text:
By Ira Winderman
7:51 AM EDT, July 25, 2014
July 25, 2014
Q: Ira, your paper and the Herald have had stories about how with LeBron gone, this can become a football town again. My question: Nowhere in those stories does anyone say they expect the Dolphins to have a better record than the Heat. -- Ian, Miramar.
A: First, I've been on the record for years, even during the Shaq and LeBron eras, as saying this was, is and will remain a football town. It is in South Florida's DNA. I get that. But I also know that South Florida embraces winning more than any player or any team. It is why the basketball buzz was the most significant buzz these past four years. All of that said, I think your greater point should resonate: Many still see a Chris Bosh-Dwyane Wade-led roster as approaching the 50-victory mark this coming season. Does anyone expect such a winning percentage from the Dolphins or Marlins or Panthers (I'm not as sure about University of Miami football, considering they play an Atlantic Coast Conference schedule)? The point being that even with the loss of LeBron, the Heat very well could remain the lone playoff team among the four major-sports teams in South Florida.
Q: What's the downside in retiring numbers? I noticed they gave James Ennis what was Shaquille O'Neal's old number. I mean, wouldn't you want to retire the numbers of some of the greatest players in the game? For all of Shaq's burned bridges, it's impressive to be able to boast that one of the greatest centers of all-time played for your team. I'd still retire LeBron James' jersey just the same. If you won a championship and this player was a huge part of that, I think it's worth a retired jersey. Or is there some type of code that teams adhere to? -- Moshe.
A: I think because of the way Shaq left, they didn't even think about it, and then first gave it to Mickell Gladness, before now giving No. 32 to Ennis. But teams also have had players wear numbers for players that later were retired, so Shaq could yet have his Heat moment. It is why I doubt Mario Chalmers would be allowed to go back to his previous No. 6, as the Heat just leave LeBron's number in place for the moment. Of course, Chalmers wanted his collegiate No. 15 all along, with Mark Blount wearing it when Chalmers first arrived to the Heat in 2008.
Q: I see Rip Hamilton wants to play again. I'd take him as a third point guard in a heartbeat. -- David.
A: First, he's a shooting guard, which certainly is a position of need for the Heat, with depth lacking behind Wade. But I'm not sure the Heat are in a position to be looking at a player who has been out of the league for a year. It could come down to what else is left closer to the end of free agency. For now, there certainly are more enticing names out there. The question is whether they would be willing to play for the minimum, which Rip apparently is.
July 24, 2014
Q: Ira, what are the chances the Heat bring back Michael Beasley and Greg Oden? Do you see more of a featured role for them if they do come back? I think Beasley would be a nice fit on this squad. He isn't great at defense, but he isn't atrocious, and his offense can be much needed. -- Rick, Coral Springs.
A: I agree that with the current mix, where Danny Granger currently stands as the top reserve to Dwyane Wade at shooting guard, that keeping Beasley as a wing wound make some sense, for the one-on-one offense that at times is needed. I also think there could be more patience with LeBron James gone, as far as putting up with Michael's lapses. But his defense has to get better, especially with the Heat lacking rim protection when Chris Andersen is out of the game. As for Oden, I just don't sense a comfort or commitment to spot him for regular minutes, which is something I think Greg wants to see if he still is capable of handling.
Q: What do you expect the Heat to do with the rest of their cap space? -- Steve.
A: Nothing, because they don't have any. And the Heat used their last salary-cap exception to bring back Udonis Haslem. But it's also been somewhat overstated that the Heat now can only sign players at the veteran minimum. The Heat also can add players via trades. And that makes Norris Cole somewhat of a valuable chip, with his $2 million salary creating permutations that could grow even greater when added to Justin Hamilton's contract, which does not become even partially guaranteed until Aug. 1. And remember, Pat Riley tends to add intriguing pieces at the minimum closer to camp, as he did last season with Beasley and Roger Mason Jr. (who also remains available).
Q: Hey Ira, do you think once the Chris Bosh World Tour is over that it would benefit him to do some work with Hakeem Olajuwon much like LeBron did a couple of years back? I think it may be beneficial, seeing as he will likely be getting more work in the post this upcoming season. -- Karl, Miami.
A: The thing is, Chris already has post moves; they've just been dormant in recent years. Plus, his style is a bit different than Olajuwon's, with more of a face-up, mid-post game that allows for the threat of his mid-range jumper. Look, Erik Spoelstra helped find games that maximized the possibilities for LeBron and Wade in recent years, and I would expect that he'll be spending plenty of time at the Oregon Coast coming up with possibilities for Bosh and the rest of his reconfigured mix.
July 23, 2014
Q: Ira, I've read (and listened) where you've said that if LeBron James told the Heat earlier that he was leaving, the Heat would have taken a different approach to free agency. But if they did get Kyle Lowry or Marcin Gortat, they might not have been able to add as many players. -- Felix.
A: You have a point. If the Heat did overbid for Lowry or Gortat, and if Chris Bosh still wanted his max deal, then it might have been just a single tangible addition, instead of Luol Deng, Josh McRoberts and Danny Granger. In fact, if the Heat had more cap space at the start of free agency, it is possible they would have spent significantly more on Deng. Look, I like the Deng addition at his price point, and the same with McRoberts. As for Granger? It is a typical Pat Riley-esque risk, some of which work, some of which don't. I will say this: For a team that lost LeBron James, the Heat did well to avoid the tag of free-agency's biggest loser. They played the space race well, perhaps better than if LeBron had left earlier. You raise a reasonable point.
Q: Hello Ira, I am concerned that the Heat have not made any additional moves to address their lack of height and rebounding. "Small Ball" was a bit of a stretch even with LeBron. Any thoughts? -- Roger, Miami.
A: You can only add what's available and what's within your means. Yes, they might have been able to get Chris Kaman instead of McRoberts, or Spencer Hawes instead of Deng, but I think the initial approach has to be maximizing the roster's overall talent. And when the Heat went for height and bulk last summer, in Greg Oden, it was largely unplayable height and bulk. There still is time and there still is length out there. Riley will pounce if he sees value and someone who is serviceable in this system.
Q: The Heat should have traded their draft pick for Iman Shumpert when they had the chance? -- Vince, Hollywood.
A: In hindsight, perhaps, but there also were salary-cap implications there. As it is, the Knicks seem to be having a backcourt fire sale, so perhaps we may yet get our first Phil Jackson-Pat Riley trade.
July 22, 2014
Q: Hey Ira, you always hear that the truly great players make their teammates better. Now, I'm not arguing with the Heat's success with LeBron James, but do you feel that he made anyone better? Seems like, at least stat-wise, many players did worse as the years went on. I know age/injury were responsible for some of that, but I'd like to get your thoughts. -- Jerry, Fort Lauderdale
A: I think in addition to all being witnesses with LeBron, some also turn into spectators. That is only natural when LeBron advances the ball, taps on his chest, indicates that he is taking this one himself. And, yes, there is a natural sacrifice of statistics when a teammate no longer is a leading man. But LeBron's passing and playmaking also allowed teammates to have career-best shooting percentages, as he attracted the defense's focus. All of that said, I do think you will see certain aspects from returning Heat players that had not been on full display in recent seasons. And the reality is those aspects now have to be on display.
Q: Ira, looking at James Ennis from summer league last year to this year, you can see the growth in his game. Why don't teams send players overseas more often? -- Carlos.
A: Because NBA teams try to stock their Development League rosters, where coaches affiliated with the parent team can ingrain their system. And I do think the Heat developed players last season with the Sioux Falls Skyforce. But I think the experience overseas opened Ennis' eyes, with Australia's league, well, a man's league, physical and rugged. I think the experience did James, well, a world of good.
Q: Ira, why don't we all stop following and talking about LeBron? He is gone. There is nothing he is going to do for Miami Heat now, so why bother? -- Ernesto, Plantation.
A: I agree that it's time to move on. Of course, I'm also a sentimental sort, still longing for a return by Vladimir Stepania.
July 21, 2014
Q: I know it's not ideal, but do you think Erik Spoelstra will insert Birdman into the starting lineup? I think it's asking too much of Chris Bosh to not only score 20-plus per game but also be responsible for anchoring the defense. -- Kevin.
A: Not with Josh McRoberts aboard. McRoberts was a durable, every-game starter for Charlotte and I think the Heat should keep it that way. And Chris Andersen is the type of instant energy the Heat need off the bench. Plus, let's face it, when committing that much salary to Andersen for two years, at his age you want to make sure there will be enough left for the playoffs. Now, if you're asking if I would play Andersen alongside Bosh at times, absolutely, perhaps when McRoberts initially checks out of the game.
Q: You tweet about it and joke about it, but how come you do not answer "Ask Ira" questions about Mario Chalmers? You say Pat Riley ignored "outside noise" and signed Chalmers. There was plenty of inside noise, as well. Specifically what does the Riley see in Mario that the fans and sometimes fellow players who are frustrated with his game do not? -- Stone, Miami.
A: First, the players grow "frustrated" because they know that with a bit more consistency that Mario can be a significant contributor. He is an excellent spot-up shooter, creates turnovers with his length and activity, and appreciates in a star-driven league when it's time to get out of the way. And he can be efficient and explosive when attacking the rim, which I think you'll see more of with LeBron James gone.
Q: At the end of the NBA Finals, some were calling for Dwyane Wade moving to the bench as sixth-man due to his failing body. Now it appears that he will be asked to carry more of a load this upcoming season. Realistically, how good can we be with this Wade? -- Rene, Davie.
A: We'll see soon enough. But I remember the last time Wade was counted out and how he responded with a vengeance. I think the chip on Wade's shoulder will be bigger than any knee sleeve.
July 20, 2014
Q: Ira, as well as opening up cap room for a pitch to free agents in 2016, do these new Heat contracts also give Pat Riley more flexibility to make trades in the next couple of years? He has been limited in the players he could trade in recent years due to so many players opting to play for less to play with LeBron James. -- Sam, London.
A: Terrific point. In recent years, and even during this free-agency period, the Heat have had few options either for trades or sign-and-trade possibilities. Now, Riley can mix and match. No, that was not the reasoning for the way these contracts were structured, but it does put Riley back in the market. In recent years, the Heat largely had to sit out the trade deadline and hope for something to fall into their laps at the buyout deadline. This time, there will be trades pieces to put in play at the deadline, but no remaining cash or cap exceptions for the buyout deadline.
Q: Let's assume that LeBron spends the rest of his career in a Cavs uniform without winning a title. Does he go in the Hall of Fame wearing Heat colors or Cavs colors? Also, would Miami ever considering retiring his jersey, seeing that he only spent four years here? Granted, the four years were really special and should be recognized by the Heat organization. -- Andrew, West Palm Beach.
A: Unlike baseball's Hall of Fame, you are not enshrined into the Basketball Hall of Fame with a particular team designation. In basketball, that is particularly sensible, with free agency and so many trades. It's sort of similar to those who had asked when Tim Hardaway was a recent finalist, whether he should go in as part of the Run TMC Warriors or from the Heat. As for LeBron's number being retired by the Heat, I think four years falls short of any legitimate requirement. Of course, Riley does enjoy displaying jerseys at AmericanAirlines Arena.
Q: Mario Chalmers? -- Roy.
A: You know what? Mario has done well by this franchise, and has never had a salary where anyone truly could say he was overpaid. To get a starter at a below-average salary just seems like good business.
July 19, 2014
Q: Ira, what makes you or Pat Riley or Micky Arison or anyone believe that Chris Bosh can be a leading man again? -- Len.
A: First, I don't think that's the approach that Chris is taking, has taken since leaving the Raptors. He appreciates that it takes a depth of talent, which is why it is important to him that he remained alongside Dwyane Wade, as well as the type of talent Riley has added, such as Luol Deng. The reality is that in the NBA you overpay at times. This, amid the devastation of the departure of LeBron James, is one of those times there is a benefit to overpaying. The signing of Bosh stabilized the Heat's situation. And the one thing about Chris since his Heat arrival is that when given the opportunity, he has seized it. His play these past four years inspires confidence. And the sense is there is a newfound motivation.
Q: As an outsider looking in, I think LeBron James felt that Dwayne Wade was not a max-contract player. He knows Wade is not the same player on offense or defense he was a few years ago, and signing a contract to stay with the same group without room to change, he would have not won again. -- Mark, Nashville.
A: Which should be all the motivation Dwyane needs, to make those head-to-head matchups what they were like when LeBron previously played for the Cavaliers. And perhaps for Wade to invite LeBron to his playoff games after James' team is eliminated. It may not have been the reasoning, but LeBron surely has provided ample motivation for Dwyane.
Q: Something tells me the A/C might not be working when the Cavs come to town. -- David.
A: Funny. Guess LeBron won't have to worry about overheating and cramping up playing in Cleveland in the dead of winter.
July 18, 2014
Q: As Dan Gilbert prepares to let LeBron James' inner circle overtake his franchise again, and amidst reports that Pat Riley and Micky Arison were holding the line on how they wanted the Heat organization to be run, which is the right approach? -- David, Staten Island.
A: The reality is that when you can wield the type of power that LeBron can, you have no choice but to capitulate. While the reasoning for James taking a two-year deal from the Cavaliers has been the greater cut of television money that should be available in the 2016 offseason, I think it's because with the one-year opt out, he can continue to hold the hammer against management, at least present the threat of possibly leaving. It actually is a brilliant strategy. As for the Heat, they gave James every tool he needed to win. That is where they drew the line. His manager in the training room? Fine. Access for his family in the locker-room tunnel? Fine. His personal therapist brought in from the Cavaliers? Fine. Every whim and wish? Not when he still was part of a team.
Q: When James Jones leaves, what does that tell you? -- Art.
A: That playing with LeBron is a transcendent experience, like Russell Crowe, DeCaprio, Damon summoning you to be in their next movie. You don't ask where, you ask when.
Q: Ira, when do you plan to remove the picture of LeBron from your blog page? It's time to move on. -- Ezra, Falls Church, Va.
A: As you will notice from the collage above, LeBron formally has been replaced by Chris Bosh answering the type of demanding questions you, the "Ask Ira" readers, provide.
July 17, 2014
Q: Considering Lance Stephenson's contract starts at less than Luol Deng's, why didn't the Heat go with Stephenson? -- Arturo.
A: First of all, the difference in the salaries is marginal. But at the point that the Heat locked up Deng, Stephenson still was pushing for more, actually far more. Plus, the Heat needed someone to replace LeBron James at small forward, with Stephenson more of a shooting guard or even combo guard, which would have created more duplication with Dwyane Wade. Beyond that, what the Heat most need in the wake of James' departure is stability, a strong-suit of Deng's, something far less with Stephenson. Does Stephenson have greater upside? That's a reasonable argument. But there's also history there with Lance. After losing LeBron, Deng was a heck of a consolation prize.
Q: Was James Jones even pursued by the Heat this offseason? -- Phil
A: My sense is the Heat sensed a need to shake things up, try to get younger, more athletic. Also, I think the challenge of carrying a roster with 14 starting-quality players began to weigh on the staff in keeping everyone content. Jones deserved minutes last season, but so did Rashard Lewis, Udonis Haslem, Michael Beasley and others. I think the goal now is to have a better-defined rotation and a development program on the side, where James Ennis, Shabazz Napier and perhaps Justin Hamilton can grow into something more.
Q: LeBron also wanted Zydrunas Ilgauskas when he was in Miami, and how did that work out? -- Michael.
A: If nothing else, LeBron is loyal to those who have been loyal to him, which is why he requested Ilgauskas' presence with the Heat in 2010, why he wanted Mike Miller with him in both Miami and now Cleveland, and why Jones is headed to Cleveland. That's what happens when a player also is de facto general manager. LeBron has considerable basketball sense, and sway. But it can get difficult for a coach when he knows his star player has personally delivered certain players to the rotation.
July 16, 2014
Q: Ira, I understand Dwyane Wade agreeing to a pay cut and being a team player. But why does he have an opt out after the first year? -- David.
A: Because what if he is super-fantastic again and merits a long-term deal like Chris Bosh? In the short term, Wade allowed the Heat to fit in several new pieces, including Josh McRoberts and Danny Granger, while also giving himself the chance to prove the Heat still might merit an A-list salary. No matter the outcome from here, Wade has proven to be the Heat's Dan Marino, sticking by the franchise for better or worse. He could have just stayed in his two-year, $42 million deal and never opted out in June. Instead, he facilitated the overall salary structure for the Heat's greater good. He appreciated the need to help set the table for the final years of his Heat career. Now, in 2016, the only Heat contracts on the books, at least at the moment, will be those of Chris Bosh and McRoberts. When Wade's jersey is hoisted to the rafters at AmericanAirlines Arena, it should rise to a position a bit higher than the others.
Q: I was thinking: Udonis Haslem could actually be useful next season, as without LeBron James, the Heat could bring back the pick-and-pop game. With LeBron, Haslem was asked to roll to the basket instead and it was just out of his comfort zone. The patented Haslem 15-footer just might make a comeback. -- Moshe.
A: And he might have to offer more, without as much depth of talent as in recent seasons, especially with Rashard Lewis off to the Mavericks. But while those shots might be there, the question is whether the shot can be as efficient as it once was. But someone will have to help make up for the rebounds lost with LeBron's departure.
Q: Does James Ennis crack the rotation next season? -- Jeffrey.
A: I think he will open with sort of the "Michael Beasley role," getting minutes when they might be there. From there, it could come down to both his adjustment, as well as how much Danny Granger has left. Ennis has shown in summer league that he can defend, which could be essential when it comes to potential playing time.
July 15, 2014
Q: If Pat Riley had known that LeBron James wouldn't be re-signing, do you think he would have still signed Josh McRoberts and Danny Granger, or do you think he would have gone in another direction? -- Moshe.
A: Look, Pat Riley does one thing particularly well, and that's think big. So if he had $17 million-plus in cap space at the start of free agency, had LeBron been candid from the start, then doubt he would have trimmed it into parcels where $5 million went to Josh McRoberts, $2 million to Danny Granger and then shopped with the remaining $10 million, which turned into Luol Deng. I think he would have been far more aggressive in pursuing Kyle Lowry and Marcin Gortat, or perhaps even delved into the trade market. LeBron had every right to do what he wanted. It's how he did it that impacted the Heat upon his departure. Argue whether it was the Heat helping LeBron get those two titles, or whether it was LeBron getting those two titles, but when it came to the partnership, it is clear that something went wrong along the way.
Q: In two years, do you really believe a 32-year-old Chris Bosh is going to be able to convince a 27-year-old Kevin Durant to abandon a 27-year-old Russell Westbrook to come join him in Miami? I don't, and I don't think you do, either. With very few exceptions, history has shown that the pathway to sustained NBA excellence is to draft a young star. I understand and support what Pat Riley is doing, but at some point, it's time to go all in on Blake Ahearn and Kasib Powell. -- Richard.
A: I think anything about Durant is overstated, because it remains such an abstract with two years still to play out. But, yes, I do think Chris has the type of game that should age gracefully and prove alluring, just as Miami will always prove alluring as a destination. And I don't agree about the lottery approach, because for every lottery star there is an Anthony Bennett. That's where I give credit to teams like the Mavericks and Hawks, for continuing to give their fans a playoff product. Yes, it's about championships. But it's also about watch-ability.
Q: It seems the roster has little in the way of 3-point shooters. What are your thoughts on addressing that? -- Brian.
A: Well, McRoberts, Bosh, Mario Chalmers, James Ennis, Danny Granger and others shoot 3-pointers on this roster at enough of a clip to keep the opposing defense somewhat honest. I think what the Heat want to do is get away from players who only shoot 3-pointers. Yes, you need to space the floor, but the question becomes whether you allow that to start compromising your rebounding and defense.
July 14, 2014
Q: Ira, Pat Riley is engineered for these circumstances. -- Alfredo.
A: Being candid here, I honestly thought the Heat were going to go into 2007-08 mode after the loss of LeBron James, just as they did when Shaquille O'Neal began shutting it down. Instead, Riley showed there's still plenty of fight left, that he, not Phil Jackson, will be the feistiest 69-year-old team president in the NBA. First there was the caution-to-the-wind contract for Chris Bosh, affirming a conviction that Bosh can be a build-around star. Then there was a wild Sunday when Riley locked up Luol Deng, shunned the outside noise about Mario Chalmers, and got Chris Andersen to agree without Andersen definitively knowing about his contract terms. Like I said on Twitter, if you're having your taxes done next year, consider having them done by Andy Elisburg, who knows the CBA better than any accountant could possibly know the tax code. The ultimate reality: There is plenty of fight left at 601 Biscayne. Good for them. Good for Heat fans.
Q: Could the Heat get Carlos Boozer if he is amnestied by the Bulls. -- Jayce.
A: You must have remaining cap space to bid during amnesty waivers. Only if a player clears that process without anyone making the minimum necessary bid can the player become a free agent, as was the case with Mike Miller last year, when there supposedly was considerable doubt about his health. Boozer is likely to receive a bid that would put him beyond the Heat's grasp.
Q: What about . . .? -- Everyone.
A: I have been receiving these non-stop ever since the Heat got active Sunday, especially names like Lance Stephenson, Eric Bledsoe and Greg Monroe. All three are restricted free agents, with their current teams allowed to match. The Heat not only lack the funds for a bidding war, they essentially lack any salary-cap funds beyond the veteran minimum. A proven veteran who joins the Heat from this point forward will be someone who is not making salary a priority.
July 13, 2014
Q: Perhaps I am in the minority, but I am not that upset that LeBron James is leaving. Yes, we have had four wonderful years with four Finals appearances and two championships, but being the overwhelming favorite every year can get boring. Think about it: The regular season has had little meaning other than determining if the Heat will get home-court advantage all the way through the playoffs or simply for the Eastern Conference finals. Every game was played with managing minutes of players to reach mid-April with optimum strength. With LeBron gone, the regular-season games will once again be significant. Young players will get a chance to develop, Chris Bosh has a chance to star instead of playing a supporting role and Pat Riley can rejuvenate himself by showing why he is the best executive in the NBA. I have been a Miami Heat fan since Game 1 in Year 1 back in 1988. My children were in elementary school back then and now have children of their own. We have gone through ups and downs with the Heat. We went through the Shaquille O'Neal years and won a championship and we have gone through the LeBron years with two more. Remember in that same time period that we won three championships our neighbor to the north, Orlando, has won none. So instead of being depressed and angry with LeBron, I say thanks for the memories, we wish you the best, you have gone back to Cleveland for very noble reasons, but I will be cheering along with my children and grandchildren for us to defeat you and the Cavaliers each and every time. A new Miami Heat era is about to begin. -- Jeffrey.
A: Wow. Powerful. And the point that resonates here is that every game will matter again, the standings will matter, there no longer can be coasting and cruising, and maintenance and marginal interest. Those games against the Jazz and 76ers and Kings and Bucks can't be blown off. It will be different, and it might not be as dynamic or dramatic, but I agree that it could be compelling in a different way than these past four seasons.
Q: It was a magical feeling being at AmericanAirlines Arena that June evening in 2012 when the Miami Heat won their first NBA championship (second overall) at home. Mike Miller couldn't miss and LeBron finally became a champion. As an NBA fan, I thought the championship only occurs in Boston, Los Angeles, Chicago and every few years in San Antonio. I hope LeBron James and Cavaliers fans get to experience that special feeling together one day. They deserve it. Thanks LeBron for creating so much joy on a summer night in June 2012. -- Stuart.
A: I've been getting more of these than the sniping I might have expected. It's almost as if there has been a domination hangover and a desire for something more competitive and intriguing. We shall see.
Q: The future looks bleak for the Heat. James was not going to play another season for two video coordinators disguised as coaches. When he saw the Orlando Heat summer-league team end up with a 1-4 record, James left. Dan Gilbert surely pointed this out to James about the Cavs new coach David Blatt, that time and time again, from Russia to Israel and several other prominent head coaching jobs in between, David has done one thing: win. James clearly sees the player-development program of the Heat is in shambles, and has a very poor track record of producing replacements for retiring veterans. Riley can shuffle around players, but the coaching staff needs to be shaken up and replaced with people who only know winning. The summer league may be about scouting, but the Heat should never accept losing on any level. Famously Kobe Bryant took on every competition, no matter how trivial, with the determination to win. -- L.K.
A: So summer league is the reason LeBron is gone? I knew it. It's all Nobel Boungou-Colo's fault. And while many reasons could be cited for the Heat's ugly finish in the Finals, how can anyone blame a coach who helped get his team to four consecutive NBA Finals?
July 12, 2014
Q: The thing I don't understand is the concept of going home. Earvin Magic Johnson grew up in Michigan and played his professional career in Los Angeles; Larry Bird, raised in Indiana and played in Boston; Michael Jordan was from North Carolina and played in Chicago. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was New York and played in Milwaukee/Los Angeles. Very rarely does a player play in the same area/city they grew up in. We all applaud LeBron James, but something deeper is going on. -- Stuart.
A: What was going on was his hometown team presented itself with more potential than the team he ended the season with. The narrative is convenient and undeniable, but there is so much more in play, including how the Heat looked (or didn't look) in the NBA Finals, his relationship with Erik Spoelstra, Pat Riley and Micky Arison. Ultimately, it was a four-year marriage and LeBron got possession of his former house in the breakup.
Q: Kevin Durant and Anthony Davis are going to be free agents in 2016. Isn't it better to have cap room to pursue those guys in that summer than to spend it now to make everybody feel better in this one? I understand you have to do right by Dwyane Wade and Udonis Haslem. But Chris Bosh would have gotten the money he opted out of on the open market anyways. -- Juan.
A: But you can't recruit with a blank slate. What's important is that the Heat get Wade his money back over the next two seasons, so it can be Bosh and more than enough cap space in 2016. The perfect answer is to simply give Wade back what he opted out from, two years at $42 million. But there now is a squeeze, making it difficult to also round out the current roster under the cap. As far as Haslem, a two-year deal at $3 million per season would seem to be the answer. The 2016 class very much could yet provide Riley with a shot a rebuilding redemption.
Q: So where does this leave the Heat? -- Tommy.
A: Thankfully they're in the East, where a roster with Bosh and Wade and a wing of decent quality still can put you in a fight for homecourt in the first round, sort of at the level of last season's Nets.
July 11, 2014
Q: Ira, the Nets, Cavaliers and Celtics announced their trade Thursday, and other teams introduced their new players, so what should we make of not a peep out of the Heat with Josh McRoberts and Danny Granger? -- Bruce.
A: That the NBA signing period moves in strange and mysterious ways. While the Heat agreed to salary framework with both McRoberts and Granger, they did not finalize the mechanisms with which they would be signed, since, amid the LeBron James delay, Pat Riley did not know if he would be working with cap space or salary-cap exceptions. Essentially, McRoberts and Granger will get their money as promised from the Heat, it's just a matter of how those salaries will be slotted into the Heat's salary cap. Riley took the extraordinary step of announcing the agreements before the actual signings, as if to assure the players, "Don't worry, this is getting done." Amid all the uncertainty, what is certain is that Josh McRoberts and Danny Granger will be in Heat uniforms come the start of training camp.
Q: How many players from this summer-league squad can we realistically expect to see on the Heat next year? Shabazz Napier is a lock, but what are the real chances for James Ennis or a return for Justin Hamilton? -- Andrew, Miami.
A: It's way too early for that, and, to a degree, I think some of these kids will get lost in the shuffle, with Erik Spoelstra and Pat Riley having far greater concerns at the moment. Ennis is intriguing, and the Heat way of business has been that if you step aside and play overseas for a year while allowing the team to retain your draft rights, the Heat will take care of you the following season. So I think Ennis sticks, if only with a non-guaranteed contract to start the season. With Hamilton, a decision has to be made by Aug. 1 on his partial guarantee, and that could set him back. I wouldn't be surprised to see the date for that guarantee changed.
Q: Forget the Big Three. Considering none of the other free agents from last season have signed, doesn't that say all that needed to be said about the Heat bench? -- Davis.
A: Not at all. The start of the free-agent signing period rarely is about supporting players. Plus, some of those players from the end of last season's bench were waiting to see how the Big Three situation shakes out. When you think about it, many of the Heat's bench players were late-offseason additions, and could be this offseason, as well.
July 10, 2014
Q: If LeBron James leaves, what happens to Dwyane Wade? Do you think the Heat sign Wade back at his two-year, $42 million deal or the four- or five-year deal we've been hearing about? I would go with the two-year deal since the Heat will be rebuilding and will need to get him off the books ASAP. -- Joel.
A: I agree. And I believe that was always a consideration. And then, after those two years if Dwyane wants to play on and stay with the Heat, he can do so at a more reasonable number that allows for the addition of talent. In fact, if LeBron were to return at a short deal, I think it's possible that everyone simply puts their money back on the books as it previously was, perhaps even Udonis Haslem. Of course, all this math is secondary to how LeBron resolves his equation. And, for now, at least at the time of this typing, we wait.
Q: Is waiting and waiting and waiting fair to Miami, or even fair to Cleveland? Is it too much to ask someone to make a decision? -- Marty.
A: In this case, with so many moving parts, it might be. While the Cavaliers opened enough cap space for LeBron to get his max deal in Cleveland, they clearly are not finished trying to put the best shine on their pitch. It could be as simple as LeBron waiting to see if the Cavaliers can lure Kevin Love, or waiting to see if Pat Riley can come up with another personnel move.
Q: I cannot endure another 15-67 season. I went to all those [2007-08] games. I was lured into believing something might become of Kasib Powell and Blake Ahearn. G-d help us all. -- Moshe.
A: We're not there yet. Yet.
July 9, 2014
Q: Ira, you are LeBron James sitting back and see Pat Riley sign Josh McRoberts and Danny Granger and then say he's out of cap space. What would you think? -- Dan.
A: First, it doesn't matter what I think. Second, LeBron is as smart as anyone when it comes to judging NBA landscapes. He knew what his desire for as maximum salary would do to the Heat's salary-cap position, and he knew which players likely weren't going to for below-market offers. So he had to sense that the upside could be McRoberts- and Granger-type players. He also had to recognize that such an approach could be the best way to keep his friend Ray Allen alongside with the Heat. Unlike fans who want each and every player regardless of salary-cap implications and logic, LeBron is a general manager who just happens to also wear a uniform. Pat Riley did the best with what he could work with. The question is whether LeBron ultimately respects Riley's judgment.
Q: Could the Heat wind up running their offense through Josh McRoberts? -- Scott, L.A.
A: That's probably a stretch, but having a facilitator at that position presents options for Erik Spoelstra to further diversify his approach. I might not be sold at McRoberts' price point, but I am intrigued by his possibilities.
Q: Ira, I read what you wrote yesterday about players having to wait to sign (and I'm never going to understand the salary cap). But what good does toying with fans' emotions do? -- Tomas.
A: Emotions only get "toyed" with if you allow them to get toyed with. It's sort of similar to the period prior to the trading deadline, when there is equal bluster. The difference is few get moved at the trading deadline, while dozens of players are moved at the start of free agency. Still, based on the delay this summer by players, I don't think it would matter when you make the first day of signing, players would still take their time to maximize their prospects. Free agency is a four-month process that works on its own schedule. So lots of deep breaths are recommended.
July 8, 2014
Q: Ira, after all the Heat have been through with Dwyane Wade, why add another guy who sits more than he plays? What next: Sign Derrick Rose and his crutches? -- Sid.
A: Look, I can appreciate the Josh McRoberts signing. He is a player with a unique skill set who should work well with Erik Spoelstra's systems. I get that. While I think they overpaid for McRoberts, big men who can pass and shoot are the exceptions. And he certainly has proven durable. But the Danny Granger thing almost comes off as desperate, something along the lines of adding a name more than a player (to a degree, it comes off similar to the Greg Oden signing last summer, as if the Heat added the player-formerly-known-as-Danny-Granger). Look, if it works, at that price point, it could be a home run. But the same could have been said about Oden, which never panned out. To be honest, I truly thought Granger would have to work his way back at the veteran minimum. It seems as though the Heat could have gotten more out of the $2 million bi-annual exception. I seriously doubt that if Pat Riley wasn't working with his back against the wall that he would have made such a move. Honestly, I'm not sure I'd have Granger on a higher tier than Michael Beasley at this stage.
Q: I don't get the NBA personnel moratorium. Why can't they sign players July 1? -- Rolf.
A: They basically do, with the type of press releases Pat Riley offered with Monday's moves with McRoberts and Granger. The NBA says it needs the time to compute the salary cap and luxury tax for the following season through an audit during the moratorium period. I'm starting to believe ESPN pays the NBA to keep the moratorium in place to drive ratings. I do think it's a mechanism whose time has come and gone. Open the signing gates on July 1 and worry about the exact numbers later. As it is, teams reach agreements that get modified by the final cap numbers, anyway.
Q: You said the Heat could bring Mario Chalmers back, why? -- Ian.
A: Why did I say it? Because if the Heat are working with salary-cap exceptions instead of cap space, they could use Chalmers' Bird Rights to pay him and go over the cap. They also could use him in a sign and trade for a possible replacement player. For the moment, Chalmers still has use to the Heat. And let's be fair: He was the starting point guard on a two-time champion and four-time NBA Finalist. He remains a quality player.
July 7, 2014Q: Ira, with the overall salary-cap situation in the NBA and the prevailing talk about mid- to low-tier players having almost an obligation to take less to give their existing teams "flexibility" to sign needed players, are the owners laughing themselves all the way to the bank, or is this the first volley in the demise of "super-teams," which have been instrumental in making the NBA a global brand with global appeal? The players must be looking at their own NBA players association reps in disgust, no (re the last CBA)? -- Patrick, Parkland.
A: Yes, the owners are having themselves a grand old time (except for perhaps the rare owner who loses a superstar, or one who is having to sweat out the LeBron James situation). And I have no doubts the players will seek a dramatic overhaul in the next round of negotiations on a collective-bargaining agreement. But I don't think "super teams" are done, just the salaries that star players will have to accept to keep such bands together. Other than NFL players putting up with shocking physical abuse on non-guaranteed contracts, no player in sports is playing at as much of a fiscal deficit these days as the tier of NBA players below the superstars.
Q: People are missing the issue that LeBron James rightfully should have with the fact that the Heat amnestied Mike Miller's contract. Yes, $17 million (or whatever the amount of tax they'd have paid) is a lot for Miller, but that's assuming the Heat were paying the tax for Miller. You could just as easily say that the contracts of LeBron, Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade were the reason the team was over the luxury-tax line, and if that's the case, aren't those three worth an extra $5.7 million each in tax payments per year? Heck, even an extra $17 million just for LeBron is worth it. Micky Arison should have considered it a "best player in the game" tax and paid up. -- Preston, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
A: Micky Arison hasn't had many missteps in his stewardship of the Heat, but that appears to have been one. Unless . . . unless he told James, Bosh and Wade ahead of time, "With the money we're paying you three, we may have to make a move like this and are you all on board with that?" If he did that, then it's another story.
Q: How come no team is copying the San Antonio Spurs? In the new CBA era, the Spurs have been to the NBA Finals two years in a row. They have no player making more than $11 million to $12 million a year. They seem to have figured it out before the rest of the pack, as usual. -- Stuart.
A: Because if it was a model so easy to follow, everyone would. First, it requires winning one draft lottery, building with David Robinson, then winning another, and landing Tim Duncan. Then it involves having the foresight to draft European prospects like Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili and having them arrive as ready-to-go prospects on below-market contracts. Then you have to find a team that allows you to turn George Hill into Kawhi Leonard. Yes, the Spurs' front office has done a remarkable job maximizing their possibilities, but sometimes good fortune goes a long way, as well. And let's be honest, I'm sure most NBA fans just over a month ago instead were asking: "Why can't our team do what the Heat did?"
July 6, 2014
Q: Ira, what about Bird Rights? Can't Micky Arison spend and then bring back his stars above the cap? -- Sandor.
A: No. When you use Bird Rights, you're not using cap space. Look, here's the simplest of math (to a degree oversimplified): A basic projection would have, using my best low-end guesses, LeBron James ($20 million), Chris Bosh ($16 million), Dwyane Wade ($13 million), Udonis Haslem ($2 million) and Shabazz Napier ($1 million) eating up $52 million (and you easily could argue more than that). Factor in the necessary cap holds to round out the salary cap (a required element), and that would bring the Heat up to $56 million in accounted-for space (and that's assuming the Heat could trade away Norris Cole's $2 million salary for a draft pick). That means the Heat would have about $7 million in cap space. Then, after using such space, you would have one additional $2.7 million salary-cap exception. That's it. So if you give that exception to Ray Allen, then you have to ask Chris Andersen to return at the veteran minimum (or vice versa). That's it. And everyone else on the roster gets the minimum salary, even if it means you might not have a true center or veteran point guard on the entire roster making above the minimum.
Q: Ira, is Pat Riley losing his touch, I see that he now has to bring Erik Spoelstra along? -- Tad.
A: First, you could make an argument that Spoelstra has become somewhat of a closer, based on the way he bonded last summer with Greg Oden and closed that deal. Plus Spoelstra is somewhat of an ace on the hole, the way he has been able to transform his team to best accommodate the skill sets of LeBron, Bosh and Wade. While Riley can only offer limited dollars because of the Heat's salary-cap situation, Spoelstra can offer possibilities to how a player might unlock skill sets and make the game more enjoyable. Spoelstra helped craft James into more of a multi-positional threat, helped Bosh take his game to the perimeter (which, for better or worse, is an approach Bosh has embraced) and allowed Wade to play freely while off the ball. Erik Spoelstra very much is a Heat selling point. Of course, money remains more of a selling point.
Q: Can Shabazz Napier become a starter? -- Allan.
A: Perhaps eventually. But I can't fathom a team in championship-contention mode, which I'm assuming will remain the Heat approach, starting a rookie, no matter where he might have been drafted. But I do like his maturity and believe he will find a way to contribute in his first year. But the Heat need to also carry a veteran, someone even with more experience than Cole. There are times when you need the right NBA play to be made, and done the veteran way.
July 5, 2014
Q: There is no question LeBron James is worthy of a max deal based on what he brings to the table every night. But my question is how can he say, "All I care about is winning. I just want win," in the exit interview and then demand max salary knowing with the CBA how prohibitive that is? Clearly, winning isn't all that matters to LeBron. I am a huge LeBron fan and do not want to see him leave, but this baffles me a little. Your thoughts? -- John.
A: My thought is no one knows what LeBron is thinking, because LeBron hasn't said what he's thinking. Instead, everyone is working through speculation, secondary sources and assumptions. When LeBron completes his deal, whenever he completes his deal, then we can assess it. It's like someone asking, "What did you think of LeBron's performance tomorrow night?" (Re-read that, you'll get the point.) You can't analyze his performance until he gives a performance, whether it's a game or a contract negotiation. Just as we assess his regular season and his postseason, we'll have ample time to assess his offseason . . . at the proper time.
Q: I don't see three to four players left in free agency that would put us over the top. What does Pat Riley see? Thanks. -- Scott, Los Angeles.
A: At this stage, he also does not see three or four players to put a team over the top. He already has those types of players. What he needs are three or four complementary players to help the players that will put the Heat over the top. And there are plenty of those still out there.
Q: How can the Heat not sign Spencer Hawes for five years, $23 million and the Clippers can? -- Dave.
A: Because Pat Riley saw better places to spend his money, perhaps didn't view Hawes as the same fit as the Clippers. In free agency, everything is in the eye of the beholder. You'll only know if the Heat lost out on Hawes when you first see where that money instead went.
July 4, 2014
Q: If Mike Miller were still on the roster, regardless of the NBA Finals outcome to this just-completed season, would we still be in wait mode with LeBron James? Is this mainly about that decision to amnesty a player he obviously wanted to keep? -- John.
A: The simplistic answer is yes. The reality is that if cap space or roster flexibility was the concern, as Pat Riley said, then the move could have been made this offseason. No, it was about a significant luxury-tax savings, a move made with shrewd business sense in the wake of Miller's limited health and contributions. Was it shortsighted? In hindsight, absolutely. And LeBron reminded us of it almost nightly when Dwyane Wade was unavailable. The Arisons have gone above and beyond in their ownership of the Heat, but just like LeBron can have an off night, in retrospect the trust gained by retaining Miller would have been beneficial. The best way for the Heat to make the tax-savings approach worthwhile would be for the Heat to turn the $2.2 million Joel Anthony trade exception into something tangible, where the Heat could tell LeBron, "See what the tax savings got us?" As it is, if the Heat work with cap space this offseason, the Anthony trade exception will vanish.
Q: How would Anthony Morrow be any sort of improvement over James Jones? I don't get that one at all. Great spot-up shooter, but hardly a dynamic player. I'm not one of these fans under the illusion that we can make a major splash with the big names, but give me Jameer Nelson, Marvin Williams and Vince Carter or Shawn Marion before bothering with Morrow. I don't get that one at all. -- Mike.
A: It's all in the eye of the beholder, whether it's Pat Riley or LeBron James. Look, even Erik Spoelstra seemed to have a different view of James Jones than LeBron did. So clearly, if there is interest, it's because Riley would envision it as an upgrade. Cap space is way too precious to the Heat for any move not to be a tangible upgrade.
Q: I don't understand why LeBron or Wade and Chris Bosh have been silent. Do they blame Pat Riley, the Arisons and Spo for the team coming up short? Is LeBron that angry? The Heat won the Eastern Conference finals. Why isn't our core vocal about getting to the next level? What other team has been more successful than the Miami Heat in recent times? I'm not enjoying this offseason yet. -- Chet.
A: Yet. Free-agency is like Fourth of July fireworks. They hardly look impressive while still in their cases. Plenty of time remains for the Heat to fire things up.
July 3, 2014
Q: Ira, Carmelo Anthony has been (or is going to be) everywhere but with the Heat. Now, Pau Gasol is looking elsewhere. Why can't the Heat get anything going? -- Ed.
A: Look, this is not Game 6 of the Spurs' series, where everything is continuing to careen out of control. This is free agency, a game played at its own pace, with plenty of twists and turns. Remember, it was four years and one week ago when the panic alarm was sounding amid word that Dwyane Wade would be leaving the Heat to sign with the Bulls. Except it never happened. On the other hand, just because a player is linked to the Heat doesn't mean the Heat prioritized the player. Marcin Gortat, for example, wasn't one that got away. The Heat simply never had a chance to get to him, with the Wizards closing the deal before the Heat could bid. And there is plenty of reason for outside executives to paint a portrait of a Heat breakup, especially when they're courting the same players as the Heat. "Sources" sometimes say the darndest things, especially when it's to their advantage.
Q: With the cap room the Heat have now, could they make a trade where they just accept players and salary equal to that cap space, where another team wants to move that salary off their books? -- Mike.
A: Absolutely. And that's a facet many have overlooked. The question is whether an outside team would help facilitate the Heat. Actually, they could have dealt for Omer Asik had the Rockets waited, and maybe they should have.
Q: How come there has been zero news on Chris Kaman? He can score, rebound, and averaged a block a game. I would take him on the Heat for cheap. He'll make our team even more 2003. -- Steve.
A: Does that mean they have to add Darko, also? Kaman is the type of name who is more an end-game name, when minimums are the order of the day. He did have more than a few shaky moments for the Lakers last season, which makes one wonder whether it was a matter of fit or slippage.
July 2, 2014
Q: Ira, do the Big Three each have a few different contract permutations in place, dependent upon who Pat Riley is able to land? -- Jason.
A: Absolutely. And they have to, for this reason: Too much in free agency is fluid to say you need "X" amount of money to close any particular deal or deals. Plus, the league is very, very careful when it comes to collusion. And the last thing you want to advertise is that you have prearranged deals already in place. It's just like at the trading deadline: The other side is always trying to get a little bit more. Can you imagine the outrage from any of the Big Three if they find out Riley came up short on a targeted free agent over a measly few thousand? And the last thing the Heat would want anyone to know is how much space they're actually working with, since many free-agent negotiations work along the lines of: "What do you want?" "Well, what do you got?" Riley has parameters. The final say still belongs to LeBron James, Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade.
Q: I'm confused. You list Norris Cole as the only Heat player under contract, but you say he might get traded. So is he staying? -- Henry.
A: He might. Or he might not. It depends, ultimately, who else is along for the ride. If it's Cole, Shabazz Napier and then a journeyman veteran like Luke Ridnour, then he might. But if it's Napier and Jameer Nelson (or, pie in the sky, Kyle Lowry), then the Heat might be better off cap-wise to add a journeyman veteran at the veteran minimum and move Cole to gain about $1.5 million against the cap. That, of course, is if the Heat wind up using cap space. If they're an "exceptions" team, then Cole is an asset worth keeping, if only for a trade. As it is, rookie center Justin Hamilton also is under contract, albeit with no guaranteed money until Aug. 1.
Q: Enough is enough. If reports are true that James wants a max deal and will only sign a one- or two-year deal, let him leave. It is obvious after four years he is not of the Heat culture. There was no discussion when those players got together. It was, "I am taking the max and you two can discuss how you want to divide the rest." What a friend. -- Ian, St. Petersburg.
A: No one knows how it went down, but I would not have an issue if that's the way it did. He's the best player on the team, has been the best for four years, and deserves anything and everything he can get for his services. And if short-term deals keep the feet of Riley and the Arisons to the fire, that's not such a bad thing, either. LeBron gives everything he has every night. The gives him a right to take anything he can get.
July 1, 2014
Q: I understand that the Magic waived Jameer Nelson. Does he have anything left in the tank? -- Joel.
A: Enough for the Heat to take a look, possibly when they're in Orlando this week for their summer camp and summer league. While Nelson's play has declined in recent years, he could provide a mentorship in quick-guard school to both Norris Cole and Shabazz Napier. Or, possibly, he could replace Cole's $2 million salary at a quarter of that cost should he be willing to come aboard at the veteran minimum. It also would allow the Heat to move beyond Mario Chalmers without as much concern. In many other instances, Nelson might not have been an answer. For a team seeking low-cost alternatives so salary-cap and luxury-tax funds can be spent elsewhere, Nelson could have his merits. The Heat bypassed him when they drafted Dorell Wright, now they can make good a decade later.
Q: A big problem for the Heat last season was having somebody on the floor that could create his own offense when LeBron James was on the bench and Dwyane Wade was out. Bringing in Marvin Williams, Trevor Ariza and Rodney Stuckey does not solve that issue. Your thoughts? -- Patrick, Miami.
A: I agree, which is why I'm not as high on Ariza for the Heat, at his price point, as others. Yes, there would be a defensive upgrade, but it's not as if Ariza has been a stand-alone scorer. Perhaps Shabazz Napier can handle some of the off-the-dribble scoring. And I do think Stuckey might be able to offer some of that. But the Heat do need more than shooters to round out their perimeter scoring.
Q: Can the $2.2 million trade exception we have from the Joel Anthony trade be combined with Norris Cole to bring in someone at the $4 million price range? -- Andre, Miami.
A: No. Exceptions cannot be aggregated (although the mid-level can be broken into smaller increments for multiple players). Basically, if the Heat opt to utilize exceptions, it would be one exception per player.
June 30, 2014
Q: Why not sign Carmelo Anthony instead of Dwyane Wade? I know that is a cold-hearted thing to do, but Melo is the better player now. I know Riley's loyalty to Wade would not allow this to happen, but just a thought. -- Ian, St. Petersburg.
A: The pat answer to these types of questions long has been: Because no one will ever trust Pat Riley and the Heat again if they make such a move. For one, I think if players want their money, and desire a location, they're quick to forget about history. Remember, plenty of players signed to play for the Clippers after plenty about Donald Sterling was public knowledge. This reality is that the Heat have operated more as a partnership than a hierarchy these past few years. Wade has enabled Riley as much as Riley has enabled Wade. Pardon the cliche, but for better or worse, they're in this together. That doesn't mean that LeBron James, Wade or Chris Bosh couldn't be lured elsewhere. It just means that Riley and the Arisons are not going to pull any end runs. It's not who they are or how they operate.
Q: Ira, will Pat wait for possible amnesty players, too. -- Trader.
A: The amnesty week does not end until the third week in July, so that might be too long to wait. Plus, the Bulls, Spurs, Thunder, Hawks, Celtics and Grizzlies are the only teams still in position to utilize the one-time amnesty provision. So we're not really talking about many possibilities beyond, say, Carlos Boozer and Kendrick Perkins, with only 10 players still amnesty eligible. And remember, there then is a waiver bidding period, with the Heat unlikely to have the funds at that point to make a claim.
Q: Are Marvin Williams and Trevor Ariza really going to make this team that much better? -- Jeffrey.
A: This team has been to four consecutive NBA Finals. It doesn't need to get "that much better." What it needs is enough quality depth to alleviate concerns by LeBron and others of being run into the ground during the regular season, and the Heat being out of quality options deep in the playoffs.
June 29, 2014
Q: Ira, I understand Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh and Udonis Haslem being comfortable enough to commit themselves to the Heat. But that's not the impression I had of LeBron James at the end of the season. Why is everyone so sure he's staying? -- Tony.
A: Because I can't fathom him looking Dwyane and Chris in the eye, encouraging them to opt out, and then relaying a similar message to Udonis . . . only to then walk out on the three. To me, it would be unfathomable. Everyone -- including Pat Riley drafting Shabazz Napier -- did everything for LeBron this past week. Even Napier received a Twitter vote of confidence from LeBron both before and after the draft. LeBron has gone miles to rehabilitate his reputation, has stood front and center in Erik Spoelstra's "Band of Brothers" approach. It would be one thing if he acted independently, with the perfect right to then move on independently. Instead, between vacationing with Ray Allen and James Jones, meeting with his fellow Heat stars, and making a pointed statement about the Heat's draft, he has made himself a co-pilot with Pat Riley in the Heat's offseason. These coming days, and perhaps even weeks, will be filled with drama, but if LeBron James truly is a different person than the one who sat for "The Decision" in July 2010, then this decision is done. Too many have followed his lead in recent days for him to then up and lead elsewhere.
Q: How many premium players might the Heat add with the free $8 million to $10 million they now could have? Will they still have their exceptions (mid-level, mini mid-level, etc.)? -- Brian.
A: They will have their cap space, plus one $2.7 million cap-space exception, with everyone else having to fill in at the minimum, beyond Napier's rookie-scale deal. Basically, expect one significant component to be added, with the Heat then deciding whether that $2.7 million will go to another outsider, or whether it would be used to lure back Ray Allen or Chris Andersen. And I still think there's a chance Norris Cole is moved to create even more space, especially if Kyle Lowry is the free agent added.
Q: I know hindsight is 20/20. But the Big Three opt-ting out really makes getting that extra year for all of them via sign-and-trade back in 2010 a waste. We gave up multiple picks to the Cavs and Raptors, all for nothing. I understand that in the moment, getting the Big Three was pie in the sky and we were gonna do whatever it took. But those picks could have really helped fill voids now and in the future. Nothing replaces young talent at a relatively cheap price, which is what you get with a lot of first-round picks. Just wanted to hear your thoughts. Love the work you do! -- Jason.
A: What it did was allow LeBron and Bosh to work with higher starting salaries, as well as affording long-term security in case of a major injury. But as you surmised, it all was about giving up whatever was needed to get the job done. Just as it was comical back in 2004 when Heat fans were debating whether Caron Butler should be thrown into the Shaquille O'Neal deal . . . would you really have allowed the entire Big Three thing to be aborted over a few middling draft picks? It was the price of thinking outside the box.
June 28, 2014
Q: Ira, I see the Kyle Lowry to the Heat as a done deal was B.S. But the Norris Cole stuff seems to have legs. Does he go if they get another point guard? -- Karl.
A: If the Heat do make a move for Lowry, which certainly will be a consideration when free agency opens Tuesday, it would be a gambit that could come down to the type of salary cap space (if any) the Heat can clear. In that case, clearing Cole's space might be a factor. But remember, the Heat would have to find a landing spot for Cole, and don't have much, if anything, left to sweeten deals. With Shabazz Napier a keeper, I would doubt the Heat would want anything more than a minimum-salary point guard to round out such an equation alongside Lowry. But as became clear Friday, Lowry at the moment is more of an abstract than reality. So Napier, Cole and a minimum-scale veteran (Luke Ridnour) could be where it might wind up. For the Heat, it's all about A-list talent at this stage, with all the other pieces to be addressed afterward.
Q: Hello, Ira. Judging from highlight reels on YouTube, it seems like Shabazz is a shoot-first point guard. Am I wrong? How does that fit with the Heat? -- Jason.
A: As with everyone who jumps aboard, it's about making it fit. But there have been plenty of times, especially when Dwyane Wade sits, when it has been LeBron or bust with end-of-clock offense. Napier, with his creativity, should come in hand in those situations. And his ability to create his own shots should allow teammates to operate in space. As with everything handed to Erik Spoelstra, it's all about finding the right Napier game that meshes with the Big Three game (assuming everyone stays).
Q: It was a surprising deal with Michael Jordan helping Pat Riley get Napier. I guess that jersey in the rafters was good for something, after all. -- Shep.
A: You kidding, after the Hornets helped facilitate the Napier trade, the Jordan jersey is now going alongside the championship banners at AmericanAirlines Arena.
June 27, 2014
Q: Pat Riley, knowing Shabazz Napier is a player LeBron James wanted, traded for him to let LeBron know he would do "whatever it takes" to build a team that suits LeBron. Frankly, I don't see Shabazz as a difference-maker (although who knows?). However, this sends LeBron a signal. Hopefully LeBron re-signs at a good price, so that Riles can get the real pieces in free agency. -- David.
A: Look, if all it took to appease LeBron was moving up two spots in the 20s of the draft and giving up a pair of second-rounders, then it was a sound investment. That doesn't mean players taken later couldn't possibly amount to more, even next season. But the remake of the Heat is about far more than which player was selected Thursday. If the Heat are who they think they are, then there will be at least five players more significant to next season's team than Napier, and possibly even more. But unlike many draft prospects, Napier arrives at the top of his game. He is what he is after four seasons at UConn. At the least, that's a winner.
Q: Well the Heat got the guy that LeBron James wanted. So, by logic, it would seem the LeBron James will re-sign with Miami. -- Martin.
A: If only it were that simple, Far more significant is what Chris Bosh, Dwyane Wade, and possibly even Udonis Haslem do with their contracts. For that matter, whatever veterans Riley can deliver in free agency will impact LeBron's approach far more than what transpired Thursday.
Q: Does drafting Napier mean Kyle Lowry is not option? -- Jeffrey.
A: No, it means the Heat's makeover at point guard merely has begun. It likely spells the end for Mario Chalmers with the Heat, and could possibly put Norris Cole's future with the team in doubt, since a veteran at the veteran minimum in place of Cole could save that Heat about $1.5 million against the cap.
June 26, 2014
Q: Ira, who's running the Heat, LeBron James or Pat Riley? LeBron has a high basketball IQ, but isn't it better to leave the basketball operation to Riley? -- Theo.
A: The Heat don't exactly have that choice at the moment, with LeBron clearly setting some ground rules for what he wants done. But the danger in resetting the team from LeBron's standpoint is that if he does re-sign, he likely still could return to free agency soon enough. And then the Heat could wind up like the Cavaliers, who eventually had a bunch of hand-picked LeBron choices and no LeBron, left wondering what to do with the likes of Antawn Jamison. The key is for Riley to finesse the situation to make LeBron feel like his suggestions carry weight. I think Pat Riley would be comfortable in telling LeBron that he tried for Carmelo Anthony but just couldn't make it happen. Just like when LeBron breaks the offense and runs his own play, sometimes Erik Spoelstra knows he has to smile and move on. So Riley likely will have to meet LeBron half way, allow LeBron to set the agenda, but then decide when to break off the play to the Heat's overall benefit.
Q: You've been talking for years about Samuel Dalembert commuting from his Boca home. If he's waived by the Knicks, could the Heat do it then? -- Baker.
A: Basically, a bunch of players with contracts that are only partially guaranteed or not guaranteed at all for next season will be part of trades either at the draft or during the early stages of free agency. Those are the type of bargains Riley could capitalize on, with John Salmons likely also to be in that group, as well. But I still would take a re-signed Chris Andersen over Dalembert. There is a reason Sam has bounced between so many teams.
Q: Ira, I like that the Heat worked out 40 players before the draft. That's almost as many as are in the entire draft. It tells me they plan to sign players who go undrafted. -- Wil.
A: Exactly. And if the players the Heat want aren't available when the Heat select, then it wouldn't surprising me if they dump their picks and load up with prospects for their summer camp that begins next week.
June 25, 2014
Q: In the spirit if overanalyzing all news, can we speculate that Ray Allen would not be leaning on returning unless LeBron James was going to stay? After all, they just went on vacation together. -- D.S.
A: At this time of year, you can speculate on anything, considering the free-agency signing period does not begin until July 1. But while Allen has made it clear that he wants to play alongside LeBron, that does not necessarily mean it has to be in Miami. The thing is, several of LeBron's Heat teammates, including James Jones, who also vacationed with LeBron last week, and even Chris Andersen, seemingly would prefer South Florida. So LeBron basically could have most of his band back, plus one or two prime additions, if Miami remains home. LeBron values locker-room cameraderie, especially what he has had these past four years. What Pat Riley has to convince LeBron (and therefore Ray, as well), is that there is a possibility for a more complete and well-rounded roster with the Heat. As I've writte, this is all about a series of dominoes that could fall into place, with Allen being one of them.
Q: Any chance of the Heat trading a first rounder for Iman Shumpert and still buying their way into the first round for some young talent? -- David.
A: Based on LeBron opting out, and therefore his desire for the Heat to work with cap space this offseason, not only don't I see the Heat trading for the locked-in salary of a veteran, but I could see Pat Riley either trading his pick or selecting a player who would spend 2014-15 overseas, in order to avoid being locked into a guaranteed salary for a first-round pick. An argument could be made that trading into the second round would make more sense, since those contracts are not guaranteed.
Q: This is one Heat fan that is chillin'. I fully expected LeBron to opt out. I expect Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh to do the same. I consider most of the stuff going on "white noise." When I hear final decisions made, I'll worry about it then. I believe LeBron will sign a two-year deal with an opt-out again after next season. Obviously, that's if he likes Pat Riley's game plan going forward. I believe that decision gives LeBron the most flexibility and options going forward, which I believe is his ultimate goal in this process. It gives him another year to see how it goes, how Wade's health holds up, and how the pieces Riley brings in work out. -- Bob.
A: So the sky isn't falling? (I've been locked inside my office, so I haven't been able to check.)
June 24, 2014
Q: My initial reaction to news that the Knicks were shopping Iman Shumpert for a late first-round pick was that it has Pat Riley written all over it! I got the following impressions from Riley's press conference the other day (among other things): 1. He's, as usual, not that committed to drafting a very young guy, but rather wants to replace old experience with younger experience. 2. And he wants Erik Spoelstra to get back to Heat basketball, gritty defense, etc. Shumpert is the quintessential Riley-type: He's cheap, and he's available for a draft pick (which Riley is historically loath to use). What are your thoughts? -- Mike.
A: That the Heat have to decide whether they want to maximize potential cap space during free agency, or find enough pieces to make one more run with LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh at high salaries. Considering LeBron has until June 30 for his early-termination option, he essentially would have to sign off on such a deal in advance. Shumpert is due $2.6 million next season, as his rookie-scale contract comes to a close. And there are ongoing health issues there. But, yes, I agree that there would be more instant gratification there than with the No. 26 draft pick. Plus, it would be interesting to see if you could stack Shumpert and Norris Cole on top of each other.
Q: When Riley talks to Carmelo Anthony and opens his bag of rings (now fuller by two) on the table, do you think that will work? Heck, may as well put the Heat's five conference champion trophies on the table, too. If Melo is serious about winning, I don't see how he would turn down the Heat. -- Terrence, Tampa Bay.
A: This has nothing to do with a Pat Riley pitch. This has everything to do with a LeBron James pitch. The only reason Anthony became a Heat possibility was because of the LeBron-Carmelo connection. Pat Riley likely would be informed after the fact whether it's happening.
Q: Dear Ira, Chris Bosh is a diva who practices shooting in the game. -- Aurora, Philippines.
A: Actually, Chris Bosh is the furthest thing from a diva, arguably one of the hardest-working players with the Heat. A diva would not allow a coaching staff and a system to totally reinvent his game. He is a team player willing to put aside his ego for the greater good. He is the absolute opposite of a diva.
June 23, 2014
Q: Is there any possibility that Carmelo Anthony could talk to LeBron James about taking a pay cut so he could join him in Miami? -- Jorden.
A: This is where the NBA's tamper-free zone falls apart, this period between now and the supposed July 1 start of the free-agency negotiating period. While Pat Riley can't text, email or call Carmelo, there is nothing to stop his players from actively recruiting. For that matter, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh are represented by the same agency as Carmelo, so it's not as if the respective agents can't hash out all the numbers. Not only "could" LeBron talk to Carmelo before James' June 30 early-termination deadline, he absolutely has to, for both his sake and the potential benefit to the Heat. With this much at stake, it would be practically irresponsible for LeBron, Wade and Bosh not to drop in unexpectedly on Carmelo. Team recruiting begins July 1. Player recruiting begins . . . now.
Q: Do you expect D-Wade to opt out? -- Brian.
A: Yes, to work out a deal that works for both him and the Heat . . . but only if he is sure that any money reworked will ease the burden on all of the Big Three. I believe the Heat's stars would give up money for the right player. I also believe they, and not Pat Riley, will decide who that player should be. I'm not sure they're giving up anything of consequence for Spencer Hawes and Marvin Williams, or anyone else of that tier.
Q: If Wade and Bosh don't opt out then trade their [adjective and bad word]. -- Tyler.
A: Which is why is makes sense for them to opt out, so they can control their own destinies. As free agents, they cannot be dealt. And if they re-sign, there would be an extended period before they could be traded. But you also don't blow up a team that has gone to four consecutive NBA Finals. That's where Riley's "get a grip" urging comes into play. There is an end game that can work for the Big Three, for Riley, and for the Heat. That's what these upcoming days and weeks are about.
June 22, 2014
Q: Ira, with all the talk about Dwyane Wade having to "reinvent" himself, what about Chris Bosh? If Wade cannot put up big numbers every night or be that "1A" option, I think it's time Bosh concentrated on getting back in the paint and scoring more. He certainly has the talent. -- Harold, Wellington.
A: First, the Heat and Wade have to decide next season's approach. Will Wade again miss a third of the schedule, once again either start or not play at all? Or can he gracefully move into a sixth-man role, where his routine absences would not have as much overall impact? Much of that, of course, is up to Dwyane, but a lot of it has to do with what replacement options become available on the free-agent market. Also, if Wade does slide into such a sixth-man role, then how would Ray Allen fit into the mix? Does Wade have enough quickness left to play as a reserve point guard (which, of course, the Heat also might already have in Norris Cole). It is a complex lineup puzzle that starts with Wade. Only then can the remainder of the pieces fall into place, including Bosh's role in the hierarchy.
Q: I'm still numb from the thumping I witnessed in the last three games of the Finals and have been reading articles on the debacle. Now that Pat Riley has told Erik Spoelstra to reinvent himself, will Spo have his "LeBron James/Mavs" renaissance summer? And if so, what changes do you think we'll see next season? (I'm hoping less small-ball and a stable substitution pattern is on the list.) -- Larry.
A: To Erik's credit, he has evolved every season, not just after that 2011 NBA Finals flop against the Mavericks. He certainly has kept the Pacers on edge these past three seasons. Mostly, what he has done is play to the strengths of his rosters. He certainly would have played bigger this season if Greg Oden had panned out, and he assuredly would have played deeper if Michael Beasley had inspired more confidence. So, to a degree, it also comes down to what Riley provides him. Only then can he formulate a strategy.
Q: Isn't it weird LeBron went on vacation with James Jones and Ray Allen, and not Wade and Bosh? Don't you find this odd? -- Layla.
A: No. Don't overstate the friendships with Wade and Bosh as the ultimate factor in LeBron's decision. He grew close to several member of this season's roster.
June 21, 2014
Q: Pat Riley's new criticisms of Erik Spoelstra's defensive strategies bring a couple questions to mind: If Riley really felt the strategy was so bad, why didn't he order a change much earlier in the season? I mean any general manager, if he sees a problem with the approach, he makes a change in format. He does not wait until it's too late. Or perhaps Riley did have such a discussion and Spoelstra ignored it? -- Martin.
A: I don't think Riley ever gets involved to the point where he dictates strategy or the rotation, which is why it was surprising in Washington when it was Riley who said Greg Oden would be activated that night. Also, I'm not sure how simple it would be in midstream, with a roster constructed with Spoelstra's approach in mind, for such a dramatic change. This is all about playing the result. If there was another championship, or at least a stronger showing against the Spurs, then nothing would have been said, and "disruptive" would have again carried the day.
Q: Ira, could the Heat potentially trade Dwyane Wade to a talent-starved team and free up the cap space to sign the likes of Carmelo Anthony or upgrade the roster? -- Luis.
A: Wade, Chris Bosh, or, for that matter, LeBron James cannot be dealt until they bypass their early-termination options (you cannot trade an impending free agent). And considering the lengths the Heat supposedly have gone to keep co-captain Udonis Haslem with the team, I can't fathom any scenario where Wade is moved without his consent, -- Luis.
Q: Did you hear the latest rumor? It's bad news for us Heat fans. Kevin Love to Golden State for Klay Thompson, David Lee and a first-round draft choice. Is there any doubt whatsoever that the Warriors are angling to get LeBron James after next season? Since Andrew Bogut comes off their books at the end of next year, all they have to do is find someone to take Andre Iguodala off their hands, and Golden State can offer LeBron a max contract, and pair him with Steph Curry and Kevin Love. I don't think LeBron could handpick a better pair to join (young pieces who fit), and to do it in a great city with a great fan base, and a new arena on the horizon. -- Richard.
A: This, Heat fans, is what you'll be dealing with this week, this month, this summer, and (should LeBron continue on a year-to-year basis with the Heat) for months to come. If it's not rumors, it's reports of LeBron and Micky Arison have a slap fight while dining on Whoppers. Ah, welcome to the Summer (and possibly longer) of LeBron.
June 20, 2014
Q: I thought Pat Riley's tone Thursday was kind of paternal, like a father defending his children, but also challenging them and not being one iota scared of what they might have to say about it. Like, "This is the way it's gonna be and if you don't like it you can leave, but you'd be stupid to." I don't recall ever seeing Riley like this. It was clear he had pent up these feelings for a while. He knew exactly what he was going to say and how to answer every question. And yeah, he was pissed. I think his aim was to quash any seed of thought LeBron might have about leaving. And, to me, this is what has set Riley apart from LeBron's former team and probably any other team in the league: Riley has the [nerve] to tell LeBron how it's going to be and he has the "street cred" with what to back it up. LeBron respects him probably more than anyone in the league. -- Moshe.
A: He better. Because otherwise, it's a heck of a gambit by Riley. If LeBron stays (which I believe he will), Riley's position with the team will never be stronger. But if it didn't work and LeBron leaves, it's a heck of a lot more than an error in judgment. It's the end of an era as we know it. I also think it comes down to this: Riley would not be long for the Heat if LeBron leaves. I just don't think Riley would want to have to lead another major rebuild (just like he stepped aside coaching after the 15-67 season). So I think Thursday was Riley saying, "I still want to lead, and I still want to lead you, but you have to commit to my trust." So now we wait to see if an exhale can follow.
Q: I think if the Big Three opt out and re-sign for less money, the financial sacrifices should not be solely on the players. Great players like Carmelo Anthony are available and Micky Arison has to be willing to sacrifice as well, even if it means going over the tax. We need to take advantage of having the greatest player in the game by surrounding him with the best talent possible. If not, I fear the Heat organization will regret it. -- Mike, West Palm Beach.
A: I think it's important to clarify something here: If the Heat add another free agent to the current Big Three, it will be via cap space. And the only way to do that is to fall completely out of the tax. So if it is a Big Three-plus one approach in free agency (with Carmelo or Kyle Lowry or Pau Gasol), then the Heat will not be a tax team at all. The real question is if the Big Three return and the Heat add another player at the taxpayer mid-level and utilize their trade exceptions, would Arison then go deep, deep, deep into the tax with raises for Chris Andersen, Ray Allen, Rashard Lewis and perhaps even James Jones and Mario Chalmers, for services rendered during a pair of championships seasons?
Q: Hi Ira, why would the Heat trade away picks to Cleveland and Toronto to be able to sign LeBron James and Chris Bosh to longer deals when they can just opt out and renegotiate? Can you please explain the logic? -- Brian, Tallahassee.
A: Because it allowed James and Bosh to get higher starting salaries. But you logic is sobering. For example, consider this harrowing possibility: If LeBron signs with the Cavaliers (not saying it's going to happen, just offering a hypothetical), the Cavaliers would still get the 2015 first-round pick the Heat owe them for the LeBron sign-and-trade deal from 2010. And without LeBron, the Heat's 2015 pick could have value. Talk about your ironies.
June 19, 2014
Q: Was it a mistake to use the amnesty provision on Mike Miller? Setting aside whether he could have helped against the Spurs, having the option to amnesty Dwyane Wade would have given the Heat more financial flexibility, or at least leverage in getting him to accept a pay cut. -- David.
A: Amnestying Wade would not have been realistic had the Miller move been bypassed, especially this summer, since you're still paying out the full salary, the $42 million he is due the next two seasons. That's a lot to pay a player not to play, especially when he could come back to play against you. And it's not as if Wade still isn't a quality contributor, certainly nothing less than Manu Ginobili, at minimum. Getting beyond salary, the question is Wade's role going forward. It's not as if he wasn't essential in getting past the Pacers. And it's not as if he's not essential to the Heat going forward. Sometimes we get too caught up in the money. Dwyane Wade is a very good NBA player who had a not-so-good two weeks against the Spurs. But keeping Miller would have made it easier on LeBron James and the rest of the roster on those nights when Wade wasn't available during the regular season. In the end, amnestying Miller might have been penny-foolish, since it gets LeBron to wonder about franchise frugality going forward. Remember, just a year ago, it was Pat Riley was who raving about how essential Miller was to the franchise. And for those late to the game, amnesty is a one-time allowance, which the Heat used last July on Miller. So it no longer is an option for the Heat with any player. What amnesty does (or in this case, did) is wipe out the salary-cap and luxury-tax hit, but you still must pay out the full salary to the player, minus a portion of what he might sign for elsewhere. Also, that player cannot return until his amnestied contract expires. Since Miller had two seasons on his Heat deal when amnestied last July, he cannot return to the Heat under any means until July 2015, at the earliest.
Q: Despite non-stop speculation about what LeBron is going to do, there is one scenario no one has mentioned: accepting a drastically lower salary, like $5 million or $10 million per year. Sort of like Mark Zuckerberg working for $1. LeBron has made hundreds of millions in salary, endorsements and his stake in Beats. -- D.S.
A: First, he'd run into plenty of resistance from his fellow players and the union, since it could pressure other stars to minimize their deals. It's one thing to step away from the maximum salary, another to be earning Spencer Hawes money. And for others who have asked, getting a piece of the team, any team, also is not allowed. It's interesting how after making the NBA Finals four consecutive years that so many are asking (demanding) Heat pay cuts. Based on the groundswell, Wade apparently is lucky he got paid at all after that 15-67 season.
Q: The Spurs lucked out with Tim Duncan, but since then they have not chased marquee names. Gregg Popovich values players with heart who accept his iron-fist rule of team play. He is similar to John Wooden who insisted his teams follow a strict team protocol, where individual success was not important, but effort was. The teams the Spurs easily beat had players with egos who thought the team revolved around them. -- Leonard, Aventura.
A: Look, it takes a certain type of player who willingly stays long-term in San Antonio, with no disrespect to the small-market atmosphere. So perhaps it goes hand in hand that a player who chooses to put roots down with the Spurs is the type of player with limited ego.
June 18, 2014
Q: Ira, you could tell from Tuesday that Chris Bosh loves it here. I'm not worried about him. I am worried about LeBron James and Dwyane Wade. LeBron didn't sound committed, and Wade went into hiding. -- Sid.
A: Tuesday was just rhetoric, although it sure seemed like if Pat Riley walked into the room, Chris would have signed on the dotted line right there and then. LeBron is different. He wants assurances that he will have a livelier supporting cast next summer, and the best way to do that is to hold Riley to the fire, and probably opt out just to make the Heat sweat, and work on upgrades. As for Dwyane, I think the Finals left him with questions that even he can't answer. The best answer might have been the candor of that his body simply let him down. That's at least a place you could go to work from. But there is no mandate a player participate in the postseason media session, and several other Heat players bypassed the interviews, as well. But you're right, it doesn't look good when LeBron and Bosh face the fire, and Wade is a no-show.
Q: Does Wade go from loved to hated if he doesn't rework his contract? -- Robert.
A: I've heard a lot of that, and that's just silly. At worst, Wade will be at the same place Dan Marino was at the end of his career, when Dolphins fans called for a replacement. And while it didn't end well for Marino, he remains a South Florida icon, one with his jersey hanging at AmericanAirlines Arena. Dwyane Wade's South Florida legacy is secure. And the only ones who should vilify him are the ones who walk into their own offices and tell their bosses to please take some of their salary back so potential replacement can be hired.
Q: Is Greg Oden coming back? -- Wilson.
A: I don't think so. I'm not sure the Heat believe he can work in their style, and I'm not sure Greg wants to go through another season stuck at the end of the bench. Erik Spoelstra's testimonial Tuesday was a lot more about praising Oden for the effort he made to return, rather than the efforts Oden made on the court. The reality is the Heat likely would be benefit more with Cole Aldrich next season than Oden.
June 17, 2014
Q: There needs to be a substantial overhaul of the Heat roster. Every position needs big improvement. They need to get younger. -- Erikk.
A: The Heat are in no position for substantial overhaul if LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh all return. That can't happen. What can happen is the three agree to opt out and then decide what outside players would be worthy of bringing in at a sacrifice of their own salaries. Essentially, it would be the Big Three in a room with Andy Elisburg's calculator trying to make the math work. For Carmelo Anthony, they might sacrifice a bunch. For Luol Deng, perhaps not so much. But there is little realistic possibility of them sacrificing for several smaller pieces. An overhaul would likely mean no more Big Three. James, Wade and Bosh hold all the cards, including how the roster is reshaped. And even then, it still will require efficient and effective veterans at the minimum salary.
Q: I have owned a piece of Heat season tickets since 1990 and have followed the NBA since 1960. This Heat team of the last four years has been a remarkable team. Under incredible scrutiny, LeBron always displayed class and he showed up every night to play, even those mid-winter games in Milwaukee. To make the NBA Finals four years running is an achievement worth remembering. This year the streak ended against an incredible team that was motivated by last year's loss. Given the record for futility of other professional teams in South Florida, we should celebrate this team, the coaching staff and management, and hope that Pat Riley figures out how to evolve to face new challenges next year. -- Bob, North Palm Beach.
A: Well said. And worth saying. It has been exhilarating, exhausting, excruciating, but, ultimately, enjoyable. And it's not as if it's over yet. Eastern Conference champion might not have been the consolation prize sought, but it sure beats those 15-67 seasons.
Q: Am I the only one missing Joel Anthony after watching the terrible defense this season? -- Mike, Weston.
A: Yes.
June 16, 2014
Q: Same strategy; same results. Even you have to admit this series was not a good one for Erik Spoelstra. Yes the Spurs were better in every way, but the "Heat way" of doing things was exposed. -- Mack.
A: I honestly think with Chris Andersen a step slow, still clearly bothered by that thigh bruise sustained against the Pacers, with Dwyane Wade a shell of what he was the previous round, there wasn't much more Erik could have done, other than try to get the very best out of LeBron. He adjusted constantly in the series, perhaps even too much. But to give up on a system that helped you motor through the previous rounds would have been foolish at the outset of the Finals. And you could also see that he did not have as many quality pieces at his disposal as Gregg Popovich. Spoelstra eventually recognized he did not have a point guard, at all. And James Jones, Udonis Haslem, Michael Beasley only get you so far at this level.
Q: The Miami Heat spent their entire season in fourth or fifth gear and when it came time to flip that switch to get to the next gear, they didn't have it. Just as you have been saying for four seasons, playing the "we can flip the switch when we want" card is a dangerous game. -- George, Toronto.
A: And yet with the volume of games they have played these past four years, and with Dwyane Wade's iffy knees, who's to say that if they pushed hard throughout they even would have made these four Finals? Popovich didn't push too hard either, he just had more quality pieces at his disposal.
Q: Assuming the core of the team comes back, and a few pieces are added, do you see Erik Spoelstra adjusting to a more conservative approach defensively? The current system, while effective, is demanding and clearly takes a lot of effort and commitment. -- Daniel, North Palm Beach.
A: I think he will adjust based on his system. Without a big-minutes shot blocker, playing disruptive gave this team the best chance. I think players just lost the passion for the system along the way, or grew too fatigued, perhaps as much mentally as physically.
June 15, 2014
Q: Ira, isn't this series a defeat for Pat Riley vs. R.C. Buford more than Erik Spoelstra vs. Gregg Popovich? Riley just hasn't gotten the blame for failing to put the pieces together for LeBron James, even with the financial restrictions. He has always taken the easy way out and not taken the time to develop and scout like the Spurs. "Just go buy me some superstars and if it doesn't work, destroy the team and try again." -- Howard, Palm City.
A: Look, at times like these I can appreciate the frustrations. But Riley first put together the Big Three, then added pieces like Shane Battier, Norris Cole, Ray Allen and Chris Andersen that helped produce consecutive championships, something the Spurs have never had and won't even if they finish off this series. The difference is when Riley got his prime lottery shot, he wound up with Michael Beasley; when Buford and the Spurs got their prime lottery shot, they landed Tim Duncan (after David Robinson). An argument could be made that with more youth and less experience, the Heat never would have been able to get LeBron those first two titles. And if not for Riley's veteran bent, and the moves for Antoine Walker, Jason Williams and Gary Payton, there likely wouldn't have been the 2006 title, either. Riley and Buford succeed in different ways. But they both succeed.
Q: I had the Spurs in seven. My expectations for the series were that the Spurs were simply the better, deeper team, playing better than the Heat. So losing the series won't be the end of the world. I'll gladly take another four years in the Finals with two more championships. But in these last two games, the lack of focus, intensity, urgency and whatever other adjective you want to use has been stunning. How to explain this? That is the disappointment here, not so much that we lost, but the way we are losing. -- Bob.
A: I agree. It is one thing to go down with a fight. It is another to leave this type of aftertaste. Pride should resonate more than it has these past two games. In Game 5, every play has to matter for the Heat. There can't be anything loose, lazy, loafing. That's where reputations are sullied, not by the final score alone.
Q: So the quest for redemption may actually be a stronger motivation than the quest to three-peat. You can tell Spurs want this bad, the way their coach prepared for this series (or this season for that matter) and the way the players have executed. -- Neil, Manila.
A: Sort of like the hunger the Heat displayed coming off the 2011 loss in the Finals to the Mavericks. Now the question is whether the humiliation and embarrassment of Games 3 and 4 are enough to inspire the Heat in time for Game 5, or whether such disappointment first must burn for an entire offseason.
June 14, 2014
Q: Here's to the Heat Big Three somehow finding a way to three-peat and then Dwyane Wade saying, "I've had an amazing career, but my knees are shot and it's time to retire." The Next Big Three: LeBron James, Chris Bosh, Carmelo Anthony. -- Shep, Washington, D.C.
A: Dwyane Wade is not leaving $42 million on the table. There's "sacrifice", then there's $42 million of sacrifice. Loyalty has its limits. And Dwyane Wade in the right role still has significant value. But that also means coming to grips with where he stands, what he can do, and what he no longer can afford to try to do. Look, at times this postseason Wade has been brilliant. But when the shine is off, such as Thursday's Game 4, the luster is completely gone. There no longer is a "1" and "1A" dynamic with Wade and LeBron. There can't be. But the issue in this series is there is too much standing still on offense, waiting for LeBron or Wade for a bail-out shot. That doesn't work against the Spurs. And once they Heat get too passive on offense, they wind up less sharp on defense.
Q: If somehow the Heat can obtain Carmelo Anthony as the Heat's Big Three take pay compromises, and if LeBron and Wade took turns defending point guards, then the opposing team would be forced to use their point guard to guard Wade and the two-guard has to guard James or Carmelo. Mismatches all over. Of course, Wade can only be counted on for half the games. But it's a nice luxury if that happened. In all reality, a case can be argued Heat need a Carmelo Anthony more so than they need a Chris Bosh. -- Martin.
A: Totally disagree on the last point. Bosh has bought in to the Heat's approach and sacrifices. With any outside player, you don't know if that would happen until it happens. In fact, for all the Anthony conjecture, an argument could be made that what the Heat really need is size, and a point guard. Put it this way, if Joakim Noah or Chris Paul were free agents, that would make more sense for salary sacrifice than adding Anthony. As I wrote previously, if you're suggesting essentially an Anthony-Bosh trade, it would leave the Heat at a net deficit. Of course, we could first get through the NBA Finals, a level Bosh has helped lift the Heat the past four years, before worrying about free-agency permutations.
Q: Is there any chance of a Mike Miller return next season? Will there be any interest from either side? -- Bruce, Deerfield Beach.
A: Under amnesty-release rules, the Heat cannot reacquire Miller, through any means, until the contract they amnestied expires. Miller's Heat contract runs through next season, with the Heat still paying off that contract (even though it no longer counts against the Heat's cap or tax).
June 13, 2014
Q: Another embarrassing home loss. Aside from the lack of effort, hustle, and heart throughout the game, the lack of movement on the offensive end, and the inability to get a stop or defend, yet another issue compounding their problems is the coaching. I have never really criticized Erik Spoelstra before, but knowing that the point guards are giving you nothing, why is he playing both with another guard several times throughout the game? And they were getting killed on the boards and on second-chance points, and he waits until the fourth quarter to finally bring in Udonis Haslem? Terrible. -- Myles.
A: And yet for all the cogent points you make, if LeBron James starts off that passive, and if Dwyane Wade plays that poorly, then really there's not much else that matters. The Spurs are a different team with a different system, where it's all for one, and one for all. The Heat are a star system, where their stars have to be at their best at the biggest moments. LeBron was not nearly LeBron-ish enough Thursday, and Dwyane Wade was terrible, after months of prepping for this moment. Three games in five nights left Dwyane without any lift or explosion. I don't think Erik Spoelstra or Phil Jackson or Red Auerbach could have gotten past the Spurs with what Wade and LeBron offered for most of the night Thursday.
Q: I'm guessing there's about a 95-percent chance that Wade will never be as healthy in future playoffs as he has been this year (and look at how he's playing . . .). And he's only getting older and slower. Can Miami really justify paying him anything close to a max contract whenever he opts out? Can they continue to field a championship-caliber roster if Wade is taking up one-third of their cap space? --Kevin.
A: That remains a backburner question until the Heat either get their fourth victory or fourth loss of this series. But it's an issue that has to be addressed head on. Dwyane has had some terrific moments this postseason, especially when extra rest has been built into the schedule. But something is failing him now. The Spurs defense has a lot to do with it. But that's the exact type of challenge a superstar needs to be able to overcome. If he can.
Q: It's incomprehensible to see this Heat team be so badly beaten. -- Chet.
A: Let's give credit to the Spurs. They were the best team during the regular season and they're the best team now in the playoffs since that opening-round scare against the Mavericks. The Heat might not be at the top of their game, but the Spurs are at a level that would win championships against anyone. If they played this well in last season's NBA Final, they'd be in position for their first championship repeat.
June 12, 2014
Q: Should the Miami Heat pursue Carmelo Anthony? -- Nadia.
A: I know that again became a talking point after the USA Today report, but I still find it hard to fathom that a team that allowed Mike Miller to depart via amnesty release would turn around and then spend on a fourth star, even if it came with the Big Three giving up part of their salaries. Remember, the Heat still will be paying Miller's salary next season, even though he no longer counts against the cap or tax. All of that said, never, ever doubt Pat Riley. But Erik Spoelstra also talks about how it takes a certain type of player to fit the team's system, one who is willing to sacrifice, as Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade have done. Carmelo Anthony hardly comes off as such a player, although the influence of LeBron James, Micky Arison, Spoelstra and Riley could potentially change that. Still, it comes off as pie-in-the-sky conjecture, rooted neither in anything offered from Anthony nor even hinted at by the Heat's Big Three. And, no, to preempt a follow-up, I would not trade Bosh for Anthony. Not with the way Bosh fits with this group. Are the Heat "considering" a run at Carmelo Anthony should he become a free agent? Yes. They also are considering a run at every other player who could be a free agent. That's how they operate, having targeted Ray Allen weeks before 2012 free agency began. The Heat brought Michael Beasley back when no one saw that coming, so anything is possible. Anything. Including a Big Four. Or, of course, possibly the end of the Big Three. And anyone who thinks any of LeBron James' focus at the moment is on Carmelo Anthony doesn't know LeBron James.
Q: The way Erik Spoelstra spoke earlier this week of Rashard Lewis' "emotional stability," is that a shot at Michael Beasley? -- Rick.
A: It's safe to say Spoelstra in no way was thinking about Michael when he was speaking about Rashard, especially since the two players are in completely different situations. Rashard is a veteran who already has had All-Star and NBA Finals moments, one who displayed great patience until this opportunity came around. Been there, seen that, done that. Michael is still waiting to make his mark. Truth be told, Beasley got many more opportunities this season than Lewis, especially early in the season. Michael is still waiting for his first big break, something he has to eventually create, given every opportunity to play as a leading man in his initial Heat tenure, and then with the Timberwolves and Suns. The question now is whether Michael can accept a secondary fate this early in his career, something Lewis has found far easier to handle at this late stage of his career.
Q: The Spurs figured out small ball. -- Chet.
A: No, the Spurs have figured out basketball. The thing is, the Heat also know how to play the game the right way, they just don't always seem motivated to put in the necessary effort. Now, they seemingly have no other choice.
June 11, 2014
Q: Is it time to give Tony Douglas some playing time? -- Joel.
A: If you're going to go in that direction, then you're more likely to go without a point guard, as Erik Spoelstra has been forced to do at times this series. But I can understand why you could see the need for a change. Mario Chalmers is teetering in 2011 Mike Bibby territory, with Finals struggles that need to be addressed before it's too late. And it's getting late. I'm just not sure there is any rhythm with Douglas to inject him into the mix at this late date. The Heat's best lineups have been with Dwyane Wade and Ray Allen together in the backcourt, but not if Wade is turning the ball over like he did in Tuesday's first half. But I agree there has to be a shorter leash with Chalmers going forward. The problem is that with the quickness of Tony Parker and even Patty Mills, it would require LeBron James to defend at the point. And when Kawhi Leonard is going well, that could leave the Heat without someone to defend in that matchup.
Q: Clearly the Heat's defense wasn't working in the first half. Why not play Shane Battier? Instead, James Jones played and picked up three fouls. -- David.
A: Oh, don't kid yourself, anything and everything will be explored in these 48 hours before Game 4. There are issues that go beyond even this single loss. Look, Spoelstra pushed the right buttons with Rashard Lewis, and Ray Allen also has been solid off the bench. But the reality is instead of inserting Battier or hoping for more from Jones, there has to be more from LeBron. That's simply is how this team is built. When he has seven turnovers and is outplayed by Kawhi Leonard, there will be issues, no matter the rest of the rotation.
Q: Dwyane Wade has become so useless in the Finals. I guess the time off in the regular season did not help much, after all. -- Ananth.
A: I agree that his numbers have been deceiving, and some of his play has been way too loose for games this significant. The Heat's hope at this point has to be that Tuesday night got his attention. At least he got past the turnovers in the second half of Game 3. He needs to be aggressive, but also smart with his play.
June 10, 2014
Q: Ira, last year there weren't any flagrant fouls or technicals with the Heat and Spurs. Now Mario Chalmers has a flagrant, LeBron James and Tim Duncan were T'd up and Dwyane Wade and Tony Parker are flopping. I love it. -- Sid.
A: Because these teams are getting tired of one another. Like LeBron said going in, it's difficult to establish a rivalry when you're only playing twice during the regular season. But now, with 11 meetings in just over 12 months, a testiness is developing. It's not quite Heat-Pacers, but both teams recognize that a certain edge is required in what is an incredibly competitive matchup. These teams are different in style, yet remarkably close in ability. While neither team utilizes an enforcer, the Heat likely will start doing whatever it takes to keep Duncan from the rim, and the Spurs figure to do the same in trying to keep LeBron out of the lane. It takes all rivalries a while to percolate. This one has been simmering for a year, seemingly approaching a boiling point.
Q: Is Shane Battier's career officially over? I was surprised he didn't get into Sunday night's game ahead of James Jones. He still can contribute on defense and you never know when he can get hot and hit a few 3-point shots. -- Joel.
A: I'm not sure part of that wasn't to appease LeBron, who has been pushing for more of Jones. In fact, I'm not sure Udonis Haslem's token appearance wasn't Erik Spoelstra getting him in after teammates mentioned his potential contributions. The reality is, through Rashard Lewis' length, Jones' shooting and Battier's hustle, the Heat are trying to cobble together what they lost with the amnesty release of Mike Miller.
Q: Hi, Ira. It's better for the Heat to play without Mario Chalmers in the fourth quarter. The best lineup is LeBron, Wade, Ray Allen, Birdman and Bosh. That should be the close-out lineup. -- Wayne. Miami
A: But without a point guard on the floor, it most likely requires LeBron to guard Tony Parker, which drains his energy. Actually, LeBron has benefited by Kawhi Leonard being such a non-factor offensively. Also, counting on Allen's offense late can be a dicey proposition, although I certainly have no issue with offense-defense substitutions. In addition, with Chris Andersen on the floor, it allows the Spurs to keep one of their big men at home in the paint. Your lineup has plenty of merits, just not for the entire fourth quarter. The reality is the Heat have to get more out of Chalmers and Cole.
June 9, 2014
Q: Ira, don't be so quick to dismiss Chris Bosh's 3-point shooting, especially in the corner. Fool you once, fool you twice, he can make a fool of you. Think the Spurs don't have newfound respect? -- Sam.
A: Look, Chris has proven he can step up and make big shots at any spot on the floor, and more than that, he is not afraid to take the next one, even when he missed the previous one. Sunday's shot was huge. But just as huge was his earlier show of force with his slam dunk, and then his hard drive to the lane that led to Wade's game-deciding layup. What I don't like is the notion that Chris should be pigeonholed into any single role. He is a versatile talent who can impact the game beyond outside shots. The versatility of his game should be explored on a nightly basis, and he should test his bounds.
Q: When are the Heat going to stop leaving 3-point shooters open? They call that defense? I call that watching. -- Ed.
A: The goal is to recover and close out on 3-point shooters, at least run them off the line, after first protecting the paint. What made the system so efficient in previous seasons was the Heat's remarkable close-out speed. Due to aging, fatigue and other factors (lack of air conditioning?), some of that speed has been lost amid these marathon seasons and postseasons. If that closeout speed isn't there, then it might be time to rethink the approach. Even in Sunday's loss, the Spurs shot 9 of 17 on 3-pointers in the second half. But the Heat also limited San Antonio to .439 shooting, so they did plenty right on that end of the court.
Q: Who is the better player today: Michael Beasley or Shane Battier? -- Arnaldo, Miami.
A: I assuming you're asking in regards to Battier being somewhat in the playoff rotation and Beasley not at all. Michael arguably is more athletic and more skilled. But the Heat are so much of a "system" team that if you're not operating in lockstep, the entire system can fail. That has been the concern with Michael, who certainly tries on the defensive end, but has not grasped the approach to the degree of Battier. All of that said, with Battier retiring, a summer back in the Heat system could yet land Beasley in the rotation next season, should he decide to re-up in free agency. As it was, Beasley was inactive and Battier did not play Sunday. While James Jones' cameo did not go particularly well, it is clear that Rashard Lewis will continue to get minutes that might otherwise have gone to Battier.
June 8, 2014
Q: Udonis Haslem has done a good job in the past of guarding Tim Duncan. No one could stop him in Game 1, so why didn't Erik Spoelstra use him at all? -- Chaz.
A: To be honest, I thought there was a chance Erik Spoelstra was going to start Haslem in Game 1 in place of Rashard Lewis for just that reason. But the reality is with all of Duncan's early scoring, the Heat still held a late lead. And Lewis did catch the Spurs' attention with his outside shooting. Still, I believe there is a situational place for Haslem in this series, and I think when Dwyane Wade spoke of going deeper in the Heat rotation, I think Haslem was who he had in mind.
Q: I wouldn't be so quick to praise Dwyane Wade's legs in Game 1. With LeBron out, he was supposed to take over the game, be the Wade of old, the one that won games by himself, attacking the basket and getting to the free-throw line. Instead, he was largely invisible in the fourth quarter, save for one basket at the beginning of the period. It was his chance to shine and show the world he was still Dwyane Wade. So if he had his legs, he sure didn't show it in the fourth. -- Moshe.
A: The reality is that Dwyane, especially at this level of the postseason, no longer is a stand-alone scorer. He's just not. And between the heat and his early scoring Thursday night, he clearly did not have a lot left in his tank. And that's a concern, considering he only played 33 minutes Thursday. With three rebounds and two assists, it was not one of his best playoff moments.
Q: I really wish the games were every other day. There is too much time for the media circus. -- Stuart.
A: But this probably is the rare occasion when, even with all the media scrutiny, the Heat benefit from the added time off, with LeBron James given time to rehydrate and work past his cramping issue. The problem is that with the media-day scheduling how the Heat have to be back in San Antonio by Friday night in order for a full media day before next Sunday's Game 5 (if needed) at the AT&T Center.
June 7, 2014
Q: Since we are not going to play Greg Oden, I think we should have Michael Beasley available, just in case LeBron James struggles on Sunday. LeBron has no backup at his position. -- Paul.
A: To me this is a no-brainer. The Heat have tried to do right all season by Oden, considering the remarkable commitment he gave to push back from so much time out of the league. But the reality is that even against Tiago Splitter, with the Spurs' remarkable ball movement Oden simply cannot play at this speed. Is Beasley an answer? He likely would struggle mightily defensively against the Spurs' ball movement, but he at least has skills that could, or at least might, help. Greg Oden still could get his ring, and he already hoisted the Eastern Conference trophy. This should be about getting the 13 players who most could help into uniform. Beasley, even if 13th, is one of those 13.
Q: I hate to make excuses or instigate conspiracy theories, but aren't there just a few too many coincidences to ignore? 1. The Spurs fans were all given "noise-makers" before tip-off that could double as fans to cool themselves. 2. LeBron has a well-documented history with cramping, particularly when it's hot during the summer. 3. The Spurs are deeper and have mostly international players who are accustomed to playing in those conditions. 4. An electrical failure caused the AC to malfunction while all other systems seem to be unaffected. -- Shawn, Miami
A: And all Powerade in the building was confiscated an hour before tipoff, leaving LeBron to choose between marketing and hydration. Fascinating.
Q: Does the Heat travel with a team physician? Maybe they should (plus a few portable A/C units). You could probably fill AmericanAirlines Arena with doctors, nurses and EMTs who are Heat fans and would gladly give LeBron an IV at halftime? -- David.
A: They do during playoffs. But as we've come to learn over the past few days, the best way to handle potential cramps is to start hydrating well in advance. Ultimately, for the Heat, peeing is believing.
June 6, 2014
Q: You are not going to win with five points from your top two point guards. -- Alonso.
A: First, there has to be the caveat that Thursday night was not your typical NBA game, so there were plenty of mitigating factors (heat, humidity, etc.). But Thursday also was not an exception with Mario Chalmers this postseason, this time with three points and five turnovers. And Norris Cole wasn't much better with his two points, although at least he also had five assists. Against Tony Parker there simply has to be more. Chalmers has to play smarter, avoid the silly fouls that essentially took him out of Thursday's game. This can't be what Chalmers expected heading into free agency. He may very well be playing himself back into the Heat's price range. More is needed.
Q: Am I crazy to think that the Spurs saw LeBron James and Chris Bosh struggling with the temperatures and told the workers to not bother fixing the air conditioning? Clearly a team with superior depth benefits more from the conditions. What a stupid way to lose a game! -- Adrian.
A: Actually, both LeBron and Bosh were playing well, until the latter stages. The real question is why the NBA wasn't more proactive, sending the teams back to the locker rooms when the temperatures remained in the mid 80s for an extended period. Clearly, there was far more concern about satisfying the needs of ABC and the television partners than staging the highest-level competition. Never forget, these NBA Finals are about entertainment, nearly packaged entertainment that fits within a designated time frame. In this case, the NBA was not going to sweat the small stuff when it had broadcast partners to consider. All I know is you better have a parka with you when the series returns to Miami and AmericanAirlines Arena, where the early projections are temperatures in the mid 50s.
Q: Why does LeBron James suffer cramps when other players do not? Is it diet, lack of fluids or something else? -- Stone, Miami
A: I think it could be as simple as when you have more muscles, you have more muscles to cramp up. No one else in the NBA is built like LeBron. The question might be why there aren't IVs in place should they be needed, considering LeBron history with the issue.
June 5, 2014
Q: Erik Spoelstra reminds me of the year Jack McKeon took over for Marlins, when every "unconventional" move worked. -- Martin.
A: He certainly has not been afraid to think outside the box. But unlike Trader Jack, the Heat return to these Finals largely intact, save for the amnesty-release loss of Mike Miller. While Spoelstra deserves credit for the unconventional approaches, his players deserve credit for being so accepting, from Chris Bosh's willingness to step out to the perimeter, to Dwyane Wade's willingness to play off the ball, to Mario Chalmers' willingness to play primarily as a spot-up shooter, to LeBron James' willingness to defend all five positions. For that matter, Spoelstra's unconventional approaches succeed because of reserves willing to adapt to ever-changing roles.
Q: This year's Finals will probably be as compelling as any of those old Lakers/Celtics Finals that were played centuries ago. No other Western Conference team could have brought what we expect the Spurs to bring in terms of best vs. best. -- Roland, Portland.
A: (Centuries ago?) Agree. This won't be a case of Scott Brooks' questionable coaching or Russell Westbrook's questionable shot selection. And it won't be a case of Frank Vogel having run his starters into the ground or having neglected his offense. These are two teams and two coaches and two front offices that built toward and for this moment. To a degree, the past eight months have been mere prelude to Spurs-Heat II. Another seven games, please.
Q: The Finals narrative by the media so far has focused on "The Redemption." In actuality, this is Redemption vs. Place in History (to be one of the few teams to Three-peat). I hope the Heat's motivation comes from that and not just from being able to defend their title against a team seeking redemption. -- Neil, Manila.
A: I think the Heat's motivation will come from those who minimized last season's Finals win against the Spurs as a fortuitous and lucky shot from Ray Allen, forgetting that the Heat still had to battle through and win overtime in that Game 6 and then go on to win Game 7. The Heat players said as much during Wednesday's media day.
June 4, 2014
Q: While players are the faces of the franchises, this year's rematch is also between arguably the two best coaches in the NBA. After the meltdown of two very talented teams, in the Pacers and Thunder, in the conference finals, I think the executives will take much more seriously the selection of coaches who tend to be under the fan's radar. -- L.K.
A: And both coaches allow their players to play, to find their way through games, never too rigid that they are unable to adjust. In fact, that's what made last year's Finals so compelling, the rotation adjustments and the style adjustments. Both Gregg Popovich and Erik Spoelstra are quick thinkers at moments of truth (taking Tim Duncan out late in Game 6 was not a mistake, but rather a commitment to staying with a season-long approach), while also able to digest a game and return with a more palatable approach next time out, if needed.
Q: The Spurs play a beautiful game of basketball. They move the ball better than anyone, and were able to make enough adjustments to stop the Thunder attack and Tim Duncan is still, well Tim Duncan, with a great supporting cast. But the Heat play defense way better than the Thunder and can also get to the hoop. This should be a great series. -- Chet.
A: I agree. And it will be all about what transpires on the court, and I'm not talking about blowing in ears or cheap shots. The Spurs' offense is what every team should aspire to, sharing of the ball without regard to who gets the shot, as long as it is the best possible shot. And when the Heat are at their best, they're taking a similar approach. It is difficult to find a villain in this series. As Chris Bosh said, Game 8 of the 2013 Finals starts Thursday. Last year's Finals was a series that deserved an encore.
Q: Who is this year's Mike Miller? -- Adam.
A: Got to tell you, there are few questions that irk Spoelstra more than that one. He positively bristles at the notion of a "Mike Miller role," as if another player can be pigeon-holed into such a contribution. Frankly, I don't know which Heat player is best when shooting while wearing only one shoe. I'd say Rashard Lewis comes closest to the mythical "Mike Miller role." But the reality is that in Game 7 last season, it was Shane Battier who turned himself into Mike Miller, after Miller had turned himself into Shane Battier.
June 3, 2014
Q: LeBron James making second-team All-Defensive sounds about right. He certainly coasted on that end at times. It was just a weird regular season. -- Jeff.
A: While there was outrage from others about LeBron's streak of first-team All-Defensive ending, I think you're closer to the truth. The reality is that, across the board, the Heat only pushed as hard as needed during the regular season. There wasn't the type of all-out commitment to the regular season as there was from other teams (including, lamentably, the Pacers). You could even make the argument that LeBron didn't make his typical definitive statement for regular-season Most Valuable Player. But just as LeBron has pushed deeper than MVP Kevin Durant in these playoffs, figure on the perceived All-Defensive snub also fueling him. There are few things (other than winning championships) that LeBron enjoys more than quieting the naysayers, even if they say nay at the right time.
Q: I notice there are three three-day breaks during the Finals. Each comes before a game in San Antonio, and there will be a five-plus-day break before the first game, also in San Antonio. San Antonio thus gets extra rest prior to each home game. Is this extra rest before each of San Antonio's home games intended to provide additional homecourt advantage for the Spurs? For the three days between Games 1 and 2, it also means the Spurs get to rest at home whereas the Heat have to stay in "enemy territory." This scheduling would appear to provide the Spurs with an unfair advantage in the Finals. -- Gregg.
A: Yes, there will be plenty of room service for the Heat in these Finals. In fact, when they return to San Antonio for Game 5 and 7, if necessary, the league is requiring they return two days before in order to have a full media day before each of those games (which seems unfair, since practicing at home would allow for another night in their own beds). In fact, with the shift to 2-2-1-1-1 scheduling in the Finals, I think it should be like the other rounds, where the only requirement is you arrive the day before a game, not two days.
Q: Greg Oden or Michael Beasley, who should bring their sports coat to San Antonio? -- Charles.
A: I would think Oden, with the Spurs moving to a small lineup against Oklahoma City. I just don't think Greg is nearly as nimble as he needs to be at this level of the playoffs. Beasley could possibly (OK, maybe only out of desperation) provide some relief scoring, if in uniform.
June 2, 2014
Q: Ira, I was watching ESPN and the talk is about the Spurs' bench, and how they got it done against OKC and will do it against Miami. Is their bench that much better? -- Robert.
A: The only addition of significance in the offseason was Marco Belinelli, who did have his playoff moments last season against the Heat. But what makes the Spurs' depth unique is the way they go out of their way to play Manu Ginobili off the bench. So Dwyane Wade winds up having to chase Danny Green early, and then Ginobili enters to inject life into the second unit. And Boris Diaw also is a starting-quality talent who comes off their bench. Plus, Patty Mills looms as far more than a towel-waver in this year's Finals rematch. All of that said, the Heat's top three off the bench -- Chris Andersen, Norris Cole and Ray Allen -- each have had their game-changing moments this postseason. Yes, the Spurs get more out of their bench, but that's only because the Heat rely far more on their starters (but not to the degree the Pacers' did in overusing their starters). With five days off before the Finals and then a two-day break between Games 1 and 2, I'm not sure that depth will be as necessary, at least at the start of the series.
Q: Last year Norris Cole and Chris Andersen struggled against the Spurs. Mike Miller played a lot of minutes then. But with Miller gone, will we see more of James Jones again? -- Ryan, Naples.
A: I think it's a totally different equation this time around in the Finals, foremost because Wade is physically able to offer far more than he could in the 2013 Finals. Plus, Rashard Lewis effectively has emerged over the past two weeks as this postseason's version of Miller, at least when it comes to stretching the defense. Beyond that, Cole and Andersen have come on strong lately, further creating hope.
Q: Has there ever been a game in the NBA that was more talked about while never actually being played than Game 7 of the 2014 Eastern Conference finals? -- Abel, Miami.
A: I you ask the Heat, they might say Game 7 of the 2011 NBA Finals, which they never got to against the Mavericks. But I understand where you're coming from. From what I've been told, the Pacers showed up Sunday at Bankers Life Fieldhouse, anyway, trying to justify what they spent the previous seven months setting up.
June 1, 2014
Q: Like Shane Battier said, this series will be about basketball, not blowing in LeBron James' ear or getting in the King's head. -- Robert.
A: And that's part of what made last season's NBA Finals series against the Spurs so special, even beyond Ray Allen's 3-pointer late in Game 6. There were no flagrants, no technicals, no lack of respect for the game, no blowing in ears or palming of faces. And I'd expect the same with the upcoming series. Gregg Popovich and Erik Spoelstra have too much respect for the game for such shenanigans. Heat-Spurs 2013 elevated the memories of the 2012-13 NBA season. I suspect this upcoming series will do the same for this season, even with so much compelling basketball already this postseason. Heat-Thunder would have been fun. Heat-Spurs can't help be anything but compelling.
Q: How much, if any, does it bother the Miami players that people insist on trying to diminish their accomplishments? Every year people predict they won't make it to the Finals, and when they do, the excuses come out. -- Jason.
A: I think there is plenty of respect for the Heat, and what they have accomplished. Predicting against the Heat winning a series is not a condemnation, but rather a guess. In every case, predicting against the Big Three-era Heat in a playoff series has been wrong, except for the 2011 Finals against the Mavericks. All of that said, the reality is that the Spurs had a far more challenging gauntlet to withstand in the Western Conference playoffs than what the Heat had to endure in the East portion of the bracket. But that's not to diminish how dominant the Heat have been this postseason.
Q: Are you surprised it took less than 24 hours for it to be made known that Frank Vogel is coming back to the Pacers? -- John.
A: First, it would be the height of lunacy to dismiss a coach after advancing to the conference finals and coming within two victories of the NBA Finals. That said, I think Vogel also learned a lesson about leaning too hard too often on his starters in order to secure a No. 1 seed. The Pacers appeared to be running on fumes at the finish, and that's has to be considered a coaching issue.
July 6, 2014
Copyright © 2014, South Florida Sun-Sentinel