I do not want to suggest anything here, but how can one fail to read in his works the signs of an almost intentional mutilation of the soul to balance the mutilation accepted in regard to the absurd?
Ez dut hemen deus iradoki nahi, baina nola ez haren idazlanetan nabaritu arimaren mutilazio ia-ia borondatezkoaren zeinuak, absurduaz onarturiko mutilazioaren aitzinean?