It may well seem-since in concrete cases duty breaks regularly into opposition, and, by doing so, sunders the opposites individuality and universality-that the duty, whose content is the universal as such, contains on that account, ipso facto, the nature of pure duty, and that thus form and content are here entirely in accord. On this view, it might seem that, e.g.
Kasu errealean betebeharra aurkakoan eta, horren bidez, banakoaren eta orokorraren arteko aurkakotzan bikoizten den heinean, itxuraz betebehar hark, zeinaren edukia orokor-den bera den, horren bidez bitartegabe betebehar hutsaren izaera bere baitan dauka, eta forma eta edukia guztiz adostuta daude;