Do not these examples serve to make good what I said at first: that our reasons often anticipate the effect, and have so infinite an extent of jurisdiction that they judge and exercise themselves even on inanity itself and non-existency?
Ez ote dute adibide hauek balio hasieran esaten nuenerako: gure arrrazoiek ekintza aurreratzen dutela eta beren menekotasunaren hedadura hain mugaezina dutela non ezer ezari buruz eta ez izateari buruz baitihardute?