٢- حُمَيْدُ بْنُ زِيَادٍ عَنِ الْحَسَنِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ ابْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنِ ابْنِ رِئَابٍ عَنْ زُرَارَةَ قَالَ سَأَلْتُ أَبَا جَعْفَرٍ (عَلَيْهِ السَّلام) عَنْ رَجُلٍ مَاتَ وَتَرَكَ عَلَيْهِ دَيْناً وَتَرَكَ عَبْداً لَهُ مَالٌ فِي التِّجَارَةِ وَوَلَداً وَفِي يَدِ الْعَبْدِ مَالٌ وَمَتَاعٌ وَعَلَيْهِ دَيْنٌ اسْتَدَانَهُ الْعَبْدُ فِي حَيَاةِ سَيِّدِهِ فِي تِجَارَتِهِ وَإِنَّ الْوَرَثَةَ وَغُرَمَاءَ الْمَيِّتِ اخْتَصَمُوا فِيمَا فِي يَدِ الْعَبْدِ مِنَ الْمَالِ وَالْمَتَاعِ وَفِي رَقَبَةِ الْعَبْدِ فَقَالَ أَرَى أَنْ لَيْسَ لِلْوَرَثَةِ سَبِيلٌ عَلَى رَقَبَةِ الْعَبْدِ وَلا عَلَى مَا فِي يَدِهِ مِنَ الْمَتَاعِ وَالْمَالِ إِلا أَنْ يُضَمَّنُوا دَيْنَ الْغُرَمَاءِ جَمِيعاً فَيَكُونُ الْعَبْدُ وَمَا فِي يَدِهِ مِنَ الْمَالِ لِلْوَرَثَةِ فَإِنْ أَبَوْا كَانَ الْعَبْدُ وَمَا فِي يَدِهِ لِلْغُرَمَاءِ يُقَوَّمُ الْعَبْدُ وَمَا فِي يَدِهِ مِنَ الْمَالِ ثُمَّ يُقْسَمُ ذَلِكَ بَيْنَهُمْ بِالْحِصَصِ فَإِنْ عَجَزَ قِيمَةُ الْعَبْدِ وَمَا فِي يَدِهِ عَنْ أَمْوَالِ الْغُرَمَاءِ رَجَعُوا عَلَى الْوَرَثَةِ فِيمَا بَقِيَ لَهُمْ إِنْ كَانَ الْمَيِّتُ تَرَكَ شَيْئاً قَالَ وَإِنْ فَضَلَ مِنْ قِيمَةِ الْعَبْدِ وَمَا كَانَ فِي يَدِهِ عَنْ دَيْنِ الْغُرَمَاءِ رُدَّ عَلَى الْوَرَثَةِ.
2. Humayd ibn Ziyad has narrated from al-Hassan ibn Muhammad from ibn Mahbub from ibn Ri’ab from Zurarah who has said the following: “This is concerning my question before abu ‘Abd Allah , about the case of a man who dies owing a certain amount of debts and leaves behind a slave who has his assets in business and a son. In the hand of the slave he leaves the assets, goods and debts owed by the slave which he had incurred during the lifetime of his master for business. The heir and creditors dispute about what is in the hand of the slave, the slave himself and the assets and goods. He (the Imam) said, ‘In my view the heirs have no say about the slave or about what is in his hand of assets and goods, except if they take responsibility for the debt for all the creditors. Thereafter the slave and what is in his hand of the assets and goods all go in the hands of the heirs; but if they refuse to take responsibility, the slave and all that is in his hand go to the creditors. The slave and whatever is in his hand of the assets are distributed among the creditors proportionate to their shares. If the slave and the asset could not pay the debts the creditors can ask the heirs for the remaining liabilities if the deceased has left anything. If the slave and assets exceed the debts the remaining goes to the heirs.’” 