As for the suggestion that emotional excess of the type, which in these cases the ascetic priest is fain to order to his sick patients (under the most sacred euphemism, as is obvious, and equally impregnated with the sanctity of his purpose), has ever really been of use to any sick man, who, forsooth, would feel inclined to maintain a proposition of that character?
Sentimenduaren horrelako desbalaztatzea, apaiz aszetikoak kasu honetan bere gaixoei preskribatu ohi izan zuenez (izenik santuenen pean, ulertzen da, eta bere helburuaren santutasunaz konbentziturik gainera), gaixoren batentzat onuragarria izan dela, nork luke horrelako baieztapen bati eusteko atseginik?