>>>>> Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard?
>>>> I don't understand the question.
>>> Why is it vendor-specific to RHEL?
> included in the kernel?
The logical code to SELinux isn't specific to RH, not by a long shot.
of doing that Fedora acquired/affirmed its reputation for eating babies.
is still "disable SELinux, it sux").
SELinux is that often it produces instant gratification.