text:
Avoid switching a colourbomb with a stripe as this won't give you many points, much better to switch it with a single candy, especially if there are bombs on the board the same colour as the candy.
- Level 1 - 100
- Level 101 - 200
- Level 201 - 300
- Level 301 - 400
- Level 401 - 500
- Level 501 - 600
- Level 601 - 700
- Level 701 - 800
- Level 801 - 900
- Level 901 - 1000
- Level 1001 - 1100
- Level 1101 - 1200
- Level 1201 - 1300
- Level 1301 - 1400
- Level 1401 - 1500
- Level 1501 - 1600
- Level 1601 - 1700
- Level 1701 - 1800
- Level 1801 - 1900
- Level 1901 - 2000
- Level 2001 - 2100
- Level 2101 - 2200
- Level 2201 - 2300
- Level 2301 - 2400
- Level 2401 - 2500
- Level 2501 - 2600
- Level 2601 - 2700
- Level 2701 - 2800
- Level 2801 - 2900
- Level 2901 - 3000
- Level 3001 - 3100
- Level 3101 - 3200
- Level 3201 - 3300
- Level 3301 - 3400
- Level 3401 - 3500
- Level 3501 - 3600
- Level 3601 - 3700
- Level 3701 - 3800
- Level 3801 - 3900
- Level 3901 - 4000
- Level 4001 - 4100
- Level 4101 - 4200
- Level 4201 - 4300
- Level 4301 - 4400
- Level 4401 - 4500
- Level 4501 - 4600
- Level 4601 - 4700
- Level 4701 - 4800
- Level 4801 - 4900
Candy Crush Saga Level 2240 tips and video
Avoid switching a colourbomb with a stripe as this won't give you many points, much better to switch it with a single candy, especially if there are bombs on the board the same colour as the candy.
102 comments:
It's been a very long time since I have been waiting for levels. Don't waste boosters on this one like I did. I used all my boosters and then got it with a lucky board. Got a wrapped with a striped together and that opened up the bottom and then I got some sprinkles given to me by the gods and then I just waited for the timer to run out.... happy days:) Onward crushers!
- 10 January 2017 at 06:42
Agreed. No sense wasting boosters on this one. Ms Cookie's hints work IF you can get the bottom opened up enough. There in was the difficulty for me. It took many tries before the "Lucky board" came along. That's the only way I got through this pain in the arse. Did I mention that I hate timed levels?
- 10 January 2017 at 08:51
The timed levels are AWFUL!!! The only good thing about them is that they are finished very quickly. They still have a way of getting you into a REALLY bad mood. I have been trying this level for several days and not even been able to open up the bottom part of the board.
- 10 January 2017 at 10:22
- Don Gurian said...
So, for the first time, I have caught up with Cookie and must await new levels! Unbelievable how much time I waste with this.
- 10 January 2017 at 11:30
Boring, frustrating, boring level.
- 11 January 2017 at 10:29
I cannot get enough of the bottom cleared to make any moves or collect any time.
- 11 January 2017 at 17:09
This is the one of the most difficult timed level in Candy Crush for me. Your moves are limited to the upper half of the board. It's very hard to clear the dispensers of licorice and blockers at the middle for the +5 candies to drop. Even after hitting it with a stripe and a +5 candy drops, there is no way to get at it sort of hammering it. In addition, you have to deal with countdown bombs at the same time. The best way to clear the bottom part of the board for the +5 candies to drop is switching 2 color bombs together. That will surely clear all the licorice and blockers on the bottom half of the board. You have to have a lot of color bombs to do it because you cannot reset on a timed level. Also even if you start with one, you have to make another one to pair it. You might need several hand switches to do it. All this you have to do within 35 seconds. The second option I thought of is to use a UFO. After about 40 or so tries, I was getting nowhere so I bought a UFO with gold bars. I have to get 2 time extensions to complete the level. I spent about 60 gold bars in doing so. Anyway, I am glad to complete a entire episode again on the PC and don't have to wait till Wednesday for it to be available on mobile.
- 13 January 2017 at 11:55
Got it first try with no boosters. Quite a surprise for me as I hate timed levels. I actually enjoyed playing this one because I must have had a lucky board. Was able to get to the bottom in about three moves with a striped wrapped combo which opens it up enough to get time candies and go back-and-forth as Cookie said.
- 15 January 2017 at 10:57
While many are struggling to pass a hard, especially timed level, somebody will pass it on the first (second, third or so) try. That is what is called a "lucky board". How often can you get a lucky board? Someone mentioned about 1 in 30. Somebody posted a comment in level 1538, another hard timed level with 301 comments, that lucky boards might be a predetermined percentage of players per day/hour allowed [by Candy Crush] to complete a level. So if you have the time and patience to wait for the "lucky board" wait for it, otherwise do something about it.
- 15 January 2017 at 12:54
Well, this should be fun - NOT.
- 16 January 2017 at 17:24
- Cybelle said...
Posting for luck...
- 17 January 2017 at 00:12
Twice now I have had over 90,000 with time left on the bombs and the game stops cause it says bomb about to explode...frustrating!
- 17 January 2017 at 12:01
Dreadful level - my first time to post this. Once you can make matches in the lower part of the board it is simply a matter of keeping enough time available through extra time candies, whilst keeping the bombs under control. I focused on making vertical stripes to do this - and - after about 30 attempts, managed this.
Good luck from Manila
- 17 January 2017 at 16:08
Not very hard level, on 9th try, got two CB without boosters, reached two stars within 10 steps. Must be lucky board. Good luck every one. PH
- 18 January 2017 at 13:08
Tried several times again, and passed with two times with low scores. Had better luck working from two sides, center stripes had not worked out for me yet. PH
- 18 January 2017 at 19:55
I was really dreading this last level but got through with less tries than the first timed level. Didn't like this episode at all. Hopefully, the next one will be more enjoyable. Til next Wednesday.
- 18 January 2017 at 22:01
Well, this was weird. 2nd move and a sprinkle fell down. I matched that with a wrapped and it did some damage. Then another sprinke dropped and I matched that with a bomb. Got 87,000 pts. Got a few stripes and went to 98,000+
I never even had to get an extra time candy.
- 19 January 2017 at 03:54
Have a lot of Candy crushers quit already? Level 1575 has 353 comments and level 1538 has 302. I found levels 2229 and 2240 to be about as hard but have less than 20 comments each, or I am wrong about their difficulty.
- 19 January 2017 at 06:44
Didn't like the timed levels, this one had a lucky chocolate bomb form then let iit count down. See you next Wednesday.
- 19 January 2017 at 12:42
I find that the best board on timed levels are almost always the first one you try. So I watch Cookie example until I understand the game. It does help.
- 19 January 2017 at 16:49
Agree. But I am always just very small amount shy of passing for the first try of timed levels. Also I had many games one move short of passing. Temptation has not got me yet though, never paid a penny. PH
- 19 January 2017 at 21:50
I also pay close attention when I got a life after watching 3rd party AD video because the board is usually better for me. I passed quite several hard timed levels this way. PH
- 19 January 2017 at 21:58
I watched the video twice. Ms Cookie says you need 90,000 points but the video starts out and it clearly shows 140,000 as the target. She only got 97,760 but it said she passed. What the hey?
- 19 January 2017 at 22:45
That is normal, if you replay any passed level, the target is your highest score, not minimum required score. You pass if you beat the minimum but fail to beat your own record. PH
- 20 January 2017 at 07:05
I just watched her video and it clearly shows 90,000 points required at the start.
- 20 January 2017 at 09:12
Is anyone playing the Striped Contest? I'm just curious of the prizes. Only the top 3 players will receive a prize. I played level 1955 for about an hour and collected about 500 stripes. An hour later, this character Kuljeet zoomed to the no. 1 spot with 1,590 stripes. I'm wondering how one can collect that many stripes in that short time. I think the contest is rigged. I'll just spend my hour collecting sugar drops and earn about 10 boosters in the process.
- 20 January 2017 at 12:29
The Great Reward for winning First Place in the Striped Contest is...merely a standard set of one each of the boosters. Totally not worth it.
To rack up huge numbers of stripes, all you have to do is repeatedly play level 1476 over and over...totally asinine and tedious thing to do.
It is not rigged, just a rip-off.
- 20 January 2017 at 16:16
That is because new level stripe number is multiplied by 10. It is not that hard to collect 159 new stripes in short time. I used to always win the first spot before I completed all levels. Now that I finished all levels, it is tough to win stripe contest. On the other hand, I found that diamond challenge is not that hard, I can almost always pass the first 3 levels without booster, then 1 booster for level 4, some boosters for final level 5. The reward is larger than what consumed, so it is OK to let other people win stripe contest. PH
- 20 January 2017 at 17:13
Thanks CHunger for clarification on the Striped Contest. I don't know if you entered that contest yourself, but I agree it is really not worth it. For those who are thinking of joining that contest, I just want to add that for getting more stripes, playing level 1955 is better than level 1476. Level 1955 is a timed level and you can stop anytime or play continuously as long as you have attained the required points. Either way, the stripes you have created will count. In level 1476, you have to complete the level in order for the stripes to count. When I played 1476, sometimes I did not get the 100 wraps to complete the level and the stripes did not count.
- 20 January 2017 at 17:32
Tried to tap the wrench at the end of level 2240. To my surprise, it was not usual "Soon there will be more space to explore", instead it popped out a 3x3 gift array, I selected the center one which was hammer or switch(forgot what I received). Then it went back to usual behavior. You might try it while waiting for new levels till next Wednesday. By the way, the diamond challenge award is one set of every booster plus one extra hammer and one extra bomb. PH
- 20 January 2017 at 17:38
Thanks also PH for explaining that stripes created on new levels (which are released on Wednesdays) are worth 10 times. That explains why someone can get thousands right away. I also played the one-life step challenges while waiting for the new episodes to be released but only the 3-level ones. Once you complete the 3-level one, King will increase the step to 5 or 6 levels which makes is much more difficult. I also used boosters but only on the final level of the step in which case the I can get back the booster plus the other boosters.
- 20 January 2017 at 17:47
I don't know how you got that 3x3 gift array by tapping the wrench at the end of level 2240. I tried it on my iPad and my Android table but only got only the "To be continued" screen.
- 20 January 2017 at 17:58
If any of you wants to get a free lollipop very easily, play Dexter's Delight. Collect just 10 stripes on any level and you get the free lollipop. (I played level 1955).
- 20 January 2017 at 18:09
Did not know what I did. I finished level 2240 in about 3 hours before Wednesday noon. If I remembered correctly, I tapped the wrench in Wednesday afternoon.(Definitely not right after finish but not very long after finish). The pop out was something like "You finished level 2240, here is ...", then 9 gifts in bags which I never saw before, it disappeared after I made selection. PH
- 20 January 2017 at 18:17
Need a lucky board CC
- 21 January 2017 at 05:49
I have several questions, hope fellow crushers can give me answers:
Regarding stripe competition
1. Which color stripes count? Looks only red, green, yellow count for me
2. When stripe is combined with color bomb, do all turned into stripes count? Looks like only count as 1
3. At the end of game, remain steps turned into stripes, do these count?
4. Do stripes in one life challenge and other challenges count?
Also I have hard time to tell how many times spawner/mixer has been hit from its appearance, is there a way to tell from its damage. when I decided to use hammer to knock it out, it often surprised me that I was short of hammer. PH
- 21 January 2017 at 08:33
- Mad Man said...
I too am very curious about how to determine spawner damage visually.
- 21 January 2017 at 12:49
- Mad Man said...
Got it on my 2nd try, nothing in particular to note aside from that I only got a couple +5 candies and mostly seemed to skate by (barely) based on matching bombs really quickly.
And so... I made it to the end for the very first time!!!
This is the end of an 11.5 month journey/obsession, and I'm actually not quite sure what to do with myself next. I'm tempted to go back and fill in missing stars now, which I never cared about before at all. What I *should* do is spend more time with my family.
A couple thoughts on this (for me) auspicious occasion...
1) This is a great blog and has been a big part of helping me through so many levels, both Ms. Cookie's advice and tips from all of you who post. Even the bellyachers are entertaining some of the time.
2) There is a lot of griping about King, but truthfully I'm impressed that they are able to come up with new levels week in and week out that are both interesting and, mostly, reasonable to complete. After 2240 levels already done, this is no small feat, so I tip my hat to them.
3) I've never paid a dime, although I've been mightily tempted on a few occasions when I was *really* close on extremely hard levels but didn't have the gold to purchase extra time/moves. No disrespect to those who *have* paid though. Without you the economics of the game simply wouldn't work. You have my respect.
I've waited a long time to say this...
"See you next Wednesday!"
- 21 January 2017 at 13:13
I don't like this level, too hard CC, need a very lucky board
- 22 January 2017 at 04:55
Just can't catch a break on this level. I've lost count of how many times I've tried it. I've only broken through to the lower level twice. I'm at the point where I dread even trying. Oh lucky board, wherefore art thou?? ((sigh))
- 22 January 2017 at 18:52
- Victoria said...
Passed this level by using a sprinkle and using it after getting some bombs with matching colors. Another sprinkle fell down and used it on more bombs that matched color. Never broke through the bottom level. Passed on 2nd attempt and was surprised because I heard this one was hard.
- 22 January 2017 at 21:33
3rd place: 2 boosters + 2 hours
2nd place: 4 boosters + 4 hours
1st place: 6 boosters + 6 hours
The unlimited life hours maybe valuable to those have not finished all levels yet.
- 23 January 2017 at 09:57
After trying for a day, I got a lucky board and made my points without breaking into the bottom section. Thanks for the idea of clicking on the wrench at the end to get a prize!
- 23 January 2017 at 12:46
Finally passed this awful level. Has to be near the top of my most hated level list.
On a different note, has anyone experienced any unexplained reductions in their boosters?. I don't usually keep track that closely, but my chocolate sprinkle and wrapped/stripped boosters have been going down without me using them. After I first noticed it, I deliberately did not use any to make sure I wasn't going crazy. Although, after level 2240, that's a distinct possibility ...
- 23 January 2017 at 14:28
Follow up - just played 2240 again to see what would happen. No boosters "checked", but a chocolate sprinkle showed up on the board, and was deducted from my inventory. Beware!
- 23 January 2017 at 17:48
Think this game is doable , my gripe is if I leave the game for more than an hour and restart it again a colour bomb booster appears on the screen , if I reset it I'm a bomb down , I've lost six today , not much point playing for them just to lose them like this , is anyone else having this problem.
- 24 January 2017 at 14:17
Same happened to me
- 25 January 2017 at 00:26
Happening nealy every time i play now, on android and pc.very annoying as every time the game updates i lose all my boosters.
- 25 January 2017 at 14:17
- Paul Stevens said...
In uk King is running magic helmet booster right now. You get striped, wrapped & sprinkle to start plus 3 extra moves (don't count on timed levels) Pass 7 levels without losing a life to get it. Just play first 7 levels or level 1 7 times. Had this level won till it crashed with few seconds left. I'll have it passed soon enough
- 26 January 2017 at 00:39
The toughest one yet. Hardly ever get to bottom board and same as Unityman and others I am losing boosters despite not having checked them. Have reported this and have a ticket number but not holding my breath for an answer! Lucky board needed please!
- 26 January 2017 at 09:05
I was OK to play old levels, but today, not only my color bomb disappears, but also my hand switch reduces by itself. Guess I am going to stop playing any levels before next Wednesday. Hope CC stops stealing our boosters back. This is even worse than one-time wipe out, at least that does not scare you for every game play.
- 30 January 2017 at 19:22
- wendy green said...
Another terrible one I hate timed I am just not fast enough, just have to wait for a lucky board......if I stay around!
- 21 February 2017 at 13:36
- Doreen Price said...
Waiting for lucky board yet again
- 25 February 2017 at 01:49
I can't get close. My best scores are 39k 40k and 49k but most are 20 something. I'm struggling to get into the bottom half of the board.
- 1 March 2017 at 01:04
Just when I was thinking I'd never beat this level two stripe/wrap candies over the centre took my score to over 100k. I must have got lucky. In the previous game I managed to clear most of the lower half but only scored 35k. Glad this level is over.
- 1 March 2017 at 04:11
Posting for luck
- 3 March 2017 at 07:15
Can't get anywhere near req'd amount. Time runs out. I will have to wait for lucky board. Finding this episode difficult. Posting for luck.
- 3 March 2017 at 12:21
This one is a toughie. Let me get a lucky board soon.
- 4 March 2017 at 16:55
What a Joke!
- 7 March 2017 at 04:03
- Suzie O said...
About the stripe contest: I've won first place several times and in addition to 6 free boosters you also get 6 free hours of play> don't click on it until you have the time, it will still be there.
I used to play 1476 but 1955 is much better, I get between 300-600 stripes per game! The rule is only stripes you make count so matching a sprinkle with a stripe only counts as one and the same goes for stripes for left over moves after the game ends, they don't count BUT... the saving grace here is that stripes made in cascades DO count and that is why level 1955 is the way to go... endless cascades. When I come in first my score is usually 3000 and up.
- 10 March 2017 at 21:34
Posting for luck. Very hard to get through the blockers. Not enough time on the clock.
- 18 March 2017 at 00:27
Can't get to the bottom and access the extra time. Posting for luck!
- 12 April 2017 at 14:53
This level has no skill or strategy involved. Luckily rounds last only seconds. You rarely can even get to the bottom, or get any extra time, so it's all over in a few seconds. Then we go play some other game. What value is this to King? Please send my lucky board soon.
- 14 April 2017 at 06:07
Another shit time level. no game, just wating for luck. I quitt...............bye King
- 17 April 2017 at 08:22
- Donavan said...
I got my lucky board on my 4th try. I created and set off a few vertical stripes but was not able to open up the bottom of the board. Luckily I got a chocolate bomb and was able to switch it with a color with 2 or 3 bombs. A few more moves and I had the points I needed without getting any extra time candy.
- 17 April 2017 at 17:00
- 21 April 2017 at 07:33
- slychard said...
Honestly, what's wrong with these F'n programmers, this is pure F'n torture.
- 23 April 2017 at 02:38
- slychard said...
Hey boss here's my latest timed level.
Why this is near impossible.
Should I add some Seconds?
NO, drop it by 12 seconds, and ADD some F'n dropping swirls.
- 23 April 2017 at 03:20
Actually this was not as bad as I was expecting based on what I had been reading from other players. I tried starting with a candy ball in hopes of being able to mate it with a bomb, but never got the chance, having to use it earlier in the game. But it was still putting me over 60,000 points, so I figured I was close, just needing a little luck. But I stopped starting with boosters. I played until I was able to create a candy ball and then let it ride. This gave me the points I needed. Fortunately I was on two hours of unlimited lives, so I got to keep playing games. Took me maybe 45 minutes, rather than the days I had to go through for the other timed levels in this episode. Onward!
- 23 April 2017 at 17:50
Most times not even getting 9,000 never mind 90,000.. Even starting with chocolate ball still not getting more than 20,000. Posting for the lucky game coz I sure need it....
- 24 April 2017 at 13:57
ANOTHER TIMED LEVEL! This is getting ridiculous. Spent 3 weeks on the last one which was only 5 levels ago. Think it's time to hire some new programmers. It gets tiring to wait for a mere lucky board. Bring back the fun.
- 6 May 2017 at 09:27
- Cybelle said...
Posting for luck...
- 14 May 2017 at 19:17
- Cybelle said...
Got it right after Posting for luck... yessss
- 14 May 2017 at 19:22
The longer the comment section is the more difficult is the level. You can guess right away without even starting to play that level.
- 17 May 2017 at 13:21
- John Ohagan said...
Impossible no fun anymore
- 19 May 2017 at 10:47
King is suggesting that playing CC is a way to reliev stress. Not whith a timed level like 2240!
Read the comments so am waiting for a lucky board. 5 games goes by very quickly in this level.
- 30 May 2017 at 14:50
First try honestly. Had a Morty's helmet, shot one stripe down to get some bombs, plus a few extra moves, then used the helmet on the highest number of bomb colors. 102,000 points and stopped play there.
Signed, Amazed
- 31 May 2017 at 08:21
- B.K.Arora said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- 5 June 2017 at 03:28
- B.K.Arora said...
Does King has booster called LUCK so that I can opt for that to clear the level. Really, find myself unfortunate not to possess the luck to get a lucky board as others had to clear the level.
- 5 June 2017 at 03:32
- B.K.Arora said...
Does King has booster called LUCK so that I can opt for that to clear the level. Really, find myself unfortunate not to possess the luck to get a lucky board as others had to clear the level.
- 5 June 2017 at 03:34
- Marielle Litr said...
Boring level .... no chance up to now...
- 10 July 2017 at 12:37
Another really hard level! Need a lucky board!
- 10 July 2017 at 17:04
over a week on this level...cleared the bottom many times but no extra candy falls...and if one does it is when the time runs out....
- 21 July 2017 at 10:18
- liloldlady said...
Need a lucky board. Timed levels are nearly impossible for me and my slow computer!
- 27 July 2017 at 04:33
- Ron Pretty said...
Another stupid timed level, Only got into the bottom of the board twice after many attemps. I like a skilled level which you study like a game of chess. Slow computer makes these levels almost impossible, need a lot of lucky candies
- 29 July 2017 at 11:07
- LynnKaiser07 said...
I am finding this level much harder than the past few timed levels. Hopefully after using a sprinkle and posting here for luck, I'll get it done.
- 30 July 2017 at 05:04
- Lynne said...
After playing quite a few times and reading the comments here, I was having no luck. Fortunately I was able to use Morts helmets on the board I passed. I did not use the color bomb right away. I tried to keep hacking away at the bottom of the board and getting as many extra time candies as I could while trying to match bombs at the top when I could. This time my focus was getting extra time every chance I could while keeping a strict on on the bombs. I then got tons of points and just let the time run out. This strategy worked for me
- 9 August 2017 at 17:31
This is the limit!!
I really cannot beat this time level, so this is the end for me, bye bye Candy Crush!
- 4 September 2017 at 13:16
Please give me a lucky board
- 9 October 2017 at 18:17
Am in great need of a lucky board. Posting for luck.
- 27 October 2017 at 18:53
c/candycrush here
I'm not through or anywhere near it. Usually score in the 30,000+ mark only.
Have to give a cynical laugh at the advice to work in the bottom to score some of the 5 sec candy. If I could I would! I rarely make any inroads at all into the bottom, that's my problem.
Re lucky boards. I'm wondering if King has a computer program that keeps tabs on how often you try a level & eventually sends a few 'luckier' boards to keep you moving on.
As for the daily spin-have never struck the jackpot in any of my 4 accounts in 4 years. Has to be rigged so the odds are very long.
- 13 December 2017 at 15:26
c/candycrush here:
Took 2-3 days.
No boosters.
I tried working the sides to try to open up the bottom that way, tried the top in the hope of combos.
Basically, you just have to wait for the right board. I got a stripe/wrap centre top which opened the bottom enough to make matches.
You just have to wait for a board that gives you that chance to work at the bottom but I found boosters didn't help me. They may other people though. Good luck.
- 15 December 2017 at 04:46
No real strategy, although a sprinkle to start isn't bad. You need two doses of pure luck. One dose to be lucky enough to clear out some of the bottom, and the second dose to be lucky enough that you can match things once you do. Extra frustrating level because it always looks like you are "close" to getting somewhere with it all, but you aren't...
- 30 December 2017 at 14:10
Lives flying past in the blink of an eye. Barely able to open bottom of board. Started with Chocolate Sprinkle but that didn't help.
- 14 January 2018 at 10:33
"work in the bottom of the board to get time candies". Yup. Sure would like to do that.
Positive side to losing lives so quickly is that it makes me go and do things that I ignore while I'm playing CC.
- 14 January 2018 at 13:29
I don't think anyone ever passed this level. The next posts are fictitious to make us keep playing.
- 15 January 2018 at 14:42
- Judy said...
This is a tough one. Still trying.
- 16 January 2018 at 17:20
Posting for lucky board, this one is impossible ,!!!!!!
- 20 January 2018 at 20:55
First time made 85000 then no where near in 4 days, just waiting for a lucky board.
I hate time d levels.
- 1 March 2018 at 02:21
- Robin Wahrenberger said...
Not having fun with this level! Need a lucky board please.
- 2 March 2018 at 19:29
Am I the only one who sees that Candy's example has nothing to do with the reality of level 2240? Her example ISN'T timed. The goal is to reach 140,000 points. My 2240 IS timed and you need to reach 90,000. This "example" of how to pass is completely useless.
- 5 July 2018 at 10:26
- Tammy Caison said...
Come on lucky board
- 16 January 2019 at 18:56


text:
Although the troubleshooting chart in this installment is focused on pressure-compensated, variable-displacement piston pumps, it can be used to check any type of variable-displacement pump.
Compensator setting — Adding pressure-compensation capability to a pump creates a new and important factor to be considered when troubleshooting a circuit. The pressure compensator monitors downstream pressure and automatically changes the pump's internal configuration to alter flow so as to maintain a preset pressure.
A common problem in circuits with pressure-compensated, variable-displacement pumps is incorrect setting of the compensator cut-off pressure in relation to the spring setting of the system relief valve. The relief valve must always be set higher – 100 to 150 psi — than the compensator. The reason: if the compensator is set higher, part or all of pump output will flow over the relief valve when system pressure reaches the relief valve setting. The compensator will, in effect, be bypassed, and the operating concept for which the system designer specified pressure compensation will be negated. In addition, fluid temperature will rise due to the energy loss resulting from the pressure drop over the relief valve.
Case drain — Another important consideration in these circuits is case drain pressure, which is usually in the range of 5 psi. In many pump designs, the pressure compensator drain flows into the case, allowing pump case pressure to affect the compensator. Should excessive case pressure develop from a partially obstructed case drain line, for example, this additional back-pressure could cause serious problems. An erratic, fluttering compensator could quickly destroy the pump mechanically.
Incorrect pressure — Again, a pressure gauge installed downstream from the pump is a most valuable troubleshooting tool. If the gauge shows no pressure, follow the checkpoints in the extreme left-hand column of Figure 11.
First, note if the pump shaft is rotating and in the correct direction. Next, establish whether lack of system pressure might be caused by an "open system" condition: no resistance to fluid flow because of an open directional control valve or an incorrectly set relief valve. If the pump is not primed, an air-bleed valve installed downstream will help the pump self-prime.
If the system is developing some pressure – but less than desired or required – follow the check points on the extreme right-hand side of Figure 11. There usually is a lack of flow and system pressure because:
- inlet connections to the pump are blocked.
- faulty downstream components are impairing fluid flow and system pressure buildup.
Internal problems — If none of these conditions are found, the troubleshooter will have to examine the internal condition of the pump. There is a fast and easy check to determine if the pump rotating group is worn or damaged resulting in substantial, internal leakage. Using your sense of touch, establish whether the pump case drain line is hotter than the pump outlet line. If it is, shut down the pump, remove the solid piped pump case drain line, and replace it with a hose. Hold this hose over a bucket and restart the pump. Case drain flow will vary with pump size, but if more than a small trickle of oil runs through the hose, you have a very strong indication that the pump rotating group is badly worn.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Form Elements and
March 29, 2005
Finding a balance between label association, validation, and automatic form generation.
So we're all aware by now that the
id attribute is supposed to occur exactly once on a page. You're not allowed to use more than a single instance of any given
id; for that, you'd turn to a
class. Multiple classes are no problem, but multiple
ids are.
Now if you've done you're homework and you know how to properly apply a
label, you've probably run into this:
Attribute definitions
This attribute explicitly associates the label being defined with another control. When present, the value of this attribute must be the same as the value of the id attribute of some other control in the same document. When absent, the label being defined is associated with the element's contents.
This is from the spec and it basically means you should be specifying in your markup that any given
label is attached to a specific form element using the
for attribute.
There are a few implications from this that are just a little inconvenient. Most importantly, if you're doing it right, this means that every single
input box on a page must have a unique
id, for the sake of its label. If you've ever had a page that required multiple copies of the same or similar forms, you'll most likely have run into the validation issues this creates.
The natural tendency is simply to duplicate the forms. If you're running script which is automating the form creation, you'll have had to do something like
echo "<input type=\"text\" id=\"" . $formControl . $i . "\" />"; — where
$i is an incrementing value in the loop. If not, you'd have to do it by hand.
Another issue this raises is that
label elements may be associated with exactly one form control on each page. For cases where more than one element should share a common label, the only options are to over-do the labeling and selectively
display: none; the undesired labels, or you could also turn to the
fieldset and
legend combo… neither of which are particularly graceful in their ability to be styled, based on current browser support.
Now, both problems feel more like a design problem than a code problem — in the first case, the benefits of having duplicates of the same form on a page are questionable from a user interaction perspective, and in the second case the desire to not explicitly label a form control seems somewhat user-unfriendly. But let's recognize that in certain cases, the best choice is an atypical operation. So what then? Extra work for you, that's what.
Luckily though, the first problem has a fix which is old news, but I've only recently discovered simply by reading the spec a little more thoroughly. Implicit association means that instead of this:
Your Name:
<input type="text" id="myName" />
You can simply do this:
Your Name: <input type="text" />
This solves the first issue nicely, but doesn't do anything about the second — again according to the spec, you're only allowed to include a single form element within the label. But at least it's a start.
Please do not shoot me but I only have IE6 here at work.
Was playing around with the due date example.
<fieldset id="due_date">
<legend>due date</legend>
month<input type="text" id="due_date_month" name="due_date_month"/>
day<input type="text" id="due_date_day" name="due_date_day"/>
And a css of
fieldset { border: none; }
legend { height: 1em; }
label { display: none; }
input { margin: -1em; float: left; }
#due_date_month { margin: -1em 0 0 8em; }
makes a rough inline label and 2 input boxes display.
Can't test this in other browsers at the moment.
i'll go ahead and be the unpopular one to point out that that is one of the nice things about ASP.NET - it creates unique id's for elements and adds the "for=" attribute to labels automatically.
that said, the rest of the code it generates does suck.
I'm sure that the spec says that this:
Your Name:
…is OK, but the implementation is a little buggy. Clicking on the label should focus the associated field - it doesn't quite work out that way in IE (OK in Firefox, not sure about others).
Some of the examples pointed out above (2 address lines, 3 date inputs) contain different *fields*. I think the LABEL's intent is to describe the field that it's asociated with. It sounds like most of these issues would be caught by use of the fieldset and legend elements - if it was supported properly.
Sure ASP.NET outputs the label, but you're only talking about checkboxes and radio buttons right? The radio button/checkbox lists it generates are total crap though, just a big table mess.
Nesting an element into a label has two disadvantages:
- in IE, clicking the label won't work anymore (yuck)
- you can't use it with markup like

Foo

<input type="text" name="foo" id="foo" />

I didn't know you could wrap the label around the elements… sweet. That makes float-based styling a little more straightforward. All you have to do is overflow:auto the label, and then wrap the label text in a span, float it left, and float the textbox right.
what I especially like about the following markup:
<input id="someId" />
is that it keeps the markup down since <input /> fields require some kind of block (or inline-block) level element to wrap around it. You can easily style your forms to look lined up and fancy just styling the label's to be block elements, floating your input elements to the right, give them a set width, then clearing your label's.
Would using lists be an ok approach to achieve the same effect Dustin's example gave without nesting the input in the label?
(I am enamored of lists.)
Dustin: You don't even have to include the for= clause if it's nested. (according to the article…)
And your approach definitely works also. I'm currently fascinated with the overflow:auto business…
I first learned about the here:
[Note: That link was a royal pain the publish because of Dave's naughty word checker. Click on the first search result on the page, "The amazing element". Sorry about that, but that's the name of the website :)]
Which was probably published in 2001 or so. Notice his example usage uses the  to wrap the input element. It wasn't until later than I began making my labels stand-alone (rather than wrapping the input element). I've grown more partial to *not* wrapping the input element, but with this secret let out on the CSS design community maybe we'll be seeing a new trick to get the pseudo-table effect that makes it a little easier.
"Dustin: You don't even have to include the for= clause if it's nested. (according to the article…)"
Mike: You do need to explicitly do the for, even if you nest, if you want ti to work in IE.
The use of implicit form labels is deprecated in WAI WCAG 2.0 in favour of explicit. I've had a validator pull me up on this before so had to look it up. The reason they give for deprecating the method is they're "not supported by user agents and should not be used" �" http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-HTML-TECHS-20041119/#label. hmmm…
Dave, I've never had an issue assigning a unique id to a form element or any page element for that matter. Heck, I often resort to labelling a repetitious block of elements o1, o2, o3, etc. Because in the overall scheme of things, I just need them to be unique.
In database design, this makes perfect sense, each row in a table is assigned a unique id. It's usually an auto-incrementing integer.
As for associating a label with multiple controls, I think you touched on it when you said that this really tends to be a design issue. We often want to design forms in such a way that makes it easier for a developer to handle on the backend. Breaking down a date field in day, month, year fields is easier to handle than trying to parse what a user enters.
Having Address 1, Address 2 lines is another great example. We do that because we can restrict a user to two lines, and restrict the number of characters per line. "Textareas give users too much control!" So we try and stop them.
In these situations we need to stop and think about what would make the user's life easier… not ours.
title <input type="text">
title <input type="radio" value="1"> Yes <input type="radio" value="0"> No
I thought everyone did it this way. The pain (and bytes) of writing all those IDs and FORs is far too much.
IE is broken, but 1) too bad, no tiny added convenience for you (my approach), or 2) you can use a js onload script to make it work. Everyone else is fine.
As an aside, I don't think labels are even 5% as useful as "useability experts" seem to think they are. Most websites don't have them, so why would any rational user waste a click clicking on a title that most likely won't do anything? (And missing by 5mm+ isn't going to happen often.) I know I never do. Probably the only people who do are developers checking if other developers have used labels :-)
beautiful! I am actually in the middle of this problem at the moment, am going to have to tackle and finish it tomorrow, now I know the angle I'll pursue. Thanks Dave!
I myself have problems nesting a input inside a label because the way i style forms right now is giving a label a fixed width where you can give your form a nice indented horizontal layout.
Nesting a input would leave you no way to fix the width, other then that putting the contents of a label inside a span or a div and I absolutely not want that.
Ill go with the old way and using unique ID's and to be honest if you have to much unique ID's in your form maybe its more time to go through your forms and ways to split a form in several steps.
How does this affect the use of radio buttons?
I'm involved in a project right now which requires a labeled set of radio buttons. Using the name attribute, it is possible to group them, but giving them all the same id causes validation issues.
This is probably a stupid question, but it's one that I haven't found a satisfying solution to.
I must confess I'm finding it hard to think of times when a label should be associated with more than one form control, with the exception of radio buttons and check boxes (which definitely should be enclosed in a fieldset).
If you want to go down the "hidden labels" route, consider the following writeup:
We're in the same minefield at the moment, I'm morbidly fascinated by how differently Mozilla and IE handle legend styling. At this rate, hidden labels looks to be the practical approach.
At least I'm not alone now ;-)
Cameron Walters asks: "How does this affect the use of radio buttons? .. I'm involved in a project right now which requires a labeled set of radio buttons. Using the name attribute, it is possible to group them, but giving them all the same id causes validation issues."
Each radio button would require its own unique label anyway - one for each unique option text. The problem left over is how to associate the "main text" label with all three. Semantically that's what fieldset and legend are for.
Each radio button requires its own unique id (unless you use implicit labelling of each radio button) - so you are right, they can't share ids. Here's a good piece for radio buttons: http://webstandards.org/learn/tutorials/accessible-forms/02-accessible-forms.html
One wrinkle reading the HTML specification carefully - it is possible to have more than one label applying to one particular field. But not one label applying to multiple fields.
Hope that helps.
As Isofarro said, even in the case of checkboxes and radio buttons, a label tag should be used to display the value of _each_ individual form element — not a group of elements. One probable reason for this (among others) is clickability issues; if you click on a label tag that surrounds 4 checkboxes, which checkbox should become checked?
If you're trying to label a group of form elements (and aren't comfortable with the styling quirks of the legend tag), you might as well use a or
 to label the entire group. Using multiple identical label tags in that fashion doesn't gain you any additional semantic or usability value, and is probably just more trouble than it's worth.
Simon — "Address Line 1", "Address Line 2" vs. "Address". Although my inclination would be to use different wording and thus require both labels anyway, but that's one example for you.
Simon: One of the classic "multiple inputs requiring one label" scenarios would be a date input, e.g.:
Due Date
<select id="selMonth">
<option value="1">January</option>
<option value="2">February</option>
<input type="text" id="txtDay" />
<input type="text" id="txtYear" />
The label should apply to all three inputs, except that according to the specs, it can't. Why would you ask for a date like that, instead of just nicely asking the user to enter the date in "mm/dd/yyyy" format? That's what the client wanted. Or maybe you want to allow the user to enter a non-specific date like just the year, or the month and year.
I typically take the hidden label approach, and do something like this:

Due Date
Month Due
<select id="selMonth">…</select>
Day Due
<input type="text" id="txtDay" />
Year Due
<input type="text" id="txtYear" />
You can guess the basics of the CSS - the label and .label selectors get the same styling, and the .hidden class gets hidden.
This article reminds me of what I was lamenting yesterday. When are things in the world of web design/development going to "get better"?
How long have we waited for (insert aggravating fix or missing feature)?
Why is it that a good 10 years after the appearence of the web, we have so many irritating and aggravating interface issues with browsers and CSS/HTML?
Not to derail this thread because the label issue is a valid one. It just highlights something that for me has been very frustrating lately as I struggle with these issues on a daily basis.
My personal opinion is that things are moving way too slowly. The W3C is ineffective, in my view. It seems to have become a beauracratic nightmare. The only thing that has given our industry a kick in the pants lately has been FireFox - and it's effects have been great, but not far reaching enough by a long shot.
End rant. We now return to stupid problems with labels that ought not to be.
Tom – I definitely understand your frustration, but this  issue seems to be the fault of certain browsers' inability to style <fieldset> and <legend> consistently. The W3C provided the those tags for exactly this purpose – and they work well, provided that you're willing to sacrifice a precise layout in some browsers. As annoying as this can be (I've torn my hair out over it in the past), it seems to me that the spec isn't the problem, the browser implementation is.
Is there a real reason for wanting the id for a radio/checkbox to be the same for the whole group?
What possible effect can be reached by id'ing them all the same that can't be reached when giving them their proper ids?
Only thing I can think of would be javascript validation but if you are autogenerating the form why can't you autogenerate code?
I must say I am a tad confused why this,
[INPUT type="radio" name="gender" value="Male" /] Male[BR]
would be preferred over this
[LABEL for="gender_male"]Male[/LABEL][INPUT type="radio" id="gender_male" name="gender" value="male" /]
Or is there something wrong with the later example? I would think that "Male" is the label for this radio button.
Very nice, I was struggling with how to approach the multiple labels for a single input element (not literally a single element, but a date represented by 3 drop-downs). The hidden label answers this problem.
The fieldset implementation *is* buggy and frustrating, but hopefully by this time next year everyone will have it better sorted out. Even Mozilla has bugs some bugs to fix:
Another related problem the duplication of is 'id' and 'name':
For a label to 'work' it needs linking to the id of the control:
Username <input type='text' id='username'/>
All well and good, but if you submit the form the value wont be passed because you haven't specified a 'name':
Username <input type='text' name='username'/>
…except now, the label doesn't 'work'.
The fix is to have both an id AND a name:
Username <input type='text' id='username' name='username'/>
…which is unnecessary duplicated code in my book.
I think it's that upon click the label, the element the label is for will be focused. Since not more than one element can be focused at the same time in a browser, the label cannot be applied to more than one element, otherwise the browser would crash or something.
for information this solution (surroundding the input with label)cause some bug on the old version of netscape like between 6 and 7 and maybe on mozilla too.
Richard@Home: the importance of having a separate name and id attribute is that they serve two different purposes. The name attribute is to identify the value to a server when a form is submitted; the id is to identify the element in the client.
Consider the following:
Red<input type="checkbox" value="red" name="colour" id="redCheckbox">
Green<input type="checkbox" value="green" name="colour" id="greenCheckbox">
Blue<input type="checkbox" value="blue" name="colour" id="blueCheckbox">
In this case, the labels are attached by the client to the checkboxes via their id. Assume that the user checks "red" and "green". When the form is submitted, two values with the name "colour" will be sent to the server, one with value "red" and one with "green"; assuming a GET, we have
In the more likely case of a server-side form handler, most systems will automagically convert the same-name elements into an array (or equivalent collection) which can be iterated over.
Thus there is no redundancy: just a clear separation of attributes having relevance to the server, and those having relevance to the client. I may be wrong, but I believe this was the reason the id attribute was introduced with HTML 4; in HTML 3.2, all we had was a name.
The issue with using the label wrapped around the input fix is that sometimes you need the label and the input element to be in different divs or table cells and the label tag doesn't work accross different block level elements.
I've been nesting inputs inside labels for a while now, but then I add a label:hover rule to give it a subtle background highlight.
I'm sure it's not for everyone (and only works in "happy" browsers), but I like the effect.
I coworker of mine will commonly use a label element within a fieldset's legend, so I tried out something funky: an input inside a label inside a legend, with a further label as a sibling to the input (child of previously mentioned label) and that all validates.
I am curious about what implications this has for form semantics and consequently accessibility.
Interesting find Dave; a very useful design tool that fixes a lot of past problems I've experienced. I'll be implementing straight away on my projects. Thanks!
a bit late…
but yea, like Lach said, you need the for attr for this to work in IE. The great thing is though, you're still saving up on a lot of markup. Even the CSS is cut down quite a bit from what you might think of what it would take to look like it was nested in a table.
Nick Fitzsimons said:
> In the more likely case of a server-side form handler, most systems will automagically convert the same-name elements into an array (or equivalent collection) which can be iterated over. <
You can properly a form control to be an array adding square brackets after the name. Thus, the code would become:
Red<input type="checkbox" value="red" name="colour[]" id="redCheckbox">
Green<input type="checkbox" value="green" name="colour[]" id="greenCheckbox">
Blue<input type="checkbox" value="blue" name="colour[]" id="blueCheckbox">
To differentiate form elements with the rest of the content I use a prefix, usually form_. I find it a bit silly that form controls use the same sort of 'id' as the rest of an (X)HTML page. This is clearly a bad decision on the W3C's behalf and should be altered in following recommendations.
"You can properly a form control to be an array adding square brackets after the name."
That's a hack for PHP. In my, admittedly limited experience, most server side processors are smart enough to put multiple values in an array without needing [] to prompt them.
This is a little off topic, but what do you think of the way that XForms decided to handle label elements? In XForms, the label element is a child of the input element. (and a required one at that)
<input ref="name">
This makes it easy because the element is always associated with the propper input without need for unique id for each control.
Of course, since no browsers support XForms, or the pseudo-elements to style it, it's somewhat of a moot point. We'll just have to wait and see what will be possible when we can actually use these features outside of a controlled enviroment.
Since so many are bringing up the subject of saved bytes for nesting elements inside labels, I figured I'd nitpick the sample PHP code:
echo "<input type="text" id="" . $formControl . $i . "" />";
echo '<input type="text" id="' . $formControl . $i . '" />';
sprintf('<input type="text" id="%s%s" />', $formControl, $i);
By using single quotes, you don't have to escape any double quotes inside the string, but you do if you use single quotes. You only need to use double quotes for strings if you're using "special characters" like newlines or otherwise want PHP to process the contents of the string (e.g. echo "We've looped through this piece of code $count times.\nAre we there yet?!\n\n");).
All those escaped quotes decrease readability in addition to adding extra bytes for no reason.
"for information this solution (surroundding the input with label)cause some bug on the old version of netscape like between 6 and 7 and maybe on mozilla too."
The only issue with labels that I'm aware of with NS 6/7 and the corresponding Mozilla builds causes floated labels to disappear. I personally used for/id because I was unaware of nesting when I encountered the bug. And no, adding display: block or any other CSS trickery could bring it back (other than removing the float, of course).
I really like your work around. It saves some html code and in my opinion makes everything mroe readable.
Don't you just love how the W3C can keep churning out new great technologies like XForms that won't be supported till 10 years later… and then-so only partially by internet explorer.
Anyways… One problem I have run into with checkbox group arrays is accessing them in javascript. if you have:
<input type="checkbox" value="green" name="color[]" id="id1">
<input type="checkbox" value="blue" name="color[]" id="id2">
you cannot say: document.forms[0].color since "color" isn't the actual name… its "color[]" so you need to do somthing like document.forms[0].elements["color[]"] in order to get at the slement


text:
Select your exact date and or time or event below to purchase your Glasgow Rangers tickets.
If a date or event or your preferred seating is not listed below, feel free to email or call us for more information regarding purchasing your Glasgow Rangers tickets or click Live Help above during business hours.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All Glasgow Rangers ticket prices are in US Currency. Glasgow Rangers ticket prices and availability are subject to change at any time. Football Tickets will send a confirmation receipt upon full payment.
Football Tickets reserves the right to provide upgrades on all Glasgow Rangers ticket
orders at no extra charge to the customer. Football Tickets ticket deliveries
are guaranteed no later than noon on the day of the event unless stated otherwise,
however every effort will be made to deliver your Glasgow Rangers tickets as early as possible. All Glasgow Rangers tickets will be delivered by federal express overnight unless stated otherwise.
Football Tickets will not be responsible for any weather delays, event
postponements, event cancellations, change of venue, date, time, lost or
stolen Glasgow Rangers tickets.
Football Tickets is an independent, privately-owned company engaged in the service of finding and providing Glasgow Rangers tickets. We are not affiliated with, nor do we have any licenses or strategic alliances with, not are we authorized by any box office, promoter, venue, stadium, hotel, sporting team or sporting association. All and any copyrights, trademarks, trade names used within this web site are for descriptive purposes only. We are not acting on the authority of or by the permission of any of the above mentioned entities. We are able to provide access to Glasgow Rangers tickets through our contacts and various sources. Our prices are much higher than the face value of the Glasgow Rangers tickets. This reflects the degree of difficulty, and, of course the cost of obtaining Glasgow Rangers tickets.
We offer Glasgow Rangers tickets so you can watch your favorite team in the big game. Football
tickets, Soccer tickets and Glasgow Rangers tickets are available here online. Get great seats to the Glasgow Rangers games.
Bring your friends and family to the next Glasgow Rangers game. Reserve your Glasgow Rangers tickets today via phone or our Glasgow Rangers online ticket store. Go Glasgow Rangers!
Glasgow Rangers Tickets are available for purchase. Call and reserve your Glasgow Rangers tickets today! We offer Glasgow Rangers tickets that represent seats with excellent views of the game.
Dont miss out on your Glasgow Rangers tickets. Call today! Go Glasgow Rangers!


text:
A long-distance swimmer plans to swim 22 miles across Lake St. Clair this summer while hauling dinghies filled with 2,000 pounds of bricks.
ALGONAC, Mich. (AP) ? A long-distance swimmer plans to swim 22 miles across Lake St. Clair this summer while hauling dinghies filled with 2,000 pounds of bricks.
Jim Dreyer has made direct crossings of each of the five Great Lakes. He's scheduled to begin his swim on Aug. 5 from the Clinton River Boat Club near Algonac, and the event is to raise funds and awareness for Habitat for Humanity. The swim is expected to take 30 hours and end Aug. 6 at Detroit's Belle Isle.
Dreyer said the effort will be one of his most challenging, The Grand Rapids Press reported.
"It will be a real 'train of pain,' symbolic of the pain felt by Michigan families trying to keep their heads above water," Dreyer said. "However, instead of sinking with the weight of our burdens, I believe that together we can triumph and be the bricks that rebuild lives, rebuild communities, and strengthen the foundation of this great state."
When Dreyer swam across Lake Superior, he towed a boat loaded with 250 pounds of supplies.
Dreyer has partnered with Habitat for Humanity of Michigan to help fund building projects for up to 75 affiliates through the Cornerstone Strength Swim Campaign. Engraved commemorative bricks, including ones towed by Dreyer, will be sold to support the building project of the purchaser's choice.
Lakeshore Habitat for Humanity, which serves Ottawa and Allegan counties, is part of the effort.
"We sincerely hope it brings more attention and action to the need for more access to safe, affordable and decent homes in our communities," said Jack Zandstra, executive director of Lakeshore Habitat for Humanity.


text:
NoAds Advanced
by Gemorroj
Extension blocks external scripts, specific global script functions and variables, elements of a page and can import subscriptions from CSS-block (Adblock+ format) or URL-block (urlfilter.ini) filter files.
- This extension can modify or add functionality to one or more websites.
Feedback from users
Reviews and ratings
Excellent work on this extension. I used to have Opera adblock, but this one is far more user-friendly when it comes to css-blocking on a specific website. Love it, great job !
The Best!
Of course, this is the best. But why you removed menu item "Deactivate for this page"? Please fix this so that we could disable blocking for some sites.
Best adblocking extension on Opera by far! But PLEASE keep this maintained! Don't let it die like the others.
This is by far the most effective ad-blocker available as it seems. Sadly, it has such a MASSIVE hit on performance even by enabling it, it is completely useless after all because the whole browser suffers from it to nearly not working anymore (CPU usage 50-90% on a 3.2 GHz dual core!). There sure are alternatives here, but they aren't nearly that effective. PLEASE fix this extension! =)
@quangltm: I tried with even just on simple list without CSS filters and got the same results. Yet, with another extension like this (Opera AdBlock, https://addons.opera.com/de/addons/extensions/details/opera-adblock/0.52/?display=en) i can have a handful of lists AND CSS filters without a mesurable impact on performance at all! But it's still not as good with the filtering as this one ... =(
txt replace feature request
such as
www.google.com##"ad begin * ad end", means that all the text between "" will be deleted.
It blocks Captchas.
Best ad-blocker available, but slows and freezes opera often.
Połowy nie blokuje
tried two websites which adblock can't block, it works very perfectly, thanks!


text:
Booth Gallery
Here you will find a selection of booths through-out our Sol's stores. If you see something you're interested in don't hesitate to let us know. You can contact us via e-mail or give us a call at 330-893-3134. We will be more than happy to be your "personal shopper" and give you more information on any of the items (prices, sizes, available colors, designs, etc.) The number below the picture will be how we identify which booth you are referring to. A lot of the items we will be able to ship to you, but keep in mind we don't ship our larger items and furniture.
Page 1 of 8 NEXT »
|307 Total Results : Pages : 1   2 3 4 5 6 7


text:
Patricia E. Salkin, Dean and Professor of Law, Touro Law Center
Samuel J. Levine, Professor of Law and Director of the Jewish Law Institute, Touro Law Center
Lawrence Raful, Professor of Law and Former Dean, Touro Law Center (Moderator)
Deborah Cantrell, Associate Professor of Law and Director of Clinical Programs, Colorado Law
Bruce Green, Louis Stein Professor; Director, Stein Center for Ethics, Fordham Law School
Greg Kalscheur, S.J., Associate Professor of Law; Senior Associate Dean for Strategic Planning and Faculty Development, College and Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Boston College
Mary Szto, Associate Professor of Law, Hamline University
Stephen Wizner, William O. Douglas Clinical Professor Emeritus of Law, Supervising Attorney, and Professorial Lecturer in Law, Yale Law School (moderator)
Perry Dane, Professor of Law, Rutgers School of Law
Ronald Garet, Carolyn Craig Franklin Chair in Law and Religion, University of Southern California Gould School of Law
Avi Soifer, Dean; Professor of Law, University of Hawai'i at Manoa William S. Richardson School of Law
Cliff Richner, Esq., Vice President and Publisher, Richner Communications, Inc. (moderator)
Howard Friedman, Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Toledo Law School
Paul Marshall, Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute
Rusty Reno, Editor, First Things
Michael Sean Winters, National Catholic Reporter
6:30 - 9:00 p.m. - Dinner
Keynote Speaker, Geoffrey Miller, Stuyvesant P. Comfort Professor of Law; Director, Center for Financial Institutions, New York University Law School
Mark Movsesian, Frederick A. Whitney Professor of Contract Law and the Director of the Center for Law and Religion, St. John's University (moderator/commentator)
David Friedman, Professor of Law, Santa Clara Law School
Randy Lee, Professor of Law, Widener Law School
Phillip Ackerman-Lieberman, Assistant Professor of Jewish Studies; Assistant Professor of Law; Affiliated Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies and History; Vanderbilt Law School
Angela Carmella, Professor of Law, Seton Hall Law School (moderator)
Rabbi Shalom Carmy, Assistant Professor of Jewish Philosophy and Bible, Yeshiva University
Graham McAleer, Professor of Philosophy, Loyola University, Maryland
Lena Salaymeh, Robbins Postdoctoral Fellow, UC Berkeley School of Law
Marc DeGirolami, Associate Professor of Law Associate Director, Center for Law and Religion, St. John's University (moderator)
Fuat Gursozlu, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Loyola University, Maryland
Cathleen Kaveny, John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of Law and Professor of Theology, University of Notre Dame
Kevin Lee, Professor of Law, Campbell University, Normal Adrian Wiggins School of Law
Rabbi Dr. Meir Y. Soloveichik, Director, Zahava and Moshael Straus Center for Torah and Western Thought, Yeshiva University; Associate Rabbi, Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun
1:00 – 2:30 – Lunch and Closing Reception
Touro Law Center was established in 1980 as part of Touro College, a private, not-for-profit, coeducational institution based in New York City. Founded under Jewish auspices by its President, Dr. Bernard Lander, the College was chartered by the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York in 1970. Read more about our law school here.
If you would like to reserve a One Bedroom Suite, please use this link.
**Please note that if you are looking to book your room online and you attempt to make your reservation to check in prior to April 10th, or choose to stay beyond April 12th, the system will respond that there are no rooms available.
For additional information about the conference, please contact Samuel J. Levine, Professor of Law and Director of the Jewish Law Institute at (631) 761-7138 or email email@example.com.


text:
Thu Feb 2, 2017
I have been an Etsy seller since 2013. Recently I questioned myself about the lack of sales. Wondering about my product, was it quality, quantity or what? My product sells – but my pictures don't sell my product. After all, a dark blurry photo isn't going to bring people to your Etsy shop. However, a clear, sharp, and crisp photo will entice someone to not only visit but to look around at what else you might have in your shop. I learned a few tips and tricks over the past two weeks that might help you take better photos.
My Photo
You Don't Need: An expensive camera to take pictures, sure it helps but you can get great quality pictures with a phone or point and shoot camera as well. This photo below was taken with my cell phone.
Use only Natural Light: I Will never, not ever use a flash to take pictures again. I can't get the right colour when I use a flash. I want my product colour to arrive to my customer in the same colour / condition they purchased it in. Flashes also make shadows on your product that distract the customers eye when looking at your photo.
Follow a Pattern: I have looked around and a lot of shops have many different backgrounds and I find this distracting. I find there is a better flow and feel to your product if your (not your product colour) background follows a pattern. If you take a look at the photos in my seaglassing shop, you will see that the background of the pictures have a flow to them. What I'm getting at is perhaps your background colours are all pastel, or they match. I am still working on this and changing things everyday to see what works and what doesn't.
Have Fun: Take 100 photos of the same item in different directions, play with your camera and find a photo editing software to play with. There is plenty of free software available that could help you edit your photos. I am old school and I use NeoPaint, a program that I can write text, downsize photos and I'm sure do a lot more but this is all I want the program to do. These photo editing software on the market like PicMonkey, PhotoGrid, and BeFunky are all great tools.
Don't use cover up: You have an item that might have a flaw, be sure to take a shot that includes the flaw, don't cover it up. I mean you don't want to hide this and surprise the customer later. I have an Etsy shop MadeByGrandmasHands where I make deer hide moccasins. I don't believe in waste and so therefore if the animal has brushed up against a tree and has a scar on it I will use that in my moccasin to show that it is authentic material. Now I don't use large holes, large scrapes, thinning materials, but I think you know what I mean, and I take at least one photo that shows this.
De-Clutter your Photos: I seemed to feel my photos were naked if I didn't add clutter to them. What I mean by clutter was I would nicely place loose leaf tea, tools, maybe a picture of me, or the grand-babies in the picture. This is not good practice and shouldn't be done. When taking a photo remove and de-clutter all the noise and mess from your pictures. I used to take and place my sea glass wire wrapped pendants on a page from a calendar so as to show off how beautiful the coast line is where I live – duh! what was I selling the Island or my wire wrapped sea glass? Needless to say I stopped doing that, now I place my item on a stick so the background has that natural earth feel. Another great way to display your item is perhaps a small print sheet of 12 x 12 scrapbooking paper. For instance, I might take a photo shoot on cork a sheet of beach sand. These are all good ideas and they are not glossy pages like a calendar.
Size Matters: I can write all the description I want but sometimes this just doesn't help. Lets say you have a necklace, maybe one of your pictures could be of your neck shot so people can see the size of the pendant. Or maybe you just hold an item in your hand and take the picture that way, remember, you don't want the light bouncing off that $900 dollar engagement ring that you are not selling anyway so don't distract the buyer, de-clutter.
Shoot from all sides: A straight on shot is best but sometimes customers would like to see the back of a product to see how it was crafted. You can if using an IPhone or IPad centre hold in the screen to lock the AE/AF LOCK what this does is holds the exact light. So you can move about your item taking pictures from all sides and angles and the colour will match from one shot to the next.
So this is a tip of the iceberg, Etsy is a large marketplace. I don't have all the answers, but learn with me. Ask me questions so I can go find the answer and post in my next blog. I, like you, want the world to see what I do, but if good pictures don't increase visibility, no one wins. More visibility will lead to more sales – Now get going and "Shoot to Sell, because Good Photos sell Etsy Products."
[3] Comments
Subscribe to comments RSS
3 Responses to " Shoot to Sell – Good Photos Sell Etsy Product "
Sometimes I look at a picture and I am not impressed. Other times, a picture is captivating. At first, I thought it was because the subject was more interesting. After reading your post I studied pictures that drew me in and they generally follow the suggestions you stated….thanks for the hints.
Hi Cindy! Good tips! I keep saying I should open my Etsy shop again, I should write on my blog again, I should, I should, I should! I'm glad to see – you are!