Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story:

Question: Labour must take a hard look at itself and the gap that has opened up with millions of people who used to vote for the party.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

That was the message from a fringe event at Labour's conference in Liverpool which examined the electoral threat from UKIP - and the effect of the marginalisation of working-class communities.
While the Conservatives remain the biggest obstacle to Labour getting back into power, Jeremy Corbyn faces challenges on multiple fronts. In Scotland, there is the SNP and across large swathes of England, there is UKIP.
The party is arguably the official opposition to Labour in much of the north west and north east.
Labour MPs who feel UKIP breathing down their necks are anything but complacent, but dealing with the challenge is another matter.
"For us, it is about how you fight an emotion," says Ruth Smeeth, who won Stoke on Trent North for Labour in 2015 but saw UKIP increase its vote by 18% in the constituency.
"They were not politicians in the way we recognise them," she says of her opponents. "They didn't run political campaigns in the way we recognise political campaigns."
UKIP, like Labour, may have had its share of internal strife recently but that doesn't mean it will be any less of a threat whenever the next election takes place, activists were warned.
"There are some people trying to write off UKIP saying they are busted flush and they have peaked because of the EU referendum and (Nigel) Farage going," says Nick Lowles, founder and director of campaign group Hope Not Hate.
"But we should really caution against writing them off or at least writing off a party like that. Even if that party did not exist, there is nothing to say that people who voted UKIP at the last election would come back to Labour.
"Political and culturally, there is a huge and growing gulf between the Labour Party and Labour voters and UKIP voters."
Its research points to a growing divergence between Labour and UKIP voters in their attitudes to immigration and the threat posed by multiculturalism, with Labour voters becoming more "tolerant, open, and relaxed" about immigration and its benefits while UKIP supporters' views have moved in the opposite direction.
"This is fundamentally Labour's problem," he adds. "Where we are is not necessarily where our voters are."
This is a situation, he fears, which could be exacerbated by Brexit if leaving the EU does not result in lower levels of immigration and a rise in wages.
The rise in hate crime incidents after the EU referendum was a worrying portent, Ruth Smeeth says.
In her constituency, she says there was a 157% rise in racially-motivated incidents following the Brexit vote, with some people - in her words - "looking for a fight".
Coming so soon after the death of her friend Jo Cox, she said it made it even more important that the late Labour MP's legacy was not squandered.
"There has been too much said about what happened," she says. "It is now a question of making sure everything she stood for, we continue to fight for."
For Labour to make headway in communities that have turned their back on the party, it will be necessary to confront some "uncomfortable" truths and, in the words of community organiser John Page, the "narrative of blame" that has been fostered by decades of economic disempowerment and dislocation.
The reality, he says, is that there are towns in England and Wales where refugees are not welcome and the Brexit vote was as much a howl of frustration and anger than a focused political statement.
"If we want to win in these communities, I am thinking of places like Rotherham, Dudley, Merthyr Tydfil and Thurrock, we need to start off with a discussion with people who hold racist views," he says.
"We have to distinguish between the hard racists who are off the spectrum and those people who are not inherently racist but have adopted racist views and narratives - those who I would describe as 'I am not a racist, but'.
"These are the people we need to engage with."
Labour's attempt to shift its position on immigration under Ed Miliband, by admitting it made mistakes in the past - ostensibly did not work, partly campaigners believe, because the nature of discussions it was having were misguided.
Challenging the economic pessimism that many in Labour believe UKIP feeds off will not be done by attempts at "myth-busting" or ramming facts down people's throats, John Page says.
What is needed, in his words, is a mixture of "empathetic listening and Socratic questioning" - the former designed to encourage people to open up and the latter to help them to make connections of their own.
"You have to encourage people to reflect on their own views."
This was echoed by Waida Forman, a Labour councillor in Harlow, who says the party has reacted to the challenge posed by UKIP in the town by "talking to people and actually listening to them".
This approach is striking for the absence of any talk of standard policy prescriptions - instead, the focus is on grassroots initiatives aimed at boosting communities' self-respect and sense of identity - ranging from things as simple as setting up a local choir or walking club.
"If you speak to people out there, you cannot get people involved in Labour at the moment," John Page adds. "If you try to start a darts team, you wouldn't get people involved because people are atomised and isolated.
"If people start to engage with each other, get out of the house, do some exercise, meet new people and feel a bit better, they are already winning. When people feel they are winning, they are prepared to take more action and have a bigger vision of the change possible."

Last week, UKIP's ruling body excluded one of the better known candidates to succeed Nigel Farage because his application missed by the deadline by 17 minutes.
Three members of the executive promptly resigned, one of them telling the BBC the party was in a fight for its very survival.
"There is a huge amount of confusion, flux and sadly infighting," Steven Woolfe, the excluded candidate, told me, as he pinned the blame on the executive.
Over at the Labour Party, the mood is, if anything, more poisonous.
After its National Executive imposed a retrospective cut-off date for party members to be eligible to vote in next month's election, it was challenged in court and lost.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of each case, from the outside it does not look great for those who ask us for our votes on polling day to appear to be narrowing the choice in their own internal elections.
There are plenty of reasons to wonder whether the political parties are increasingly out-of-step with the voters.
The European referendum is only the latest example.
There is much to be said for maintaining your principles even when they are not popular.
So, the Liberal Democrats say they will campaign at the next general election for the UK to be in the EU.
Two peers are reported to have resigned the party whip in protest, perhaps aware that it might not increase the chances of a Lib Dem revival to set its face against the - albeit narrow - decision of a majority of those who voted.
Last year's general election result has not filled any of the parties with confidence, with perhaps the exception of the SNP.
Labour's recovery from one of its worst ever results - in 2010 - consisted of increasing its share of the vote by 1.5%, and losing seats in the process.
The Liberal Democrat share collapsed from 23% to just under 8%.
Its 57 MPs were reduced to eight.
Those two parties, as well as the Conservatives, were all but eliminated from Westminster's Scottish constituencies.
Even UKIP, which took close to four million votes, finishing third overall, ended up with only one MP.
Divided oppositions do not win elections, but they help to hand power to those that do.
David Cameron has bequeathed to his successor, Theresa May, a majority Conservative government, even though the Tories won just shy of 37% of the vote.
"The Tory party is not as strong as the opinion polls might imply," Sir Malcolm Rifkind, the former Foreign Secretary, said.
But he believes the threat to the party's unity posed by Europe has passed.
Although there are divisions even among supporters of Brexit over what deal the UK should negotiate as it leaves the EU, he doubts they will lead to any kind of split, not least because of the cohesive effect on parties of being in power.
"Why is the Tory Party the world's oldest political party?" he asked rhetorically.
"It has been around for 300 years.
"Of course there have been divisions, but the Tory party basically does not have an ideology.
"It has never had an ideology.
"It occasionally has an existential problem, and it does not have one now."
Jenny Willott, one of those Lib Dem MPs ousted in 2015, thinks both her party and UKIP have one advantage compared with the others, a clear and consistent position on the EU.
She thinks the Conservatives and Labour could be hit by divisions over the Brexit negotiations, and at the next general election that could become a cause more important than party.
"We may see people not just standing on the old ticket, so that we have a Labour candidate, a Lib Dem, Tory, UKIP, whatever; I think we might actually see people defining themselves much more clearly as to where they stand on Europe," she said.
The European Union was one of those issues of consensus in the mainstream of British politics; even sceptics such as Sir Malcolm or Jeremy Corbyn still believed the UK should remain in.
Another was light-touch financial regulation, the failure of which exacerbated the effects of the financial crisis.
Faith in the judgement of political elites follows the decline in the "broad church" appeal of political parties.
If there ever was a correlation between income, class and voting, it looks pretty threadbare now.
It is this combination of factors which has made Frank Field, a Labour MP since 1979, sceptical about his party's chances.
Never known for his respect for consensus in politics, Mr Field believes UKIP is "threatening to kill the Labour Party".
Assuming it can overcome its leadership problems, he fears UKIP could do to Labour south of the Scottish border what the SNP has done north of the border.
"If they reshape themselves as the English Party, then there is a real danger that the million voters who previously voted for us in the last election who moved over to UKIP," he said, could be followed by others, "making it impossible for us to be a serious party of opposition challenging for government."
Mr Field said it was not a case of UKIP "stealing" Labour's vote; this passionate EU-sceptic believes there is not what people used to term a "core vote" to steal.
"There clearly is a very, very large section of the Labour vote that does not actually feel natural affinity with Labour any more," he said.
"They are more concerned about the sense of place, of identity, of country."
As Labour MPs agonise about whether or not to split from the parliamentary party in the event of Jeremy Corbyn winning the leadership election, Frank Field fears they may be missing the point.
"We can have this top-down approach that we had with the Gang of Four, the founding of the SDP," he told me.
"We might well do that, but I do not think anybody's listening.
"The key thing that is happening is that voters are moving."
In what direction and who will be there to meet them when they arrive is a question no party politician can answer; no wonder they are so nervous.
As a leading figure in the French Revolution is said to have remarked: "I am their leader and must follow them."
Shaun Ley presents The World This Weekend during the summer, at 13:00 BST on Sundays, and afterwards available on the BBC Radio 4 website.


Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story

Question: Brazil's inflation rate has spiked to its highest level in more than six years.

this is part of a news article. represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article.

Consumer prices rose 7.31% in September from a year earlier, according to the national statistics agency.
This follows a surprise 0.5% interest rate cut at the end of August. The central bank cited a "substantial deterioration" in the global economy in cutting rates to 12%.
Some economists think the bank's action was premature.
"The interest rate cut came too soon," said Oxford Economic's Lloyd Barton.
"It's acting as a trigger for a decline in the exchange rate, and that is exacerbating the central bank's problem with inflation."
However, Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff wants the cost of borrowing to be lowered again. She recently said policymakers must weigh up the threat of a global recession.
The central bank's president, Alexandre Tombini, says he believes the inflation rate will peak in September and then fall back.
The bank targets an inflation rate of 4.5%.
Some analysts think it will have to consider alternative action to prevent one of the big drivers of world growth from overheating.
"They are in a boom phase and face a dilemma," said Professor Ricardo Cabral at Madeira University in Portugal, a former adviser to the World Bank on Brazil.
"Real interest rates were high, causing foreign funds to flow into Brazil, pushing its currency higher. The rate cut may thus have been appropriate.
"To avoid perverse effects on credit growth, the central bank could follow the example of the Chinese and increase bank reserve requirements."
China's central bank has forced its lenders to hold on to more of their cash.
The restriction on lending is designed to cool growth and limit price rises. However, analysts are divided over whether the action is as effective as using interest rates.
Brazil's central bank holds its next policy meeting on 19 October.

Analysts had expected growth of at least 6.6%.
Growth was dampened by a weakness in demand for consumer goods and exports and high interest rates.
January's figure was revised from 6.8% to 1.14%, with a data error blamed, leading to expectations that the central bank might lower interest rates for the first time in three years.
The Reserve Bank of India is due to review its rates next week and has already signalled that it may lower them by 25 basis points to 8.25%.
The Indian economy grew by 6.9% in the financial year that ended on 31 March, its slowest rate in three years, under pressure from international economic uncertainty, high interest rates at home and a high rate of inflation.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: Olympic heptathlon champion Jessica Ennis-Hill will miss this year's indoor athletics season because of an Achilles injury.

Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence

The 30-year-old Briton, who is also the world champion, is "really frustrated" but wants to be "100% ready" to defend her Olympic title in Rio in August.
The indoor season begins in Glasgow on 20 February.
"My priority has always been Rio and I don't want to take any risks in the short term," said Ennis-Hill.
"I am understandably frustrated but know this is the right approach."
Ennis-Hill struggled with an Achilles problem in 2013 and missed the World Championships in Moscow that year.
She also missed the entire 2014 season as she gave birth to her son.
Ennis-Hill returned to training in the autumn of that year and went on to win heptathlon gold at the 2015 World Championships in Beijing.
Have you added the new Top Story alerts in the BBC Sport app? Simply head to the menu in the app - and don't forget you can also add score alerts for the Six Nations, your football team and more.

The reigning world, European and Commonwealth champion suffered an ankle problem competing in Italy in May.
Rutherford, 30, was also one of many high-profile absentees from the British trials last weekend.
"Obviously this isn't ideal, but I am doing everything to give myself the best chance of success at the World Championships in London," he said.
Rutherford, who has only competed twice all season, is looking to defend his long jump world title at the 2017 Worlds which run from 4-13 August.
"After some really excellent training this year, the start to the season has been riddled with a series of troublesome injuries, most recently a problem with an ankle ligament," he added.
"As a result, I am absolutely gutted to say that I am unable to compete at the Anniversary Games this weekend - one of the greatest events in our sport."


Question: Represent

Question: More must be done to support people living with alcohol and drug addictions across Scotland, an official watchdog has said.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article!

The Care Inspectorate said local agencies should improve the way people's needs are assessed.
This would aid effective recovery and protect communities, it said.
The report said the roll-out of government guidelines to help addicts varied across the country, with many having still experienced stigma.
So-called "Quality Principles" were issued by the Scottish government last year.
They seek to foster person-led and stigma free services across Scotland.
The Care Inspectorate was asked to assess how Scotland's 29 Alcohol and Drug Partnerships had adopted the new principles.
The partnerships are multi-agency groups made up of local authorities, health boards, police and drug and alcohol agencies.
The report said the majority of partnerships were actively embracing the new guidelines, but their uptake was variable across the country.
Care Inspectorate Chief Executive Karen Reid said services "needed to be available at the right time, in the right way and for as long as needed".
She said: "We want to see communities supported to take a holistic approach towards assisting recovery in people with addictions.
"That means it's not just specialists who have a role to play, but everyone working across health and social care."
She added:  "The majority of operational staff were very positive and confident in demonstrating that they worked well together to improve outcomes for people, families and communities.
"However, many people still experienced stigma and prejudice when accessing services in the community or in hospital.
"Local councils and health boards must do more to reduce the stigma and create the necessary conditions to successfully embed a recovery philosophy.
"Where young people are affected by substance misuse, we expect to see closer working between drug and alcohol staff and those supporting children to ensure young people are protected from harm."

Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence

The panel said that includes provision for people with eating disorders.
It said there must be funding parity between mental and physical health.
It recommends significant changes to the way mental health services are organised, including the introduction of a maximum four-hour waiting time for admission to an acute psychiatric ward.
The independent commission was led by Lord Nigel Crisp and supported by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in Northern Ireland.
Lord Crisp said he and his team had travelled the length and breadth of Northern Ireland looking at inpatient service "finding much to like but still not enough being done".
Professor Sir Simon Wessely, the president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, said there was much to build on.
The report is highly critical about the shortage of facilities in spite of Northern Ireland having the highest rates of suicide and mental illness in the UK.
Set up last year to examine the issues facing patients requiring emergency hospital care, the panel also confirmed that the shortage of crisis home treatment teams is serious.
It reinforces calls from charities over the years that there are too few specialist psychiatric services for men and women with eating and personality disorders.
There was criticism about the level of support for women with mental health issues both before and after birth.
Dr Gerry Lynch, the Northern Ireland chair of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, welcomed the report.
"Mental health can be just as serious as cancer, or someone being diagnosed with a stroke or a heart condition," he said.
"Those with mental health problems die 20 years sooner than those with good health.
"We need the funding in Northern Ireland to match the demand for mental health services.
"There must be parity between mental and physical health."
He added: "This gives us an opportunity to take forward the Bamford vision and local health professionals are also demanding that overseas treatment for patients comes to an end."
For decades, mental health provision in Northern Ireland has been referred to as the "Cinderella service" with demand for assistance far out stripping supply.
According to several charities, their calls over the years have fallen on deaf ears.
It is hoped now that those in the Department of Health will listen to their concerns.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: An American student who poisoned a fellow St Andrews University classmate by lacing a bottle of wine with solvent has been jailed for three years.

this is part of a news article. represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

Alexander Hilton, 24, encouraged Robert Forbes to drink the wine containing methanol before a ball in Fife.
Mr Forbes needed kidney dialysis after the incident in March 2011 and was left temporarily blind.
Hilton admitted assaulting him to his severe injury, permanent impairment and to the danger of his life.
Passing sentence at the High Court in Edinburgh, judge Lord Burns told Hilton: "This was a wicked and deceitful act and it could have had fatal consequences."
The judge said Mr Forbes "has been left with the agonising prospect of going blind in the future".

Melissa Ann Shepard, 80, was freed in March after a jail term for drugging her new husband.
But police said she was a high-risk re-offender and set a number of conditions, including not going online.
She used a computer on Monday to access the web at a library in Nova Scotia.
Police have warned elderly men looking for love to steer clear of Shepard, with the internet flagged up as a possible threat.
In addition to not using the web, she is also required to abide by a curfew and inform police before starting a romantic relationship.
Her prior convictions include the manslaughter of her second husband in 1992, whom she drugged and ran over twice in a car.
Her third husband died in 2002 shortly after they were married. No charges were brought in connection with his death.
Shepard was sentenced to five years in prison in 2005 for seven counts of theft from a man in Florida whom she met online and with whom she lived for a month.
She was also convicted of stealing from another man Alex Strategos, 73. Mr Strategos believes Shepard drugged him as well, although she was not charged.
Shepard was charged again last October after her latest husband, Fred Weeks, 75, fell ill from the effects of tranquilisers mixed into his coffee on board a ferry from Nova Scotia to Newfoundland on their honeymoon the previous month. He survived.


Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story

Question: A car driver has suffered a serious leg injury after being involved in a head-on crash with another vehicle on the A977 in Perth and Kinross.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article.

Emergency crews were called to the scene, near Blairingone church and primary school, shortly after 09:00.
The Scottish Ambulance Service said the male driver was treated at the scene before being taken to hospital.
The other driver involved suffered minor injuries. Police Scotland are investigating.

A man was flown to Raigmore Hospital in Inverness by air ambulance after an accident on the B9025 at the Ord crossroads between Aberchirder and Portsoy.
It involved a tractor and a van and happened at about 07:30.
Another man was taken to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary after a car crashed into a house on the A92 near Stonehaven.


Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story:

Question: Tens of thousands of Brazilians have joined street protests against a vote which they say threatens to undermine a major anti-corruption investigation.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

The biggest marches have taken place in Sao Paulo's business district and along Rio de Janeiro's Copacabana beach.
Demonstrators were angry after the lower house of Congress on Tuesday passed a number of amendments to a landmark anti-corruption bill.
Organisers say politicians have tried to intimidate the investigators.
Politicians, who are themselves being investigated, watered down the proposal, protesters say.
Controversially, they included in the bill the prospect of harsh punishment for judges and prosecutors who abuse their powers.
The bill still needs to be approved by the Senate before it becomes law.
At Sunday's demonstrations in major cities across Brazil, many were carrying signs supporting prosecutor Sergio Moro and the team leading the investigation, known as Operation Car Wash.
Dressed mostly in the green and yellow colours of the national flag, demonstrators have marched in the capital, Brasilia, and more than 20 Brazilian states.
President Michel Temer praised the demonstrations, which took place "in a peaceful and orderly manner".
"The powers of the republic must always remain aware of the demands of the Brazilian population," he said in an official statement.
Since it was launched in 2014, Operation Car Wash has unveiled a huge corruption scheme at the state oil company, Petrobras.
Prosecutors say private companies, including some of Brazil's biggest construction firms, agreed to pay bribes to politicians, civil servants and Petrobras executives to secure lucrative contracts with the oil company.
Investigators found out that most contracts were overpriced, to account for the bribes the companies agreed to pay.
The kickback scheme cost Petrobras an estimated $1.8bn (Â£1.4bn), said company boss Pedro Parente last month.
Most of the dozens of politicians investigated and charged in connection with the scandal were from the governing coalition led by the Workers Party of former presidents Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff.
Party supporters accuse Mr Moro and the other prosecutors in the investigation of being partisan and selective in their work, focusing unfairly on their members.
Former President Rousseff was dismissed in September after an impeachment process in Congress for illegally manipulating the budget to hide a growing deficit.
On Friday, Berlin-based campaign group Transparency International granted its annual anti-corruption award to the Brazilian prosecutors leading Operation Car Wash.
Dozens of high-profile politicians and businessmen who were previously untouchable have been convicted since the probe began, the group said.

The GDP increase came after two consecutive years of negative growth, during which the Brazilian economy shrank by almost 8%.
A record harvest of soybeans, one of Brazil's main exports, gave the economy a boost.
But analysts warned Brazil could go back into recession in the near future.
A record 14 million people are unemployed according to official figures released earlier this week.
Uncertainty over the future of President Michel Temer has also rattled the markets.
Stock markets plummeted last month after a taped conversation was leaked in which the president seemed to discuss the payment of hush money to a jailed politician.
Mr Temer has denied the allegations, saying the tape had been "manipulated" but there have been growing calls for his resignation.
The ongoing corruption scandal has also thrown Mr Temer's planned economic reforms into doubt.
The president wants to push austerity reforms through Congress to restore fiscal discipline but his plans have been met with street protests.
There has been particularly strong opposition to his proposal to overhaul the pension system and raise the retirement age to 62 for women and 65 for men.
The plan triggered Brazil's first general strike in two decades.
Thursday's GDP growth announcement is expected to bolster the president's chances of staying in office and pushing through his reforms.


Question: represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: A car has crashed into a shop on a Carmarthenshire business park.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary!

The Ford Kuga drove through the front window Home Bargains in Cross Hands at about 11:00 GMT on Sunday.
A female customer received treatment for shock, but no-one was injured.
A Dyfed-Powys Police spokeswoman said it is investigating the incident but no arrests have been made. Work is being carried out to recover the car.
Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service helped to make the area safe but said no-one was trapped.

Witnesses said a satellite navigation error had caused the lorry to try and negotiate the narrow roads in Aberystwyth town centre, and reported gridlocked traffic as a result.
The lorry became stuck between North Parade and Alexandra Road in the town centre, before moving on to Stanley Road.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: Chelsea moved to within one win of the Premier League title and confirmed Middlesbrough's relegation with a consummate performance and emphatic victory at Stamford Bridge.

Antonio Conte's side can become champions with victory against West Bromwich Albion at The Hawthorns on Friday night while Middlesbrough must contemplate a future back in the Championship after they were swept aside on Monday.
The Blues had already created a succession of chances before Diego Costa turned in man of the match Cesc Fabregas' pass after 23 minutes.
And the contest was effectively over when Marcos Alonso scored at the far post via the legs of Middlesbrough keeper Brad Guzan 11 minutes before the break.
Fabregas created Chelsea's third which Nemanja Matic converted as the hosts laid siege to Boro's goal, with the final whistle bringing contrasting emotions.
In this mood it is hard to see the league title coming from anywhere other than at West Brom on Friday night.
Baggies manager Tony Pulis was watching from the stand at Stamford Bridge and will have gone away with plenty of food for thought after a Chelsea display that oozed class and intent.
Middlesbrough - downhearted, defeated and on their way back to the Championship - were little more than cannon fodder here.
From the opening moments when Guzan turned Alonso's shot on to the bar, Chelsea were rampant, nerveless and played with the swagger, poise and menace of the best team in the Premier League.
Chelsea's nerves may have shown momentarily in those defeats at home to Crystal Palace and at Manchester United in April, but the response has been magnificent, reeling off wins in the FA Cup semi-final against Tottenham and in the Premier League against Southampton, Everton and now Middlesbrough.
It is a question of when, rather than if the ebullient, effervescent Conte claims the title in his first season in England - and Chelsea will be fully deserved champions.
Chelsea's fans talk about Fabregas wearing a "magic hat", but all the magic was in his boots as he picked the visitors apart here at Stamford Bridge.
The 30-year-old was a key purchase from Barcelona when Jose Mourinho brought the title back to Chelsea to two seasons ago. But this season he will be a different kind of title-winner.
The signing of N'Golo Kante from Leicester City and Chelsea's subsequent success has meant Fabregas, who would have been first choice in almost every other Premier League side, has been marginalised and unable to claim a regular place.
When he has, however, the Spain midfielder has shown the class and quality that has made him one of the game's enduring talents in the recent era.
Fabregas stepped in here for the injured Kante and gave a midfield masterclass, and when he created Chelsea's opener for Costa he became the first player to record 10 Premier League assists in six different seasons.
He also created Chelsea's third for Matic with a glorious instinctive flick that unlocked Middlesbrough again.
Fabregas may wish to seek more regular first team football elsewhere despite being on course to claim another Premier League title winners' medal - and on this evidence there will be no shortage of takers.
Middlesbrough knew they were fighting against all the odds to try and avoid the defeat that would send them back into the Championship - and it was a battle they never looked like winning.
They were on the back foot from the first whistle and were simply overwhelmed by a Chelsea side who would not be denied. The Middlesbrough fans, who were stoic throughout, were applauded by Conte after the final whistle.
The feeling will remain that Middlesbrough have simply come and gone without contributing a great deal to this Premier League season. Could they have been bolder in pursuit of survival?
Boro have proved stubborn in defence on many occasions but have been totally undermined by a failure to score goals - and a failure to cure that obvious problem.
Aitor Karanka, the man who brought Middlesbrough up but who left in March as the decline started to accelerate, was backed by chairman Steve Gibson in January but his attacking purchases were never going to provide the answer.
Rudy Gestede arrived from Aston Villa and Patrick Bamford from Chelsea, but neither are of Premier League quality and the price was paid with relegation.
Middlesbrough look to currently have a good squad for the Championship - but this was a horribly tame end to their Premier League ambitions.
Media playback is not supported on this device
Chelsea boss Antonio Conte: "We must be pleased. It was a great performance, my players showed commitment and work-rate for three important points.
"At this stage it was important to win and exploit Tottenham's defeat. Now, another step to the title. We have to rest well and prepare for West Brom."
Media playback is not supported on this device
Middlesbrough boss Steve Agnew: "I am absolutely gutted and bitterly disappointed with the result and we have now lost our Premier League status which we took great pride in.
"I have just left a very silent dressing room.
"We haven't had enough wins and that's the key to the whole thing. Scoring goals wins football matches and we haven't done that enough this season.
"I have to say the fans all season have been outstanding - home and away has been top class and the least they deserve is Premier League football."
Chelsea will win the title if they beat West Brom on Friday. Even if they do not, they have two more opportunities to wrap up the title against Watford and Sunderland at home.
Middlesbrough will finish life in the Premier League by hosting Southampton on Saturday before going to Liverpool on Sunday, 21 May.
Match ends, Chelsea 3, Middlesbrough 0.
Second Half ends, Chelsea 3, Middlesbrough 0.
Hand ball by George Friend (Middlesbrough).
Foul by Willian (Chelsea).
Adam Clayton (Middlesbrough) wins a free kick on the right wing.
Attempt missed. Nemanja Matic (Chelsea) left footed shot from outside the box is high and wide to the left. Assisted by Cesc Fàbregas following a corner.
Corner,  Chelsea. Conceded by Adam Clayton.
Corner,  Chelsea. Conceded by Fabio.
Patrick Bamford (Middlesbrough) is shown the yellow card for a bad foul.
Marcos Alonso (Chelsea) wins a free kick on the left wing.
Foul by Patrick Bamford (Middlesbrough).
Foul by Cesc Fàbregas (Chelsea).
Patrick Bamford (Middlesbrough) wins a free kick in the attacking half.
Substitution, Chelsea. John Terry replaces David Luiz.
David Luiz (Chelsea) wins a free kick on the right wing.
Foul by George Friend (Middlesbrough).
Substitution, Middlesbrough. Rudy Gestede replaces Álvaro Negredo.
Diego Costa (Chelsea) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Foul by Calum Chambers (Middlesbrough).
Substitution, Chelsea. Nathaniel Chalobah replaces Pedro.
Gary Cahill (Chelsea) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Foul by Patrick Bamford (Middlesbrough).
Attempt saved. Victor Moses (Chelsea) right footed shot from the right side of the box is saved in the centre of the goal.
Attempt blocked. Diego Costa (Chelsea) right footed shot from the centre of the box is blocked. Assisted by Willian with a cross.
Offside, Middlesbrough. Adam Clayton tries a through ball, but Patrick Bamford is caught offside.
Attempt missed. Pedro (Chelsea) left footed shot from the left side of the box is too high. Assisted by Diego Costa.
Foul by Pedro (Chelsea).
Patrick Bamford (Middlesbrough) wins a free kick in the attacking half.
Substitution, Chelsea. Willian replaces Eden Hazard.
Foul by Diego Costa (Chelsea).
Brad Guzan (Middlesbrough) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Attempt saved. Grant Leadbitter (Middlesbrough) right footed shot from outside the box is saved in the bottom left corner. Assisted by Fabio.
Goal!  Chelsea 3, Middlesbrough 0. Nemanja Matic (Chelsea) right footed shot from the centre of the box to the centre of the goal. Assisted by Cesc Fàbregas following a corner.
Corner,  Chelsea. Conceded by Ben Gibson.
Nemanja Matic (Chelsea) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Foul by Patrick Bamford (Middlesbrough).
Hand ball by Adam Clayton (Middlesbrough).
Fabio (Middlesbrough) is shown the yellow card for a bad foul.
Eden Hazard (Chelsea) wins a free kick in the attacking half.
Foul by Fabio (Middlesbrough).

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article.

Liverpool punished Brighton with a 6-1 win at Anfield, giving them the chance of a cup double - FA Cup and Carling Cup - for the first time since 2006.
Stevenage had an exciting tie with Tottenham Hotspur, and everyone assumed Spurs would win. But the game finished 0-0, which means there'll now be a replay between the two sides at White Hart Lane.
On Saturday Birmingham held on to a 1-1 draw with Chelsea at Stamford Bridge, meaning they too will have a replay.
Leicester City finished Norwich City's hopes of cup glory with a 2-1 victory, while Stoke did the same to Blackpool 2-0.
In a north-south battle, Bolton beat Millwall 2-0.
Arsenal's 2-0 defeat to Sunderland leaves the team with hardly any chance of lifting a trophy for the seventh season in a row.
Manager Arsene Wenger says it's the lowest point of his career at Arsenal so far.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: Tony Blair has said he wants the Iraq Inquiry report to be published as soon as possible and "resents" claims he is to blame for its slow progress.

represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

There are concerns the report will not be released before the 2015 election.
Some MPs have blamed hold-ups on a reluctance to release correspondence between Mr Blair and President Bush.
But the ex-Labour prime minister said he was not blocking any documents and publication would allow him "restate" the case for the 2003 invasion.
The inquiry, which is examining the UK's participation in the military action against Saddam Hussein and its aftermath, began in 2009 and its last public hearings took place in 2011.
Although the inquiry team, led by Sir John Chilcot, has never set a target date or deadline for publication, it is generally accepted that the timetable for publication has slipped on several occasions.
David Cameron has said he hopes the report will be released before the end of the year.
Mr Blair, who appeared in person twice before the inquiry to justify his decision to take the UK to war, said he had an interest in the report being published as quickly as possible.
"It is certainly not me who is holding it up," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. "The sooner it is published the better, from my perspective, as it allows me to make the arguments."
In its last update, in November, the inquiry said making progress was dependent on the "satisfactory completion" of discussions about the disclosure of private material, including 25 notes from Mr Blair to President Bush and more than 130 records of conversations between either Mr Blair or Gordon Brown and the former US president.
Asked about this, Mr Blair said the inquiry has had the documents in its possession "for a long period of time".
"Obviously there are whole load of issues to do with confidentiality that have to be resolved - as far as I am concerned the government is resolving them."
The former Labour leader was asked whether he believed the US government was responsible for the apparent hold-up.
"I do not know what the reason for the delay is because I am not in charge of the inquiry and I am not in charge of the government. All I can tell you is it is not from me and I resent the suggestions that it is.
"I have as much interest as anyone seeing the inquiry publish its findings and to be able to go out and, frankly, restate my case and defend my position."
The final decision about the publication of UK documents will be taken by Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heyward. MPs have said they may call him to a Commons committee hearing to explain the state of affairs.

The report has been looking at the run-up to the conflict, whether troops were properly prepared, how the war was conducted and what planning there was for its aftermath.
Here's a timeline of the main developments since the inquiry, under Sir John Chilcot's leadership, began in July 2009.
The report will be published on Wednesday 6 July, it is announced. Sir John Chilcot says national security vetting has been completed and that no sections of the report will either be removed or redacted.
He confirms that the report will be 2.6 million words long and that families of the 179 British service personnel and civilians killed in Iraq will have the chance to read it before it is published.
It later emerges that the full report will cost £787 to purchase while the 150-page executive summary will cost £30.
Chilcot report to be published on 6 July
Sir John Chilcot says, in a letter written to Prime Minister David Cameron, that he expects to finish the report - which will be more than two million words long - by April 2016.
He says that allowing for National Security checking the PM should be in a position to publish the report in "June or July 2016".
In his latest update, Sir John Chilcot said the process of giving witnesses subject to criticisms in the report the right to reply had yet to be completed, with some individuals yet to respond.
Until this happened, he said he could not set out a "realistic timetable" for when the report would be completed but hoped to do so as soon as possible.
In response, David Cameron expressed his "disappointment" and said he was "fast losing patience" over the time being taken. He has asked the cabinet secretary Sir Jeremy Heyward to meet with Sir John to discuss the issues involved.
Appearing before the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, Sir John Chilcot says he will not give any timetable for publication as he does not want to "arouse false hopes".
He says the process of giving witnesses criticised in the draft report the right to respond is the primary obstacle standing in the way of completing its work.
He says he is not aware of any individuals holding up the process by taking an undue length of time to respond to his findings.
He also informs MPs that one of the panel members, historian Martin Gilbert, has died.
Chilcot rejects calls for Iraq timetable
Sir John Chilcot says he will agree to appear before the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee in early February to answer questions about the inquiry's progress. However, he insists he will not comment on the substance of its work or its likely publication date.
The inquiry will not be published until after the election, Sir John Chilcot confirms. David Cameron says he would have liked the report to have been published already and criticises the previous government for not establishing it earlier.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg says the public would find the latest development "incomprehensible".
Government minister Lord Wallace says the report is "largely finished" and the process of contacting people who have been criticised to give them a right to respond is taking place. He suggests the inquiry should have more staff at the outset to deal with the documents and confirms the report will be "held back" until after May's election if it is not ready for publication by the end of February.
More staff needed
William Hague, the leader of the House of Commons, says he hopes the report will be published before the general election on May 7 2015. David Cameron says the same but both men say they are "not in control" of the timing of the report's conclusion.
Hague hopes for 2015 publication
The UK's top civil servant said the inquiry will "not be a cover-up in any shape or form". Sir Jeremy Heywood told MPs that the report would be "more transparent" than people were expecting and would include material that would not normally be disclosed "in a million years". The cabinet secretary said the inquiry was "happy" with the documents it could publish after a "delay of sorts".
Inquiry will tell "whole story"
Details of the "gist" of talks between Tony Blair and George Bush before the Iraq war are to be published, the inquiry disclosed, but transcripts and full notes of conversations will remain secret at the request of the Cabinet Office.
Deal over Bush-Blair documents
Tony Blair has said he wants the Iraq Inquiry report to be published as soon as possible and "resents" claims he is to blame for its slow progress. The former Labour prime minister said he was not blocking any documents and publication would allow him "restate" the case for the 2003 invasion.
Blair: I am not to blame for delays
The US has no veto over the disclosure of communications between Tony Blair and George W Bush regarding war with Iraq, the UK Cabinet Office said in response to media reports suggesting Washington was behind delays to declassification of documents.
No 'US veto' over Blair-Bush notes
The inquiry says it cannot proceed with the next phase of its work because key information, including correspondence between Tony Blair and George W Bush, has yet to be released. Sir John Chilcot said it had not yet agreed with the government over the publication of the most "difficult documents".
Hold-up over access to key documents
The inquiry announces a further delay to the publication of its report. In a letter to the prime minister, Sir John Chilcot says he will not report before the middle of 2013 at the earliest - a decade after the war. The report is "unprecedented in scope" and will be about a million words long, he adds. He also confirms the inquiry is seeking a "dialogue" with government officials over further access to secret documents, such as notes of Cabinet meetings and correspondence with foreign governments.
The inquiry says it will not publish its report until the summer of 2012 at the earliest, six months later than had been anticipated. It says it needs this extra time to "do justice" to the issues involved. It also suggests it has not yet been given permission to publish or refer to all the classified documents it wants to in order to provide the fullest picture of decisions taken. It says it needs co-operation from the government to do this in a "satisfactory and timely manner".
The inquiry publishes new witness statements and de-classified papers as it gives an update on its work. In one of the new documents, a former senior intelligence official disputes evidence given by former No 10 spokesman Alastair Campbell in 2010. Michael Laurie contradicts claims made by Mr Campbell that the September 2002 dossier on Iraq's weapons threat was not designed to "make the case for war". He said he and others involved in its drafting thought "this was exactly its purpose". Separately, inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot says the final report will not be published until the autumn at the earliest.
In the last hearing to be held in public, former foreign secretary Jack Straw insisted regime change was "never" the goal of UK policy towards Saddam Hussein. If the former Iraqi leader had complied with UN disarmament demands, he would have remained in power, Mr Straw argued. Mr Straw said he believed the military action was justified but expressed his "deep sorrow" for the loss of life of British troops and Iraqi civilians. Bringing an end to the public part of the inquiry, Sir John Chilcot said he would not set an "artificial deadline" for publishing its final report while indicating it would take "some months".
Straw denies regime change plan
The UK drew up a list of countries seen as potential threats after 9/11 in a process known as "draining the swamp". The Foreign Office sought to identify countries that could pose "similar risks" as Afghanistan, senior former diplomat Stephen Pattison said. Mr Pattison told the inquiry the process led to Iraq moving up the political agenda after 9/11 although the phrase "draining the swamp" was dropped after it emerged it had been taken from a magazine article.
UK drew up 'threat list' after 9/11
Tony Blair was "reluctant" to hold Cabinet discussions about Iraq because he thought details would be leaked, the UK's top civil servant told the inquiry. Sir Gus O'Donnell said Mr Blair did not believe Cabinet was "a safe space" in which to debate the issues involved in going to war. The number of informal meetings held under Mr Blair's premiership meant records of discussions were not "as complete" as he would have liked.
Blair 'feared Iraq Cabinet leaks'
The former head of the armed forces said Tony Blair's government had lacked coherence and failed to deliver the equipment needed to fight the Iraq war. Admiral Lord Boyce told the inquiry that the Treasury had to be "beaten over the head" to deliver on the former prime minister's cash promises, adding that "half the cabinet" did not think the country was even at war.
The UK's most senior official in Iraq told ministers that "heavy-handed" US military tactics made security worse in the year after the 2003 invasion. In a de-classified letter released by the Iraq Inquiry, Sir David Richmond said the unpopularity of the coalition and failure to supply electricity was "visible signs" of lack of progress. He told the Inquiry "things had started to go badly wrong" earlier in 2004 but insisted the UK had managed to alter US thinking in some areas.
US tactics 'hurt post-war Iraq'
Tony Blair was warned by the UK's top civil servant in 2002 he was getting into a "dangerous position" on Iraq. Former Cabinet Secretary Lord Wilson said he alerted Mr Blair to the legal issues involved - which he saw as being a brake on military action. In separate evidence, his successor Lord Turnbull said the cabinet "did not know the score" about Iraq when they were asked to back military action in March 2003. Ministers had not seen key material on Iraq policy and were effectively "imprisoned" as they knew opposing the use of force would likely have led to Tony Blair's resignation.
Blair warned about 'Iraq dangers'
Tony Blair is recalled to give evidence for a second time. He expresses "deep and profound regret" about the loss of life suffered by UK personnel and Iraqi citizens during and after the 2003 war. He addresses questions about the war's legality, admitting Former Attorney General Lord Goldsmith could have been more closely involved in decision making but his final determination was that war was lawful. He also said the West must confront the "looming challenge" posed by Iran, if necessary by military force.
Blair's regret for Iraq war dead
The Iraq inquiry published details of evidence given by former spy chief Sir Richard Dearlove. Sir Richard, head of MI6 in the run-up to the 2003 invasion, said suggestions that he became too close to Tony Blair were "complete rubbish". Assessment of Iraq's weapons threat was "incomplete", he said, and there was a "convincing" case that Saddam Hussein had "weaponised" chemical agents.
Spy chief detailed Iraq worries
Sir John Chilcot says he is "disappointed" the government has chosen not to make public details of correspondence and conversations between Tony Blair and President Bush about Iraq. The panel - which has seen the material - said disclosure of key extracts would serve to "illuminate Mr Blair's position at critical points" in the run-up to war. But Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell said publishing the information was not in the "public interest" as it could "prejudice relations" between countries in future and "inhibit exchanges" between leaders.
Iraq inquiry criticises secrecy
It emerges that former attorney general Lord Goldsmith was "uncomfortable" with statements made by Tony Blair about the legal basis for war in early 2003. In fresh written evidence, Lord Goldsmith - who ultimately concluded that the military action was lawful - said he was concerned about remarks by Mr Blair about the need for a further UN mandate and suggested they were not compatible with advice given. Mr Blair's spokesman said he would deal with the issue when giving evidence on Friday.
Blair to deal with Goldsmith claims
Tony Blair will be recalled to give evidence a second time, the inquiry confirms. It says it wants "more detail" from a number of witnesses including the former prime minister, former Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and former Chief of the Defence Staff Lord Boyce. A number of other prominent figures, including Cabinet Secretary Gus O'Donnell, have been called to give evidence for the first time.
Blair recalled for Iraq questions
Sir John Chilcot reports on a recent visit to Northern Iraq where he and one other panel member spoke to senior figures within the Kurdish regional government about their perspective on the war and its aftermath.
Details emerge of how much the inquiry has cost to stage so far. Between July 2009 and March 2010, the inquiry cost an estimated £2.2m. Nearly £800,000 was spent on staff costs while nearly £600,000 was spent on the public hearings, including room hire and broadcasting.
The committee gives an update of its work over the summer: It says it met with 80 serving officers who took part in the Iraq campaign and also visited the defence medical rehabilitation centre at Headley Court to learn about the treatment and rehabilitation of those injured during the war. It also gives details of its visit to Iraq where, during meetings in Baghdad and Basra, it spoke to government officials including former prime ministers Ayad Allawi and Ibrahim Al-Jaafari.
Chilcot inquiry visits to Iraq
The intelligence on Iraq's weapons threat was not "very substantial", former deputy prime minister Lord Prescott said. He told the inquiry he was "nervous" about the intelligence being presented in 2002 - some of which he said was based on "tittle-tattle". Nevertheless, he defended the military action taken as "legal" and said he would take the same decision again. Closing public hearings for the summer, inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot said the committee may choose to recall some witnesses in the autumn and also planned to visit Iraq in the autumn to hear "Iraqi perspectives".
Prescott Iraq intelligence doubts
Troop commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan created the "perfect storm" for an overstretched army, a former Army chief said. Gen Sir Richard Dannatt said the Ministry of Defence's projections of required troop commitments differed from Army estimates and the Army had come close to "seizing up" in 2006. His predecessor Gen Sir Mike Jackson, in his evidence, said there were too few troops to cope with the aftermath of the invasion.
Army 'almost seized up in 2006'
The UN's former chief weapons inspector Hans Blix said it is his "firm view" that the Iraq war was illegal. Dr Blix said the UK had sought to go down the "UN route" to deal with Saddam Hussein but failed. Ex-Attorney General Lord Goldsmith, who advised the war was lawful on the basis of existing UN resolutions, "wriggled about" in his arguments, he suggested. Dr Blix also said his inspectors had visited 500 sites in Iraq but found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction.
Blix 'sure' Iraq war illegal
The inquiry has been "too easygoing" in grilling witnesses about the lead-up to the war, a former UK diplomat said. Carne Ross told the BBC that chairman Sir John Chilcot was running a "narrow" investigation, with the standard of questioning "pretty low". Mr Ross alleges that the Foreign Office withheld key documents before he gave evidence to the inquiry recently.
Iraq inquiry 'too easygoing'
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg had to clarify the government's position on the Iraq war after telling MPs the conflict had been "illegal". At prime minister's questions, Mr Clegg said Labour's former foreign secretary Jack Straw would have to account for his role in the "disastrous" decision to invade. Mr Clegg later stressed his opinion was a "long-held" personal one and the government awaited the outcome of the Chilcot inquiry.
Clegg clarifies Iraq war stance
The invasion of Iraq "substantially" increased the terrorist threat to the UK, the former head of MI5 said. Baroness Manningham-Buller told the inquiry the action "radicalised" a generation of young people, including UK citizens, and she was not "surprised" that UK nationals were involved in the 7/7 bombings in London. The intelligence on Iraq's threat was not "substantial enough" to justify the action, she argued.
Iraq war 'raised terror threat'
Helping British troops seriously wounded in Iraq was a "real challenge" but welfare support has improved as a result, defence officials said. Improved battlefield care saved more lives but more soldiers were left with multiple injuries, senior personnel officers told the inquiry. Air Marshall David Pocock said the military had "learnt a lot [of lessons]" about helping casualties. But he accepted support for bereaved families was often not good enough.
Iraq wounded 'real challenge'
Legal concerns were partly to blame for the government not being open with the families of troops killed in Iraq, a former minister said. Adam Ingram told the Iraq inquiry lawyers advised caution to officials about their wording in case it was taken as an admission of liability. He said it was "very wearing" for ministers to have to meet bereaved relatives who blamed them for deaths. But he dismissed some reports of equipment shortages as "urban myths". Legal fears 'hit Iraq openess'
The cabinet should have seen all the arguments on the legality of the Iraq war, a former senior minister has said. Lord Boateng said it would have been "helpful" to see then Attorney General Lord Goldsmith's full legal deliberations in the run-up to war. Military action would be lawful, Lord Goldsmith ruled days before the invasion, but critics said his earlier reservations were not made clear. But Lord Boateng said he believed the invasion was "right".
Ministers wanted more Iraq 'trust'
Dealing with Saddam Hussein through sanctions and other methods was a "very available" alternative to military action, a former UK diplomat said. Carne Ross, who resigned over the war, told the Iraq inquiry that the UK did not work hard enough to make its pre-2003 policy of containment work. Officials trying to argue for this approach felt "very beleaguered". There was no "significant intelligence" to back up beliefs Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, he added.
Iraq war options not considered
The inquiry said it had taken evidence from 35 people in private. Witnesses who have appeared behind closed doors included Sir Richard Dearlove, a former head of MI6. Individuals to have taken part in private as well as public hearings included Sir John Scarlett, Sir David Manning and Sir Jeremy Greenstock. Inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot said evidence was taken in private where doing so in public would have damaged national security or international relations. Inquiry hears from 35 witnesses in private.
Iraq inquiry hears from 35 witnesses in private
Tony Blair "misread" Iran's view on efforts to build a democracy in Iraq after the 2003 invasion, a former UK ambassador to Tehran said. Tehran did not wish to "destabilise" efforts to establish a government after Saddam Hussein's overthrow, Sir Richard Dalton told the inquiry. Claims of Iranian support for al-Qaeda and the counter-insurgency in Iraq that began in 2004 were "exaggerated", he argued.
Blair 'misread Iran view on Iraq''
The government "let down" the families of British troops killed in Iraq in terms of the support given to them, ex-Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth said. He told the Iraq inquiry that the Ministry of Defence "simply did not get it right" in terms of the overall "welfare package" given to families. Communication was often inconsistent and inquests into deaths in service took too long. However, he defended government action over pay and compensation for injuries as well as the medical care given to the wounded.
Bereaved Iraq families 'let down'
The Blair government should have "sorted out" its plans to rebuild Iraq after the war much sooner, a former minister told the inquiry. Sally Keeble said the Department for International Development's role was still under debate "close to the action" starting in 2003. There was a "problem" with the UK's military and aid roles not being focused enough on one area of Iraq, she added, while "real issues" had arisen over funding.
Iraq plans too late ex-minister says
The inquiry publishes previously secret documents relating to the legality of the war after they were de-classified by the government. Details of former Attorney General Lord Goldsmith's draft legal advice to Tony Blair on 12 February 2003 were published on the inquiry's website, as well as a note he sent to former prime minister on the issue two weeks earlier. The inquiry also heard from the former head of the Diplomatic Service, Lord Jay, who said he was "very uncomfortable" with the idea of military action without the backing of the UN. However, he said he did not "dissent" from Lord Goldsmith's conclusion that the war was lawful.
Iraq war legal advice published
The inquiry resumed hearings after a four-and-a-half month break for the general election. It heard that former French President Jacques Chirac believed the invasion was a "dangerous venture". Sir John Holmes, the UK's ambassador to France in 2003, said Paris saw efforts to get a further UN resolution to authorise military action as a "trap". Also, the man sent to advise Iraqi officials on building up its police force after the invasion said there was not enough focus or resources given to the task. Douglas Brand said British and US officials had unrealistic expectations about how quickly officers could be trained and believed policing structures could be "imposed" quickly after the war despite the unstable situation in the country.
Iraq probe told of Chirac concern
Foreign Secretary David Miliband said the United Nations had been "feeble" in following up threats made to Saddam Hussein in the run-up to the Iraq war. He added that most Iraqis felt they had been liberated from tyranny since the fall of Saddam Hussein and the situation in the country showed "chaotic potential". Ministry of Defence permanent under-secretary Sir Bill Jeffrey said the expansion of UK involvement in Afghanistan did not mean forces left Iraq at the wrong time. Concluding hearings until after the UK general election, inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot urged political parties not to use its proceedings as a campaign issue.
UN feeble with Saddam - Miliband
Prime Minister Gordon Brown denied starving UK armed forces of equipment, insisting at the Iraq inquiry that every request made while he was chancellor was met. Making his long-awaited appearance, the prime minister said he fully backed the 2003 war and had been kept "in the loop" by Tony Blair in the build-up. However, he expressed "sadness" for the deaths of British soldiers and Iraqi citizens.
PM denies Iraq war cash curbs
The full story: Brown's appearance
The inquiry says Prime Minister Gordon Brown will give evidence on 5 March. International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander will also appear on that day while Foreign Secretary David Miliband will appear on 8 March.
Sir Kevin Tebbit, a retired permanent secretary to the Ministry of Defence, claimed Gordon Brown had "guillotined" £1bn from defence spending in December 2003, while efforts to rebuild Iraq were ongoing. This created the need for a "very major savings exercise", he said. Mr Brown rejected the allegations later in Parliament. Also giving evidence, former Defence Secretary John Reid said the "failures of Vietnam" haunted the US military during the earlier part of its time in Iraq, hindering reconstruction efforts. And former human rights envoy Ann Clwyd said she believed there was "no other option" than to remove Saddam Hussein to prevent further persecution of a large section of the Iraqi population.
Brown denies defence 'guillotine'
Vietnam 'affected Iraq planning'
'No option' in removing Saddam
Tony Blair's cabinet was "misled" into thinking the war with Iraq was legal, ex-International Development Secretary Clare Short told the inquiry. She said Attorney General Lord Goldsmith had been "leaned on" to change his advice before the invasion and that the cabinet had not properly discussed events leading up to the war. She also suggested she had been "conned" into remaining in the cabinet despite her misgivings about the war by the promise of a lead role in post-war reconstruction efforts.
Cabinet misled on Iraq says Short
Ministers were warned of a "serious risk" the military would not have all the equipment it needed to invade Iraq, the inquiry heard. Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, the head of the armed forces, said defence chiefs "simply didn't have enough time" to source everything they wanted and more time to prepare would have made a "significant difference".
Ministers warned of Iraq kit risk
In the most eagerly anticipated moment of the inquiry, Tony Blair insisted he had no regrets in removing Saddam Hussein. During six hours of questioning, the former prime minister mounted a robust defence of his decision to take the UK to war, describing the former Iraqi leader as a "monster" and a threat to the world. There was "no conspiracy, deceit or deception" behind the decisions he took and no "covert" deal with President Bush to back military action. At the time he was convinced the regime possessed weapons of mass destruction while it was clear Saddam planned to step up weapons programmes once he was able to.
I'd do it again Blair tells Iraq inquiry
The full story: Blair's appearance
Lord Goldsmith told the inquiry he changed his view on the legality of military action but denied this was down to political pressure. While initially believing a second UN resolution was necessary, he concluded otherwise in the middle of February 2003 after consulting with lawyers and diplomats in the US about the meaning of existing UN agreements. He issued a definitive judgement only days before the war because the military said they needed one to go ahead. He made clear he stood by his decision that the invasion was lawful. Inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot also said he shared Lord Goldsmith's frustration that not all relevant documents had been declassified.
Goldsmith admits Iraq legal shift
Anger at documents secrecy
Straw defends ignoring advice
Two former Foreign Office legal advisers told the inquiry that, in their opinion, the invasion of Iraq was unlawful without the express backing of the United Nations. Sir Michael Wood, the department's chief legal adviser, said Foreign Secretary Jack Straw rejected his advice that a further mandate from the Security Council was needed to justify military action. His deputy Elizabeth Wilmshurst, who resigned in protest at the decision to go to war, said the way in which the legal arguments were presented and assessed had been "lamentable".
Iraq legal decision 'lamentable'
Straw rejected Iraq legal advice
The inquiry heard from Des Browne and John Hutton, defence secretaries between May 2006 and July 2009. Mr Browne said he found it personally "difficult" to cope with the impact of British fatalities in Iraq. He said he never came under pressure to shift resources from Iraq to Afghanistan but questioned the ability of the UK armed forces to fight two major campaigns at the same time. Mr Hutton said the death toll among Iraqis had been "disastrous" but the invasion was justified as Iraq was now a democracy and not a threat to regional security. But he said a shortage of helicopters was a "factor" in the campaign.
Iraq deaths 'difficult'
Inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot confirms that Gordon Brown will appear at the inquiry before the general election. He said Mr Brown had written to the inquiry stating that he would be prepared to give evidence whenever "you see fit" and would be "happy" to do so before the election. Sir John said the hearing was likely to take place in late February or early March at a date to be agreed. Opposition parties, who had criticised the decision to delay Mr Brown's appearance until after the election, welcomed the change of plan.
PM to face inquiry before election
Supporting the invasion was the "most difficult decision" of his life, Jack Straw told the inquiry. The foreign secretary said he was aware the UK could not have gone to war without his backing. He said he had taken the decision "very reluctantly" as he disagreed with the US objective of regime change as the basis for action but he believed Iraq posed a threat. He said the 45-minute claim in the September 2002 dossier on Iraq's weapons threat was an error that "has haunted us ever since".
Iraq my 'hardest choice' - Straw
Including the 45-minute claim in an intelligence dossier on Iraq's weapons was "asking for trouble", Tony Blair's former security co-ordinator Sir David Omand said. He described it as a "bit of local colour" which was used because there was little other detail that the intelligence services were happy to be included in the September 2002 dossier.
45-minute claim 'a bit of colour'
Former defence secretary Geoff Hoon - the first cabinet minister from the period to appear before the inquiry - said the first he heard of the controversial "45 minute claim" on Iraq's weapons was when he read about it in the September 2002 dossier. Separately he also said he had opposed the deployment of British troops to Helmand, before forces were reduced in Iraq.
Iraq weapons claim 'new' to Hoon
Hoon opposed 2006 Helmand mission
Britain gave "no undertaking in blood to go to war in Iraq" in March 2002, Tony Blair's former chief of staff told the Inquiry. Jonathan Powell dismissed ex-diplomat Sir Christopher Meyer's claim that his stance had hardened after a private meeting with the US president. He said there had been an "assumption" Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, because Saddam had used them before.
No Iraq deal 'signed in blood'
It emerges that the inquiry met in private on Friday following a request by General Sir John Reith, the man who ran British operations during the war. He told the inquiry that the Ministry of Defence had been "reluctant" to begin vital logistical planning for a potential invasion as late as December 2002 for fear of alerting the public. Ultimately, he said there were no equipment shortages but some kit could not found once it was sent to Iraq.
Iraq inquiry meets in private
UK forces in southern Iraq had to rely on their US allies for helicopters because all UK aircraft were deployed in Afghanistan, a senior military officer told the inquiry. Major General Graham Binns, who commanded coalition forces in Basra from mid-2007 until early 2008, said there was a "major gap" in attack helicopters but those provided by the US were "magnificent".
Ex-No 10 spokesman Alastair Campbell was attacked for suggesting former cabinet minister and war critic Clare Short was barred from key meetings because she could not be trusted. Former head of the civil service, Lord Turnbull, said his remarks were "very poor" and Ms Short's views should have been respected. He also said Tony Blair must explain recent comments that he would have backed the war even if he had known Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.
Campbell criticism of Short 'poor'
Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair's former communications chief, told the inquiry he would defend "every single word" of the 2002 dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, containing the famous claim that Saddam's weapons could be launched within 45 minutes. In a typically combative performance, stretching over nearly five hours, he said the dossier could have been "clearer" - but he insisted the government did not "misrepresent" the threat they posed by Saddam's weapons. He also denied claims Mr Blair "shifted" to back regime change after a US summit, pouring scorn on the evidence given to the inquiry by former UK ambassador to the US Sir Christopher Meyer.
Campbell defends Iraq war dossier
Lt Gen Sir Richard Shirreff said the British Army was effectively providing "no security at all" in the southern Iraqi city of Basra by mid-2006. The former commanding officer of the multi-national division in south-east Iraq told the inquiry that 200 troops were attempting to control a city of 1.3 million people, with militias "filling the gap". He also said troops had not been employed effectively and criticised equipment levels provided for the mission in southern Iraq.
Basra security was 'non-existent'
The complexity of negotiating the British exit from Iraqi in 2009 was revealed. Peter Watkins from the Ministry of Defence said that one lesson learnt was that the coalition allies should have sought a single agreement with the Iraqis. "We should have applied the Balkans principle of in together out together". Foreign Office officials described with some optimism how life for the people of Basra had steadily improved, six years after the invasion.
Evidence centred on Operation Charge of the Knights in March 2008 when an Iraqi-led military campaign drove the Mahdi Army militia out of Basra. Lt Gen Barney White-Spunner of the Multi- National Division South East said the Iraqis had asked the British to carry out aerial bombing of areas which had not been "sufficiently vetted", where there could be civilian casualties. UK forces refused to launch these attacks. In the event, the Shia militias "crumbled quickly" in the face of the Iraqi-led operation.
Witnesses described the period leading to the drawdown of British forces in Iraq. Jon Day from the Ministry of Defence confirmed that the UK held talks with the Mahdi Army militia in Basra three months before British troops pulled out of the city and moved to the airport. Lt Gen Sir Peter Wall said young soldiers would complain how bored they had become in Basra in the final months of the operation. Christopher Prentice, the British ambassador to Baghdad (2007-09), said the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al Maliki was "very very keen" on the relationship with Britain.
Sir William Patey, the former UK ambassador to Iraq, told the inquiry some post-war ambitions for the country were "probably higher than the ability to deliver". He talked about the difficulties of drafting a constitution and setting up an effective police force. General Sir Nick Houghton, former chief of joint operations, said that, from 2006, there had been pressure to reduce British force levels in Iraq to concentrate on the new mission in Helmand.
Ambassador queries Iraq ambition
The bombing of the UN headquarters in Iraq in 2003 had "a very serious impact" on UK efforts to rebuild the country, former overseas aid official Jim Drummond told the inquiry.
UN Iraq blast 'hindered UK work'
Britain may have had "second thoughts" about its participation in the Iraq war had it foreseen the mayhem that would occur in the years after the invasion, the inquiry was told. Sir John Sawers, a former adviser to Tony Blair and now head of MI6, said the level of violence in post-war Iraq was "unprecedented". Earlier, top commander Lt Gen Sir Robert Fry said the invasion could have failed without the backing of UK troops.
Iraq violence 'unprecedented'
Key decisions taken in post-war Iraq were examined as Sir Jeremy Greenstock made his second appearance before the inquiry. He said the US thwarted UK efforts to give the UN a "leading political role" in post-war Iraq and US officials did not listen to UK advice or even keep them informed of major developments.
Iraq errors 'must not be repeated'
The US refused to accept it was facing an organised counter-insurgency in Iraq, the UK's senior military representative in Baghdad told the inquiry. Lt General John Kiszely quoted former US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as saying growing attacks in 2004 were the work of a "bunch of no hopers". Lt Gen Jonathon Riley, who commanded forces in the south of Iraq, said the US had "no choice" but to disband the Iraqi army - a decision criticised by many UK officials. He said the force lost the respect of the people and effectively "disbanded itself".
Iraq counter-insurgency 'not recognised'
Former Prime Minister Tony Blair has yet to appear before the Chilcot inquiry. However, asked about the decision to go to war in a BBC TV interview, he said he would have done so even if he had known Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. The "notion" that Iraq was a threat to the region had tilted him in favour of the invasion, he added. Reacting to the remarks, Defence Secretary Bob Ainsworth said he was "surprised" by them while Sir Ken MacDonald, a former director of public prosecutions, has accused Mr Blair of "alarming subterfuge" in justifying the war.
Blair Iraq attitude 'a disgrace'
Blair attacked for Iraq war claims
Tony Blair's ex-foreign policy adviser Sir John Sawers said the US was not talking about war with Iraq in early 2001. Sir John, the current head of MI6, visited Washington in January that year for informal talks with the incoming Bush administration. George W Bush and the then UK prime minister held their first meeting at Camp David in the February. There was agreement that their policy of "containment" of Iraq through sanctions and no-fly zones was "unsustainable", Sir John said. And while there was talk of "regime change", there was no discussion of military intervention.
US 'not talking of war in 2001'
"Amateurs" were put into key roles in post-invasion Iraq, Britain's senior military representative in Iraq said, claiming lives had been lost as a result. Lt Gen Frederick Viggers said senior officials, including ministers, needed more training to deal with the complexities involved in mounting an invasion. Lessons from Iraq were not being applied in Afghanistan, he added. Sir Hilary Synnott, the Coalition Provisional Authority's (CPA) regional co-ordinator for Southern Iraq from July 2003 until January 2004, said the long-term plan for the governance of Iraq was "deeply flawed". He said bureaucracy, resource and expertise problems had hampered the coalition's mission. Lt Gen Sir Graeme Lamb likened the CPA to "dancing with a broken doll".
Army chief lambasts Iraq 'amateurs'
Ex-spy chief Sir John Scarlett said there was "no conscious intention" to manipulate information about Iraq's weapons. He denied being under pressure to "firm up" the September 2002 dossier which contained the claim Iraq could use WMD within 45 minutes of Saddam's order. Former permanent secretary at the Department for International Development, Sir Suma Chakrabarti, said UK aid officials had "scanty" evidence of the situation in Iraq in the lead-up to the 2003 invasion. Air Marshall Sir Brian Burridge, who led UK ground forces in Iraq, said he was told by a top US commander 10 months before that it was a "matter of when not if" it went into Iraq.
No Iraq manipulation says Scarlett
Iraq details 'scanty' before war
Army chief 'told of US Iraq aims'
A senior British officer said he urged Tony Blair to delay the invasion of Iraq two days before the conflict. Maj Gen Tim Cross, who liaised with the US on reconstruction efforts, said planning for after the conflict was "woefully thin". A senior diplomat also told the inquiry the UK government felt "helpless" to deal with the kidnappings of its citizens in following the war. Edward Chaplin, former UK ambassador to Iraq, said the taking hostage and killing of Ken Bigley and Margaret Hassan had been "terrible" events.
Officer urged Blair to delay war
UK felt 'hopeless' over hostages
The US first revealed its military plans at a meeting in June 2002, the UK's chief military adviser to the US Central Army Command told the inquiry. Major General David Wilson said there was no talk of Iraq among top US commanders in Spring 2002 but this "changed suddenly" in June when he said the "curtain was drawn back" on their thinking. Asked to comment on the plans, he said the UK could not back them without political and legal approval. Dominic Asquith, British ambassador to Iraq in 2006-7, said the Treasury refused to provide extra cash for reconstruction projects in Basra which he said was "extremely frustrating".
Moment 'US revealed war plans'
Treasury accused over Iraq funds
The US "assumed" the UK would contribute troops to the invasion even if there was no UN backing, the head of UK armed forces at the time told the inquiry. Admiral Lord Boyce said the "shutters came down" in Washington when UK officials pointed out they would not be able to back the war without Parliamentary approval. He also criticised Clare Short, Secretary of State for International Development during the invasion, saying her department had effectively hampered reconstruction efforts and been "particularly uncooperative".
US 'assumed UK war involvement'
Short's 'Iraq team sat in tents'
In a session dominated by the aftermath of the war, a senior Foreign Office official said there was a "dire" lack of planning in the Bush administration for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq. Edward Chaplin, head of the Middle East department in 2003, said the UK raised the issue many times but its concerns had been largely overlooked. His colleague, Sir Peter Ricketts, said the UK could have achieved more in its role in stabilising and rebuilding southern Iraq after the invasion if it had been given more resources.
Planning for post-war Iraq 'dire'
Tony Blair indicated he would be willing to back "regime change" at a meeting with President Bush in Texas in April 2002, the prime minister's foreign policy adviser at the time told the inquiry. But Sir David Manning stressed that Mr Blair told the President he should get UN support for the move and continued to press for this throughout 2002. According to Sir David, during the Texas meeting, President Bush said there was no "war plan" for Iraq but a "small cell" had been set up in Florida to explore options for removing Saddam Hussein. Sir David also said Mr Blair asked in June 2002 for military options for the UK joining action against Iraq.
Blair 'pledge on regime change'
The UK's ambassador to the UN in the run-up to the war said he believed the invasion was legal but of "questionable legitimacy" as it was not backed by the majority of UN members or possibly even the British public. Sir Jeremy Greenstock revealed he had not always been kept fully informed of British policy as it developed and had considered resigning at one point. Had weapons inspectors been given more time to do their job, the war could possibly have been prevented, he argued.
Iraq war legitimacy questioned
Tony Blair's stance on Iraq "tightened" after a private meeting with US President George Bush in April 2002, the inquiry was told. Sir Christopher Meyer, the UK's ambassador to the US in the run-up to war, said a day after the meeting Mr Blair mentioned the possibility of regime change publicly for the first time in a speech. In his evidence, the former ambassador said military preparations for war overrode the diplomatic process and he criticised post-war planning for Iraq as a "black hole".
Bush 'hardened' Blair Iraq stance
The UK received intelligence days before invading Iraq that Saddam Hussein may not have been able to use chemical weapons, the inquiry heard. Sir William Ehrman, the Foreign Office's director general for defence and intelligence between 2002 and 2004, also said it was a "surprise" that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq. Meanwhile, Gordon Brown rejected claims from Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg that the government could effectively veto aspects of the final report, saying it was up to the inquiry what went into it.
Iraq war eve WMD doubt revealed
On the first day of public hearings, four senior diplomats and advisers gave evidence on the war's origins. Sir Peter Ricketts, a top intelligence official at the time, said the UK government "distanced itself" from talk of removing Saddam Hussein in early 2001. He said it was assumed it was not "our policy" despite growing talk in the US about the move. Before the hearings began, inquiry chairman Sir John Chilcot said he would not "shy" away from criticising individuals in his final report.
Inquiry focuses on Iraq 'threat'
Launching the inquiry, Sir John says he intends to hold as many hearings as possible in public. Over the summer, he and his team begin to wade through thousands of government documents relating to the war. In September, the inquiry team meet relatives of some of the 179 service personnel killed in Iraq between as well as retired and serving members of the armed forces. At a meeting in London, a retired Army officer whose son was killed in Iraq says the government "misled" the country over the reasons for going to war.
Iraq inquiry 'told of war lies'
Gordon Brown announces an inquiry will be set up to "learn the lessons" of the Iraq conflict, to be led by former civil servant Sir John Chilcot. He tells MPs it should be held in private but within days and under pressure from the opposition and ex-government officials, he says it will be up to Chilcot to decide how to proceed.
Brown announces Iraq inquiry
Iraq inquiry: Day-by-day timeline
Brown denies inquiry U-turn


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: England will host the 2021 Rugby League World Cup after being selected ahead of a rival bid from the United States and Canada.

It will be the biggest edition since 2000, with 16 teams and 31 matches.
England last hosted the competition in 2013, when Australia beat New Zealand 34-2 in the final at Old Trafford.
The Rugby Football League received £25m from central government to support its bid and plans to stage 80% of games in Lancashire and Yorkshire.
It also proposed "showpiece fixtures" in London, the Midlands and the north east of the country.
A mixture of 12 rugby league and other sporting venues, including Manchester's Old Trafford and Wembley in the capital, are in line to host matches at the 2021 event.
The Rugby League International Federation (RLIF) has recommended that the 2025 tournament be staged in North America as it attempts to increase the global appeal of the sport.
The American-Canadian joint bid aims to stage the competition outside Australasia and Europe for the first time since it began in 1954.
While praising their "extremely compelling" proposal, the RLIF said that England were preferred "primarily based on the current rugby league participation numbers in North America."
The Toronto Wolfpack - Canada's first professional team - will compete in English rugby league's third tier in this coming season as part of the game's development in North America.
Media playback is not supported on this device
Subscribe to the BBC Sport newsletter to get our pick of news, features and video sent to your inbox.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

A 49-8 defeat of Hong Kong in Tokyo ensured they maintained their record of appearing in every tournament to date.
They join Scotland, South Africa, Samoa and the United States in Pool B of the 20-team competition which begins in September next year.
Hong Kong can still join them despite the loss, if they come through the four-team repechage.
If Hong Kong were to beat Uruguay in the first round, they would then face either Russia or an African team in the final. Should they win that, they would secure the last place in Pool A alongside the hosts, Wales, Australia and either Fiji or the Cook Islands.
Japan, the hosts of the 2019 tournament, are coached by Eddie Jones, who led the Australia team defeated by England in the 2003 final in Sydney.


Question:
represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story:
------
The provided query could be '['This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article.', "The actors' union Equity has hit out at the decision to remove two of Mull's best-known creative directors from their posts."]' and the positive '['Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary', 'Alasdair McCrone, of Mull Theatre, and Gordon McLean, of the arts centre An Tobar, were among three directors of the umbrella body Comar.\nIt looks after a number of arts organisations on the island.\nComar\'s board said funding restrictions made it necessary to reduce three posts to one.\nIt said the three existing directorial posts - in theatre/dance, visual arts/film and music/literature - would be replaced by one artistic director who would lead the entire creative programme\nComar, which was created two years ago, said it hoped to continue to work with both Mr McCrone and McLean.\nEquity blames poor business planning and is calling on the board to resign.\nA public meeting about the decision is to be held in Tobermory next week.\nHigh-profile Scottish actor Alan Cumming tweeted: "This makes me so sad.  Another example of the accountants take over at the expense of the art. And in Mull too."\nFormer Scottish culture secretary and SNP MSP for Argyll and Bute, Michael Russell, tweeted: "Making Alasdair & Gordon redundant is an extraordinary wrong-headed decision and must be opposed."']' and the negative '['Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary', 'Shows include a 30-minute guest-edited art magazine show on BBC Two, called Artsnight, which will start in Spring.\nAnother show, Artists Question Time, will be a 60-minute one-off debate hosted by Kirsty Wark on BBC Four.\n"I strongly believe that arts should be for everyone with more primetime arts content on the BBC," said BBC director general Tony Hall.\nThe new shows will air from March, with seasons planned on dance, film, theatre and poetry across the BBC.\nThe year-long campaign aims to "encourage creativity and participation" in the arts.\nEditors of Artsnight will be actress Maxine Peake, Sunday Times journalist Lynn Barber, writer and satirist Armando Iannucci and director of Tate Modern, Chris Dercon.\nThey will each edit the show, which will be aired on BBC Two following Newsnight every Friday in March.\nThe BBC will also team up with What Next? - a cultural movement that brings together UK-wide arts organisations.\nWorking with the British Film Institute (BFI), Jonathan Ross will front a documentary exploring The Secrets Of Pinewood.\nThe BBC Two documentary will see the former Film 2010 presenter join a number of famous faces as he goes behind the scenes of the famous studios.\nElsewhere, BBC Four will continue the film theme with In Conversation…, where actors and directors discuss their craft in front of an audience at the BFI.\nOther seasons devoted to theatre and poetry include BBC Two adaptation of The Dresser, with Sir Ian McKellen and Sir Anthony Hopkins taking lead parts in the Ronald Harwood play, and a profile of the poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy.\nThe announcement of a boost to arts content across the BBC comes as it is claimed the organisation spent nearly £7m on consultants last year.\nQuoting the Freedom of Information Act, the Guardian reported that the total cost in the year ending March 2014 was £6.93m.\nA BBC spokesman said it had a legal obligation to use consultants and it was cost effective to use external companies.\n"We are legally obliged to use external organisations to audit our accounts," the corporation said.\n"On occasion, just like any other large organisation, we also use external companies for specialist services - this saves the BBC millions of pounds because it is cheaper than employing permanent, full-time staff to carry out work which would only last a short period."']'

Question: Technology companies could face fines of up to 4% of their global annual turnover under new European rules on data protection.

this is part of a news article. represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article:

The European Union has approved significant changes to data laws, aimed at putting individuals back in charge of their information.
It is the biggest shake-up to privacy regulation for 20 years, according to experts.
The changes would make privacy "a board-level issue", one lawyer said.
Peter Church, a technology lawyer at Linklaters, said it would make businesses "start taking these issues a lot more seriously".
US technology companies already have an uneasy relationship with European regulators, with both Google and Facebook facing big fines - Facebook over its use of cookies and Google over its privacy policy.
Although this new law will not come into force until 2018, the changes meant the tech giants would have to "pay more attention to what regulators are saying", said Mr Church.
The new draft policy, in discussion since 2012, will need to be ratified by the European Parliament next year.
Other changes include:
Jan Philipp Albrech, chief negotiator, said of deal: "This would be a major step forward for consumer protection and competition and ensure Europe has data protection rules that are fit for purpose in the digital age."
Stewart Room, head of data privacy at PwC, said: "The scale and breadth of the EU's changes to privacy rules will deliver unprecedented challenges for business and every entity that holds of uses European personal data both inside and outside the EU.
"Most companies will be shocked at the scale of the new rules and the work that needs to be done before the laws take effect in two years - it is not much time for the magnitude of the internal changes that will be required."

It says people will be able to ask for data about them to be deleted and firms will have to comply unless there are "legitimate" grounds to retain it.
The move is part of a wide-ranging overhaul of the commission's 1995 Data Protection Directive.
Some tech firms have expressed concern about the reach of the new bill.
Details of the revised law were unveiled by the Justice Commissioner, Viviane Reding, at the Digital Life Design (DLD) conference in Munich.
A spokesman for the commissioner clarified that the action was designed to help teenagers and young adults manage their online reputations.
"These rules are particularly aimed at young people as they are not always as aware as they could be about the consequence of putting photos and other information on social network websites, or about the various privacy settings available," said Matthew Newman.
He noted that this could cause problems later if the users had no way of deleting embarrassing material when applying for jobs. However, he stressed that it would not give them the right to ask for material such as their police or medical records to be deleted.
Although the existing directive already contains the principle of "data minimisation", Mr Newman said that the new law would reinforce the idea by declaring it "a right".
Other measures in the bill include an obligation on all firms to notify users and the authorities about data lost through hacking attacks or other breaches "as soon as possible".
Ms Reding said that she would expect that under normal circumstances this would mean within 24 hours.
The commissioner said that firms would have to explicitly seek people's permission to use data about them and could not proceed on the basis of "assumed" consent in situations where approval was required.
Her proposed law says that internet users must also be notified when their data is collected, and be told for what purpose it is being processed and for how long it will be stored.
The bill also suggests people must be given easier access to the data held on them, and should have the right to move it to another provider in addition to the right to have it deleted.
However, the commissioner said that she recognised there were some circumstances under which this right would not apply.
"The archives of a newspaper are a good example. It is clear that the right to be forgotten cannot amount to a right of the total erasure of history,"Ms Reding told DLD delegates.
If approved the law would create a pan-EU set of data privacy rules for the first time. These would also apply to overseas companies active in the 27-member bloc, even if they handled the data on servers based in other parts of the world.
The commissioner suggested that this would simplify regulations and reduce the administrative burden on firms, saving them around 2.3bn euros ($3bn; Â£1.9bn) a year.
However, Microsoft Europe's chief operating officer, Ron Zink, was quoted by the Financial Times as saying that the proposalsmight be "too prescriptive".
Facebook also signalled that it wanted more information about the scope of the data that the EU thought users should be able to control.
But it added: "We welcome vice-president Reding's view that good regulation should encourage job creation and economic growth rather than hindering it, and look forward to seeing how the EU Data Protection Directive develops in order to deliver these two goals while safeguarding the rights of internet users."
Google and Yahoo said that they were not able to provide statements at this time.
Firms that failed to abide by the proposed new rules could be fined as much as 1% of their global revenues, according to a draft document obtained by the Reuters news agency. The FT had reported in December that the sum could be as much as 5%.
The new rules will need to be approved by the EU's member states and ratified by the European Parliament. As a result it could take two or more years for the new directive to come into effect.