Next message: Markus Sch�pflin: "Re: [boost] [iostreams] [RC_1_33_1] Currently broken on Tru64/CXX andComo 4.3.3"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"
In reply to: Martin Wille: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"
Next in thread: Roger Leigh: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"
> anyway (if it supports Boost at all).
tests with it at one stage but it threw up many errors.
been bothering them for some time.
library (as well as the associated old GNU C++ library).
compiler and library and report back.