>> transitional uses, declared at time of application.
> The /18 maximum conflicts with the second paragraph of the existing 4.10 (which specifies a /24 maximum).  You should probably update that paragraph as well.
Noted... Will incorporate that in the next rev.
>> time ARIN received this reserved block from IANA.
>> assignments from the provider at the time of this assignment.
>> the time of this assignment.
>> other provider at the time of this assignment.
>> to the ISP/LIR and must be making use of IPv6 within their network.
>> /9 + a /10).
>> equivalent under this section.
>> to deploy IPv6 as specified in section 4.12.
>> allocation. An LIR may not distribute this space to their customers.
>> both types within 6 months.
>> to the reserved pool created by 4.10.1.
>> 1. The most recent 4.10 allocation/assignment must be at least 80% utilized.
>> 3. All prior 4.10 allocation/assignments must be at least 90% utilized.
> Is there any reason to limit this requirement to just 4.10 allocations and assignments?  If we struck 4.10 there, and require that "All prior  allocation/assignments must be at least 90% utilized", would that be better?
addresses to their customers prior to runout.
the consensus on the rest of this proposal.
I encourage others to provide feedback (positive or negative on this idea).
>> organization has received resources of both types.
>> technologies operated by the recipient organization.
> The existing 4.10 language mentions "key dual stack DNS servers", but you don't mention that here.  Can you elaborate on what you think should be allowed there?
I would consider those to be covered under "other transitional DNS enablers", but, I can easily add that to the list if you feel it's helpful.
More community guidance here would be very useful.
Did you intentionally cut e off below your signature? (Note it is an important part of the intent of this section).
>> e. For other technologies of similar purpose and scope.
>> quarterly verification of utilization.
>> requirement to return space to the IANA.
>> from any requirement to return space to the IANA.