Open Journal of Microphysics, 2013, 3, 5-9 doi:10.4236/ojm.2013.33B002 Published Online August 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojm) Neutrino Properties Probed by Lepton Number Violating Processes Sabin Stoica Department of Fundamental Research, Horia Hulubei Foundation, P.O. Box MG-12, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania Email: stoica.at.theory.nipne.ro, sabin.stoica.at.unescochair-hhf.r Received July, 2013 ABSTRACT Study of neutrino properties is nowadays one of the most active domains of research in physics. On the one hand, fun-damental properties of the neutrinos like their absolute mass, their character (are they Dirac or Majorana particles?) and the number of neutrino flavors, are still unknown. On the other hand, the knowledge of these properties are of great importance since the neutrinos are very abundant in nature and play a key role in nuclear and particle physics, astro-physics and cosmology. In addition, the results of the neutrino oscillation experiments have convincingly showed that neutrinos have mass and mix, in contradiction to the initial assumptions of the Standard Model. In this context there is an increased interest in the study of the Lepton Number Violating (LNV) processes, since they are capable to decide on the above mentioned neutrino properties. Since recently, the neutrinoless double beta (0ββ) decay was considered the only process able to distinguish between Dirac or Majorana neutrinos and to give a hint on the absolute mass of the electron neutrino. At present, the increased luminosity of the LHC experiments at CERN makes it feasable the search for LNV processes at LHC as well. Besides the neutrino character, these studies can also shed light on the existence of other types of neutrinos (the sterile neutrinos), than the three known ones. In this paper, I make a brief review on our present knowledge about the neutrino properties and on the way they can be probed by LNV processes at low- and high-energies. Particularly, I refer to the 0ββ decay process and to the first attempts of searching of LNV processes in hadron collider experiments, particularly in LHC experiments at CERN-Geneva. Keywords: Neutrinos; Neutrino Oscillations; Double Beta Decay; Neutrino Mass; Lepton Number Violation 1. Introduction Results of the neutrino oscillation experiments have con-vincingly showed that neutrinos have mass and can os-cillate from one flavor to another. They extend our un-derstanding on the Standard Model (SM) and strongly encourage us for searching of beyond SM physics. However, fundamental properties of the neutrinos as their absolute mass, their character (are they non-identi- cal (Dirac particles) or identical (Majorana particles) with their anti-particles?), the number of neutrino flavors, the mechanism of their mass generation and their mass hierarchy, are still unknown. The knowledge of these properties is of fundamental importance for understand-ing the formation, composition and evolution of the uni-verse, as well as for all the processes in which the neu-trinos take part. In this context there is a great interest for the study of LNV processes because they are capable to provide in-formation on these unknown neutrino properties. Since recently, the neutrinoless double beta decay (0νββ) was considered the only process capable to dis-tinguish between Dirac or Majorana neutrinos and to give a hint on the absolute mass scale of the electron neutrino. At present, the increased luminosity of the LHC experiments at CERN makes it feasable the searching of LNV processes at LHC experiments, as well. They can bring complementary information to that which can be extracted from low-energy neutrino studies. In this paper, I make a brief review on our present knowledge about the neutrino properties and on the way they can be probed by LNV processes at low and high energies. Particularly, I refer to the 0ββ decay process and to the first attempts of searching of LNV processes in hadron collider experiments, particularly in LHC ex-periments at CERN-Geneva. The paper is organized as follows: in the Section 2, I shortly present the actual status of our knowledge about the neutrino properties. In the section 3, I refer to the 0νββ process and to how one can extract the relevant neutrino parameters from the information provided by the study of this decay mode in connection with neutrino oscillation experiments. Section 4 is dedicated to the presentation of the LNV processes at high energy, and to the first attempts for their searching at hadron colliders, Copyright © 2013 SciRes. OJM S. STOICA 6 particularly at LHC experiments at CERN. The paper ends up with Section Conclusions, where I sum up the importance of the study of these LNV processes and I sketch some future prospects. 2. Neutrino Properties From neutrino oscillation experiments we know that neutrinos have a non-zero mass and they can oscillate from one flavor to another, in contradiction with the ini-tial assumtions of the SM. The squared mass differences between mass eigenstates and the mixing angles ( θ12, θ23, θ13 ) are measured within a few percentage accuracy by various experiments running in both terestrial and under-ground laboratories, and measuring neutrinos produced in Sun, Earth atmosphere, accelerators and reactors [1-8]. The actual values of these parameters are: 1) Δm212 = Δm2sol ~ 7.58 x 10-5 eV2; tan2θ12 ~ 0.484 → θ12~350 - measured in solar neutrino (underground) + KamLAND (reactor) experiments; 2) |Δm213| = |Δm232| = Δm2atm ~ 2.40 x10-3 eV2; sin2 2θ23 ~ 1.02 → θ23 ~ 450 – measured in atmospheric (underground) + K2K (reactor) + MINOS (accelerator) experiments; 3) sin2 2θ13 ~ 0.092; θ13 ~ 90 - Daya Bay (reactor) experiment. This last measurement (with 5.2σ statistical significance) allows an unambigous differentiation between oscillation 1-3 and the anomalous disappearance of anti-electron neutrinos from the reactor ν flux at RENO and Double-Chooz experiments, strengh tening the argument for existence of a sterile neutrino. Future expected measurements at T2K, RENO, MINOS, etc. Experiments are expected to start in the next future to measure the imbalance matter-antimatter. An impor-tant remark is the following: while the sign of Δm212 can be measured due to matter effects of the neutrino propa-gation from sun, the sign of Δm213 can not be measured. In a three flavor neutrino analysis this leads to two possi-ble scenarios for the neutrino mass hierarchy, the so- called “normal” (m1/me (1) where G0ν is a phase space depending on the energy Qββ released in the decay and on the nuclear charge Z, and M0ν are the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) which de-pend on the nuclear structure of the isotope that decays. The third factor appearing in Equation (1) is a BSM parameter, that can be expressed in terms of neu-trino mass eigenstates and neutrino mixing matrix U: 2 = | i Uei2 mi|2=| i |Uei|2 ei mi|2, i=1,2,3 (2) Experimentally one can distinguish the two DBD modes by measuring the sum of the electron energies: for the 2νββ mode the number of DBD events versus the sum of the electron energies is a function that looks like a gaussian (the electrons share their energy with the two neutrinos), while in the case of 0νββ mode this function is a single line at the energy Qββ (all the energy released in the decay is taken by the two electrons). The extraction of the neutrino parameters is a very important issue. As one can see from the Equations (1) and (2) it is subject of the measured half-lives and of the precise calculation of the NMEs. Their accurate calcula-tion is a challenge for the study of 0νββ. A measurement of the 0νββ decay rate combined with neutrino oscillation data and a reliable calculation of the NMEs, would yield insight into all three neutrino mass eigenstates. In the following we show how the neutrino mass parameter can be extracted in the case that one (dominant) mechanism is responsible for the occurrence of 0νββ decay. This is done separately for the two mass hierarchy scenarios. i) normal hierarchy: || = |c213 s212 (∆m2sun)½ + s213(∆m2atm)½ e2i ≤ 4 · 10-3 eV (3) ii) inverted hierarchy: || = |c213 s212(∆m2sun)½ + (∆m2atm)½ s213(1-sin22θ12 sinα12)½| → 1.5 ·10-2eV ≤ || ≤ 5.0·10-2 eV (4) where cij = cosθij and sij = sinθij are the neutrino mix-ing parameters, θij being the mixing angle between neu-trino species i and j. It is worth to mention that while in the case of normal hierarchy there is no lower limit for the electron neutrino mass, so an exact cancellation be-tween the terms in Equation (3) can occur. By contrary, in the case of inverted hierarchy there is a lower limit for the electron neutrino mass and this will be checked by the next generation of the DBD experiments. This is an important experimental challenge in the study of this process. Theoretically, the main challenge is the accurate calculation of the NMEs involved in DBD. Then, if the 0νββ will be discovered, an important issue will be to establish the (dominant) mechanism of its occurrence. In case when more mechanisms contribute to the 0νββ oc-currence, the expression of the half-life is modified ac-cordingly. An interesting case is that when two mecha-nisms dominate: exchange of light (active) and heavy (sterile) Majorana neutrinos. Recently, it has shown that in spite of the naive expectation that the light neutrinos give the dominant contribution, heavy sterile neutrinos can saturate the present experimental bound of 0νββ de-cay process. In this case, under the assumtion that only one flavour (N) of heavy neutrino exist, the expression of the half-life reads: (T01/2)-1 = G0ν (Mν ην + MN ηN)2 , with η = 3/me = i Uei2 mi/me and ηN = 4/MN = UeN2 mp /MN (5) and 3+1 = |c212 c213 c214 e2i1 m1 + c213 c214 s212 e2i2 m2 + s213 c214 e2i3 m3 + s214MN (6) In this scenario one can extract information about the neutrino parameters if we have data from 0νββ decay of at least two different nuclei. 4. Lepton Number Niolating Processes at High-Energies In the extensions of the SM where a Majorana mass term is introduced, the LN is violated by two units. Thus, any such a LNV process can probe the Majorana character of the neutrino. At present the increase of the integrated luminosity at the LHC and superB experiments makes feasible the study of LNV processes at high energy, as well. There are many possible decay channels where the LN is violated by two units. The common experimental signature of these channels is the presence of same sign di-leptons in the decay products. Below, we give a list of such possible decay channels. There are baryon, meson, tau, top quark, double Higgs possible decays, with 3-body or 4-body products in the final states. i) baryon decays: B → B l1± l2± ii) hyperon decays: Σ- → Σ+ e-e- ; Ξ- → p -  Ξ+c → Ξ- + + , etc. iii) meson decays: M± → M-/+ l1± l2± (3-body decays) M0 →l1- l2- M1+ M2+ (4-body decays) iv) tau decays: - → μ+ μ- μ- ; - → p μ− μ− - →  l- l- X+ v) same sign di-leptonic production: pp → l1+ l2+ X vi) top-quark decay: t → b 11+ l2+ W- W- vii) double-charged Higgs decays: H±± → l1± l2±X The decay sensitivity of different heavy flavor LNV processes is determined by comparing the scale of the neutrino mass with the energies of the decay process . We have three different cases: 1) exchange of light neu-trinos (m2 << q2). In this case the decay rate R ~ = ΣiUliUl’imi (Uli – mixing parameters of the active neutrinos); 2) exchange of heavy neutrinos (m2 >> q2), and in this case the decay rate → R ~ = ΣNVlNVl’N Copyright © 2013 SciRes. OJM S. STOICA 8 / mN (VlN – mixing parameters between light (active) and heavy (sterile) neutrinos); and 3) exchange of neutrinos with mass of the of the order of the energy decay process (mN2 ~ q2). In this case they can be produced on their mass shell and the decay rates are enhanced due to the resonant effect associated to their decay widths ΓN → R ~ ΣNVlNVl’N/ ΓN. For the first two cases the decay rates are quite small: in the first case due to the smallness of both the mixing parameters between the active neutrinos and of the neutrino mass (of ~ 1 eV), and in the second case due to the smallness of the mixing parameters be-tween the ligh (active) and heavy (sterile) neutrinos di-vided by the large mass of the heavy neutrino. The branching ratios (Br) in these cases are of the order of 10-20 -10-31 and, at the present LHC luminosities, they can not be detected. The third case is quite interesting since the theoretical predictions for the Br for these resonant decay processes become at reach of the present and next future high energy experiments. Until now several LNV processes at high energy have already been investigated. Their non-observation has set bounds on the corresponding Br and, further, on the neu-trino mixing parameters. In the following we shortly present the most important such investigations performed at LHC experiments at CERN. ATLAS experiment  has performed an inclusive search of events with two isolated leptons (e or μ) having the same electric charge. The data are selected from events collected from pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV by the ATLAS detector and correspond to an integrated lu-minosity of 34 pb-1. The spectra in dilepton invariant mass are compared to SM predictions. No evidence is found for contributions beyond those of the SM. Limits are set on the cross-section in a fiducial region for new sources of same-sign high-mass dilepton events in the ee, e and  channels. Four models predicting same-sign dilepton signals are constrained: two descriptions of Ma-jorana neutrinos, a cascade topology similar to super-symmetry or universal extra dimensions, and fourth gen-eration down-type quarks. Assuming a new physics scale of 1 TeV, Majorana neutrinos produced by an effective operator V with masses below 460 GeV are excluded at 95% CL. A lower limit of 290 GeV is set at 95% CL on the mass of fourth generation down type quarks. CMS experiment  has searched for events with same-sign isolated dileptons (ee, e, , ,  ). The searches used an integrated luminosity of 35 pb-1 of pp collision data at a ECM of 7 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC. The observed numbers of events agree with the SM predictions, and no evidence for new physics was found. To facilitate the interpretation of the data in a broader range of new physics scenarios, infor-mation on the event selection, detector response, and efficiencies is provided. LHCb experiment has investigated several LNV proc-esses of meson and tau decays. A first search of same sign dileptons was performed in the decays of B+ → K- (π-) μ+μ+ at an integrated luminosity of 36pb-1 . No signal was observed in either channels. They set limits of the Br for the two channels as follows: Br(B+ → K- μ+ μ+ ) < 5.4·10-8 and Br( B+ → π- μ+ μ+ ) < 5.8 · 10-8 at 95% CL, which improves the previous existed limits by factors of 40, 30, respectively. Another analysis was performed for the B- decays into same sign di-muon channels at an in-tegrated luminosity of 380 pb-1 . Also, no signal was observed beyond the SM and limits were set for the channels Br(B- → D+ μ- μ-) < 5.6·10-7 and B(B- → D*+ μ- μ- ) < 4.1 x 10-6 at 90% CL. Besides these B meson channels a first search for tau decays was also performed . Particularly, such an investigated process was - → μ+ μ- μ-, which is in the same time a Lepton Flavor Vio-lating process. The analysis was done using 1.0 fb-1 of data collected in 2011 at (s)1/2 = 7 TeV. The upper limit for the Br was Br < 7.8 ·10-8 at 95% CL. These studies performed at LHC experiments will be certainly im-proved in the next future with a new set of data at an in-creased luminosity. Besides these already investigated channels, there are many others that merit to be investi-gated, according to theoretical estimations for the Br. For example, the hyperon decay channels are at present weakly constraint (Br ~ 10-3 – 10-4). In addition, there are very recent theoretical estimations which show that 4-body decay channels, like decays of neutral mesons (B, D), or the tau decay channel - →  μ- μ- π+ can provide us with even more stringent bounds on Br and neutrino mixing parameters between muon flavor and sterile fla-vor (N) . Thus, the study of the LNV channels at high energies opens an interesting direction of investiga-tion at LHC experiments and superB factories in the next future. 5. Conclusions Recent neutrino oscillation experiments have convinc-ingly shown that neutrinos are massive particles and they mix. This is the first evidence that extends our under-standing on the SM and encourages us to search for BSM physics. The large majority of BSM theories involve massive Majorana neutrinos which imply non-conserva- tion of the LN. Concerning the neutrino properties we still do not know important issues as the scale of their absolute mass and the mass hierarchy, the mechanism of their mass generation, the nature of neutrinos (are they Dirac or Majorana particles?), the number of neutrino flavors, etc. The LNV processes can shed light on these issues, that is why there is a great interest to search for such processes. At low energy there is the 0ββ decay, a process which is intensively studied both theoretically and experimentally. Theoretically, a key challenge is to Copyright © 2013 SciRes. OJM S. STOICA Copyright © 2013 SciRes. OJM 9accurately compute the NMEs involved in DBD by de-veloping of nuclear structure methods for their calcula-tion. Experimentally, there are several running experi-ments, and others are planned to start in the next future. The expectation is to explore the entire region of neutrino masses associated with the inverted mass hierarchy sce-nario. If the 0ββ will be discovered, the next challenge will be to find the dominant mechanism(s) which con-tributes to its occurrence. At present, a new opportunity appears: the search of LNV processes at high energies. The very large “effective luminosity” of 0ββ decay ex-periments becomes now to be compensated by the in-creased luminosity at LHC and superB factories. Thus, the search of these processes at high energies becomes another interesting avenue of research. Also, the com-bined information from low- and high-energy experi-ments will be of help in the study of LNV processes with consequences on the better understanding of the neutrino properties. 6. Acknowledgements This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS – UE-FISCDI, project no. PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0318. REFERENCES  Y. Ashie et al. (SK collaboration), “Measurement of Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillation Parameters by Super-Kamiokande I,” Physical Review D, Vol. 71, No. 11, 2005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.112005  T. Araki et al., “Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation with KamLAND: Evidence of Spectral Distortion,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 94, No. 8, 2005, 081801.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.081801  M. H. Ahn et al., “Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation by the K2K Experiment,” Physical Review D, Vol. 74, No. 7, 072003, 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.072003  P. Adamson et al., (MINOS collaboration), “Measure-ment of the Neutrino Mass Splitting and Flavor Mixing by Minos,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 106, 181801, 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.181801  Daya Bay Collaboration, Physical Review Letters, “Ob-servation of Electron-Antineutrino Disappearance at Daya Bay,” Vol. 108, 171803, 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.171803  J. Ahn et al., (RENO collaboration), “Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrinos Disappearance in the RENO Experiment,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 108, 191802, 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.191802  Y. Abe et al., (Double Chooz collaboration), “Indication of Reactor ν̅ e Disappearance in the Double Chooz Experimen,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 108, 131801, 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.131801  K. Abe et al., (T2K Collaboration), Physical Review D, Vol. 85, No. 3, 031103 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.031103  J. D. Vergados, H. Ejiri and F. Simkovic, arXiv: 1205.0649.  A. Faessler, arXiv:1203. 3648.  Werner Rodejohann, International Journal of Modern Physics E, Vol. 20, No. 09, 2011, 1833. doi:10.1142/S0218301311020186  M. Horoi and S. Stoica. Physical Review C, Vol. 81, 024321, 2010; A. Neascu, S. Stoica and M. Horoi, Physical Review C, Vol. 86, 067304, 2012.  A. Atre, T. Han, S. Pascoli and B. Zhang, JHEP, Vol. 05, 030 (2009).  ATLAS collaboration, JHEP, Vol. 10, 107 (2011).  CMS collaboration, JHEP, Vol. 06, 077 (2011).  LHCb Collaboration, “Search for Lepton Number Violating Decays B+→π-μ+μ+ and B+→K-μ+μ+,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 108, 101601, 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.101601  LHCb collaboration, Phys. Rev.85,112004 (2012).  LHCb collaboration: J.Harrison, Nucl. Phys. B, Proceed-ings Supplement, 2012; LHCb collaboration: P. Seyfert, arXiv: 1209; 4939v1 [hep-ex] and FPCP 2012, Hefei, China.  G. Lopez-Castro, N. Quinteros, arXiv: 1212.0037 [hep- ph].
{"ft_lang_label":"__label__en","ft_lang_prob":0.8394182,"math_prob":0.78496283,"size":23912,"snap":"2020-45-2020-50","text_gpt3_token_len":6713,"char_repetition_ratio":0.13802911,"word_repetition_ratio":0.06788577,"special_character_ratio":0.2590331,"punctuation_ratio":0.12708601,"nsfw_num_words":0,"has_unicode_error":false,"math_prob_llama3":0.9521797,"pos_list":[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8],"im_url_duplicate_count":[null,1,null,1,null,1,null,1,null],"WARC_HEADER":"{\"WARC-Type\":\"response\",\"WARC-Date\":\"2020-10-22T07:15:43Z\",\"WARC-Record-ID\":\"<urn:uuid:527ad9c9-984f-4762-8fed-4067dffa4bc5>\",\"Content-Length\":\"106208\",\"Content-Type\":\"application/http; msgtype=response\",\"WARC-Warcinfo-ID\":\"<urn:uuid:cdd3e259-bcc7-450d-ac1c-8691a4576d2c>\",\"WARC-Concurrent-To\":\"<urn:uuid:ac56417f-d445-469f-90eb-20ceb2aa9241>\",\"WARC-IP-Address\":\"209.141.51.63\",\"WARC-Target-URI\":\"https://file.scirp.org/Html/38948.html\",\"WARC-Payload-Digest\":\"sha1:ONTJ4M3VRL3OEIPABCWK67BYBOP46KJR\",\"WARC-Block-Digest\":\"sha1:VQEHX3COHFE63VI3U4NL6A3SILJ75P2L\",\"WARC-Identified-Payload-Type\":\"text/html\",\"warc_filename\":\"/cc_download/warc_2020/CC-MAIN-2020-45/CC-MAIN-2020-45_segments_1603107878921.41_warc_CC-MAIN-20201022053410-20201022083410-00497.warc.gz\"}"}