Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] old_numeric_cast and Borland 5.6.4"
Previous message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [regex] Boost.Regex and TR1 fundamentally broken?"
In reply to: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] [function types] New tag type logic"
>> "unspecified" for this case).
> all possibilities. In other words, to ignore that aspect.
I can't understand either phrasing.