yet none of them were uncontrolled in the use of it, but such as were gracious for their own naturall abilities, or felicities. So that from the practise of those times, there can no argument be drawn, that the right of Supremacy in Religion was not in the Kings, unlesse we place it in the Prophets; and conclude, that because Hezekiah praying to the Lord before the Cherubins, was not answered from thence, nor then, but afterwards by the Prophet Isaiah, therefore Isaiah was supreme Head of the Church; or because Josiah consulted Hulda the Prophetesse, concerning the Book of the Law, that therefore neither he, nor the High Priest, but Hulda the Prophetesse had the Supreme authority in matter of Religion; which I thinke is not the opinion of any Doctor.
botere biak, zibila nahiz erlijiozkoa, erregeengan zeuden arren, ezein erregek ere ez zeukala botereok kontrolik gabe erabiltzerik, beren trebetasun natural edo arrakastengatik lortzen zutenek salbu. Beraz, garai haietako praktikatik ezin atera daiteke argumentu bat ere erlijio-arloko nagusigoaren eskubidea erregeengan ez zegoenik konkluditzeko, ez bada eskubide hori profetengan jartzen dugula eta zera konkluditu: Jaunari kerubinen aurrean otoitz egitearren Ezekiasi leku eta une hartan ez zitzaiolako ezer esan, baizik geroago Isaias profetak, profeta hauxe zela Elizaren buru nagusia; edo Josiasek Legearen Liburuari buruz Hulda profetisari kontsultatu ziolako, emakume honexegan zegoela, eta ez Josiasengan edo Apaiz Nagusiarengan, erlijio-arazoei buruzko autoritate gorena; baina ez dut uste doktore bat ere iritzi horretakoa denik.