# Definition of $e$

## Definition of $e$

$\ln (e)= \int_\limits{1}^e\frac{1}{t}dt=1$

I found this in my calculus textbook, and I was wondering what does this exactly "mean". This is more of a research question which I could do, but where would I start. I understand that its an integral, and what it states; however, how was this derived in calculus? Where would be a good book to research to understand an ideal proof of the equation?

• "Derived" may not be the correct word to use. What you posted can be a "definition" of the natural logarithm (the antiderivative $F$ of $\frac{1}{t}$ such that $F(e) = 1$). – Mark Nov 10 '16 at 0:41
• Because $f(x)=\int_1^{x} \frac{1}{t}\,dt$ is strictly increasing, continuous, and unbounded, and $f(1)=0$, you know that $f(e)=1$ for some exactly one value $e>1$. – Thomas Andrews Nov 10 '16 at 0:44
• Unless you already have another definition of $e$ of $\ln$, this is not a "theorem", i.e. something to be proved, but rather a definition. As such the only interesting thing to be proven about it i that it is well-defined, i.e. that there is a single number with this property. – Ian Nov 10 '16 at 0:49
• @Ian So basically its something really basic that has no magical complex explanation. Because I understand it I just thought there would be a magical complicated way to show the why its a definition. – EnlightenedFunky Nov 10 '16 at 0:52
• If this is how you're introducing $e$ for the first time then no there's nothing special there. What's striking is that this definition is equivalent to a bunch of other stuff; for example this $e$ is the same $e$ as $\lim_{n \to \infty} (1+1/n)^n$ from compound interest – Ian Nov 10 '16 at 0:58

To say that $e$ is the number such that $\int_\limits{1}^e\frac1x\mathrm{d}x=1$ is to say that when you graph the curve of $y=\frac1x$ and shade in the area to the right of $x=1$, then $e$ is the boundary on the right such that the shaded area is exactly $1$. Take a look at the diagram below. The green curve is $y=\frac1x$ and $a$ is the area of the brown region. If the boundary on the right were $x=3$, we'd have slightly too much area. If it were instead $2$, we'd have too little area. But $e=2.718\ldots$ is the point that's just right.
{"ft_lang_label":"__label__en","ft_lang_prob":0.98631763,"math_prob":0.9977982,"size":412,"snap":"2019-26-2019-30","text_gpt3_token_len":105,"char_repetition_ratio":0.1004902,"word_repetition_ratio":0.0,"special_character_ratio":0.2524272,"punctuation_ratio":0.10227273,"nsfw_num_words":0,"has_unicode_error":false,"math_prob_llama3":0.9998673,"pos_list":[0,1,2],"im_url_duplicate_count":[null,1,null],"WARC_HEADER":"{\"WARC-Type\":\"response\",\"WARC-Date\":\"2019-07-17T22:56:37Z\",\"WARC-Record-ID\":\"<urn:uuid:162beb4d-a10b-4cd3-ab5d-f52b3aa93cbb>\",\"Content-Length\":\"146161\",\"Content-Type\":\"application/http; msgtype=response\",\"WARC-Warcinfo-ID\":\"<urn:uuid:fdc61213-b3bf-424b-9f43-d16b5ed6bebc>\",\"WARC-Concurrent-To\":\"<urn:uuid:edc88326-cafd-4462-97de-f8da84c5adda>\",\"WARC-IP-Address\":\"151.101.129.69\",\"WARC-Target-URI\":\"https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2007293/definition-of-e/2007313\",\"WARC-Payload-Digest\":\"sha1:JAJLXTB2ZEYA6KPYU6B3RV5XEEN6ZT6N\",\"WARC-Block-Digest\":\"sha1:5ULCUOPP7IWIDH2PAUVT3TJMZQGBWYBH\",\"WARC-Identified-Payload-Type\":\"text/html\",\"warc_filename\":\"/cc_download/warc_2019/CC-MAIN-2019-30/CC-MAIN-2019-30_segments_1563195525414.52_warc_CC-MAIN-20190717221901-20190718003901-00041.warc.gz\"}"}