text:
Tory Burch
Marion Tote
USD http://schema.org/OutOfStock
Color:An ideal everyday carryall, our new Marion Tote is crafted of pebbled Italian leather in wear-with-all hues, perfect for any season. Whipstitch detailing at the top and chain straps woven with leather give this versatile style an extra dose of chic. The roomy interior promises to stow a myriad of essentials — from gym clothes and a bottle of water to a stack of magazines and an in-flight snack — for wherever the day takes you.
Style Number: 11139589
Pebbled leather.
Magnetic snap closure.
Whipstitch detailing.
Interior zipper pocket.
2 Additional interior open pockets.
Logo jacquard lining.
Gold tone hardware detail.
2.75" (7 cm) Stacked leather logo detail.
Interior Tory logo plaque.
Woven leather and chain strap with leather shoulder pad and 11.5" (29 cm) drop.
Height: 12.5" (32 cm).
Length: 12.25" (31 cm).
Depth: 4.24" (11 cm).
Rated 4.3 out of 5 by 9 reviewers.
Rated 4 out of 5 by Chris20 NICE! This tote is spacious yet not bulky. Leather is gorgeous! Straps stay on my shoulder. Would be perfect if it had a small outside/back pocket for cell phone. December 10, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by GinaBo Fabulous! I get compliments on this tote all the time. It's a bit larger than I expected, but it's beautiful leather and the chains make it fancy! A perfect way to add elegance to your everyday office look. October 19, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by Nannette Multi use tote Beautiful leather, perfect length straps, this tote is a classic that will be in my collection for years to come! The only thing I miss on this bag is an exterior pocket for easy access to my cell phone & keys. August 29, 2013
Rated 4 out of 5 by Blackbunny Good size tote I like the size of the tote, very roomy and can hold basically all of my daily essentials without being too bulky. The leather is nice but I wish the leather is a little stiffer so that it can hold its shape better. I found a couple of times the straps got detached from the hold, although it's easy to put it back in, it's kind of annoying. I think the base T metal needs to be a little wider so that the strap doesn't come off that easy. Overall, it's a very nice/elegant looking everyday tote. August 27, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by apricot soft, fashionable it's really chic! and perfect bag everywhere. I felt great satisfaction at sight bag. I wanted softness, texture, design had this bag. I carry a bag thought to be a long time without getting tired. July 17, 2013
Rated 4 out of 5 This bag is a perfect everyday tote! This is a fabulous everyday tote! It is the perfect size - it has plenty of compartments as well to fit all of my essentials. Not to mention, it is a great looking bag! I especially love the stich detailing at the top and the leather and gold straps - I have received many compliments! July 15, 2013
Rated 2 out of 5 by Laura0522 Beautiful bag....not so great quality I bought this loving the pictures online. I still loved it when it came in. I have had it for only about 2 months now and the leather in the gold chain straps is already starting to come undone. For $550, this should not be happening. I baby this bag because of how much I spent on it. I guess I just really hoped I would get what I paid for but this is not the case. The bag is gorgeous, the quality is not worth the $550 price tag. April 29, 2013
Rated 5 out of 5 by Shoelover4ever Perfect spring/summer tote I was looking for a nice large bag in the bleach color and this is it! The style is trendy yet classic! This bag is the perfect compliment for any spring or summer ensemble! March 2, 2013


text:
- MLB Tickets
- NBA Tickets
- NFL Tickets
- NHL Tickets
- Boxing Tickets
- Soccer Tickets
- Auto Racing Tickets
- WWE Tickets
- UFC Tickets
- more tickets...
- Alternative Tickets
- Bluegrass Tickets
- Children/Family Tickets
- Comedy Tickets
- Country / Folk Tickets
- Hard Rock / Metal Tickets
- Holiday Tickets
- Jazz / Blues Tickets
- Latin Tickets
- Other Tickets
- Pop / Rock Tickets
- Rap / Hip Hop Tickets
- Reggae / Reggaeton Tickets
- Techno / Electronic Tickets
- more tickets...
- Ballet Tickets
- Broadway Tickets
- Children / Family Tickets
- Cirque Du Soleil Tickets
- Las Vegas Tickets
- Musical / Play Tickets
- Off-broadway Tickets
- Opera Tickets
- more tickets...
The images appearing herein are for informational purposes only. OnlineSeats is not affiliated with Ticketmaster or any other ticketing company, any box office, venue, performing artist or sporting organization such as: NBA, NFL ,NHL, MLB, NCAA, NASCAR, USTA, PGA, LPGA, USGA, WNBA or any other sporting organizations. All logos and names of any of the aforementioned are used for purposes of factual description only. OnlineSeats is a nationwide events ticket-shopping directory and was purchased by Alliance Tickets in August of 2012. OnlineSeats is managed by Alliance Tickets and is an Alliance Tickets website.
The Sanford Center (Formerly Bemidji Regional Event Center) Information and Schedule
The Sanford Center (Formerly Bemidji Regional Event Center) tickets available for all events.
All Events by Date
|Amy Grant
|Oct 22, 2014
Wed 7:00PM
|The Sanford Center
Bemidji, MN
|Nov 9, 2014
Sun 6:00PM
|The Sanford Center
Bemidji, MN
|Mannheim Steamroller
|Nov 20, 2014
Thu 7:30PM
|The Sanford Center
Bemidji, MN
|The Beach Boys
|Dec 11, 2014
Thu 7:30PM
|The Sanford Center
Bemidji, MN
|Martina McBride
|Dec 14, 2014
Sun 7:00PM
|The Sanford Center
Bemidji, MN
|Love And Theft & DJ Silver
|Dec 17, 2014
Wed 7:00PM
|The Sanford Center
Bemidji, MN
|Celtic Thunder
|Mar 24, 2015
Tue 7:30PM
|The Sanford Center
Bemidji, MN
|The Fab Four - The Ultimate Tribute
|Jul 17, 2015
Fri 8:00PM
|The Sanford Center
Bemidji, MN
- Coachella Tickets
- Lollapalooza Tickets
- Chicago Tickets
- Cher Tickets
- Luke Bryan Tickets
- Elton John Tickets
- Phantom of the Opera Tickets
- The Lion King Tickets
- Wicked Tickets
- Monty Python's Spamalot Tickets
- The Little Mermaid Tickets
- West Side Story Tickets
- Seattle Seahawks Tickets
- Boston Red Sox Tickets
- San Diego Chargers Tickets
- New York Yankees Tickets
- Denver Broncos Tickets
- National Finals Rodeo Tickets
- Blue Man Group Tickets
- David Copperfield Tickets
- Shania Twain Tickets
- Legends In Concert Tickets

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Monday, December 5, 2011
Geocentricity vs. Heliocentricity
Why does the Earth seem motionless?
GC: Because it is motionless.
HC: It only seems motionless because it's spinning at a perfectly uniform speed with no acceleration or deceleration ever and the atmosphere is magically velcroed to it. Actually the Earth is spinning on it's axis at 1,000 mph, rotating around the Sun at 67,000 mph, which is orbiting the Milky Way at 500,000 mph and shooting through the known Universe at 67,000,000 mph. We don't feel even the slightest bit of this motion because all the centrifugal, gravitational, and inertial forces somehow perfectly cancel out.
"Most people who accept that the Earth is in motion believe it is a proven fact. They do not realize that not only has the motion of the Earth never been proven, but by the constructs of modern physics and cosmology cannot be proven. Again, even modern cosmology does not claim to be able to prove that the Earth is in motion. In fact the very best argument for Earth's motion is based on pure 'modesty' not logic, observation and experience. If anyone could prove the Earth's motion, that someone would become more famous than Einstein, Hawking and others. They may all be fools but even they would not make such an ignorant claim to proof of Earth's motions, and those who do so don't realize just how ignorant of physics they really are! Before folks go demonstrating how ignorant they are, they should consider: 1. The relationship between Mach's principle and relativity. 2. The relationship between Gravity and Inertia, and Gravity and Acceleration (and the paradoxes that exist). 3. Relativity does not claim to prove Earth's motions, in fact it 'dictates' the ridiculous idea that motion cannot be proven period. 4. Relativity proposes motion, it does not nor can it claim to disprove that the Earth is the center of the universe! 5. Only those who are ignorant of physics attempt to make arguments based on weather patterns, ballistic trajectories, geosynchronous satellites, and Foucault's pendulums for evidence of Earth's motions! For all those 'geniuses' out there, not even Einstein would claim such stupidity." -Allen Daves
Why do the Sun and Moon appear to be the same size?
GC: Because they are the same size.
HC: They only appear to be the same size because of an incredibly perfect parallax perspective from Earth. Actually the Sun is 1.392x10^6 km in diameter and 1.496x10^8 km from Earth. The Moon is 3474 km in diameter and 384,403 km from the Earth. And these just happen to be the EXACT diameters and distances necessary for a viewer from Earth to falsely perceive them as being the same size.
Why do the Sun, Moon, and Stars all appear to revolve around a stationary Earth?
GC: Because they do.
HC: The Moon does revolve around the Earth, but the Earth actually revolves around the Sun, and all the stars only seem to revolve around the Earth because the Earth itself is spinning beneath your feet!
"Whilst we sit drinking our cup of tea or coffee the world is supposedly rotating at 1,039 mph at the equator, whizzing around the Sun at 66,500 mph, hurtling towards Lyra at 20,000 mph, revolving around the centre of the 'Milky Way' at 500,000 mph and merrily moving at God knows what velocity as a consequence of the 'Big Bong.' And not even a hint of a ripple on the surface of our tea, yet tap the table lightly with your finger and ... !" -Neville T. Jones
"If the Government or NASA had said to you that the Earth is stationary, imagine that. And then imagine we are trying to convince people that 'no, no it's not stationary, it's moving forward at 32 times rifle bullet speed and spinning at 1,000 miles per hour.' We would be laughed at! We would have so many people telling us 'you are crazy, the Earth is not moving!' We would be ridiculed for having no scientific backing for this convoluted moving Earth theory. And not only that but then people would say, 'oh then how do you explain a fixed, calm atmosphere and the Sun's observable movement, how do you explain that?' Imagine saying to people, 'no, no, the atmosphere is moving also but is somehow magically velcroed to the moving-Earth. The reason is not simply because the Earth is stationary.' So what we are actually doing is what makes sense. We are saying that the moving-Earth theory is nonsense. The stationary-Earth theory makes sense and we are being ridiculed. You've got to picture it being the other way around to realize just how RIDICULOUS this situation is. This theory from the Government and NASA that the Earth is rotating and orbiting and leaning over and wobbling is absolute nonsense and yet people are clinging to it, tightly, like a teddy bear. They just can't bring themselves to face the possibility that the Earth is stationary though ALL the evidence shows it: we feel no movement, the atmosphere hasn't been blown away, we see the Sun move from East-to-West, everything can be explained by a motionless Earth without bringing in all these assumptions to cover up previous assumptions gone bad." -Allen Daves
Why do we never see the rotation of the Moon?
GC: Because it doesn't rotate.
HC: Both the Moon and the Earth are actually rotating but they are doing so in such a way that from our perspective it seems that neither are. The Earth is spinning East to West at 1,000 mph while orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph. The Moon is spinning West to East at 10.3 mph while orbiting the Earth at 2,288 mph. These motions/speeds perfectly cancel out so that the Moon always only shows us one side.
"They want you to believe that the Moon's rotation is perfectly synchronized with its orbit so that's why we only ever see one side of the Moon, rather than conclude the obvious - that the Moon is simply NOT rotating. Moreover, they had to slow down the Moon's speed by 58,870 mph AND reverse its direction to West-East to successfully sell their phony heliocentricity system to a gullible public. I don't think there is one person in many, many thousands - regardless of education - who knows that the Copernican Model had to turn the Moon's observable direction around and give it a new speed to accommodate the phases and eclipses." -Marshall Hall
"The Moon presented a special math problem for the construction of the heliocentricity model. The only way to make the Moon fit in with the other assumptions was to reverse its direction from that of what everyone who has ever lived has seen it go. The math model couldn't just stop the Moon like it did the Sun, that wouldn't work. And it couldn't let it continue to go East to West as we see it go, either at the same speed or at a different speed. The only option was to reverse its observed East to West direction and change its speed from about 64,000 miles an hour to about 2,200 miles an hour. This reversal along with the change in speed were unavoidable assumptions that needed to be adopted if the model was to have a chance of mimicking reality." -Bernard Brauer
Why do the stars appear to be fixed along a celestial sphere?
GC: Because they are.
HC: The stars only appear to be fixed along a celestial sphere because they are so incredibly far away. Even after hundreds of millions of miles of our (supposed) orbit around the Sun, the stars appear in the exact same positions at the exact same meridian times because they are many "light-years" away. A light-year is approximately 6 TRILLION miles away and that is why they falsely seem fixed from our faulty perspective.
"Take two carefully-bored metallic tubes, not less than six feet in length, and place them one yard asunder, on the opposite sides of a wooden frame, or a solid block of wood or stone: so adjust them that their centres or axes of vision shall be perfectly parallel to each other. Now, direct them to the plane of some notable fixed star, a few seconds previous to its meridian time. Let an observer be stationed at each tube and the moment the star appears in the first tube let a loud knock or other signal be given, to be repeated by the observer at the second tube when he first sees the same star. A distinct period of time will elapse between the signals given. The signals will follow each other in very rapid succession, but still, the time between is sufficient to show that the same star is not visible at the same moment by two parallel lines of sight when only one yard asunder. A slight inclination of the second tube towards the first tube would be required for the star to be seen through both tubes at the same instant. Let the tubes remain in their position for six months; at the end of which time the same observation or experiment will produce the same results--the star will be visible at the same meridian time, without the slightest alteration being required in the direction of the tubes: from which it is concluded that if the earth had moved one single yard in an orbit through space, there would at least be observed the slight inclination of the tube which the difference in position of one yard had previously required. But as no such difference in the direction of the tube is required, the conclusion is unavoidable, that in six months a given meridian upon the earth's surface does not move a single yard, and therefore, that the earth has not the slightest degree of orbital motion." -Samuel Rowbotham, "Zetetic Astronomy"
Why can't I simply hover in a helicopter and wait for the Earth's rotation to bring my destination to me?
GC: Because the Earth doesn't rotate.
HC: Because the Earth's atmosphere is magically velcroed to the Earth and rotates along with it.
If the atmosphere is magically velcroed to the Earth and constantly rotates from West to East along with it, 1) how is it that clouds, wind and weather patterns often travel in opposing directions simultaneously? 2) why don't East to West traveling planes or projectiles encounter increased resistance? 3) why can I feel the slightest Westward breeze but not the Earth's supposed 1,000 mph Eastward spin? 4) If gravitational force is so great to pull the atmosphere together with the Earth then how come little birds and bugs are able to fly?
GC: All these questions are moot and irrelevant in the geocentric view.
HC: All of these questions are difficult and my pseudo-scientific heliocentric answers will be implausible and like grasping at straws.
"If the atmosphere rushes forward from west to east continually, we are again obliged to conclude that whatever floats or is suspended in it, at any altitude, must of necessity partake of its eastward motion. A piece of cork, or any other body floating in still water, will be motionless, but let the water be put in motion, in any direction whatever, and the floating bodies will move with it, in the same direction and with the same velocity. Let the experiment be tried in every possible way, and these results will invariable follow. Hence if the earth's atmosphere is in constant motion from west to east, all the different strata which are known to exist in it, and all the various kinds of clouds and vapours which float in it must of mechanical necessity move rapidly eastwards. But what is the fact? If we fix upon any star as a standard or datum outside the visible atmosphere, we may sometimes observe a stratum of clouds going for hours together in a direction the very opposite to that in which the earth is supposed to be moving. Not only may a stratum of clouds be seen moving rapidly from east to west, but at the same moment other strata may often be seen moving from north to south, and from south to north. It is a fact well known to aeronauts, that several strata of atmospheric air are often moving in as many different directions at the same time ... On almost any moonlight and cloudy night, different strata may be seen not only moving in different directions but, at the same time, moving with different velocities; some floating past the face of the moon rapidly and uniformly, and others passing gently along, sometimes becoming stationary, then starting fitfully into motion, and often standing still for minutes together. Some of those who have ascended in balloons for scientific purposes have recorded that as they have rapidly passed through the atmosphere, they have gone though strata differing in temperature, in density, and in hygrometric, magnetic, electric, and other conditions. These changes have been noticed both in ascending and descending, and in going for miles together at the same altitude." -Samuel Rowbotham, "Zetetic Astronomy"
How do Heliocentricist's account for the Allais effect, and the results of Michelson-Morley, Michelson-Gale, Airy's Failure, Sagnac and Kantors experiments proving the aether and a fixed Earth?
GC: Yeah, good question.
HC: (silence)
"I don't argue or enter into debates, because the issue here is exactly what you would bring to the debate, which is the wealth of erroneous information that allowed our situation to become as dire as it is in the first place. Your argument would consist of phony statistics, historical fables, the newspaper's latest lies, and profit-driven 'science.' My argument is simple. Discover who controls everything you've been told, only believe what you can verify for yourself through original documentation, science and logic, and then look for a political connection between the sources of all the erroneous information. Find the motives behind the lies. If you did that, there would be no debate, and we would all agree on whose head should roll, as the saying goes." -Jolly Roger
59 comments:
- Eric Dubay said...
Here are a few more interesting quotes from Geocentricists:
"Centrifugal Force (CF): the apparent force that is felt by an object moving in a curved path that acts outwardly away from the center of rotation. If the Earth were rotating the CF would cause people, objects and valuable commodities to weigh less at the equator than at more northern or southern lines of latitude. The equation for Centrifugal Force is: CF = (mass x velocity squared) over radius. That means that one could transport cargo ships full of valuable commodities from the equator where it would weigh less and then proceed to sell them up north or south for a higher price. Opponents admit that there is a weight difference but only 0.9%. That means that multimillion dollar commodity shipments would be missing thousands of tons... but they are NOT!!" -Pawel Kolasa
"The 'quasars' are what led people like Hawking to notice that the Earth was in the center of the universe. Maxwell said there was absolute space, the basis of Geocentrism, and his equations prove it. Einstein said no. You argue with them. As for Einstein, if you want to believe that lengths shrink when an object moves, time changes in the process, and its mass increases, just so you can explain the anomalies of Michelson's experiment, that's your privilege, but I'd just as soon answer it by saying that mass, time and length stay the same and the Earth isn't moving, and I'm just as 'scientific' as you for saying so." -Robert Sungenis
"Ignorant folk think that such minority opinions as Geocentrism are the 'conspiracy theories'... There is a real conspiracy for sure but the sad thing is it is mostly a conspiracy of willful and apathetic ignorance (for numerous reasons). The very people who would call Geocentrists 'quack conspiracy theorists' are either themselves completely ignorant of even modern cosmological axioms and principles of gravitation and mechanics or they are just 'playing stupid,' hoping that no one will notice or call their bluff. Most of those who pretend to be intelligent and/or knowledgeable about physics are just plain stupid, and a few are just ignorant but once you show them, if they are honest and will continue the dialogue, they say something to the effect of, 'Wow! I even got a PhD in physics X number of years ago and even taught it for X number of years... I did not think about it that way... but you can't ignore those facts.' You can go to any mental hospital and the population of wackos and inmates will outnumber the doctors and the sane folk, and moreover call them crazies. What's even more hilarious is the fact that even folk like Steven Hawking and a few intellectually honest physicists and cosmologists who would read what we are saying and are capable of understanding it, know that what we have been saying is absolutely true (it is a philosophical not a logic and observational choice). Not only do they admit that but even 'snicker' about it to each other but they won't dare to address that too openly with the dumb, ignorant masses... best not to confuse the common folk with unnecessary information and facts. Even more sad are all the others out there who don't have a clue what I'm saying here and shake their heads thinking they know something about physics that tells them that the Earth moves. If only they studied the text books and peer-reviewed papers a little closer, they would realize just how absolutely ignorant with a capital 'I' that argument really is." -Allen Daves
- December 6, 2011 at 8:51 AM
I thought of this great example last time i saw your post on geocentricism. Here is why the Earth is not spinning... If the current accepted theory that the Earth spins is true, than the area of Earth's equator would spin around the speed of 1000 m/ph west to east to complete a 24 hour day. Where i am located, it would spin around 850 m/ph. Now if the Earth is spinning 850 m/ph, then you simply have to to divide that speed by 60(minutes in an hour) to find out how fast you have to move to beat the Earth's motion like a huge treadmeel. One would have to be moving more than 850 m/ph to even go in the direction of west. That would mean that its physically impossible to walk west, bike west, drive west!!! Yet we can, with no resistance in that direction. CASE CLOSED, the EARTH DOES NOT SPIN...HC(0),GC(1)...Some good topics for your site are Education Sytems(look up the term sudbury school, its very cool), you could talk about the new bill being passed(s.1867)Explicitly authorize the federal government to indefinitely imprison without charge or trial, you could talk about DMT(dimenthentrypnol), Shamanism…Peace-AG
- December 6, 2011 at 9:21 AM
- nvra75 said...
the still photos make me think we are in a "worm hole".
what is in the center of the concentric circle of stars from the cameras viewpoint?
- December 6, 2011 at 9:55 AM
Good post Eric.what do you think of the corlois effect and it being " evidence" of earth rotating? What would it's place be in relation to a geocentric model?
Corlois effect is the direction water will form into a vortex when you flush a stoilet, sink, etc..counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere, clockwise in the southern hemisphere WITHOUT intentionally influencing the direction of the flow.
- December 6, 2011 at 3:10 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
Hey Anonymous, the Coriolis effect just like Foucault's pendulum can be equally explained by the rotating firmament or a rotating Earth. Regardless whether it is the Earth that is rotating or the aether that is rotating, the same effect would be noticed. No experiment however has ever shown the Earth to be moving, but the Michelson-Morley, Michelson-Gale, Airy, Sagnac, and Kantor experiments all proved the existence and motion of the aether.
For more on this I came across a great PDF today I've been reading:
Galileo vs. The Geocentric Theory of the Universe
- December 6, 2011 at 8:08 PM
- Baron Munse said...
Interesting, I'm not expert in this. But there are some social implications worth mentioning.
The accepted theories of space seem to support the idea of human insagnifigance. In the material sense.
An occult perspective might suggest that, each person is the static center of their own universe, because there needs to be a mind to perceive it. He or she is at the center of perception always.
The middle may be here or it may be there, but if a fellow is denied the knowledge that he is also undeniably a and the "center". That is a way of consciously or unconsciously claiming power over them.
If we look at the "evolution" or concept of the evolution of the sun, there are always people who undeniably know what it is, usually it coincides with the latest science, in ancient times it was god, in the 1800s, it was burning gas, the the 1900s, it was nuclear, I believe, now I belive it works by fusion. What shall it be next? Always it is the most powerful thing man can conceive of. Many will always be certain of that.
There are even those dumb enough to say when it will burn out, based on their "measurements".
The sun will always be what it is, and that is likely beyond our terrestrial perception at this time. We don't have great tools to measure it.
As to the workings of the rotation or non rotation of the earth, it's the same presumptuous certanty. Subject to the same "evolution" as the sun.
My take.
Good stuff, thanks for the read.
- December 7, 2011 at 1:29 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
Here's another quote confirming the irrelevance of Foucault's pendulum and the Coriolis effect to determining geo or heliocentricity:
"Since Foucault's pendulum and the Coriolis effect are closely related, they can be considered together. Foucault's pendulum, which was constructed in Paris in 1851, was a pendulum consisting of a 200 foot long flexible wire on which a heavy iron weight was suspended so as to be free to oscillate in any direction. It was found that the oscillating pendulum never retraced its path but at each swing apparently deviated: if the experiment is conducted in the northern hemisphere it deviates to the right, and in the southern hemisphere it will deviate to the left. The so-called "Coriolis effect" is similar: a shell from a long range gun, aimed at a target to the south of it, will land to the right of the target in the northern hemisphere and to the left in the southern hemisphere. Although the apparently obvious conclusion to be drawn from these two experiments is that the earth is rotating anticlockwise when observed from a fixed point above the North Pole, on further examination the obviousness is seen to be an illusion. It is at first not easy to grasp the fact that Foucault's pendulum and the Coriolis effect only demonstrate relative motion and do not demonstrate which, if either, of the two objects is at rest, but careful thought will show it to be true. All that the experiments show is that there are forces which act on bodies in motion relative to each other, and that either the earth is rotating, or the inertial field of the "rest of the universe" is rotating round the earth, or some combination of these movements is occurring. Certainly a rotating earth would account for the phenomenon equally well (in this case the fixed stars would be preventing the ether from going round the earth at the same speed as the latter rotated), but it does not account for it better. The phenomenon cannot therefore logically be used to prove any one of the alternatives." -N. Martin Gwynne
Trying to use Foucault's pendulum as proof for heliocentricity really backfired when Maurice Allais repeatedly observed pendulums slowing their motion during eclipses! This implies that either the "rotating Earth" decelerates during eclipses or the firmament does. NASA doesn't want to concede the implications so they continue to remain silent on the issue:
Foucault Pendulum Eclipsed by Allais Effect
- December 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM
So what's the purpose of this lie they tell us?
- December 7, 2011 at 10:12 AM
- Anthony said...
For what its worth, I know several physicists that believe in an aether, i.e., that empty space is not empty. This idea of an aether was in Cauchy's work, and Lord Kelvin's. Why do you think Einstein won a Nobel prize? Because he was able to come up with a logical explaination against such a concept.
What I am struggling with the most is how can it be that such a vast and immortal conspiracy can be envisioned and implemented by ordinary men.
- December 7, 2011 at 12:49 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
So what's the purpose of this lie they tell us?
To make you believe in the Big Bang, Evolution, and Aliens, and to make you not believe in God, purposeful creation, and astrology:
By removing Earth from the motionless center of the Universe, these dark philosophers (Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Galileo, Einstein) have moved us physically and metaphysically from a place of supreme importance to one of complete nihilistic indifference. If the Earth is the center of the Universe, then the ideas of God, creation, and a purpose for human existence are resplendent. But if the Earth is just one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars in billions of galaxies, then the ideas of God, creation, and a specific purpose for Earth and human existence become highly implausible.
"The heliocentric theory, by putting the sun at the center of the universe ... made man appear to be just one of a possible host of wanderers drifting through a cold sky. It seemed less likely that he was born to live gloriously and to attain paradise upon his death. Less likely, too, was it that he was the object of God's ministrations." -Morris Kline
By removing Earth from the motionless center of the Universe, the entirety of astrology, a science of consciousness coveted and used obsessively by the elite, is made null and void. If the Earth is the center of the Universe and all the planets (ancient gods) revolve around us, then birth charts, alignments, and astrology are measurable, calculable, repeatable, and thus scientifically verifiable. But if the Earth is just one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars in billions of galaxies, then astrology disappears into the realms of pseudo-science believed by our ignorant ancestors.
- December 7, 2011 at 6:45 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
For what its worth, I know several physicists that believe in an aether, i.e., that empty space is not empty.
Yes, all knowledgeable & honest physicists know this. The aether has been proven to exist in multiple experiments, and true vacuums don't exist anywhere in outerspace or laboratories. The aetheric medium is always everywhere.
This idea of an aether was in Cauchy's work, and Lord Kelvin's. Why do you think Einstein won a Nobel prize? Because he was able to come up with a logical explaination against such a concept.
Exactly. I wouldn't go so far as to call the Special Theory of Relativity "logical" though. LOL. As the Robert Sungenis quote stated: "As for Einstein, if you want to believe that lengths shrink when an object moves, time changes in the process, and its mass increases, just so you can explain the anomalies of Michelson's experiments, that's your privilege, but I'd just as soon answer it by saying that mass, time and length stay the same and the Earth isn't moving, and I'm just as 'scientific' as you for saying so."
What I am struggling with the most is how can it be that such a vast and immortal conspiracy can be envisioned and implemented by ordinary men.
I know what you mean, but throughout recorded history, rich, powerful men conspiring in secret to advanced shared agendas is the rule, not the exception. Have a look at the plethora of other intricate and vast conspiracies I've exposed here on AC.com and I think you'll agree that big lies and conspiracies are the norm; truth, honesty and accountability are not. Peace
- December 7, 2011 at 7:02 PM
Wow. Just...wow.
- December 8, 2011 at 9:05 AM
- سلامة - Salama said...
And beside convincing Man of his Insignificance, we can add another reason for the Deceive. Putting "the Sun at the Center" is a (Sun-Worship,Druids,Kabbalah)belief!
(Thomas Paine's Origin of Free-Masonry)
- December 9, 2011 at 1:18 AM
Umm, Planes traveling East to West DO counter resistance...take any round trip and the Westbound leg is almost always longer than the Eastbound return flight....
- December 10, 2011 at 6:38 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
"Almost always?" That doesn't sound like consistent, scientifically verifiable resistance. How much more resistance are you claiming West bound planes encounter than East bound?
- December 10, 2011 at 6:48 AM
The Moonwalker's album, Blood on the Dance Floor, does the Moontalker on 9/11:
- December 10, 2011 at 9:27 PM
Antikytheria Mechanism ~ Ancient Clockwork Computer to Predict...
- December 10, 2011 at 10:14 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
For all the geocentric deniers, research George Airy. He was convinced of Heliocentricism too and designed an experiment to prove it! Instead, however, he proved Geocentricism and the establishment deemed it "Airy's Failure." Let's hear you NASA-indoctrinated heliocentrists explain the results of Airy's experiment using the moving Earth model:
Airy's Experiment
Airy's Failure Reconsidered
- December 13, 2011 at 1:30 AM
If the moon and sun are the same physical size, then from our perspective they would only look the same size in the sky if they are equal distance from us.
So if they are the same size and equally distant from the earth -- how can an eclipse happen? Why don't the moon and sun collide with each other instead?
- December 13, 2011 at 3:27 PM
- ibn Salama said...
Not Equal Distances.
The Moon is in the First Orbit. The Sun is in the Fourth.
But they aren't as far as NASA wants us to believe.
- December 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
There are quite a few theories about the size of the Sun and the Moon all with their points of evidence and points of contention. The least plausible theory I've heard is the reigning heliocentric theory that the Sun is 400 times larger and 400 times further away than the Moon so that's why they serendipitously appear the same size. Other models like Salama referenced have the Moon slightly in front of the Sun, and others still suggest that the Sun and Moon aren't densely physical, just luminous discs that can pass through one another.
This universe was intelligently created with purpose and order, and NASA/Copernican nihilistic Big Bang cosmology attempts to hide this obvious fact. There are two huge lights that circle around us in perfectly synchronized opposing cycles. They appear exactly the same size and stay in the sky for exactly the same length of time. Human sleep and reproduction cycles are intimately connected to one, and all growth and physical life depends on the other. We live in a ying yang universe of perfect order and balance between good and evil, male and female, inhale and exhale, birth and death, sleep and awake, night and day, and Sun and Moon.
NASA claims with no experimentally verifiable evidence that both the Earth and Moon spin in opposite directions at just the right speed so we only see one side of the Moon and never feel any of the movement. They say the Sun is 400 times larger and 400 times further away than the Moon, and just coincidentally appear the same size from our faulty perspective. Not only that but they regularly cross one another showing us their balanced orbits, but that's just coincidence too. It appears that all the celestial bodies revolve around us and multiple experiments have proven just that, but people would still rather believe NASA because they can't/don't want to believe how badly they've been lied to.
- December 13, 2011 at 6:53 PM
I'm not trying to argue one way or the other, but have rudimentary knowledge of physics and astronomy and have been taught the earth is in motion. I am not adverse to changing my opinion. The wormhole idea is intriguing, for example. But for now, if the earth is NOT in motion, how to answer these questions. And my assumption here is it's admitted the Earth isn't moving, but the rest of the objects in the universe, and therefore our solar system, are:
Question 1--If the Earth isn't moving in an orbit around the sun, why does Mars appear to have a retrograde orbit some of the time? I believe this should be a well-known phenomenon to not have to further explain. Are we to believe that Mars speeds up and slows down?
Question 2--If a moving Earth would pull people right off the surface due to the speed scientists claim it is travelling at through the universe, why then would the Martian Landers through the decades, Viking's 1 & 2, and the Spirit & Opportunity rovers, not fly off the surface of Mars?
Question 3—If an atmosphere can only be explained to exist on a body in motion as being "magically velcroed," how do we explain atmosphere's on other planets and moons. Venus has a very thick atmosphere and Mars has a thin atmosphere. Saturn's moon Titan has an atmosphere. All these bodies are in motion.
Comment 1—From a previous comment left on 126 by Anonymous: "Here is why the Earth is not spinning... If the current accepted theory that the Earth spins is true, than the area of Earth's equator would spin around the speed of 1000 m/ph west to east to complete a 24 hour day. Where i am located, it would spin around 850 m/ph. Now if the Earth is spinning 850 m/ph, then you simply have to to divide that speed by 60(minutes in an hour) to find out how fast you have to move to beat the Earth's motion like a huge treadmeel. One would have to be moving more than 850 m/ph to even go in the direction of west. That would mean that its physically impossible to walk west, bike west, drive west!!! Yet we can, with no resistance in that direction. CASE CLOSED, the EARTH DOES NOT SPIN"
Ok, well, have you noticed on an airplane you are able to get up and walk to the aft of the plane to go to the bathroom? Yet the plane's thrust is in the opposite direction. Shouldn't this be impossible? The same is true of any moving object—a boat, a train, a bus.
- December 14, 2011 at 3:25 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
Thanks for the questions Anonymous.
1) The motion of other celestial bodies, retrograde or not, does not and cannot prove the motion or lack of motion of Earth. Ptolemy's epicycles account for retrograde motion just as well as Kepler's ellipses. The planets have long been known as "wandering stars" due to their motion across the celestial sphere, going in all directions at varying velocities, unlike all the other "fixed stars" which follow perfect fixed circular orbits:
Retrograde Epicyclic Motion
2) Because the Viking missions were faked on Earth and we've never actually been to Mars:
Mars Faker
3) We have never been to the Moon or Mars and all NASA images/video of the planets is CGI computer-graphic imaging. NASA is the biggest and most successful propaganda machine in the world.
The Moon Landing Hoax
As for the "magic velcro," it is quite magical as it is apparently able to make the entire atmosphere spin perfectly along with Earth so no one in all of history has ever felt the slightest bit of motion, disturbance, or air resistance. Not only that but the magic also allows for clouds, wind and weather patterns to casually flow in every direction at varying velocities, often in opposite directions at different altitudes simultaneously! The magic velcro, which heliocentrists claim is some perfect amalgamation of gravity and centrifugal force, is strong enough to drag miles of Earth's atmosphere along with it, but too weak to prevent little bugs, birds, clouds and planes from easily traveling in any direction without a smidgen of added resistance. Also the world is supposedly spinning at 1,038 mph at the equator, about 900-700 mph at the mid-latitudes of USA and Europe, decreasing gradually all the way down to 0 mph at the North and South poles, where apparently the stagnant atmosphere never moves and completely escapes the grips of the magic velcro. This means that at all latitudes, the atmosphere manages to perfectly coincide with the speed of the Earth compensating from 0 mph at the poles all the way up to 1,038 mph at the equator, and every speed in between. These are quite lofty assumptions that heliocentrists make without any experimental evidence to back them up. Hence why it is very "magical thinking" they're using to bolster this implausible moving Earth/atmosphere theory.
- December 14, 2011 at 8:05 PM
- Susumu said...
Why when I fly to Okinawa from Phoenix it takes 16 hours to get there and 18 hours to get back. Because in the plane going there the earth is rotating towards me and when I am going back my direction of flight is the same as the Earth rotation
- December 22, 2011 at 1:06 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
In the other post Ben said the reason why you can't hover in a helicopter waiting for your destination to arrive, the reason we feel no constant wind or motion, and the reason there is no difference in resistence/acceleration for East-West flying planes and proectiles is because the atmosphere moves precisely along with the Earth.
In this post Susumu and Anonymous are claiming that East-West flying planes DO encounter resistance. So, heliocentrists, which is it? You can't have it both ways. And if there is measurable resistance please show me proof of this.
- December 23, 2011 at 12:39 AM
- Susumu said...
Not sure, all I know is the difference in the passage of time and also flying the same route. All though time is relative right? LOL! Wonder if SR71 Pilots saw a preception diffrence in round trips
- December 23, 2011 at 10:42 AM
I would venture to say that the fact that it's 2012 and it's still an issue whether the Earth is moving/rotating or not clearly proves that the Geocentric Model is correct.
Think about all the missions, manned and unmanned, all the satellites, and all the spacecrafts that NASA and other space agencies have but into space and even outer space and yet you will not find one decent experiment from space proving that the Earth moves. Not even one single video either. The pathetic animation from Galileo supposedly showing the Earth rotating is a joke. Satellites and Space stations shooting video don't count because they are themselves rotating around the Earth. Search in vain, you will find nothing, nada, zilch, a big fat zero.
- March 18, 2012 at 9:17 PM
Anon: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
It is doubtful that NASA would waste budget attempting to prove something that mainstream science has considered proven for decades. You don't have to prove what's already been proven.
Of course, that's not to say they aren't incorrect, but their actions in this case are nonetheless perfectly in line with what you would expect.
- March 19, 2012 at 11:10 AM
- Strangelove said...
Great blog friend!
More on our geocentric universe here:
- May 18, 2012 at 11:19 AM
Maybe this has already been explained but I missed it.
What accounts for the seasons, and the shortened/lengthened days?
- July 19, 2012 at 2:46 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
Hey there, it's the same thing that accounts for them now. The sun. The seasons and length of days are exactly the same whether it's the Earth rotating around the sun or the sun rotating around the Earth.
- July 19, 2012 at 5:05 PM
I've been studying geocentricity a lot, substituting my favorite subject -Jesse James- to search out proof. I believe geocentricity is true, but in order to share this with my friends, I also decided to study a little bit of heliocentricity. I went to a heliocentric website and found that many of them believe that not only is the sun the center, but in the center of the sun walks around the other part of each of us, and we must learn to "connect with them". I thought that would be interesting to share.
- October 22, 2012 at 12:53 PM
- ibn Salama said...
I don't think those are Heliocentrists per se, but more likely "spiritualists" who believe in the existence of "other self".. which in my opinion is a false interpretation of the real Djinn(s) in Islam (i.e. evil fiery creatures that help Satan\Shaitan to seduce\temp humans, and every one of us has a one of them.)
btw, those are the real power behind most of the "weird ET\non-human phenomena"
- October 23, 2012 at 10:57 AM
"NASA claims with no experimentally verifiable evidence that both the Earth and Moon spin in opposite directions at just the right speed so we only see one side of the Moon and never feel any of the movement."
I don't even think this excuse makes sense. If you visualize it, you still should be able to see that although you from your vantage point would see the same side or perspective of the moon, the person 1000km (for example) to your left and right wouldn't. They would consistently see a completely different side.
Correct me if I am wrong here. As I am doing a back of the envelope visualization.
- December 3, 2012 at 8:02 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
Hey Al, you're right, I was coincidentally just talking with my fiance about this last night. Even if they were spinning in perfect opposition, different people at different times and different places on Earth should all be seeing different parts of the moon, but no matter where or when, we all always only see the same side. Excuse disproven! :)
- December 3, 2012 at 7:14 PM
I'm confused. If you hover in a helicopter you spin with the earth. But if you shoot a bullet a real long distance, it moves to the side of the target. I'm lost
- January 15, 2013 at 3:02 AM
Wow you just really opened my mind to some crazy new theory that is beginning to make sense. As an inventor, I have a strong imagination capable of picturing motion of objects and with each new paragraph I attempted to piece together a mental working model of the information I was presented with. I could imagine most and had a fairly working model inside my head, however I did come upon some anomalies I could not fit into my mental model. A Google search of the Geocentric visual model cleared up some of my confusion, except one.
If the earth does not rotate nor orbits the sun, how do we account for the seasons and the meridian location of the sun in the sky?
This would make it seem like the weather would be consistently the same no matter which day of the year in any given point on earth, minus the variation of local weather and atmosphere movement, right?
The only answer would be that the entire universe has this 23deg wobble that is associated with Earths axis-tilt, to account for the seasons?
Thank you so much for this enlightening article. I was initially captured by researching that the Moon landings were fake and filmed in a studio - the visible puppet wires were a dead give away. Then the simple fact (though completely oblivious to it previously, even as simple as it really seems) that the top atmosphere is over 2500 degrees (it makes sense if you really understand solar radiation), then it would seem impossible to leave earths atmosphere, period. I just simply never entertained the presented facts intellectually and assumed empty space was cold and this was how the temperatures were balanced. I continued reading about Geocentricism and fell DEEP into the rabbit hole you presented.
- February 14, 2013 at 5:01 AM
Eric Dubay I also had that quick idea but it cannot be. What accounts for the seasons is the fact that the earth is tilted 23 degrees facing one direction, and as it rotates on its axis, it wobbles. You can imagine this as when you spin a spindle on a table, when it starts slowing down, the top center starts to wobble until it completely loses speed and falls on its side. You will also notice this on a standing globe, where it is off center.
Anyway, the earth wobbles along this path around the sun, changing the position of the sun in the sky (direct exposure to sun in same region), thus we get seasons.
Hopefully my College Geology class did not fail me here...heh
- February 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM
4 questions Eric...
1. Could "Foucault's pendulum and the Coriolis effect" be explained with earths magnetic field?
2.Is the Magnetic Field real and is it present do to possible Earth's rotation, the inner Core's rotation or it is just there?
3. They teach that earth's magnetic field protects us from solar radiation, is it true? or is it the atmosphere that protects? or both since the magnetic field keeps the atmosphere glued to earth?
4. According to Heliocentric model, the Sun is NOT the center of the universe, but the center of our solar system, correct? Apparently the largest black hole is the center of the Universe?
Your quote ""The heliocentric theory, by putting the sun at the center of the universe" threw up some flags for me.
- February 14, 2013 at 5:44 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
Hey Life Tinkerer, thanks for the great questions and comments. Whether it's the sun moving around us or us around the sun, seasons are explained the same way, namely the sun's travel from tropic to tropic each 6 month solstice cycle. I'm not familiar with the magnetic field so I can't really say much about those questions. As for the 4th question, yes, the name is quite deceiving because even people who believe in heliocentricism say the sun is not the center of anything, rather that everything is relative and the sun is only "relatively" central, but it revolves around the galaxy and the galaxy revolves around some mysterious blackhole, but they've never found the edges of the universe so they couldn't say where the "center" is. This differs greatly from Geocentrisism which says the Earth is the unmoving center of the universe and everything else in existence revolves around Earth. Heliocentricism should be called Acentricism.
- February 14, 2013 at 5:59 AM
I think I found some holes that we need to work out. I would like if we both could do some research on the Magnetic field and how it could possibly fit into the Geocentric model of the Universe. You seem like an individual who strives on 100% facts and I think the Magnetic Field either needs to be refuted or found a home within the Geocentric model. I will try to do some research and lets continue this great conversation!
I will have to disagree with you on the notion that it is simply the Sun's rotation around the Earth that would account for the Seasons. As I thought and this websites says - http://resources.woodlands-junior.kent.sch.uk/time/seasons.htm, the seasons are due to the angle the sun hits the earth as it wobbles across the sky according to the Heliocentric model. In the Geocentric model the earth must tilt or the sun must move via the Meridian to account for the sun appearing lower and higher in the sky according to the season. If neither moved at all, the Sun would ALWAYS appear at the same height during the peak time of each day. That is, it would ALWAYS hit the equator all year long, and we would have no seasons.
It then must be that the Earth does in fact rotate/spin in one place, and wobbles, or the entire Universe also wobbles accordingly. I hope I've explained it effectively. Thank you and I look forward to learning more!
- February 14, 2013 at 6:45 AM
It could also be that the entire Universe as a cohesive unit does not wobble, but parts of it do and not wobble along this path. It could even be that the entire Universe is completely flat with no wobble, except the Sun. The point is that the earth or the Sun must change their angle in order to account for the different lengths in day and the position of the Sun in the sky during the peak hour of the day.
Just imagine, if earth did not move and the Sun went perfectly around the equator - the Sun would ALWAYS hit the earth in the same point (center/equator), with the same amount of energy. Thus the weather would always be the hottest at the equator, cooling as you moved to the poles.
Lol you can tell I'm really into this... 8)
- February 14, 2013 at 6:54 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
I will have to disagree with you on the notion that it is simply the Sun's rotation around the Earth that would account for the Seasons. Just imagine, if earth did not move and the Sun went perfectly around the equator - the Sun would ALWAYS hit the earth in the same point
Seasons are accounted for exactly the same way regardless of helio or geocentric... the sun doesn't stay perfectly along the equator all 12 months of the year, it cycles from the Tropic of Cancer at the Summer Solstice in June, slowly down to the Tropic of Capricorn at the Winter Solstice in December. This fact doesn't change regardless of whether it's the Sun revolving around us or us around the Sun. Glad to hear you're interested in this fascinating topic... keep me updated with your developments! Peace
- February 14, 2013 at 8:41 AM
Eric it seems with what you are describing, we would have 2 seasons, summer and winter. Would you say only the Sun or the entire Universe travels at this orbit (according to you)?
- February 15, 2013 at 10:12 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
There aren't 4 seasons everywhere, but I just mentioned the solstices, and of course there are the Vernal and Autumnal equinoxes too. The weather corresponding to these astronomical positions has to factor in wind/tidal patterns and topology too. Where I was born in Maine there are 4 clearly different "seasons." Where I live now in Thailand it's just hot and sunny all year-round; there are no seasons. Tropical/equatorial "seasons" are nothing like non-tropical/equatorial seasons.
- February 15, 2013 at 7:38 PM
Hi , Eric I wonder how do you explain retrograde motion and parallax with geocentrism? Also the phases of venus that Galileo observed?
- February 27, 2013 at 1:40 AM
- ibn Salama said...
Regarding the Retro-grade motion & Parallax, the Answer is in something called The Tusi Couple & the effect of temperature (through the seasons) on our observations of the stars!
The planet in its orbit moves around a center of a "little circle".. I recommend the work of 15th century Astronomer Ibn Al-Shater.
The difference of temperature affects the angle of light that comes from the stars, so we see the star in a different position.
- February 27, 2013 at 10:30 AM
Hi. I have just started looking into this and one thing that sticks with me is this little experiment:
Take 2 balls, one earth and the other sun.
O -o
Sun Earth
The dash on the left of 'earth' is where you are on our planet in relation to the sun at time stamp 12 o'clock noon let us say. So, the earth spins once in @ 24 hour period correct? And it also revolves around the sun @365 days for one year.
Okay, now let's move earth 6 months into the future at the same 24 hour time stamp of our location and here is what it ends up being, give or take a small fraction due to what we know the earth does through the seasons:
-o O
Earth Sun
You will now notice that the 12 noon is facing completely away from the sun!!! This is what is taught today folks and does not work if you simply use your clock and move earth around the sun.
Again, I am new in looking into this, so anything I may be missing please feel free to reply. Thanks!
- March 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM
Hi Guys have a look at this site!
- March 21, 2013 at 2:04 PM
- Jayson Lafe DuVal said...
love your article, very thought provoking. here's my question. Don't satellites like Voyager show us that the Earth is moving around the sun and not the other way around?
- April 23, 2013 at 7:44 AM
Einstien was not born into a rich or privileged background, and leant his trade whilst working, what part of the 'league of rich and powerful men' planned this? What of his countless other scientific discoveries which have proved useful in hundreds of fields - are they false as well? The theory of relativity was applied to the universe and theoretically explains, and predicts the behaviour of celestial bodies. There were shortcomings, but they have been subsequently built on and extended. The idea that mathematics, studied by thousands of dedicated individuals is in fact a complex trick played on the masses is laughable - do you think that this group of men really plan way beyond their lifetimes on a plot so ridiculously high profile and risky for the sake of monetary gain?
- August 28, 2013 at 1:33 AM
- Matthew Phin said...
Eric question, I'm sure your more then familiar with the celestial battle between "marduk" and "Tiamat" so how after such a force would we be at rest? since we are this significant fraction but yet so small how is it that all of this energy would be centered around us or focused on us. I completely agree its an eye opening and hopeful way to look at life saying "yup I'm at the center
of it all, we are the most important things here we are that unique" but with that still so many unanswered questions please get back to me I'm really curious what you think
- October 6, 2013 at 8:23 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
Hey Matthew, to me stories of Marduk and Tiamat are just that, stories of supposed celestial events that happened thousands of years ago. Unfortunately such things have no scientific bearing on the helio/geocentric debate. Check out these videos, they may help:
Geocentric Truth Part 1
Geocentric Truth Part 2
- October 6, 2013 at 7:49 PM
- Richard Paulson said...
Foucault's Pendulum: don't even look at it. It is not a proof, just an effort at mind control, to cast one into a trance - hypnosis. "Believe, believe, just believe" because we have no proof.
- November 17, 2013 at 9:41 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
You're right about Foucalt's Pendulum Richard, and Jason, NASA admits using Geocentric calculations when launching rockets/satellites. Check out this footage, it's not proof either way (because it could be moving at perfect constant velocity), but it sure doesn't appear to be moving:
The Earth From Space
- November 17, 2013 at 7:04 PM
Hi Eric,
How about this guy saying Aether exists. Please kindly help
- February 13, 2014 at 7:46 PM
- Eric Dubay said...
Great clip, see, Greg Braden knows what's up! :) The aether actually exists while relativity is just a theory.
- February 14, 2014 at 2:28 AM
Hi Eric. It has been months since I last glanced at this blog. I don't accept however anything as evidence from outer space, because there is no proof that man has been in outer space. The proof that people accept is photos and films and statements. And if such proof is numerous, then it seems to hold weight in peoples minds and means that it must be so. But such proof is as solid evidence as a Star Trek film. For also there are photos and films and statements in the Star Trek "universe". Accordingly then, there is solid evidence that everything in Star Trek is real; if that is, you think of these things as evidence.
Space travel is really absurd. For admittedly, a rocket must go at least 7.9 kilometres per second to enter into space. If you really think about how fast that is, how can it be believed?
Well then, what about satellite technology? All alleged satellite technology is ground based or can be more easily produced on Earth without the need to go into space. It is thus only reasonable to believe that man or anything man made, has been to about 62 miles above Earth's surface (the Karman Line) or thereabouts. For it is admitted that aeroplanes cannot fly above that height without falling back to Earth. For the atmosphere is too thin to keep an aeroplane up. True space must be only a few miles higher than that. The idea of rockets in space is really a joke. The simple reasoning is that a fish needs water to propel itself, a bird needs atmosphere to beat its wings against, and solid matter is needed for us to have locomotion on Earth. So a rocket cannot act upon nothing, and cannot move in space. And without atmosphere everything man makes falls back to Earth.
Images, films, theories, and statements prove nothing, and have no merit in a world of liars. Supposed scientific statements are meaningless. My basic observation of the sky can prove that all the lights we see in the sky above (Sun, Moon and stars) are only thousands of miles high. The Sun and Moon are a great deal smaller than Earth, and the stars are so much smaller. The stars can be deduced to be only a few miles in diameter at most. The 8 planets are also stars with the exception that they wander beneath the fixed stars.
Telescopes cannot even resolve images of the stars as more than points of light (although so-called scientists tell us they can see into infinity), and yet they are only thousands of miles high. And there is no evidence that a telescope is able to "see" anything further than a few thousand miles away. Lights that cannot be seen without being magnified are deemed as further away, rather than as obviously only smaller lights. For the fixed stars are evidently all at the same height.
There is also no solid evidence in fact, that there are more than 20,000 stars! I'd like someone to count them and see, without referring to alleged images of stars/galaxies and supposed scientific numbers. What is called astronomy thus, is all a joke. All that people argue so much about can be easily disproved with the most basic observations and simple logical deductions. You don't even need to be a mathematician - it is that easy and obvious. It is only the abundance of lies (if not unwillingness) that prevents one from seeing this. The key to overcoming them is to not believe man, but to seek God. But this attitude of seeking only for God, seems to be an increasingly rare thing.
- October 1, 2014 at 11:19 AM
- Eric Dubay said...
Awesome comment Richard, I totally agree with every point you made. Very few people are able to see through this deception, I'm glad to hear from folks like yourself who can see the forest for the trees. Please keep posted in the coming few months I'm about to finish and release my 4th book which will be all about these subjects we're discussing here. I think you're gonna love it :) Peace
- October 1, 2014 at 9:09 PM


text: People often talk about Spa-Francorchamps being located in the Ardennes hills, but they tend to overlook the fact that it's also in the Wallonie region of Belgium. Wallonites are very proud of their roots and of their racetrack. And who wouldn't be proud of Spa, one of the most challenging circuits in the world?


text:
OK, I think it's safe to go out on a limb and confess I'm no longer what would be considered "young" any longer. I'm not old - yet; but I have come to grips with the fact that I'm no longer a young man.
That being said, I am in the midst of something new that for several days has had me a little perplexed.
I've been running more and more as you've been reading on these Health and Fitness BLOG posts. Up until this past week, it was without incident. But on Tuesday I was running along the Lake Walk when, in about eight strides, I went from comfort to searing, burning pain shooting into my left hip.
I actually did stop and look, as I thought to myself I might have been shot - it hurt that much.
After limping back to my car and heading home, I contacted a Trainer friend of mine and she reminded me I was forgetting a key element that many runners neglect.
I wasn't rolling out my upper legs ahead of the run, and I wasn't stretching out my Hip-Flexers - the area where the leg and hip join up. This 5 minutes of prep will take care of several days of pain when executed properly.


text:
The CD-60 dreadnought cutaway boasts features you'd expect on much more expensive instruments, with a spruce top and choice of natural, sunburst and black finishes.
Upgrades include a new black pickguard and mother-of-pearl acrylic rosette design, rosewood bridge with compensated Graphtech® Nubone™ saddle, white bridge pins with black dots and smaller (3 mm) dot fingerboard inlays. Features include scalloped X bracing, black body binding, 20-fret fingerboard, dual-action truss rod, die-cast tuners and Fishman® pickup system with active onboard preamp, tuner, volume and tone controls. Hard-shell case included (North America only).
You are welcome to praise or criticize the products you have purchased. However, please be specific in your comments as to why you like or dislike a product, so that it's helpful to others in their decision-making process. All reviews will be monitored, and normally posted within 1-2 business days. Please refrain from including phone numbers, addresses or URLs in your review. Also, we ask that you please do not post promotional content such as advertisements of any kind (including "for sale" ads), links to your music page or music video, or repeated posts that make the same point excessively. Fender reserves the right to reject publication, without notice, of any review due to content, language or other issues.
Note: currently we are only approving reviews written in English.
How do you rate this item?
Enter a title for your review:
Review this item:
Style of music you play:
Our moderation system is temporarily down so it may take a few days before we can approve your review. Rest assured, it has been received and will be made available as soon as possible. Please do not re-submit your review.
owns this item
owns Fender product(s)
This guitar is so awesome! I went to a music store and I was looking for Fender CD140SCE and they didn't have it. However, an employee was working on this one and after he was done, I took it and played it! It was amazing! I am collecting my money to buy this one.
I was completely speechless when after 3 months of wanting this guitar I went to a music store and played it. The sound is so crisp and beautiful. Of course the sound of a guitar is a personal preference but I wanted a very "bright" sounding guitar and as soon as I heard it I knew it was the one. I love the cutaway for songs that require me to play the higher frets. The pictures don't do it justice it's much more beautiful in person, very glossy. I also love that it has a pick-up so I can plug it in and play songs on Rocksmith with it. It also has a built-in tuner that isn't the most accurate, but does the job. All in all I have no regrets and I'm positive that I will come back to Fender if I purchase another guitar in the future.
cynicalsinger owns this item
This guitar has just blown me away in the short amount of time I have had it! Mine is even in all mahogany!!
BlueDollarBill owns this item
Though I love my Strat; I bought this guitar for my quiet things. Its sound is nice, the guitar looks great. The same is true for its classy hard case and the wood Fender logo on it. I am not used to acoustic guitars, so I found it a little bit hard to play at first. But, I'm getting used to its high strings. The only thing to mark as non-comfortable is the battery place holder, it is a bit harder to insert the battery there. I'm enjoying it, and its price is great.
BeingLouder owns this item
Well I started off with my first acoustic, the Fender CD60, which was incredibly well priced and had monstrous tone. Also you didn't have to be careful with it, you could knock it around and it'd be fine. I ended up selling the CD60 in exchange for the slightly more expensive "ce" version., to avoid having to buy preamps and piezo pickups and whatnot myself. Now whilst this unplugged guitar is still absolutely brilliant, (especially with the inclusion of the cutaway which I believe should be standard on the CD60 model too), within a few months of owning it the piezo pickup had come loose despite extensively more care being taken with it. This caused horrible string buzz on the G string and I had to get it repaired, the local luthier charging me around £40 for the work. Personally I believe the best solution is to buy a standard cd60 and if possible, install your own electronics and microphones, however this guitar is still beautiful and works fine now post repair.
TheInfamousCuro owns this item
After borrowing some acoustic guitars to start playing guitar, I decided to buy my first guitar. The CD60-CE looks absolutely great, but that isn't the only thing that matters. The cutaway is looks great and is functional as well. The mahogany is well furnished, nice and shiny.
Well, enough about the looks. As I said, I borrowed some other guitars to play guitar until I bought my own. What a surprise when I started playing the CD60-CE! The .012-strings sound very nice and are easy to play. Thinner strings (e.g. .010) could be fitted for more flexibility, but I think that makes the guitar sound too shrill.
The Fishman pickup works fine, although the built-in tuner is not very precise.
The CD60-CE is a great guitar with a great value for money!
RickSet owns this item
|Model Name:
|CD-60CE, Black
|Model Number:
|Classic Design
|Body Material:
|Laminated Spruce Top with Laminated Mahogany Back and Sides
|Body Finish:
|Gloss Polyurethane
|Body Shape:
|Dreadnought Cutaway
|Scalloped X
|Body Back:
|Laminated Nato
|Body Sides:
|Laminated Nato
|Body Top:
|Laminated Spruce
|Neck Material:
|Neck Finish:
|Scale Length:
|25.3" (643 mm)
|Number of Frets:
|String Nut:
|Graph Tech® NuBone™
|Nut Width:
|1.69" (42.9 mm)
|Position Inlays:
|Truss Rods:
|Built-In Chromatic Tuner, Volume, Bass, Mid, Treble
|Special Electronics:
|Fishman® Isys III System with Active Onboard Preamp and Tuner
|Rosewood with Compensated Graph Tech® Nubone™ Saddle
|Hardware Finish:
|Tuning Machines:
|1-Ply Black
|Fender® Dura-Tone® 880L (.012-.052 Gauge)
|Unique Features:
|Dual Action Truss Rod, 3mm Dot Position Inlays, Black Pickguard, White Bridge Pins, and Crushed Acrylic Rosette
Your Fender Profile is your golden ticket that grants you access to most of the cooler stuff going on here at Fender.com.
In order to prevent spam, we require you to create a Fender profile to submit reviews.


text:
PANIC en LA PLAYA (4-hour Live Set and 3 Tracks)
https://soundcloud.com/mopo/sets/panic-en-la-playaThis is a gift to the 3000+ wonderful people that made my week at the Hard Rock in Dominican Republic so wonderful, Cloud9 Adventures. and the band that brought them together WSP. This includes the complete recording of my second 4-hour set and three of the Panic-related remixes/edits I used in the process. Many of the other tracks are unreleased MoPo originals that…See More


text:
Certainly there are many things to motivate people to come out to the fair grounds in West Allis for the Wisconsin State Fair. For some it is the Grandstand and numerous free entertainment stages, for others its the rides and games on the Midway, yet for others its the traditional fair food and the variety of food types now available on a stick. But if you look at the surveys and talk to those who work for the fair or sit on the board, the animals and the numerous livestock exhibits are still one of the biggest draws to the fair.
Located right in the heart of Milwaukee County the fairgrounds provides a convenient setting for many non farm residents to get an up close look at Wisconsin's livestock industry. Not only the barns, and exhibit halls, but the Discovery Barn and House of Moo provide a great opportunity for dialogue between fair goers and junior fair exhibitors on what type of care is given to the animals and what they mean in not only producing our food and fiber, but the care that is given to those animals as well. In a conversation I had with our State Secretary of Agriculture Ben Brancel he stressed what a great environment the fair is for agricultural education and how the fair experience really helps these junior exhibitors prepare to be our future leaders in not only the agricultural community, but in their communities as well.
The fair is also a great time to highlight some of our best traditions and to celebrate an important part of our heritage. It is a social gathering, that build a sense of community and pride. And it is also an educational venue that hopefully can foster a better understanding of rural and urban communities and what is behind one of the strongest economic engines in our state, Agriculture.
So come for the entertainment, enjoy the rides and the food, visit the trade show and activities at the central mall. but make sure you stop on by the exhibit halls, barns and show ring to see what reall is the heart of your state fair.


text:
Paradise Point and all its amenities offer a unique resort experience that is secluded, yet centrally situated; the airport and top attractions like Old Town, Balboa Park, the San Diego Zoo and the Gaslamp Quarter are just minutes away .
Passport to Paradise resort fee is $19 per room per night and parking is $34 per night .
|Check-in Policy
|Check-out Policy
|# Of Rooms
|# Of Floors
Old Town Western Inn
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
Hotel is located in Old Town close to all major attractions in San Diego and just a 5 minutes walk to the Trolley line and 3 mile from San Diego Airport. We offer free wireless internet and a con't breakfast....
Starting at $69 Per Night
A Sea mountain inn spa resort adults only
Palm Springs, California Hotels & Resorts
sea mountain is the upscale awarded luxury clothing optional mineral spa located in palm springs -ranked as best celebrity spa in the usa by msn this desert oasis brings the vibe of Jamaica right to the southern california area-incredible couples spa...
Starting at $255 Per Night/Room
Western Inn/ San Diego/Old Town
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
Stay in the heart of Old Town. Walk out our door to explore 150 international shops, historical landmarks, theme restaurants, and art galleries that surround the birthplace of California. And the Western Inn & Suites in Old Town is just minutes fro...
America's Best Value Inn - Conv. Center / Downtown
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
Americas Best Value Inn - Convention Center / Downtown is located near all of the most popular attractions, Downtown / Gaslamp District and a San Diego Convention Center. We are also close to San Diego International Airport and Naval Bases....
$65 Per Night
Hotel and vacation guide
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
Hotels.bz is the essential online travel planning and hotel booking site. Buy airline tickets online, find vacation packages, and make hotel and car reservations, find maps, destination information....
Sheraton San Diego Mission Valley
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
The Sheraton San Diego Mission Valley is located in Mission Valley, approximately seven miles from the San Diego International Airport and six miles from ...
$109 Per Night
La Quinta Inn San Diego Scripps Poway
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
Set under the Pacific blue skies and surrounded by lush landscaping, this La Quinta offers great amenities. ...
$79 Per Night
San Diego Marriott Hotel And Marina
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
The centerpiece of the inspiring San Diego Bay, the Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina is Southern California's premier San Diego hotel, with 1,360 guest ...
$199 Per Night
Residence Inn By Marriott Rancho Bernardo Carmel M
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
The North County San Diego hotel is conveniently located near attractions such as Old Town, Sea World, San Diego Wild Animal Park and Legoland. ...
$119 Per Night
The Sofia Hotel Downtown
San Diego, California Hotels & Resorts
Situated at the corner of Front Street and Broadway, near the historic, trendy Gaslamp Quarter, guests of Sofia are just minutes away from San Diego's ...
$74 Per Night
Scuba San Diego
San Diego, California Scuba & Snorkeling
Guided Scuba Dive to the Kelp forest and Sea Caverns of the La Jolla Cove Ecological Reserve. Guided Snorkel Adventure tour to the Sea Lions and Sea Cavern of the La Jolla Cove Ecological Reserve Guided Night Kayak tour under Sea World Firework...
Starting at $75 Per Person
Scenic bike tours in San Diego and La Jolla
San Diego, California Bike Tours
The PLUNGE! is our most popular bike tour. It begins with a 3 mile decent and then back through some of Pacific Beach and La Jolla's beautiful beach neighborhoods. We finish at our shop where you can also sign up for kayaking, snorkeling or surfing!...
$50 Per Person
A Balloon Ride Adventure with Magical Adventures
San Diego, California Ballooning
Enjoy an adventurous magic carpet balloon ride with Magical Adventures! We are Southern California's premiere balloon ride company. Ride in new uncrowded baskets with doors, champagne and the most amenities near Los Angeles, San Diego, Palm Springs....
Starting at $109 Per Person
San Francisco whale tours
Central Coast, California Whale Watching
One of the top three things to do in San Francisco.Take the whole family or come alone on a whale watching tour. The boat leaves the dock at 7.30AM from San Francisco Fishermans wharf Fri,Sat,Sun ...
$110 Per Trip
Whale Watching - eco tours/ San Francisco Bay Area
San Francisco, California Whale Watching
Whale Watching, Nature trips, eco tours birdwatching, off the San Mateo, San Francisco, Bay area coast of California. Half and full day trips departing from Half Moon Bay. Your small charter specialist....
Tawarica - Embrace the Light of Spring
Santa Cruz, California Spiritual
At this weekend workshop you will learn practices of health and healing passed down for thousands of years through the Huichol tradition. This seminar focuses on the Power of the Light and spiritual practices to brighten yourself from the outside in....
Starting at $299 Per Person
32nd Annual Mount Shasta Retreat
Mount Shasta, California Spiritual
Join us for the 32nd annual retreat at Mount Shasta, CA. Learn to connect with the spirit of the mountain and recognize the power of place at a wonderful 5 day retreat....
Starting at $650 Per Person
Pali Adventures Summer Camp
Running Springs, California Summer Camps & Programs
18 amazing specialties - 1 Fantastic Camp! One of the best California summer camps for kids and teens! Located in Southern California, Pali Adventures is the adventure sleep-away camp of choice where fantasy meets reality!...
Rates from $1,865 Per Week
Dana Wharf Sportfishing & Whale Watching
Dana Point, California Sight-Seeing Tours
Dana Wharf has the BEST Sportfishing and Whale Watching tours in Orange County, Ca. We have been serving the public since 1971 from Dana Point. We also have FREE PARKING for our customers!...
Great Rates & Specials! $46 Per Trip
Rise Up River Trips
Auburn, California Sight-Seeing Tours
Rise up River Trips is a California rafting company offering fully customizable journeys through remarkable places....
|Link Code


text:
Whether dressing for the red carpet or for the real world, look like a Hollywood Starlet thanks to this genius, profile-narrowing, bust-lifting bra. Features an ultra-innovative cup that's engineered to comfortably give your golden globes a glamorous embrace!
Contact the Transformation Team for advice! Let our team of SPANX specialists help you place an order or find the right product for you!


text:
File Not Found!
The page you are looking for has not been found. This could be for one of several reasons: You may have mis-typed the URL, so please check your spelling; It could also have been moved, renamed or deleted from our server.
We have moved a number of guides over to our Lancaster LibGuides site.
If you still cannot find what you are looking for then please Ask a Librarian and we will try to help.


text:
See why more IT pros choose SherWeb as their hosting provider >
Join SherWeb's Partner Network
Learn more
How safe is your business data? Make sure you have a plan B for the unexpected!
In the cloud-computing business, proven and trusted solutions are the key. At SherWeb, a Microsoft Gold Certified partner and leader in the hosted services industry, we cover all your company's email hosting and collaboration needs with our first-rate products, such as Hosted Exchange 2013, Hosted Exchange 2010, Hosted Lync 2013, Hosted Lync 2010, Hosted SharePoint 2013, Hosted SharePoint 2010 and CRM, as well as our Virtual Private Servers (VPS) and Web hosting solution.
Hosted Exchange 2013
Hosted SharePoint 2013
Hosted Lync 2013
Online Backup


text:
You are currently viewing the beta version of the new AMM site.
Click here
to return to the current site.
Nov 13, 2012 | 02:59 PM
| Lisa Gordon
ferrous scrap,
shredded scrap,
scrap quality,
copper contamination,
John Zanieski,
Evraz Inc. NA,
AMM's 6th Annual Steel Scrap Conference
Dan Pflaum
PHILADELPHIA The quality of scrap arriving at steel mills is crucial and should motivate auto shredders to enhance their reputations by providing low-residual feedstock on a consistent basis.
"We are willing to pay a premium for reliable-quality scrap, but it has to be reliable-quality scrap," John Zanieski, president of Evraz Inc. North Americas Evraz Recycling division, told attendees at AMMs 6th Annual Steel Scrap Conference in Philadelphia. Suppliers who have a proven track record of delivering loads of material with low copper and chrome levels are valued sources, he said.....
PHILADELPHIA The quality of scrap arriving at steel mills is crucial and should motivate auto shredders to enhance their reputations by providing low-residual feedstock on a consistent basis.
To access AMM's full content, please log in below. If you do not have an AMM account, we invite you to take a free trial or subscribe below.
Access to amm.com editorial content is granted only to paid subscribers and trialists. If you do not have an active account in your own name, please either subscribe or take a trial and you will have instant access to amm.com content. Sharing your login credentials with individuals who are not subscribers represents a violation of AMM copyright.
Every morning, every minute no matter how often you follow the markets, there's an AMM subscription to fit your needs.
Not sure if you are ready to invest in a subscription right now? Take a free, no-obligation trial. Start your free trial today.
Are you stocking more inventory today than 18 months ago?
We actually don't know who his investors are. At the point when we are ready, we will investigate further. There are just so many things to handle and there are a lot of items to be considered with the project."
-- Charles C. Mitchell, Barstow city manager


text:
7 U.S. Code Chapter 83 - AGRICULTURAL COMPETITIVENESS AND TRADE
Part A—General Provisions
5211, 5212. Repealed. 5213. Joint development assistance agreements with certain trading partners. 5214. Reorganization evaluation. 5215, 5216. Repealed.
Part B—Foreign Agricultural Service
5231 to 5233. Repealed. 5234. Cooperator organizations. 5235. Authorization of additional appropriations.
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for the contained sections. If there are multiple sections, they are presented in section number order (original document order).
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Tuesday, August 13, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
|Description of Change
|Session Year
|Public Law
|Statutes at Large
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.


text:
Top-earning dead celebrities of 2013
POSTED: 10:22 AM PDT Oct 29, 2012 UPDATED: 08:30 AM PDT Oct 23, 2013
Find out which celebrities are earning the most from beyond the grave.
The views expressed are not those of this company or its affiliated companies. Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms Of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms.blog comments powered by Disqus


text:
Love Braley? Anti-Gravity has new, incredibly comfortable dress shoes this season. This mid-heel shoe is lightweight and has a flexible outsole that offers comfort and traction. Blaney features a cushioned insole that makes this style comfortable enough to wear all day and into the evening. The bow upper adds the perfect feminine touch. Available in medium widths and wide widths. 2 1/2" mid heels.
Imported 2 1/2" Heel Closed Heel Anti-Gravity Collection Leather Upper Style Code: ESBLANEY
Blaney Mid-Heel Dress Shoes
Anti-Gravity Collection


text: Who knew toilet training could be so dangerous? According to a new study from Reuters Health, emergency room doctors are revealing that they are seeing more injuries caused by falling toilet seats. Basically what is happening is young boys are learning to use the toilet standing up, when suddenly the seat and lid fall crushing their mini manhood. Dr. Benjamin Breyer of the University of California says, "It's a toddler basically potty training who doesn't have the most advanced motor skills and they just don't have the reflexes to move fast enough." According to their study they found that the number of "crush" injuries has increased by 100 every year since 2002, up to 1,707 emergency room visits in 2010. Beyer also states, "This data can be the tip of the iceberg, because there could be kids who are hurt whose parents don't bring them to the ER. So this could be an underestimation of how often this is going on." So we may never know how many toilet seat injuries occur in a year but at least now maybe you can see why some men don't lift the seat.


text:
Crok, I'm not mad at you I just want to know what's going on here.
A broadcasting legend pleads with the world of the living.
The human anatomy is home to more than three hundred organs. Doctors and chocolatiers agree that the vast majority of these revolting lumps of tissue serve little to no function. If you find yourself standing in a long line or stuck at the airport waiting for a delayed flight, consider taking a few minutes to remove the following from your person.
Lose weight by wearing magical toe rings*, exercising and eating healthy! *The toe rings do nothing.
Haunted house reaction shots are always funny, but just to be sure the SA Goons make them funnier.
Can Dirk save Princess Daphne from the ACID MONSTER? Can Pac-Man overcome is depression?!!
Shmorky's Flash Tub. A collection of Flash cartoons and shorts, all crammed into neat little Flash Tub packages!
Copyright ©2014 Rich "Lowtax" Kyanka & Something Awful LLC.


text:
Neon pink water flowed from home faucets in St. Michael, Minn., on Monday, surprising many residents after a mix-up at the water treatment plant sent more than 100 gallons of pink chemicals into the water supply.
A FOX 9 viewer sent in this photo of her Pepto-pink water Monday morning. The city water department told her the pink water was caused by a malfunction of the chemical pump that pumps rust inhibitor into the city's water.
"When I first saw the picture, I first thought it was bubble gum -- or you know, bubble bath," said Kim Walden.
It's not uncommon to have a little rusty water out in the country, but Walden said she couldn't believe what she saw when her daughter called her to check out their faucet.
"I said, 'You know, it'll be alright. Let it run for a little bit -- and I'd tell dad,'" Walden remembered. "She goes, 'Now the toilet's all pink.'"
As sinks filled with bright pink water, many residents searched for a local source.
"I figured womething was wrong with the water heater," said Rich Brown. "I checked and it was pink!"
After a while, that perplexing pink color had many residents seeing red and asking Joint Powers Water Customers just what was going on.
Kelly Daleiden says a chemical called potassium permanganate, which is used in the filtration process to remove iron and manganese. Inside the plant, the pipes are color-coded to keep track of where the chemical is going.
According to the utility, the wells were shut down on Sunday for maintenance -- but it seems the chemical feed kept running, releasing about 130 gallons of the solution into the lines.
Yet, although it may look disgusting, officials say you'd have to drink about 5,000 gallons of the water to get ill.
"The color is a little shocking. It doesn't take very much to make it really bright pink or purple -- not much at all," said Daleiden.
Still, the chemical can stain laundry, but a solution of vinegar, hydrogen peroxide and water should take care of it.
After the quirky coloration was discovered at about 5 a.m., the city opened a few water mains to clear the lines. Anyone who still has discolored water is asked to run their faucets for a few minutes.
In a Monday press release, St. Michael city officials said "the water discoloration this morning was caused by a pump which over-fed potassium permanganate into the water treatment process." They assured the chemical is non-toxic. That full statement can be read below.
Full statement
"We have recently received reports of water discoloration in a number of homes in St. Michael, Albertville and Hanover and have issued this communication to keep customers updated.
The water discoloration this morning was caused by a pump, which over-fed potassium permanganate into the water treatment process. Potassium permanganate is non-toxic and used to remove iron and manganese in the water treatment process. The pump has been fixed. We have flushed parts of the system to help resolve the color issue.
We absolutely understand the inconvenience it poses to customers. Affected residents should be advised that the water remains safe to drink. Some customers may continue to experience temporary discoloration as this problem is resolved and we respect their patience. Affected customers may choose to allow taps to run until the color returns to normal.
We expect that any residual color will be resolved quickly. In the meantime, we ask any customers with questions about their water call us at 763-497-3611."
25 FOX Drive
Phone (781) 467-2525
Didn't find what you were looking for?
All content © Copyright 2000 - 2014 Fox Television Stations, Inc. and Worldnow. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | New Terms of Service What's new | Ad Choices


text:
Hi! Hope you had a great 4th of July weekend! I tweeted a photo of my famous Jell-O shots and had so many people ask how I made them, so that's what you'll find in this blog. I've been making these red, white, and blue Jell-O shots for a few years and EVERYONE loves them. If you prepare a few days in advance they are REALLY easy to make.
All of the little cups and lids are found at Party City ... it's the Jell-O that's the problem. Finding WHITE Jell-O is a chore, but if you're willing spend a little extra, I found Pina Colada Jell-O on Amazon and that's what I used! (It takes awesome too!) The trick to these jello shots is to let each layer color set in the fridge for an entire day before adding the next layer on top! For first timers - make jello like you normally would, but replace the COLD cup of water, with a cup of vodka or rum! I used a different flavor vodka for each color Jell-O!
In all, it takes 3 days to make these ... but trust me, it's totally worth it. They are a total CROWD PLEASER on the 4th of July! Save for next year! :) XO
Memorial Day weekend is the unofficial start to SUMMER and after this LONG freaking WINTER, I'm bringing in the SUMMER FUN ASAP! John and I were talking about having nothing to do Memorial Day weekend and VOILA, his parents texted us that they are going to have a BBQ. Perfect! I was assigned drinks! My favorite! His family has come to expect over-the-topness from me, so I can't disappoint. I quickly did a PINTEREST search for festive beverages for the party. If you're doing it up this weekend - check out these drinks ... perhaps be the party starter and bring them to the party you're attending!
For the grown ups (I still think it's weird that I'm considered one of those) a sangria ... and for the kiddos (I'm totally trying one of these too) a red, white, and blue drink!
For the kids: http://www.pinterest.com/pin/202662051956591429/
For the adults: http://welcometomontalvocountry.blogspot.com/2012/06/red-white-and-blue-sangria-white-wine.html
Hi friends!
2014 is off to a great start! We have lots of fun things in the works for the year on the show and as of Sunday, I've been married for 3 months! 3 months down, a lifetime to go. Married life is great ... there's something really cool about promising to spend forever with your favorite person. :)
10 days ago I started Weight Watchers online. So far, I really like it because it's easy to track on the app ... but to be honest, I really havent, my routine hasn't really changed. I was already making good choices, so I'm hoping maybe the close attention will make the difference. I'll wait an entire month before posting any results because I want to give it a fair chance. So many of you tweeted me your success with the WW program, so I'm hoping to see the same. The one thing I NEED to do is step it up at the gym. It's just so hard to actually get there. I really need to drag my ass there before coming into work.
Speaking of making good choices, I found the best (GOOD FOR YOU) protein bars ever. Most protein bars are candy in disguise... but not these. Check out QUEST bars if you're looking for something sweet that's REALLY low in sugar, high in protein and fiber. You can thank me later. I've tried most of the flavors, chocolate peanut butter is pretty much the most amazing thing ever.
This weekend my 2 godchildren are coming for a visit. I'm so exicted! I have a fun filled weekend planned for them and will check in on twitter! If you have any ideas or MUST DO things with kids in Poconos - email me email@example.com!
Production of the book-turned-movie begins shooting in Vancouver on Dec. 2 and is set to be released on Valentine's Day, 2015.
So ... what do you think? Are they believable? Do they look like what you pictured while reading the books? I'm not sure i'm convinced.


text:
How many water parks have not just one, but two, water coasters? And they're the two longest in the world!
#1 Wooden Coaster in the nation, according to TIME magazine. You'll experience 24.3 seconds of zero-G, one of the steepest drops on any wooden coaster and 90-degree banking at highway speeds!
By Paula @ Holiday World
Published November 7, 2008
Click here to cancel reply.
* indicates required field
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 1,094 other subscribers