# zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Semi-stable conjecture of Fontaine-Jannsen: A survey. (English) Zbl 1041.14003
Berthelot, Pierre (ed.) et al., $$p$$-adic cohomology and arithmetic applications (II). Paris: Société Mathématique de France (ISBN 2-85629-117-1/pbk). Astérisque 279, 323-370 (2002).
From the paper: In these notes, we give an outline of the proof of O. Hyodo and K. Kato [in: Périodes $$p$$-adiques, Sémin. Bures-sur-Yvette 1988, Exposé V, Astérisque 223, 221–268 (1994; Zbl 0852.14004)], K. Kato ibid., Exposé VI, Astérisque 223, 269–293 (1994; Zbl 0847.14009) and T. Tsuji [Invent. Math. 137, 233–411 (1999; Zbl 0945.14008)] of the conjecture of J.-M. Fontaine and U. Jannsen [in: Galois groups over $$\mathbb{Q}$$, Proc. Workshop, Berkeley/CA (USA) 1987, Publ., Math. Sci. Res. Inst. 16, 315–359 (1989; Zbl 0703.14010)] and J.-M. Fontaine [in: Périodes $$p$$-adiques. Sém. Bures-sur-Yvette 1988, Exposé III, Astérisque 223, 113–184 (1994; Zbl 0865.14009; §6] on the $$p$$-adic étale cohomology of a proper smooth variety over a $$p$$-adic field with semi-stable reduction. This conjecture compares the two $$p$$-adic cohomologies: $$p$$-adic étale cohomology and de Rham cohomology associated to a proper smooth variety over a $$p$$-adic field with semi-stable reduction; it especially asserts that these two cohomologies with their additional structures can be reconstructed from each other. Our proof uses syntomic cohomology, which was introduced by J.-M. Fontaine and W. Messing, as a bridge between the two cohomologies.
In the appendix, we also show that the semi-stable conjecture implies the de Rham conjecture thanks to the alteration of de Jong.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 0990.00020].

##### MSC:
 14F30 $$p$$-adic cohomology, crystalline cohomology 14F40 de Rham cohomology and algebraic geometry
{"ft_lang_label":"__label__en","ft_lang_prob":0.72453594,"math_prob":0.94528025,"size":2142,"snap":"2021-31-2021-39","text_gpt3_token_len":709,"char_repetition_ratio":0.16043031,"word_repetition_ratio":0.04109589,"special_character_ratio":0.33193278,"punctuation_ratio":0.21768707,"nsfw_num_words":0,"has_unicode_error":false,"math_prob_llama3":0.9951761,"pos_list":[0],"im_url_duplicate_count":[null],"WARC_HEADER":"{\"WARC-Type\":\"response\",\"WARC-Date\":\"2021-09-19T23:24:55Z\",\"WARC-Record-ID\":\"<urn:uuid:c833986e-3511-472a-864c-d33107c807a8>\",\"Content-Length\":\"48388\",\"Content-Type\":\"application/http; msgtype=response\",\"WARC-Warcinfo-ID\":\"<urn:uuid:d7e68fa1-2955-487d-8d06-a750a69309b7>\",\"WARC-Concurrent-To\":\"<urn:uuid:cbe53846-3b45-4dab-80f5-adc8c4d3d02c>\",\"WARC-IP-Address\":\"141.66.194.2\",\"WARC-Target-URI\":\"https://zbmath.org/?q=ut%3Acomparing+%5C%28p%5C%29-adic+cohomology+and+de+Rham+cohomology\",\"WARC-Payload-Digest\":\"sha1:PBQBLPMAY7LYEB774PXQVNBYJZRVBQIG\",\"WARC-Block-Digest\":\"sha1:PZDPXTKTZCETQ6T2YC2R6AFELIHEVDCM\",\"WARC-Identified-Payload-Type\":\"text/html\",\"warc_filename\":\"/cc_download/warc_2021/CC-MAIN-2021-39/CC-MAIN-2021-39_segments_1631780056902.22_warc_CC-MAIN-20210919220343-20210920010343-00679.warc.gz\"}"}