When we say, then, that a man acquiesces in what is false, and that he has no doubts on the subject, we do not say that he is certain, but only that he does not doubt, or that he acquiesces in what is false, inasmuch as there are no reasons, which should cause his imagination to waver (see II.
Horra zergatik erraten dugularik gizaki batek faltsukeriak onartzen dituela eta ez dituela zalantzan jartzen, ez dugun erraten horrengatik segur dela, baina bakarrik zalantzarik ez duela edo faltsukeriak onartzen dituela, bere irudimena zalantzan edukitzeko arrazoirik ez duelako.