He brought forward arguments on both sides of the question, but the conclusion he came to was that a person of integrity was entitled, indeed bound, to prevent evil, and was justified in using whatever means might be necessary to ensure the triumph of that which was right and proper.
Kontraesanezko argudioak aipatu zituen ugari. Labur esateko, haren ustez, arima zuzen batek, eskubidea ez ezik, betebeharra ere bazuen gaizkia eragozteko, eta askatasunez hauta zitzakeen ongiaren garaipenerako bitartekoak.