If it be lawful for Panætius to maintain his opinion about augury, dreams, oracles, vaticinations, of which the Stoics made no doubt at all; why may not a wise man dare to do the same in all things that he dared to do in those he had learned of his masters, established by the common consent of the school, whereof he is a professor and a member?
Paneziori goresgarri bazaio azti, amets, orakulo eta asmakizunei buruz bere epaiketaren sostengatzea, estoikoek gauza horiek ez baitituzte zalantzan ezartzen, zergatik zuhur bat ez da gauza guztietan ausartatuko hori bere irakasleengadik ikasi dituenetan ausartzen denara, irakasle eta alderdikide den eskolako ahobateko adostasunean onarturik baitira?