A team of neuroscientists has published a paper claiming it has developed a mathematical calculation that could potentially predict the tipping point of any massive event -- from a market crash to a brain seizure.
can be predicted if you have the right information. For instance, when a team of neuroscientists monitored the brain activity of a macaque while its hand was being touched in a recent study, the team could identify which chain reaction of electrical stimulation in the brain signified that sensation. By replicating the same pattern, the team could cause the macaque to "feel" that same sensation artificially. Now, in a study let by professors at the University of Sussex, along with colleagues working in psychology and physics, that kind of pattern hunting has been translated into a computer simulation that those behind it say could one day "predict calamitous events before they happen".
The team, also made up of professors from the Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science and the Centre for Research in Complex Systems at Charles Sturt University in Australia, developed an equation that revealed the effects of information flow between multiple nodes. According to Lionel Barnett, lead author on the paper, they found the fact that all the elements "casually influence each other" to be of most importance.
It means we must first identify all the parts of a system, then assess the relationship between individual nodes and then their causal effect on the whole. In doing so, we can find out when the fate of a node is dependant on its own behaviour because it behaves so differently from the others, and when its fate is dependant on all other nodes. "The dynamics of complex systems -- like the brain and the economy -- depend on how their elements causally influence each other; in other words, how information flows between them," said Barnett.
'information flow' peaked at or to one side of the phase transition. While some of these results could be established by analytical maths, other had to be obtained by computer simulation.
'finite' simulations leading to ceiling effects and the like."
Using supercomputers at the Charles Sturt University in Australia, the team found that one measure called "global transfer entropy flow" reached a peak, repeatedly, "on the disordered side of the transition -- just before the tipping point".
It's the density of the information flow that anticipates the tipping point -- "all other measures peak strictly at the tipping point itself" explained Seth.
In a statement, Seth had called the implications of the study "far-reaching", suggesting it might be possible to predict calamities in the real world before they happen and affect the outcome as a result -- for instance, delivering brain stimulation before a seizure to prevent it. "This would change the course of the dynamics and prevent the seizure," he said, before suggesting its applications could spread to financial, climate sand even immune systems.
Speaking to Wired.co.uk, Seth went on to explain why he believes this really could be feasible, despite the systems discussed being so vastly different. "Financial networks and epilepsy detection, [for example]are also canonical examples of phase transitions about critical points," he said. "While the Ising model is of course a highly simplified abstraction, our findings nonetheless warrant exploration of the possibility that measures of information flow will be sensitive to transitions in these systems in well. For instance, in epilepsy, electrical activity in the brain moves to a highly ordered (hypersynchronous) state during seizures, preserving some of the important dynamical features we have studied in the Ising model. Arguably similar dynamical features characterise transitions in financial systems -- bad things happen when all the indicators start to 'move together' too much."
The proposal is along the lines of other work done by simulation software companies, including Simudyne, that suggest complexity science is the answer to decision-making. Even here, however, the company falls short of claiming it can predict the future, and acknowledges the depth of human factors and how they can interfere with mathematically-drawn conclusions. The difference here is the joint Sussex-Australia team has applied the principles of a known model and is only focussing on phase transitions. The team plans to expand on the work through further research.