text:
Asian pornstars have always been one of the most popular sets of performers and the digital era has allowed more Asian amateurs than ever before to make their way into hardcore XXX action online. Whether you prefer Japanese sluts, eighteen year old Korean girls, Chinese MILFs or Dragon Ladies from other regions of the Far East - Porn Tube is the best place for you to get your free Asian porn fix! Thousands of Asian sex movies in one exclusive collection you can't get anywhere else, with feature XXX action from many studios and plenty of first time Asians in hardcore action - that's the PornTube.com advantage!
Choose your favorite Asian pornstar by clicking her name to access all of her free porn tube videos, or visit this Asian Porn section of the site to scout out the best new Asian smut starring gorgeous Oriental darlings you haven't seen in fuck films until now. Every day more sexy starlets are added in Asian video porn scenes that give you all the access you could ever want for fantasy sessions packed full of pussy so raw and fresh it seems like sushi! Give that Asian ass a tight squeeze, suck on some Geisha nipples and fuck pretty Asian pussy right away with a porn tube interface perfectly designed to keep you in the flow of the action from hot start to sticky finish!
Related channels:
HD PornTube, All Japanese Pass, Jav HD, Avidolz, Jav HQ, show all...
Most popular related tags:
japanese, brunette, hairy, riding, cum
Related categories:
Amateur, blowjob, Hardcore, masturbation, cumshot, show all...
Related pornstars:
Aaralyn Barra, Asa Akira, Ex Girlfriend, Katsumi, London Keys, show all...
Related tags
- Uploaded: All Time
- Sort by:
- Date
- Duration
- Popularity
- Views
- Rating


text:
Share this Event
The next-generation data center will be designed to increase IT agility and enable more dynamic IT service delivery models. But to increase responsiveness, IT organizations will have to make real changes and re-optimize tools and processes for a more dynamic IT environment that will include self-service, resource scaling, and workload movement within and between cloud resource pools.
Attend this webcast to find out how standardization of infrastructure and
operational practices can multiple value by increasing agility related
benefits, while at the same time reducing risk and costs associated with
managing a more dynamic IT environment. Also learn how Red Hat Enterprise
Linux can be a key component of a standardization bridging strategy that
delivers real value now and in the future.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
You can also read manga online try the Iinari! Aibration manga!
You're reading Iinari! Aibration 21 online. You can try some of the related manga below or try some other manga from our manga list.
Users who read Iinari! Aibration also read Ranma, Zero no Tsukaima, Mahou Sensei Negima!, Kemeko Deluxe!, Rosario to Vampire Season II and Spas-Pa.


text:
Babylon's authentic travertine look combines state-of-the-art porcelain tile performance with the latest in digital printing technology. Available in five modular sizes and four colors, creating a one-of-a-kind look provides a stage for endless possibilities.
Color varies with each plank creating a natural mosaic. Low: Color varies slightly from plank to plank. Medium: Color varies moderately from plank to plank. High: Color varies significantly from plank to plank while retaining some similarity.
Porcelain -Any variation in color or texture from tile to tile.
Slight: Color and texture vary slightly from tile to tile. Moderate: Color and texture vary vary moderately from tile to tile. Substantial: Color and texture vary significantly from tile to tile while retaining some similarity.
Mannington Porcelain Flooring Babylon Artifact - BA1T12


text:
And the 2009 Chess Oscar went to... Magnus Carlsen
Magnus Carlsen won the 2009 Chess Oscar. Yesterday, just before the start of the World Blitz Championship, Carlsen received the trophy. It was the first time that the Norwegian won the prize, which is a result of votes by chess journalists and awarded by Russian chess magazine 64.
The participants of the World Blitz Championships had been asked to come to the playing hall 1.5 hours before the start of the tournament. After speeches by FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, former World Champion Anatoly Karpov and Head of the Supervisory Board of the Russian Chess Federation Arkadij Dvorkovich, suddenly Magnus Carlsen was asked to come on stage. Something he didn't expect.
"I knew that I won it," Carlsen said, "but I thought they would give me the award during the closing ceremony." He received the prize from Mark Glukhovsky, the editor-in-chief of Russian chess magazine 64. The magazine has been coordinating the prize for years. It sends out questionnaires to leading journalists, who then send in their top 10.
Magnus Carlsen, honored to receive his first Chess Oscar, with FIDE President Kirsan ilyumzhinov in the background
Carlsen received the trophy, a bronze statuette, and thanked Glukhovsky. "It's an honour to receive a prize witch such a long tradition," Carlsen said.
The prize was first awarded in 1967 to another Scandinavian, the legendary Bent Larsen, who passed away this year aged 75. It was given away uninterrupted until the year 1988, and then it resumed in 1995.
The last two times the Oscar was won by current World Champion Viswanathan Anand. Garry Kasparov holds the record for winning the Oscar 11 times; Anatoly Karpov won it 9 times.
Carlsen holding the trophy
Congratulation Magnus!
Now go early to bed and crush the bugs tomorrow. Winning the WC Blitz and (eventually) London Classic will secure you another Oscar next year.
BTW: How many Oscars did Kasparov win? -His basement is probably full of those "beautiful" trophies. LOL
Just for the record, GM Levon Aronian and runner-up, GM Sergey Karjakin, just burst your buddies (Carlsen) bubbel at the WC Blitz in Moskau
Bobby Fiske, we'll see who has the last laugh in London. :)
Many people are still mad at GM Kramnik for denying, the legend in his own mind, GM Kasparov the re-match. Vlady's courageous decision (Sorry Garry, we all know your good, but if you want to contest the World Championship ever again you must first re-qualify) not to give in to Garry's audacious demand was correct and really got the film rolling toward re-unification.
Re-unification has been a success!
Let's hope the bafoons bent on retarding further progress are kept in check, on billboards, in Norway.
They left the clown in the box for fear of disheveling MC's hair shd Kirsan or Karpov rush forward ((photo op) to set it upon his head.
3 years 5 months ago
Are you sure 2009?? We are going into 2011 soon...
I don't get it. :o
Admitedly it is strange that the Chess Oscar for year 2009 is given so late, but yes it is for year 2009.
In previous years it was awarded around May. I already thought that Chess Oscar was discontinued (again) when there was no word on it during the whole year.
I still think that Chess Oscar for 2009 should go to Kramnik and not Carlsen. Kramnik had a better string of results throughout the year 2009 than Carlsen (who had a fantastic finish). You can compare their results through 2009 here:
I clicked your link and saw nothing to show that Kramnik's results were better. You seem to forget how groundbreaking Carlsens results were in Nanjing- that shook the entire chess world! And then he topped it off with the World Blitz and then London where he toppled your Kramnik...sorry, 2009 and 2010 have been Carlsens!
As I already explained - when I look at the final ranks I always see Kramnik's name in the 1st or 2nd row. Only once you have to go down to the 4th row.
With Carlsen it is very different - a lot of time you don't find him in forst two rows, specially in the 1st half of 2009.
And this is what matters to me. If you ask me, I would give it to Kramnik.
He played what, three tournaments? Won two without impressing while Carlsen performed 3000 Elo in Nanjing and won other top tournaments like London. And reached #1 when 18 years old. He must have won that vote in a landslide.
3 years 5 months ago
Of course a known Carlsen fan won't disagree ... . I don't say that Carlsen doesn't deserve the Oscar, and that the voting journalists got it all wrong - but ebutaljib is correct that 2009, like any other year, had 12 months and didn't start with Nanjing in October. If the first half gets full consideration, Aronian (who completely dominated two FIDE GP events) would also be a serious candidate.
IMO, arguments in favor of Carlsen were:
- Nanjing was a stellar performance, and people remember the more recent results more.
- He was/is a rising star who hadn't received the Oscar before, so it was his turn.
But there is no need to minimize Kramnik's results: If Tal Memorial 2009 wasn't impressive, what would be impressive? So while a Carlsen victory is deserved, a "landslide" isn't - BTW are the full results available anywhere? How big was Carlsen's margin, and who were the runner-ups?
"But there is no need to minimize Kramnik's results: If Tal Memorial 2009 wasn't impressive, what would be impressive?"
He won it fair and square, but with 0.5 point after being quite lucky against Ponomariov and Gelfand (he was more unlucky this year so it evens out with time). Several other players could just as well have won it in 2009 though. A good result for Kramnik but not something that really stays in the mind like Karpov's Linares 1994 or Carlsen's Nanjing 2009. The same thing with Kramnik's Dortmund. +3 in 10 rounds after +2 against Naiditsch. Good, yes, but not particularly memorable.
Naturally one can count non-classical events if one wants, and then Carlsen had the by far most impressive achievement in 2009 when winning the blitz title with a huge margin.
3 years 5 months ago
3 years 5 months ago
Karpov still there!!! That is it. If you want to change things is preferible to be there and not out there!
Kirsan is also a smart guy! He knows that his rival is very important and wants him next to him. This is working.
Karpov likes to keep his friends close, and his alien friends closer
Calvin Amari
3 years 5 months ago
The Chess Oscar isn't about annualized statistics and Magnus taking off like a rocket in late '09 was unquestionably the most notable development of the year. His subsequent trajectory certainly suggests that, rather than some fluke, this burst quite plausibly was a beacon signaling a new era in chess. Well deserved.
Nice photo by the way. Everybody happy and smiling, uniting old and young, candidates, players and presidents. It's a pitty it can't be like that all the time.
"i wish everyday could be like Christmas"
3 years 5 months ago
actually vishy anand has won the chess oscar for six times! as such, the line " the last two times the oscar was won by the current(!) [have you heard karpov or kasparov described like this?] world champion viswanathan anand" reads dubious!
"actually vishy anand has won the chess oscar for six times!"
And soon he will have won it a seventh time, for 2010 :-)
"It's an honour to receive a prize witch such a long tradition,"
and the World Chess Championship is not worth fighting for?
3 years 5 months ago
"If Tal Memorial 2009 wasn't impressive, what would be impressive?"
Actually, it was even more impressive getting 2nd place, while being very sick, like Carlsen was. When he recovered, he totally crushed the field in Tal Blitz,, with the highest score ever 74%.
Summer 2009, Carlsen finished school and became professional chess player.
Read again what you wrote and what I wrote.
You said: "Carlsen dominated 2009"
and then I said: "IF someone dominated first 3 quarters..."
I presented all the results that both players played during the whole year 2009. You only pick those who are in favour of your point and disregard the rest.
"Read again what you wrote and what I wrote.
You said: "Carlsen dominated 2009?"
I didn't, but let's say Kramnik dominated 3/4th's of the year and that it was wrong to give Carlsen the Oscar, and finally end this discussion :)
Oh yes, sorry. It was Bobby Fiske who said it, and my response was to him, but then you challenged what I wrote making an impression that you agree with that.
I still say Kramnik, with Carlsen being my 2nd choice. But it's already decided so it doesn't make any sence to continue the debate.
Now who do you think deserves it for 2010? :)
Notable events in 2010
Carlsen might naturally win it also in 2010, but I'd give it to Anand.
3 years 5 months ago
Vishy should have been awarded the Chess Oscar this year for his win over Topalov in the WC. A great display of championship chess and character overcoming a volcano, Bulgarian organizers, and an opponent using a Super Computer!
Of all the Chess Oscar winners Carlsen is by far the least deserving considering all other recipients of the award participated in Candidates Matches or contested World Championships or became World Champion.
Sad that this years panel lowered its standard to accomodate a two-bit celebrity.
Time for you to do a reality check ;-)
Carlsen dominated 2009.
Carlsen dominated last quarter of 2009. If someone dominated the first 3 quarters then it was Kramnik who was always 1st, except for Amber where he was 2nd behind Aronian. This 2nd place was the only "stain" on Kramnik's record in the first 3/4 of 2009, everything else he has won. OK he didn't play so much, but everywhere he showed up he won. Only then came Carlsen, but Kramnik was right after him in London, and ahead of him in Tal Memorial.
He only won two significant tournaments in 2009. All I'm saying is, when compared to the previous Chess Oscar winners since 1967 his achievements (up to now) just don't cut the mustard.
Seems to me the panel bought into the hyperbole lock, stock, and barrel and ignored, or overlooked former WC Kramnik's 2009 achievements.
"Oh and when did Carlsen dominate?"
I didn't say that Carlsen dominated the first half of the year. You stated that Kramnik dominated the first three quarters of the year, I just pointed out that it's a generous view to see Kramnik as dominating when he didn't even play for the first half of the year and more. Apart from two rapid events of which he won only one (the by far weaker one, where he only played opponents from Azerbaijan).
There might be a case for saying that Kramnik dominated the third quarter and Carlsen the fourth but none of them dominated the first quarters of the year. That Carlsen won his first games in Nanjing during the third quarter isn't important, and it doesn't matter how the hairs are split, it was just Carlsen's year. It doesn't matter that he had a bad start the first months, what matters is Nanjing Elo 3002 +6 and 18-year old #1 2800+. That is wow factor on a different level than some other player winning two events in a year, for the 20th time, with a small margin. Carlsen could probably even have had a bad London instead of beating Kramnik and winning the event at the end of the year, or not won the blitz world championship with an incredible margin never seen before. But that's just what I think, and enough on the subject for me.
Oh and when did Carlsen dominate? Maybe when he was 5th in Wijk aan Zee? Or maybe when he was 3rd in Linares? Or 4th in Amber tournament? 2nd in Sofia? 2nd in Dortmund (behind Kramnik)?
That is some real dominance you have there, huh? If you disregard Leon (which you do!) then Carlsen first win came in October 2009 in Nanjing.
2009 has 12 months, you know.
"If someone dominated the first 3 quarters then it was Kramnik who was always 1st"
Amazingly impressive considering that he didn't play a single tournament the first half of the year :) Oh, one rapid minievent that was more of the exhibition kind where he scored the best result against Guseinov and Gashimov, but no one would of course count that as an event that signifies anything whatsoever with regards to the Oscar.
3 years 5 months ago
Carlsen won the Oscar. It was a done deal. Its been decided and just accept it. All the argument is only for an opinion.People who's votes matter voted for Carlsen. But everyone are entitled to their opinion. Some of Nakamuras fans probably would say he deserve the honor instead, some will pick Aronian or Anand since he is the world champion, it goes on and on and on...never ending arguments.
"People who's votes matter voted for...." Why shd we take the Panel's point of view at face value? The arguments, pro and con, posted up-thread help put the group of judges decision in perspective.
What criteria did the Panel use to determine the winner?
2 years 2 months ago
It is a very informative and useful post thanks it is good material to read this post increases my knowledgeCorporate Entertainment
Your commentBy posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions
Latest articles
2 hours 12 min ago
23 hours 19 min ago
1 day 17 hours ago
2 days 3 hours ago
2 days 21 hours ago
4 days 10 hours ago
6 days 1 hour ago
6 days 4 hours ago
6 days 23 hours ago
1 week 6 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 6 days ago
2 weeks 5 hours ago
2 weeks 1 day ago
2 weeks 2 days ago


text:
Last spring, Charlie Haas abruptly announced his retirement after a really weird incident with ROH that took place both backstage and in the ring. While many expected him to resurface, he has opted to remain off the grid. He has worked a couple of matches on the independent wrestling circuit in Texas, but those were mainly small shows.
February 10, 2014
Prior to becoming a WWE star, Charlie Haas worked as a stockbrocker.
November 23, 2013
While he does work a few independent shows around Texas, Charlie Haas has no interest in returning to wrestling on a full time basis.
October 27, 2013
Kurt Angle wasn't involved in a match at Great American Bash 2004, but he still played a role at the WWE pay per view. His first appearance of the evening was accompanying his new protege, Luther Reigns, and guiding him to a victory over Charlie Haas.
June 27, 2004
Chris Benoit shocked the wrestling world when he was able to win the Royal Rumble and earned himself a shot at the World Heavyweight Championship at Wrestlemania. He was successfully able to eliminate the Big Show to win the match.
January 25, 2004
Despite being on the short end of the handicap match, Chris Benoit and Brock Lesnar were able to defeat Team Angle, which consisted of Kurt Angle, Shelton Benjamin and Charlie Haas, at No Way Out 2003. The heel stable had Paul Heyman in their corner as well.
February 23, 2003


text:
Click here to read the full story in Storify.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This privacy statement discloses the privacy practices of HealthWatchMD.com located at http://www.HealthWatchMD.com (the "Site").
How We Collect and Use Information
If you choose to receive communication from HealthWatchMD.com, we will ask you to provide us with your name and email address.
We will use your email address to send you one or more invitations or reminders to register for, test or use the Service or visit the Site. From time to time, we may also send you other transactional or promotional email related to the Service. Email messages we send you may contain code that enables our database to track your usage of the emails, including whether the email was opened and what links (if any) were clicked. If you would rather not receive emails from us at any time, simply click on the "unsubscribe" link at the bottom of the email message. We fully comply with the requirements of the U.S. CAN-SPAM Act.
Any time you visit the Site, our servers may automatically gather non-PII from your browser (such as your IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, platform type, date/time stamp, and number of clicks). We do not share this information externally.
Age Restrictions
We do not target our Site or Service to children under the age of 13, and in compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, any information we may receive from users we believe to be under the age of 13 will be purged from our database. If you are under age 13, do not use the Site or register for the Service.
Geographic Restrictions
Users may not access the Site, register for or use the Service if prohibited by law in their country of residence.
Disclosure of Your Information to Third Parties
We may share your PII with service providers that may be associated with us to perform functions on our behalf. Your information will be treated as private and confidential by such service providers and not used for any other purpose than we authorize.
You acknowledge and agree that we may disclose information you provide if required to do so by law, at the request of a third party, or if we, in our sole discretion, believe that disclosure is reasonable to comply with the law, requests or orders from law enforcement, or any legal process; protect or defend our rights or property; or protect someone's health or safety.
As we develop our business, we may buy or sell assets and, depending on the transaction, your PII may be one of the transferred assets. In the event that we are acquired by another company, your PII may be part of the assets transferred to the acquiring party. If this occurs, you will be notified if there are any material changes to the way your PII is collected or used.
We will only share your information with third parties in the ways defined in this privacy statement.
We have security measures in place to protect the loss, misuse and alteration of the information stored in our database. We will exercise reasonable care in providing secure transmission of information between your computer and our servers, but given that no information transmitted over the Internet can be guaranteed 100% secure, we cannot ensure or warrant the security of any information transmitted to us over the Internet and hence accept no liability for any unintentional disclosure.
Contacting Us
If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of the Site, or your dealings with the Service, you can contact us by emailing: firstname.lastname@example.com
Acceptance of Privacy Statement
Your use of the Site, including any dispute concerning privacy, is subject to this privacy statement. BY USING THE SITE, YOU ARE ACCEPTING THE PRACTICES SET OUT IN THIS PRIVACY STATEMENT.
If we decide to change our privacy policy, we will post those changes to this privacy statement page and any other places we deem appropriate so that you are aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. We reserve the right to modify this privacy statement at any time, so please review it frequently. If we make material changes to this policy, we will notify you here, or by other means, such as email, at our discretion.
Your continued use of any portion of the Site following posting of the updated privacy statement will constitute your acceptance of the changes.
Effective Date
This privacy statement was last revised on July 18th 2012.
Stay informed. Get better.
Piedmont's HealthWatch is a community resource that helps you prevent disease, stay healthy, and know what to do if illness happens. Our articles and videos help you navigate the complex world of healthcare. You will find experts to explain medical conditions, treatments and diagnostic tests, and you will learn about our comprehensive services that treat both body and soul. Hear from our experts, be inspired by our patients and their personal stories, and get to know one of the best health systems in Georgia.
HealthWatchMD has created and compiled the content on its website for your information and use. This information is not intended to replace or modify the medical advice of your doctor or health care provider. Please consult your health care provider for advice about a specific medical condition. Please remember that the information and content, in the absence of a visit with a health care professional, must be considered as an informational/educational service only and is not designed to replace a physician's independent judgment about the appropriateness of risks of a procedure or condition for a given patient.