text:
Monday, February 04, 2008
The Enchanted Talking Tea Kettle
That's the kind of day I had. I didn't stick any kettles in my ears though.
What do you think it's saying?
And how did she know to listen in?
14 comments:
- Linda Davick said...
I think it's saying: "You've had enough of me. Time to get out the liquor bottle soldier."
- Feb 4, 2008, 10:05:00 PM
- Jesse said...
Grumble mumble.. yell into a stethascope ..
- Feb 5, 2008, 12:13:00 AM
I hope it's not a tornado siren! 70 degrees and rain here in Feb. does not bode well....
- Feb 5, 2008, 7:05:00 AM
Time to call Dr. Oliver Sachs. He wrote "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat". He'd probably know what to do with a woman who mistook her kettle for a phone.
- Feb 5, 2008, 7:52:00 AM
- Namowal (Jennifer Bourne) said...
I think it's gossiping about the toaster myself.
You may already know this:
The Linking Ring is a publication of the International Brotherhood of Magicians (I think that's what it's called), so I bet the talking kettle was a magic act.
- Feb 5, 2008, 10:32:00 AM
- Sally said...
Funny folks around here!
Namowal, how did you know about that? It IS part of a magic act, from a catalog of paraphernalia. In order not to correct the animation I'm doing (which is too hard!) I colored in the picture.
Then I started wondering how it worked. Do you suppose there's a tiny record player inside? And that the boiling water causes the turntable to spin, and thus the record plays and voices come out? (This was from long before mini tape recorders.)
Or is there a tiny ventrilloquist inside. yes, that must be it.
- Feb 5, 2008, 10:51:00 AM
Yes to tiny ventrilloquist. (I can remember thinking there were little people who lived inside the TV.)
- Feb 5, 2008, 12:37:00 PM
Photo reminds me of a favorite landmark: Boston's steaming tea kettle:
- Feb 5, 2008, 2:26:00 PM
- Namowal (Jennifer Bourne) said...
Years ago I took some magic classes. I was never very good at the magic, but it was great fun to watch tricks and then to learn how they're done.
Not sure how the kettle worked.
I googled "talking tea kettle" and found a page that claimed it had a radio inside that broadcast answers from an assistant in another room:
(Personally I think a ventriloquist act with a kettle would be more charming.)
- Feb 5, 2008, 3:00:00 PM
- Sally said...
That steaming tea kettle in Boston is really nice. Never seen that before.
I still like my science project tiny record turned by steam... but it would always say the same thing.
- Feb 5, 2008, 5:44:00 PM
She's trying to clear her sinuses, but she's confused. One of those people who can't read directions, she has to be shown.
- Feb 6, 2008, 8:37:00 AM
Our county was spared the tornadoes, but at least 24 people died in storms in our state yesterday.
- Feb 6, 2008, 12:34:00 PM
- Sally said...
sal, very glad to hear you're safe. it was amazing and awful to learn about the tornadoes after what you'd posted here yesterday.
- Feb 6, 2008, 3:05:00 PM
- Nathaniel Crim said...
- This comment has been removed by the author.
- Sep 4, 2019, 11:31:00 PM


text:
I think you've raised some excellent points here and one can't help but wonder if it would not be more beneficial for future generations if we all learned to get by with the cards we've been dealt. What if we learned from this recession, the lessons that won't be received from the bail-out - such as how to become both self-reliant and community-driven, by relying on one another, sharing what we have, and using the best of our innovative and creative minds to create new sources of income and social support?
The Economic Stimulus Bill: Will The Heavy Debt Be Worth It?
In recent weeks, I've gotten into some great discussions with people about the stimulus bill that was cobbled together by Congress last week. At one point, one of the proposed versions of the package grew to a staggering $900 billion until it was wrestled back to a relatively trimmer $800 billion. I suppose we should thank our wonderful leaders that they were somehow able to spare us the additional debt.
A lot of people are still preoccupied about where their stimulus check is, but let's look at the big picture for the moment. Now that the stimulus package details have been released, I've found many people weighing in on both sides of the debate: is the plan justified?
The Hotly Debated Economic Stimulus Bill
Some of the arguments and concerns I've read have been swirling around these points:
- We need to spend for the short term. Spending is expected to take us out of the hole we're in. Many students of Keynesian economics and past history will vouch for the effectivity of this approach.
- We'll be in deep debt as a nation for many generations. We are sacrificing our future and our children's future to speed up the economy's recovery. Many personal finance enthusiasts maintain this concern, as many of us are debt averse.
- We need to define "stimulus". What kind of spending should this bill contain? There seems to be spending provisions here that should be part of a different kind of budget (e.g. could some of these proposals turn into "pork")? Many students of politics know that this bill can be a magnet for determined lobbyists who can spin a tale of "stimulus" into any cause they drum up.
How Effective Is This Stimulus Plan?
The hefty economic stimulus package is jampacked with provisions that try to please everyone. According to this CNN report, the big "winners" (whose piece of the stimulus pie grew larger by the final version) were in the areas of transportation, health and science whose allocations were in the multi-billions. As for us regular people, we'll be awaiting tax cuts to the tune of $400 per individual or $800 per family.
Issues With The Tax Cuts
Do you wonder whether this bill will be effective enough to resuscitate our crippled economy? Will there even be enough consumer spending done at all? Tax breaks and tax deductions are nice, but the question remains whether the general population will actually be putting that extra money to good use. Here are just a couple of scenarios that can potentially deflate the consumer spending goals of this stimulus plan. What if:
- We spend the stimulus money on the wrong things. Apparently, the first wave of stimulus checks didn't really achieve its desired effect. The spending was misplaced, with reports surfacing that consumers where using the money on imports. So let's see how that works: we borrow money from foreign interests, from which we get funding for our economic stimulus checks. Then we turn around and spend the bucks on things manufactured abroad. A vicious cycle if I ever saw one.
- We bank our tax credits. What if people collectively take a step towards self-preservation, and decide instead, to keep and save the money they receive from the government? Then any economic stimulation won't be coming from the consumers and those tax cuts will be for naught.
Issues With Government Spending
Well, we can at least expect that there's going to be some serious guaranteed government-funded spending. We can count on the majority of the package that's dedicated to national spending to hopefully get us out of the doldrums. Just please don't let the rumors be true that multi-millions will be going to green golf carts for government officials or to save the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse (a noble cause for a different budget).
Our debt load has ballooned to an astonishing 1.5 trillion in just a year if you add up Bush's bailous and TARP funds to Obama's bill. Maybe we should enjoy our tax cuts now while we can, because we'll be paying the financial piper for a good long while.
Disclaimer: The links and mentions on this site may be affiliate links. But they do not affect the actual opinions and recommendations of the authors.
Wise Bread is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
"what if" is a question too late to ask, I'm afraid. The deed is done - God help us and our children.
No, we need to help ourselves.. there is nothing apocalyptic in this situation. The USA and other countries have run much higher debt (as a % of GDP) in the past and things have improved over time. We need to be positive and use the tools that are before us. We need to build society up & not tear it down. We need to learn from our mistakes.
I am less concerned with the spending portion of the bill, although it seems too small to make the difference that everyone touts, than the tax breaks that were shoved in. Both parties repeated the mantra that this bill had to be "targeted and temporary," but Republicans in the senate (my sneator Collins among them) shoehorned in a fix for the AMT, which is predicted, by economists including GWB's chief advisor, to return 22 cents on the dollar. The plan to help laid off workers maintain their health coverage, meanwhile, was cut from a 75% assist to 60%. The same economists gave that a return of $1.25 on the dollar, and it is inherently targeted (to those who would otherwise lose health coverage) and temporary (it sunsets in 2 years). While I think the AMT gets far too many people of relatively modest income, I can't understand how it was pushed into a stimulus bill.
I also find it incredible that, with so much talk of bipartisanship, less than 2% of Republicans voted for this bill in any form, even after many of their proposals were put in. At some point, the Repubs need to realize that they lost, massively, and pure obstructionism won't help get them back to power or help the country recover from an economic emergency that they are almost universally blamed for. Publicly cheerleading for the stimulus plan to fail, which at least 3 did, seems like the first step in organizing a circular firing squad for the party. I'm not a fan of the Repubs and give them a fair majority of the blame, but I don't look forward to their complete destruction as a national party, which seems the inevitable result of these tactics. Without any positive agenda, I fear that's where they're heading, and an effectively single-party system isn't good for anyone, the country as a whole, or the Democrats. (Think I'm exaggerating? There are no House members from New England at all, and the Repub senator from Maine ran her last campaign on the theme "She can work with the Democrats.")
This bill, like the previous "stimulus" bill, will do little to help our economy. I equate it to putting a bandage on a burst artery: the U.S. will bleed to death unless she goes in for major surgery! Unemployment benefits for people who QUIT their part-time jobs? These kinds of welfare programs will inspire others to sit on their seats and be unproductive because of the notion that "the government will take care of me" has been ingrained long past the days of FDR. Don't worry, though, Mr. and Mrs. John Q. Taxpayer continue to struggle for the good of others who won't think of repaying into the system.
Further proof: read "The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression" by Amity Shlaes
I see an expansion of government with this bill, making it impossible for the average citizen to get a voice in. This country was based on an idea that the people would have a say and that we ELECT REPRESENTATIVES to hold our best interests at heart (Remember "created by the people, for the people"?). Putting the country in debt, ruining our monetary system, and instilling socialist fundamentals is not the America I want to live in. And no, I won't accept the notion of others who say: "If you don't like it, get out!" I say, "If you like being told what you can and cannot do/say/feel, move to a country where you don't have any personal freedom. Don't bring it into mine!"
Unfortunately, we the people haven't had representation in the government for a long time. Instead we our "representatives" using our tax dollars like their own personal credit card, with no real thought on how this money is supposed to be paid back. Amazing that the same people who fly the flag of "It's for the Children" would sacrifice future generations' Pursuit of Happiness by burdening them with insurmountable debt.
I may not have a college degree from Harvard, but I do understand that in order to succeed in life, you must live below your means, work hard, pass on values and principles to your children, and never stop paying attention to the world around you.
Be wary of government figures claiming ROI > WACC.
(ROI = return on investment, and WACC = weighted average cost of capital)
Claims that government spending is going to magically return $1.25 per $1 "invested" is ridiculous. GDP is an absurd measure for gauging prosperity, particularly when its compoments are so far out of whack. Government spending is part of GDP, as is consumer spending-the two comprise the bulk of the metric-so artificially boosting both through debt and printing money boosts GDP but leaves the country poorer in the long run. This is why we are facing the current calmnity. Similiar policies have been pervasive for decades.
It feels great to borrow and spend, or worse, to create money out of thin air and spend it. But as everyone on this site knows, such "prosperity" is short lived. Future lifestyle suffers exactly by the cost of the debt. Worse is what happens when the Federal Reserve finances Treasury shortfalls with printing-they debase the dollar and erode the real value of savings. What kind of perverse society punishes savers? That's exactly what America has been doing for decades and why we are now suffering.
Finally, if government spending produced such great "returns" we might as well nationalize everything and behave as did the Soviets, Nazis, and other Communists around the world. The truth is that government spending is never as efficient as spurring growth as private.
I find it interesting that anyone is expecting Obama to be their economic savior. Particularly when he was one of the people who wanted that first round of checks that did nothing to go out. It was Edwards and Clinton who said we needed to spend on infrastructure(and wooweee weren't they right). Second, I'm not quite sure how funding ACORN(you know the group who got caught paying people to register Mickey, Minnie and Donald) and the salt marsh mouse is going to stimulate the economy. Finally, it was less than a decade ago people were insistent that a GOP congress and a GOP president meant the demise of the democratic party. How'd that work out? I suspect the pendulum will start swinging back as soon as Americans start to realize they've been had and the Democrats can't and won't deliver because at the end of the day they are just as beholden to special interests as the GOP(and if you think they aren't you aren't following the money and haven't been paying attention to legislation).
With due respect, ACORN didn't 'get caught' trying to register Mickey & Minnie as voters. They took registration forms filled out by canvassers they hired and flagged those (and others) as probably fraudulent. The state requires that all registration forms filled out be turned in and they complied with the law. The (Republican) Secretary of State praised their effort to separate out questionable forms. They are, besides their advocacy role, very good at helping people work out a way to avoid foreclosure and, on a wider field, to help people get into a first home. The money they get will likely produce better results, with less cost, than a Federal agency doing the same thing. As for funding Marsh Mouse research, it will produce some jobs and is a worthwhile effort, though I personally wouldn't have included it in a stimulus bill. It is more likely to produce results than giving a financial company the same amount of money to pay for a spa day. Of course, after the bank bailout fiasco, this bill faces a significantly lowered bar to be better.
I think this so called stimulus is just going to make things worse down the road. This is still going to take time to see if it works. It may slow the declining economy. I think it's over rated but time will tell.
Govt has the credit card and is spending like a teenager.
Guess what is the collateral? You!!! Human Resources.
You don't think banks loan without collateral do you?
Solution: Take away the credit card.
Sorry, had to share more accurate information (than what I said previously) about the mouse money.
• Several Republicans claimed this week that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put $30 million in a bill to protect the salt marsh harvest mouse. We looked into the issue and found that was not the case. There's no money for mice in the bill. There might — or might not — be money for a major coastal restoration project in California that could help out the mice. And a state agency submitted the project, not Pelosi. We rate the claim, made most plainly by Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana, as False.
More detailed information about which claims are true or not, on the stimulus and other government doings, available from http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/ - run by The Poynter Institute.
...the question is, will it work? The simple fact is, we can't know; even if there was unanimous agreement on the economic merits (or demerits) of the bill, the more important factor is how it affects the national psyche. Will people be more willing to spend (and hire, and start new businesses, and lend out money, and perform all the other financial functions we need in our economy)? Or will the money disappear into various pockets, leaving us in essentially the same situation next year, as we debate what else we can do? I don't know, and until we actually see what happens, neither does anyone else (claimers of success or catastrophe included).
TARP and the latest stimulus bill isn't even a reflection of all bailout related government spending, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (neither of which are properly accounted on the government books), the loans to AIG, the deficit of the PBGC, potential FDIC liability, or the worthless assets added to the Federal Reserve balance sheet.
What common sense dictates (and what this article states) is that the government cannot dictate where spending goes. We've already got a country that's got misallocated capital everywhere (credit locked up in the banking system, loaned money to banks being used for unproductive purposes like lobbying, way too much car production) which has yet to correct itself, yet somehow the money is supposed to magically find itself towards productive growth purposes.
It's not the job of govt to run the economy. Economies rise & fall - it's a natural thing.
What's unnatural is the govt trying to stave off a depression. This isn't a Democrat or Republican thing & those of you who don't see that are blind.
It is the job of govt to keep the street lights on and protect our freedoms for foreign entities.
This thing just seriously hosed us over as citizens but what do you expect from a President who didn't even serve a full term in Senate? Yeah, he's giving us "change" all right.
Every economist on the nation has said this bill is a mistake but what do they know? The more "stimulus" the harder the crash will be when it comes.
And for those of you who are going to bash me for being a "Republican" I'm actually a Constitutional Libertarian and care only about elected officials doing their job which is outlined in the Constitution. :)
Sam said: "Every economist on the nation has said this bill is a mistake but what do they know?" Every economist who has spoken about the current bill has said that it is too small and timid, or that it misallocates funding too much to tax cuts and not enough to job creation and spending. If you can cite a few economists who opposed any stimulus, which seems to be what you suggest, it would be instructive. Even the Republicans who opposed the bill didn't want no stimulus, just a different type of bill.
Also, why does this not pass constitutional muster? The Constitution certainly calls for Congress to "provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States;" says that "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises;" "To borrow money on the credit of the United States; To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;" and "To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof." So, Congress must provide for the general welfare, is empowered to regulate commerce and to raise and borrow money and to pass laws to perform these duties. What part of this bill is not covered by those elements. (Read Section 8 of Article 1 of the Constitution).
The stimulus plan and all the tax breaks may not amount to much in $$ terms for the average American, but the key that it does provide is confidence to the regualr American that the government is doing something. This will give them confidence to spend, boost company profits which in turn spurs economic activity/jobs and gets us out of a recession.
Rob Viglione said "Claims that government spending is going to magically return $1.25 per $1 "invested" is ridiculous. GDP is an absurd measure for gauging prosperity, particularly when its compoments are so far out of whack."
First, the return figures come not from the government but from Mark Zandi, certainly not a government economist. Why do you think the figure is ridiculous, and why should we believe you over the vast majority of economists, who concur with Zandi's figures? What will the return be, in your opinion, and on what do you base your figure? Why is GDP an absurd measure of prosperity? It seems to be a reasonable measure, at least comparatively (if GDP this year is twice GDP last year, the country as a whole has produced twice as much; that would seem likely to indicate that prosperity is greater). Again, you simply attack a widely used and widely respected metric without either any evidence that it is inaccurate or any alternative, with evidence that it is better.
Your final paragraph is arrant nonsense -- government spending has no relationship to nationalization. If the government buys a plane, has it nationalized Boeing? This is just far-right Republican red meat, which "everyone on this site knows."
If the stimulus is wrong, finally, what do you suggest? Should we wait for private investment to spur the economy, or what? You offer no evidence and no alternatives.
Considering our GDP has been largely based on housing for the last decade is this really a surprise to anyone paying attention?
That's another thing the "stimulus bill" does nothing to address the mitigating factor that created the recession.
Quit accusing people of GOP talking points if you don't like what they have to say. As laudable as saving a marsh may be it isn't going to create the jobs this economy needs. Furthermore, I could care less whether some putz in California praised an organization that runs around criticizing minimum wage while paying its folks minimum wage for their efforts. They have no business being funded in a stimulus bill. None, whatsoever.
'Guest' said "saving a marsh may be it isn't going to create the jobs this economy needs." Maybe you didn't read the earlier post - there is nothing about saving the marsh mouse in the stimulus. Maybe that's one of those GOP talking points I shouldn't criticize?
I think it is reasonable to criticize statements made with absolutely no evidence or citation -- like the one about all economists oppose the stimulus. I try to provide some basis for what I say, rather than simply throwing out outlandish statements without anything to back them up.
I would like you to point out where I mentioned "GOP talking points" though - I can't find it in anything I wrote. Ever hear of a straw man argument? You just made one.
The tax breaks part of the Bill are ridiculous, the government needs revenue to offset the debt.
The spending part is sound economics, Keynesian remedies have worked in most downturns, and this one certainly isn't showing signs of being the "stagflation" crisis of the 80s. It might be too little too late, and it's unfortunate that Obama's going to take the blame for a crisis that was made by the Bush administration, but hey, that's politics.
The money would be better spent establishing long-term universal social welfare programs (fixing health-care, universal pensions, other non-means-tested programs) that would create real jobs rather than merely staving off capital flight for a few more years, but those are politically impossible with the republicans in Congress desperately trying to destroy the economy so they can win the next election..
Just wrote a blog post on 11 ways the stimulus package will directly affect you and your budget. Check it out, it's a great resource!

subset: commoncrawl


text:
Onsite Estate Sales & Online Estate LiquidationsSenior Downsizing - Moving Sales - Business Liquidations
Voltaire 60 in. x 30 in. Acrylic Single-Threshold Center Drain Shower Base in White
Direct to stud install
Retail Price: $316
Are you sure you want to submit this bid of:
Copyright ©
2020 North Bay Online Estate Auctions - Privacy Policy
All times on this website are displayed in
Pacific Standard Time. The current date and time is approximately:
Powered by Xpert Online Auction Software
Sign up for our newsletter to start treasure hunting
Share with your friends.
Sign-up for our newsletter list to receive notifications on all new and upcoming auctions as well as special offers on unsold or unpaid items!
Do you love the deals you've been getting? Can you think of any friends that would love those deals as much as you? go ahead and share North Bay Online Estates Auctions site and spread the great deals!


text:
Don't let foodborne illness spoil the holidays
While the holidays are a time for surprises, one holiday surprise to be avoided at all costs is foodborne bacteria, according to a Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service expert.
"Foodborne bacteria can make people sick and take the joy out of the holidays," said Dr. Mary Bielamowicz, AgriLife Extension nutrition specialist and licensed dietitian, College Station. "Watching out for contamination and taking the proper steps to ensure better food preparation and preservation safety will reduce the chance of your holidays being spoiled by a food-related illness."
Bielamowicz said making sure all kitchen items—knives, cutting boards, cookware, serving pieces, dishes, food storage containers, etc.—are thoroughly cleaned before use is the first step toward fighting bacteria.
"Make sure you follow the basic food safety rules, which are to clean, separate, cook and chill," she said. "Be sure you and anyone helping you washes their hands thoroughly with warm water and soap before handling any food.
She said raw meat should be separated from fruits and vegetables in the grocery store and refrigerator, as well as on the kitchen counter.
"Make sure your refrigerator is set at 40 degrees or lower and keep the door closed as much as possible during food preparation and storage," she said. "Perishable foods should be refrigerated within two hours after purchase.
"Cook foods to their proper temperature and refrigerate them promptly after cooking to reduce opportunities for bacterial growth."
Bielamowicz said leftovers should be eaten within three to four days after refrigeration.
"Remember that food may often smell or even taste fine after that time, but it still may have enough bacteria to make someone ill," she said. "The general rule for food safety when it comes to leftovers is: 'When in doubt, throw it out.'"
Bielamowicz said the nonprofit Partnership for Food Safety, whose stated mission is to "end illness and death from foodborne infections in the United States," has developed a Holiday Food Safety Success Kit available to families wanting to learn more about the basics of food safety.
The kit, which can be found at www.holidayfoodsafety.org , provides food safety advice and meal planning information. It also contains information on buying and cooking a turkey and has a holiday menu planner, holiday recipes, and fun and educational activities for children.
More information on food safety can be found at the Fight BAC! website at www.fightbac.org as well as at www.foodsafety.gov , which provides consumer food safety information from various government sources.
Provided by Texas A&M University


text:
The Chicago Council's Global Agricultural Development Initiative is pleased to release a new Issue Brief, "National and Global Market Implications of the 2012 US Drought," authored by Wallace E. Tyner. Professor Tyner is an energy economist and James and Lois Ackerman Professor of Agricultural Economics at Purdue University.
Issues Briefs offer factual and analytical information and resources to policymakers and other non-governmental stakeholders to advance understanding of the potential implications of major developments, events, and decisions on US agricultural development and food security policy.


text:
As the nominated tech section admin it's my job to keep things running as best as they can in this corner of the forum. So if anyone has any requests for editing threads then please post in this thread or send me a PM.
Examples might be such as breaking a thread into two that has gone way off topic (as we all love to do!), combining threads, deleting un-necessary posts, etc...
However for any requests that are in regard to another user please instead click on the report icon, which is the exclimation mark within a triangle on the bottom left of a post.
My website: SQ Engineering - 4AGE and 3SGE upgrade/replacement parts
- SQ Engineering on facebook -
Please e-mail to contact me instead of sending a private message on here.


text:
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, March 27, 2013, 11:36 AM
Town Square
Menlo Park won't disclose findings of investigation into city's gymnastics program
Original post made on Mar 28, 2013
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, March 27, 2013, 11:36 AM
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Mar 28, 2013 at 9:14 am
They should investigate the MP City Council and the city's staff !!! This whole episode should have never happened..The next thing you know, the council will vote to put a Rite-Aid drug store in where the GMC dealership was. All they are doing is diluting the dollars people spend
and the sales tax collected, there is no new revenues coming. How about filing up the 10-12
empty store fronts on Santa Cruz ? That's new business & sales tax money, unless of course
it's another pet store !
a resident of another community
on Mar 28, 2013 at 10:10 am
The city council's role is to hire the city manager, other that that, the hiring and firing of city employees is outside the scope of the city council.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 28, 2013 at 1:29 pm
The City of Menlo Park needs to over-haul its hiring and firing practices, including its sites in Belle Haven where the next big ruckus just may come from.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 30, 2013 at 9:31 am
Who is running the HR dept for the City and neglecting to train management on the professional way to deal with staff? Some major lapses in judgment and disregard for the law here. Doesn't matter if the employee was a temp or not, HUMAN Resources needs to get to work to better serve the City staff and City programs.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Mar 30, 2013 at 5:10 pm
The city's HR Director is Gina Donnelly.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Apr 6, 2013 at 2:07 pm
Heard though the grapevine that there is another on going investigation at the MCC amid numerous claims of discrimination and harassment. Almanac reporters on the story yet?
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Apr 6, 2013 at 3:55 pm
The City attorney neglected to disclose that in the event that there is a lawsuit, the information gathered during the investigation will be made public. And it might become public before then under FOIA. Mr McClure also neglected to check the personnel files of City managers, this is NOT the first time that the City became aware of specific allegations against the supervisor(s) who fired Michelle Sutton. Interesting how the facts change to suit the City's needs.


text:
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best possible online experience. If you continue, we'll assume you are happy for your web browser to receive all cookies from our website. See our Cookie & Privacy Policy for more information.
More Information |
I Accept
You have no items in your basket.
Established in 1958
Free standard delivery Over £99
Need help? - email firstname.lastname@example.com
Regal Tip Wood Handle Blasticks play like a stick but produce a soft and full sound. They are great for gigs when you want to play hard, but not blow through the band. Adjustable sound rings allow you to slide the rings up and down the plastic bristles to produce different sound punctuations depending on your playing situation.
Be the first to review this product
As drummers, we take things for granted. We forget that until 1958 only wood tip drumsticks were available. Necessity, the Mother of Invention, intervened when professional drummer and woodworker Joe Calato confronted the problem that the tips of his sticks were wearing out too quickly. He decided to make a stick that would last longer and would retain a pure sound.
After much experimenting, Joe perfected the idea: a drumstick with a nylon tip that stayed on, didn't shatter and produced a sound pleasing to the ear. In fact, the sound was so pleasing it helped define the musical styles of the day with its signature clarity on drumheads and ride cymbals. His contribution to the percussion industry was recognized by the Percussive Arts Society when he was inducted into its Hall of Fame.
Joe Calato's invention signaled a revolution in drumstick manufacturing and design. Joe took it as his mission to upgrade the drumstick, beginning with the quality of the wood used, the drying of the wood, quality control for straightness of grain, weight, knots, warp and finally the famous Regal Tip PEF finish. He was also the first in the industry to match and pair sticks. To this day, the drum world credits Joe with establishing modern standards in drumstick design and crafting.
The invention of the nylon tip drumstick was but the beginning of a long history of quality products and innovation. Joe set the standards for quality and innovation when he introduced his line of best-selling brushes. Its patented interior design, which keeps metal from hitting metal, and two-point spread all assisted in the creation of a brush with a feel and performance second to none.
Joe Calato's dedication to manufacturing only quality percussion products for drummers was ingrained in his children and grandchildren. A long list of innovations includes the Thai Sticks, Conga Stick, Danny Reyes Multi-Percussion Stick, and most recently the E-Tip drumstick. The company is still owned and operated by the Calato family. Now, as the third generation begins to assume responsibility for the day to day operations, they continue the commitment to produce quality products for drummers and percussionist very seriously. The tradition goes on.
Regal Tipメs manufacturing processes have evolved over the years as technology has evolved. Machinery has gone from mechanical to computer operated. Office procedures have gone from manual to digital. But the companyメs philosophy of continuous quality improvement has never changed. The company has spent the last several years instituting the philosophy of Kaizan Lean to its employees, management processes and manufacturing. The EPA defines this process as follows: Kaizen focuses on eliminating waste, improving productivity, and achieving sustained continual improvement in targeted activities and processes of an organization.
Regal Tip has always been environmentally conscious. For example, it was the first drumstick company to end the use of plastic bags when pairing its sticks. Many are concerned, as we should be, about the over-use of our natural resources, such as our trees. The trees used in the manufacture of our drumsticks are sustainable and logged in such a way as to ensure the existence of the species. The manufacture of wooden drumsticks is still a more environmentally friendly process than the manufacture of synthetic based products.
Regal Tip has the distinction of having always manufactured all of its own products. This alone allows uncompromised product control, thus giving us the edge when it comes to bringing new products to the market. With a multi-million dollar capital improvement project underway, our facility, machines used in our manufacturing, including our state-of-the-art machine shop, combined with our in-house design team of engineers, allows us to deliver a consistency unseen in the industry. Only the best of the best can bear the Regal Tip stamp.
People have a tendency to look at a drumstick and think, "Just a piece of wood whittled downナI could do thatヤ. But talk to anyone who has toured the Regal Tip drumstick factory and find out how surprised they were to learn how much work and planning goes into the design and manufacture of the "simple" drumstick.
How much is delivery?At Ivor Mairants Musicentre we offer thousands of products that are currently in stock and can be delivered to your home address, anywhere in mainland UK. You will be able to see your delivery charge at the "Checkout" page. Do you offer Next Day Delivery?Yes, we offer a Next Day Delivery service for in-stock orders placed before 1pm Monday-Friday. Next Day Delivery and Saturday Delivery carries an extra charge. Ivor Mairants Musicentre commit to delivering on time, we rely however, on our carriers to fulfil their contract in this regard, and can not be held liable for any failure of third parties in fulfilling delivery expectations. Can I change my delivery address after I have placed my order?Once you have placed your order with us, we are unable to change any of the information you have given us, as most orders are dispatched from our distribution warehouse. Our contract carriers however offer various levels of free of charge enhanced service such as DPD PREDICT, which allows the consignee to be alerted by e-mail and/or text message of the delivery window and allows for changes allowed by the contract carrier to the detail of the actual delivery time and/or location. Where such services are available all orders will benefit from auto enrolment in the services. Ultimately, if there is no-one to sign for your delivery, you will be left a card by our contract carrier inviting you to collect from the depot or re-arrange delivery.
If it proves impossible to deliver your goods within the time allowed by our contract carriers, the consignment will be returned to us and you will unfortunately become liable for all redelivery, and/or redirection charges. Please check your confirmation email for the status of your goods before contacting us. Should you need to change your details, for example you have moved house, you can change your details by email at email@example.com and the new information will be updated within 24 hours. Please note that any orders placed before changes are made will use your old details. Can I track my order?The vast majority of our UK and Eire domestic consignments and international shipments are by trackable service. You will be emailed a tracking number with your dispatch information. Please note that tracking numbers are not used for smaller orders sent by Royal Mail or similar postal service. If you require your order to be consigned using a trackable service, please advise us AT THE POINT OF ORDER.
There are no reviews yet. Be the first to review this product
In Stock
Our Price:
Our Price
Our Price:
Our Price
Maximum 5 email addresses allowed.
Add Recipient
Only registered users can write reviews. Please, log in or register
Ivor Mairants Musicentre head office & warehouse: Salem House, Parkinson Approach, Garforth, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS25 2HR
Email: firstname.lastname@example.com
©2019 Ivor Mairants Musicentre. All Rights Reserved.


text:
Anything to stop me from typing, Underfoot pulled out all the cute. He started by peeking over the laptop and staring at me with sad, doe eyes. Then, he crept around the side of the laptop, climbed up my chest and planted himself in front of my face. He succeeded in stopping the tap-tap of the keys that time. It's hard to do anything except laugh when you have a cat in your face.
After I made him get off my chest, he jumped up on the cat jungle gym behind me so he could step off it and onto the back of the chair. It took him several minutes to climb down the side of the chair, doing something I think he believed was stealth, to the arm where he plopped down, pushed my arm out of the way and put his pouty face on the edge of the laptop.
Poor baby, but I still managed to finish day one!


text:
New Publication Provides the Key to Creating a Drug-Free World
The Truth About Drugs initiative, supported by the Church of Scientology, makes highly effective drug education and prevention available to communities everywhere.
The Church of Scientology International announced the next phase of its decades-long anti-drug campaign to launch Tuesday, November 13, 2012. Already one of the world's largest and most effective nongovernmental drug information and prevention initiatives, the release of a new publication, Scientology: How We Help—the Truth About Drugs, Creating a Drug-Free World, expands the scope of the Truth About Drugs initiative, making the program and award-winning materials available to communities everywhere.
The Truth About Drugs is a secular program supported by the Church of Scientology. Truth About Drugs volunteers have distributed some 7.5 million Truth About Drugs booklets in the last 12 months alone, and, with the Truth About Drugs curriculum adopted by schools, youth groups and law enforcement programs in more than 80 nations, an estimated 10.5 million youth have been empowered with factual information to help them live drug-free lives.
Drugs are more than just another social problem. Some 120 million people at all levels of society consume illegal drugs. Almost 200,000 die from drugs each year.
The greatest toll is on the young. Every 12 seconds another school-age child experiments with illicit drugs for the first time. Drug use in this age group has risen steadily throughout the past decade and children are exposed to these dangerous substances at younger and younger ages.
"For more than 25 years, Scientologists around the world have worked in their communities to combat drug abuse at ground level," says Tracie Parker, spokesperson for the Church of Scientology. "We have drawn on all this experience to create a program that solves the problem of effectively communicating the reality of drug abuse to teens and young adults. This makes it possible for youth to make their own decisions, uninfluenced by peer pressure and pro-drug propaganda."
The program began in the mid-1980s with a European grass-roots movement, "Say No to Drugs, Say Yes to Life." At the same time, Scientologists in the United States began raising public awareness on the issue with the "Lead the Way to a Drug-Free USA" campaign.
In the late 1990s, Scientologists in Europe produced a series of youth-oriented booklets containing straight facts on the dangers of drugs. The booklets were in such high demand, the Church undertook to publish them internationally. Since then, the Church has sponsored distribution of millions of booklets, fliers and posters through thousands of drug education activities in communities, schools, churches and the workplace.
Described by law enforcement officers, educators and community leaders as "astonishingly effective," "outstanding," and "the answer to the global epidemic," all components of the program are geared to interest and engage children and teens.
The Church publishes Truth About Drugs booklets, banners, posters, information packets and educator kits, making them available free of charge to health educators, law enforcement officers and other drug prevention specialists. For more information on the anti-drug initiative supported by the Church of Scientology or to read a copy of the brochure, visit the Scientology website.
Scientology Founder L. Ron Hubbard wrote, "The planet has hit a barrier which prevents any widespread social progress—drugs and other biochemical substances. These can put people into a condition which not only prohibits and destroys physical health but which can prevent any stable advancement in mental or spiritual well-being."
The Church of Scientology supports Truth About Drugs, one of the world's largest nongovernmental drug education and prevention campaigns. It has been conclusively proven that when young people are provided with the truth about drugs—factual information on what drugs are and what they do—usage rates drop commensurately.


text:
What is XSpasm about? Expanding XSpasm System Requirements Login and Registration Issues Posting Issues Membership
How do I edit or delete a post?
Unless you are the webmaster or forum moderator you can only edit or delete your own posts. You can edit a post by clicking the edit button for the relevant post. If someone has already replied to the post you will find a small piece of text output below the post when you return to the topic, this lists the number of times you edited it. This will only appear if no one has replied, it also will not appear if moderators or administrators edit the post (they should leave a message saying what they altered and why). Please note that normal users cannot delete a post once someone has replied.
Can I use HTML?
You are allowed to use only certain HTML tags (B, I, A and IMG). This is a safety feature to prevent people abusing the site by using tags which may destroy the layout or cause other problems.
Can I link to a web site?
That's simple. Simply write your web site's address in a post, e.g. www.mywebsite.com. You don't even have to put a HTML tag to make it a clickable link.
Can I post images?
Images can indeed be shown in your posts. However, there is no facility at present for uploading images directly to this site. Therefore you must link to an image stored on a publicly accessible web server, e.g. http://www.some-unknown-place.net/my-picture.gif. You cannot link to pictures stored on your own PC (unless it is a publicly accessible server) nor images stored behind authentication mechanisms, e.g. hotmail or yahoo mailboxes, password protected sites, etc. To display the image use appropriate HTML tag.
Copyright © 2002 XSpasm.com, All Rights Reserved. Site Map. Privacy Statement. Want to link to us? Download our logo XHTML CSS


text:
Pink Opens Up About Her Teenage Overdose in Shape
Pink was a notorious wild child, and in the new issue of Shape magazine, she opened up about the time she did way too many drugs at a club back when she was 15.
According to Shape (via Contact Music), Pink experimented with ecstasy, crystal meth and acid and once found herself in a bad place. "It wasn't to the point of going to the hospital, but I remember getting up off the floor in the morning, and that was the last time I ever touched a drug again," the singer said.
Pink added that her love of singing and a strict DJ helped her kick the bad stuff. "It was also the day a DJ offered to let me sing on hip-hop night. His only caveat was that I couldn't do drugs, so I didn't. That's the thing with me -- once I make up my mind, I'm done."
She may be off drugs, but Pink has no plans to give up wine. "I'm a wino!" she said. "I'm taking online classes to learn about different grapes. My dream is to own a winery."
We previously got a look at Pink's hot post-baby bod on the cover of the magazine, and she talked about how a brutal training regimen with Jillian Michaels and Jeanette Jenkins helped her lose 55 pounds after baby daughter Willow was born last summer. "They're both amazing, and their bodies were all the inspiration I needed to get back into shape," Pink revealed.
Watch the Pink 'Try' Video


text:
E-Series 4 Socket, 3-Metre SurgeStrip™
F9E400uk3M / {{blVariant}}
This item is added to your Wishlist
This SurgeStrip™ provides basic protection in a white, hard-plastic casing sure to blend well with a number of gaming and peripheral devices. It keeps your entry-level computer and peripherals protected from power surges, spikes, and lightning strikes. The unit provides four protected AC sockets.


text:
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul stood up shortly before noon Wednesday and announced his intention to filibuster President Barack Obama's nomination of John Brennan to lead the CIA.
"I will speak until I can no longer speak," he said. And so he did.
While it was far cry from South Carolina Sen. Strom Thurmond's 1957 filibuster that went on for more than 24 hours, Paul's dilatory tactic earned him a spot in Senate history.
U.S. & World
The day's top national and international news.
In a move out of the "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" playbook, the tea party Republican, for 12 hours and 52 minutes, criticized the Obama administration's lethal drone program, which has vastly expanded under the influence of Brennan, the president's counter-terrorism adviser.
While Paul's style veered occasionally into wacky territory — like when he re-imagined a portion of "Alice in Wonderland" to make a point about the American justice system — he remained focused on his chief gripe: Attorney General Eric Holder's refusal to rule out the hypothetical targeted killing of Americans on U.S. soil — something Holder said the government had no intention to carry out but would keep on the table for "extraordinary circumstances."
"It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States," Holder initially wrote in a letter to Paul.
On Thursday, however, Holder sent the senator a follow-up letter clarifying that the president does not have the authority to kill Americans that are not engaged in combat on U.S. soil, according to White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, who read excerpts from the letter to the press.
If the U.S. were under attack or if there were an "imminent threat," however, the president had the authority to protect the country from that assault, Carney added.
Though Brennan was expected to and eventually did win confirmation, Paul's filibuster garnered plenty of publicity and achieved what was surely one of his goals — turning the spotlight on the controversial program that has become one of the U.S. military's key tools in the war against terror.
His political move divided Republicans but won him rare support from Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden and other liberals and praise from the American Civil Liberties Union.
It was the country's eighth-longest filibuster and one of the first in recent history to stick to the traditional procedure — blocking or delaying a vote by refusing to yield the floor to anyone else. Of late, lawmakers have been engaging in a softer style of filibustering, wherein they essentially vote to not vote (which was the case with the recent Republican move to delay a vote on Chuck Hagel's confirmation to lead the Pentagon).
But Paul did what no other U.S. lawmaker had done since Sen. Bernie Sanders in 2010: He spoke until he absolutely could no longer. "I would go for another 12 hours to try to break Strom Thurmond's record, but I've discovered that there are some limits to filibustering," Paul said in a comical conclusion. "And I'm going to have to go take care of one of those in a few minutes here."
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Here's a look at the seven lawmakers who somehow surpassed Paul's biological limits:
STROM THURMOND: 24 hours, 18 minutes
In 1957 the South Carolina senator tried to thwart a vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1957 with the lengthiest filibuster in history. The senator reportedly took steam baths to dehydrate himself in preparation for his epic talkathon that Sen. William Knowland referred to as "cruel and unusual punishment."
ALFONSE D'AMATO: 23 hours, 30 minutes
In 1986, the New York senator protested a military spending bill that would cut off financing for planes built by a Long Island-based company. The New York Times wrote that "even the threat of missing the opening game of the World Series between the New York Mets and the Boston Red Sox on Saturday would not deter the Republican of New York from continuing a filibuster."
WAYNE MORSE: 22 hours, 26 minutes
The Oregon senator filibustered the Tidelands Oil legislation in 1953, which ultimately handed U.S.-owned swaths of the Gulf of Mexico to the state of Texas. According to reports, his longest speaking break lasted just two minutes when he paused to allow a colleague to make a statement. While he was permitted to lean against the desk behind him, he was called to order when he tried to sit down.
ROBERT LA FOLLETTE: 18 hours, 23 minutes
In 1908 the Wisconsin senator launched a filibuster to block debate on the Aldrich-Vreeland currency bill, which established the National Monetary Commission and gave the Treasury the authority to lend to banks during financial crises.
WILLIAM PROXMIRE: 16 hours, 12 minutes
The Wisconsin Democrat in 1981 tried to halt a debt limit hike with what he called a "genleman's filibuster." He agreed in advance not to delay regular Senate business, which was scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. the following day, and he ended his long talk with an apology to "the chief presiding officers, the pages, the reporters and all the people who have just been so courteous and so helpful and so gentle in spite of the fact that I've been such a trial to them," the Washington Post reported.
HUEY LONG: 15 hours, 30 minutes
In 1935, the senator from Louisiana delayed a vote on a bill that would require Senate confirmation for the National Recovery Administration's senior employees. The senator, in what he called "the greatest speech in history," according to the New York Times, read the entire U.S. Constitution aloud, told stories about his uncle and provided recipes for fried oysters and potlikker.
ROBERT BYRD: 14 hours, 13 minutes
West Virginia Sen. Bob Byrd was part of a group of Democrats who tried to roadblock passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and kept the bill pending in the Senate for 57 working days.


text:
Listings in Collaboration, Search and SharePoint and O365 in Milpitas
in Text Analytics, Search, Robotic Process Automation, Records Management, Process Services, Process Automation, Multi-channel Capture, Low Code Development Platforms, Information Governance, Document Management, Data Recognition and Extraction, Content Services, Content Integration and Migration, Artificial Intelligence, Analytics Services
ABBYY enables enterprises to action information with world-leading document capture and language-based technologies. Transforming data into useful knowledge, ABBYY solutions optimize business processes, accelerate decision-making and drive revenue.
890 Hillview Court
Suite 300
Milpitas, California 95035
United States


text:
When Mark Wahlberg takes on dramatic or quirky comedy roles, the results are surprisingly good ("The Fighter," "Boogie Nights," "The Other Guys"), when he does straight-up action, the results are, well, less than good ("Max Payne," "Shooter," "Four Brothers") - which has us a little leery of "Contraband."
Wahlberg plays an ex-Greatest Thief of All Time (check) who is out of the game and trying to go legit (check, check) who gets pulled back in (check) by his reckless brother (check) and now must protect his wife and kid (check, check) from a sinister crime lord (check) with the help of his old gang (checkity check).
But now, the good: The supporting cast is impressive, with the lovely Kate Beckinsale playing the wife in distress, the always-welcome J.K. Simmons is in it, Giovanni Ribisi makes for a creepily-high-pitched baddie, and Wahlberg's old crew boasts the likes of Ben Foster and Lukas Haas. Plus, Wahlberg isn't playing someone named Bob Lee Swagger.
U.S. & World
"Contraband" opens everywhere January 13, 2012.


text:
Blue Tansy Resurfacing Mask
About the Brand
This stunning, simple line appeals to purists and hipsters alike (beard tonic is one of their most popular products). Made with entirely active ingredients and no fillers, the line, started by founders Julia Wills and Alex Kummerow in their tiny Seattle kitchen harnesses the power of concentrated, potent ingredients. The clean-lined packaging (which often allows the colors of the products to shine through) is an undeniable part of the appeal.


text:
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?LUCKIEST Nov 28, 2011 8:31 AM (in response to Dervie)
It is NEVER too early to start a small business
Common knowledge to others, but in many ways new to you. Learn before you start your business
It's important to not put the cart before the horse.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 28, 2011 9:16 AM (in response to LUCKIEST)
This individual is 16 years old! They are not looking at starting a lawn care business, or a snow removal service. They are looking to open up a store front. Why would you encourage that, knowing that they are going to find themselves facing contracts, leases, etc. that they cannot sign into?
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?jwmann2 Jan 2, 2012 5:52 PM (in response to CorpCons08)
You need to be 18 for a lot of the regulations and paperwork, leases, etc. You also need money. No way you have a serious amount of money to start a business at the age of 16. You also need to have a great amount of credit established.
Go to college and get your degree. Get a decent job after college and start saving for your business. Keep all of your options open in case your business doesn't work out, that way you can go and work for someone else and have a steady salary. Best of luck to you. Keep studying up on business.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 28, 2011 8:37 AM (in response to Dervie)
While it is very admirable that you want to start your own business, you are far from ready to "jump in" to any project. There are many obstacles that are in your way right now, and the most obvious one is age. In order to enter into contracts (including business formation paperwork, leases, etc.), you must be a minimum of 18 years old. You also need to put more thought into what type of business you want. Once you have that decided, a business plan needs to be put together to layout how you will enter into the business, where you will get the financing for your expenses, how you will exit if the business does not work out, etc. There are other considerations as well, too numerous to sit here and type out. My advice, focus on your education right now. Complete high school and go to college. If you are set on becoming an entrepreneur, seek out a business degree. Once you have gone that far, then you may be ready to start your own business.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?chris1985 Nov 28, 2011 11:02 AM (in response to Dervie)
With a parents help I had a friend in high school that had a small bakery operation, making mini cakes and cupcakes (forgot the name). But she was only 17 and had her parent get the space and help with signing the lease for a booth at a local fair and then at a market every Saturday. She made good money with low startup. So it's possible to do but you would need help at first from an adult. Dervie, maybe you could shadow a few business owners too, to learn more about what they do and if it would be something that interested you. Good luck.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 28, 2011 11:09 AM (in response to chris1985)
This is a valid option. I had one client who was 17 years old, and put the entire liability on their parents. In this situation, the parents were willing to take on the risk. But in many cases, parents are not willing to take on the risk. When financing and liability is in the equation, any issues could result in a lawsuit against the parents. They could lose their personal property, including their houses, etc.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?LUCKIEST Nov 28, 2011 12:50 PM (in response to CorpCons08)
In a down economy, franchise opportunities are some of the best business opportunities available
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 28, 2011 1:13 PM (in response to LUCKIEST)
That's not a guarantee... A lot of franchises right now are facing record losses and many franchisees are closing shop. Remember, you are still making an investment when purchasing into a franchise. Your investment is going to face the same risk as any other business opening.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?OfficeGoddess Nov 28, 2011 11:51 AM (in response to Dervie)
I agree that it is never to young to start a business. Yes, there will be issues with age and who will take on signing responsibilities, etc.
I highly recommend you go to www.choosewhat.com for a business startup checklist to help you work through the logistics of starting a businesss.
And I also suggest you sit down and make a list of what type(s) of merchandise you would like to sell. Why a specific product? Who will it benefit? Who will be your market? How will you market TO your target market? Also find books at the library about small business operations and marketing.
There is a tremendous amount of setup/background information required long before actually getting into a business. I am a virtual bookkeeper so no vendors required and I still spent over six months in the setup phase before "opening my virtual doors."
You will hear a lot of naysayers who tell you that you are too young, too inexperienced, blah-blah-blah. You have just as good a shot at succeeding as any other entrepreneur if you do your research and setup a foundation first instead of jumping headlong into an unfamiliar situation.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Moderator_JoleK Nov 28, 2011 1:13 PM (in response to Dervie)
Excellent questions , Dervie .I want to welcome you to the community. Is there any particular type of business that gets your attention most?
You are getting some great feedback in this thread and I think we are all learning something!
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Nov 28, 2011 1:59 PM (in response to Moderator_JoleK)
I also agree, these are great answers and I'm noting each and everything down. Any type of business? At this moment in time, no. I'd love to however be a part of a business in which deals with handling customers, etc. I'm one who loves to interact with customers, as well as selling merchandise.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 28, 2011 2:07 PM (in response to Dervie)
Have you ever worked in a customer service based business? Maybe a good starting point would be to look for employment with a company that deals with customer service, gather ideas from your experiences, and then look into starting a business in the future. I think it's great that you love customers, and a lot of business owners would love to have you be part of their teams. Especially since customer service has gone downhill during the recession.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Nov 28, 2011 2:09 PM (in response to CorpCons08)
Typically, where I live, It's hard to get a job for 2 reasons, especially for me.
1. I have absolutely no empolyment experience, whatsoever.
2. I'm only 16, they tend to look for people whom are older.
So primarily, my lack of experience and age play a huge part in whether or not I'm able to get a job.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 28, 2011 2:19 PM (in response to Dervie)
A lot of times businesses don't higher younger applicants, not because of their lack of employment history or age, but because they are not prepared to step into the position they are applying for. Have you taken business courses in school? Do you entertain extra curricular activities like FBLA (Future Business Leaders of America), etc.? Businesses are 10x more likely to higher a younger applicant who has a resume with extra curricular activities like the one mentioned or college level business courses.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 28, 2011 2:08 PM (in response to Dervie)
Let me just add... I am not trying to discourage your dreams, just making sure you enter into it prepared to succeed.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Nov 28, 2011 2:10 PM (in response to CorpCons08)
Oh no, It's fine. I'm not one whom is easily put down, rather I take your words and put them into a positive perspective. I know that this is going to be a big deal, and I'll have to research a ton prior to even thinking of starting.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 28, 2011 2:16 PM (in response to Dervie)
I'm glad that you are taking things positively..
I will be more than happy to continue working with you on developing your dreams.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?OfficeGoddess Nov 28, 2011 2:30 PM (in response to Dervie)
I, too, would be happy to help you with any questions you may have as you start out.
Lily - aka Virtual Offce Goddess
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Intravec Designs Nov 28, 2011 3:03 PM (in response to Dervie)
I would advise you to find someone in your area that is the managerial side of business and ask them to let you shadow them for a couple of weeks. There are some people that love helping young people start into the business world. This way you can have some idea of what you are getting involved in. It is never to early to go into business entrepreneurship.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Moderator_MoniE Nov 29, 2011 10:23 AM (in response to Dervie)
While I see a lot of flip flopping around between contractual obligations Dervie cannot sign into and having the parents shoulder the responsibility of an actual business venture, I am wondering why no one seems to have touched on something specific I saw, including the person who actually said it.
Corp said to Luckiest: "This individual is 16 years old! They are not looking at starting a lawn care business, or a snow removal service."
I am wondering why he hasn't been encouraged to start a business that a 16 year old COULD actually begin and manage rather than focusing on how he can't legally establish a brick and mortar business.
Dervie said he may not have enough money to lease a storefront but could possibly get flea market space or a kiosk. (Trust me Dervie, mall kiosks aren't cheap either) If he had the money to get himself a good mower and has the means to transport that mower (in most states 16 year olds can drive) he could start a landscaping business. I know this because one of our neighbours started out the exact same way and as they learned from their experiences what worked, what didn't and how best to manage this business, it grew and it took off and they now own one of the premier landscaping SUPPLY businesses in the area. They now hire people to go out and do the actual physical labour of landscaping lawns while they manage the business of obtaining and selling product etc. What started out as a business they ran as teenagers from home with a mower, a trailer and some trimming tools is now a lucrative business on a large piece of land in town with a storefront in their adulthood (and they're now only in their early to mid 20's).
Sure, Dervie may not want to go into landscaping but if his local Mickey D's isn't hiring and he can't or doesn't want to find employment elsewhere for whatever reason (both of my girls worked food service starting at the age of 15) then let's think outside of the proverbial box and encourage him to follow his dream in a manner that fits his age bracket, interests and drive. He said it is his goal to become a "businessman". Goals aren't instantly reached. They require time and effort so whose to say he can't get a jumpstart on obtaining that goal by starting small with a home based business he can handle at his age?
After all, some of the leading Fortune 500 businessmen today started out with a paper route, a lemonade stand or a car washing service and that is where it all begins!
One last note, it is awesome to see so many people reaching out to help our next generation of entrepreneurs! Keep up the awesome work! The way you all help out so willingly is what makes this such a great community to be a part of!
Best of luck, Dervie! I hope you find success in the years to come!
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Nov 29, 2011 8:36 PM (in response to Moderator_MoniE)
You misunderstood the point I was trying to make. While I agree that entrepreneurship can begin at any age, I believe that you should start out with something realistic based on your experience and qualifications. Dervie does not have experience dealing with customers or selling products first hand. My suggestion is to utilize a school program like FBLA to work on community service projects where he/she can gain experience dealing with people on a consistent basis. Then, they can put those skills towards a career in customer service or look into starting their own customer service business. You always want to have some kind of a foundation before you begin building a house, and right now, everyone is saying "forget the foundation and start with the roof!"
I myself started out at 14yrs of age with a small .com company. I developed custom software applications for local businesses. Eventually it grew quite a bit, until it was at a level that I no longer could handle on my own. My background was there, I had worked through many certifications and coursework, including shadowing local business owners to learn the trade more. I always knew programming since I was young, and it was a skillset that business owners liked about me and were willing to take me under their wing so to speak.
I'm rambling here, but again, I think that the starting point for this individual is to start learning some trade skills in customer service. This is the start of their dream!
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Moderator_MoniE Nov 30, 2011 1:18 PM (in response to CorpCons08)
Hi Dan! I wasn't so much commenting on the thoughts and ideas in your response to Luckiest as I was using what you said as an example. I whole-heartedly agree with you about building a good, solid foundation before building the house. But after reading through the entire thread, it dawned on me that the only one that even remotely touched on "age-appropriate" business ideas was you, however, you didn't run in the direction I thought you would with it. It was that concept that I wanted to put out there for others to consider.
I built my foundation in a "little club" known as Junior Achievement. I LOVED JA! I remember how much fun we had as a group running our businesses, designing & marketing our products and attending trade fairs to show off what we learned and make our mark. Sitting here writing this, it dawned on me that locally, I really haven't heard much about JA anymore. Honestly, I wasn't even sure it was still in existence and had to Google it to see if they were still operating. I am definitely going to do more research into whether or not we have a local JA group because something as educational and fun as that shouldn't be lost over time. I would suggest to Dervie that he look into whether or not there is a group in his area because I believe that would be a good place to start building his foundation!
I do still think that starting his own home based business could be a great learning experience for him as well - start small, learn how to best market & manage it and grow slowly, noting what works and what doesn't. Trail and error now, when it's less risky, could save costly mistakes later.
As always, Corp, it has been a pleasure sharing a conversation with you! Happy holidays everyone!
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Dec 1, 2011 7:59 AM (in response to Moderator_MoniE)
Well said. Glad that we were on the same page!
Best wishes,
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Nov 30, 2011 11:23 PM (in response to Dervie)
I apologize for my abscence. I'm trying to juggle school and my personal life at the moment. However, I am reading ALL the responses, and boy.. let me tell you. I thought I'd receive a ton of negative crticisim, but you guys are just awesome.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Intravec Designs Dec 1, 2011 12:17 AM (in response to Dervie)
As Moni said.. Start small, don't just jump into it head first. Educate yourself on the desired industry of your choice. Talk to your parents and discuss your choices.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dalip Kumar Dec 2, 2011 3:06 AM (in response to Dervie)
its not early to start i appreciate your higly passions for your bright future which are you going to design in teenage.If you are really want to start then you should think about in which business you are interested and can learn easily.i am also going to start my leather apparels shop in bangalore but i have my own manufacturing unit and experience if you are interested for partnership then we can go ahead.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Moderator_JoleK Dec 5, 2011 1:16 PM (in response to Dalip Kumar)
Agreed! Do what you love. I hope Dervie remembers us when he hits the big time .
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Dec 5, 2011 4:24 PM (in response to Moderator_JoleK)
Of course, haha! Darn, all this good information cannot go to waste! I'm slowly, but surely, noting all of this down. Mentally and physically that is, haha.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?roimarket Dec 5, 2011 8:52 AM (in response to Dervie)
This article may help. No matter what you decide to do, seek as much education as possible about the subject.
When thinking about starting a business, it is important to understand "Business Models" & "Sales". This will help you determine how you are going to build a business but, they "type" of business you want to develop. Refer to organizations like The Direct Selling Association (DSA.org). The DSA is the national trade association of the leading firms that manufacture and distribute goods and services sold directly to consumers. Approximately 200 companies are members of the association, including many well-known brand names. (i.e Avon, Amway, Talk Fusion, ACN, etc.) Search for companies that are members: http://www.dsa.org/forms/CompanyFormPublicMembers/
There are a lot of , as you say, scams out there, but Multi-level Marketing is not a scam. It could be a way to get your business started with minimal investment. If the company supplies you with the marketing and advertising materials (which are a huge expense for business), it can narrow down our efforts to just selling. At the end of the day, your ability to make money depends on you.
Examples of Business models
Business model
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Business models)
In the early history of business models it was very typical to define business model types such as bricks-and-mortar or e-broker. However, these types usually describe only one aspect of the business (most often revenue model). Therefore, more recent literature on business models concentrates on describing business model as a whole instead of one most visible aspect. Following examples provide an overview for various business model types that have been in discussion since the invent of term business model:
Business model by which a company integrates both offline (bricks) and online (clicks) presences. One example of the bricks-and-clicks model is when a chain of stores allows the user to order products online, but lets them pick up their order at a local store.
Business organization or association typically composed of relatively large numbers of businesses, tradespersons or professionals in the same or related fields of endeavor, which pools resources, shares information or provides other benefits for their members.
The removal of intermediaries in a supply chain: "cutting out the middleman". Instead of going through traditional distribution channels, which had some type of intermediate (such as a distributor, wholesaler, broker, or agent), companies may now deal with every customer directly, for example via the Internet.
Direct selling is marketing and selling products to consumers directly, away from a fixed retail location. Sales are typically made through party plan, one to one demonstrations, and other personal contact arrangements. A text book definition is: "The direct personal presentation, demonstration, and sale of products and services to consumers, usually in their homes or at their jobs."[24]
Business model which works by charging the first client a fee for a service, while offering that service free of charge to subsequent clients.
Franchising is the practice of using another firm's successful business model. For the franchisor, the franchise is an alternative to building 'chain stores' to distribute goods and avoid investment and liability over a chain. The franchisor's success is the success of the franchisees. The franchisee is said to have a greater incentive than a direct employee because he or she has a direct stake in the business.
Business model that works by offering basic Web services, or a basic downloadable digital product, for free, while charging a premium for advanced or special features.[25]
Other examples of business models are:
- Auction business model
- All-in-one business model
- Chemical Leasing
- Low-cost carrier business model
- Loyalty business models
- Monopolistic business model
- Multi-level marketing business model
- Network effects business model
- Online auction business model
- Online content business model
- Premium business model
- Professional open-source model
- Pyramid scheme business model
- Razor and blades business model
- Servitization of products business model
- Subscription business model
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Dec 5, 2011 4:26 PM (in response to Dervie)
Let me add (if it isn't included in the main post) that Merchandise selling is probably a hobby of mine. I actually conduct virtual business online with virtual goods, however, I'd like to partake in selling physical goods, whether it be as e-commerce, or directly.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Dec 17, 2011 1:13 AM (in response to Dervie)
I have a question. Does anybody have any experience in the business of selling prinited goods? Specfically hooded sweatshirts, crew neck sweatshirts, and all of that jazz? I find it has quite a decent and unsaturated (to a point) down where I live and I'm sure I can easily make back my investment, in terms of equipment, in a short period of time. However, I lack the experience and I'm unsure as to what it's called.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?simon misiewicz Dec 17, 2011 8:43 AM (in response to Dervie)
First of all I wish you the very best of luck.
I started a business when I was just 16 and I have no regrets. I found that a good education after I left school was very important to always improve my knowledge and competence. I would suggest that you also find ways to "sharpen the saw".
At the age of 16 it may be difficult to have a store front on your name. Legally you may not be of age to sign some legal contracts. Do not let this stop you. I had my parent sign documents on my behalf and acted a guarantors. I always made sure that I did not put them at financial risk.
Opening a shop may be a very good idea but it depends on what products and services you specilaise in. The sales & marketing video and article may help you make some decisions.
Have a look at this business template
I have given some links to generating and evauating your ideas. There is also a template that you can use.
Contact me at any time for free mentoring.
Warm regards
Simon Misiewicz
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Intravec Designs Dec 17, 2011 3:16 PM (in response to Dervie)
Screen printing.. There is also process called digital printing..
Screen printing is the process that is preferred amongst most clients.
Digital printing is more cost effective...
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Dec 17, 2011 3:37 PM (in response to Intravec Designs)
Sound good. I'll give Screen Printing a search. Is it costly to start up?
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Dec 17, 2011 10:24 PM (in response to Dervie)
Make sure you do your homework carefully when entering the printing business. There is a lot of competition, including Fedex Kinkos, Staples, and then online printing companies like VistaPrint, 123 Print, etc. Online printing companies are really giving small printing businesses a run for their money. Their low operating costs are allowing them to price lower than many small printing businesses can afford to do. The end result, the small printing business closes down. The only upside to the small printing business, is quality is usually a lot better because of their dedication to their work. Whereas the online printing companies have so many jobs, they very rarely pay attention to quality.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Dec 17, 2011 11:21 PM (in response to CorpCons08)
I understand, and thanks for your input! I don't plan to go into e-commerce (is that the term?) anytime soon, most likely just local selling.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Dec 17, 2011 11:28 PM (in response to Dervie)
You're going to want to create an image for yourself...a reason that makes your products stand out from cheaper online competition. That is going to be one of your greatest challenges and one you want to plan for in your Business and Marketing Plans.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Intravec Designs Dec 18, 2011 12:02 AM (in response to Dervie)
Screen printing is not the cheapest business to get into, but at the same time don't go all out. Get enough equipment to learn how to become better than average, because you will make mistakes at first and you don't want those mistakes to be overly costly.
There is competition out there online, Even though you will be local, you still have to think about how many companies are online with the same business that you are in. A great deal of people shop online and so you have to be aware of the competition even if they are not in your locale. I can assure you of this, a lot of these companies that say they are this "cheap t-shirt printer", they really are not. There are ways to become competitive in that market, but the oblject is to better than the next company and offer competitive prices. Not just lower, but competitive.
I am a graphic designer and I sale business cards and I can promise that I am very competitive and aggressive in my marketing strategies. My family and friends are my guinea pigs and I don't regret the path I have taken. I don't have lower prices, but I have a far superior product at a more than fair price. I have had customers tell me I am to cheap.. I answer with laughter and say, "wait till your next bill!"
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Moderator Jim Dec 18, 2011 9:46 AM (in response to Dervie)
Great responses so far. I hope you've found an answer to your question.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?CorpCons08 Dec 18, 2011 9:58 PM (in response to Dervie)
You seem to be bouncing around with a lot of ideas. Have you considered working with a consultant to figure out exactly which path is the one for you? I don't want you to become discouraged with all of the information being thrown at you. I think you have a passion and ambition, and could become a happy business owner, but I think someone guiding you through the process is going to be essential to your success.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?anthonydavis418 Dec 19, 2011 2:17 AM (in response to Dervie)
hey Dervie, I congratulate you on taking right decision quite early. I have seen so many people wondering in dark & still do not found any goal. There is bunch of wise advices you get here. I would not add any more. Just come here to say "all the best" & we would like to know the progress at your front. Keep us posted.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Moderator_MoniE Dec 20, 2011 9:45 AM (in response to Dervie)
It's nice to see the community continue to pull together and help today's youth! After all, (Yes, I'm about to get cheesy here and quote a Whitney song) the children are our future. Teach them well and let them lead the way. It really makes me happy to see so many people care and I'm proud to be a part of this community!
Happy holidays everyone!
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Dec 20, 2011 9:00 PM (in response to Dervie)
I love all these replies, I'm taking each and every point into mind. My Christmas break is coming up soon, which I will put into great use in terms of researching, thanks!
- Happy holidays everyone.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Dervie Feb 19, 2012 10:41 PM (in response to Dervie)
Wow, I still cannot believe this is still up. I've just read each and every comment over again. Nonetheless, my goal is still set on this.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?OfficeGoddess Feb 21, 2012 12:21 PM (in response to Dervie)
We are all really glad to help. Have you decided yet what your business will be? I know you were looking into screen printing as a possiblity. We did our own t-shirts when I was in high school theater and, once we learned the process, it wasn't especially difficult. You WILL need to be aware of copyright issues, however.
If I didn't suggest it before, check out www.choosewhat.com to help you set up your business. And keep us up on how your process is going.
Lily Chambers
The Virtual Office Goddess, LLC
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Moderator Jim Feb 21, 2012 1:56 PM (in response to Dervie)
Great answers everyone!
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?John Blue May 15, 2012 1:35 PM (in response to Dervie)
Hey Dervie, first i wanna say you have courage, if you set your desires goal then nobody will stop you to do what you want, this era is going to be focus on Entrepreneurship. there is many international NGO's and platforms those helping young Entrepreneurs to start up their adventure, and I am damn sure there is no issue about age, well its important but experiences will teach you how to handle all hurdles problems during business starts up. Just focus and concentrate what you want to start and just do it. I remember when we started our business about online printing stores, we just started with few products likes pocket folders printing, stickers printing, carbonless forms and like that. And now we have lot of customer's portfolio & huge online reputation, it's just because of our passion and struggle. And you will be rock if you concentrate on your work
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?Moderator Berta May 20, 2012 1:45 PM (in response to Dervie)
Hi Dervie,
Have you decided yet what business you want to start? We're all here to help any way we can so please update us on your status.
Re: Is it "too early" to start a small business?NYDS May 21, 2012 6:33 PM (in response to Dervie)
Hi Dervie,
16 is not too early to start a small business. Entrepreneurship is a character trait, some people have but some not. So if in that age you're thinking to open a business, if not today you will have someday, believe me. And I hope will be successful as well.
New York Web Design Studio - tanganika.com
I'm at the age of 16 and I'm highly interested in starting up a small business. Believe me, I'm at the point where my goal is to open a store or some sort of business and just be in charge. In all honesty, I do not have the experience, however, the research comes after my decision on whether or not I should start one. I know this may come as a joke to some, but ever since I had been required to make a decision in school on what I'd like to be in the future, I simply answered "A businessman". Financially, I may not be able to lease a building, but surely I've got enough to lease some areas (such as Fleamarkets, a Kiosk, etc).


text:
A small group of us have decided the metro area needs a monthly food event where we can all sit around, get to know each other, eat some great food, toss back a few drinks of your choice and talk bikes or rides or what ever suits us. The first Meet and Greet was a success I think and the group that showed up decided to make it a regular event.
So here it is
What: Portland Meet & Greet
When: Third Wednesday of each month
Time: For now let's set the time at around 6:30pm
Where: Pyramind Breweries McTarnahan Taproom
2730 NW 31st Portland Oregon, 97210
Hope to see you there by car, truck, and hopefully some by BMW.


text:
Over the last little while I managed to complete Torchlight 2 and, more recently, Borderlands 2.
I definitely enjoyed Torchlight 2 more than I did the first which seemed more and more about delving down deeper and deeper (mostly), kill quests on those levels and the odd side dungeon. TL2 has more of a linear horizontal story, taking you outside with dips into dungeons as part of the story or as side quests. Much better than just the single town as a hub if you prefer a little more exploration.
I liked the randomness of the levels more than I did with Diablo 3 (which had better graphics). There outdoors seemed to be somewhat randomly generated. I didn't replay too many of the levels to get a feel for how they do it (and I didn't look it up) but it seems different enough from when I played alone or with the boys.
I also preferred the leveling/character growth options in TL2 over D3. I found the D3 abilities sort of lacking choice and customization – a direction that seems to be common for Blizzard now. I like the choices and ability to pick between trees or combine them. I like choice. I'll stop there before I go off on a tangent.
Steam reports I spent about 23 hours on the game – this includes some time dabbling with the different classes and playing with the boys who didn't really take to the game as much as some other games.
Borderlands 2 was completed just the other day. I started playing as Salvador with the boys (LBO was playing Axton while LLO was playing Zero) but we didn't get too far before LBO took off playing Axton while I wasn't around, vastly passing me in levels making playing together difficult – he was hosting on my old (but awesome) machine so enemies scaled to his level and his missions progression was much farther along.
I took to playing single player and decided to try Maya out. I got farther along with Maya, enjoying her ability more than Salavdor's. I got her up to mid-20s when the LBO needed some help with the Bunker mission so I helped him out – even being several levels too low, Maya's ability to do some crowd control helped out. I also had her spec'ed to do acid damage when shooting targets and explode with fire damage centered on the target she CCed – both of those were vastly beneficial against Hyperion loaders and the bunker itself.
I then proceeded to help him in the Angel Core.
Downside of that was it updated my quest log and appeared to cause me to lose some quests since I wasn't far enough along to actually do the Bunker mission. Very strange and that caused me to stall on continuing. I popped on to help LLO with Bunker and the Angel Core then later loaded up LBO's Axton to help LLO with the Warrior. He had was loaded into LBO's game when LBO beat the game and so he got credit which meant he wasn't going to face Jack and the Warrior, just the Warrior. He was really disappointed with this because only one Jack face head mod dropped and he missed out on it.
So multiplayer doesn't quite separate single player progression. I suggest keeping a character for single player if you're a completionist and don't want to miss out on anything.
With Maya's quest log in a messed up state (some quests were categorized under 'blocked') I decided to reroll as Zero. I started going down the Sniper tree but decided it was too similar to how I was playing Mordecai in the first Borderlands so I decided to try out the melee (Bloodshed) spec.
Damn… once you hit the top of the tree it becomes a wrecking machine. If you kill a target with melee, deception triggers again, pops out a decoy again (only one up at a time) and resets the timer. In combination with Execute (lunging towards the target in your crosshair, doing lots of damage) it works well for disabling a whole squad of enemies. For the tougher ones, you can soften them up with a grenade then zip through, assassinating them one by one.
The Warrior isn't really an encounter that doesn't really suit melee very well. I beat the stuffing out of Jack though.
For the last few parts of the game, the boys hopped on and helped me out. First the LBO showed up with Salvador (well suited to him – he tears around the maps in a frenzy shooting everything) and later the LBO popped on with his Axton (I respec'ed him to have a Longbow, Nuke turret which was impressive). Amazingly, LBO showed a lot of patience and didn't do much more than bail me out if I was in a downed state since he was already into the second playthrough (which means he was level 40 something, 10 levels higher than I was, and geared up with far better gear).
It was definitely a lot of fun, especially playing with the both the boys. We decided we would use the skin customization for "Bandits" and be the "Bandit Clan"… okay, they decided that, I wanted to use the Hyperion skins for an extra F U to Handsome Jack but got out voted.
Again, another game with a talent tree allowing you to focus or adjust how your play your character to emphasize on different aspects or generalize.
I won't go on a rant about how WoW's simplification of this is a bad thing for players – really only a good thing for developers. Devs have it easier to balance the game since they don't need to worry about predicting hybrid specs; yes, they did away with a portion of this by forcing you down one tree… now they've taken trees away entirely.
Sad panda. (see what I did there?)
The game itself is pretty much like the first one, only a little more story driven. The same twisted humor exists in the game, be it quests, introduction of bosses or NPCs you interact with (Tina is a nutter and Elle is … well… jeez.).
I like what they hinted at with the end of the game – a map of various systems containing vaults. Oh, that was a spoiler, by the way.
At first I wasn't too keen on the change to the customization system – you basically find or are rewarded with skin or head customizations which are preset. After some time, the collector in me started to enjoy it and I suspect I spent a lot of time running from vending machine to vending machine to collect all the different company based skins (Dahl Elite, Maliwan, Torgue, etc.).
The multiplayer setup was much easier than the previous version. It ties right into Steam Friends or XBox friends (if you're playing the XBox version) and lets you see (and join) friends when they're playing. There are settings to make the game private though, so if you don't want to be disturbed, you don't need to be.
Steam says I've spent 95 hours playing Borderlands 2. Wow! That's not to say one play through takes that long, it's a combination of my playing Salvador, Maya and Zero through a lot of the content.
Fun game.