5); the judgment censured the judgment of a Court of Appeal for dismissing an application brought by Sacem, seeking an interim measure awarding a provisional payment in security, on the ground that the Court of Appeal had not first "considered whether it could seriously be contended that the rate of fee which Sacem had proposed had been set in breach of Article 86 ofthe Rome Treaty as interpreted by the Court of Justice ofthe European Communities."
"esaminato se fosse seriamente sostenibile la circostanza che il canone proposto dalla Sacem alla controparte risultava stabilito in violazione dell'articolo 86 del Trattato di Roma, in conformità dell'interpretazione della Corte di giustizia delle Comunità europee".