user191: So you probably know about those Identification Request type of questions, most probably from them swamping the front page pretty often. Let's talk about where they are now and where they may better belong.
A while ago the main site classified such questions as off-topic until one day we decided to allow them for reasons of goodwill. It's great to help others discover new things and remember old ones. Everybody feels good about doing that.
But what's not good is that those types of questions are usually of very low quality level, compared to all the other, "main" types of questions before ID requests. They bring down overall question quality and flood "recently active questions" tabs/views.
Also, they are not useful to a lot of viewers. Honestly, have you yourself read a lot of those? Is it that much better than just asking for recommendations in chat? How do you think the "satisfied customer count" differs between an average ID question and an average in-universe rule explanation?
Rules don't apply to IDs the same way they do to regular questions. There is a whole other ruleset to govern IDs now, which makes it apparent that they themselves are a whole different type of question (and this is why I'm talking about IDs and "main" questions separately).
Most users that come by to ask ID questions, disappear forever. Very few edit after getting closed, and very few stick around. Talk about time well spent.
I'm not saying IDs are bad and we should ban them. I'm saying maybe both IDs and the "main" content would be better off if they were separated from each other.
One idea that I've had for a while is to put them all into a separate tab called "ID requests". That would clear up all the "main" site views from them, and it would serve as an "exploration" view for some connoisseurs (personally, I don't think that's a viable exploration method).
Another idea is to completely move them from the main site to chat. That would also automatically mean 20 rep minimum requirement, and I see how a lot of the ID answerers wouldn't agree with this, as it basically doesn't allow 99% of newcomers to ask anything, while your goal is to help everyone in need. It's just one of the ideas. One important note: in chat, it's gonna be hard to track down all posts related to one ID request. So perhaps one "place" per ID is better.
Lastly, how about just moving this whole ID thing to a separate site from StackExchange and offer help there? Perhaps to one of the Anime&Manga social network pages? It would still be affiliated with SE but not clutter up the site, and anyone can post with a social network account.
How does all of that sound? 


user8486: IDs on a separate tab: not going to happen unless SE decides to implement this just for us.
Move IDs to chat: keep them on the main chat room, like on Arqade. There is no need to track down all posts related to IDs. Just ask, and if no one answers, tough luck. Maybe ask again later, or don't bother. We have already written Where is this picture from? How do I use Reverse Image Search to find the source of an anime/manga image? and An arsenal of tools and know-hows for tackling identification request questions, read them and try those tools/techniques.
Move IDs to a site separate from SE: I don't know, since I probably won't be visiting said site.

user1587: I am for the separate tab idea. However, despite what everyone else is saying, there is an existing functionality on Stack Exchange which can be used for this purpose, given some more tweaking by SE Programmers (which I think will be less work adapting this functionality than building new functionality).
Currently on Stack Overflow, you can create tabs which you can specify tags, and the results are questions which contain those tags.

This only exists on Stack Overflow for now, so I suggest that Anime.SE, Gaming.SE, Scifi.SE, Movies.SE and any other entertainment SE site that may be created in the future have an automatically created tab for ID requests, where the tags specified for this tab is set up by the Community Moderators of the site, to account for the different tagging schema used across these sites.

But what about the other tabs which will still show identification-request?

Like the above, there exists functionality for this:

To adapt this, the identification-request tag in this new tab would be automatically added to the Ignored Tags for new users and guests, so if registered users want to see these questions again, they can remove the tabs from this section in their profile.

user13647: I stumbled across the Anime and Manga Stack Exchange recently and squeed with delight.  And then noticed all of the poorly written, downvoted identification requests.
Then I started to think about what kinds of questions you might ask in a Q&A style format, instead of a discussion format.  Honestly, I think there's more content to be had with discussion style, but occasionally I see interesting, valid questions float by.
However, the flood of ID requests is a flood, and kind of annoying for all the well known reasons stated above.  Due to that, I don't see many other questions.
I think the tab idea is a great solution, and the fact that @Memor-x found a way to implement it is great.  And then you can have a few default settings to get the desired effect: a tab just for ID requests, and a tab for everything else.

user17758: identifcation-request issues:

Question Quality
New user turnover
Flooding out other questions

I understand that no one wants this to become an identification request oriented site. I don't want that either.
I have heard the same information about new user retention for identification-request questions being extremely low. That's disheartening, as I'd really like our efforts we put forward count as an effort to grow the community.
Your argument about these questions having a different set of rules shows that the community is trying to improve the quality of these questions by setting up these standards. However, we can expect most users to be unwilling to read a large set of rules before posting a question. Thus, the lack of quality remains.
If Stack Exchange was willing to put in the development time to make such a place to house identification-request questions then I'd be 100% for such an option. As the others have said, I am doubtful that this will be the resolution to this issue. As a company it'd be easy for Stack Exchange to just say, either ban the tag, or allow the questions. It's also likely that if this option did get taken another war on identification-requests could take place some time down the road. If that happened, and we had asked Stack Exchange to make a feature for us it would make it much harder to change, as we, as a community, would have effectively wasted their development time.
As for putting these types of requests in chat: I would like to say that's not a good idea.
It's easy to offer recommendations at a moments notice to someone in chat since we can ask what type of genre or style they are looking for and offer them some titles we liked. However, ID Requests are different. There is a single answer to their question. It belongs in a Q&A style format. It has a single question, and a single answer.
Answers to identification requests are not ideal for a chat environment. This is because we cannot just produce an answer at a moments notice unless they give us an extremely detailed explanation of what was involved, and the right people read it. We know from experience that this would not be the case. Another thought about chat is the rep requirement would bar nearly all identification-request questions from happening, as these generally come from new users.
Having these identification request questions open as a question allows people time to come in and look at the question and determine if it's something that can be answered. Question and Answer is the correct format for identification-request questions. The issue is not the format, it is the quality of the questions, and the results we receive for answering them (e.g. turnover rate).

So what do we do?
Remove the identification-request tag from the site. These types of questions will then be off-topic on Anime.SE.
Redirecting these types of questions to another site as Toshinou suggested would be fine. There are plenty of forums that offer help with identifying anime & manga. We could simply make a post that offers suggestions of sites that can help similarly to how we instruct users to do reverse image searches.

user1530: 
The battle of id requests begins anew.
There are very strong opinions on this topic, which I hope people can restrain in this thread.
Ignoring the question of if do these questions belong here, let me comment on your ideas instead.

New Main Section: The first thing that sticks out to me is (As @Gao mentioned), It's unlikely that SE will devote some engineering time to this. So I think that option is out.
Moving to chat: We allow recommendation questions on chat, not the main site, so does that 20 rep matter?
Moving to chat: Id requests sometimes need time to identify - apart from the low-effort questions, there's usually some research / specific knowledge needed. In a chat based enviroment, I forsee they would get only a few moments of attention and then dismissed.
A new SE site: This would presumably work similar to Code Review SE. I don't think the subset of users interested enough to monitor 2 sites is significant enough to make a new site.
A new social site: From what I've seen (I don't control the social sites), the interaction with them is pretty low from the userbase.
A new separate site: Why not just give the work to an existing site?


user20878: I'm not an active user on this site, and I don't have a particularly large interest in anime. However, I'm here for a simple reason. I'm a power user over at the Movies & TV Stack Exchange, where we have struggled with this problem for years and someone happened to highlight this discussion to me. There are a plethora of questions on our Meta discussing our identify problems, but I can refer you to something I wrote quite recently, which is a very detailed analysis of the questions asked on our site over the last five years.
In short, retention rates of identify-askers is pretty terrible (just 25% of askers have 125 rep or more, compared to 75% of non-identify askers) and the quality of questions is generally very poor (with substantial editing and modding needed for each one to make them legible). We've added in pop-ups and more information to assist users posting these questions, and largely they're ignored. We even put in a link to an external website which is a specialist place for these questions, and all it appears to have done is increase traffic to our site for these questions.
In short, 30% of all our questions are identify this, from 2011 (which was when we opened). However, that's all time. In the last two years, they've averaged 36% of questions on the site and they're continuing to grow.
If you take a look at our Movies & TV home page you'll hopefully see some wonderful, in-depth questions and analysis. But sadly, there's also a clutter of identify-this questions, most of which are looked at once by the OP and forgotten about. It's not clear they have any value to users down the line which is one of the fundamental purposes of any Stack site.
I don't believe chat would be a good place for these questions either, and new users wouldn't know to post them there.
Therefore, I'd strongly urge removing them from your site, so you don't have the issues we have on our own beloved site. The problem (and volume of them) will get worse, and sadly it will make the home page, for any new users, look like a random trivia dump, as opposed to a detailed, in-depth question and answers page.

191: <p>So you probably know about those Identification Request type of questions, most probably from them swamping the front page pretty often. Let's talk about where they are now and where they may better belong.</p>

<p>A while ago the main site classified such questions as off-topic until one day we decided to allow them for reasons of goodwill. It's great to help others discover new things and remember old ones. Everybody feels good about doing that.</p>

<p>But what's not good is that those types of questions are usually of very low quality level, compared to all the other, "main" types of questions before ID requests. They bring down overall question quality and flood "recently active questions" tabs/views.</p>

<p>Also, they are not useful to a lot of viewers. Honestly, have you yourself read a lot of those? Is it that much better than just asking for recommendations in chat? How do you think the "satisfied customer count" differs between an average ID question and an average in-universe rule explanation?</p>

<p>Rules don't apply to IDs the same way they do to regular questions. There is a whole other ruleset to govern IDs now, which makes it apparent that they themselves are a whole different type of question (and this is why I'm talking about IDs and "main" questions separately).</p>

<p>Most users that come by to ask ID questions, disappear forever. Very few edit after getting closed, and very few stick around. Talk about time well spent.</p>

<p>I'm not saying IDs are bad and we should ban them. I'm saying maybe both IDs and the "main" content would be better off if they were separated from each other.</p>

<p>One idea that I've had for a while is to put them all into a separate tab called "ID requests". That would clear up all the "main" site views from them, and it would serve as an "exploration" view for some connoisseurs (personally, I don't think that's a viable exploration method).</p>

<p>Another idea is to completely move them from the main site to chat. That would also automatically mean 20 rep minimum requirement, and I see how a lot of the ID answerers wouldn't agree with this, as it basically doesn't allow 99% of newcomers to ask anything, while your goal is to help everyone in need. It's just one of the ideas. One important note: in chat, it's gonna be hard to track down all posts related to one ID request. So perhaps one "place" per ID is better.</p>

<p>Lastly, how about just moving this whole ID thing to a separate site from StackExchange and offer help there? Perhaps to one of the Anime&amp;Manga social network pages? It would still be affiliated with SE but not clutter up the site, and anyone can post with a social network account.</p>

<p>How does all of that sound? </p>

<p><a href="http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/27212347#27212347"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/XoQRJ.jpg" alt="that&#39;s what it looks like here after id req conversations"></a></p>
 8486: <p>IDs on a separate tab: not going to happen unless SE decides to implement this just for us.</p>

<p>Move IDs to chat: keep them on the main chat room, like on Arqade. There is no need to track down all posts related to IDs. Just ask, and if no one answers, tough luck. Maybe ask again later, or don't bother. We have already written <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/q/21618/8486">Where is this picture from? How do I use Reverse Image Search to find the source of an anime/manga image?</a> and <a href="https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2293/8486">An arsenal of tools and know-hows for tackling identification request questions</a>, read them and try those tools/techniques.</p>

<p>Move IDs to a site separate from SE: I don't know, since I probably won't be visiting said site.</p>
 1587: <p>I am for the separate tab idea. However, despite what everyone else is saying, there is an existing functionality on Stack Exchange which can be used for this purpose, given some more tweaking by SE Programmers (which I think will be less work adapting this functionality than building new functionality).</p>

<p>Currently on Stack Overflow, you can create tabs which you can specify tags, and the results are questions which contain those tags.</p>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/AG54w.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/AG54w.png" alt="Tabs"></a></p>

<p>This only exists on Stack Overflow for now, so I suggest that Anime.SE, Gaming.SE, Scifi.SE, Movies.SE and any other entertainment SE site that may be created in the future have an automatically created tab for ID requests, where the tags specified for this tab is set up by the Community Moderators of the site, to account for the different tagging schema used across these sites.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em>But what about the other tabs which will still show <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a></em>?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Like the above, there exists functionality for this:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/jm8n8.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/jm8n8.png" alt="Ignore tags"></a></p>

<p>To adapt this, the <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> tag in this new tab would be automatically added to the Ignored Tags for new users and guests, so if registered users want to see these questions again, they can remove the tabs from this section in their profile.</p>
 13647: <p>I stumbled across the Anime and Manga Stack Exchange recently and squeed with delight.  And then noticed all of the poorly written, downvoted identification requests.</p>

<p>Then I started to think about what kinds of questions you might ask in a Q&amp;A style format, instead of a discussion format.  Honestly, I think there's more content to be had with discussion style, but occasionally I see interesting, valid questions float by.</p>

<p>However, the flood of ID requests is a flood, and kind of annoying for all the well known reasons stated above.  Due to that, I don't see many other questions.</p>

<p>I think the tab idea is a great solution, and the fact that @Memor-x found a way to implement it is great.  And then you can have a few default settings to get the desired effect: a tab just for ID requests, and a tab for everything else.</p>
 17758: <p><a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identifcation-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identifcation-request&#39;" rel="tag">identifcation-request</a> issues:</p>
<ul>
<li>Question Quality</li>
<li>New user turnover</li>
<li>Flooding out other questions</li>
</ul>
<p>I understand that no one wants this to become an identification request oriented site. I don't want that either.</p>
<p>I have heard the same information about new user retention for identification-request questions being extremely low. That's disheartening, as I'd really like our efforts we put forward count as an effort to grow the community.</p>
<p>Your argument about these questions having a different set of rules shows that the community is trying to improve the quality of these questions by setting up these standards. However, we can expect most users to be unwilling to read a large set of rules before posting a question. Thus, the lack of quality remains.</p>
<p>If Stack Exchange was willing to put in the development time to make such a place to house identification-request questions then I'd be 100% for such an option. As the others have said, I am doubtful that this will be the resolution to this issue. As a company it'd be easy for Stack Exchange to just say, either ban the tag, or allow the questions. It's also likely that if this option did get taken another war on identification-requests could take place some time down the road. If that happened, and we had asked Stack Exchange to make a feature for us it would make it much harder to change, as we, as a community, would have effectively wasted their development time.</p>
<p>As for putting these types of requests in chat: I would like to say that's not a good idea.</p>
<p>It's easy to offer recommendations at a moments notice to someone in chat since we can ask what type of genre or style they are looking for and offer them some titles we liked. However, ID Requests are different. There is a single answer to their question. It belongs in a Q&amp;A style format. It has a single question, and a single answer.</p>
<p>Answers to identification requests are not ideal for a chat environment. This is because we cannot just produce an answer at a moments notice unless they give us an extremely detailed explanation of what was involved, and the right people read it. We know from experience that this would not be the case. Another thought about chat is the rep requirement would bar nearly all identification-request questions from happening, as these generally come from new users.</p>
<p>Having these identification request questions open as a question allows people time to come in and look at the question and determine if it's something that can be answered. Question and Answer is the correct format for <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> questions. The issue is not the format, it is the quality of the questions, and the results we receive for answering them (e.g. turnover rate).</p>
<hr />
<h2>So what do we do?</h2>
<p>Remove the <a href="https://anime.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/identification-request" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;identification-request&#39;" rel="tag">identification-request</a> tag from the site. These types of questions will then be off-topic on Anime.SE.</p>
<p>Redirecting these types of questions to another site as Toshinou suggested would be fine. There are plenty of forums that offer help with identifying anime &amp; manga. We could simply make a post that offers suggestions of sites that can help similarly to how we instruct users to do reverse image searches.</p>
 1530: <p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/dkBTK.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/dkBTK.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p><strong>The battle of id requests begins anew.</strong></p>

<p>There are very strong opinions on this topic, which I hope people can restrain in this thread.</p>

<p>Ignoring the question of if <em>do these questions belong here</em>, let me comment on your ideas instead.</p>

<ul>
<li><p><strong>New Main Section:</strong> The first thing that sticks out to me is (As @Gao mentioned), It's unlikely that SE will devote some engineering time to this. So I think that option is out.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>Moving to chat:</strong> We allow recommendation questions on chat, not the main site, so does that 20 rep matter?</p></li>
<li><p><strong>Moving to chat:</strong> Id requests sometimes need time to identify - apart from the low-effort questions, there's usually some research / specific knowledge needed. In a chat based enviroment, I forsee they would get only a few moments of attention and then dismissed.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>A new SE site:</strong> This would presumably work similar to Code Review SE. I don't think the subset of users interested enough to monitor 2 sites is significant enough to make a new site.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>A new social site:</strong> From what I've seen (I don't control the social sites), the interaction with them is pretty low from the userbase.</p></li>
<li><p><strong>A new separate site:</strong> Why not just give the work to an existing site?</p></li>
</ul>
 20878: <p>I'm not an active user on this site, and I don't have a particularly large interest in anime. However, I'm here for a simple reason. I'm a power user over at the <em>Movies &amp; TV Stack Exchange</em>, where we have struggled with this problem for <em>years</em> and someone happened to highlight this discussion to me. There are a plethora of questions on our Meta discussing our identify problems, <a href="https://movies.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2128/8219">but I can refer you to something I wrote quite recently</a>, which is a very detailed analysis of the questions asked on our site over the last five years.</p>

<p>In short, retention rates of identify-askers is pretty terrible (just 25% of askers have 125 rep or more, compared to 75% of non-identify askers) and the quality of questions is generally very poor (with substantial editing and modding needed for each one to make them legible). We've added in pop-ups and more information to assist users posting these questions, and largely they're ignored. We even put in a link to an external website which is a specialist place for these questions, and all it appears to have done is increase traffic to our site for these questions.</p>

<p>In short, 30% of all our questions are identify this, from 2011 (which was when we opened). However, that's all time. In the last two years, they've averaged 36% of questions on the site and they're continuing to grow.</p>

<p>If you take a look at our <a href="https://movies.stackexchange.com/">Movies &amp; TV home page</a> you'll hopefully see some wonderful, in-depth questions and analysis. But sadly, there's also a clutter of identify-this questions, most of which are looked at once by the OP and forgotten about. It's not clear they have any value to users down the line which is one of the fundamental purposes of any Stack site.</p>

<p>I don't believe chat would be a good place for these questions either, and new users wouldn't know to post them there.</p>

<p>Therefore, I'd strongly urge removing them from your site, so you don't have the issues we have on our own beloved site. The problem (and volume of them) <em>will</em> get worse, and sadly it will make the home page, for any new users, look like a random trivia dump, as opposed to a detailed, in-depth question and answers page.</p>
