text:
From email@example.com Fri Jun 9 04:27:20 PDT 1995 Article: 65123 of alt.conspiracy Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage From: firstname.lastname@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: Militia defined - ATC Dictionary Message-ID:Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:03:05 GMT Lines: 61 Sender: email@example.com From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -------------------------------- AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY -- A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms Used to Neutralize the common man. TERRORIST AS USED BY GOVERNMENT: Anyone who violently resists or reacts against the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot. Acts of violence against the government are acts against the citizenry as a whole.. ACTUAL MEANING: One who uses violence or the threat of violence to intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons. Members of central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government opproession. Groups or nations too small to have their own military and air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by government. Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, robbery, and brutalization. This is true terrorism. Those who speak or act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by politicians and lackeys in the media. Terrorist-type incidents are commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like planting a bomb. Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more laws to increase police powers. What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary? People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled. Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the way people think about certain things. To accomplish this, the controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and ignorant. Eventually, all important words said by anyone will automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious view. At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made unpopular. If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_. However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts to control our mind and spirit. Get the complete dictionary by FTP from: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From firstname.lastname@example.com Fri Jun 9 07:03:58 PDT 1995 Article: 5542 of alt.politics.nationalism.white Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage From: email@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: Militias Defined - ATC Dictionary Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:25:06 GMT Lines: 60 Sender: email@example.com From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -------------------------------- AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY -- A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms Used to Neutralize the common man. TERRORIST AS USED BY GOVERNMENT: Anyone who violently resists or reacts against the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot. Acts of violence against the government are acts against the citizenry as a whole.. ACTUAL MEANING: One who uses violence or the threat of violence to intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons. Members of central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government opproession. Groups or nations too small to have their own military and air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by government. Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, robbery, and brutalization. This is true terrorism. Those who speak or act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by politicians and lackeys in the media. Terrorist-type incidents are commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like planting a bomb. Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more laws to increase police powers. What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary? People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled. Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the way people think about certain things. To accomplish this, the controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and ignorant. Eventually, all important words said by anyone will automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious view. At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made unpopular. If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_. However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts to control our mind and spirit. Get the complete dictionary by FTP from: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From firstname.lastname@example.com Fri Jun 9 21:38:01 PDT 1995 Article: 5542 of alt.politics.nationalism.white Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage From: email@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: Militias Defined - ATC Dictionary Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:25:06 GMT Lines: 60 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.com From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -------------------------------- AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY -- A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms Used to Neutralize the common man. TERRORIST AS USED BY GOVERNMENT: Anyone who violently resists or reacts against the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot. Acts of violence against the government are acts against the citizenry as a whole.. ACTUAL MEANING: One who uses violence or the threat of violence to intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons. Members of central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government opproession. Groups or nations too small to have their own military and air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by government. Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, robbery, and brutalization. This is true terrorism. Those who speak or act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by politicians and lackeys in the media. Terrorist-type incidents are commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like planting a bomb. Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more laws to increase police powers. What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary? People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled. Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the way people think about certain things. To accomplish this, the controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and ignorant. Eventually, all important words said by anyone will automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious view. At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made unpopular. If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_. However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts to control our mind and spirit. Get the complete dictionary by FTP from: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From firstname.lastname@example.com Sat Jun 10 10:41:20 PDT 1995 Article: 150915 of talk.politics.guns Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage From: email@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: Militias Defined - ATC Dictionary Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:35:57 GMT Lines: 60 Sender: email@example.com From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -------------------------------- AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY -- A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms Used to Neutralize the common man. TERRORIST AS USED BY GOVERNMENT: Anyone who violently resists or reacts against the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot. Acts of violence against the government are acts against the citizenry as a whole.. ACTUAL MEANING: One who uses violence or the threat of violence to intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons. Members of central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government opproession. Groups or nations too small to have their own military and air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by government. Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, robbery, and brutalization. This is true terrorism. Those who speak or act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by politicians and lackeys in the media. Terrorist-type incidents are commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like planting a bomb. Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more laws to increase police powers. What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary? People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled. Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the way people think about certain things. To accomplish this, the controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and ignorant. Eventually, all important words said by anyone will automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious view. At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made unpopular. If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_. However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts to control our mind and spirit. Get the complete dictionary by FTP from: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From firstname.lastname@example.com Sat Jun 10 14:21:54 PDT 1995 Article: 22032 of alt.revisionism Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Holocaust Almanac - I.G. Farben removed 'indicator' from gas Date: Wed, 7 Jun 95 19:57:41 -0500 Organization: Delphi (email@example.com email, 800-695-4005 voice) Lines: 73 Message-ID: References: <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1f.delphi.com X-To: Ken Mcvay > In the past the S.S. had bought moderate amounts of Zyklon B from > Degesch as a vermin control in its concentration camps. When the > Final Solution added Jews to the S.S. extermination plans, Degesch > profits reflected the new prosperity. I.G.'s dividends on its > Degesch investment for the years 1942, 1943, and 1944 were double > those of 1940 and 1941. European Jews. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1961. 568; NG-2586-E.> Was the sum total of 1942, 1943 and 1944 double to the sum total for 1940 and 1941, or was each year (1942, 1943, 1944) double to each year of 1940 and 1941. What evidence is there that the SS was the solely responsible for the doubling of these profits? I would suspect that the SS increased its personnel during the latter years. There were only eight Waffen SS units of divisional strength raised toward the end of 1942; between 1943 and 1945 thirty more units were raised although less then half were of divisional strength (pages 156-159 Waffen SS, John Keegan). I can only guess that the other branches of the SS increased their personnel as well, since they had captured an enormous amount of Soviet prisoners. > There was still another episode that gave the officials of Degesch > more than a hint of the dread purpose to which their Zyklon B was > being put by the S.S. When manufactured as a pesticide Zyklon B > contained a special odor, or 'indicator,' to warn human beings of > its lethal presence. The inclusion of such a warning odor was > required by German law. When the S.S. demanded that the new, > large order of Zyklon B omit the 'indicator,' no one familiar with > the workings of the S.S. could have failed to realize the purpose > behind the strange request. The Degesch executives at first were Which branch of the SS made the request? According to page 571 of Raul Hilberg's book, a person by the name of Mrugowski made the request for the Waffen-SS without the odor indicator. What evidence is there that this request was shipped to Auschwitz and (or) that this request was approved? On the same paragraph of Dr. Hilberg's book, there was a request for 2800 kg. by Dr. Evers who had it shipped to Auschwitz. There is no way of determining whether or not this shipment had the odor indicator based on this sentence by Professor Hilberg, but I believe it did include an indicator. > It seems clear to me that if, as the denial set maintains, the S.S. > only used Zyklon B for insect control, they would most certainly not > have wished to remove the only warning device available to their men > working with the deadly gas in the field. The lice, after all, > wouldn't care one way or the other. It also seems clear that the only > conceivable reason to remove the indicator odor would be to disguise > the killing agent from the victims - Zyklon B would have been > odorless without that indicator. In short, it shows clear intent, > thus shattering yet another denial myth - that there was no organized > plan to exterminate anyone. If the victims were in a locked and airtight room, it wouldn't matter whether or not there was an odor indicator. If the SS was concerned about keeping this as secret as possible, they would have ordered the product in the usual manner. From email@example.com Sat Jun 10 21:07:45 PDT 1995 Article: 5542 of alt.politics.nationalism.white Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!rsavage From: firstname.lastname@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: Militias Defined - ATC Dictionary Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 17:25:06 GMT Lines: 60 Sender: email@example.com From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -------------------------------- AntiThought-Control DICTIONARY -- A Guide to Deceptive Words and Terms Used to Neutralize the common man. TERRORIST AS USED BY GOVERNMENT: Anyone who violently resists or reacts against the government, especially by surprise counter measures - suually an Arab, a White Supremacist, or a Patriot. Acts of violence against the government are acts against the citizenry as a whole.. ACTUAL MEANING: One who uses violence or the threat of violence to intimidate or coerce, especially for political reasons. Members of central governmetns (the true terrorists), from the top down, use this term to label anyone, or any group, that protests against government opproession. Groups or nations too small to have their own military and air force are labeled "terrorists" when they fight against being raped by government. Central governments terrorize the people by threats, intimidations, robbery, and brutalization. This is true terrorism. Those who speak or act against government terrorism are conter-labeled "terrorists" by politicians and lackeys in the media. Terrorist-type incidents are commonly orchestrated by government intelligence (CIA, FBI, ATF, etc.) by agents infiltrating local protest groups, inciting one or more of the weak-minded ones to "help them" do something immoral or illegal -- like planting a bomb. Afterwards, the agents conviently disappear, the blame is aimed at all protestors, the police and media follow their scripts handed down to them, and the incident is used as an excuse to pass more laws to increase police powers. What is the Anti-Thought Control Dictionary? People can be controlled if their thoughts can be controlled. Since words are thoughts in physical form, they can become manipulative tools for controlling thoughts and thereby change the way people think about certain things. To accomplish this, the controllers only need to change the MEANINGS of important words to fit their particular political view, and invent NEW EMOTIONALLY-CHARGED TERMS to keep us confused and ignorant. Eventually, all important words said by anyone will automatically convey the controllers biased political/religious view. At this point it will become increasingly difficult for the opposition to construct an effective opposing argument because the words being used have been changed, defused, and/or made unpopular. If we carelessly acquiesce to meaning changes in this war of words, then we will become _thought-controlled people_. However, if we constantly define words, terms and phrases and insist others give us their definitions, we can frustrate their attempts to control our mind and spirit. Get the complete dictionary by FTP from: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From email@example.com Sun Jun 18 15:48:50 PDT 1995 Article: 22301 of alt.revisionism Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage From: email@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: This Age of Conflict Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:09:56 GMT Lines: 1045 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.com From: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA/history ---- THIS AGE OF CONFLICT By Ivor Benson ABOUT THE WRITER: Ivor Benson is a former South African and Fleet Street, London, journalist; South African Broadcasting Corporation news analyst and commentator 1963/64; Information Adviser to Ian Smith's Rhodesian Front Government 1964/65; political analyst and author of several books, he has traveled widely. Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past - George Orwell It is almost a joke now in the Western world, in the 20th century, to use words like 'good and 'evil'. They have become almost old-fashioned concepts, but they are very real and genuine concepts. These are concepts from a sphere which is higher than us. And instead of getting involved in base, petty, short-sighted political calculations and games. we have to recognize that the concentration of world Evil and the tremendous force of hatred is there and it's flowing from there throughout the world. And we have to stand up against it and not hasten to give to it, give to it, give to it, every-thing that it wants to swallow. - Alexander Solzhenitsyn. PART 1 THIS AGE OF CONFLICT Knowledge can be of two kinds: knowledge of the world outside ourselves, the macrocosm, and knowledge of the kingdom within, the microcosm, both of them boundless. The better we know ourselves, the easier it will be to know the world; alternatively, the better we know the world, so much easier it will be to know ourselves and our deepest and most enduring needs. It is not more and more knowledge that we need for the purpose of strengthening our position as individuals, but only knowledge of a kind that holds together and makes sense. We need a coherent interpretation of the history of the age in which we live and an insight into what it is that we must have if we are to be physically well and in good spirits. The following paragraph from a book by three university historians, published in 1949, will serve as a starting point for an exploration of what they describe as "this age of conflict": Two world wars and their intervening wars, revolutions and crises are now generally recognized to be episodes in a single age of conflict which began in 191l and has not yet run its course. It is an age that has brought to the world more change and tragedy than any other in recorded history. Yet, whatever may be its ultimate meaning and consequence, we can already think of it and write of it as a HISTORIC WHOLE. (1) (Emphasis added). An age of conflict that must be thought of "as a whole" must also be capable of being explained and understood as a whole; therefore, it is a highly condensed and simplified synopsis of the history of our century that we must have if the seemingly interminable succession of "episodes" of conflict and tragedy is to be seen as a whole and understood. The method I have chosen is to begin with a list of categorical statements which can be developed and expanded later and supported with an extensive bibliography. Here they are: 1. Our century of conflict is the product of an alliance of money and intellect, with intellect almost .invariably subordinate to, and at the service of, money; money being in the 20th century the primary source of great power. 2. We need to fill and identify the changes which have occurred in the realms of money and of intellect, changes which have made this century so different from all others in recorded history. 3. The change which has occurred in the realm of money is this: Constellations of finance-capitalism which had been separate and nationally oriented were absorbed into a greater constellation of finance-capitalism serving a different set of long-term interests. 4. The change which occurred in the realm of intellect is this: Christian orthodoxy was replaced by an ideology of socialism as the basis of a consensus intellectual frame of reference and system of values. This socialism or secular religion has given rise to what the psychologists Carl Gustav Jung has described as a "psychic epidemic" now afflicting the educated classes in the West. 5. The changes which heralded our century of conflict were first clearly visible in South Africa in the late 1890s, producing the Anglo-Boer war (the first of three great fratricidal wars in the west), the beginning of the end of the British Empire and the beginning of a new and unprecedented kind of world imperium - money- powered, race-oriented, Zionist national- socialist. 6. These changes in money and intellect have drawn the peoples of the West into a dialectical trap, with money as thesis, socialism as antithesis and the new imperium as synthesis; money incessantly concentrates power, socialism promises the total dispersal and distribution of power; the resolution of this contradiction supplies the new imperium with its dynamic. 7. The process of the transference of financial power to the new imperium was only completed in the 1930s when J.P. Morgan and the great American pioneering families lost their dominance in Wall Street. 8. The immediate cause of the great increase in conflict all over the world: External interference with the natural hierarchical system or "pecking order" WITHIN AND AMONG ethnic groups, as everywhere states were set up, and regimes established, which have no local or NATURAL right to exist. This interference by third parties is what makes episodes of conflict in the 20th century quite different from conflicts in other ages, conferring on all of them a shared meaning. 9. All these developments are linked to the moral evil of a system of money creation and debt in which the nations of the West are at the same time offenders and victims. We can think of our age of conflict as a historic whole, but what reason do we have to believe that it is the product of a uniform and continuous set of identifiable causes? Students of history can provide innumerable examples of major influences, baffling to all at the time of their occurrence, which yielded finally to quite simple elucidation and explanation. It is not only in history that events widely separated in space and time can be found to have. a combined meaning; for example, a few years ago when over a period of many months there were visitations of freak weather all around the world, in many cases with disastrous consequences the meteorologists were soon able to trace them all to a single cause or set of causes: they were able at least to show that the storms, floods, hurricanes, droughts, etc, belonged together and had an intelligible combined meaning. Needless to say, the meteorologists were not hindered in their investigations by "no-go" areas of inquiry of the kind to be expected by those who seek to understand worldwide visitations of freak political weather. We have no reason to suppose that we shall find an explanation of our age (lf conflict as easy to present and understand as spells of freak weather, but we are encouraged to hope that where we see in many parts of the globe, over many decades, a recognizable pattern of evil consequences, we can expect to find evidence of a uniform pattern of causes. What is required is an interpretation of the history of our century which will explain and render mutually intelligible the major changes which have occurred - those changes which brought more conflict and tragedy than ever before in recorded history. Among the few books of history in which any attempt has been made to interpret the history of our century as a whole are Oswald Spengler's THE DECLINE OF THE WEST and Carroll Quigley's TRAGEDY AND HOPE. Spengler's main contribution to historiography is his theory of the morphology of history in which he assigns to our present civilization in the West a condition of irreversible decline. Paradoxically, he does not regard this as a pessimistic view. One fact emerges very clearly in Spengler's analysis: What has happened in the 20th century must be seen and studied as an alliance of money and intellect with money, rather than pure politics, as the main moving power in world affairs. Quigley leaves many things unexplained - he may have done so intentionally - but he supports with a good deal of documentary evidence the thesis that much of what has happened in our century has been deliberately MADE TO HAPPEN. What he offers is, in fact, a conspiratorial theory of history involving a number of secret and semi-secret organizations like the Rhodes Scholarship Trust, the Round Table movement, the Royal Institute of' International Affairs and the American Council on Foreign Relations, all under the umbrella of what he calls an "Anglo-American network" of businessman, educationists, politicians and journalists. Quigley, who was Professor of History and of International Relations at the Georgetown Foreign Service School, Washington DC, supplies much other well documented information which no one has yet tried to fit into a general inter-interpretation of the history of our century. TRAGEDY AND HOPE was hastily withdrawn by its publishers, the Macmillan Company, arguably because it was found to have contributed too much to a fully coherent interpretation of the history of our century - to the embarrassment of those who prefer to work under a cloak of secrecy. The theory that much of what has happened has been made to happen is further endorsed by another consensus historian, Arnold Toynbee, not in his monumental A STUDY OF HISTORY but in his other public utterances, of which the following is an example, >from a paper read at the Fourth Annual Conference of the Institute for the Scientific Study of International Relations at Copenhagen in June 1931 (published in INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, December 1931): We are at present working discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be, perhaps not quite burnt at the stake, but certainly ostracized and discredited. Quite clearly, the denudation of the national states of much of their sovereignty during the 20th century represented for Quigley and Toynbee part of the progressive fulfillment of their ideal of an elaborately planned "brave new world" to be raised on the flattened ruins of the old - for Quigley a world of "hope" with which to replace a world of "tragedy, a world of planned revolutionary change to replace a disorderly world of slow revolutionary change. Where and when did this age of conflict begin? The three co- authors quoted above say that it began in 1914. with World War I; but there are good reasons to believe that it began with the Anglo- Boer War of 1898-1902, which we can now see quite clearly as the beginning of the end of the British world imperium and as marking the inauguration of another imperium of a mysterious kind. If our century of conflict can be said to have begun with the Anglo- Boer War, then it is in South Africa that we may have the best chance of seeing more clearly the crucial historical change that was to spark off a great chain reaction of change involving the whole world. Until that time the record of the British Empire had been one of continuous progress, marred only by the hiving off of the American colonies. Britain had out paced all rivals in last century's scramble for colonial possessions, and could boast by the turn of the century to possess an "empire on which the sun never set". However, by a mere accident of history, Afrikaners - Boers, as they were called - who had trekked from Britain's Cape Colony into South Africa's virtually unpopulated hinterland, suddenly found themselves to be the owners of the world's richest gold fields. The eagerness of race-nationalists like Cecil John Rhodes and Alfred Milner to add the new Boer Republic of the Transvaal to the British Empire is understandable. In the climate of thought and sentiment then prevailing, not to have tried to grab so valuable a prize would have been virtually unthinkable. After a war that proved unexpectedly costly both in lives and money, Britain succeeded in adding to its empire both the Transvaal and its ally in the struggle, the Orange Free State republic, but all this happened in circumstances mysteriously different from those that had attended all previous imperial conquests. It was a war over which the British people were themselves sharply divided until the first shots were fired by the Boers; it was a war against which the British Government had been sternly warned by one of the empire's most loyal servants, General Sir William Butler, then Commander- in-Chief of British forces in South Africa; it was a war which gave rise to a greater outpouring of false communication than any other in British colonial history. There was something decidedly different about this tempting opportunity for further imperial expansion, which that prominent writer J.A. Hobson explained thus in his book THE WAR IN SOUTH AFRICA, while that war was still in progress. "We are fighting in order to place a small international oligarchy of mine-owners and speculators in power in Pretoria. Englishmen would do well to recognize that the economic and political destinies of South Africa are, and seem likely to remain, in the hands of men most of whom are foreigners by origin whose trade is finance and whose trade interests are not British". There can be no doubt today about the correctness of that assessment. Thomas Pakenham, in his book, THE BOAR WAR, published in 1979, has this to say about the causes of that war: "First there is a thin golden thread woven by the 'gold bugs', the Rand millionaires who controlled the richest mines in the world. It has been hitherto assumed by historians that none of the 'gold bugs' was directly concerned in making the war. But directly concerned they were ... I have found evidence of an informal alliance between Sir Alfred Milner, the High Commissioner, and the firm of Wernher-Beit, the dominant Rand mining house. IT WAS THIS ALLIANCE, I BELIEVE, THAT GAVE MILNER THE STRENGTH TO PRECIPITATE THE WAR" (Emphasis added). Hobson devotes an entire chapter of his book to mine-ownership in the Transvaal. A few of the financial pioneers were Englishmen; he names among these Rhodes, Rudd and J.B. Robinson. These had all made their fortunes in South Africa, but the others, "the small group of international financiers, chiefly German in origin and Jewish in race", were wealthy when they arrived in the country and had access to seemingly boundless funds in Europe, including the German Dresdner Bank, which Hobson believed to be largely owned by Wernher and Beit. Rhodes, too, had to go to an international banking dynasty, the London Rothschilds, for money with which to buy out his rivals and gain complete control of the diamond industry in Kimberley. General Sir William Butler was even more emphatic about the sources of power and motivation which were decisive in precipitating the war, "the train-layers setting the political gunpowder, as he called them. In a despatch to the War Office in June 1899 he wrote: "If the Jews were out of the question, it would be easy enough to come to an agreement, but they are apparently intent upon plunging the country into civil strife ... indications are too evident here to allow one to doubt the existence of strong undercurrents, the movers of which are bent upon war at all costs for their own selfish ends." (4) Noticed by few, and by even fewer understood, effective control of the British Empire at a decisive point in history had passed, if only momentarily, out of essentially British hands. Or, to put it differently, the center of gravity of real power in the world had shifted significantly. That was the mysterious change that was to inaugurate a chain reaction of more change, first for the British Empire and then for the whole world. More precisely, it was the first clear sign of the commencement of a process of change in the realm of finance-capitalism which was not to be complete before the middle of the 1930s. Other changes are less readily noticeable, one of the most important of these being radical changes in the methodology of warfare - the human mind itself has become a battleground for warring interests as never before in recorded history. Political warfare - \/on Clausewitz's "war by other means" - there has always been but never before on the scale practiced after the turn of the century. Persuasion there always was as a means of readying a population for war; but the world was to encounter in the late 1890s something unprecedented in the quantity and audacity of the lying propaganda that was used in drawing the British people into the Anglo-Boer War. This new evil, or recurrence of an old evil on a gigantic scale, came as a great shock to General Butler, who wrote as follows to the Colonial Secretary on December 18, 1898: "All the political questions in South Africa and nearly all the information sent from Cape Town are being worked by what I have already described as a colossal syndicate for the spread of false information". Hobson wrote in his book THE WAR IN SOUTH AFRICA: "South Africa presents a unique example of a large press, owned, controlled and operated by a small body of men with the direct aim of bringing about a conflict which shall serve their business interests". With prophetic insight, Hobson wrote a book, THE PSYCHOLOGY OF JINGOISM, which, as an analysis of the dishonest uses of propaganda, bears comparison with George Orwell's NINETEEN EIGHTY FOUR. Only a few of the major historic changes which ensued need be mentioned for our present purposes: the Anglo-Boer War; two World Wars; the Bolshevik Revolution and setting up of the Soviet Union as an industrial and military super-power; the dismantling of the colonial empires and conversion of the former colonies into new nations, few of them economically viable; the delivery of mainland China and other vast areas in the Far East to totalitarian socialist rule; the setting up of the United Nations with its innumerable agencies as the prototype of some form of world government; and the progressive undermining of the national sovereignty of all the Western nations. It is significant that the first years of the 20th century also ushered in a phenomenon that was to remain a conspicuous feature of the ensuing age of conflict, namely the concentration camp, symbol of an expanded barbarity in which civilians join the soldiers in the front line of every major conflict. We need to know what were the deep-seated changes in human affairs which gave rise to a worldwide chain-reaction of conflict and tragedy. As we shall try to show, these deep-rooted changes occurred in two quite separate realms, money and intellect. So, let us begin with an examination of the great change which took place in the world of money. Towards the end of the 19th century money began to acquire a new role and meaning in human affairs as economics began to prevail over politics. The two need to be clearly distinguished as sources of value, motivation and control at the level of leadership. Politics is a social function concerned with the total welfare of a community, long-term as well as short-term, in which the requirements of economics, although always important, have only a supportive or secondary role. Economic thinking, a mere department of political thinking, is concerned exclusively with the requirements of economic prosperity and progress. It assumes automatically that whatever is good for business is good for the community as a whole, an attitude of mind that excludes virtually all other considerations. What happened towards the end of the 19th century was, therefore, not something of sudden occurrence; it must be seen rather as a crucial stage having been reached in a process which had continued slowly during most of the preceding century. Not only did the Anglo-Boer War signalize the beginning of the end of the British Empire, it also signalized the beginning of the end of national financial sovereignties all over the Western world, a process that was to reach its culmination only in the 1930s when the great American pioneering families, headed by J.P. Morgan, were finally edged out of their dominating position in Wall Street. In the relations of politics and high finance there subsisted a very complex state of affairs until shortly before the commencement of World War II, which can be briefly explained as follows. There had always existed within the national states of the Western world families or dynasties of bankers, like the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Montefiores, etc. who lent to governments and specialized in transactions across national frontiers, but these were never fully integrated as an international system capable of controlling politics on an international basis. These concentrations of high finance, although always influential, lacked the power wholly to control the politics of the national states, but each remained an important part of a nationally oriented constellation of financial power. This was a situation that suited them well enough in the circumstances prevailing until the turn of the century. Enormous influence they could exert, - both nationally and internationally, but not the dominating power they were later to acquire. Paradoxically, in spite of the enormous lead which the Jewish banking dynasties had gained in international commerce, it was the gentile financiers with their ownership and access to the cornucopia of new wealth, plus their control of national politics, who First established high finance on a fully internationalized basis. The facts are supplied by Dr. Carroll Quigley: The apex of the system was to be the Bank of International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury bonds, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by sub-sequent economic rewards in the business world. (Tragedy and Hope). Quigley explains further that the Rothschilds had been pre-eminent during much of the 19th century, but at the end of that century "they were being replaced by J.P. Morgan", whose central office was in New York, although it. operated as if it were in London "Where it had indeed originated as George Peabody and Company in I838". The process by which the separate national concentrations of financial power were absorbed into a global concentration was only completed in the 1930s, producing among other historical consequences the rise of the Third Reich in Germany, the outbreak of World War II and subsequent involvement of the United States and Japan, and the setting up of a Marxist-Leninist People's Republic of China. Professor Quigley supplies many of the facts about the final shift in the center of gravity of financial power, and his story begins with these ominous words: "The third stage of capitalism is of such overwhelming significance in the history of the twentieth century, and its ramifications and influences have been so subterranean and even occult, that we may be excused if we devote considerable attention to its organization and methods." (Opp. cit, p.50). It is the story, assembled from a vast accumulation of documented facts, of a process of change in the United States, beginning before World War I, which Wilmot Robertson was later to describe as the "dispossession of the American majority", (5) culminating in what Quigley calls "a shift on all levels, from changing tastes in newspaper comic strips . . . to profound change in the power nexus of the 'American Establishment'" >From the 1880s the United States had been ruled from behind the scenes by a plutocracy supported by the fortunes of the great American pioneering families - Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Mellon, Duke, Whitney, Ford, Du Pont, etc - a power constellation with J.P. Morgan as its banking center. This "Eastern Establishment" is described by Quigley as "high Episcopalian, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, and European-culture-conscious", and was matched with a similar establishment on the other side of the Atlantic with Montagu Norman as its banking head. The two worked closely together and came to be known as the "Anglo- American Establishment. Quigley tells us of the "decline of J.P. Morgan itself from its deeply anonymous status as a partnership (founded in 1861) to its transformation into an incorporated public company in 1940 to its final disappearance by absorption into its chief banking subsidiary, the Guaranty Trust Company, in 1959". Quigley says that the less obvious implication of the shift in Wall Street was the realization by the Morgan group that it no longer had the votes on the Board of Trustees of Columbia University to nominate a successor to Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, the retiring president. In a word, the control of American higher education had quietly been taken out of the hands of America's great pioneering families, described by Quigley as "high Episcopalian, Anglophile and European-culture-conscious" - a studiously discreet way of saying that they were not Jewish. Wall Street fell into the hands of the international financiers like a ripe plum, their real battle having been fought and won in the realm of parliamentary politics by methods which are still standard practice in the Western world; these include the financing of party politics, the manipulation of public opinion through the medium of newspapers, radio, the cinema, the book trade, etc, plus the penetration, financing and manipulation of trade union movements. This was a take-over exercise in which America s emerging secret rulers could draw on centuries of accumulated expertise and experience as a nation struggling to survive in dispersion. The eclipse of the power of the great American Families first took the form of taxation laws, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913 and culminating in the inheritance tax, which drove all the great family fortunes into the refuge of tax-exempt foundations. Morgan and his circle lost control of the Federal Government as one money-and-intellect alliance was subtly replaced by another. And the fact that a money-and-intellect alliance behaves in much the same way no matter who controls it made the change hard to detect. The Morgan group dabbled in the politics of the radical left and lost no time in trying to get a foothold in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution. But at this game they were no match for their Jewish rivals. The rival Wall Street elites were both fired by the ideal and ambition of a "new world order", but there the similarity ended. The original American establishment, like its British opposite number, was for containing the Soviet Union with its socialist rulers with a view to ultimate absorption of the Russian empire into a new world order to be raised on the foundations of the British Empire and which they, as inheritors of the Rhodes dream, would control. The other, the new Eastern Establishment. was for building up the Soviet Union as an industrial and military giant which would replace the British Empire as the foundation of a new world order These developments in the realm of finance capitalism and power politics came to a climax towards the end of the 1930s, coinciding with a considerable eruption all over the Western world of a social phenomenon misleadingly described as "anti-Semitism". (6) Professor Hannah Arendt, in her book The Origins of Totalitarianism puts it frankly and succinctly: "Twentieth century political developments have driven the Jewish people into the storm center of events . . . the Jewish question and antisemitism . . . became the catalytic agent first for the rise of the Nazi movement and the establishment of the organizational structure of the Third Reich . . . then for a world war of unparalleled ferocity. Henry Ford, who for many years had roundly condemned all the big bankers as the natural enemies of private enterprise industry, now drew a clear distinction between the house of Morgan, which he described as "constructive", and its rivals, whom he described as "warmongers".(7) Morgan himself, like his opposite number in London, Montagu Norman, was known to dislike the Jews. The talks of Father Coughlin and writings of Father Denis Fahey, the frantic efforts of Charles Lindbergh to keep America out of the war, and the activities of Oswald Mosley and his Blackshirts in Britain, were all reactions to the appearance of the Jewish people in "the storm center" of 20th century politics. What all these alarming developments mean is that a highly concentrated Jewish financial power was suddenly seen to be gaining ascendancy in the West. Another layer in the prevailing political reality during the last decades of the l9th century must now be studied separately - namely, the thoughts about the future that were then circulating in the English ruling classes. Cecil John Rhodes was one of the most potent men of action in English history, but he was also a visionary and dreamer, pictured by friend and foe as a callouses bestriding the continent of Africa. His ability to inspire activity and loyalty in others was proverbial. In the realm of pure thought, however, the unifying and emergising agent was not Rhodes but John Ruskin, at one time Slade Professor of Fine Arts at Oxford University, who had armed a generation of young Englishmen with an ideology of service having as its object the creation of a better and happier world. This was to be imagined as an extended application of the civilizing and humanizing concept of the British Empire; it was to be a fellowship of free and independent states held together by an abstract principle which came to be labeled the "English idea". The numinosity, or sense of magic, evoked by these ideas can be traced to a single cause: the ideology of a "brave new world", with order and welfare for all mankind, was offered as a replacement for a religious orthodoxy that had long since begun to crumble under the impact of a scientific "enlightenment"; there was something to restore to the existence of the educated and energetic a keen sense of meaning, purpose and direction, and ideology, moreover, which sanctified imperial expansion and the personal advancement of all its servants. So potent was this ideology as a secular religion that it won converts all over the Western world; even former leaders of the conquered Boers, including General Louis Botha, who was to be South Africa's first Prime Minister, and General Jan Christian Smuts, yielded to its psychic charm. Practical measures to give effect to this political idealism took the form of a range of operations including the Rhodes Scholarship Trust, the semi-secret Round Table movement, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the American Council on Foreign Relations, etc. This was definitely a racial affair, invoking on both sides of the Atlantic a genteel racial response. Ralph Durand, in a book about Oxford University published in 1909, wrote of "Cecil Rhodes of Oriel, the dreamer of great dreams ... Believing that the preservation of the peace of the world lay in the hands of men of Teuton blood, he made provision in his will for the founding at Oxford of scholarships that would be open to citizens of the British Empire, the German Empire and the United States"- OXFORD: ITS BUILDINGS AND GARDENS, published by Grant Richards, London. The fatal flaw in this ideology does not belong to the art or science of politics nor that of high finance, but to an area of knowledge less readily accessible to exploration and discussion, namely, metaphysics. Quigley puts his hand on the key to that riddle: each of the central banks in the different national states, he says, "sought to dominate its government" and to "influence co-operative politicians by subsequent rewards in the business world". What this means is that something had already gone wrong in the West's different national power structures - all had incorporated a system of money creation and debt, a corrupting influence with implications of infinite complexity. Money had become progressively the measure of all things, with a ruling elite drawn less and less from the land and more and more >from the factory and the counting houses. The nations had, in fact, become plutocracies, capable of maintaining themselves in power with a public opinion not sought and consulted as before but CREATED as required by newspapers, patronage and other "rewards in the business world". Such a conversion of money into public opinion and support was accomplished in Britain by Rhodes and Milner and their "gold bug" partners, with a total disregard for all moral considerations. Money had shown what money could do. There was, thus, an iron inevitability about the outcome of a struggle which the gentile financiers did not even see as a struggle: AN ALIEN HIGH FINANCE firmly united by long-range political aims, increasingly influenced the politics of the different national states and finally DISPLACED the gentile financiers as managers of the new international banking structure. And educated minds, conditioned by John Ruskin's secular ideology calling for a "new world" to be raised on the foundations of the British Empire, seem to have had no difficulty in transferring their attachment and enthusiasm to a new idealogy worked out by Marx and Engles. Antony Sutton's trilogy, WALL STREET AND THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION, WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER, and WALL STREET AND FDR,contains a vast quantity of information but is more remarkable FOR WHAT IT OMITS. For that Which is omitted is precisely what Professor Hannah Arendt correctly describes as the "catalytic agent" in the "storm center of events", namely, the role of the Jewish people in 2Oth century power politics. So far as Sutton is concerned there is and always was only one "Wall Street Establishment", which is made to carry the main blame for the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution and later fur the financing of Hitler's rise to power in Germany. That is a misleading over-simplification of the story. In fact, Wall Street during the two preceding decades had a sort of split personality, one half of it symbolized by Morgan and the other by Warbug. It is true,as alleged, that "Wall Street" helped to finance the Bolshevik Revolution, but in this exercise the Warburg faction (Jacob Schiff in particular) took the initiative, with the Morgan faction getting all The bad publicity as they belatedly tried to get a share of the action. There is much evidence also to support the contention that "Wall Street", this time clearly the Morgan interests, supported Hitler's rise to power. But at the same time who, if not the internationalists, were funding the Communist Party in these crucial elections in Germany in 1930 in which the communists gained spectacular successes? The fiercest political struggles in the 1930s all over the West can now be more clearly seen as so many proxy battles on behalf of rival concentrations of financial power, culminating in World II and the triumph of the internationalists. In Britain opposition to World War II came from what remained of the British end of the original Anglo-American establishment, labeled the "Clivenden set" - Cliveden being the name of the home of Lord Astor. This interpretation will also help to explain one of the weirdest and most mysterious episodes in American history - a reported attempt, with the assistance of the American Legion and armed forces, to set up a "fascist style" dictatorship in the White House. News of the plot was given brief front-page treatment in the NEW YORK TIMES on November 21, 1931; a congressional committee was set up to investigate the allegations; but then all news of the plot faded out of the press. Those involved included a few leading personalities in the American Legion and another organization known as Liberty League, which together seem to have undertaken to make available a force of 500,000 men. Leadership of the operation was offered to Major-General Smedley D. Butler, a much decorated military hero, but there is no real evidence that he ever agreed to go along with the plotters. (8) Significantly, it is exclusively the gentile power -wielders of big finance and big business who were identified as the culprits behind the scene, all linked in one way or another with J.P. Morgan: Grayson Murphy, a director of the Guaranty Company; Jackson Martindell, associated with Stone and Webster, allied to the Morgans; the DuPont Company; the Remington Arms Company, controlled by DuPont; and the Morgan-Harriman financial interests. It would seem, therefore, that the Morganite financiers and industrialists, finding themselves at last outmaneuvered and outgunned in Wall Street, were tempted to take desperate measures against the international financiers - as had been done with some success in Italy and Germany. As the rivalry of separate national constellations of financial power gave rise to last century's scramble for colonial possessions, so the consolidation of financial power on a global basis in the 20th century required the dismantling of all the colonial empires and their replacement with innumerable new states over which the separate nations of the West would be able to exercise little or no influence. A clear distinction must, thus, be drawn between the pace and quantity of change and conflict in the world up until l939, when the new imperium was still in the process of being established, and the pace and quantity of change and conflict after the new imperium had emerged as the only real victor in World War II. So much for the revolutionary change which occurred in the realm of high finance. - - - - - - We must now briefly examine a fundamentally charged Western intellect, which can be regarded as one of the main causes of our century of conflict - the other half of that "alliance of money and intellect". The change can be said to have begun more than two centuries ago and to have been concomitant with the decline of Christianity as the consensus religion of the West. The new kind of thinking and the new system of values which were inaugurated as a result of the decline of the influence of Christian orthodoxy came to be known as socialism. Socialism however, was only one of the symptoms of something much deeper with profound metaphysical implications, a condition better represented by the words "idealism" and "humanism"; socialism is, in fact, only idealism with an economic and political programme of sorts. So, it is this "idealism" which we need to understand, an attitude to existence that responds readily to any plausible programme or ideology proposing the betterment of the world and of mankind. Such ideologies have included anarchism, nihilism, syndicalism, socialism, communism, etc. This idealism supplies the psychic foundation for a system of secular belief which acquires the force and intensity of the religion which it has replaced. There is a fundamental and most important difference between 1- a metaphysical or religious system of belief, and 2- a secular or humanist system of belief . The difference can be stated as follows: 1. All the great religions which have endured down the ages, however different in their orthodoxies are founded on the central belief that human existence, like everything else in the universe, is governed by immutable laws of cause and effect which the intelligence must discover and obey. What this amounts to is a recognition that human freedom finds fulfillment only as FREEDOM UNDER LAW. We are free to do as we please but, if we are to avoid the disappointment of our hopes and expectations, if we are to preserve psychic health, we must first find out what can and what cannot be done. 2. Fundamental to idealism or humanism is the notion that the intellect is fully qualified to be a law unto itself in promoting purposes which can be visualized or imagined as socially advantageous, that is, well intentioned and for the common good. The element of error in this perception of the intellect as the highest source of guidance in human affairs is extremely subtle, hard to detect, and even harder to explain; it can be compared with a compass deflection in navigation which progressively falsifies all positional and directional calculations. The ancients called it HUBRIS, an attitude that presupposes that the intellect can conquer life itself as it can conquer the human environment. Milton handles this most profound theme in the language of symbolism in his great epic poem PARADISE LOST. (9) The almost irresistible attraction of socialism for the educated classes who last century found themselves without the support of their ancestral Christian faith is, therefore, understandable for it supplied a highly plausible and ingeniously elaborated framework of ideas calculated to free the world from many evils and to bring happiness and contentment to mankind. It offered to the educated individual a laudable ambition and an integrated intellectual frame of reference which promised to infuse his existence with meaning and purpose. Yet it is precisely this idealism, this attitude and this plausible kind of thinking, which has given the world a century of conflict and tragedy without precedent in recorded history. Frankly, evil intentions in other ages never produced cruelty and disorder on so vast a scale as idealism or humanism have produced in the 20th century. Evil at the service of good intentions has been exposed by the experience of history as capable of producing the most dreadful consequences. It is in this area of conduct where ends are called on to justify means that the mind makes mistakes of a kind that the mind itself can not easily understand and where the mind is most exposed to the influences of hostile cunning. The great mistake is to suppose that the means used can be justified by the quality of the ends proposed when, in fact, as experience may only demonstrate belatedly, it is only the actual results produced that can ever justify the means. The idea that the laudable end envisioned, however distantly separated from the present, justifies the employment of whatever means are required for its attainment, is thus fundamental to idealism or humanism in whatever form it may take, whether as socialism or as that benevolent imperialism preached by John Ruskin and which captivated the mind of the young Cecil John Rhodes. Political idealism in action exhibits two major negative aspects: it undertakes long-term enterprises which are incapable of actualization because in conflict with unalterable requirements of human nature as expressed in instinct, and it produces among its "believers" a progressive blunting or description of what, for want of a more precise description, we can call "a sense of evil". In other words, immoral behavior in the service of an ideal is condoned and even recommended, and any suffering that ensues is habitually regarded with indifference as part of the price that must be paid for "progress". Socialism as a substitute for a discredited religious orthodoxy, after a long period of incubation in Germany and central Europe early in the 19th century, was given a more scholarly form as "dialectical materialism", a materialistic interpretation of existence, by Karl Marx and was later presented in a more delusive and accept- able form by leading British intellectuals, including Edward Pease, George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb. The Fabian Society and later the London School of Economics were then set up as seedbeds for the future proliferation of socialist ideas and ideals throughout the English-speaking world, including the United States. Significantly Julius Wernher, of the Wernher-Beit conglomerate that supported Milner's effort to precipitate the Anglo-Boer War, contributed substantially to the funding of the London School of Economics and socialist movements everywhere, all vehemently "anti-capitalists", continued to receive massive support from the most powerful "capitalists." It was because of THE ABSENCE OF ANY FUNDAMENTAL ANTAGONISM between the philosophies of Juhn Ruskin and of Karl Marx that it was possible for the "Brave new World" ambition, so actively promoted by Rhodes and his heirs, to be absorbed into the socialist world-power vortex with hardly a sign that anything untoward had happened. In fact, the international socialists, instruments of the most highly concentrated financial power, were able to take over the Rhodes-Milner establishment, complete with its worldwide network of organizations - the Rhodes Scholarship Trust, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilaterals, etc - and continue to run it as if still under its original management; indeed, it simply gave the socialists a new Dimension for the exercise of their incomparable skill in the arts of deception. The decay of Christianity in its orthodox forms, and especially in its institutionalized form as the Church, proved overwhelmingly to the advantage of the new order of financiers. For many centuries in the West, Christian orthodoxy had been more than something to believe; it had become a world view, an interpretation of the totality of existence and, as such, the very medium in which men's minds had their reality, as water is the medium in which fish fulfill their existence. The educated classes in the west would need a new religion, better still a secular substitute, one fully in harmony with the new rationalist climate of thought engendered by a triumphant science. This was provided in the form of socialism, an intellectual frame of reference and system of values which has continued to dominate higher education in the West into the beginning of the 20th century, especially in academic disciplines like history, anthropology, sociology and political science This socialism can be said to have two separate and different realities: 1- It is something that can be believed; and 2- It is something that can be used. Spengler recognized socialism's double character when he remarked that every proletarian movement, even a communist one, "Operates in the interest of money" adding significantly "without the idealist in its ranks having the slightest suspicion of the fact". (10) The crippling effect of socialism as an intellectual frame of reference can be ascribed to the fact that it is basically a confidence trick, one of the components of a dialectical trap with money that funds socialism as THESIS, a socialism in which men believe as ANTITHESIS and "the new imperium" as SYNTHESIS. Money grabs and concentrates power and socialism promises the ultimate redistribution of ownership and power; the resolution of this contradiction supplies the new imperium with its irresistible dynamic. But why should an alliance of money and intellect ostensibly bent on reforming the world and reducing it to order have produced in the 20th century so much more conflict than was produced last century and earlier when the nations of Europe were engaged in a competitive scramble for aggrandizement, and especially for colonial possessions? It would appear that money and intellect as determinants in the shaping of history had undergone a radical change for the worse, giving rise, among other phenomena, to what Professor P.T. Bauer has described as "an undeclared, one-sided civil war in the West". (11) A money power alien to the West cannot tolerate health, strength and order in the West; it is, therefore, committed to policies of destructiveness. Health, strength and order in any part of the world can only mean selfwill and self determination in that area, an obstacle to money's global power-concentrating purposes. An alien money power needs a world of ethnic communities reduced to a condition of arrested cultural and political development and has concentrated its enmity on the Western community of nations, which it sees as the main rival for world dominion. The new imperium finds its strength in the weakness of all those it seeks to control. The 19th century plutocracies, by contrast, could not afford to weaken their own national communities; and by undisguised direct rule in their colonies, requiring little force, were able to create areas of order which were able to create areas of order which were almost always under their control. Moreover, the colonial powers tended to leave as much as possible unchanged and undisturbed in the areas which came under their control, ruling as far as possible through the medium of traditional institutions. Placing themselves, as it were, at the top of the primaeval hierarchical order. The new imperium has spread conflict and disorder trying to rule secretly and indirectly by means of artificially contrived surrogate regimes, everywhere disrupting the natural hierarchical order within and between ethnic groups. In other words, an extraneous power has everywhere prevented the emergence of what Robert Ardrey would call the natural "pecking order" within and between contiguous ethnic groups. In fact, in very many instances, a reversal of the ancient "pecking order" (12) has been found necessary by the world's new secret rulers. (13) It is this disturbance of relationships within and between ethnic groups which has given the 20th century an age of conflict and tragedy without precedent in world history. A process of unfolding history having as its culmination the decline of the West and a century of unprecedented conflict can be traced to many causes. but central to all the corrupting principle of USURY - money traded as a commodity and lent at interest - as a component of the world's monetary system. Our century of conflict thus has many meanings, some of them beyond our powers of understanding, but that which we need and can use is the knowledge that the peoples of the West have only themselves to blame for the plight in which they and the rest of the world find themselves today; for they have themselves created the morally unhygienic conditions in which evil flourishes as never before. The prediction and promise of the Old Testament prophets has been fulfilled: the nation of lenders has become "the head" and all the others, blind to usury's hidden peril, "the tail" - - - - - - 1. This Age of Conflict, F.P. Chambers, C.P. Harris and C. G. Bayley (Harcourt Brace & Co). 2. See, The Siege of South Africa, (Institute for Historical Review), and The Zionist Factor (Veritas), both Ivor Benson. 3. See, The Zionist Factor, above mentioned. 4. An Autobiography, Sir William Butler (Constable). 5. The Dispossessed Majority, Wilmot Robertson (Howard Allen) 6. See, Antisemitism, Bernard Lazare (Britons); The Zionist Connection, Alfred M. Lilienthal (Veritas); The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed (Veritas); and others. 7. Who Financed Hitler, James Pool and Suzanne Pool (Dial Press) 8. War is a Racket, Smedley Butler (Noontide Press) 9. See, A Preface to Paradise Lost, C. S. Lewis (Oxford University Press). 10. The Decline of the West, Oswald Spengler, (Allen & Unwin). 11. Equality, the Third World and Economic Delusion, P.T. Bauer (Weidenfeld & Nicolson). 12. African Genesis, Robert Ardrey (Collins). 13. See, 'Dr. Sun Yat-sen and the Principals of Nationalism' in Truth Out of Africa. Ivor Benson (Veritas). 14. See, The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed (Veritas). Other References in Text: Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich). Ralph Durand, Oxford: It's Buildings and Gardens (Grant Richards) J.A. Hobson, The Psychology of Jingoism, and the War in South Africa (James Nisbet). John Milton, Paradise Lost (New American Library). George Orwell, 1984 (Secker & Warburg) Thomas Pakenham, The Boer War (Weidenfeld & Nicolson) Carrol Quigley, Tragedy and Hope (Macmillan Company). Antony C. Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (both Veritas), and Wall Street and FDR (Random House). Arnold Toynbee, A Study of History. ------ A guide to further reading is given under the heading BIBLIOGRAPHY, at the end of Part Two, 'The Source and Technology of Illegitimate Power." ---------------------------------------- Get the "Identity.faq" by anonymous FTP and many other files from: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From firstname.lastname@example.com Sun Jun 18 17:00:36 PDT 1995 Article: 5791 of alt.politics.nationalism.white Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage From: email@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: What is Racism? Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:31:49 GMT Lines: 274 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.com --------------------------------------- Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by anonymous FTP from: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA ------------------------------------------------- WHAT IS RACISM? by Thomas Jackson {Originally Published in American Renaissance, Vol 2, No. 8} There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater horror than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable texture of American life. "Racism" is never shrugged off. For example, when a white Georgetown Law School student reported earlier this year that black students are not as qualified as white students, it set off a booming, national controversy about "racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he would have attracted far less attention and criticism. Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full alert for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it, churches preach against it, America is said to be racked with it, but just what *is* racism? Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the word. They usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock is superior to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are rooted in race. When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this. Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to understanding what Americans *do* mean. A peculiarly American meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are equal. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, all races have been declared to be equally talented and hard- working, and anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong but evil. The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important. If blacks, for example, are equal to whites in every way, what accounts for their poverty, criminality, and dissipation? Since any theory of racial differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is white racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone, and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive racism. Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state. All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic. Any explanation for black failure that does not depend on white wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences. Thus, even if today's whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's whites must have oppressed them. If whites do not consciously oppress blacks, they must oppress them UNconsciously. If no obviously racist individuals can be identified, then *institutions* must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so terribly in America, there simply must be millions of white people we do not know about, who are working day and night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion, an indictment of white people. The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to believe that the only explanation for non-white failure is white racism, every time a non-white is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, white society stands accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or misbehavior by non-whites is standing proof that white society is riddled with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-whites fail to succeed in life at exactly the same level as whites, whites will be, by definition, thwarting and oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be committed almost exclusively by white people. Indeed, a black congressman >from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit, have argued that only white people *can* be racist. Likewise, in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which she explained that *all* whites are racist and that *only* whites can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality? Although some blacks and liberal whites concede that non-whites can, perhaps, be racist, they invariably add that non-whites have been forced into it as self-defense because of centuries of white oppression. What appears to be non-white racism is so understandable and forgivable that it hardly deserves the name. Thus, whether or not an act is called racism depends on the race of the racist. What would surely be called racism when done by whites is thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The reverse is also true. Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost tedious to list them: When a white man kills a black man and uses the word "nigger" while doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and the nation beats its collective breast; when members of the black Yahweh cult carry out ritual murders of random whites, the media are silent (see AR of March, 1991). College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-whites as "racist," but ignore scurrilous attacks on whites. At election time, if 60 percent of the white voters vote for a white candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote for the black opponent, it is white who are accused of racial bias. There are 107 "historically black" colleges, whose fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name of diversity, but all historically white colleges must be forcibly integrated in the name of... the same thing. To resist would be racist. "Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything that could be construed as an expression of white pride is a form of hatred. It is perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect school instruction and driver's tests in their own languages, whereas for native Americans to ask them to learn English is racist. Blatant anti-white prejudice, in the form of affirmative action, is now the law of the land. Anything remotely like affirmative action, if practiced in favor of whites, would be attacked as despicable favoritism. All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs and caucuses are thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club or association expressly for whites is by definition racist. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) campaigns openly for black advantage but is a respected "civil rights" organization. The National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) campaigns merely for equal treatment of all races, but is said to be viciously racist. At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action have set up student unions for whites, analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, etc, and have been roundly condemned as racists. Recently, when the white students at Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones that non- whites have. They were turned down in horror. Indeed, in America today, any club not specifically formed to be a white enclave but whose members simply happen all to be white is branded as racist. Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality of American racism is "celebration of diversity." It has begun to dawn on a few people that "diversity" is always achieved at the expense of whites (and sometimes men), and never the other way around. No one proposes that Howard University be made more diverse by admitting whites, Hispanics, or Asians. No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University in San Jose (CA) would benefit from the diversity of having non-Hispanics on campus. No one suggests that the Black Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the NAACP or the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from a lack of diversity. Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to celebrate *homogeneity*. And yet any all-white group - a company, a town, a school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to suffer from a crippling lack of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as possible. Only when whites have been reduced to a minority has "diversity" been achieved. Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace" diversity, as we are so often asked to do, is no different from *deploring an excess of whites.* In fact, the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess of whites. Our current immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90 percent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-white. The several million illegal immigrants that enter the country every year are virtually all non-white. It would be racist not to be grateful for this laudable contribution to "diversity." It is, of course, only white nations that are called upon to practice this kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to imagine a nation of any other race countenancing blatant dispossession of this kind. What if the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated citizens across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into thinking that Mexico was being "culturally enriched?" What if the state of Chihuahua were losing its majority population to poor whites who demanded that schools be taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of July, who demanded the right to vote even if they weren't citizens, who clamored for "affirmative action" in jobs and schooling? Would Mexico - or any other non-white nation - tolerate this kind of cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not. Yet white Americans are supposed to look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians entering their country as a priceless cultural gift. They are supposed to "celebrate" their own loss of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own dispossession, for to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist. There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non- whites advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of "hating" another group. Blacks can join "civil rights" groups and Hispanics can be activists without fear of being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They can agitate openly for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of whites. They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds without anyone ever suggesting that they are "anti-white." Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to affirmative action to be called haters. They need only subject racial policies that are clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called racists. Should they actually go so far as to say that they prefer the company of their own kind, that they wish to be left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European heritage, they are irredeemably wicked and hateful. Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race relations. All non-whites are allowed to prefer the company of their own kind, to think of themselves as groups with interests distinct from those of the whole, and to work openly for group advantage. None of this is thought to be racist. At the same time, *whites* must *also* champion the racial interests of non-whites. They must sacrifice their own future on the altar of "diversity" and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to encourage, even to subsidize, the displacement of a European people and culture by alien peoples and cultures. To put it in the simplest possible terms, white people are cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit racial and cultural suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism. Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United States is perfectly natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to love one's people and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are doubtless astonished to discover that simply by setting foot in the United States they are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them? Is it surprising that they should want their languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters to take possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? If the once-great people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and is prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for it, why should Mexicans and Cambodians complain? No, it is the white enterprise in the United States that is unnatural, unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let themselves be convinced that it is racist merely to object to dispossession, much less to work for their own interests. Never in the history of the world has a dominant people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its wealth to aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into thinking that there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its heritage, and giving away to others its place in history. Of all the races in America, only whites have been tricked into thinking that a preference for one's own kind is racism. Only whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow "hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of their own kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men love their families more than their neighbors, but this does not mean that they hate their neighbors. Whites who love their racial family need bear no ill will towards non-whites. They only wish to be left alone to participate in the unfolding of their racial and cultural destinies. What whites in America are being asked to do is therefore utterly unnatural. They are being asked to devote themselves to the interests of other races and to ignore the interests of their own. This is like asking a man to forsake his own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to do otherwise would be "racist." What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say. It is any opposition by whites to official policies of racial preference for non-whites. It is any preference by whites for their own people and culture. It is any resistance by whites to the idea of becoming a minority people. It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in short, any of the normal aspirations of people-hood that have defined nations since the beginning of history - but only so long as the aspirations are those of whites. ------------------------ For further study on the issue of race listen to the recorded message, _Scriptural Understanding of Race_ by Pastor Pete J. Peters. Audio tape $4.00 offering, booklet by same name $1.00. Available from Scriptures for America, P.O. Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO 80535 --------------------------------------- Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by anonymous FTP from: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA ------------------------------------------------- -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From email@example.com Sun Jun 18 17:00:41 PDT 1995 Article: 5792 of alt.politics.nationalism.white Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage From: email@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: The Ducks and the Hens Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:32:52 GMT Lines: 393 Sender: email@example.com From: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA ----------------------------------- The Fable of the DUCKS AND THE HENS Many, many years ago, When animals could speak A wondrous thing the ducks befell; Their tale is quite unique. Down by a pond dwelt all these ducks, Ten thousand at the least. Their duckish joys were undisturbed, By any man or beast. One day, down near the entrance gate, There was an awful din. A hundred hens all out of breath, Were begging to come in. "Oh, let us in!" the poor birds cried. "Before we do expire!" "'Tis only by the merest inch That we escaped the fire!" Their feathers singed, their combs adroop, They were the saddest sight. They'd run a hundred miles or more, All day and then all night. "Come in! Come in!" the ducks all quacked, "For you our hearts do bleed! "We'll share our happy lot with you, "Just tell us what you need!" And so the poor, bedraggled hens, Among the ducks moved in. "For, after all," the ducks declared, "We're sisters 'neath the skin." Before too many months had passed, The hens were good as new. They sent for all their rooster friends, And these were welcomed too. To please their hosts, the chickens tried to waddle and to quack, To simulate the duckish ways they quickly learned the knack. This pleased the flock of ducks, because it gratified their pride. But hear my tale, and learn how they got taken for a ride. The ducks, it seemed, spent all their time in fixing up the place, In growing food and building homes and cleaning every space. They asked the hens what they would do to earn their daily bread. "We'll teach and write and entertain, and buy and sell," they said. And so the hens began to teach the baby ducks and chicks. They traded food and eggs and things, with many clever tricks. They wrote great books and put on shows; of genius they'd no lack. It wasn't long till chickens owned The Duckville Daily Quack. One day a mother duck who took Her ducklings to the lake, Was flabbergasted when one said, "A swim I will not take!" "Why, ducklings always swim!" she gasped. "It's what you're built to do! "Like bunnies hop, and crickets chirp, and cows "most always moo!" "You're nuts!" her little son replied, "That stuff is all old hat!" "It's wrong for birds to swim; besides, It's damned cold on my pratt!" "Oh, fie!" the mother duck exclaimed, "You're talking like a fool!" Up quacked the other ducks and said, "He's right! We learned in school!" "Such things must stop!" the mother cried, "Those hens can't teach such lies!" "For sheer ingratitude and nerve, I'm sure this takes the prize!" But she was wrong, for even then the hens did thump the tub, Demanding they be let into The Duckville Swimming Club. "But you don't swim!" the ducks exclaimed, "To join, why should you care?" "That's not the point!" the hens replied, "To exclude us isn't fair!" The younger ducks, who'd been to school, Agreed right there and then: "To keep them out is bigotry! "'Twould just be anti-hen!" Outnumbered by the younger ducks, The old ducks soon did lose. They agreed to let the hens all in, If they would pay the dues. That night the Duckville Daily Quack contained this banner spread: "Reactionary Ducks are Licked! Duckville Moves Ahead!" Down at the Duckville Gaiety, the young set laughed with glee, At cracks about "old fuddy ducks" in burlesque repartee. Next day the hens were at the club. A petition they'd sent 'round: They objected to the swimming fund with fury and with sound. "You use our dues to fix the pond, to keep it neat and trim, "And this is wrong," they said, "because you know we do not swim!" "God help us!" cried a wise old duck, "These chickens have gone mad!" "We'll take this thing to court, by George! And justice will be had!" But when they went up to the judge, imagine their dismay! A chicken-judge decreed that they a heavy fine to pay! "Minorities must have their rights!" The judge declared right then. "To use hens' dues to fix the pond is very anti-hen!" Once more the Duckville Daily Quack emblazoned 'cross the page: "Old-Fogey Ducks Refuse to See The Great New Coming Age!" In Duckville's church on Sunday morn, The preacher spoke these words, "Discrimination's got to stop! Remember, we're all birds!" The wisest duck in all the town sat down in black despair. "I'll write a book," he thought, "and then this madness I will bare!" "Let swimmers swim, let hoppers hop, let each one go his way." "Let none coerce a fellow bird!" Was what he had to say. "Twere wrong to force the hens to swim, so here's the problem's crux; "It's just as bad for hens to try to chicken-ize our ducks!" "I can't print that," the printer said, "twill put me in a mess!" "My shop is mortgaged to the hens; the chickens own my press!" This worried duck then tried to warn His friends by speech and pen, But young ducks fresh from school just jeered. "He's vicious anti-hen!" Now up the stream a little way was Gooseville, on the lake. The hens had come to Gooseville too, but the geese were more awake. When the hens began to spoil the young, and Gooseville's laws to flout, The geese rose up in righteous wrath and simply threw them out. Of course you know where they all ran; on Duckville they converged. "We've got to take these refugees," was what the hens all urged. The Duckville Daily Quack declared: "These geese will stop at naught! "They plan to conquer all the world! Atrocities they've wrought!" "That's right!" the young ducks all agreed, "We'll help our fellow birds! "These geese have plans to conquer us! We've read the Quack's own words!" They let the hens from Gooseville in, The whole bedraggled pack. And every hen took up a job on Duckville's Daily Quack! When Duckvilles' mayor's term was up, The Quack put up its duck. A vain and stupied duck was he, a verifiable cluck! But when he praised the wild young ducks, and cursed the evil geese, The Quack declared he was all-wise; His praise would never cease. The hens chipped in to help this cluck give grain away for free. The old ducks sadly shook their heads; the writing they could see. And, sure enough, this stupid duck, He was elected mayor. >From this point on, the Duckville ducks, they never had a prayer. The mayor said, "Gooseville must go! We'll wipe them off the map!" While Duckville slept, the scheming hens for Goosville set a trap. They called the geese by filthy names; they filled their pond with sticks. They helped the weasels catch the geese, and other hennish tricks. The geese got mad and threw some rocks. "It's war!" the Quack announced. "We ducks must fight those evil geese "'Till they've been soundly trounced!" The ducks (who knew not of the tricks indulged in by the mayor) Were filled with patriotic zeal, and pitched right in for fair! Now when the ducks had whipped the geese, the mayor called "Retreat!" "Our hennish friends should really take Gooseville's big main street!" The hens were back in Gooseville now. They starved and beat the geese. They prayed for peace-but organized the "Hennish Armed Police!" They drained the Gooseville swimming pond; they de-goose-ified the schools; They wrung the neck of Gooseville's mayor on lately made-up rules. They formed a council of the hens: "United Birds" the name. The other birds who joined the thing did not perceive the game. No sooner had they set this up, than they announced their plan To seize up Swanville as a home for all their hennish clan. They took a vote amongst the hens, and every one approved! "Swanville was for hens!" they said, "Way back, before we moved." And so they kicked the swans all out with Duckville's help and power, And Duckville couldn't understand why swans on them turned sour. By this time, Duckville was a mess; The young ducks had gone mad. They stole and laughed at truth and law; They went completely bad. The hens were selling loco weed In every nasty den. But ducks who dared to mention this were labelled "anti-hen." The hens all preached of tolerance. They invoked the Golden Rule, But they subsidized the indigent, the greedy, and the fool. At last the very dumbest ducks began to smell a rat. "This mayor is no good!" they cried, "And we will soon fix that!" But the hens had planned for even this; a Candidate they had Whom even wise old ducks believed just never could be bad. This hen-tool duck had whipped the geese; A soldier-duck was he. Although the hens had set him up, the ducks all thought him free. This hen-tool got elected, through ignorance and greed, Through hennish lies in press and speech, through bribes of chicken feed. The hens now kicked the ducks around without a blush of shame, Until the mayor ran the town in nothing else by name. They pumped the swimming pool all dry; they taught the ducks to crow. While duckish numbers dwindled, the hens' began to grow. The hens stirred up the happy crows >from out the piney wood, to come and mix with all the ducks in the name of brotherhood. Things got so bad that fifty ducks who knew of days gone by Took up their wives and children and decided that they'd fly. They flew through storm and tempest; They froze, and many died. But on they drove, until, at last, a lovely lake they spied. They settled down exhausted, but soon went straight to work To build and clear and cultivate. No danger did they shirk. Now, after many years of toil, this little band had grown. The fields around were full of grain >from seeds that they had sown. The first ducks now were long since dead; their struggles long had ceased. Through hard work and suffering their joys had been increased. One day near the entrance gate there was and awful din; A hundred hens, all out of breath, were begging to come in. "Oh, let us in!" the poor birds cried, "Before we do expire!" "'Tis only by the merest inch...." And now our tale repeats itself entire. - G. L. Rockwell (1918-1967) --------------------------------------- Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by anonymous FTP from: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA ------------------------------------------------- -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From email@example.com Sun Jun 18 17:00:58 PDT 1995 Article: 5793 of alt.politics.nationalism.white Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage From: email@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: Whites & Blacks 100 Facts Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:29:59 GMT Lines: 989 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.com Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by anon. FTP from: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA Scriptures for America files are also available by WWW: http://nyx10.cs.du.edu:8001/~nmonagha/arc.html ------------------------------------------------- Whites & Blacks 100 FACTS (and one Lie) By Roger Roots Senator Bilbo's Warning "If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be wrecked, we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed, out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who would redeem our power. But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for a Negroid America as would be redemption and restoration of the Whiteman's blood which had been mixed with that of the Negro." -Senator Theodore G. Bilbo, of Mississippi in 1947 In the pages of this booklet are found 100 facts, the vast majority of which can be easily verified in any set of encyclopedias, almanacs, psychology text, and other reference materials commonly found in any public library. THE LIE Cleverly hidden within these hundred facts, for added incentive to read onward, is one lie. not a lie of statistical or grammatical error, but a ludicrous falsehood at once so absurd as to strike the reader as an insult to human intelligence, and yet so deadly evil that if allowed to go unanswered its final cost would be incalculable. I sincerely pledge that my motivations are not of insult or hatred, but of the deepest love for mankind and the truest concern for its future generations. my purpose is not to deceive but to enlighten, and I hope this work will help you reflect and reexamine your views on race. FACT #1: The White race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren icefields. It has been responsible for the invention of the printing press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, flight, rocketry, astronomy, the telescope, space travel, firearms, the transistor, radio, television, the telephone, the lightbulb, photography, motion pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the automobile, the steam engine, railroad transportation, the microscope, computers, and millions of other technological miracles. It has discovered countless medical advances, incredible applications, scientific progress, etc. Its members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Ceaser, Napoleon, William the Conqueror, Marco Polo, Washington, Jefferson, Hitler, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Columbus, Cabot, Edison, GrahamBell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Darwin, Newton, Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, Devinci, Poe, Tennyson, and thousands upon thousands of other notable achievers. (37) (39) FACT #2: Throughout 6,000 years of recorded history, the Black African Negro has invented nothing. Not a written language, weaved cloth, a calendar, a plow, a road, a bridge, a railway, a ship, a system of measurement, or even the wheel. (Note: This is in reference to the pure-blooded Negro.) He is not known to have ever cultivated a single crop or domesticated a single animal for his own use (although many powerful and docile beasts abounded around him.) His only known means of transporting goods was on the top of his hard burry head. For shelter he never progressed beyond the common mud hut, the construction of which a beaver or muskrat is capable. (21) (39) INTELLIGENCE FACT #3: The I.Q.'s of American Negroes are from 15 to 20 points, on average, below those of American Whites. (26) (16) (18) (22) FACT #4: These Black\White differences have been demonstrated repeatedly by every test ever conducted by every branch of the U.S. Military, every state, county, and local school board, the U.S. Dept. of Education, etc. The same ratio of difference has held true over a 40 year period. (18) (26) (24) FACT #5: With an average I.Q. of 85, only 16% of Blacks score over 100, while half the White population does. The Negro overlap of White median I.Q.'s ranges from 10 to 25 percent-- equality would require 50 percent. (31) (27) (16) FACT #6: Blacks are 6 times as likely to have I.Q.'s of 50 to 70 which put them in the slow learner (retarded) category, while Whites are ten times more likely to score 130 or over. (15) (16) (18) (23) FACT # 7: The U.S. government's PACE examination, given to 100,000 university graduates who are prospective professional or administrative civil-service employees each year, is passed with a score of 70 or above by 58% of the whites who take it but by only 12% of the Negroes. Among top scorers the difference between Negro and White performance is even more striking: 16% of the white applicants make scores of 90 or above, while only one-fifth of one percent of a Negro applicants score as high as 90--a White/Black success ration of 80/1. (27) FACT #8: Differences between Negro and White children increase with chronological age, the gap in performance being largest at the high school and college levels. (31) (26) FACT #9: White/Negro I.Q. differences are constantly excused as results of environmental variations. but at least five studies that have attempted to equate socio-economic backgrounds of the two races indicate no significant change in relative results. As environment improves, the Negro does better but so does the White. The gap is not decreased. (26) In fact, extensive research by DR. G.J. McGurk, associate Professor of Psychology at Villanove University, reveals that the gap in intelligence between Blacks and Whites INCREASES where socio-economic levels of both races are raised to the middle classes. (18) FACT #10: In 1915, Dr. G.W. Ferfuson took 1000 school children in Virginia, divided them into 5 racial categories, and tested them for mental aptitude. On average. full-blooded Negroes scored 69.2% as high as Whites. Three-quarter Negroes scored 73.0% as high as Whites. One-half Negroes scored 81.2% as high as Whites. One-quarter Negroes scored 91.8% as high as Whites. All of these Blacks lived as and considered themselves "Negroes." Their environments and "advantages" or disadvantages were exactly the same. (14) Also see (26) pg 452. FACT #11: Results of the Army Beta test given by the U.S. Army to over 386,000 illiterate soldiers in WWI showed Negro draftees to be "inferior to the Whites on all types of tests used in the Army." Additionally, tests were conducted upon pure Negroes, Mulattoes, and Quadroons. It was found that "the lighter groups made better scores." (14) FACT #12: Studies conducted with identical twins raised apart in radically different environments provide conclusive evidence that over-all influence of heredity exceeds that of environment in a ratio of about 3 to 1. (41) FACT #13: Even when Blacks and Whites have the same backgrounds, in terms of family income and childhood advantages, Blacks still have average I.Q. scores 12 to 15 points lower than comparable Whites. This includes cases where Black children have been adopted by White parents. Their I.Q.s may be improved by environment, but they are still closer to their biological parents than their adoptive parents. (3) (15) (26) FACT #14: Equalitarian ideologists often discount I.Q. test results with the excuse that they are culturally biased. Nonetheless, NO ONE, not the NAACP nor the United Negro College Fund, nor NEA had been able to develop an intelligence test which shows Blacks and Whites scoring equally. (15) (42) (3) FACT # 15: American Indians, who often live in conditions far worse than American Blacks during their entire lives, still consistently outscore them on I.Q. tests. (3) (27) FACT #16: The offspring of interracial marriages tend to have lower I.Q.s than the white parent. (11) (26) THE NEGRO BRAIN Fact #17: Among human races numerous studies have been made of the comparative weight of White and Negro brains with results that fell within the range of about an 8-12 percent lower weight for the Negro brain. Such studies have been conducted by Bean, Pearl, Vint, Tilney, Gordon, Todd, and others. (23) (27) FACT #18: In addition to the difference in brain weight, the Negro brain grows less after puberty than the white. Though the Negro brain and nervous system mature faster than the white brain, its development is arrested at an earlier age which limits further intellectual advancement. (22) (27) FACT #19: The thickness of the supragranular layer (the outside layer) of the Negro brain is about 15 percent thinner, and its convolutions are fewer and more simple, on average, than that of the White brain. (9) FACT #20: The frontal lobes of the Negro brain, responsible for abstract conceptional reasoning, are smaller relative to body weight, less fissured, and less complex than those of the White brain. (9) (27) (23) (22) ANTHROPOLOGY FACT #21: The name Homo sapien was first used by the 18th Century Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus. The word "sapien" means "wise." The name was originally used to speak of the White man and synonymous with "europaeus." As a result, many later taxonomists and geneticists believed that Negroes and other races should be classified as different species. In fact, Darwin declared in The Descent of Man that the varieties of mankind are so distinct that similar differences found in any other animal would warrant their classification in different species, if not different genera. (39) FACT #22: For his mammoth work, The Origin of Races, Professor Carleton Coon, President of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and the premier geneticist of the world, assembled massive evidence from geography, anatomy, genetics, physiology, comparative dentition, linguistics, archeology, and fossil records from 300 bone-bearing sites to verify his theory of pre-sapien racianation." In other words, Homo erectus was divided by race even before evolution into Homo sapien stage. (12) FACT #23: According to Dr. Coon, while the Caucasoid subspecies (the White race) was evolving in Europe, the Negro race was standing still on the evolutionary plane and is today no less than 200,000 years behind the European in skull and brain development. (9) FACT #24: The Negro skull, in addition to having a smaller brain volume and thicker cranial bones than that of the White, is prognathous; i.e., the lower face projects forward, rather in the manner of an animal's muzzle. In consequence, the Negro jaw is substantially longer, relative to its width, than the White jaw. A feature of the Negro lower jaw is its retention of a vestige of the "simian shelf," a bony region immediately behind the incisors. The simian shelf is a distinguishing characteristic of apes, and it is absent in Whites. (9) (12) (39) FACT #25: The skin of the Negro is thicker and possibly superior to the White's in the way it impedes the penetration of germs and in its protection from the ultraviolet rays of the sun. (39) (14) FACT #26: The dark color of the Negro is due to melanin pigment which is spread through every layer of the skin and is found even in the muscles and brain. (9) (27) FACT #27: An African dentist can tell a Negro's tooth from a white man's at a glance. (14) FACT #28: Negroes have arms which are longer, relative to body height, than those of Whites. This feature, together with their much thicker cranial bones, gives Black athletes an advantage over Whites in boxing. The skeletal and muscular peculiarities of Negroes' lower limbs have given them considerable success as sprinters, but have left them relative undistinguished as distance runners. (39) (27) FACT #29: ADDITIONAL DIFFERENCES --The hair is black, crispy, and "woolly" in texture, it is flat and elliptical with no central canal or duct like the hair of Europeans. --The nose is thick, broad and flat, often turned up nostrils exposing the red inner lining of the mucous membrane similar to an ape. --The arms and legs of the Negro are relatively longer than the European. The humerus is a trifle shorter and the forearm longer thereby approximating the simian form. --The eyes are prominent, iris black and the orbits large. The eye often has a yellowish sclerotic coat over it like that of a gorilla. --The Negro has a shorter trunk the cross-section of the chest is more circular than whites. The pelvis is narrower and longer as it is in an ape. --The mouth is wide with very thick, large and protruding lips. --Negro skin has a thick superficial horny layer which resists scratching and impedes the penetration of germs. --The Negro has a larger and shorter neck akin to that of anthropoids. --The cranial sutures are more simple than in the white type and close together earlier. --The ears are roundish, rather small, standing somewhat high and detached thus approaching the simian form. --The Negro is more powerfully developed from the pelvis down and the white more powerfully developed in the chest. --The jaw is larger and stronger and protrudes outward which, along with lower retreating forehead, gives a facial angle of 68 to 70 degrees as opposed to a facial angle of 80 to 82 degrees for Europeans. --The hands and fingers are proportionally narrower and longer. The wrist and ankles are shorter and more robust. --The frontal and paricial bones of the cranium are less excavated and less capacious. The skull is thicker especially on the sides. --The brain of the Negro on the average is 9 to 20% smaller than whites. --The teeth are larger and are wider apart than in the white race. --The three curvatures of the spine are less pronounced in the Negro than in the white and thus more characteristic of an ape. --The femur of the Negro is less oblique, the tibia (shin bone) more curved and bent forward, the calf of the leg high and but little developed. --The heel is broad and projecting, the foot long and broad but slightly arched causing flat soles, the great toe is shorter than in the white. --The two bones proper of the nose are occasionally united, as in apes. FACT #30: Blood group studies made during WWII suggest the American Negro gene pool is about 28% white. --This despite all manner of institutional discrimination, social segregation, etc. Keep in mind that the results of test from true Black Africans would show even bigger differences from Whites. (32) (14) CRIME FACT #31: The rate at which Blacks commit murder is thirteen times that of Whites; Rape and assault, ten times. These figures, as given by the F.B.I. reports, vary somewhat from year to year but fairly represent the trend for the past decade. (27) (6) (13) FACT #32: According to the justice Dept, 1 in every 4 Black males between the ages of 20 and 29 is currently in prison or on probation or parole. (32) (6) (3) FACT #33: Though only 12% of the U.S. population, Blacks commit more than half of all rapes and robberies and 60% of all murders in the U.S. (32) (27) (6) FACT #34: Approximately 50% of all Black males will be arrested and charged with a serious felony during their lifetime. (27) FACT #35: A Black person is 56 TIMES more likely to attack a White person than Vice Versa. (3) (32) FACT #36: Black rapists choose White victims over half (54.9%) of the time, 30X as often as Whites choose Blacks. (2) (32) (28) FACT #37: The annual report from the Department of justice shows that when Whites commit violence they do it to Blacks 2.4% of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose White victims MORE THAN HALF the time. (3) FACT #38: In New York City, any White is over 300 TIMES MORE LIKELY to be assaulted by a gang of Blacks than is a Black by a gang of Whites. (32) FACT #39: Many people argue that high Black incarceration rates show that police center enforcement at Black crimes and ignore white-collar crimes. However, Blacks commit a disproportionate number of white-collar offenses as well. In 1990, Blacks were nearly 3 times as likely to be arrested for forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as Whites. (32) (6) FACT #40: Many people believe that crime is a product of poverty and lack of "advantages." However, the District of Columbia, which enjoys the highest average annual salaries and is second only to Alaska in personal income per capita, leads the nation in just about every category of crime including murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle theft. D.C. also has the country's strictest gun control, highest police costs per capita, highest ration of police and correctional officers per citizen, and highest rate of incarceration. Its permanent population is over 80% Black. West Virginia, which has the nation's lowest crime rate, suffers >from chronic poverty and has the highest unemployment in the U.S. It also has the fewest police per capita. West Virginia is over 96% White. (33) THE BLACK FAMILY FACT #41 46% of inner city Black men between the ages of 16 and 62 are unemployed. (27) FACT #42: More than 66% of the children of Negroes are born out of wedlock. Per capita, their illegitimacy rate is ten times that of Whites. (32) (27) FACT #43: Blacks are four and a half times more likely than Whites to be on welfare. (32) FACT #44: More than 35% of all Black men in U.S. Cities are drug or alcohol abusers. (27) BEAUTY FACT #45: The January l986 issue of the journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies, "Skin Color Preference, Sexual Dimorphism and Sexual Selection: a case of Gene-Culture Co-evolution?" by Peter Frost and Pierre Van der Herghe, stated that in any given race, the women tend to have lighter complexions than the men. Using standard ethnographic files from 51 societies on five continents which have recorded their preference for human skin color, the study found that 30 preferred lighter women and 14 preferred lighter women and lighter men. The cultures of India, China, Brazil and Bali, as well as the Arabs and Negroes regard the lightest women as the most beautiful. --perpetuating the aesthetic appeal of the ivory-skinned, rosy-cheeked, blue-eyed, blond "nordic ideal" of feminine beauty- -even though they themselves do not possess the genetic capacity to reproduce such an organism. Over time, the study said, the upper classes of all races have become lighter-skinned than their fellow countrymen because they have repeatedly skimmed off fairer women from the lower classes. (Also see #11) FACT #46: Scientific research on what constitutes human beauty, in which 300 judges of various backgrounds were shown portrait photographs and asked to rate the beauty of the individual's face, has revealed that nordic Whites are universally recognized as the most attractive humans, even by Blacks. The judges were instructed to evaluate the faces solely on his or her "personal standards of beauty and not to consider popular norms." The results of the study "Age, Sex, Race, and the Perception of Facial Beauty." Developmental Psychology, 5, Nov., 1971, pp 433-439, are reprinted below. GROUP BEAUTY RATINGS IN CROSS AND CROSS STUDY JUDGES' GROUP GIVEN CHARACTERISTICS HIGHEST RATING --------------- -------------- Age 7 white males white adolescent males Age 7 black males white adolescent males Age 7 white females white adolescent females Age 7 black females 3-way tie: black adolescent females, white adolescent females, white female children Age 12 white males white adolescent females Age 12 black males white adolescent females Age 12 white females white adolescent females Age 12 black females white adolescent females Age 17 white males white adolescent females Age 17 black males white adolescent females Age 17 white females white adolescent females Age 17 black females white adolescent females Adult white males white adolescent females Adult black males white adolescent females Adult white females white adolescent males Adult black females white adolescent females FACT #47: In experiments in which Black children have been left to themselves with White and Black dolls, it has been found tha most of the them would rather play with White dolls. This is true all over the world. Even in such places as Tobago. (32) (22) (23) AMERICAN HISTORY FACT #48: The Declaration of Independence, which contains the oft-repeated phrase ". . . all men are created equal . . ." was written by Thomas Jefferson, who owned about 200 slaves at the time and never set any of them free, including the mulattoes and quadroons. Jefferson's words certainly had no reference to Negroes, who at that time had no place in American society except as property. (27) (38) (31) FACT #49: The Constitution was written by and for 'We the people" and dedicated to "ourselves and our posterity," All of the 55 delegates that met in Philadelphia to draft the Constitution and all of the members of the 13 state conventions that ratified it were of the White race. (38) WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY OF 1828 defines Posterity as: POSTERITY. 1. Descendants; children, children's children, etc. indefinitely; the race that proceeds from a progenitor. 2. In a general sense, succeeding generations; opposed to ancestors. . . FACT #50: The 14th Amendment is invalid for the following reasons: -It was never ratified by three-fourth of all the States in the Union according to Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Out of 37 States, 16 had rejected it. -Many of the States who were counted as ratifying it, were compelled to do so under duress of military occupation. Any legal act entered into under force duress, and coercion is automatically null and void. -The fact that 23 Senators had been unlawfully excluded from the U.S. Senate, shows that the Joint Resolution proposing the Amendment was not submitted to or adopted by a constitutional Congress. -The intent of the 14th Amendment is repugnant to the original U.S. Constitution and the Organic Law of the land. It did not, and could not, repeal anything that was part of the Organic Law. Therefore the principles of precedent and stare decisis render it void. (23) FACT #51: In Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation of Sept. 1862 he said: "I have urged the colonization of the Negroes, (back to Africa), and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan (of colonization). There is no room for two distinct races of White men in America, much less for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks. . . . I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal . . . Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro . . . under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable." (27) FACT #52: Lincoln actually proposed an amendment to the constitution that would've authorized congress to recolonize all freed Blacks back to Africa. On Aug. 15, l962, Congress did appropriate over half a million dollars for that purpose. Thousands of Negroes had been shipped back when Lincoln was shot. (27) WASHINGTON D.C. FACT #53: The District of Columbia, which is approximately 70% Black, leads the U.S. in many areas: - The nations highest crime rates - Strictest gun control - Highest incarceration rates - Highest birthrate - Highest death rate - Highest rate of federal assistance per capita - Highest number of welfare recipients per capita - Highest rate of illegitimacy - Highest high school dropout rate even though its teachers are the highest paid in the U.S. - Highest rate of ghonnorrhea and syphilis - Highest incidence of AIDS (33) (32) PORTUGAL FACT #54: Populated by White stock, the nation of Portugal rose in four centuries to be the wealthiest most powerful country in the world. A great commercial and maritime power, it had large colonies in Asia, Africa, and America. Its seamen were the first to explore western Africa and they brought back hundreds of Negro slaves. By 1550, at the height of Portugal's power, one-tenth of its population were Blacks. Today, Portugal's population is described as one of the most homogeneous in Europe, having slowly absorbed the Negro gene pool. As of l975 it had lost all of its outside territories. Its workers are the lowest paid in Europe and they have the highest rate of illiteracy and a high infant mortality rate. In terms of art, literature, music, science and philosophy the "new" Portugal has produced virtually nothing in 100 years and by most standards is the most backward nation in Europe. *Keep in mind that the Black population of the U.S. is approximately 13%. (27) HAITI FACT #55: The Republic of Haiti, the only completely Black republic in the Western Hemisphere also happens to be the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. It also has the lowest life expectancy, highest illiteracy, lowest per capita consumption of newsprint, lowest per capita GNP, and the lowest level of political stability. (27) FACT #56: Haiti once had a promising future. Before 1789 as a French colony under White rule, San Domingo (Haiti) was as rich or richer in productivity as all the 13 American Colonies combined. It was considered the "crown jewel" of the French colonial system, and was in fact the most prosperous colony anywhere in the world. Populated by 40,000 Whites, 27,000 freed Mulattoes, and 450,000 Black slaves and with a bountiful climate and productive soil, it supplied all of France and half of Europe with sugar, coffee, and cotton. But in 1791, the French government issued a decree ordering Haiti to give the vote to the Mulattoes, and soon after another ordering freedom for all the slaves. This resulted in a bloody civil war in which the entire White population (about 40,000 Frenchmen) was murdered, down to the last man, woman, and child. Rape, decapitation, and mutilation were committed almost universally upon their bodies. (22) (23) FACT #57: After the Blacks massacred the last of the White population in 1804, Haiti remained a part of Santa Domingo, until 1844 when it became a separate "republic." Between 1844 and 1915 only one Haitian president completed his term in office. Fourteen were ousted by armed uprisings, one was blown up, one was poisoned and another was hacked to pieces by a mob. Between 1908 and 1915 the revolutions and assassinations increased so rapidly that a United States military occupation was needed to restore order. This lasted from 1915 to 1934. Thereafter followed twelve years of rule by a Mulatto elite which ended in the resumption of control by the Black military in 1946. Since then wholesale corruption and political murder have been the rule. (23) INDIA FACT #58: India's Negroid peoples have been subjected to numerous White invasions for over 5000 years, prompting the rise and fall of one civilization after another as the White invaders became absorbed into the non-White masses. Then, about 1800 B.C. Aryans again invaded from the northwest, this time establishing a rigid caste ("varna." meaning color) system of White supremacy which eventually evolved into an integral part of the Hindu religion. Interracial mixing was banned and punishable by death. (5) (37) FACT #59: Led by an Aryan ruling class, Classical India blossomed into a great culture, giving expression to philosophy, poetry, science, mathematics, and literature. The land prospered as never before --or after. FACT #60: The caste system lasted about 2,000 years (probably longer than any civilization under similar racial circumstances.) However, eventually the castes broke down due to miscegenation and by modern times virtually no pure Whites were remaining. (39) (37) (10) FACT #61: Today, India has 834 million people who speak 150 different languages and dialects. When the annual rainfall is insufficient, they die of starvation at a rate of 2,000,000 to 6,000,000 per year. India has the highest birthrate in Asia, one of the lowest per capita incomes in the world, and an illiteracy rate close to 70%. (35) (33) EGYPT FACT #62: Ancient Egypt was founded and built by Mediterranean Caucasians as far back as 4500 B.C. Egypt's period of greatness was from 3400 B.C. to 1800 B.C. and was characterized by its amazing architecture, pyramids, temples, and mastery of mathematics and engineering, the remnants of which are still evident today. The White Egyptians pioneered medicine, chemistry, astronomy, and law; In many cases, their achievements remain unequalled. (37) (39) (21) FACT #63: But, about 3400 B.C. Egypt civilization began to spread up the Nile River, bringing it in close contact with the black Nubians to the south. Soon they were using Blacks for slave labor and Egypt became history's first melting pot. (39) (10) (14) FACT # 64: In time the infusion of Negro blood worked itself up >from the bottom of Egyptian society. The slaves were eventually freed, received political equality, and took posts of authority in government. (10) (37) FACT #65: By the time of King Tut (1370-1352 B.C.) even the ruling classes had been mongrelized and Egypt began a tailspin downward. Today, the once-mighty Egypt is very much a Third World country, having lost its art, its medicine, its architectural ability, and its position in world affairs. (10) (37) The absurd notion that Ancient Egypt was a product of Negro ingenuity is now being widely disseminated in the schools. Though scholars know this is a blatant lie, they justify the deception by assuming it will boost the "self-esteem" of Black children. SOUTH AFRICA (Note: These facts will most likely change drastically now that South Africa has fallen under black rule.) FACT #66: White people have lived in South Africa much longer than Negroes. There have been White settlements in South Africa for over 300 years, about the same length of time Europeans have lived in North America. Even 150 years after the first colonies around Capetown, at the beginning of the 19th Century, there still were no Blacks within 500 miles. The Blacks wandered in from central Africa later on, possibly fleeing the slave trade or due to famine. In fact, most of South Africa's Blacks were born in other countries. (29) (8) (14) FACT #67: South Africa is by far the wealthiest and most advanced country in Africa, producing nearly 75% of the continent's Gross National Product. It is almost completely self- sufficient so boycotts have little affect upon its economy. In fact most of Africa is dependent upon South Africa. South Africa is governed by a Western parliamentary republic and strictly segregated racially. South Africa grants complete self-government to the Blacks in their own areas of the country. (29) (8) (14) FACT #68: Though South Africa is perpetually criticized by the world press for its racial separatism, its Blacks live better than the Blacks of any other African country and are multiplying rapidly and healthily. 87% of Black welfare costs are being paid by the White man. This includes food, clothing, training, housing, education an health care. --even old age pensions. (14) FACT #69: Thousands of South African Blacks graduate from college every year, more than three times as many as in the rest of Africa combined. Every Black child is within walking distance of a primary school. Africa's largest hospital, which serves Blacks almost exclusively and performs over 1800 operations per month, is in South Africa. (14) FACT #70: The Blacks of South Africa own more cars than do all the citizens of the Soviet Union. (29) FACT #71: South Africa has more Black doctors, lawyers, professional people, and millionaires than all of the rest of the world combined. (8) FACT #72: In fact, conditions are "so bad" for Blacks in South Africa that the country has a tremendous problem with illegal Black immigration, having over one million illegal foreign workers. (14) (29) ICELAND FACT #73-75: Iceland, the only all-White nation in the world, has the world's highest literacy rate. 100%. It is an island of cooled volcanic magma, located Just south of the Arctic Circle. It has no coal, no fuel, no timber, no mineral wealth or natural resources, and no navigable rivers. 75% of the interior is uninhabitable and only about 1% of the land is arable. It is the youngest nation in Europe and one of the most isolated countries in the world. Nonetheless, Iceland is #2 in the world in life expectancy and has one of the world's highest standards of living, in terms of per capita income. It has tremendous medical facilities and a thriving publishing business. Virtually every family has a telephone. Upon graduation from high school, each Icelandic student has learned five languages. (33) MARTIN LUTHER KING FACT #75-77: On Jan. 31, 1977, Martin Luther King's FBI records were sealed by court order until the year 2027 because, as his wife said, "its release would destroy his reputation" These records are rumored to contain instances of bizarre sexual perversion and homosexuality, and proof that King was under the direct orders of Soviet spies and financed by the Communist Party. FACT #78: The Wall Street Journal (Nov.9, 1990) disclosed that Stanford University editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King Jr. have long known that King was guilty of plagiarism in his l955 Boston University doctoral thesis, having lifted significant portions from the works of other writers and graduate students. FACT #79: Martin Luther King frequently enjoyed prostitutes and paid for them with his church's money. Still, congress has voted to make King's birthday a national holiday, in most places replacing Columbus Day or Washington's Birthday as an official observance. FACT #80: Almost every state in the union has a King holiday, and almost every city has a King Boulevard or King Civic Center. Yet the electoral evidence suggests that Americans will almost always vote down honors for King when given a chance. (41) MISCELLANEOUS FACT #81: The entire continent of Africa, perhaps Earth's richest land, accounts for only 3% of world trade. (27) FACT #82-84: Almost all Blacks who have been leaders in fields other than athletics or music have had some White ancestry: Fredick Douglas, W.E.B. Dubois, Booker T. Washington, George Washington Carver, Alex Hailey, Thurgood Marshall, Bryant Gumbell, Colin Powell, Carl Rowan, Ed Bradley, Doug Wilder, etc. According to Dr. E.B. Reuter, ". . . Of successful and best known men that the Negro race has produced, at least thirteen- fourteenths are men of mixed blood. (27) (21) FACT #85: Blacks are 50 times more likely to have syphilis than Whites. (32) FACT #86: Twice as many Blacks as Whites receive dishonorable discharge from the U.S. military. (32) FACT #87: A White woman is 15 times more likely to contract AIDS by engaging in sex with a Negro than with a White heterosexual. (U.S. Centers for Disease Control) FACT #88: 90% of U.S. children with AIDS are Black or Hispanic. (36) FACT # 89-92: In l950, American schools were among the best in the world. However, vocal elements within our society demanded that the public schools take on a social engineering role as well as an educational one. Violent disruptions of American education were ordered by the Supreme Court for the purpose of breaking down racial barriers. For 30 years, American schools have diverted enormous resources into forced integration, quotas, and bussing operations. (Few people realize how expensive bussing is. Annual cost may run into tens of billions of dollars. In l990 California alone was spending $500 million per year on integration. Many school districts spend a quarter or more of their budgets on transportation. In Milwaukee alone and in a single school year, 30,000 staff hours were diverted into calculating the race of students to attend the various schools.) The results? Today's students rank at the very bottom worldwide in science and math, some 40% of American adults are functionally illiterate, and standardized test scores have declined steadily for both Whites and Blacks. Today the average White still scores 200 points higher on the combined SAT than the average Black. Americans spend more on education than any other country in the world and have the worst results. Massive White flight to escape racial zoning has reduced the tax base of every major American city. In l983, after nearly two generations of racial experimentation to promote equality, the research arm of the Dept. of Education could not produce a single study that showed Black children were learning appreciably better after desegregation. (25) (20) (32) FACT #93: In Black Africa the average ruler lasts 7 months. (22) (27) (7) FACT #94: By 1995, a third of U.S. students will be non-Whites and Whites will be a minority in the school districts of 5 states. (32) FACT #95: Dr. William Shockley, Nobel prize winner for his work in the invention of the transistor and renowned geneticist as Stanford University, said, "The major cause for American Negroes' hereditary is origin and thus not remedial to a major degree by improvement in environment." FACT #96: In 1930, about 33% of the world was White. Today, the U.N. estimates that only about 9.5% of the world's population is Caucasian. This percentage is falling rapidly. (34) (27) FACT #97: Every race has an equal capacity to learn and contribute to civilization and any differences are caused by prejudice and racism. The fact that white skins are associated with civilization is merely a quirk of fortune and coincidence. Any attempt to distinguish the races is motivated by paranoia and hatred. We must prevent any investigation into the subject and work to melt society together into a receless, nationless, harmonious utopia. (?) FACT #98: In 1988 there were 9,406 cases of Black-on-White rape and fewer than 10 cases of White on Black rape in the U.S. (32) FACT #99: For the book INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT, by Raymond Cattell, three distinguished American scholars compare massive evidence of national I.Q. score averages worldwide and warn against the decline of any nation whose population reflects declining intelligence. Taking into consideration the differential birthrates of American ethnic stocks, they concluded that American ability is declining rapidly. (21) FACT #100: The American taxpayers have spent over $2.5 TRILLION trying to upgrade Blacks since the l960's. (6) FACT #101: QUOTES "The Negroes' rude ignorance has never invented any effectual weapons of defense or destruction: they appear incapable of forming any extensive plans of government or conquest: and the obvious inferiority of their mental faculties has been discovered and abused by the nations of the temperate zone." --Edward Gibbon, the great historian and author of THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE, (V.III, pg. 277) "Wherever you find the Negro everything is going down around him, and wherever you find the White man you see everything around him improving." --Robert E. Lee, to Col. Thomas H. Carter, May, l965 ----------------- Recommended books for further study: * "The Origins of Race and Civilization" by Charles A. Weisman. $8.00 from Scriptures For America, P.O. Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO 80535. "The greatest controversies today seem to center around the races of man, the origin of which is battled over by two concepts - "evolutionism" and "creationism." But in all the debates, it is strange no one has suggested that BOTH of these concepts may be in error. It is the intent of this material to reveal the true origin and nature of the different races and civiliazations occording to 'immutable' evidence. In doing so it will be shown that both of the forenamed concepts are inconsistent and illogical in much of what they say, and that they both have been manipulated so as to produce the 'same' erroneous results regarding our origins." pg. 4 (preface) "Since God is the source of science as well as His Word recorded in the Bible, it is impossible for the two to be in conflict with one another." -pg. 5 "The word 'species' is in itself an anti-evolution term since the very meaning of the word refers to something specific and fixed." -pg. 9 "Natural selection and the survival of the fittest are natural processes, they are not evolutionary ones." -pg. 14 "Nature has a way of preventing cross mating between species and rejecting the hybrids that do occur." -pg. 18 " The Bible, verified by the geological record, reveals the pattern of creation God has used." -pg. 23 "All evidence available from comparative ethnology, linguistics, and prehistoric archaeology indicates a long seperation of the principal races of man." -pg. 38 "From the Egyptian monuments we know that there were various races of man in existence during the three centuries that followed the Flood." -pg. 55 "All scripture evidence indicates Adam was created a white man." -pg. 57 "Inequality and discrimination, like segregation, are Divine precepts." -pg 80 "The weight of scientific studies and research on the subject of the races of man seems to be in favor of classifying them as distinct species." - pg. 86 "Prolificacy of distinct species, inter se, is now proved to be no test of COMMON ORIGIN." -pg. 128 "A study of civilizations throughout history is a study of the history of the Adamic race - the builders of civilization." -pg 131. "3,000 years before the Europeans ever raised a single cathedral, their ancestors had already constructed pyramids in Egypt, Stonehenge in Britain, and palaces at Crete." -pg. 153 SOURCES ------- 1. African Business Magazine, Dec. '91 2. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, pg 822+ 3. American Renaissance, Dec. '90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026 4. American Sociological Review, Vol 45, pg. 859 5. Basham, A.L., The Wonder That Was India, Grove Press, New York, NY 1954 6. Buckley, William F. syndicated column, Jan. 5. 1993 7. "But What about Africa?" Harper's, May '90 8. "The Christian Heritage of South Africa Under Attack!", Peter Hammond, Herald the Coming, Dec. '92. 9. Coon, Carleton S. The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. Knopf 10. Fagan, Myron C. How the Greatest White Nations Were Mongrelized - Then Negroized, Sons of Liberty Books. 11. Fields, Dr. Ed, The Dangers of Interracial Marriage, PO Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061 12. Howells, William. Mankind So Far, Doubleday, Garden City, NY 1945. 13. Harris, Marvin, 1981. Why Nothing Works. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY 14. Jacob, A. White Man, Think Again! 1965, publ. by author. 15. Jensen, Arthur R. Bias in Mental Testing, The Free Press, New York 1980 16. Jensen, Arthur R. Straight Talk About Mental Tests, the Free Press. (Macmillan) New York, 1981 17. McCall's, May '92, pg 76 18. McGurk, Frank, "A Scientist's Report on Race Differences." U.S. News and World Report, Sept. 21, 1956. Washington, D.C. 19. Pearson, Roger, Eugenics and Race, 1966, Noontide Press 20. Pearson, Roger. Race, Intelligence, and Bias in Academe, Scott-Townsend Publishers, N.W. Washington, D.C. 21. Pendell, Elmer, Sex Versus Civilization, Noontide Press. 22. Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen Press, Cape Canaveral, FL 23. Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 24. Putnam, Carleton. A Study in Racial Realities, an address at the University of California at Davis, Dec. 17, 1964 25. Scott, Ralph. Education and Ethnicity: The U.S. Experiment in School Integration, Scott-Townsend. Washington, D.C. 1989 26. Shuey, Audrey H., The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York, 1966 27. Simpson, William Gayley. Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D. C. 20007 28. Social Forces, Vol. 69, pg.1+, Sept. '90 29. "South Africa: Time to Choose Sides" Soldier of Fortune, Dec. '89. 30. Snyderman, Mark, and Rothman, Stanely. The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ 1990. 31. Stell v Savannah-Chattham County Board of Education, U.S. District Court, Southern Georgia, May 13, 1963. 32. Taylor, Jared, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY 33. World Almanacs, '88, '89, '90, '91, '92 34 United Nations World Census, 1990 35. Van Loon, Henrick, 1940, Van Loon's Geography, Garden City Publ. 36. The Voice, Feb. 27, 1990. 37. Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, CA 38. Weisman, Charles A. America: Free, White and Christian, 1989, SFA, Box 766-c, LaPorte, CO 80535 39. Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA 40. Weyl, Nathaniel. The Geography of American Achievement, Scott-Townsend, Washington, D.C. 1989. 41. Martin Luther King (Man Behind the Myth) by Des Griffin. ------------------------------------------------- Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by anon. FTP from: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA Scriptures for America files are also available by WWW: http://nyx10.cs.du.edu:8001/~nmonagha/arc.html -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From email@example.com Sun Jun 18 17:01:16 PDT 1995 Article: 5794 of alt.politics.nationalism.white Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!Sunserver.insinc.net!news.Direct.CA!news.cyberstore.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rsavage From: firstname.lastname@example.com (Rick Savage) Subject: White_America Message-ID: Organization: ftp.netcom.com pub/SF/SFA X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 05:31:23 GMT Lines: 1145 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.com From: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA ----------------------------------- WHITE AMERICA How Civilization Was Built ------------------- Summary of the book by Earnest Sevier Cox ------------------- Introduction by Dr. E.R. Fields This is the title of the greatest race book ever written. Unfortunately it has long been out of print and is not available in any library. The remarkable and far seeing author was Earnest Sevier Cox. He was born on Jan. 24, l880 in Knoxville, Tenn. and this book was published in l937. Cox proved that all civilization stems from the White Race. Also, that interbreeding with lower races always destroys civilization. Cox was not recognized for his greatness during his lifetime but what he wrote in l937 has turned out to be a prophecy of the racial problems Western civilization faces today. Thousands of years ago the same racial crisis plagued Egypt, India and more recently Haiti, Portugal, Brazil, Puerto Rico and other countries. Cox maintains that maintaining the purity of the White Race is far more important than a nation's economic condition or whether or not it has the raw materials to develop, etc. He says that nothing can stop the eventual amalgamation of two races except the physical separation of those races. Even Segregation is but a temporary solution because sexual contact of the lowest lust driven Whites will mix with the mulatto and even the full-blooded Negro. Cox did not "hate" blacks and in fact actually worked with the great black leader Marcus Garvey who organized millions of Negroes in America. Garvey's plan was to take them all back to Africa to form a new nation. Garvey was framed by the U.S. government at the behest of big business who wanted to keep the blacks here for cheap labor. He was thrown into prison and then deported to Jamaica and never allowed to return to the U.S. again. Earnest Cox uphold the right of the Negro to develop his own society but insists that it must be within his own separate nation. During the l920s and 30s, Cox toured America speaking publicly on his racial discoveries which were developed after a life time of study and world-wide travel. His meetings were often canceled or disrupted. Not by Negroes, but by left-wing political forces and big business elements who wanted to keep the Negro here to be exploited as cheap labor or for their controlled block vote. Problems caused by Negroes Cox clearly lays out the argument that the very existence of blacks in our presence will lead to high taxes, crime, riots and the deterioration of our cities. He said this in l937 - do we not bear witness to this today? Cox graduated from Vanderbilt University and the University of Chicago. His studies were mostly devoted to the "colored problem." He then sought funds to finance a world-wide tour to: 1) Observe the traits of other races. 2) How other nations treat the Negro. 3) Make a study of Negro governments. 4) Study the effect of the Negro race upon White society. Cox was shocked when he learned that there was no university or foundation willing to finance such an important expedition. He therefore set off on a six-year tour of the world at his own expense. He spent two years in South Africa, visited colonial and black nations in Africa. He traveled up the Nile to Egypt. From there he traveled to India, Southeast Asia, the Philippines, Australia, New Zealand and South America. Cox's Legacy To Us "White America" was delayed because of World War One in which Cox served in Europe and observed Negro troops first hand. Earnest Sevier Cox was an original thinker and one of the first to recognize the relationship between race and the maintenance of civilization. When the book was published it became an "underground best seller" but was shunned by book reviewers and book stores. It was sent to every member of Congress and Mississippi's famous Sen. Theodore G. Bilbo quoted from it. Cox formed the "Anglo-saxon Clubs of America" and lectured widely on the urgent necessity to preserve the purity of the White Race. Cox passed away on April 26, 1966, at age 86 in Richmond, Va. He is buried in Arlington National Cemetery. Important notice: The following text is summarized from the original 200 page book "White America." Wherever the word "Note" appears there follows comments by this editor.) Race friction is not local but is world wide. It exists wherever two different races live together in the same country. To urge the White people to preserve their own identity is not a superficial desire. It is a primary necessity if civilization is to continue. Preserving the White race is to promote its own progress and impart its achievements to the backward races. Many non- scientific thinkers grudgingly acknowledge the age long ascendancy of the White race and make lame excuses for the lack of progress on the part of the Negro and mongrel races. They cannot answer the question: "If the White race has retained its relative position of superiority over the non-White races for six thousand years what reason do we have to suppose that this will change in the future?" The "color problem" goes much deeper than just the pigment of ones skin. Culture is created by the brain matter of a particular race. When the quality of that mind is diluted by interbreeding with colored subjects, leaving a mix-breed population heir to the pure White, the result is arrested development, stagnation and eventual collapse. Colored races will gladly avail themselves of the opportunity to mate with the White. Gloomy consideration shows that sixty centuries of race history have proven that the White people at no time or place in history have remained white when in prolonged contact with colored races. This, then, is the essence of the color problem - the difficulty of preserving the culturally fit when in contact with the culturally unfit. There are many economic and political problems but the fundamental problem is to preserve the breed from which all progress issues. Out propositions: 1) The White race has founded all civilizations 2) The White race remaining White has not lost a civilization. 3) When the White race becomes mixed it has not retained any civilization. Ancient White Civilizations It is our objective to show that ancient civilizations whose origins have been ascribed to colored races were actually developed directly out of the creative ingenuity and energy of the White people. This will include India, China, Ethiopia, Japan, etc. Written record cover but a short last chapter in human history. To grasp the results of contact by races, it is necessary to push back the curtain of history and trace earlier events. Prehistoric migrations of the Whites since the dawn of time carried with them the germs of intellect and culture which would later develop. When races are in permanent contact, there is blood amalgamation creating a mongrel race. However the language, carvings, statues, and monuments remain to prove that the White race once build the civilization. The White man has always been in motion, restless, daring, seeking unknown lands and dominating other peoples. Civilization Begins Civilization dawned along the Nile and Euphrates. Early Aryans ventured out to Greece, Rome and Carthage. To the East they traveled to India and on to Asia. These race movements can easily be followed by skeletal remains, skull formations, implements, burial mounds, etc. A sign of the ancient White man was his burial cell and block (which led to today's vault and tombstone.) J. McMillan Brown calls them: a Caucasian track across the earth." Renown British ethnologist Prof. A.H. Kean wrote: "These neo-lithic monuments, all of the stone cell and block types are found in Asia, Iran, Syria, Palestine, Arabia, Northern Africa, Ethiopia, the Crimea, the British Isles, and China." This megalithic engineering is not found among the yellow or black races. Water was a barrier to the African Negro (who never even developed a sail). The Whites were the only race never deterred by the ocean wave. The White man of the stone age reached the Pacific at two points two thousand miles apart. Mongrel Remnants Often when two races come in contact with the other the stronger will expel the weaker from its territory. If this does not take place the two races adjust to one another and interracial breeding occurs. Thus the leading race loses its specialized characteristics. This is a biological law which cannot be altered by educational programs or legislative decrees. White Egypt Sir Harry Johnston. the foremost authority on Egypt, in his book "History of Egypt," says this was a White nation! Early Egyptians recognized that inter-breeding with the Negroes to the south in Nubia would dilute their race. Through race-mixing the decay would eventually destroy their civilization. They were divided into two nations - Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt. The first Pharaoh, Menes, ruled in the year 3400 B.C. However, the Whites had launched the great civilization at a much earlier date. In the year 4300 B.C. the people of the delta had invented the first calendar year with 365 days. Menes conquered the Nubians and build a great dam to divert the waters of the Nile. Thus they were able to drain the swamps and build a vast farming community in the fertile land. Under Menses hieroglyphic writing (the first alphabetic signs) were developed. It would be 2500 years later before any other people thought up an alphabet. Thus we have an interval of 27 centuries in which an efficient society thrived. The decline covered a long period of time. The decay begins when the "fit race" is replaced by the "unfit race." Many attempts were made by the Pharaohs to stop the interbreeding of the races. Mongrelization ended a great civilization. It was never really conquered from without - it had decayed from within. White Mummies Egyptian Mummies have been exhumed which are complete with hair eyes, skin which are strictly from the White race. The great engineering skills which resulted in the construction of the huge pyramids declined as inter-breeding between the races spread. By breeding downward their culture gradually disappeared. It was a slow retrogression of both mind and body. The Second Dynasty Under the Pharaoh Namar the first huge stone temples were erected using 120,000 Nubians as slave laborers. The following six dynasties (years 2,929 B.C. to 2,475 B.C.) saw the development of a formal religion, an orderly government, society, industry and art. All would be superior to that which would follow them. Within the home the wife was in every respect equal with the husband. Faithful affection and obedience to parents was important to youths. A favorite early tomb inscription was: I was beloved by my father and praised by my mother." Even at this early date the White Egyptians believed in a religion which was much like the Christianity which was yet to come - more than 2000 years later. The Egyptians devoutly believed in the immortality of the soul, the resurrection of the body after death. Of their God Osiris it was said: "As Osiris lives so shall ye live; as Osiris died not, so shall ye also not die, as Osiris perished not, so shall ye also not perish." (Note: Does this not sound familiar?) Thus the Egyptians elaborately embalmed their dead leaders as mummies to prepare for the day when they would be resurrected from the dead. They believed that a ferryman would row the departed to the land of the glorified. However the ferryman would carry only the good people of whom it was said: "There is no evil which he has done." This was the first recorded record of the making of the life hereafter dependent on the moral quality of the life lived in this world. As mongrelization set in with the Negroes of central Africa this religion was discarded and replaced by the worship of animals which still exists in chaotic Egypt today. Building The Pyramids The Egyptians were the first to discover the use of metals as tools. Thus the drill was developed which would cut slabs of stone blocks twenty to thirty feet long weighing fifty to sixty tons. They had drills of copper, long copper saws, which brought forth mighty weapons. Pyramids were build that would be very difficult to erect today. Sesostris III, the Pharaoh of the 12th Dynasty came to power in 1,887 B.C. He completed the conquest of Nubia. This extension southward was very slow and to this they owed their long-lived civilization. The Great Pyramid was built of two million three hundred thousand stone blocks each weighing two and a half tons. They were floated on rafts from quarries south of Cairo and raised on enormous ramps. This single project took ten years to complete. The Great Pyramid is 481 feet high. The blocks are so close that the edges are fitted one ten-thousandth of an inch together which is equal to optical work today. Decline and Fall The sixth Dynasty began the use of Negro troops recruited in Nubia against their enemies. This had much to do with the final decay and collapse of Egypt. By the year 1,500 B.C. Half of the people of Southern Egypt were of mixed blood. Some 800 years later, all progress ended when Teharka became the first mulatto Pharaoh in 688 B.C. Negroes came to Egypt as soldiers, slaves and captives from other nations. They lived in squalid settlements along the Nile outside the White communities. Certain Pharaohs sought to prevent the mongrelization of the Egyptian race and made it a death penalty to bring them north. One fort was erected on the Nile in central Egypt to stop the passage of Negroes to the north. However, important people were always able to circumvent the law and their slaves were permitted to pass. The Negro was a docile, subservient workman and soldier whom the less enlightened Pharaohs accepted. Today, after 30 centuries of a mongrel Egypt, no progress whatsoever has occurred. The White Egyptian race is now extinct. The later mulatto Pharaohs also wanted to be buried in pyramids but could not build them. Thus they removed the name of an early Pharaoh and inserted their own and were buried under the old pyramid. Art, science and literature died out. The Assyrians easily conquered Egypt and Teharka fled into Nubia from which he would never return. His sister was the divine queen of the grossly debased animal worshipping religion. All subjects had to bow down before his Nubian mother. His feeble line died out and Nubia relapsed back into its previous barbaric condition. All future Pharaohs would be appointed by foreign occupying powers. India -Land Of Aryans The ancient Aryans came from Persia and entered India by way of Afghanistan (where their White descendants can still be found.) To the south they conquered and enslaved a dark aboriginal race. These people can be traced to the Asiatic branch of the Negro race. Historian Madison Grant found that the Aryanized Whites of India spoke a language directly traceable to the old Sanskrit of the Mediterranean White people. The great Aryan civilization of India existed from 2,000 B.C. to 1,400 B.C. Their writings reveal a vigorous White society, a conquering people, well organized, respecting their women and already in possession of ancient laws. They glorified in agriculture, were passionately religious, and imposed their faith and culture on the surrounding colored population whom they referred to with contempt. They called themselves "a people of fair complexion." They ridiculed the half-breeds they had so easily conquered. They held them to be inferior and referred to them as "monkeys." (Note: When the Whites first ventured into Central Africa they wrote that the Negroes looked much like the gorillas who inhabited the same lands.) The High Nose Race Besides complexion a high bridged nose elevated a person over dark people who have a round-wide nose. Even today the "nasal index" influences the status of Indians in the caste system. It should be noted that the British conquered India without hardly firing a shot. The ancient Aryans found it even easier! The Aryans set up a caste system to prevent racial intermarriage. Explicit laws were adopted outlawing intermarriage and they established the Hindu religion which promoted the ideal of maintaining racial purity. The caste system of segregation helped to prolong the Aryan civilization but eventually mongrelization set in. The big question was - how to preserve the White race and still utilize the inferior colored peoples? They decided that the answer was: "Caste, enforced by law and religion" Originally caste divided the people into five divisions - warriors, priests, farmers, merchants and laborers. The first was made up of the purest of the Aryans and the last of the subjected mix-breeds. People were required to marry within their own caste. The very black lower race was not even allowed to enter the system and were called 'outcasts." This is how the term "outcast" originated. White people are the custodians of civilization. Illegitimate Unions Caste prevented mixed marriages but was incapable of preventing illegitimate sexual unions. The Aryans were intent on retaining the purity of their White race. Yet they were unable to discover those engaging in secret relations with the "low caste coloreds." Thus they turned their wrath on the helpless half-caste. They were not allowed to live within the confines of the city. They were reviled by all, both White, colored and black castes. Under certain conditions soldiers were permitted to slay them without mercy. With time the mixed-breeds multiplied and the caste system broke down. Today less than 10% of the Indian people can be classified as "White." Nevertheless they still make up the ruling class. (Note: Look at pictures of the Nehru family with their White features!) These fair-skinned, high nosed warriors and priests, suddenly emerged from obscurity and conquered South India and Ceylon (now Sir Lanka.) Then they moved along the coast and seized Cambodia. In India the colored Dravidians practiced a cult of barbaric superstitions. Their religion was debauched and they worshipped cows and even rats (as some still do today.) They recognized only the mother as the head of the family as this was the only way to establish parenthood. Chile marriage was permitted along with the ghastly practice of throwing the widow on the funeral fire of the deceased male to send her off with him. Culture decays when submerged by the non-creative race. It is interesting that many of these primitive practices are also common in Darkest Africa. A God Fearing People The Aryans of India 2,000 years before the birth of Christ held high ideals. They believed that immortality would be obtained through good works. They believed that God would be incarnated and walk as man upon earth. They also believed that God the Redeemer would return to this earth again. One early Hindu prayer asked: "God who comprehends all things - take me to the immortal and imperishable abode where lithe dwells eternal." They prayed and fasted for this one God, who through a miraculous birth would be reincarnated upon this earth. They prayed for his reappearance. It is interesting to note that Christianity has long been "natural" to the White Race. It is the only branch of humankind to accept Christ. The colored races which embrace Jesus Christ do so only with the influence of White Christians of missionaries. When our kind leave the scene the non-Whites quickly return to their superstitious voodoo type worship. Even black Christian churches have adopted portions of the primitive African style of worship into their "churches" today. One element saw in the interracial breeding of Aryan stock was quietly taking place with the mongrels of India. They urged their leaders to expel the coloreds from their midst. Such an action was overruled as being too "harsh" by the property owners who benefited from serf labor. Sympathy for the oppressed is one of the chief means by which the racemixers seek to weaken the side of the Whites to accept coloreds as equals. The Hindu religion sought to perpetuate the Whites by keeping the races apart in India. It taught that caste was the will of God. However, Gautama Buddha, an aristocrat of mixed blood, with Asiatic features predominating, sought a religion which would level the races of India. Since the mongrels were in the vast majority, Buddhism became very popular. It taught that all races were equal and interracial marriage would create a one race utopia. However, today India is a hodge-podge of mixed breed peoples but the caste system is still intact. Hindus who are light- skinned rule India! Whites in Asia Prof. Keane wrote "The dominant position in Society seems destined into the future to be held by the large and much convoluted brain of the White Caucasian people." A branch of the White race followed a Northern route into Northern China, Mongolia, Korea and to Japan. It is admitted that some people living here today are partly Caucasian. Early Chinese civilization has been linked to that existing in Babylonia in prior centuries. The people of southern China and Entocone are a much darker race and are inferior to the "Whiter" Asiatics of the north. The Japanese are hybrid Caucasians. Even to this day the White "Ainus" people live in the mountains of northern Japan are definitely descendants of White Aryans. They are also found on the northern Japanese island of Yezo. The Chinese have the ability to hold on to science but not to advance it (which the Japanese - a more Whiter race are efficient at.) The Chinese suffer from arrest of mental development by the closure of the sutures of the skull at an earlier age than do the Europeans or Japanese. _The Races of Man_ by Deniker, page 363, states: "Southern Siberia and North Mongolia are covered with stone circles, barrows, burial places, skulls, iron and copper, which are of European origin." Early Chinese records refer to blonde tribes and there remain fair-skinned blue-eyed people in Manchuria and Korea today. The rulers of China for the most part have been of hybrid-Caucasian descent. The Chinese civilization was more creative 2,500 years ago than it is today - especially in the southern provinces. Madison Grant, In his masterful book, "The Passing of The Great Race" wrote: " The Chinese seem in some respects to be almost as incapable of progress as the Negroes themselves. The only essential difference being that the arrest of mental development comes later in life for the yellow man than for the black. "Meanwhile it may be pointed out that Chinese culture has been stagnant since the early historic period despite many attempts to shake off the chronic state of lethargy in which China seems to vegetate." Even today Chinese medical art continues to be a hopeless mix of superstitions and absurd ideas. Acupuncture still is considered a "cure all." Whites In South America Prominent Ethnologists are confident that the White man is responsible for the cultures of Mexico and Peru. The American Indian came from Mongolia in Asia. They ventured here from Siberia to Alaska and down into Central and South America. Did the Caucasian follow the Mongolian on the same route to America? We also know that the Vikings came from Greenland and Iceland to settle in eastern Canada and the New England states. (Note: Thor Heyerdahl has proven that Egyptians in reed boats crossed the Atlantic and settled in Mexico. His explorations show that the Pyramids of Mexico and Peru are similar to those in Egypt. He also proved that Whites from Peru voyaged 2,000 miles to Easter island where they erected hundreds of huge stone statues of White faced images. Thus White people probably came here on northern Siberian route as well as across the sea from Egypt. Cox did not have the benefit of this new information when he wrote this book in l937) The Caucasian race built an early civilization in the Americas. By the time the Spaniards arrived their society was already crumbling. The White aristocratic leadership exhibited very different racial features than do the Mongolian Indian population which make up the vast majority of people living in Mexico today. They built mighty pyramids like those in Egypt and originally had a religion similar to that of the Whites in India. These pyramid builders did not have the slant eyes of the Indian nor the short round nose. These Caucasian people originated a very high culture. There is definitely a non-Mongolian element in the American Indian. There is no doubt that this "lost race" amalgamated with the Indian people. Many Indian words such as "Manhattan" are traced to European roots. The Racial Brain The power of race extends to both body and mind and is not skin deep. Race not only conditions us to what we are but to what we are to become. The differentiations in the sub-species of humanity were determined in all their essentials untold ages ago. The Caucasian is the only race which has produced great stone architecture. The stone temples of Mexico and Peru show an astonishing resemblance to those of Egypt. Can there be any difference of opinion as to their racial source? Authorities have identified the language used in certain localities in Mexico with the spoken tongue of the ancient Caucasians in Asia. There is a similarity between the games played in Mexico and those known to have been familiar to eastern Asia. (See 1934 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica on Archaeology - "The same designs, patterns and even games are found in ancient Mexico and in India and China.") Alexander von Humcal has declared that the Mexican sun-dial calendar is identical with the Tibeto-Chinese calendar - which emanated from the European method of reckoning time. The American Indians The mysterious American "Indian" mounds were not built by the present day Mongolian Indians. The White pioneers asked the Indians about the pyramid type mounds. They did not know how they were constructed or for what purpose. We now know that a Caucasian-hybrid people from Mexico journeyed up the Mississippi and spread east building the pyramid mounds as grave sites (like in Egypt-) and as defense fortifications for their rulers. The people of Mexico and Peru held a religious belief in a universal flood. The Aryan idea that God would become carinate and walk as a man to set an example for people to follow. Bear in mind that the Christian faith rose within the White race and was disseminated across the world by the Caucasian people. While there are Christians who are not White there are no colored Christians who have not taken this religion directly or indirectly from the White race! Similar thoughts will arise from a common cerebral brain structure even though such related Caucasian people exist thousands of years apart or thousands of miles apart! Races Think Alike When interbreeding dilutes the purity of a race. it also destroys this common cerebral structure of the brain thus eliminating these important features of White thinking. The mind is dependent upon the quantity and quality of the brain. The Negro brain is vastly different and more archaic than the White brain. Millions of coloreds are flooding our nation They are at war against our White civilization at all times. As this deluge floods into our cities, so they will crumble. (Note: Do we not see this frightening prophecy coming to pass today?) Their increasing numbers constitute an ever growing menace to the progress of our White society. Ultimately they threatened the very existence of our people. The "color problem is a permanent problem." Our very future is clouded and the problem will become even greater as the non-White population increases. (Note: Has not the charge of "racism" against White people grown with the increasing numbers and belligerence of the non- Whites?) Race-Mixing Problem In South America Far more slaves were brought to South America than to the U.S. The Negro and Indian freely co-mingled with many of the original Spanish and Portuguese. Thus there was interbreeding on a massive scale. This is why a continent, far richer in natural resources, lags far behind the U.S. in progress. Garcia Calderon, a Peruvian diplomat, in his work, Latin America, wrote: "The Negro is a formal influence in Latin America. They are revenged for their enslavement in that their blood is mingles with that of their masters. The black race is doing its work and the continent is returning to a primitive barbarism. Their retrogression constitutes a very serious menace. The African woman satisfied the ardor of the conquerors - she has darkened the skin of his face. South American civilization is dependent upon the numerical predominance of the Spaniard over the Mulatto, the Negro and the Indian. Protect Blood Line The White people are a majority in Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, and southern Brazil. Senior Pezet, Peru's foreign Minister stated in a lecture at Clark University: "You people formed an unmixed mass. Your ancestors came determined to settle down and so they brought their families with them. Our men did not bring their women and families until many years after the conquest. In consequence many Spaniards took unto themselves Indian women and the offspring became 'Mestizos,' a mixed race that the haughty Castellan Spanish would never countenance. However the Spanish monarchy, on the contrary encouraged interbreeding as the best possible means of establishing a uniform race." Spain and Portugal believed that a mongrel nation would be more easily controlled. This view was also promoted by Portugal, France and England in their African colonies. The Belgium government in 1911 sought to promote unions between Whites and Negroes in the Belgium Congo. Northern Brazil, where the Negro is in the majority, has witnessed the collapse of both culture and law and order. The richest country in the Americas is facing total destruction at the hands of the blacks and mulattos. Integrate South Africa In 1830 the British government launched a program to encourage interracial breeding in South Africa. All policies of segregation were banned. However, in this vast land it was possible for the Whites to escape the enforced race-mixing program by fleeing to the north. Missionaries from the British Anglican Church (The Church of England officially headed by the Queen) preached a radical pro-Negro policy openly advocating interracial marriage. Some 98% of the slave owners remained in the Cape Colony. The Voortrekkers (the Dutch Whites), the non-slave owners, knew that interbreeding with Negroes would doom their culture. They were a breed of austere, hard working, hard fighting praying Anglo-Saxons. They defied the official British policy of reducing them to the level of the black African. Their number included Dutch, Germans, English, Scotch and Irish. They first made their way to Natal. No sooner had they 'settled down" when the British landed from the sea and attacked them. From here they proceeded to the transvall and Orange Free State. However the Zulus were at the peak of their power and knew no mercy. Cut off from supplies from the sea, many Whites died >from famine and pestilence. Still they refused the demands of the British to return to the coast where they would have been submerged with the Anglican's church's madness of merging the two races into one. As an example to others many missionaries and sub-normal Whites in the Cape Colony married black women and founded co-racial schools. They urged the White and Negro children to socialize with one another. They brazenly paraded the children through the streets with signs reading: "We Are Of One Blood." The colony fell under the influence of these misguided zealots who believed that only they had the right to interpret the Holy Bible. Whites Betrayed Negro tribes were now pouring into South Africa to take advantage of the British order that no retaliation be taken against blacks who raped, looted and murdered Whites. Colonial Secretary Lord Glenelg actually ordered that the rampaging blacks be considered innocent because if they were treated with tolerance they would then behave properly. Soon the Cape Colony would be destroyed through the decay of thousands of mulatto (colored) people unable to sustain civilization. Today Cape Town is the most corrupt, decadent and collapsed area of South Africa with over 500,000 mulattoes. The Whites of the Transvall and Free State now had the British to their backs and the fierce Zulu warriors to the north. Often the Zulus would pretend friendship or ask for truce talks. Then they would brutally slaughter the emissaries. They would surround White Farming communities and attack with spears and hatchets. Women and children would be brutally raped and then tortured to death. Fight Two Front Racial War Hissing like a snake the Zulus would dance and then begin their charge. The Voortrekkers would fire and reload again and fire with true aim. Thus they were triumphant despite being outnumbered 100 to 1. The British Colonial Office never forgave the Whites for defying their orders to integrate with the Negroes. For 25 years they would persecute these people, withholding food and weapons so that they would become weakened. Then the savages might have another opportunity to defeat the Whites. Three times the British invaded the small White colonies and finally captured the Free State. After subduing the Whites and disarming them the British withdrew. They left them to the mercy of the Basuto tribe with whom the British had concluded a peace treaty. Against all odds, in brutal hand-to-hand fighting in a two year war, the Whites finally defeated the Basuto. The British, at the request of the Negroes, "took them under the folds of the British flag" and warned the Whites (Boers) to desist as the Basuto were now British subjects. The British told the world that they were protecting the poor downtrodden blacks from the cruelty of the Whites. (Note: Is this not the anti-White propaganda line we constantly hear today?) The British bullied the Boers into submission, then abandoned them to the fierce black tribes, attacked them again when they dared to defend themselves from terrible and murderous assaults by the Negroes. The British occupied the Boer lands again and deprived them of their liberty for resisting the blacks. This was to prove to the world that Britain would enforce racial equality and the interbreeding of the races. Gold and Greed -- War Against Whites The discovery of gold and diamonds in the Free State and Transvaal led to the Boer War of 1898 to 1902 in which thousands of Whites were slaughtered. All this because Cecil Rhodes demanded that this immense wealth be held for the Rothschild family of England to which the monarchy was deeply in debt. (To this day the Rothschilds and Oppenheimers maintain a world-wide monopoly on all gold and diamond reserves.) Known laws of biology demonstrate that mongrelization does not blend traits and capacities of the races together. The germ plasm of the primitive race will dominate and reduce the creativity of the advanced race. Suddenly the British government realized what tremendous damage race-mixing had inflicted on this rich nation of South Africa. They saw the crumbling and decayed culture of the Cape Colony which was now called, "the land of the tar brush" and "the coffee-colored capitol." Thus the British Parliament passed the _Act of Union_ which limited the seats in the South African parliament to "British Subjects of European descent." Thus, after decades of fighting and senseless bloodshed, the British had recognized that the Boers had been right all along. (Note: Today the White people of South Africa are back where they began. Both the British, U.S. and the colored dominated United Nations are once again demanding black rule over the Whites. This will never work and bloodshed will return on a massive scale. The White people of the rest of the world must depend the rights of the Boer South Africans to have their own All-White society within the nation.) The Negro In America The Negro has not proven himself to be the equal of the White Worker. This is the reason big business has always favored hiring Whites over blacks. The cotton gin and other inventions eliminated tens-of-thousands of jobs for blacks. The Negro is indolent, slow and careless about his work. The tendency to allow harder working mongrels to immigrate to America will eventually cost White people decent paying jobs. The slave trade was immensely profitable. Queen Elizabeth of England was keenly interested in taking the slave trade away >from the Spanish. She knighted John Hawkins and furnished him with a fleet of ships to haul slaves to America. The first ship was named, "The Jesus." Slavery In America At that time the White world believed that they were doing the Negro a favor by saving him from brutal tribal chiefs who had already enslaved these people and would have either eaten them, worked them to death or tortured them for pleasure. It was not uncommon for Puritan ministers to go out in small boats to meet the slave ships. They gave prayers of thanksgiving to the Almighty for bring the heathen blacks to America where they could be saved through Christianity. Before the American Revolution, some farsighted men petitioned the Queen to stop the slave trade because they saw that in the future it would lead to interbreeding and doom civilization here. She refused as the profits of slavery were too great. With modern industry replacing the need for stoop labor, the Negro has become a burden. Some believe that the black race will die out due to their early and high death rate but this is not true. The real danger lies in the White man becoming extinct. Civilization has never survived an intimate and prolonged contact with the colored races. The American civilization has survived as long as it has because important measures have been taken to preserve the purity of the White race. These steps are: Protection for Whites 1) In most states it is against the law for a White to marry a non-White. 2) We have laws providing for the Segregation of the races in schools and public accommodations. 3) The blacks have effectively been denied the right to vote in the Southern states through the Democratic White Primary and the poll tax and literacy test. 4) Most of the major churches in the nation teach that race- mixing and interracial marriage are forbidden by the Holy Bible. White Americans are fortunate to have all these barriers erected to maintain the preservation of the White race. (Note: Dear readers - take note that all of the above was written by Cox in 1937. All of these protective barriers have been destroyed leaving our children defenseless to the constant barrage of propaganda advocating every conceivable form of interracial mixing. Such dastardly policies are now advocated by most churches, schools, politicians and the media. Thus we see the work we have cut out for ourselves to save our White Race and White America.) It is our duty to bequeath to our posterity the race type and culture received by us from our forefathers. We have survived in America for over three centuries but will we survive in the three centuries ahead of us? The struggle for the maintenance of civilization is the struggle for the preservation of the White race. We owe the fact that we are White entirely to those who lived before us. Had they feebler morals, we would be mix-breeds living in squalor today. Stop Black Voting Even after the civil war a majority of Americans were opposed to granting "suffrage" (the right to vote) to the Negro. It was voted down in every state except Iowa and Minnesota where no blacks lived. In 1868 Michigan voted it down by a 32,000 vote majority. New York voted against allowing Negroes the right to vote by 34,000 votes. The problem lies not in a White marrying a full-blood Negro. It is the octoroon (one-eight) light skinned Negro who will marry the White girl. Their offspring will consider marrying a quadroon (one-fourth) darker Negro and so the downward spiral spins out of control. It is of interest that those "blacks" who are hailed as being very intelligent are always mulattoes. Had they been White their "brilliance" might well make them appear merely "average." Race and Heredity Maintaining the purity of the White race must be a national ideal. Racial heredity governs , spiritual, physical, skin color, hair texture, skull shape, brain capacity, skeletal propositions and psychic predispositions. Allowing such an inferior race increase within our borders will drastically lower our standards. If the Negro could be removed from the Southern States our future would be much brighter than it is now. Slavery Benefited Negroes President Grover Cleveland said: The Negro is the greatest problem of our civilization and constitutes the only problem beyond which we cannot see." Slavery in America left the Negro infinitely better off that he was in Africa. White people rescued them from cannibalism, clothed the naked savage and provided him with medical care and job training in a far more healthier environment. The institution of slavery resulted in greater harm to the White race than to the black. The Negro has profited from contact with the White while the White has suffered great losses from his contact with the Negro. The White people have held a superior position to the Negro down through history and has been the predominant force in directing the civilized history of the world. No one can deny that the Negro has been the beneficiary of the White man's progress. Separate Nation For Blacks Thomas Jefferson said: "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free / nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government." The part of this statement after the slash (/) was deliberately left off the Jefferson Monument in Washington. During the Lincoln-Douglas debate held in Charleston, ILL. on Sept. 18, 1858 Douglas said: "I am opposed to Negro citizenship in any and every form. I believe that this government was made by White men for the benefit of White men and their posterity forever." Lincoln Speaks Lincoln's famous response was: "I will say then, that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the White and the black races - that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of the Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with White people, and I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the White and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality." Liberia - The Black Homeland Jefferson, Lincoln, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, Clay, Webster, Douglas, Grant and many others supported the American Colonization Society. They established the nation of Liberia in Africa for the resettlement of all blacks back to their own homeland. During the Civil War Lincoln made inquiries with South American nations to determine if our blacks could be sent there. Later President Grant presented a bill in the Congress to provide for all blacks to be resettled in Haiti and Santo Domingo. Unfortunately it failed to pass. Separate The Races The physical separation of the races is the only total alternative to the eventual amalgamation of the races. Timid individuals will tell you that repatriation of the American Negro is an impossibility. Ask them for their solution to the problem. They have none! There are but two solutions - separation or amalgamation! Those who do not advocate the first are to be classed as adherents of the latter! Will you work with those who seek a White America or will you grant the misguided liberals the power to turn our country into a mulatto populated decadent nation? Will it be a White America or a Negroid America? One or the other will be our fate - there is no middle ground! God helps those who help themselves. Look into the future and visualize the burden our children and our children's children will face unless we act now. Men die; man lives on! Now is the time for all White people to UNITE for action to save the White race for a white America. (Note: There is still a small black "Back To Africa" organization in America. They should be encouraged to continue working in the name of the great Marcus Garvey. Also consideration should be given to providing the Negro race with a separate nation within our borders made up of one or more states. Black independence must be studied, debated, and acted upon for the permanent salvation of both races.) Fastest Collapsing Cities Many people think of New York City as the most rapidly declining area in the nation. The East-West Council has reported that the worst major city in America is ST. LOUIS, followed by PITTSBURG and CLEVELAND. St Louis has lost 95,000 people in the past 10 years. They were mostly in their productive years of 18 to 65. All three cities had a large loss of young educated professionals. There can be no doubt that the criminal violence on the part of Negroes is the root cause of the decline. The Anti-White Church The Anglican Church of England is once again intruding in South African affairs. On Jan. 17 the Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, arrived in the mongrelized decadent town of Cape Town (where over 500,000 mulattoes live.) Carey urged a rapid and peaceful transition to a black ruled government. END Communist Work to Instill a "Guilt-Complex" Within Whites to Further Mongrelization The following statement quotes the well known Communist writer, Israel Cohen, who in 1921 wrote "A racial Program For The Twentieth Century." This quote can be found in the U.S. Congressional Record of 1957, on page 8559, available from the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. "We must realize that our Party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. The terms colonialism and imperialism must be featured in our propaganda in America, we will aim for a subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites. We will endeavor to instill in the Whites a built complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. "We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause." *** ------------------ Words of Wisdom by Senator Theodore G. Bilbo, of Mississippi in 1947 "If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be wrecked, we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed, out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who would redeem our power. But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness of the United states of America would be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for a Negroid America as would be redemption and restoration of the White man's blood which had mixed with that of the Negro." ------------------ End of Article.. ----------------------- "Vigilantes of Christendom" by Richard Kelly Hoskins (The story of Militant Christianity) It follows the spread of violent alien liberation tactics into Christendom, gives the past history of Christendom's own Phineas Priesthood, and projects startling events that lie just ahead. Richard Kelly Hoskins is the author of the best seller, "War Cycles/Peace Cycles" and other books, pamphlets and articles circulated worldwide. His new book relates the history and rebirth of militant Christianity. His research discloses that the rise of violent religious movements in other lands has triggered the same phenomenon in the West. No longer will political and economic considerations alone determine events in Christendom as people again begin to believe that their God's Laws must be enforced on earth and that God has created a priesthood to enforce them! 482 pages, hardback. As the Kamakazi is to the Japanese As the Shiite is to Islam As the Zionist is to the Jews So the Phineas Priest is to Christendom Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the stories of role models - Phineas, Sampson, King Arthur, Beowulf, St. George, Capt. John Smith, and many others. Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of Death Wind who, after being ambushed by savages, killed 2000 in retaliation Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of the attack on homosexuals and the destruction of porno-parlors Vigilantes of Christendom - traces the assassinations of Western Christian leaders and the beginning of retaliation Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of the execution of Alen Berg - foul mouthed anti-Christian disc jockey. Vigilantes of Christendom - tells the story of Blood River in South Africa where the Zulus say angels came and fought for the settlers. Published by: Virginia Publishing Company Available from: Scriptures for America, P.O. Box 766-c, LaPorte, Colorado 80535, USA $20.00 postpaid --------------------------------------- Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by anonymous FTP from: ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA ------------------------------------------------- -- _____________________Rick Savage ______________________ | For unique political commentary & Christian views Rick Savage | | Anonymous FTP: ftp.netcom.com - pub/SF/SFA PO Box 5251 | | To obtain files by e-mail write me for help file Denver, CO 80217 | | In your message ask for FTP-EMAIL help. (u)SA | From firstname.lastname@example.com Thu Jun 29 05:35:56 PDT 1995 Article: 22851 of alt.revisionism Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!news.insinc.net!news.sprintlink.net!wizard.pn.com!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet From: firstname.lastname@example.com Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: NO NO DELIBERATE STARVATION POLICY FOR INMATES Date: Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:49:25 -0500 Organization: Delphi (email@example.com email, 800-695-4005 voice) Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <firstname.lastname@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1b.delphi.com X-To: Jamie R. McCarthy Jamie R. McCarthy writes: >In the second half, I pointed out that Hans Frank documented, in his >diary, exactly when it was decided by top Nazi officials to starve the >Jews and Poles. In his diary entry for 24 August 1942, Frank took down >the minutes of the meeting: "That we sentence 1,200,000 Jews to die of >hunger should be noted only marginally." And there are other >expressions of this statement (though none so explicit and in so few >words) -- all of which I presented with full context. > This quote from Dr. Frank's diary is devastating not to the Revisionists, but to the anti-Revisionists. According to the Exterminationists, Chelmno began operations on December 1941 (this camp was outside of the General Government). The camps of Belzec and Sobibor were in operation in early 1942. The Treblinka camp began working several weeks before this entry by Dr. Frank was made. If this entry by Dr. Frank is authentic, then there were no gas chambers at these camps, nor were there evacuations to the east. What Dr. Frank should have said (to please both sides of the debate): "We do not need to feed 1.2 million Jews within our borders, since these people are being evacuated to the east." From email@example.com Thu Jun 29 05:36:03 PDT 1995 Article: 22858 of alt.revisionism Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!unixg.ubc.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!fountain.mindlink.net!agate!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!simtel!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet From: firstname.lastname@example.com Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: Holocaust Almanac - I.G. Farben removed 'indicator' from gas Date: Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:06:41 -0500 Organization: Delphi (email@example.com email, 800-695-4005 voice) Lines: 55 Message-ID: References: <firstname.lastname@example.com> <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1d.delphi.com X-To: HMazal HMazal writes: >Both Mr. Hunt (a.k.a. DbtgThomas) and Mr. [anonymous] (a.k.a. >email@example.com) have had the opportunity to search their libraries and >prove, beyond reasonable proof, whether the producers of Zyklon-B did or >did not include a warning agent in their deadly product. After perusing >the evidence that follows, one hopes that they will concede that Zyklon-B >was produced both _with_ and _without_ the agent. We can then continue >with Mr. rs241's inquisiton. I am not concerned whether this gas was produced with an odor indicator (or irritant or warning agent), or without. What interests me is whether or not the production of this product without the indicator showed criminal intent in regards to the alleged extermination of Jews. The quotation from Commandant Hvss's memorandum does not state that the gas did not have an indicator, but that it had "less" of an indicator. There were forty copies of this memorandum distributed throughout the camp. The document NI-9912 does state that: "this irritant also has the advantage of stimulating the respiration of insects." It is claimed by the manual that it has an advantage; it does not mean that it would be disadvantageous to use it on lice without the indicator. Also, many businesses's often emphasize the positive aspects of their products, not the negative. In other words, does an irritant warn rodents; therefore giving these creatures a chance to escape from a multiroom building should it not be sealed properly? Regarding your quotation of Professor Hilberg, you had forgotten to include the rest of Professor Hilberg's sentence. This order by a representative of Mrugowski was needed by the Waffen-SS. I had pointed out in an earlier post that this organization had expanded during the course of the war (I had used combat units as an example, since I do not have sufficient informations on the other branches such as the training units, prison guards, etc.) and could have been shipped anywhere. Professor Hilberg did not state that all or part of this requisition was intended for Auschwitz. On the following sentence, Hilberg claims that 2800 KG (if we really want to nitpick, he did not state whether or not this was Zyklon, but I would think so) was ordered by Dr. Evers and shipped to Auschwitz. Professor Hilberg did not claim these two requests were linked. Where does Professor Hilberg directly state that the request for Zyklon B without the odor indicator was necessary for the extermination of people? From email@example.com Thu Jun 29 15:24:51 PDT 1995 Article: 22863 of alt.revisionism Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!unixg.ubc.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!news.mindlink.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news2.near.net!news.delphi.com!usenet From: email@example.com Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: NO NO DELIBERATE STARVATION POLICY FOR INMATES Date: Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:55:30 -0500 Organization: Delphi (firstname.lastname@example.com email, 800-695-4005 voice) Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <firstname.lastname@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bos1f.delphi.com X-To: Jamie R. McCarthy Jamie R. McCarthy writes: >* "If the Germans had wanted to kill the inmates, why choose a policy >of starvation, why not set up another gas chamber?" (Starvation, >though it takes longer and is crueller, is just as effective. And >Mr. Roberts knows full well that the Belsen camp did not experience >its dramatic overcrowding until the last few months of the war -- if >they had wanted to gas the inmates, there was not much time to build >the gas chamber.) If Commandant Kramer had intent to commit murder via starvation, why didn't he cremate the corpses? He was commandant of Birkenau during his career. It has been alleged that this camp was murdering and cremating people (via furnaces and burning pits). The logic used by non-Revisionist historians was to cover-up the crime. Why the sudden change in policy? Couldn't he obtain fuel >from the panzer school? From email@example.com Thu Jun 29 15:25:02 PDT 1995 Article: 22874 of alt.revisionism Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!unixg.ubc.ca!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news1.digex.net!news3.digex.net!digex.net!not-for-mail From: firstname.lastname@example.com (Michael P. Stein) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: NO NO DELIBERATE STARVATION POLICY FOR INMATES Date: 28 Jun 1995 00:09:32 -0400 Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA Lines: 68 Message-ID: <email@example.com> References: <firstname.lastname@example.com> <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: access5.digex.net In article , wrote: >This quote from Dr. Frank's diary is devastating not to the >Revisionists, but to the anti-Revisionists. According to the >Exterminationists, Chelmno began operations on December 1941 >(this camp was outside of the General Government). The camps >of Belzec and Sobibor were in operation in early 1942. The >Treblinka camp began working several weeks before this entry by >Dr. Frank was made. If this entry by Dr. Frank is authentic, >then there were no gas chambers at these camps, nor were there >evacuations to the east. Not necessarily; Frank may at that time have been unaware of a) the camps, or (more likely) b) their capacity and/or full scope of operations. See below.... >What Dr. Frank should have said (to please both sides of the debate): >"We do not need to feed 1.2 million Jews within our borders, since these >people are being evacuated to the east." And you know what? Frank did change his tune! On 9th December Frank no longer talked about losing Jews to starvation; more active measures were referred to though not spelled out in detail. I expect great things from your elasticity, and please don't come to me with complaints about contradictions in our economic policy. For you there is only one order, bring in workers from wherever you can find them. Recently they have taken away a non-insignificant portion of our old, protected Jewish workers. It is clear that the process of finding workers is made more difficult when, in the middle of this war-related jobs program, an order comes that all Jews are to be exterminated. [In German "alle Juden sind der Vernichtung anheim zu stellen", literally "All Jews are to be submitted to extermination."] The responsibility for this order does not rest with the administration of the General Government. This order for extermination of the Jews comes from higher authorities. We must only reconcile ourselves to its conclusions, and can merely inform the Federal authorities that the removal of those Jews capable of working has led to tremendous difficulties. Only recently I complained to State Secretary Ganzenmueller [top official in the Federal Transportation Ministry] that a huge building project in the General Government had come to a standstill, and that I could prove that this would not have happened had not the many thousands of Jews who were employed on that project been hauled away. Now an order has been issued saying that all Jews should be taken off of armaments work; I hope that this order will be repealed, if it has not already been repealed, for otherwise I see the situation as even worse. Source: Minutes of a Cabinet Meeting, from the Office Diary of Hans Frank, 9 December 1942 (588-89), quoted in "Holocaust 1939-1945: A Collection of Primary Sources," selected and translated by John L. Heineman, pp. 142-143. (Please do note that Frank said "Vernichtung" rather than "Ausrottung.") Posted/emailed. -- Mike Stein The above represents the Absolute Truth. POB 10420 Therefore it cannot possibly be the official Arlington, VA 22210 position of my employer. From email@example.com Thu Jun 29 19:52:50 PDT 1995 Article: 22880 of alt.revisionism Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!unixg.ubc.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!psgrain!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!kfilan From: firstname.lastname@example.com (kevin filan) Subject: Re: Holocaust Almanac - I.G. Farben removed 'indicator' from gas Message-ID: Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <email@example.com> <email@example.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 12:44:36 GMT Lines: 61 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.com firstname.lastname@example.com wrote: : I am not concerned whether this gas was produced with an odor : indicator (or irritant or warning agent), or without. It is good you feel that way, as there is pretty overwhelming evidence that the gas was produced BOTH with and without an irritant. Now we come to the question of why... the same question which arises for you later on in your post. What interests : me is whether or not the production of this product without the : indicator showed criminal intent in regards to the alleged : extermination of Jews. The quotation from Commandant Hvss's : memorandum does not state that the gas did not have an indicator, : but that it had "less" of an indicator. We've already said that Zyklon-B's active ingredient (Hydrogen Cyanide) has a distinctive "bitter almond" smell. There is a CONSIDERABLE difference between this odor and the odor of the irritant, which I'm led to believe had an effect similar to tear gas. Given the fact that Zyklon-B is highly dangerous, don't you suppose that we might consider that irritant pretty darned important? And that we might question why it was shipped? There were forty copies of : this memorandum distributed throughout the camp. The document : NI-9912 does state that: "this irritant also has the advantage of : stimulating the respiration of insects." In other words... this irritant makes it _more_ effective as a delousing agent. And yet the SS still wanted it removed, even though they were using it as a delousing agent. Curious, no? It is claimed by the manual : that it has an advantage; it does not mean that it would be : disadvantageous to use it on lice without the indicator. Give me an "A!" Give me a "U!" Give me an "S!" ... No, they didn't say it wouldn't WORK without the irritant... just that it worked better WITH it? Also, many : businesses's often emphasize the positive aspects of their products, : not the negative. In other words, does an irritant warn rodents; : therefore giving these creatures a chance to escape from a multiroom : building should it not be sealed properly? Possibly... but Zyklon-B was predominantly used in "delousing" chambers for delousing clothing. Last I heard, lice aren't rodents. So why remove something that would make it a more effective tool in getting rid of lice... its ostensible purpose? Peace Kevin Filan -- ________________________________________________________________ Kevin Filan * P.O. Box 231582 firstname.lastname@example.com * Old Statehouse Station Rakshasa PODSnet, FidoNet, IRC * Hartford, CT 06123 ________________________________________________________________ "Toto... I don't think we're in Kansas anymore..." From email@example.com Sat Jul 1 05:27:03 PDT 1995 Article: 22959 of alt.revisionism Path: news.port.island.net!news.island.net!news.bc.net!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!news.Arizona.EDU!bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu!dmittleman From: firstname.lastname@example.com (Daniel Mittleman) Newsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: Re: NO NO DELIBERATE STARVATION POLICY FOR INMATES Date: 28 Jun 1995 06:18 MST Organization: University of Arizona (BPA) Lines: 43 Distribution: world Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.com> References: <firstname.lastname@example.com> <email@example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bpavms.bpa.arizona.edu News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.50 [posted and emailed, reply by post please] >Jamie R. McCarthy writes: > >>In the second half, I pointed out that Hans Frank documented, in his >>diary, exactly when it was decided by top Nazi officials to starve the >>Jews and Poles. In his diary entry for 24 August 1942, Frank took down >>the minutes of the meeting: "That we sentence 1,200,000 Jews to die of >>hunger should be noted only marginally." And there are other >>expressions of this statement (though none so explicit and in so few >>words) -- all of which I presented with full context. >This quote from Dr. Frank's diary is devastating not to the >Revisionists, but to the anti-Revisionists. According to the >Exterminationists, Chelmno began operations on December 1941 >(this camp was outside of the General Government). The camps >of Belzec and Sobibor were in operation in early 1942. The >Treblinka camp began working several weeks before this entry by >Dr. Frank was made. If this entry by Dr. Frank is authentic, >then there were no gas chambers at these camps, nor were there >evacuations to the east. What Dr. Frank should have said >(to please both sides of the debate): "We do not need to >feed 1.2 million Jews within our borders, since these people >are being evacuated to the east." {sigh} Some days I wonder if there is a screen a denier basic training to make sure that no one there has passed a course in logic. If the entry by Dr. Frank is authentic, then why would that entry invalidate either gas chambers or evacuations to the East? Isn't it possible that there were different policies at different times? Isn't it possible that there were different policies at the same time for different sub-groups of the population? Isn't it possible that Dr. Frank (rather than summarizing all comprehensive policy with this diary note) was merely commenting to himself on a new policy established that day? =========================================================================== daniel david mittleman - email@example.com - (520) 621-2932 "I can't complain, but sometimes I still do..." -- Joe Walsh
Home ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2012
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.