime.
MR. ROSE: You're bombing in war and innocent people are hurt.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Right. Then he said this is collateral benefit because sometimes you have to do things for the economy that may help people that you don't want to help, like the banks, but it's -- what you have to do is what's right for the economy. If they happen to benefit from it, you can't say no to it because it would hurt the economy.
MR. ROSE: How do you characterize the anger in the country and in the Congress against the banks?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Against the banks but also against the whole TARP, how the TARP was implemented to be begin with. It's very high. It's very high. Well, just --
MR. ROSE: What's the indictment?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, the indictment is that there was some expectation that when this money went out there, it would contribute -- increase liquidity, would --
MR. ROSE: It would get the credit moving again.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Get more credit in circulation, it would help with loan modification of mortgage foreclosure forbearance, which the bill called for. It did none of the above.
MR. ROSE: And do we know why?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, because they changed -- well --
MR. ROSE: One, they didn't spend the money.
SPEAKER PELOSI: They changed course.
MR. ROSE: They didn't use the money.
SPEAKER PELOSI: They came in and said it would be for one thing. We said you have to add mortgage forbearance to that. And then they went and did something completely different. To this day a bill that spelled out the purchase of toxic assets, if there is such as thing as a toxic asset, I think that sounds like an oxymoron to me. But in any event, the troubled paper, buy the troubles paper and they were directed by the legislation to help with mortgage forbearance. They never did any of it. Instead, they went and recapitalized the banks which may or may not be a good or bad idea --
MR. ROSE: All done by the previous administration?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Previous administration. But they didn't do what they set out to do, and now something still has to be done about that. Time has been lost. So now the administration is saying with accountability, with transparency, with compensation -- CEO compensation reform, with all of these things, we will go forward to deal with the stability of the financial institutions.
MR. ROSE: I meant to touch a little bit on international -- again, on international economics. One of the leading officials in China was quoted today as basically saying, look. It's not a certainly thing. We are now worried about America paying back its debt, we may have bought too much, we may want to reduce our share. Does it concern you? I'm sure you're aware of what he said.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, I think that -- I don't think anybody ever need worry about America paying back its debt for one thing. But I also do think that we have to reduce our deficit. And not be so dependent on governments buying our treasury bills and the -- so --
MR. ROSE: He probably meant there are wiser investments for the Chinese, is probably what he meant.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, that's up to them to decide. But we cannot be at the mercy. And what we must do is reduce our deficit for many reasons, including the fact that we don't want ownership of so much of our paper to be by foreign governments. So every country has to do what's in its interests, and I believe it's in our interest to reduce the deficit.
MR. ROSE: Knowing your history, when the Secretary of State went to China --
SPEAKER PELOSI: Oh, yeah.
MR. ROSE: And said maybe we just have to -- I didn't speak about human rights because we know what they think about that, and -- another time, you must have went --
SPEAKER PELOSI: No. I mean I understood why the Secretary of State said what she said. But I also note that it's been interpreted in a way that I think may be an overinterpretation. I know that the Secretary of State is a values based diplomat and that she represents, Secretary Clinton represents our country, and that what she's saying is that we do have to engage on global --
MR. ROSE: Essentially the message came out with the economic crisis as the highest priority, we'll talk about human rights later, I think.
SPEAKER PELOSI: I don't know that we'd ever spoken about human rights with China. I have been making that fight for 23 years come June. Twenty years --
MR. ROSE: That's one thing you'd like for the administration to do, is to make human rights more a part of the bipartisan dialogue?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, let me say this. This week was -- we observed the 50th anniversary of exiling His Holiness, driving His Holiness, the Dalai Lama, out of Tibet.
The Chinese government is putting in all this revisional stuff on it. Well, okay. In June we will have the 20th anniversary of Tiananmen Square massacre. I have said whether it's with his holiness in India right at the border of Tibet or on the floor of the Congress, if we do not speak out for human rights in China and Tibet, we have lost all moral authority to speak out for it other places. Now, what form that takes what, the timing of it is and the rest, you can't say -- only the going to talk about human rights, we're not going to talk about climate change and we're not going to talk about the economy and we're not going to talk about other issues. I think that's what the secretary was saying. I had complete comfort level with what she said. We all have our roles. And I have, in my essence of my being, that I -- for 20 years they have been saying to me, peaceful evolution. If you just be patient, there will be human rights and respect for another view in China. It hasn't happened. And that's really sad.
MR. ROSE: And you'd like to see America see that it happens.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, what can we do? What can we do? I don't think we should anoint it, what the Chinese are doing in Tibet, that's for sure. Because it's really a tragic -- Tibet challenges the conscious of the world, because we all like to think of ourselves as acting in a much loftier place in terms of human rights.
MR. ROSE: And does Darfur challenge the conscious of the world?
SPEAKER PELOSI: How many -- how many times are we going to say never again? Darfur does. I have been there. It's like you have gone -- it's as if you have gone to a place that is so sad. Now, some of my friends have been there recently, have said with the expelling of the -- the expulsion of some of the workers and stuff, that it's really awful. Others have said before then, some things were hopeful. But, again, we have to -- we have to be consistent. By the way, the Chinese were not helpful in terms of Darfur. In terms of the United Nations --
MR. ROSE: Because they have a deal to get their oil.
SPEAKER PELOSI: They have a deal.
MR. ROSE: We haven't had a chance -- we're out of time. We haven't had a chance to talk about foreign policy, a whole range of issues. We'll have to do this --
SPEAKER PELOSI: Afghanistan.
MR. ROSE: We'll have to do this --
SPEAKER PELOSI: Just came back from Afghanistan.
MR. ROSE: You -- (inaudible) -- your report.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Well, the -- again, seven-and-a-half years of, I think, lost opportunity on the part of the Bush administration. We also need a new direction in Afghanistan as it relates to how we employee our military, how we insist that governance be different there, ending the -- reducing the corruption. I don't know if you can end it. How we help with the construction and development of Afghanistan, not to build a nation, but to build support in the country for -- for the government and not the Taliban. And most important of all, how we interact with all the countries in the region. I'm so pleased that President Obama has Richard Holbrooke doing India, Pakistan, and -- he's doing India?
SPEAKER PELOSI: As he's doing Afghanistan --
MR. ROSE: And Pakistan. He's going conversation --
SPEAKER PELOSI: In that loop. I think it has to be expanded to Iran, Russiaa, China, the other stands in the region. Because they all of a stake of stability in Afghanistan. It's in our national interest to make sure that forces in that region are not targeting us. And on top of that, our NATO allies have to play more of a role. That's the short version.
MR. ROSE: It could be a test for NATO, in fact. Are you satisfied with the president's commitment to take -- to do the troop withdrawal. Combat divisions that will leave 50,000 troops there?
SPEAKER PELOSI: Thirty-five (thousand) to 50,000 troops. And --
MR. ROSE: I'm quoting Admiral Mullen.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Yes.
MR. ROSE: Go ahead.
SPEAKER PELOSI: You're right. They do put the emphasis on the 50 (thousand), and I'm hoping it's closer to the 35 (thousand). And what I have said is the good news is the war is ending. Troops are leaving Iraq.
MR. ROSE: The bad news is?
SPEAKER PELOSI: It's not bad, but the other side -- the other part of the news is that this is a large number of troops and there has to be a very focused mission that has -- as the president said, force and diplomatic protection training and advising the Iraqis and counter terrorism. But again, that's a lot of troops in country to do that. If that's what the president is suggesting, and we know there is a time certain when everyone will be out, I think that's good news for the American people.
MR. ROSE: Thank you for coming. There are many things we could talk about. And I look forward to doing in the coming weeks. This is the time, almost the word momentous time does not do justice to the drama of what is happening today.
SPEAKER PELOSI: And thank you for the opportunity to share some thoughts. And it's fast moving, so I'll have some things to talk about pretty soon again.
MR. ROSE: Thank you very much.
SPEAKER PELOSI: Thank you, Charlie. Nice to see you.
(End videotaped segment.)
MR. ROSE: Nancy Pelosi from San Francisco, a long political family from Baltimore before that. The Speaker of the House. Thank you for joining us. See you next time.
Source: http://www.fnsg.com/transcript.htm?id=20090313t1326&nquery=&query=nancy+pelosi


text:
Are The Police Tax Collectors Or Part Of G.R.A ?
All over the regions in the country (that I have travelled), you will see policemen taking money from vehicle drivers, which I don't know whether they (the money taken) are tolls or vehicle taxes, hence the question are the police tax collectors.
These Policemen take this money at the expense of the life of the people of Ghana because instead of ensuring that the drivers have the correct licenses, renewed their insurance or have insurance and their vehicles/cars are in good condition for the transport of people from one place to another, they take money from those drivers thus condoning with the drivers in not ensuring that their cars are in good conditions and follow the appropriate rules and regulations.
The result is that, the life of the people of Ghana is in jeopardy, the life of the future leaders of Ghana are in jeopardy.
I will undoubtedly, say that some fatal accidents happened because the police failed to do what is right.
I believe some of the policemen are having the people of Ghana at heart and will always do the right thing. I will urge them to do more than they are doing and should also help expose the few who want to tarnish the image of the Police force.
Paa Grant Kwesi Ampeh.
Student (U.P.S.A).

subset: commoncrawl


text:
"Eva Kruijswijk is an experienced UX Consultant. As a Certified User Experience Analyst (CXA) she can not only convince users to use a certain interface, she knows how to persuade users in wanting to use the interface. Analyzing users, their tasks and their needs are the fundaments of advanced user experience. Eva sets the bar high, has a critical view and delivers thought-out and careful analyzed design solutions. She creates realistic feasible and visual attractive IT-solutions which fulfill the need of the target audience. Her broad and solid knowledge – design and front-end development – are a real asset. Eva works for a variety of companies; Lely, Danone, National Dutch Police, Public Prosecution Service, Heineken, Tour de France, Sodexo.
TALK: Fuck it, let's talk UX!
"This talk will give you an introduction into the world of User Experience (UX). UX/UI what's the difference?
What are the basic principles and examples of what you should and shouldn't do?
Why do UX'ers spent so much time on Persona research and analysis?
What matters more: test results or taste to create effective interfaces?
And ends with a look back and forward in the world where UX matters."
|Into UX|


text:
Stop the Foreclosure SAVE YOUR HOME!: 10 Steps to Snatching Your Home From Foreclosure!
Catherine Gibson McCauley
Stop the Foreclosure SAVE YOUR HOME!
10 Steps to Snatching Your Home From Foreclosure!
Catherine Gibson McCauley
Catherine Gibson McCauley has helped save hundreds of homes and commercial properties from foreclosure and she continues to do so with her helpful book.
Stop the Foreclosure, Save Your Home! is a ten-step guide on how you can take the power back and save your home from foreclosure. So many people have a difficult time communicating effectively with mortgage companies and this book provides you with all the tools you will need to cut through the red tape and get results.
- In this book you will:
- learn what foreclosure is and how much time you actually have before the foreclosure occurs
- also learn all the major players and how all their roles intersect
- know how to put together a convincing package to qualify for a loan modification program
- learn all about which programs are available to you to assist you in saving your home from foreclosure
- learn how to make sure your home does not foreclose while you are still negotiating with the mortgage companies
Stop the Foreclosure, Save Your Home! will give you the leverage you need to help you fight to save your property.


text:
Where defendants have moved for relief from a consent decree, arguing that the federal government is precluded from demanding replacement of a pond with newly created wetlands, the motion must be denied without prejudice based on a lack of jurisdiction. ...Read More »
Real property – Subdivision – Conditions – Modifications
Where the Andover planning board modified two conditions of its approval of a subdivision creating two buildable lots, neither modification was subject to the notice and hearing requirements applicable to major modifications. "These three zoning appeals are the latest of ...Read More »
Zoning – Variance – Setback – Standing
Where the Freetown zoning board granted a variance for the construction of a house, the variance was not supported by sufficient findings, so it must be annulled. "Robert Buckley and Richard and Elaine Holmes own abutting lots on Long Pond ...
Tagged with: Standing VarianceRead More »
Insurance – Lead – Citizen enforcement suit
Where a manufacturer threatened with a citizen enforcement lawsuit sought insurance coverage, a judge did not err in ruling for the defendant insurer based on the terms of the policy. "Osgood [Textile Co.], a textile business operating in West Springfield, ...Read More »
Jurisdiction – Transfer – Insurance – Superfund site
Where a plaintiff insurance company filed a complaint for declaratory relief seeking a judicial determination of the parties' respective rights and responsibilities under policies the plaintiff issued in the 1980s and 1990s, the case should be transferred to the Southern ...Read More »
Zoning – Corporate center – Parking spaces
Where the Lexington zoning board approved an addition to an office park, the board's decision must be vacated for lack of sufficient parking. "The development challenged in this zoning appeal would add 162,000 square feet of new office space, and ...Read More »
Real property – Prescriptive easement – Beach
Where plaintiff homeowners live near Silvershell Beach in Marion, they have, with the exception of two of them, established a prescriptive easement over the defendants' private property for the purposes of beach access. "The plaintiffs can all get to the ...
Tagged with: Prescriptive easementRead More »
Zoning – Multi-family homes – Business district
Where the Falmouth zoning board granted a special permit for five multi-family residential structures, each containing two apartments, in a business-zoned area of North Falmouth, the board's decision was not contrary to the town's zoning by-law. "I find, on the ...Read More »
Zoning – Variance – Special permit
Where the Mashpee zoning board denied a special permit and a variance to plaintiffs seeking to replace a preexisting nonconforming single-family dwelling on an undersized lot with a larger dwelling that would occupy a greater percentage of the lot, the ...Read More »
Zoning – Concrete – Permit
Where the Framingham zoning board has denied a building permit for a concrete manufacturing facility, the board's decision must be vacated because the proposed facility is permitted as of right as a use free from neighborhood-disturbing impacts. "Framingham's officials and ...Read More »


text:
Women With This Name Are Known To Be The Most Beautiful
Page 1 of 7
Shakespeare once said "What's in a name?" Well, if your name happens to be Jennifer chances are you are beautiful. Think about it and check out our list of hypnotizing Jennifers.
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Aniston became a star, hair icon, and model during her role as Rachel on Friends. Girls wanted to be her and she's every guys dream girlfriend. Aniston is laid back with an effortless beauty. Since the smash TV show ended, Aniston has started in mediocre movies although her gritty role in The Good Girl gained her some critical acclaim. Other than her divorce from Brad Pitt, she stays out of the spotlight though A list enough to earn big bucks from product endorsements like Smart Water.
Page 1 of 7


text:
Paul Merson leaves Sky Sports team in stitches after hilarious gaffe on live TV
PAUL Merson has never been renowned for his use of the English language.
But the Sky Sports News pundit had the rest of the Soccer Saturday team in stitches with his latest blunder while reporting on Saturday's Premier League fixtures.
The former Arsenal player was watching Leicester vs Crystal Palace and was about to discuss the action featuring the home side's record £28m signing Islam Slimani.
But Merse was clearly hungry as he instead called him "Salami".
Cue hysterics from Jeff Stelling and the rest of the gang.
Fellow pundit Matt Le Tissier ribs him by saying "Stop thinking about food."
Clearly embarrassed by his gaffe, Merson just about pronounces it right the second time before saying: "He nearly scored – hit the side netting. Let's move on."
But you can still hear giggles from the studio as consummate pro Stelling keeps the program going.
One of the most contentious points from the weekend's action so far is whether Tottenham's Moussa Sissoko will face a ban after an apparent elbow on Bournemouth player Harry After during the sides' 0-0 draw in the early Saturday kick-off.
But Arsenal fans will be happy with Hector Bellerin's response to rumours about a move to Barcelona.


text:
AE Business Solutions utilizes local resources for its Managed Services solutions. These resources work onsite at a client's facility and/or from AE Business Solutions' Wisconsin offices to provide a blend of local and remote support. All resources stay up-to-date through continuous training and certification and are all native English speaking.
Together, the AE team has over 100 years of enterprise solution delivery and administration experience, giving it the expertise and background to best support client's complex IT environment.
HOW AE's CLIENTS BENEFIT:
Experienced, Local Technical Expertise
Current-Release Certified Engineers
Reduced Operational Costs & Risks
Improved Resource Utilization
Predictable Expenses
Reduced Training Expenses
Flexible Support


text:
I can tell you this. One thing your waiter/waitress hates is seeing you pull out a tip chart. If you can figure out how much to tip, feel free to ask your waitress, she can help you out. Another thing your waiter hates is to see you left him a religious tract and no/bad tip. We are thinking about making a shirt that says "Hey Christians, if you want to recruit me, tip me".
Hey servers, would you buy this shirt?


text:
The Calgary Stampeders have added import receiver Jeff Fuller and import running back Clifton Smith to the club's practice roster.
Fuller was Texas A&M's all-time leader in catches (233), receiving yards (3,092), and touchdowns receptions (34) when he finished his collegiate career in 2011. He signed with the Miami Dolphins, spending the 2012 season on the NFL team's practice roster.
Smith has played 24 NFL games with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the Dolphins and the Cleveland Browns. He was named to the 2009 Pro Bowl.
Smith played college football at Fresno State, leading the Bulldogs with 1,367 all-purpose yards in his senior season.
The Stampeders host the Toronto Argonauts at McMahon Stadium next Saturday.
To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.
By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.
Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are moderated and published according to our submission guidelines.


text:
We stayed one month in December/January and it was wonderful. Karen was great to work with. Our daughter Chloe, who was 11 months old, loved the fish/turtle pond and the cats. The location was great as it was close to the Hollywood stage but set back enough so that it was always peaceful and quiet. It is also close to 2 playgrounds if you have kids. My husband has allergies so we always have trouble finding a place to stay with good clean air, but everything was clean and there was no carpet, so he had no trouble. We didn't want to leave. We will definitly be back! Thanks for everything Karen!
- Official Description (provided by the hotel):
- Angelfish Inn is a cute beachside inn with newly renovated rooms. All rooms have full kitchens, cable t/v, cold a/c and free wifi. Rentals can be daily, weekly or monthly. We welcome all well behaved pets with no security deposits just a small daily fee.We offer on site and street parking Located in the center of Hollywood beach, close to shopping and many restaurants. ... more less
- Reservation Options:
- TripAdvisor is proud to partner with Hotwire and TripOnline SA so you can book your Angelfish Inn reservations with confidence. We help millions of travelers each month to find the perfect hotel for both vacation and business trips, always with the best discounts and special offers.
- Also Known As:
- Angelfish Hotel Hollywood


text:
New Freebies available from SampleSource
The SampleSource team announced they have gathered "the most samples ever" and they're coming real soon!
If you're not signed up yet on the SampleSource program hurry and do it now!
To be the first to know about the new FREEBIES, make sure you like our Free Samples in Canada Facebook page and I'll notify you!
Click on the pink Go to Offer button to sign up today.


text:
Click the button below to add the Torrey Earrings to your wish list.
Apatite, Sterling Silver, Gem-quality 24K Gold-plated Chains and Earwires
We promise to never spam you, and just use your email address to identify you as a valid customer.
This product hasn't received any reviews yet. Be the first to review this product!
Write a review


text:
"Last week's Gallbladder surgery"
About: Royal Lancaster Infirmary Royal Lancaster Infirmary Lancaster LA1 4RP
Posted via NHS Choices
From A&E arrival to the caring hands of the surgical team and then on to Ward 34 I experienced marvellous professionalism and treatment. I would love to be able to name people for their loveliness... particularly 2 nurse onward 34 who I felt safe and confident in the hands of..My heart felt thanks.
To "the bosses" my husband and I were in A&E for approx. 12hours whilst a bed could be found. I am sure that this must add more stress to your staff and raise it as a concern for their well-being ... my husband did recover from a numb bum,bless.
Response from Royal Lancaster Infirmary nearly 2 years ago
Thank you for taking the time to let us know about your experience at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary. We will pass your comments on to the teams involved.
- {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
- Was this response helpful? Yes | No
Thank you for your feedback.
See more responses from Royal Lancaster Infirmary


text:
- Please select a date to see the proper prices!
Description of the accommodation:
Rooms, services Kutuk Condominiums Steamboat Springs is offering a tastefully furnished room to those seeking accommodation in Steamboat Springs. For recreational purposes you may try the wellness services provided by the hotel. The exact list of services available at Kutuk Condominiums Steamboat Springs (including those for an extra fee) and the exact list of equipment in a room can be found on the information sheet below.
Payment Advance bank card payment or credit card guarantee may be required for the reservation, depending on the chosen date, room and price.
Arrival, opening hours The personnel is at your service in English.
Kutuk Condominiums Steamboat Springs rooms Rooms
- Please select a date to see the proper prices!
Accommodation services
Wellness section, relaxation
- Wellness section, relaxation
- Jacuzzi
- Pool (Outdoor - seasonally open)
General Policies
Spoken languages
Accepted bank cards
MasterCard, VISA, Diners Club, Amex
Local tax
Please check the details of the selected price.


text: Do you have open web joists that have been collecting dust for years? Is there dirt and graffiti on the exterior of your building? Machines all greasy? We can help you with that. This is what the removal of 30 years of dust looks like. High pressure air is used to blow down all areas, than we vacuum it all up.


text:
REF 24734/173 City Road Southbank 3006 VIC
Melbourne Tower, 27th floor - Fabulous Southbank Living!
This spacious 2 bedroom apartment set high on the 27th floor of Melbourne Tower is a must see. In a most magnificent central location, with Southbank Boulevard, CBD, Southgate, Crown complex, Melbourne Arts Centre, public transport and Melbourne's best Restaurants and Cafe's within walking distance. Inspection is a must!
Accommodation: Comprises magnificent open plan living/dining area with air conditioning, state of the art modern kitchen with dishwasher, stainless steel appliances, stylish granite bench tops and glass splashbacks, master with private ensuite and walk in robes, 2nd bedroom with mirrored built in wardrobes, and main bathroom with laundry facilities.
Features: Also features private balcony, 1 undercover secure car space, and use of great resort facilities including tennis court, indoor lap pool, fully equipped gymnasium and landscape garden courtyard.
By registering your details you will be INSTANTLY informed of
any updates, changes or cancellations for your property appointment.
If no one registers for an inspection time then that inspection may not proceed.
Book for an inspection time today by sending us a message!
Please call us on 03 9697 8800 or email us to arrange for an inspection!
MICM Real Estate SouthbankOne Leasing Office
178 City Road, Southbank
Ph: (613) 9697 8800
Email this agent
Email sent successfully!
Your email has been sent.
Would you like to get The Real Estate Conversation?
Agent Information
MICM Real Estate
Southbank VIC, 3006
More property from MICM Real Estate
Get new properties in your inbox
Real Estate For Rent in Southbank, VIC 3006 priced between $410 and $750


text:
iBAKATV is the world's largest online catalogue of Nollywood movies, with over 15,000 hours of incredible movie and TV content streamed on-demand.
The Hunger to come up with something more innovative and competitive has always being the drive of Blessed Idornigie after venturing into so many online businesses, from e-gold to multilevel marketing. He discovered that the Nollywood industry needs more competitive and innovative ideas in online movies distribution, which before now had restricted lovers of Nollywood movies to only one channel, which invariably created a monopolistic market. He decided to make more research about the industry and discovered that Nollywood Content is highly demanded for in the diaspora, and that began the journey of iBAKATV. He started in his room with a laptop, and with support from family members and friends, the company was birthed in 2011.
Job Title: Graphic Artist
Job Summary:
Design or create graphics to meet specific needs such as catalogue, newsletter, website, fliers, posters etc.
Job Description:
Key Competence:
Additional Requirement:
Application Closing Date
March 17, 2017
Method of Application
Interested and qualified? Click the Apply now button to send your application
JustJobsng is Nigeria's leading online jobs site, providing the latest job vacancies and recruitment in Nigeria in a variety of industries and locations in Nigeria.
Search for all job vacancies in Nigeria here on Nigeria's #1 Job site. Everything latest jobs in Nigeria, Jobs in Nigeria, recruitment in Nigeria, vacancies In Nigeria and employment opportunities in Nigeria is our forte.
Browse our website and search current job opportunities that meet your search criteria. Our job services are FREE. We strive to post only genuine/Verified Jobs.
Sign up for latest jobs and recruitment offers in Nigeria today!


text:
Research Fellow + PhD Student
Phone: +49 (0)234 / 32-19024
Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14294
In Ghana and South Africa, the official interest in agriculture in urban centres and suburbs is quite recent, although it has been practised for a long time. Urban agriculture is associated with many benefits including increasing food security of households, diversifying diets, and income provision. These are just some of the reasons why academics, governments, and aid organisations have touted urban agriculture as the panacea for disadvantaged neighbourhoods in the Global South. However, an adequate consideration of interests and needs of urban farmers and their incorporation into policies remains weak.
This research project applies a more critical perspective on existing top-down approaches in urban agriculture, emphasising the agenda of food gardeners, their motivations and how they individually perceive the benefits. Guided by the theoretical approach of the right to the city and the concept of food sovereignty, the role of innovative farming initiatives in the urban food system, their political value for an inclusive and sustainable transformation of the city is analysed. The combination of both theoretical concepts offers important aspects for the improvement of urban agriculture from a socio-political and ecological perspective. Based on this considerations, a platform for the much needed dialogue between policy-makers and communities is introduced. In this context, this research questions how an optimal environment for urban farming initiatives in terms of governmental support and integration on a local level should be designed. Empirical research will be conducted in George, South Africa and Tamale, Ghana.
Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Pierre Thielbörger
|2013 - present:
|Institute of Development Research and Development Policy (IEE), Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
Research Fellow and PhD Student
|2015 - 2016:
|Institute for Development Studies (ISD), University of the Western Cape, South Africa
EUSA_ID Fellow, one-year research stay and teaching mobility
|Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Semarang, Indonesia
Junior Consultant, Project Policy Advice for Environment and Climate Change (PAKLIM)
|2005 - 2012:
|Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany
Master in Social Sciences (Dipl. Soz.-Wiss.), with a focus on developing regions
|2010 - 2011:
|Makerere University Kampala, Uganda
Research stay within the Academic Partnership for Environment and Development Innovations in Africa (APEDIA)


text:
Warning! Major Spoilers for Game of Thrones Season five and six below.
Ever since Sansa left the clutches of her husband, Ramsay Bolton, people have been speculating about Sansa possibly having a child with him but it is still a debate whether or not this is simply of theory or not.
If you recall in Season five of Game of Thrones, Sansa was married off to Ramsay Bolton and she was repeatedly raped by him every night. At the end of the Season, Sansa managed to escape alongside Theon Greyjoy/Reek. It is unclear how long Sansa was kept captive by Ramsay but we know that she was there for a long time.
So, is Sansa pregnant?
It is of course hard to determine but we do know that Ramsay was raping Sansa a lot because he wanted to make an heir to Winterfell which would proclaim is right to be warden of the North. We know that Ramsay wanted a child but it does not mean he succeeded. Well if we look at some specific images like the one linked here you will notice that her stomach looks a bit larger than normal. People have also noted that she is paler than normal in some scenes. The most interesting hint is in the newest Episode of the show, Battle of the Bastards, where finally see the death of Ramsay Bolton. Moments before his death Sansa tells Ramsay this:
Your words will disappear. Your house will disappear. Your name will disappear. All memory of you will disappear.
Most people would take this as a hint that Sansa isn't pregnant but any true Game of Thrones fan would know the creators of the show aren't adverse to giving their characters a slap in the face.
The slaps are not always that physical but instead more metaphorical. What if we find out in next week's Episode or in the next Season that Sansa is, in fact, pregnant. That would really make Sansa regret her choice of words in front of Ramsay.
What would she do if she was pregnant?
It is difficult to presume what Sansa would do if she was, in fact, pregnant with the child of Ramsay. Sansa absolutely hated Ramsay but we don't know if she will hate his child. It is possible that she will keep him and grow an affection for the child and we will see a great character moment from Sansa. We do not know if abortions are a thing in Game of Thrones but there are probably old school medieval abortions and there is a possibility that Melisandre can use some type of magic to perform an abortion.


text:
Raising the Standards
01952 407838
Driveways, Patios & Paths
Covering Shropshire & Staffordshire
Block Paving Drives
Pattern Concrete
Patio Paving
Before & After
Product Selector
Driveway & Patio Repair
Drive Cleaning & Sealing
Free Survey & Quote
Earls Court Show
Areas Covered
Our driveway paving
is not only beautiful, but will last many years. For driveway paving we use 65mm blocks that are 20% thicker than most. We have a wide range of styles to suit any property, traditional or modern. To complete your project, we have choices of kerbs, drains and lighting


text:
Nicolas Andry 1658-1742
Nicolas Andry was born in 1658 in Lyon France. He originally started his career in the ministry and became a priest; he went on to teach theology before becoming adoctor.
In 1697 he defended his thesis: The Relationship in the Management of Diseases Between the Happiness of the Doctor and the Obedience of the Patient. He became well known for his stand against the
"bleeding barber surgeons"
and he worked tirelessly to limit their venues. 247
He has cemented his place in the history of surgery simply because the word Orthopaedic came from him. The picture of a tree being supported by a post to encourage it to grow strait and now used as an emblem for many organisations aligned to Orthopaedics.
The orthopaedic profession in Andry's days were mainly concerned with the treatment of conditions such as Ricketts and such, these conditions when caught early were treatable using the splints developed at the time. He wrote a book in two volumes called L'Orthopedia which was published in 1741 just before his death.


text:
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: Encryption in SQL Server2000/VB
09-08-03, 06:09 #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 7
Unanswered: Encryption in SQL Server2000/VB
I have an application in SQL Server 2000 and VB as the front end. We want to encrypt the password for connecting to the database so that even the programmers will not be able to see it. Only administrator should know the password. A common db account will be used for connecting to the database. This password needs to be encrypted.
Encryption either in VB or SQL server 2000 is fine.
Is there a way? Thanks in advance.
09-08-03, 06:31 #2Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Penang, Malaysia
- Posts
- 212
I'm asuming u meant the password written in your codes.
err I'm guessing...compile your connection parameter coding into a object file and call it in your vb?
I know a way to encrypt ASP,vbscript thought, using Windows Script Encoder. You can find it in unser MSDN search.
It not fool proof, but then again, I think it only encrypts script files.Patrick Chua
LBMS ( Learn By My Self) NPQ ( No paper Qualification )
09-08-03, 06:36 #3Registered User
Provided Answers: 1
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 65
Encrypt in VB.
use VB to encypt...and have a dll to do this encryption and decryption...and embed this logic of encryption and put the password as well into this dll. Actually what i have done is, i have a file name config.txt which this dll accesses and retrives the password..and this config.txt is encrypted. And when user/developer put his password in the login dialog or any connection string...it will be first sent to that dll and it encrypts that password and compares against the encrypted password in the file.>>
>> Learn PHP/MySQL for free https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpQts3ezPVg
>> Free Web Hosting with PHP, MySQL, Website Builder : http://www.000webhost.com/862861.html
09-08-03, 06:53 #4Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Delft, The Netherlands (EU)
- Posts
- 447
Re: Encrypt in VB.
I have an easier solution. I developed an encryption function, and put them into an DLL. There is an "admin" executable, which shows the result of encryption, and I used the result as the real DB password.
This DLL isn't availabe to the developer directly, but is used in the middle tier, which receives the original password from the developer, and connects to the DB with the encrypted one.Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler! - A. Einstein
DB Problems? DB Explorer, BTrieve Re-engineering, DB Conversions & ETL? Conversion Tool


text:
The DiSC Profile is a behavioral style profile developed by Inscape Publishing. The profile is designed to help people understand their differening approaches to work so that ultimately an organization can be more successful. We use DiSC within our team and leadership development programs to help clients:
Effective delegators know that a one-size fits all approach to delegation isn't very effective. The best leaders adapt how they delegate based on their team members' level of competency and confidence. Here is a simple chart that we use in our leadership development and executive coaching programs in Denver and Boulder, Colorado to show the Directing, Coaching, and Empowering delegation styles.
Reflecting back on my days in the Army, there are two moments that are most memorable for me. The first was an award ceremony where several soldiers, including myself, were recognized at the end of an almost year-long deployment in Turkey. The second was my graduation from Ranger School.
This week we lost an incredible man who made a rich and meaningful contribution to the field of leadership development, and, more importantly, to the lives of many people. Stephen R. Covey will be missed.
In dedication to him, I thought I would share my favorite of his "7 Habits" - Habit 2 Begin with the End in Mind.
You have already made your decision. You are set on a course of action. The horse is out of the barn. Now is NOT the time to ask for input!
Asking for opinions after the fact — merely because you think it will appease others — will definitely backfire. Your team members can see right through this artificial, insincere gesture.
New leaders often get promoted because they were good at what they did. They rarely receive the training and development to be successful at their new level.
If you are interested in elevating your leadership effectiveness, join us for our introductory People-First Leadership™ Seminar on July 18th in Boulder, Colorado.
This 3-hour seminar will give you insight into our practical and powerful 4-point People-First Leadership model to help ignite your leadership potential and the potential of the people around you.
Imposing your own goals on team members is one of the fastest ways to lose their commitment.
Goal setting is a collaborative process. The role of the leader is to provide coaching to ensure everyone is in line with overall team goals. Make sure any online collaboration tools or other technology you use to support the goal-setting process doesn't take the place of crucial in-person conversations.
Just a quick shout out to say "Happy 4th of July."
Thank you to the members of the armed forces and those public servants who enable our freedom with their sacrifice, service, and selflessness.
In gratitude,
The Rescuer
"It's faster to do it myself than to delegate it to others..." or "If I want it done right, I'm the one who has to do it..." or "Let me do this for you..."
These are the words of the Rescuer - the person, or in this case the leader, who solves problems for others that they should solve for themselves.
The Victim
We utilize the DiSC profile by Inscape publishing in several of our team building and leadership development programs here in Denver, Colorado. DiSC provides people with a framework for understanding their own style and how they differ from others. This framework helps team members and leaders elevate their effectiveness regardless of their role. Here are some applications in which we use DiSC.
Team building:


text: I'm currently shopping for new countertops to replace my 25 year old Formica counters. This is not a fancy house so will be sticking with mid-grade counters and shopping at Lowes/Home Depot kind of places. Right now we're leaning towards some darker styles and it has me thinking about the hard water spots I get everywhere. I am on a neighborhood well system and every water drop leaves a little white mark when it dries. It is not permanent but can become unsightly and can build up in certain places like around my sinkside dish dryer, etc. I'm wondering if anybody has had the same issue and if darker counters are just going to frustrate me?


text:
Robert Downey Jr. chats about dressing in drag and working with Jude Law in his latest flick,"Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows." Plus, find out if there will be a third movie in the detective franchise.
Published at 11:44 AM PST on Dec 6, 2011 | Updated at 7:02 PM PST on Dec 7, 2011


text:
The Menu is wholesome and bursting with flavour. We are dedicated to quality and have a passion for products, sourcing as many local, fresh, organic and artisan ingredients that we can.
You will enjoy distinctive Jester House flavours from our menu, as our chefs produce all our sauces, chutneys, jams, dressings, bread and bakery goodies.
Our online booking system does not take bookings on the day so please contact us directly if you would like to make a reservation for today. Ph 03 5266742 and speak to one of our hosts.
If you would like to make a booking for a group of 9 or more please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.com
We look forward to hosting you.


text:
Ok, I've decided to ramp things up a bit here.
A good while ago I made available a video and ebook set that detail a little known technique that I and a handful of other marketers use to identify potential Super Affiliates to promote our products and services through the roof.
In the past I only made this available as a pretty sizeable download.
You can still get it that way if you like, but now I have also decided to make it available streaming as well.
So, without further ado here it is:
Filed under Blog, Gifts from Sam, How To..., Online Marketing by
I've just launched my newest software application.
The name of it is The Ultimate Exit Popup and it is pulling in great reviews.
This is a super, easy to use desktop application that enable anyone to add unblockable exit popups to their pages in just five simple steps… taking less than 60 seconds.
The main sales page is located at www.ultimateexitpopup.com and the "Advanced version" which comes with Master Resell and Rebranding rights is available here: UltimateExitPopup Advanced (there is a special offer on the advanced given to all buyers of the personal edition).
I'll be adding a demonstration video to the sales site in the next few days and I'll also post it here as well.
That's all for now.
Onward & Upward!
Sam Knoll
Filed under Blog, General Musings, Online Marketing, Software by
I suppose I should say not TV in general but TV advertising (the state of TV as we know it today is another post on another day).
I find it very entertaining and interesting to watch advertisers restructure and redirect how and where their marketing dollars are spent.
Yes, most folks know that "social media" is pretty much the latest and greatest thing since sliced bread, especially if the conversation mentions the word "Web" and the numbers "2.0".
The great riddle is how to harness it and even more importantly, how to monetize it.
Take a look around and you will notice all of the major television networks trying to generate conversation and interaction between viewers. This, really in an effort to draw people into their websites.
That is what the networks are doing, but what are the companies that typically advertise on those networks broadcasts doing.
The answer is… not spending anywhere close to what they used to on TV ad time.
I recently read the results of a very interesting Forrester Study that details this exact topic.
Here are a few of the findings:
Sixty-two percent of marketers believe television advertising has become less effective in the past two years, but close to half of the advertisers surveyed have already started to experiment with new ad types to work with DVRs and VOD programs. Eighty-seven percent of advertisers believe branded entertainment will play a stronger role in TV advertising in the coming year.
Advertisers are eager to try new ad formats, including ads in online TV shows (65 percent), ads embedded in VOD (55 percent), interactive television ads (43 percent), and ads within the set top box menu (32 percent)
Over 50 percent of marketers reported that when half of all TV households use DVRs, they will cut spending on TV advertising by 12 percent.
Eighty-seven percent of respondents said they intend to spend more on Web advertising this year.
Seventy-two percent of marketers are very interested in having individual commercial ratings rather than average commercial ratings.
Ah yes, did you notice the mention there of the DVR. That technology alone is singlehandedly giving TV advertising a hard spanking. All one has to do is record, and then start watching a show 10 minutes into that same show. Do that and you can fast forward through all of the commercials. You no longer have to watch a single one.
So what next?
What will happen as more people do their TV viewing through the computer?
Can you say "Opportunity" for those individuals and companies that understand and can harness the Internet as an interactive, marketing channel.
Well, this is all new enough that the jury is still out, but TV and more specifically TV advertising seems to be a dying breed.
Filed under General Musings, Offline Marketing by
It is quite easy to get caught up in all of our busy concerns, work, goals, desires, frustrations etc.
It is also quite easy to allow all of those pressures of life consume us to such an extent that we don't make the time or patience we should for those important people around us in our lives.
All of the "stuff" that consumes our time and energy all feels so very important doesn't it?
Well, let me ask you a question…
What is really important?
Before you even start to answer that for yourself I urge you to watch the short (11:32) video below… then ask and answer that same question of yourself.
If you have any trouble viewing the video above
you can see it on Google Video Here
Onward & Upward!
Sam Knoll
Filed under Blog, General Musings, Videos by


text:
Random rants, reviews and opinions of modern technology and it's effects on society, life.
Saturday, July 11, 2015
My 2015 Miles Ahead Performance Motoring School 1/2 Day
A video recap of my 1/2 day at the Miles Ahead #MINI Performance Motoring School (http://bit.ly/1TrWvNG) at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway (#IMS). So much fun, recommended for any car enthusiasts or MINIac! 120mph on the Indy speedway? heck yea! Check! Cars: 2015 MINI Cooper JCW F56 w/all suspension and brake upgrades Instructors/Racers: -Gabby Chavez -Pippa Mann -Stephen Simpson -Stephen Gregoire A big thanks to the staff for making it such a fun time!
Uploaded: July 10, 2015 at 08:10PM
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)


text:
At least 5 characters
Don't just read the content, submit your own and participate by becoming a free member. By registering you unlock special privileges reserved for members such as...
Story URL
"These are simple applications that lets you take screenshots and record..."
"http://www.tiska.in Russian Escorts in Delhi..."
"iWeb Technology is the best website design & development, SEO service..."
"Skype customer care team do work hard on their users quarry..."
"We not only discuss the divorce process, but the strategy to address your..."
New user? Create a new account