linux - Is it better to use git grep than plain grep if we want to search in versioned source code?
In a git repository, is there any difference/benefit using git grep over good old grep?
An example would be?

The two are very similar. The main difference is that git grep defaults to searching in the files that are tracked by git.
Examples
If I want to find foo within my project I can use git grep or good ol' stand-alone grep:
git grep foo
grep -R foo .

The git grep version will only search in files tracked by git, whereas the grep version will search everything in the directory. So far so similar; either one could be better depending on what you want to achieve.
What if we want to limit the search to only .rb files?
git grep foo -- *.rb
grep -R --include=*.rb foo .

The plain old grep version is getting a bit more wordy, but if you're used to using grep that may not be a problem. They're still not going to search exactly the same files, but again it depends on what you want to achieve.
What about searching in the previous version of the project?
git grep foo HEAD^
git checkout HEAD^; grep -R foo .; git checkout -

This is where git grep makes a real difference: You can search in another revision of the project without checking it out first. This isn't a situation that comes up too often for me though; I usually want to search in the version of the project I have checked out.
Configuring git grep
There are some git config variables that modify the behaviour of git grep and avoid the need to pass a couple of command line arguments:

grep.lineNumber: Always show line numbers of matches (you can pass -n to both grep and git grep to get this behaviour)
grep.extendedRegexp: Always use extended regular expressions (you can pass -E to both grep and git grep to get this behaviour)

In practice
In practice I have gg aliased to git grep -En, and this almost always does what I want.
