2012-07-02 Assigned to WHITE, ERIC reassignment WHITE, ERIC CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT Assignors: MARTIN, JOHN H.
A system and method of providing network access comprising a processor, a first network interface coupled to the processor, a second network interface coupled to the processor, a storage media accessible by the processor and a set of computer instructions stored on the storage media, executable by the processor, where the computer instructions can be executable to receive a network communication over the first network interface from a user using a user device and determine if the network communication is associated with an authenticated user. If the network communication is not associated with an authenticated user, is not destined for a server in a walled garden, and a pre-authentication interface is specified, the computer instructions can be executable to direct the user to the pre-authentication interface. The computer instructions can be further executable to direct the user to an authentication interface when the network communication is not associated with an authenticated user, is not destined for a server in the walled garden, and a pre-authentication interface is not specified.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/551,705 entitled “System and Method for Double-Capture/Double-Redirect to a Different Location,” by Keith Johnston, et al., filed Mar. 10, 2004 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/551,702 entitled “System and Method For Access Scope Control (“Walled Gardens”) For Clients of a Network Access Gateway”, by Patrick Turley, Keith Johnston and Steven D. Tonnesen, filed Mar. 10, 2004, which are both hereby fully incorporated by reference herein.
Embodiments of the present invention relate to network access control and security. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to providing access control for a shared network.
Network access providers utilizing Access Controlled Network Sharing technology to provide user-specific provisioned access to private/public networks may also have a need to allow controlled access for unauthenticated users to a restricted collection of network destinations.
For example, a shopping mall owner may want to provide any on-site customer possessing a wireless device (such as a laptop computer, PDA, etc.) with access to the Web server for the mall, plus one or more other Web sites that are associated with the mall (e.g., the local Web server for a tenant in the mall, such as a department store or movie theater). The collection of Web servers that the mall owner will allow an anonymous user to visit is referred to as the “walled garden”.
In addition, the mall owner may intend to provide unlimited web access to customers who agree to register with the mall owner, and identify themselves (by providing credentials—typically, in the form of a user identifier and a password that were assigned at the time they registered) whenever they wish to be granted full access to the Internet. The process of verifying a customer's credentials is referred to as “authentication”.
Previous solutions would either 1) require that the network destination of the authentication service (i.e., the “captive” portal) be specified explicitly in a link on at least one of the web pages within the set of destinations that are members of the “walled garden”, or 2) require that the end-user manually enter the web address of the authentication service in the address bar of their web browser.
The invention is a software-based system and method that enhances the function of a network access controller by introducing a “Pre-Authentication Capture Destination”. In the standard Access Controlled Network Sharing solution, an unauthenticated client who attempts to access the network is re-directed to a challenge screen or “captive portal”, where they must provide their network login credentials (e.g., user name and password).
If a Pre-Authentication Capture Destination is specified, then this behavior changes. Any attempt by an unauthenticated client to access a network resource that is not in a list of allowed destinations (e.g., the list of servers that make up the “walled garden”) will result in the client being re-directed by the Network Access Controller to the Pre-Authentication Capture Destination. The unauthenticated client is then free to visit any of the servers that are included in the walled garden without authentication. Any attempt to access a web site or location that is outside of the walled garden will cause the client to be re-directed back to the Pre-Authentication Capture Destination.
At some point, the unauthenticated client may want to use network access privileges that are only available to an authenticated user. Consequently, the client must then be re-directed to an authentication URL (or “captive” portal), where they may login (or register as a new user). To accomplish this re-direction, at least one of the web sites within the walled garden can include an HTML link that references a site that is not in the walled garden and includes a special token within the “query” portion of the link's target HTTP URL (as defined in the IETF RFC-2616—“Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1” and RFC-1738 “Uniform Resource Locators (URL)” specifications). This special token, referred to as the “Authentication Token”, is a unique sequence of characters that are valid for use in the query portion of a URL. When the client attempts to access the referenced site, they will be captured by the Network Access Controller. However, because of the presence of the Authentication token within the HTTP URL, the Network Access Controller will re-direct the client to the authentication screen, rather than redirecting them back to the Pre-Authentication Capture Destination.
Note that there is no requirement for any web page in the walled garden to have prior knowledge of the actual authentication screen location. Consequently, the same collection of walled garden sites may be used to service multiple Network Access controllers, where each controller may utilize a different authentication portal.
This invention enables a public/private network service provider to automatically redirect anonymous clients to a pre-defined destination within a limited set of network destinations, and provides a mechanism for accessing the authentication service without requiring that the web servers in the “walled garden” know the actual authentication URL. The automatic redirection occurs whenever the anonymous client attempts to access a network destination outside of the allowed set. The anonymous client does not have to enter the network URL of a server in the “walled garden”—instead, they just have to attempt to access any well-known URL (such as www.yahoo.com), and they will be redirected to the pre-defined destination.
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of the flow of control (decision diagram) for a network access sharing device implementing the double-capture, double-redirect method, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
The following applications are hereby fully incorporated by reference herein in their entirety: U.S. application Ser. No. 10/683,317, filed Oct. 10, 2003, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING ACCESS CONTROL,” by Richard MacKinnon, Kelly Looney, and Eric White; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,698, filed Mar. 10, 2004, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BEHAVIOR-BASED FIREWALL MODELING,” by Patrick Turley which converted into U.S. application Ser. No. 11/076,719, filed Mar. 10, 2005, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BEHAVIOR-BASED FIREWALL MODELING,” by Richard MacKinnon, Kelly Looney, and Eric White; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,754, filed Mar. 10, 2004, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPREHENSIVE CODE GENERATION FOR SYSTEM MANAGEMENT,” by Keith Johnston which converted into U.S. application Ser. No. 11/078,223, filed Mar. 10, 2005, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPREHENSIVE CODE GENERATION FOR SYSTEM MANAGEMENT,” by Keith Johnston; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,703, filed Mar. 10, 2004, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A CENTRALIZED DESCRIPTION/CONFIGURATION OF CLIENT DEVICES ON A NETWORK ACCESS GATEWAY,” by Patrick Turley and Keith Johnston; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,702, filed Mar. 10, 2004, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCESS SCOPE CONTROL (“WALLED GARDENS”) FOR CLIENTS OF A NETWORK ACCESS GATEWAY,” by Patrick Turley, Keith Johnston, and Steven D. Tonnesen which converted into U.S. application Ser. No. 11/076,591, filed Mar. 10, 2005, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING NETWORK ACCESS,” by Patrick Turley, Keith Johnston, and Steven D. Tonnesen; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,699, filed Mar. 10, 2004, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC BANDWIDTH CONTROL,” by Patrick Turley, et al.; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,697, filed Mar. 10, 2004, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTION OF ABERRANT NETWORK BEHAVIOR BY CLIENTS OF A NETWORK ACCESS GATEWAY,” by Steven D. Tonnesen which converted into U.S. application Ser. No. 11/076,652, filed Mar. 10, 2005, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTION OF ABERRANT NETWORK BEHAVIOR BY CLIENTS OF A NETWORK ACCESS GATEWAY,” by Steven D. Tonnesen; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/551,704, filed Mar. 10, 2004, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NETWORK MANAGEMENT XML ARCHITECTURAL ABSTRACTION,” by Keith Johnston and Mario Garcia which converted into U.S. application Ser. No. 11/076,672, filed Mar. 10, 2005, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NETWORK MANAGEMENT XML ARCHITECTURAL ABSTRACTION,” by Keith Johnston and Mario Garcia; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/660,408 filed Mar. 10, 2005, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A CENTRALIZED DESCRIPTION/CONFIGURATION OF CLIENT DEVICES ON A NETWORK ACCESS GATEWAY,” by Patrick Turley, et al.
Network access providers utilizing Access Controlled Network Sharing (as, for example, described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/683,317, filed Oct. 10, 2003, entitled “System and Method for Providing Access Control”, by Richard MacKinnon, Kelly Looney, and Eric White) technology to provide user-specific provisioned access to private/public networks may also have a need to allow controlled access for unauthenticated users to a restricted collection of network destinations (this can be referred to as the “walled garden”—see U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/551,702 entitled “System and Method for Access Scope Control (“Walled Gardens”) for Clients of a Network Access Gateway” by Patrick Turley, Keith Johnston and Steven D. Tonnesen, filed Mar. 10, 2004, converted into U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/076,591, entitled “Method and System for Controlling Network Access” by Patrick Turley, Keith Johnston and Steven D. Tonnesen, filed Mar. 10, 2005).
The Pre-Authentication Capture Destination for the embodiment of FIG. 1 will be designated http://wg1.com/welcome.html.
The Authentication Capture Destination is https://auth.com/login.jsp.
As shown in the embodiment of FIG. 1, assume that an anonymous user has access to one of the Client network access devices 1. This user launches a Web browser and enters “www.yahoo.com” (an “external” URL, i.e., a destination that is not in the Walled Garden 5) in the address bar, and presses <Return>. The Network Access Controller 2 uses its internal Firewall 3 function to recognize the attempt by an unknown user to access an “external” location (represented by the Internet cloud 4 in FIG. 1), intercepts the request, and sends an HTTP redirect to the Client's browser, specifying the Pre-Authentication Capture URL “http://wg1.com/welcome.html”. The browser then automatically performs an HTTP Get to retrieve that Web page from the wg1.com server.
At this point, the anonymous user may access Web locations on any of the three servers that are in the Walled Garden 5. For this example, assume that the Web pages on the wg1.com Server 6 include links to Web pages on the wg2.com Server 7. The anonymous user would be able to click on any of these links and view the referenced pages hosted on Server 7. However, if one of these Web pages contained a link to an “external” web site, and the user clicked on that link, then the Network Access Controller 2 would again redirect the Client's browser back to the Pre-Authentication Capture URL http://wg1.com/welcome.html, hosted on Server 6.
When the user clicks on this link, the Network Access Controller 2 intercepts the request. However, instead of redirecting the Client's browser to the Pre-Authentication Capture URL, the Network Access Controller 2 recognizes the presence of the token, and redirects the browser to the Authentication URL http://auth.com/login.jsp, hosted on the “auth.com” Server 8.
At this point, the user is presented with a Login page, and enters a username/password. Assuming that these credentials are valid, the “auth.com” Server 8 sends an “authorize” command to the Network Access Controller 2. This command instructs the Network Access Controller 2 to allow “external” access for the authenticated user.
As shown in FIG. 2, the Client now has access to the Internet 4 (“External Network”). If the user now entered “www.yahoo.com” in the Web browser's address bar, the Network Access Controller 2 would no longer intercept this request, and the welcome page from the Yahoo web site would be displayed.
Note that in one embodiment, this “external” access is only granted to the authenticated user. An anonymous user on a different Client would still be restricted to the Walled Garden 5.
One embodiment of the decision logic (and associated flow) that can be executed by the Network Access Controller 2 is depicted in FIG. 3. The Network Access Controller continuously monitors for network access from network access client devices 1 on its first network interface at step 18.
When a network packet is received (step 19), the Network Access Controller 2 determines if the packet is being sent by an authenticated client (step 20).
If the packet is from an authenticated client, then the Network Access Controller 2 allows the packet to pass through and be routed to its target destination (“Yes” decision fork).
If the packet is from an unauthenticated client, then the Network Access Controller 2 determines if the destination of the packet is one of the servers within the Walled Garden 5 (step 21).
If the packet is from an unauthenticated client and the destination is a server in the Walled Garden 5, then the Network Access Controller 2 allows the packet to pass through and be routed to its target server (“Yes” decision fork).
If the packet is from an unauthenticated client and the destination is not a server in the Walled Garden 5, then the Network Access Controller 2 determines if a Pre-Authentication URL has been specified (step 22).
If the packet is from an unauthenticated client, the destination is not a server in the Walled Garden 5, and a Pre-Authentication URL has not been specified, then the Network Access Controller directs the client to the Authentication URL (step 24).
If the packet is from an unauthenticated client, the destination is not a server in the Walled Garden 5, and a Pre-Authentication URL has been specified, then the Network Access Controller 2 determines if the packet contains the Authentication Token (step 23).
If the packet is from an unauthenticated client, the destination is not a server in the Walled Garden 5, a Pre-Authentication URL has been specified, and the packet does not contain the Authentication Token, then the Network Access Controller 2 directs the client to the Pre-Authentication URL (step 25).
If the packet is from an unauthenticated client, the destination is not a server in the Walled Garden 5, a Pre-Authentication URL has been specified, and the packet contains the Authentication Token, then the Network Access Controller 2 directs the client to the Authentication URL (step 24).
direct the client to the pre-authentication URL if the authentication token is not present.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the computer instructions are further operable to grant access for an unauthenticated client to any destination server within the walled garden.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the computer instructions are further operable to redirect an unauthenticated client to the pre-authentication URL destination, when such destination has been specified.
send a redirect request to the device to redirect a web browser to the authentication interface.
send a reply to the device according to the network protocol directing the user to the authentication interface.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the network protocol is one of HTTP, SMTP, POP, telnet, UDP or FTP.
US643864A (en) * 1899-05-03 1900-02-20 Henry M Williams Automatic return-signalling device for telephones.
US641494A (en) * 1899-09-01 1900-01-16 Robert C Atkins Coupling for railway-rails.
US709423A (en) * 1902-03-17 1902-09-16 Patrick D Skahen Rough box for burial-caskets.
US816174A (en) * 1905-01-25 1906-03-27 Underwood Typewriter Co Card-holding device for type-writers.
US821565A (en) * 1906-01-10 1906-05-22 Alfonzo F Wilson Lifting-jack and wire-stretcher.
US881147A (en) * 1907-06-05 1908-03-10 Julian L Perkins Heat-radiating device.
US930392A (en) * 1908-11-18 1909-08-10 Albert B Lake Door-lock.
US930922A (en) * 1909-02-10 1909-08-10 Francis C Bates Mail-box.
US953325A (en) * 1909-04-08 1910-03-29 H E Detering Plow.
Hamzeh, et al., "Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol—PPTP RFC 2637" Network Working Group, Jul. 1999, pp. 1-54.
Lingblom, "Bluesocket's New Gateway Based on Open Standards—WGX-4000 Switch Wireless Gateway" CRN, Burlington, MA at www.crn.channelsupersearch.com, Apr. 21, 2003.
No author, "Netilla Lauches SSL VPN for Citrix. (Industry Briefs) (Virtual Private Networks) (Brief Article)," Sep. 20, 2004, p. 43.
Oh et al., Interaction Translation Methods for XML/SNMP Gateway, Jul. 11, 2003, retrieved from . . . (citation continued in next line) . . . http://web-archive.org/web/20030711162412/http://dpnm.postech.ac.kr/paper s/DSOM/02/xml-snmp-gateway/xml-snmp-gateway.pdf, pp. 1-5.
Rashti et al, "A Multi-Dimensional Packet Classifier for NP-Based Firewalls," Jan. 2004, retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 12, 2009: .
Rashti et al, "A Multi-Dimensional Packet Classifier for NP-Based Firewalls," Jan. 2004, retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 12, 2009: <URL:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1266123&isnumber=28312>.
Trabelsi et al., "Malicious Sniffing Systems Detection Plafform", 2004, pp. 201-207.
U.S Appl. No. 10/469,206, Ohtani et al.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action issued in 11/076,591, mailed Aug. 06, 2009, Turley, 29 pages.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,041, mailed May 8, 2009, White, 13 Pages.
U.S. Patent Office Official Action issued Jan. 25, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,652, Steven D. Tonnesen, Jan. 25, 2008.
U.S. Patent Office Official Action issued Jul. 13, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,041, Eric White, Jul. 13, 2007.
U.S. Patent Office Official Action issued Oct. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/687,002, Tuan Ta, Oct. 18, 2007.
U.S. Patent Office Official Action issued Oct. 31, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/078,223, Keith Johnston, Oct. 31, 2007.
U.S. Patent Office Official Action issued Oct. 9, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/683,317, Richard MacKinnon, Oct. 9, 2007.