In spite of this, lawyer of Hagyó indicated to BRFK before the pre-trial detention that his client is at the authorities’ disposal at anytime and anywhere. (Letter to Col. Mihány Bezsenyi, dated 11th May 2010, delivered personally .pdf – official website of Miklós Hagyó) However Miklós Hagyó was taken to pre-trial detention on 17th May 2010 ordered by the Central District Court of Pest regarding the BKV-case. The most severe forced action was appealed by the lawyer of Hagyó but the Prosecutor’s Office rejected the appeal on the basis of the above mentioned data. (A case being pulled out of constitutional rights? – Éva Kádár .pdf – jogiforum.hu) Mária Szívós automatically confirmed three times the pre-trial detention against Hagyó. She also referred to that certain police report which contains a data on the intention to escape. (Winners of BKV-case: Mária Szívós Constitutional Judge – Hagyó dossier, 27.08.2012) Despite of Gábor Tóth’s declaration this certain data has not been disguised yet.
It was 23rd February 2011, when Hagyó was taken to pre-trial detention and the ordering decision stated that there was no data on escape. (Decision 21.Bnf.470/2011/2 of Metropolitan Court as second instance on taking Hagyó to pre-trial detention.pdf – official website of Miklós Hagyó, 23.02.2011) The court of second instance – in its decision of 10th June 2011, by which Hagyó was released – declared that there is no such data in the documentation of the investigation. (Decision 31.Bnf.1448/2011/2 of Metropolitan Court as second instance .pdf – official website of Miklós Hagyó) Furthermore, the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg also misses this certain data. The Strasbourg decision declared the unacceptable conditions of Hagyó’s pre-trial detention. (Strasbourg Court agreed with Hagyó – Index, 23.04.2013) It is still unknown what kind of data Gábor Tóth talked about.
The confessions taken on the trial in Kecskemét were against the confessions taken during the investigation although Gábor Tóth confidently declared. He confirmed that they hold the investigation in their hand and was talking about new evidences, investigative confessions and therefore new conclusions.
Another witness of the prosecutor shoot back too. János Pálocska informed the Kecskemét Tribunal that Cpt. Dr. László Bói, leader-detective of BKV-case promised him to influence the judge and the investigation in another case if he signed the draft of the P.I. as his own confession. As he told in the court, Cpt. det. Bói shamelessly behaved when after this promise he forced him by instructions to sign a false, incriminating confession which’s actors he never knows. Bói told him that “Hagyó is going to be arrested, this has already been decided and your confession is required”. (Hagyó-trial: Prosecutor’s witness shoots back – Index, 07.05.2013) As narrated by Pálocska, Hagyó, former socialist Deputy Mayor, Éva H. and Ottó L. were arrested on the basis of a – inter alia – false minutes.
Consequently, Gábor Tóth can work together with his ex-colleagues who were acting under the Gyurcsány and Bajnai administration in order to create a tighter relation between the police and the secret service.