In 1937, a new constitution declaring Ireland a free state was established and the old designs for the coins of Ireland that featured the legend “Saorstat Eireann” or Irish Free State were changed to “Eire” to reflect the new constitution.
It is believed by some numismatic experts that these coins are “patterns” that were made to test the striking of the coins with the new legend. While the coin is not listed as a pattern in references, it features superior strike and surface quality relative to that of a normal business strike and, therefore, has been given a designation of Proof. The one example in private hands (the 1938 Irish Penny) has been designated as a “Specimen” by NGC to denote that it is a special striking.
Specimen is used to describe any coin produced to a particularly high standard of finish but nowadays, most people would describe them as ‘proof’ quality. Some mints produce especially good versions of their uncirculated coins which they call specimens – these are ordinary uncirculated coins which have been handled individually and with greater than normal care, to avoid most, but not all, of the surface blemishes which occur due to bulk handling. In that regard they would be very similar to brilliant uncirculated or FDC coins. In my considered opinion, the 1938 coin shown above falls well below that standard. If it was produced as a ‘test’ or ‘trial’ piece to see if the dies were suitable for future production or as a sample for the Central Bank of Ireland officials, it is a ‘pattern’ plain and simple.
Meanwhile, this debate is going to go on … and on … and on in finitum.
On Monday 10th July, 2000, the Irish Department of Finance presented a ‘trial striking’ of the modified dies for the 1938 Irish Penny and the 1938 Irish Halfcrown to the National Museum of Ireland.
These coins, dated 1938, were produced because the metal flow on these denominations between 1928 and 1937 was not particularly good leaving weak areas on the obverse harp. This would suggest that they were, in fact, patterns.
The 1938 penny and halfcrown ( discussed here ) are not really ‘circulating’ coins, i.e. they are patterns for the new designs to be introduced the following year.
As per my previous post (1933 British Penny), a ‘pattern’ or ‘trial’ is a coin which has not been approved for release, usually produced for the purpose of evaluating a proposed new or modified coin design. In my considered opinion, these coins are patterns – not specimens.
Percy Metcalf, the designer of the 1928 coinage, used the opportunity of re-designing the obverse harp for all the coins to improve the reverses of these two denominations.
These two examples were the coins supplied by Metcalf to the Department of Finance in November 1938. Since then they had remained secure but unknown in the department’s archives.
It is possible that another 1938 halfcrown, or further 1938 pennies, will turn up as the contents of more archives are opened and examined in the near future when government departments are temporarily or permanently re-located.
With valuations ranging from €12,000 to as much as €35,000 for a single coin, it was inevitable that fakes would appear on the market.
In 2012 a fake Irish 1938 Irish penny appeared on Boards.ie and, from an enlarged image of the date, we can clearly see the “3” has been altered from another number. This example highlights the need for care when bidding or buying online, i.e. a clear image is vital before one makes a decision to bid or purchase.
The “3” in the date “1938” has clearly been altered, i.e. faked. This forgery has been produced to deceive the buyer. The “8” doesn’t look genuine either.
It has been suggested that the “3” has been grafted from another penny, so I show the date formats (fonts) from contemporary coins for comparison. See illustrations below.
1938 date comparisons – what type of coin was the donor for the fake 1938 Irish penny?
Neither the ‘Saorstat’ penny or the later ‘Eire’ pennies look like good donor candidates, so it has been suggested that an earlier (George V) British penny looks like a good candidate … but the top half of the “3” on this coin is not a good fit.
Perhaps the forger used the top half of an Irish penny “3” + the bottom half of a British penny “3”.
The “8” on the 1938 Irish penny forgery doesn’t look right either. Where did it come from?
It looks like it came from a 1948 Irish penny.
For a potential pay out of €12,000+, it might have been worth the time and effort to do this.
← O’Brien Rare Coin Review: Why is the 1933 British Penny so valuable?