Question:
represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details:
------
E.g.
'['this is the first sentence of a news article. represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article\n\nE.g.\nThe European Central Bank (ECB) says it will no longer produce the €500 (£400; $575) note because of concerns it could facilitate illegal activities. == The decision comes in the wake of a European Commission inquiry in February into the way the notes are used.\nSenior ECB officials said at the time that they needed more evidence that the notes facilitated criminal activity.\nThe UK asked banks to stop handling €500 notes in 2010 after a report found they were mainly used by criminals.\nThe ECB says the €500 banknote remains legal tender and will always retain its value.\nIt will stop issuing the note around the end of 2018, when it will bring in new €100 and €200 banknotes.\nA report earlier this year for the Harvard Kennedy School, urged the world\'s 20 largest economies to stop issuing the largest notes in circulation - £50, $100 and €500 notes - to tackle crime.\nPeter Sands, former chief executive of Standard Chartered bank, said the high-denomination notes were favoured by terrorists, drug lords and tax evaders.\nIllegal money flows exceed $2 trillion (£1.4 trillion) a year, he said. != A resolution, which is not binding, has called for the government to remove the notes to "reduce illicit money flow".\nTwo months ago, India\'s Prime Minister Narendra Modi surprised the country by scrapping 1,000 rupee and 500 rupee notes overnight,\nThe move led to acute currency shortages in India.\nScrapping the Pakistani banknote was proposed by Senator Osman Saifullah Khan, who said it was being used in illegal transactions and should be withdrawn, Pakistan Today reported.\nHe said the banknote should not be withdrawn overnight, but over a period of three to five years.\nLaw minister Zahid Hamid opposed the resolution, saying the move would hamper business activities.\nPakistan has a large informal economy. The government has offered tax amnesties to try to expand the country\'s tax base.\nThe 5,000 rupee note accounts for almost one third of the 3.3 trillion rupees of notes in circulation in Pakistan.', 'Text by Luiz Felipe Silva, photographs by Fellipe Abreu.']' == '['Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence', '"Our land is our spirit," says one of the spiritual and political leaders of the Cinta Larga.\n"An indigenous person without land is an indigenous person without soul," he says about the challenges facing this indigenous group in Brazil.\nThe group lives in the Roosevelt Indigenous Area between the states of Rondonia and Mato Grosso.\nThe area contains what could be the world\'s most abundant diamond deposit and it is these riches which are a threat to the traditional way of life of the Cinta Larga.\nUnder Brazilian law, no mining whatsoever should be carried out in the indigenous territory and yet illegal diamond mining has been taking place here since 1999.\nAn area measuring 10km by 2km (6.2 miles by 1.2 miles) in size and another adjacent area called Grota do Sossego have already been deforested for mining.\nIndigenous rights activists warn that the extent of deforestation could be much greater and amount to as much as 1,000 hectares (2,470 acres).\nOne of the artisanal mines in the area is Lajes.\nAn estimated 100m reais ($31.4m; Â£25.7m) worth of diamonds is currently being extracted from it annually - all of it mined illegally. Geologists from Brazil\'s Geological Survey calculate that it has the potential to produce more than six times that amount.\nThey think the mine could yield one million carats of diamonds per year, worth more than $200m.\nAnd Lajes is not the only site with potential riches. A mining company report suggests that the area could have as many as 14 sites of kimberlite, the rocks known to sometimes contain diamonds.\nIf the estimates were to be confirmed, it would make Roosevelt Indigenous Reserve the world\'s largest diamond deposit.\nThe Cinta Larga say that if it was down to them, there would be no illegal mining on their land.\n"The problem is the government does not help us in any way and we are in dire need of a lot of things," a leader who preferred not to give his name explains.\n"We don\'t have any medication or transport and there are no opportunities for us here,."\nThose involved in the illegal mining have brought some services to the indigenous community to try to buy the trust of the Cinta Larga and convince them to allow the mining to go ahead on the Cinta Larga\'s land, he adds.\nThe riches of the land on which the Cinta Larga live have historically brought them misfortune. Before diamonds were discovered, rubber prospectors killed many of them for their land.\nIn the most infamous incident, in 1963, dynamite was thrown from a small plane on to a Cinta Larga village on the orders of a rubber plantation owner. The village was wiped out in what became known as the Massacre of the 11th Parallel.\nReginaldo Trindade, who officially defends the interests of the Cinta Larga on behalf of the attorney general\'s office, says that "the risk of a new genocide is the highest since then" because of the current conflict between the Cinta Larga and the illegal diamond prospectors.\nThe indigenous group, which once numbered more than 5,000, had dwindled to just 1,758 in the latest census taken in 2012.\nThe Cinta Larga say that they have to resort to diamond mining and trafficking to survive. The group receives some aid from the Brazilian state but they say it is not nearly enough. In 2014, the Cinta Larga received just under 105,000 reais ($33,000; Â£27,000), which amounted to about 58 reais ($18; Â£15) per person.\nBut the diamond mine has attracted outsiders to the area and with them have come other dangers. Bruno Lima e Silva, a former regional co-ordinator for Brazil\'s indigenous agency, Funai, says that the Cinta Larga "are the worst affected by the entry of drugs, alcohol, prostitution and violence" which the diamond mining has brought with it.\nAs the diamonds extracted at Roosevelt are mined illegally, getting them out of the area further attracts smugglers.\nThe Cinta Larga say the only solution they can see is for the ban on mining in Roosevelt to be lifted, so the stones can be extracted legally.\nThat way, they could exploit the riches below their land without coming into conflict with the authorities and without attracting the criminal elements currently involved in smuggling the diamonds.\n"We want the mine to be legalised," says chief Marcelo Cinta Larga.']' != '['Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary', 'Picture credits: Jeff Overs\nQuiz compiled by Tom Moseley']'

Question: The productivity of the UK workforce remains slightly lower than in 2007, marking an "unprecedented absence" of growth since World War Two, official figures show.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said UK labour productivity fell 0.2% in the last three months of 2014.
That meant productivity last year remained "little changed" on 2013.
The Bank of England has previously raised concerns about productivity levels.
The ONS said labour unit costs - otherwise known as employee benefits, which include wages, pension contributions, bonuses and other benefits such as private healthcare  - had increased by only 1% a year over the last five years.
The figures come a day after the ONS revised fourth-quarter GDP figures, which led to annual economic growth being uprated to 2.8% from an earlier estimate of 2.6%.
The economy is a major theme of this year's general election, with Labour arguing the economy's recovery from the financial crisis has been the longest and shallowest on record.
The Conservatives have pointed to the fact that there are more people in work than ever before and that wages and living standards have begun to rise.
While the UK now has historically high levels of employment, the Bank of England has suggested many people may be underemployed.
It has previously suggested the economy may have as much as 1.5% spare capacity, meaning the economy is performing below its potential because of a lack of productivity in the workplace and underinvestment by business.
Another possible explanation for low UK workforce productivity in the years since the financial crisis is that businesses refrained from making staff redundant where possible, while freezing or cutting salaries instead.
The Bank of England says that as the economy improves, more businesses will begin to reinvest in expansion, which should lead to improved productivity.
The Bank expects that as the economy reaches near full employment, pressure for wage rises will also increase.
The ONS said last month that average pay had risen by 1.8% in the three months to January compared with a year earlier.
And on Tuesday, it said household disposable income edged up 0.2% in December 2014 compared with May 2010 - the first increase in living standards recorded under the coalition government - equivalent to Â£10 a year per person.
It comes as a closely watched survey suggested activity in the UK manufacturing sector hit an eight-month high in March.
The Markit/CIPS purchasing managers' index (PMI) for the month rose to 54.4, up from 54 in February.
Any reading above 50 indicates growth, while a figure below 50 means a fall in activity.
Manufacturing production grew at the fastest pace in nine months, Markit added, helped by the strongest increase in new business since July 2014.
Rob Dobson, senior economist at Markit, said: "The UK manufacturing sector has continued its bright start to 2015, with March seeing the headline PMI rise to an eight-month high.
"The sector is on course for output growth ranging around 0.6% over the opening quarter as a whole, a positive contribution to broader economic expansion and its best performance since the first half of last year.
"Continued job creation of around 5,000 new manufacturing employees a month also provides a decent bellwether that the labour market is still strengthening."

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article!

It was the lowest jobless rate since the three-month period to January 2006, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
The number of people out of work fell by 110,000 to 1.71 million between August and October.
There were 31.3 million people in work, 505,000 more than for a year earlier.
Joblessness had been expected to remain at 5.3%, where it was a month ago, according to a poll of economists by news agency Reuters.
The figures also show EU citizens working in the UK increased by 324,000 to 2.02 million, whereas workers who were neither EU nationals or Britons were "little changed" at 1.20 million.
The jobless rate a year ago was 6%.
The pay of workers grew at its slowest rate since the January to March period, in spite of the unemployment dip.
Total pay grew 2.4%.
"Earnings continue to grow in real terms, although at a slower rate than we have seen in recent months," ONS statistician David Freeman said.
Bank of England Governor Mark Carney has said he would like to see earnings growth above 3% a year before he would increase interest rates.
"The employment rate is at its highest ever level, the unemployment rate is down to its lowest since well before the crash at 5.2%, and youth unemployment - always a tricky problem to solve - continues to fall impressively," said Michael Martins, economic analyst at the Institute of Directors.
"All of this indicates we are closing in on full employment."
"What this means for wages and inflation over the next 12 months, however, is less clear. In theory, a tightening labour market should mean wage rises. This is the trend we saw throughout 2015. But wage growth has outpaced productivity for much of this year, and in the last few months pay increases have trailed off."
A interest rate decision is expected from the US central bank, the Federal Reserve, later on Wednesday.
"It is a foregone conclusion that the Fed is going to raise rates," said Kully Samra, a managing director at US investment manager Charles Schwab.
Vacancies of 747,000 in the UK jobs market have not been higher since data began in 2001, said the ONS.
The number of hours worked per week topped one billion for the first time, the ONS said. This was a consequence of more people in work, "as average weekly hours per person are fairly stable," said Mr Freeman of the ONS.


Question: represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details.

Question: Thousands of people have taken part in a protest in Hungary to demand the abolition of laws which could force the closure of one of the country's most prestigious universities.

New rules introduced by the government mean the Central European University (CEU) would be unable to award diplomas because it is registered in the US.
The university was founded by philanthropist George Soros.
The legislation has already been rushed through parliament.
Demonstrators in the capital on Sunday want President Janos Ader not to sign the controversial legislation backed by the governing right-wing Fidesz party of Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
Hungarian government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs said the demonstrations would not cause the government to back down.
"There's no reason to," he said. "It's possible for CEU to fulfil the requirements set out in the new law - they have a year to comply."
Unlike last Sunday's protest, it was not just students who were out in the street - there were also lots of families, with some middle-aged and some elderly people in the crowd.
They marched peacefully in the bright spring sunshine, crossing Budapest's historic Chain Bridge as they headed towards Parliament. The protesters chanted slogans urging President Janos Ader to ask the Constitutional Court to review the new law adopted by parliament last week that is likely to lead to the closure of the CEU.
BBC Budapest correspondent Nick Thorpe says it was probably the biggest anti-government protest in Budapest since Mr Orban came to power seven years ago.
The protesters took to the streets both to defend the CEU and protest against attempts by the government to pressure human rights and environmental groups which support refugees.
At least 50,000 people - organisers say as many as 80,000 protesters - took part in the demonstration.
The government passed amendments to the Higher Education Act last week which would make it impossible for the CEU to continue working in Budapest - 26 years after it was set up by Hungarian-born billionaire financier and philanthropist George Soros.
The government opposes the liberal outlook of both the university and many non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
"We do have a problem with George Soros  - or rather George Soros has a problem with us," said Mr Kovacs. "He's been using his money and influence - through his NGOs - to put pressure on Hungary."
The CEU has vowed to fight the legislation. The English-speaking university is ranked among the top 200 universities in the world in eight disciplines.
Mr Soros has a strained relationship with Mr Orban - a keen supporter of US President Donald Trump - who has accused the financier of wanting a role in Hungarian politics and supporting the influx of migrants into Europe.
Mr Orban recently claimed Hungary was "under siege" from asylum seekers.
The prime minister won a scholarship sponsored by Mr Soros to study at Oxford university and the pair were allies in the days immediately following the fall of communism in 1989.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary.

The new rules increase reporting requirements for the groups, which risk closure for non-compliance.
Critics say the move is a crackdown on independent voices and an attempt to stigmatise the organisations.
Prime Minister Viktor Orban has accused foreign-funded NGOs, in particular those supported by American billionaire George Soros, of domestic interference.
Groups receiving more than â‚¬24,000 ($26,000; Â£21,000) will have to register as "foreign-supported organisation".
Mr Orban's right-wing government says the measures aim at improving transparency and fighting money laundering and terrorism funding.
But the rules are seen as targeting Hungarian-born Mr Soros, who for decades has given away billions of dollars to promote a liberal, "open society" culture, and has founded the prestigious Central European University.
Mr Orban sees Mr Soros as an ideological enemy, and has declared a battle against liberalism. In April, parliament approved a bill that threatens to close the CEU.
The law targets three groups in particular, according to government chancellor Janos Lazar: Transparency International, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, and the Civil Liberties Union. Many others will also be affected.
The move is the latest in a sustained government attack, in official statements and in government-backed media, on civil society groups which criticise it. Formerly critical media have also been taken over by government allies.
The Central European Union is also under threat of closure, due to another law passed in April. A "national consultation" was recently concluded by the government, which aimed to stir up the public against internal and external "enemies". The latter include "Brussels bureaucrats" - a reference to the European Commission - and Hungarian-born philanthropist George Soros.
The Civil Liberties Union say it will refuse to obey the new law, on the grounds that it breaches the right to freedom of expression and association. If it is closed down, it says it will turn to the Hungarian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights.
The law, passed by 130 votes to 44 in the 199-seat parliament, resembles legislation introduced in Russia in 2012 requiring NGOs to call themselves "foreign agents" if they get any foreign funding, which led to a ban on Soros foundations.
Human rights group Amnesty International said the Hungarian law was a "vicious and calculated assault on civil society", while Human Rights Watch considered it an attempt of "silencing critical voices in society".


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: House prices rose by 6.1% in the year to September 2015, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence

That was up from 5.5% in August, and 5.2% in July. It brings the average house price to £286,000.
However, the rise is still much lower than a year previously, when prices were rising by more than 12%.
The Halifax has previously said that house prices rose by 8.6% over the same period, while Nationwide said the rise was just 3.8%.
Separately, the Land Registry for England and Wales announced that prices were up by 5.6% in the year to October.
The Land Registry includes cash sales, which typically represent about a third of the market.
The ONS figures show that prices rose fastest in Northern Ireland (10.2%) and the East of England (8.4%).
What is the difference between the various UK house price surveys?
John Hawksworth, the chief economist at PwC, said house price inflation was now running at twice the rate of average earnings.
"The ongoing rise in house prices reinforces our projections that, by 2025, only around a quarter of 20-39 year olds in England may be owner occupiers, compared to around three quarters of over-55 year olds," he said.
Jeremy Leaf, a former chairman of Rics, said that, far from running out of steam, the housing market was re-energising itself.
"With the average property price in London now £531,000, unless you earn way above the national average salary, you have precious little hope of being in a position to buy," he said.
"Generation Rent is being left out in the cold: they have aspirations to buy but are being pushed further away from their goal."

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

It was the second rise in a row, following an increase of 6,000 in the previous set of figures.
The unemployment rate in Scotland is now 6%, compared with 5.6% for the UK as a whole.
Employment was up by 3,000 to reach 2,615,000, according to the Office for National Statistics.


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article.

Question: Two women have been rescued following a suspected arson attack on a house in Bournemouth.

Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence.

The neighbours entered the burning property in Milford Drive, on Sunday afternoon in an attempt to rescue two cats, police said. The occupants were not home at the time.
The women had inhaled smoke and were taken to hospital with breathing difficulties. The cats were unharmed.
Fire destroyed the front door and caused heavy smoke damage to the house.
Dorset Police said it believed the fire had been started deliberately through the cat flap in the front door of the property at about 15:00 BST.
Officers are appealing for witnesses or anyone with CCTV to get in touch.
Det Con Luke Davis said: "I am appealing to anyone who saw suspicious activity near to the property during that afternoon, particularly anyone seen in the garden or the front drive of the property just before 3pm, to please contact me.
"If you have any information about the cause or motive of the fire, please contact Dorset Police or call Crimestoppers anonymously."

Fire crews and paramedics were called to Cuthbert Road, Cheadle, at 20:00 GMT on Saturday.
She was taken to Manchester Children's Hospital, where she is being treated for burns to her back, hand and leg.
Several fires started by lit candles have been reported in Greater Manchester during the past two weeks.
Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service said a man "was left homeless" on Friday after a house fire in Bolton.
On Thursday, two people were taken to hospital after a lit candle caused a fire at a flat in Hyde.
In a third fire, the roof of two terraced homes in Moss Side was destroyed in the early hours of 11 December.


Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story

Question: Walsall scored two second-half goals to beat League One promotion rivals Gillingham and move up into third.

The hosts started brighter, but Neil Etheridge saved a Luke Norris penalty after Paul Downing's handball.
That spurred the Saddlers on and Milan Lalkovic picked up a loose ball to curl the ball in and break the deadlock.
With the Gills pressing, Walsall broke, Jordy Hiwula slotting in after Romaine Sawyers' composed pass, and Norris's bicycle kick was only a consolation.
Gillingham, who have now failed to win any of their last nine matches against Walsall, drop down to sixth place.
The Saddlers were playing their third straight away game in 11 days, having lost the previous two, to Sheffield United and Oldham. But, having won the first of their two catch-up games caused by Easter postponements due to international calls, they are now five points behind second-placed Burton Albion.
They have now won four of their six matches since Jon Whitney became interim boss following last month's sacking of Sean O'Driscoll.
Walsall boss Jon Whitney told BBC WM:
"It was a huge game and we approached it with belief. I have sensed people doubting us and I hope those people now realise what we are about.
"That was an outstanding performance from my boys. I don't think Gillingham could live with us. We passed them off the park, ran them off the park and the most pleasing thing for me is that we were more physical than them.
"I said from the start that it's going to be an up and down season. It is going to go right to the wire. The Burton players will be having their tea and biscuits but they won't taste as nice because we're hunting them down."

Joe Pigott put the Hatters ahead with a cool finish in the first half, and Josh McQuoid tucked in a close range second after the break.
Carlisle gained hope when Jack Stacey drilled in from the edge of the box.
However, the visitors defended resolutely to climb above the Cumbrians to 13th in the League Two table and remain six points off the top seven.


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article

Question: Politicians from Scotland's five main parties have clashed over the causes of - and possible solutions to - poverty.

They were appearing in a BBC Scotland election debate in front of a specially invited studio audience.
It came ahead of seven party leaders from across the UK taking part in a live ITV debate on Thursday evening.
And the forthcoming general election is also expected to dominate the last first minister's questions at Holyrood before the Easter recess.
The Scotland 2015 programme's Poverty Debate, which was broadcast on BBC2 Scotland on Wednesday evening, saw senior figures from the SNP, Labour, Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Scottish Greens face questions on topics including foodbanks, welfare sanctions, the living wage and childcare.
They were appearing before an audience largely comprised of people who work with those in poverty, or who are themselves affected by poverty.
About a million people in Scotland - or a fifth of the total population - are said to be living in poverty, with nearly half of those living in households where at least one person is working.
Responding to a question about why thousands of people in Scotland rely on foodbanks when the UK is said to be one of the wealthiest nations in the world, Scottish Social Justice Secretary Alex Neil said it pointed to a "real contradiction" in the country.
The SNP politician said: "We are the fourth or fifth richest nation in the world and yet we have some of the worst levels of poverty in the whole of Europe, and indeed in the western world."
Mr Neil said the poverty problem started with Margaret Thatcher and had continued with subsequent prime ministers such as Tony Blair, who he claimed had "made poverty worse as well", and said governments in both London and Edinburgh should have a firm commitment to ending poverty, not just reducing or mitigating it.
Scottish Conservative MSP Mary Scanlon said the UK had the fastest-growing economy in the western world, and that per head of population there were more foodbanks in Germany than in either Scotland or the UK.
But she conceded: "That is no excuse. There is still a long way to go to address poverty. I have been on benefits myself, I have been a single parent of children one and two years old,  I have been there and I have never forgotten about being there. It is hard and you do need help from government."
Ms Scanlon said that, while there was no magic solution to poverty, she would like to see resources focused on early years and childcare, and called on governments to do more to tackle mental health issues by treating people in poverty with respect and dignity and giving them the support they needed.
Scottish Labour's social justice spokesman Ken Macintosh said foodbanks were "actually a sign of hope", because they reflected the generosity and compassion of people in Scotland.
His comment was met with an angry response from some people in the audience, with one man saying: "It is actually a sign of desperation rather than hope. It really is shameful. People don't go to foodbanks for hope."
Mr Macintosh then clarified that he believed food poverty was shameful, while foodbanks themselves were "a sign that we care for each other".
He added: "I would like to see an end to the need for foodbanks, I want to see an end to food poverty, and that means putting money in people's pockets. There are things we could do right here, right now in Scotland. We could do more to tackle poverty wages in Scotland."
Katy Gordon, the vice-convenor of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, said the big challenge was one of income.
She said: "What the Liberal Democrats have achieved in government is to give as much money back in terms of tax cuts to those on low and middle incomes to make sure that pensioners are protected by having a triple lock on pensions so that the pensions are always going up.
"So it is about making sure that the money that people are getting, more of it they get to keep to spend."
The fifth member of the panel, Scottish Greens co-convenor Patrick Harvie, predicted that many people would feel a "great deal of weariness" when they heard the answers of his rivals.
He said: "How wealthy your country is overall is not the same as how fairly that wealth is shared, and we focus too much in this society on averages. GDP growth is one good example - it just tells you how much money is swilling around, it doesn't tell you in whose interests it is working.
"If we want a fairer society we have to share our wealth more equally."
Meanwhile, Scottish First Minister and SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon is preparing to face six other party leaders, including Prime Minister David Cameron, Labour's Ed Miliband and Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, in a two-hour live general election debate to be screened on ITV from 20:00 on Thursday.
The debate, which will be given extensive live coverage by other media outlets including the BBC, will also feature Green Party leader Natalie Bennett, Nigel Farage of UKIP and Plaid Cymru's Leanne Wood.
Speaking ahead of the debate, Ms Sturgeon said it marked an opportunity to break out of the traditional two-party politics of Westminster and ensure "real progressive voices" could be heard.
Elsewhere on the campaign trail ahead of the election on 7 May, Labour will say their tax plans can release Â£1bn over five years which could go to the NHS in Scotland.
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie will argue that his is the only party that stands for local business success.
And the Scottish Conservatives will argue that the election is a choice between "economic stability and constitutional chaos", with their party offering the former.
What are the top issues for each political party at the 2015 general election?
Policy guide: Where the parties stand

The Scotsman describes Scotland as "the sick child of Europe" after the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health's report found it had one of the worst child health records in western Europe.
The Herald says the situation is a "child health crisis". It reports that the study calls for the ban on smoking in public places to be extended to school grounds, playgrounds and all sports fields.
"We're failing our children", warns the front page headline of the Scottish Daily Mail. It says that the authors of the study believe that the SNP has been in power long enough to be held accountable for the state of children's health in Scotland.
Scotland's children are facing a "health time bomb", according to the i newspaper. It says many Scottish babies are set on a path to ill health even before they're born.
Meanwhile The Scottish Sun reports that six dogs have died after they were walked in a park at an old gasworks, sparking fears that they were poisoned.
A driver who has been involved in three fatal crashes has had his driving ban cut short, according to the Daily Record.
The Scottish edition of The Times looks ahead to Theresa May's meeting with Donald Trump. It reports that she will tell the new US president that Britain and America can "lead together again".
In a striking front page which mocks up an image of a popular Channel 4 quiz show, The National reports that the "countdown" to a second Scottish independence referendum is on.
In contrast, the Scottish Daily Express claims that the SNP's bid for another independence vote has suffered a "serious blow". It says the party have been accused of "ignoring the facts" on the Scottish economy.
A man who stole presents from a family home on Christmas Eve is facing prison, the Dundee edition of The Courier reports.
The Press and Journal leads with a story about a legal battle by two local authorities. If they are successful, Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire councils could claim hundreds of millions of pounds from developers.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details:

Question: Online hate crimes should be treated as seriously as abuse committed face-to-face, prosecutors in England and Wales have been told.

this is part of a news article. represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

Revising its guidance for prosecutors, the Crown Prosecution Service said the impact of tweeting abuse can be as "equally devastating" as shouting it.
The guidance includes offences against bisexual people for the first time.
Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said online abuse can fuel "dangerous hostility".
A hate crime is an offence motivated by a "hostility or prejudice", including racism, sexism or homophobia.
Writing in the Guardian, Ms Saunders said recent events in the US - where white nationalists clashed with counter-protesters in Charlottesville - showed what online abuse can lead to.
"Whether shouted in their face on the street, daubed on their wall or tweeted into their living room, the impact of hateful abuse on a victim can be equally devastating," she said.
She said the internet and social media in particular have provided "new platforms" for abuse.
In December 2014, Scotland's Crown Office issued similar prosecution guidance, saying "if it would be illegal to say it on the street, it is illegal to say it online".
Love Island contestant Olivia Attwood told the Victoria Derbyshire programme: "There are things I look at and I think 'is this normal? Are you just meant to see this and just pretend you haven't seen it?'"
Labour councillor Seyi Akiwowo received a tirade of racist and gender-based slurs in February 2017. She was called the N-word and "a monkey".
Ms Akiwowo told BBC Radio London: "They're not just words. They actually echo the behaviour we don't tolerate in society so we shouldn't start thinking its OK to say on any platform, on social media and the internet.
"There needs to be a big campaign about proper conduct online...[and] about what you can do as a witness.
"You wouldn't be a bystander to a crime in society. If we saw someone being mugged, or being abused we wouldn't stand back we would try and intervene in some way."
The CPS says it has set out more clearly what victims and witnesses should expect from the law.
The new legal guidance and accompanying CPS public statements guide prosecutors deciding whether to charge suspects of offences motivated by hostility towards people of different races, religions, sexuality, gender and disability.
Cases should be pursued with the same "robust and proactive approach used with offline offending".
It says exceptions to prosecution should be made in the case of children who may not appreciate the potential harm they have caused by publishing something online that amounts to a hate crime.
Until now, CPS guidance on hate crime motivated by sexual orientation has had a general focus on all victims.
The new guidance specifically refers to bisexual victims, particularly if they report being victimised by gay men or lesbians.
By Dominic Casciani, home affairs correspondent
Hate crime is any criminal offence "which is perceived by the victim or any other person to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice".
The difficulty is working out where the line is drawn between that and words that are simply offensive.
Obvious examples are words linked to violence - such as the racially-aggravated threat made by an aristocrat on Facebook against businesswoman Gina Miller.
Other online abuse can amount to harassment or the crime of inciting hatred.
Campaigners say too many charging decisions based on existing guidance have landed on the wrong side of the line, leaving victims let down.
If the CPS is serious about getting tough with online hate crime, they say there needs to be more than a change in guidance - there needs to be a change in will.
According to the latest figures, the CPS successfully prosecuted more than 15,000 hate crime incidents in 2015-16 - the highest number ever. A third of those convicted saw their sentence increased because of the hate crime element of the offence - also a record.
However, in the same year, the number of cases being referred by police to prosecutors for a decision fell by almost 10%.
Nik Noone, chief executive of Galop, a charity that campaigns against anti-LGBT violence and hate crime, said its own research suggested many victims did not have confidence in the police to report online hate attacks.
"The threshold for prosecuting online hate crime is very high, and the investigative process is often too slow and cumbersome to respond to the fast-moving online world," she said.

Announcing the change, justice minister Sam Gyimah said: "Stalkers torment their victims and can make everyday life almost unbearable."
If the offence is racially or religiously aggravated, the current seven-year maximum will go up to 14.
Labour said ministers had "changed their mind" under pressure, having previously opposed tougher penalties.
In 2015, 194 people were convicted of stalking in England and Wales and were, on average, sentenced to 14 months in jail.
The government is expected to bring in the changes in an amendment to the Policing and Crime Bill, when it is debated in the Commons on Tuesday. The bill, which is in its final stages in Parliament, is likely to become law in the coming weeks.
It will also raise the maximum sentence for harassment from five to 10 years, and similarly from seven to 14 if it is racially or religiously aggravated.
Helen Pearson's five-year ordeal started with slashed bicycle tyres.
Then the text messages, phone calls and threatening letters began. A dead cat left on the doorstep.
"It just slowly kind of escalated," says Helen Pearson, from Devon. "You are constantly the whole time living on a knife edge.
"Every time you had a letter, it would get sent off for fingerprints. They'd find no fingerprints, so it would be logged and it would just carry on and on and on."
Read more here
Mr Gyimah said the sentences were being doubled so these "awful crimes can be properly punished".
But Labour said its amendment to the bill in the House of Lords in December, which would have doubled maximum sentences for the most serious offences, had been opposed by the government.
The amendment was approved by the Lords by 160 votes to 149 but 139 Conservative peers voted against.
However two Conservative MPs, Alex Chalk and Richard Graham, had campaigned to increase punishment for stalking. Mr Chalk introduced a private member's bill last year calling for the maximum sentence to be doubled.
Labour says there was a chance of a "sizeable rebellion" among Conservative MPs if the government sought to overturn the move when MPs debate it.
"Thankfully, under pressure, the Tories have changed their mind," said shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon.
"But more still needs to be done to ensure that victims of stalking feel confident enough that their complaint will be investigated properly when they first report it."
Last month, new stalking protection orders were introduced to protect victims - especially those targeted by strangers or colleagues - at the very earliest possible stage.
Police in England and Wales can now apply to the courts for an order before a stalking suspect has been convicted or even arrested.
A typical order might ban the suspect from going near the victim or contacting them online, and could also make them undergo treatment if they have a mental health problem.
The orders follow legislation introduced in 2012 which made stalking a specific criminal offence in England and Wales.
In Scotland, stalking is illegal under the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 and in Northern Ireland it is prohibited under the Protection from Harassment Order (NI) 1997.


Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story

Question: Members of the Paharia tribe living in the upper hill regions of India's Jharkhand state have been spending sleepless nights.

A marauding elephant has trampled at least 15 local people to death in the past few months.
Further north, villagers living around the Pilibhit Tiger reserve in Uttar Pradesh are up in arms after three people were killed by a tiger within a week. At least 16 people have been killed in tiger attacks near the reserve since last October.
"We have sent in teams to tranquilise the animal and relocate it inside the reserve," said VK Singh, a senior Uttar Pradesh forest department official. "We understand that people are also afraid. It is challenging."
There are similar stories in southern and eastern India where animal sanctuaries are located. It is not just forested areas that are affected - even people in suburban areas and small towns have started encountering animals like leopards.
According to the Indian environment ministry, 1,144 people were killed in elephant and tiger attacks between April 2014 and May 2017. Experts say the numbers could be much higher if attacks by leopards and other wild animals were included in the list.
"Human-animal conflict is one of the biggest challenges for conservation efforts - especially for large species which get lots of attention," said Alexandra Zimmermann, chair of the International Union for Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) Task Force on Human-Wildlife conflict.
After an alarming fall in the number of tigers, the Indian government launched the Project Tiger initiative in the 1970s. Protected zones were declared, new animal reserves were announced and anti-poaching measures implemented. As a result, the numbers have gone up.
Two-thirds of the world's tigers live in India, with their numbers increasing from about 1,700 to more than 2,200 in the last five years.
K Ullas Karanth, director for Science-Asia at the Wildlife Conservation Society, says increased human-animal conflict must be viewed as a result of the success of conservation in India.
"This problem is restricted to parts of India where parks have recovered and wildlife has increased, in the case of some species like tigers," he said.
I visited Sathyamangalam Tiger reserve in Tamil Nadu earlier this year. This forest area was not known for tigers, and was only declared a tiger reserve in 2013. About 25 tigers are thought to be living in the area and the population is increasing.
Experts believe that the tigers in the new reserve may have migrated from the neighbouring state of Karnataka due to over-population in sanctuaries there.
Villagers in the area say they are increasingly seeing tigers very close to houses, roads and rivers. There have been several elephant attacks in the area but people now are worried about tigers too.
Nearly 60% of Asia's elephants live in India, where their estimated population is between 24,000 and 32,000. But elephants are thought to kill about 500 people each year, far more than any other wild animal.
Experts say expanding human populations have cut off elephant corridors, trapping the animals in smaller areas and forcing them to raid towns and villages.
"Elephants do move along traditional routes and we have some understanding of what those corridors are," says Ms Zimmermann, who is also the head of Conservation Science at Chester Zoo in the UK. "But they can adapt as any other intelligent species."
She says more thought is needed on how elephant corridors can be protected and training given to villagers so the animals can move through safely.
India has 1.2 billion people and the population is growing, putting immense pressure on land to build homes and factories.
"As we try to meet this aspiration for economic growth, we do have to have careful evaluation of projects," says Mr Karanath.
"And the government is not doing that. They are rushing through projects, sometimes without proper safeguards built. This is a matter of serious concern."
Conservation work has had some success in increasing wild animal populations. The task now is to strike a balance in the competition for land between people and animals.
But there is little comfort for those caught in the middle.
"We want the forest officials to kill the tiger responsible for the attacks," a relative of a farmer killed near the Pilibhit reserve told local media. "This is our only demand. We won't settle for anything less than that."

"I and my fellow farmers were trying to convey the message that we will be forced to eat mice if things don't improve," he told me, sitting in a makeshift tent near Delhi's Jantar Mantar observatory, one of the areas of the Indian capital where protests are permitted.
The tatty tent and the street outside have been home to Mr Palanisamy and his 100-odd fellow farmers for some 40 days now. They hail from drought-affected districts of the southern state of Tamil Nadu, one of India's most developed states.
It appears to be a drought that India forgot, so Mr Palanisamy and his spirited co-protesters mounted a unique, eye-catching protest to put pressure on the government to act.
They are demanding ample drought relief funds, pensions for elderly farmers, a waiver of crop and farm loans, better prices for their crops and the interlinking of rivers to irrigate their lands.
Wearing traditional sarong-like garments and turbans, these farmers have brandished human skulls that they claim belong to dead farmers.
They have held live mice in their mouths, shaved half their heads, worn women's traditional saris, slashed their hands and oozed "protest blood", rolled bare-bodied on boiling hot macadam, and conducted mock funerals.
The protesters have also eaten food off the road, and stripped near the prime minister's office in the heart of the city after they were reportedly refused a meeting.
Fire-fighters rescued a protestor who tied a noose around his neck and tried to hang himself from a tree at the venue. Many of them have been taken to the hospital and treated for acute dehydration.
Some complain that the famously inward-looking Delhi media have painted their protest as an exotic freak show, often missing the pain and desperation driving it.
One commentator wrote that the protest had taken on a "farcical proportion where the performance seems to have become the point of it, and the protest itself is lost".
In Tamil Nadu, where more than 40% of the people make a living from farming, lack of water due to poor rainfall, low crop prices, and dwindling access to formal credit has created what is possibly the state's worst agrarian crisis in decades.
The jury is out on whether this protest will fetch results.
India, after all, has seen many abortive uprisings. But this Delhi protest shines the spotlight on how drought, debt and dysfunctional policies continue to blight India's farmers: agriculture growth has shrunk to a worrying 1.2%, and tens of thousands of farmers are struggling with debt and little income.
There was a time not so long ago, recounts Mr Palanisamy, when his 4.5-acre farm in Tiruchirappalli would yield abundant rice, sugarcane, pulses and cotton. There was also a bountiful crop of fruit from his mango and coconut trees.
Crippled by a debilitating drought brought on by years of poor rainfall, Mr Palanisamy's farm is now largely barren.
Two of his sons, who helped their father farm, have been forced to take up small jobs to keep the home fires burning. There's no money to pay his five workers. Loans worth 6,00,000 rupees ($9,287; Â£7,247) have piled up, and he's already pawned a lot of family gold as collateral.
"This is the worst farm crisis I have seen in my lifetime," says Mr Palanisamy, a second generation farmer, whose lean and sinewy frame belies his age. "I have never lived through such a crisis."
Many haven't. Fifty-eight debt-stricken farmers have taken their lives in drought-affected districts in Tamil Nadu since October, according to officials. A local farmers association insists the number of farm-related suicides and death of farmers is more than 250.
One of them is Mr Palanisamy's own brother-in-law who fell ill, refused treatment, and "wasted himself to death" in November. He was crushed under loans that he had taken out to buy a tractor and a bore well to irrigate his five-acre farm.
Led by a charismatic sixty-something farmer-lawyer, the protesters at Jantar Mantar have unwavering spirit. Most of them, like Mr Palanisamy, took a train ride to Delhi in March and found the weather "rather cold". At night, many of them slept fitfully in the open, enduring mosquito bites.
The farmers tell stories of their denuded villages where lack of water has left their trees bare and the landscape barren. They swap stories of mounting crop loans taken from banks and money lenders. They rave and rant in their dog-eared diaries. On some days, the mercury soars to 45C (113F)
Some of them complain that the media is more interested in the spectacle than the problem. They are men and women of dignity who have fought hard all their lives against all odds.
Mr Palanisamy, for example, belongs to a hunter-gatherer tribe, among the most underprivileged people in India. He studied until high school, picked up a certificate as a recognised farm teacher, and was employed at an anganwadi - a government sponsored mother and child-care centre - until his retirement even as he tilled his farm.
His three sons have been equally hardworking - two of them have earned degrees in engineering - and have helped their father in the farm. His brother-in-law, who took his life, used the money he earned from farming to send his only daughter to a nursing school.
They are symbols of the hard-fought social mobility of India's poorest, and also examples of how a long-drawn farm crisis can return them to a precarious existence.
When dusk falls, and the noise recedes, Mr Palanisamy sometimes takes out his diary and scribbles furiously. He said he recently wrote some verse, remembering the hard times back home. It is a haunting elegy for farming in India:
It's dead/it's dead/Farming is dead
It's agony/it's agony/This death of farming
It's burning/it's burning
The farmers heart and belly
Stop this/stop this
These farmers' deaths


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article

Question: Luther actor Idris Elba has put himself up for auction as a Valentine's date to raise money for charity.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

In an online video, he offers bidders a "romantic evening" involving cocktails, food and "whatever your heart desires".
"I'll let you pound my yams," the 44-year-old star continues before downing a glass of champagne.
Proceeds will go to WE (Women Everywhere) Can Lead, a charity organisation "working to empower and educate girls throughout Africa".
The winner will join Elba for "a candlelit meal at one of his favourite restaurants".
Flights and accommodation at a four-star hotel are included, according to the actor's page on the Omaze website.
Interested parties have until 14 February to make a bid.
Elba also voiced Shere Khan in last year's hugely successful Jungle Book film as well as producing and starring in Beasts of No Nation (2015).
He is also set to star in The Dark Tower later this year, a fantasy western horror film based on a series of Stephen King novels.
Follow us on Facebook, on Twitter @BBCNewsEnts, or on Instagram at bbcnewsents. If you have a story suggestion email entertainment.news@bbc.co.uk.

represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

Elaine Fairfax, from London, placed the winning bid after another fan doubled her previous offer of £500,000, live on Chris Evans' Radio 2 breakfast show.
"Oh my God," said Gary Barlow, upon being told the news by Chris Evans.
The businesswoman, who made her fortune by setting up a pet insurance firm, will now receive a 45-minute, one-off performance from the band.
"We'll come and sing to you, have a drink with you, have selfies, see your friends, meet your mum and dad," said Barlow. "Whatever you want us to do, we'll do it.
"Try and get rid of us. You'll be pushing us out the door by the end of it".
The proceeds will go to Children In Need, which stages its annual telethon on Friday.
It is the first time Take That have performed a private show for a competition winner since the start of their career.
"The last time we did something like this was in 1991 for Jackie magazine," said Barlow.
The prize was orchestrated by Chris Evans, who suggested the idea to Barlow in an email a few days ago. He phoned his bandmates Mark Owen and Howard Donald, and they had agreed to take part within four minutes.
"This is a charity we all love," said Barlow, who has previously organised the fundraising Children In Need Rocks concerts at the Royal Albert Hall.
Earlier this year, the singer surprised a mega-fan by turning up unannounced at her 40th birthday party in Maidstone, Kent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCNewsEnts, on Instagram at bbcnewsents, or if you have a story suggestion email entertainment.news@bbc.co.uk.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: More than one home every minute will need to be refurbished in the UK between now and 2050, experts say.

The authors of a report to Parliament say 25 million existing homes will not meet the insulation standards required by mid-century.
The UK needs to cut carbon emissions by 80% by then - and a third of those emissions come from heating draughty buildings.
The government said it would devise policies as soon as possible.
But critics say ministers have been far too slow to impose a national programme of home renovation which would save on bills and improve people's health, comfort and happiness. It would also create thousands of jobs.
Successive governments have been criticised for failing to tackle the UK's poor housing stock - some of the worst in Europe.
Local authorities have limited cash to insulate council homes, and landlords and owner-occupiers have proved reluctant to invest large sums in disruptive improvements that will save on bills, but take many years to pay off.
The report from a group of leading construction firms - the Green Building Council - says four out of five homes that will be occupied in 2050 have already been built.
That means 25 million homes need refurbishing to the highest standards by 2050 - at a rate of 1.4 homes every minute.
The authors say this huge challenge also offers an unmissable opportunity under the government's infrastructure agenda. The fiddly business of insulating roofs, walls and floors creates more jobs and has more benefits than any existing infrastructure priority, they maintain.
The question is how to pay. The government's Green Deal scheme for owner-occupiers collapsed amid a welter of criticism that interest rates for insulation were too high, and that the insulation itself was too much hassle.
The government has failed to produce a replacement solution to stimulate necessary demand for refurbishments amongst owner-occupiers. The Treasury is reluctant to throw public money at improvements that will increase the sale value of private homes.
The report recommends:
It says the construction industry needs certainty about what it is expected to deliver, and measurement to discover what is already being built. This should stimulate innovation, it says.
Julie Hirigoyen, head of the GBC, told BBC News there was a great prize to be grasped in upgrading building stock: "People will have warmer homes and lower bills; they will live longer, happier lives; we will be able to address climate change and carbon emissions.
"We will also be creating many thousands of jobs and exporting our best skills in innovation.
"Driving up demand for retro-fitting homes is essential for any policy to be a success - the Green Deal told us just offering financial incentives isn't necessarily the only solution. We need to make it all easy, attractive and affordable.
"The good thing is that the business community is really starting to recognise the opportunity."
Insulation: The unspoken reason for high fuel bills
Ms Hirigoyen called for support for innovation amongst builders. The GBC pointed to a firm, q-bot, which insulates people's floors by sending robots to creep under people's floorboards and spray them with foam.
The firm's head, Mathew Holloway, told BBC News: "We have to find new ways of doing things. Normal refurbishment often means literally tearing a home apart.
"That means local authorities having to re-house tenants whilst it's being done. With our robot, we can seal and insulate wooden floors without hardly touching the inside of the house."
Mr Holloway's start-up business was funded by the EU and the business department BEIS, but industry experts complain that building insulation research has received a tiny fraction of the sums channelled into glamorous renewables.
In the last 25 years, governments have tended to shy away from the issue. The Labour government made a rule that people extending their properties should be obliged to insulate the rest of their home too.
However, the Coalition government dropped the clause after it was labelled a "conservatory tax" in the media, even though it was not a tax and did not refer to conservatories.
The government is currently focused on bringing down bills through fuel switching - but home energy expert Russell Smith said: "Switching saves on average Â£25 a year. That's not much help to a person in fuel poverty. The solution is refurbishing homes, but it's difficult, so politicians keep putting it on the back burner."
Mr Smith is currently refurbishing Ruth Baber's home in Wimbledon, south London. He says it has added 10% to the Â£250,000 total cost, which included major extensions, but will save 80% of energy bills and take about 20 years to recoup.
Ms Baber is downsizing into the house and said: "I'm worried about climate change and I look forward to being able to control the heat in my house better. I've done it [the insulation programme] for my grandchildren, for the future."
The government's task is to persuade another 25 million people to follow her lead.
Follow Roger on Twitter @rharrabin

The Radyr Weir scheme will channel water through two turbines and use it to generate energy that can be fed into the electricity grid.
It should be able to provide enough energy to power 550 homes and raise £140,000 a year for Cardiff council.
Construction work on the project is scheduled be completed by March 2016.


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article.

Question: Google has announced three new Android-powered, Nexus-branded devices, comprising a set-top box for TVs, a tablet and a smartphone.

The machines are all designed to showcase the forthcoming update to its operating system, codenamed Android Lollipop.
The Nexus Player marks the introduction of Android TV, Google's latest bid to get a foothold in the living room.
Experts noted that the firm had tried and failed with set-top boxes before.
However, Hiroshi Lockheimer, vice-president of Android engineering, suggested the company had learned from its past mistakes.
"On Google TV you could get a lot of apps, but a lot of the versions were just big tablet versions on a 50in screen that just didn't feel right," he explained.
"[Now] we're much more opinionated about what an app should look like on a TV set, so we've been working very closely with app developers in the TV and content space over the past months on optimising their applications.
"You'll see a much more focused set of applications that are higher quality."
Apps have to comply with a new set of guidelines - such as supporting a remote control - before they will be added to Android TV's version of the Google Play store, he said.
The Nexus Player is a set-top box built by Asus and featuring an Intel chip.  It will cost $99 (Â£62) when it launches in the US and Canada in early November.
It is bundled with a remote control with a built-in microphone, and owners can buy an add-on controller if they want to play video games.
In addition, Google has announced that Sony, Sharp and Philips will be building Android TV into forthcoming TV sets, and that more manufacturers will be unveiled at a later date.
However, neither of the two biggest television makers - Samsung and LG - have agreed to support the platform at this point, although Mr Lockheimer said that Samsung was at least "studying" it.
Although the previous Google TV platform was scrapped, the search giant has had limited success with its Chromecast TV dongle - it says it has sold millions but could not provide a specific number. Chromecast supports a smaller set of apps than Android TV since it was not designed for games.
Even so, one market watcher has doubts about the new platform's chances.
"Google is going to keep trying with this, but that doesn't mean it's going to succeed," said Ian Maude from the consultancy Enders Analysis.
"This doesn't look very different from Amazon's Fire TV or other devices out there - there's nothing that jumps out at you.
"And Google has an additional hurdle, which is that some broadcasters and TV manufacturers are particularly nervous about getting into bed with it because they fear being disintermediated - in other words undermined - because Google would now be controlling the interface."
The other new devices are:
Mr Lockheimer drew attention to the fact both smart devices featured metal exterior parts, which he said gave them a more "premium" feel than the all-plastic shells used by earlier Nexus hardware.
The Nexus 6 will be made available in 26 countries, including the UK, in November and has been priced $649 (Â£407) for the contract-free 32 gigabyte edition.
The Nexus 9 will go on sale at the end of this week in 30 countries and costs $399 (Â£250) for the 16GB version.
One analyst was surprised by the prices.
"They're definitely not cheap, which is interesting because that seems to be a bit of a change in strategy," commented Carolina Milanesi from Kantar Worldpanel ComTech.
"Google has obviously gone for more expensive materials, which might signal it is going after the enterprise space.
"Businesses are less sensitive to price and look closely at the durability of devices, plus we know that the next version of Android has incorporated enterprise-friendly features.
"The other thing is that a 6in phone is a form factor that IT departments might view as a good two-in-one option, to avoid having to give staff both a tablet and a phone."

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

One woman held up a sign reading "develop a conscience", while another shouted that the firm was creating "machines that kill people".
The yearly Google I/O event is a chance for the firm to show off its latest products and plans.
Google could not be reached for comment about the interruptions.
Away from the event, at Google's headquarters in Mountain View, another group of people were reportedly arrested in a separate incident regarding the ongoing "net neutrality" debate.
Google launched this year's event with a keynote presentation lasting about two hours.
During a segment explaining an enhanced battery-saving feature on a forthcoming software release, a protester could be heard shouting the name of Jack Halprin, a Google lawyer.
Mr Halprin has been at the centre of a row involving tenants living in a residential block he purchased.
The protester held a sign saying "stop Jack Halprin from evicting SF teachers".
On stage, Google engineer David Burke attempted to deflect attention from the disturbance by jokingly suggesting the better battery life would come in useful during a "long protest".
Later during the same keynote address, a man was removed by security staff shortly after shouting "you all work for a totalitarian company that builds robots that kill people".
Last year, Google acquired Boston Dynamics, a company that had previously developed sophisticated robotics for the US military.
Google said at the time that it would honour existing contracts Boston Dynamics had with the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa).
Over the past year there has been increased friction between long-time San Francisco residents and what some have dubbed the "Silicon Valley tech elite".
Buses used to shuttle Google employees from residential areas to the company's campus have become a target for anger - with some protesters standing in the vehicles' way. In some cases buses have been vandalised.
San Francisco locals said they were concerned that an increase in the numbers of wealthy technology workers was driving up the cost of living in the city.
Google will be keen to make sure the focus remains on its new announcements at I/O, of which there were many.
Aside from a closer look at new smartwatch hardware, the company was excited to show off major updates to its Android operating system, which has had a visual refresh.
One feature that impressed the audience was smarter phone unlocking - if a handset owner's paired smartwatch is detected nearby, the phone will not require a password to unlock it.
Google's agenda-setting conference is ostensibly aimed squarely at developers - but while there were no great surprises, there was plenty to interest users too.
Android already has impressive market share in developing markets - but with overall smartphone adoption running at just 10%, Android One is a way for Google to consolidate its presence by delivering users affordable hardware and an up-to-date Google-supported software experience; in the process it delivers a blow to rivals including Microsoft.
But its renewed attempt at capturing the living room TV will be a harder nut to crack - the market is more crowded than it was when it launched its first disastrous foray with Google TV four years ago.
Lots of users already have capable set-top boxes, many TV makers (notably Samsung) have already established their own interfaces or partnerships, and others (like Logitech) have sour memories of their failed partnership.
Similarly, Google has yet to move convincingly into enterprise; despite walling-off business data and enhanced security, many IT administrators will take some convincing to adopt a platform which has become synonymous with malware.
With so many software products across multiple devices - from PCs, mobile and the living room to new arenas like our cars, and even our wrists - it is little surprise that Google is aiming for greater consistency between them.
The cleaner and unifying "material design" in the new version of Android will help deliver a slicker experience. It should help shed Android's reputation as a disjointed and chaotic experience, and maybe - just maybe - give some Apple users pause for thought.
Google also used the event to unveil Android TV. The platform is designed to work on big screens, and can be controlled by items such as a person's smartphone, games controller or, eventually, smartwatch.
"We're giving TV the same level of attention that phones and tablets have enjoyed," said Mr Burke, on stage.
Sony, Sharp and TP Vision - which manufactures Philips' products - will all release smart TVs using Google's software.
Google has attempted to get stuck into the TV market several times before with little success - although its most recent TV-related launch, the Chromecast, has been well-received by consumers.
Also shown off at the event was Android Auto, the company's attempt to get its software into the dashboards of popular cars.
The mostly voice-activated system is being experimented with by car makers including Ford, Honda, Audi and Volkswagen - but should not be confused with Google's continued efforts to create a driverless car.
The firm's new Google Fit service hopes to provide a central place for people to track all the health data gathered from fitness apps. The system has the likes of Nike and Adidas on board.
Android One is at the other end of the tech spectrum - the scaled back software is designed to work on phones used primarily in the developing world.
Absent from the keynote speech were any significant developments involving Google Glass eyewear or the firm's social network, Google+.
As is typical at the developer event, those in attendance were all given free devices.
One item this year was a cardboard box which could be folded into a makeshift virtual reality headset - a playful joke aimed at Facebook, which acquired virtual reality outfit Oculus VR earlier this year for about $2bn (Â£1.2bn).
Details of Google's slightly less expensive do-it-yourself hardware were posted online.
Follow Dave Lee on Twitter @DaveLeeBBC


Question: this is the first sentence of a news article. represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article

Question: More than 1,500 South Yorkshire Police roles could be cut over the next five years, the BBC has learned.

Five hundred officers, 1,000 support staff and 150 Police Community Support Officer (PCSO) positions may go.
The force said its required savings of Â£59m by 2020 "will only be achieved by reducing officer and staff numbers".
South Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner Alan Billings described the potential 1,500 job losses as the "worst case scenario".
He said no decisions had been made on which areas of force operations would be cut and he wanted a public discussion on how South Yorkshire Police could make savings with new ways of working.
"There may be better ways of doing things that are more cost efficient," he told BBC Radio Sheffield.
"At the end of the day, there will be an impact on numbers - there is no question of that."
'More pronounced'
Neil Bowles, of the front-line officers' union the Police Federation, said cuts had become "more pronounced".
"There was a Comprehensive Spending Review by the government last autumn which came up with the next set of cuts," he said.
"In 2007, we had over 3,300 police officers and 2,500 members of police staff which included the PCSOs (Police Community Support Officers).
"If you cut the police force again to about 2,000 officers, that's a cut of a third. How can we carry on doing the same work we were doing in 2007, let along meet the new and increased demand that is out there?"
Mr Bowles said the consequences of the budget cuts would be "less officers on the streets, more instances of officers in cars and less neighbourhood officers".
Deputy Chief Constable Andy Holt said: "We are working hard to minimise the impact of this decrease, but with around 90% of the force's budget spent on salaries, we have to review our staffing levels to make such extensive savings."

Media playback is unsupported on your device
8 December 2014 Last updated at 16:52 GMT
The council said although a final decision has not been made, Â£420,000 could be saved if children are given training in how to use ordinary buses.
The measure would be part of Â£15m cutbacks by the authority after the money it received from central government was cut by 37% over the past five years.
As BBC Midlands Today's Kevin Reide reports, parents have said they are "horrified" at the suggestions.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details.

Question: Rafael Nadal came from behind to beat Jack Sock and book a China Open semi-final meeting with his US Open conqueror Fabio Fognini.

represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence:

For example, '['Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence', 'The Republican presidential frontrunner claimed that research by the respected Pew organisation showed a "great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim population" - but he did not refer to any specific study to support that claim, and we can\'t find one that does.\nMr Trump did cite a specific a study by the Center for Security Policy - "very highly respected people, who I know, actually" - which he said showed that 25% of Muslims in the US believed violence against America was justified "as part of the global jihad".\nMr Trump\'s press release:\nBut what exactly is the Center for Security Policy, and just how highly respected is it?\nThe CSP was founded in 1988 by Frank Gaffney Jr, a former staffer in the Ronald Reagan administration who has been accused of Islamophobia. On its website, the centre calls itself a "Special Forces in the War of Ideas" which offers "maximum bang for the buck" to its donors.\nThe CSP does not publish information about who those donors are, but according to a 2013 report by Salon they include some of the US\'s biggest aviation and defence companies - Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and General Electric.\nPromoted on the organisation\'s website are reports and books with titles such as Star Spangled Sharia, Civilisation Jihad, and Muslim Colonisation of America. Responding to the controversy over Mr Trump\'s remarks, the CSP said it was "necessary to respond to the threat posed by jihadist terror in a way that ... calls it what it is".\nThe CSP has been criticised across the political spectrum - by high-profile Republicans as well as Democrats - and by organisations which monitor extremist groups. Terri Johnson, executive director of the Center for New Community and J Richard Cohen, president of the Southern Poverty Law Center, called it "an extremist think-tank" led by an "anti-Muslim conspiracist".\nThe group was heavily criticised in 2012 after it repeatedly accused Huma Abedin, an aide to Hillary Clinton, of being a secret member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Leading Republicans including John McCain and John Boehner denounced the accusations.\nThe CSP has been criticised by a wide range of extremism monitoring organisations, including the  Anti-Defamation League, and Center for Democratic Values at City University of New York.\nArguably, no. According to the Bridge Initiative, a Georgetown University Islamophobia research project, the CSP survey was an online, self-selecting poll of 600 people, meaning respondents opted in to taking part.\nSelf-selecting internet surveys are less reliable that more traditional, random polling methods, because the opt-in element can lead to bias. Then there are the existing views of the organisation commissioning the poll - the CSP - which may have influenced the outcome.\nThe Washington Post called the poll "shoddy". According to the Post, the question had an agree/disagree answer format with agree in each case linked to the more controversial option - favouring Sharia law or supporting violence. Researchers say this format is affected by "acquiescence response bias" - we are generally more likely to favour agree options.\nThe CSP said in a statement on Sunday that its research methods were "consistent with international industry standards".\nMr Gaffney Jr served in the Reagan administration during the 1980s but left in 1988 to form the CSP, after his nomination as assistant secretary of defence was rejected by the Senate.\n"Once a respectable Washington insider," according to the Southern Poverty Law Centre, which monitors US hate groups and extremists, Mr Gaffney Jr became "one of America\'s most notorious Islamophobes", the SPLC said.\nMr Gaffney Jr has repeatedly accused parts of America\'s Muslim population of what he calls "civilisational jihad". He has also called for Muslims to be investigated by a "new and improved" House Un-American Activities Committee - a highly controversial Cold War-era body which questioned and blacklisted US citizens accused of being communists.']' should be close to '['Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details.', 'Raising the bar for US political controversy once again, Donald Trump called on Monday for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States".']'

The third seed's 3-6 6-4 6-3 win in Beijing took the 29-year-old to a first hard-court semi in more than a year.
Novak Djokovic extended his winning streak to 27 matches with a 6-2 6-2 win over John Isner and the Serb will meet David Ferrer in the last four.
Agnieszka Radwanska and Ana Ivanovic are both through in the women's draw.
Italian Fognini, 28, beat Uruguay's Pablo Cuevas 6-1 2-6 6-2 to set up a meeting with Nadal, who he defeated in the third round at Flushing Meadows.
Nadal's fellow Spaniard Ferrer, 33, overcame Taiwan's Lu Yen-Hsun in straight sets to set up his match with 28-year-old world number one Djokovic.
Radwanska, 26, beat Angelique Kerber 6-1 6-4 in her quarter-final, while Serb Ivanovic, 27, saw off Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 6-3 7-5.
Radwanska will face Wimbledon finalist Garbine Muguruza, after the 22-year-old Venezuelan beat American Bethanie Mattek-Sands  6-1 7-5.
Ivanovic will take on Switzerland's Timea Bacsinszky, who overcame a shocking first set to defeat Sara Errani of Italy 0-6 6-3 7-5.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article:

The 19-year-old German beat his 32-year-old Swiss opponent, the world number three, 4-6 6-2 6-1, setting up a tie with Nick Kyrgios or David Goffin.
Rafael Nadal also made it through, defeating France's Nicolas Mahut 6-4 7-6 (7-4). He plays American Jack Sock.
And Roger Federer beat Roberto Bautista Agut to continue his excellent form.
The Swiss, 35, secured a 16th win from 17 matches in 2017 with a 7-6 (7-5) 7-6 (7-4) victory to set up a meeting with Tomas Berdych, who beat Adrian Mannarino of France 6-3 7-5.
Earlier on Tuesday, last year's defeated finalist Kei Nishikori of Japan booked his quarter-final spot with a 6-3 4-6 6-3 victory over Argentina's Federico Delbonis.
The 27-year-old, who lost to Novak Djokovic in last year's final, will face Fabio Fognini, who beat American Donald Young 6-0 6-4.


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article

Question: Two people have been found guilty of murdering a vulnerable man who was tortured for months and forced to eat his own testicle.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

Jimmy Prout, 45, was found dead on wasteland near his home in North Shields on 27 March 2016.
A jury heard he was tortured by a group he thought of as friends who subjected him to months of abuse.
Ann Corbett, 26, and Zahid Zaman, 43, both from Percy Main, were found guilty of murder at Newcastle Crown Court.
Myra Wood, 45, and Kay Rayworth, 56, of Stephen's Way, North Shields, were cleared of murder but convicted of causing or allowing the death of a vulnerable adult.
After the verdicts, Mr Prout's brother Eddie Prout said: "The things they've done to my brother you wouldn't have even seen in the worst horror films or your worst nightmare.
"There's not a word horrible enough to describe the people who did that to my brother.
"I hope they rot in hell. I don't want them to die, I just want them to suffer the way we are, suffer every single day and have nightmares like I do."
During the seven-week trial, the court heard Mr Prout died on 9 February 2016, and his decaying body had been partly eaten by animals on the wasteland.
All four defendants, who previously pleaded guilty to perverting the course of justice, will be sentenced on 27 June.
The court was told the group of five, including Mr Prout, had a strange relationship which had developed an almost "cultish dimension".
They heard that a series of events in late 2015 created tensions that led to a number of serious assaults against Mr Prout, which included him having his teeth knocked out with a hammer and chisel.
Paul Greaney QC, prosecuting, said: "In effect, over a period of time, Jimmy Prout was not just mistreated, he was tortured.
"In the end, this conduct was to cause the death of Jimmy Prout."
After Mr Prout's body had been dumped, the court was told the group then set about covering their tracks by pretending to look for him and asking others to help.
Zaman, who uses a wheelchair and was the leader of the group, was described as vengeful and controlling and was determined to get his own back after he thought Mr Prout had been involved in stealing from him.
The jury was shown CCTV images, often taken from cameras Zaman had on his house, of the worsening condition of Mr Prout as the assaults continued, some of which showed him clearly unsteady on his feet and being pushed along the street.
Images of Mr Prout's injuries also appeared on his own Facebook account at the time, with words such as "My bodie hurt" and "My sholder hurts".
After the verdict Det Ch Insp Andy Fairlamb, of Northumbria Police, said it was "hard to imagine" that such assaults could still take place.
He said: "What they have done is appalling, abhorrent. In all my years of investigating homicides I have never seen levels of abuse of this nature before.
"Prior to his death, Jimmy was subjected to a number of serious assaults of a vile, degrading nature, which resulted in his health, both physical and emotional, deteriorating in the last weeks of his life, and to his death."
All four are due to be sentenced on 27 June.

The gang "bullied" the 20-year-old into the back of a van before threatening him with a shotgun, beating his knees with a mallet and stunning him with a Taser-style weapon.
Luton Crown Court heard the gang took him captive as revenge for the apparent theft of cannabis worth Â£60,000.
The gang admitted a range of offences and received sentences up to 20 years.
The court heard the kidnap took place in Luton on 20 June last year.
More on this story and other Bedfordshire news
They bundled the man into the van in Downs Road before driving to an address in Ashburnham Road.
During his imprisonment, the gang put a live shotgun in his mouth, stubbed out cigarettes on his arm and beat him with a knife.
Ransom calls were made to the victim's relatives, and one defendant also threatened to rape him.
The following morning, the victim was abandoned and left tied to the metal gate of a farm near Kensworth. He freed himself and made his way home.
The court heard the gang believed two brothers had stolen cannabis from them, and targeted the victim - the boyfriend of the two brothers' sister.


Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story

Question: MPs can order the founder of Sports Direct to answer questions about how his workers are treated, the House of Commons speaker has said.

John Bercow said the matter can be taken further by immediately assessing if Mike Ashley can be held in contempt for refusing to appear at Westminster.
Mr Ashley branded MPs "a joke" on Monday as he said he would not attend, despite being formally summoned.
A Commons committee wants to quiz him over a review of staff conditions.
Updates on this story and more from Derbyshire
Mr Bercow said the Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) select committee can now take the matter further by asking the Commons to debate the case as a matter of privilege, enabling it to consider the contempt issue.
Addressing Mr Bercow, BIS chairman Iain Wright said: "I don't think scrutinising reports of Victorian-type employment conditions in modern day Britain is a joke."
Mr Bercow said "the House expects witnesses to obey the committee's order to attend".
Mr Ashley - who also owns Newcastle United Football Club - had been asked to attend Westminster on 7 June following a BBC investigation into Sports Direct's warehouse working practices.
He had unsuccessfully urged MPs to attend his firm's Derbyshire base to see conditions for themselves.
In a statement, Mr Wright said: "We expect Mr Ashley to attend on 7 June to respond on public record to the serious concerns regarding the treatment of workers at Sports Direct.
"We are still to receive a formal response from Mr Ashley."
Mr Ashley said on Monday he would not "stand idle" while Sports Direct is "subjected to public vilification".
"In my opinion, they're (MPs) just showboating," he told Sky News. "In my opinion, they're actually a joke."
He added he would love to "box the ears" of Ed Miliband - after the former Labour leader said the company was "a terrible place to work", in 2014.
In response, Mr Miliband stood by his claims and told the BBC the "downward spiral in the reputation of Sports Direct is down to the practices of Sports Direct".
"All of us that have drawn attention to these practices have been right to do so," he said.

represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence.
Examples:
Provided: "['Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence', 'Sitting there will be scores of peers who - when the ermine robes are off and Parliament gets back to business - could start causing a bit of trouble for the government.\nManaging Mr Cameron\'s small majority in the Commons - 12 MPs - is going to require some skill from the party whips. But it could turn out to be an easy day at the office compared with handling the complicated mechanics of the Lords where the Conservatives aren\'t even close to a majority.\nThe numbers - see below - don\'t add up for the prime minister in the "upper chamber".\nTogether, Labour and the Lib Dems have 315 peers - enough to beat the Conservatives by 91 votes. Then there are the crossbench - or independent - peers to think about.\nThey\'re hard to predict as they don\'t vote as a block.  In the worst-case scenario for the Conservatives, their 224 peers are up against a whopping 555 from other parties and groups. On the other hand the crossbenchers could, in theory, help the Conservatives win.\nAs Professor Meg Russell, Director of the Constitution Unit at University College London, notes: "The Conservatives are in a relatively weak position in the Lords, holding less than a third of seats. The government can readily be defeated by various combinations of other forces."\nPolicies that could stir up objections in the Lords include abolishing the Human Rights Act and legislation paving the way for an EU referendum.\nIt\'s very unusual for peers to vote against an entire Bill. Their style is to go through legislation amending bits they don\'t like. The government can either accept the changes or overturn them in the Commons.\nMaybe David Cameron will start wishing he\'d pushed on with plans, three years ago, to introduce elected peers. He abandoned the proposals in the face of opposition from Conservative MPs and peers. It was another reprieve for the House of Lords, which has survived numerous attempts at reform over the last 100 years.\nAnd there won\'t be another existential crisis for the time being. The Conservative election manifesto states that they see a "strong case" for introducing an "elected element" but "it isn\'t a priority in the next Parliament".\nWith wounds to lick and new leaders to choose, Lib Dem and Labour strategists aren\'t thinking too deeply about their tactics in the  Lords. But as politicians drift back to Westminster the possibilities are starting to bleep on the political radar.\nLabour peer Lord Foulkes has already been tweeting about what he calls the "difficult job" facing the Leader of the Lords, Baroness Stowell, whose task is to get government business through.\nHe predicts "interesting times", saying: "Labour and the Liberal Democrats have a huge majority over the Conservatives. The crossbenchers are unpredictable but on a number of occasions they have come with us. The Lib Dems in the Lords are old-fashioned Lib Dems. They\'ll be happier working with us than the Tories."\nThe Liberal Democrats are leading lights in the campaign to turn the House of Lords into an elected chamber. It\'s a cruel irony that with only eight MPs, the Lib Dems will be relying on an institution they dislike to give them a solid platform at Westminster.\nHow will they get along with their former coalition partners though? The Lib Dem peer, Baroness Hussein-Ece, said the Conservatives were now "off the leash" but wouldn\'t be getting "an easy ride".\n"The dynamics are going to be completely different. We will take things on a policy-by-policy basis. I feel quite passionately about keeping the Human Rights Act and I\'m pretty sure that my colleagues will be opposing abolition vociferousIy."\nBut David Cameron can take some comfort from the fact that the Lib Dems will not be falling into Labour\'s arms.\nBaroness Hussein-Ece is certain there will be issues the two parties can agree on but is equally sure they will not form a happy union as a matter of course.\nShe said: "I\'m afraid that the Labour Party is more interested in tribal politics. It could have conducted itself in a more progressive way during the election."\nIn the last Parliament, the coalition government was defeated 103 times in the Lords and a Labour source in the Lords predicts that the Conservatives will "want to make up for lost time".\nHe said: "What we anticipate is that they will start to look back at the concessions they made and the opposition amendments that got through."\nAnd the feeling is that the government will find ways to use secondary legislation - which empowers ministers to adjust some laws.\nBy convention, the House of Lords is reluctant to challenge policies promised in election manifestos and doesn\'t vote against measures on taxation and spending. But Professor Russell thinks the rules around those conventions are "far from clear" and that Labour and the Lib Dems might be tempted to block what they see as Conservative "austerity" measures.\nMeg Russell says: "The House of Lords is a complicated place. Historically at least, they have always been very sensitive to public opinion. They are not likely to go in all guns blazing."\nHow can David Cameron deal with trouble in the Lords - even if it is well-meaning and principled?\nHe can\'t get rid of any peers but he could, in theory, create a huge number of new Conservative peers to give him a stronger base.\n"There are no rules," Meg Russell adds of the possibility. "The prime minister has complete patronage. But of course it wouldn\'t go down well with the  public and there would be an outcry in Parliament."\nAnd introducing too many new peers would also be embarrassing because the Conservatives have promised to tackle the size of the chamber. With 779 active members, it\'s one of the largest in the world.\nThe Conservative Lord Cormack thinks that the prime minister shouldn\'t worry too much because he can rely on the Lords to behave "with a considerable degree of sense".\n"There will be stormy patches and it\'s always over the things that you don\'t predict," he says. "But the important thing to do is play to the strengths of the Lords. There\'s an enormous accumulation of wisdom and experience. It generally improves bills."\nHe is relaxed about the next few years. "I don\'t anticipate any unpleasantness. For the government to be defeated in the House of Lords isn\'t the end of the world." And that\'s because, he said, the Lords believes in the supremacy of the Commons.\nIt may be a while before the new dynamics in the Lords play out. The first bills will be unveiled in the Queen\'s Speech on 27th May and any controversial ones may not reach the House of Lords until after the summer break.\nBut there\'s one other constitutional niggle to mention. In theory, all parties should be represented in the House of Lords - even the small ones. The Greens have one peer and UKIP has three.\nBut there are no members of the SNP in the House of Lords. And with 56 MPs, it means the Lords isn\'t speaking for millions of people in Scotland. The SNP is adamant, though, that it doesn\'t want anything to do with the place.\nWith the Lords potentially a powerful force, are the Scottish Nationalists missing a trick?\nNot according to the SNP MP Pete Wishart who declared: "It\'s an affront to democracy. We will have nothing to do with this democratic outrage. The House of Lords doesn\'t need reform. We need to abolish it and start again."']" Match: "['Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details', "When David Cameron heads to the House of Lords for the Queen's Speech later this month he might want to cast his eye along the red benches."]"

The married father-of-two paid for the men to visit him one evening last month at a flat he owns in London, it claims.
Mr Vaz, 59, who is chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee which monitors crime and drugs policy, told the paper he was referring the claims to his solicitor and would be seeking advice.
The Mail on Sunday says he has stepped aside as committee chairman.
It says Mr Vaz responded saying: "I have referred these allegations to my solicitor Mark Stephens, of Howard Kennedy, who will consider them carefully and advise me on what is published."
A Labour Party spokesman said: "Keith Vaz has issued a statement on this matter. As with all departmental select committees, Keith was elected to the chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee by the House of Commons, and his position is a matter for him and the House".
According to the Sunday Mirror, Mr Vaz's meeting with two male escorts included a discussion about using the party drug Poppers.
The MP for Leicester East had opposed government attempts to criminalise the drug. Ministers later announced they would remain within the law.
His committee is also currently overseeing a review of the UK's prostitution laws.


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article

Question: The donors who have effectively been paying Seán Quinn's legal bills include business acquaintances and "close family connections", the High Court has been told.

Almost 1.7m euro (£1.3m) has been paid out by the Erne Trust since 2012.
The money was for legal bills and other fees incurred by the Quinn family.
The receiver for the assets of various Quinn family members took legal action to have the trust's donors disclosed to him.
He suspects it is a "sham trust", which is a conduit for assets which have been concealed from him.
Declan Taite was appointed receiver in 2012 at the request of IBRC, formerly known as Anglo-Irish Bank.
He told the court that it is his job to identify, locate and collect assets.
He added that the Quinn's have "openly admitted" they put property assets beyond the reach of IBRC and that those assets have "generated tens of millions of euros".
He said he is trying to "understand the provenance" of the money in the trust to determine that it does not originate with the Quinn family.
A list of donors including names, addresses and sums donated has now been given to Mr Taite.
His barrister said the close family connections includes siblings, however, a barrister for the trust said he was "not aware" of a sibling connection.
The trust's barrister added that it was "not surprising" that Mr Quinn's business acquaintances should support him.
Mr Taite's barrister said that having received the list of names there may now be a need to gather further affidavit evidence.
The case was adjourned until September.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

Mr Cushnahan was a Northern Ireland advisory committee member for the Irish National Asset Management Agency (Nama) or "bad bank" from 2010 to 2013.
Details of the police complaint against him emerged during property developer Gareth Graham's ongoing legal battle with US investment fund Cerberus.
The complaint was made last month.
Prior to his Nama appointment, Mr Cushnahan worked for the Graham bookmaking business from 2005 to 2008.
Mr Graham is a director and major shareholder in property firms which own commercial and residential premises in Belfast.
The companies' loans were among those transferred over to Nama.
On Wednesday, the High Court in Belfast was told that Mr Graham has been removed as a director from the management company running one of his apartment complexes in the city.
Last year, Cerberus bought Nama's entire Northern Ireland property loan portfolio in the biggest property deal ever reached in the jurisdiction.
Mr Graham is challenging the validity of the appointment of administrators to his companies.
He insists his businesses were financially strong and never missed a repayment. His legal team are instead set to claim an improper motive was involved.
A two-week trial is due to get underway at the High Court in Belfast in January.
At an earlier hearing, the judge was told the Northern Ireland loan book deal would be rendered illegal if any third party "fixers" were wrongly involved.
At that stage counsel for Mr Graham referred to Mr Cushnahan, who during had an office at the Graham bookmaking business during the period he worked for the firm.
Recorded telephone calls allegedly revealed a "deep animosity between Mr Cushnahan and the Graham connection", the court heard.
In September, Mr Graham told a Stormont inquiry that Mr Cushnahan had a conflict of interest in his advisory role because he retained shareholdings in some Graham property companies that were taken over by Nama.
The court heard no civil action has been taken against Mr Cushnahan at this stage but the judge asked if the former Nama adviser had been reported to police.
Counsel for Mr Graham, replied: "He has, and police indicated, I think it was on October 12, that they are proceeding with the investigation."
Mr Cushnahan is not charged with any wrongdoing and has also rejected the criticisms Mr Graham made about him at the Stormont inquiry, saying he gave up the Graham shareholdings in 2009.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details.

Question: A 21-year-old man who died after being hit by a car near Lossiemouth has been named by police.

Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence!

Bryan Addison was walking on or beside the A941 in the early hours of Saturday morning when he was struck by a white Audi Q3
The accident happened close to Easter Greens Farm turn-off, to the south of the Moray town, at 01:40.
Police are trying to establish his movements after he left his home in Elgin at 18:30 on Friday evening.
Officers would also like to hear from anyone who witnessed the collision or who saw a male walking on the road.
No one else was injured in the accident.

The 30-year-old is expected to appear at Edinburgh Sheriff Court on Monday.
Earlier this month, a 16-year-old man was arrested in connection with the incident.
Peter Stewart, 43, and his brother James, 45, told police they had travelled from Aberdeen to buy a car and were subsequently stabbed in the Wardieburn area of the city on 8 April.