text:
During my recent attempt to learn the Dvorak keyboard layout, my goal was to remain proficient in QWERTY, trying to store both layouts in my brain and be able to eventually use them both equally. At the outset, it seemed like it would be impossible to store two ways of using the same complex object in my brain at once. And though some successful switchers warned me that it might be impossible, some preliminary research shows that it may be doable after all.
In a study Ars covered in December, a group of scientists found that even extremely good typists that can hit 72 words per minute or better don't actually know where the keys on the keyboard are. As people learn to type, the motion of hitting a key and the reason for doing so are stored in short-term memory. As the process becomes more automatic, typists' knowledge of a keyboard goes from explicit to implicit—even as they get faster and faster, they become no better at, for instance, knowing where the letter X is on the keyboard they're typing on.
This study doesn't address learning multiple layouts, but it does point out that a typist's knowledge of a keyboard is a fairly complex and very internalized, reflexive relationship that depends far more on mental work than the object itself. When Ars asked one of the authors of the paper, Dr. Kristin Snyder, about how one might mentally store both layouts, Snyder said the process was possible—in fact, she's tested for it.
Last summer, Snyder took a group of skilled QWERTY typists with an average speed of 74 wpm and had them complete 20 training sessions in the Dvorak layout. Simply completing all the training sessions took the typists from an initial speed of around 13.3 wpm—on the order of where I started and roughly where my speed stayed—to 33 wpm.
Not only were the typists able to get their speed up in fairly short order, but they were able to preserve it even while switching between layouts. Snyder put the typists through a task-switching test where they were cued with a word and instructed to type it in either Dvorak or QWERTY. According to Snyder's early interpretation of the results, "it's harder for typists to switch from Dvorak to QWERTY than vice versa," she told Ars. However, the results showed that switching on a mental level between layouts was possible, "even on a word-by-word basis," Snyder said.
Uncommon though the need for switching keyboard layouts is, it's possible through our ability to quickly switch between two tasks (what's colloquially referred to as multitasking). Our "knowledge" of a keyboard layout is tied to the physical object only incidentally, and this makes it relatively easy to switch between two layouts, even on the fly.
Each keyboard layout is what researchers refer to as a task set, or a learned way of interacting with an object. It seems counterintuitive that we would be able to store two complex, different, and yet similar ways of using the same object. But we already do this for many objects: a pen can be used to write in two different languages or alphabets, or to draw—or it can be fashioned into, and used as, a weapon. The important thing about retaining and calling up this information isn't the sheer number of the alternative ways of using something but how we are at using it in practice.
"Task switching," which is what we are doing when we change keyboard layouts, does come at a small cost of time and error. In a 2003 paper, one researcher examined how switching between two tasks affected performance as opposed to repeating the same task over. Between two different tasks, people must do a kind of "mental 'gear changing'" that can include "retrieving goal states" and "condition-action rules… enabling a different response set and adjusting response criteria."
Giving people time, even just a second, to prepare for a switch can mitigate their response times in completing a small task—for instance, switching between categorizing letters as vowels or consonants and numbers as odd or even. Just having mental space for a reset could theoretically be enough to allow someone with knowledge and competency in both keyboard layouts to swap between one and the other.
Snyder said her research is ongoing, and she plans to run another set of keyboard layout-switching tests this coming summer. But if you're interested in learning a new keyboard layout like Dvorak or Colemak and want to repeat my experiment of learning it while staying competent in both QWERTY and Dvorak, research says it's doable, as long as you stay in practice.


text:
A DAD told how he had a winning £1m lottery ticket in his back pocket for three days and nearly forgot all about it.
Malcolm Sills, of Stockton, thought it was loser before wife, Claire, double checked the numbers at a Sainsbury's store before realising the bit of paper was worth £1m to be split with friends Martin and Claire Tait, also from Stockton.
The couples are in a 50p syndicate and had actually won £40 on a scratchcard while they were on a Cener Parcs break with their children.
Mr Sills wanted to spend the money on a few drinks or a meal but Mr Tait persuaded them to buy some buying Euromillion tickets.
The draw was held on Thursday, February 19 but the Sills didn't double check the number on one of the tickets until the Friday, after Mr Tait had returned to Nigeria, where he works as a sub-sea engineer.
"The other three all say they would have probably thrown the ticket away," said Mr Sills.
They phoned Mrs Tait who was able to pass on the good news to her husband.
The two women, both 36, met when they were 16 while working at Woolworths and their husbands are also old friends.
Mr Tait, 37, and Mr Sills, 38, who works in sales, are keen cricketers and have decided to attend the Ashes in Australia in the winter as part of a joint family holiday.
Both couples now look forward to paying off their mortgages and debts.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
HDFC Co-op | "Affordable" Home Ownership
|The Monterey | 351 West 114th Street
Morningside Park
Q: What is an HDFC coop?
A: HDFC (Housing Development Fund Corporations)
Since 1979, the Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) has sold formerly City-owned buildings to Housing Development Fund Corporations (HDFC's)
HDFC coops are affordable cooperatives in New York City. They are a relatively unknown market niche that are city subsidized and sell below market (40%-50%) below non HDFC comparable coops and condos.
If you qualify an HDFC coop may be right for you. It may be a great deal.
HDFC coops are a form of limited equity home ownership. HDFC coops offer many of the same benefits as regular coops but they have some eligibility (income) restrictions and many have a "flip tax" paid by the seller.
Since they are sold below market and the maintenance remains low because the city reduces real estate tax on HDFC coops upon selling a portion of the profit is shared with the coop and sometimes the city hence "flip tax".
Back in the late 70' and 1980's many rental buildings were abandoned by landlords and owners that may have owed back taxes or city water charges and the buildings were taken over by the city. NYC HPD (Housing Preservation Department) through an affordable housing program helped to rehabilitate the buildings, trained the tenants on ownership, set the Coop up financially to be self-sustaining, and then sold the apartments to the existing tenants for very low amounts some as low as $250 in exchange the new owners had to maintain the buildings.
Rather than becoming a landlord, the City helped rehab and trained the existing tenants, even some squatters about maintaining their building and becoming a self sufficient housing cooperative. It has been a very successful program. Over the years they rarely sold and remained within families.
During the past several years brokers including myself began listing and marketing HDFC coops and have been able to get much higher prices for the owners. While they still sell below market many sellers are now able to get the highest possible price for their coop and their sweat equity.
I recently represented a seller and a buyer in two different 3 bedroom apartments in the same line in an HDFC coop in Morningside Heights. I sold the seller's beautifully renovated apartment for $660,000 and managed to procure the same apartment on a higher floor, un-renovated for $550,000. The highest prices in the building's history. A non HDFC comparable coop would be $900,000 - $1.2M.
More recently I've represented sellers and buyers in Harlem's most sought after HDFC coop as well as HDFC's in Hamilton Heights, Sugar Hill, Morningside Heights, Manhattan Valley, Hell's Kitchen the East Village and Williamsburg, Brooklyn.
The specific definition of low income for some HDFC cooperatives were time limited and have expired, the cooperation must adopt a new standard. The highest standard that HPD will accept is 165% of the median income for the metropolitan area.
Because HDFC coops were originally set up as low income housing they must remain affordable so a buyer must qualify financially. An HDFC coop must be a primary residence and the income restrictions are based on area income standards. In many cases either less than 120% or 165% area median income. Therefore individual HDFC coops have different income requirements. It also varies depending on the household size. A household of five can have a substantially higher income enabling larger households to afford larger apartments.
The cost of owning and maintaining shares in a cooperative include apartment maintenance, the monthly payments on any loan used to purchase the shares, utilities, and homeowners insurance. Generally buyers should not pay more than 30% of their gross income in housing costs. HDFC boards have the same discretion to approve or reject a buyer like any regular coop. The only difference is there is a maximum income allowed to purchase or lease in HDFC coop apartments.
When buying or selling an HDFC Coop it is important to use a broker that understands the rules, restrictions and nuances of HDFC coops.
If you would like more information about buying or selling an HDFC coop please contact me.
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, this blog and my answers to questions are my opinions for information purposes only based on my experience as a real estate broker and not intended as legal or financial advice and should not be used as a substitute for advice of legal counsel.
updated: 4/1/19


text:
Roof Coating Kansas
It's proven. Roof coatings can save you money on roof replacement and cooling costs.
What types of roof can be coated?Almost all types of roofs can be coated. Metal, Built-up (BUR), Concrete, Modified Bitumen, Spray Polyurethane Foam and Single-ply (EPDM, TPO & PVC). Ballasted or gravel surfaced roofs are not acceptable roof surfaces for roof coatings.
How many types of roof coatings are available?Lexis sells several types of reflective roof coatings such as acrylics, butyls, polyurethanes and silicones.
How long will it last?A properly applied roof coating system can last up to 10 years or more depending on overall coating thickness. It can also be recoated to extend the life even longer.
Factory Direct to any location in Kansas
We ship high quality, contractor-grade roof coatings all Kansas cities.


text:
The festival will run through Sept. 21.
The lineup includes playwrights Jessica Blank, Radha Blank, Mikhail Durnenkov, Kathryn Grody, Adi Hanash, Erik Jensen, Harry Kondoleon, Ethan Lipton, Dominique Morisseau, Mary Kathryn Nagle, Dan O'Brien, Robert O'Hara, Pavel Pryazhko, Ethan Sandler, Patrick Vassel and Natal'ya Vorozhbit.
Directors participating in New Work Now! include Daniel Goldstein, Liesl Tommy, Kwame Kwei-Armah, Leigh Silverman, Kate Whoriskey and Davis McCallum.
Click here for a complete schedule of New Work Now!
"New Work Now! explodes on our stage this fall with 14 incredible plays from a brilliantly talented group of writers," associate artistic director Mandy Hackett said in a statement. "Sharing new work-in-progress with our audiences is always a thrilling experience and this dynamic line-up (for free) is not to be missed."
This year's New Work Now! series also includes New York Then, an opportunity for The Public to celebrate seminal works from the past. This year, The Public will present a reading of Harry Kondoleon's Zero Positive.
Tickets are available by calling (212) 967-7555 or visiting publictheater.org.


text:
Despite a two-hour parade of musical tributes featuring the biggest names from every genre of modern popular music, Ringo Starr and Paul McCartney effortlessly stole the show at 'The Beatles: The Night That Changed America.'
Starr's three-song set served as a reminder of just how charming and charismatic a live frontman the Fab Four's drummer has become. He followed the night's theme of celebrating the 50th anniversary of his former group's first appearance on 'The Ed Sullivan Show' by performing two songs — 'Matchbox' and 'Boys' — that could have been in their set lists at that time. Then he traveled ahead a couple of years to lead the crowd in a massive 'Yelllow Submarine' singalong.
McCartney and his crack / fantastic / awesome / however you want to say it solo band kicked off their set with the totally appropriate 'Birthday.' After an energetic reading of 'Get Back,' he launched into the theme song from 'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band,' which of course led into… 'With a Little Help From My Friends,' with Starr (err, sorry, Billy Shears) returning to take over lead vocals.
The duo then invited everyone who had performed earlier in the night — including Joe Walsh, Jeff Lynne, Kenny Aronoff, Steve Lukather of Toto and Peter Frampton — for a big 'Hey Jude' finale. The latter three musicians, together with Don Was, served as part of the backing band for much of the night, providing support for performances by Brad Paisley, Stevie Wonder, Katy Perry and others.
In between the performances — which were highlighted by Walsh and Gary Clark Jr.'s guitar duel on 'While My Guitar Gently Weeps,' Dave Grohl's heartfelt 'Hey Bullldog' and a pleasantly lively and creative acoustic rendition of 'Revolution' by Imagine Dragons — McCartney and Starr were shown being interviewed by Dave Letterman. These talks were particularly poignant since they were conducted at the Ed Sullivan Theater, where Letterman currently films his 'Late Show' program.
McCartney told a particularly funny story about the backstage scene just moments before the group's legendary Feb. 9, 1964 performance. Apparently Paul was "standing there, all prepared, with my guitar, ready to go on," when a Teamster in charge of pulling back the curtain decided to get more involved. "He says, 'are you nervous?' I said, 'no, not really'.. lying." To which the man responded, "Well you should be, there's 73 million people watching!"
Read More: Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr Steal the Show at Beatles Grammy Tribute | http://ultimateclassicrock.com/beatles-grammy-tribute-recap/?trackback=tsmclip


text:
Mehmet "Memo" Akten's experiment shows the possibilities of the newly hacked gadget.
The XBox Kinect is connected to my Macbook Pro, and I wrote a little demo to analyse the depth map for gestural 3D interaction. One hand to draw in 3D, two hands to rotate the view. Very rough, early prototype.
[Kinect hacks, via Adafruit.]


text:
This Shavuot, Memorial Day and Summer take your meals outside…. Every Shabbat all summer long, my family enjoys Saturday lunch outdoors, under a pergola with views of a lake…. With nature as your decor, how can you go wrong?
For Summer, I love galvanized metal, burlap and linen tablecloths and runners, retro touches and graphic prints! Here are some of my favorite pieces for outdoor dining.
Party tub $24
Have a great summer!


text:
Enterprise Imaging IT
Digitalizing healthcare
Cost pressure and value-based reimbursement are two global trends that drive consolidation in healthcare. Therefore, enterprise and Integrated Delivery Networks (IDN) grow larger and more complex.
How can you enable your imaging workflow to run smoothly while ensuring secure patient-centric access to images and reports, whenever and by whoever necessary?
Integrated Enterprise Imaging IT solutions provide the answer. They help lower costs, reduce complexity, and enable seamless cooperation of all clinicians involved.
- Consolidate your IT – save costs
- Enhance clinical collaboration – improve outcomes
- Streamline administration – focus on excellent patient care
- Enjoy a worry-free solution with a strong strategic partner
Características y Beneficios
Our highly flexible and interoperable Enterprise Imaging IT solution helps you align your infrastructure with your strategic goals. Based on international standards and initiatives1 and our 25 years of experience, you can optimize clinical operations, enhance communication with referrers, and reduce unwarranted variations – strategic pillars on the journey towards digitalizing healthcare.
Enterprise Imaging IT comprises:
- Reading, Reporting and Viewing – automated tools that support reading workflow standardization of almost all clinical cases (e.g. Radiology, Cardiology)
- Universal Viewing@EHR – zero-footprint viewing solution for enterprise wide access to patient images and data, seamlessly integrated with existing EHR
- Advanced Visualization – highly sophisticated and specialist diagnostic tools for evidence-based reading and reporting of complex cases
- Vendor Neutral Archiving – enterprise-wide vendor neutral archiving, (DICOM / Non-DICOM) and data life cycle management on one platform
- Imaging Workflow – a range of valuable tools that can help increase efficiency while decreasing operational cost
- Interoperability – easily connected thanks to a standard-based, IHE-compliant connectivity platform that eliminates information silos and costly integration points
Consolidate your IT – save costs
How can you make your imaging IT landscape less complex? How can you reduce vendor variety and maintenance contracts while increasing cost transparency? Siemens Healthineers is there to help you with enterprise-wide consolidation. Based on a strategically aligned imaging IT infrastructure, you can improve day-to-day operation, lower expenses for system integration, and reduce education and training costs.
Enhance clinical collaboration – improve outcomes
How can you strengthen workflow efficiency and improve the quality of care? By letting all clinical users and referrers share consistent standards and easy data access. Siemens Healthineers provides a smart IHE (Integrated Healthcare Enterprise) compliant IT infrastructure that supports standardized, paperless, and patient-centric imaging workflows. Eliminate sources of error and waste of resources while enhancing collaboration – within both you're the enterprise and your network.
Streamline administration – focus on excellent patient care
How can you focus on successfully managing health as your core task? How can your Enterprise Imaging IT solution support you in improving clinical outcomes at reduced costs? Siemens Healthineers provides a single vendor solution including consultancy and professional project management. You´ll benefit from high-quality implementation, lean administration, and safe operation.
Enjoy a worry-free solution with a strong strategic partner
How can you get the most from ever-tighter budgets? Your Enterprise Imaging IT solution from Siemens Healthineers generates a high return on investment throughout its lifecycle. Expert consulting and professional implementation ensure a perfect match with your needs and fast availability. The agile solution adapts to changing conditions and prevents your technology from obsolescence.
Profit from a good partnership
"Good partnerships are the key to success. Finding the right partner is the decisive factor – because typically you'll work together for years or decades."
Univ. Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Werner Leodolter,
Steiermärkische Krankenanstalten GmbH
Chief Information Officer, Information & Process Management
Enterprise Connectors Solutions
Our Enterprise Connectors Solutions help healthcare providers improve data and information flow and generate benefits along the entire imaging value chain. The adaptable, low-footprint software solutions can optimize the healthcare providers' imaging workflow by bridging connectivity gaps and overcoming limitations of isolated data silos within your enterprise and beyond.
Integrating applications for efficient reading and reporting with Desktop Connector Solution
Our Desktop Connector Solution is based on an interface engine, integrating applications on a physician's desktop. It helps reduce mouse clicks and streamlines workflows. The solution also supports multiple communication formats and selected third-party Application Interfaces (API).
- Automatically launching dictation when opening a study
- Automatically syncing RIS with the displayed study
- Signing in only once even when different authentication systems are in place
Connecting Imaging IT for seamless dataflows with Imaging IT Connectors
Overcoming the limitations of disparate data silos and bridging connectivity gaps with our Imaging IT Connectors for seamless dataflows.
Integrating legacy systems into an Master Patient Index environment, providing smart DICOM prefetching across data silos, unifying study lists, smooth cloud backup or enhanced data reconciliation: These are just some examples how our Imaging IT Connectors can help to improve workflow – within your department and beyond. The modular design of our Imaging IT Connectors Solutions make it a smart investment because you decide which setup you actually need.
Standard-compliant connectivity beyond your enterprise with eHealth Connector
Participate in collaborative care via a single data exchange platform. With our eHealth Connector, you can integrate even non-standardized legacy systems into state-of-the-art Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) and eHealth infrastructures. The standard-compliant connectivity allows communication and data exchange across the heterogeneous system landscapes of multiple healthcare institutions and even regions.
- Gain access to a wide range of applications based on a standardized regional network
- Optimize processes and save costs, without losing investment of existing IT infrastructure
Compartir esta página:
Productos, servicios y recursos relacionados
1Communication and file standards like IHE, HL7, DICOM, FHIR, etc.


text:
Distinguish between the real and intended audience.
Distinguish between general and specific audiences (e.g. graduate students in Psychology vs. students).
Explain how the chosen audience can impact stylistic choices (tone, vocabulary, formality, etc.).
Explain how to indicate or imply the chosen audience in the title or introduction (e.g. A teacher's guide to incorporating technology in the classroom).
This packet should help a learner seeking to understand how to prepare to write a paper and who is confused about how to choose an audience. It will explain why it is important to determine the audience before writing the paper.
"My play was a complete success. The audience was a failure." - Ashleigh Brilliant
Almost any piece of writing, whether an essay or story or poem or a song, is meant for an audience. And the audience in many ways determines the success of the writing. Read the above quote again. Can a play really be a success if the audience hates it? Recognizing the importance of the audience is one of the keys to developing as a writer. The identity of your audience, from their beliefs and their backgrounds to their educations, jobs and emotions, are going to affect how they react to a piece of writing. A good writer keeps that in mind.
One of the first distinctions to think about as a writer is who is going to read the essay vs. who does the writer want to read the essay. This is the difference between the real vs. the intended audience. The intended audience is the group the writer has in mind as he or she is composing. The real audience, on the other hand, is all the people, both intended and unintended, who actually read the work.
This distinction arises all the time. An article by a baseball reporter may be meant for fans of a particular team (the intended audience) but may be read by anyone who buys that newspaper (the real audience). A report prepared at work may be meant for the boss but might make its way to coworkers as well.
The same is true in the classroom. Most of the papers a student writes will be for the instructor.
But what about teaching assistants? What if the professor has students share their papers with each other as part of a peer review? The good writer keeps these possibilities in mind when crafting their work.
The basic idea as this: as a writer, think about who your audience is, whether that's your teacher, classmates, parents, or others. But also remember that more than that intended person or group may read your work. As such, write work that is specific enough to appeal to your intended audience, but that offers enough explanations that even an outsider can follow and appreciate what you've done. That way, you can be confident that no matter who sees your story or essay, you'll have your bases covered.
Source: Dan Reade; Quote: http://thinkexist.com/quotation/my_play_was_a_complete_success-the_audience_was_a/7438.html. Image CC Credit: Scott Abbott Image CC Credit: Aus_chick
This slideshow covers the basic definitions of general and specific audiences and offers writing strategies for addressing each one.
Source: Dan Reade
In this section, you will study how recognizing your audience may change the way you write. The PDF below provides explanations and exercises.
Source: Dan Reade
The following slide show will discuss how to indicate your intended audience through the title of your essay or its introduction.
Source: Dan Reade
While writing is often an activity we do alone, it is one that is meant for others. By thinking about your audience before you begin writing, and by keeping them in mind throughout the writing process, you can create a paper that more effectively meets the needs of your audience and convinces them to support your point-of-view.
Source: Dan Reade


text:
Tuesday, February 07, 2012
Joe and I headed off to the exit that we thought she had indicated and I saw that there was a step, a small step, but enough of a step to make it inaccessible. Just as I noted and commented on it, several of those who were attending the lecture indicated that the accessible exit was one door over. So we backed out of that exit and went over to the other. And waited.
The fire must have been far away from where we were waiting because the only smoke evident was from the smokers who all had the look of people especially graced by God as they puffed away and chatted. When it was all over, we headed back in and I went back up the ramp. I should say here that I was so pleased that they even had a stage with a ramp, it was a large audience and after becoming a wheelchair user, I seldom get to be on stage any more. I was able to see and be seen.
This blog isn't really about the fact that the stage had a ramp and the hotel had an accessible exit near the ballroom. As Joe and I say, using a quote from the movie, Made in Dagenham, 'That's as it should be, Eddie.' The fact that it often isn't doesn't make the fact that it 'is' special. Anyway what was lovely, and remarkable, and noteworthy, was though there was a real fire, and though there was a real need for us to get out of the building, not one, not two, but many people in the audience came forward to offer assistance for me to get down the ramp and out of the building.
I knew that Joe would be heading up to get me when he got through the rush going the other way, so I thanked people and assured them that I had assistance. Everyone who offered, offered genuinely, equal parts concern and respect. All listened to what I said, understood that all was taken care of. I was truly impressed by how I was treated, respected and listened to by those in my audience.
I'll remember Thunder Bay for a long time because I'll have a cue. I travel with a mug I use for lectures. I'd forgotten mine at home so I bought a new one, one I like better, here at the mall the other day. It's got a lovely design, in blue, of all the buildings that comprise a community. It's cool. So, every time I pull it out, I'll remember that I bought it in Thunder Bay. My cup at work reminds me of a Tescos in North London. It will be nice to remember, not the fire, nor the ramp, nor the hotel, but the people who knew how to ask, who knew how to listen, who knew the basics of respect. That's always a good thing to have in mind before beginning a day.
PS I know I have readers who know this blog better than I do, Have I ever written about 'That's how it should be, Eddie'? If not, I should
5 comments:
- Jan said...
Thanks for the kind words about my home DaveYour presentation left me with lots to digest and think about. What a great way to start off a long week. Your stories and examples brought the message home and made the content real. It his great to hear a speaker who is actually been there and done that. You remind me yet again that there are humans in human services. Thanks again
- 7 February 2012 at 07:35
- Louna said...
I don't remember you using the Eddie quote before, but I haven't been following for more than a year.
- 7 February 2012 at 10:05
I don't remember that Eddie quote either, and I've been reading I think since about 2007 or so.
To make sure, I did a google search for the exact phrase, 'That's how it should be, Eddie' and the only result is this blog post right here. Plus some twitter tweet that doesn't seem to be related at all. I didn't even have to go to advanced search (which allows you to search within a specific domain, such as davehingsburger.blogspot.com).
So it seems the scientific answer, according to google.com, is that you've never used that phrase at this blog before now!
Please do tell us the story behind that!
- 7 February 2012 at 13:59
- Shan said...
Yeah, tell us!
- 8 February 2012 at 14:31
Thank you for coming to Thunder Bay! I have recently started reading your blog posts, and after seeing you present on Monday will likely become a bit of a groupie! The real way you present and offer meaningful examples, and also own that you did things differently before you were showed otherwise was inspiring. Re-invigorates the passion for supporting people!
- 9 February 2012 at 14:12


text:
KERPEN, GERMANY (Sept. 13, 1:45 p.m. ET) — Compound and masterbatch producer A. Schulman Inc. officially opened its Schulman Academy center earlier this year at its European engineering thermoplastics business headquarters in Kerpen. The new center is a special section of Schulman's technical center, which opened in November.
The center has been equipped with technology to function as a fluid systems development center for pipe and tube extrusion, complete with an extruder, corrugators, online dimension monitoring and pipe burst testing equipment.
The center's main focus is presently on developing automotive fuel and coolant line tubes with Schulman materials.
Asked why the center has not focused on injection molding, innovation manager Thilo Stier indicated that three-component injection molding and blow molding might be developed at a later stage by the academy.
Stier said the key to success in tube development lies 50 percent in formulation and 50 percent in processing. "But without the equipment you can't convince the customer. Fuel and coolant line tube products from EMS, Evonik, Arkema are all forms of the polyamide produced by those companies. We can bring different polymers together in the most economical way without being tied to a particular type of polymer," he said.
The lower cost, easy processing alternative to today's monolayer nylon 12 tubes consists of a Schulatube BP (break pressure) three-layer design involving a Schulamid 612 IC 4005 W outer layer, a Schulamid 612 FS 4003 central layer and Schulamid BB 4011 inner layer.
As a special co-polyamide with high monomer content, the BB (break booster) 4011 inner layer material has good elastic recovery. The more conventional unplasticized FS (fuel system) 4003 heat stabilized nylon 6/12 central layer grade is supported by the 612 IC (industrial consumer) 4005 W outer layer material, a plasticised nylon 6/12 with high ductility and viscosity. It also has around 20 percent higher heat resistance than nylon 12.
612 IC 4005 W is already used in extrusion applications because it can be extruded at high speeds without diehead build-up. The material also has high cold impact strength and high burst pressure resistance. Wittmann's Feedmax S3-40 dosing equipment in the Schulman Academy is fitted with DIN 73378 standard blue monolayer pneumatic fluid tubes made in this material.
Schulman has already made Schulamid 612 IC 4005 W and conventional nylon 12 W monolayer tube burst pressure comparisons which show burst pressure is consistently 10 percent higher with 612 IC 4005 W. In tests, a 6mm outer diameter, 1.0mm wall thickness pipe sample had burst pressure of almost 90bar, compared with the same-sized sample in nylon 12 W with just over 80bar. Corresponding values for 15mm diameter and 1.5mm wall thickness were just over 50bar for the Schulamid material, and around 45bar for nylon 12 W.
Against a backdrop of this year's nylon 12 shortages that have been aggravated by the CDT feedstock plant fire at Evonik's Marl plant, Schulman stresses the "unlimited and global availability" of its three nylon 6/12 based grades for automotive fuel line pipes. These are supplied in natural and black colors.
Stier said that some three-layer tube systems were already running at customers in June. He stressed that Schulman's tube concept allows customers to run the three grades in three-layer tubes on older and existing machinery, avoiding a need to make equipment investment.
After Bernhard Rzepka, Schulman's CEO for the EMEA region, presented the company's product and worldwide strategy, Stier was asked why the Schulman Academy had been built in Europe and not in a higher-growth market.
Stier replied: "We have developments in other countries, but the engineering thermoplastics competence is here in Europe. It is also easier to do development work in one place. And if we extrude a tube and find it is not very good, we can solve the problem in-house."
Schulman technical and market development manager Peter Seb" said that conducting trials at customer facilities is difficult due to conflicts with production needs. He continued by saying there is a shift from mono nylon 12 to multilayer tubes that is being driven by the European market.
Allowance has to be made in tube materials and design for use of automatic quick connector insertion that "takes a lot of manual assembly out of manufacturing operations", Seb" said. High temperature resistant plastics remain important, as engine downsizing means rising engine compartment temperatures, bringing nylon 12 close to its limits.
Seb" said the Schulman Academy is investigating "green" polymers by using recyclate in the central layer of multilayer tubes.
Stier pointed out that there is a need to focus on individual requirements, since "a particular region may involve more exposure to ethanol or sulphur, for example, which can be challenging. We welcome it, however, because if it gets easy, everyone can then do it".
Maintools of Germany supplied its Extrudex EG 35-25D central, EN 40-25D inner and EN 45-30D outer layer extruders for the academy. These were fitted with Maintools dosing and extrusion controls, for production of monolayer or multilayer tubes, as well as a set of 50 pairs of 56.5mm x 68.5mm x 36mm vacuum corrugation tools with capability for eight corrugation geometries.
ETA Kunststofftechnologie of Germany provided a spiral mandrel diehead with circular melt pre_distribution that enables separate temperature control for each individual tube layer and product centering adjustment during production. Although presently provided for three-layer tube solutions, ETA says up to seven layers are theoretically possible and a further three can be added by coating processes. The company also supplies dieheads for blow molding nine layers.
Bellaform supplied the vacuum tank, cooling batch, pull-off and servo-cutter equipment. Beta LaserMike supplied Datapro 5000 online and BenchMike 283-10 laser micrometer offline equipment for measurement of outer diameter, wall thickness and concentricity. The equipment makes a total of 10 measurements; six ultrasonically and four by laser.
The final stage in Schulatube BP processing involves tube marking and coding with KBA-Metronic's alphaJET evo pro Pig 70µm continuous ink jet printer, which can print at speeds up to 600m/min.
Having made tubes, these are then tested in static and dynamic burst pressure testing equipment developed by IPT Institut für Prüftechnik Gerätebau for testing up to 200bar pressure between - 40°C and 160°C.
Schulman also uses a Distelkamp Electronic digital microscope to prepare and display images of multi-layer pipe cross-sections on a computer screen, complete with display of individual layer thicknesses.


text:
Copyright 2005, National Broadcasting Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This is a rush transcript provided for the information and convenience of the press. Accuracy is not guaranteed. In case of doubt, please check with:
(202) 885-4598
Sundays: (202) 885-4200
NBC News MEET THE PRESS
Sunday, January 9, 2005
GUESTS: Sen. Bill Frist, (R-Tenn.), Majority Leader, Al Hunt, Bloomberg News, Katty Kay, British Broadcasting Corporation, Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Byron York, National Review
MODERATOR/PANELIST: Tim Russert - NBC News
MR. TIM RUSSERT: Our issues this Sunday: the tsunami. The devastation and death toll mount. What more can be done? Iraq, only 21 days until the election, but the violent insurgency continues. What more can be done? With us, earlier in the week, he visited tsunami-ravaged Sri Lanka. Yesterday, he was in Iraq. The Republican leader of the United States Senate, Dr. Bill Frist of Tennessee.
Then the president pushes for private accounts for Social Security, limits on damages and lawsuits and prepares for his second term. Insights and analysis from Albert Hunt of Bloomberg News, Katty Kay of the BBC, Andrea Mitchell of NBC News and Byron York of the National Review.
And in our MEET THE PRESS Minute, Shirley Chisholm was the first African-American woman to serve in Congress and the first woman to seek the Democratic presidential nomination:
REP. SHIRLEY CHISHOLM, (D-NY): I am the candidate of the people.
(End videotape)
MR. RUSSERT: She died last week at the age of 80 and appeared on MEET THE PRESS almost 33 years ago:
REP. CHISHOLM: I was breaking the tradition, a tradition in which only white males only been the gentlemen in this country that have guided the ship of state.
(End videotape)
MR. RUSSERT: But, first, an exclusive interview with Senator Bill Frist, the majority leader of the United States Senate, who traveled to Sri Lanka this week, then went to Iraq and Kuwait. We spoke to him late yesterday about his trip and asked him to share his firsthand observations of the terrible damage done by the tsunami.
SEN. BILL FRIST, (R-TN): Tim, the tsunami has had a catastrophic impact, as we've all seen play out over the last now two weeks. I had the opportunity to visit Sri Lanka and travel hundreds of miles along the coast. What was unique about it to me when I compare it to other tragedies that I've seen and tornadoes was the continuity, the continuous uninterrupted mile after mile after mile after mile after mile of devastation.
While we were there, we had the opportunity to visit clinics and to visit hospitals and to look at the human face of this tragedy. It clearly, as we all know at this juncture, is a tragedy of biblical proportions.
MR. RUSSERT: Do you believe that the death toll will rise dramatically because of disease that could now continue to wipe out large amounts of people in that area?
SEN. FRIST: Tim, I visited in part as a United States senator but as well as a public health official, as a medical physician, and the reason I add that is that after disasters of this proportion, you can have almost a multifold impact if several public health initiatives are not taken, and that is because the lack of clean water or what we call potable water can result in water-borne illnesses like typhoid fever or dysentery. Other types of water-borne illnesses that result in diarrhea and can result in catastrophic death.
Now, in Sri Lanka, still about 80 percent of the affected population, even though many are in relief camps today that we visited, do not have access to clean water. In addition, simple things like sanitation facilities were destroyed all along the coastline, and with that, that additional risk of those water-borne diseases can be increased over time.
The good news is that the NGOs, the governments are making very powerful efforts and are successfully to date getting potable clean water to many of those populations. The challenge will be distribution along that coastline where there are no roads, there are no airports.
MR. RUSSERT: Senator, Australia has pledged $810 million; Germany, $660 million; Japan, $500 million. The United States is at $350 million. Will the U.S. have to increase the amount of aid it's providing?
SEN. FRIST: The United States has pledged $350 million. And the common question is: Is that enough, or since other countries are pledging different amounts, should we outbid them? I think for right now, $350 million is appropriate, but just as that figure has changed over the last week and a half, there needs to be an ongoing assessment. And indeed the United States Congress, the president of the United States, has shown a willingness to adjust that according to the assessment.
MR. RUSSERT: Senator, you left Sri Lanka, went to Iraq, and I want to show you a headline that was on the front page of The New York Times on Friday: "Rumsfeld Seeks Broad Review Of Iraq Policy." He is sending General Gary Luck to Iraq to look into everything, a suggestion that things in Iraq have gone very wrong. Is that your assessment?
SEN. FRIST: No, it is not, Tim, and I can just share with you what I learned today, having spent the day there with a bipartisan group of United States senators. First and foremost, progress is made from six months ago when I was last there, and the fact that in just very few days, on the 30th of this month, we are going to have elections there in Iraq that will move us is another major step along this road to democracy and freedom and the rule of law.
While I was there today, secondly, I had the opportunity to visit General Dave Petraeus, who is overseeing the military training, the training of the police, and huge progress has been made compared to four months ago, five months ago, when those initial plans were initially being made. A hundred and twenty-seven thousand Iraqis have been trained. That's about half military and about half police, fully trained and equipped. Real progress has been made in that regard.
And let me just say, thirdly, because it was very unique, I had the opportunity to participate in an open town meeting with about 150 Sunni sheiks. And it was like a town meeting in Nashville, Tennessee, or Knoxville, Tennessee. There was debate and disagreement and discussion--open, heated, emotional. People were saying--some were saying, "Don't postpone elections"; others were saying, "Postpone," something that would have never, ever occurred in Iraq before the collapse of Saddam Hussein.
MR. RUSSERT: I think many Americans are confused, Senator, because we hear such disparate views about what is really going on in Iraq. For example, Brent Scowcroft, who was the national security adviser for former President Bush, Bush 41, in The Washington Post said this: "`The Iraqi elections, rather than turning out to be a promising turning point, have the great potential for deepening the conflict,' Scowcroft said. He said he expects increased divisions between Shiite and Sunni Muslims after the Jan. 30 elections, when experts believe the government will be dominated by the majority Shiites. Scowcroft predicted `an incipient civil war' would grip Iraq and said the best hope for pulling the country from chaos would be to turn the U.S. operation over to NATO or the United Nations--which, he said, would not be so hostilely viewed by Iraqis."
Do you think that General Scowcroft's right, there is a potential for civil war in Iraq?
SEN. FRIST: Well, I would certainly disagree with what the implication is. The idea of cutting and running and leaving with the hope that either an international organization such as United Nations or NATO could further the road from tyranny to democracy and freedom of rule and law, to me, is really sort of grasping at thin air. We don't know what the outcome of these elections will be on January 30, but we know--at least we were told today by the United Nations representative, the coordinator who was there on the ground--that we are on the road to expecting elections that can be credible, and those are his words, as well as independent, and that is what the mandate by the United Nations has been.
Those elections clearly are not going to be perfect elections, and in many people's eyes, people would say, "You know, those are not fair elections." What they will accomplish is, by international standards, credible elections that are independent, that the majority of people in Iraq, regardless of ethnic group or religion, will participate in. Nobody knows what the outcome will be, but that freedom of being able to vote, of expression, and having an elected representative--275 people chosen by the Iraqi people--is a major step forward, the beginning, not the end, of this process of continuing along the road of democracy.
MR. RUSSERT: The United States' exit strategy is based upon the Iraqis stepping forward and creating a military and a police force that can protect its own people. How far away are the Iraqis from having that force in place?
SEN. FRIST: Early this morning, Tim, we had really a privilege of watching the special forces of the Iraqi police participate in their drilling exercise. We visited a long time with General Dave Petraeus, who has been charged by the coalition in overseeing the training of the Iraqi military as well as the Iraqi police. This six months ago was just a plan on a piece of paper. It was initiated about four months ago. And now four months later, we learned today--we met many of these soldiers and had the opportunity to talk, and the police, to talk to them. There are 127,000 both police--about half of those are police, and the other half being military who have been trained and equipped.
No, it's not up to the standards that we would assume for the United States of America, but according to our military personnel on the ground, these are effective soldiers, they are effective, they are Iraqi soldiers. They can fight alongside side by side the coalition forces, and over time as progress is made, as those numbers increase--and again, it's been a dramatic increase over the last four months in terms of the type of training that has been set up and delivered--if that progress continues to be made, they will be able to supplement the forces that we have on the ground and replace those forces over a period of time.
MR. RUSSERT: As you well know, the national Army Reserve and National Guard make up about 40 percent of our troops in Iraq, more than 5,000 members of the Reserve and Guard from Tennessee in Iraq, and at the end of this year, the Reservists and the Guardsmen will have completed their 24 months of active service. We'll, in effect, run out of Reserves and Guardsmen. The head of the Reserve, General James Helmley, said that the policies are now "dysfunctional," and he went on to say that the "`current demands' in Iraq and Afghanistan put his command in `grave danger' of being unable to meet other potential Pentagon missions or help with domestic emergencies, and that the Army Reserve is, `rapidly degenerating into a broken force.'"
Many are suggesting, Senator, that Reservists and Guardsmen be assigned more than 24 months of active duty, there be a change in the law. Would you support that?
SEN. FRIST: There's no question that we are straining our Guard forces at this juncture, as well as the Reservists. The repeated missions, the return after a brief time back home puts a stress and a strain on them. They are issues that we're going to have to address. And as you know, and as you pointed out earlier, there's a current assessment under way, both in terms of appropriate use, appropriate size of troops in Iraq. I think that that will also include a look at our Reserves and our Guard units. We have to be very careful. There could be a recruitment problem in the future if we wear down these Guard and Reserve units. It's something we're very sensitive to. It's something we'll continue to study over time.
MR. RUSSERT: But if the Pentagon recommends increasing active duty beyond 24 months for Reservists and Guardsmen in order to maintain the force in Iraq at levels they think are necessary, would you support that extension?
SEN. FRIST: Tim, at this juncture, for a proposal as specific as that, I really can't say whether I would support it or not. I think if the assessment is that we have the too few Guard and Reservists to carry out the responsibilities that are important to the safety and security of this country, I would think that the first move would be to increase the number of Reservists and Guards personnel that we have rather than ask them to have repeated duties overseas beyond what is required or what is currently under way today. Again, I'd have to study the issue. We are straining our Guard and our Reservist personnel today. There is no question about that, and it's something that will have to be addressed over time.
MR. RUSSERT: As you know, some of your colleagues have suggested raising the death benefit for soldiers who are killed in Iraq, in active service around the world, from $12,000 to $100,000. Do you think that legislation has a good chance of passing in the Senate?
SEN. FRIST: It is an issue that has been brought forward. It has been discussed. It has not been taken to the floor of the United States Senate. As I talked to Guards personnel tonight, I mentioned that, and they obviously said, "Well, of course that is something we would be interested in." Other issues such as other retirement benefits, educational benefits are issues that will all be on the table, things that we will look at as we fulfill our obligation for our men and women who are sacrificing so admirably for us overseas.
MR. RUSSERT: Senator, as you look back at your visit and briefings in Iraq, do you think the American people should be optimistic about the war and the effort in Iraq?
SEN. FRIST: Based on what I saw today, Tim, I think we can all be cautiously optimistic. Our expectations cannot be set too high. I think we can optimistically look forward to elections on the 30th. The fact that on the 30th, the majority of people in Iraq will participate in elections, they will elect an assembly of 275 Iraqis who ultimately will choose the Iraqi government, who ultimately--and that government ultimately several months later will write and finalize a constitution--is huge progress compared to six months ago or a year ago.
If we look at terrorism, we know there's been a huge increase in anti-insurgency and in insurgency activity over the last several weeks. That is likely to continue up until the time of the elections and will continue until after the elections. We heard today that education for young children and children even to the college level has greatly improved. At the same time, we recognize that the infrastructure there in terms of electricity and in terms of other health facilities will have to be repaired, and that's going to take a long time.
We're going to have to be cautiously optimistic. Our military will stay there, I am quite sure--in fact, I am positive--until the job is done. The war on terror is one that faces us directly in the face in that part of the world, and it's one that we will face aggressively in support of our troops and continue until that job is done.
MR. RUSSERT: Senator Bill Frist, we thank you for joining us. Travel safe.
SEN. FRIST: Thank you, Tim.
MR. RUSSERT: Coming next, the Bush second term agenda is in motion. Social Security and tort reform; insights and analysis from our political roundtable. Then a special MEET THE PRESS Minute as we remember the first African-American woman to serve in Congress. Shirley Chisholm on MEET THE PRESS, July 1972.
MR. RUSSERT: A pundit taking money from the government, Social Security, insights and analysis from our political roundtable after this brief station break.
MR. RUSSERT: And we are back. Welcome all.
Albert Hunt, we just heard Senator Frist say that he was cautiously optimistic about Iraq, that he thought from the elections would flow a major step to democracy and to freedom and to the rule of law. Brent Scowcroft who worked for former President Bush said it may lead to civil war. Who's right?
MR. ALBERT HUNT: Well, Tim, I don't know, but it seems to me the point that Scowcroft is making is as essential as elections are to a stable society, there are other institutions and other infrastructures that are probably essential before you can have successful elections. And I think there is serious questions as to whether those are in place in Iraq, and so, therefore, if they're not, these elections could, as Brent Scowcroft says, be counterproductive. If you end up on February 10 with what really is a Shiite theocracy aligned with Iran, it's not only not going to be better for Iraq, it's not going to be very good for Western interests. And I think that's a distinct possibility.
MR. RUSSERT: Byron York.
MR. BYRON YORK: Well, I think you have to look--I mean, the question on the table right now is whether to delay the elections or not. And there are new calls, you know, today we should have divided Iraq into electoral districts. That would have allowed the Sunnis to have more proportional representation. But I think you have to look--first of all, you have about 60 percent of the country, the Shiites who want to go ahead with this, 15 to 20 percent, the Kurds want to go ahead with this, and then the 15 to 20 percent of the Sunnis, a faction of whom the insurgents plus the outside fighters don't want this to happen. And I think you have to look: Why are they doing this? If you postpone the election, divide Iraq into the electoral district, say we can have a little more representation or fairer representation for the Sunnis, would the insurgents then say, "Well, mission accomplished; we'll stop now"? I don't think that's the case. I think everything is pushing toward having these elections on January 30 and going ahead and doing it.
MR. RUSSERT: Andrea Mitchell, privately, as official Washington, State Department, Pentagon--are they more aligned with the Scowcroft view or the Frist view?
MS. ANDREA MITCHELL: Probably more aligned with the Scowcroft view and believing that there could be a civil war, but that they do have to proceed, as Byron just said. Look, the insurgents would declare victory if this is postponed, and they're not going to be quieted, as Byron just said, by postponing the election. They'll just find another target, literally and figuratively. The tragedy here is that they could have found a better system, some more proportional system, and they're going to try to fix that after the fact by perhaps invalidating some of the election results, by giving some Sunni seats that they didn't win. Now, that's going to create all sorts of other problems. The question, then, as King Abdullah and some others have suggested, is: Can you create a separate commission to write the constitution, which is all that this initial election is, and give some more representation to the Sunnis and try to enfranchise more people?
MR. RUSSERT: Katty Kay?
MS. KATTY KAY: I think there is a real risk, too, as Byron was suggesting, that if you postpone these elections, you start alienating the Shia, who, fairly remarkably, have actually been on America's side until now. You haven't had a particularly radicalized Shia movement. Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani has supported the American initiative, lukewarmly, but he has supported the Americans up until now. If you postpone those elections, the Shia, who have not held power since 1923 and are desperate to get hold of power because they are the rightful majority in Iraq, will fear that power is being snatched from them. You could then have a more radicalized Shia movement, and America, I think, wants one enemy and not two in Iraq. You already have the Sunnis, who oppose you. If you start taking on the Shia as well, then you really do have a risk that the inevitable transfer of power, which has to happen, from the minority Sunni to the majority Shia, is going to be even more difficult.
MR. RUSSERT: Brent Scowcroft suggested the United States transfer control of the operation in Iraq to NATO or to the United Nations. How practical or feasible is that?
MS. KAY: I think the United Nations, certainly, not NATO, has said that they will start training Iraqi troops, but you don't see much more of an initiative coming out of either Europe or the United Nations at the moment to take real control of a security situation which is still very difficult. I mean, the risk here is that, as the United Nations knows, the UNDP is not even working in Iraq at the moment. The security is not there on the ground for any sort of reconstruction to start going ahead, and they don't want to be the ones saddled with a problem which they see as America's own making.
MR. RUSSERT: Andrea?
MS. MITCHELL: In fact, the U.N. isn't even doing the job that we've asked it to do by going in and overseeing the elections in enough force. The U.N. was so frightened away from Iraq by the destruction of its headquarters and the death of its main leadership there that they won't go back in in sufficient numbers, so they are not about to take charge of this. NATO would be another issue. But NATO has been reluctant.
MR. RUSSERT: Albert, our exit strategy is to have an Iraqi security force and military that is strong enough to protect its people and to have a rule of law that is honored by all so that we can withdraw. If we don't have that in place, by the end of this year, as I said with Senator Frist, Guardsmen and Reservists will have served their 24 months of active duty. We hit the wall. Who are we going to send to Iraq in the United States military if we don't have the Reservists or Guardsmen who now make up 40 percent of our assets there?
MR. HUNT: Or heaven help us if there's a crisis someplace else in the world. We have two options if that happens: one, I think we have to go to something that's tantamount to a draft; or secondly, we have to get out of Dodge. And those are the only two options, I think, if we hit that stage.
I'm going to go to the point that Byron made earlier. I think you're absolutely right that suddenly, if we postpone those elections, the insurgents would not say, "All right, fine, we'll be good guys now." And I think the flip side of that is that, after the elections are held, is it going to have an effect on them? Are they going to say, "All right, fine, we've been defeated"? And I think the worry I have from people who've been to Iraq--and I have not been to Iraq--is they say every time they go, it's worse. You see fewer Iraqis. It's more dangerous. This has been over the course of the last year. And if on February the 28 that's no longer true, that'll be great news. But if it is true, then I wonder if these elections will have served the purpose we hoped for.
Ms. MITCHELL: And that's a...
MR. YORK: And, obviously, getting the security forces going is the thing. And people at the Pentagon, by the way, tell me that General Luck's mission to Iraq is not a general--a wide-ranging reassessment, but very narrowly focused on the Iraqi security forces and making sure this can work. At the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, General Luck is very active. There is actually a group called Lessons Learned, where they're constantly reassessing what they do. This is the kind of thing he does. And I'm told that this is really not any sort of general rethinking of the mission, but a very specific look at making these Iraqi forces work.
MS. MITCHELL: Now...
MR. RUSSERT: Byron, is there a possibility that Guards and Reservists will have active duty extended beyond their 24-month obligation?
MR. YORK: I think that there probably is. You know, there was a memo that came up this week from a general who is involved with the Army Reserve who wanted more flexibility in being able to send more people over there and to make them stay longer, so I think that that, yes, is a possibility.
MR. RUSSERT: What will that do to renewals?
MR. YORK: Well, that's going to make a lot of people very unhappy and it's going to make fewer people sign up and more people be angry, I think reasonably angry, at having come in under one deal and then having the terms change.
MS. KAY: There was one indication of perhaps the length of the mission this week when the Iraqi intelligence minister came out and said there was actually some 400,000 Iraqi insurgents of which 40,000 were full-time call, but then you had a whole run more. If you think that Britain, when we were fighting in Northern Ireland, the English, we were fighting against perhaps 300 or 400 active insurgents. Well, that insurgency went on for 30 years. It's some indication of what insurgents can do for a long time when they are in these particular numbers.
MS. MITCHELL: And, Tim, one of the other things is not just the extension of the tours, but how quickly these men and women are being sent back. I talked to a Marine major the other day who is a pilot over there, and he's going back in July, and he said the Marines, the morale is still pretty good, but it's beginning to really affect the families. Families back home are really being hurt badly by what's happening in both the Marines and the Army. And they don't think that they can keep this up, where they're back, you know, for six months and then they're back on active.
MR. RUSSERT: And that's why I think discussion of raising the death benefit from $12,000 to $100,000 has really taken hold in both houses of Congress.
MS. MITCHELL: And Bill Richardson, the governor of New Mexico, has done something that is not only smart politically but probably is long overdue, which is to take out a $250,000 government-purchase insurance policy for all of the New Mexico National Guardsmen. This is the legislation he's proposing, and I think that this is an attempt by an obviously ambitious Democratic politician to try to make the Democratic Party right with the military. It's a move that's going to spread to other states.
MR. HUNT: You also see, Tim, I think there is the beginnings of a huge battle within the conservative movement on the GOP side. I mean, I there are--I hear more anti-neocon sentiments coming from conservative Republicans these days, and I think that there is a lot of--you know, what did you get us into? You know, who did this to us, even as we're approaching elections three weeks from now.
MR. RUSSERT: Conservative columnist George Will has expressed reservations. The founder of The National Review, William F. Buckley, has indicated some real concerns about the war in Iraq, Byron.
MR. YORK: He has basically said that if we knew then what we know now, that perhaps it wouldn't have been worth doing. I will say the White House answer to this is, "Let's wait until after the elections." It's not going to be a miracle, but they do think there wasn't enough attention paid, for example, to the success of the elections in Afghanistan which some people thought weren't going to happen, that al-Qaeda would disrupt it, and they're saying that this is not an exact analogue, but wait until after this to see what happens.
MS. KAY: They didn't have the major degree of insurgency in Afghanistan that you have now, and you also didn't have a country that is so clearly split between Sunni, Kurd and Shia. And if you have a low turnout amongst the Sunni--I mean, the risk of this election and of holding it now, is that you do have a low turnout among the Sunni group who then feel less represented and less invested in making the Iraqi government work. That's the argument for postponing.
MR. YORK: On the other hand, in Afghanistan, perhaps they were not schooled in the ways of liberal democracy, but clearly a large, unexpectedly large number of people came out to say they want to be part of a change for the future. So I think that was a positive step, and you might see it in Iraq.
MR. RUSSERT: We'll know a whole lot more in 21 days when they hold the Iraqi elections.
Let me move to the tsunami. Albert Hunt, when it first hit, there was a lot of criticisms of the United States. Remember the United Nations said we were "stingy." Then former President Bush, former President Clinton stepped forward in a bipartisan way. President Clinton said that criticism was unfair. And it seems as if now the United States is leading the way in the world to try to bring much-needed relief to that area. Has that criticism subsided in this country and around the world?
MR. HUNT: Oh, I think it has. I think clearly the president was slow off the mark. But he's done I think a very effective job in the last week or 10 days, sending General Powell and Governor Bush over there, the two presidents. And also it's not just the money. We talk about, you know, a lot about the money, but the American military is playing an absolutely crucial role over there. No one else can do that.
Tim, I think the interesting question of this is what happens two months from now, six months from now when the cameras no longer are there? There is an unfortunate history of big commitments, big pledges being made for disaster relief, and then not much follow-through when the attention is no longer there and when it's no longer front-page news. I hope that doesn't happen here. But I think America's done a very good job in the last week.
MR. RUSSERT: Senator Frist pointed out as a physician that the disease that can take hold in those areas months after the initial shock of this tsunami could bring about as many deaths as the initial tsunami did.
Katty Kay, you were affected very personally by this tsunami. Tell us about your brother.
MS. KAY: Well, I was very lucky. My brother was in Thailand in Phuket on his family holiday with his four young children. They were having breakfast on the terrace of their hotel. It was Boxing Day and perhaps they were all together and having breakfast a bit later than they would have been. And the first warning they had that something was wrong was when my brother's six-year-old son came rushing up and said, "Daddy, can I borrow the camera I was given for Christmas because the sea has disappeared?" Because my brother lives in Asia, he's heard about what happens before a tidal wave. The water is literally sucked out to sea. So he had, in a sense, an early warning system. He had a few minutes.
He then shouted at everyone on the terrace of this hotel, "Get out! Get out! A tidal wave is coming." They went up to a second floor bedroom. Within minutes, the water was up to their chests, and they were holding their children up, out of the water. They climbed up onto the roof of the hotel. In the chaos that followed, they were all separated for about six hours, and they didn't know who had lived or died or whether they had all survived. We found out about four days later that they had all survived, so luckily. But of course, they left behind people in much poorer situations who didn't.
And the one thing he kept saying was that the Thai people themselves had been so generous, people who had lost everything gave them bandages, gave them food, really reached out to them. And, of course, they could leave, and they have gone back to their homes in Hong Kong.
But it is, I think, the key as I was saying is really the long-term commitment once the cameras have gone. And already we're starting to go see the stories disappearing from the front pages. It's not on the front pages of the major newsmagazines this week. But it's going to take a long-term commitment to rebuild these lives. And it's going to take as much perhaps as the money that we've raised initially. It's going to take a look at the real development processes. Opening trade markets, this is going to be a key for this region. To rebuild long-term stability, to rebuild long-term economic development, what you need is opening U.S. markets to goods from that area of the world--could do as much if not more than the money we've just raised.
MR. RUSSERT: The sea is disappearing through the eyes of a six-year-old clearly saving lives. Animals have this early warning system, Albert Hunt, where they detect something happening and begin to run to high ground. Secretary Powell was on this program last week, and he said, "Yes, we did have some notice in Hawaii with our National Oceanographic and Atmosphere Agency. But we don't have the ability to communicate that to countries throughout Asia." Will that change?
MS. MITCHELL: Well, in fact, I think it may change. But what's remarkable is that we have a system in place where we detect--we have an early warning system for the possibility of illegal nuclear tests. And the people who work on the non-proliferation issues don't communicate with the people in the weather area. So none of this has been coordinated. Whether or not it is worth it to invest the kind of money in the Indian Ocean area to have this kind of warning system that does exist in the Pacific remains to be seen because there is so much greater need now. The odds of another tsunami happening, you know, within the next decades are so small, and the development needs are so much greater to rebuild whole countries along those coastal areas.
I think that Colin Powell and now Kofi Annan and the World Bank leader are all in the region. But Colin Powell really was the face of America. And it was, along with Jeb Bush, such a strong and such a really disciplined yet emotionally powerful response that I think that that has really overtaken any of the criticism of the early problems. And the soft side of the American military, if you will--those helicopter pilots are doing a world of good.
MR. RUSSERT: And we do learn from a crisis. There is no doubt about it.
MR. YORK: Well, the White House does feel--first of all, they will concede that maybe we were a day late getting off the mark on this, but I think they feel that they are past the criticism because you did have the Powell thing, you had the two ex-presidents, and you have 13,000 troops over there, 19 U.S. Naval vessels, including a carrier and an amphibious carrier. There are 18,000 troops in Afghanistan by comparison. So this is a big operation doing a lot of things. So I think that they feel that they have really, really gone past the early criticism.
MS. KAY: And we should make sure that the money pledged is actually dispersed. As so often in these cases, for Iran, for the earthquake in Iran a year ago, we know that $1 billion was pledged. Only $17 million actually made it to the people on the ground. We do not have a very good track record of actually giving the money that we say we're going to give.
MR. YORK: I think it's likely to be more though. They are talking $350--Congress is actually going to fund this at the end of this month. And Republicans have said $350 is a base line. It could be much bigger.
MR. RUSSERT: Let me turn back home. This was a jolting issue in USA Today newspaper on Friday, that, "Seeking to build support among black families for its education reform law, the Bush administration paid a prominent black pundit $240,000 to promote the law on his nationally syndicated television show and to urge other black journalists to do the same. The campaign...required commentator Armstrong Williams `to regularly comment on NCLB [No Child Left Behind] during the course of his broadcasts,' and to interview Education Secretary Rod Paige for TV and radio spots that aired during the show in 2004."
Senators led by Democratic leader Harry Reid have written the president, Albert Hunt, to say that Mr. Williams should give the money back, that this was a violation against the law of blatant government propaganda.
MR. HUNT: Well, I don't know what the law is. It strikes me that it's not a very good use of taxpayers' money. It's certainly as egregious a journalist violation as one could engage in. Mr. Williams' column was yanked, as it should be. I will say this. Armstrong did deliver his promise, because I occasionally worked out at a gym and Armstrong's there, and he told me several times, you know, "Why don't you write about No Child Left Behind." I don't know if I'm going to be on one of those government expense accounts or not but...
MR. RUSSERT: How many columns did you do?
MR. HUNT: I didn't do any. So I let him down. I'm sorry, Armstrong. Listen, I'll tell you this. I'll bet that there will be a great market for FOIR, Freedom of Information Requests, in the next couple weeks because I suspect Armstrong Williams is not alone. There have been other people who've been doing this.
MS. MITCHELL: In fact, the Census Bureau has done this. The Department of Health and Human Services has done this in the past on Medicare and other issues. So they have gone to not just to journalists, but they have put out fake news releases...
MR. RUSSERT: Video news releases.
MS. MITCHELL: ...video news releases that are misleading to the average person who believes that they are news reports. And I think that the lines are so blurred. We have to also take a step back and ask, you know, "When did the lines become confusing to people, between what a real journalist is and commentary, analysis or political figures being used as commentators?" I mean, that's really the issue because with all due respect to Mr. Williams, he didn't rise through the normal track of journalism and...
MR. RUSSERT: Byron York, how do we do this? How do people know the difference between journalists, commentators, pundit, who's on the take from the government and who is not? This is very confusing.
MR. YORK: Well--but actually the core issue is really very simple, which is disclosure. You've always got to disclose. And, of course, if Armstrong Williams had done that, it would have destroyed his credibility as it did when he came out. But, you know, The New York Times actually quoted the head of Medialink which is the company that does a lot of these video news releases, saying, you know, "The Clinton administration did more of this." This is something that's been going on for quite a while. And you can argue back and forth whether it's an appropriate expenditure of taxpayer funds, but the key question with the video news releases is you've got to know in the actual product, in this story, this was something produced and paid for by the government. If they do that, that's fine. And if Armstrong Williams had said that ahead of time, then we would have viewed him as a PR man, but on the other hand, it wouldn't have been a scandal.
MR. RUSSERT: These are pseudonews releases where you have a fake journalist sitting there interviewing a Cabinet secretary and materials are sent out across the country. What serious or legitimate news organization would ever air something like that?
MR. YORK: Well, obviously, the networks don't do it, but they are aired on smaller stations or on very small cable outlets. So some of the stuff is just kind of yanked off the satellite and put on the air. So given that that happens, that's why a disclosure is so important.
MR. RUSSERT: Katty.
MS. KAY: And one of these apparently aired on about 200 cable channels. So a lot of people are seeing this, and understandably, after Mr. Williams' story, people are going to look at what they see on television and ask themselves, "How do I know that this reporter isn't being paid either by a government organization or by a business organization?" And that confusion is understandable, particularly since there has been an erosion of the lines of what is clear, objective news reporting.
We've seen the encroachment of entertainment into that field and also the encroachment of business and government interests paying for time in that field, and there does have to be a clarity here. The audiences need to know: Am I getting news, which is objective fact, which is being reported, or am I getting advertising or propaganda, which is being paid for by a government interest or a business interest, or am I getting entertainment, somebody's opinion? And it's not always very clear, and it should be clearer.
MR. YORK: You know, No Child Left Behind--a lot of conservatives hated it; a lot of Democrats hated it. The only way you could get somebody to say something nice about it is pay them $240,000.
MR. HUNT: Well, and they did it, of course, in a very sneaky way. It was funneled through a PR firm, Ketchum PR firm, so they knew exactly what they...
MS. MITCHELL: It was laundered.
MR. HUNT: Yeah. They knew exactly what they were doing. I want to go to Katty's point, because I think it's a very good one. I think the danger for people in our business is we better think carefully about exactly what we're doing. I think there ought to be full disclosure of people of any kind of outside income and--otherwise, I think our business is really going to suffer a tremendous erosion of credibility.
MS. MITCHELL: Well, we've already lost a lot of credibility. This has not exactly been a good couple of years...
MR. HUNT: It's not.
MS. MITCHELL: ...for either print or television credibility.
MR. HUNT: It has not.
MR. RUSSERT: Let me turn to the big issue confronting our country: Social Security. Pete Wehner, who works for Karl Rove in the White House, sent an e-mail message this week--this is how The New York Times reported it: "In an e-mail message this week that circulated among conservative activists, Peter Wehner, a top aide to Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's senior adviser and political strategist, made clear that the White House was leaning toward a reduction in scheduled benefits, partly because failing to do so would unsettle the financial markets and risk harm to the economy. `You may know that there is a small number of conservatives who prefer to push only for investment accounts and make no effort to adjust benefits, therefore making no effort to address this fundamental structural problem,' Mr. Wehner said in the message. `In my judgment, that's a bad idea. We simply cannot solve the Social Security problem with personal retirement accounts alone.'"
And today, you'll see a full-page ad from The Concord Coalition which has Democratic Senator Bob Kerrey, Republican Senator Warren Rudman, Pete Peterson, who served in the Ford administration, Bob Rubin, secretary of treasury under Bill Clinton, Paul Volcker, the Federal Reserve chairman, and they say this: "Ensuring a more sustainable system will require change, meaning that someone is going to have to give up something--either in the form of higher contributions, lower benefits or a combination of both. No Social Security reform will succeed unless this fact is acknowledged up front."
Byron York, is there a battle in the conservative community over Social Security?
MR. YORK: There is a huge battle in the conservative community. They're basically split between two factions. There is the group led by Newt Gingrich, who may run for president, that is very, very hot for personal accounts, and they do not want to see those personal accounts tied to either benefit cuts or tax increases. And that faction is known as the "free lunchers." And then there's the solvency crowd, and Pete Wehner's memo really suggested that the president is among them, who feel that you're going to have to--first of all, that the personal accounts themselves will not address the solvency crisis that's going to come someday in Social Security, so you've got to have some sort of benefit cut--and they're going to be called benefit cuts; they'll try to say it's a slowdown in the rate of growth of benefits, but it's a cut--or a tax increase.
MS. MITCHELL: Well, you're absolutely correct that, if you look at the numbers, these private accounts or personal accounts, and their polling shows them--that if you call them personal accounts, they're not as unpopular; there's, in fact, some support for it compared to private accounts, so it's a matter of semantics in advertising.
But if these accounts were put in place, it would not nearly solve the problem. You're going to have to deal with the essential question, which is that our population is not growing fast enough, combined with immigration, to create enough workers to support a pay-as-you-go retirement system. And if that's the case, you either have to revert to inflation increases rather than wage increases as your standard for what your pension is going to be based on, or make other kinds of changes that will reduce the benefits.
But politically, as we all know, that is anathema. And I think that George Bush, from this memo and from other things that I've heard, is really willing to take this on, but he's got a split in the House and the Senate. The House wants a specific plan from the White House, and the Senate wants to take a step back and let a bipartisan group of senators work it out.
MR. YORK: Well, the thing that unites them is they're terrified about this. One Republican in the Senate said to me, "Well, you know we could lose both majorities in 2006 because of this if we mess it up." So they're--it's an "After you," "No, after you." They want the president to go first.
MR. RUSSERT: Albert Hunt and Katty, the situation is, when Social Security began, there were 16 workers for every retiree. There are soon to be two workers for every retiree. We have 40 million people on Social Security now. When the baby boomers retire, there'll be 80 million. Roosevelt said eligibility 65, which was genius, because if you made it to 65, you were on Social Security for a month or two and that was it. Life expectancy's now 78, 79, 80 years old, so you have twice as many people on the program for 15 years. The president says that's a crisis. Democrats say it's not a crisis. We'll find a way to grow our way out of this and make some changes that would tweak the system. Who's right?
MR. HUNT: Well, it's certainly not a short-term crisis, but certainly over the long run I think Andrea's right, you can't sustain the system. Something has to be done. Look, I've been in Washington for 35 years. This is going to be the mother of all battles. I mean, you got to go back to Medicare to find anything where the stakes are so big, the politics are so difficult. It could profoundly change American politics, American economics. I think it's going to be far tougher--I don't think the president has any idea how tough this is. I don't think he has any idea. You cannot pass Social Security reform without a virtually united Republican Party and without sizable Democratic support. This is not tax cuts. This is not free-lunch stuff. This is sacrifice, and it's going to be big and it's got to be done bipartisan, and right now it ain't there.
MS. KAY: And all the Republicans know that all of the options on the table, whether it's raising the retirement age, cutting the benefits, they all carry some cost. And they're looking at their re-election prospects in 2006 and they don't want to be the ones seen to be pushing something which is causing a huge amount of pain. And the problem for the Republicans is the discussion at the moment, at least, in Washington is focused on cutting benefits. It's not focused on the personal accounts. Somehow the shift seems to be benefit cuts. Now, if you're looking at re-election, you don't want to be the person that's looking at benefit cuts.
MR. HUNT: I think some Republicans like Lindsey Graham of South Carolina really have thought this through and have proposed something that does involve tax increases. And I think, ultimately, if the president wants to get Social Security reform, which I think he does, he's going to have to accept--he may call it something else, but it's going to be a tax increase.
MS. KAY: Could this be the one where he overreaches, though? Could this be his overreach issue in his second term where he both unites the Democrats and splits the Republicans at the same time?
MR. RUSSERT: Before we go, Byron York mentioned Newt Gingrich, thinking about running for president. Professor Bob Shmulen of Notre Dame sent me a note the other day saying 2008 will be the first time in a long, long time where there will not be an incumbent president or vice president seeking the nomination of either party. How do you see 2008, Albert? Is it going to be a free-for-all?
MR. HUNT: I gave up column writing two weeks ago, but if Newt Gingrich is going to run for president, I think I want to go back. I used to get five or six great columns a year knocking Newt. I think 2008 is going to be the most wonderful contest to cover because it is so open. And I don't think anybody could sit here and tell you with any sense of certainty even the front-runners for either party right now.
MR. YORK: You know, every year, someone writes stories about how one candidate is using the value of incumbency. And this time, nobody's going to be able to do it, which is going to equal it out and make it even better.
MR. RUSSERT: And why are we all smiling?
MS. MITCHELL: Because we love it.
MS. KAY: Because it's going to be a fun race in 2008.
MR. RUSSERT: Katty Kay, Byron York, Andrea Mitchell, Albert Hunt, thank you all.
Coming next, our MEET THE PRESS minute with pioneer Shirley Chisholm. She was on MEET THE PRESS in 1972. She was seeking the Democratic nomination for the presidency.
MR. RUSSERT: And we are back.
In 1968, Shirley Chisholm became the first African-American woman to serve in Congress, and in 1972, she became the first woman to seek the Democratic presidential nomination:
(Videotape, 1972):
REP. CHISHOLM: I am the candidate of the people of America.
(End videotape)
MR. RUSSERT: She discussed her campaign for the White House right here on MEET THE PRESS during a special broadcast from the 1972 Democratic National Convention in Miami, Florida:
(Videotape, July 9, 1972):
MR. FRANK McGEE (NBC News): Mrs. Chisholm, how do you account for the fact that no more blacks than half have come to your cause in this primary process and now at the convention?
REP. CHISHOLM: Well, I think you have to recognize, first of all, gentlemen, you have to really recognize I'm doing something in this country that has never really been done before. It's a question of inculcation, reorientation and education. Never before in this country, ever since the inception of the republic, have you had a woman seriously running for the presidency. I'm not talking about someone nominating someone at the convention as a mere gesture of symbolism and tokenism. I'm talking about someone that has been going out on the highways and byways for the past seven and a half months and saying to the American people that indeed this is a multifaceted society, that Mrs. Chisholm also can be considered a person that can run for the presidency of this country.
I was breaking the tradition, a tradition on which only white males have only been the gentlemen in this country that have guided the ship of state. So you don't expect people black, white, men or women to suddenly overcome a tradition that has been steeped ever since the inception of this republic. So I understand that. I've broken the ice.
(End videotape)
MR. RUSSERT: Shirley Chisholm died last week at the age of 80. Once discussing what her legacy might be, Chisholm commented that she didn't want to go down in history as "the first black woman congressman." She said, "I'd like them to say that Shirley Chisholm had guts. That's how I'd like to be remembered." And she will be.
And we'll be right back.
MR. RUSSERT: Start the day tomorrow on "Today" with Katie and Matt, then the "NBC Nightly News" with Brian Williams. That's all for today. We'll be back next week. If it's Sunday, it MEET THE PRESS.


text:
2020 marks Stewart & Stewart's 40th anniversary of printing and publishing fine prints in collaboration with nationally and internationally recognized artists. Stewart & Stewart is one of the first printer/publishers inducted into the International Fine Print Dealers Association (IFPDA) and is among its longest running independent printer/publishers members in North America.
Founded in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan in 1980, Stewart & Stewart specializes in screenprinting and archival pigment printing. Nationally recognized for their exceptional work, fine art prints created at the firm's printshop have been exhibited and collected by private collectors, corporate curators, and art museums across the United States and Europe.
Stewart & Stewart is an Editions Publisher


text: 9 Jamilah Corbitt CEO, i am a brand® Woohoo...you're in! Check your email 😉 Oops! There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again. Get Free Email Updates!Don't miss out! Connect with us to get updates on our latest content + exclusive offers. We're not about that spam life.


text:
Hi, Maria.
I've made a few changes.
Good luck to you!
Dear Shelly:
This year I am applying for an internship with AAA, Inc., CITY, WI. to work as research assistant for 12 to 18 months.
You might know that AAA is an equine-nutrition research and consultation company serving both the horse producer and the feed industry. Its goal is to advance the industry's knowledge of equine nutrition and exercise physiology, and to apply that knowledge to produce healthier, more athletic horses.
Perhaps you remember I am a PhD student interested in equine exercise physiology. I am definitely sure this internship is an ideal opportunity to gain invaluable experience and expand my research skills into specific areas.
Like other employees of BBB I received a reference letter at the end of the summer in 2006. I worked there for four seasons and you were my supervisor during that time. I believe you know me quite well and I think you also liked my performance. Therefore, I would really appreciate if you could write me a letter of recommendation concerning the time I work for you.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours truly,
FirstName LastName
Student or Learner


text:
Will this "debt forgiveness" simply be written off and not accounted for properly? By taking from money owed Medicare (an accounts receivable), this when properly accounted would put Medicare in an even deeper hole. Perhaps that hole is so deep that they don't think anyone will notice?
Where exactly in the rule of law does it allow for Medicare debt forgiveness? Is this not monetizing? This is not a little question or a minor detail, the rule of law and accounting standards need to be followed or confidence in the system will continue to deteriorate.
States get extra Medicaid aid but two want more
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. states will get an extra $4.3 billion to pay for drugs for elderly or disabled people covered by Medicaid and Medicare, but at least two of the states with the biggest health plans said they need more cash.
"This relief will help states continue to provide critical health care services to the nearly 60 million beneficiaries who depend upon it," U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement on Thursday evening.
Medicaid is the joint state-federal health plan for the poor, disabled and elderly. Medicare covers people who are at least 65 years old or have long-term disabilities and the federal government pays for it.
Both New York Democratic Governor David Paterson and California Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger applauded the federal assistance Sebelius announced. New York's share is $400 million; California will get over $675 million.
But like many states whose tax revenues have crumpled during the recession, New York's deficit has soared and now is expected to top $8 billion, while California must shut a nearly $20 billion budget gap -- and Schwarzenegger expects the federal government to chip in nearly $7 billion.
To underscore the cash crunch in the most populous state, Schwarzenegger last month traveled to Washington, D.C., and met with Sebelius, a former Democratic governor of Kansas.
On Thursday the Hollywood icon turned politician also thanked the White House, a sharp contrast with the criticism he recently heaped on its healthcare overhaul plans.
In a statement Schwarzenegger said that "our bipartisan efforts for a more fair and equitable relationship with the federal government are paying off."
"These funds are important, and while we still have more work to do, I appreciate the commitment of the Obama Administration in responding to our requests for these much-needed funds that are owed to our state."
New York's governor also welcomed the extra dollars but added that, "Given the serious nature of the fiscal crisis that states across the country continue to face, further action is still needed."
He urged Congress to include President Barack Obama's proposal to give states an extra two quarters of increased reimbursements for Medicaid in any job-growing legislation.
The number of New Yorkers whose health care is covered by Medicaid hit a record of 4.2 million in October 2009, 13 percent above the previous high set in August 2005.
On Friday, Paterson, whose short-term savings plans include possibly delaying income tax refunds owed to New Yorkers by several weeks, released a list of parks to be closed.
Jones Beach State Park, one of Nassau County's most crowded parks on Long Island, will shut one swimming pool and cancel fireworks on the July 4th U.S. Independence Day holiday.
And here's more from California. Writing off Medicare debt frees up their budget in a robbing Peter to pay Paul process. Make no mistake, $4.3 billion is a huge sum of money, and yet it is truly just the tip of the iceberg. This type of thing is occurring against a background of HUGE shortfalls and rising taxes. The numbers are spiraling out of control, these types of actions are an indication that the end of current debt backed money game is near.
Simply "an extension of the stimulus act passed last year?" Amazing how dysfunctional our money system and politics are. Freedom's Vision would cure most of this and end these increasingly desperate attempts at piecemeal monetization, piecemeal default. While they default in this corner, they are backfilling with even more debt in another. Our nation has no accounting standards at this point, it is very close to a free for all.
Feds grant $675 million in budget relief to California
WASHINGTON — Sometimes pleading pays.
The high-profile lobbying campaign that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger launched with the state's Democratic senators for more cash from the federal government yielded a $675 million dividend Thursday, a welcome bit of relief for the state's deficit-riddled budget.
U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the Obama administration will forgive $4.3 billion in health care payments owed by states to the federal government through the end of the year. California's share is $675 million.
The news came a month after Schwarzenegger made a high-profile trip to Washington to lobby for some $7 billion in federal relief he said the state is due. California faces a nearly $20 billion budget shortfall.
"Today's announcement shows that our bipartisan efforts for a more fair and equitable relationship with the federal government are paying off," the governor said in a statement. "While we still have more work to do, I appreciate the commitment of the Obama administration in responding to our requests."
The money at issue is part of the states' share of prescription drug costs for low-income seniors who were once covered by the state Medicaid programs but are now enrolled in the federal Medicare Part D program.
The decision to forgive some of those costs is essentially an extension of the federal economic stimulus act passed last year.
"We believe today's action will help states as they struggle to maintain Medicaid and other budget priorities in these difficult economic times," Sebelius said in a news release.
If a provision in President Barack Obama's budget plan is approved, California could net an additional $160 million in relief, the governor's staff said.
Schwarzenegger gave credit to Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, who argued as far back as 2006 to the Bush administration that California was being shortchanged under the prescription drug program.
Recession over, or simply an Enron style paper mirage?
James McMurtry - "We Can't Make Here" Anymore:
It's a debt backed money process that is simply out of control. We're Doing Something About it! Come Join the Swarm!


text:
Report: Apple Planning TV-Related Media Event in March
Apple is planning to hold a media event next month to introduce new developer tools for the next-generation Apple TV device the company is rumored to be releasing this fall, according to a note analysts from Jefferies Equity Research issued to clients on Wednesday.
"Channel checks indicate Apple has a product event in March that is Apple-TV related (possibly an iTV SDK introduction)," analyst Peter Misek wrote in a note picked up by Apple Insider. "We think a Sep/Oct iTV launch is being targeted."
Misek expects the TVs will come in 42" and 55" models and will cost $1,500+. He estimates that Apple will sell 2 million consoles in the third quarter if it's released in September.
Image courtesy of iStockphoto, contour99