Neste has investigated Finnish attitudes to flight-related emissions and their offsetting or compensation. Renewable aviation fuel was the respondents’ preferred method of compensating for or offsetting of flight-related emissions. 80 percent of all respondents considered renewable aviation fuel an interesting or very interesting option, as it has a concrete impact on emissions where they are generated.
A study carried out by Neste* revealed that recent public debate of flight-related emissions has had an effect on Finnish consumers. Of all respondents, 50 percent said that they are aware of emissions resulting from air travel, and 52 percent felt that reduction of air traffic emissions is a serious or very serious environmental issue. More than 2,000 responses were received in the study, which combined quantitative and qualitative methods.
“The current year largely determines whether the increase of CO2 emissions from aviation can be halted by 2020. Any increase in air traffic must be carbon-neutral after that also, which means that we need to find long-term solutions. Since this is such a hot topic right now, we wanted to get the consumers’ perspective: how they feel about flight-related emissions, and what solutions they prefer for solving the problem together with airlines and airports,” says Andreas Teir, Neste’s Vice President for Business Development in Renewable Products.
Depending on the fuel mix, renewable aviation fuel may reduce the flight’s greenhouse gas emissions up to 80 percent compared to fossil fuel.
“The results of the study emphasized the importance of transparency, which Finnish consumers expect from any offsetting or compensation payments and their impacts. The respondents appreciated renewable aviation fuel for its ability to reduce emissions in a concrete manner at their source. Therefore, the respondents preferred it over other means of compensating for flight-related emissions,” Teir says.
Renewable aviation fuel is more expensive than fossil fuel. A total of 66 percent of respondents said that the additional cost of renewable fuel should be transferred to the ticket price. They felt that all passengers would then carry equal responsibility for reducing emissions.
“This result was very interesting, as respondents were not provided with alternatives but were instead asked to state a figure. The averages were quite high – people were prepared to pay up to 20 percent more if renewable jet fuel would be used,” Teir says.
Renewable jet fuel is currently the most effective realistic method of reducing emissions in aviation. Neste produces renewable aviation fuel at its refinery in Porvoo, Finland and will also expand manufacturing to its refinery in Singapore.
“Renewable fuel will play an important role in reducing the carbon dioxide emissions of aviation. However, regulation will have a strong impact on how quickly operators will switch from fossil fuels to renewable fuels. Therefore, it is important to increase people’s awareness of the benefits of renewable aviation fuels to ensure that regulation will soon begin to support the transition in aviation as it already does in road traffic,” Teir explains.