user63: Currently, we have the anime-physics. 
I feel like it's a silly and wouldn't typically warrant a constructive answer. It invites too much speculation and theorycrafting.
So do we really want this to continue? If we do, we should set some guidelines what would make a constructive question.

user24: Questions on anime physics are, in my opinion, fine. For instance, asking how in-universe mechanics work can generate some perfectly valid questions. It's typically impossible to tell a priori whether a question like this will be answerable with in-universe information, or if the only possible answers will be speculative. I occasionally see questions like this on Scifi, which we tend to use as a role-model site, and they can generate good answers. (They can also  generate low-quality speculative answers, but those typically get downvoted and replaced by better answers.)
However, I don't see much use for the tag anime-physics. I'm not sure who benefits from it. My feeling is that the users who will understand these sorts of things best are the users who are especially familiar with the series; there are no experts in anime-physics as far as I can tell. I also don't see it being terribly useful for searching or for classification purposes.

63: <p>Currently, we have the <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/anime-physics" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;anime-physics&#39;" rel="tag">anime-physics</a>. </p>

<p>I feel like it's a silly and wouldn't typically warrant a constructive answer. It invites too much speculation and theorycrafting.</p>

<p>So do we really want this to continue? If we do, we should set some guidelines what would make a constructive question.</p>
 24: <p>Questions on anime physics are, in my opinion, fine. For instance, asking how in-universe mechanics work can generate some perfectly valid questions. It's typically impossible to tell <em>a priori</em> whether a question like this will be answerable with in-universe information, or if the only possible answers will be speculative. I occasionally see questions like this on <a href="https://scifi.stackexchange.com/">Scifi</a>, which we tend to use as a role-model site, and they can generate good answers. (They can also  generate low-quality speculative answers, but those typically get downvoted and replaced by better answers.)</p>

<p>However, I don't see much use for the tag <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/anime-physics" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;anime-physics&#39;" rel="tag">anime-physics</a>. I'm not sure who benefits from it. My feeling is that the users who will understand these sorts of things best are the users who are especially familiar with the series; there are no experts in <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/anime-physics" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;anime-physics&#39;" rel="tag">anime-physics</a> as far as I can tell. I also don't see it being terribly useful for searching or for classification purposes.</p>
