text:
Power Banks Titan Quick Quote
Whether you're after a small or large quantity, our friendly Account Managers will give you the best service they can. Enquire to get prices, virtual proofs with your logo and dummy samples. No obligation to order.
the popular devices below before a Power Bank recharge is needed:
the popular devices below before a Power Bank recharge is needed:
Pantone Reflex Blue C
Pantone Green 361 C
Pantone Yellow C
Pantone Orange 021C
Pantone Red 186 C
Pantone Rhodamine Red
Branding Options and Print Area
Screen Printing:
Area Front: 150mm X 45mm
Area Back: 150mm X 45mm
Laser Engraving:
Area Front: 80mm X 45mm
Area Back: 80mm X 45mm
Screen Printing
Shows the product can be branded using a technique called 'Screen Printing', the most established method to print onto objects. Our prices always include screen printing in up to 4 colors on all the print areas. Logo artwork for products with this symbol should be provided in a vector format such as .eps, ai, or.cdr. Fonts should be converted to outlines and all colors 'solid', rather than in tones or shades.
Laser Engraving
Shows the product can be laser engraved. Engraving gives a stylish, very professional effect. Our prices always include engraving on all brandable areas shown on the product description. Logo artwork for products with this symbol should be uploaded in a vector format such as .eps, ai, and .cdr. Fonts should be converted to outlines and all colors 'solid', rather than in tones or shades.
- Output over-current and over-voltage protection
- Input over-current and over-voltage protection
- High temperature shut down
- Short-circuit protection
- Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) protection
- Easy check charge status. Push button to see remaining charge.
- Auto-on when device connected. Auto-standby when disconnected.
- Auto-adapting charge current to support variety of devices and optimise charge time
- A handy LED Torch that can be turned on and off by pressing the status button.
How they come
Charging Cable
Dimensions and WeightLength: 170mm (6.69 inches)
Width: 65mm (2.56 inches)
Height: 24.5mm (0.96 inches)
Weight: 412 grams (14.53 Ounces)
Tech SpecsInput: 5V/2A, Output: 5V/3A
Battery Type: Lithium-ion
Full Charge Time: 8-10 Hours
EnvironmentWhere plastic is used for non-visible internal parts, these materials come from 100% recycled sources
RoHS This product fully conforms to RoHS Directive (EU Restriction of hazardous substances).


text:
VANCOUVER, WASH. -- Custom injection molder Kaso Plastics Inc. has expanded into vinyl window and sliding glass door parts by acquiring a business from VPL Enterprises Ltd. for undisclosed terms.
Kaso of Vancouver, Wash., bought the fenestration products line from VPL Enterprises Ltd. of Langley, British Columbia, on March 5 for an undisclosed amount of cash. Products include handles, rollers and weep holes injection molded of polycarbonate and nylon, Kaso general manager Darin King said in a telephone interview. Assets bought are inventory, dies and manufacturing fixtures.
Kaso is a diverse molder which should find the extra work helps level off capacity utilization and improve efficiency, King explained. He expects Kaso will add six or seven new jobs to its staff of 90 over the next four or five weeks as the firm ramps up production of the fenestration products. The company has enough injection capacity to handle the extra business. Other key Kaso markets include auto, truck, consumer electronics and sports equipment.
"We sold the entire plastic fenestration business to focus on construction and telecommunications," said VPL vice president of sales and marketing Donovan Hammersley in a telephone interview. "A year ago we sold our metal fenestration business."
VPL injection molds construction products such as HVAC parts, wire management items and similar goods and telecommunications housings under its Primex brand name. Its Vanguard branded products include ABS shelf supports and retail shopping baskets with molded polypropylene baskets and nylon handles, some of which contain 25 percent recycled plastic. Hammersley said VPL will continue to make the baskets and shelf supports.
VPL will consolidate all its businesses under the Primex Manufacturing Ltd. name effective April 1, according to Hammersley. Its Primex division has a warehouse in Bellingham, Wash.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Whenever I hear (some) "limited government" conservatives and (minarchist) libertarians utter phrases like "We must keep the U.S. federal government to its Constitutional size" and "Only Congress has the legal and just power to [do this] or [do that]" or "These new laws and regulations are an affront to and assault on free market capitalism" or "President [Insert name here] has signed into law a bill that clearly violates the Constitution," I feel a sudden chill rushing down my spine. And it's not a good feeling. None indeed whatsoever.
The problem with this school of thought is that the individual who stands to defend this rhetoric bar none injects an enormous amount of political and ideological faith in a few areas under a blind guise of praxeological arguments. Not surprisingly, these aforementioned arguments are of the following:
- That the United States of America as a quasi-governmental corporation must be governed by a blanket set of rules called a constitution and that these rules see the State as a pet to be tamed and put on a leash;
- That, unless the Constitution "authorizes" the State to partake in legal functions (such as granting Congress the power to "coin Money" and to "declare War" against a foreign power) as "America's Founders had originally intended and envisioned them," the President, the Senate, and the Congress "has no constitutional authority" to engage in these said functions if said rules expressly forbid them to do so;
- That the 10th Amendment to the Constitution, which states in part, "The powers not expressly delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," is the law of the land and that Constitution "is only granted enumerated powers at the State level that the Constitution does not clearly spell out and define." Oh, and don't forget that they also say that Washington, D.C. "has no right to tell people and their States what they can and cannot do" because these issues (like taxes, economic regulations, immigration) pertain to "state sovereignty" and "states' rights."
(Some of these so-called limited statist conservatives reach an impasse with their ideological and political paradigms because they cannot reconcile their love affair for the Constitution and their alleged pro-liberty ideologies with their corporate socialist and privileged philosophies, given that they express deference to the State while appearing to favor laissez-faire "free market" capitalism);
- That the U.S. Supreme Court was never meant to be an instrument of judicial activism (that is, the Court having legislative power from the bench on the whims of the judges on account of their personal and political views and interests) but rather a provider of a strict, restrictive interpretative federal power on interstate commerce and limited judicial power (as mandated by the 11th Amendment);
- That the State was meant to be "limited" in nature, and that it must be confined to the chains of the Constitution, as "America's Founders intended it to be";
- That the State is meant to be in place to have "federal powers few and defined," and that some functions of society (such as roads, the police, prisons, and the courts) must be socialized and not left in the hands of a free market;
- And so on and so on;
What's equally troublesome is their easily-debunkable claim that free markets exist now (despite regulations by the State) and their corporatist/privileged safety net protection rackets are protected and carried out by state decree. Even Objectivists fall under this perturbing rubric all too well.
If those phrases are meant to be taken seriously, then I must ask those who employ them in political and ideological discourses this very paramount question: Why? Why must we care about "limited government" when the State is not some kind of a canine that can be put on a leash and trained to behave at his owner's command? Is it worth spewing those words, knowing how impossible it is to have a limited "minimized state" government because of its temptation to grow? This political opiate has taken on a life of its own. Even the Founders of whom some conservatives and minarchist libertarians have grown so fond had individually different ideas of what the role of government should be in civil society on its own merits. It's no secret that the "Founding Fathers" of the United States couldn't bring themselves to see eye-to-eye on how "small" the State should be. (The Articles of Confederation merely accomplished this [despite some of the problems that it had], but that document was thrown aside in favor of the current constitution.)
If we are an astute judge of constitutional history, then it is obvious that the great constitutional experiment that the Founders established has not created a government "limited" within power and scope but a plutocratic-autocratic hybrid apparatus. In other words, the State has become both an instrument of unlimited power and a collusive partner with Big Business and Fortune 100 and 500 corporations that enjoy privileged advantages at the expense of the underclasses. This is where the "free market capitalism" angle comes in: a politico-economic system that is state capitalistic in nature but disguised as a pseudo "free market capitalistic" system exploiting the underclass and protecting privileged elitism by according the ruling class with tangible perks that are not available to the poor a.k.a. the ruled.
And it doesn't help that a minor subset of libertarians, whether they fall under the minarchistic or, to a lesser degree, the anarchistic categories, have embraced this "vulgar libertarian" mindset, while forgetting that they condemn corporatism if it does not benefit them but, once it starts to work for them, they immediately embrace it. And some of their conservative allies who embrace the constitutional fetishism that the State is their enemy and that Wall Street and corporate America are enemies of true liberalism, a free market, and a peaceful civil society.
Conservatives (even the Ron Paul ones) have done the same, albeit a much lesser degree than the others. If nothing, they are their own worst enemies, and yet they don't recognize that.
The conservative and libertarian love affair with maximum "limited" statism, corporatism, and constitutional fetishism is enough for me to deliberately question the absolute integrity of these groups.


text:
- Sure, a hangover will put a damper on blogging, but I shut my eyes real hard right now and thought about how thankful I was for a few things, namely, that I am not an American Airlines customer sales representative. [Wash Post]
- And my hangover isn't as bad as Randi Rhodes' will be tomorrow. [Mediabistro]
- I'd rather do this job with tongue sweat and migraines every day than have the job of this guy's speechwriter. [WSJ]
I would also rather be hungover than have the song "I Guess That's Why They Call It The Blues" in my head. [Reuters]
- And I am less incapacitated than famed Arizona congressman Mo Udall on his deathbed when no one came to visit him anymore besides John McCain. [Slate]
- And speaking of McCain, I wouldn't really want to be on the receiving end of whatever he's saying about David Brock right now in this state. [Politico]
- Same goes for Colin Powell. [ABC News]
- I'm pretty lucky today that, like most scientists, I have ADD. [Breitbart]
- And that the French aren't prosecuting websites accused of promoting drunkorexia. [Times of London]


text:
I am sure many of you didn't hear, but there are a few around in my area, but the storm that ripped through Iowa yesterday morning went right over or very near my house. I've heard a neighbor to the east, half a mile, had 2 grain bins fall on his semi, while another neighbor half mile to the west just had branches down, but his field that is right next to my house, was leveled. Now for the good part, I am on vacation and was traveling from central Florida to NE Georgia at the time, so I wasn't even home. I didn't know anything about it till a friend asked me when I was getting home and then a text message after that said there was a tornado that went through. I've heard it was a tornado and then heard it was very strong winds. Either way, it was nasty shit that went through and I got to miss all of it. My friend has checked my house and there was a limb from a tree that took out a support 4x4" beam and damaged some sofet but that's been it. There's no power due to a lot of lines being down and no idea when it will be back up, but my friend has a generator at my house to run the sump pump in the basement. It's an unfinished basement so a little water isn't going to hurt anything. No idea if there was any lightning damage, but before I left, I unplugged my TV for sure, but I can't remember if I unplugged my computers. O well, if anything, it gives me more reason to build another one them (and will make use of my deductible) I am already thinking 6 core proc, sata III SSDs, dual GTX590s, ZOMG I better stop lol
Anyways, I heard about it. A friend I bowl with lost his house, and it was a huge house, but no one was injured. I had heard that the storm went all the way to central Illinois. Not sure if it got to the quad cities, but I know there are a few AO members down that way.
Just wanted to let everyone know I am alright, and that I wasn't even in the state when it happened. Should be back around this weekend or so.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk


text:
shooraijin wrote:The Tegra chip concerns me. Not so much from the backwards compatibility viewpoint but rather that I don't see this being sufficiently compelling for performance.
Bobtheduck wrote:Make this thing region free, and I"ll buy it when I have the money, for sure.
Don't make it region free, and I'll buy it once it's hacked.
There have been 2 pieces of hardware I've wanted to see for years: A system that was both portable and console, and VR. I have my VR (and, by the way, it's pretty great) and a hybrid console is coming out. The region thing will get in the way, though. I'm not living in the US.
Return to Video Games and VG Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


text:
Recently, Felix Salmon, Clusterstock, and others have been mentioning an essay from the Hoover Institute about the financial crisis. Now, I haven't yet linked to the essay in question… I will, but only after I've said some thing about it.
I was on the front lines of the securitization boom. I saw everything that happened and am intimately familiar with how one particular bank, and more generally familiar with many banks', approach to these businesses. I think that there are no words that adequately describes how utterly stupid it is that there is still a "debate" going on surrounding banks and their roles in the financial crisis. There are no unknowns. People have been blogging, writing, and talking about what happened ad naseum. It's part of the public record. Whomever the author of this essay is (I'm sure I'll be berated for not knowing him like I was for not knowing Santelli — a complete idiot who has no place in a public conversation whose requisites are either truth or the least amount of intellectual heft), unless it's writing was an excesses in theoretical reasoning about a parallel universe, it's a sure sign they don't what they are talking about that they make some of the points in the essay. Let's start taking it apart so we can all get on with our day.
For instance, it isn't true that Wall Street made these mortgage securities just to dump them on them the proverbial greater fool, or that the disaster was wrought by Wall Street firms irresponsibly selling investment products they knew or should have known were destined to blow up. On the contrary, Merrill Lynch retained a great portion of the subprime mortgage securities for its own portfolio (it ended up selling some to a hedge fund for 22 cents on the dollar). Citigroup retained vast holdings in its so-called structured investment vehicles. Holdings of these securities, in funds in which their own employees personally participated, brought down Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. AIG, once one of the world's most admired corporations, made perhaps the biggest bet of all, writing insurance contracts against the potential default of these products.
So Wall Street can hardly be accused of failing to eat its own dog food. It did not peddle to others an investment product that it was unwilling to consume in vast quantities itself.
(Emphasis mine.)
Initial premise fail. I had a hard time finding the part to emphasize since it's all so utterly and completely wrong. Since I saw everything firsthand, let me be unequivocal about my remarks: the entire point of the securitization business was to sell risk. I challenge anyone to find an employee of a bank who says otherwise. This claim, that "it isn't true that Wall Street made these mortgage securities just to dump them on them the proverbial greater fool" is proven totally false. There's a reason the biggest losers in this past downturn were the biggest winners in the "league tables" for years running. As a matter of fact, there's a reason that league tables, and not some other measure, were a yardstick for success in the first place! League tables track transaction volume–do I really need to point out that one doesn't judge themselves by transaction volume when their goal isn't to merely sell/transact?
In fact, the magnitude of writedowns by the very firms mentioned (Merrill and Citi) relative to the original value of these investments imply that a vast, vast majority of the holdings were or were derived from the more shoddily underwritten mortgages underwritten in late 2006, 2007, and early 2008. In fact, looking at ABX trading levels, as of yesterday's closing, shows the relative quality of these mortgages and makes my point. AAA's from 2007 (series 1 and 2) trading for 25-26 cents on the dollar and AAA's from early 2006 trading at roughly 67 cents on the dollar. The relative levels are what's important. Why would Merrill be selling it's product for 22 cents on the dollar if the market level is so much higher (obviously the sale occurred a few months ago, but the "zip code" is still the same)? This is a great piece of evidence that banks are merely left holding the crap they couldn't sell when the music stopped.
Now, onto the next stop on the "How wrong can you get it?" tour.
It isn't true, either, that Wall Street manufactured these securities as a purblind bet that home prices only go up. The securitizations had been explicitly designed with the prospect of large numbers of defaults in mind — hence the engineering of subordinate tranches designed to protect the senior tranches from those defaults that occurred.
Completely incorrect. Several people who were very senior in these businesses told me that the worst case scenario we would ever see was, perhaps, home prices being flat for a few years. I never, not once, saw anyone run any scenarios with home price depreciation. Now, this being subprime, it was always assumed that individuals refinancing during the lowest interest rate period would start to default when both (a) rates were higher and (b) their interest rates reset. [Aside: Take note that this implicitly shows that people running these businesses knew that people were taking out loans they couldn't afford.] Note that the creation of subordinate tranches, which were cut to exactly match certain ratings categories, was to (1) fuel the CDO market with product (obviously CDO's were driven by the underlying's ratings and were model based), (2) allow AAA buyers, including Fannie and Freddie, an excuse to buy bonds (safety!), and (3) maximize the economics of the execution/sale/securitization. If there were any reasons for tranches to be created, it had absolutely nothing to do with home prices or defaults.
Further, I would claim that there wasn't even this level of detail applied to any analysis. We've seen the levels of model error that are introduced when one tries to be scientific about predictions. As I was told many times, "If we did business based on what the models tell us we'd do no business." Being a quant, this always made me nervous. In retrospect, I'm glad my instincts were so attuned to reality.
As a matter of fact, most of the effort wasn't on figuring out how to make money if things go bad or protect against downside risks, but rather most time and energy was spent reverse engineering other firm's assumptions. Senior people would always say to me, "Look, we have to do trades to make money. We buy product and sell it off–there's a market for securities and we buy loans based on those levels–at market levels." These statements alone show how singularly minded these executives (I hate that term for senior people) and businesses were. The litmus test for doing risky deals wasn't ever "Would we own these?" it was "Can we sell all the risk?"
But wait, there's more…
Nor is it plausible that all concerned were simply mesmerized by, or cynically exploitive of, the willingness of rating agencies to stamp Triple-A on these securities. Wall Street firms knew what the underlying dog food consisted of, regardless of what rating was stamped on it. As noted, they willingly bet their firm's money on it, and their own personal money on it, in addition to selling it to outsiders.
One needs the "willingly bet [their own] money on it" part to be true to make this argument. I know exactly what people would say, "We provide a service. We aggregate loans, create bonds, get those bonds rated, and sell them at the levels the market dictates. It isn't our place to decide if our customers are making a good or bad investment decision." I know it's redundant with a lot of the points above, but that's life–the underlying principles show up everywhere. And, honestly, it's the perfect defense for, "How did you ever think this made sense?"
And, the last annoying bit I read and take issue with…
Nor is it true that Wall Street executives and CEOs had insufficient "skin in the game," so that "perverse" compensation incentives created the mess. That story also does not pan out. Individuals, it's true, were paid sizeable bonuses in the years in which the securities were created and sold.
Richard Fuld, of failed Lehman Brothers, saw his net worth reduced by at least a hundred million dollars. James Cayne of Bear Stearns was reported to have lost nearly a billion dollars in a matter of a few months. AIG's Hank Greenberg, who remained a giant shareholder despite being removed from the firm he built by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer in 2005, lost perhaps $2 billion. Thousands of lower-downs at these firms, those who worked in the mortgage securities departments and those who didn't, also saw much wealth devastated by the subprime debacle and its aftermath.
Wow. Dick Fuld, who got $500 million, had his net worth reduced by $100 million? That's your defense? And, to be honest, if you can't gin up this discussion, then what can you gin up? The very nature of this debate is that all of these figures are unverifiable. James Cayne was reported to have lost nearly a billion dollars? Thanks, but what's your evidence? The nature of rich people is that they hide their wealth, they diversify, and they skirt rules. So, sales of stock get fancy names like prepaid variable forwards. Show me their bank statements–even silly arguments need a tad of evidence, right?
Honestly, at this point I stopped reading. No point in going any further. So, now that you know how little regard for that which is already known and on the record this piece of fiction is, I'll link to it…
Although, Felix does a great job of taking this piece down too (links above)… Although, he's a bit less combative in his tone.


text:
AUGUSTA — Friday will be the last day of production at the Garelick Farms milk processing plant in Bangor, bringing to an end 110 years of local dairy production. And the situation Maine's dairy industry finds itself in, and which likely led to Garelick's closure, are not improving, according to the Maine Milk Commission, which met Thursday.
The Maine Milk Commission gathered to determine the minimum price dairy farmers will receive for their milk in February, as well as discuss whether the minimum price processors like Oakhurst receive from retailers should be increased.
Julie-Marie Bickford, executive director of the Maine Dairy Industry Association, said the meeting saw "great discussion, but significant inaction."
Part of the reason for the inaction, Bickford said, is that the commission is somewhat limited in what it can do.
The federal government sets the minimum price Maine farmers get for their milk, a number influenced by the global commodities market for dairy products. The Maine Milk Commission has a few mechanisms to increase the price Maine farmers receive, including what's called the "producer margin," which is a premium placed on top of the federal minimum price that is supposed to reflect the cost of production for Maine farmers.
According to new estimates supplied by the commission, on average it costs Maine dairy farmers $30 to produce a hundredweight of milk — which is approximately 12 gallons. Farmers, however, will only receive roughly $20 per hundredweight for their milk in February, according to the commission's data.
"There aren't too many things swinging the dairy farmers' way, quite honestly," Bickford said. "About one-third of our total costs are not being covered by the minimum price set by the federal government and it's not covered by any of [Maine's] safety nets. It means dairy farmers are digging a deeper hole for themselves. It's not a very pretty picture."
Despite the fact the federal minimum price dropped 76 cents in February, the commission opted to keep the producer margin where it was in January, at $1.53. The reason was that raising that premium to try to help the farmers would have the potential to harm the processors and the retailers.
Richard Cook, a member of the commission, spoke directly to the half dozen dairy farmers in the audience. He called the situation the milk commission finds itself in is a "catch-22."
"It's like putting a cup of water into a stream," he said. "The little things we can raise doesn't do very much for anybody or anything. It does a little bit for farmers, but we're getting to a point where raising it might help the farmer or hurt the farmer. It might mean the producer then can't take the milk and we lose the farms anyway. I feel terrible about it."
Testimony presented by Hannaford stopped any discussion of increasing what's called the "dealer margin," the minimum price milk processors receive from retailers, in its tracks.
Hannaford said, in essence, that if the price retailers have to pay for Maine milk increased much more, the reality of the market would force retailers to consider buying milk from out-of-state producers to remain competitive. "This could lead to a weakening of the Maine milk industry," Stephen Culver, Hannaford's VP of government relations, wrote in written testimony.
If Hannaford, which currently sources more than three million gallons of Maine milk for its private-label milk, decided to source its milk elsewhere, it would be a big hit to Maine's dairy industry. But the company, which is owned by Delhaize, a Belgian company, is not threatening to buy all its milk from out of state, a decision it would make "very reluctantly," according to Mike Norton, a Hannaford spokesman.
"[The testimony] doesn't portend a business decision," he said. "It's a statement about how markets work."
Tom Brigham, co-president of Oakhurst Dairy in Portland, said Hannaford's testimony is a worrying sign of the challenges the dairy industry faces.
"Not only have they been a very good customer for us, but they have been very supportive of local producers of all sorts of food products and the Maine dairy industry, in particular," Brigham said. "It would be very disappointing to see them turn to out-of-state processors for their supply. The fact that they could be in a position where they might consider that shows how difficult this situation is, and underscores how much of a challenge this is for all of the stakeholders in all facets of the dairy industry."
Bickford expressed some frustration at Hannaford's testimony.
"The thing that was frustrating is Hannaford came in at the very last day of the comment period with comments after not participating in process prior to that, and then said 'don't do any of this, we'll take our business elsewhere,' which is kind of a big stick," she said. "We're not used to that because Hannaford has been one of the retailers that has stepped forward as more of a team player. But, again, we have to remember they're not our Hannaford anymore — they're Delhaize."
Bickford said dairy farmers understand that processors and retailers are all under pressure from rising costs. However, while farmers have both hands tied behind their back and can't access competitive markets, retailers have the flexibility to raise the price of milk they sell to consumers to increase their profit margin and make up some of the difference, she said.
"I wish we had a system where we were on a level playing field and we could talk equitably between the sectors about achieving profitability, but for the farmers, we don't have that luxury. We're talking about surviving. We're not talking about profit margins or even return on investment. We're talking about pure out survival," she said. "I wish there was a magical solution, but there isn't. I just want to be able to be back here in a few months, a year, a couple of years, and still be able to have these conversations, and not have the conversation be, 'Well, there's not enough milk in Maine to supply the plants.'"
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.
The Rangeley Highlander
Rangeley teenager is first full-time firefighter in the town
The Rangeley Highlander
Scrappy Chef- Simple Ingredients that Lead to a Delicious Cake!
The Rangeley Highlander
Donna Perry named New England's journalist of the year
Photo: Shoppers grab deals on Black Friday
The Rangeley Highlander
Mother Nature


text:
/** */
It was a lovely sunny day this Saturday, and on the outside wall of the famous department store NK in Stockholm, Björn Borg met John McEnroe for a game of vertical tennis.
Except they were stuntmen, of course. "We couldn't convince the original players to do a re-match on the wall" said Pernilla Johansson, global PR-&-Event at Björn Borg, to Resume.se.
Speaking of non-originals, vertical tennis has been played on sides of big buildings before.
On the 29th of April this year, the Madrid Open opened with vertical tennis on a wall.
Back in 2008 there was a special installation billboard in Hamburg with a vertical tennis match.
Actually, this has been done by Carlsberg as well, so it's been spotted in Badland before: Vertical football times two - Carlsberg vs Adidas. The root? TBWA Japan had the entire world talking with their Adidas vertical football ad in 2004 - and they raked home the awards.


text:
Girls just want to have fun so they say - and this week's new film sees teen beauty Erica getting all creative!
Watch as Erica skillfully body paints every inch of Karolina to create a living work of art! Both girls are totally naked of course, making this an artistic and yet sexy project.
Erica certainly seems to be enjoying herself as she paints Karolina's lithe limbs and perfect curves…
Why not join in the fun?
Would you like to comment? Join us today, or sign in if you're already a member.


text:
Hi. I've been searching the internet for days now, and can't locate the programming software and cable for my Maxon (Midland) SP-330 radios. I've found many places that say they have the items, but when I place the orders, they contact me to let me know they don't have them. I've been checking with everyone since then, and nobody seems to know where I can find these items.
Does anyone have any idea where I might be able to locate these?
Thanks in advance!
Need Programming Software and Cable for Maxon/Midland SP330
Forum dedicated to discussion on Maxon Radio products
Post Reply
1 post • Page 1 of 1
Post Reply
1 post • Page 1 of 1


text:
The Cleveland Orchestra performs year-round at home in Northeast Ohio, on the road in the United States and overseas, and in homes and on mobile phones and music-players everywhere through weekly radio broadcasts and an acclaimed catalog of recordings.
Two acclaimed concert venues serve as the ensemble's home, Cleveland's Severance Hall during each schoolyear and Blossom Music Center each summer.
To learn more, click on these links:
Your gift for music will help us weather the COVID-19 crisis - and be doubled with matching funds!