user10100: What is wrong in my answer?
He ask about "no believing == no kamma".
I answer "kamma can give their resultant, although people do kamma without believing" by the example.
But why vote down?
https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/21710/10100
I don't mind about vote, but I want to know what is the problem in my answer?

user11762: People downvote even good honest attempts to answer, just because they disagree with something. And your answer might seem not serious: mosquitos probably are not intelligent enough to hate people; and virtually all people kill mosquitos, so anti-killing people would hardly really hate for that. So your answer might look to someone as a poor attempt to joke. besides, the answer was not very polished and didn't explain the core mechanism of karma, so it was obviously not of very high quality; that might help people to decide to downvote it. Just my guess...

10100: <p>What is wrong in my answer?</p>

<p>He ask about "no believing == no kamma".</p>

<p>I answer "kamma can give their resultant, although people do kamma without believing" by the example.</p>

<p>But why vote down?</p>

<p><a href="https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/21710/10100">https://buddhism.stackexchange.com/a/21710/10100</a></p>

<p>I don't mind about vote, but I want to know what is the problem in my answer?</p>
 11762: <p>People downvote even good honest attempts to answer, just because they disagree with something. And your answer might seem not serious: mosquitos probably are not intelligent enough to hate people; and virtually all people kill mosquitos, so anti-killing people would hardly really hate for that. So your answer might look to someone as a poor attempt to joke. besides, the answer was not very polished and didn't explain the core mechanism of karma, so it was obviously not of very high quality; that might help people to decide to downvote it. Just my guess...</p>
