Now, why may we not as well argue that figure and extension are not patterns or resemblances of qualities existing in Matter, because to the same eye at different stations, or eyes of a different texture at the same station, they appear various, and cannot therefore be the images of anything SETTLED AND DETERMINATE WITHOUT THE MIND?
Orain bada, zergatik ez dugu argudiatzen era berean figura eta hedadura ez direla materian existitzen diren nolakotasunen eredu edo antzeko, begi berari ikuspuntu ezberdinetatik edo ehundura diferenteko begiei ikuspuntu beretik ezberdinak begitantzen zaizkienez gero, ezin direlarik izan, beraz, adimendua gabe finkatu eta mugaturiko ezeren irudi?