text:
Andrew Solomon joins Fresh Air host Terry Gross to discuss his book, Far from the Tree: Parents, Children, and the Search for Identity.
Terry Gross, host: This is Fresh Air. I'm Terry Gross. There's an old adage about children that says: The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. But what if it does? What if your child is profoundly different from you because they have Down syndrome, autism, dwarfism or schizophrenia? What if the child is transgendered? What if the child's behavior is totally unjustifiable, and they become a criminal or a killer? What if the child was conceived in rape and is a reminder of that act of brutal violation?
In the new book Far From the Tree, my guest Andrew Solomon writes about parents who have accepted their children in spite of what others might consider tragic or even horrifying. He found that many of the children he writes about can experience the thing that makes them different as illness or identity, and that the line can shift.
For example, Solomon is gay, and when he was growing up, that was considered an illness. Solomon won a 2001 National Book Award for his book about depression, The Noonday Demon.
Andrew Solomon, welcome back to Fresh Air. So let's start with your research into children conceived in rape. Since rape and abortion became such a major issue in this election – and just to refresh everybody's memories about this, Todd Akin, who ran for the U.S. Senate and was defeated, said if it's "legitimate rape," a woman has a mechanism to shut it down. Richard Mourdock, who was defeated in the Indiana Senate race, said, I think that even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that is something that God intended to happen, and therefore he didn't want to make an exception for rape in his stance against abortion.
Paul Ryan, who ran for vice president and remains a congressman, said that he thinks abortion should be illegal with no exception for rape because, quote, "the method of conception doesn't change the definition of life."
Did you hear all these comments through the lens of all the research that you had done on children conceived in rape?
Andrew Solomon: When I set out to write about children conceived in rape, I wanted to strike a very tricky balance, which is that I wanted to describe how some women who have chosen to keep these children have built relationships with them and to explore both the difficulty and the reward that there may be in that.
My fear – and I worked very hard to try to ensure this wouldn't happen – was that anything I wrote could be construed to suggest that everyone should keep their child conceived in rape. I don't think everyone should keep their child at all. I think everyone should have free and unfettered access to choice, and that rape is a – it entails, more than anything, disenfranchising the victim, and the first way to enfranchise someone is to give them a choice.
So I wanted to look at what the lives of these women who had kept children were like without ever seeming to suggest they should. But having looked at what those lives were like, I mean, many of the women ultimately able were able to build great joy in their relations with their children. Many others weren't. All of them went through agonies.
And to hear these people running for office in the United States in the 21st century effectively dismissing these women's experience and saying that the trauma of carrying such a child was something that was not – they didn't deserve legal rights that surrounded it, it was really sickening to me.
And Todd Akin's comment was particularly irksome because he said I believe that a woman's body has a way of shutting that whole thing down. It reflected such ignorance about human biology. I found those positions brutal and cruel. I know that the people who are very much opposed to abortion feel that abortion contains brutality and cruelty, and my view would be that they therefore have every right to avoid it. But the idea of dictating to women that they can't make that choice, especially under those circumstances, seems to me hideous.
Gross: Did the women that you interviewed who carried the children of rape, as opposed to having an abortion, did they think about abortion? Or, you know, was there – did they make the choice, or did they feel there was no choice for them but to have the baby?
Solomon: There was some of each. There were definitely some women who felt that there was religious pressure or family pressure that prevented them from having an abortion, or who just had a personal belief that abortion was wrong. But there were a lot of them who wobbled around while they were pregnant. Some of them wobbled around until it was too late to have an abortion, and it's almost as though they didn't quite get around to it.
And some of them actually just thought I'm going to have this child, and something beautiful will come out of the awful thing that happened to me. And that could be very powerful. But, I mean, the two anecdotes I think that for me sum up that chapter, one was a woman who I interviewed who described being really brutally raped, pulled into the back seat of a taxi, raped when she was 16 years old, who had then become pregnant and had had to give up the career that she was looking forward to and wasn't able to college and so on and so forth.
She'd had a very, very traumatic experience, but it was a long time ago. And I said to her: Do you ever think back on the man who raped you? And she said, you know, I used to think of him with great anger, she said, but now just with pity. And I thought she meant pity because he was so unevolved. And I said: Really? And she said: Yes, she said, because he has a beautiful daughter and two beautiful grandchildren, and he doesn't know that, and I do. So, as it turns out, I'm the lucky one.
But having said that and having posed that as something which, ultimately, one way or another, this woman has built a life for herself which has been a very powerful one, I also talked to a lot of women, and there was one woman who said to me: I have to fight against my instincts all the time. Other mothers rely on their instincts, but my instincts are terrifying. And every time she comes over for a hug, it feels like a thousand razorblades scraping against my skin. And I just think nobody should dictate policy to either of those women. They should each have the option of doing the thing that works for them.
Gross: What are some of the issues that the women raised to you about the difficulties or the conflicts that they had carrying a child who was conceived in rape and then mothering the child?
Solomon: Well, there are several parts to it. One is that we live in an age in which there is a kind of hegemony of genetic determinism. And so all of the women were concerned about the ways in which their child might resemble the rapist psychologically. If the biological father of this child was capable of something so awful, is this child going to turn out to be capable of awful things? So that was one fear.
And then next to it – and not entirely separable from it, but also not entirely the same thing – the child was a constant reminder of the rape. As one of the women said to me: I have a friend who was raped, and a few years later, she was really able to get into a kind of useful denial and say it never happened. I will never be able to say it never happened. I will always have that pair of eyes looking at me that are evidence that yes, it did happen.
Gross: So let me just interrupt here with a quote from one of the women who you interviewed, and she's talking about how she was constantly reminded of how her child was conceived. And she says: "There were many times that I had terrible feelings of hatred toward my son. The laughter of my little boy often reminded me of the hideous laughter of this guy as he had raped me. I took it out on my son."
Solomon: Right. I think it's sometimes very difficult not to take it out on your child. I mean, abused children are much more likely to grow up to be abusive parents than other children. And a woman whose child has been conceived in trauma is likely to have a lot more to struggle with than a woman whose child has been conceived in love – or at least, you know, proximate affection of some kind.
A lot of the women struggled with it. What impressed me was how hard they were trying. I went to Rwanda, actually, because I wanted to see a place where this experience of having a child of rape was commonplace rather than extraordinary. And on my last day there, I had an interview with a woman who, even at the high standards of all of the Tutsi women, was breathtakingly beautiful and incredibly elegant.
And we sat in her little hut, and she had actually managed to remarry following the genocide, and she was – her life was in many ways sort of OK. At the end of interviews, I often say to people: Do you have any questions for me? Because it helps to rebalance the conversation, so it's not just my taking their story, but I try to give them something, as well.
And in Rwanda, people would say: Will this be published in French? Or are you going to use my real name? Or how long are you here for? Or questions like that. And this woman looked at me, and there was this sort of pause, and she said: You're in this field of psychology, right? And I said: Well, yes, more or less. And she said: Can you tell me how to love my daughter more? She said because every time I look at her, I think about what happened to me, and it gets in the way. Can you tell me how to love my daughter more? And, unfortunately, it was only afterwards that I thought how much love there was in that question itself.
Gross: I want to get back to the American women who you interviewed about giving birth to children who were conceived in rape. You also talked to some of their children. And what kind of stigmas did the children of rape face in their own lives?
Solomon: Well, there's a central problem always for a woman who decides to keep a child conceived in rape, which is: At what point do I actually tell my child where the child came from? So people who adopt children are usually now advised to tell the children from the very beginning of childhood: You were adopted, but you were adopted because we so much wanted a child, and we were so lucky to have you. And it's a part of their narrative.
But rape is too disturbing and too violent, and the sexuality involved in it is too complicated to explain to a two-year-old. So you don't tell the child from the very beginning. And then what happens when you eventually do tell the child? What is the child to make of discovering that horror in the background?
I met children who had been conceived in rape and who said that actually finding out had been a great relief, that it explained to them why their mother had had a child under odd or unusual circumstances. It explained why they had sensed some ambivalence in a mother whom they had tried to please. There were a lot of levels at which they found it a liberation.
But there were others who were so horrified by that news and felt so polluted by it that they acted out in various, very destructive ways. And there were many of them who felt that they didn't want other people to know that was where they came from because they thought other people would think: this person is a child of rape. This person is like a rapist. This person is untrustworthy. This person comes from dirt and darkness.
I mean, there was a real fear of that, and I found that while we have reduced the stigma around many disease categories – you know, there isn't as much stigma as there used to be around someone having Down's syndrome. People may not be longing to have it, but they don't have as many negative associations as they once did.
This is an area in which the negativity remains incredibly pronounced. And if you look on the Internet – which is, of course, prone to people raving on – but there are people talking about how the children of rape should all be, one post said, put them to sleep like unwanted pets. There's a lot of darkness in that.
Gross: Some of the children who were conceived in rape became strongly anti-abortion. Can you explain why?
Solomon: You know, there's a tendency for people who are in categories that are frequently faced with abortion to describe not being aborted as though it were some wonderful victory that they had achieved by riding at the head of an army on a white horse. And so there's a resistance to abortion. There's anti-abortion sentiment in the disability community. There's anti-abortion sentiment in the rape community.
When I thought about it a lot, I realized that I would find it disturbing if someone were now to develop a test that would allow mothers to find out whether their children would be gay, and if I discovered that most mothers were aborting those children, it would be painful to me to know that.
So I understand why it's painful for people who are in other stigmatized categories to know that there are medical advances that are being used to construct a world in which people like them no longer exist. Some of them feel that being anti-abortion activists is a way of justifying their own existence.
My own experience, again, is simply that women who have been raped have lost volition. Some of them will actually choose to keep their children, and they should receive every possible support. They should get psychological counseling. They should get whatever they need to be able to bring those children up well.
And other women will choose to terminate those pregnancies, and they shouldn't be questioned about it. They should be allowed to make that decision.
Gross: What did the research you did for this chapter in your book lead you to think about that you hadn't thought about before? What – how, if at all, did it change your ideas about the children of rape or about abortion?
Solomon: I was completely shocked by how relatively little literature there is about children conceived in rape, and most of what exists deals either with conflicts in faraway countries where there have been rape campaigns as part of brutal military activities, or is written by anti-choice activists, and they're sort of angry screeds.
And I thought the actual stories of these women haven't been told very much. And, of course, at the beginning I thought: Who am I, as a man, to come in and try to tell their stories for them? But I just thought that the stories had been neglected. And in the course of reporting the chapter, I think I had: A, the feeling that someone who has been subject to sexual violence will always have a somewhat distorted relationship at one level or another to the experience of sexuality and motherhood, because the motherhood that has begun this way has begun in so much pain. They may resolve it well enough so that everything is livable, but it doesn't go away, I guess is what I found.
But the other thing, which was also very striking, is that the children are people themselves. There were a few families in which the children seemed to be growing up to be highly problematical. But most of the people I met actually really loved their children. And I feel like the idea – that idea of how resilient maternal love is for a woman to be able to achieve love for a child who is a constant emblem of something she went through that was so awful, I was humbled, humbled really, by the passionate way in which these women spoke, many of them, about their own children, and humbled also by the courage it had taken to keep the children and to look at them every day, given all of the things that they reminded them of.
Gross: If you're just joining us, my guest is Andrew Solomon, and we're talking about his new book, which is called Far From the Tree: Parents, Children, and the Search for Identity. And it's about families in which there is a child who is profoundly different, through deafness, dwarfism, Down syndrome, autism, schizophrenia, children conceived in rape, children who have become criminals.
And his previous book, The Noonday Demon, was about depression, including his own depression. So let's take a short break here, and then we'll talk some more. This is Fresh Air.
(soundbite of music)
Gross: Let's talk about the research that you did about families in which a child is born with Down syndrome. First, I'm going to ask you to describe the condition.
Solomon: The scientific name for Down syndrome is Trisomy 21, and the condition is characterized by having an extra copy of the 21st chromosome, and it's the most common genetic anomaly that there is. It affects a large number of people. It's also one of the first things for which it was possible to scan prenatally, using amniocentesis, and many women who discover that they are carrying a pregnancy with a child who will develop or will be affected by Down syndrome choose to terminate those pregnancies.
There's a very broad range of function in people with Down syndrome, as there is, in fact, in people without Down syndrome. But it's striking that some people seem to have it more than others. But most of them are intellectually disadvantaged, some of them severely disadvantaged. They have faces that look a little bit different. They have very round faces, and their eyes tend to be on something of a slant.
They don't have a lot of abilities in areas of thought and argument such as logic. Some of them have additional physical disabilities. It's a – it can be a very severe syndrome. It's also the one in which medical science, or rather social science has made the most radical advances in recent years with changes in how people are treated.
Gross: So this story relates to abortion, too, since it can be diagnosed in vitro, through amniocentesis. And many women decide to abort the pregnancy if they know that baby they're carrying will have Down syndrome. Did most of the women who you interviewed for this chapter know in advance and decide to keep the baby?
Solomon: No, most of them did not know in advance. A few of them knew in advance. But most of them were not aware.
Gross: And so for those who were not aware, what were some of their reactions when the child was born about how this was going to affect their own lives?
Solomon: When the child was born, many of them had a difficult time with it. Some of them didn't. Some of them had very buoyant personalities. But many of them really, really struggled with that news and felt that they had this defective child and felt that they had been thrown into a strange country in which they didn't know how to do anything.
They didn't know, most of them, because most of the families I was talking to had children who were growing up in the '70s, '80s, '90s, and some even more recently. But a lot of them didn't know how much those children would be able to do. They didn't know how severely affected they would be. There was a lot of pain around it.
And there were some of them who didn't express a lot of pain or didn't experience a lot of pain, who then, when the children were older, admitted to themselves: I was in a lot of pain and I just pushed it out of my mind. And that was the story I heard from a number of people.
Gross: If you're a parent of a child with Down syndrome, you have to alter your life for the rest of your life, in a very profound way. And if you could talk a little bit about how parents felt that their lives had been changed for better or for worse by the things they had to get up and the things they received in return.
Solomon: You know, there's a famous passage – I don't know what else to call it but a passage, a sort of little, almost a prose poem by Emily Perl Kingsley, who was a writer for "Sesame Street" who has a son with Down syndrome and whose son has done remarkably for someone affected by DS.
And she wrote something called "Welcome to Holland." I always feel a little bit bad for the Dutch in relation to this particular thing. But it basically describes the process of having a child with disabilities as being like getting on a plane to Italy and then discovering that you're landing in Holland. And you'll always miss Italy and you'll always wished you'd seen the things of Italy, but if you spent your whole time worrying about that, you won't notice the beauty of Holland and the tulips and the Rembrandts and so on. And it's a kind of lovely metaphoric passage, and it's helped vast numbers of people. And many, many people I met described having been deeply moved by it.
What I found is that, again, the sort of time of diagnosis and the time of birth was often very difficult and upsetting for people. Kids with Down syndrome are, by and large, quite affectionate and relatively guileless, and frequently the attachments to them grow and deepen, and the meaning that parents find in it grows and deepens.
So the story that epitomizes it, perhaps, was of Tom and Karen Robards, who are a couple I met in New York, who had gotten involved in changing the way education services are delivered to people with Down syndrome. They set up something called the Cooke Center, and they did really noble and heroic work in that arena. And their son is now 30.
And I said, look, this is – you've given your lives to this. I said, do you wish you hadn't? Do you wish you'd never heard of Down syndrome? Do you wish you could make it go away? And his mother said, you know, for our son David, I wish I could make it go away, because for David, it's a difficult way to be in the world and I would do anything to make David's life easier.
She said, but speaking for myself, while I would never have believed 30 years ago that I would get to such a point, speaking for myself, it's made me think so much more deeply and appreciate humanity so much more broadly and live so much more richly that, speaking for myself, I wouldn't give it up for anything in the world.
And while she articulated that idea with particular eloquence, I found that it was a not-infrequent refrain that most of the parents who'd become very attached to their children. And at some level, I kept thinking: But surely you'd rather have children without Down syndrome.
And then I thought: People become attached to their children with whatever their flaws are. I'm attached to my children with whatever flaws they have. And if some glorious angel broke through the living room ceiling and offered to exchange them for other, better children, I'd cling to my kids and pray away this specter. We all love flawed children, and the general assumption that these more extreme flaws make the children somehow unlovable, it wasn't true to most of my experience.
Gross: Now, there are probably some children who you write about in your book who would have died at birth or close to it, if not for modern medical interventions that save the lives of babies now. And so, you know, parents are raising children who probably wouldn't – nowadays, who probably wouldn't have been alive years ago. Is that a fair statement?
Solomon: Yes. That's absolutely true.
Gross: I want you to talk a little bit about the 1984 Baby Doe Amendment, which is an amendment to the Child Abuse Act that President Reagan signed, and what it said and the ways in which it was or wasn't a turning point in that story.
Solomon: Essentially, up until the Baby Doe Amendment, if you had a child who had what appeared to be a severe defect, you could basically allow that child to die by not using medical intervention to help the child if they had undeveloped lungs or other challenges at birth. But you really effectively could allow the child to starve to death. You could say I don't want to deal with a child like this, and it was not a crime, because that child was really not treated as a human being.
And at some point, people began militating for recognition of the full humanity of every child born, no matter what that child's condition. And the Baby Doe Amendment basically said that allowing a child to die constituted a crime, whether the child was healthy or unhealthy. And it was an important moment in the crystallization of this idea of the profound humanity even of the profoundly disabled.
I mean, it's shocking, but there was a passage in Harper's, which I've described in the book, and I'm trying to remember what year it was. But it was about how it's terribly sad if you have a child with Down syndrome whom you have to allow to die – terribly sad, but not tragic, because a Down's is not a person.
That was running in Harpers, which is a relatively liberal voice, and it was running there, I think, in the 1970s. So it took a long time to get to the point at which we really recognize the humanity of people with Down syndrome.
And it was only really after that movement began – the movement that led to the Baby Doe Amendment and the movement that followed it – that all of the educational interventions for people with Down syndrome set in, which have now allowed such people to rise to levels of accomplishment which were utterly unimaginable given the medical expectations of 50 years ago.
Gross: In your thinking, now that you've done all this research for your book, Far From the Tree, what is the quality of life? Like, what level of quality of life is worth living? You know, because there are some children who are born with like such profound deformities, where you can take heroic measures to keep the child alive, but the child will probably live in an extremely compromised state for the rest of their lives. So, you know, has your thinking on that shifted?
Solomon: My thinking on that has shifted a lot. It shifted in part because there are stories of people who, because the brain is quite plastic, have been able to do things that neurologists predicted they would never be able to do. There are people who were expected never to be able to walk or to talk or to do anything who actually, in the end, were able to do much more than people thought.
So partly my thinking has shifted because I think medical science has an aura of precision which it has not earned in these particular instances. And I think it's very difficult to know what a very compromised life is like unless you are in a very compromised life. And for a life that's as compromised as some of the ones we're talking about, the people who are in them can't communicate about them.
I myself have seen children who seem to me to be suffering terribly, and I've thought: I feel like children like that should be allowed to be let go, but I don't do it with any certainty. And I've met other children and thought, oh, but wait a minute. Look. He does seem to be smiling. He seems to be kind of – it's like trying to understand something that's at the bottom of the ocean from where you sit on board a ship. You can't really tell what shape or what color it is.
So my feeling, ultimately, is I think the same as my feeling about abortion, that I feel families should be allowed to choose what to do. Families who want to keep these children should be able to keep them. Families who want to give them up should have a system that allows them to do so. But I think it's very dangerous if you start describing some people as not being really people. I think that's a very dangerous direction to go in.
Gross: If you're just joining us, my guest is Andrew Solomon. A few years ago, over 10 years ago, he wrote the book The Noonday Demon, about depression, which won a National Book Award. We're talking about his new book Far From the Tree, which is about children who are born with profound differences like deafness, dwarfism, Down syndrome, autism, schizophrenia, children conceived in rape, children who become criminals, children who are transgendered.
Yes, I know these are not, by any means, similar. (Laughs) Are these conditions – but in terms of the challenges they present within families, there are certain connections that Andrew Solomon sees.
So one of your chapters is on children who become criminals. And two of the people who you interviewed for that chapter were the parents of Dylan Klebold. And Klebold, along with Eric Harris, killed 13 people – 12 students and one teacher – at Columbine High School in Colorado in April of 1999. Why did you want to talk with them?
Solomon: You know, I really wanted to understand what it was like to have a child who had done something so awful and what effect it had on the emotional life and the experience of the parents. I had found, as I did research on crime in general – and I had taken a job for a few months working on a theater project in a juvenile facility in Minnesota – I had found that mostly, contrary to popular perception, the parents of criminals are not themselves criminals.
Mostly, the parents of criminals don't think it's such a great idea to commit crimes. Mostly, especially with juvenile felons, the parents are very distressed and want to fix the situation. And I was interested in trying to understand what the dynamics of that were.
And then when I had the opportunity to talk to the Klebolds, I thought, how could you ever recover from having a child who had done something as horrific as what Dylan Klebold did? And I also, I think, was still trying to figure out, OK, but do the parents cause these things to happen? And I thought, maybe, maybe if I understand these parents, then I'll understand why the Columbine massacre occurred. And I was curious.
And I would say what I feel, now that I've spent all that time with them, is that knowing the parents has made it far more mysterious to me than it was before I met them.
Gross: Did the Klebolds have any idea how troubled their son was and what he was capable of?
Solomon: You know, it took a long time for me to persuade them that we could talk about all of this. And then, when they finally agreed to it, they were so full of their story, it overflowed in them. And at the end of the first long weekend that I spent recording – I think more than 20 hours of interviews over a weekend – we were sitting, all of us very exhausted around the kitchen table, and I said: If Dylan were here now, is there anything you'd want to ask him or tell him, or do you have a question for him?
And his father said I sure would. I'd ask him what the hell he thought he was doing. And his mother, Sue, sort of looked down at the floor, and she thought. And then she said: I would ask him to forgive me for being his mother and never knowing what was going on inside his head.
I think she had no idea. I think now that I've got to know both parents well, if they had had any idea, they would have done something. They would've fixed it. They would've intervened. I think people can keep their character very secret, and having had the experience with Tom and Sue, I look even at my own children and think: I think I know them well, but I have to always remember that you never necessarily do. But I'm sure, 100 percent sure that his parents had no idea he was planning such a thing. They just, if they had any idea, that they would've tried to stop it. That's who they are.
Gross: So I'm going to ask an outsider's question, which is: How could you not know that your son was so troubled?
Solomon: So, I think that we have a long history of thinking that things are caused by parents. We thought that autism was caused by parents, "refrigerator mothers" were the ones who caused it. Schizophrenia was apparently something that you developed because your parents had an unconscious wish that you not exist.
If you go back 100 years further, there was the idea of imaginationism, which said that the reason your child was a dwarf or had deformities was because the mother had lascivious longings which were expressed in the deformities of her child. These theories of implying – implicating parents go back all the way through history, and a lot of them have been dismissed. But crime is the one area in which people seem not to be able to let go of that idea.
I saw endless family photos. I saw a video that Tom had made of Dylan three days before the massacre when he was going off to the prom, and he looks like a feckless adolescent who's a little bit irritable. He looks like all the other feckless adolescents who are a little bit irritable whom one comes across.
And I think that he was someone who had that ability, which is a profound ability, to hide his true nature from other people, in the same way that I think – I don't know – it would appear that Jerry Sandusky, for a long time, could hide his nature from a lot of people who were quite close around him.
People have that skill and that ability, and it comes in unpredictable ways and places. And I think he presented a very, very convincing facade. And I think that convincing facade was actually a large part of who he was, but I think he expressed it as all of who he was and kept this other part held away in secret.
Gross: I want to quote something. There's a couple of things that Dylan Klebold's mother said to you, and I guess this was upon hearing the news of what was going on at Columbine. She said, while every mother in town was praying that her child was safe, I had to pray that mine would die before he hurt anyone else. And then she said to you that she had hoped that he would die by suicide rather than going into the criminal justice system where he might be executed.
And she said: I gave the hardest prayer I ever made, that he would kill himself, because then at least I would know that he wanted to die and wouldn't be left with all the questions I'd have if he got caught by a police bullet. I've spent so many hours regretting that prayer. I wished for my son to kill himself and he did.
Solomon: Right. I mean, it's a very powerful statement. If you read, as I now have, the thousands and thousands of pages of material relevant to the various lawsuits that were brought in connection in Columbine, you can read a lot of Dylan's writings and a lot of Eric Harris' writings. And what you find if you do so is that Dylan was mostly depressed, and it feels as though he went along with the brutality of killing other people in part because that was Eric's big idea.
And Eric was mostly out to rule and then destroy the world. And he went along with killing himself because it was Dylan's idea. But Dylan definitely was suicidal. Now, it should be said that Dylan had had a minor criminal offense a year before Columbine, had been in trouble with the police, had then been assessed by a psychiatrist who saw no evidence that he was troubled in any way.
No evidence that he was depressed, certainly no evidence that he was psychopathic. Nobody saw it. But the thing that Sue said about that was that she just – when she heard the reports and understood what was happening, she said it just – it was so awful, but she was in a state of such agony about what was happening to her child, but also what was happening to all of these other children.
She said – she's a very empathetic person and I think the idea that she was somehow implicated in this wanton horror that was taking place, was awful. And I think even aside from the question of whether she was implicated, simply the fact that it was happening was so immensely distressing to her. And like everyone in Colorado then, maybe everyone in the country who had the news on, I mean everyone thought, oh my god. When is this going to stop?
And she had that tragic knowledge that it was only going to stop when her son was dead.
Gross: If you're just joining us, my guest is Andrew Solomon and we're talking about his new book which is called Far From the Tree: Parents, Children, and the Search for Identity. And it's about families in which there is a child who is profoundly different – through deafness, dwarfism, Down syndrome, autism, schizophrenia, children conceived in rape, children who have become criminals. So let's take a short break here and then we'll talk some more. This is Fresh Air.
Gross: Writing this book seems to have had a profound effect on you, including becoming part of the reason why your personal story has changed. While writing this book you got married, and you and your husband have a son.
You both are also sperm donors. And I think part of the reason why you became enthusiastic about being a father had to do with all these families that you wrote about.
Solomon: I had always hoped that I would someday have children, but I'd never known quite when or whether and I certainly didn't know how. And I met John, who's now my husband, at almost exactly the same time that I sold the proposal for this book back in 2001. And he then told me that he had been the donor for some lesbian friends and that they had a son of whom he was the biological father, Oliver – who was supposed to call him "donor dad" but because he couldn't quite understand the word, kept calling him "donut dad" instead. And then a couple of years later Tammy and Laura asked him to be a donor again and they had a daughter, Lucy. And then one of my best, best, best friends from college had gone through a difficult divorce and she and I were talking about it.
And I said are you sad about it? And she no. She said the only thing I'm sad about is not being a mother. And I said rather lightly, because I didn't think it was something she would be particularly inclined toward, but I said, well, if you ever decide you want a baby, I would love to be the father.
And she said a few years later, I've really thought about it. She said, what do you think? And we realized that it was something we both really wanted to do. So I have a daughter who lives with her mother in the Southwest but comes up to visit. And we go to visit there all the time. We were there a few days ago.
And I have – John and I talked about it and I really wanted us to have the experience of being fulltime parents. So we decided to have another child. We had George. We found an egg donor. Laura, who was the one within the Tammy and Laura couple who had been the biological mother of Oliver and Lucy, said to John I'll never be able to thank you enough for allowing us to have a family and helping us with that, but I could show you how much you mean to us by carrying this child for you.
And so we've ended up in this sort of funny amalgam of five parents of four children in three states. And we all sort of fit together in our way. And people said to me, but you are doing this book about all of these terrible things that have gone wrong for all of these families. And surely, doing that would have made you draw back from the project of having your own family.
And I said that on the contrary, I felt that what the book was about was the fact that parents can love almost anyone who is presented to them as their child and that that love has a compelling urgency to it that rises above any difficulty. And I thought, whoever my children turn out to be, I think I'll be able to love them.
And I felt that partly because of what I'd seen in these other families and partly also because I had been somewhat unforgiving of my family for being a little slow – not very slow, but a little slow – to accept the fact that I was gay. And when I started looking at all of these families, I thought, loving someone and accepting someone are two different things.
And I thought, my parents always loved me. It just took them a while to accept me. And then they got there. And actually, all of these parents had to struggle to accept their children, and then they got there. And I began to think all parents at some level have to struggle to accept their children. Their children are always full of surprises.
And I thought, OK, I don't know. The acceptance thing may be tricky but I bet I'll get through it and I'll bet that I'll be able to love them whoever they are.
Gross: Well, your thoughts about becoming a parent were pretty much tested right at birth when your son George was born and there was a period you thought he might have a profound disability. Describe what happened.
Solomon: So George was born. We were all in the delivery room, Laura, who was carrying the pregnancy and John and I. And when he was born they noticed that there had been a knot in his umbilical cord and they said they thought everything was fine but if the knot had tightened that it could've cut off oxygen to his brain.
And then we went off and we went to sleep and everything seemed fine. And the next day, John said, oh, the pediatrician wants to talk to you. And I assumed it was the routine conversation of the first day in his life. And the pediatrician said he's not extending his legs in the way that he should. And I said oh. And she said yes. She said, and insofar as he is extending them, he's doing so somewhat asymmetrically. And I said is that a cause for concern? And she said, well, she said the fact that he's not extending them may indicate significant brain damage. She said the fact that he's not them symmetrically may mean there's asymmetric brain damage, possibly a tumor.
And John, who hadn't been writing this book, said, oh, I'm sure he's going to be fine and essentially has a more optimistic temperament than I do anyway. But I had witnessed what all these families had been through and I knew that you often find out in the first few days of a child's life that you're on a completely different course than you thought you were.
And I was terrified by it. And I suddenly realized when I looked at George I had been thinking, hmm. I have this baby. Do I love this baby? And then I suddenly found myself trying not to love this baby. I thought what if this baby is going to be incredibly sick and die and I wanted to stop being emotionally engaged. And I realized I couldn't do that.
And we then had an endless thing of scans and all kinds of things and after about five hours they said, well, the scans are all clear. And look, now he's extending his legs just the way he should. He probably had a cramp earlier. And I thought you might've mentioned that that was a possibility…
Solomon: …when you were telling me about brain tumors. But I kept thinking how ironic it would be if in the middle of writing this book I had a child who had some kind of severe disability. But nature is no stranger to ironies and it could've happened. I definitely experienced it differently than I would have before I'd written this book.
Because I think before I'd written the book it would've seemed to me like, not only like a tragedy for the child, but I would have thought, I don't want to have this life at all. And now I looked at it and I thought, oh, god, I hope this child isn't going to suffer. And I thought, I really hope I'm not going to suffer. I don't especially want to do this, but I thought, if it's what I have to do, I know I can.
I'd learned that from these other parents.
Gross: Andrew Solomon, thank you so much for talking with us.
Solomon: It's been such a pleasure, Terry. Thank you so very much.
Gross: Andrew Solomon is the author of Far From the Tree. You can read an excerpt on our website, freshair.npr.org, where you can also download podcasts of our show.


text:
Thursday, September 19, 2013
to see how crowded Universal Orlando will be!
Pick the best parks with our recommendations.
Universal Studios Florida
- Crowd Level: subscribers only.
- Park Hours: 9:00am - 8:30pm
- Universal's Superstar Parade at 5:00pm
- Universal's Cinematic Spectacular - 100 Years of Movie Memories at 8:30pm
Universal's Islands of Adventure
- Crowd Level: subscribers only.
- Park Hours: 9:00am - 7:00pm
- Early Park Admission at 8:00am
Updated on February 4, 2023
Join today to get the full 365 day Crowd Calendar and access to all of our other tools including the mobile app!
» View Showtimes
Inaccurate/stale schedule?
Let us know.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Ultimate Strength
In last year's Health Issue (No. 167), I detailed a three-month training program that included strength, power and power-endurance. While most people ...
In last year's Health Issue (No. 167), I detailed a three-month training program that included strength, power and power-endurance. While most people understood the principles and purpose of training power and power-endurance, I received a lot of questions about the strength part of the program. Many people were confused about the difference between strength and power, and wanted to know more about what strength is and why it's so important.
Strength is the maximum contraction load that a single muscle can exert. Power is using the strength of muscle groups to complete a movement in as short a time as possible. Strength is the foundation of what is possible. Power is tapping into the strength of one or more muscle groups to perform an action.
Many people train to get stronger through power exercises such as campusing, system boards and bouldering. These exercises are great for teaching us how best and most effectively to use the existing strength that we have however, they do not create lasting changes in the makeup of our muscles. Power exercises improve the efficiency of the muscles and initially yield an improved climbing performance. Eventually, however, they lead to a plateau in performance when improving efficiency is not enough. Then, more strength is needed in order to improve as a climber.
This article targets climbers who have been climbing for a few years and who boulder regularly. These climbers will benefit most by incorporating strength-specific exercises into their training routines for six to eight weeks, one or two times a year. After completing this period of pure strength, spend a few weeks doing power and power-endurance exercises in order to reach your peak.
Power exercises can result in higher levels of strength, but not as efficiently as direct strength training. If you are predominantly a route climber, you will see improvement in your climbing by bouldering for a few months, indoors over the winter.
These exercises are to be done three times a week with a minimum of one day off in between training days. Some of the exercises are best done in a climbing gym or at least on a hangboard, and others require access to a basic weight room. Ideally, you can work out at a climbing gym that also has weight-training equipment.
During the strength-training portion of a long-term training plan, keep your actual climbing to a minimum. Climbing on training or non-training days will affect either the quality of a workout or the recovery from one. If you need to climb, take it easy. After a few of these workouts, you probably won't be able to climb much anyway. Strength training saps your muscles and will cause you to forget how to climb efficiently. Despite this steep drop in performance, understand that the long-term gains from strength training are worth the few weeks of sucking.
It is important to follow a strength-training program for a minimum of four weeks. Anything shorter won't produce lasting results. You should see improvement after two or three weeks, merely a result of your muscles adapting to the specific exercises. Keep pushing yourself for at least four weeks – it is the lasting results that will make you a better climber.
With weight lifting and hangboarding, you will be doing two sets of some number of reps depending on what week it is. The target range for reps will be 12 to 15 for the first and fourth weeks, 8 to 10 reps for the second and fifth weeks, and 5 to 8 reps for the third and sixth weeks. You will need to figure out in advance how much weight you need to add to fall into this range of repetitions. Keep a log of these numbers (weight/reps/sets) for each exercise after every workout so you know where to start next time. The point of increasing the weight and number of reps is to force your body to adapt.
The length of time you rest between the two sets will depend on the number of reps completed. In general, the higher the number of reps, the less time you should spend resting. This seems counterintuitive, but doing more reps means using less weight, thus placing less stress on the muscle fibers, which therefore require less rest between sets.
Five to 8 reps: Rest two to three minutes between sets.
Eight to 12 reps: Rest one to two minutes between sets.
With 12 to 15 reps: Rest one minute between sets.
Spend one week (three training sessions) doing 12 to 15 reps at the max weight for the 12-rep amount. Then spend a week doing 8 to 10 reps with the max weight for the 8-rep amount. Then spend a week doing 5 to 8 reps at the 5-rep amount.
From the fourth to the sixth week, your goal is to increase the previously accomplished max weight and repeat the same progression. With each training day you should fail at the end of the second set. If you do not fail, do extra reps until you do. Make a note of how many reps you did, and at what weight, and if necessary adjust the weight for the next training day.
For maintaining strength during other phases of your training (power and power-endurance), do at least one set of 10 reps for each exercise at least once a week. The different exercises can be done on different days spread over more training sessions.
While simple stretching has not been proven to reduce the chance of injury when working out, warming the muscle groups is important to performing the exercises properly with the correct range of motion. Warm up by raising your heart rate and moving blood to your extremities. Ten to 15 minutes of light cardio like skipping rope or running will do it. Once your body is warm make sure you prepare for the workout by performing range-of-motion exercises that mimic the exercises you will be doing. Simple range-of-motion exercises can be the exact exercise with little or no weight. In climbing this can be easy routes, easy bouldering or un-weighted hangs off big holds.
The forearm muscles define hand and finger strength and are key to climbing harder routes. Training the forearms requires care to avoid injury. Most people's hands are not built for the strength demands of climbing. Hands are meant for gentle, dexterous activities, not holding onto quarter-pad crimpers on 45-degree overhanging walls. It is essential that you warm up prior to launching into these exercises. Some warm-up activities include easy bouldering or route climbing, non-weighted hangs, low-weight finger rolls.
(In the Weight Room)
Finger Rolls: Hold a barbell below your hips with your elbows and knees slightly bent. With your hands fully closed, slowly open your hands and roll the barbell down to the tips of your fingers – this is one rep. Don't pull the bar back up: to re-close your hand to do the second rep, rest the bar on your thigh to adjust your grip. The reason for not closing your hand under weight is to train your muscles to resist against the weight, like hanging from a hangboard.
(In the Climbing Gym)
Hangboard: This effective training tool is small and easy to install. Most climbing gyms have at least one. To use a hangboard properly:
> Use holds that are only a single fingertip (pad) deep – nothing bigger than 1.5 pads deep.
> Try not to hang directly off your joints. Keep your muscles slightly contracted and fingers slightly bent. In actual climbing, you want to hang from your joints and stay relaxed, but this is not climbing. This is training. Contracting your muscles will provide some protection to your finger and elbow joints.
> Unless you're doing a pinch grip, don't use your thumbs on the side of the slots. Don't let your skin friction work against the slot sides either. You want to maximize your workout by only hanging straight down.
> With hangboarding, "reps" equal the number of seconds you can hang. Adjust the number of reps you can do by wearing a harness and hanging weights (the plate kind) from your belay loop with a sling and carabiner.
Do two sets for each of these hangs. The rest time between sets depends on the number of seconds you are hanging and the weight you are using.
>Four-finger hangs.
>Outer two-finger hangs (middle and ring fingers).
>Inner two-finger hangs (index and middle fingers).
>Outer three-finger hangs (pinkie to middle fingers).
>Inner three-finger hangs (ring to pointer fingers).
> Sloper hang.
> Pinch hang (if your hangboard doesn't have a pinch grip, see if you can make one using two features on the board).
> If you don't have a hangboard, you can use a chin-up bar in the weight room.
The biceps brachii and the brachialis are the two muscle groups that control arm bending. Both of these muscle groups play an important role in climbing and need to be strengthened.
(In the Weight Room)
Keeping the proper form is crucial when doing these exercises. Watch yourself in a mirror or have your partner check your form. Keep your knees slightly bent, your shoulders rolled back, your abdomen firm and your back straight. Don't lean back or jerk the weights to start the motion.
Bicep Curls: Hold a barbell below your hips with your palms facing out. Bending only your elbows, bring your hands to your shoulders. Lower in control. At the top of the lift your palms should be facing your shoulders.
Reverse Bicep Curls: Hold a barbell below your hips with your palms facing your thighs. Bending only your elbows, bring your hands to your shoulders and lower in control. At the top of the lift your palms should be facing away from your shoulders.
(In the Climbing Gym)
Weighted Narrow-Grip Pull-ups: Grip a chin-up bar or a hangboard with your hands no wider than shoulder width. Do full chin-ups: Start with your arms slightly bent and finish with your hands at your shoulders. If possible do two sets by grabbing the bar with your palms facing away from you (pronated hands in a normal climbing position) and two sets by grabbing the bar with your palms facing toward you.
The two different types of lifts, palms in versus palms out, are necessary to target the bicep muscle and brachialis independently.
The major muscle group in the back for climbing is the latissimus dorsi (the lats). This is the muscle that pulls your shoulders and upper arms down. The chest muscles, pectoralis major and pectoralis minor, are also used in climbing for bringing the shoulder down toward the front of the body. Target these groups using these exercises:
(In the Weight Room)
Lat Pull-downs: Most weight rooms have a machine that allows you to sit and pull a bar down. Grab the bar with your hands wide enough apart so that when pulling down your elbow is at the same level as your shoulder. The bend in your elbows will be 90 degrees. Pull the bar straight down in front of your face until it touches your chest.
Internal Rotations: Use a weighted pulley machine or, if necessary, lie on a weight bench. Start with your elbow bent at 90 degrees and at your side in line with your body (your hand out to the side of your head). Roll your elbow and hand in and across your body to finish with your hand below your chest on the opposite side of your body. You can only do this for one arm at a time. Try not to initiate the movement with your bicep. (This is different than a butterfly, where you contract primarily with pectoralis major.) Roll your hand from above your head to below your opposite shoulder, rather than just pulling your arm across your body.
|INTERNAL ROTATIONS. Try not to initiate the movement with your bicep, but use your shoulder and elbow to execute the roll. Keep your elbow bent at 90 degrees throughout the exercise.
(In the Climbing Gym)
Weighted Wide-grip Chin-ups: This exercise is similar to the lat pull-down but instead of pulling the bar down you will pull your body up. Grab a chin-up bar in the same wide grip described for the lat pull-down exercise above. You can do this exercise with added weight, or if necessary take weight off by using a spotter, bungee cord or pulley system.
The exercises discussed to this point have targeted the major climbing muscle groups. However, if you only target the major muscle groups, you may develop muscle imbalances that lead to injury. The exercises introduced here should be done every training day and continued during all
raining phases. Do two sets of 8 to 12 reps each time. There's no need to vary the sets or reps for antagonistic muscle groups – this is strictly for muscular balance and maintenance. Do at least one exercise for each muscle group listed below.
Tricep Push-downs: Use a weighted pull-down pulley machine. Depending on the available apparatuses, you may have different grip-handle options ranging from simple bars to doubled-up rope handles.
Choose one that is comfortable and allows you to keep your hands shoulder-width apart. Begin by gripping the bar
ith your ha
ds at shoulder height, palms facing out and arms fully bent. Tighten up your core, especially your lower abdomen, and lean slightly into the bar. Push the bar away and down until your arms are straight. Start the motion with your triceps, not by leaning forward.
|TRICEP PUSH DOWN. Tighten your gut as you push down and drive with your forearms, not by leaning forward.
Tricep Pull-overs: Lie face up on a weight bench, holding a dumbbell with your palms facing up. Lower the dumbbell behind your head. Tighten your abdomen and try to push your sacrum (lower back) into the bench. Using your triceps, drive the dumbbell up until your arms are straight, and lower. Lower in control.
|TRICEP PULL-OVER. Keep your back flat on the bench and concentrate on lifting by using your triceps.
Close-grip push-ups: Start in a standard push-up position with your arms extended straight under you and your hands at shoulder width. When you lower your body, keep your elbows tight to your sides, then push back up.
Side Lateral Raises: Grab two light dumbbells. Stand with your feet shoulder-width apart. Hold the dumbbells just in front, and to the side, of your body – your palms face each other. Keep a slight bend in your elbows and knees. Raise the dumbbells out to the side until they are at shoulder level, then lower slowly. Squeeze your shoulder blades together during the entire range of motion.
Upright Rows: Hold a barbell in front of your body with your palms facing away, hands just less than shoulder width apart. Lift the barbell till it's at chest level and lower. Concentrate on squeezing your shoulder blades together during the entire range of motion.
Paul Robinson's 10-Minute Hangboard Routine
Warm up: Hang on jugs for 15 seconds. Do 15 pull-ups.
One-arm lock-offs: Do a pull-up on a jug (or pinch) and let go with one hand. Hold yourself locked off for 10 seconds with each hand. (Use a pulley to take weight off if needed.) Robinson does this without coming off the hangboard.
Campus from lower holds to the upper jugs and lock-off in a pull-up. Bring knees up into an "L Hang," and hold for 10 seconds.
More L Hangs: Hold slopers, do a pull-up, lock-off, and raise knees/legs up – hold for 10 seconds. Without dropping off, lower so arms are bent 90 degrees and hold 10 seconds. Do three sets, without letting go if possible.
10 pull-ups on: two-finger pockets, pinches, smallest crimps, biggest crimps, slopers.
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 6
4 finger, Outer 2 finger, Inner 2 finger, Outer 3 finger, Inner 3 finger, Sloper, Pinch
12-15 second hangs with 1-minute rest
8-12 second hangs with 1-2 minute's rest between hangs .
5-8 second hangs
12-15 second hangs with 1-minute rest
8-12 second hangs with 1-2 minute's rest between hangs.
5-8 second hangs
Upper Arm
Bicep Curls, Reverse Curls, Weighted narrow-grip pull-ups
12-15 reps with 1-minute rest between sets.
8-12 reps with 1-2 minute's rest between sets.
5-8 reps with 2-3 minute's rest between sets.
12-15 reps with 1-minute rest between sets.
8-12 reps with 1-2 minute's rest between sets.
5-8 reps with 2-3 minute's rest between sets.
Lat Pull-downs
12-15 reps with 1-minute rest between sets.
8-12 reps with 1-2 minute's rest between sets.
5-8 reps with 2-3 minute's rest between sets.
12-15 reps with 1-minute rest between sets.
8-12 reps with 1-2 minute's rest between sets.
5-8 reps with 2-3 minute's rest between sets.
12-15 reps with 1-minute between sets.
8-12 reps with 1-2 minutes between sets.
5-8 reps with 2-3 minutes between sets.
12-15 reps with 1-minute between sets.
8-12 reps with 1-2 minutes between sets.
5-8 reps with 2-3 minutes between sets.
Cross Training
Tricep pushdowns, Tricep pull-overs, Close-grip push-ups
8-12 reps
8-12 reps
8-12 reps
8-12 reps
8-12 reps
8-12 reps


text:
Knit cuff beanie in RustRegular price $22.00
Our knit cuff beanies are crafted with an Organic Merino wool & Cotton blend to feel soft and lightweight, while keeping tiny humans cozy all year round.
S :0-6 months
M: 6 months - 3 years
L: 3years to Adult
All packages are shipped from California. We make every effort to ship your order to you as soon as possible but please allow 3-5 business days for order processing and preparation (this doesn't include actual time in transit). For customized orders, please give us 5-7 business days to create it.
The amount of time that it will take to receive your order once shipped will vary based on your location and USPS' and shipping times.
PLEASE NOTE: During peak holiday seasons, weekends, or high traffic promotions - processing orders may take additional time beyond the 3-5 business day window.
We cannot guarantee delivery by a specific date, so please take this into consideration if purchasing for a specific occasion or event.
Once your order has been shipped, you will receive a confirmation email with the tracking information.
Shipping Rates:
U.S. Shipping (contiguous 48 states):
- Free shipping on orders over $50
For orders below $50
- Flat-rate Standard shipping fee of $6.90 (3-4 business days)
Most orders are shipped via USPS and include tracking.
International Shipping
We offer standard shipping delivery to the following countries for flat rate of $30
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom.
Canada - Flat rate of $20
If your country is not on the list above please email us at firstname.lastname@example.com and we will do our best to give you a shipping estimate.
Any applicable duties or custom fees are the responsibility of the customer.
The Little & Brave is not responsible for:
- Delays with US Postal Service or UPS.
- International Duties or Customs Charges
- Lost, damaged, or marked delivered items. To file a claim with the carrier, please click the following links:
- USPS Claims Support
Wrong Address Disclaimer
It is the buyer's responsibility to make sure that he or she enters the shipping address correctly. We are not responsible if a package is shipped back to us due to an incorrect or undeliverable address. We do our best to speed up processing and shipping times; hence, there is a minimal time gap to cancel/change your order or change its address.
- If you decide to cancel your order or change your shipping address, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.com as soon as you place your order. We will do our best to make the change; however, we cannot guarantee that we will do so.
- If there is a problem with your tracking number or package delivery, please contact the courier directly before contacting us. Please allow 1-4 business days for your tracking information to show. In some rare cases, tracking information may not update, but you will still receive your order. Please contact us after the estimated delivery time has passed.
- All our shipments include Tracking with Delivery Confirmation. If your tracking information confirms that the item has been delivered to your order address, but you have not received your order, please contact the carrier directly to investigate this issue. We cannot be held accountable for packages where tracking information states the package has been delivered to your order address.
Any additional questions, please email us at firstname.lastname@example.com.
Returns & Exchange
It is important to us that you love the products you've purchased!
If you're not 100% satisfied with a product, we have a 10 day return policy, which means you have 10 days after receiving your item to request a return.
Please ship items back within 10 days of the date of delivery.
Request a cancellation within 2 hours of purchase.
Initiate Return Process
send an email to firstname.lastname@example.com specifying in the subject email RETURN with your name and order number.
Only items that comply with the return policy outlined below will be eligible for a refund.
Once the returned item is received, a refund will be processed, and a credit will be applied to your credit card or original method of payment as soon as possible. Please note that the refunded amount may take up to 14 business days to reflect in your account.
You are responsible for paying the shipping costs incurred by returning your item.
Items sent back to us without first requesting a return will not be accepted.
Shipping costs are non-refundable. The buyer is responsible for the return shipment fees. The Little & Brave is not responsible for untraceable or lost return shipments. We recommend using a delivery service with tracking to protect your return.
We recommend trying on all items in your order before washing to ensure they fit. We cannot accept returns or provide a refund after items have been washed.
Damaged items must be reported within 3 days of delivery.
An item may be returned if it is sent back:
- unwashed
- with original packaging
- free of stains, odors, animal hair, and damage
Due to safety and sanitary concerns, several types of goods are exempt from being returned: cloth diapers, cloth diaper inserts, cloth diaper storage bag (wet bag), pacifiers, pacifier clips, teethers, and other items of a similar nature.
Sales Items (discounted 15% or more) will not be accepted as returns.
We will notify you once we have received and inspected your return, and let you know if the refund was approved or not. If approved, you will be refunded on your original payment method. Please note that the refunded amount may take up to 14 business days to reflect in your account.
The fastest way to ensure you get what you want is to return the item you have, and once the return is accepted, make a separate purchase for the new item.


text:
|Departure station
London Kings Cross
|Arrival station
Cardiff Central
212 miles (131 km)
Look out for Advance tickets – they usually come out up to 12 weeks before the departure date and can be cheaper than buying on the day. If you're here a tad early, sign up for our Advance ticket alert today to get notified when your tickets are released.
If you catch this train more than 3 times per week, you could save money with a Season Ticket. With annual, monthly and weekly options available, find out if a season ticket for London Kings Cross to Cardiff Central is right for you.
National Railcards offer a 1/3 off eligible train tickets in the UK and can be a great investment if you travel a few times or more in a year. Find out how you can save with a National Railcard here.
Download our app to find split tickets — courtesy of SplitSave, our handy feature which 'splits' your train tickets where possible to find you a better deal. Learn more about the clever tech behind split tickets, and how to spot SplitSave discounts in our app.


text:
From Fedora Project Wiki
Fedora Science and Technology SIG
The purpose of the Fedora Science and Technology SIG is to improve the number and quality of packages available for scientific and technical users.
- Mailing list: Fedora Scitech List
- #fedora-science on the freenode IRC network
Packagers/Reviewers/People interested
- EdHill
- JasonTibbitts
- DejiAkingunola
- GerardMilmeister
- OrionPoplawski
- QuentinSpencer
- ChitleshGoorah
- Dominik Mierzejewski
- JoseMatos
- RexDieter
- PeterLemenkov
- PatriceDumas
- FabianAffolter
- SergioPascual
- Alex Lancaster
- MarekMahut
- StuartCampbell
- Kevin Kofler
- PierreYvesChibon
- ChristianIseli
- EricTanguy
- Jerry James
- NicolaSoranzo
- SantoshKumar
- Noah Lee
- Adam Huffman
- Michael Ughetto
- Jussi Lehtola
- Alexander C.
- Yaakov Nemoy
- Cody Smith
- Yumas Hankouri
- UsingMultipleMPIs - How to use lam and openmpi on the same system.
- SAGE packaging discussion
- MPI work:
- Use environment-modules to improve the "MPI alternatives" situation -- please see the proposal at the bottom of EdHill
- Make a Fedora-science spin.
Available Packages
Packages awaiting review
Add the FE-SCITECH blocker bug to any Science/Technology related review in Bugzilla. (Remember to remove it once the review is passed.)
Potential Packages
- Asana Math font
- GAP - Computer algebra system - JasonTibbitts has a working and up-to-date GAP package, but it needs significant cleanup before it has a chance of passing review.
- Ideas of packages for bioinformatics base on bio-linux.
- ITK - Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit - software system to support the Visible Human Project
- SAGE Mathematica-like open source mathematics software ( SAGE packaging discussion )
- XPP - A tool for solving differential equations - Jason Tibbitts has a working package, but the program has such a poor interface that it may not be worth adding to the distro
- Neuron - A simulator of neurons and networks, useful for computational biology. Packages are available upstream; shouldn't be terribly hard to package properly but requires a truly ancient user interface toolkit.
- Nanodesigner - Example design 1 The Nanodesigner project is an attempt to create a software platform for research on nanometer sized objects. By objects is meant everything that consists of atoms: molecular motors, biomolecules, a crystal slab
- RasTop - Molecular Visualization Software
- [1] - GUI based numerical analysis system. SIGs/SciTech/Scilab page has details on current status
Bioinformatics WishList
List of applications we will NOT package
- Non-commercial clauses in applications licenses render them invalid for inclusion into Fedora Package Collection. Such apps are not Free and open source software and violates Clause 6 of the OSI definition. See an example of such clause:
This software may be copied and distributed for educational, research, and not for profit purposes provided that this copyright and statement are included in all such copies. Other copyrights may also apply.
|Why it won't be packaged
|Mesh generation utility
|Non-Free license (verified by fedora-legal)
|Molecular Visualization and Analysis Package
|Non-Free license
|fasta2 and fasta3
|The FASTA programs find regions of local or global (new) similarity between Protein or DNA sequences
|License contains non-commercial clause
|bar app
This category has only the following subcategory.
Pages in category "SciTech SIG"
The following 9 pages are in this category, out of 9 total.


text:
Freezing rain could cause power outages
By MARK SPENCLEY
CHEBOYGAN – Freezing rain is possible each of the next two days, making power outage preparations essential for northern Michigan residents.
Temperatures are expected to hover in the 30s through Wednesday with rain and drizzle in the forecast each day, the perfect recipe for a beautiful, frosted landscape and a power failure.
Northern Michigan residents are already all too familiar with the disastrous effects ice storms can have on power lines. In late December, a winter storm knocked thousands of Michigan residents out of power, some of whom remained without power for more than a week.
Branches often break under the weight of accumulating ice, falling on power lines and leaving area residents, sometimes numbering in the thousands, without power.
"The high winds and heavy snow cause limbs to break and droop," said Jeff Holyfield, public information officer for Consumers Energy. "That causes a lot of our problems."
Having essential supplies on hand can ease the stress once the lights go out.
n Lighting: flashlights, candles, lanterns, batteries.
n Contacts: Emergency contact list, wall mounted or corded telephone.
n Food: Canned food, non-refrigerated items, manual can opener.
n First aid: Complete first aid kid, sufficient supply of prescription meds.
Keeping these basic supplies around is simple and prudent.
For those with heating systems that don't require electricity, these provisions are usually enough to stem the tide until the flow of power is restored. For those without heat, don't try to tough it out. Overnight temperatures in the 20s can sap the heat from a house rather quickly, creating a dangerous situation for residents trying to wait until power is restored.
If the duration of the power outage is uncertain, Holyfield suggest residents stay with relatives or find a nearby hotel room.
Regardless of the heating situation, there are several post-power outage steps to ensure everything in the house is back to normal once electricity is restored.
The first item of priority should be unplugging all electrical appliances that run continually or automatically, according to information assembled by Holyfield and his team. Included on this list are refrigerators, furnaces, computers, stoves, water heaters, TVs, DVD players and microwaves to name a few.
It's also a good idea to keep one light switched on as an indicator when electricity is up and running.
If the power outage is expected to be a long one, turn the main breaker off. This will prevent a power surge for damaging any appliances.
Frozen food is usually a source of panic, but it shouldn't be.
According to Holyfield, frozen food should stay frozen for 36-48 hours if kept in a freezer with the door closed.
When the lights go out, homeowners insurance will cover some damages, but specific circumstances are required.
"It won't cover power outages that aren't just their residence," said Sue Schoenith, Cheboygan State Farm Insurance agent. "If it's just their residence that's affected, it can be covered."
"If your pipes freeze as a result of an outage, it will cover that, but its not going to cover additional living expenses like putting you up in a hotel or eating out while the power is out," she added.
Though there is no surefire way of avoiding home damage during a power outage, a few pre and post outage steps can help northern Michigan residents avoid many of the dangers and stresses.


text:
Celebrate Easter Crown Scripture Banner On Sale! $89.00 / ea.SKU: VB2229401
The 3' x 5' banner is inexpensive and versatile. Can be used with a stand or without in virtually any space in your building. The 15 oz Non-Curl Vinyl provides for vivid colors and eye-catching graphics whether up close or far away. Outreach uses a high quality vinyl that wont curl at the edges - so your banner will stay looking brand new for a long time! This "As Seen" banner is printed exactly as you see it here, finished to your specifications, and shipped to you fast.
- As Seen
- Customize Online
- Customize For Me
Order this stock product as shown.
Order this stock product as shown.
Order this stock product as shown.
Show Estimated Delivery Dates & Shipping Costs (for this item only)
|Est. Delivery Date
Need It Sooner?
We'll do everything in our power to get your product to you when you need it. Call 1.800.991.6011 to discuss special delivery options.


text:
Mission Control
Email address
Registered yet?
Sign up here.
Forgotten your password?
Forgotten Password
Register For This Site
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Email Address
1. Establishing Your Mission
1.1. Defining the problem
1.2. Describing your target group
1.3. Identifying 'stakeholder' expectations
1.4. Defining your mission
1.5. Building support for your cause
2. Defining Your Business Model
2.1. Understanding the business of doing good
2.2. Defining your business model
2.3. Validating the business concept
2.4. Keeping business activity simple and focused
2.5. Balancing business and social goals
3. Identifying your value proposition
3.1 Describing your value to customers
3.2 Defining your financial success
3.3 Explaining how you do business responsibly
3.4 Describing how you solve social problems
3.5 Setting out your value proposition
4. Planning your intended change
4.1 Establishing your intended impact
4.2 Identifying your outcomes
4.3 Defining your activities
4.4 Describing your theory of change
4.5 Using your theory of change
5. Using performance measures
5.1 Identifying information requirements
5.2 Identifying relevant performance measures
5.3 Focusing on the indicators that matter
5.4 Expressing indicators in monetary terms
5.5 Selecting the right indicators
6. Collecting useful information
6.1 Deciding what information to collect
6.2 Finding the right data-collection methods
6.3 Organising your data collection
6.4 Collecting data routinely
6.5 Collecting data effectively
7. Gauging performance and impact
7.1 Managing information securely
7.2 Analysing performance information
7.3 Making useful comparisons
7.4 Reviewing findings regularly
7.5 Reaching realistic conclusions
8. Reporting on results
8.1 Reporting publicly
8.2 Producing suitable written reports
8.3 Using visual reporting styles
8.4 Telling compelling stories
8.5 Reporting based on credible evidence
9. Communicating with impact
9.1 Setting communication goals
9.2 Understanding your audience
9.3 Sharing the right messages
9.4 Using suitable communications tools
9.5 Developing a communications plan
10. Using evidence to grow impact
10.1 Learning as you go
10.2 Building an impact-focused culture
10.3 Acting on evidence
10.4 Changing course when necessary
10.5 Influencing others
FREE Social Impact Guide
Lost Password /
Lost Password
Username or Email Address
Get New Password
Log in


text:
Columbia River Knife & Tool CRKT Fossil Ikoma Design Frame Lock Knife
Columbia River Knife & Tool CRKT Fossil Ikoma Design Frame Lock Knife - Hammered Satin Handles - No Cracks - Locks up Tight - No Wobble - Very Nice Unused Condition - Approx. 4 1/4 inches closed. Still has factory edge. Never sharpened, carried, or cleaned. No chips or cracks in handles.
Email with Questions or Offers: email@example.com
NOTE: This is NOT AN AUCTION. This Knife is available for immediate purchase by using the Add To Cart button to the right and then by following the instructions. I accept payment in the form of Pay Pal, Credit Card (Online Only), Personal Check and Money Orders.
Shipping $5.50 First Class Bubble Mailer
** I "BUY" KNIVES ** - Any Size Collection!!! NOTHING MADE IN CHINA!!!
For Sale By: Sanders Knives (Sanders Knives)
Item # 76904
Shipping Details:
Shipping & Handling to United States Addresses: $5.50
Shipping Discounts Available for Multiple Items Purchased from Sanders Knives:
If this item is purchased with another item from Sanders Knives that has a shipping cost of $5.50 or more, standard shipping to US addresses for this item will be discounted to $1.00.


text:
In the olden days, when leftists wished to argue against gun owners, they claimed that guns were phallic symbols and that the excessive love of guns demonstrated latent homosexuality. Keep oiling and loading that pisstool, big boy. We know what you're really doing….Can we not now claim that excessive fear of gun ownership indicates a streak of homophobia. They don't want to ban guns. We know what they really want to ban.To which the Perfesser adds:
Well, phallophobia, anyway. Which seems about right.Looks like these guys are taking that "man card" thing a mite serious. Don't worry, fellas; as a person of the "gun" myself, I will defend to the death your right to bear that thang.
UPDATE. The Althouse post to which the comment is attached is ridiculous, too, but it does raise the fascinating possibility that Justice Scalia and Matt K. Lewis are only kidding which, if I could only believe it, would greatly elevate my faith in humanity.


text:
Fancy – Interactive Parallax – Responsive Theme
Powerful site template designed in a clean and minimalistic style. This template is very flexible, easy for customizing and well documented, approaches for personal and professional use. assets. has been coded in HTML5 & CSS3 and jQuery. It has a solid flexible responsive layout that scales from 330px to 960px width. Follow me to be notified for future updates!
Template features:
- HTML5 & CSS3 & jQuery
- Interactive Parallax – Responsive Theme
- Filtered portfolio with css3 animations
- Accordion
- Flexible Images & Videos
- filterable portfolio with jquery
- Gallery Pages
- Blog Pages
- Awesome touch support Sliders
- Working Responsive Google Map
- JQuery Responsive Dropdown menu
- Many more jQuery Features
Please note: Images used in our demo site are not included to the theme package.
Recent Projects
Slato – Bootstrap Responsive Template
Success – Bootstrap WordPress Responsive Theme
assets – Responsive HTML Template
Gritoo WordPress
Simplyapp – Bootstrap Responsive HTML Template


text:
"We tried you on your cell but you didn't pick up so we got a little worried since we didn't know where your appointment was and we tried calling Leon at work but his assistant said he left early to pick up his son at the airport and against our better judgment we tried your house and Hail Mary Full of Grace answered and after she deposed us, I asked if she knew your doctor's number and she said she had to think for a few minutes and while she was thinking I started thinking who else we could call and that's when I remembered your GYN's name was a hotel: Hilton!"
Where have all the commas gone? Yes, this sentence from Terry McMillan's The Interruption of Everything reads like the winner of a Bad Hemingway Parody Contest. But is it bad enough to win a Delete Key Award? Is it worse than the work of Mitch Albom, Dr. Phil, or Danielle Steel?
You have until the end of the day to comment. The Delete Key Awards will be announced by noon tomorrow on only the blog One-Minute Book Reviews.
(c) 2007 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.


text:
The Situation of First-Person Shooters
Posted by The Situationist Staff on April 30, 2007
We have written about possible connections between playing violent videogames and violent acts ("The Intersection between Tort Law and Social Psychology in Violent Videogames" and "Suing the Suer: Video Game Company Sues Jack Thompson"). In the wake of the Virginia Tech shooting, Amanda Schaffer of Slate examines whether Cho Seung-Hui's apparent playing of first-person shooters may have contributed to his shootings. We excerpt portions of her article below.
* * *
Pathological acts of course have multiple, complex causes and are terribly hard to predict. And clearly, millions of people play Counter-Strike, Halo, and Doom and never commit crimes. But the subtler question is whether exposure to video-game violence is one risk factor for increased aggression: Is it associated with shifts in attitudes or responses that may predispose kids to act out? A large body of evidence suggests that this may be so. The studies have their shortcomings, but taken as a whole, they demonstrate that video games have a potent impact on behavior and learning.
Three kinds of research link violent video games to increased aggression. First, there are studies that look for correlations between exposure to these games and real-world aggression. This work suggests that kids who are more immersed in violent video games may be more likely to get into physical fights, argue with teachers, or display anger and hostility. Second, there is longitudinal research (measuring behavior over time) that assesses gaming habits and belligerence in a group of children. One example: A study of 430 third-, fourth-, and fifth-graders, published this year by psychologists Craig Anderson, Douglas Gentile, and Katherine Buckley, found that the kids who played more violent video games "changed over the school year to become more verbally aggressive, more physically aggressive," and less helpful to others.
Finally, experimental studies randomly assign subjects to play a violent or a nonviolent game, and then compare their levels of aggression. In work published in 2000, Anderson and Karen Dill randomly assigned 210 undergraduates to play Wolfenstein 3-D, a first-person-shooter game, or Myst, an adventure game in which players explore mazes and puzzles. Anderson and Dill found that when the students went on to play a second game, the Wolfenstein 3-D players were more likely to behave aggressively toward losing opponents. Given the chance to punish with blasts of noise, they chose to inflict significantly louder and longer blasts than the Myst kids did. Other recent work randomly assigned students to play violent or nonviolent games, and then analyzed differences in brain activation patterns using fMRI scans, but the research is so far difficult to assess.
Each of these approaches has its flaws. The first kind of correlational study can never prove that video-game playing causes physical aggression. Maybe aggressive people are simply more apt to play violent games in the first place. Meanwhile, the randomized trials, like Anderson and Dill's, which do imply causation, necessarily depend on lab-based measures of aggression, such as whether subjects blast each other with noise. This is a respected measure, but obviously not the same as seeing whether real people hit or shoot each other. The longitudinal work, like this year's elementary-school study, is a useful middle ground: It shows that across the board, playing more-violent video games predicts higher levels of verbal and physical aggression later on. It doesn't matter why the kids started playing violent games or whether they were already more aggressive than their peers; the point is that a year of game-playing likely contributes to making them more aggressive than they were when they started. If we had only one of the three kinds of studies, the findings wouldn't mean much. But taken together, the body of research suggests a real connection.
The connection between violent games and real violence is also fairly intuitive. In playing the games, kids are likely to become desensitized to gory images, which could make them less disturbing and perhaps easier to deal with in real life. The games may also encourage kids (and adults) to rehearse aggressive solutions to conflict, meaning that these thought processes may become more available to them when real-life conflicts arise, Anderson says. Video games also offer immediate feedback and constant small rewards—in the form of points, or access to new levels or weapons. And they tend to tailor tasks to a player's skill level, starting easy and getting harder. That makes them "phenomenal teachers," says Anderson, though "what they teach very much depends on content."
Critics counter that some kids may "use games to vent anger or distract themselves from problems," as psychiatry professor Cheryl Olson writes. This can be "functional" rather than unhealthy, depending on the kid's mental state and the extent of his game playing. But other studies suggest that venting anger doesn't reduce later aggressive behavior, so this thesis doesn't have the most solid support.
* * *
To read all of Schaffer's article, click here.
6 Responses to "The Situation of First-Person Shooters"
May 4, 2007 at 1:12 pm
As an avid game player, I must criticize the researchers for their choice of Myst as a choice of "non-violent comparison". Myst is a very calm game, and Wolfenstein 3-D is a very intense one. Comparing Wolfenstein 3-D and Myst is like comparing hip-hop music played in a nightclub to classical music played during a meditation session. You haven't eliminated some very relevant confounding factors! The difference in agression could be a simple matter of excitement (or, if you're inclined to use the technical term, "arousal"), not exposure to violence. If they compared Wolfenstien to Tetris – a similarly intense, yet non-violent game, I'd give more credence to their conclusions.
May 4, 2007 at 11:35 pm
I don't know why people or so surprised about the conclusion–or so hysterical (No one is stating such games, no matter how repugnant in content should be illegal, just that we should combat the validation of their message in society). People learn by doing and violence is learned behavior. Combine that with desensitization in a culture that legitimizes "Might is right!" for males dealing with emotional frustration, and violence will increase. What the Slate article fails to discuss is the distinctly bigoted nature of this violence: males overwhelmingly target females. Grand Theft Auto is famous for the killing of prostitutes, who prove the easiest female prey. The public justifies such violence on the basis of the sexual immorality of prostitutes, all the while glorifying Johns and pimps. Sexuality merely becomes a medium which to express violent hatred of females. How does that not teach boys to see girls and women as the enemy, to be disposed of as callously as possible?
May 19, 2007 at 7:51 am
[…] of television and video games on children's behaviour thanks to those nice people over at The Situationist. I first talked about the possible effects of gaming on children's behavior in the first few […]
June 7, 2007 at 10:02 pm
[…] on June 7th, 2007 We have examined violence found in videogames on several occasions (e.g., "The Situation of First-Person Shooters"; "The Intersection between Tort Law and Social Psychology in Violent […]
June 20, 2007 at 10:28 pm
[…] influence of Cho playing of first-person shooters on computers and video game systems, click here. For related posts on the consequences of deindivduation, go to Maintaining Army, Internet […]
October 7, 2007 at 8:26 pm
[…] on October 7th, 2007 We have examined violence found in videogames on several occasions (see "The Situation of First-Person Shooters"; "The Intersection between Tort Law and Social Psychology in Violent Videogames"). We have […]


text:
Well, I'll be! I have been given the Blogger Recognition Award by Oscar and Mrs. P. Thank you both from the tip of my waggly tail allllll the way to my little, wet nose.
As with all awards, there are things I have to do. For instance, I'm supposed to tell you how my blog got started:
Mom was browsing the web when she came across a video called, "Tiny Hamster Eating Tiny Burrito".
It wasn't the first time she had seen it and she was shocked that it had gone viral (it currently has over 10 million views). She turned to Dad and said, "If a hamster can become famous for eating a burrito, I'm positive Noodle could become famous!"
That very same day, my blog was created. Thank you, Tiny Hamster! Although, maybe I need to eat a burrito or something because I'm not famous and it's been almost a year….
Anywho, I'd like to pass this award to some bloggers who have impacted me and/or my blog:
- Marking Our Territory
- Saving Sammie
- Maggiesblog0019
- Lexi the Schnauzer (she's hot stuff…she's also my girlfriend <3)
- corkscot
- DZ's Adventures
- Jacques' Dog Blog
- Piglove
- Princess Leah's Blog
- Purrince Siddhartha Henry an LadyMum'ss Purrfect Pad
- Ruby the Airedale
- Tails Around the Ranch
- The Three Little Pugs
- Happy Wiggle Butt
- Raising Daisy
The rules:
- Select 15 other blogs you want to give the award to. Do some digging if you must! Find those blogs. You cannot nominate yourself or the person who has nominated you.
- Write a post to show off your award! Give a brief story of how your blog got started, and give a piece or two of advice to new bloggers. Thank whoever nominated you, and provide a link to their blog. List who you've nominated in the post.
- Make sure to also attach the award itself! (You can do this by right-clicking, saving, and uploading the image above).
- Comment on each blog and let them know you've nominated them. Provide a link to the award post you created.
- Provide a link to the original post on Edge of Night. That way, anyone can find the original guidelines and post if needed, and we can keep it from mutating and becoming confusing! (It happens LOL).
- Note: You can decline the award if you don't feel up to doing the above, but remember—you have to earn it by doing the work! 🙂


text: Look no further than the Official Online Store of the NBA for all the latest Klay Thompson Golden State Warriors Accessories and Gifts. The Warriors Shop at the NBA Store offers tons of new accessories for every fan in your crew. Check out Klay Thompson Warriors Accessories like Sunglasses, Phone Cases and Lanyards, or go all out with a pair of officially licensed Golden State Warriors Beats headphones. Browse our collection for Warriors Klay Thompson Socks and more from of the top brands in basketball. Whatever you've got in mind is available at the NBA Store, so choose your favorite Klay Thompson Warriors Accessory as a gift or keep it for your own collection.


text:
Cream Jacquard Indo Western (NMK-2670)
Product Code: NMK-2670 Ships in 10 Days Need Earlier?
$255.00 $165.75 35% Off
Any Questions? Just Ask
We Offer Lowest Prices
We offer free shipping on orders above USD 199 for international deliveries and shipping within India is entirely free.
We offer free pouch, with every product.
We guarantee price match. You may send us the link of any website offering lower price than us and we will match the price for you.
Cream Jacquard Indo Western is designed with beads, resham, zari and stone work. Comes with a matching bottom. Actual product colors, patterns and designs may slightly vary.


text:
Williams' daughter targeted
NEW YORK (AP) -- Robin Williams' daughter has abandoned her online social media accounts in disgust following what she called "cruel and unnecessary" messages following her father's death, a move that has prompted Twitter to explore how it handles such situations.
Zelda Williams, 25, wrote that she was stepping away from her Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram accounts "for a good long time, maybe forever."
The move came after at least two users upset the grieving actress by sending disturbing images and verbal attacks. In one of her last tweets on Tuesday night, Williams asked fellow users to report her alleged tormentors to Twitter managers. "I'm shaking," she wrote. One of the images was a Photoshopped image of Robin Williams purporting to be his corpse.
Well-wishers and fans online quickly rallied to Zelda Williams' defense, and the accounts of both alleged bullies were suspended by Wednesday. Facebook, which also owns Instagram, said the photo violated its policy and was "being actively flagged and removed across both platforms as it pops up."
Twitter went further. "We will not tolerate abuse of this nature on Twitter," Del Harvey, who heads Twitter's Trust and Safety Team, said in a statement Wednesday.
"We have suspended a number of accounts related to this issue for violating our rules and we are in the process of evaluating how we can further improve our policies to better handle tragic situations like this one. This includes expanding our policies regarding selfharm and private information, and improving support for family members of deceased users."
Last summer, Twitter introduced a one-click button to report abuse and updated its rules to clarify that it will not tolerate abusive behavior.


text:
Book Review: 'Submergence'
The writer J.M. Ledgard leads multiple lives. He's a journalist and covers East Africa for the Economist, but Ledgard is also a novelist. Here's Alan Cheuse with a review of his latest book, "Submergence."
ALAN CHEUSE, BYLINE: James More, a British secret agent, has been captured by a Somalian affiliate of al-Qaeda, a peripatetic fringe group that keeps moving him back and forth across the mostly barren terrain of northeastern Africa, trying to hide from drone attacks and make jihad at the same time.
More, free in imagination only, has thoughts that move him back and forth between the excruciating circumstances of his captivity - little water, less food, chained or tied most of the day - and the memory of a brief affair, less than a week in time, in a hotel on the cold coast of Atlantic-facing France.
There, he met a brilliant and worldly bio-mathematician named Danielle Flinders. She studies currents and the luminescent creatures of the ocean floor. In the present moment, More sinks deeper and deeper into the despair of his captivity, while Danielle participates in a dive that takes her to the utmost depths of the known Atlantic.
This summary may give you some sense of the material, but only excerpts can suggest the way character, setting, and language come together in this novel in an extraordinary fusion of science and lyricism.
(Reading) The night in Nairobi is like a river, More says at one point in his tryst with Danielle. What do you mean, she asks him. It's deep and treacherous, he tells her, in the way of African rivers, you can't see into it, you have no idea where the crocodiles are, or where the rapids run. It has its own luster.
As does this darkly gleaming novel about love, deserts, oceans, lust and terror.
CORNISH: Alan Cheuse reviewing the novel "Submergence" by J.M. Ledgard.
CORNISH: This is NPR. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.