In Sakruari's Modern Physics, it's written that

$$H(t)|n;t\rangle =E_n(t)|n;t\rangle$$ simply noting that at any particular time $$t$$, the states, and eigenvalues may change. If we now look for general solutions to SE of the form $$i\hbar \partial_t|\alpha;t\rangle =H(t)|\alpha;t\rangle$$

then we can write $$|\alpha;t\rangle =\sum_nc_n(t)e^{i\theta_n t}|n;t\rangle$$ where $$\theta_n(t)=-\frac{1}{\hbar}\int_0^tE_n(t')dt'$$

But consider what I have done. $$i\hbar\partial_t|n;t\rangle =H(t)|n;t\rangle =E_n(t)|n;t\rangle \rightarrow |n;t\rangle =e^{i\theta_nt}|n;0\rangle$$ $$|\alpha ;t\rangle =\sum_nc_n(t)|n;t\rangle =\sum_n c_n(t)e^{i\theta_nt}|n;0\rangle$$ This is different from what is done above. What's wrong with my thinking?

$$H(t)|n;t\rangle =E_n(t)|n;t\rangle \rightarrow |n;t\rangle =e^{i\theta_nt}|n;0\rangle$$
The "evolution" of the basis states $$|n;t\rangle$$ is given by the requirement that it should be the $$n$$th eigenvalue of $$H$$ at time $$t$$. There is no requirement that this should match the evolution given by the Schrodinger equation. That is (if you will excuse the slightly butchered notation) $$| n;0\;(t)\rangle := U(t) | n;0\rangle \ne |n;t\rangle$$ where $$U(t)$$ is the time evolution operator.
{"ft_lang_label":"__label__en","ft_lang_prob":0.669829,"math_prob":0.99998105,"size":740,"snap":"2023-40-2023-50","text_gpt3_token_len":257,"char_repetition_ratio":0.22146739,"word_repetition_ratio":0.0,"special_character_ratio":0.32972974,"punctuation_ratio":0.12883435,"nsfw_num_words":0,"has_unicode_error":false,"math_prob_llama3":1.0000087,"pos_list":[0],"im_url_duplicate_count":[null],"WARC_HEADER":"{\"WARC-Type\":\"response\",\"WARC-Date\":\"2023-09-24T19:28:31Z\",\"WARC-Record-ID\":\"<urn:uuid:178b1b44-757e-4915-9108-98ae0012e06d>\",\"Content-Length\":\"163637\",\"Content-Type\":\"application/http; msgtype=response\",\"WARC-Warcinfo-ID\":\"<urn:uuid:5119c274-25a5-49ed-8651-25b017fef298>\",\"WARC-Concurrent-To\":\"<urn:uuid:6e8e09b3-d5b2-465c-a85e-5f2c900febcf>\",\"WARC-IP-Address\":\"104.18.11.86\",\"WARC-Target-URI\":\"https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/657349/on-adiabatic-approximation\",\"WARC-Payload-Digest\":\"sha1:LRJL5O64UIS7XOHPCP55DWL327E34YK6\",\"WARC-Block-Digest\":\"sha1:SRSIPYO4NC7E77PLTJ3NOSJM6KVSF4YM\",\"WARC-Identified-Payload-Type\":\"text/html\",\"warc_filename\":\"/cc_download/warc_2023/CC-MAIN-2023-40/CC-MAIN-2023-40_segments_1695233506669.30_warc_CC-MAIN-20230924191454-20230924221454-00613.warc.gz\"}"}