text:
Information For Authors
- Manuscript Submission Guidelines
- Author Benefits Program
- Open Access Policy
- NIH/HHMI Wellcome Trust Policies
- Self-Archiving Policy
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Submission Benefits Package
Your submission to Antioxidants & Redox Signaling provides you with robust tools and support to ensure maximum impact and readership for your work. By submitting your manuscript, you'll receive:
- Rapid, rigorous peer-review and editorial attention
- Immediate deposit to PubMed and other indexing services upon online publication
- Exposure to thousands of thought-leaders in your field, maximizing readers, citations, and downloads
- Fast Track online-ahead-of-print publication
- Global availability in over 170 countries
- Open Access publication options
Submitting Your Manuscript
ORCID IDs
All submitting authors are required to complete their submissions using an ORCID identifier. Please visit the ORCID website for more information, or to register.
Submitting your manuscript to Antioxidants & Redox Signaling delivers a comprehensive benefits program that ensures high-quality review of your research and maximum impact for your work. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling carries a manuscript submission charge* of $75.00 USD upon submission of each new manuscript.
Upon payment, you will be provided a Manuscript Submission Code, and will be prompted to enter this information when uploading your files to our peer-review system. Please note: Securing a token does not automatically create an account in our peer-review system. If you do not already have an account, you will be asked to create one before you can begin your submission.
Submissions do not need to be completed at once. Submitting authors/agents may begin the submission process, save their work, and return to the site to complete the upload(s) at a later time. There is no limit on the number of times one can save their work and subsequently resume the submission. Doing so will not incur additional charges.
Invited work such as Forum articles, Comprehensive Invited Reviews, Editorials, Redox Pioneer articles and any other solicited work are not subject to this fee. Authors who have been invited by the Editor-in-Chief to submit a paper can request a waiver by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.com. Upon approval, a one-time exception code will be issued in order to bypass the submission fee.
Keywords (Areas of Expertise)
To facilitate the peer review process, select 4-6 keywords from the drop-down list of pre-selected terms when submitting your manuscript. These keywords will assist in the selection of skilled reviewers in the field for the purposes of peer review.
Click here to submit your paper via our fast and user-friendly electronic submission system.
Manuscript Revisions
Processing charges and submission codes are NOT required for revisions to previously submitted papers. To upload a revision of a paper, the submitting author should log in to their Author Center at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ars and click on "Revised Manuscripts in Draft." The paper will appear in this area, and the submitting author will be able to upload revised files without paying any charges or entering a submission code.
Please be sure to follow the Instructions for Authors below on Manuscript Preparation. Authors whose submissions do not comply with the Instructions for Authors will have their papers un-submitted so that the file(s) may be adjusted accordingly. Directions regarding the necessary corrective actions will be provided in an email to the corresponding author at the time the paper is un-submitted. The submitting author/agent will then be provided the opportunity to re-upload the corrected file(s). If a paper is un-submitted, the paper will reside in the corresponding author's "Author Center" as a draft, and the submitting author/agent will be able to make the necessary adjustments and re-upload the paper without incurring another manuscript processing charge.
*The manuscript processing charge is independent of editorial decision and is non-refundable.
Instructions for Authors
(Please read in full. Revised in August 2016)
Antioxidants & Redox Signaling (ARS) is the top-ranked international, interdisciplinary peer-reviewed publication that encompasses the emerging field of antioxidants and redox biology. The Journal is published 36 times per year and is available in both print and online. ARS is published as two series: ARS-Discoveries (bimonthly) and ARS-Therapeutics (monthly).
ARS welcomes highly innovative original contributions dealing with molecular aspects of reactive species, antioxidants, and other redox-dependent processes in biomedical and related systems. Redox-based therapeutics and impact on health care represents a key focus. The Journal features basic as well as clinical research articles and full length review articles. Original research communications must reflect extraordinary innovation and be extensive in nature. Appropriate videographic supplements are encouraged and viewed as a strength. Such supplements are required for methodological articles.
Page charges for this journal are set at $75.00 USD per typeset page. Nonpayment of page charges may result in a delay in publication. Costs for printing images in color are a separate fee and are not included in the page charge total.
Page charges are waived (color charges still apply) for authors of Forum Articles and for those who contribute a Comprehensive Invited Review.
Online submission: ARS only considers online submissions. Any other form of submission will not be considered. Once a manuscript is successfully submitted, the submitting author should expect to receive an email notification within hours. Only senior authors of a work who take complete scientific as well as financial responsibility of a submission may submit the work. Manuscript cannot be submitted on behalf of the corresponding author by any agent other than the corresponding author's own office.
Cover Letter: The submitting author must accept responsibility for the following:
1. That the submitting author has the written consent from all authors to submit the manuscript and that all authors accept complete responsibility for the contents of the manuscript;
2. That the manuscript is not currently under consideration elsewhere and the work reported will not be submitted for publication elsewhere until a final decision has been made as to its acceptability by the Journal (note that posting of submitted material on a website is considered pre-publication);
3. That the manuscript is truthful original work;
4. That (where applicable) microarray data reporting, gene nomenclature, and research on fetal tissue matter has been done in compliance with Journal guidelines. If this is not applicable, please state so;
5. If the manuscript contains color illustrations, indicate which figures print in color and which print in black & white (see notes below on COLOR REPRODUCTION). Color may not be withdrawn after acceptance of manuscript. If submitted, color must be published at least online.
IMPORTANT: Please upload individual files of all manuscript material—do NOT upload a single PDF file containing all text, figure, and table files of your article. Once all individual files are uploaded on to Manuscript Central, the system will automatically create a single PDF proof for you and the peer-review process.
All accepted manuscripts will be processed through a plagiarism detection software, and any notice of acceptance is considered conditional, pending the review and verification of the plagiarism detection report. If the report detects a high incidence of overlap in text, the Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to rescind the decision to accept the paper.
Initial submission of Forum Review Articles should not be made online unless the designated Forum Editor has a conflict of interest with the authors. Such articles should be submitted by email as PDF files to the designated Forum Editor. If preliminarily accepted by the Forum Editor, please submit the article to ARS using the ARS Manuscript Central Online Submission system. Note that Forum Review Articles that are preliminarily accepted by the Forum Editor will be reviewed for format and deficiencies in format will be subject to additional revision or rejection. Forum Original Research Communications must be directly submitted via the ARS Manuscript Central Online Submission system identifying the Forum Editor.
Authors of Forum articles already reviewed and preliminarily accepted by the respective Forum Editor, are advised to perform the following:
1. During online submission, the submitting author will be specifically asked for the name of a Forum Editor. Please correctly enter the name of the specific Editor of the Forum for which you have written the manuscript.
2. On the title page, above the title, identify the article as FORUM ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION or FORUM REVIEW ARTICLE, whichever is appropriate.
To submit any non-Forum free-standing review article, please contact the ARS Central Editorial Office (email@example.com) in advance.
Peer-Review Process
Format. Manuscripts that are not formatted strictly according to the guidelines described herein or in the guide for Online Submission may be administratively rejected or unsubmitted without any peer review.
Science. ARS can only accept a small fraction of the total manuscripts submitted. Only manuscripts reflecting an exceptionally high level of innovation and thorough in nature will be subjected to full-length review. Others will be triaged following preliminary review of scientific content. Examples of manuscripts that are typically not subjected to full-length review include: (a) in vitro findings that are not validated in vivo, although strikingly extraordinary in vitro findings are exempt; (b) physical and biochemical characterization of an antioxidant without substantive evidence supporting in vivo relevance; (c) manuscripts where relevant data (e.g., microarray, sequences) have not been submitted to a public database; (d) results from the use of pharmacological inhibitors that have not been verified using appropriate genetic approaches; and (e) illustrations lacking appropriate statistical markings and/or self-explanatory legends. Manuscripts selected for full-length review are typically reviewed by a panel (4-6 reviewers for Original Research Communications, and 6-10 for Comprehensive Invited Reviews) of peers to maintain high standards and quality. Such peer review practice is aimed at minimizing bias in the review process. See Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012 Feb 15;16(4):293-6.
Policy & Procedure. All manuscripts sent to reviewers are watermarked as "For Peer Review." All material under review is privileged information. It should not be used to the benefit of the reviewer unless it previously has been made public. It should not be shared with anyone unless necessary to the review process, in which case the names of those with whom the information was shared should be made known in writing to those managing the review process. Material under review should not be copied and retained or used in any manner by the reviewer unless specifically permitted by the Journal or reviewing organization and the author. If there is a violation of the above policy, it should be reported to the Editor-in-Chief in writing including all evidence supporting the claim. The Editor-in-Chief will evaluate the claim and as needed form a committee to review the claim and make recommendations. Retraction: Should there be any reasonable concern about the quality or integrity of published data, the Editor will communicate with the corresponding author and may promptly issue a retraction if the author fails to defend the data to the Editor's satisfaction. This is done rapidly to protect the interest of ARS readership. Typically, the print version of retractions (not Epub ahead of print) address the cause of retraction for public records. In case of concerns related to violation of ethics, ARS will inform the author's institution and may rely on the institution's investigation for a final decision on the case. If authors need to correct or edit data in an accepted manuscript, they may do so by withdrawing the manuscript and entering a new submission. Authors found to be guilty of unethical conduct may be barred from submitting manuscripts to ARS.
Original-Rebound Track. Scientific publication relies on efficient peer review. ARS recognizes that the peer review system is not without flaws. "The worst except all the others that have been tried" – Winston Churchill's quote on the democracy form of government may apply to peer review. To improve the efficiency and power of peer review, when possible, ARS engages a broad panel of reviewers so that an extreme opinion of any single reviewer may be interpreted in light of comments by other experts. To protect author interest and innovative science, ARS relies on the concept of Rebound Peer Review (see Sen CK. Antioxid Redox Signal. 16:293-6, 2012) on where manuscripts that have been rejected following full-length review may come back to ARS based on a credible open peer review process. Here, authors may select experts who they know are best suited to judge the work in question. Eligible manuscripts. Only those full-length Original manuscripts that have been fully Rejected (not Major Revision or Withdrawn) following full-length review. Manuscripts rejected during the preliminary screening process are not eligible. Timeline. Must be submitted within 30 days from the date of rejection. Process. (i) Authors will identify four peer reviewers (for criteria see below) who accept to be named on the manuscript; (ii) Selected open peer reviewers will review the manuscript as well as peer review comments from the previous (anonymous) review cycle submitted to them by the author; (iii) Each open peer reviewer will submit two sections of peer review comments. The first page should contain reviewer name and complete affiliation including email address. Section A (not to exceed 300 words) will address whether the work is complete and represents outstanding significance and innovation recommend "ACCEPT," "REVISE" or "REJECT." Acceptance may not be justified by citing merit of other articles in the journal and must be solely based on quality of science and depth of data; Section B (not to exceed 300 words) will address (itemized; state concern in brief and list your comment) why the concerns raised during the anonymous peer review system are not substantial to justify rejection. Both sections should be supported by references (not counted in word limit). Open reviewers should include a Conflict of Interest disclosure statement; (iv) Author will submit the manuscript that was rejected, with revisions as required by the open reviewers. The top of title page will be marked as "ORIGINAL RESEARCH – REBOUND TRACK." Bottom of the title page should name (in full) the open reviewers as: "Sponsoring Peers: Tina A Das, Jane B Doe, Kay C Lee and Kim D Ho (see Review Comments online);" (v) Comments of all four open reviewers will be included as SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT (one file). If all four open reviewers recommend acceptance, the work is likely to be accepted pending final evaluation of the submission package by ARS Editor-in-Chief. If accepted, all open review comments will be published as Supplementary Text online. This is an experimental track aimed at improving author satisfaction at a time when rejection rate has sharply risen. Selection of open peer reviewers (must meet all 3 criteria): (a) within the last five calendar years must have published as corresponding author at least three original publications (on topics broadly relevant to the manuscript in question) in journals with impact factor equal to or exceeding that of current ARS impact factor; (b) has publication history of at least 10 years or serves on ARS Editorial board; and (c) no conflict of interest with any of the authors of the manuscript in question – never published together – not from the same institution – no shared financial interest.
(Materials & Methods appear after Discussion; Innovation section required)
Type the entire manuscript, including figure legends, tables, and references, double-spaced using Microsoft Word. Leave 1-inch margins on all sides.
Length: Manuscripts should be written succinctly and should cite select references that are directly relevant. NEWS & VIEWS articles should not exceed a total of 2,000 words, excluding a maximum of 9 references and a NOTES section (see specific guidelines for News & Views articles below); ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS should not exceed a total of 6,000 words (between 8–10 illustrations), excluding, Materials & Methods (detailed Methodology and specific catalog number and source of reagents must be included), a maximum of 75 references and figure legends. Brief description of methodology is not acceptable. Methods-related submissions must include a video supplement demonstrating the key steps. REVIEWS should be kept to a maximum of 8,000 (at least 6 illustrations), excluding a maximum of 200 references and figure legends. COMPREHENSIVE INVITED REVIEWS are to be between 15,000–17,000 words (at least 15 illustrations) long, excluding a maximum of 400 references and figure legends. Manuscripts not following these length-related guidelines will be subjected to administrative rejection or unsubmission. Please list word count and reference numbers (excluding references and figure legends) on the Title Page. Supplementary material: Only supportive data and figure legends may be submitted as supplements. For any cropped Western blot band shown in the main body of the manuscript, the entire blot including molecular weight markers must be submitted as Supplement. The figure legend must connect such blot to appropriate panel of the main figure. No Materials & Methods related text may be submitted as Supplement.
Title page: At the top center, specify the type of article (e.g., Original Research Communication, Forum Original Research Communication, Forum Review Article, Comprehensive Invited Review, News & Views, or Editorial). Title page should list title of the article; author(s); department and institution in which the work was done, with city, state, or country, and zip code; an abbreviated title for the running head (not exceeding 50 characters, including spaces between words); name and address of corresponding author, contact telephone, fax number, and e-mail address. Where necessary, identify each author's affiliation by superscript numbers matched to the appropriate institution. Please list word count (excluding references and figure legends), reference numbers and number of greyscale illustrations and number of color illustrations on the Title Page. If color illustrations are for online only, indicate that in parentheses [e.g., Color illustration: 3 (online 1 and hardcopy 2)].
Manuscript keywords (search terms): On the title page of the manuscript, include a minimum of three (3), maximum of six (6), search terms that will aid in the discoverability of the article in indexing services and search engines. These terms may or may not be different from the terms you selected for the peer review process and areas of expertise. You will be asked to retype these search terms in the submission form when uploading your manuscript. These keywords will be included in the published article. If the search terms entered do not match the manuscript, the manuscript will serve as the default.
Second page: Provide an abstract of no more than 250 words. For Original Articles, the Abstract should consist of the following sections: Aims, Results, Innovation and Conclusion. For review articles, the Abstract should consist of the following sections: Significance, Recent Advances, Critical Issues, and Future Directions.
Following pages: The Abstract should be followed by the Introduction, Results, Discussion, Innovation, Materials and Methods, Acknowledgments, List of Abbreviations, References, Tables, and Figure legends. Begin each of these sections on a separate page. The Innovation section, which should appear after Discussion, cannot exceed 100 words and cannot be diffused. In a sentence or two it must summarize the current state of the field and then cite specific results reported to explain how this work helps to substantially advance the field. If the work has clinical significance, please be sure to highlight that. Do not regurgitate findings.
A complete list of abbreviations (covering text as well as illustrations) arranged in alphabetical order must be provided at the end just before the Reference section.
Number pages (bottom-center) consecutively; the first author's last name should appear on each page. The source of cells utilized (species, sex, strain, race, age of donor, whether primary or established) should be clearly indicated. The source of reagents should be stated (name, city, state and catalog number within parentheses) when first cited. Publication of results is based on the principle that results must be verifiable. Authors must accept to make unique reagents available to qualified investigators either directly or through a recognized distributor. The text should be clear and concise, conforming to accepted standards of English style and usage. Unfamiliar or new terms should be defined when first used (see section on Abbreviations, Symbols, and Terminology). Jargon, clichés, and laboratory slang should not be used.
The Journal publishes all accepted papers within 72 hours of acceptance in their unedited, uncorrected format. It is important to note that the information that is published online, and in all indexing services, is pulled directly from the data that is populated into the fields in Manuscript Central – NOT from the manuscript file – when the paper is originally uploaded to the system for peer review. Consequently, any errors contained in the system will remain on our website and all indexing services, including Medline, until the next revision of the article is published. As such, it is critical that authors enter all authors' names correctly into the system at the time of submission.
The next revision will take place after the corresponding author sees page proofs, makes any necessary corrections, and returns the changes to the Publisher. Once the alterations are completed, the revised version will be published on our website, and the newly corrected information will then be released to Medline/PubMed, in addition to any other indexing services in which the Journal is included.
Please note that the typical time between acceptance of a paper and page proof distribution is approximately 4-8 weeks depending on the length and complexity of the paper.
Supplementary Informtion, if supplied, will NOT be published in the Just Accepted/LION platform, but instead will be published in the Online Now (epub) and final versions of the article. Supplemental Information will not be copyedited or typeset; it will be posted online as supplied.)
Author Disclosure Statement
Immediately following the Acknowledgments section, include a section entitled "Author Disclosure Statement." This text must be part of your actual manuscript file.
In this portion of the article, authors must disclose commercial associations that might create a conflict of interest in connection with submitted manuscripts. This statement should include appropriate information for EACH author, thereby representing that competing financial interests of all authors have been appropriately disclosed according to the policy of the Journal. It is important that all conflicts of interest, whether they are actual or potential, be disclosed. This information will remain confidential while the article is being reviewed and will not influence the editorial decision.
Please see the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals at http://www.icmje.org/index.html#conflicts for further guidance. If no conflicts exist, the authors must state "No competing financial interests exist."
Comprehensive Invited Review
If you are an authoritative expert (senior investigator with long standing and extensive publication record) in a field relevant to the Journal and are interested in contributing a Comprehensive Invited Review article on a topic of general interest, please write to the Editor-in-Chief. These articles are intended to be full-length critical appraisals of topics that would be of long-term archival value. Textbook-style coverage is strongly discouraged. Emphasis should be placed on late-breaking advances and critical treatment. ARS dedicates a substantial amount of space to these articles. Page charges are waived. To ensure balanced treatment of any given subject, these articles are typically reviewed by 6–10 experts in that field. These experts are identified in the publication as Reviewing Editors unless they opt against it.
News & Views – Short Outstanding Observations
This track aims at expediting publication of short communications of outstanding significance. It is recommended that authors refer to a sample article. Note that although sample articles may have a larger number of references, current reference number must be limited as specified below. Sample articles may be requested from the Central Editorial Office. NEWS & VIEWS articles should not exceed a total of 2,000 words, excluding a maximum of 9 references (Supplemental Material not allowed), figure legends and a NOTES section to be placed before the Acknowledgments. It must include a section on Innovation (100 words) as required for mainstream articles. This section has a major influence on acceptability. Note that the "MATERIAL AND METHODS" part of these articles is moved to the NOTES. Do not shorten this section. Provide ALL details necessary to reproduce your work, including reagent source, catalog number, etc. Note that these articles are not arranged as the regular Introduction–Results–Innovation–Discussion–Material and Methods pattern. The manuscript is written with focus on certain themes in every paragraph as may be seen from sample articles. The tone of the text should focus on raising new questions in light of the observations made, instead of drawing firm conclusions. Abstracts should be limited to no more than 200 words and avoid experimental details. Last line of the Abstract must propose a hypothesis based on observations reported.
Title: Short title (100 characters) with a question mark at the end is mandatory.
Sample Abstract: "Consumption of alcohol induces protein A in the human brain, which in turn causes specific degeneration of glial cells. We note that protein A is glycated under conditions of diabetes. Such glycation results in a gain of function of protein A, resulting in more extensive glial degeneration in response to alcohol consumption. Our observation leads to the hypothesis that the consumption of alcohol poses increased risk to diabetics compared to matched non-diabetic humans." For general rules, please follow the guidelines given for regular articles.
Redox Pioneers – Introducing our Most Cited to the New Generation and to the Scientific Community outside Redox Biology
Anyone (author) may nominate a scientist (nominee) other than themselves who meets the following criteria: the nominee must be someone who (a) has published, as first/last author, at least one PubMed listed publication directly addressing antioxidant/redox biology that has been cited over 1000 times (per data from ISI, www.isiknowledge.com); (b) has published, as author (any rank), at least 10 publications that have each been cited over 100 times (per ISI data); and (c) has expressed, in writing, her/his willingness to be nominated by the individual for the ARS Redox Pioneer series. Once the above three criteria are met, the author may submit an article to ARS in the "REDOX PIONEER" track. The article must strictly meet the format criteria specified below. For general rules, please follow the guidelines given for regular articles.
Title format: Redox Pioneer: Professor John Smith (articles will appear in PubMed as such).
Page after Title Page: Include a 50-word summary introducing the author and her/his relationship to the nominee.
Abstract (no more than 250 words): Start with "Dr. John Smith (Ph.D. 1966) is recognized here as a Redox Pioneer because he has published at least one article on antioxidant/redox biology as first/last author that has been cited over 1000 times and has published at least 10 articles, each cited over 100 times." Educational/professional training of Dr. Smith, with reference to institutions (55 words); Summary of top scientific contributions of Dr. Smith (100 words); Relevance of findings to human health (50 words).
Main Body of the text (not to exceed 2000 words): Background, development, and training (250 words); Area of interest in redox biology, its significance, and how that interest developed (500 words); Description of key finding 1 (250 words, thoroughly referenced): provide this section with a short title highlighting the finding, then describe the finding and how it helped to move the field forward; Description of key finding 2 (250 words); Description of key finding 3 (250 words); and Other Achievements and Current Position (500 words). A short quotation from the nominee is encouraged in this last section.
Illustrations: The Background section should be supported by a personal photo in black and white (either alone or in a group with family or colleagues); each Key Finding section should be supported with a summary illustration—it could either be a data slide (reproduced with appropriate permission) or a schematic. Figure legends need to be fully explanatory, where the illustration may be understood without reading the main body of text. The section on current position should be supported with a current passport style photo). Photos of the pioneer should not be numbered as figures, but should be labeled as PioneerPhoto1, PioneerPhoto2, etc.
Supplemental illustrations (mandatory for online publication): Provide a tabulation of the articles (cited as is seen in ARS reference lists)—Table 1 will contain all published articles, where the nominee is the first/last author, that have been cited over 1000 times; Table 2 will contain all published articles, where the nominee is an author (any rank), that have been cited over 100 times. List each article and enter citation data and date recorded next to it.
Supplemental information (not for publication, for peer review): Acceptance letter of the nominee; Full-length curriculum vitae of the nominee.
Acknowledgment (not to exceed 250 words): The nominee may use this section to thank everyone who has played a key role in her/his career. "Professor John Smith thanks...."
Peer Review: Each article is subject to peer review by a panel of top experts in the relevant field. Acceptance will be based on such peer review. If accepted, names of reviewers will appear on the article unless a reviewer specifically chooses to be anonymous. The nominee will also be invited to review for fact check.
Cost: If accepted, page charges will be waived for this track. However, the author is responsible for the cost of any color reproduction.
Letters to the Editor(s): Letters to the Editor(s) are welcomed, but with a 500-word limit and no more than (1) table OR figure, and with a maximum of four (4) references.
It is mandatory that all articles using microarray data analysis comply with the Minimum Information About Microarray Experiments (MIAME) standard (www.fged.org).
In accordance with the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC), authors should obtain approval for new human and mouse gene symbols. Additional information on gene nomenclature guidelines is available from the HGNC (http://www.genenames.org).
The Journal endorses the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki and insists that all investigations involving humans be conducted in conformity with these principles. All animal experimentation reported must be conducted in conformity with internationally accepted principles. In describing surgical procedures, the type and dosage of the anesthetic agent should be specified. Curarizing agents are not anesthetics; if these were used, evidence must be provided that anesthesia of suitable grade and duration was employed. All articles involving the use of human fetuses, fetal tissue, embryos, and embryonic cells must adhere to the US Public Law 103–41, effective December 13, 2001. Editors are expected to reject articles in which evidence of the adherence to these principles is not apparent. They reserve the right to judge the appropriateness of the use of animals and humans in experiments. The Editor-in-Chief will adjudicate differences of opinion employing principles consistent with the content posted at: http://ethics.od.nih.gov/.
Include in the manuscript a list of new or special abbreviations used in the article, with the spelled-out form of the definition. Internationally accepted biochemical abbreviations such as ADP, NADH, and pi do not need to be defined; other frequently used abbreviations need only to be defined at first mention. For commonly accepted abbreviations, word usage, symbols, etc., authors are referred to The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers (8th ed., 2014)Chemical and biochemical terms and abbreviations should be in accordance with the recommendations of the IUPAC system. IUB Combined Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. Isotope specification should conform to the IUPAC system.
Authors should follow Webster's Third New International Dictionary for spelling and compounding.
Journal policy is against inclusion of implicit or explicit promises that future work will be published.
Horizontal and vertical lines should not be used in the background of any line or bar graph. It is critically important that dead space within illustrations be kept to a minimum. Single column wide illustrations should not exceed 7.5 cm in width. Use font size that is not too small and clearly legible. For illustrations that must be unavoidably wider, the maximum limit is 15 cm for width. All parts (A, B, C...) of any illustration should be arranged on one page. Figure number or author name should not be printed on the face of the illustration.
Supply figure legends as a separate Word file independent from the main text.
The use of Tables is discouraged. When unavoidable, type each table single-spaced with a brief title on a separate page. The title should be brief and informative. All explanatory matter, including explanation of abbreviations, should be in the footnotes, not in the title. Horizontal and vertical lines should be omitted. Use Arabic numerals to number tables. Do not repeat information that is given in the text, and do not make a table for data that can be given in the text in one or two sentences. Table footnotes should be listed in order of their appearance and identified by standard symbols *, †, ‡, § for four or fewer; for five or more, use consecutive superior letters.
Please follow these guidelines for submitting figures:
1. Do NOT embed art files into a Word or PDF document.
2. Line illustrations should be submitted at 1,200 dpi.
3. Halftones and color should be submitted at a minimum of 300 dpi.
4. Save as either TIFF or EPS files.
5. Color art must be saved as CYMK–not RGB.
6. Black and white art must be submitted as grayscale–not RGB.
7. Do NOT submit PowerPoint, Bitmap, or Excel files.
8. All parts of one illustration must be arranged on the same page with appropriate marking of components (e.g. A, B, C...).
Please name your artwork files with the submitting author's name, i.e., SmithFig1.tif, SmithTable2.tif, etc.
Supplementary Information, if supplied, will NOT be published in the Just Accepted/LION platform, but instead will be published in the Online Now (epub) and final versions of the article. Supplemental Information will not be copyedited or typeset; it will be posted online as supplied.)
Additional Information about Art Files
Converting Word or Excel files: Perhaps the best and easiest way to convert Word or Excel files into a format that is suitable for print is to scan them using the below guidelines:
1. All files should be scanned at 100% size.
2. 300 dpi
3. Final color mode: cmyk.
4. Save file as .tif or .eps.
If you need directions on how to convert a PowerPoint slide to an acceptable format, go to https://home.liebertpub.com/MEDIA/pdf/ppconvert.pdf
Submit high-quality digital copies using the ARS Manuscript Central Online submission system. If hardcopies are required for production, authors of accepted manuscripts will be notified by the production office.
Figure legends should describe experimental conditions and spell out all abbreviations used. Electrocardiograms, kymograms, and oscillograms should be prepared so that the cross-hatched background is eliminated. To avoid problems in processing, use non-photo, blue-ruled instead of black-ruled, recording paper for the originals.
All authors submitting color illustrations, including those who have been invited to contribute, must cover the cost of color reproduction. There are two tiers of color publication: Print and online OR online only. Costs are based on the number of figures and pages in a typeset article. Please contact firstname.lastname@example.com for estimates, and for options on discounted services.
In figures legends of images that are only available in color in the online version of the journal, the following line should be added at the end: "To see this illustration in color, the reader is referred to the online version of this article at www.liebertpub.com/ars"
Note: Any submission that goes through the peer review process with color figures MUST publish in color, using either of the two options noted above. Non-payment of color publication after acceptance will result in withdrawal of the acceptance.
Authors are responsible for the accuracy of citations. References must be limited to directly pertinent published works or articles that have been accepted for publication. An abstract properly identified (Abstract) may be cited only when it is the sole source. Submitted articles can be cited in the text as "unpublished observations" and should not be included in the reference list. References should be double-spaced (do not single-space any line), arranged alphabetically by author, and numbered serially. The reference number should be placed in parentheses at the proper point in the text. Example: Oxidants serve as cellular messengers (1–3). The style of citation should be as follows, with the journal name abbreviated as in Medline. Journal articles. Example: 1. Moldovan L, Irani K, Moldovan NI, Finkel T, and Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ. The actin cytoskeleton reorganization induced by Rac1 requires the production of superoxide. Antioxid Redox Signal 1: 29–43, 1999. Book References. Author(s), title of book (main words capitalized), city of publication, publisher, year, and pages. Example: 2. Sen CK, Sies H, and Baeuerle PA. (Eds). Antioxidant and Redox Regulation of Genes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000, p. 562. Book Section References. Example: 3. Masutani H, Ueno M, Ueda S, and Yodoi J. Role of thioredoxin and redox regulation in oxidative stress response and signaling. In: Antioxidant and Redox Regulation of Genes, edited by Sen CK, Sies H, and Baeuerle PA. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000, pp. 298–310. Internet Citation for World Wide Web Home Page. Author/editor (if known). Revision or copyright date, if available. Title of page (publication medium). Page publisher. URL (Protocol:Site/Path/File). Access date. References to government technical documents should be included only when the corresponding author ensures their availability. For style of citation of these documents, congress proceedings, chapters in books, etc., consult recent issues of the Journal. Citations such as "unpublished observations" or "personal communication" should not be included in the reference list but may be added in parentheses in the text. It is assumed that in "personal communications," the author has secured the written permission of the person cited.
The corresponding authors must accept full responsibility to return corrected galley proof within 48 hours of receipt. Only corrections directly related to errors in typesetting will be allowed. Other changes will have to be approved by the Editor and are subject to being charged. If the corresponding author does not respond within 48 hours of receipt of the galley proof, the manuscript may be dropped from publication schedule or published as is at the discretion of the publisher. If the corresponding author expects to be out of the office during the time the galley proof is expected, the publisher should be provided with an alternate contact.
The author must obtain permission whenever it is required in conjunction with the reproduction of material such as figures and tables from copyrighted material. Written permission must be obtained from the publisher of the journal or book concerned. The publication from which the figure or table is taken must be listed in the reference list. A footnote to a reprinted table or to the legend of a reprinted figure should read, "Reprinted by permission from Jones et al.," and list the appropriate reference. All permissions listings must be shown in the manuscript—they cannot be entered on proofs.
Any fees or charges that are levied by other Publishers or copyright holders are the sole responsibility of the submitting authors(s).
Reprints may be ordered by following the special instructions that will accompany page proofs, and should be ordered at the time the corresponding author returns the corrected page proofs to the Publisher. Reprints ordered after an issue is printed will be charged at a substantially higher rate.
ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING is published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 140 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle, NY 10801–5215. Telephone: (914) 740-2100; fax: (914) 740-2101. www.liebertpub.com
Ensure maximum visibility, discoverability, and impact for your article with our Liebert Open Access (OA) option
Does your research funder have an open access mandate or would you like to expand the dissemination of your research?
The Liebert Open Access option enables authors to publish open access in our esteemed subscription-based journals.
The benefits of Liebert Open Access include:
- High visibility; open access articles are freely available online upon publication
- You retain copyright with the open access license allowing broad dissemination of your research
- You can freely share your article in repositories and research networks without restrictions
- Easy compliance with open access mandates
- Rigorous editorial and peer-review
- Targeted email announcement featuring a direct link to article
Identification and Marketing
Open access articles are listed with an OA icon in journal tables of content (TOC), TOC alerts, and in marketing announcements. Open access articles are highlighted and promoted in targeted email announcements to thousands of research leaders in your field.
Copyright and Licensing
If you choose to publish with open access, you will retain copyright of your article and a Creative Commons license will be applied. The liberal Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) license is the default open access license used at Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. The CC-BY license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
At this time we allow authors to choose between the CC-BY or CC-BY-NonCommercial license. A limited number of journals offer NonCommercial licenses exclusively.
Ordering Open Access
Once your article has been accepted for publication in a journal, you will receive an email with information on ordering Liebert Open Access. If you would like more information about Liebert Open Access or would like to order open access, please email email@example.com.
Publishing open access includes an article publication charge (APC) and authors are asked to fill out a short open access order form. You can pay by credit card or receive an invoice to be returned with payment or via bank transfer. Please remember that traditional subscription journals can carry mandatory or optional author fees. The Liebert Open Access APC does not cover or replace existing publication or author fees.
Publishing biomedical or biotechnology research?
Biomedical researchers should consider publishing in BioResearch Open Access, a fully open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing top research in the biomedical and biotechnology fields. For details, please visit the information for authors on the journal website.
*Please note that PubMedCentral, not the Publisher, has sole control over when the paper is made live on PMC.
Browse journals in the Liebert Open Access portfolio:
NIH Public Access Policy: In order to assist our authors who have NIH funding to comply with this policy, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. publishers will deposit the final accepted paper (after copy-editing and proofreading) to PubMed Central (PMC) on behalf of the authors. Authors need not take any action. The manuscript's public access posting on PMC will occur 12 months after final publication. This service is provided free of charge. Please note that authors may not deposit manuscripts directly to PMC or other sites without permission from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Publishing in Subscription Journals
By signing the copyright transfer statement, authors still retain a set of rights that allow for self-archiving.
Authors may archive their preprint manuscripts (version prior to peer review) at any time without restrictions. Authors may archive their postprint manuscripts (accepted version after peer review) in institutional repositories, preprint servers, and research networks after a 12 month embargo. The 12 month embargo period begins when the article is published online. Postprints must not be used for commercial purposes and acknowledgement must be given to the final publication, and publisher, by inserting the DOI number of the article in the following sentence: "Final publication is available from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]". Authors may archive on their personal website without an embargo provided their manuscript is updated with an acknowledgement to the publisher copyright and final published version.
The final published article (version of record) can never be archived in a repository, preprint server, or research network.
Publishing Open Access
Authors that wish to easily comply with funder or institutional open access mandates should consider publishing open access. Liebert Open Access option allows authors to make their research freely available online without restrictions. Additionally, Liebert Open Access option allows authors to retain copyright, archive and share the final published version of their article without restrictions. To publish open access please email email@example.com or visit Liebert Open Access for more information.


text:
The Perseids meteor shower lasts several weeks each summer and is most visible this week, on the nights of August 11-13. Edge on Science has a blog post about the best ways to view the event. Framingham State University held an AstroNights Live video session last Friday about the event, and you can view a recording of it here: Prepare for the Perseids.
Sign up for Email Newsletter(Not more often than weekly)
Follow us on Twitter
Contact NewtonSTEMEmail: firstname.lastname@example.com
Phone: 1-781-462-1786
Useful Links
- BU School of Medicine City Lab & Summer Lab
- Day Dragons FLL Team
- Girls Who Code – Newton
- Governor's STEM Advisory Council
- Innovation Lab
- Inquiry First (MassSciFair blog)
- iRobot SPARK Program
- Khan Academy – free video tutorials
- Ligerbots
- Mass Math + Science Initiative
- Mass. Science Olympiad
- Mass. State Science & Engineering Fair
- National Math + Science Initiative
- New England FIRST Robotics
- NNHS Greengineers
- NNHS Science Team
- Optics4kids.org
- Quirkles
- Science from Scientists
- STEM Ed (RSS feed)
- STEM Education Institute at UMass
- [Bayer] Making Science Make Sense
Website Admin

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Iran leader: Having nuclear weapons "a sin"
TEHRAN, Iran - Iran's top leader insisted on Wednesday that his country is not seeking nuclear weapons, saying that holding such arms is a sin as well as "useless, harmful and dangerous"
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei spoke after meetings with Iranian nuclear scientists and officials. He did not mention a visit this week to Iran by the U.N. nuclear watchdog.
The International Atomic Energy Agency team left Tehran on Tuesday without finding any way forward in attempts to persuade Iran to talk about suspected secret work on atomic arms.Iran outlines conditions for EU oil exports
UN nuke watchdog again denied access in Iran
Iran: Pre-emptive strike against enemies possible
The West accuses Iran of using its civilian nuclear program as a cover to develop nuclear weapons. Iran denies the charges, saying its program is peaceful and geared toward generating electricity and producing radioisotopes to treat cancer patients.
In remarks broadcast on state TV, Khamenei said atomic weapons don't bring power but that Iran's achievements in nuclear technology; including proficiency in the nuclear fuel cycle from extracting uranium ore to producing nuclear fuel; have brought dignity and pride to the nation.
Khamenei, who has final say on all state matter in Iran, also said that Western powers know "we are not seeking nuclear weapons because the Islamic Republic of Iran considers possession of nuclear weapons a sin ... and believes that holding such weapons is useless, harmful and dangerous."
"The Islamic Republic of Iran wants to prove to the world that possessing nuclear weapons does not bring power and that might doesn't come from atomic weapons. Might based on nuclear weapons can be defeated and the Iranian nation will do this," he said.


text:
No time. Only pictures.
Luis listens to Megan's baby.
I made a million cookies, and piping icing is hard. (But I win, because they're still cute.)
Ken is 51.
I spent a ridiculous amount of time with a peeler and made this tart. I thought I was crazy then Meg said "Oh Mum, I love pretty food!" and then it was all worth it.
Jen (knitter, cyclist, student midwife) brought her fetoscope. Best baby shower favour ever.
This picture is okay, but it's not as good as the one I should have taken, which was 2 minutes later, when the baby moved, and Pato pretty much fell off a chair.
We are excited. I am knitting.


text:
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
A Break = Hair Bows
32 comments:
I have done bows with ribbond before but never with felt. they look great!ReplyDelete
love them!ReplyDelete
randomness: i'm new to your blog. i love these bows. i love that you took a day off to make hair accessories with your (beautiful, by the way) little girls. i love that you're going to get a break (all moms need 'em). i love your furniture creations and now suddenly want a pink piece of furniture in my home. or green. or blue. i'm mad you live in Arizona. 1. because of the weather. 2. because i want to buy the furnitire you make-over. 3. because i kinda think i wanna be your friend. ;) i only have a little boy so it looks like i'll be making hair bows for myself. who ever said a 26 year old wife and mom can't wear a bow in her hair? not me. not you. so, there. :)ReplyDelete
A day well spent, for sure! The bows are beautiful! I love the navy and white ribbon... and thanks for the tip to taper the felt strips!ReplyDelete
- Andrea
The bows are gorgegous. I love the striped ones. Now I just need a daughter :)ReplyDelete
So Cute! I'm over From Lolly Jane~http://runwithglitter.blogspot.com/ReplyDelete
You're a good Mom! Just wait till the empty nest, that's a killer. It's been three years and I'm still struggling. However, I look back at the good I did with my kids and fill fulfilled.ReplyDelete
Sounds like a good day well spent! I think those bows would make really cute bracelets, too!ReplyDelete
these are super cute and easy to make thanks for sharingReplyDelete
nicely done!ReplyDelete
Nope you aren't the only one that didn't know about the taper -- I didn't either. Now I will be adding bow making to my list of things to do!ReplyDelete
- Kayci BugApril 20, 2011
Furniture & hair bows? Cute!! Visiting from Lolly Jane :) KayciReplyDelete
Thanks for the tutorial. Come and join our link party: http://fabricbowsandmore.blogspot.com/ReplyDelete
Stopping by from Lolly Jane- cute bows! Love the transformations on your furniture! :-)ReplyDelete
What gorgeous little bows! So clever : )ReplyDelete
Michelle's Style File
What a simple little trick for the bows! THANK YOU! I'm a new follower visiting from Lolly Jane!ReplyDelete
Love! Can't wait to find a little girl to make some for ( we have a little boy, and nephews!)ReplyDelete
Would love for you to share at Calling All Crafters, today!
Wish I had known--can't wait to make some that turn out pretty! Thanks!!ReplyDelete
Great tips!! I am visiting from TT&J and I am a new follower!ReplyDelete
Hope you have a great weekend!
p.s. I am having a giveaway at my blog this weekend for a bib necklace and zipper rosette flower! I would love if you checked it out!
So cute! I am featuring you on my blog tonight {redberrybarn.blogspot.com}. You are so talented! Love your style!ReplyDelete
Have a delightful day!
This comment has been removed by the author.ReplyDelete
Hi, friend! I'm admiring all your creative posts here so can you please share them with us at the Creative Bloggers' Party & Hop? Hope to see you there at the party :)ReplyDelete
Darling! I'm featuring you tomorrow at naptimecrafters.blogspot.comReplyDelete
Thanks for sharing the tutorial!! The ribbons one you made are adorable!ReplyDelete
My mom used to make this for me when I was little! So in love with you blog and your work!!ReplyDelete
Marisa Frade
Very pretty! I never thought to make hair bows out of felt like that - so adorable!!!ReplyDelete
Thanks for this great tutorial! I've had it pinned on my pinterest board for a while, and finally got around to making my bows tonight. I am using them to go with Snow White and Alice in Wonderland tutu dresses. They turned out perfectly! Thank you again!ReplyDelete
I don't see patterns for all the felt pieces. Are there pattern pieces &/or a tutorial for the striped bows?ReplyDelete
Super cute! I love the tute!ReplyDelete
Love the felt bows, especially for the winter! The striped bows are so sophisticated. I'm gonna make mine soon!ReplyDelete
Love the felt bows, especially for the winter! The striped bows are so sophisticated. I'm gonna make mine soon!ReplyDelete
Thanks for sharing the tutorial!Hospitality furnitureReplyDelete


text:
Frequent Links
Remote procedure call
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2009)
In computer science, a remote procedure call (RPC) is an inter-process communication that allows a computer program to cause a subroutine or procedure to execute in another address space (commonly on another computer on a shared network) without the programmer explicitly coding the details for this remote interaction.[1] That is, the programmer writes essentially the same code whether the subroutine is local to the executing program, or remote. When the software in question uses object-oriented principles, RPC is called remote invocation or remote method invocation (RMI).
Many different (often incompatible) technologies have been used to implement the concept.
History and origins
The idea of treating network operations as remote procedure calls goes back at least to the 1980s in early ARPANET documents.[2] Bruce Jay Nelson is generally credited with coining the term.[3][4][5] One of the first business uses of RPC was by Xerox under the name "Courier" in 1981. The first popular implementation of RPC on Unix was Sun's RPC (now called ONC RPC), used as the basis for Network File System.
Message passing
An RPC is initiated by the client, which sends a request message to a known remote server to execute a specified procedure with supplied parameters. The remote server sends a response to the client, and the application continues its process. While the server is processing the call, the client is blocked (it waits until the server has finished processing before resuming execution), unless the client sends an asynchronous request to the server, such as an XHTTP call. There are many variations and subtleties in various implementations, resulting in a variety of different (incompatible) RPC protocols.
An important difference between remote procedure calls and local calls is that remote calls can fail because of unpredictable network problems. Also, callers generally must deal with such failures without knowing whether the remote procedure was actually invoked. Idempotent procedures (those that have no additional effects if called more than once) are easily handled, but enough difficulties remain that code to call remote procedures is often confined to carefully written low-level subsystems.
Sequence of events during an RPC
- The client calls the client stub. The call is a local procedure call, with parameters pushed on to the stack in the normal way.
- The client stub packs the parameters into a message and makes a system call to send the message. Packing the parameters is called marshalling.
- The client's local operating system sends the message from the client machine to the server machine.
- The local operating system on the server machine passes the incoming packets to the server stub.
- The server stub unpacks the parameters from the message. Unpacking the parameters is called unmarshalling.
- Finally, the server stub calls the server procedure. The reply traces the same steps in the reverse direction.
Standard contact mechanisms
To let different clients access servers, a number of standardized RPC systems have been created. Most of these use an interface description language (IDL) to let various platforms call the RPC. The IDL files can then be used to generate code to interface between the client and server
Other RPC analogues
|This section needs additional citations for verification. (December 2013)
The RPC paradigm was invented by Sun Microsystems with their implementation, now known as the Open Network Computing Remote Procedure Call. Other RPC analogues and implementations can now be found elsewhere:
- D-Bus open source IPC program provides similar function to CORBA.
- Java's Java Remote Method Invocation (Java RMI) API provides similar functionality to standard Unix RPC methods.
- SORCER provides the API and exertion-oriented language (EOL) for a federated method invocation
- Modula-3's network objects, which were the basis for Java's RMI[6]
- XML-RPC is an RPC protocol that uses XML to encode its calls and HTTP as a transport mechanism.
- JSON-RPC is an RPC protocol that uses JSON-encoded messages
- JSON-WSP is an RPC protocol that uses JSON-encoded messages
- SOAP is a successor of XML-RPC and also uses XML to encode its HTTP-based calls.
- RPyC implements RPC mechanisms in Python, with support for asynchronous calls.
- Spyne defines primitives for doing RPC in Python. It also contains implementations of some of the most popular protocols and transports.[7]
- Pyro object-oriented form of RPC for Python.
- ZeroC's Internet Communications Engine (Ice) distributed computing platform.
- Etch framework for building network services.
- Apache Thrift protocol and framework.
- BERT-RPC is an RPC protocol in use by Github [8][9]
- CORBA provides remote procedure invocation through an intermediate layer called the object request broker.
- Distributed Ruby (DRb) allows Ruby programs to communicate with each other on the same machine or over a network. DRb uses remote method invocation (RMI) to pass commands and data between processes.
- Action Message Format (AMF) allows Adobe Flex applications to communicate with back-ends or other applications that support AMF.
- Libevent provides a framework for creating RPC servers and clients.[10]
- Windows Communication Foundation is an application programming interface in the .NET framework for building connected, service-oriented applications.
- Microsoft .NET Remoting offers RPC facilities for distributed systems implemented on the Windows platform. It has been superseded by WCF.
- The Microsoft DCOM uses MSRPC which is based on DCE/RPC
- The Open Software Foundation DCE/RPC Distributed Computing Environment (also implemented by Microsoft).
- Google Protocol Buffers (protobufs) package includes an interface definition language used for its RPC protocols.[11]
- Google Web Toolkit uses an asynchronous RPC to communicate to the server service.[12]
- Apache Avro provides RPC where client and server exchange schemas in the connection handshake and code generation is not required.
- Spike-Engine provides cross platform RPC facilities for .NET framework, web and mobile architectures with auto-generated stubs.
- Twitter Finagle is a network stack for the JVM that you can use to build asynchronous Remote Procedure Call (RPC) clients and servers in Java, Scala, or any JVM-hosted language.
- SAP Remote Function Call (RFC) is the standard SAP interface for communication between SAP systems. RFC calls a function to be executed in a remote system.
See also
- JSON-RPC the "JSON encoded" RPC variant.
- XML-RPC the "XML encoded" RPC variant.
- Microsoft RPC
- Local Procedure Call
- Remote function call
- Remote evaluation
- External Data Representation
- ROA (Resource-oriented architecture)
- Distributed object middleware
- ^ Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H.; Arpaci-Dusseau, Andrea C. (2014), Introduction to Distributed Systems (PDF), Arpaci-Dusseau Books
- ^ Anand M. White (December 23, 1975). "A High-Level Framework for Network-Based Resource Sharing". RFC 707. Augmentation Research Center. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
- ^ "1994 – Andrew Birrell, Bruce Nelson: Remote Procedure Call". Software System Award citation. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
- ^ "SIGOPS Hall of Fame Award". Special Interest Group on Operating Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
- ^ Bruce Jay Nelson (May 1981). Remote Procedure Call. PARC CSL-81-9 (Also CMU-CS-81-119) (Xerox Palo Alto Research Center). PhD thesis.
- ^ The A-Z of Programming Languages: Modula-3 - a-z of programming languages. Computerworld. Retrieved on 2013-07-17.
- ^ "Spyne". Spyne Website. Retrieved Feb 1, 2013.
- ^ "Introducing bert and bert rpc". Github blog. Retrieved July 17, 2012.
- ^ "How we made github fast". Github blog. Retrieved July 17, 2012.
- ^ libevent: Main Page. Monkey.org. Retrieved on 2013-07-17.
- ^ "Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format". Google project website. Retrieved November 1, 2011.
- ^ "Google Web Toolkit". Google project website. Retrieved November 1, 2011.
External links
- RFC 1057 - Specifies version 1 of ONC RPC
- RFC 5531 - Specifies version 2 of ONC RPC
- Remote Procedure Calls (RPC) — A tutorial on ONC RPC by Dr Dave Marshall of Cardiff University
- Introduction to RPC Programming — A developer's introduction to RPC and XDR, from SGI IRIX documentation.


text:
Reunion Weekend
April 12, 2014 • 8:00 AM • See description
Main Content
On April 11-13, 2014, we will welcome back graduating classes ending in 4 or 9, the Half Century Club (any alum who graduated more than 50 years ago), and our 2013 graduates for a full weekend of activities. Learn more at https://law.duke.edu/alumni/reunion/. For more information, please contact Carol Lilley at email@example.com.


text:
RESTON, VA – The American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance (AAHPERD) will keep its name.
The AAHPERD Board of Governors approved a name change to the American Alliance for Health and Physical Activity at its meeting last September, but during the AAHPERD Alliance Assembly in March in Baltimore, delegates defeated the motion for the name change (106 votes for, 129 votes against). Any change in the organization's name requires a two-thirds vote from the Assembly.
"The intention of the Board of Governors' action was to have a more inclusive name for our alliance," Judy Young, vice president for programs for AAHPERD, said before the March vote. "There's not really any change in what we're going to be doing in our organization."
AAHPERD has had its current name since 1978.
In other news, Monica Mize was voted as the 2007-2008 president-elect of AAHPERD. Mize served the past two years as Southwest District governor. She is a professor in the department of health promotion and human performance at Weber State University in Ogden, UT.


text: In "Glengarry Glen Ross" Alec Baldwin "motivates" sales representatives by offering a car, a set of steak knives -- and getting fired -- as performance incentives. Thankfully sales managers today have better tools. With its on-demand sales performance and incentive compensation management applications, Callidus seeks to do for sales compensation management what Saleforce.com has done for CRM. The applications help businesses manage incentive payments to employees, distributors, brokers and -- yes -- channel partners, to help align those incentives with corporate goals.


text:
Do you have a modified controller or layout that makes it possible for you to play your favourite game? If so, please share the details with us here and it may aid someone else whom is in a similar position and looking for a solution
Use this control to limit the display of topics to those newer than the specified time frame.
Allows you to choose the data by which the topic list will be sorted.
Order topics in...
Note: when sorting by date, 'descending order' will show the newest results first.
Forum Rules


text:
The day after Colin's birthday, most of us in the house started passing around a case of the yuckies. Some had this, and some had that....and it was over a week before we were all feeling back to normal! As soon as we were, though, it was time for the rest of Colin's birthday celebration!
Ethan and Cameron each wrapped their present to Colin, purchased with their very own money. My family and I are the janitors of our church, so for several months now, the boys have each been earning a couple of dollars a week helping us clean. It has been a wonderful learning process, showing them how far (and how not-so-far!) a dollar goes.
We love you Col! Happy 8th birthday!


text:
OROVILLE >> Four people were arrested today when an illegal marijuana grow southeast of Oroville was raided by the Butte County Sheriff's Office Special Enforcement Unit and the Butte Interagency Narcotics Task Force.
A search warrant was served at a location in the 4600 block of Oro-Bangor Highway, and a large outdoor marijuana garden with 206 marijuana plants was found.
Four people were detained, and deputies determined the suspects were using Proposition 215 to disguise the illegal grow, according to a press release from the Sheriff's Office.
There were two wells on the property, but they weren't apparently enough to support the plants, as a nearby creek had been tapped. It was dammed, widened and deepened and lined with black plastic. A submersible pump was found there that piped water to the cultivation site.
There were also several illegal structures on the property, according to the Sheriff's Office.
Two suspects, Tomas Thao, 50, and Chao Vang, 54, both of Oroville, were arrested for felony charges of marijuana cultivation and armed in the commission of a felony. Der Vang, 53, and Kha Thao, 48, also both of Oroville were arrested for felony charges of marijuana cultivation.
Butte County Code Enforcement is investigating the illegal structures and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife is investigating the environmental damage to the creek.


text:
Hey Josh, I think you have something in your eye.
Hello kids. I have decided to open up the comments section to a good old fashioned Caption Contest. It's like making fun of retards, without the guilt and feelings of supremacy.
Please join us in the comments section and show why MYFO readers are the most funny, perverse and "special" (in a good way) people on these here internets. So go ahead and let us know what would be the most fitting caption for the above photo. Winner gets their choice of any MYFO product from our store on Zazzle. Most imporantly, be the third person in the world to don MYFO gear! (Other than me and LeNoc's grandma – that cooky lady)
Submissions will be accepted through Friday, October 10th.
Be nice. Although, we encourage you to make jokes along the lines of "buk-hockey?", any acceptable attempt at humor will become the intellectual property of MYFO and we will use it accordingly and make millions of dollars off of it while you sit there eating Smack Ramen. Sucks to be you.


text:
Odissea mission facts
ISS taxi flight (5S) including Belgian ESA astronaut Frank De Winne. Test flight of new Soyuz TMA. During the nine day stay on board ISS, Frank De Winne worked on a substantial programme of 23 scientific experiments including four physical science experiments for which De Winne made use of the newly installed Microgravity Science Glovebox (MSG) which was designed and developed by Europe.
30 October 2002. 08:11 Baikonur time (03:11 UT)
Launch site:
Baikonur, Kazakhstan
1 November 2002, 11:01 Baikonur time (05:01 UT)
10 November 2002, 02:44 Baikonur time (9 November, 21:44 UT)
10 November 2002, 06:04 Baikonur time (01:04 UT)
Landing site:
Kazakh Steppe, near town of Arkalyk
Launch vehicle:
Soyuz TMA-1
Return vehicle:
Soyuz TM-34
Commander Sergei Zaletin
Flight Engineer Frank De Winne
Flight Engineer Yuri Lonchakov
Back-up Flight Engineer Aleksandr Lazutkin


text:
COLLEGE PARK, MD. – Maryland will play its first game of the season against a ranked opponent on Saturday when it travels to face interstate rival West Virginia, which is ranked No. 8 in this week's Associated Press poll. The Terps (2-1) and Mountaineers (2-0) have played 48 times in the all-time series which dates back to 1919, the most games Maryland has played against any non-conference opponent. West Virginia has had the upper hand as of late, winning six straight in the series including a 37-31 victory in College Park last season. Prior to that, Maryland had won four in a row.
• Despite surrendering just 223 yards of total offense to Connecticut last Saturday, the Terps suffered a hard-fought, 24-21 loss to the Huskies. After trailing 14-0 in the second quarter, Maryland battled back to get within three points when freshman wide receiver Stefon Diggs caught a 29-yard touchdown pass from freshman quarterback Perry Hills with 14:07 left in the fourth quarter, making it 17-14 Connecticut. The Huskies, however, answered with a 10-play, 76-yard touchdown drive to go up 24-14. Hills helped get the Terps back within striking distance on a 10-yard touchdown run with 4:39 remaining, but after the Maryland defense forced a three-and-out to get the ball back with 3:29 left, the offense was unable to tie or score the go-ahead points.
• Still, the Terps have shown improvement from week-to-week with a team that has already played 12 true freshmen, the ninth most in the Football Bowl Subdivision, and lists 14 total in its two-deep depth chart (excluding return men). Maryland played 12 true freshmen in the season opener against William & Mary, the most for a Maryland team in at least 15 years (see note page 3), and seven players made their first career starts in the season opener. In week two, Hills received ACC Rookie of the Week honors after going 11 for 21 for 190 yards, two touchdown passes and a touchdown run in a 36-27 win over Temple. Against Connecticut, freshman running back Wes Brown shined against what came in as the top-ranked rushing defense nationally. The Huskies had allowed just 77 rushing yards total through their first two games – and Brown nearly matched that on his own. He had 74 yards on 14 carries, a 5.3 average, including a 19-yard touchdown run in the second quarter. On the season, Brown has a team-high 124 rushing yards and is averaging 5.9 yards per carry.
• The defense has led the way for a young but talented Maryland team on its way to a 2-1 record through the first three games of the season. The Terps have been very tough against the run with an experienced front seven highlighted by senior defensive linemen Joe Vellano and A.J. Francis, and senior linebacker Demetrius Hartsfield. Those three have played a big role in holding opponents to an average of just 2.58 yards per rush, which ranks 14th nationally. It's also been a disruptive defense – Maryland's 2.67 sacks per game are tied for 27th in the FBS and its seven tackles for loss per game are tied for 32nd. The Terrapin defense ranks sixth nationally against the pass (124.3 yards per game) and 28th against the run (103 yards per game). Overall, the Terps are allowing just 227.3 yards per game, which ranks eighth nationally.
• Maryland has also had a knack for forcing timely turnovers in the first three games. In the closing moments of the 7-6 win over William & Mary in week one, cornerback Jeremiah Johnson forced a fumble on a sack that Hartsfield recovered to seal the game. In week two vs. Temple, the defense forced fumbles on the Owls' first two possessions of the game and Hartsfield again helped seal the win by intercepting a tipped pass with 2:05 remaining to preserve the 36-27 victory. In week three against Connecticut, Darin Drakeford forced a fumble on the Huskies opening drive that Maryland recovered. The Terps have forced six total turnovers so far, which is tied for the second most in the ACC.
Quick Hitters
• Maryland's defense has allowed just 682 total yards to opponents through three games (William & Mary – 229, Temple – 230, Connecticut – 223). That marks its best defensive performance in a three-game span since 2004, when it held The Citadel (137), West Virginia (156) and Eastern Michigan (275) to a total of 568.
• Maryland won its first two games despite committing more turnovers than its opponent in each contest. In the loss to Connecticut, though, the Terps turned it over twice and the Huskies only had one giveaway. All 10 of the Terrapins turnovers (four interceptions, six fumbles) have come from freshmen.
• The Terps have done a good job controlling the clock. In three games, Maryland has had the ball for an average of 30:30 to 29:30 for the opponent. That's a major upgrade compared to 2011, when Maryland averaged just 25:16 a game to 34:44 for the opponent.
• Seven players made their first career starts in the season opener against William & Mary: quarterback Perry Hills, running back Albert Reid, safety Sean Davis, defensive back Jeremiah Johnson, linebacker Cole Farrand, nose tackle Darius Kilgoand offensive lineman Nick Klemm.
• In addition to the seven first-time starters, 14 players saw their first action against William & Mary. And of the 44 players that saw time against the Tribe, 25 of them were underclassmen.
• Maryland has 14 true freshmen listed on its two-deep (excluding return men), which is the fourth most in the FBS (Colorado – 16, Texas – 15, TCU – 15).
• The Terps are holding opponents to 2.58 yards per carry, which ranks 14th nationally. Of the opponents' 120 rushing attempts this season, 81 have been for three yards or less (28 of 41 vs. William & Mary; 28 of 39 vs. Temple; 25 of 40 vs. Connecticut).
• Demetrius Hartsfield leads the team with 26 tackles and has had a hand in three turnovers, also a team high (one interception, two fumble recoveries).
• Head coach Randy Edsall handed out game balls for the win over Temple. Sal Conaboy got the game ball for offense,Demetrius Hartsfield for defense and A.J. Francis for special teams.
• Maryland was hit hard by injuries in the preseason. Thirteen players missed the season opener due to various injuries and ailments, and 14 were out against Temple. Seven of those were potential starters on offense and defense: defensive linemanAndre Monroe; defensive backs A.J. Hendy and Matt Robinson; linebacker Kenneth Tate; quarterback C.J. Brown; running back Brandon Ross; offensive lineman Josh Cary. Place-kicker Nick Ferrara also missed the first two three. Both Monroe and Brown are out for the season. Robinson and Cary both made their returns against Connecticut.
• Perry Hills became the first true freshman starter at quarterback for Maryland since Latrez Harrison in 1999. He also became the first freshman to start a season opener since redshirt freshman Calvin McCall on Sept. 2, 1999, in a 6-0 win over Temple.
• Maryland had 15 seniors on the 2011 roster, but just 12 of those players were listed on the two-deep at some point during the year. There are 17 seniors listed on the 2012 roster, and 12 are on the two-deep.
• Three Terps ended 2011 ranked among the top 12 in the ACC in tackles. Hartsfield was second at 12.0 per game and Franklin was sixth at 8.8. Vellano was 12th with 7.8 per contest.
• There are just two returning starters (Bennett Fulper and Justin Gilbert) on Maryland's offensive line, but six players entered the season with starting experience. De'Onte Arnett, Josh Cary, Sal Conaboy and Peter White have also started on the O-line.
• Nine bowl teams from last year appear on Maryland's 2012 schedule: Temple (Gildan New Mexico Bowl), West Virginia (Discover Orange Bowl), Wake Forest (Franklin American Mortgage Music City), Virginia (Chick-fil-A Bowl), NC State (Belk Bowl), Georgia Tech (Hyundai Sun Bowl), Clemson (Discover Orange Bowl), Florida State (Champs Sports Bowl) and UNC (AdvoCare V100 Independence Bowl).
Maryland-West Virginia Series History
• Maryland and West Virginia have met a total of 48 times since the first meeting between the schools in 1919. The Mountaineers own a 25-21-2 lead in the all-time series. West Virginia has taken six straight from Maryland after the Terps had won the four meetings prior to that. The Terps defeated the Mountaineers 41-7 in the 2003 Toyota Gator Bowl in the only postseason meeting between the two schools.
• Last season, a comeback bid by Maryland fell short as West Virginia won 37-31 in College Park. Kevin Dorsey had nine catches for 79 yards and a touchdown, and Matt Furstenburg had seven catches for 70 yards. Mountaineer QB Geno Smith went 36 of 48 for 388 yards and a touchdown.
• Maryland has played West Virginia more than any other non-conference opponent, and the Terps have only faced six schools more than the Mountaineers.
• The Terps and Mountaineers met every season from 1980 to 2007. The teams took two years off (2008-09) in the series, but are scheduled to meet every year until at least 2017.
• 2013 – @ Maryland
• 2014 – @ Maryland
• 2015 – @ West Virginia
• 2016 – @ West Virginia
• 2017 – @ Maryland
• Maryland is 3-10 all-time against ranked West Virginia teams. The Terrapins last win over a ranked Mountaineer squad came in the 2003 Toyota Gator Bowl, when the 23rd-ranked Terps toppoled the 20th-ranked Mountaineers, 41-7.
• Maryland is 11-12-1 at home and 9-13-1 on the road in the series. The lone neutral site game was the 2003 Toyota Gator Bowl.


text:
From Lamaze International
Despite best evidence, health care providers continue to perform routine procedures during labor and birth that often are unnecessary and can have harmful results for mothers and babies.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) most recent release of birth statistics reveals that the rate of Cesarean surgery, for example, is on the rise to 31.1 percent of all births — 50 percent greater than data from 1996. This information comes on the heels of The Milbank Report's Evidence-Based Maternity Care, which confirms that beneficial, evidence-based maternity care practices are underused in the U.S. health care system.
What the Research Says
Research indicates that routinely used procedures — such as continuous electronic fetal monitoring, labor induction for low-risk women, and Cesarean surgery — have not improved health outcomes for women and, in fact, can cause harm. In contrast, care practices that support a healthy labor and birth are unavailable to or underused with the majority of women in the United States.
Suggested Labor and Delivery Practices
Beneficial care practices outlined by Evidence-Based Maternity Care, a report produced by a collaboration of Childbirth Connection, the Reforming States Group, and the Milbank Memorial Fund, could have a positive impact on the quality of maternity care if widely implemented throughout the United States. Suggested practices include to:
- Let labor begin on its own.
- Walk, move around, and change positions throughout labor.
- Bring a loved one, friend, or doula to support you.
- Avoid interventions that are not medically necessary.
- Choose the most comfortable position to give birth and follow your body's urges to push.
- Keep your baby with you — it's best for you, your baby and breastfeeding.
"Lamaze is alarmed by the current rate of Cesarean surgery, and furthermore, by the overall poor adherence to the beneficial practices outlined above in much of the maternity care systems in the United States," said Pam Spry, president of Lamaze International, www.lamaze.org. "We are continuing to work to provide women and care providers with evidence-based information to improve the quality of care."
Lamaze International has developed six care practice papers that are supported by research studies and represent "gold-standard" maternity care. When adopted, these care practices have a profound effect –instilling confidence in the mother, and facilitating a natural process that results in an active, healthy baby. Each one of the Lamaze care practices is cited in the Evidence-Based Maternity Care report as being underused in the U.S. maternity care system.
A Need for Balance
"As with any drug, we need to be sure that women and their babies receive the right dose of medical interventions. In the United States we are giving too high a dose of Cesarean sections and other medical interventions, which are causing harm to women and their babies. Yet, there are many countries where life-saving medical interventions are under dosed, which can also cause harm," said Debra Bingham, chair of the Lamaze International Institute for Normal Birth. "Every woman and her baby needs and deserves the right dose of medical interventions during childbirth."
The research is clear, when medically necessary, interventions, such as Cesarean surgery, can be life-saving procedures for both mother and baby, and worth the risks involved. However, in recent years, the rate of Cesarean surgeries cause more risks than benefits for mothers and babies.
The Danger of Cesarean Sections
Cesarean surgery is a major abdominal surgery, and carries both short-term risks, such as blood loss, clotting, infection and severe pain, and poses future risks, such as infertility and complications during future pregnancies such as percreta and accreta, which can lead to excessive bleeding, bladder injury, a hysterectomy, and maternal death.
Cesarean surgery also increases harm to babies including women giving birth prior to full brain development, breathing problems, surgical injury and difficulties with breastfeeding.
About Lamaze International
Since its founding in 1960, Lamaze International has worked to promote, support and protect normal birth through education and advocacy through the dedicated efforts of professional childbirth educators, providers and parents. An international organization with regional, state and area networks, its members and volunteer leaders include childbirth educators, nurses, midwives, doulas, lactation consultants, physicians, students and consumers. For more information about Lamaze International and the Lamaze Institute for Normal Birth, visit www.lamaze.org.


text:
Skip to main content
Primary links
English Department
Cook, Ashley
DeCoste, Kim
Horne, Natalie - English Department Head
McMullen, Ryan
French & Arts Department
Comeau, Amy Jo
Comeau, Trevor - French Dept Head
Gilbert, Louis
Gouthro, Donnie
Martin, Adrienne
Matheson, Debbie
Sherry, Craig
Mathematics Department
Densmore, Kari
Ells, Darlene - Math Department Head
Juurlink, Lexi
Kennedy, Patti
Myers, Shannon
Young, Sally
van de Riet, Emily
Science, Phys. Ed., Tech. Department
Boutilier, Abby
Cameron, Ashley
Carruthers, Chris
Forster, Kyle
Forster, Leah - Science Department Head
Goswell, Joel
Young, Sarah
deVries, Rachel
Social Studies/Skilled Trade/CEP Department
Casavechia, Craig (Chef)
Chase, Stephen
Foley, Gary
Hayward-Isaac, Sasha
Isenor, Trudi - Soc. St. Department Head
Stockdale, Chris
Tibbitts, Christa
Wilson, Ian
Student Services/Program Support
Cutler, Jill (Gr. 9 Resource)
Cyr, Kyla (Gr. 11 Resource)
Dean-Moore, Stephanie (Guidance 10 & 12)
Londa Farrell - Student Services/Program Support Department Head
MacKinnon, Theresa (Grade 10 Resource)
Robinson, Rachael (Learning Center)
Shiers, Shawna (Guidance 9 &11)
White, MaryAnne (Learning Center)
vonKintzel, Heather (Resource 12)
Documents/ Forms
School Calendar
Athletics Calendar
Student Services
Attendance Policy
Course Selection
New Student Registration
Local Bursaries / Scholarships
Miscellaneous Bursaries / Scholarships
Student Loans
Student Council
Our School
Bell Schedule
HERH Audio Visual Room
SAC (School Advisory Council)
Skilled Trades
Gilbert, Louis
Email -
Design by Adaptivethemes.com


text:
Are you in the United States?
Visit our U.S.A. & International site for relevant pricing, distribution and product availability information.Go to StarTech.com
10 Port L2 Managed Gigabit Ethernet Switch with 2 Open SFP Slots - Rack Mountable
Scale your network and connect up to 10 different Gigabit Ethernet devices, including 8x RJ45 + 2x fiber optic connections using the SFPs of your choice
Product ID: IES101002SFP
- 8x RJ45 ports + 2 fiber SFP slots, merged into a convenient Gigabit network switch
- Compliant with most SFP modules, for broad compatibility and flexibility
- Layer 2 management capabilities, for improved network control, efficiency, and stability
- Optional 19" rackmount brackets
- Web-based GUI and command-line management
- Supports IGMP
- Up to 9.6K Jumbo Frame support
- Support for link aggregation, VLAN tagging, spanning tree protocol, port-based network access control
- Compatible with 10/100/1000 Mbps networks, and compliant with IEEE 802.3, 802.3u, 802.3ab, 802.3z
- Compliant with IEEE 802.3az Energy-Efficient Ethernet, and 802.3x flow control for full duplex, and back-pressure for half-duplex operation
The IES101002SFP 10-port Ethernet switch delivers flexibility and control of your network by letting you connect a combination of RJ45 and fiber Ethernet devices. Plus, with Layer 2 management capabilities you can customize your settings to achieve optimal network performance, offering improved efficiency and reliability over typical Layer 1 and unmanaged network switches.
This versatile switch adapts to your network fiber connection and distance needs to offer flexible configuration via 2 open SFP slots, and you can choose your preferred GbE SFP transceiver as required. Plus, you can integrate fiber devices and cables into your network infrastructure, which can help to eliminate bandwidth, latency, and electronic interference issues.
To avoid the nuisance and added costs of different and additional switch types, this clever switch also offers 8 RJ45 Ethernet ports, giving you two effective interfaces for connecting both fiber and copper connections to just a single network device.
The scalable switch offers Layer 2 management capabilities, which lets you control packet traffic on a busy network, and in turn provides enhanced efficiency and stability of networked applications. For even more flexibility and control, the IES101002SFP offers essential features such as support for jumbo frames, link aggregation, VLAN tagging, and web or console-based command lines, as well as rackmount installation brackets.
This reliable metal switch is backed by a StarTech.com 2-year warranty and free lifetime technical support.
- Connect both copper and fiber Ethernet devices to just a single switch
- Interconnect a fiber device to a copper device and use the SFP ports to daisy chain multiple switches together
- Use fiber optic cable to connect to your network from remote areas, at greater distances than copper cable would permit
- Ideal for secure setups, fiber connections provide reduced electronic interference in complex network infrastructures
- Install in a server rack or cabinet in a network room or test lab environment
- Easily expand the number of ports on your existing network, perfect for small or medium business environments
The StarTech.com Advantage
- Advanced network flexibility, with support for copper and fiber connections as well as layer 2 management capabilities
- Adapt to your network configuration using the SFP fiber transceiver module of your choice, through 2 open SFP slots
- Adaptable installation options perfect for server and network rooms, with provided rackmount brackets
Product Numbers
Ingram Austria
UPC Code
Technical Specifications
|Warranty Information
|2 Years
|Industry Standards
|IEEE 802.3 10BASE-T, IEEE 802.3u 100BASE-TX, IEEE 802.3ab 1000BASE-T
|IEEE 802.3z 1000Base-SX/LX
|IEEE 802.3az Energy-Efficient Ethernet, IEEE 802.3x Flow Control, IEEE 802.1q VLAN Tagging, IEEE 802.1p QoS, IEEE 802.1x Port-Based Network Access Control, IEEE802.3ad Link Aggregation, IEEE 802.1d Spanning Tree Protocol, IEEE 802.1w Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol
|RJ45 (Gigabit Ethernet)
|Fiber Ethernet
|Auto MDIX
|Buffer Size
|Compatible Networks
|10/100/1000 Mbps
|Flow Control
|Half-duplex back-pressure, IEEE 802.3x full-duplex
|Full Duplex Support
|Jumbo Frame Support
|9.6K max.
|Maximum Data Transfer Rate
|2000 Mbps (2 Gbps) - Full-Duplex
|Supported Protocols
|IEEE 802.3ad Port Trunk with LACP, IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree Protocol, IEEE 802.1w Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol, IEEE 802.1s Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol, IEEE 802.1p Class of Service, RFC 3810 MLD version 2, RFC 792 ICMP, RFC 2068 HTTP, RFC 1112 IGMP version 1, RFC 2236 IGMP version 2, RFC 3376 IGMP version 3, RFC 2710 MLD version 1, IEEE 802.1Q VLAN Tagging, IEEE 802.1x Port Authentication Network Control, bIEEE 802.1ab LLDP, RFC 768 UDP, RFC 793 TFTP, RFC 791 IP
|Switching Architecture
|Connector Type(s)
|8 - RJ-45 Female
|2 - SFP Slot Female
|1 - RJ-45 Console Female
|OS Compatibility
|OS Independent; No additional drivers or software required
|Special Notes / Requirements
|Fiber data transfer speeds and distances are dependent on the SFP used (sold separately)
|LED Indicators
|10 - Link / Activity
|1 - Power
|1 - System
|Input Current
|Input Voltage
|Power Consumption (In Watts)
|Power Source
|AC Adapter Included
|10~90% RH (Non-Condensing)
|Operating Temperature
|0°C to 40°C (32°F to 104°F)
|Storage Temperature
|-20°C to 90°C (-4°F to 194°F)
|Physical Characteristics
|Product Height
|4.4 cm [1.7 in]
|Product Length
|26.3 cm [10.4 in]
|Product Width
|16 cm [6.3 in]
|Weight of Product
|1.1 kg [2.4 lb]
|Packaging Information
|Package Height
|67 mm [2.6 in]
|Package Length
|46.5 cm [18.3 in]
|Package Width
|20.9 cm [8.2 in]
|Shipping (Package) Weight
|2.2 kg [4.9 lb]
|What's in the Box
|Included in Package
|1 - 10 Port Gigabit Ethernet Switch w/ 2 Open SFP Slots
|2 - Mounting Brackets (1 set)
|3 - Power Cords (NA/UK/EU)
|1 - Instruction Manual (CD)
|1 - Quick Start Guide
Related Products
5 Port Unmanaged Industrial Gigabit Ethernet Switch - DIN Rail / Wall-Mountable
Network up to 5 Ethernet devices through a rugged, industrial Gigabit Ethernet switch - DIN / Wall Mountable
6 Port Unmanaged Industrial Gigabit Ethernet Switch w/ 4 PoE+ Ports and Voltage Regulation - DIN Rail / Wall-Mountable
Connect Gigabit Ethernet data and power to 4 PoE-enabled devices, with 2 additional GbE ports and redundant power input
8 Port Unmanaged Industrial Gigabit Power over Ethernet Switch - 802.3af/at PoE+ Switch - Wall Mountable
Connect power and Gigabit Ethernet data to 8 PoE-enabled devices, with 30W per-port output - Wall Mountable
Cisco GLC-LH-SM Compatible SFP Module - 1000BASE-LX/LH - - 1GE Gigabit Ethernet SFP - LC 20km - 1310nm - Cisco IE3400, IE3300, IE3200
1000 Mbps (1 Gbps) | Single & Multi Mode Fiber | LC | 10 km (6.2 mi) | Lifetime Warranty
Cisco GLC-SX-MM Compatible SFP Module - 1000BASE-SX - 1GbE Multimode Fiber MMF Optic Transceiver - 1GE Gigabit Ethernet SFP - LC 550m - 850nm - Cisco IE3400, IE3300, IE3200
1000 Mbps (1 Gbps) | Multi Mode Fiber | LC | 550 m (1804 ft) | Lifetime Warranty
Cisco SFP-GE-S Compatible SFP Module - 1000BASE-SX - 1GbE Multimode Fiber MMF Optic Transceiver - 1GE Gigabit Ethernet SFP - LC 2km - 850nm - DDM Cisco IE3400, IE3300, IE3200
1000 Mbps (1 Gbps) | Multi Mode Fiber | LC | 550 m (1804 ft) | Lifetime Warranty
Cisco GLC-LH-SMD Compatible SFP Module - 1000BASE-LH - 1GbE Single Mode Fiber SMF Optic Transceiver - 1GE Gigabit Ethernet SFP - LC 20km - 1310nm - DDM Cisco Firepower, IE2000, IE4000
1000 Mbps (1 Gbps) | Single Mode Fiber | LC | 20 km (12.4 mi) | Lifetime Warranty
6 ft RJ45 to DB9 Cisco Console Management Router Cable - M/F
Connect your computer's serial port to the RJ45 console port on your Cisco router
1-Port Serial-to-IP Ethernet Device Server - RS232 - DIN Rail Mountable
A cost-effective way to connect, configure, and manage a remote RS-232 serial device over an IP network
Product Support
Frequently Asked Questions
This device's default static IP address is 192.168.2.1.
To perform a factory reset, hold down the Reset button for 10 to 15 seconds. This will cause the system to reboot and reset all settings. The System LED will go out briefly and then start flashing once the reset has occurred.
- Make sure that the IES101002SFP is on the same network as your computer.
- In an Internet browser, enter the IP address of the unit. The default IP address is 192.168.2.1.
- In the user name field, enter the user name. The default user name is admin.
Compliance and Safety
Compliance Letters
Safety Measures
- If product has an exposed circuit board, do not touch the product under power.
- If Class 1 Laser Product. Laser radiation is present when the system is open.
- Wiring terminations should not be made with the product and/or electric lines under power.
- Product installation and/or mounting should be completed by a certified professional as per the local safety and building code guidelines.
- Cables (including power and charging cables) should be placed and routed to avoid creating electric, tripping or safety hazards.
* Product appearance and specifications are subject to change without notice.