the world, but even if I admit it is probably a losing battle to protect one’s privacy I still appreciate very much that you helped spread the message from Katherine Albrecht. Avoidance techniques, like not allowing a tracker to be inserted into your body and refraining from use of Windows 10 and similar ilk, will delay the assault facing us from the world of information technology. So I thank you for alerting us at 19:36 about additional cautions to be taken. Cheers.
The results are in. Donald Trump is by far the Natural News reader favorite for the 2016 elections, earning 44.3% of the vote.
What’s truly fascinating is that 97.9% of Natural News readers REJECTED establishment candidates like Bush and Clinton.
Another day. Another psych op.
“DOW Roars back, rallies 620 points, in sign of market stabilization”.
-you see they put it right out there for everyone to see. In plain sight. Stabilization. That’s the key word right there.
matter how awful the selling is.
Soon, before September ends, the door opens up to silver and gold as the last men standing.
It concerns me when Sinclair thinks we’re going to launch, he serves who again? Shite I hope not another giant flush down wave that destroys me.
on this afternoon. All the problems have been solved, nothing to see here – keep moving !
I think he may be right this time. I guess we find out in a month or two. I’m just hoping it’s not a total global meltdown. No fun if there’s mass chaos, starvation-looting etc.!
So FAR ,SO GOOD ..its the sudden stop ya need to watch out for !
Nymex September palladium contracts tumbled on Tuesday, dropping as much as 8% following a double whammy of surging mine production and weakness in the top consumer of the metal.
In after hours trade palladium was exchanging hands for $536.05, down 6.6% or $38 compared to its previous close. Earlier in the day the metal plunged to a low of $528.20.
The price of palladium jumped to 13-year highs above $900 an ounce a year ago but has now retreated far into bear territory trading at the lowest since September 2010.
LONDON – A corporate power struggle, along with what appears to be a major clash of personalities and a breakdown in community relations, appears to be threatening the future of the promising Ollachea gold project in Peru.
In so doing this potentially threatens also the whole future of Minera IRL, the London, Toronto and Peruvian listed company, which was planning to bring the project into production by 2017.
As mining companies operating in Peru have sometimes found to their cost, relations with the local community are key to whether a project can sink or swim. Over the years the trust built up by Minera IRL management under the guidance of former President and CEO, Courtney Chamberlain who tragically passed away in April, and former co-founder Diego Benavides, with the Ollachea community had been seen as a model of the way to set about this.
But all this trust appears to have been dashed by local interpretations resulting from a community meeting addressed by the company’s recently appointed Executive Chairman, Daryl Hodges. Hodges was reporting on the key US$70 million credit facility with Peruvian state-owned development bank, COFIDE.
By many accounts, Hodges’ statement was apparently not well received. Now whether this was due to a misunderstanding of new Minera IRL policies given that Hodges, a non-Spanish speaker addressed the community in English via an interpreter, or because the community obviously favoured Benavides, whom they knew well, is uncertain. But the net result of what has so far proven to be an ill-judged presentation by Hodges, was a letter from the Community leaders withdrawing all support for the project under current management and calling for Benavides to be confirmed as CEO.
Hodges has an excellent track record in the financial community, but perhaps may not be so skilled in dealing with local social and community issues. The initial result has thus led to the deferment by IRL management of the Ollachea development, and the dismissal of Benavides from his position. (Presumably on grounds of fermenting the local community unrest).
Seems like I have heard that before – hopefully this time or some time in the future (while I am still alive) he will be correct and we all get paid !
it is a political satire piece and did not really happen. Or at least it says that at the end of the piece. Having said that, I personally believe they are bought and paid for by someone.
Police uncover documents which turned out to be a handwritten ledger, containing names of well-known individuals and organizations who have been paying Snopes.com to debunk stories that cast them in a bad light, while validating damaging half-truths and rumors about their political opponents.
The list of groups and individuals paying to use the website’s clout ranged from local politicians to transnational entities to foreign governments, including Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the Palestinian Authority. None of the specifics or individual names are being revealed.
Especially scandalous may be the website’s possible collaboration with left-leaning national media organizations, which started with payments to Snopes.com to overlook or validate their inaccurate and biased reporting, and eventually evolved into a full-scale coordinated effort with left-leaning groups and public relation firms to construct a media narrative that gave legitimacy to certain opinions, political causes and public figures, while discrediting other opinions, causes, and public figures.