This formalism-about which we spoke before in general terms, and whose procedure we wish here to state more fully-thinks it has comprehended and expressed the nature and life of a given form when it proclaims a determination of the schema to be its predicate. The predicate may be subjectivity or objectivity, or again magnetism, electricity, and so on, contraction or expansion, East or West, and such like-a form of predication that can be multiplied indefinitely, because according to this way of working each determination, each mode, can be applied as a form or schematic element in the case of every other, and each will thankfully perform. the same service for any other. With a circle of reciprocities of this sort it is impossible to make out what the real fact in question is, or what the one or the other is. We find there sometimes constituents of sense picked up from ordinary intuition, determinate elements which to be sure should mean something else than they say;
-Formalismo horrek, lehen ere aipatu dugunak orokorrean eta orain zehazkiago aztertu nahi dugunak, uste du tankera baten izaera eta bizitza aditu eta adierazi dituela, hartaz eskemaren determinazio bat ahoskatu duenean predikatu gisa, dela hori subjektibitatea edo objektibitatea, edo magnetismoa, elektrizitatea, eta abar, uzkurdura edo zabalpena, ekialdea edo mendebaldea eta horrelakoak, amaigabe errepika daitezkeenak, zeren era horretara determinazio edo tankera oro besteek erabil baitezakete eskemaren forma edo une gisa, eta bakoitzak zerbitzu berbera egin diezaioke besteari esker onez; elkarrekikotasun zirkulu horretan gaia bera zer den ez da esperimentatzen, ez bata zer den ezta bestea ere.