the understanding having no data to decide which of these two causes operates in any particular case,-for their effects are exactly alike,-always assumes the presence of the commoner cause, and as the activity of the understanding is not reflective and discursive, but direct and immediate, this false cause appears before us as a perceived object, whereas it is merely illusion.
adimenak, zeinak ez baitu daturik hemen zein kausa eragiten ari den bereizteko, zeren efektua erabat bera baita, ohiko kausa aurresuposatzen du beti, eta bere ekintza ez erreflexiboa eta ez espekulatiboa delarik, baizik eta artez eta bitartegabea, horrela, halako kausa faltsua agertzen da objektu begietsi gisa gure aurrean, zeina begitazio faltsua baita.