text:
|Publication number
|Publication type
|Application number
|Publication date
|Oct 18, 2005
|Filing date
|May 27, 2003
|Priority date
|May 24, 2002
|Fee status
|Also published as
|Publication number
|Christopher D. Tagge, Jacob Freas Pollock, Lennard Torres, David S. Soane, Ken Saito
|Original Assignee
|Innovative Construction And Building Materials
|Export Citation
|BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
|Patent Citations (31), Referenced by (50), Classifications (28), Legal Events (6)
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/383,335, to Soane et al., filed May 24, 2002, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/463,138, to Tagge et al., filed Apr. 14, 2003.
The field of the invention is cementitious construction materials having fiber reinforcements.
Concrete and gypsum wallboard are typically characterized by the ability to withstand large compressive stress. However, tensile strength is generally poor. There has been a longstanding and unresolved need to improve the flexural strength of inorganic building materials. The use of metal, glass, wood, and polymer fibers as reinforcements to improve the tensile and flexural strengths has been attempted, but failed to solve some of the needed improvements.
For example, concrete is often reinforced by rebar, welded wire fabric or synthetic fibers to improve crack control. Rebar must be tied together when added to concrete to provide some structural integrity during earthquakes, for example. In addition, a number of building materials have been disclosed which have substantial quantities of cellulosic fillers, including wood particles and fibers. More expensive and brittle, glass fibers are used in place of wood in applications where greater fire resistance is required. Other fibers and fabrics, such as synthetics, have also been investigated, but failed to adhere to matrix materials used in construction materials. By fabrics, it is meant all woven or non-woven mats of at least one type of fiber, including fiberglass and textiles made of natural or synthetic materials.
Conventional reinforced, inorganic composites suffer from several disadvantages. For example, reinforcing wire mesh currently provides the most common crack control for concrete composites. However, wire is both expensive and prone to corrosion, which degrades the performance of the composite over time. Synthetic fiber reinforcements cost less and have high tensile strength, but have not been incorporated in a networked mesh and have poor adhesion with the matrix. Thus, results have shown comparatively poor crack control properties when compared to wire mesh.
Fiber reinforced gypsum composites also suffer from a variety of drawbacks. At low board weights, the majority of wallboard strength is provided by expensive multi-ply paper face sheets having oriented fibers. Particularly in high humidity climates, the paper facing of wallboard is subject to mold and mildew, which further deteriorates the mechanical properties of the board and produces disagreeable odors and may be harmful to human health. Also, paper face sheets are expensive, contributing approximately 40% to the overall cost of a wallboard.
In addition, conventional fibrous reinforcements, particularly glass, do not adhere well to the gypsum matrix, limiting the efficiency of adding fibers to the matrix. Glass fibers are also brittle and can become easily dislodged during handling, installation, or demolition, causing health hazards, such as skin irritation or lung damage.
The cementitious matrix in composites of concrete and wallboard should support a structural framework that resists compressive loading and transfers tensile loads to the fibers or fabrics that improve tensile strength of the composite material. However, strength and toughness of fiber-reinforced cementitious materials is strongly dependent on the interface between the fibers and the matrix. Most fibers have little interaction with a cement matrix, and thus poor interfacial adhesion. Fiber pullout occurs upon tensile loading. Incorporation of foam or lightweight filler into the matrix to reduce the density of the cementitious building materials exacerbates fiber pullout.
Sizing, an important step used in the preparation of fibers for weaving, involves coating fibers with a warp size. Warp sizes, or sizes, are film-forming polymeric materials which are applied to fibers to protect them from damage during the abrasive weaving process. These sizes are generally formulated to be removed after weaving. Sizing is similarly used in paper production to improve mechanical properties, dimensional stability, and resistance to water or solvents. However, as sizing is removed from fabrics, the use of sizing as a way to decrease pullout or increase interaction between fibers and a cementitious material has not been explored previously.
A method of producing a fiber-reinforced composite for residential and commercial construction comprises systematic microstructure engineering, designed to create construction materials of controlled morphology at low cost and superior strength, thermal/sound insulation and moisture/fungus/microbial resistance than comparable unreinforced alternatives. Such materials contain natural, synthetic, or inorganic fibers or particles having chemically modified surfaces. For example, the attachment of a multifunctional polymer to a fiber or particle alters the properties of the particle, such as its water-repellent characteristics, tailoring the properties for specific applications.
In one embodiment, an inorganic phase provides mechanical and dimensional stability as well as fire/flame retardancy, and the surface-modified fibers dispersed therein are engineered to have a cohesive bond between the fiber and the matrix. For example, the surface modifier provides bonds from the fibers to both the inorganic phase and an organic component, improving, for example, tensile strength, mechanical performance at low weight, and moisture resistance. In alternative embodiments, the surface-modified fiber reinforcements are either dispersed in the matrix or located in a layer or layers of a composite. The matrix phase is comprised of concrete, gypsum, clays, calcium carbonate, or glass, for example. In alternative embodiments, multifunctional molecules are either a single polymeric molecular form having a plurality of functions or are comprised of a plurality of molecules having a plurality of functions that work together cooperatively to engineer the surface of fibers.
Improvements to conventional cementitious building materials and finishing materials give improved structural integrity and handling characteristics and resist both mold and fungal growth.
In one example, a bio-active additive is anti-fungal, for example, quaternized poly(vinylpyridine) and gluturaldehyde, as discussed in U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/463,138, to Tagge et al., filed Apr. 14, 2003, which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.
In one example particulate or fibrous materials are chemically treated to provide mold-resistance, water repellency or anti-staining. The treatment is achieved using a solution and/or emulsion of functionally designed polymers that bond around or to the fiber surface upon drying and/or curing. A monomer, a functional group and/or a crosslinking agent of the formulation adhere to the fibrous surface, for example by reacting directly with the fibrous surface or with another component of the composition that itself adheres to the fiber surface. Herein mold resistance includes both bio-active measures that destroy mold or fungi and passive measures that merely inhibit mold growth. Preferably, the coating is bio-active, such as gluturaldehyde and/or quaternized poly(vinylpyridine). For example, the treatment modifies the particulate or fibrous surface with functional monomer or polymer appendages or a fine, insoluble coating. In one preferred embodiment, hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups are located in or attached to polymer chains or co-polymers in the formulation.
One advantage is that the surface modification may be durable and permanently bound to the particulate or fibrous surface and not dissolve in water, preventing migration or leaching of the bio-active component or passive inhibitor. In one embodiment, the fibers may be treated prior to weaving or spinning of a textile, eliminating the need for a separate step of sizing the fibers prior to spinning and/or weaving textiles. In an alternative embodiment, the surface modification is either added to an earlier sizing or to a strand of spun fibers or a textile that has no sizing, e.g. the sizing is removed or the fiber was spun without sizing.
Another advantage is that the treatment may be applied to many materials, including paper, woven and non-woven glass mat, and natural and synthetic textiles, as well as a variety of particulate and fibrous materials.
Yet another advantage is that the treatment may provide an interface layer between the fibrous surfaces and the matrix that transfers tensile loads from the matrix to the fibrous reinforcements. Optionally, the interface layer interacts strongly with cement matrices and increases the pullout or peel strength of the fibrous materials. Alternatively, for brittle fibers, the interface is engineered to provide a cohesiveness that optimizes pullout and fracture strength and fatigue life, which is improved with some measurable pullout before failure.
The scope of the invention includes interface layer compositions, e.g. sizing, that interact with cementitious materials, as well as cementitious compositions that interact with inclusions and additives, such as fibers and particles. Improved fibers and fabrics of the present invention may be used to reinforce different types of cements, such as gypsum and Portland cement, depending on the type of fiber and size selected.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention which refers to the accompanying drawings.
One object of the invention is to provide a composite material for concrete, wallboard, ceramic tiles, plumbing fixtures, and countertops with superior mechanical properties. Wallboard is meant, herein, to be a generic term that includes, without being limiting in any way, paper-covered sheet rock, panels for wall, ceiling and floor, underlayment, sheathing board, moisture resistant board, type-X board, insulation board, shaft liner, soffit board, backing board, core board, ceiling board, cement board and gypsum glass mat board.
Another object of the invention is to provide composites by inserting the composite material between any two surfaces, such as wood veneers, for example, to make lightweight doors and panels.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, representative embodiments are shown in the accompanying figures, it being understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown, but only by the language of the claims.
Examples of the present invention will now be described in detail for specific embodiments of the invention. These embodiments are intended merely as illustrative examples and procedures for producing fiber and/or particle reinforced composites. The invention is not to be limited to these specific examples, but only by the language of the claims themselves.
In one embodiment of the invention, surface-modified fibers promote adhesion to gypsum crystals on the molecular scale. For example, an organic fiber component adheres to the gypsum and contributes superior strength to the wallboard, thus eliminating or reducing the need for paper facing. The reduction in board weight enabled by a greater strength allows the incorporation of more porosity, for example. Porosity reduces board weight and also improves other properties, such as thermal insulation and sound attenuation. In one example, a commercially significant reduction in density reduces cost of installation.
In another embodiment, surface-modified fibers promote adhesion to concrete on a molecular scale. The organic fiber component contributes a superior strength and crack control to the concrete, improving the performance and lifetime of the concrete compared to conventional fiber reinforcement.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, surface-modified fibers are chemically modified to produce a hydrophobic surface. The fibers, which are dispersed throughout the gypsum or are formed into a layer on the surface, substantially decrease moisture absorption of the gypsum compared to unmodified fibers. Thus, the composite maintains its mechanical performance in high humidity and is resistant to mold and mildew.
In another embodiment, as shown in
In alternative embodiments, a reduced-paper or paperless wallboard is produced. For example, a reduced-paper wallboard is produced having only a single ply of decorative paper on one or both surfaces.
In another embodiment, fibers are surface-modified with multifunctional molecules that are then chemically crosslinked. The resulting fiber network is formed into a mat, for example, onto which a gypsum slurry is poured and replaces the multi-ply paper face sheets of a wallboard for use as a fire resistant shaft liner. In one example, the surface-modified fiber-mat-faced drywall exhibits improved moisture resistance and thermal insulation when compared to conventional drywall. In an alternative example, the crosslinking is generated in situ during slurry production to form a continuous network throughout the matrix, resulting in substantially improved flexural strength and nail-pull resistance.
In another embodiment of the invention, fibers are surface-modified with multifunctional molecules and then the surface-modified fibers are chemically crosslinked and incorporated into a polymer network within a concrete matrix. The crosslinking is generated in situ during concrete production to form a continuous network throughout the cement of the concrete composite. The resulting network of crosslinked, surface-modified fibers contribute exceptional mechanical strength and crack control for the concrete composite.
In specific embodiments, fibrous and particulate materials, including cellulose materials, such as paper and wood fibers, textile fibers, such as cotton and wool, synthetic polymer fibers, such as nylon and polyester, and inorganic fibers, such as glass and mineral wool, are surface-modified by covalent and/or non-covalent attachment of certain polymers or polymeric groups to the materials. For example, materials comprising modifiable functional groups may be modified, by the covalent attachment of a multifunctional molecule. The modifiable functional groups in the materials are, for example, reactive groups capable of covalently reacting to attach the multifunctional polymer to the material. For example, modifiable functional groups include amine groups, hydroxyl groups, thiol groups, and carboxylic acid groups. In another example, the modifiable functional groups also permit surface-modification by non-covalent bonding of certain pre-polymers, polymers, monomers and/or polymeric groups, by hydrogen bonding interactions, hydrophobic interactions, or salt bridging, for example.
In one embodiment, the surfaces of fibers are modified with multifunctional molecules, which are defined as molecules with two or more regions serving different functions. For example, one region interacts with surface groups to anchor the molecule to the fiber while the other regions perform different functions, such as adhering to gypsum, bioactive protection and/or repelling moisture. For example, fibers, such as stearoyl chloride has an acid chloride group that reacts with surface groups of wood fibers, to anchor the molecule on the fiber, and the stearyl group contributes moisture resistance to the fibers. Another example is 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, which, when hydrolyzed under acidic conditions in the presence of glass fibers, attaches the molecule to the surface of the glass fibers. The amine group then reacts with, for example, polyisocyanates to crosslink the fibers into a network.
In one embodiment, multifunctional polymers are used. Herein, the term "multifunctional polymer" means polymers with plural functional groups or regions, such as binding groups, hydrophobic groups, hydrophilic groups, oleophobic groups, bioactive groups, crosslinkable groups and other reactive groups. For example, the multifunctional polymers include both hydrophobic regions and hydrophilic regions or either hydrophobic or hydrophilic regions. Binding functional groups, for example, that enable either non-covalent or covalent binding to the particles and/or fibers are included as another example. Such multifunctional polymers form non-covalent or covalent coatings on the particles and fibers. For example, the binding functional groups are capable of associating with the surface via hydrogen bonds, van der Waals, ionic, and/or hydrophobic, or other non-covalent interactions between the coating molecule and the surface being coated. In another example, the binding groups are reactive groups capable of reacting with functional groups on the surface of the particles and/or fibers forming a covalent bond between the coating polymer and the surface. In yet another example, the multifunctional polymers include hydrophilic functional groups that are capable of interacting with the hydrophilic surface, as well as hydrophobic functional groups capable of repelling water molecules. For example, graft copolymers and block copolymers are capable of comprising both hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions within a polymer chain.
In one embodiment, cellulose materials, such as wood fibers, are surface-modified by the attachment of a "gypsophilic" multifunctional polymer, such as polycarboxylic acids or sulfonates, to provide exceptional adhesion between the fibers and gypsum. The surface of wood fiber contains hydroxyl groups, which may be chemically modified to alter its properties. For example, polyanhydride, such as poly(maleic anhydride), is partially reacted with wood fibers to covalently attach the multifunctional polymers to the surface. The modified wood fibers are then mixed with water and gypsum. The remaining anhydride groups of the multifunctional polymer are hydrolyzed to carboxylic acids. It is believed, without being limiting, that the poly(carboxylic acid) tendrils strongly anchor the fibers in the gypsum crystalline matrix, similar to a root system anchoring a tree in soil. The improved adhesion between the fibers and gypsum produces a gypsum-based composite having superior flexural strength and nail-pull resistance.
In another embodiment, synthetic fibers, such as nylon and polyester, are surface-modified by the attachment of a hydrophilic multifunctional polymer, such as polycarboxylic acids or sulfonates, to provide exceptional adhesion between the fibers and concrete. The surface of nylon fiber contains amine groups, which may be chemically modified to alter its properties. For example, polyanhydride, such as poly(maleic anhydride), is partially reacted with nylon fibers to covalently attach the multifunctional polymers to the surface. The modified nylon fibers are then mixed into cement. The remaining anhydride groups of the multifunctional polymer are hydrolyzed to carboxylate groups during concrete production. The poly(carboxylate) tendrils strongly anchor the fibers in the concrete matrix. The improved adhesion between the fibers and concrete contributes exceptional crack control and mechanical strength to the composite.
In another embodiment, paperless wallboard is produced. Synthetic polymer fibers, such as nylon and polyester, are surface-modified by the attachment of a "gypsophilic" multifunctional polymer, such as polycarboxylic acids or sulfonates, to promote exceptional adhesion between the fibers and gypsum. For example, the surface of polyester fibers contains alcohol groups, which may be chemically modified to alter its properties, by the partial reaction with a polyanhydride to covalently attach the multifunctional polymer to the surface. The modified polyester fibers are then mixed with water and gypsum, hydrolyzing the remaining anhydride groups to carboxylic acids in one alternative embodiment, two separate slurries, one containing a relatively high percentage of modified polyester fibers and the other containing a relatively low percentage of polyester fibers, are prepared. The former slurry, rich in strengthening polyester fibers, is then used to make the relatively thin outer layers, which provide the vast majority of the strength of the wallboard. The latter slurry, having a low percentage of fibers to reduce material cost, forms the core of the wallboard. The sandwich structure improves the strength-to-weight ratio of wallboard such that the expensive paper facing is not needed to surpass wallboard performance requirements. Furthermore, by removing the need for paper, which is flammable and hygroscopic, the wallboard of this invention shows superior moisture repellancy, mold resistance, and fire retardancy.
In another embodiment, the fibers of a wallboard facing paper are chemically modified to produce a hydrophobic surface. The matrix of the facing paper may be made of a resinous compound that binds the fibers of the paper into a sheet, for example. In one example, the fibers of the facing paper are made of a cellulose, for example, wood pulp and/or wood fibers. The hydroxyl groups of the cellulose are modified by the attachment of multifunctional polymers comprising, for example, anhydride groups, which react to anchor the polymer to the fiber, and hydrophobic groups, such as hydrocarbon and fluorocarbon groups, to impart hydrophobic characteristics to the cellulose, and consequently, to the wallboard.
In another embodiment, fibers are incorporated into a polymeric network to produce wallboard of exceptional strength. Multifunctional polymers, such as a polyisocyanate, partially react with the amine groups of nylon fibers to attach the polymers to the surface of the fibers. Hydrolysis converts the unreacted isocyanates to reactive with amine groups. The fibers are then mixed with water, gypsum, and polymeric additive that is reactive with the multifunctional polymer, e.g. with amine reactive groups. For example, a polyurethane pre-polymer, which typically consists of a polyether terminated with diisocyanates is reactive with amine groups. It is believed, without being limiting, that the amine groups of the modified fiber react preferentially with the polyurethane pre-polymer. The remaining pre-polymer reacts with the water in the slurry to form a polyurethane polymer network incorporating the fibers dispersed throughout the slurry. The resulting composite produces a wallboard having exceptional strength and insulation properties.
In one preferred embodiment, co-polymers are polymerized from a mixture of fluoro-aliphatic (meth)acrylate monomers, hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylate monomers, stearyl (meth)acrylate monomers and chlorinated monomers to form a surface modifier. Herein, the co-polymers of this embodiment are referred to as fluoro-polymers; however, these co-polymers may actually contain little or no fluorinated groups, depending on the desired application. In one example, the fluoro-polymers are applied to fibrous surfaces using an anhydride functional polymer and a catalyst. In this example the anhydride group chemically binds to the functional groups of a fiber and crosslinks the hydroxyl groups, for example. Binding to hydroxyl groups of water and oil repellant polymers imparts an impermeable surface to the fibers by integrating the functionally designed polymer on the surface. In another embodiment, a cross-linking agent, such as an organic titanate, diisocyanate, metal salt or another reactive, functionalized polymer or pre-polymer, is used in place of an anhydride functional polymer to bind the surface modifier to the surface of the reinforcing additive, such as fibers or particulates.
In another embodiment, additional monomers with functional groups that are selected to react with a cross-linking agents are included in the fluoro-polymer synthesis. In one example, water and oil repellant and/or bio-active co-polymers contain monomers that react with metals, and a metal salt is used to crosslink the polymer. For example, additional monomers may contain other functional groups, such as, but not limited to, carboxyl, carboxylate, sulfate, sulfonate, phosphate and phosphonate groups.
In an alternative embodiment, one or more functional co-polymers include a reactive group that chemically bonds to a particulate or fibrous surface without crosslinking the polymer. For example, graft, block and random co-polymers of stearyl (meth)acrylate and maleic anhydride may be used with or without a catalyst to increase the rate of chemical bonding between the functional co-polymers and the fibrous surfaces.
In one method of modifying fibrous surfaces, the fibers are incorporated into a fabric, such as a fiber mat or textile. The fabric is treated with the fluorpolymer either before or after incorporation into the fabric. Next, the fabric is exposed to a solution or emulsion that binds one or more functional groups to the fiber surfaces, for example, by immersing the fabric in an emulsion or solution including a monomer, polymer or co-polymer and a metal salt. The treated fabric is then dried, cured and washed to remove undesired, residual components. Drying and curing is performed either under the same conditions or under differing conditions. For example, the temperature for curing may be either greater or less than the temperature used for drying.
In an alternative method, a polymer is synthesized in situ on a fibrous surface by applying a solution or an emulsion including the desired monomers directly on the fibrous surface. A free radical initiator is applied either with the desired monomers or in a separate step, and the fibrous surfaces are exposed to heat or UV light, for example, after drying the fibrous surfaces. Then, the fibers, mat or textile is washed to remove any undesired, residual components.
In one embodiment, bio-active functional monomers are included in the fluoro-polymer synthesis and impart mold resistance, such as anti-microbial and/or biocidal properties. Alternatively, crosslinking of a bio-active functional polymer, co-polymer or oligomer is achieved by including the bio-active component during application of a metal salt and/or free radical initiators. In another alternative, both bio-active functionality and water and oil repellency are imparted in the same process.
In another embodiment, bio-active functional monomers, oligomers, co-polymers or polymers are polymerized (or further polymerized or crosslinked) in situ around fibrous or particulate surfaces. In one example, another reactive polymer and/or a crosslinking agent is mixed together with the bio-active functional component, binding the bio-active functional component to the fibrous surface. In an alternative example, the bio-active functional components are functional groups on monomers, oligomers, co-polymers and polymers, which are capable of binding to particulate and fibrous surfaces. For example, the monomers, oligomers, co-polymers and polymers bind to functional groups that are bound to the fibrous or particulate surface. Some examples of bio-active functional monomers, oligomers, co-polymers and polymers include, but are not limited to, quarternized amine functional groups, for example, having from 4 to 10 carbons in the alkyl chain. In one specific example, the fungicidal and bactericidal properties have been shown to kill mold after the mold contacts a bio-active coating on the surface of a textile.
In one embodiment, fibers are first treated to provide a desired functional group on the surface of the fiber. Then, the fibers are incorporated into a mat or textile. For example, the fibers may be woven into a fabric or otherwise incorporated into the form of a mat or paper. The fibers may be combined with fibers having no coating or having a coating incorporating a different functional group, providing the paper, mat or fabric with mold resistance and/or other desirable properties, based on the properties of treated fibrous surfaces.
In one embodiment, a facing paper is treated on one surface to impart mold resistance and water repellency. The opposite surface is alternatively untreated or is treated to provide the opposite surface with excellent adhesion with a slurry that forms a wallboard core. Alternatively, the facing paper may be made of multiple plies. For example, an outer ply may be treated to provide bio-active and water repellency to a wallboard, while the innermost ply may be treated to adhere to the core of the wallboard In another example, the outer ply may be treated for water repellency and one or more inner plies may be treated to impart bio-active properties. In yet another embodiment, the outermost ply on an exposed surface is treated to prepare the surface for plastering, stucco, painting, tarring or decorative papering. For example, the outermost ply may be treated to provide a self-stick surface for a later-applied, decorative wallpaper.
In one embodiment, a film forming polymer or mixture of polymers, at least one of which is an at least partially water-soluble or water-swellable strength enhancer is used as a sizing for fibers or is applied to a mat or a fabric. The composition may optionally include a bio-active component and/or a fire retardant to increase fire-resistance. The polymer is preferably cross-linked or treated to prevent complete dissolution of the polymer and subsequent migration away from the fiber during addition to water and subsequent drying.
For example, a water-soluble, film-forming polymer utilized in a sizing composition preferably has a strong interaction with the cementitious matrix. Preferred strength enhancing, film forming polymers of the invention include, but are not limited in any way, to carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) for Portland cement compositions and cellulose ethers other than CMC or polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) together with an appropriate cross-linker such as polystyrene sulfonate (PSS) for gypsum compositions. Surface modified fibers may be of any denier and length, ranging from continuous, bundled strands, such as those often used in woven meshes, to relatively short, monofilament fibers, such as those used for discrete fiber reinforcement and in some non-woven mats. Herein denier is used as a measure of the fiber mass per unit length in milli-grams per inch (mg/inch), which is an indirect measure of the fiber cross section. Alternatively, a polymer composition is selected that acts as a binder in non-woven fibrous mats, and the mats are used for reinforcing composite cementitious materials.
It is thought, without being limiting in any way, that in one embodiment a polymer coating that is at least partially water soluble or swellable forms an interfacial layer of polymer-enriched slurry adjacent to the fiber. As the set cement dries, the polymer re-forms a film encapsulating the fiber and local cement matrix surrounding it. The polymer binds the fiber to the matrix and reinforces the region surrounding the fiber. This results in an effective transfer of stress between the cement matrix, reinforcing polymer film, and reinforcing fiber when the composite is loaded in tension. In this embodiment, the sizing composition is selected to give a range from 0.5% to 50% solids and an add-on from 1% to 500% to the original fiber. Preferably, from 2% to 20% solids and an add-on of from 20% to 500% are added to the fiber. Strength enhancement in surface modified fiber reinforced composites increases with increasing amounts of polymer add-on.
In one embodiment, the cement is mixed with surface modified fibers and water. The sizing is selected from one of a starch, a starch derivative, a cellulose derivative, an acrylic polymer (commonly polymerized from an acrylic acid, an acrylic salt, an acrylic ester, an acrylamide, a methacrylic acid, or an acrylonitrile monomer), a polyvinyl acetate, a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), an alginate, and a natural gum. In another embodiment, the sizing comprises emulsions or dispersions of polyesters, polyurethanes, and styrene copolymers. Wallboard reinforced by fibers coated solely with these formulations show some improvement in mechanical strength if the treated fibers are mixed into the slurry gently, as a final step. However, excess water content must be minimized and drying carried out quickly, as low molecular weight and non-crosslinked additives dissolve in the water and tend to migrate away from the fibers and toward the surface of the wallboard over time during drying. Without further treatment these additives often segregate to the surface and serve as nutrients for undesirable microbial, mold and fungus growth. Iodine staining techniques were used to observe this propensity for migration for a polyvinyl pyrrolidone. Preferably, the surface modifier used for surface modification of a reinforcement, such as a particulate or fiber, forms a cohesive bond with the matrix without retarding the set or adversely affecting the growth of inorganic crystals during hydration.
For example, reinforced composite cementitious materials are used for fiber-reinforced cement for cast products, fiber-reinforced gypsum, such as glass-fiber-reinforced gypsum (GFG), cement boards, and patching and joint compounds. In one embodiment glass-fiber-reinforced concrete (GFRC) is prepared having glass fibers that are surface modified by a CMC. Also, fabrics and paper are used with cement as a reinforcement, such as in joint tapes, patching kits, and molded articles. The fibers and fabrics, themselves, can be made by any conventional process or may be specifically designed with functional groups on the fibrous surfaces that react with polymer additives or sizing.
In one embodiment, conventional sizing equipment is configured to apply the polymer additive and to dry and crosslink the polymers. In one embodiment, the surface modified fibers are incorporated into the composites according to conventional methods by merely replacing existing fiber or fabric inclusions.
The preferred polymer for enhancing the strength of a cementitious composite depends on the type of cement to be reinforced and the type of fiber or particles to be used as reinforcements. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) improves the dried strength of Portland cement. However, CMC degrades the mechanical strength of gypsum products. It is thought, without being limiting in any way, that the chelating effect of the carboxyl groups on the growing gypsum crystal surface retards the set, which is at least partially responsible for decreasing the strength of the gypsum matrix.
Other cellulose ethers improve the strength of gypsum. Some of these cellulose ethers are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/351,675, filed Jan. 23, 2003 and U.S. Patent Application entitled "Reinforced Wallboard," to Tagge et al., filed May 24, 2003, and the description and drawings relating to the improvement in nail pull resistance and flexural strength with addition of cellulose ethers is incorporated herein by reference.
In explanation, the number of substituted hydroxyl groups per anhydroglucose unit is expressed as the degree of substitution (DS). The DS can vary between 0 and 3. As with all polymer reactions, this reaction does not occur uniformly along the polymer chain. The reported degree of substitution is therefore a mean degree of substitution over the whole polymer chain. Alternatively, molar substitution (MS) may be used to report the number of moles of substituent groups, such as a hydroxypropyl group, per mole of anhydroglucose. Often, manufacturers follow a convention whereby one of the substituents is reported by DS and the other by MS, where the substituent reported by MS may replace a hydroxyl group or may attach to another substituent in a chain. The DS is not always reported, and we have found that the value reported is often inaccurate or given as a broad range.
In a preferred embodiment, a methyl cellulose with a low degree of substitution (DS) is used, e.g. less than 1.6, to surface modify a fiber for reinforcement of a composite comprising gypsum and fiber reinforcement. In another preferred embodiment, a polymer additive is crosslinked in situ at least partially reducing the solubility and migration of the polymer additive after forming a surface film on fibrous or particulate additives. For example, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) is ionically cross-linked in situ by polystyrene sulfonate (PSS), providing surface modification of fibrous and particulate additives. In yet another preferred embodiment, molecular weight of the PVP is selected in a range of at least 10,000 MW, which greatly increases the cohesiveness of the bond produced by the PVP+PSS interfacial layer. The use a cross-linked polymer as a bulk addition is disclosed in co-pending application 10/278,214, filed Oct. 21, 2002, by Tagge et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In yet another preferred embodiment, an HPMC is selected as a surface modifying polymer that provides good adhesion with a matrix comprising gypsum.
It is thought, without being limiting in any way, that intermolecular bonds of the cellulose ethers and ionic crosslinking of PVP and PSS, result in strong adhesion to the matrix comprising gypsum crystals. Also, cohesive forces retain the surface treatment on the surface of the fibers during mixing, setting and drying of the composite slurry. Preferably, the surface treatment is somewhat soluble or swellable in water, resulting in an interfacial layer of polymer that adheres to the fiber and partially penetrates the crystallized particles of cement or gypsum, but resists removal from the surface of the particulate or fiber reinforcement. In a preferred embodiment, PVP is used as a surface modifier of the fibers of a facing material.
Preferably, high molecular weight, e.g. at least 10,000 mW, sizing has lower solids content than conventional sizes; however, the add-on is comparable or even greater, because the increased slurry viscosity of the high molecular weight sizing adds a thicker layer of the sizing during each pass at the fiber through the sizing. Furthermore, cross-linking the surface coating creates a durable coating for fibers or fabrics that is not easily removed during the mixing, setting, or drying steps of fiber-cement production.
In one embodiment, hydrophilic polymer systems are converted to swellable hydrogels upon cross-linking. It is believed, without being limiting in any way, that these swollen coatings allow cement crystal growth into the interfacial layer of the surface modified fiber, while resisting erosion, dissolution, and migration. Fibers with cross-linked surface coatings are used in conventional high-speed mixing procedures such as those found in wallboard production. In one embodiment, the fibers are pre-mixed with dry components of the cement. Alternatively, the fibers are dispersed in water prior to cement mixing or are combined together with both the water and cement and/or calcium sulfate hemihydrate.
Several cross-linking methods are utilized to decrease the solubility of surface coatings. In one embodiment, a sizing is at least partially insolubilized by exposing the sizing to higher temperatures than normal during drying, causing crosslinking of the sizing. Sizing components such as starch and starch derivatives, PVA, CMC, and acrylate polymers, as previously listed above, crosslink at elevated temperatures. Conventional sizing avoids such temperatures to prevent the sizing from becoming insoluble, for example. In another embodiment, radiation, such as ultra-violet (UV) light or gamma rays, can also be used to cross-link some sizing components, such as PVP. In another embodiment, water-insoluble polymers are incorporated into a film forming polymer to physically cross-link the surface treatment. For example, a reactive polymer system, a system of reactive pre-polymers, or a latex, preferably with an internal cross-linker, may be mixed with hydrophilic polymers and reacted to lower the solubility of the resulting film on the reinforcing additive, such as a particulate or fibrous reinforcement.
In an alternative embodiment, a film forming polymer is chemically cross-linked to form a hydrogel. For example, cross-linking agents for cellulose ethers include organic titanates, organic zirconates, and dialdehydes, such as glyoxal and gluturaldehyde. Borax and sodium trimetaphosphate for preferred for starches, and calcium chloride with peroxide, PSS and UV light are preferred for PVP. In one preferred embodiment, the cross-linking system is relatively stable and is preferably enhanced during or after drying by the elevated temperature, which allows swelling during setting but avoids migration of the polymer during drying and weakening of the bond if a cementitious building material becomes wet, for example, by flooding or exposure to high humidity.
In one embodiment, HPMC is crosslinked by a chelated organic titanate which is activated at temperatures above 100 degrees centigrade. In another embodiment, a cross-linking agent is applied to only the outermost region of the surface coating, forming a surface cross-linked polymer coating with delayed solubility. In another preferred embodiment, a surface coating polymerizes in situ on a fiber in combination with a crosslinking agent. For example, the free radical polymerization of 1-vinyl 2-pyrrolidone with 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate is used to form a surface coating on a fiber for use in cementitious composite materials.
In another embodiment of a multifunctional surface modifying film, a coupling agent is selected to improve the bond between the size and the fiber, promoting adhesion. For example, a silane coupling agent is added to a surface modifying formulation. Alternatively, the coupling agent is applied to the fibers or fabric as a primer before application of the surface treatment. In a preferred embodiment, a cross-linking agent, such as an organic titanate, acts as both the crosslinking agent and the coupling agent, chemically bonding the surface treatment to the fiber. For example, hydroxyl functional groups of the fibrous surface of a fabric are used to couple the fiber surface to a surface modifying polymer film. In one embodiment, the layer of the surface treatment adjacent to the fibrous surface is cross-linked by the coupling/crosslinking agent, but the exterior of the surface treatment is either not cross-linked or is less highly cross-linked than the interfacial layer adjacent to the fibrous surface. In one preferred embodiment, a plasticizer, such as polyethylene glycol or glycerol, may be included in the surface coating composition to increase the flexibility and toughness of the coating.
Preferred fibers to be sized with the inventive composition include monofilament, bundled, and spun strands of various materials, including inorganic fibers, such as glass, mineral wool, and steel, synthetic fibers, such as polypropylene, polyester, and nylon, and natural fibers, such as cotton, hemp, and wood fibers. In one embodiment, bundled and chopped spun strands are designed to separate when mixed with the slurry, allowing the treated fibers to be embedded in the matrix material. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the sizing composition and slurry mixing conditions are controlled to maintain an intact surface coating around a fiber bundle or strand, while allowing for some separation of the individual fibers. This provides a larger effective surface area of the fibers for adhesion to the size and cement matrix. The surface coating acts as a binder, allowing discrete bundles or spun strands of fibers that would normally separate into individual filaments when mixed in a slurry.
In one embodiment, the fiber is immersed in the surface coating material, dried, woven if desired, and cut to the desired dimensions in an automated process. For example, bundled fiberglass strands sized with a cross-linking CMC composition may be woven or arranged into a mesh and embedded as reinforcement in cement boards. In one embodiment, chopped or other types of discrete fibers are sized by spraying them with a sizing solution while they are suspended in air. In another embodiment, individual fibers are coated by a surface coating in a solvent or emulsion and are agglomerated into a mat of fibers, and each coating process is repeated any number of times to achieve a desired thickness of add-on and optional crosslinked with condensates, such as melamine formaldehyde or urea formaldehyde.
In one preferred embodiment, a fiber or fibers is coated by a cellulose ether (CE), such as a CMC, MC, HPMC or hydroxy ethyl methyl cellulose at an elevated temperature, at which the cellulose either particles have low solubility. Powdered CE's are dispersed in hot water without hydrating or dissolving them, maintaining a low viscosity even at high concentrations of CE's. As the solution cools, as when exposed to a cool fiber or fabric or to air, the CE hydrates, forming a semi-solid gel.
In an alternative embodiment, a surface-treated (HEMC), delayed-solubility CE is used. Preferably, the surface-treated, delayed-solubility cellulose ether is coated with an aldehyde, more preferably a gluturaldehyde, imparting bio-active properties to the fibers and the composite, while delaying dissolution of the cellulose ether. For example, fiber immersion sizing (single or double) with a high molecular weight cellulose ether achieves an add-on thickness greater than 25%.
In one embodiment, fabrics or papers are sized by immersing the fabric or paper sheet in the surface modifying composition. In another embodiment, a surface modifier is sprayed onto one or both sides a fabric or paper layer.
In another embodiment, a fiber mat is formed by evenly dispersing chopped fibers in solution for surface modifying the fibers. Then, the fibers are evenly spread, and the dispersion is drained over a wire mesh. Next, the surface modified fiber mat is dried. Alternatively, the mat is first compressed to force liquid out of the mesh. For example, the fibers may be glass fibers, the surface coating may be PVP, and the PVP may be crosslinked by PSS and/or UV light before and/or after the mat is dried. In an alternative embodiment, pressure or vacuum is applied before the wet fiber mat is dried, degassing the fibers and improving penetration of the surface modifying solution.
In one preferred embodiment, intermingling of the polymer and the cement or gypsum crystals in the matrix is increased by incorporating inorganic particles in the sizing formulation. For example, the inorganic particles, such as accelerant, act as seeds for the precipitation of cement crystals, causing cement crystals to grow directly from the surface coating and improving adhesion with the matrix. Also, inorganic particles may be added that act as a fire-retardant filler, improving the fire-resistance. Preferably, inorganic particles are one of ground cement and limestone in cement compositions, and ground gypsum ball mill accelerator for gypsum compositions.
In an additional embodiment, the surface coatings are used to coat other types and forms of materials in addition to fibers. For example, reinforcing polymer coatings can be used to coat reinforcing aggregate, lightweight filler and wire mesh. The surface modifiers are preferably multifunctional, providing cohesion and protecting against corrosion, for example. Also, the surface coating may be added primarily for its bio-active properties, rather than the improvement in cohesion.
In one alternative embodiment, the surface modifier is applied to a surface of a fabric or paper, such as a fiber-reinforced paper or a re-pulped, recycled paper, such that the treatment does not penetrate the surface or only partially penetrates the surface. Thus, the properties imparted to the fabric or paper have a functional gradient from the exterior surface toward the interior.
The following examples are intended merely as examples, and the invention is not to be limited thereby.
Quarternization of Poly(vinylpyridine). An amount of 6 g of poly(4-vinylpyridine) MW 160,000 was dissolved in 80 g of nitromethane. The temperature of the solution was brought to 96� C. An amount of 10 g of hexyl bromide was added dropwise to the solution which was then left to stir for 4 hr. During the mixing, the color of the yellow solution became darker. After 4 hr, the solution was precipitated in 400 mL of toluene. The fibrous solid was filtered and washed with 100 mL of acetone. The quaternized polymer was dried in an oven at 180� C. for 30 minutes.
Use of Quarternized Poly(vinylpuridine). An amount of 100 parts of β-calcium sulfate hemihydrate was mixed with 0.5 parts of quaternized poly(vinylpyridine), 0.13 parts accelerator and 0.2 parts of dispersant. The mixture was then added to 150 parts of water containing a small percentage of retarder and blended at a high shear setting for approximately 20 seconds. The resulting slurry was poured directly from the laboratory blender to a mold measuring 12 in�14 in�0.5 in. After setting, the sample was removed from the mold and cured at 45� C. for 2 days.
Poly(vinylpyridine) Bio-Active Film. A fibrous polyester material was coated with a poly(vinylpyridine) bio-active film. A solution was made of the following: 6 g of 4-vinylpyridine, 0.12 g of divinylbenzene, 0.12 g of benzoyl peroxide, and 6 g of methanol. One each of a 2″�2″ polyester pad and a glass mat were dipped in the solution and then were exposed to ultraviolet light for about 3 hours (plus or minus 10 minutes). Then, the pad and mat were immersed in a solution of 10 milli-liters of nitromethane/hexyl bromide (10:1, vol/vol) and placed in an oven at 80� C. for 4 h. After heating, the pad and mat were cooled to room temperature.
A mold solution was prepared. Two Petri dishes of potato dextrose agar were stored in a humid environment. After 3 days, a dense layer of mold was evident. In a 1000 mL flask, 10 g of potato dextrose starch was added to 500 mL of water. The mixture was heated with stirring until the starch dissolved and was then cooled to room temperature. Two drops of Triton-X was added. The moldy agar from the two Petri dishes was then added and the mixture was stirred for 30 min. The mixture was filtered and the dark green filtrate was collected in a spray bottle. For comparison, samples of an untreated polyester material and glass mat and the treated polyester pad and glass mat were each sprayed twice with the mold solution. The samples were then stored in a humidity chamber at 37 degrees C. and 90% humidity. After 5 days, both the untreated glass mat and the untreated polyester material exhibited mold growth while the bio-active, anti-fungal coated samples were free from mold growth. The samples were observed for a period of five weeks during which no mold growth was observed on the treated samples.
Glass Fiber Gypsum, No Size. As a comparative example, strands of fiber were removed from a sheet of woven type E fiberglass boat cloth. The strands were cut into 4″ sections and individually massed to determine fiber denier. The specimens were then embedded in the center of a 9″�1″ ″ gypsum block. The fibers were oriented parallel to the �″ direction with approximately one inch spacing between each fiber. The mold was constructed with the fibers suspended between two sets of clamped �″ zinc bars with two �″ plastic spacers. Three inches of fiber were left exposed from the gypsum block on one side for clamping to the testing apparatus.
One hundred grams of beta calcium sulfate hemi-hydrate stucco was mixed with 0.13 g of ground gypsum ball mill accelerator. This powder was added to 150 g tap water and mixed in a Waring blender at low speed for 15 seconds. The slurry was then poured into the mold around the suspended fibers. The block was removed from the mold after 20 minutes of setting and dried in a convection oven at 45 C for 24 hours.
After drying, the block was massed to determine matrix density. The pull-out characteristics of each fiber were tested using an Instron mechanical testing machine at a displacement rate of one inch per minute.
The gypsum density was 0.62 g/cc, the average fiber denier was 3.5 mg per inch, and the average pull-out strength was 2.62 lbs with a standard deviation of less than 5%.
Glass Fiber Gypsum, Polyurethane Latex Surface Modifier. As another comparative example, a commercially available polyurethane latex emulsion with an internal cross-linker was used as a surface modifier. The surface modifier was applied at room temperature to strands removed from a sheet of woven type E fiberglass boat cloth. The surface modifier was applied by winding the strands onto a small roller, submerging the roller in the sizing composition, and unwinding the strands through the composition. The fiber strands were then weighted with a small clip on one end to prevent warping and hung to dry in a 45 C convection oven for 30 minutes. The dried fibers were cut to 4″ sections, massed, and embedded in a gypsum block following the procedure from the Glass Fiber Gypsum, No Size Example. The pull-out strength of the fibers was also tested. The results were recorded and compared to determine the amount of size add-on and pull-out strength improvement from control fibers in the same matrix. Pullout strength improvement indicates the increase in pullout strength over that for a glass fiber with no sizing (negative indicates a decrease in strength).
Fiber Denier
Energy at Yield
(% wt)
Glass Fiber Gypsum, Waterborne Epoxy Size. Also included for comparison is a waterborne epoxy surface modifier. A sizing composition was prepared by mixing 100 g of Epirez 3519 50% solids waterborne epoxy emulsion with EpiCure curing agent, both from Shell. The surface modifier was applied at room temperature to strands removed from a sheet of woven type E fiberglass boat cloth as in the previous example. The fiber strands were then weighted and hung to dry in a 100 C convection oven for 2 hours. The dried, cured fibers were then cut to 4″ sections, massed, and embedded in a gypsum block following the procedure from the Glass Fiber Gypsum, No Size Example. The pull-out strength of the fibers was also tested. The results were recorded and compared to determine the amount of size add-on and pull-out strength improvement from control fibers in the same matrix.
Fiber Denier
Energy at Yield
(% wt)
The polyurethane latex surface modifier and waterborne epoxy surface modifier are included for comparison with some preferred embodiments of the invention. Interfacial bond strength was not improved by adding these sizes between the cement and the fiber. Instead, polyurethane latex and waterborne epoxy reduced the pull-out strength, despite the increased surface contour and denier of the fiber. This may explain why sizing is removed as part of conventional processes, because one of ordinary skill in the art would not expect sizing to improve pullout strength.
Glass Fiber Gypsum High Molecular Weight HPMC Surface Modifier. A sizing composition was prepared by mixing 5 g of Methocel 240 from Dow Chemical (40,000 cps @ 2 wt %, 25 C) into 100 g of 85 C tap water. The dispersion was mixed for 5 minutes and then cooled to 45 C. The surface modifier was applied to strands removed from a sheet of woven type E fiberglass boat cloth by winding the strands onto a small roller, submerging the roller in the surface modifier composition, and unwinding the strands through the composition. The fiber strands were then tensioned and hung to dry in a 45 C convection oven for 30 minutes. The dried fibers were cut to 4″ sections, massed, and embedded in a gypsum block following the procedure from the Glass Fiber Gypsum, No Size Example. The pull-out strength of the fibers was also tested. The results were recorded and compared to determine the amount of size add-on and pull-out strength improvement from control fibers in the same matrix.
Fiber Denier
Energy at Yield
(% wt)
These results show that with less add-on, such as used in conventional sizing applications, the Methocel lowers the pull-out strength of the fiber. It is believed, without limiting in any way, that the weakening is due to migration of the water-soluble polymer away from the fiber, leaving a void and a weak interface between the fiber and cement matrix. However, increased add-on resulted in significantly improved pull-out strength and energy.
Glass Fiber Gypsum, Low Molecular Weight HPMC Surface Modifier. A composition was prepared by mixing 30 g of low molecular weight HPMC from Aldrich (5 cps @ 2 wt %, 25 C) into 100 g of 85 C tap water. The dispersion was mixed for 5 minutes and then cooled to 25 C The surface modifier was applied to type E boat cloth glass fiber as described previously, and the fiber strands were then tensioned and hung to dry in a 45 C convection oven for 30 minutes. The dried fibers were cut to 4″ sections, massed, and embedded in a gypsum block following the procedure from the Glass Fiber Gypsum, No Size Example. The pull-out strength of the fibers was also tested. The results were recorded and compared to determine the amount of size add-on and pull-out strength improvement from control fibers in the same matrix.
Fiber Denier
Energy at Yield
(% wt)
Low molecular weight CEs do not improve fiber-cement adhesion as much as their high molecular weight counterparts. Much more add-on of a low molecular weight HPMC surface modifier is required to achieve the same improvement in pull-out strength as high molecular weight HPMC surface modifier. For example, the pull-out energy of a fiber sized with 200% add-on of 40,000 cps HPMC is greater than that of a fiber with 500% add-on of 5 cps HPMC. It is thought, without being limiting, that low molecular weight reinforcing polymers migrate more easily in the drying cement.
Glass Fiber Gypsum High Molecular Weight HPMC/Polyurethane Latex Surface Modifier. A surface modifying composition was prepared by adding 4 g of Airflex 423, a 50% solids polyurethane latex emulsion with an internal cross-linker from Air Products Inc., to 100 g of 85 C tap water. Three grams of Methocel 240 (40,000 cps @ 2 wt %, 25 C) from Dow Chemical was then added to the mixture. The dispersion was mixed for 5 minutes and then cooled to 45 C. The surface modifier was applied to type E boat cloth glass fiber as described previously, and the fiber strands were then tensioned and hung to dry in a 45 C convection oven for 30 minutes. The dried fibers were cut to 4″ sections, massed, and embedded in a gypsum block following the procedure from the Glass Fiber Gypsum, No Size Example. The pull-out strength of the fibers was also tested. The results were recorded and compared to determine the amount of size add-on and pull-out strength improvement from control fibers in the same matrix.
Fiber Denier
Energy at Yield
(% wt)
The latex component of this surface modifier functions mainly to physically cross-link the HPMC and create a more uniform coating. Fibers coated with a surface modifier that is physically or chemically cross-linked demonstrate improved fiber pull-out strength even with conventional amounts of sizing add-on. Because the surface modifier does not migrate away from the fiber, it remains an effective reinforcement, even at low levels. It is observed that fiber pull-out strength increases linearly with sizing add-on within the limits tested here. Thus, this crosslinked surface modifier has a much greater pullout strength than non-crosslinked HPMC having similar add-on.
Glass Fiber Gypsum, High Molecular Weight HPMC/Organic Titanate. A surface modifying composition was prepared by mixing 3 g of Methocel 240 from Dow Chemical (40,000 cps @ 2 wt %, 25 C) into 100 g of 85 C tap water. The dispersion was mixed for 5 minutes and then cooled to 60 C. Five drops of Tyzor 131, organic titanium chelate, from DuPont Chemical were added to the dispersion. This mixture was mixed for an additional 10 minutes and then cooled to 45 C. The surface modifier was applied to type E boat cloth glass fiber as described previously. The fiber strands were then tensioned and hung to dry in a 45 C convection oven for 30 minutes. The dried fibers were cut to 4″ sections, massed, and embedded in a gypsum block following the procedure from the Glass Fiber Gypsum, No Size Example. The pull-out strength of the fibers was also tested. The results were recorded and compared to determine the amount of surface modifier add-on and pull-out strength improvement from control fibers in the same matrix.
Fiber Denier
Energy at Yield
(% wt)
Glass Fiber Gypsum, High Molecular Weight Surface Treated HEMC/Melamine Sulfonate. A sizing composition was prepared by mixing 1 g of sulfonated melamine polycondensate (Melment F17G from Degussa) and 3 g of surface treated, high viscosity HEMC (Culminal 15000PFR from Hercules) into 100 g of tap water at room temperature. The mixture was stirred for two minutes. Ten drops of a 1% solution of calcium hydroxide was then added to the mixture, which was stirred for another five minutes. The resulting solution of surface modifier was applied to type E boat cloth glass fiber as follows. Glass fiber strands measuring approximately two feet long were tensioned across a cardboard frame. The frame and fibers were placed over wax paper and the surface modifier was applied by spreading it across the fibers. The frame was then lifted away from the paper, pulling the fibers through the sizing solution. The fibers were then dried in the framework in a 120� C. convection oven for 30 minutes. The fiber coating had good mechanical properties and excellent swelling characteristics.
Glass Mat—High Molecular Weight PVP/PSS Size. A glass mat was produced mixing 2 g of PVP, 1.3M MW, 0.5 g of PSS, IM MW, and 5 grams of chopped glass strand (as used in gypsum wallboard production) in 300 g of water with an overhead stirrer for one minute at 1500 RPM. The high viscosity gel of high molecular weight surface modifier quickly dispersed the strands into its individual fibers. The dispersion was then poured onto a wire mesh and spread into a layer of even thickness. The solution was allowed to drain for several minutes before drying the mesh in a convection oven at 45 C for 2 hours. The glass mat was then peeled away from the wire mesh. The resulting surface modified fiber mat had an average thickness of 25 mils or 0.64 mm and a weight of 2.2 lbs per sq. ft. or 10.8 g per sq meter. The mat had good mechanical strength and excellent adhesion to gypsum and cement were observed in tests preparing composite panels
Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Sep 24, 1975
|Aug 30, 1977
|Basf Wyandotte Corporation
|Method for providing polymers with durable improved properties
|Dec 13, 1976
|Jul 4, 1978
|Basf Wyandotte Corporation
|Providing polymer with antistatic properties
|Jan 28, 1991
|Apr 28, 1992
|Brigham Young University
|Enhanced thermoplastic adhesion to fibers by using plasma discharge
|Jul 13, 1990
|Oct 13, 1992
|American Cyanamid Company
|Surface-modified polyacrylonitrile fibrous substrates
|Sep 11, 1991
|Aug 31, 1993
|Teijin Limited
|Surface-modified wholly aromatic polyamide fiber and method of producing same
|Jun 8, 1992
|Dec 14, 1993
|American Cyanamid Company
|Surface-modified polyacrylonitrile fibrous substrates
|Jul 9, 1992
|Feb 8, 1994
|American Cyanamid Company
|Surface-modified polyacrylonitrile fibrous substrates
|Apr 13, 1992
|Feb 22, 1994
|Fiberstone Quarries, Inc.
|Moldable building material composites
|Aug 16, 1993
|Apr 26, 1994
|American Cyanamid Company
|Surface-modified polyacrylonitrile fibrous substrates
|Oct 6, 1994
|Jan 9, 1996
|Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
|Extruded fire resistant construction and building products
|Jun 30, 1995
|Apr 8, 1997
|Kimberly-Clark Corporation
|Surface-modified fibrous material as a filtration medium
|Dec 9, 1994
|Nov 4, 1997
|E. Khashoggi Industries
|Articles having a starch-bound cellular matrix reinforced with uniformly dispersed fibers
|Jan 7, 1997
|Jun 30, 1998
|Andersen Corporation
|Advanced compatible polymer wood fiber composite
|Apr 9, 1996
|Nov 3, 1998
|E. Khashoggi Industries, Llc
|Articles of manufacture and methods for manufacturing laminate structures including inorganically filled sheets
|Oct 14, 1997
|Nov 9, 1999
|Andersen Corporation
|Advanced compatible polymer wood fiber composite
|Oct 8, 1999
|Mar 6, 2001
|W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
|Micro-diastrophic synthetic polymeric fibers for reinforcing matrix materials
|Feb 8, 1999
|Mar 27, 2001
|Jeh Mody
|Corrosion and fire resistant composite conduits and method of making
|Nov 12, 1998
|Apr 3, 2001
|Andersen Corporation
|Advanced compatible polymer wood fiber composite
|Dec 29, 1999
|May 8, 2001
|United States Gypsum Company
|Clay-free ready-mixed setting-type joint compound
|Aug 16, 2000
|Jul 24, 2001
|W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
|Micro-diastrophic synthetic polymeric fibers for reinforcing matrix materials
|Aug 21, 1998
|Jan 29, 2002
|United States Gysum Company
|Gypsum-containing product having increased resistance to permanent deformation and method and composition for producing it
|Oct 20, 1999
|Apr 30, 2002
|3M Innovative Properties Company
|Thermoplastic composition comprising fluoroaliphatic radical-containing surface-modifying additive
|Sep 14, 2000
|Jun 18, 2002
|Takachiho Corp.
|Material for constructional finished wallboard
|Dec 7, 1999
|Jul 2, 2002
|Sumitomo Electric Fine Polymer, Inc.
|Chemical grafting onto a substrate and coating composition
|Sep 22, 2000
|Feb 4, 2003
|Ut-Battelle, Llc
|Microwave and plasma-assisted modification of composite fiber surface topography
|Apr 11, 2001
|Sep 20, 2001
|W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
|Micro-diastrophic synthetic polymeric fibers for reinforcing matrix materials
|Nov 13, 2002
|Aug 21, 2003
|United States Gypsum Company
|Gypsum-containing board and tile, and method for producing gypsum-containing board and tile
|Mar 20, 2002
|Sep 25, 2003
|Saint Gobain Technical Fabrics
|Drywall tape and joint
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Title not available
|Citing Patent
|Filing date
|Publication date
|Apr 9, 2002
|Nov 25, 2008
|James Hardie International Finance B.V.
|Integral water resistant fibre-cement
|Jan 25, 2007
|Feb 2, 2010
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Binder and wood board product from maillard reactants
|Nov 13, 2008
|May 18, 2010
|James Hardie Technology Limited
|Integral water resistant fibre-cement
|Jan 25, 2007
|Aug 10, 2010
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Binder and fiber glass product from maillard reactants
|Jan 25, 2007
|Oct 5, 2010
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Binder and fiber glass product from maillard reactants
|Apr 16, 2009
|Oct 26, 2010
|Hawaii Nanosciences, Llc
|Compositions and methods for imparting oil repellency and/or water repellency
|Oct 13, 2004
|Nov 30, 2010
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Binder compositions and associated methods
|Jan 25, 2007
|Dec 21, 2010
|Knauf Insulation Limited
|Formaldehyde-free mineral fibre insulation product
|Jul 26, 2006
|Feb 15, 2011
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Fibrous products and methods for producing the same
|Feb 1, 2010
|May 24, 2011
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Binder and wood board product from maillard reactants
|Aug 1, 2008
|Feb 14, 2012
|Carl Hampson
|Aug 1, 2008
|Feb 28, 2012
|Nanopaper, Llc
|Functionalization of paper components
|May 23, 2011
|May 22, 2012
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Binders and materials made therewith
|Jan 25, 2007
|Aug 6, 2013
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Composite wood board
|Apr 9, 2008
|Oct 8, 2013
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Composite maillard-resole binders
|May 23, 2005
|Nov 5, 2013
|The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army
|Fiber modified with particulate through a coupling agent
|Oct 11, 2005
|Dec 10, 2013
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Polyester binding compositions
|Jul 2, 2013
|Feb 18, 2014
|Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
|Extrusion molding hydraulic composition
|Nov 5, 2010
|Apr 8, 2014
|Knauf Insulation Gmbh
|Binder compositions and associated methods
|Aug 9, 2010
|Dec 2, 2014
|Knauf Insulation
|Molasses binder
|Jun 12, 2013
|Dec 2, 2014
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Composite wood board
|Dec 30, 2011
|Jan 27, 2015
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Feb 13, 2012
|Mar 17, 2015
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Sep 13, 2013
|May 26, 2015
|Knauf Insulation, Llc
|Apr 23, 2013
|May 26, 2015
|Knauf Insulation, Llc
|Binders and materials made therewith
|Sep 25, 2013
|Sep 22, 2015
|Milliken & Company
|Method of strengthening existing structures using strengthening fabric having slitting zones
|Apr 19, 2013
|Feb 16, 2016
|Knauf Insulation, Inc.
|Binders and materials made therewith
|Sep 30, 2013
|Apr 12, 2016
|Knauf Insulation, Inc.
|Composite maillard-resole binders
|Nov 6, 2014
|Aug 16, 2016
|Knauf Insulation, Inc.
|Molasses binder
|Apr 19, 2013
|Sep 6, 2016
|Knauf Insulation, Inc.
|Binders and materials made therewith
|Jun 9, 2015
|Sep 20, 2016
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Composite wood board
|Apr 23, 2013
|Oct 11, 2016
|Knauf Insulation, Inc.
|Binders and materials made therewith
|Aug 1, 2008
|Oct 18, 2016
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Mineral wool insulation
|Aug 17, 2013
|Nov 15, 2016
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Wood board and process for its production
|May 7, 2011
|Nov 15, 2016
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Carbohydrate binders and materials made therewith
|May 8, 2014
|Nov 29, 2016
|Knauf Insulation Sprl
|Carbohydrate polyamine binders and materials made therewith
|Aug 20, 2015
|May 30, 2017
|Milliken & Company
|Method of strengthening existing structures using strengthening fabric having slitting zones
|Dec 14, 2016
|Aug 29, 2017
|Knauf Insulation, Inc.
|Binders and materials made therewith
|Apr 9, 2002
|Oct 28, 2004
|Simon Trevethick
|Integral water resistant fibre-cement
|Mar 10, 2004
|Sep 15, 2005
|Kajander Richard E.
|Silane based coatings on glass fiber reinforcements in gypsum board
|Jan 10, 2006
|Jul 20, 2006
|Jerry Zucker
|Fiber reinforced cementitious material
|Aug 9, 2006
|May 17, 2007
|Soane Laboratories, Llc
|Hair hold formulations
|Apr 23, 2007
|Oct 25, 2007
|Georgia Tech Research Corporation
|Methods for internally curing cement-based materials and products made therefrom
|Jun 13, 2006
|Dec 13, 2007
|Jacob Cornelis Dijt
|Sizing composition for glass fibers, sized fiber glass products, and composites
|Dec 20, 2006
|Jun 26, 2008
|David Paul Miller
|Fiber reinforced gypsum panel
|Mar 20, 2007
|Jan 8, 2009
|Evonik Degussa Gmbh
|Silanization of Wood Turnings and Fibers for Producing Wood-Plastic Composite Materials
|Nov 13, 2008
|Jun 18, 2009
|Simon Trevethick
|Integral Water Resistant Fibre-Cement
|Aug 15, 2008
|Jul 2, 2009
|Nanopaper, Llc
|Expansion agents for paper-based materials
|Aug 13, 2010
|Dec 2, 2010
|U.S. Government As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army
|Fiber modified with particulate through a coupling agent
|Jul 2, 2013
|Jan 16, 2014
|Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
|Extrusion molding hydraulic composition
|U.S. Classification
|428/53, 428/36.4, 428/36.91, 206/524.3, 428/223, 428/294.7, 428/339, 428/310.5
|International Classification
|Cooperative Classification
|European Classification
|May 27, 2003
Owner name: INNOVATIVE CONTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, CAL
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TAGGE, CHRISTOPHER D.;POLLOCK, JACOB FREAS;SOANE, DAVID S.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014129/0502
Effective date: 20030522
|Dec 19, 2005
Owner name: COMMATONE LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM
Free format text: LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING MATERIALS;REEL/FRAME:016902/0824
Effective date: 20051215
|Feb 16, 2009
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
|Nov 18, 2011
Owner name: SAINT-GOBAIN PLACO, FRANCE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INNOVATIVE CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS;REEL/FRAME:027251/0598
Effective date: 20110620
|Mar 12, 2013
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
|Apr 13, 2017
|Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 12


text:
OWNERS and managers are hoping that business will soon be booming at a new-look complex on the edge of Morpeth.
The departure of Farmway from the area about 18 months ago gave Penny Petroleum, which runs the Grandstand Services petrol station and shop in Fairmoor, a chance to expand its provision.
The company has invested between £90,000 and £100,000 to increase its trading size and add some new units. One of them is its own venture – Fairmoor Country Store.
It has leased out the remaining space to Power Equestrian and Fairmoor Arts, Crafts and Collectables.
Area Manager Wendy Newton explained that the improvements have included new air conditioning, upgrading the lighting, installing floors, freezers, chillers and coffee machines and providing hot food in the shop.
"We thought it would be worthwhile to make the investment because it meant we could sell more goods at the shop, including a large selection of wines, and set up the country store as people kept asking us if we had the types of product sold by Farmway in stock," she added.
"A big focus of the new store is making sure we have plenty of items from local suppliers. Much of the meat, cheese and fruit and vegetables come from Northumberland-based farmers and businesses and we receive pickles, mustards and relishes from a local lady entrepreneur.
"The horse food and pet food is proving very popular with customers and if anyone wants some animal food that we don't have on the shelves, we can make a special order.
"We're confident that the new set-up will be a success in the long term. It helps that there is a high demand for locally-sourced meat following the horsemeat scandal."
As well as installing an LPG pump at the petrol station in the near future, Penny Petroleum is working with the other two businesses in the building – called The Fairmoor Centre – to erect some new external signage.
Ms Newton said: "It makes sense for all three of us to work together where we can because quite a few of the people who come along to purchase items at one of the venues will also have a look around the others."
Power Equestrian, which opened just before Christmas, sells a range of specialist horse supplies, equipment and rider clothing.
Owner Lynsey Ratcliffe said the shop has been very busy since the weather got a little warmer over the past few weeks and customers are coming from parts of north Northumberland as well as Morpeth.
Fairmoor Arts, Crafts and Collectables provides display space for well-known and up-and-coming artists and craftworkers.
Special exhibitions are being planned with seasonal and local themes and there will be a school competition for young people to showcase their talent.
Resident artist Naomi Walker is developing the studio upstairs and she is also appealing for more volunteers to help out in the shop.
For more information about the three businesses, visit www.thefairmoorcentre.co.uk

subset: commoncrawl


text:
About Our School
Contact Information
For Students
For Parents
For Staff
Classroom Pages
Programs and Services
Specialist Pages
Student Support
School Event Calendar
Lunch Menu
Beacons After School Program
Why Attend Sullivan?
Who was Anne Sullivan?
Fun Sites for Kids
iPad Expectations
Sullivan Languages
How to Help
Rules and Policies
School Hours
School Symbols & Colors
Walking Permission
School Requests
Parent Portal
Attendance Policy
Mobile Info
Resources for iPads
Sports Information
Resources for iPads
iPad Directives
Web Pages for Teachers
High Five
First Grade
Second Grade
Third Grade
Fourth Grade
Fifth Grade
Middle School
Special Education
Ms. Breezee
Ms. Rogers-Killian
Ms. VanEtten
Ms. Funmaker
Mrs. Belden
Ms. Chapman
Ms. Mayers
Ms. Hempel
Ms. McArdle
Ms. Dearing
Ms Christensen-Mortland
Ms. Faiad
Ms. Liu
Ms. Gisi
Mrs. Nwachuku
Ms. Poppler
Ms. Duffy
Ms. Gores
State Tourism Director Project
Mr. Hyland
Ms Rudolph
Ms. Kesler
Ms. Lindsay
Ms. Andrews
Mr. Cannady
Ms. Driskell
Ms. Hanlon
Mr. Johnson
Mr. Kukielka
Ms. Lund
Mr. Sjoberg
Mr. Webster
Ms. Wilson
Ms. Feldhamer
Ms. Roby
C.L.A.S.S. Pages
Deaf/Hard of Hearing Program
EL Services
Title I Services
Project Success
Art Adventure
Ms. Hanson
Ms. Theisen
D/HH Sullivan Directory
D/HH K-8 Program
Mission & Features
WIDA Levels & Assessment
Elementary Teacher Bios
Middle School Teacher Bios
NABAD Teacher Bios
Facilitator, Sharifa Charles
Health and Physical Education
Amy Strickland Johnson - Health and Physical Education
Jeff Sanders - Physical Education, Coaching, Athletic Director
Kyle Foster - Fitness, Physical Education, Coaching
Ty Dombeck - Physical Education
Support Program Teachers
Counseling Department
School Health Services
School Psychologist
School Social Workers
The Counseling Island
Special Education Teachers
C.L.A.S.S. Teachers
What does a school counselor do?
Parent Information
Health Services
Short-term counseling
Evaluation of individual students
Program evaluation and research
Education for staff, parents, and community members
What does a School Social Worker do?
Steve Lish, Grades 2-5
Liliane Bilezikian, Hi-5, HHM & Attendance
Brenda Beyer, ECSE Autism Program
Birgit Larson, Grade 1 & DHH Program
Megan Diederich, Grades 6-8
Classroom Pages
Ms. Rogers-Killian
Early Childhood Special Education/Deaf/Hard of Hearing
Welcome to the Early Childhood Special Education, Deaf/Hard of Hearing classroom web page! My name is Lois Rogers-Killian and I teach preschool at Sullivan. I have taught at Sullivan since 2003. Our classroom is in room 122. Program hours are Tuesday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. You may contact me via phone, email, voice mail, or backpack mail!
Contact information:
D/HH office: 668-5020
Sullivan office: 668-5000
Voice mail: 692-0136
Use the link below to email me with questions or comments. I would love to hear from you!
Check "Classroom News" to see what your child has been doing in the classroom. Simply click on the title below for an update of what's happening at school!
3100 28th Street East, Minneapolis, MN 55406
Telephone: 612.668.5000 | Fax: 612.668.5010


text:
Montana Mountain Log Cabin
Total Acres: 19.8
Price: ~ ~ SOLD ~ ~
Property Description: You could not ask for more than this Montana Mountain Log Cabin Paradise Hideaway. Take a serious look at this rare opportunity to own 19.8 acres where land is hard to find but a treasure to have! Includes private frontage on 2 year round mountain creeks, mature lodge pole pines, 100 year old Douglas fir timber, beautiful rustic log cabin, easy 3+ season access, and much more! Paradise mountain property offers stunning alpine peak and timbered mountain views from the 1,200 sq. ft. log cabin (22'x28' ground floor + 22'x28' loft), wildlife abounds both on the property and in adjoining massive block of federal Forest lands. Near new cabin on 4' concrete foundation features 2 balcony decks and entry porch, wood stove heat, private well and septic already in place, cabin currently powered by generator, however exceptional opportunity for off-the-grid living via solar and/or hydro-electric power. Plenty of room to build additional cabins, or invite your family and friends to bring their RV's and camp among the pines or in the beautiful mountain creek-front meadow. Includes ALL mineral rights, and is located just over the hill from the famed Alder Gulch - home of a major gold strike in the 1800's just outside of Virginia City, Montana's 1st state capital. This area is a true outdoorsmens playground. Seller reports Bull Elk have been taken every year, along with deer and bear both on and near this remarkable property. 3+ season access is via good county/forest access road. All within approx. 6 miles of the Ruby Reservoir and the famed Ruby River, a blue ribbon designated trout fishery.
Property Address: Barton Gulch Road


text:
The Broken String, is crystalline and clear, full of cleverly detailed stanzas (a slew of debutantes named Jennifer, the "snippy snap of wild dogs") and wonderfully full arrangements (replete with trumpet, ukulele, and hand claps). Rice's voice is equally surefooted, whether shouting in his best Ira Kaplan howl or crooning in a cigarette-strained Will Oldham-y tone. And then there's "The News from Your Bed," a cheery, Sufjan Stevensesque charmer that's as anti-isolation as you can get. Compared to their mumblecore performances, the boys of Bishop Allen are practically Up with People, offering a declarative, feel-good record worth shouting about.
Bishop Allen plays with John Vanderslice.
Sat., Oct. 20, 9 p.m., 2007


text:
Click Picture to Zoom
Off Your Path (Curly Girl Design) - Beaded Cross Stitch Kit
Mill Hill
$19.00 $17.09 + $3.29 shipping within the U.S.
In Stock. Usually ships in 1-2 business days.
Item: CG30-4103 - Type: Cross Stitch Kits.
"Sometimes your journey will take you off of your path. It's all a part of the same trip." Kit includes: Mill Hill glass beads, 28 Ct. linen fabric, floss, needles, and chart with instructions. Finished size: 7" x 7".
123Stitch.com ships via the U.S. Postal Service to anywhere in the world. Orders to the U.S. typically arrive 3-5 days after we ship.
Shipping charges are shown in your shopping cart every time you add an item.
If you are not completely satisfied with any of our products, you can return it to us within 30 days for a full refund.
|More Items Like Off Your Path (Curly Girl Design) - Beaded Cross Stitch Kit
Current Filters
☒ Items Like CG30-4103
☒ Mill Hill (137)
Product Types
Cross Stitch Kits (137)
New and Sale Items
Sale Items (26)
Clearance Items (3)
Themes / Subjects
Sentiments (45)
Travel and Vacations (3)
Don't miss any of our special sales or offers! Sign up for our Weekly Ad today!
Cross Stitch, Fabric, Floss, Thread, Rubber Stamps and Dies


text:
Ash has a number of licensed products available for both wholesale and retail purchasing directly from the following manufacturers. Please contact the manufacturers for pricing and availability.
Licensing Inquiries: Ash frequently licenses her artwork for various products. If you are interested in using Ash's art in a licensing venture please contact her directly via the contact form on this website. Ash is open and comfortable with working directly with companies to create custom pieces to suit their needs and has herself manufactured items such as plush and statuary and understands the process.
Heaven and Earth Designs - Beautiful hand charted cross stitch patterns
Pacific Trading Figurines - "Familiar Friends" collaborative figurines with Brigid Ashwood
Starshine Arts Stickers- Assortment of stickers made in the USA
Evolve Watches- Watches, shoes, bags and pillows
Head Case Designs- Cell phone cases and wallets
CDO Tubes and Tags- Officially licensed tubes for tagging
Autumn Moon- Makes Beautiful OOAK luminaries with my artwork
Something Different- Wall Clocks and Plaques
Collaborative works:
Familiar Friends: A collaborative project with friend and fellow artist Brigid Ashwood. Ash and Brigid work together to develop this brand. Ash's Fortuna the cat is paired with Brigid's beautiful Kitchy Witches. To view more of Brigid's artwork you may do so at: http://www.brigidashwood.com
About the Brand
Ash is the creator of things with fur, horns and wings. She specializes in whimsical creations and creatures and is well versed in many mediums. Her most popular property to date is Fortuna the cat and Ash is very keen to work with companies interested in developing his brand in particular.
My artwork is versatileand can compliment several kinds of product lines including: statuary, jewelry, stationery, paper products, stickers, greeting cards, calendars, mouse pads, apparel, fabrics/textiles, stamps, house wares, journals, plush and vinyl toys, home decor, and in the gift industry. All of the artwork on this website is available for licensing or I can work with your company to develop specific artwork and designs for your products, publications, advertising and promotions.
If you feel that my artwork is a perfect complement to your product, Please contact me. I am always seeking new companies to work with.
We have several branded characters and more in the works! Check out our Mewnicorn, Fortuna the cat, the Purrsnicketys and more!!


text:
Subscribe via RSS
Category Archives: Lean Tools
Save Your Sanity with PFEP
PFEP simply stands for Plan For Every Part. A simple material control concept from the past resurrected and touted as a new transformative process. PFEP simply stands for Plan For Every Part . Material Control professionals first thought after introduction … Continue reading
Lean Tools 101 – Run Chart
During our lean journey we oftentimes become overwhelmed with the jargon, anecdotes and theories. In our rush to out "Toyota" one another some of the foundational tools are lost in the process or simply taught in passing. I've seen leaders … Continue reading
10 Tips to Sustain Gemba
As we all know Gemba is the Japanese for "Real Place". The purpose of Gemba walks is to take management directly to the area where "value" is created to understand a situation thoroughly. In a restaurant this might be the … Continue reading
Posted in Lean Tools Tagged gemba, gemba walks, lean blog, lean manufacturing, Lean Practitioner, Problem Solving, Taiichi Ohno, toyota, tps Leave a comment
After The Kaikaku
The big Kaikaku event is finally over, the smoke has cleared and the dust has settled. The armies of building contractors along with their heavy equipment have vanished as swiftly as they appeared. Also absent are the great gurus and … Continue reading
Posted in Lean Tools Tagged continuous improvement, Kaikaku event, kaizen, leadership, lean manufacturing, lean tools, linkage and flow Leave a comment
IQR – Powerful Inventory Reduction Tool
Have you discovered IQR! IQR stands for Inventory Quality Ratio. This is a very powerful and effective tool for inventory valuation, reduction and review. This is how it works. Divide your inventory into four quality categories. Active– Items with future … Continue reading
Is a Kaikaku in your future?
Kaikaku is the latest continuous improvement initiative being practiced in the business world. Kaikaku means "Radical change." The goal is to tear down walls both literally and figuratively. Kaikaku events are generally used when kaizen events no longer provide the … Continue reading
Posted in Lean Tools Tagged continuous improvement, Deming, Kaikaku, kanban, lean manufacturing, lean tools, radical change, toyota 1 Comment
Lean and the Sole Source Supplier
Sole sourcing is one of many important issues Material Planners struggle. The primary question is how do I mitigate risk and lower inventory when using a sole supplier? The short answer is you cannot. The lower the inventory in the … Continue reading
Posted in Lean Tools Tagged continuous improvement, lean manufacturing, mitigating supplier risk, sole supplier, toyota 2 Comments
Don't 5s yourself out of profitable business!
One of the most important activities of a lean enterprise is 5's. You know Sort, Straighten, Sweep, Standardize and Sustain. The main premise is that only the tools needed to perform your job should be readily available at work station … Continue reading
Posted in Lean Tools Tagged continuous improvement, Deming, juran, kaizen, lean journey, six sigma, toyota, tps Leave a comment


text:
Not been my personal experience.
Hey guys,
Just wanted to gather some opinions related to Tormach and customer service.
i purchased a PCNC deluxe package in December 2016, my experience with the service side has been extremely poor.
i could go into great detail , it will take a long time to write it all up , but I am left wondering why the general feeling is good about Tormach.
i do like the machine for the most part , my biggest issue is with service , followup & taking ownership of problems.
tons of phone calls , broken promises , no call backs , terrible communication, voicemail , bouncing calls from person to person , wasting lots of my time for very small issues...... Not what I would expect on a $10.5k purchase.
Similar Threads:
Not been my personal experience.
Nor mine. I've had some slower than normal shipments but as far as tech support they've been quite responsive.
The Body Armor Dude - Andrew
Sorry to hear that. My decision to go with Tormach was BECAUSE of their reported good customer service and support.
So far I have not been disappointed. After getting passed the quirks with the machine (mostly coolant shielding/leaking with enclosure and collet closer fitment), I'm relatively happy with my Slant pro lathe. I've been an owner since May 2016.
Maybe any issues I've had were minor compared to yours (initial wiring questions, replaced bad tailstock). However they've resolved all of them on a timely matter and assistance over the phone have been consistent.
I don't know if it helped but I tried to keep my correspondence with the same person so I don't have to keep explaining my story on every new phone call or email.
One huge value I've noticed is the support from the many fellow owners that are active on this forum. I've handled most of the little issues just from talking to the many insightful people here (after searching the forum). I would say that is an added benefit to owning the same brand.
I hope everything works out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have never had anything but stellar customer service from Tormach (including recently). Call-backs, extra effort beyond what I expected, and always timely. That's an 8 year history.
That's not to say every experience is perfect: read the record here. There have been bumps. But over time, for the vast majority of us, it's been excellent.
I have nothing but good things to say about the service I have gotten from Tormach.
My machine will be 6 years old in July and with one exception, all I have ever done is run it.
I don't run it as much now as I did then, but I still get 10 to 20 hours per week on it.
You can buy GOOD PARTS or you can buy CHEAP PARTS, but you can't buy GOOD CHEAP PARTS.
I generally get good customer service from Tormach service though they did drop a year ago or so when I was having issues with my lathe turret. They never did get back to me despite several calls and emails but I eventually solved the problem on my own. I almost always get next day delivery on spare parts and am about to order another in a bit. I'll follow up here with the results either way.
Bought my PCNC 1100 in November 2013. Customer service was always terrific. However, my last order of accessories got completely screwed up. Multiple mistakes happened and e-mails weren't answered. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for now as I think they might just have a lot on their plate temporarily.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I also have gotten good customer service.. I usually deal with e-mailing and I get a response next day. They have also gone above and beyond with the few problems that I have had. Do you think it is something you are doing or having unreasonable expectations?
I've been impressed with tormach customer served over the last year (my first year of having the 770). They have to be patient on the phone, methodical with trouble shooting, very helpful. I've had several small challenges; my x motor needed to be replaced; I needed help setting up the auto oiler and machine (just little questions), software questions with wifi, fielding suggestions and workflow questions about path pilot , etc. I'm sure I've talked to 5 different people. They are a bit slow in responding - or getting them on the phone -but over time I've become ok with that because I never feel rushed when I talk to them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I hate to change the general tune here, but my experience with Tormach CS has been mixed. It went from supportive and cordial (responding to every single point I brought up via email), to techs ignoring my e-mails, being short with me, etc. I'm not sure exactly why it changed, but I've been nothing but polite on my end. My guess is, I've been asking for more than they can give me, with regards to getting my mill to perform at the factory tolerances. But, it could also be that they simply don't know what I'm talking about when I supply them data... as a decent "novice" machinist with an engineering degree, I'm not going to get much respect on that front. Basically, all I've been asking for is that the machine, and accessories I get from them, perform to general specs.
Anyhow, my Tormach setup journey with a 2015 770 is a pretty odd case, as our machine wasn't even fully set up and scrutinized until after the warranty period expired. Long story, but it basically sat in a crate for a few months, and partially installed on its stand for another few. We're in an academic R&D setting... my boss didn't let me devote the time required for setting up a machine shop from scratch.. big mistake!
It was either a terrible month at the Tormach factory, or the machine was given a beating during shipping, but when I was finally able to fire it up, and throw some proper metrology tools at it, a few points were WAY out of spec. It's almost like the machine had a very hard crash before I even got it. So, I was left with begging for support to correct as much as possible. Even when carefully following their guidance to correct the issues however, most adjustments I've made have either made the specs worse, or didn't improve things.
In the end, the machine's casting is permanently deformed, so it will never run as true as it was designed to do (at least over the y-axis travel range). The z axis was wonky from the get-go... I've had to shim the spindle head on a "brand new" machine. They've scared the fear of God into me about trying to rotate the spindle head, so that X-Z tram goes back into spec. Plus, the lubrication system keeps stopping-up at 3 points, and will require sliding the table over (I'm sure you all know the drill there, not fun looking though), to purge debris and install new orifices. I even taught them about how the lubrication system was designed... they didn't know about the cross-drilled access holes for the x-ways, for example. Makes me think the machine is full of debris (the entire thing was covered in gravel when I opened the crate... inside all of the way covers and everything). Plus, the full enclosure ordered for the machine had lots of design errors, which required some creativity to get it to fit.
In other words, I would expect them to send me a new machine if it were still under warranty. Instead, I've spent nearly a year trying to correct all of the mistakes that came with the machine and full enclosure.
On the flipside, they were quite friendly at one point, and the service manager even offered to send me a new stand, out of warranty, once I found that ours was only halfway painted and leaked coolant.
I think it really all boils down to their CS philosophy, and not trying to promise customers anything from their machines. Scrutinize their communications carefully. If Tormach doesn't specify something about their machines, they won't even comment on it. Across the board, that's probably just good general CS strategy, but it does get annoying, when you need to know how much torque it's going to take to damage your gibs while adjusting them, for example, and they keep dancing around the issue.
They'll never explicitly say it, but these machines are what they are... you get what you pay for. Tormach's factory QC is spotty, at best. Their output is far from a Six-Sigma level, but, being a small company, that produces hobby-level machines on the cheap, what do you expect? In the end, I think Tormach CS is forced to do damage control all day... no better way to put it. That has to get taxing after a while!
It's been said that CS complaints follow a Pareto distribution... 20% of your customers give you 80% of your complaints. Now that's sometimes, but not always, the fault of the customer's pickiness. A good bit of that comes from the actual quality of the products themselves. I've become one of that 20%, but not by choice. I'm sure all the techs over there go "Oh no, not him again", when they get my e-mails, because I've just had so many problems pop-up that aren't covered in the manuals.
Count your blessings if you received a machine with everything in spec. It's always difficult to tell how many machines actually arrive that way. I sure can't, with my biased perspective, and from tooling around on a forum like this (where everyone comes in with their problems), but I'm guessing it's still the majority of Tormach owners that get decent machines out of the gate.
Thanks for letting me rant
I would not like to work as a tech support for any companies like Tormach.
I"m sure many buy a mill or a lathe and think it will come with a machining and CNC course and call or email tech for any minor problem they have.
When you buy a CNC machine, you're suppose to be able to make it work.


text:
Baby weight?
View Single Post
January 16th, 2013, 07:35 PM
Mega Super Mommy
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 1,851
Oh my gosh Ashley, I wouldn't worry about this at ALL! He's only 4 months - it's not like you can make him be more active to lose weight and I would think you'd have to be feeding him around the clock for him to be overeating and even then it would be a huge stretch to say that! A friend of a friend has a baby who is a week younger than Remy, so just turning 3 months old, and he is over 16 pounds and wearing 6-9 month clothes. Every baby is different and I wouldn't let any of those comments get to you. I'm jealous of all those adorable baby rolls you get to look at every day! Declan is a healthy, growing little guy and there is NOTHING wrong with him.
View Public Profile
Find all posts by smashley8