I think this is an interesting judgement, especially from the point of view of the title itself, as you mentioned.
Perhaps the court is trying to humanise the process by removing the sometimes inanimate feel these judgments have.
It certainly helps me to picture better that there is a real child in this scenario and allows me to engage with the case on a more emotional level, which I think is a good thing.
It might be good to title all child cases with fictitious names from now on.... what do you think?
Yes, it does seem to humanise the process somewhat, and also make the case easier to remember(!), although if all cases were named like this, I suppose the courts could eventually run out of unique names.
This is true! However, I am willing to offer the government my extensive library of baby name books.
:-) I was assuming that 'Jane' was chosen as 'J' was the child's initial, although obviously that may not be the case.
I was thinking Jane, as in Jane Doe.
SW: I knew some nutjob would come on here and start naming names! You are a very bad person, and if I get into trouble for publishing your comment, I'm blaming you.