To this Rambert might reply that it did not alter the substance of his argument at all, to which they answered that it did alter something in respect of administration, this being unfavourable to any measure of exemption that might tend to create what, with expressions of great repugnance, they called 'a precedent'.
Horren aurrean, Rambertek esan zezakeen ez zuela bere adierazpidearen funtsarekin zerikusik, eta erantzungo zioten bazuela nolabaiteko zerikusia edozein mesede-neurrien kontra doazen zailtasun administratiboekin, hitz guztiz gogaikarriz zeritzon delako zera hori sortzeko arriskua zegoelarik: aurretiko bat alegia.