Unfortunately that's out of my hands at the moment; IANA is in the process of setting up the registry. However, I've been discussing it with them, and the impression that I get is that it's imminent.
After they set up the registry, the RFC editor will unblock (see <http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue2.html#State_Names>; we're currently in the IANA state) and we'll continue the process.
Note that the mailing lists are set up, so we can start discussing proposed registrations now.
> At the meeting and in the email below Julian reported that the registry is being setup and recommended that we be ready to populate the registry with initial data.  At the WG meting it was noted that both Ian and Lief had signed up to populate the registry when it was available.
> Can you give us a definitive timeline for when the IANA registry will be available?
>> are the appropriate next steps for the WG to take?
> slow at it (potentially due to the unorthodox requirements).
Next message: Adam Barth: "Processing of &prod_id= in attributes"
Previous message: Julian Reschke: "Re: Conformance requirements related to differences that must not matter"
In reply to: Paul Cotton: "ACTION-182 and Issue-27"
Next in thread: Paul Cotton: "RE: ACTION-182 and Issue-27"
Reply: Paul Cotton: "RE: ACTION-182 and Issue-27"