user295: All the MP3 links in this post are valid directly refers to Metta and Vipassana: https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/12770/295
Wondering what the rationale behind it being delete? The tradition of Kiribathgoda Gnanananda Thero as taught in Mahamevnawa Buddhist Monastery is pretty wide spread in Sri Lanka and abroad. This might not be directly compatible with the lineage of Mahasi Sayadaw from the lineage the moderator who deleted the post is from, though the previous post by the same OP does not meet the requirements of the question though this post does.
Also the following has a top level link promoting a site as well as a book:

https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/9107/295


user-1: I deleted the post because there was a link to the users personal blog. Promotion of ones own work should not be done on this site.
I have now undeleted the post to allow the Metta-links to remain and I have deleted the blog-link.
Let me make it clear that the deletion has nothing to do with tradition or lineage but is purely founded in site policy.
Im referring to this Policy:

Here are some specific behaviors to avoid - even with the best of intentions, these will nearly always result in your posts being flagged as spam:

Don't talk about your product / website / book / job too much. Folks will read your answers for their ability to solve a specific problem; if you're good at doing that, then they'll find themselves more interested in who you are and what you're working on. If you respond only to questions where the answer can be something you're selling, they'll assume you're just here to sell.



295: <p>All the MP3 links in this post are valid directly refers to Metta and Vipassana: <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/12770/295">https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/12770/295</a></p>

<p>Wondering what the rationale behind it being delete? The tradition of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiribathgoda_Gnanananda_Thero" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Kiribathgoda Gnanananda Thero</a> as taught in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahamevnawa_Buddhist_Monastery" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Mahamevnawa Buddhist Monastery</a> is pretty wide spread in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mahamevnawa_branches" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Sri Lanka and abroad</a>. This might not be directly compatible with the lineage of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahasi_Sayadaw" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Mahasi Sayadaw</a> from the lineage the moderator who deleted the post is from, though the previous post by the same OP does not meet the requirements of the question though this post does.</p>

<p>Also the following has a top level link promoting a site as well as a book:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/9107/295">https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/9107/295</a></li>
</ul>
 -1: <p>I deleted the post because there was a link to the users personal blog. Promotion of ones own work should <strong>not</strong> be done on this site.</p>
<p>I have now undeleted the post to allow the Metta-links to remain and I have deleted the blog-link.</p>
<p>Let me make it clear that the deletion has nothing to do with tradition or lineage but is purely founded in site policy.</p>
<p>Im referring to this <a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/help/promotion">Policy</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Here are some specific behaviors to avoid - even with the best of intentions, these will nearly always result in your posts being flagged as spam:</p>
<ul>
<li>Don't talk about your product / website / book / job too much. Folks will read your answers for their ability to solve a specific problem; if you're good at doing that, then they'll find themselves more interested in who you are and what you're working on. If you respond only to questions where the answer can be something you're selling, they'll assume you're just here to sell.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
