What would likely be the future wars be fought for? What are the most important resources that will be necessary for the world of the future?
Which countries will emerge as leading due to their natural resources?
user
Future wars are likely to be fought over resources and geopolitical power, though of course there is no way to predict the future with certainty:

- Important resources for the future world may include:
- Fresh water: As climate change impacts water supplies and populations grow, fresh water may become more scarce and contested. Countries with abundant water supplies may have a strategic advantage.
- Rare earth metals: Metals like lithium, cobalt, and nickel that are critical for technologies like batteries, solar panels, and electronics may be increasingly important and fought over. Countries that produce these metals may gain more global influence.
- Food: As the world's population grows and climate change impacts agriculture, food production and exports may be a more significant source of geopolitical power for some countries.

In terms of countries that may emerge as leading powers due to resources:

- Those with plentiful fresh water supplies, like Canada and Russia, may be in a stronger position.
- Major producers of critical rare earth and strategic metals, like China, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Australia, may gain more global influence due to their resources.
- Major agricultural exporters like the United States, Brazil, and various countries in Africa may also be able to exert more power on the global stage by controlling food supplies.

However, it's difficult to predict how technology, politics, and other factors may impact the dynamics around resources in the coming decades. A country's resource advantages do not necessarily guarantee global leadership, and resources can be highly geopolitical assets. A lot will depend on how successfully countries are able to manage and leverage their resources in the face of various global challenges.
assistant
What should be done to prevent any war?
user
That is a difficult question and there might not be any good answer. The main way to prevent wars is to acknowledge the legitimate grievances that people have and to focusing on fixing the problems they face. To mitigate the huge risk of large wars this century the international community has to get its act together and prevent the currently predicted emmision levels from happening, as climate change will be the catalysts for many wars over resources in the near future. Moreover, superpowers must learn restraint. The US and Russia have been responsible for the majority of wars the last 50 years and would need to stop invading and bombing their neigbourghs and thirld war countries. We can reduce the number of civil wars and terrorist attacks by not destabilizing regions and overthrowing governments, which ties into my previous point about the US and Russia. 

In conclusion, conflicts are typically neither irrational nor must they always end in war. There are ways to adress them that doesn't involve using violence to solve violence. Diplomacy and agreements that solve the underlying problem have a fair chance at mitigating these risks and reducing the number of wars.
assistant