Why do some people develop terrible complications from diabetes, while others skate through with no complications at all? Is there such a thing as immunity from complications, and if so how can you get that immunity for yourself?
Unfortunately, nobody knows the answer to those questions, and until now, few have even looked into them. We know from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and from other studies that blood glucose control makes a big difference in complications of diabetes. But there is much more to the story.
In the DCCT, and the long-term follow-up study called EDIC (Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications), people with Type 1 practicing “intensive blood glucose control” reduced diabetic kidney disease by 50%, heart attacks by 57%, nerve disease by 60%, and eye disease by 76%. Pretty good, but what about the 25% to 50% of intensive control subjects who got the complications anyway? And what about the 10% to 15% of people with Type 1 who never seem to get severe complications, without practicing intensive control?
Now Swedish scientists are finally starting to look at this basic question. Valeriya Lyssenko, MD, PhD, and Peter Nilsson, MD, PhD, both from Lund University Diabetes Center, are conducting the PROLONG (PROtective Genes in Diabetes and LONGevity ) study, looking at Swedes who have had diabetes for more than 30 years, half of them without complications. They will be compared to others who have had diabetes less than 15 years and have already developed major complications.
At least scientists are finally looking. Another study at Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston is following people who have had Type 1 for over 50 years, to find out what keeps them complication-free, or close to it.
According to Dr. Nilsson, complications arise because “The blood vessels and other organs of the body become sugar coated and stiff. It is reminiscent of premature biological aging.” I would call that a pretty unsophisticated level of understanding.
They’re starting to learn more at the cellular level, at least in mice. Washington University researchers say that blood vessel damage in diabetes may involve a deficiency of fatty acid synthase (FAS) an enzyme that helps protect blood vessel walls. Mice engineered to lack FAS had a lot of blood vessel damage. People with low insulin production or high insulin resistance also tend to have low levels of FAS.
The Lund study participants will answer questions about their lifestyle and diseases they, or their closest relatives, may have. Genetic tests will be analyzed, and close relatives of the participants will also be invited to take part.
It’s looking more and more like all types of diabetes should be considered inflammatory diseases. Hopefully this will lead to new treatments and paths to prevention, but how does this knowledge apply to self-management? I hope readers have some ideas, but all I can do is refer you back to this article on inflammation from 2009, or this one on anti-inflammatory diets. Other than that, it seems like the best thing you can do is to have good genes, and the second is to keep glucose well controlled. A person concerned about inflammation could certainly take cheap anti-inflammatories such as salsalate or ibuprofen. One could also reduce stress, meditate and relax more, and move one’s body more.
One encouraging note from the Swedes: They have found that “a person who has had diabetes for [over 30 years] without developing complications is unlikely to develop them later in life.” So if you’ve made it that far, things are looking good!