text:
Softball Canada Hall of Fame
Officials Category
Tom Bell (Deceased)
Inducted: 2016
Tom Bell (Richmond BC) was well known as one of the biggest contributors to Softball BC's strong umpiring program, leading the way for a number of umpires to develop and progress as working officials on the field and administrators off the field. He encouraged many umpires to get involved in British Columbia's provincial program and set goals to achieve the best they could be. He always wanted to make things better for the sport, and spread his contributions to softball in the state of Washington and Australia.
On the field, Bell was a successful umpire but he sacrificed his own career to lead and mentor others to achieve success. He worked a total of five Canadian Championships, including the 1979 and 1984 Junior Men's, 1982 Men's, 1988 Women's in Fast Pitch and 1992 Men's Slo-Pitch Championships. He attained his ISF Certification in 1988 and worked the 1991 Pan American Games in Havana, Cuba. Throughout his on-field experience, he earned plenty of praise from fellow umpires with his attention to detail, diligence and professionalism, always striving for the best and fully supporting those he worked with.
Though he had an impressive career on the diamond, Bell was even more active in developing umpires on the administrative side, serving as Softball BC's Umpire-in-Chief from 1981 to 1989 before serving two years as a Deputy Umpire-in-Chief on Softball Canada's Officiating Development Committee in 1990 and 1991. During that time, he ran an umpire's school in 1990 to develop Softball Australia's officiating program, and used that experience to author and run Softball Canada's Umpire Schools as head clinician. Tom Bell passed away on September 27, 2014 at the age of 79 and is survived by his wife Christine and children Colleen, Chris and Maggie.
Mike Hornak
Inducted: 2016
Mike Hornak (Langley, BC) had a distinguished career as a working official and gave back to the sport by serving at the administrative level and mentoring a number of elite officials. As the Umpire-in-Chief of the Canada Cup international tournament, he gave opportunities to a number of Canadian and international umpires to help them succeed and propel them to the top level. He brought his strong personality to the administrative level and was able to contribute to the growth of the local, national and international umpiring programs through his support.
On the field, he worked the 1985 Junior Women's and 1986 Junior Men's Canadian Championships before earning his Level V and ISF certification following the 1990 Men's Canadian Championship, and also worked the event in 1994. He then set his sights on officiating at the international level, working the Canada Cup from 1993-1996 and 1998, the 1995 Pan American Games and the 1995 Olympic Qualifier before reaching the pinnacle of his career by representing Canada as an official at the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta. Following this major achievement, he remained in the umpiring program and provided inspiration and dedication to help others achieve similar success.
Hornak served Softball British Columbia's umpiring community as an educator from 1984-1998 before taking the role of Provincial Umpire-in-Chief from 1998-2005, and was also the Umpire-in-Chief of the Canada Cup beginning in 1998 until he retired in 2008. Throughout that time, he chaired Softball BC's Umpire Schools to help develop the province's and the country's umpires and was able to take the program to new heights with his enthusiasm and innovations. Hornak showed his dedication to the game every step of the way and gave back to help others reach their dreams.
Bruce Bierman
Inducted: 2015
Bruce Bierman had a tremendous impact on the Canadian umpiring community. He always represented Softball Ontario and Softball Canada with pride, respect and humility, and proposed many good ideas to the National Officiating Development Committee. Bierman showed his leadership skills by promoting, developing and fostering softball officiating in Ontario and throughout Canada. He was also a very good on-field official, always developing his umpire skills, applying rules quickly and correctly to the situation and became a spokesperson for the game of softball.
An active umpire in from 1981 to 2006, Bierman officiated in five Softball Canada Canadian Championships (Junior Women's in 1987; Senior Women's in 1993; Senior Men's in 1990, 1997 and 2002) and was also an Umpire-in-Chief at countless provincial, national and international softball tournaments, leagues and associations, including Deputy Umpire-in-Chief of the 2001 Canada Summer Games in London and Softball Ontario's Umpire-in-Chief from 1989 to 1994. As an international umpire, he represented Canada at the 1999 Pan American Games in Winnipeg, Manitoba.
In addition to all he has done on the field, Bierman also dedicated many hours to the development of umpires by instructing at numerous umpire clinics and has attended and/or volunteered at all of Softball Canada's Blue Conventions. Bierman is an individual who worked tirelessly for the betterment of Softball Ontario and Softball Canada's umpiring program. His greatest trait and legacy is the way in which his patience and endless volunteer time has expanded and increased the depth of quality umpires in Ontario and across Canada.
Ron Cooke
Inducted: 2014
Ron Cooke had a stellar umpiring career that expanded over three decades, and has given his time to teach and mentor both new and experienced umpires, not only in New Brunswick but across Canada. As a leader, Ron took on many roles, such as a local administrator and clinician. He is known as a master teacher and motivator who is able to bring the best in individual umpires, always providing a positive growth environment for his charges. Ron also spent countless hours as a volunteer researching, developing and drafting content for Softball Canada's Umpire Casebook. His rule knowledge, interpretation, understanding and explaining in writing of them were exceptional.
On the field, Ron was a very successful umpire who worked four Canadian Championships (Senior Men's in 1978 and 1988; Senior Women's in 1980 and 1983) and supervised 11 others as an Umpire-in-Chief or Deputy Umpire-in-Chief. He earned his Level V designation in 1988 and his International Softball Federation (ISF) certification the following year before attending the 1991 Pan American Games in Cuba as an on-field official, where he worked the bronze medal game due to the fact Canada was playing in the Gold medal game.
In addition to his accomplishments on the field, Ron also offered significant leadership at the provincial and national levels off the field. As a leading national clinician, he supports the program at countless local, provincial and national clinics, and also supported emerging umpires through his work as an Umpire-in-Chief or Deputy Umpire-in-Chief at numerous provincial events. His vast knowledge, down to earth manner, ability to point out tips to fine-tune an umpire's game and professional approach were all great talents he demonstrated in these capacities.
Frank Hughes (Deceased)
Inducted: 2014
Frank Hughes started umpiring at the age of 13 and first registered as a Softball Canada umpire in 1977. He umpired at four Canadian Championships before obtaining his Level V certification in 1991, and served as an Umpire-in-Chief or Deputy Umpire-in-Chief at four other Championships. Locally, provincially, nationally or internationally, Frank gave his best at all times. If not on the field working, he would always be at the field watching. He loved the sport of softball and was always willing to share his knowledge and passion with other umpires, and he especially loved to watch minor players and offer assistance and advise on how they could improve.
He was a member of Softball PEI's executive for over 20 years, holding several positions such as Ladies Director, Umpire-in-Chief, Treasurer and President. As an administrator, he attended numerous Softball Canada Annual General Meetings and Congresses as a voting delegate and attended national and provincial Umpire-in-Chief meetings. When Softball PEI's Umpire-in-chief resigned, Frank returned to his roots as an umpire and served four more years in that position. He was later named the Umpire-in-Chief for softball at the 2009 Canada Summer Games, but was unable to accept the position due to illness.
Frank was also a major contributor to the development of umpires in Prince Edward Island by organizing numerous umpire clinics that went far beyond the classroom, and was frequently involved with local host committees for Canadian Championships in the area. He initiated and developed a Novice umpire manual for Softball PEI and updated it regularly, with the resource still being used to this day. Sadly, Frank passed away on June 24th, 2012 but he will always be remembered by his family and the softball community.
Nancy Morrison
Inducted: 2014
Nancy Morrison is a highly regarded softball and basketball official who has been heavily involved in sport since the early 1980's. After playing softball for several years, she became a certified umpire in 1987 and officiated in three Canadian Championships before receiving her Level V and ISF certification in 1997. From there, she went on to represent Canada as an umpire at numerous international events, including the 1999 Pan American Games, the 2001 ISF Women's World Championship, the 2003 Olympic Qualifier, and finally the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, where she worked the plate in the semi-final matchup and on the field for the Gold medal game.
At the administrative level, Nancy is a certified Instructor/Evaluator and has been a regular instructor at several Softball Canada Blue Conventions. As an Olympic umpire, she became an ambassador of the sport and has spent many hours sharing her love of softball and her Olympic experience. Nancy represented Canada very well on the international scene and would pass on whatever knowledge she had picked up in her endeavours including supervisory experiences at Canadian Championships and her on field officiating at Canadian, World and Olympic Championships.
On top of her accomplishments on the softball field, she has used her natural abilities and professional training as an educator to support the program off the field. Whether acting as an umpire supervisor at a Canadian Championship, leading instruction at a national mechanics school or presenting a session at the Blue Convention, Nancy is always able to lift others, particularly young people, and help them become better officials.
Jimm Barr (Deceased)
Inducted: 2013
Jimm Barr worked with umpires from across Canada and left his legacy as a mentor, instructor and role model. He was one umpire you wanted on your team when you went to "war", so to speak. He had great game control and always had your back. Many umpires will remember Jimm's stern yet fair demeanor when dealing with players and teams.
He began his illustrious umpiring career in Saskatchewan in 1980 and worked several Canadian Championships before relocating to the Northwest Territories where he would go on to serve as Umpire in Chief for five years. He continued working local games and attended several major tournaments throughout the country at his own expenses, earning Level V and International Softball Federation (ISF) Certification in 1990. He umpired in 10 Canadian Championships and worked the 1994 and 2002 ISF Women's World Championships as well as the 2000 ISF Men's World Championship, also officiating at the 1995 Women's Olympic Qualifier in Puerto Rico.
Jimm served on Softball Canada's Officiating Development Committee (ODC) from 1996 to 2000, and served as a Canadian Championship Umpire in Chief eight times and Deputy Umpire in Chief four times as well as presenting at several Blue Conventions. He moved to Saskatoon, SK in 1996 and to London, ON in 2006 where he passed away on March 8th, 2012. He is survived by his wife Diana Barr and son Nolan Barr.
Stan Hay
Inducted: 2012
Robert Stanley (Stan) Hay entered the Hall of Fame as an official for his many contributions in this area. Widely respected by all umpires, players, coaches and administrators who have had the pleasure to know him, Stan is an umpire who always went above the call of duty and contributed as much as he possibly could to the sport of softball.
After umpiring in three Canadian Championships (Senior Women's in 1975, and Senior Men's in 1980 and 1982), Stan began a stretch of nine years in which he supervised an astounding 13 Canadian Championships, including two per year from 1986 to 1989. He was one of the first umpires to receive his Level V Fastpitch designation in1980, and was later grandfathered in with the equivalency of Level V in Slo-Pitch due to his great knowledge of both disciplines. He was also one of the first two Canadian umpires to pass the ISF Recertification Clinic in 1987, and umpired at the 1981 ISF Youth World Championship and the 1988 ISF Men's World Championship.
In addition to his tremendous involvement on the field, Stan also contributed to the national umpiring program as a member of the Officiating Development Committee from 1986 to 1991. He was also a member of the executive of the Calgary Umpire's Association from 1980 to 1990, and also a member of the executive of the Alberta Umpire's Association from 1981 to 1987. In addition, he has attended all seven of Softball Canada's Blue Conventions (held from 1997 to 2013).
Dave Moore
Inducted: 2010
Dave Moore is a long-time umpire who has participated in an astounding amount of Canadian Championships and International events. He has been an executive of the Saskatoon Bridge City Umpires Association since 1977 and also served on Softball Saskatchewan's Board of Directors from 1981 to 1987.
At the national level, he obtained his Level V International status in 1985 and officiated at the Women's Canadian Slo-Pitch Championship (1998) and four Senior Men's Canadian Fastpitch Championships (1980, 1985, 1994, 2007), while also serving as Umpire in Chief or Deputy Umpire in Chief at several Canadian Championships, Western Canadian Championships and two Canada Games (1993 and 1997).
At the international level, he umpired at the ISF Women's World Championship in St. John's Newfoundland in 1994. Each year, Dave also submits questions for the Softball Canada Fast Pitch and Slo-Pitch National exams, and regularly holds rule interpretation clinics in Saskatchewan.
Al Shenduk
Inducted: 2010
Al Shenduk joined the Edmonton Men's Fastball League as a player in 1967 after playing four years at the University of Idaho on a baseball scholarship. As his playing career came to an end, he registered as a Softball Canada umpire in 1977 and went on to officiate in three Senior Men's (1982, 1985 and 1987), one Senior Women's (1990) and one Junior Women's (1992) Canadian Championships.
In addition to his success on the field, Al has also been very involved on the administrative side of softball, hosting and attracting many clinics in the province of Alberta and serving as Softball Alberta's Umpire in Chief from 1990 to 2005. He was also the UIC for numerous Canadian and Western Canadian Championships, and also contributed to Softball Canada on numerous projects.
He was inducted to the Softball Alberta Hall of Fame in 2006, and recently joined Softball Alberta's Board of Directors (2010).
Don Bracey
Inducted: 2009
Don Bracey, an official from Oshawa, Ontario, has made many contributions to the sport of softball in addition to his many years of officiating. His umpiring career began in 1980 and he quickly made an impact at the local, provincial and national level, umpiring at numerous Provincial and National Championships over his lengthy career.
In 1989, Don was granted Level V status at the Canadian Senior Men's Championships, and later worked that very same event in 2003. Between those two major appearances, he also worked many other Canadian Championships at various levels. At the International level, he worked the 1994 (where he worked the plate during the Gold medal game) and 2002 ISF Women's World Championships.
In addition to his hard work on the field, Don was also very involved in the administration side of officiating, serving as a member of the Officiating Development Committee and working as Umpire in Chief at various Canadian Championships. He mentored many officials as a Master Instructor and Evaluator, and his greatest impact on the Softball Canada Umpire Program was when he created and maintained the Softball Canada Umpire Case Book – a resource that provides a practical implementation of the rules for umpires, players and coaches, which is considered one of the best teaching aids for everyone involved in softball.
Don was also the chair of the 2003 Blue Convention, and was also awarded with the HSRS Umpire of the Year award that very same year. In 2006, Softball Ontario awarded him with the Jim Bradford award, which is awarded annually to a Softball Ontario Fast Pitch Umpire that best exemplifies the characteristics of leadership, educator and evaluator.
Ivan Mader
Inducted: 2008
Ivan Mader began his involvement in softball back in 1967, when he volunteered as an umpire and coach in New Brunswick. He then moved on to Ontario and finally arrived back to his home province in Nova Scotia in 1977, where he has lived and been involved ever since. Ivan also dedicated a lot of time to the administration side of officiating, serving as a regional umpire-in-chief, deputy umpire-in-chief and Provincial umpire-in-chief from 1991 to 2003. His umpiring career on the national level included six Canadian Championships – one Junior Men's Championship (1983), two Senior Women's Championships (1987, 1991) and three Senior Men's Championships (1989, 1991, 1996).
Throughout his years as an umpire, Ivan also find the time to be active as a builder, league president, coach and manager of various minor softball and baseball programs. One of his many successful programs was in 1994 when he launched a junior officials program. He was selected Softball Nova Scotia's Umpire of the Year in 1988, Softball Canada's Umpire of the Year in 1994, and also earned Softball Canada's Indicator award in 2001.
Ivan has been a registered umpire for over 30 years, and was inducted in the Softball Nova Scotia Hall of Fame in 2001. He has spent many hours instructing at various clinics and supervising umpires, always putting the interests of the program and others before his own.
Walter 'Butch' Ryan (Deceased)
Inducted: 2008
Walter "Butch" Ryan sadly passed away on May 19th, 2001. He was a pioneer in Softball Canada's Officiating program. He began umpiring in the 1950's and his involvement was tremendous all the way up to the year 2000. He umpired in or supervised six Canadian Championships (1978, 1981, 1983, 1988, 1992, 1994), often working the plate in Championship games. He was also a Softball Canada National Deputy Umpire in Chief for three years and a leading instructor and mentor for Softball New Brunswick for 30 years, conducting many clinics to help develop local umpires.
Butch was a true technician and clinician of the game, always trying to help others become better umpires. He was a member of Softball Canada's Officiating Development Committee from 1981 to 1985, and was responsible for National seminars and Program Development for all officials in the country. He was an Umpire in Chief at numerous Canadian Championships in the 1980's, having at least one National assignment each year.
The highlight of Butch Ryan's long and illustrious career was in 1981 when he received his Level V Officiating certificate. That same year, he officiated at the World Youth Tournament in Edmonton, Alberta, which is recognized by the International Softball Federation (ISF) as the first Junior World Softball Championship.
Walter "Butch" Ryan was inducted into Softball New Brunswick Inc.'s Hall of Fame in 1994.
Wayne Brown
Inducted: 2006
Wayne Brown became the true definition of an Umpire. Wayne's beginnings as an umpire began in 1969. His national umpiring career began in 1975 when he was an on-field umpire for five consecutive Canadian Championships, a supervisor for 21 Canadian Championships, two Canada Games as well as the Chair for the 1994 Senior Women's Canadian Fast Pitch Championships.
In international competition, Wayne was an on field umpire for the 1989 ISF Junior Men's World Championships and the 1993 Maccabiah Games in Israel. He was the Deputy Umpire in Chief for the 1999 and 2002 Men's Pan American Games, the 1997 ISF Junior Men's World Championships, the 2001 Women's Pan American Games and the 2002 ISF Women's World Championships. He was also an Evaluator for the 2001 ISF Junior Men's World Championships.
Lucie Carmichael
Inducted: 2005
Lucie Carmichael is the youngest in a family of three children. Born in Québec City, Lucie studied at the CEGEP of Limoilou in Sciences and at Laval University, where she received her Bachelor's degree in Science as well as a Master's degree in Bacteriological sciences.
Jim Bradford (Deceased)
Inducted: 2003
Jim Bradford, born in Toronto, Ontario, was a highly valued member of the umpiring community. Jim's achievements came both on and off the field. Jim was a teacher who had a positive impact on his students and peers. He was always fair, had a kind word to say about everyone and his quiet integrity gained him respect by all. His daughter once said that Jim may have been late for everything in his life, but he was always on time for a ball game. Jim umpired his first Canadian Championship in 1982 and continued umpiring and supervising activities through the 2000 season. Jim also umpired on the international stage; in 1987 he umpired at the Pan Am Games that took place in Indianapolis, Indiana. He was very active in the softball program as an instructor at various Blue Conventions and served on the national Officiating Development Committee from 1988 to 1993. Jim achieved his level V Fast Pitch status in 1985, and in 2000, received his level V Slo-Pitch status, making him the only umpire to earn both designations. In Jim's honour, the Umpire Committee of Softball Ontario present an annual "Jim Bradford Memorial Award" to deserving Slo-Pitch and Fast Pitch umpires who emulate the qualities and characteristics that Jim exuded. He was a very humble man who is greatly missed.
Robert "Bobby" Smith (Deceased)
Inducted: 2002
Robert "Bobby" Smith' s umpiring career spanned 18 years, during which time he was widely regarded as one of the best umpires ever produced in Nova Scotia and among the best in Canada. He was known for his professional, levelheaded, no nonsense approach and gained the respect of players, coaches and fans alike.
Douglas Earl Foster (Deceased)
Inducted: 2002
Douglas Earl Foster is one of the pioneers of the Softball Canada Umpiring program. He began at the local level in Saint John, New Brunswick, was instrumental in the success of the provincial program and was a driving force at the national level. For over 30 years his on-field and off-field presence improved the game.
Sharon SinclairInducted: 2000
Province: Ontario
Max PyeInducted: 1999
Province: Nova Scotia
Gerry Howard (Deceased)Inducted: 1995
Province: Manitoba


text:
172nd / 190th Corridor Plan Virtual Workshops
Clackamas County, in coordination with Damascus, Gresham and Happy Valley, is working on a planning project to identify the future look and alignment of 172nd Avenue north of Sunnyside and to determine how it will connect to 190th Drive in the Gresham area.This project is needed to accommodate the future traffic demand that will come with the buildout of developable land in Happy Valley, Damascus, and Gresham, and there is a need for a north-south connection to accommodate local and regional traffic growth. There are limited locations where this type of connection/facility can occur due to topographic constraints and existing urban buildout.
KAI produced five virtual workshops for the project in order to engage a wider variety cross-section of the public in the planning process. Virtual workshops ran alongside real workshops and provided a similar experience to the in-person event. By utilizing comment maps, fillable PDFs, and surveys, the public was able to provide feedback as well—just like they would have in person.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Laredo Baseball Investors, LLC and the City of Laredo will jointly build a $18M state of the art the multi-use stadium located adjacent to the Laredo Energy Arena on Sinatra Drive. Stadium Architect and design team is Dallas-based HKS. HKS was the architect of record for the new Dallas Cowboys Stadium. Capacity for baseball games will be 6,000 and capacity for concerts will be 16,000. Stadium amenities will include a built-in concert stage above the centerfield wall, 9 luxury suites, grass berms, state of the art LED video board, three private picnic areas, three private party areas and a Stadium Club located on the suite level.
The park opened on May 17, 2012, with the Lemurs defeating the defending American Association champion Grand Prairie AirHogs 5-1 in front of a crowd of 5,923.
The baseball field playing surface was designed and built by sports field contractor Texas Multi-Chem, out of Kerrville, TX. The baseball field's natural grass surface is TifSport hybrid bermuda and the root zone consists of an 8″ layer of USGA sand and Dakota peat. The field also contains an internal drainage system to help avoid rain outs.
"We welcome you and your business to
Uni-Trade Stadium"
Uni-Trade Stadium"
Uni-Trade Stadium plays host to the Laredo Lemurs baseball games during the summer but there is more to this facility than just great playing field.
Uni-Trade Stadium is a multi-purpose stadium that can accommodate many types of functions including meeting, tradeshows, weddings, quinceaneras, special party events, festivals, photo shoots, and much more. We also have a built-in concert stage in our outfield to host local and national known artists.
If you wish to book a non-game day function, please contact us as soon as possible. or call us at (956)763-6877.


text:
Raleigh, N.C. — The Fire in the Triangle finale is Monday night, so we wanted to take one last opportunity to get to know the members of each team.
Team Midtown Grille is lead by chef Scott James. We have already gotten to know him, so we asked him about the two other members of his Fire in the Triangle team.
Here's what James had to say:
Chris Santucci has been working at Midtown Grille since 2010. When he started, we noticed how organized he was for a young, inexperienced cook. As we got to know him and his work ethic, the term OCD, which in the kitchen world is a good quality to have, started to come to mind. I notice how some of the things that young cooks have trouble grasping seemed to come naturally to him. The interest he takes in how cooking works, the nuts and bolts of cooking, is, I think, the reason why he has moved forward so fast in our kitchen. His passion for doing all things properly and understanding of the subtle nuances in preparing our food is beyond his years. He competed with us last year in Fire in the Triangle and shares the same desire as I do to rock the red jacket. As my sous chef, I have a sense of comfort knowing he is watching over the bulk of daily operations in the Midtown Grille kitchen. Chris understands my style and the thought I put into food, making our ability to creat food in this high pressure event less stressful for me. In other words, I can't do it with out him. A.K.A. Culinary thunder buddies.
Jeanne Sutherin has been blessing us with her abilities since March. Bringing a much needed feminine aspect to our uber macho kitchen team. As I continue to learn about my self from an overall restaurant management perspective, I have recognized my short comings and the complete lack of discipline that it takes to be a strong pastry chef. Enter Jeanne - the strong minded savor of our dessert menu at Midtown. Her aggressive approach to stock piling our desert options from the get-go has changed not only our bottom line but gives us a new dynamic personality on our team. Versatile and full of vigor, I could not see us in the final without her. The great part is we are competing for the red jacket and she has yet to break out "the big guns."
Midtown is facing off against Flights in the Fire in the Triangle final Monday night. Out and About will have complete coverage of the winner on Tuesday morning.


text:
Get an overview of this hotelMotel in Richmond with free breakfast and outdoor pool
Popular property highlights
Situated in Richmond, this motel is 1.1 mi (1.8 km) from Putt-Putt Fun Center and within 6 mi (10 km) of South of the James Market and Maymont Park. University of Richmond Stadium and James River are also within 6 mi (10 km).
Property Features
Along with an outdoor pool, this motel has a seasonal outdoor pool and conference rooms. Free continental breakfast, free WiFi in public areas, and free self parking are also provided. Additionally, laundry facilities, a 24-hour front desk, and express check-in are onsite.
Room Amenities
All 115 rooms provide conveniences like refrigerators and microwaves, plus free WiFi and TVs with cable channels. Guests will also find coffee makers, free local calls, and hair dryers.Information missing or incorrect? Tell us!Opens in a new window
Days Inn Richmond/South
Hotel Amenities
Hotel Amenities
Guests can enjoy a complimentary breakfast each morning. Wireless Internet access is complimentary. This business-friendly motel also offers an outdoor pool, barbecue grills, and complimentary newspapers in the lobby. Complimentary self parking is available on site.
- 24-hour front desk
- Total number of rooms - 115
- ATM/banking
- Number of floors - 3
- Barbecue grill(s)
- Free newspapers in lobby
- Free breakfast
- Conference space
- Elevator/lift
- Express check-in
- Express check-out
- Free WiFi
- Laundry facilities
- Outdoor pool
- Meeting rooms 2
- RV, bus, truck parking
- Safe-deposit box at front desk
- Free self parking
- Number of buildings/towers - 1
- Outdoor seasonal pool
Family Friendly Amenities
- Family Hotel
- Outdoor pool
- Free Wi-Fi
- Laundry facilities
- Refrigerator
- Microwave
Available in all rooms: Free WiFi
Available in some public areas: Free WiFi
Free self parking, RV, bus, truck parking
Room Amenities
- Premium TV channels
- Access via exterior corridors
- Air conditioning
- Phone
- Free local calls
- Refrigerator
- Coffee/tea maker
- Microwave
- Daily housekeeping
- Private bathroom
- Free toiletries
- Hair dryer
- Shower/tub combination
- Cable TV service
- Desk
- Iron/ironing board
- Television
- Free WiFi
- In-room climate control (air conditioning)
- Connecting/adjoining rooms available
- Rollaway/extra beds (surcharge)
Where to Eat
A complimentary continental breakfast is served each morning between 6 AM and 9 AM.
Nearby Things to Do
Recreational amenities at the motel include an outdoor pool.
- Golfing nearby
If you have requests for specific accessibility needs, please note them at check-out when you book your room.
- Accessible bathroom
- In-room accessibility
Hotel Policies
Check-in time starts at 1:00 PM
Check-out time is 11 AM
Payment types
Children and extra beds
- Children are welcome.
- Rollaway/extra beds are available for USD 15.00 per night.
- Cribs (infant beds) are not available.
- Pets allowed for an extra charge of USD 20 per pet, per day
You need to know
Extra-person charges may apply and vary depending on property policy.
Optional extras
- Pet fee: USD 20 per pet, per day
- Early check-in fee: USD 35.00
- Late check-out fee: USD 35.00
- Rollaway bed fee: USD 15.00 per night
Hotel Name
- Days Inn Hotel Richmond South
- Days Inn Richmond South
- Days Inn Richmond/South Motel Richmond
- Days Inn Richmond/South Motel
- Days Inn Richmond/South Richmond
- Days Inn Richmond/South
We should mention
The property has connecting/adjoining rooms, which are subject to availability and can be requested by contacting the property using the number on the booking confirmation.


text:
Tactile Ground Surface Indicators for the Vision Impaired
Installing Guardian Tactiles Internally
Guardian Tactiles bonded directly to carpet.
The installation process for the Guardian Tactile System has been designed to be as rapid and efficient as possible with minimal disruption to traffic.
The Peel, Bond & Walk® installation means our tactiles can be fitted into small areas that would be difficult or impossible for laying indicators in alternative materials, such as concrete or ceramic tiles.
Who installs the tactiles?
The Guardian Tactile System can be supplied in kit form and installation instructions or we can organise one of over 60 installers throughout Australia to carry out the work for you.
Internal Installation Process
Typical concrete stair well installation.
Design & Quality Guaranteed
Guardian is so confident that our Tactile Ground Surface Indicator will withstand any natural condition, that we offer a 10 year warranty*. Ensuring your peace of mind like no other tactile.
Professional Installation
Schedule an appointment today with our friendly Customer Service Team and have your tactiles professionally installed. Guardian Tactile Installations are provided with a warranty and comply to the Australian Standards AS1428.4 Act.
© Guardian Tactile Systems Pty Ltd, 2017
Unit 11/88 Erindale Road, Balcatta WA 6021 Aluminium Stair Nosing - Fiberglass Stair Nosing - Grip Tape - Braille Signage


text:
Description Hi all
On the image you can see Esenthel Engine's Rendering Quality.
The screen comes from one of the engine tech-demo's.
The screenshot contains following effects:
-Real Motion Blur (every part of the screen that you see has its own linear and angular velocities, which calculated relatively to the camera result in appropriate blurring)
-Depth of Field (makes the unfocused areas more blurred, and focused areas more sharp, effect is designed to maintain correct blurring even on the edges between blurred and focused areas)
-Subsurface Scattering (makes the skin look more natural)
-Glow and Bloom (improves general lighting and coloring)
-Relief Mapping and Normal Mapping (adds more bump details onto the character and the ground surface)
-Cascaded Shadow Maps (up to 6 shadow maps can provide realistic shadowing even on huge visible distances)
-Soft Shadows
For more (video and other demos) you can see here http://www.esenthel.com/ or watch it directly on youtube here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eaRwwz0rQM
The render looks pretty hard to me, I dont see how there is sss involved.
Very impressive, damage that we do not see the creature moving...
A very good work... :o)
I honestly think that people need to stop writing these god-awful "Depth-of-Field" shaders. Seriously, does anyone think that looks good at all?
I'm not impressed at all. What your engine has is featured in many others and I can't extract some innovation from the description you gave, sorry. Aside from that, the image follows the typical path "use-shaderz-for-iffektz-that-should-look-good-n-real-but-instead-look-totally-crap". I'm sorry, this kind of depth-of-field does not occur in such manner. Nor does the bloom effect appear so bright. Nor does the motion blur. It just looks highly ugly.
Now don't take that as offense, I know your engine and I know cool things can be done with it, that really look stunning and you've also put quite a work in it so it bears a lot of positve energy. I'm following the YouTube demos closely. Just don't try to impress by using every effect in one scene with unsuitable parameters. Keep up the good work instead: your website is very polished and the screens there are completely different from what you present here. Why?
...In other words, Fake Motion Blur?
Looks like everyones out for something more, you gotta be a good soldier to give people that.
is there a reason eveyone is bashing this guy?
Whatever, I think its good, ambitious work. However, do tone down the DOF some, its hard to look at in games.
is there a reason eveyone is bashing this guy? Whatever, I think its good, ambitious work. However, do tone down the DOF some, its hard to look at in games.
Starstutter, nobody is bashing the guy, just the poor choice of screenshot, compared to the whole set of screenshots available for that engine.
More like constructive criticism. At any rate, as Mihail121 pointed out, this screenshot is a very bad representation of the engine. I have seen countless screenshots taken of this engine that were much better. We've simply pointed out the areas that could be improved, and we don't want him to fall into the common pitfall of just adding shaders for reasons other than to improve the image.


text:
Tuesday, April 21. 2009
Jurisdictional Disunity and the Russian Mission
Comments, anyone?
Posted by Mark at 05:18 | Comments (51)
No Trackbacks
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
Thank you Fr Oliver. Christ is risen!
#1 anonymous on 2009-04-21 05:44
Fr. Herbal's "essence" is quite perfumy, but lacks a real understanding of the historical realities and canons. Yes, many Orthodox of many different nationalities arrived in North America and sought to find their own kind and churches with their own language. The canons are quite clear, a church which has started it's missionary activity in a territory and has established itself, is responsible for the Orthodox in that territory. This began with the Russian mission in Alaska going to San Francisco & NYC which became the Metropolia and then the OCA. This is clear. The ethnic churches which developed under their foreign patriarchs was directly related to the chaos caused by the Russian Revolution. The many different bishops in North America under foreign patriarchs became a non-canonical arrangement which continues today.
The answer: exactly what SCOBA outlined in its early meetings. A synod of ethnic bishops in an "autocephalous" church where each bishop rules over his own churches. This is the gift given to North America by Fr. Schmemann in 1970 in his successful negotiation of an indigenous, autocephalous Orthodox Church (OCA) from Moscow. According to Canon Law, when this occurs, ALL the Orthodox must come under this church's authority. And thus why the Phanar has fought this tooth and nail.
The Phanar has stated, that ONLY it can grant "autocephaly." This is not true and there are historical examples where this argument proves to be bogus.
The ONLY real future for Orthodoxy in North America is to throw off the control of foreign bishops and for us to take responsibility for our own future. The Canons are clear "local churches are under the authority of local bishops."
#2 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 06:40
Which canons are those? What about the ones which forbid ordaining bishops for areas outside your own canonical territory? Ecclesiastical flag-planting is uncanonical. A church cannot simply expand its borders by scattering clergy. There is a reason why canonical territory has to be agreed-upon in a pan-Orthodox, not unilateral, manner.
#2.1 A history student on 2009-04-21 07:43
The Canons of the Holy Apostles
Canon 35
"Let not a bishop dare to ordain beyond his own limits, in cities and places not subject to him...let him be deposed."
Foreign bishops have no authority over North America!
#2.1.1 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 09:06
Interesting that Father Oliver neglected to mention St. Herman's Mission to the Aleuts before that of St. Innokenty's missionary activities. What is left out of his "history" may reveal more than what he includes.
The mission in Alaska (which included St. Herman as a member, but not the leading member) was precisely to Russian citizens within Russian imperial territory, some of whom were the native people. It also was prior to any bishop or diocese being appointed for Alaska.
In short, it existed outside of any questions of "jurisdiction" or "unity."
#22.214.171.124 A history student on 2009-04-21 12:36
But wait -- isn't this exactly what Fr. Oliver is disputing? This notion that the Russian Church had a full-fledged missionary effort aimed at Americans, which involved a fully-functioning diocese throughout the North American continent?
The "foreign patriarchates" were involved in America well before the Russian Revolution. This is easy to demonstrate, and is undisputed (as far as I'm aware) by scholars who study American Orthodoxy. And the Russian "missionary work" was, first of all, virtually nonexistent among English-speaking Americans prior to 1905 or so. And secondly, any missionary work was directed (after 1891) at converting Uniates to Orthodoxy.
I'd like, just once, for someone to who disagrees with these statements to produce primary sources in support of their claims. As Fr. Oliver said, many have confused the visions of Saints Innocent and Tikhon with actual realities, when in fact they were not. They were unrealized, or at best partially-realized, visions. It would have been wonderful if St. Innocent's advice had been followed to evangelize America, but it wasn't.
We need to stop pretending, and to stop accusing the EP and others of being uncanonical. Let's all give up our spurious arguments (including Canon 28) and work together. This rhetorical language is not helpful, and it certainly isn't respectful.
#2.2 Ferris Haddad on 2009-04-21 10:07
Thank you, Fr. Oliver, for this fine look at even the barest of the primary source evidence which explodes the myth of pre-Bolshevik Orthodox unity in America. It is a much-beloved myth, to be sure, but it needs to go the way of the dodo, or else we will hardly ever be able to get on with the real work of converting America to Christ.
#3 A history student on 2009-04-21 07:40
Fr. Oliver exploded nothing. The libraries of the world are filled with books with misinterpretation of historical facts. This is why it takes scholars of American Church History and Canon Law to properly comment on Fr. Oliver's observations. Where do we find such scholars? I suggest we begin with Fr. John Erickson who teaches at St. Vladimir's Seminary to begin. I will forward Fr. Oliver's essay and let's see if we get a comment.
#3.1 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 08:36
I would encourage you to contact Fr. John Erickson. I know both Fr. John and Fr. Oliver Herbel, the author of this essay. Fr. Oliver was a student of Fr. John's at St. Vladimir's, and I am confident that Fr. John would affirm the conclusions of Fr. Oliver's historical work.
There are not many scholars who deal with American Orthodox history, but I would be very, very surprised if any of them would dispute Fr. Oliver's conclusions. He has not cherry-picked facts and misinterpreted evidence. If you consult primary sources from the period in question, the conclusions are almost inevitable.
#3.1.1 Ferris Haddad on 2009-04-21 09:53
Fr. John has actually come to similar conclusions himself, putting forward a theory of two rough "spheres" prior to the Bolshevik revolution, one which was Russian-influenced and another which was independent.
In any event, Fr. Oliver is a Ph.D. candidate working on his doctorate in history. His dissertation is on related material.
The "explosion" is not solely by Fr. Oliver's brief article, but rather by any serious examination of the primary source documents, which honestly do not bear out the commonly repeated myth. I've not yet seen any earnest engagement with the sources which does not come to similar conclusions.
Mind you, all of this is a separate issue from what "ought" to have been, according to canonical interpretation. (There again, of course, there is not agreement as to how the canons ought to be interpreted and applied in this case.)
This is simply a matter of what actually was the case on the ground: there was no agreed-upon unity under the Russian administration in America prior to the Bolshevik revolution. Statements to the contrary are post facto inventions, usually created to serve the purpose of some agenda or other. In the case of the first known assertion along these lines (Boris Burden, whom Fr. Oliver mentioned), his agenda was bolstering the claim of his bishop, Aftimios Ofiesh, that his newly founded (and ill-fated) jurisdiction ought to have claim over all Orthodox in America.
#3.1.2 A history student on 2009-04-21 11:09
Fr Oliver /is/ a scholar of "American Church History and Canon Law" and is about to defend his doctorate at St Louis University on the history of intra-Christian conversion to Orthodoxy in America. He has published a variety of scholarly articles in peer reviewed journals in patristics, church history and theology and has a book of translations of Sarapion of Thumis forthcoming. Lastly, he was a student of Fr John Erickson in both Church History and Canon Law as we were at St Vladimir's together. His brief very clear overview of a very complex area shows both a mastery of the sources and a dedication to truth above the beloved historical myths of some in the OCA. Fr Oliver, in fact, is now one of the few academic historians specializing in the history of Orthodoxy in America so his contribution is most welcome.
Brandon Gallaher
(Regent's Park College, U of Oxford)
#3.2 Brandon Gallaher on 2009-04-21 09:51
Fr. Oliver's MDiv thesis was on hunting; he likes to write about things in a controversial way. That is nothing new for academia. Unfortunately, that is not always a helpful way to look at the world when you are trying to BUILD UP something, namely, the Church.
If Fr. Oliver is a historian of American Church history -- does he know how to read Russian?
#3.2.1 Doubtful on 2009-04-22 16:21
Yes, Fr Oliver knows Russian, he learned it /after/ he left SVS but perhaps you have not kept in touch (as you seemed to remember his period at seminary?)? Why the need to be anonymous? If one doubts his reading of the source material then show specifically where he is wrong. The OCA should be able to stand without a particular mythos of its foundation just as the EP should be able to stand without its rather dubious apostolic foundation.
Brandon Gallaher
#220.127.116.11 Brandon Gallaher on 2009-04-23 06:44
Canon 8 of The Third Ecumenical Council
"Let the rights of each province be preserved pure and inviolate. No attempt to introduce any form contrary to these shall be of any avail."
Canon 20 of The Sixth Ecumenical Council
"The bishop of one city shall not teach publicly in another. If he shall be shown to have done so he shall be deprived of the episcopate and shall perform the functions of a presbyter."
All the canons stress local churches and local bishops. There is no such thing as foreign bishops have control over foreign territory.
#4 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 09:31
Fr. Oliver writes an extraordinary essay that does indeed go against the grain of the traditional feel good narrative of "Established in 1794-Granted Autocephaly in 1970, thus everyone must join us and it'll be like St. Tikhon meant it" mentality put forth by the OCA. I commend OCANews for publishing it.
St. Tikhon's 1905 report puts forth a view of unity through plurality, though in a different way than Fr. John Meyendorff would use the phrase and idea some 70 years later. St. Tikhon writes:
"And the North American Diocese should be reorganized into the Exarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church in North America. The fact is that its members include not only different nationalities but also different Orthodox Churches, each of which, within the unity of the Faith, has its own peculiarities in canonical structure, in liturgical order, and in parish life. These peculiarities are dear to them and are quite tolerable from the common Orthodox point of view....
Therefore, we do not believe we have the right to encroach upon the national character of the local Churches. On the contrary, we are trying to preserve it in them, giving them an opportunity to be under the direct authority of a superior of their very own nationality...."
Certainly sounds like he wants an English-speaking, ethnically neutral Church in America, doesn't it?
One thing that really jumped out at me about Metropolitan Jonah's remarks, which he has now apologized for, was the use of the phrase "American Orthodox Church." There is no such thing, and intentionally so. That's why the Metropolia renamed itself the Orthodox Church in America. St. Tikhon's vision, which has been continually misinterpreted since the 1950's to serve the narrative the Metropolia/OCA wished to put forth at the time, called for anything but such a thing.
After all, if the OCA was serious about being open to ethnicity, and to the "national character" St. Tikhon speaks of, would they make an effort to make the Albanians, Romanians, and Bulgarians feel less like strangers who don't really account in the fullness of the Church administration? One can listen to Archbishop Nathaniel's remarks at the AAC for more on that. After all, the Canadian and ethnic dioceses are not counted in the official membership figures (whatever they may be, depending on who you ask), and none of the ethnic dioceses pay assessments.
In the end, one must question why there can be three ethnic dioceses in the OCA, yet Russian/Slavic parishes are relegated to the catch-all general administration of the Church. Of course this has to do with the way in which these episcopates were accepted into the fold in the 1960's and 1970's, but the fact remains that the remainder of the OCA is a confusing mixture of Slavic and so-called "pan-Orthodox" or "American" parishes, with a strong emphasis on the latter from Syosset. There were preliminary plans and some momentum for a Russian Episcopate in the early 1990's, but that was unceremoniously squashed. And we wonder why the MP/ROCOR presence in America is growing stronger...
Thus, we must ask, what is the OCA doing, to paraphrase St. Tikhon, to preserve the national character of the local churches, Alaska included? Throwing in a cursory "Lord Have Mercy" in Church Slavonic is not the correct answer.
#5 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 10:13
I'm sorry, but you don't know what you are saying. Go back and read the minutes from SCOBA in 1961-62. ALL the canonical bishops agreed to move toward a united, autocephalous church in North America. The minutes even point out that the name should be, "Orthodox Church in America." (OCA) THIS WAS AGREED UPON. When Fr. Alexander Schmemann brought this about in 1970, the Greeks & Antiochians reneged. The idea of the OCA is a council of ethnic bishops joined in a council (synod) where the church is autocephalous. Each bishop rules over it's own ethnic churches. That's what the OCA is. This format solved all issues and was exactly what SCOBA agreed upon!
#5.1 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 14:24
Very nice exposition, 3 things,
-I believe OCA was chosen because AOC was already licensed.
-Canadian cannot give large portions of money to foreign countries by Canadian Law.
-I wonder if the model of having a local bishop that respects the local languages/customs and having an auxilary under a metropolitan to deal with specific cultural issues wouldn't be the better idea. (local bishop head of church, however customs, translations, and much of visits done with partnership of auxiliary)
Perhaps a way to balance out young people leaving due to language barriers, would be to have a larger English/(local language) service on Sundays, with a Tuesday(midweek) , biweekly liturgy in the specific language of a large immigrant group. (eg;. English church every Sunday with Arabic/Romanian every alternating week on Tuesday, bringing in a local priest who speaks the language).
We most definitely do not have what it means to be an Orthodox Church in a multicultural society worked out yet. This is one thing that needs to at least be on paper before talks for an North American Orthodox Church begin.
(editor's note: I think you missed what Metropolitan Jonah, Fr. Herbel and many others are pointing out: There is a North American Orthodox Church already here - and has been here for more than 200 years. It does not need to begin - it just needs to be recognized for what it is. And that is the question before us: we know what we want it to be - but how do we best describe its reality now?)
#5.2 Reader Michael on 2009-04-21 16:46
I know what you all mean when saying American or North American Orthodox Church, but we need to refrain from calling it such. As Father Hopko has stated, you can't use an earthly adjective to name the Church.
#5.2.1 Gerry Bokas on 2009-04-23 09:36
I suggest everyone here go here and read this:
All the false historical thoughts put forth here are ridiculous. It's amazing how some wish to re-write history.
(editor's note: As the author of the aforementioned work I do not think that the facts Fr. Herbel put forth are ridiculous. He is simply offering a different framework for understanding our past, based on much of the same evidence. Is one better or more accurate than the other? Perhaps - it depends on where one wants to go. It is clear that if we want to go forward together we had better come up with an understanding that encompasses all of us. In the end, a view of history that is only a straight line leading to us may ignore other lines of meaning that are valid as well. I have no problem with Fr. Herbel's thesis - nor should you.)
#6 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 14:27
Fr. Oliver's reflection is a most welcome examination of our history. It may violate some of our favorite tales, but we have to be brave enough to face truth and reality.
Perhaps exploding some of our false histories [and it's an equal-opportunity explosion of all of our false histories] can help us focus on our current reality.
Our reality is multi-jurisdictional.
Our reality is multi-ethnic.
Our reality is a mix of communities rooted in ethnic identity and communities somewhat detached from ethnic identity [although containing multiple ethinicities within themselves].
Our reality is missionary.
Our reality is one of support for 'our own' recent arrivals.
And our reality is uncannonical.
Not because anyone ever set out to violate the cannons, but because our situation is unimagined by the cannons. Just as we cannot find answers in false history, we cannot find answers in cannons that never conceived of a complex, multi-ethnic, multi-lingual society formed by immigration yet connected to countries of origin by the radical transformation of travel and communication of the last 100 years.
So in some sense we need to start from scratch -- that may seem like a let down in some way, but really it's far better than refighting the same battles for primacy and domination we've been fighting for ... well, forever.
#7 Rebecca Matovic on 2009-04-21 15:01
A History and Introduction
of the Orthodox Church in America
Written by the Very Rev. John Matusiak
Managing Editor, The Orthodox Church magazine.
The Orthodox Church in America traces its origins to the arrival in Kodiak, Alaska of eight Orthodox missionaries from the Valaamo Monastery in the northern Karelia region of Russia in 1794. The missionaries made a great impact on the native Alaskan population and were responsible for bringing many to the Orthodox Christian faith.
Today, the Orthodox Church in America numbers some 700 parishes, missions, communities, monasteries, and institutions throughout the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
In the 1820s, Father John Veniaminov arrived in Alaska and also conducted missionary work. Among his many accomplishments was the translation of Scripture and the liturgical services into the native dialects, for which he also devised a grammar and alphabet.
Around 1840 Father John was elected to the episcopacy, taking the name Innocent. The Church continued to grow among the native Alaskans, but Bishop Innocent also visited California and the Orthodox community at Fort Ross, north of San Francisco. He eventually returned to Russia, where he was named Metropolitan of Moscow. [In 1977, he was glorified (canonized) by the Russian Orthodox Church as a Saint of the Orthodox Church.]
While the Church continued to grow in Alaska, immigrants began arriving in what we today call the lower 48. In the 1860s a parish was established in San Francisco by Serbians, Russians and Greeks. [Today this parish is the OCA's Holy Trinity Cathedral.] Gradually other similar parishes were established across the territory of the United States and, with the great waves of immigrants from Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Southern Europe at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, the headquarters of the North American Orthodox Diocese was moved to San Francisco and later to New York. By the early 1900s almost all Orthodox communities, regardless of ethnic background, were united in a single diocese, or jurisdiction, which was under the Russian Orthodox Church. In fact, the first bishop for Arab-Americans, Bishop Raphael Hawaweeny, was also the first Orthodox Christian to be consecrated to the episcopacy in North America. He and the parishes under his direction were an integral part of the North American Diocese. [Bishop Raphael was glorified as a saint in May 2000 by the Orthodox Church in America.]
In 1917 the Russian Revolution broke out. As a result communications between the North American Diocese and the Church in Russia were greatly hindered. In the early 1920s the Patriarch of Moscow, Saint Tikhon for ten years he had served as Bishop of the North American Diocese issued a decree calling on dioceses outside the borders of Russia [by then the Soviet Union] to organize themselves autonomously until such time as normal communications and relations with the Church in Russia could resume. Shortly thereafter, at a Council of all hierarchs and clergy and parish delegates, it was decided that the Church in North America could no longer maintain strict administrative ties with the Church in Russia, especially since Patriarch Tikhon had been arrested. [He subsequently died in 1925, and glorified as a Saint by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1989.]
Concurrently, various ethnic groups which had been an integral part of the single diocese organized separate dioceses, or jurisdictions, and placed themselves under their respective Mother Churches. This gave rise to the present situation of Orthodoxy in North America, namely the existence of multiple, overlapping jurisdictions based on ethnic background, rather than following the canonical principle of a single Church entity in a given territory.
In the early 1960s the OCA at that time it was known as the Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church of North America, or The Metropolia entered into dialogue with the Moscow Patriarchate in an attempt to regularize the Metropolias status. In 1970 the Metropolia once again entered into communion with the Moscow Patriarchate, which promptly granted it autocephaly, or administrative self-governance. At a Council of hierarchs, clergy and laity held at Saint Tikhon's Monastery, South Canaan, Pennsylvania in the same year, it was decided that the Church should be renamed The Orthodox Church in America.
Today the OCA, in addition to counting the parishes of the former Metropolia, includes the Romanian Orthodox Episcopate, the Albanian Orthodox Archdiocese, and the Bulgarian Orthodox Diocese. Further, within the past two decades the OCA has established over 220 new parishes, almost exclusively non-ethnic in origin and employing only the English language in worship. [Virtually all of the former Metropolia parishes now employ English exclusively in the services.]
The Orthodox Church in America is a full member of the Standing Conference of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas (SCOBA), together with the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America, and the other member jurisdictions. Hierarchs and clergy of the OCA regularly concelebrate with clergy of other SCOBA jurisdictions. This is especially evident on the annual celebration of the Triumph of Orthodoxy on the first Sunday of Great Lent.
As a self-governing Church, the OCA has the right to elect its own Primate, or presiding hierarch, without relying on any ecclesiastical entity abroad for ratification. His Beatitude, Metropolitan Jonah, the current Primate of the Orthodox Church in America, presides at meetings of the Holy Synod of Bishops, consecrates Holy Chrism, and carries out other duties appropriate to his office. Elected Primate at the 15th All-American Council convened in Pittsburgh, PA in November 2008, Metropolitan Jonah was enthroned on Sunday, December 28, 2008, at Saint Nicholas Cathedral, Washington, DC.
The Orthodox Church in America is fully committed to the unity of Orthodoxy in North America according to the canonical principle of a single, united Church in a given geographic territory. To this end, it fully supports and participates in the work of numerous pan-Orthodox agencies and initiatives, including International Orthodox Christian Charities, the Orthodox Christian Mission Center, the Orthodox Christian Fellowship, the Orthodox Christian Education Commission, and numerous Orthodox media and communications outlets.
#8 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 15:16
Yes, this is the story we tell ourselves. But it is simplified and others tell different stories. All of these stories reflect the historical realities, but none of them really encompass the complexities of the history. And much energy is lost insisting on particular interpretations and treating our own interpretations as fact and others' as fiction. I know I spent many years arguing with various people from ROCOR online, maintaining the OCA history as I'd learned it and assuming their information was faulty. Ultimately though I realized that the facts fully supported neither position, and arguing for one interpretation over another was not productive.
Anyway, I find it fascinating that this reflection has provoked such vehemence. Also that people feel compelled to post defenses of the standard OCA interpretation of our history anonymously -- why???
Maybe this reflects that while we've cleaned up aspects of our administration, we haven't cleansed ourselves of the triumphalistic fictions that helped set the stage for the corruption that took hold in the previous administration.
#8.1 Rebecca Matovic on 2009-04-21 18:24
ROCOR has been trying to re-write the history of American Orthodoxy since I can remember. The lies and twists manufactured by them is amazing. They never recall that Pat. Tikhon himself condemned them as a non-canonical entity. The Greeks also wish to re-write the history of American Orthodoxy, but all these attempts amount to frivolous, non-factual interpretations. Unfortunately, Fr. Oliver may be going for his Ph.D, but someone should really check his facts.
#8.1.1 Anonymous on 2009-04-21 20:38
I'd be willing to bet he'd love some earnest fact-checking! So far, all the detractors here have yet to do so, just repeating the same unsourced assertions from secondary commentators.
Anyway, a lot of material is coming out which seriously questions the "received wisdom" of the OCA's mythical history regarding itself, which many even outside the OCA have accepted as fact. But serious engagement with the primary sources shows a quite different picture.
So, in straightforward language: "put up or shut up." You can either just shout out "I don't believe you!" at the top of your lungs, or you can do some research yourself.
#220.127.116.11 A history student on 2009-04-22 06:44
Huh? Somebody should really check Fr. Oliver's facts? I've known him personally for about six years now, and actually, I HAVE checked all his facts. My advice: go for it. I mean, the man is a legitimate scholar, and I know for a fact that he is basing his conclusions on the whole body of primary sources. Do you have any primary sources to back up your views? Have you ever researched the early history of American Orthodoxy? Or do you just believe what you've been told and then criticize anyone who says otherwise?
And you should know that Fr. Oliver is not somehow biased against the OCA or Orthodox unity, or biased in favor of ROCOR or the EP. He's an OCA priest serving in the Antiochian Archdiocese.
As for you, Anonymous, I'll echo Rebecca's question and ask, why are you being anonymous? I understand Antiochian priests not wanting to reveal their identities when criticizing Metropolitan Philip, but what exactly do you fear in this discussion? Why not reveal your name when you question someone's scholarly integrity?
So again, I challenge you to do the research yourself and present a coherent, fact-based argument in opposition to Fr. Oliver.
#184.108.40.206 Ferris Haddad on 2009-04-22 10:00
Were we as a church to be held captive to party line interpretations of history and to remain preoccupied with our perogatives, there would be no path forward towards unity.
We must start with current reality -- pretending that today's ROCOR is the same as that about which St. Tikhon spoke is as silly as pretending there is an unbroken line of consistently focused missionary activity connecting the 1794 mission to Alaska with today's OCA. We can be inspired by our past, but we must not allow ourselves to be held captive by worshipping a particular interpretation of the past.
It seems that some remain enamored of the Potemkin Village version of the OCA.
#22.214.171.124 Rebecca Matovic on 2009-04-22 10:28
What do you think is the source for the OCA's triumphalistic fictions? Certainly not grass roots. Something a bit more sophistocated and subtle, I'd wager.
Everybody likes to have the power and authority, but only a few are clever enough to get it and promote it for their own reasons, perhaps?
#8.1.2 Ever and anon. on 2009-04-22 05:59
I love these arm-chair settler versions of history! Keep it up guys, and don't be surprised when people like myself don't buy into your wonderbread version of Orthodoxy. I think this "historian" priest should have used the words "Protestant" and "convert" about a half dozen more times in the reflection...makes you wonder doesn't it? protestant, convert, protestant, convert, protestant, convert, protestant, convert...there, I did it for him!
Moses the Tlingit
#9 Moses on 2009-04-21 15:39
Moses -- Fr. Oliver is an actual historian. Have some respect.
And I really, really do not understand what your deal is with "Protestant" and "convert." Fr. Oliver used the word "Protestant" two times in his article. He used the word "convert" three times, and "converted" twice. What are you trying to imply with your comment? In what way was his use of these words inappropriate or objectionable?
#9.1 Ferris Haddad on 2009-04-22 10:02
I agree that my response to this article was a bit harsh, I could have said it differently; on that note, one of my fears is that as more white protestants have been converting to Orthodoxy for last 30+ years, they will increasingly try to claim all of it for themselves and will procede to claim that they "resuced" it from all of those "ethnic" ingrates with all of our outdated traditions, thereby creating a sort of WASPy "bleaching" of Orthodoxy in North America. As an Alaska Native, I also find it strange and maybe a bit disconcerting that the great-grandchildren of the very Protestants that came here to Alaska and undertook a massive campaign of both cultural genocide (while trying to destroy the Orthodox Church in Alaska as an un-American threat to yankee-doodlism and native assimiliation) and ethnic cleansing are now claiming to be showing all of us ignorant believers that our history is all wrong and we need them to show us what "real" Orthodoxy looks like! I personally don't have a problem with the emergence of an "American" Orthodoxy, I think that is fine, but don't think that all the rest of us folks who might have a ethnic identity that is not of the WASP variety will go along with all of it, and please know that if you do try to cram it down our throats, there are many of us who will resist you at every turn. We have seen and expereinced American Manifest Destiny up close and personal in all of its brutality and unfortunately, it can also take on a viral-spiritual form; there is still a tendency to believe that this is some kind of "saving light" that we should all be in (shock and) awe of...I am not. My version of Orthodox history here in my neighborhood comes from my Tlingit Orthodox predecessors. A concise printed (as opposed to oral) version of "my Orthdox history" is "Memory Eternal" by Sergei Kan, it is a tour-de-force that shows everything, warts and all. One last thing: "peer revieiws" are one of the dirty little secrets of academia, give me a break.
#9.1.1 Moses on 2009-04-23 15:11
I agree with almost everything you have written, and I am very sympathetic with your concerns.
I might add this as a nuance to your own position. We all know the caricature of the overzealous white middle class American convert. In some regards, the apparatuses of this caricatured sort point to a very white, Republican, middle class, saccharine, Disneyesque Orthodoxy - Again Magazine, AFR, various Orthodox parachurch ministries, Orthodox 100% organic cotton t-shirts with sayings from the desert fathers on them -- in other words a stylized Orthodoxy for the American bourgeoisie. I feel a bit of your pain, brother.
That said, there is another "threat" as it were. There is in certain camps of "ethnic" Orthodox an overwhelming desire to accomodate to American middle class values. Thus we see in the current Antiochian debate ethnic Arab Orthodox who want to be left alone in their rites of accommodation (Jamie Farr signing a Gospel book in the altar, no fasting, etc.) and not bothered by a convert bishop who is simply trying to enforce the rules established by his Arab metropolitan. When you think of those Orthodox who have most tried to accommodate Orthodoxy to White American middle class social norms, you think of GOArch parishes with organs and padded pews and Antiochian parishes in Detroit that have guest signings in the altar and do a 15 minute Matins service, along with the McByzantium you suggest. Often times, it is "ethnic" immigrants who cherish middle class American values as much or more than anglo Americans do.
All I can say to you is that Fr. Oliver is not your target. I only wish that you could have a conversation with him in order to realize that, of all Orthodox priests who speak broadly of Orthodoxy in America, he is certainly among those most adamently opposed to notions of manifest destiny, or the notion that whites must be freed from foreign, darker skinned ecclesiastical rule of some sort. Part of the concern here, is that no Synodal order be presented in a manner in which it deems itself as having the authority to squash real and legitimate local traditions, wherever they might be found in North America.
Thank you for your insights and reminders, I really don't want to come off as some jerk-in-reverse (I know many here think I am), and I know that painting any group of people with a broad brush is not wise, I will try harder not to do that...we all need to solve the problems at hand, while somehow giving each other a break and the benefit of the doubt more often. We can all fall victim to the norms and fashions "of the world" reagrdless of where we are from; we have an entire native corporate elite here in Alaska that has, since 1971, become exactly the kind of people you mention (of course, not all of them!). I will try harder.
#184.108.40.206.1 Anonymous on 2009-04-23 21:34
Just for the record, while my skin might be white like those that went to Alaska to convert the Native Orthodox to Protestantism or Roman Catholicism, my white family had not yet set foot on the continent when that was at its height - and never went West of the Rockies much less up to Alaska. I think this is true of many. Please don't tar all white people with the same brush. In fact, I'm part Native American myself - Ojibway from the French-Canadian side of my family. The resolute faith of the Alaskan Orthodox has been a source of great, great pride for Orthodox whites - especially converts since it proves that Orthodoxy is not about being Eastern European or Middle Eastern. I think it is the converts that probably treasure your faith and culture the most, in fact.
There are converts and then there are converts. Some elderly converts have been Orthodox longer than younger cradle Orthodox. We are also seeing the first generation of cradle Orthodox that are not 'ethnically' Orthodox - not Greek, Russian, Tlingit, etc.
Also, it isn't as if converts have just made up some pure form of 'Orthodoxy' out of whole cloth. The 'ethnic' Orthodoxy here in North America is not like the 'ethnic' Orthodoxy back in the old countries - 'ethnicity' can be a cover for laxity, innovation, cultural arrogance and romantic escapism, as well as for the continuity of Orthodox faith in a living culture. There are also 'ethnic' Orthodox that behave in ways that some like to scorn as 'convertitis' - I don't think Elder Ephraim is a convert and he's got the worst case of 'convertitis' I've seen in a long time; same with ROCOR; those crazy monks in the Holy Land are also a bunch of evangelical know it alls. Being born Orthodox doesn't mean one's Orthodoxy is pure or sufficient, neither does an MDiv, Holy Orders, membership in a priestly family, or converting and reading every book available - we are all to repent daily and to struggle. No one's Orthodoxy is pure or sufficient.
There is also a different between the venerable local traditions of the Aleuts and Tlingits - traditions that have witnessed martyric struggles in the preservation of Orthodox faith - a innovated traditions taken over in an attempt to 'be more American'.
Good points, all...I will try harder not to generalize or use broad brushes in the future, thank you for your insights and POV, things really are more complicated than any of us would like to admit...my family is still recovering from the damage done by the American Protestant missions to Alaska, it is an inter-generational healing process. My grandparents, great-grandparents and father were tortured by these people, all in the name of Christ, and yet, as you and the other gentleman pointed out, many of our own people collaborated with these missions and hurt thier own families and communties in the process. On another note, I was corrected by an elder that I have alot of respect for on my earlier cassock rants (a few weeks ago) and stand corrected, it is not my place or business to tell a priest what he should wear and when. (I know, I know, but this really is me saying this...)
Thanks again
#22.214.171.124.1 Moses on 2009-04-23 21:52
I was thiniking about this comment from you when I went to sleep last night and when I woke this morning!
"Being born Orthodox doesn't mean one's Orthodoxy is pure or sufficient, neither does an MDiv, Holy Orders, membership in a priestly family, or converting and reading every book available - we are all to repent daily and to struggle. No one's Orthodoxy is pure or sufficient."
This really is all of it in a nutshell, thank you! We really all must repent weekly, daily, hourly, and by the minute, no matter who we are! Great comment.
#220.127.116.11.2 Moses on 2009-04-24 09:19
I've commented quite a bit on here already, but I do want to make another point. Fr. Oliver is a friend of mine, and I can tell you without a doubt that he is just as opposed to Constantinople's erroneous interpretation of Canon 28 of Chalcedon as he is to the erroneous interpretation of history by some in the OCA.
I agree with him completely. Both views, both myths, are wrong and are actually hindering Orthodox unity in America. Both views hold that those who do not join one group (EP or OCA) are "uncanonical." And both views ignore a great deal of historical evidence.
For a great critique of the EP's interpetation of Canon 28, I highly recommend Fr. John Erickson's paper "Chalcedon Canon 28: Yesterday and Today" which may be found at:
#10 Ferris Haddad on 2009-04-22 10:09
I find it ironic that many of the posters on this topic still insist on anonymity! What on earth are they afraid of? I don't see many factual history books being written by A. Nony Mous!
Rdr. James (not a mouse here)
Olympia WA
#11 James Morgan on 2009-04-22 10:18
I found Fr Herbel's Reflection very enlightening, and I rejoice that it dispels the myth of pre-Revolution "unity" in America. However, this does not change the fact that those of what has been called the "Russian Mission" were, in fact, the first Orthodox on the continent in 1794. The fact that there was future disunity, fractionalism, breaking of communication and communion (with Russia, following the Soviet Revolution) proves Fr Oliver's point that there never was any idyllic, romanticized unity in reality, but this real history of fractionalism does not detract from the reality of the first missionaries in 1794. The spiritual "descendents" of that missionary activity are now officially organized under the autocephalous Orthodox Church in America (OCA)!!! The constant name changes that Fr Oliver points out (Archdiocese of Alaska, whatever) bursts the bubble of the idyllic myth, but does not change the fact that we are the spiritual descendents, however fragmented our "family tree" turns out to be, of that Russian Mission! And, despite the fact that some people have a bad taste in their mouths regarding claims to canonical status, it is in the canonical tradition of our Orthodox Church that the first group of Orthodox to missionize a new land lay legitimate claims to establishing what will hopefully, in time, become a united Church in that land!! Therefore, along with agreeing with Fr Herbel that we should not point the finger and name-call other Orthodox in our country as "uncanonical," we should work, all of us together, to unite our fellow Orthodox brothers and sisters to our canonically-established (despite what Istanbul says [there is no Constantinople anymore, nor has there been for centuries!!]) autocephalous Orthodox Church in America!!! Our fellow Orthodox in this country may not be uncanonical, but the continued domination of them from phanars across the ocean is!!
#12 David Barrett on 2009-04-22 10:36
I wonder if it is really fair to consider all of North America the canonical territory of Moscow because it planted its flag first in one corner of this giant continent? A similar argument is implied by Greeks regarding New Smyrna in FL and New Orleans.
Personally, I would love to follow this line of reasoning regionally, state by state, or city by city. Let us establish who first established a parish under episcopal rule and/or furnished that place with active episcopal oversight and give it to that local church. Then, let the horse trading begin.
Greece is divided between 2 local churches - and it would have been three had Cyprus acceded to the Republic of Greece but for the actions of Turkey. Let the huge continent of North America also be divided up. The canons only require 'one city, one bishop', not one local Synod (whether autocephalous, autonomous or exarchate) of contiguous territory per independent, UN-recognized state (e.g., Serbia/Montenegro; Slovakia/Czech Republic,; Israel/Palestine/Jordan/Egypt; Syria/Lebanon; Romania/Moldova; Russia/Ukraine/Belarus, etc.)
For instance, I believe there was already an Orthodox bishop in Boston prior to Met. Methodios' GOA see was established there.
Thank you for your comments and responses. However, if I may, I would like to propose a different perspective than the one you have put forth, advocating the "horse trading" of parishes, people (faithful Orthodox) and so on. This may seem to have worked well at Yalta, at the meeting between Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Josef Stalin (it actually didn't!! We are still suffering from that "let's split the pie of Europe" meeting today!!!). Yet, we need to remember that this is *the Church*, and that we don't use the ways of the fallen world to solve our problems.
Furthermore, let me share something that was said many times in Dogmatic Theology class by Fr Thomas Hopko, who has a gift for presenting ideas in small, algebraic-like tidbits. He often said, "Christ unites!!! It is the devil who divides!!" Therefore, when you propose, in good faith, I am sure, "Let the huge continent of North America also be divided up," we will only end up more fragmented than we already are.
I believe that we should endeavor to use our energies to unite the other so-called "jurisdictions" (how I hate that term!!) with the OCA for two reasons: 1) despite the nit-picky microscopic examinations of when a lone Greek, Romanian, Serbian, or whomever visited these shores years ago, it seems apparent to most that it was the visiting Russians in 1794 who began the missionary work of planting Orthodoxy on this continent. 2) an even wiser reason to work at bringing in the other Orthodox into the OCA fold is that we are the only "jurisdiction" that is not under the thumbnail or the boot heel of phanars across the ocean!!! This is what really rankles Istanbul and the other totalitarian hierarchs associated with them!! We are not canonically or financially subservient to any of them. If, for example, the OCA were to merge "under" the AOCA or the GOA, we would, alas, find ourselves in the same predicament that the AOCA now finds itself re +Philip and Damascus!! Working to bringing the others into unity by asking them to merge with us would free them from such spiritual serfdom!!! Again, let us heed Fr Hopko's words, realizing that it is our Lord, Jesus Christ, Who unites, and work (and pray!!) towards Orthodox canonical, financial, and autocephalous unity in our land!!!
Christ is Risen! Indeed, He is Risen!
#12.1.1 David Barrett on 2009-04-23 13:51
"Christ unites!!! It is the devil who divides!!"
I don't think that the division of the Orthodox Church into separate local churches (eparchies, Metropolitanates, dioceses) divides the Church - that is actually a Roman Catholic argument against the unity of the Orthodox Church. The Orthodox Church has not been 'devilishly' divide in the Orthodox countries I mentioned.
Our unity is not dependent on whether each country has its own local Orthodox Church. The canons require only 'one city, one bishop' and that they know who is 'first' among them when the meet twice annually.
"Early Orthodox Immigration to the United States
Prior to 1890, only small numbers of Orthodox Christians had immigrated to the United States. In colonial times (1768), an English land-grant settlement, populated mainly by Greeks, had been established in Florida. Quickly succumbing to disease, exploitation, and neglect, the New Smyrna plantation was forcibly disbanded by British troops on order of the English governor of Florida in 1769.
The first Orthodox Church in the continental United States was established during the Civil War in New Orleans by Greek cotton merchants (1864). This "Eastern Orthodox Church of the Holy Trinity" was typical of the earliest Orthodox parishes in America: it was multi-ethnic, composed of Greeks, Slavs, and Arabs, and multi-lingual, services being held in Greek, Slavonic, and English. Between 1868-1892, similar multi-ethnic and multi-lingual parishes were founded by diplomatic personnel, foreign businessmen, and small numbers of Orthodox immigrants in San Francisco (1868), New York (1870-1883), Chicago (1888), Portland, Oregon (1890), Galveston (ca 1890), and Seattle (1892). Following the provisions of the Council of Carthage (AD 419), wherein responsibility for Orthodox communities in a new land is given to that Orthodox Church which initiates missionary work in it, these small communities, numbering altogether some 600 faithful, received priests, financial assistance, and/or liturgical items from the -- -- missionary diocese -- in San Francisco. "
#13 Anonymous on 2009-04-22 14:45
Let's not forget that a parish was organized and started in San Francisco in 1864 and Galveston, TX in 1862. There was never a question that these parishes were under the Russian Orthodox Mission and accepted funds, direction and priests from it.
#13.1 Anonymous on 2009-04-23 07:05
Just correcting some factual errors:
Chicago did not have a parish in 1888. There actually was an attempt to start a parish then, but it never came to fruition. The first Orthodox parish in Chicago was Greek, under the Church of Greece and founded in 1892. The very next month, the Russian diocese started its own parish in Chicago.
The New York chapel of Fr. Nicholas Bjerring, which Fr. Oliver mentioned in his article, was shut down by the Russian hierarchy in 1883. They abandoned the city, and the next two parishes to be founded were Greek (one under Greece and one under the EP). After that, in 1895, the Russian Church returned to New York.
The Russian chapel in Portland, Oregon was founded in 1895. It too was abandoned several years later. The next Orthodox church in Portland was Greek (1907).
As for Galveston, I've heard the claim that there was a Russian parish there in the 1860s, but I've never actually seen any evidence for it. I have searched multiple Galveston newspapers from the 1860s through the 1890s, and I have found no evidence of an Orthodox parish. The first parish in Galveston for which there are any known sources is Ss. Constantine and Helen, founded in 1896 (under the Russians).
Also, the New Orleans Greek church was not formally created until 1865 (rather than 1864). Of course, just as in San Francisco and elsewhere, there were certainly Orthodox Christians in that city well before the founding of the parish, but in terms of existing as an actual church community, 1865 is the correct date.
The above parishes are not the only churches founded in the 1890s, but since they have been brought up, I wanted to set the record straight.
#13.2 Ferris Haddad on 2009-04-23 12:24
Well, I guess that we in Portland celebrated a false centinary in 1995, then, and are under delusion -- as we've thought ourselves to have had a continuous parish life since 1895. Guess I'll go tell the "old folks" that their history in this parish doesn't exist!
#13.2.1 Rdr. John on 2009-04-23 18:11
Rdr. John,
There was still plenty of justification for celebrating a centenniel in Portland in 1995. It was still the 100th anniversary of the founding of the first Orthodox chapel in the city, which I think is worth celebrating. The fact that St. Nicholas itself wasn't established until 1927 doesn't take away from that.
#126.96.36.199 Ferris Haddad on 2009-04-24 06:17
The tone of Fr. Oliver's MDiv is hardly controversial. The topic is controversial to a minority of American Orthodox. No one who knows the man, or has familiarity with his writing would refer to him as a controversialist without deceit. The man is the image of moderation in tone, and fairness in debate. Fr. Oliver reads Russian, as well as Patristic Greek, and I think Serbian and maybe Romanian as well, not to mention the European languages every historian who has done serious graduate work is required to know. I have had some occasion to know because he is the Godfather of two members of my immediate family and I have spent countless hours speaking with him and corresponding with him for the near decade I have known him. I have also read, I believe, everything he has published.
There is an inference being made in this thread which I would like to address - the straw man dismissal of Fr. Oliver's essay because it has been written by an academic with serious academic credentials. With regard to the man in question here, these inferences are incorrect. Fr. Oliver is, intellectually speaking, akin to Fr. John Behr in this respect - while he is competent and well versed with regard to the methods of contemporary historiography, he well knows the limits of such methods, especially when they are imposed upon the Church, and, like Behr, he understands the charism and the method of the Church's actual hermeneutic, and how this differs from would-be modern imposters. In this regard, like Behr, he will use contemporary intellectual nomenclature and method, but only in the service of the Church, and, more importantly, subject to the Church's own way of understanding herself.
Questions of historiography and criticism are not easy ones, and one of the ironies in this game is that those who reject any writing that strikes them as "academic" or "intellectual" often are themselves unwittingly embracing late modern ideologies. Indeed, those who think that questions of historiography and the criticism of history are black and white are almost always subject to an ideology of some sort. But besides all this, Fr. Oliver, in his own personal life, is not an academic first and a priest second. If that were the case he would have pursued the sort of academic life his credentials afford him, instead of going back to his native land (Fargo) to serve as a missionary priest among the people and culture he knows and loves so well.
I have never met another person who understands, by way of his peculiar synthesis of peer reviewed historical analysis and his first hand lived experience, Orthodoxy in the American context. The man has no agenda for or against the OCA. He has no agenda for or against the Ecumenical Patriarchate. He loves the Church, he loves this country. Thus I concur with certain comments above. One might well disagree with the data he presents or his interpretation. If that is the case, one might be best served to dispute the actual data, or to provide reasons for disputing the interpretation. Anything less than this quickly falls the way of rabid and crass hubris.
On a final note, those who in rote fashion state that the Russians were here first and Russia granted the OCA autocephaly therefore , contrasted then with those who in rote fashion state that the Greeks were here first and therfore ., well, seeing these two arguments stated as simple fact requiring no interpretation or serious review should remind us of the need for men with the skills and research experience Fr. Oliver provides.
One wonders...If the churches in North America were poor, would these issues ever have come up?
(editor's note: They threw dice for our saviour's robe, so being poor is no safeguard either.)
#15 Morton on 2009-04-23 10:47
fr. oliver's account probably is as accurate as any historical account can possibly be, he simply states what happened based on available documentation.good work.WE ORTHODOX OF ALL JURISDICTIONS MUST STOP THIS BICKERING AND WORK TOGETHER. we already are ONE CHURCH in america,because we have UNITY IN THE CHALICE, which must be cherished and safeguarded. i so hope and pray the greeks will not cease concelebration with us because of our very good and pious,but inexperienced metropolitan's speech.it would be very bad for our oca and orthodox unity in america if that happened.metropolitan JONAH needs experienced and wise advisors to assist him.protopresbyter fr.Thomas Hopko would be great in that capacity, he has deep theological knowledge,wisdom and experience.in fact, one of the most important attributes of any great king and leader is the capability of choosing good advisors and ministers to "run" things. i am basically very happy we have metropolitan JONAH,because as a true monastic,he'll lead the church in the right direction.
#16 Anonymous on 2009-04-25 18:23
"fr. oliver's account probably is as accurate as any historical account can possibly be, he simply states what happened based on available documentation."
Baloney! His conclusions create a false history without factual content.
#16.1 Anonymous on 2009-04-27 14:19
The author does not allow comments to this entry


text:
Last week I began my journey to the Green Side of Mothering: Cloth Diapers.
As much as I try to be environmentally aware at work and at home, I hesitated going down the path of CD when I found out I was pregnant. Too much work, I thought.
So here we are, 16 months later, and I finally feel ready to attempt it. Ok, finally feel BRAVE enough to do it.Plus, I have two friends who work for Rockin Green detergent, and was looking for an excuse to use their soap.
After a lesson at the pool, I hauled Olive to Go, Baby, Go for a quick "How To" and "What the?" session with the owner, Elizabeth, and walked out with this:
- bumGenius Freetime Albert Velcro
- bumGenius Freetime Lovelace
- Fuzzibunz Watermelon
- Fuzzibunz Mac N Cheese
- Thristies DUO AIO Meadow 2s
- Thirsties DUO AIO Hoot 2s
So far, I've only tried them at night. I haven't mentioned to the daycare that this is coming. Heh. In any case, here's the results so far:
- Test 1: fuzzibunz overnight. Win. Full of overnight pee. No leaks.
- Test 2: thirsties overnight. Minor front leak fail.*
- Test 3: bumGenius overnight. Less than major front leak fail. **
* Maybe if I had figured out how to put it on correctly…
** See above comment. *Facepalm*
Seriously, where are the instructions? Even youTube videos only include reviews. WHERE'S THE HOW TO? I have work getting in the way of researching this and it's irritating the f**ck out of me. I swear, I'm smarter than this. I WILL WIN!
Today, I swapped out her disposable as soon as we got home from daycare. Into the Meadow Thristies she went. And into it went a poop. So…where are those instructions again? Tonight's bedtime features Fuzzibunz Watermelon with THREE inserts and a better snap fit. Just in case.
*fingers crossed*
Please note: I'm trying out WordPress.
For my living blog, head to http://optimisticheathen.blogspot.com/


text:
If it's true that cats are nature's comedians, then this kitty is pure comedy gold! A baby isn't a toy, of course--but just try telling that to this spazzy cat! This is probably his first experience with a mini human, but clearly he's taking to babysitting like a duck to water. Hopefully, nobody will tell him that the baby's in the swing-set for his own amusement, not the cat's. Fortunately, this video is here for the amusement of us all--so click play and get ready to laugh!
Share this video with your furiends!


text:
USNM Diptera collections
The Diptera Collection at the National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Washington, is one the finest in the World. The collection comprises more than 8,059 drawers of pinned material, 8,538 boxes of slide-mounted specimens, and 325 vial-units of specimens in alcohol.
Although there is material from all faunal regions, the Nearctic region and the New World in general are represented best. In all families, there are good synoptic series of the genera and species; but only in a few areas are there long or complete series for most of the included taxa.
Among the nematocerous Diptera, four groups are particularly well represented: the crane flies, mosquitoes, biting midges, and gall midges. The crane fly collection is unsurpassed by any in the world, as the Smithsonian has recently acquired the C. P. Alexander Collection: probably the greatest private collection of flies ever made. More than 11,000 of the 14,000 known species of crane flies are represented in this collection by type specimens, 8,000 of which are holotypes.
The Department has long served as the world center for mosquito research. In the early 1900's pioneering work was done on the collection and culminated in a four volume publication of The Mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies, (1912-17). In 1964, the Smithsonian contracted with the U. S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, to study the mosquitoes of Southeast Asia.
|This was continued until 1974 when a new contract was initiated for the Medical Entomology Project. These 2 projects have accessioned more than 250,000 specimens and have described over 100 new species of mosquitoes. The Mosquito Collection counts more than 300,000 specimens including 1,200 primary types. [http://www.wrbu.org/]
The brachycerous Diptera are best represented by 3 families: the Bombyliidae, Asilidae, and Empididae.
Of the cyclorrhaphous Diptera, the acalyptrate families are all well represented. Due to the strong and continuing interest of the USDA in fruit flies (Tephritidae), the USNM holding of these flies one of the finest. The Sciomyzidae, snail-killing flies, are likewise well represented and the Ephydridae, or shore flies, also deserve particular note for the strong cosmopolitan collection built by W. W. Wirth.
Holdings of Tachinidae, Sarcophagidae, and Calliphoridae stand out among the calyptrate flies, although most of the families of this group are well represented. Most of the leading New World specialists on tachinid flies have worked with and left their collections to the USNM. This series of specialists began with D. W. Coquillett, who first monographed the
Nearctic tachinids in 1897, and continued with C. H. T. Townsend, J. M. Aldrich, C. W. Sabrosky and now with N. E. Woodley. Many other tachinid workers have augmented the collection by adding their types to it. The USDA purchase of the N. Baranov Collection in 1960 added much tachinid and sarcophagid material from the Old World. Thus the USNM collection of Tachinidae is unusually valuable. The collections of Sarcophagidae and Calliphoridae are also exemplary due to the contributions of such specialists as J. M. Aldrich,
D. G. Hall, H. W. Allen, and H. de Souza Lopes.
As the number of scientific positions associated with the Diptera Collection has been reduced, from a high of 14 scientists in the 1970's to the current 5, the dipterists have sought new and different ways of maintaining the National Diptera Collection. Portions of the collection have been loaned in total to specialists on a long-term basis. The Bombyliidae now reside at the Bishop Museum, Honolulu, under the care of Neal Evenhuis and the Phoridae at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, under the care of Brian Brown.
The dipterists at Washington are dedicated to insuring the best care for their collections as well as access to them so that our knowledge of may increase and be of use to all. A small endowment fund, the S. W. Williston Diptera Research Fund, has been established to provide additional resources for these goals. Proposals are considered annually in January, so please submit them before the 1st of December. Donations as well as inquiries about support are always welcome. More information about this fund can also be found on the Asiloid Flies web site under the Williston Fund tab.
Content by F. Christian Thompson
Please send questions and comments to Torsten Dikow


text:
Dutch Queen Beatrix has begun a two-day visit to Brunei, focusing on expanding economic relations despite concerns about the reported increased persecution of minority Christians in the gas and oil rich Islamic mini-state.
Well-informed Open Doors, a Netherlands-based Christian relief group, said ahead of her visit that the sultan announced preparations for an 'Islamic Criminal Law' to "complicate the situation for the Christian minority further, especially those known to have converted." (continue reading...)(...more)