He apprehends in God the most extreme antitheses that he can find to his own characteristic and ineradicable animal instincts, he himself gives a new interpretation to these animal instincts as being against what he "owes" to God (as enmity, rebellion, and revolt against the "Lord," the "Father," the "Sire," the "Beginning of the world"), he places himself between the horns of the dilemma, "God" and "Devil." Every negation which he is inclined to utter to himself, to the nature, naturalness, and reality of his being, he whips into an ejaculation of "yes," uttering it as something existing, living, efficient, as being God, as the holiness of God, the judgment of God, as the hangmanship of God, as transcendence, as eternity, as unending torment, as hell, as infinity of punishment and guilt.
"Jainkoa"rengan atzematen du bere animali instintu benetako eta ezabaezinentzat aurkitzeko gai den azken antitesia, animali instintu horiek berak Jainkoarekiko zor bezala berrinterpretatzen ditu (etsaitasun, errebolta, "Jauna"aren "Aita"ren, progenitorearen eta munduaren hasieraren aurkako asaldatze bezala), "jainkoa eta deabrua" kontraesanean teinkatzen da, eta, nork bere buruari, naturari, naturaltasunari, bere izatearen errealitateari esaten dion ezetz oro bere baitatik kanpora proiektatzen du baietz bat bezala, existitzen den, gorputza duen, erreala den zerbait bezala, Jainko, Jainkoaren santutasun, jainko epaile bezala, Jainko borrero bezala, haraindi bezala, betiera bezala, amaigabeko martirio bezala, infernu bezala, zigorra eta erruaren neurtezintasun bezala.