text:
NEW YORK — A city police officer was charged today in a ghoulish plot to kidnap and torture women and then cook and eat their body parts.
Gilberto Valle sent numerous e-mails and other Internet communications about the torture and cannibalism scheme, according to a criminal complaint. He identified and cataloged at least 100 women on his computer, investigators said, but there was no information that anyone was harmed.
"I was thinking of tying her body onto some kind of apparatus ... cook her over low heat, keep her alive as long as possible," Valle allegedly wrote in one exchange in July, the complaint says.
In other online conversations, investigators said, Valle talked about the mechanics of fitting a woman's body into an oven (her legs would have to be bent), said he could make chloroform at home to knock a woman out and discussed how "tasty" one woman looked.
"Her days are numbered," he wrote, according to the complaint.
Valle was to appear in federal court in Manhattan this afternoon to face charges of kidnapping conspiracy and unauthorized use of law enforcement records. The name of his attorney was not immediately available, and no one answered the door to his home in a quiet, middle-class Queens neighborhood.
A search of Valle's computer found he created records of at least 100 women with their names, addresses and photos, the complaint says. Some of the information came from his unauthorized use of a law enforcement database, authorities said. He claimed, according to the complaint, that he knew many of them.
"The allegations in the complaint really need no description from us," said Mary E. Galligan, acting head of the FBI's New York office. "They speak for themselves. It would be an understatement merely to say Valle's own words and actions were shocking."
There was no immediate response to a message left with the NYPD today.
Valle met one potential victim over lunch, authorities said.
The complaint alleges that in February, Valle negotiated to kidnap another woman for someone else, writing, "$5,000 and she's all yours."
He told the buyer he was aspiring to be a professional kidnapper, authorities said.
"I think I would rather not get involved in the rape," according to the complaint. "You paid for her. She is all yours, and I don't want to be tempted the next time I abduct a girl."
It says he added: "I will really get off on knocking her out, tying up her hands and bare feet and gagging her. Then she will be stuffed into a large piece of luggage and wheeled out to my van."
Cellphone data revealed that Valle made calls on the block where the woman lives in March, the complaint says. An FBI agent interviewed the woman, who told them that she didn't know him well and was never in her home.
Valle, 28, lives in Queens. He had been assigned to a Manhattan precinct before his suspension on Wednesday.
His Facebook page cultivated the image of a very different man. Postings were filled with photos of a smiling wife, a baby girl and an English bulldog puppy named Dudley. A Maryland football and Yankees fan, Valle had more than 600 Facebook friends, including dozens of young women.
Valle respected his colleagues on the force, took the sergeant's exam and spoke out against Occupy Wall Street, cop killers and others who broke the law, according to the page. His current photo was a blue line, a sign of mourning for when an officer is killed, and expressed condolences for the family of a Nassau County officer who was shot to death this week.
"Keep Nassau County police in your prayers what a brutal week," he wrote earlier this week.
The page was taken down this afternoon.
A man who identified himself as Valle's younger brother but did not give his name told reporters outside the officer's home that he was surprised by the arrest.
"You guys know more than I do," he said.
Related coverage:
• Naked man chewing another man's face off killed by Miami police
• Maryland college student charged with killing man, eating his brain and heart


text:
What We Believe -- A message from Graham Maxwell
I believe that the most important of all Christian beliefs is the one that brings joy and assurance to God's friends everywhere -- the truth about our Heavenly Father that was confirmed at such cost by the life and death of His Son.
God is not the kind of person His enemies have made Him out to be -- arbitrary, unforgiving and severe. Jesus said, "If you have seen Me, you have seen the Father." God is just as loving and trustworthy as His Son, just as willing to forgive and heal. Though infinite in majesty and power, our Creator is an equally gracious Person who values nothing higher than the freedom, dignity, and individuality of His intelligent creatures -- that their love, their faith, their willingness to listen and obey may be freely given. He even prefers to regard us not as servants but as friends.
This is the truth revealed through all the books of Scripture. This is the everlasting Good News that wins the trust and admiration of God's loyal children throughout the universe.
Like Abraham and Moses -- the ones God spoke of as His trusted friends -- God's friends today want to speak well and truly of our Heavenly Father. We covet as the highest of all commendations the words of God about Job: "He has said of Me what is right."
God may you "win your case when you go into court!"
Goodspeed's dramatic translation of Romans 3:4 matches Paul's use of David's prayer in Psalm 51:4. The apostle has raised the question, does the lack of faith among God's privileged people mean that God Himself cannot be trusted? "By no means! God must prove true, though every man be false; as the Scripture says, 'That you may be shown to be right in what you say, and win your case when you go into court.'"
If God had not been accused, there would have been no need for Him to defend Himself. And just as the charges had been heard throughout the universe, so the answers must be publicly made known. When Daniel described a convening of the heavenly court, he emphasized the open presentation of the evidence. A hundred million watched as "the court sat in judgement, and the books were opened" (Daniel 7:10, RSV).
Read more ...
"I hate to have to do this," said the voice on the telephone, but I must warn you that pastor so-and-so is teaching heresy."
"Are you sure?" I inquired.
"Absolutely. It was explained to our whole class at the seminary. Then I heard it again at campmeeting."
"What heresy is the pastor accused of teaching?"
"They said it was something called 'the morally influential theory.'"
"Actually it's pronounced 'moral influence,'" I corrected. "But do you know what this theory is all about?"
"I was hoping you could tell me. But at least I understand it has something to do with the cross and atonement. Evidently the pastor is confusing people by saying that Jesus didn't have to die."
"That's a very serious charge. Have you told many others about it?"

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Sunday's Obituary - Frank Villers
CASCO, Wis. - Frank Villers, 63, died at 2:30 this morning at his farm home at Rosiere after an illness of four years.
Mr. Villers was born on the Lincoln Township farm Jan. 28, 1891, and was married to Mary LaCrosse May 20, 1913. he was a member of the Holy Name society of St. Hubert Church, Rosiere.
Survivors include his wife; a son, Louis, at home; one grandson, Marvin; a brother, Joe, of Green Bay, and two sisters, Mrs. Louis Villers and Mrs. William Wendricks, Green Bay.
Friends may call at the Wiesner - Massart Funeral Home here beginning Thursday afternoon, and the rosary will be recited at 8 o'clock Thursday and Friday evenings. The last rites will be conducted in St. Hubert Church at 9:30 a.m. Saturday by the Rev. Henry Zelinske and burial will be in the church cemetery."
Sadly, this clipping tells me nothing of his parents. Don't you love it? Luckily, I can find by looking at the 1930 U.S. Federal Census (Lincoln, Kewaunee, Wisconsin) that his parents, Louis and Emmerance Villers, were living with Frank and Mary Villers. At least that mystery is solved. Now to find out where Frank belongs in my tree, because we have Villers, but no Frank, Louis or Emmerance Villers...
NOTE: This clipping was passed on to me by family in Green Bay, Wisconsin. It was taken from a scrapbook filled with newspaper clippings an does not have any publication information. The date written on the article is most likely the date of death and not publication. The clipping was most likely taken from the Green Bay Press-Gazette.
Posted by Cherie Cayemberg at 7:00 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)


text:
We just posted the 6-page Express Black Friday ad scan!
Similar to last year, this is more of a "look book" and does not reflect the typical Express Black Friday sale. For the past few years, Express has offered 50% off sitewide and free shipping no minimum for their online Black Friday sale. If you find an item that you like, be prepared to shop quickly if and when that discount is reflected -- popular sizes always sell out very quickly at Express.
Thanks for Visiting and Tell Your Friends!
Posted by Louryn Strampe link


text:
Villanova is committed to providing financial assistance to students on the basis of the family's ability to contribute, as the holistic admission process for domestic students is need-blind. Through grants, loans and student employment opportunities provided through federal, state and University resources, the University seeks to make a Villanova education affordable. Villanova's financial assistance budget—including the Villanova Grant Program—has grown steadily over the last five years.
The Office of Financial Assistance provides complete information about financial aid at Villanova, including important deadlines and how to apply, as well as current year costs.
If Villanova offers what you are looking for in a college or university, complete an application for admission and financial assistance, and make your college choice based on the financial assistance that you receive.
A limited number of merit-based scholarships are available, including the Presidential Scholarship, for students who have demonstrated academic achievement and active participation in their school and the broader civic community.


text:
Friday, July 23, 2010
Banana, Avocado, Chocolate smoothie GIVEAWAY!!
29 comments:
OH that sounds exciting and delicious. I totally would love to try this!ReplyDelete
Great picture of your daughter! Looks like she likes it for sure! :0
I have to admit, that adding avocado with banana seems weird, BUT because there is chocolate in their I will try it. Chocolate does make everything taste better! Thanks for sharing the recipe!ReplyDelete
I love Açaí and have been using it a lot for smoothies. Avocado shake was also my childhood beverage.ReplyDelete
Forget the powder. I want the kid!ReplyDelete
It would be awesome to try it! I've never used "powders" like that, but just got a Vita-Mix and ordered some hemp powder, so this would be a great addition!!ReplyDelete
2 of my favorite things in one smoothie?! Are you kidding me? Can't wait to try!ReplyDelete
Oooh, the smoothie looks fantastic! I'm going to try it with raw cacao powder; I have a bunch. I love Açaí - but I've only had it in the frozen form....I'd love to add the powder to my morning smoothies - yum!ReplyDelete
First of all: Hello Chocolate! And LOL at happy child-approved chocolate face! So how do you pronounce ACAI? Is each letter pronounced--like A-K-A-I? I'm just curious is all. But I would love to try it, too! Thanks, girl!ReplyDelete
- NivedithaJuly 23, 2010 at 1:48 PM
Your kid is so adorable:)) I would love to try this powder and thank you for this giveaway!!!ReplyDelete
I love it, especially the photo of Leelu. Acai powder is great in frosting too.ReplyDelete
yummy yum yum yumReplyDelete
I've never heard of Acai powder! That would be cool to try!ReplyDelete
1. Daughter is ADORABLE with that chocolate smile!ReplyDelete
2. That smoothie looks amazing
3. I'm in for some Acai.
4. Hope you are having a great summer:)
Love the happy baby photo! I've never tried acai powder but would like to. Thanks for offering the giveaway.ReplyDelete
I love the Acai juice. Never tried the powder. I bet this makes great smoothies. BTW Nice to meet another Kirsten!ReplyDelete
hibbard_k at yahoo dot com
Ooohh!! I'd love to try it!ReplyDelete
Ha Ha Ha! I love the chocolate smile, it made ME smile. Thank you.ReplyDelete
I haven't jumped on the whole acai bandwagon yet, so I'll give it a whirl if I win. :)
I've never tried Organic Acai powder but my brother-in-law lost some weight while using it. I'd love to try it in our smoothies.ReplyDelete
matt4melis at hotmail dot com
I love smoothies and have heard some positive stuff about using Acai. Your GIVE AWAYS are great. Hope to have a taste real soon.ReplyDelete
- AnonymousJuly 27, 2010 at 11:19 PM
Chocolate and avocados, thought I, surely not!ReplyDelete
I was wrong. Lov-lov-loved it! yum indeed.
I have also heard great things about Acai...would be terrific!
Wow, that smoothie look SO good! I've used a few recipes lately that called for acai, but the stores around here don't sell it. I hope I win some!ReplyDelete
I have never tried Acai poweder before but I would LOVE to... Thanks for being inspirational..ReplyDelete
That smoothie looks amazing! I usually have them as a mid day pick-me-up, and would feel bad having chocolate, but I guess the avocado and acai balance it out, right? ;)ReplyDelete
I'd love to try Acai powder! Enter me, please :)ReplyDelete
I've just discovered your blog through Marysol's blog and I'm loving your recipes - I'm trying to eat vegan on most days, so it's a great source of inspiration :) xxx
- AnonymousJuly 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM
Yummy, your smoothie looks delicious. Love Leeluu's chocolate smile. Thanks, Kirsten.ReplyDelete
Thanks everyone!ReplyDelete
My comment has nothing to do with the Acai powder, but just came across your blog for the first time and love it! I had never thought of using avocados blended alongside anything else, but this is the second time I've read of it recently. Your smoothie sounds DELICIOUS! I will have to try it. Thanks for the idea!ReplyDelete
Just found your blog! I would love to try the Acai powder! I look forward to reading through your recipes!ReplyDelete
I would love to try some!ReplyDelete


text:
Press Release:
Kirby Krackle, Seattle's hottest nerd rock band, plays at the Portland Things From Another World on Monday July 15th with openers H2Awesome as part of their "Sounds Like You" 2013 West Coast Tour! Come to the Portland TFAW at 2916 NE Broadway: the cover is $7, doors open at 7:30, and the show is from 8:00-10:00 p.m.
Kirby Krackle is headed by Kyle Stevens, who has been reading comics and writing and recording music since the age of 13, and Jim Demonakos, founder of Seattle's Emerald City Comicon as well as The Comic Stop chain of retail stores. Known for high-energy shows and songs referencing pop-culture icons, comic book characters, and video games, Kirby Krackle's name has become synonymous with melding nerd themes with superior musicianship.
"One of the key advantages of moving the Portland TFAW to our new location is the increased space to do big, one-of-a-kind events," said TFAW Vice President Andrew McIntire. "We're excited to have Kirby Krackle and H2Awesome come and blow the doors off!"
This is the first West Coast tour for New York's H2Awesome, which includes Charlie LaGreca (artist/illustrator for DC Comics, co-founder/director of Denver Comic-Con), Jeff LaGreca (writer/director of Bijou and the 'Bots, Gargoyle Garden, and Elfland), Jon Price (writer/creator of Magus and 12 Gauge Comics), Matt van Metre, and Gregg Zehentner.
Water/sodas and light snacks provided. CDs for both bands will be available for purchase. Make sure to come to the Portland TFAW 7/15 for an evening of geeky fun!
Things From Another World
2916 NE Broadway, Portland, OR 97232


text:
The Perry Daily Times. (Perry, Okla.), Vol. 1, No. 268, Ed. 1 Wednesday, August 1, 1894
Description: Daily newspaper from Perry, Oklahoma that includes local, territorial, and national news along with advertising.
Date: August 1, 1894
Creator: Greer, Bert R.
Item Type: Refine your search to only Newspaper
Partner: Oklahoma Historical Society


text:
If your printer is networked, it can actually communicate with our support knowledge base directly, and troubleshoot itself.
Tools to grow your digital printing business and increase profits
© 2020 Xerox Corporation. All rights reserved. Xerox® and PrimeLink® are trademarks of Xerox Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.


text:
The GENES Blog does not ask for any financial contribution from readers and never will. However, if you have a sudden and overwhelming desire to shower me in coins, could I ask that you redirect any contribution you may wish to make to a much more worthwhile venture, as set up by Australian based gene genie Judy Webster?
Genealogists for Families (http://genfamilies.blogspot.com) is a worthwhile scheme which seeks to make loans of $25 to people in need around the world, which can be reclaimed once repaid or re-invested to help another person in need. The idea was based on Judy's father's idea of setting aside 'Do Good Money' and is gaining widespread support across the world's genealogical community. The initiative also has a Facebook page at www.facebook.com/groups/173969336022998/. All loans opportunities are provided through the Kiva non-profit platform, and you can select who you wish to pay to and for what worthwhile opportunity.
By the way - you don't need to be a professional genealogist to sign up! All donations will be very welcome, and if you contribute I will love you all even more than I do already and will shout your names from the Scottish hills for all eternity to hear! :)


text:
My Poll
Thanks for voting!
Here are the current poll results
Callaway Mavrik Hybridsview other products
It's not hard to see why we think these are some of the easiest to launch and longest hybrids on the market once you've given them a try.
A.I. Technology has been used to develop a different face design for every loft, ensuring the optimum spin rate and launch angle has been achieved to help you hit the ball further with more accuracy when you need it most. Nice!
Key features and benefits include:
- Jailbreak technology allows for the face to take on more load promoting added ball speed
- A.I. Technology designs each face for optimum performance per loft
- Flash Face SS20 is constructed from a high strength steel for exceptional ball speed
- Multiple head shapes and sizes to suit all ranges of players
- Optimum centre of gravity helps promote easy launch
We love the Mavrik hybrids as they offer exactly what a golfer needs from a hybrid - high launch and easy to hit.


text:
|Skip Navigation Links
|Exit Print View
|System Administration Guide: Oracle Solaris Containers-Resource Management and Oracle Solaris Zones Oracle Solaris Legacy Containers
1. Introduction to Solaris 10 Resource Management
2. Projects and Tasks (Overview)
3. Administering Projects and Tasks
4. Extended Accounting (Overview)
5. Administering Extended Accounting (Tasks)
6. Resource Controls (Overview)
7. Administering Resource Controls (Tasks)
8. Fair Share Scheduler (Overview)
9. Administering the Fair Share Scheduler (Tasks)
10. Physical Memory Control Using the Resource Capping Daemon (Overview)
11. Administering the Resource Capping Daemon (Tasks)
13. Creating and Administering Resource Pools (Tasks)
14. Resource Management Configuration Example
15. Resource Control Functionality in the Solaris Management Console
16. Introduction to Solaris Zones
17. Non-Global Zone Configuration (Overview)
18. Planning and Configuring Non-Global Zones (Tasks)
19. About Installing, Halting, Cloning, and Uninstalling Non-Global Zones (Overview)
20. Installing, Booting, Halting, Uninstalling, and Cloning Non-Global Zones (Tasks)
21. Non-Global Zone Login (Overview)
22. Logging In to Non-Global Zones (Tasks)
23. Moving and Migrating Non-Global Zones (Tasks)
24. Oracle Solaris 10 9/10: Migrating a Physical Oracle Solaris System Into a Zone (Tasks)
25. About Packages and Patches on an Oracle Solaris System With Zones Installed (Overview)
What's New in Packaging and Patching When Zones Are Installed
Packaging and Patch Tools Overview
Patches Generated for Packages
Package Operations Possible in the Global Zone
Package Operations Possible in a Non-Global Zone
How Zone State Affects Patch and Package Operations
About Adding Packages in Zones
Using pkgadd in the Global Zone
Adding a Package to the Global Zone and to All Non-Global Zones
Adding a Package to the Global Zone Only
Adding a Package Installed in the Global Zone to all Non-Global Zones
Using pkgadd in a Non-Global Zone
About Removing Packages in Zones
Using pkgrm in the Global Zone
Removing a Package From the Global Zone and From all Non-Global Zones
Using pkgrm in a Non-Global Zone
Setting Package Parameters for Zones
SUNW_PKG_ALLZONES Package Parameter
SUNW_PKG_HOLLOW Package Parameter
SUNW_PKG_THISZONE Package Parameter
Oracle Solaris 10 8/07: Deferred Activation Patching
Oracle Solaris 10 10/09: Zones Parallel Patching to Reduce Patching Time
Applying Patches on an Oracle Solaris System With Zones Installed
Using patchadd in the Global Zone
Using patchadd in a Non-Global Zone
Interaction of patchadd -G and the pkginfo Variable on a System With Zones
Removing Patches on an Oracle Solaris System With Zones Installed
Using patchrm in the Global Zone
26. Adding and Removing Packages and Patches on an Oracle Solaris System With Zones Installed (Tasks)
27. Oracle Solaris Zones Administration (Overview)
28. Oracle Solaris Zones Administration (Tasks)
29. Upgrading an Oracle Solaris 10 System That Has Installed Non-Global Zones
30. Troubleshooting Miscellaneous Oracle Solaris Zones Problems
31. About Branded Zones and the Linux Branded Zone
32. Planning the lx Branded Zone Configuration (Overview)
33. Configuring the lx Branded Zone (Tasks)
34. About Installing, Booting, Halting, Cloning, and Uninstalling lx Branded Zones (Overview)
35. Installing, Booting, Halting, Uninstalling and Cloning lx Branded Zones (Tasks)
36. Logging In to lx Branded Zones (Tasks)
37. Moving and Migrating lx Branded Zones (Tasks)
38. Administering and Running Applications in lx Branded Zones (Tasks)
The patchrm system utility described in the patchrm(1M) man page is used to remove patches on a system with zones installed.
As the global administrator, you can use the patchrm utility in the global zone to remove patches. The patchrm utility cannot remove patches from the global zone only or from a subset of the non-global zones.
As the zone administrator, you can use the patchrm utility in a non-global zone to remove patches from that non-global zone only. Patches cannot affect areas that are shared.


text:
- Description
DetailsEnhanced regular size with perfectly cut circular lenses, these superb quality and very stylish round sunglasses are set in well built John Lennon style frames with spring temples, this is a very durable and high quality product. Yellow lenses enhance contrast and depth perception by filtering scattered, out-of-focus blue light. They're especially effective in flat light, foggy or overcast conditions helping to increase visibility. The anti-reflective coating on the back of the lenses reduces side and back reflections for sharper vision with less glare whilst driving at night and reduced eye strain for greater comfort during prolonged computer use.
Frame: stainless steel frame with lightweight premium-grade cupro-nickel temples for combined strength and durability; premium plated - enhances their look giving a high quality finish; reliable high tension spring temples giving extra fitting comfort for a variety of face sizes and reduced wear and tear; plastic arm ends for comfort and grip; adjustable nose pieces and temples; medium to large (regular) size - frame size 45-25-130.
Lenses: pale yellow; helps relieve eye strain and fatigue; suitable for night driving and computer glasses; luminous transmittance 82%; 2mm acrylic round lenses - provides the best balance of optical performance and strength; impact resistant; UV400 protection.
Comes with a FREE compact case and a soft cleaning pouch worth £5.94 plus 12 months limited warranty.
Approximate Measurements: A = 132mm (5 1/4") across temples; B = 45mm (1 3/4") lens diameter (47mm in frame); C = 135mm (5 3/8") to arm ends; D = 25mm (1") across nose bridge.
These sunglasses comply with the latest European Standard EN 1836:2005 and block 100% UVA and UVB rays meeting ANSI Z80.3 UV General Purpose Protection Standards. UV filter category 0 suitable for low light, cloudy/overcast conditions and night driving.
- Additional Information
Additional Information
We have three options for deliveries within the UK:
Our SUPER SAVER service is FREE by Second Class Royal Mail for order values over £10 or charged at £1.99 for orders below £10. The estimated delivery time is 3-14 days.
Our EXPEDITED service by First Class Royal Mail is £2.99 per order and the expected delivery time is 2-5 days.
Our PRIORITY next day service by Royal Mail Special Delivery is £6.99 per order. A tracking number will be sent to you by email when dispatched and the delivery time is next working day by 1pm for orders received before 2pm.
INTERNATIONAL orders for delivery outside the UK are sent by Royal Mail International Signed For or International Airsure depending on your country. The charge is £6.99 per order within the EU and £8.99 per order to the rest of the world. A tracking number will be sent to you by email when dispatched and the expected delivery time is 5-14 days.
We aim to dispatch all orders placed by 2pm GMT on the same working day.
- Reviews
Customer Reviews 1 item(s)
- very good
Arrived the next day, very good. Part of a Christmas present
Description Value Delivery


text:
Google CEO Eric Schmidt was at the Newseum in Washington D.C. when he dropped yet another bon mot of creepy: "We know where you are. We know where you've been. We can more or less know what you're thinking about."
Seriously, Eric? Still thinking about deploying those Google implants into our personal computers, and by that we mean our brains?
And it's fitting that he was at the Newseum when he said it, because there isn't a newsperson in the world who isn't going to gobble sound bytes like that.
U.S. & World
The day's top national and international news.
Importantly, though, he had tons of insightful, germane and probably prescient things to say, too.
The editor of The Atlantic did the interview and posted videos of the event.
Some quotes to mull from one of Silicon Valley's taller ivory towers:
* Politics: "Washington is an incumbent protection system."
* Academia: "We have 90 percent of the top researchers in the world. We also have a bizarre policy to train people and then kick them out by not giving them visas, which makes no sense at all."
* Getting the economy going: "Businesses much prefer consistency over change."
* Creepy: "Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it."
Good luck with that.


text:
Ever had a boyfriend who wants to make you a deal to get rid of all your clothes so he can replace them with new stuff?
That's exactly what Kanye West volunteered to do with Kim Kardashian. On Sunday night's episode of Keeping Up With The Kardashians, Kanye and his stylist Renelou Padora took to Kim's closet for a purge.
As Kim points out, Kanye is a fashion designer although his ready to wear shows haven't exactly gotten rave reviews, getting panned for his 2011 and 2012 collections. He also created a sneaker collection in collaboration with Louis Vuitton, the label helmed by fashion maven Marc Jacobs.
Kanye brought Kim to Paris Fashion Week this summer and the pair generated headlines for driving around in a Lamborghini and Kim rocking a pair of $6,000 shoes Kanye designed.
One dress seen being fitted on to Kim in the show showed up again when the two sat front row at a July show for Valentino.
(Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images)
-Courtney E. Smith, CBS Local
You must log in to post a comment.


text:
For the past year, the biggest news story in San Diego has been the newspaper.
There's not enough space to recount all of the things that have happened since Doug Manchester assumed ownership of the Union-Tribune. But it's fair to say that Manchester has offered a different vision of what a newspaper should be than most Californians are accustomed to.
He has said he wants the papers to be unabashedly positive and relentlessly pro-military and pro-business and pro-development, and to take sides in disputes, such as whether the football Chargers should get a new stadium. (He's for it, and those journalists who aren't willing to be for it are not welcome at the U-T).
U.S. & World
News from around the country and around the globe
The result has been staff changes, and lots of controversy, about whether his paper has lived up to the type of boosterism he's promised. But he's not stopping. He's just purchased the North County Times as well.
In journalism circles, Manchester is seen as an outlier. But is he? Californians saw something not dissimilar a few years back when Wendy McCaw took over the Santa Barbara News-Press.
And cheerleading, boosterish, less-than-critical newspapering is a long American, and California tradition. The Los Angeles Times was this kind of paper for much of its history. And there are reasons to believe that Manchester-style newspapering is going to make a big comeback.
Those reasons are many.
But the short version is that newspapers nowadays are a bad business by themselves. So people who own them are likely to own them for reasons than being in a good business. They may want newspapers that serve their larger business or ideological interests, or cheerlead for favored causes. If a newspaper gives you that, the bad economics of the business make more sense.
What's more, the audience may be ready for this kind of journalism.
Surveys show that engaged citizens are more partisan and ideological than in the post-war era. They have less interest in papers that try to find the dispassionate middle. And one of the most often-aired complaints about media is that they are too negative, which bolsters the case for boosterism.
The appreciation for the role of the press as watchdog is not as deep and wide as we journalists would like to believe. Bottom line: the incentives are in place for more Manchesters.
But that leaves a very basic question for those of us who believe that government and powerful people and interests need to be watched, and that society needs the power of an independent press: what the heck do we do now?
I don't know. But to get an answer, your lead blogger is moderating a discussion of this question on Monday night in, yes, San Diego. The event, at the San Diego Museum of Art, runs just over an hour and is free and open to the public.
It features people who are trying to figure out what the future might be: Scott Lewis, who leads the Voice of San Diego, which has embraced the Internet and new techniques in the service of old-fashioned accountability reporting; a documentary filmmaker named Bernardo Ruiz, director of a film about Zeta, a Tijuana magazine whose journalists have paid a heavy price for covering the cartels; and journalist Carrie Lozano of PBS and UC Berkeley, who is an expert in how media and citizens can collaborate to investigate and hold power accountable.
Is it nonprofit journalistic organizations that will fill the void left by Manchester-style newspapers? Or Internet-based citizen collaboratives? Or will reporters find ways to do journalism from within other institutions -- unions, corporations or even government? Does the NPR-style model of membership funding work? Or do newspapers and TV stations that were once competitors band together to share resources to get the job done?
I hope to see Prop Zero readers there who may have their own answers to these questions. Or even better questions.
Lead Prop Zero blogger Joe Mathews is California editor at Zocalo Public Square, a fellow at Arizona State University's Center for Social Cohesion, and co-author of California Crackup: How Reform Broke the Golden State and How We Can Fix It (University of California, 2010).
Send us your thoughts via Twitter @PropZero or add your comment to our Facebook page.


text:
About United Family Healthcare
United Family Healthcare is a pioneering, international-standard health system providing comprehensive, integrated healthcare in a uniquely warm, caring, patient service-oriented environment.
Since 1997, UFH has led the way in private international healthcare in China. After almost two decades, UFH has established itself in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Wuxi, Tianjin, Nanjing, Qingdao, and Hainan as the provider of choice for those seeking premium, personalized healthcare. UFH is constantly striving to meet and exceed worldwide service quality and patient safety standards. This level of quality is evidenced at our international hospital facilities, which together with our 14 satellite clinics and medical centers comprise China's complete, pioneering system of Joint Commission International (JCI) accredited facilities.
Letter from our CEO
We thank you for choosing us to care for you. We understand the trust you have placed in us by allowing us to provide for your health and well-being. We accept our responsibility seriously and promise that we will look after you as if you were a member of our own family.
We understand that making health care decisions can be confusing if not frightening. For this reason, we will keep you informed and help you to understand all options available to you. Along the way, we need you to tell us when you have a concern or question. We need you to tell us when you don't understand medical terms or details of your care. If you are unable to follow your plan of care, we need you to make us aware immediately. If, for any reason, you would like a second opinion, let us know.
To help you at any time, we always have a patient services representative and administrator on call. Should you or your family have any compliments, concerns, or complaints that need to be addressed, someone is available. We promise that sharing your concerns or complaints will not compromise your access to care, treatment, or services.
We consider your health extremely personal and handle all matters in a highly confidential manner. We strive to treat each patient with respect and dignity and ask that you treat your fellow patients as well as our staff in the same manner. We pay attention to your special needs and respect any cultural considerations. Please let us know of any dietary, religious, or language needs you might have and we will respond to the best of our ability.
At the end of your stay, we will explain any continuing health care needs and, should you require, a copy of your treatment records and medical records will be made available to you.
We dedicate our lives to caring for others and we consider caring for you our privilege.
Roberta Lipson
Board Chair, United Family Healthcare
CEO, Chindex International, Inc
Commitment Values
- A commitment to excellence in offering quality care and programs that set community standards, exceed patients' expectations, and are offered in the most caring, convenient, cost-effective, and accessible manner.
- A commitment to providing care in a respectful, culturally-sensitive manner, remembering at all times that we treat people, not diseases.
- A commitment to being leaders within our communities in the application of both the art and science of medicine for the maintenance of well-being, and, when health fails, to the delivery of the highest-quality medical care.
- A commitment to continuing to provide a physical environment that supports our mission.
- A commitment to care about people; to care about how we interact with them, to enrich the lives of our patients, visitors, and employees by creating a warm, welcoming environment that embraces individual creativity and cultural diversity, fostering collegiality, trust, and mutual respect.


text:
Two British teens have sparked outrage after they dressed up for a Halloween contest as the twin towers during the 9/11 terrorist attack -- and won.
The costumes, labeled "South Tower" and "North Tower," featured explosions, flames and people jumping from windows, The Sun newspaper reported. The 19-year-old students also wore hats with Americans flags planted in wreckage for the contest at Rosies nightclub in Chester, England.
According to the paper, Amber Langford, a biology student whose father is reportedly a retired pilot, and criminology student Annie Collinge received £150 ($240) after being crowned "best dressed."
U.S. & World
"The insensitivity level for this act of ignorance is topped by none. As for the nightclub who allowed it, sponsored it and endorsed it, shame on you," John Feal, president of New York-based 9/11 victims' organization The FealGood Foundation, told The Sun.
The teens apologized, telling The Sun in a statement that, "The idea was to depict a serious, modern-day horror that happened in our lifetime and was not intended as a joke."
A spokeswoman for the Stonegate Pub Company, which runs Rosies nightclub, said, it was "extremely concerned" the pair had won the contest.
The Sept. 11 attacks killed nearly 3,000 people.
TODAY'S front page of THE SUN pic.twitter.com/0z2LgtwAAT — The Sun Newspaper (@TheSunNewspaper) November 6, 2013


text:
Hi everyone!
I'm having some technical issues with my video studio, and I'll need to replace a part that is absolutely vital to recording. I had hoped to have a video post up today, talking about National Coming Out day, but it doesn't look like that is in the cards. I've tried everything I can think of to fix the problem and I just can't get it fixed.
In lieu of that video, I would like to share this blog post that I wrote a year or so ago about the love and friendship between myself and my best friend from high school.
Coming out still matters because if everyone comes out, some day, coming out won't be a big deal.


text:
Claim Status
Checking Online
After submitting a claim, you can check the status online. In doing so, you can verify if your claim has been received, pended or finalized. Additionally, you can verify the descriptions for any claim denials.
You or your billing agent can obtain real-time results by checking claim status through the AvailityTM Claim Research Tool or your preferred vendor. The Claim Research Tool provides the equivalent of an Explanation of Benefits (EOB), including line item breakdowns and detailed denial descriptions. All results are printable and can be used as a duplicate EOB for another insurance carrier when requested.
Note: If your claim did not process the way you anticipated, it is important that you do not submit a duplicate claim for the same patient. Duplicate claims typically result in additional denials.
Adjust a Claim via Telephone
If you have additional questions or need to request a claim adjustment, a document control number (claim number) is required when calling via our Interactive Voice Response (IVR) automated phone system to speak with an agent.
To access our IVR system, call 800-496-5774. The system is available Monday through Friday, 6 a.m. to 11:30 p.m., CT, and Saturday, 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., CT. For additional details, refer to the Claims Caller Guide.
Email our Provider Education Consultants. Be sure to include your name, direct contact information, tax ID or billing NPI.
Availity is a trademark of Availity, L.L.C., a separate company that operates a health information network to provide electronic information exchange services to medical professionals. Availity provides administrative services to BCBSOK. BCBSOK makes no endorsement, representations or warranties regarding any products or services offered by third party vendors such as Availity. If you have any questions about the products or services offered by such vendors, you should contact the vendor(s) directly.


text:
4:03 am
April 9, 2009
I'm not such an idiot afterall Humphreys because I do not agree with your science test and libets idea of free will. My "Strange" idea of free will, as you discribe it, is not so strange afterall, when you consider all these different inturpetations of free will in theology of many differnet religions. Gee wizz, it doesn't have a thing to do with brain signals making your finger move either.
Free will in theology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the theological questions of free will. For other uses, see Free will (disambiguation).
Free will in theology is an important part of the debate on free will in general. This article discusses the doctrine of free will as it has been, and is, interpreted within the various branches of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism and Zoroastrianism. Religions vary greatly in their response to the Standard argument against free will, and thus might appeal to any number of responses to "the paradox of free will" - the claim that omniscience and free will are incompatible.
Contents [hide]
1 Overview of the antinomy
1.1 Common defenses
2 In Christian thought
2.1 In Arminianism
2.2 In Lutheranism
2.3 In Calvinism
2.4 Comparison of Protestants
2.5 In Catholicism
2.6 In Eastern Christianity
2.6.1 Oriental Orthodox
2.6.2 Eastern Orthodox
2.7 Differences of view between Catholic and Orthodox Churches
2.8 In the LDS (Mormon) Church
2.9 In the New Church
2.10 Other views
3 In Jewish thought
3.1 Free will and creation
3.2 The paradox of free will
3.3 Alternate approaches
3.4 In Kabbalistic thought
4 In Islamic thought
5 In Hinduism
5.1 Different approaches
6 References and notes
7 External links
7.1 General
7.2 Christian material
7.3 Jewish material
8 See also
[edit]Overview of the antinomyMain article: Argument from free will
The theological doctrine of divine foreknowledge is often alleged to be in conflict with free will, particularly in Calvinistic circles. For if God knows exactly what will happen (right down to every choice a person makes) it would seem the "freedom" of these choices is called into question.[1]
This problem is related to the Aristotelian problem of the sea battle: tomorrow either there will or will not be a sea battle. According to the Law of excluded middle, there seems to be two options. If there will be sea battle, then it seems that it was true even yesterday that there would be one. Thus it is necessary that the sea battle will occur . If there won't be one, then by similar reasoning, it is necessary that it won't occur.[2] This means that the future, whatever it is, is completely fixed by past truths—true propositions about the future (i.e. we reach a deterministic conclusion: things could not have been any other way).
However, some philosophers follow William of Ockham in holding that necessity and possibility are defined with respect to a given point in time and a given matrix of empirical circumstances, and so something that is merely possible from the perspective of one observer may be necessary from the perspective of an omniscient.[3] Some philosophers follow Philo of Alexandria, a philosopher known for his homocentrism, in holding that free will is a feature of a human's soul, and thus that non-human animals lack free will.[4]
[edit]Common defensesJewish philosophy stresses that free will is a product of the intrinsic human soul, using the word neshama (from the Hebrew rootn.sh.m. or .נ.ש.מ meaning "breath"), but the ability to make a free choice is through Yechida (from Hebrew word "yachid", יחיד, singular), the part of the soul that is united with God, the only being that is not hindered by or dependent on cause and effect (thus, freedom of will does not belong to the realm of the physical reality, and inability of natural philosophy to account for it is expected).
In Islam the theological issue is not usually how to reconcile free will with God's foreknowledge, but with God's "jabr," or divine commanding power. al-Ash'ari developed an "acquisition" or "dual-agency" form of compatibilism, in which human free will and divine jabr were both asserted, and which became a cornerstone of the dominant Ash'ari position.[5] In Shia Islam, Ash'aris understanding of a higher balance toward predestination is challenged by most theologists.[6] Free will, according to Islamic doctrine is the main factor for man's accountability in his/her actions throughout life. All actions taken by man's free will are said to be counted on the Day of Judgement because they are his/her own and not God's.
The philosopher Søren Kierkegaard claimed that divine omnipotence cannot be separated from divine goodness.[7] As a truly omnipotent and good being, God could create beings with true freedom over God. Furthermore, God would voluntarily do so because "the greatest good ... which can be done for a being, greater than anything else that one can do for it, is to be truly free."[8] Alvin Plantinga's "free will defense" is a contemporary expansion of this theme, adding how God, free will, and evil are consistent.[9]
[edit]In Christian thoughtMain article: History of Calvinist–Arminian debate
In Christian theology, God is described as omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent; a notion which some people, Christians and non-Christians alike, believe implies that not only has God always known what choices individuals will make tomorrow, but has actually determined those choices. That is, they believe, by virtue of his foreknowledge he knows what will influence individual choices, and by virtue of his omnipotence he controls those factors. This becomes especially important for the doctrines relating to salvation and predestination.
[edit]In ArminianismChristians influenced by Jacobus Arminius, such as Methodists, believe that while God is omnipotent and knows the choices that individuals will make, he still gives individuals the power to ultimately choose (or reject) everything, regardless of any internal or external conditions relating to the choice. Like John Calvin, Arminius affirmed total depravity, but Arminius believed that only prevenient grace allowed men to choose salvation:
Concerning grace and free will, this is what I teach according to the Scriptures and orthodox consent: Free will is unable to begin or to perfect any true and spiritual good, without grace.... This grace [prœvenit] goes before, accompanies, and follows; it excites, assists, operates that we will, and co operates lest we will in vain.[10]
Prevenient grace is divine grace which precedes human decision. It exists prior to and without reference to anything humans may have done. As humans are corrupted by the effects of sin, prevenient grace allows persons to engage their God-given free will to choose the salvation offered by God in Jesus Christ or to reject that salvific offer.
Thomas Jay Oord offers perhaps the most cogent free will theology presupposing prevenient grace. What he calls "essential kenosis" says God acts preveniently to give freedom/agency to all creatures. This gift comes from God's eternal essence, and is therefore necessary. God remains free in choosing how to love, but the fact that God loves and therefore gives freedom/agency to others is a necessary part of what it means to be divine.
[edit]In Lutheranism
...man's will has some liberty to choose civil righteousness, and to work things subject to reason. But it has no power, without the Holy Ghost, to work the righteousness of God, that is, spiritual righteousness... –Augsburg Confession, Art. 18: Of Free Will[11]Lutherans adhere to divine monergism, the teaching that salvation is by God's act alone, and therefore reject the idea that humans in their fallen state have a free will concerning spiritual matters.[12] Lutherans believe that although humans have free will concerning civil righteousness, they cannot work spiritual righteousness without the Holy Spirit, since righteousness in the heart cannot be wrought in the absence of the Holy Spirit.[13] In other words, humanity is free to choose and act in every regard except for the choice of salvation.
Lutherans teach that sinners, while capable of doing works that are outwardly "good," are not capable of doing works that satisfy God's justice.[14] Every human thought and deed is infected with sin and sinful motives.[15]
Orthodox Lutheran theology holds that God made the world, including humanity, perfect, holy and sinless. However, Adam and Eve chose to disobey God, trusting in their own strength, knowledge, and wisdom.[16][17] Consequently, people are saddled with original sin, born sinful and unable to avoid committing sinful acts.[18] For Lutherans, original sin is the "chief sin, a root and fountainhead of all actual sins."[19]
According to Lutherans, God preserves his creation, in doing so cooperates with everything that happens, and guides the universe.[20] While God cooperates with both good and evil deeds, with evil deeds he does so only inasmuch as they are deeds, but not with the evil in them. God concurs with an act's effect, but he does not cooperate in the corruption of an act or the evil of its effect.[21] Lutherans believe everything exists for the sake of the Christian Church, and that God guides everything for its welfare and growth.[22]
Lutherans believe that the elect are predestined to salvation.[23] Lutherans believe Christians should be assured that they are among the predestined.[24] Lutherans believe that all who trust in Jesus alone can be certain of their salvation, for it is in Christ's work and his promises in which their certainty lies.[25] According to Lutheranism, the central final hope of the Christian is "the resurrection of the body and the life everlasting" as confessed in the Apostles' Creed rather than predestination. Conversion or regeneration in the strict sense of the term is the work of divine grace[26] and power[27] by which man, born of the flesh,[28] and void of all power to think,[29] to will,[30] or to do[31] any good thing, and dead in sin[32] is, through the gospel and holy baptism,[33] taken[34] from a state of sin and spiritual death under God's wrath[35] into a state of spiritual life of faith and grace,[36] rendered able to will and to do what is spiritually good[37] and, especially, led to accept the benefits of the redemption which is in Christ Jesus.[38]
Lutherans disagree with those that make predestination the source of salvation rather than Christ's suffering, death, and resurrection. Lutherans reject the Calvinist doctrine of the perseverance of the saints. Like both Calvinist camps, Lutherans view the work of salvation as monergistic in that "the natural [that is, corrupted and divinely unrenewed]powers of man cannot do anything or help towards salvation" (Formula of Concord: Solid Declaration, art. ii, par. 71), and Lutherans go further along the same lines as the Free Grace advocates to say that the recipient of saving grace need not cooperate with it. Hence, Lutherans believe that a true Christian (that is, a genuine recipient of saving grace) can lose his or her salvation, "[b]ut the cause is not as though God were unwilling to grant grace for perseverance to those in whom He has begun the good work... [but that these persons]wilfully turn away..." (Formula of Concord: Solid Declaration, art. xi, par. 42). Unlike Calvinists, Lutherans do not believe in a predestination to damnation.[39] Instead, Lutherans teach eternal damnation is a result of the unbeliever's sins, rejection of the forgiveness of sins, and unbelief.[40]
[edit]In CalvinismCalvinist Protestants embrace the idea that God chose who would be saved and who would be not saved prior to the creation. They quote Ephesians 1:4 "For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight" and also 2:8 "For it is by grace you are saved, through faith, and this not of yourselves, it is the gift of God." One of the strongest defenders of this theological point of view was the American Puritan preacher and theologian Jonathan Edwards.
Edwards believed that indeterminism was incompatible with individual dependence on God and hence with his sovereignty. He reasoned that if individuals' responses to God's grace are contra-causally free, then their salvation depends partly on them and therefore God's sovereignty is not "absolute and universal." Edward's book Freedom of the Will defends theological determinism. In this book, Edwards attempts to show that libertarianism is incoherent. For example, he argues that by 'self-determination' the libertarian must mean either that one's actions including one's acts of willing are preceded by an act of free will or that one's acts of will lack sufficient causes. The first leads to an infinite regress while the second implies that acts of will happen accidentally and hence can't make someone "better or worse, any more than a tree is better than other trees because it oftener happens to be lit upon by a swan or nightingale; or a rock more vicious than other rocks, because rattlesnakes have happened oftener to crawl over it." [41]
It should not be thought that this view completely denies freedom of choice, however. It claims that man is free to act on his strongest moral impulse and volition, which is externally determined, but is not free to act contrary to them, or to alter them. Proponents, such as John L. Girardeau, have indicated their belief that moral neutrality is impossible; that even if it were possible, and one were equally inclined to contrary options, one could make no choice at all; that if one is inclined, however slightly, toward one option, then that person will necessarily choose that one over any others.
Some non-Calvinist Christians attempt a reconciliation of the dual concepts of predestination and free will by pointing to the situation of God as Christ. In taking the form of a man, a necessary element of this process was that Jesus Christ lived the existence of a mortal. When Jesus was born he was not born with the omniscient power of God the Creator, but with the mind of a human child - yet he was still God in essence. The precedent this creates is that God is able to will the abandonment of His knowledge, or ignore knowledge, while remaining fully God. Thus it is not inconceivable that although omniscience demands that God knows what the future holds for individuals, it is within his power to deny this knowledge in order to preserve individual free will. Other theologians argue that the Calvinist-Edwardsean view suggests that if all human volitions are predetermined by God, then all actions dictated by fallen will of man necessarily satisfy His sovereign decree. Hence, it is impossible to act outside of God's perfect will, a conclusion some non-Calvinists claim poses a serious problem for ethics and moral theology.
An early proposal toward such a reconciliation states that God is, in fact, not aware of future events, but rather, being eternal, He is outside time, and sees the past, present, and future as one whole creation. Consequently, it is not as though God would know "in advance" that Jeffrey Dahmer would become guilty of homicide years prior to the event as an example, but that He was aware of it from all eternity, viewing all time as a single present. This was the view offered by Boëthius in Book V of the Consolation of Philosophy.
Calvinist theologian Loraine Boettner argued that the doctrine of divine foreknowledge does not escape the alleged problems of divine foreordination. He wrote that "what God foreknows must, in the very nature of the case, be as fixed and certain as what is foreordained; and if one is inconsistent with the free agency of man, the other is also. Foreordination renders the events certain, while foreknowledge presupposes that they are certain."[13] Some Christian theologians, feeling the bite of this argument, have opted to limit the doctrine of foreknowledge if not do away with it altogether, thus forming a new school of thought, similar to Socinianism and process theology, called open theism.
[edit]Comparison of ProtestantsThis table summarizes the classical views of three different Protestant beliefs.[42]
Topic Lutheranism Calvinism Arminianism
Human will Total Depravity without free will Total Depravity without free will Total depravity, with prevenient grace, does not preclude free will
[edit]In CatholicismTheologians of the Catholic Church universally embrace the idea of free will, but generally do not view free will as existing apart from or in contradiction to grace. St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas wrote extensively on free will, with Augustine focusing on the importance of free will in his responses to the Manichaeans, and also on the limitations of a concept of unlimited free will as denial of grace, in his refutations of Pelagius. Catholic Christianity's emphasis on free will and grace is often contrasted with predestination in Reformed Protestant Christianity, especially after the Counter-Reformation, but in understanding differing conceptions of free will it is just as important to understand the differing conceptions of the nature of God, focusing on the idea that God can be all-powerful and all-knowing even while people continue to exercise free will, because God does not exist in time (see the link to Catholic Encyclopedia below for more). I herewith also pull the attention to Schillebeeckx, Edward to his book:"Mensen als verhaal van God"(Schillebeeckx, Edward: "Mensen als verhaal van God"; Uitgeverij H. Nelissen B.V., Baarn 1989 p. 109) where Schillebeeckx states:""Daring to call human beings to life creatively is from God's perspective a vote of confidence in humankind and in its history, without any condition being placed on human beings or any guarantee being asked of them. The creation of human beings is a blank check for which God alone is a guarantor. By creating human beings with their own finite and free will, God voluntarily renounces power. That makes [God] to a high degree dependent on human beings and vulnerable." [ "Doubt in God's Omnipotence]
[edit]In Eastern Christianity[edit]Oriental OrthodoxThe concept of free will is also very important in the Oriental Orthodox Churches, especially in the Coptic affiliated ones. As in Judaism, free will is regarded as axiomatic. Everyone is regarded as having a free choice as to in what measure he or she will follow his or her conscience or arrogance, these two having been appointed for each individual. The more one follows one's conscience, the more it brings one good results, and the more one follows one's arrogance, the more it brings one bad results. Following only one's arrogance is sometimes likened to the dangers of falling into a pit while walking in pitch darkness, without the light of conscience to illuminate the path. Very similar doctrines have also found written expression in the Dead Sea Scrolls "Manual of Discipline", and in some religious texts possessed by the Beta Israel Jews of Ethiopia.
[edit]Eastern OrthodoxEastern Orthodox Church holds a view different from the Calvinist, Arminian, and Lutheran ones. The difference is in the interpretation of the Original sin, where the Eastern Orthodox do not believe in Total depravity. The Orthodox do not accept the Pelagian view that the original sin did not damage human nature, they accept that the human nature is depraved, but not totally, and they avoid calling it "depraved" preferring "fallen nature".
Orthodox Church holds to the teaching of synergy (συνεργός, meaning working together), which says that man has the freedom to, and must if he wants to be saved, choose to accept and work with the grace of God. The first who defined this teaching was John Cassian, 4th century Church Father, and a pupil of John Chrysostom, and all Eastern Fathers accept it. He taught that "Divine grace is necessary to enable a sinner to return unto God and live, yet man must first, of himself, desire and attempt to choose and obey God", and that "Divine grace is indispensable for salvation, but it does not necessarily need to precede a free human choice, because, despite the weakness of human volition, the will can take the initiative toward God.".
Some Orthodox use the parable of a drowning man to plainly illustrate the teaching of synergy: God from the ship throws a rope to a drowning man, pulls him up, saving him, and the man, if he wants to be saved, must hold on tightly to the rope; explaining both that salvation is a gift from God and man cannot save himself, and that man must co-work (syn-ergo) with God in the process of salvation.
Dostoevsky (an Eastern Orthodox Christian) the novelist suggested many arguments for and against free will. Famous arguments are the Grand Inquisitor, Notes from Underground and the argument that suicide, if chosen out of the irrational, was validation of freewill (see Kirilov in the Demons) novel. As for the argument presented in The Brothers Karamazov's section "The Rebellion" that the suffering of innocents was not worth the price of freewill, Dostoevsky appears to propose the idea of Apocatastasis as one possible rational solution.
Roman Catholic teaching
Illustrating as it does that the human part in salvation (represented by holding on to the rope) must be preceded and accompanied by grace (represented by the casting and drawing of the rope), the image of the drowning man holding on to the rope cast and drawn by his rescuer corresponds closely to Catholic teaching, which holds that God, who "destined us in love to be his sons" and "to be conformed to the image of his Son",[43] includes in his eternal plan of "predestination" each person's free response to his grace.[44]
The Catholic Church holds to the teaching that "by free will, (the human person) is capable of directing himself toward his true good … man is endowed with freedom, an outstanding manifestation of the divine image'."[45] Man has free will either to accept or reject the grace of God, so that for salvation "there is a kind of interplay, or synergy, between human freedom and divine grace".[46] "Justification establishes cooperation between God's grace and man's freedom. On man's part it is expressed by the assent of faith to the Word of God, which invites him to conversion, and in the cooperation of charity with the prompting of the Holy Spirit who precedes and preserves his assent: 'When God touches man's heart through the illumination of the Holy Spirit, man himself is not inactive while receiving that inspiration, since he could reject it; and yet, without God's grace, he cannot by his own free will move himself toward justice in God's sight' (Council of Trent)."[47]
God has freely chosen to associate man with the work of his grace. the fatherly action of God is first on his own initiative, and then follows man's free acting through his collaboration.[48] For Catholics, therefore, human cooperation with grace is essential.[49] When God establishes his eternal plan of 'predestination', he includes in it each person's free response to his grace, whether it is positive or negative: "In this city, in fact, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, to do whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place" (Acts 4:27-28).[50]
The initiative comes from God,[51] but it demands a free response from man: "God has freely chosen to associate man with the work of his grace. the fatherly action of God is first on his own initiative, and then follows man's free acting through his collaboration".[52] "Since the initiative belongs to God in the order of grace, no one can merit the initial grace of forgiveness and justification, at the beginning of conversion. Moved by the Holy Spirit and by charity, we can then merit for ourselves and for others the graces needed for our sanctification, for the increase of grace and charity, and for the attainment of eternal life.";[53] Orthodox criticism of Catholic doctrine
Orthodox theologian Vladimir Lossky has stated that the teaching of John Cassian, who in the East is considered a witness to tradition, but who "was unable to make himself correctly understood", "was interpreted, on the rational plane, as a semi-pelagianism, and was condemned in the West".[54] Where the Catholic Church defends the concept of faith and free will these are questioned in the East by the conclusions of the Second Council of Orange. This council is not accepted by the Eastern churches and the Catholic Church's use[not in citation given][55] of describing their position and St Cassian as Semi-Pelagian is also rejected.[56]
Although the Roman Catholic Church explicitly teaches that "original sin does not have the character of a personal fault in any of Adam's descendants",[57] some Eastern Orthodox nevertheless claim that Roman Catholicism professes the teaching, which they attribute to Saint Augustine, that everyone bears not only the consequence, but also the guilt of Adam's sin.[58][59]
[edit]Differences of view between Catholic and Orthodox ChurchesVarious Roman Catholic theologians identify Cassian as a teacher of the Semi-Pelagian heresy which was condemned by the Council of Orange.[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] While the Orthodox do not apply the term Semi-Pelagian to their theology, they criticize the Catholics for rejecting Cassian whom they accept as fully orthodox,[69] and for holding that human consent to God's justifying action is itself an effect of grace,[70] a position shared by Eastern Orthodox theologian Georges Florovsky, who says that the Eastern Orthodox Church "always understood that God initiates, accompanies, and completes everything in the process of salvation", rejecting instead the Calvinist idea of irresistible grace.[71]
Recently, some Catholic theologians have argued that Cassian's writings should not be considered Semi-Pelagian.[citation needed]And scholars of other denominations too have concluded that Cassian's thought "is not Semi-Pelagian",[72] and that he instead taught that "salvation is, from beginning to end, the effect of God's grace"[72] and held that "God's grace, not human free will, is responsible for 'everything which pertains to salvation' - even faith."[73]
The Orthodox Church holds to the teaching of synergy (συνεργός, meaning working together), which says that man has the freedom to, and must if he wants to be saved, choose to accept and work with the grace of God. Once baptised the experience of his salvation and relationship with God is called theosis. Mankind has free will to accept or reject the grace of God. Rejection of the gifts of God is called blasphemy of the Holy Spirit (gifts of grace, faith, life).[74][75] The first who defined this teaching was John Cassian, 4th-century Church Father, and a pupil of John Chrysostom, and all Eastern Fathers accept it. He taught that "Divine grace is necessary to enable a sinner to return unto God and live, yet man must first, of himself, desire and attempt to choose and obey God", and that "Divine grace is indispensable for salvation, but it does not necessarily need to precede a free human choice, because, despite the weakness of human volition, the will can take the initiative toward God.".[citation needed]
Some Orthodox use the parable of a drowning man to plainly illustrate the teaching of synergy: God from the ship throws a rope to a drowning man, pulls him up, saving him, and the man. If he wants to be saved, man must hold on tightly to the rope. Explaining both that salvation is a gift from God and man cannot save himself. That man must co-work (syn-ergo) with God in the process of salvation. As God does not predestine persons to eternal life, rather because he is God, he can see who will ultimately choose or not choose to follow him.
[edit]In the LDS (Mormon) ChurchMain article: Agency (LDS Church)
Mormons or Latter-day Saints, believe that God has given all humans the gift of moral agency. Moral agency includes free will and agency. Proper exercise of unfettered choice leads to the ultimate goal of returning to God's presence. Having the choice to do right or wrong was important, because God wants a society of a certain type—those that comply with eternal laws. Before this Earth was created, this dispute over agency rose to the level that there was a "war in heaven." Lucifer (who favored no agency) and his followers were cast out of heaven for rebelling against God's will. Many Mormon leaders have also taught that the battle in Heaven over agency is now being carried out on earth[citation needed], where dictators, influenced by Satan, fight against freedom (or free agency) in governments contrary to the will of God.
Mormons also believe in a limited form of foreordination — not in deterministic, unalterable decrees, but rather in callings from God for individuals to perform specific missions in mortality. Those who are foreordained can reject the foreordination, either outright or by transgressing the laws of God and becoming unworthy to fulfill the call.
[edit]In the New ChurchThe New Church, or Swedenborgianism, teaches that every person has complete freedom to choose heaven or hell. Emanuel Swedenborg, upon whose writings the New Church is founded, argued that if God is love itself, people must have free will. If God is love itself, then He desires no harm to come to anyone: and so it is impossible that he would predestine anyone to hell. On the other hand, if God is love itself, then He must love things outside of Himself; and if people do not have the freedom to choose evil, they are simply extensions of God, and He cannot love them as something outside of Himself. In addition, Swedenborg argues that if a person does not have free will to choose goodness and faith, then all of the commandments in the Bible to love God and the neighbor are worthless, since no one can choose to do them - and it is impossible that a God who is love itself and wisdom itself would give impossible commandments.
[edit]Other viewsFree will is also a point of debate among both sides of the Christian communist theory. Because some Christians interpret the Bible as advocating that the ideal form of society is communism,[citation needed]opponents of this theory maintain that the establishment of a large-scale communist system would infringe upon the free will of individuals by denying them the freedom to make certain decisions for themselves.[citation needed]Christian communists adamantly oppose this by arguing that free will has and always will be limited to some extent by human laws.[citation needed]
Jehovah's Witnesses believe in free will.
[edit]In Jewish thoughtThe belief in free will (Hebrew: bechirah chofshit בחירה חפשית, bechirah בחירה) is axiomatic in Jewish thought, and is closely linked with the concept of reward and punishment, based on the Torah itself: "I [God] have set before you life and death, blessing and curse: therefore choose life" ( Deuteronomy 30:19).
Free will is therefore discussed at length in Jewish philosophy, firstly as regards God's purpose in creation, and secondly as regards the closely related, resultant, paradox. The topic is also often discussed in connection with Negative theology, Divine simplicity and Divine Providence, as well as Jewish principles of faith in general.
[edit]Free will and creationThe traditional teaching regarding the purpose of creation, particularly as influenced by Jewish mysticism, is that "This world is like a corridor to the World to Come" (Pirkei Avoth 4:16). "Man was created for the sole purpose of rejoicing in God, and deriving pleasure from the splendor of His Presence… The place where this joy may truly be derived is the World to Come, which was expressly created to provide for it; but the path to the object of our desires is this world..." (Moshe Chaim Luzzatto, Mesillat Yesharim, Ch.1). Free will is thus required by God's justice, "otherwise, Man would not be given or denied good for actions over which he had no control" [14].
It is further understood that in order for Man to have true free choice, he must not only have inner free will, but also an environment in which a choice between obedience and disobedience exists. God thus created the world such that both good and evil can operate freely [15]; this is the meaning of the Rabbinic maxim, "All is in the hands of Heaven except the fear of Heaven" (Talmud, Berachot 33b).
[edit]The paradox of free willIn Rabbinic literature, there is much discussion as to the apparent contradiction between God's omniscience and free will. The representative view is that "Everything is foreseen; yet free will is given" (Rabbi Akiva, Pirkei Avoth 3:15). Based on this understanding, the problem is formally described as a paradox, beyond our understanding.
" The Holy One, Blessed Be He, knows everything that will happen before it has happened. So does He know whether a particular person will be righteous or wicked, or not? If He does know, then it will be impossible for that person not to be righteous. If He knows that he will be righteous but that it is possible for him to be wicked, then He does not know everything that He has created. ...[T]he Holy One, Blessed Be He, does not have any temperaments and is outside such realms, unlike people, whose selves and temperaments are two separate things. God and His temperaments are one, and God's existence is beyond the comprehension of Man… [Thus] we do not have the capabilities to comprehend how the Holy One, Blessed Be He, knows all creations and events. [Nevertheless] know without doubt that people do what they want without the Holy One, Blessed Be He, forcing or decreeing upon them to do so... It has been said because of this that a man is judged according to all his actions. (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Teshuva 5:5 [76]) "
The paradox is explained, but not resolved, by observing that God exists outside of time, and therefore, his knowledge of the future is exactly the same as his knowledge of the past and present. Just as his knowledge of the past does not interfere with man's free will, neither does his knowledge of the future [16]. This distinction, between foreknowledge and predestination, is in fact discussed by Maimonides' critic Abraham ibn Daud; see Hasagat HaRABaD ad loc.
(One analogy here is that of time travel. The time traveller, having returned from the future, knows in advance what x will do, but while he knows what x will do, that knowledge does not cause x to do so: x had free will, even while the time traveller had foreknowledge; see [17]. However, one objection raised against this analogy – and ibn Daud's distinction – is that if x truly has free will, he may choose to act otherwise when the event in question comes to pass, and therefore the time traveller (or God) merely has knowledge of a possible event: even having seen the event, there is no way to know with certainty what x will do; see the view of Gersonides below. Further, the presence of the time traveller, may have had some chaotic effect on x's circumstances and choice, absent when the event comes to pass in the present.)
[edit]Alternate approachesAlthough the above discussion of the paradox represents the majority Rabbinic view, there are several major thinkers who resolve the issue by explicitly excluding human action from divine foreknowledge.
Both Saadia Gaon and Judah ha-Levi hold that "the decisions of man precede God's knowledge" [18]. Gersonides holds that God knows, beforehand, the choices open to each individual, but does not know which choice the individual, in his freedom, will make. Isaiah Horowitz takes the view that God cannot know which moral choices people will make, but that, nevertheless, this does not impair His perfection.
In line with this thinking, the teaching from Pirkei Avoth above, is then to be read as: "Everything is observed (while - and no matter where - it happens), and (since the actor is unaware of being observed) free will is given ".[77]
See further discussion in the article on Gersonides.
[edit]In Kabbalistic thoughtThe existence of free will, and the paradox above (as addressed by either approach), is closely linked to the concept of Tzimtzum. Tzimtzum entails the idea that God "constricted" his infinite essence, to allow for the existence of a "conceptual space" in which a finite, independent world could exist. This "constriction" made free will possible, and hence the potential to earn the World to Come.
Further, according to the first approach, it is understood that the Free-will Omniscience paradox provides a temporal parallel to the paradox inherent within Tzimtzum. In granting free will, God has somehow "constricted" his foreknowledge, to allow for Man's independent action; He thus has foreknowledge and yet free will exists. In the case of Tzimtzum, God has "constricted" his essence to allow for Man's independent existence; He is thus immanent and yet transcendent.
[edit]In Islamic thoughtSee also: Predestination in Islam
Disputes about free will in Islam began with the Mu'tazili vs Hanbali disputes,[78] with the Mu'tazili arguing that humans had "qadar," the capacity to do right or wrong, and thus deserved the reward or punishment they received, whereas Hanbali insisted on God's "jabr," or total power and initiative in managing all events.[79] Later thinkers such as Abu Hanifa and al-Ash'ari searched for ways to explain how both human qadar, and divine jabr could be asserted at the same time. Ash'ari develops a "dual agency" or "acquisition" account of free will in which every human action has two distinct agents. God creates the possibility of a human action with his divine jabr, but then the human follows through and "acquires" the act, making it theirs and taking responsibility for it using their human qadar.[80]
[edit]In HinduismAs Hinduism is primarily a conglomerate of different religious traditions,[81] there is no one accepted view on the concept of free will. Within the predominant schools of Hindu philosophy there are two main opinions. The Advaita (monistic) schools generally believe in a fate-based approach, and the Dvaita (dualistic) schools are proponents for the theory of free will.[82] The different schools' understandings are based upon their conceptions of the nature of the supreme Being (see Brahman, Paramatma and Ishvara) and how the individual soul (atma or jiva) dictates, or is dictated by karma within the illusory existence of maya.
In both Dvaita and Advaita schools, and also in the many other traditions within Hinduism, there is a strong belief in destiny[83] and that both the past and future are known, or viewable, by certain saints or mystics as well as by the supreme being (Ishvara) in traditions where Ishvara is worshipped as an all-knowing being. In the Bhagavad Gita, the Avatar, Krishna says to Arjuna:
I know everything that has happened in the past, all that is happening in the present, and all things that are yet to come. [84]
However, this belief in destiny is not necessarily believed to rule out the existence of free will, as in some cases both free will and destiny are believed to exist simultaneously.[85][86]
The Bhagavad Gita also states:
Nor does the Supreme Lord assume anyone's sinful or pious activities (Bhagavad Gita 5.15)
From wherever the mind wanders due to its flickering and unsteady nature, one must certainly withdraw it and bring it back under the control of the self (Bhagavad Gita 6.26),
indicating that God does not control anyone's will, and that it is possible to control the mind.
[edit]Different approachesThe six orthodox (astika) schools of thought in Hindu philosophy give differing opinions: In the Samkhya, for instance, matter is without any freedom, and soul lacks any ability to control the unfolding of matter. The only real freedom (kaivalya) consists in realizing the ultimate separateness of matter and self. For the Yoga school, only Ishvara is truly free, and its freedom is also distinct from all feelings, thoughts, actions, or wills, and is thus not at all a freedom of will. The metaphysics of the Nyaya and Vaisheshika schools strongly suggest a belief in determinism, but do not seem to make explicit claims about determinism or free will.[87]
A quotation from Swami Vivekananda, a Vedantist, offers a good example of the worry about free will in the Hindu tradition.
Therefore we see at once that there cannot be any such thing as free-will; the very words are a contradiction, because will is what we know, and everything that we know is within our universe, and everything within our universe is moulded by conditions of time, space and causality. ... To acquire freedom we have to get beyond the limitations of this universe; it cannot be found here.[88]
However, Vivekananda's above quote can't be taken as a literal refutation of all free will, as Vivekanda's teacher, Ramakrishna Paramahansa used to teach that man is like a goat tied to a stake - the karmic debts and human nature bind him and the amount of free will he has is analogous to the amount of freedom the rope allows; as one progresses spiritually, the rope becomes longer.
On the other hand, Mimamsa, Vedanta, and the more theistic versions of Hinduism such as Shaivism and Vaishnavism have often emphasized the importance of free will. For example, in the Bhagavad Gita the living beings (jivas) are described as being of a higher nature who have the freedom to exploit the inferior material nature (prakrti):
Besides these, O mighty-armed Arjuna, there is another, superior energy of Mine, which comprises the living entities who are exploiting the resources of this material, inferior nature.[89]
The doctrine of Karma in Hinduism requires both that we pay for our actions in the past, and that our actions in the present be free enough to allow us to deserve the future reward or punishment that we will receive for our present actions. The Advaitin philosopher Chandrashekhara Bharati Swaminah puts it this way:
Fate is past karma, free-will is present karma. Both are really one, that is, karma, though they may differ in the matter of time. There can be no conflict when they are really one. Fate, as I told you, is the resultant of the past exercise of your free-will. By exercising your free-will in the past, you brought on the resultant fate. By exercising your free-will in the present, I want you to wipe out your past record if it hurts you, or to add to it if you find it enjoyable. In any case, whether for acquiring more happiness or for reducing misery, you have to exercise your free-will in the present.[90]
5:04 am
September 4, 2009
I'm glad Jonathan Edwards was given his due here.
It's interesting to note that the arguments proposed by Edwards Luther, Augustine, Aquinas, Whitefield... are as based upon sound logic as any argument proposed by any physicist, law professor, etc. The argument accepts that God is the Creator and accepts the bible as the Word of God. Apart from that, the conclusions on free will, predestination, and fore-ordination simply fall into place using logical deduction.
From above:
In Calvinism, Calvinist Protestants embrace the idea that God chose who would be saved and who would be not saved prior to the creation. They quote Ephesians 1:4 "For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight" and also 2:8 "For it is by grace you are saved, through faith, and this not of yourselves, it is the gift of God." One of the strongest defenders of this theological point of view was the American Puritan preacher and theologian Jonathan Edwards.
Edwards believed that indeterminism was incompatible with individual dependence on God and hence with his sovereignty. He reasoned that if individuals' responses to God's grace are contra-causally free, then their salvation depends partly on them and therefore God's sovereignty is not "absolute and universal." Edward's book Freedom of the Will defends theological determinism. In this book, Edwards attempts to show that libertarianism is incoherent. For example, he argues that by 'self-determination' the libertarian must mean either that one's actions including one's acts of willing are preceded by an act of free will or that one's acts of will lack sufficient causes. The first leads to an infinite regress while the second implies that acts of will happen accidentally and hence can't make someone "better or worse, any more than a tree is better than other trees because it oftener happens to be lit upon by a swan or nightingale; or a rock more vicious than other rocks, because rattlesnakes have happened oftener to crawl over it." [41]
It should not be thought that this view completely denies freedom of choice, however. It claims that man is free to act on his strongest moral impulse and volition, which is externally determined, but is not free to act contrary to them, or to alter them. Proponents, such as John L. Girardeau, have indicated their belief that moral neutrality is impossible; that even if it were possible, and one were equally inclined to contrary options, one could make no choice at all; that if one is inclined, however slightly, toward one option, then that person will necessarily choose that one over any others.
Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man. - Albert Einstein
12:02 pm
August 21, 2009
Never said that they weren't different interpretations, just that yours was a new one on me.
So greeney, in the other thread you suggested that free-will had nothing to do with physical acts, but did have to do with doing good or bad.
So I ask you, once again, how does one commit a good or a bad act without physically doing something?
By the way, you could have just put a link to the wiki article in the other thread, instead of spamming even further.
Was this really necessary?
"All of our behavior can be traced to biological events about which we have no conscious knowledge: this has always suggested that free will is an illusion."
- Sam Harris
12:42 pm
September 4, 2009
If you place any importance on what Jesus said... it requires no physical act to do something bad. Simply meditating on doing something bad is... well... bad.
Even other religions and philosophies believe that putting "energy" or focusing on doing something evil is bad behavior.
But from a purely scientific view, discounting any notion of the power of the mind, etc.; I guess doing something bad would require some kind of physical action.
My opinion anyway.
Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man. - Albert Einstein
1:12 pm
August 21, 2009
If we accept the Christian view I'll accept that one can think good or bad thoughts (have no idea why greeney is unable to say this for himself!), but even still, wouldn't the majority of acts still be physical?
Examples of good physical acts:
* Giving to the poor
* Openly praising Jesus
* Preaching Jesus' word to others
* Going to church
* Reading the Bible
Examples of bad:
* Stealing
* Murder
* Rape
* Lying
* Seeking revenge
It just doesn't make sense to remove the physical acts from the free-will discussion, which is what greeney is attempting to do.
All of this is a bit of a moot point though, because if we accept the Libet experiments as valid, and we have no great reason not to do so, thought itself is beyond our control and is still all in the brain at an unconscious level.
If the brain is unconsciously aware of the thought you are going to have before that thought emerges into your own consciousness, in what way can we be said to have any control over it? And if we have no control over thought, free-will fails regardless of the definition. This is the point I have been trying to make.
For the record, I am not sure this is even a religious issue as such, as certain Bible passages could be used to denote our lack of free-will, and this would have an impact on the pre-destination issue you often discuss, as well as perhaps the biblical view that we are unable to prevent ourselves from sinning. I don't think the Libet experiments are a great challenge to Christianity, and I am not sure why greeney has reacted the way he has to them.
"All of our behavior can be traced to biological events about which we have no conscious knowledge: this has always suggested that free will is an illusion."
- Sam Harris
7:04 pm
April 9, 2009
You do not get it do you Humphreys. Please show all of us where all researchers, all theologians, and all people agree on what free will may be. Why is it so hard to get the concept of free will relating to things NOT PHYSICAL. Show me the concenceous among Libets piers that they were in complete agreement with his study. Your own links tell you it was primitive for its time, controversial in that field, and that many did not agree with his findings.
This link showed you almost every religion you can think of and their idea of free will all differ, and all have nothing to do with physical reflexes or reactions. Its very obvious you did not really read it.
8:04 pm
August 21, 2009
"greeney2" wrote: You do not get it do you Humphreys. Please show all of us where all researchers, all theologians, and all people agree on what free will may be.
I have already responded to this.
"greeney2" wrote: Why is it so hard to get the concept of free will relating to things NOT PHYSICAL.
This has already been addressed.
"greeney2" wrote: Show me the concenceous among Libets piers that they were in complete agreement with his study.
Already addressed.
"greeney2" wrote: Your own links tell you it was primitive for its time, controversial in that field, and that many did not agree with his findings.
The link did not say it was primitive for its time, and of course it's controversial, it's a study that negates free-will, how could it not be?
"greeney2" wrote: This link showed you almost every religion you can think of and their idea of free will all differ, and all have nothing to do with physical reflexes or reactions. Its very obvious you did not really read it.
What is your definition of free-will?
Maybe we can start there?
Or with this:
How does one commit good and bad acts without physically doing something?
Why will you not answer that question?
The Libet experiment negates ALL forms of free-will, greeney, not just physical acts, because it shows that thoughts are predetermined at an unconscious level. There is no getting around that I'm afraid.
"All of our behavior can be traced to biological events about which we have no conscious knowledge: this has always suggested that free will is an illusion."
- Sam Harris
9:00 pm
April 9, 2009
9:01 pm
August 21, 2009
Nice rebuttal.
What is your definition of free-will?
Maybe we can start there?
Or with this:
How does one commit good and bad acts without physically doing something?
Why will you not answer that question?
"All of our behavior can be traced to biological events about which we have no conscious knowledge: this has always suggested that free will is an illusion."
- Sam Harris
11:34 am
August 21, 2009
"greeney2" wrote: Seriously Humphreys, something is wrong with you.
I would love to make this my signature but I can't for the life of me find out where you set that with these new profile layouts.
Any ideas?
"All of our behavior can be traced to biological events about which we have no conscious knowledge: this has always suggested that free will is an illusion."
- Sam Harris
1 Guest(s)


text:
I welcome comments and am curious to hear technical refinements, if necessary.Kind Regards,RJ
How do other cameras pair up with max flash-sync speed?Nikon D70 (1/500), Nikon D700 (1/250), Nikon D4 (1/250), Nikon D600 (1/200)Canon 5D (1/200), Canon 5D Mark III (1/200), Canon 6D (1/180)Older-medium format cameras like Mamiya AFD & Contax 645 (1/125)Hasselblad 500 C/M (1/500), Hasselblad H4D-40 (1/800), PhaseOne IQ series backs w/645DF (1/1600)
The D70 and D70s can reliably sync with strobes as high as 1/4000th thanks to the electronic second curtain.With some strobes it can even do 1/8000th. Their is only loss of strobe power if the strobe is slower than the chosen shutter speed. While this is a 6 MP camera it is the most versatile high speed sync camera with strobes and you are not limited to a small amount of lenses.
Have you wondered how something as simple as a lens design might shape you approach to off-camera lighting? And what if that same lens could shape how light is recorded within a camera? Add to the bonus: this same lens might take what you already have and make it four times more effective?Since there isn't much non-biased information on the web about using leaf shutter lenses, especially in light of high-speed sync, I took my best shot in writing the beginner's guide on my blog this morning.Here's the blog post.I figure, LS lenses are among the most important reasons I chose to jump to MF digital. And if we can bring about a greater awareness for the tool, generate more interest for our chosen medium, I deem that a good thing.I welcome comments and am curious to hear technical refinements, if necessary.Kind Regards,RJ
Fred,your pocket wizards top out at 1/500th of a sec... lovely shot though... however you go it... S


text:
Bullpen coach Juan Nieves says Bobby Jenks can e as good as ever but he has to make some adjustments:
"The league has adjusted to him, so now he has to adjust," Nieves said. "They're swinging early in the count on him because they don't want to get behind.
"He's gonna have to throw some fastballs up there early, bust guys inside, and use the two-seamer. If he's going to throw breaking balls early, they're going to have to be really good breaking balls off the plate or in the dirt."


text:
Noise-free radio in perfect digital quality with extremely robust reception - that's DAB+ digital radio. DAB+ overcomes the regionally limited array of FM stations by offering more than a dozen radio stations broadcast nationwide in optimal digital quality. There are also numerous national and regional broadcasters extending their radio offerings with additional channels. Tedious searching and tuning of radio stations are also things of the past. All you do is select the name of the station you want - TechniSat DAB+ digital radios display a channel list of all the digital radio channels you can receive.
Using the integrated internet radio function, you can effortlessly access thousands of internet radio broadcasters - in addition to the stations you regularly receive. The device is easy to link to the internet via your home network using the integrated network interface. The choice of programmes is constantly increasing and automatically updated, meaning that there will continue to be countless exciting channels to discover from all over the world in the future.
Thanks to the integrated CD player you can listen to your whole CD collection. The CD player supports common audio CDs as well as CD-R and CD-RW. You can also play music from MP3 CDs.
TechniSat CONNECT ist die App, die erstmals die einheitliche Steuerung einer Vielzahl smarter Funktionen aus einer zentralen App heraus ermöglicht. Die App lässt sich dabei mit verschiedenen Anwendungsmodulen individuell auf Ihre Erfordernisse anpassen. CONNECT ist verfügbar für iOS- und Android-Mobilgeräte.
Bluetooth Audio Streaming enables the transmissionof stored music collections wirelessly to the device without any loss in quality. Various mobile devices such as smart phones, tabletts or others can be connection with the product via Bluetooth.
With this device, you can also receive conventional FM radio stations in your reception area, in addition to digital radio stations. The RDS (Radio Data System) also enables you to receive additional broadcast information and alternative extra frequencies for the FM radio broadcaster you are listening to.
DIGITRADIO 370 CD IR, remote control, instruction manual


text:
Thank you for all of your love and support since October 2013. We have decided to officially close the site and won't be doing any more posts.
The site will remain up for those of you who have been featured and would still like to share your work.
A lot of you all have been asking what sparked the decision and we'd like to leave it at.. "It's just time."
We may or may not return. This may or may not be a hiatus.
backseatpolitikz.com [bspz]