Abstract: Central nervous system (CNS) cryptococcosis is an opportunistic fungal infection that typically occurs in patients with reduced immunological function, such as patients with AIDS, patients receiving organ transplants, or patients receiving corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapy. CNS cryptococcosis rarely occurs in immunocompetent patients. CNS cryptococcosis is characterized by meningitis and encephalitis and occasionally forms isolated granulomas. Isolated cerebellar cryptococcoma is a rare condition, especially in immunocompetent patients, and the misdiagnosis rate is high. A definite diagnosis must be based on pathology. To raise awareness of this disease, the clinical data of a patient with cryptococcomas in the right side of the cerebellum are reported.
A 61-year-old immunocompetent woman presented with a chronic headache for 10 months that had been progressively worsening for 18 days with emesis. She had an irregular headache without relation to body, position, or time. The patient was a peasant with no particular exposure to avian (especially pigeon) feces or woodworking. The headache got worse, with several nonbloody, nonbilious vomiting episodes, and the patient developed an ataxic gait 18 days before hospital admission. A comprehensive physical examination of her body at admission did not show any pertinent findings. There was no evidence of compromised immunological function or signs of localized infection. She could not complete the hand alternating movement test, her right side of finger–nose test was positive, and her heel-knee-tibia test was suspiciously positive, but Romberg’s sign was negative. The rest of the physical examination did not present any abnormalities. Blood cell count, urine analysis, and blood biochemistry were normal. HIV antibody test was repeatedly negative. Gram stain and India ink stain of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were negative. CSF and blood were negative for cultures. The cryptococcal antigen latex agglutination test of CSF was negative the first time, but it was positive the second time; the titer was 1:32.
Abdominal and chest radiographs were negative. A plain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the head demonstrated a 26×21×16 mm3 nodule as long or equal to T1 and long T2 signal in the right cerebellar hemisphere with no adjacent edema, and the nodule was significantly enhanced as nodular with a thick and annular wall after contrast administration (Figure 1C–E). There was no midline shift, and the compression of adjacent structures was not apparent (Figure 1A and B). The patient was considered to have a metastatic tumor or glioma in the right cerebellar hemisphere.
Figure 1 MRI scans of the head (A–E) and frozen section image (F).
Notes: (A and B) Axial plain MRI scan demonstrates a round mass about 2.6×2.1×1.6 cm3 in the right cerebellar hemisphere. (C–E) Contrast-enhanced MRI scan shows that the right cerebellar mass was enhanced as nodular with a thick and annular wall. (F) Within the tissue frozen section, a large number of mononuclear cells and multinucleated giant cells are diffusely seen. There is a small amount of bacteria circular structure and mesenchyme hyalinization, with a large amount of lymphocyte and little plasma cell infiltration and local tissue necrosis with neutrophils infiltration. Immunohistochemical staining: thallus PAS (+).
Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PAS, periodic acid-schiff stain.
The cerebellar nodule was removed by neurosurgery via a suboccipital craniotomy in the left lateral position. An 80 mm long straight incision was made 20 mm outside the right side of the occipital bone of the lower lateral hairline. Intraoperatively, the lower part of the transverse sinus and the surface layer of cerebellum were exposed. Subcortical dissection was performed until a 40×30×20 mm firm nodule with moderate vascular supply and distinct border was identified, located at the upper portion of the right cerebellar hemisphere. The blood vessels that supply for the nodule were cut off by electrocoagulation, and then en bloc resection of the nodule along the border was performed.
A portion of the nodule was sent for pathologic analysis. A large number of mononuclear cells and multinucleated giant cells were seen, with diffused distribution. There was a small amount of bacteria circular structure and mesenchyme hyalinization, with a large number of lymphocytes and a few plasma cell infiltrations; local tissue necrosis with neutrophil infiltration was also found in the frozen section tissues (Figure 1F). Immunohistochemical staining yielded CD68 (+), cytokeratin (−), epithelial membrane antigen (−), glial fibrillary acidic protein (−), Ki-67 (−), neurofilament(−), neuron-specific enolase (−), soluble-protein 100 (−), vimentin (+), cluster of differentiation 1a (−), and thallus periodic acid-schiff stain (+). The neuropathology evidenced a right cerebellar cryptococcal granuloma.
The clinical feature of CNS cryptococcosis is highly variable and nonspecific, which is related to immune status and the types of cryptococcus.11 Because of its insidious onset, progressive intracranial hypertension may be the initial symptom, characterized by headache, nausea, and vomiting, and then followed with other symptoms, such as cranial nerve damage and focal neurological signs. Immunocompetent patients may be characterized by meningitis and focal cryptococcomas.
The imaging diagnosis of immunocompetent patients with cerebellar cryptococcomas is a challenge. In general, CSF, including pressure measurement, routine tests, biochemistry indicators, and examination of ink stain of CSF, is essential to the diagnosis. Cryptococcal antigens latex agglutination test of cerebrospinal fluid and blood examination contribute to the diagnosis, but the definitive diagnosis of cryptococcosis must be confirmed by histopathologic examination. In the current patient, the diagnosis of cerebellar cryptococcoma was confirmed by histopathology, whereas the CSF and cryptococcal antigen latex agglutination tests were both negative.
Different sites, pathological types, and stages of CNS cryptococcosis may show different computed tomographic (CT) and MRI findings.12 Early stages of cryptococcosis may not show any abnormal CT findings, but a few nonspecific manifestations, including diffuse cerebral atrophy, hydrocephalus, and diffuse cerebral edema, can be found.3,13 Cryptococcoma can appear as a localized tumor-like mass when the fungus has involved brain parenchyma. Cryptococcus tumors typically show long T1 and long T2 signals on MRI, as well as circular enhancement.14 Although certain characteristic imaging findings have been described, the differential diagnosis is still difficult because of the overlap of imaging findings with granulomatous tumors and abscesses, especially the tuberculous granuloma.
The lack of specificity of clinical manifestations and the low detection rate of cryptococcus in CSF bring difficulties to its diagnosis. In this reported case, CNS cryptococcosis manifested as an intracranial lesion, which was misdiagnosed as a tuberculoma or a cerebral tumor. It is necessary to perform multiple smears and cultures in CSF examination. Radiological examination, especially by MRI, may make a suggestive diagnosis. A definite diagnosis is confirmed by histological examination.
This work was supported by Jiangxi Provincial Department of Graduate Innovation Foundation (Grants YC2013-S007 and YC2013-S011), Chinese Department of National Innovation Experiment Program for University Students (Grants 201210403052 and 2012181), and Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology support program (Grant 20141BBG70026).
Perfect JR. The triple threat of cryptococcosis: it’s the body site, the strain, and/or the host. MBio. 2012;3(4):e00165–e12.
Desalermos A, Kourkoumpetis TK, Mylonakis E. Update on the epidemiology and management of cryptococcal meningitis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13(6):783–789.
Correa MP, Severo LC, Oliveira FM, Irion K, Londero AT. The spectrum of computerized tomography (CT) findings in central nervous system (CNS) infection due to Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii in immunocompetent children. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2002;44(5):283–287.
Mitchell DH, Sorrell TC, Allworth AM, et al. Cryptococcal disease of the CNS in immunocompetent hosts: influence of cryptococcal variety on clinical manifestations and outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20(3):611–616.
Kesler R, Maertens P. Pontine cryptococcoma in a nonimmunocompromised individual: MRI characteristics. J Neuroimaging. 1999;9(2):118–121.
Li Q, You C, Liu Q, Liu Y. Central nervous system cryptococcoma in immunocompetent patients: a short review illustrated by a new case. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152(1):129–136.
Gologorsky Y, DeLaMora P, Souweidane MM, Greenfield JP. Cerebellar cryptococcoma in an immunocompetent child. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(4)(suppl):314–317.
Kanaly CW, Selznick LA, Cummings TJ, Adamson DC. Cerebellar cryptococcoma in a patient with undiagnosed sarcoidosis: case report. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(3):E571.
Reis F, Schwingel R, Souza TF, Queiroz LS, Zanardi VA. Cerebellar cryptococcoma in a non-HIV patient. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011;69(5):851.
Nakwan N, Songjamrat A, Tungsinmonkong K, Nakwan N. Cerebellar cryptococcoma in an immunocompetent adult patient. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009;40(5):1034–1037.
Peachey PR, Gubbins PO, Martin RE. The association between cryptococcal variety and immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. Pharmacotherapy. 1998;18(2):255–264.
Scozzafava J, Block H, Asdaghi N, Siddiqi ZA. Teaching NeuroImage: cryptococcal brain pseudocysts in an immunocompetent patient. Neurology. 2007;69(9):E6–E7.
Awasthi M, Patankar T, Shah P, Castillo M. Cerebral cryptococcosis: atypical appearances on CT. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(877):83–85.
Ho TL, Lee HJ, Lee KW, Chen WL. Diffusion-weighted and conventional magnetic resonance imaging in cerebral cryptococcoma. Acta Radiol. 2005;46(4):411–414.