MORE ON the progress in Iraq. Spanish media, of course, silent.
Five months ago, Suhaila al-Aasan lived in an oxygen tank factory with her husband and two sons, convinced that they would never go back to their apartment in Dora, a middle-class neighborhood in southern Baghdad.
Mrs. Aasan, 45, a Shiite librarian with an easy laugh, is living at the far end of Baghdad’s tentative recovery. She is one of many Iraqis who in recent weeks have begun to test where they can go and what they can do when fear no longer controls their every move.
CONCEPT CARS for the year 2057.
The gaudy orange, green and purple electronic palm trees flashing in the dark alert you that you're getting close to one of Baghdad's bustling nightspots.
The palms, like a mirage, can be seen from way down the darkened streets, lighting up the night and giving a promise of normality in the otherwise bleak and deserted capital, ravaged by four years of insurgency and sectarian strife.
And then, suddenly, you've arrived and the mirage has become an oasis of generator-driven light; a colourful jumble of trendy juice bars, cosy restaurants, fruit shops, roadside eateries and fish vendors, where children play, families dine and lovers meet.
"Even two or three months ago we would have been afraid to come here at night," said 20-year-old Hussein Salah, an off-duty soldier, slurping a milkshake with his wife, Shihad, at the Mishmesha (apricot) juice bar in Baghdad's relatively safe Karrada suburb.
"Now we sometimes sit outside here till one or two in the morning. It is quite safe. The security situation is vastly improved," said Salah, the orange light from a nearby flashing palm alternatively brightening and dimming his clean-shaven face.
Declines in Iraqi civilian casualties and a sharp reduction in bomb and mortar attacks have sparked optimism that the capital is at last starting to revive.
KEN ANDERSON looks at the Madrid bombing verdicts and explains why terror can't be fought in ordinary courts.
WHAT IF Iraq was never invaded?
UPDATE. Yes, the war has costed billions of dollars. But avoiding the war wouldn't have been free, eonomically speaking.
WILL KING JUAN CARLOS SMACKDOWN mark a turning point?
That's because Spain isn't just any country, and its monarch isn't just any figurehead. In asking "why don't you shut up" to Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, Juan Carlos signaled that time has run out on democracies' tolerance of anything a boorish dictator seeking to dominate the region can dish out.
Read the rest. I'm not sure I'm as optimistic, though. I think it's a matter of time until Chavez's demagoguery turns the tables and gets the support of quite a few people.
Former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar said this week that the Basque separatist group ETA was involved in the 2004 Madrid train bombings.
Aznar said the planners of the bombings "are not in remote deserts or faraway mountains," El Pais reported.
Silly for UPI, I mean. Because they're putting the conclusion in Aznar's mouth, one he didn't make. He didn't mention the word ETA in that interview, and one would expect that a news agency would use for the headline something that was actually said. Aznar did say that the planners of the March 11 bombings are not in remote deserts or faraway mountains, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it was ETA. Remember that the Socialist's theory was that the bombing were a retribution for Spain's support of the Iraq war (conveniently leaving out that when they claimed responsibility the culprits also mentioned Afghanistan, a war that the Socialists also support, sort of. But I digress). That is, that it was planned by al-Qaeda from afar.
Well, no; it was planned and executed by a gang of local Muslim terrorists with no connection with al-Qaeda, as the verdict amply proved. Hence, Aznar could have been simply thinking on that, de-linking the terror attack from Spain's foreign policy. How do I know? Well, I'm just stating that this could be a possibility, but I don't know because Aznar didn't explicitly say what he had in mind.
But UPI didn't know either.
The words of King Juan Carlos 1 of Spain to the Venezuelan President, Hugo Chávez, in the closing session of the Latin American summit today.
The Spanish monarch lost his cool when Chávez called the ex Spanish Prime Minister, José María Aznar, a fascist on several occasions. King Juan Carlos then got up and walked out of the session in a gesture without precedent, and just in time to hear the Nicaraguan President, Daniel Ortega, criticising Spanish businesses and the role of Union Fenosa in Nicaragua in particular. The King was to return later, but was not present for the singing of the Chilean hymn which closed the debates.
UPDATE (Sunday). Daniel of Venezuela has more. And as I wrote in my Spanish blog, I also commend Zapatero -if you follow this blog you know I'm not exactly a fan. But it's the first time he has raised above partisanship and showed some institutional respect towards his antecessor.
UPDATE II. Joe Gandelman has a roundup.
SAM HARRIS at Tucker Carlson. Excellent.
PUTIN is finally taking his mask off.