JSC "Yuganskneftegaz" filed a lawsuit against the State Department of Nefteyugansk of the Federal Registration Service of the Tyumen Region, Khanty-Mansiysk - Yugra, YaNAO to invalidate the refusal of registration of lease contracts Woodland concluded between the plaintiff and the Nefteyugansk forestry.
The representative of the defendant´s claim is not admitted to the court and said that the refusal of registration of the contract is justified, since according to the current forest legislation under the lease of forest land may be granted only for the purposes related to forest management. The submissions no plan - forest plot certified by the relevant body of accounting.
It is also explained that currently in the Unified State Register entry was made about the ownership of the Russian Federation on the forest area. Among the documents submitted no documents confirming the right of the landlord to dispose of federal property.
At the hearing the applicant confirmed that the production of forest area is not related to forest management, and the need to operate the object erected on this site.
Solve the case. Can the forest land leased to for purposes not related to forest management? What body keeps records of forest areas? What is an essential supplement to the lease agreement?
Limited Liability Company "Amber Shore" signed a contract to lease the land for the construction of summer houses, and land on the territory of a river Gzhelka.
After some time of "Amber Coast" clean out the bottom of the reservoir, which is located on a rented plot of land, filled it with sand, equipped sandy beach width of 1000 meters and has organized the sale of tickets.
Citizens who do not want to pay the rest on the equipped beach, appealed to local authorities to complain about the management of "Amber Coast". They believed that they had the right to use the beach for free.
The administration has sent a complaint to the Authority for the Protection of Water Resources, which prepared a written response from the fact that the lessee did not agree with him the use of the land and the water body for the commercialization of the beach.
For the protection of the rights of citizens are advised to go to court.
Do you think that citizens´ rights were violated?
Should the company have been "Amber Shore" to apply to the authority for the protection of water resources for the coordination of water? What would you have given legal advice to citizens?
The procuratorial authorities has been audited performance on the territory of the Komi-Perm Autonomous District of the RF Law "On Mineral Wealth".
During the inspection it was found that individuals within the boundaries of land belonging to them by right of ownership, develop shingles, gravel, gravel and sand materials in its sole discretion. Permits for mining has been received. The fee is not paid.
In some cases, citizens have the right to extract minerals without permission and free of charge?
How is the list of common minerals?
What public authorities are competent to determine the regional lists of commonly occurring minerals?
Is it right, in this case the actions of citizens?
What types of liability under the current legislation for illegal mining?