user63: Lately I feel that the quality of identification-request questions has waned significantly. These most of these tip-of-my-tongue are without audio-visual artifacts, and rely solely on the asker's memories which are more often than not very unreliable.
I would like to ask the community's help on deciding whether we should creating hard guidelines for what these types of questions or eliminate them all together. 
I present to you two options:
Option A: Set Guidelines
If we wish to keep that that we MUST implement and enforce some set of criteria to ensure that there is sufficient information to go on to be able to identify a series. 
We should clear up any confusion on the subject of what a good identification-request should have. This would be added to the help center for visibility and reference. An example of a set of guidelines would be something like this:

An identification request should have as many of the following points as possible:

Any description of the leading/recurring character(s) (i.e., physical description, behavioral, etc)
Any description of any distinctive features (e.g., girls who a soda cans that do battle) or the setting
What the genre or style was (e.g., mecha, sci-fi, fantasy, shonen, shoujo, seinen, etc)
What the drawing/animation style is like
When and where you saw it (If you saw it when you were a kid don't give you age, give the approximate year, and month if possible)
Type of media: TV show, OVA, movie, manga, one-shot, etc
Any image(s), audio, or video(s) related to the series

If the question has less than two of the the above mentioned criteria, or if the description given is deemed to be too ambiguous, it will be put on hold as "Unclear what You're Asking." You should edit your question to add more details, before it can be reopen.

Option B: Disallow certain identification-request questions without audio-visual artifacts
As for disallowing identification-request questions, I don't think we should needlessly disallow ALL such questions. Instead we can limit these questions to only those with some sort of visual-audio artifact component (in addition to images and clips of video and audio, rough sketches/graphics are acceptable). 
Option C: Disallow all future identification-request questions
This option involves not allowing identification-request questions on this site and closing currently unanswered questions.
If you have another idea please feel free to leave a suggestion as answer.

user63: Option B: Save the the ones we can see and hear. (Only questions with audio-viusal artifacts will stay and be allowed.)

user24: Option A': Implement more stringent quality control on these questions primarily with downvotes, not close votes.
Yes, we need some quality control on this front. However, the intended way to deal with a poor question on SE sites is downvotes. Close votes should be reserved for questions that just won't work in our format, not ones that are probably answerable but low quality. I wrote an expansive answer explaining the difference on a related question and when to do what.
This may seem contradictory to Downvoting new users whose questions don't meet our criteria, but it's really a different issue. That was a case of a decent question that needed to be closed because it's off topic and not something we cover, but didn't need to be heavily downvoted since it wasn't unclear or low-effort and the policy was (at the time) fairly obscure. Bad ID requests are on topic and answerable, but low quality/effort. They should be downvoted but not typically closed unless they fail some other criterion for closing.

For this to work, we actually have to have users willing to downvote stuff. That seems like a limiting factor right now for whatever reason, but I'd encourage everyone to be more liberal with downvotes when you think they're justified (not just in the case of ID requests). I've seen many questions and answers that I considered poor despite many upvotes. Starting now, I intend to downvote these whenever I see them, not just when I consider it to be obviously wrong or problematic. 
We also need me (or someone else willing) to write some sort of faq for new users who want to understand how to ask a good ID request. I've been planning on doing this for a while (as my linked answer above says), but I've lost one nearly complete draft and some other stuff came up that diverted my attention. I will hopefully be able to do it this weekend, but if someone else wants to take it off my hands then feel free to offer.

user63: Option A: Keep them but QC the questions! (Final guidelines to proposals to be voted on in another meta)

63: <p>Lately I feel that the quality of <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> questions has waned significantly. These most of these tip-of-my-tongue are without audio-visual artifacts, and rely solely on the asker's memories which are more often than not very unreliable.</p>

<p>I would like to ask the community's help on deciding whether we should creating hard guidelines for what these types of questions or eliminate them all together. </p>

<p>I present to you two options:</p>

<h2>Option A: Set Guidelines</h2>

<p>If we wish to keep that that we <strong>MUST</strong> implement and enforce some set of criteria to ensure that there is sufficient information to go on to be able to identify a series. </p>

<p>We should clear up any confusion on the subject of what a good <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> should have. This would be added to the help center for visibility and reference. An example of a set of guidelines would be something like this:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>An identification request should have as many of the following points as possible:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Any description of the leading/recurring character(s) (i.e., physical description, behavioral, etc)</li>
  <li>Any description of any distinctive features (e.g., girls who a soda cans that do battle) or the setting</li>
  <li>What the genre or style was (e.g., mecha, sci-fi, fantasy, shonen, shoujo, seinen, etc)</li>
  <li>What the drawing/animation style is like</li>
  <li>When and where you saw it (If you saw it when you were a kid don't give you age, give the approximate year, and month if possible)</li>
  <li>Type of media: TV show, OVA, movie, manga, one-shot, etc</li>
  <li>Any image(s), audio, or video(s) related to the series</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>If the question has <strong>less than two</strong> of the the above mentioned criteria, or if the description given is deemed to be too ambiguous, it will be put on hold as <strong>"Unclear what You're Asking."</strong> You should edit your question to add more details, before it can be reopen.</p>
</blockquote>

<h2>Option B: Disallow certain <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> questions without audio-visual artifacts</h2>

<p>As for disallowing <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> questions, I don't think we should needlessly disallow ALL such questions. Instead we can limit these questions to only those with some sort of visual-audio artifact component (in addition to images and clips of video and audio, rough sketches/graphics are acceptable). </p>

<h2>Option C: Disallow all future <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> questions</h2>

<p>This option involves not allowing <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> questions on this site and closing currently unanswered questions.</p>

<p>If you have another idea please feel free to leave a suggestion as answer.</p>
 63: <p><strong>Option B:</strong> Save the the ones we can see and hear. (Only questions with audio-viusal artifacts will stay and be allowed.)</p>
 24: <p><strong>Option A'</strong>: Implement more stringent quality control on these questions primarily with <em>downvotes</em>, not <em>close votes</em>.</p>

<p>Yes, we need some quality control on this front. However, the intended way to deal with a poor question on SE sites is downvotes. Close votes should be reserved for questions that just won't work in our format, not ones that are probably answerable but low quality. I wrote <a href="https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/792/24">an expansive answer</a> explaining the difference on a related question and when to do what.</p>

<p>This may seem contradictory to <a href="https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/437/downvoting-new-users-whose-questions-dont-meet-our-criteria">Downvoting new users whose questions don&#39;t meet our criteria</a>, but it's really a different issue. That was a case of a decent question that needed to be closed because it's off topic and not something we cover, but didn't need to be heavily downvoted since it wasn't unclear or low-effort and the policy was (at the time) fairly obscure. Bad ID requests are on topic and answerable, but low quality/effort. They should be downvoted but not typically closed unless they fail some other criterion for closing.</p>

<hr>

<p>For this to work, we actually have to have users willing to downvote stuff. That seems like a limiting factor right now for whatever reason, but I'd encourage everyone to be more liberal with downvotes when you think they're justified (not just in the case of ID requests). I've seen many questions and answers that I considered poor despite many upvotes. Starting now, I intend to downvote these whenever I see them, not just when I consider it to be obviously wrong or problematic. </p>

<p>We also need me (or someone else willing) to write some sort of <a href="/questions/tagged/faq" class="post-tag moderator-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;faq&#39;" rel="tag">faq</a> for new users who want to understand how to ask a good ID request. I've been planning on doing this for a while (as my linked answer above says), but I've lost one nearly complete draft and some other stuff came up that diverted my attention. I will hopefully be able to do it this weekend, but if someone else wants to take it off my hands then feel free to offer.</p>
 63: <p><strong>Option A</strong>: Keep them but QC the questions! (Final guidelines to proposals to be voted on in another meta)</p>
