but we find it stated that 'not understanding French this witness was examined through an interpreter.' The Englishman thinks it the voice of a German, and 'does not understand German.' The Spaniard 'is sure' that it was that of an Englishman, but 'judges by the intonation' altogether, 'as he has no knowledge of the English.' The Italian believes it the voice of a Russian, but 'has never conversed with a native of Russia.' A second Frenchman differs, moreover, with the first, and is positive that the voice was that of an Italian;
Espainiarra "ziur dago" ingeles batena zela, baina "doinuan oinarritzen da" horretarako, "berak ez baitaki ingelesa". Italiarrak uste du errusiar baten ahotsa dela, baina "sekula ez du errusiar batekin hitz egin ". Beste frantziar bat, berriz, ez dator bat lehenengoarekin, eta ziur dago ahotsa italiar batena zela;