text:
The Breakfast Club
"The world's an imperfect place, sir. Screws fall out all the time."
It's 10:30 on a Saturday morning, so there's no better time for a quote from The Breakfast Club. Plus, when I walked into the press box, the Giants' PR interns were watching the movie, which is what made me think of that line.
Meanwhile, I had breakfast this morning in a diner down the street from our hotel and saw several Dodger fans up here. Also noticed a feint chant last night at AT&T Park of "Let's Go Dodgers" late in the game. Good to see you all out in full force in the Bay Area, where the team has won nine straight games.
Today's game is on FOX regionally. Mike Lieberthal will read off the lineups for your entertainment and Rick Honeycutt will be interviewed in game. Here's the non-Lieberthal version of the lineups:
Furcal, SS
Pierre, CF (three straight multi-hit games and five in last six games)
Martin, C (has reached base in eight straight PA and has five consecutive hits)
Kent, 2B
Gonzo, LF
Loney, 1B (eight hits in last 14 at-bats)
Betemit, 3B
Ethier, RF (five hits and six RBI in his last two games)
Lowe, P
Safe to say, the kids are playing well these days. And speaking of kids at play, tomorrow, President George W. Bush will host a tee ball game on the White House lawn in honor of Jackie Robinson's 60th anniversary of breaking the color barrier. The game will host teams from the Inner-City Little League of Brooklyn, NY and the Wrigley Little League of Los Angeles, CA, the two home cities of Robinson's team, the Dodgers. The Dodgers will be represented by Special Advisor to the Chairman Tommy Lasorda, Director of Community Affairs Don Newcombe and Senior Vice President of Public Affairs, Howard Sunkin. This will be the 17th tee ball game at the White House and it will bring together some of Robinson's original teammates and other notable baseball icons.
232 Comments
First comment!!
Go Blue
Why does Ethier always bat 8th? I don't think he sees the best pitches because the pitcher is always batting after him. If there are runners on for him with two outs, the opposing team seems to just walk him to get to the pitcher. I don't think that Betemit would get an IBB batting 8th. It looks like Nomar is slowly becoming a platoon player. I'm not really surprised when i don't see him in the lineup
Did you ever wonder if they weren't Dodger fans but Giant fans mocking their own team with that "Let's go Dodgers" chant while the Dodgers were taking BP in the top of the 9th? Always my bad luck they do that when I'm not keeping score. Maybe I should stop keeping score. I'd like to be at the White House lawn when they honor Jackie Robinson's 60th anniversary breaking the Color Barrier with Tommy LaSorda and Don Newcombe and some of Robby's old team team mates, my boyhood team, with Howard Sunkin. B'klyn vs LA little league,in a Tee Ball game great show. I just ordered a Jackie Robinson 60th Anniversary T-Shirt and a regular J.R. T-shirt. In today's game I'd like to see the MEAT MAN at 3rd base get his 10th HR. If these guys can keep up the fine hitting it could take the pressure off our starting pitching and our great relief core later in the games. I see LaSorda & Milano have big blogs which I like to comment on. Well it's Saturday after noon and I'll be LISTENING to the game(No Dodger TV) to the East today. So all I can say is LETS GO DODGERS!!!!!
Let's GO DODGERS!!!!!!!
let's make it 10!!!!!!!!!
the gnats are looking pathetic for years to come I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!
Interesting 2nd in batting, 3rd in hits, MARTIN 6th in RBI, 45 hits in the last 3 games but very Dodger like 40 singles.
That's interesting too that 1st inning for LOWE but very Lowelike 2errors a hit and a double play.
Charlie Steiner & Rick Monday said it's not that much of a rivalry when you look at the standings. Since when has the standings meant anything.
The Dodgers & Giants even now are the greatest rivalry in all of sports. There truly is no domination. And the standings never mattered.
It's another LOWELIKE game which is turning out be LOWE keeping the ball on the ground "Lowelike" but the Dodgers keep their hitting shoes in their lockers. Lowe's pop up bunt cost us a run. How long will this go on?
Betemit is a difference maker with one swing, something this team needs. Also, for that to go over the glove of Bonds made it even more sweet. I love that opposite field HR swing from Betemit.
The MEAT MAN just as I wished for with number 10. He joins old reliable KENT, MARTIN & da GONZ.
Furcal coming up big with the RISP w/2 out RBI!
if Furcal gets hot like he did last year after his injuries went away this team will be alot better.
Its tough to find a place for Kemp now. Ethier is doing well and so is Gonzo.
I know MARTIN has 11 I meant in double digets
Pierre and Martin coming up with clutch base hits!
LOWE sitting in the dug out must of forgot he's pitching.
OMG KENT! love it! nice job by raffy, pierre and martin as well
Is That Really Phonebooth park almost sounded like Dodger Stadium with that Kent Shot. Nice of Morris to throw some 5th inn. BP.
Why would anybody be worried about KEMP right now? Winning is the bottom line, not Kemp. Don't worry He'll get ABs.
This not good you like to shut a team down after you get a big lead.
NOW LET'S GET THEM 2 RUNS BACK. Lowe proberbly not use to waiting that long in the dugout to pitch.
the best way to develop young players is to give them as many ABs as possible. The best way for Kemp to learn how to hit a breaking ball is to get him as many ABs as possible. It's simple. The concern for Kemp is warranted. He is very talented and we want him to realize that talent asap. But yes, winning is the most important thing. Can't get Gonzo out of the lineup, Ethier is heating up, and Pierre's contract won't get benched anytime soon. Kemp will just get playing time against lefty's and pinch hit oppurtunites. Time to bench Nomar on a more consistent basis? How bout just playing Nomar when they're playing at home? Betimit needs to play.
Love seein Lowe get some run support, if he had run support he would have the most wins in baseball right now but thats the past now. If the dodgers continue to hit like they have been since Mueller took over look forward to seein the Dodgers pursue that 100 win mark and an easy div. title. I am lookin forward to a GREAT 2nd half and some exciting October baseball. Dodgers V. Pads. in the NLCS????
I agree with Kemp needing at bats but there is no room for him right now, Ethier is heating up, Gonzo has been there all yr and Pierre is very important to our run scoring ability (also Kemp is not a CF). I think I would take my chances with Nomar on a consistent basis then Betemit, Betemit wasnt great last yr either only hitting in the 260 range, a slumping Nomar is more productive. I have a question though in order to get a big bat the Dodgers would have to give up Kemp, Ethier, or Loney who would be expendable?
I hope LOWE just had a bad inning. I hope it ain't he can't pitch well with a lead.
***I said a big bat, I meant big bat or frontline starter…
I was talking winning is more important than KEMP getting at bat's TODAY. GRADY is giving everybody a chance to hit which is good for all including KEMP and the Dodgers. I think he'll bat today, regardless of what happens in the game.
Gotta get out of this inning. Then the bullpen. OKAY we're out of it.
spanky i disagree… betimit showed good power last year, and has shown good power this year. You can't just measure their performances by batting average. Nomar does not take any walks either.
pierre… i see. I was just saying I'm concerned about Kemp's ABs and subsequently his development. Just pointing it out. Realistically, you have to go with who's hot in LF and RF, and Pierre in CF because of that contract… just shouldn't forget about Kemp.
This is our time of the game I don't think LOWE should come back we, as I say, are inside our own BULLPEN.
6 out of 7 multi hit games for Pierre, good thing we're only playing him because of his contract…he's locked in right now!
We have wonderful problems right now, Tied for first and hoping our young hitters get a chance to hit.
We can use some groundhog runs here.
Good to see KENT the "old man" have a good day.
SEEEEEEEEEEEEEE KEMP in right field.
Beimel just set up Bonds and blew him away!
Beimel was freaking filthy in that 7th inning!
BEIMEL why the bar that night before then NLDS? Yah nevahhh know. JOE learned his lesson I hope.
I agree I wanna see Kemp in their as much as you do I really enjoy watchin him hit, he has more power then Ethier and also more potential but I believe Ethier is more polished and better RIGHT NOW, but it will be nice seein Etheir in left and Kemp in Right next yr. lineup of the future looks nice.
Furcal SS (gotta resign him)
Pierre CF
Martin C
Loney 1B
Kemp RF/LF
Ethier LF/RF
LaRoche 3B
Abreu 2B
and thats just our farm system maybe a trade for a third basemen in store, I woudl liek thatbut I have not seen much of LaRoche.
But I do like our chances with our lineup right now ESPECIALLY if Kent gets hot.
It sure is nice to see Barry and that big ol' head of his hitless over the last two games.
I know, i hated watching him get walked all the time I love seein him ge tpitched to with 1st base open and doing nothing its so great. I almost expect him to break the record against the dodgers if I remember right he hit #500, 600 and 700 againts us.
The MEAT MAN is 2-4. How's his bowling average.
That's should How's his bowling average after going 2-4?
He is stroking the ball well today even his right handed at bat he hit the ball well. I still think Nomar should get his noram amount of starts and at bats, he's a great player. Maybe a sudden surge would make Betemit worth more on the market. What do you gusy think frontline starter or big bat (witht he recent surge of offense)?
Bonds hit his 5-6 & 700HRs against us? Are you sure?
I'm almost certain im looking it up right now, I remember 500 it was off Chan Ho Park.
nope wow i butchered that one I dont know where that came from but he did hit 500 off the dodgers in a Chan Ho Park start but Chan Ho Park was out…sorry bad information lol
Stiener & Monday talking about Jackie Robinson when he was traded to GNATS. NO WAY said JACK. I RETIRE. The last great thing to happen to the Dodgers in B'klyn. He would not put on the uniform of the black & the orange.
The kid lost his control Grady, pull him out of there.
I'm wrong the last best thing to happen was winning the pennant in 1956. But Jackie NOT going to the Giants was also good.
Ok seriously who didn't see that coming after being hit in the foot…Gibson style…I may puke
Un-believeable. A grand slam when he should have been yanked.
TSAO was sourer today.
tsao owes Derrick a big fat dinner, at a place of derricks choosing.
Please tell me this is not another nice start for Lowe where he gets No Decision.
Still up by one Lowe still in line to win it
Now it's our type of game again.
Well that at least give BROXTON another HOLD. SAITO was ready to come in last night before the barrage, so now's we wait for him again.
What did I say about the standing? This started in the 1800's.
Oh man Bonds vs. Saito…this is gonna be good
KEMP 1for1. LET'S GO SAITO
It's time for that funny feeling in your chest.
Man all the momentum is on the Giants side, we really need to dig deep and get out of here with the W.
Let's get two.
Nice play by Betemit to get Klesko
Let's end this thing, Sammy.
Bonds can still run.
One more Saito
WOW I'm listening and I'm glad I didn't see that with ETHIER.
It's rust from not pitching for a week
I new walking Bonds would hurt. Stealing 2nd was killer.
Another no-decision for LOWE.
**** we don't have Kent, Gonzo, Abreu and we only have Seanez, Stults and Hendrickson (on his side day) to pitch.
Let's hope the team doesn't feel like we do as they come to bat.
Geez, too scared to pitch to Bonds. I would have rather him knock it out then walk him and let those other grits knock him in.
Good patience for LONEY
Just get a freaking sac fly and we can send Saito back out there for a 2nd chance
Let's hope they keep it going, the MEAT MAN must be seeing the ball GOOOOD.
Nevermind we had to PH for him
Once again Lowe is left without the win that poor guy he should be like 13-2….
Always afraid something bad will happen but you never know how it will happen.
Why not nomar in that situation????
Unreal. If Furcal doesnt get a hit here, we will lose it!
I can't watch this anymore it's inevitable
one bright side…tomko is starting now so he wont come in!
typical dodger game. pitch to bonds and its probably over.
am i the only ones thats not surprised that Olmedo versus a righty didn't work out that well?
this is pathetic.
PAIN IS RIGHT alex and it keeps coming back. Sometimes I wonder why I couldn't become a Yankee OR a MET fan. But MY blood runs blue.
I agree Max, where the **** is Nomar???? I pick Nomar over Saenz any day, at least Nomar does not get doubled up there.
we deserve to lose this one. horrible defense all game.
It's seems everybody has lost faith. But what can you do in these games.
seriously… a fly ball is all we needed tomato.
HUGE!!!!!!! Loney
its our game now, our bullpen vs theres….
Thank you LONEY you can play that position O.K.
I just hope LONEY didn't prolong the agony.
Martin seems to have homerun magic vs Giants strike again?
"Oinkmedo" Saenz ought to be DFA'd – absolutely worthless anymore. If Grady lets him hit in another crucial game situation, he should be DFA's as well, but then he should be gone after this season anyway.
does anyone else notice martin drops the F bomb everytime he pops up I enjoy watching him play most heart by a dodger then i have seen ina long time.
Maybe KEMP….
Maybe Barroids vs Lurch.
Game OVER!
i have noticed martin dropping the f bomb when he pops up. i love it!
How often can you get passed Bonds?
ok good zobeida I wa shioping i wasnt the only one lol, dont pitch around Bonds and we will get thru this inning u cant just keep giving them a free runner
I was hoping*
YHEY ZOBEIDA you don't have the mancrush when MARTIN pops up DOyou?
lol its nice to see someone wanna do well every at bat. You see so many hitters these days act as if they dont care, you sure cant say that about Rus
Bonds: TOUGH OUT.
Bonds is not as tough as he used to be not so tough you should pitch around him every at bat like when he juiced every night. Hendrickson has been great for us this yr, Cant downplay his importance at all.
HENDRICKSON HENDRICKSON HENDRICKSON COM'ON GUYS LET's WIN IT.
You have to admire Hendrickson's spunk in this one. Very nicely done. We need to win this one for him.
Hendy has come in time in and time out to give us 2-3 good innings out of the bullpen on numerous occasions.
haha i can't have a man crush because i'm not a man, but if he pops out, well too bad…what can you do, eh?
nice job hendrickson. now, let's score some runs in the 12th…pleeeease
Let's pray that Lurch has a little more left. 2 innings, one hit, no runs. Nice work Hendy!!!
Let's get some runs and finish this off, then send Lowe out for a really nice dinner and apologize for blowing what should be his win.
Just Wonderin…
well apparently if thats the case Lowe should be fattened up at this point.
Nice hit James. Let's bring him home!!!
no screwin this up this game is ours!
Yes I can see KEMP & LONEY
Betemit SHOULD be at 2nd he needs to hustle all the way.
As long as the bases are not loaded we can score some runs.
Let's HOPE HOPE HOPE first & 3rd and nobody out means nothing.
to the outfield c'mon ethier
flyball to bonds and he throws out his arm throwing home and misses the res tof the season 😀
We need a hit IN SYNCK
Wow lets go Raffy…you cant double up Raffy why would they do that??? Well there stupid move.
OK now, two in scoring position, let's put SOMETHING on the board.
Let's go Dodgers!!!
Only the Dodgers…. Why is it soooHARD.
Oh no, bases loaded. Not our strong point….
at a boy Raffy great PA
one more knock Pierre, another multi hit game, btw.
Sooner or Later it's got to happen…. an SF. Maybe we can hold. COM 'ON GUYS.
Let's hope that will be enough. I love this game!!!
Like I said with Hendy before Seanez has been the same way this yr he has come up big for us. Look for this game to be over in 10 mins.
that ball had me sweatin a lil lol.
Here we go again…
LET'S hope that THEIR hit.
This LEWIS kid…BE CAREFUL
huge to pull out this game, great pitching hendy and rudy. Can you saw 10 in a row behind enemy lines in SF.
can u say****lol
niiice phew!
I remember as a kid in school the priciple took over an hour to unravel rosary beads he never gave up and at the end he said "THAT WAS EASY"
Again Derek LOWE no Luck…. But we won and what can we add….
now THAT was a giants dodgers game.
Now we need to send some good vibes to Tomko for tomorrow. He's been pretty rough this year but I can't believe that he is done. Bring home the sweep, Brett.
firstname.lastname@example.com But we won and what can we add…. Well I can add that Grady still doesn't know when to pull a pitcher and it almost cost another game, that and he was so sure he had the game won he pulled out Kent and Gonzo. Bochy left Bonds in the whole game ,why couldn't Grady leave those guys in? Also when you lead 7-2 in the eighth inning you should go with your best in Broxton and finish off the other team. After all, he had to use Broxton anyway, and then had to use up more of his pen. Good win but terrible managing.
I feel so bad for DLowe…
A couple thoughts: I agree with messagebear about Olmaedo… He hasnt been making good contact for pretty much the entire year and is pulling his head and flying off of EVERY ball. He seems pretty much worthless, and that being said i wwas very disappointed when they didnt pinch hit Nomar.. I really cant think of any reason why Grady did that..
Terrible move by Boschy to IBB Nomar, but thank you anyways… Very weird game. I dont think we should have taken Tsao out when he gave up the granny. There were two outs. if Winn does something than than he is gone but its hard to imagine that something would be a granny. After he hit that ball of his foot and looked hurt i was thrilled, thinking all Tsao had to do was get a fastball over the plate.. Which is apparantly what he though too, and proved us both wrong.
Anyone remember last year, i dont remember the opponent but i believe it was a home day game? Anyways, Kemp did pretty much the same thing. Hit a ball hard off his foot and wobbled around for a while. Got back in, next pitch hit a bomb to center. It was a nice moment..
Solid game today bc we won, but ridiculously close. Im glad we pulled it out though because after Olmado failed so miserably in the 10th i sincerely thought we were done.
I said a prayer for TOMKO last Sunday at Our lady Of Mount Carmel Church, when I thought he was starting. My prayer was answered when he didn't start. This week I'll have to do it again looks like this is for real. I'd just like to say that that was a satifying win today especially leading 6-0 and 7-2 before they tied it up. That must make them REAL MAD and I hope they stay that way. The gnat fans are saying "youse were lucky". My answer is THAT'S RIIIIGHT.
Fliegel, you leave Bonds in bc you are 10 games back and if you pull him everyone will leave. You cant fault grady for not pulling Tsao there– we were up by 5 runs. Please– up by 5 runs you should bring in your best.. Hindsight is always 20/20 buddy– lets be realistic. If you;re up 7-2 you save your best…
You guys are excited that we won but wait we are going to go into a losing streak i bet all you a 100% the reason is that we are not using are talented plyers like kemp,loney,la roche,eithier,Blake DeWitt,Preston Mattingly,Josh Bell all these players are way better than furcal,pierre,ganzo and kent these are all old farts if this franchise was wise we would trade for even more talent.we should trade or sit pierre he stinks.
preciado – Are you serious? DeWitt is hitting .300 in his SECOND MINOR LEAGUE SEASON with zero HR's, Bell is hitting .274 in his SECOND SEASON and Mattingly, drafted one year ago, is a 19 year old kid that is hitting all of .239 in single A ball, and you are ready to hand them the keys? They'll be fine, someday, but they are not ready for the show. Do your homework.
lots of competition for a-rod this winter.
Red Sox Will Pursue A-Rod This Winter
According to Bill Madden and Mark Feinsand, the Red Sox will make a "huge push" for Alex Rodriguez this winter if he opts out of his contract. The New York Daily News writers heard this from multiple sources.
Madden and Feinsand's source seems to indicate the push for A-Rod would be driven by team president and CEO Larry Lucchino. In other words, this wil go past Theo Epstein (Buster Olney indicated today that he'd be loathe to tie up 20% of the payroll in one player).
The Red Sox entered 2007 with a $143MM payroll, up $23MM from 2006. Here are the major changes we can expect for 2008:
$2MM more for Manny Ramirez
$1MM more for Julio Lugo
$2MM more for Daisuke Matsuzaka
$3.5MM more for Josh Beckett
$1.25MM more for Coco Crisp
An additional $9.75MM in escalating salaries
$13MM for Curt Schilling
9.5MM for Matt Clement
$9MM for Mike Lowell
$2.81MM for Eric Hinske
$4MM for Joel Pineiro
$2.8MM for Mike Timlin
$41.11MM off the books
The Red Sox are essentially gaining $31MM to play with for 2008, if they are to keep payroll around $143MM. That gels nicely with the expected salary of Rodriguez. And the team isn't overflowing with needs – they could conceivably just replace Schilling with Clay Buchholz and keep Julian Tavarez around as the fifth starter. And maybe they'll toss another $6MM or so toward crappy veteran relievers. The trio of Papelbon, Okajima, and Delcarmen could be cheap and effective.
Bottom line: the Red Sox could sign A-Rod this winter and enter 2008 with a reasonable $150MM payroll (less than a 5% increase and still far less than the Yankees).
interesting game.
1) i don't think i mind a future OF of kemp/JP/ethier for the next several years. having said that, if ned chooses to dump JP and bring in a bopping CF, i'm sure i won't mind that.
2) wonder when delwyn young is going to get a shot to rake in the big show. wasn't he an ex-2b-man? more flexibility for the Blue: backup OF/2b.
3) i think i don't like how grittle uses our bullpen. and i don't want to get into specifics right now, but it's how i feel.
4) as exciting this year is, next year is going to be fun to watch more of the kids play everyday.
5) i get the sense that somehow, someway, betemit is going to end up playing 3b everyday for the Blue, not laroche. though i'd LOVE to see LA-ROD here despite the $25mm bucks he'll cost. that would lave laroche/betemit as trade bait to shore up our BP/SP. we'll have a lot more cash to spend if/when nomas and kent are gone…
have a good night everybody! great to pick up another W. first Nl team to 51!
: email@example.com | I understand what you're saying, and hindsight is 20/20 ,but my point was that when a team is down in the late innings you should go with your best, and finish them off.Then if you still lose, you did all that you can do. Grady had to use Broxton anyway ,and Grady almost turned a win into a loss.
How about Ethier to CF and Kemp to RF vs the lefty tommorrow? I mean **** were throwing Tomko, why not try it?
Kemp vs lefties:
.405av .439ob .898ops
Pierre vs lefties :
.232av .245ob .508ops
In case you were wondering:
.333.405.936 gonzo vs left
.322.365.840 ethier
pierre is an everyday guy thats why we got him……..d-backs up going into botton of 9
even though he was platoon splits…
anyways we're facing a lot of LHP after this so clearly kemp will be playing plenty.
Pierre's contract is the only thing keeping him in the lineup.
i found it rather interesting that the Dodgers are interesting in Scott Procter and Octavio Dotel.
Madres lost.
pierre's contract is the only thing keeping him in the lineup? haha okay..go ahead and disregard what he's done the entire season…instead, keep on focusing on his negatives (as if no player has negatives), and then mention his contract as even more support..but to say that that is the sole reason? lol..
what has pierre done the whole season? have probably the worst first half of his career?
not the mention the fact he's on pace for a historically bad year for anyone Dodgers centerfielder in history.
he's been steady as of late and is contributing to Dodger wins….everytime he gets on base, you know something's gonna happen on the bases.. and he's also been hitting well as of let with strings of multi-hit games and clutch rbi hits….but then again, if he didnt have such a big contract, he would have been DFA'd, cuz apparently he cant play in the majors talent-wise….
it's hard to believe people hating a particular Dodger as much as you do, especially coming from a Dodger Fan..it makes it seem like you're rooting against him to succeed or something….i mean, it's perfectly fine to not like certain players, but to nitpick and find every conceivable reason to hate the guy, that just gets annoying…I can't wait for his next 0-4 game, he'll get blasted on this blog..thats just the way it goes…
tommorow's another day, and our next loss (hopefully not for a while) will undoubtedly be Grady, Ned, Nomar and JP's "fault"….just wondering who gets the credit for the Dodgers win? Last time i checked, we win as a team and lose as a team….
by the way…now we're in FIRST place….hopefully we stay on top the rest of the way…go BLUE! 🙂
casino… the thing about Pierre is not that we're are nitpicking on him, its that he just can't hit very well. For a guy at the top of the lineup, #1 or #2, he doesn't not get on base enough. A .313 OBP is just not good at all, even if a .284 BA is attached to it. a good OBP would be around .360 and up. Most of his hits are singles, so most of the time with Pierre a walk is as good as a hit. Sure he steals a lot of bags, but he gets thrown out a lot too. And his defense is not very good. Those are BIG things I am pointing out agreed? Truth is many people believe Matt Kemp is already a better player that Pierre, but Pierre's contract won't let him sit in favor of Kemp. Of course we aren't rooting against him or any Dodger, but that contract is really killer for the next 5 years.
i agree its a big contract…..what i don't get is why certain players get picked on and some don't. For instance, Loney's consecutive game error streak he's currently on….no one grills him on that? But if it was nomar or JP, they would be grilled to the ground and you would never hear the end of it.
What about Kemp's predictable strikeouts? I think the league knows that you can probably throw him 3 straight breaking balls and probably get a swinging K….
but for all the bad things that Kemp and Loney or other dodgers do (which is rare), they do good things as well, like Loney's good defensive plays for example and it all balances out, which is great.
So im just wondering why JP or anyone else doesnt get the same treatment? If you're going to overlook some problems and give the guy a pass, why do certain guys not get the same? Everytime i hear a Nomar or JP interview and you see how much they care and how much they want to go out there and stay positive and win, you can't but root for the guys….It's just sad that after hearing post game interviews from them, I have to come on this BLOG and here the same complaining, nitpicking that goes on, most of which is pretty predictable by now..
Loney and Kemp have a lot of talent, and have "high ceilings". We know what Pierre can do and for the most part it is not as good as what Loney or Kemp might be able to do. Also, look at the numbers… both Loney and Kemp are hitting around .400 with power. Pierre and Nomer have flailed at the plate all year. Neither has much power or patience at the plate. Again its not nitpicking… these are BIG things that Nomar and Pierre have not done well this year. They also get paid A LOT more than Loney and Kemp, so more is expected from them. I think our arguments are quite fair and logical.
casinod, the answer is simple. first of all, pierre and nomar were brought here (and being paid handsomely) to get the job done and for the most part they haven't. true pierre has picked it up a bit. some people just don't like what pierre brings to the game because our team would have been better served by bringing in a power hitter, even though it became very difficult to do so. people aren't going to harp on everything the kids do wrong because 1) we are rooting hard for them to do well so that they stick and b) they are green and going to make mistakes, and they're human. vetertans like pierre etc. are human also but contribution and consistency are expected from them, and when they don't come through its frustrating. its exciting for people to see the prospects we've been hearing about for so long finally come up and do well. even when they're not perfect its fun to watch them play. nomar and pierre are both hard workers and they'll continue to be and im sure every wants them to do well. however, players with big contracts who fail to live up to expectations are going to be the source of frustration and complaints.
forgot to mention..betemit had a great game….you can see how happy he gets when he gets those hits…it must be tough being on the bench, but at least he doesn't pout about it, and makes the best of it when he gets to play, a true team player!
Anyone see Kent rub Martin on the head after touching home on that 3-run homer? I think Kent was giving props to Martin for keeping the inning alive with that 2 out rbi to right field, leading to the 3-run bomb….nice to see that vet leadership out of Kent 🙂
yah, well i'm not disagreeing with your points….the kids are showing great flashes, and they have nothing but high ceilings, and I can wait for them to hit those ceilings and reach their max potential..
i'm just kind of tired of coming on this BLOG and predicting what comments are going to be made during and after the game about certain players. Comments like "now that's how a real center fielder should play" kind of rub me the wrong way when you're basically putting down a Dodger player…but i guess that's me, and from the short time i've been on this blog, i've kind of notice that's how it goes around here….that, and blaming grady or NED after every loss, it never gets old i guess 🙂
It's all about giving proper due when Pierre's does right and letting him know when he's done wrong. There is not nearly enough of that from some on this blog, they play their favorites and let the little things go, but some have it in for Pierre and don't give a **** what good he's done for this team at times, especially in the past three weeks. Whatever, let them hold their grudge, if we all got along this blog would be bland.
I actually didn't stop watching today, but did have to leave since the game ran way long, I listened to Steiner yell play by play in the 12th, though I like him regardless and always have since his ESPN days. really impressive 2 innings of relief from Hendrickson to keep us in it. Loney and Betemit set the table and Furcal did exactly what was needed (a sac fly), S.D lost so we have sole possession of first place and the best record in the National League.
Tough game tomorrow, but gotta hold out hope our offense can keep it going and Tomko can just keep us in it. Saito will bounce back, he's still the best!
lol… "steiner yell play by play"
How is it possible for someone to only walk 15 times in 392 PAs? How about just 17 extra base hits in 392 PAs? and 255 outs plus 9 Caught Stealing to equal 264 outs in 392 PAs? Is this player worth 9 million per year for 5 years? ehhh….
another hard luck game for lowe. what does he need to do to get a win?
listen dodgerdude
JP has 14 hits in the last 7 games.
There are players who perform far worse and get paid far more (Barry Zito, Richie Sexton, JD Drew just to name a few)
is he worth it? probably not…
should he be bashed everytime he does something wrong while not being recognized when he does something well? i guess it depends on your overall view towards him I guess..
i can't control that unfortunately…but personally, I tend not to judge a player on stats in relation to how much money he makes…that's kind of a weird ratio and it detracts from actually enjoying a game when i'm looking at how much money the guy makes in deciding whether I like him or not….but hey, that's just me 🙂
you're right casinod, the pleasure i derive out of games is watching good, talented ball players show what they can do. thats the argument, because you could make one that pierre simply isn't a good ballplayer. that detracts from MY enjoyment. but hey, to each his own.
i don't disagree, we all have our opinions…… and you're certainly entitled to your opinion, and its unfortunate that you have to watch dodger games with a player you feel isn't good enough to play, such as JP, and its even more unfortunate that it's taking away from your enjoyment of watching the game…
But i must tell you, nothing you or I say on this BLOG will take him out of the lineup or off the team, unless Grady or NED decide to take let one of you guys write the lineup or make personnel decisions and DFA JP, so i guess until that happens, MY personal enjoyment derived from reading this BLOG will be kept at a minimum with the same old negative comments that apply to the same players on our squad (win or lose)…
but luckily for me, watching the games is way more fun than reading this blog 🙂
we should have resigned Kenny Lofton but enough with the whole Pierre argument. I still dont think he'll play out that entire contract in Dodger blue anyways.
SO what about tomorrow…i'll say tomko goes 4 1/3 and gives up a bomb to barriods and allows 5 runs. Thats actually my optimistic outlook.
so long as tommorow's a WIN 🙂
bombko is basically a form of surrender now.
Stats are a big part on how players are evaluated by most people casio… the problem with evaluating on what u see is that you dont always see everything a player does. What if in a week a player goes 6 for 24(.250), but you only saw 3 games that week and he went 4 for 12(.333) in those games, and 2 for 12(.167) in the other 3 games. You might get the impression that the player is better than he is because of what you saw. Simple example but u get my point. Now the money part of that is important because, well, good baseball players cost a lot of money. And when u pay a player "good baseball player money" they should play like a good baseball player.
since everyone thinks we'll lose tommorrow, we'll probably win. isn't that how it always works?
jp will be a crucial part of our championship puzzle watch
umm, we'll ive been watching the Dodgers the entire season, so I pretty much know what type of players we have on our team, so it's not like i'm watching from afar….there are higher paid players on other teams that are having worse seasons than some of our guys….
what i don't get is how far out of their way some people would go to criticize our players…it's even more noticeable after a loss, and the same group of people are to blame.
For now, it is what it is…we're not the GM's, so we cant change the situation and the roster, so now that we have the guys on our roster, why not go ahead and support them, give them props when they do well, as well as let them know when they do bad? But apparently, its only the latter that happens far too often..
Juan Pierre is probably our 4th best outfielder. 5th in you count Loney.
I don't see how hard it is to look at his stats and comprehend that. Do you guys think we just make this stuff up? Come on now really.
Don't get me wrong, if we win it all with this roster I will be the happiest man alive. There's nothing wrong with wanting the best players possible play for your team right? I just think Pierre was a mistake, but if we win it all I wont ever say another word about it.
Even if you see every game, how can u possibly remember every single play and everything each player does. How can you make a fair and complete assessment of a player without stats? Stats are vital to evaluating baseball players.
Joy to the world, we're in first place, best record in the N.L and we're talking about Juan Pierre…again. This is so simple, when Pierre does something well comment, instead of ignoring it and waiting for him to ground out to pop on here and comment. Other than that I really don't care what you think of him, he's a Dodger, he can help this team, we're winning with him, he's not going anywhere and he's going to play every single day. This topic has been done to death! We all get it…we've gotten it for the past 7 months since the man was signed. But I will say this he's probably a better person than 95% of the players in this league. I respect him and he deserves more respect than some of you give him on and off the field.
sure, maybe pierre might have been a mistake, for his salary and the length of his contract, and sure maybe his stats are a bit off of what you might expect for a guy getting paid $9-10 million.
But does he really have to be brought up negatively time and time again? I mean, we're halfway through the season and past the all-star break and people are still complaining? If there's so much complaining right now about him and his contract, I cant even start to imagine what it was like when he was first signed…
I guess my point is that it would be nice to come on this Blog and not get stats thrown up about how "bad" pierre is, comments about what a "real center fielder looks like", how we should have signed "player X, Y, and Z over Pierre" and how pierre's walk to bi-weekly paycheck ratio is so low compared to the national average… 🙂
i guess i'm just used to being on different sites, like Lakers forums where they actually talk about the game that was played, rather than talking about the past and who we should have signed, and then dwelling on this miscue by brining up every conceivable stat to back it up, as if that's going to change anything..
Alex…amen….from now on, i'm just going to post about the game and stop trying to get my point across, because we all know the bickering/bashing of our own players won't stop, especially since the "stats" prove it, and somehow that justifies continuous bashing? *shrugs*
anyways, we're in FIRST PLACE and let's keep it that way!!!!!!!!!!!!
you can't compare other sports to baseball. Baseball is less subjective than other sports. Stats are a big part of baseball guys. U know who the original stats guy in baseball was? Our very own Branch Rickey. He was the first to use OBP as a way to measure a player's value… among the other great things he did. Jackie Robinson was a high on-base "moneyball" type guy… only he had some speed as well. How can we talk about the dodger without talking about Pierre who will end up taking about 700 ABs for the dodgers this year?
The reason we "focus" on the bad is because he does more "bad" than most 9 million dollar a year players should. I'm not saying he's the most overpaid and underachieving player in baseball, but he's among them.
anyway… we're in first by 1 game, and Bomko is pitching tomorrow. I want to see Johnathon Meloan up soon.
Here's a situation actually worth talking about, the third base situation, should we platoon Nomar and Betemit at third base? Nomar against lefties and Betemit against righties. At the very least on the road, I believe they should do it. At home Nomar is a different player and people do come out to see him. Sort of like Craig Biggio in Houston, where they're going to limit his playing time on the road for the better of the team. Be serious with your answers…
dodgerdude…maybe you misunderstood my posting, but when i referenced the Lakers Forum, I was specifically talking about the general postings that were found by individual fans like you and me and the general atmosphere of the fan blogs, and NOT the SPORT itself….there, the people/posters/fans would focus on the game played and how good the game was, what fantastic plays were made, etc…
rather than what i typically find on this blog, i.e. focusing on "mistakes" that were made in the offseason and harping on them to the point where you get immune to the same old arguments, i.e. JP *****, he's overpayed, we should have gotten Player X, Y, Z…
and you have the right to go ahead and focus on the bad all you want, and you can justify it all you want, but I guess its just me, i'm not used to having the same "point" drilled into my head day in and day out, this BLOG has become very predictable, as far as postings go, and that is why I said it was different than the Lakers forum i was used to, where people wouldn't complain about the same player day in and day out and instead would focus on other things….
anyways, i don't really care about what you think about JP..you can show all the stats you want, because stats don't lie and you're opinions/points are probably dead on 100% right…but it really detracts from the whole concept of a "fan blog" when the postings are the same day in and day out, and efforts to bash the guy are common as common…..
anyways, i give up…i'm not trying to change your mind, because quite frankly we probably see eye to eye on many things Dodger related, including pierre, his stats and salary issues…it would just be nice to focus on other DODGER related things, because the NL WEST is far more exciting than harping on how we should have gotten Player X instead of JP, etc etc
Alex….i liked how betemit played today..i got to wondering how he would do if he became an everyday player again. I know he had his struggles early on, but when he's gotten a start here and there, he's shown something our team lacks, which is POWER….As far as Nomar, he still can get you hits here and there, while Betemit has a tendency to strike out…so its a tough call
I'd be down with limiting Nomar's playing time away and giving it to Betimit. I like Betimit a bit, I'd even wanna see him take some PT away from Nomar at home because I think he provides some power that we lack. Overall Bet needs more PT and Nomar less, and this is especially true on the road.
Doesnt all the arguing make the blog better? I think it would be lame if everyone just said "go dodgers!" all the time.
i don't really think its arguing when it's a moot point. Pierre isn't a beltran type CF, his stats don't prove it, and he's getting paid close to "superstar" money….point conceded….
i think of it more like beating a dead horse 🙂
yea… but Juan Pierre is like a big zit on your GFs forehead: it's right in front of you, you can't ignore it, and you know she'll look a lot better when it's gone.
hmm, interesting take…… 😉
anyways, anyone think the Dodgers are going to make a trade before the deadline? I sure would like another starter, so who on the TB roster can we pick up this time? 🙂
If you look at actual major league playing time, I'm thinking that Betemit doesn't have any more of it than say Ethier, so he's still a major leaguer in development and with a lot of power potential. I like him at third when he's hitting. It also seems to me that he's coachable, and Mueller can do a lot with him in terms of patience and waiting for the right pitch. I think he should now be getting plenty of chances at third, even if it cuts Nomar short. The platoon basis and home/away playing suggestions offered above would be a good start.
I also think that Nomar should get used to becoming the prime pinch-hitting guy when not in the lineup, because Saenz is no longer performing in that role. I get so frustrated with Saenz blowing such obvious scoring chances as yesterday, and that is no longer an exception – he is just plain unreliable in those situations anymore.
Here our Dodgers have won four straight, we are in sole possession of first place, the kids are rocking in SF, the "over the hill gang" (less Nomar) are rocking in SF, and yet the same few STILL find it necessary for the daily Pierre stinks, Grady stinks, Ned stinks, play the kids, dump the old guys, DFA Tomko DFA Saenz, yada yada yada, over and over and over again, every single day. You guys simply amaze me.
You have no idea how much I agree with you 53!
Then put your little hand in mine
There ain't no hill or mountain we can't climb
I got you babe
I got you babe
I'm going to wish Tomko to have a terrific outing today, not only to help us sweep the series, but to showcase himself hopefully for a departure from the Dodgers before the trade deadline. I don't think we have any future together, and I hope that a deal is forthcoming very soon both for Tomko's sake and especially for the Dodgers'.
we all wish tomko a good outing…too bad noone has a fairy god mother to make it happen.im hoping we can jump ALL OVER lowry so tomko can have some room to breath, hopfully he can shine with the offense gone wild!!!
Start of 2nd half, here's my take. Despite,Kent/Nomar's bloop hits, those two did NOT benefit from 4 days off. They
will be the pathetic self ALL
thru the year.Although most of
the rest hit well (Happy), I
have been a JP basher, but we
ALL have to NOTE, that JP's small ball style, is paying off. He IS making things happen.A hit here, a sacrafice there,a stolen base
Whatever..JP is has become a sort of spark, of late. Let's
ALL give him some props. He is contributing, in his small little way and it's paying dividends. Evert team needs, this type of player. Look at the big picture. JP is going to play a HUGE role, Mark my words. He cares
YESTERDAY'S GAME was one of those games that teaches you to never say die. Their is nothing worst then to blow a big lead. Everybody including myself felt that PAIN of losing something you had in the palm of your hand. When you finally find it and shot the door and nail it down, Wow that great feeling of RELIEF. Here's wishing TOMKO the best in another BIG game as we stand 1 full game ahead of the pack KEEP IT GOING BLUE CREW.
Report from Vegas:
Our boys continue to crush the ball. D. Young, LaRoche, and Hu all went deep.
Hu went 3/5 with 3RBIS, Young went 2/4, also with a double, and 2 RBIS, LaRoche went 3/3 with two doubles on top of his bomb, with 2 RBIS…
That is the **** i am talking about. Keep it up boys. Is Hu our shortstop of the future??? Im starting to seriously reconsider saying we all but have to offer Raffy a big 4-5 year deal after next season…
It's hard to imagine a leadoff man better than Raffy when he's 100% like the last two months of last season. That's what you would expect from a $13 mil. a year player. Unfortunately we haven't seen anything like that so far this season. Assuming that he fully recovers from his ankle problem and delivers as expected all of next year, he will still have given us only about half the time of his contract at full 100% level. That's not really great payback for a top salary at his position. I would certainly guard against extending Raffy's contract prematurely like Colletti did unnecessarily with Kent. If Raffy performs like we would expect him the rest of this season and next season, there will be time to make the right offer to him. If Hu shows that he can continue to progress, that will be something to consider as well. Let's also remember that if we insist on keeping and playing Pierre at all times, Pierre is probably better suited to be leadoff than is Raffy, so we would not be exactly without a leadoff man should Raffy go elsewhere after his contract.
Agreed, and Hu seems to be a great #2 hitter.
Hu's hitting has been a big surprise this year. He's always been looked at as a defensive prospect with limited offensive skills. Hopefully this first half surge is permanent.
Unless Pierre's OBP numbers improve as a leadoff hitter, I don't want him batting leadoff.
Yeah who wants a guy with a .347 obp and a .333 avg who is 6/1 in sb's in July leading off while raffy continues to limp around the basepaths while leading off?….The sky is blue DA17….
wow, your really gonna give me stats with about 10 games of data… every dog has his day. by the way… .347 OBP… thats like average at best.


text:
Lenovo to Set Up PC Plant in U.S.
Chinese computer-maker Lenovo Group Ltd. will start manufacturing PCs in North Carolina next year. Company executives said the effort, starting with only a few million dollars and just over 100 workers, will be the beginning of something bigger, rather than a one-time made-in-America publicity effort.
The world's No. 2 personal-computer maker says the PC production line now being built at a facility in Whitsett, N.C., will allow the company to become more responsive to U.S. corporate clients' demand for flexible supplies and product customization. Although the cost of U.S. production will be higher compared with overseas production, an added benefit will be to raise Lenovo's profile in the U.S., where it ranks fourth in market share by shipment.

subset: commoncrawl


text:
From time to time, I get to hang out with a wild and crazy gang of fisheries biologists. They speak a different language as they discuss subjects like turbidity, effluent limitations, and Secchi depth.
When I first heard that last term, Secchi depth, I had to look it up. Secchi depth, sometimes called Secchi disk depth, is a measure of water clarity. It is determined by use of a device called a Secchi disk.
A Secchi disk is a circular plate divided into quarters painted alternately black and white. The disk is attached to a rope and lowered into the water until it is no longer visible. Secchi disk depth, then, is a measure of water clarity. Higher Secchi readings mean more rope was let out before the disk disappeared from sight and indicates clearer water. Lower readings indicate turbid or colored water. Clear water lets light penetrate more deeply into the lake than does murky water. This light allows photosynthesis to occur and oxygen to be produced. The rule of thumb is that light can penetrate to a depth of 1.7 times the Secchi disk depth.
Upon further investigation, I learned that the Secchi disk was invented in 1865 by a Catholic priest, Father Pietro Angelo Secchi. Although it has been improved upon a number of times, Fr. Secchi's basic design remains in place today.
My discovery of Father Secchi led to an interest in other Catholic scientists. And indeed, history provides many outstanding examples. The list is so long that I've pared it down to five exemplary individuals.
Father Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Gregor Mendel, baptized as Johann Mendel, is universally acknowledged to be the father of modern genetics. He was born in what is now the Czech Republic. His family was German. He began studying for the priesthood in 1843 at the Abbey of St Thomas, an Augustinian institution. Before entering the abbey, Mendel had worked his family's farm. He also studied physics and philosophy at Brno (then the principal city of Moravia; now in the Czech Republic).
After eight years at the abbey, Mendel was sent to the University of Vienna for two years. At Vienna, his physics professor was another renowned scientist, Christian Doppler. When Mendel returned to the abbey, he became a professor of physics.
Mendel had also studied astronomy and meteorology. Most of his surviving academic writing concerns meteorology. But Mendel is best known for his paper, Experiments in Plant Hybridization.
Mendel's magnum opus was based on his study of variations in peas which had been planted at the abbey. He also studied honeybees, with which he had been familiar since his childhood experience on the family farm. From his experiments, Mendel derived two Laws of Inheritance. The first, the Law of Segregation, states that each individual has a gene or genetic locus for individual traits such as hair color, eye color, etc. Each parent also contributes a gene to the offspring. The gene that becomes dominant will control the nature of the trait.
The second law, the Law of Independent Assessment states that any particular gene is passed from parent to off-spring independently from another gene for a different trait.
Mendel's work was not widely understood during his lifetime. It wasn't until the early part of the twentieth century that scientists embraced Mendel's genetic theories. Today, Fr. Mendel's work is the basis from which all modern genetic science proceeds.
Father Jean Picard (1620-1682)
Fr. Picard was a Jesuit mathematician, astronomer, and hydrologist. Born to a large family in La Fleche, France, he later attended the Jesuit College Royal Henry-le-Grand. In 1644, he moved to Paris, where he began assisting a math professor named Pierre Gassendi. Together Picard and Gassendi observed numerous lunar eclipses. After Gassendi's death, Picard became Professor of Astronomy at College de France in Paris.
In 1761, Picard became the first person to nearly accurately measure the size of the earth. His 17th century numbers were 99.56% of the modern figures.
Picard communicated with other scientists of his era and made significant discoveries outside his main field of astronomy. Very little else is known about Fr. Picard's life.
Ignaz Phillipe Semmelweis (1818-1865)
Semmelweis was not a cleric at all, but he was Roman Catholic. He was born in what is now Hungary to a well-to-do family. He set off to the University of Vienna, intending to study law. somehow, he ended up in medicine. At age 30, he was made assistant to the director of one of two maternity clinics at Vienna General Hospital. This first clinic was used for the training of medical students. The second maternity clinic was staffed by midwives.
Semmelweis soon discovered an odd statistic: maternal mortality rates at the first clinic where the students trained had twice, sometimes three times the rate of the midwife-staffed second clinic. The leading cause of maternal mortality was septicemia.
After eliminating all the variables he could, Semmelweis was left with the conclusion that the only significant difference between the two clinics was the staff. But why did the medical students, with superb academic training have a greater mortality rate than the midwives who had not the benefit of academic training?
The answer turned out to be rather simple: the medical students also trained with cadavers and the midwives had no contact with cadavers. The medical students took no hygienic steps between cadavers and infant deliveries and often used the same instruments for both activities. When Semmelweis realized this, he instituted a procedure requiring the students and staff at the first clinic to wash their hands with a chlorine based solution. Within a month, the mortality rate at the first clinic dropped to parity with the midwife clinic.
Semmelweis had proven something the significance of which escaped even himself: that hand washing could prevent the transmission of germs between persons. He believed he had succeeded only in preventing "cadaver contamination."
Even the simplest understanding of Semmelweis' accomplishment drew scorn and ridicule in the scientific community. Semmelweis was forced out of his position and run out of Vienna.
Aggravated, outraged and bitter, Semmelweis began to speak out against his opponents. He wrote vicious screeds against them. His associates and family came to believe he was insane and had him committed to an asylum. He died there two weeks later. Some sources say septicemia was the cause of his death.
Father Pietro Angelo Secchi (1818-1878)
We end where we began. Father Secchi was primarily an astronomer. He studied astrophysics. After training by the Jesuits in Rome, Father Secchi embarked on an academic career. He taught in the United Kingdom and at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. When he returned to Rome, Fr. Secchi was made the director of the Observatory of the College of Rome (now called the Pontifical Gregorian University).
His work in astronomy was prodigious. He discovered three comets, including one named for hm. He created the first classification scheme for stars. He made precise maps of lunar craters and color drawing of the planet Mars. And he invented the Secchi disk for use in another field in which he was interested.
Faith and Reason
As said above, the list of Catholics, both clerical and lay, who have made substantial contribution to science is a long one. It includes Roger Bacon, Galileo Galilei, Rene Descartes, Nicolas Copernicus, Louis Pasteur, Blaise Pascal, André-Marie Ampère, Enrico Fermat, and many more.
Some Catholics and non-Catholics question whether the Church can really exist successfully in a science-influenced world. Aren't faith and reason polar opposites? And by the way, what about that business with Galileo, whose publications were banned and who spent the latter portion of his life imprisoned or on house arrest for suspected heresy?
For what it's worth, Galileo was effectively rehabilitated in the 18th century. In the twentieth century, Pope Pius XII called Galileo one of the "most audacious heroes of research." In 2008, the Church celebrated the 400th anniversary of Galileo's earliest telescopic observations.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church holds:
159 Faith and science: "Though faith is above reason, there can never be any real discrepancy between faith and reason. Since the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind, God cannot deny himself, nor can truth ever contradict truth."
"Consequently, methodical research in all branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things of faith derive from the same God. The humble and persevering investigator of the secrets of nature is being led, as it were, by the hand of God in spite of himself, for it is God, the conserver of all things, who made them what they are."


text:
A maximum 5-star safety rating for your protection
With an extensive range of active and passive safety features, the D-MAX lives up to our commitment of getting you and your passengers home safely every day. 4x4 Crew Cab and 4x2 Crew Cab High-Ride models achieve a maximum 5-star ANCAP safety rating, so you can drive with complete peace of mind.
Hill Start Assist
For added driver control and safety, the D-MAX electronic brake control will automatically engage Hill Start Assist to prevent vehicle roll-back when starting on steep gradients above 5.7 degrees.
Reversing Camera
The D-MAX gives you eyes in the back of your head with a reversing camera. Perfect for tricky parking situations, hitching a trailer or reversing out of a driveway. (Standard on LS and SX ute models - accessory available for cab chassis models.)
Electronic Stability Control (ESC)
The ultimate in active safety. ESC is created by a network of sensors throughout the D-MAX that can detect if you're over or understeering. If so, ESC commands the ABS, TCS and the engine management computer to make sure you stay in control. Intelligent protection, like a third hand on the steering wheel, keeping you safe.
Emergency Brake Assist
In emergency situations, even the most experienced drivers can panic when hitting the brakes. EBA detects emergency braking and takes over, applying maximum pressure to dramatically reduce stopping distance.
Anti-lock Braking System
Trailer Sway Control (TSC)
Daytime Running Lights
Electronic Brake-Force Distribution (EBD)
Traction Control System (TCS)
6 Airbags
With front, side and curtain airbags, plus pre-tensioner seatbelts that pull you back when airbags are activated, the D-MAX protects you and your passengers from all sides.
Safety cabin shell
Constructed from high-tensile steel, the cabin offers outstanding strength and rigidity, aided by anti-intrusion bars that provide increased protection in the event of side impact.
Pedestrian safety bonnet
Impact absorbing chassis
6 Year Roadside Assistance
If you're unlucky and have an accident, or get stranded far from home, we've got your back. The D-MAX comes with our 6 year Roadside Assistance Program, so help is only a call away from our motoring organisation partners.


text:
NEW YORK – Here's a question I asked myself yesterday: Would I rather have my phone records collected and readied for possible inspection by the National Security Agency, or have my genitalia scrutinized by the Transportation Security Administration?
One answer, of course, is, why choose? In today's America you can have both.
But my preference is the latter, and not only because the TSA Genitalia-Inspection Service has been doing its business on me (and you, too!) for years now and I've grown used to it in the way that Americans too-readily accept indignities foisted on them by large institutions, including, but not limited to, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Homeland Security and Facebook.
Here's my reasoning: It is better, I think, to suffer the stick-'em-up humiliation of the TSA's naked body scan machines, because while they can see through our clothes, at least they can't see inside our heads. Not yet, anyway.
By the way, careful readers may recall that I was one of the original Opt-Outers, those bold travelers who swore never to subject themselves to full-body scans, and would choose instead the manual TSA pat-down. I found the artisanal grope session more emotionally satisfying (if more physically creepy) because I knew that it flummoxed the TSA. But the TSA quickly caught on to the Opt-Outers, and now makes the pat-down so inconvenient (delaying it, on occasion, for five or 10 precious minutes) that when I'm running late for a plane, I submit to the porn-scan. It's beginning to seem normal to me, unfortunately.
This is the E-ZPass Theory of government intrusion: Most people, when faced with a choice between privacy and convenience, will go with convenience. E-ZPass, of course, provides government agencies with an efficient way of tracking your movements up and down the New Jersey Turnpike, but who cares? The line at the tollbooth is so much shorter.
The corollary to the E-ZPass Theory is the TSA Theory of Gradual Habituation: Organizations like the TSA have worked to soften us up, to make us accustomed to the gradual theft of our right to privacy. I wouldn't be surprised if clever government bureaucrats looked at the public's bovine-like acceptance of its collective loss of dignity at the nation's airports and realized that massive, invasive data collection wouldn't spark a revolution.
I don't think that these latest revelations about the NSA — that it is constructing a huge database of Americans' phone-call data, and that it seems to be trying to build the capability to watch everything done on Google and Facebook — will turn the majority of Americans into rabid Rand Paulites. A New York Times/CBS poll taken shortly after the Boston Marathon bombings found that only 20 percent of respondents said the government had restricted civil liberties too drastically in the struggle against terrorism; 26 percent said the government hadn't gone far enough.
One reason I doubt these latest disclosures will move many people into the libertarian column is that the source, a former NSA contractor named Edward Snowden, has washed up in Hong Kong, where he has been railing against the "omniscient" power of the U.S. government. Most Americans understand intuitively that a person who believes that a city-state under the ultimate authority of the Chinese Communist Party is superior to the U.S. in its protection of freedom isn't fit to comment intelligently on the state of privacy in the post-Sept. 11 world. As Evan Osnos wrote on the New Yorker website, "going to Hong Kong out of devotion to free speech is a bit like going to Tibet out of a devotion to Buddhism."
A larger reason is that many Americans understand that our country actually does face a threat from Islamist violence (see, for instance, the Boston bombings, and dozens of plots, both successful and unconsummated, before them), and that the collection and analysis of data by our intelligence agencies seems somewhat benign when compared to, say, the mass deployment of assassination drones.
Which brings me to a main concern: the general competence of said intelligence agencies. The NSA — which obviously does an excellent job collecting data that may save lives — apparently didn't understand, or care, that a disaffected, self-aggrandizing 29-year-old libertarian had seemingly untrammeled access to some of its most highly classified programs. How can the White House assure us that they're protecting the country from terrorism if the NSA can't protect its own secrets?
And if it can't protect its own secrets, what makes it competent to protect ours? Let's assume that the NSA one day will be, as a matter of course, sweeping up medical records, or records of all purchases made on Amazon.com, in its hunt for patterns of I-don't-know-what. Would you trust the NSA to keep those records private? Of course not. How could you?
At this point, I'd sooner trust the penknife-seizing, sweater-vest-wearing warriors of the TSA to protect us from terrorism.
Jeffrey Goldberg is a Bloomberg View columnist.


text:
Posted by Editor on 06/29/02
Mont Sainte-Anne World Cup 4-Cross
Several thousand enthusiastic spectators were on hand for the very entertaining 4-Cross World Cup at Mont Ste Anne. In a combination of mountain biking and BMX, a whole series of jumps and bermed corners provided lots of fun.
From the start, the course drops from the ramp into a large left hand berm. The strategy for the majority of the winners was to be the first into this turn. It also meant several crashes as riders jockeyed to be that first person. From here there was the first of several double jumps, more berms and then a huge double jump where the better riders were several metres in the air. In the early rounds Cedric Gracia (Volvo-Cannondale) was high enough to have time to turn his front wheel completely backwards and then back again before landing. The crowd went nuts at this display.
Further down the course was the most difficult portion. From a double jump there was a big sweeping left berm with a nasty transition into a right berm. The transition was very tight and there were several crashes and also lots of rider contact. Yet another jump led into the short sprint for the finish.
Through the preliminary rounds the strong riders were Gracia, Brian Lopes, Mike King, Eric Carter and Wade Bootes. For the women Anne-Caroline Chausson and Sabrina Jonnier were the dominant riders.
Gracia sailed through the first two rounds, but in the semi's he crashed when trying to catch up to the very fast Lopes (GT Bicycles) and Bootes (Trek Volkswagen). Carter won the other semi with Michal Prokop (Team Be One) in second. The final was a very tight race with Carter pulling off a fine holeshot for the win. "I always like to put on a good show at Mont Sainte Anne. This is a prime event so I'm very motivated here. The course was really tight at the first turn so I wanted to make sure that I was in there first. Even at that there was more passing than I anticipated." The surprising Michal Prokop was second, with Lopes in 3rd and Bootes in fourth. Lopes was disappointed with the course, "Not that great, but I haven't liked any of them yet. They just don't listen to the riders. I don't even care any more. Nothing ever changes." As for the race itself, "Eric got a really good start. I dropped in behind him then I clipped out of my pedal and lost second as well."
For Chausson it was yet another race win. "I had very good race. It was a very fast course and I was able to ride smoothly." Miller was happy to take second. "It was good. I had fun racing. It was a challenging course. In the final Anne just snapped me out of the gate. Once she gets a length on you, that's it. She's just too strong. There's no catching Anne, I'll settle for second."
1. Eric Carter (USA) Mongoose
2. Michal Prokop (Cze) Be-One
3. Brian Lopes (USA) GT
4. Wade Bootes (Aus) Trek VW
20. Jordie Lunn (Can)
1. Anne-Caroline Chausson (Fra) Volvo Cannondale
2. Katrina Miller (Aus)
3. Sabrina Jonnier (Fra)
4. Lisa Sher (USA)
|Return to Canadian Cyclist homepage | Back to Top


text:
What is concurrent engineering?
The definition of Concurrent Engineering that we have adopted for the Concurrent Design Facility is: "Concurrent Engineering (CE) is a systematic approach to integrated product development that emphasises the response to customer expectations. It embodies team values of co-operation, trust and sharing in such a manner that decision making is by consensus, involving all perspectives in parallel, from the beginning of the product life-cycle."
Essentially, CE provides a collaborative, co-operative, collective and simultaneous engineering working environment.
The concurrent engineering approach is based on five key elements:
- a process
- a multidisciplinary team
- an integrated design model
- a facility
- a software infrastructure
The spacecraft design is based on mathematical models, which make use of custom software and linked spreadsheets. By this means, a consistent set of design parameters can be defined and exchanged throughout the study, and any changes which may have an impact on other disciplines can immediately be identified and collectively assessed. In this way, a number of design iterations can be performed, and different design options can easily be analysed and compared.
CDF activities are conducted in sessions: plenary meetings in which representatives of all space engineering domains participate, from the early phases (requirement analysis) to the end of the design (costing). Even those disciplines that were traditionally involved at a later stage of the process are given the opportunity to participate from the beginning and to identify trends that might later invalidate the design.


text:
Our well-known 62 mm 1200V single switch IGBT modules with Emitter Controlled High Efficiency diode and IGBT3 are the right choice for your design.
Zusammenfassung der Merkmale
- Superior solution for frequency controlled inverter drives
- UL/CSA Certification with UL1557 E83336
- Operating temperature up to 125 °C (max 150 °C)
- Optimized switching characteristic like softness and reduced switching losses
- Existing packages with higher current capability
- RoHS compliant
- Flexibility
- Optimal electrical performance
- Highest reliability
Potentielle Zielanwendungen
Please select a matching HV Gate Driver IC from our EiceDRIVER™ Portfolio.
With Infineon EiceDRIVER™ Enhanced and Compact Driver ICs as well as EiceDRIVER™ Safe Driver Boards we provide a broad spectrum of solutions for reliable and efficient controls of IGBT Modules.


text:
I want to change the default name of binary log and path. I saw the documentation where it discusses about base_name. However, I just need to confirm how to use it correctly. I want binary logs to be stored on another partition and also want to schedule binary logging to run at regular intervals in a day.
I am using MySQL 5.5.


text:
7 Top Funds from T. Rowe Price
Consistency and a focus on the long haul are hallmarks of this 76-year-old firm.
When Thomas Rowe Price Jr. founded his eponymous investment firm in 1937, he had just four associates. Today, the Baltimore company has 5,295 employees worldwide and $574 billion under management.
But Price's core investment philosophy — a focus on a long-term horizon, rigorous in-house research and an eye toward risk management — endures. So does the culture of an old investment partnership, where "investors" (as the firm's analysts and portfolio managers are known within Price's offices) work together to make sure clients do well. "When the client succeeds, T. Rowe Price succeeds," is one company belief.
It's this collaborative culture that helps Price funds stay on an even keel. Most T. Rowe fund managers rely on the army of Price analysts — 185 worldwide — to home in on good investing ideas. The process has turned out good results. Nearly half of the fund's 112 portfolios boast five-year annual returns that rank among the top 25% of their respective fund categories.
Price (the man) is considered by many to be the father of growth investing. He laid out the strategy in a May 1939 article in Barron's entitled "Picking 'Growth' Stocks." The firm's first mutual fund, launched in 1950, was T. Rowe Price Growth Stock (symbol PRGFX). The fund still operates; over the past 20 years, it has returned 9.2% annualized, outpacing Standard & Poor's 500-stock index by an average of 0.7 percentage point per year.
But Price (the firm) is hardly just a growth shop today. Its many offerings stretch across all investing styles, from stock funds and bond funds to target-date and asset-allocation funds. And it's worth noting that many Price managers resisted the allure of skyrocketing technology stocks in the late 1990s. Their reluctance to pay obscenely high prices for Internet and other tech novas may have hurt relative returns in the '90s, but it helped the funds sidestep the worst of the tech-stock collapse that followed.
Finding T. Rowe Price's best funds wasn't easy, simply because there are so many strong contenders. Here, however, are the top seven.
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth (TRBCX) Since its 1993 launch, Blue Chip Growth, under manager Larry Puglia, has earned a 9.2% annualized return by buying large, growing companies at reasonable prices (all returns are through January 18). Puglia's record outpaces the S&P 500 by an average of 0.9 percentage point per year. His strategy is to find market leaders poised for above-average earnings growth with healthy balance sheets and seasoned executives at the helm. Lately, that has meant an emphasis on technology companies; at last report, 33% of the fund's assets were invested in that sector. Amazon.com, Google, eBay and Priceline.com, for instance, are among the top ten holdings.
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation (PRWCX) Balanced funds — portfolios that hold stocks and bonds — are crafted to emphasize steadiness and growth. Capital Appreciation, which currently holds 60% of its assets in stocks, delivers both. The fund's five-year annualized return of 7.3% outpaces the S&P 500 by an average of 2.7 percentage points per year, and it was earned with 20% less volatility than the index to boot. On the stock side, David Giroux, manager since June 2006, can invest in companies of any size, and he likes a good value. Top holdings include Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pfizer and Danaher. Giroux also sells covered-call options — a strategy that trades away appreciation potential in return for more income — on about one-fourth of the fund's stocks. The options pay a premium, which provide the fund with extra income. On the fixed-income side, Giroux holds mostly high-yielding junk bonds. With interest rates so low, Giroux sees little value in most bonds. That's one reason he's let the fund's cash reserves rise to about 14% of assets.
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value (PRSVX) You may not recognize many names in Small-Cap Value's portfolio. Manager Preston Athey favors undiscovered companies and when he buys, he holds. The fund, a member of the Kiplinger 25, has a turnover ratio of just 6%, implying that Athey holds a stock for an average of 17 years. The typical small-company fund has a turnover ratio of 61%. Athey first bought shares in South Dakota conglomerate Raven Industries in 1992. More than 20 years, later, he still holds the stock in the portfolio — it's one of the fund's ten biggest positions. Come June 2014, Athey will retire after running the fund for nearly 23 years. At that point, J. David Wagner, a 12-year Price veteran and the fund's associate manager since 2005, will take over.
T. Rowe Price New Horizons (PRNHX) Manager Henry Ellenbogen has proved adept at managing this mammoth fund, which focuses on small companies. Since he became manager in March 2010, the fund has earned 20.1% annualized, beating the Russell 2000 small-company index by 6.5 percentage points per year. Like other Price managers, Ellenbogen relies on a research team for ideas. He also hands over small slices of the $9.7 billion portfolio (each about 5% to 8% of the total) to Kris Jenner, manager of Price Health Sciences Fund, and to Mike Sola, a tech analyst. The trio hunt for young, fast-growing companies with good management teams and strong balance sheets. The average holding has a market value of $2.3 billion — hardly small. One reason the fund owns a huge chunk of midsize-company stocks (42% of assets, according to Morningstar) is that Ellenbogen will hold on to a good investment, even as it grows. Take FMC Technologies, an energy-services company. Since New Horizons first bought the stock in 2002, the company has grown from a relative runt to a firm with a market capitalization of $11 billion. The larger companies provide stability to New Horizons — it has been 10% less volatile than the typical small-company fund.
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock (PRMSX) A member of the Kiplinger 25, this fund navigates the risky but rewarding waters of stocks in developing markets. Manager Gonzalo Pangaro, at the helm since 2008, favors firms with a leading or improving market position or an attractive market niche, plus seasoned execs and stable or improving earnings. Pangaro is betting big, too, on the growth of the middle-class consumer in developing nations. Two South Korean firms that are benefiting from this theme—Samsung Electronics (its stock has jumped 44% over the past year) and LG Household & Health Care (up 33%) — are among the fund's top holdings.
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences (PRHSX) Manager Kris Jenner has a knack for finding small companies with promising futures (nearly half the portfolio sat in small to midsize companies at last report). Top-five holding Pharmacyclics, for instance, is a midsize biotech with a single product, a drug that treats multiple lymphomas and different kinds of leukemia. The stock has quadrupled over the past year. Jenner brings medical expertise to the fund: He's a former general-surgery resident at Johns Hopkins Hospital. He and his team of five analysts divide the health sector into two buckets: therapeutic companies, which make drugs or devices (for example, Merck and Covidien), and service companies, such as insurers or dialysis providers (UnitedHealth Group and Fresenius Medical Care).
T. Rowe Price Media & Telecommunications (PRMTX) This fund's five-year annualized return of 11.0% bests 99% of its peers (funds that invest in cable TV companies, phone-service providers, equipment makers, broadcasters and other communications-related companies). The man responsible for that record — Dan Martino, manager since 2009builds a portfolio of 50 to 60 stocks by betting on the best ideas generated by his team of more than 20 analysts. Half of the fund's assets sit in stable, attractively priced companies with strong balance sheets and durable businesses, including cable-services companies (such as Comcast), wireless-services providers (Vodafone) and wireless-tower companies (American Tower). The other half is invested in fast-growing media (Discovery Communications) and tech firms (Apple). "Other tech funds may have more of a growth bias," says Martino. "I try to have some balance" between growth and stability.
Kiplinger's Investing for Income will help you maximize your cash yield under any economic conditions. Subscribe now!


text:
Easy Ham and Cheese Recipe With Caramelized Shallots
Ham and Cheese Sandwiches Are Simply Delicious
Like peanut butter and jelly, the pairing of ham and cheese has been around forever. However, it just doesn't get old. When I'm in the mood for a comforting and quick meal, I make this ham and cheese panini. Served with mixed greens or a bowl of soup, it's the perfect dinner for one. Caramelized shallots and fresh thyme give it a touch of elegant sophistication, while grainy mustard ensures that the sandwich isn't too dry. It's nostalgic and homey, but gourmet enough to offer guests at a luncheon or impromptu weeknight dinner. Want the recipe? Read more.
Ham-and-Cheese Panini
From Martha Stewart
- 2 tablespoons unsalted butter
4 cups thinly sliced shallots
2 teaspoons fresh thyme
1/4 cup grainy Dijon mustard
8 slices rustic white bread, sliced 1/2-inch thick
8 slices Gruyere cheese
8 ounces sliced cooked ham
- Melt butter in a medium skillet over medium-low heat; add shallots. Cover and cook, stirring occasionally, until softened, about 10 minutes.
- Add thyme and continue cooking until onions are caramelized, about 5 minutes. Remove from heat and set aside.
- Spread 1 1/2 teaspoons mustard on one side of a slice of bread. Top with a slice of cheese, 2 ounces ham, 1/4 of the shallot mixture, and another slice of cheese. Spread 1 1/2 teaspoons mustard on a second slice of bread and place mustard side down on top of cheese to form a sandwich. Repeat process three times with remaining mustard, bread, cheese, ham, and shallots.
- Brush top and bottom of each sandwich with olive oil. Place in a panini grill and press until bread is crisp and brown, and cheese has melted slightly, 9 to 10 minutes. If using a grill pan, preheat over medium-high heat. Place a heavy pan on top of sandwiches and press down. Cook, turning once, 2 to 3 minutes per side. Cut sandwiches in half and serve immediately.
Makes 4 sandwiches.
- Category
- Main Dishes, Sandwiches
- Cuisine
- North American


text:
Mike Trout, Justin Upton, Johnny Cueto lead April's group of All-Stars
Justin Upton has already watched seven balls sail over the fence so far this season. (Frank Franklin II/AP)
As Hall of Famer Reggie Jackson once said, "It doesn't matter where you are when the leaves are on the trees, it matters where you are when the leaves are on the ground." Never mind that cool early-season temperatures have limited the amount of visible greenery, with the first full month of the season almost in the books, we've gone around the diamond to highlight the best and worst performances of the young 2014 season at every position. Cliff Corcoran gave his list of the worst performers of the month, so here's a look at April's best and brightest.
Take all of these stats with a grain of salt or five, as every small-sample caveat applies. That goes double when it comes to any passing mention of 2014 Wins Above Replacement (Baseball-Reference.com version, in this case),; even a full season's worth of defense is a less-than-reliable sample, to say nothing of one month.
After back-to-back finishes among the top four in NL MVP voting, not to mention the highest WAR among catchers over the past one, two, three or four years combined — however you want to slice and dice it — it's not exactly shocking that Molina is at the top of his game again. What is shocking is his .378 batting average on balls in play, 81 points above his career norm; the highest for a batting title-qualified catcher in the post-1992 expansion era is Jorge Posada's .386 in 2007. Small-sample honorable mention to the Reds' Devin Mesoraco, who through 53 plate appearances is hitting an insane .468/.509/.787, with hits in 12 of his 13 games.
1B: Adrian Gonzalez, Dodgers
Gonzalez's power has been in decline since his October 2010 right shoulder surgery; after averaging 32 homers and a .226 isolated power during his five years with the Padres — in Petco Park, no less — he sank to an average of 22 homers and a .180 isolated power with the Red Sox and Dodgers in 2011-13. He appears to have his mojo back, as he's tied for the NL in homers; his 16-game hitting streak included an eight-game streak with at least one extra-base hit, tops in the majors this year. The difference in ballparks and a 30-point edge in OPS+ is why he gets the nod here over Cuban sensation Jose Abreu, whose 10 homers, 32 RBI and .622 slugging percentage lead the AL, with the first two being rookie records for April.
2B: Chase Utley, Phillies
Speaking of players all the way back from injury, the 35-year-old Utley is certainly playing like the guy who averaged 151 games and 7.9 WAR per year from 2005-09 before the injury bug started chewing him up; he's averaged just 108 games and a still-respectable 4.0 WAR since. His 11 doubles is tied for the MLB lead; if he keeps swinging the bat so well, some of those might turn into homers under warmer conditions. Nods to the Rays' Ben Zobrist (.302/.390/.434, 1.6 WAR to Utley's 1.5) and the Dodgers' Dee Gordon (.353/.385/.482 with an MLB-high 13 steals).
3B: Josh Donaldson, A's
On the heels of last year's breakout campaign (.301/.384/.499 and 8.0 WAR, second in the AL), Donaldson is at it again; his 17 extra-base hits are tied for second in the majors with Tulowitzki, one behind Abreu, and he's doing it without the benefit of a hitter-friendly environment. More importantly, he's helped the A's to the AL's best record (17-10) and the majors' best run differential (+48). Among NL players, the hot cornerman who stands out is the Rockies' Nolan Arenado, who made his major league debut one year ago Monday. He's riding a 19-game hitting streak, batting .313/.325/.482 and putting together one hell of a highlight reel on defense.
SS: Troy Tulowitzki, Rockies
Yes, the rate stats are inflated by Coors Field, where he's hitting — wait for it — .563/.643/1.094, the kind of numbers you'd expect a three-time All-Star to put up if he was the ringer on your company softball team. Even weighted down by a comparatively pedestrian .264/.385/.547 on the road, Tulo leads the NL in on-base and slugging percentages, OPS+ and WAR (3.0). Can he make it to 150 games for the first time since 2009? Keep your fingers crossed.
LF: Justin Upton, Braves
Maybe he's Mr. March/April to Reggie's Mr. October; he won't reach last year's 12 homers and 1.136 OPS, but his career OPS for the month (and change) is still 50 points higher than in any other. Or maybe at 26 years old, he's heading toward the heights that so many expected of 2005's No. 1 pick. Either way, in an offense that's averaging just 3.56 runs per game, with only four players with an OPS+ of 100 or better, he's done the most to help the Braves to a 17-8 start. AL standout: The resurgent Melky Cabrera (.347/.369/.576), who's swinging the bat like he did before his 2012 PED suspension.
CF: Mike Trout, Angels
That record-setting, six-year, $144.5 million extension doesn't appear to have changed the 22-year-old superstar one bit. He's still doing Mike Trout things on a daily basis, leading the AL in WAR (2.3 so far) as he's done in each of the previous two seasons, this time with no Miguel Cabrera to cloud the MVP discussion. Five of his six home runs this year — and now 22 of his career 68 dingers — have come in his first plate appearance in a game; pitchers may want to rethink those game plans. On the NL side, we'll put in a good word for the Rockies' Charlie Blackmon (.379/.425/.621, 174 OPS+, 2.0 WAR), who leads the Senior Circuit batting race and has struck out just seven times in 107 PA.
RF: Jose Bautista, Blue Jays
After playing in just 210 games and hitting .251/.358/.510 over the past two years, Bautista appears to be back in his 2010-11 form, when he clouted 97 homers (leading the AL both years) and hit .280/.412/.613. Thanks to an MLB-high 29 walks — just one intentional but a whole lot "intentional" — he has the circuit's top OBP, OPS and OPS+. Speaking of power hitters limited by injury over the past two years, Giancarlo Stanton is tied for the NL's homer lead with eight, including five that have set off the Marlins Park sculpture, none more impressive than this 484-footer, the longest in the majors this year and the longest in the ballpark's short history.
After hitting a combined .197/.317/.405 in the first three years of his four-year, $56 million deal with the White Sox, Dunn is more or less approximating the numbers he put up in 10 years in the NL (.250/.381/.521). He can thank the presences of Abreu and Paul Konerko, as they've protected him from taking the field (where he's 20 Defensive Runs Saved in the red with the Pale Hose) or from being too exposed against lefties, against whom he hit .163/.284/.348 over the last three years but faced just 20 times thus far. His 0.7 WAR would be the second-best of his South Side tenure, while his 155 OPS+ is 30 points higher than the next qualified DH, the Mariners' Corey Hart.
SP: Johnny Cueto, Reds
You know it's early when 11 qualified pitchers have ERAs below 2.00, 10 have an ERA+ above 200 and a whopping 32 have struck out at least a batter per inning. Somebody's feelings are going to get hurt by this choice, but the nod goes to Cueto on the basis of sheer consistency. In each of his six starts, he's thrown at least seven innings while allowing no more than five hits or two runs; Adam Wainwright has five such starts, Julio Teheran four, so they're in the picture too. Furthermore, Cueto has allowed just one run and nine hits in 26 innings over his last three starts, a stretch that included 21 straight scoreless frames, two complete games and two double-digit strikeout performances.
Additional mentions go out to Jose Fernandez (MLB-best 36.2 percent K-rate and 1.61 FIP), Aaron Harang (0.85 ERA, 27.3 percent K-rate, two no-hit bids of at least six innings — all from a late-March free agent pickup) and the Oakland trio of Sonny Gray, Scott Kazmir and Jesse Chavez, who have combined for a 2.03 ERA and 15 quality starts out of 17 for a staff that's lost two of its intended starting five — Jarrod Parker and A.J. Griffin — to Tommy John surgery.
Closer: Francisco Rodriguez: Brewers
16 IP, 0.0 ERA, 12.9 K/9, 13 saves
Koji Uehara


text:
Rutgers Restricted Access
Focusing on studies related to improving and augmenting aquatic yields, this database provides information on cultivating marine, freshwater, and brackishwater species. Covers the planned management of aquatic organisms.
Subject coverage includes:
- Aquaculture management and economics
- Growth and development of cultured species
- Techniques, equipment, methodology, feasibility studies, replenishing natural stocks and laboratory culture
- Culture of fish and other vertebrates
- Crustaceans, mollusks and other invertebrates
- Aquatic plants and algae
- Protozoa and microorganisms
- Reproductive biology
- Biotechnology
Click on the "Help" link in the upper right corner of any screen.
For help using these indexes see: How do I find an article on my topic?
User tools and features
RSS feeds and alerts; RefWorks citation tool; ProQuest My Research account to save, tag, organize and share research.
Dates covered
1984 - current.
Updating frequency
Journal articles.
Type of coverage
Abstracts and full bibliographic citations.
Print counterpart or
related resources
Aquaculture Abstracts (ASFA)
(Note: Print edition is not available at Rutgers Libraries.)
Producer/content provider
Vendor/electronic presentation provider


text: UFDC Home | Help | RSS Group Title: American-made cars in Cuba Title: Rear view of three automobiles ALL VOLUMES CITATION ZOOMABLE PAGE IMAGE Full Citation STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00081760/00002 Material Information Title: Rear view of three automobiles Series Title: American-made cars in Cuba Physical Description: Photograph Subjects Subject: Caribbean ( lcsh ) Spatial Coverage: Cuba -- Caribbean Record Information Bibliographic ID: UF00081760 Volume ID: VID00002 Source Institution: University of Florida Holding Location: University of Florida Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location. Contact Us | Permissions | Preferences | Technical Aspects | Statistics | Internal | Privacy Policy © 2004 - 2010 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.All rights reserved. Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement Last updated October 10, 2010 - - mvs


text:
EPL: English big guns keep power dry in January transfer window
Notoriously cautious Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger waited until the final hours of the transfer window before splurging
Premier League spending in the January transfer window rose this year but the biggest market agitators were once again the English top-flight's struggling clubs.
The 20 teams in England's highest division spent around £120 million ($190 million, 139 million euros) in transfer fees over the last month, according to business advisory firm Deloitte.
The figure was double the amount spent in January 2012 but well short of the record of £225 million established in 2011, when Fernando Torres joined Chelsea for £50 million and Andy Carroll went to Liverpool for £35 million.
Transfer activity in the mid-season window is often likened to panic buying and this season once again saw teams towards the bottom of the table scrabbling around for players to boost their bids to avoid relegation.
Newcastle United signed six new players, including five Frenchmen, while bottom club Queens Park Rangers broke their transfer record twice to sign French striker Loic Remy from Marseille for £8 million and former Blackburn Rovers centre-back Christopher Samba from Anzhi Makhachkala for £12.5 million.
Along with Liverpool, who spent a reported £12 million on Daniel Sturridge and £8.5 million on Philippe Coutinho, the three clubs' spending amounted for over half of the Premier League total.
The top clubs, in contrast, were relatively prudent.
Manchester United agreed a deal for 20-year-old winger Wilfried Zaha that could ultimately cost £15 million but immediately loaned him back to Crystal Palace until the end of the season.
Notoriously cautious Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger waited until the final hours of the transfer window before splurging £8.3 million on Spanish left-back Nacho Monreal, while champions Manchester City did not sign anyone.
"Premier League clubs have been relatively restrained in their player transfer fee spending, in spite of the upcoming uplift in their broadcasting revenues of between £20m and £30m each from next season," said Dan Jones from Deloitte's Sports Business Group.
The caution shown by Premier League clubs can be partially explained by wariness of UEFA's Financial Fair Play rules, which will oblige the leading clubs to break even or risk exclusion from European competition.
"Clubs are now in a reporting period that will count towards the first assessment of UEFA's financial fair play break-even requirement for international competition and Premier League clubs are also considering the implementation of additional cost control regulation at a domestic level," Jones added.
"Their apparent relative restraint in this transfer window may reflect an increasing focus on clubs achieving more sustainable levels of expenditure relative to revenues."
Despite an absence of mega-money transfers this year, English clubs have now spent over £1 billion on new players since the January transfer window was introduced in 2003 and continue to lead the way for spending in Europe.
Total spending in Italy's Serie A accounted for roughly 70 percent of the Premier League total, with that figure falling to around 45 percent for Germany and 30 percent for France.
The money spent on transfer fees by Spanish clubs was "minimal", according to Deloitte, despite the vast resources available to Barcelona and Real Madrid.
The challenge facing Samba, Sturridge, Zaha and company is to avoid joining the ranks of previous January transfer window movers who spectacularly failed to make an impact at their new clubs.
The careers of Torres and Carroll have both flat-lined since their January moves, while Andrey Arshavin disappeared into anonymity at Arsenal despite a superb start to life at the Emirates Stadium after he arrived in January 2009.
"You are always under pressure to buy in England and every problem has to be sorted out by buying people," said Wenger.
"It is not only in buying players that you sort out problems, especially from people who live in a different country. They come at the end of January and by the time they adapt, the season is over."


text:
After a long, mouth-watering wait, the first set of of new practice material from GMAC became available this week. We got our sweaty, eager hands on some copies of the Official Guide for GMAT Review 13th Edition as soon as possible so we could get information out to people. If you're looking to get your hands on a copy, you can find them in our bookstore.
Here's a quick recap of what you can expect when you get one of your very own:
- Integrated Reasoning Chapter – The integrated reasoning chapter includes descriptions of the question types and strategies, explantions of the question directions, and, of course, a limited number of example questions. Don't expect too much here, as the whole chapter is about 12 pages long.
- Integrated Reasoning Online Practice Questions – Probably the most relevant new addition to OG 13, the book comes with an online access code attached to the inside back cover that will allow you to do practice Integrated Reasoning questions in a fashion and format similar to how they appear on the Official GMAT (see picture below). The access code provides a set of 50 IR practice questions.
- "Exam" NOT "Test" – Apparently GMAC wants to emphasize that the GMAT is an exam and not a test. In the table of contents all references to the "GMAT Test" have been replaced with the "GMAT Exam." Not sure what the point of that is, but we figured you wanted to know everything.
- Hideous Cover – As you can see, they went with a rather unsightly shade of aquamarine. I'm no fashionista, but the maroon coloration of the last edition was a lot easier on the eyes. Thankfully, there's a lot more to like about this version of the OG.
- Admonishments Not to Cheat – As if you didn't already know, GMAC figured they should tell you in no uncertain terms that cheating is bad, and that you definitely shouldn't do it. Don't do. No, seriously. Don't do it.
Here's what you won't find in OG 13: Any more practice questions than in OG 12. While the cover of the book advertises "more than 900 questions from past GMAT exams," while OG 12 advertises more than 800, there are exactly the same number of questions in each of the five sets of practice questions (Problem Solving, Data Sufficiency, Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and Sentence Correction) as there were in OG 12.
We're still trying to figure out where exactly these additional 100 or so GMAT questions from past exams are in the book. We know there are 50 practice IR questions online, but even if we count those, where are rest supposed to be?
We're also curious about how many (and which) of the current practice questions they've updated. We'll go through every single question in the next few days to confirm whether it's new or not, and have a detailed breakdown and comparison to OG 12 next week.
As it currently stands, it doesn't seem like there's much new here in OG13. The IR should be helpful to prepare for that section, but otherwise the Official Guide remains largely unchanged. If you'd like to get a copy and get started with your IR prep, check out our bookstore. Not even mba.com has it yet!
We'll be back with a whole lot more on the IR in the coming days. Keep your eyes peeled!