Question: Represent:

Question: Plans to ban "aggressive begging" and busking in central Oxford have been approved by the city council.

represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence.

Councillors voted in favour of the introduction of a Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) at a meeting on Thursday.
The plans mean £100 fines could be handed out.
Green Party councillor David Thomas said he was "disappointed" and described the powers to fine beggars as "unnecessary".
"When they say 'aggressive begging', they define that as sitting still near a cash point which I don't think's aggressive," he said.
"Maybe annoying, but certainly not aggressive."
Labour-controlled Oxford City Council said it did not intend to fine beggars as a first resort, and would look to put them in contact with support services before taking further action.
Council leader Bob Price previously said the order covered a wide range of anti-social behaviour and was designed to make the area "safe and welcoming" for the public.
Campaign group Liberty had previously threatened to challenge the scope of such an order in court.
It said the council would be unfairly targeting those in poverty if it fined persistent beggars.
The council's own eight-week public consultation revealed the majority of responders had not been adversely affected by persistent begging, sleeping in toilets or busking.

So far four zones have been rolled out across the city and a further 10 are set to be brought in by next spring.
Protester Tony Miles said: "People feel that they have not had full consultation."
Mayor George Ferguson, who is behind the parking plans, described the tank manoeuvre as "a hilarious stunt".
Mr Ferguson added: "It does make the point that the car lobby will do absolutely everything - and I'm not anti-car."
Along with the petition, a motion of no confidence in the mayor will also be heard at the full council meeting.
The petition calling for Mr Ferguson to step down over his handling of the parking plans surpassed the 3,500 trigger point, at which it must be debated.
However, it will not affect the mayor's term in office as it has no legal standing.
The protesters previously drove a tank through the streets in April.


Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story

Question: US cable giant Comcast has abandoned its planned $45bn (Â£30bn) purchase of Time Warner Cable after failing to convince regulators the deal would not harm competition.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article!

"Today, we move on," said Comcast chairman Brian L Roberts.
"We structured this deal so that if the government didn't agree, we could walk away."
In March last year, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) launched an antitrust probe into the deal.
"The companies' decision to abandon this deal is the best outcome for American consumers," said Attorney General Eric Holder in a statement.
"This is a victory not only for the Department of Justice, but also for providers of content and streaming services who work to bring innovative products to consumers across America and around the world."
The deal was also being scrutinised by the Federal Communications Commission, and had been criticised by some politicians and various consumer and industry groups.
Shares in Comcast declined slightly on the news, whereas Time Warner Cable's were up slightly.
Comcast and Time Warner Cable are the two biggest cable companies, as well as two of the largest broadband providers, in the US.
Comcast had argued that they served different markets and a merger would not reduce competition for consumers.
The company operates mainly around Washington DC, Chicago, Boston and its home town of Philadelphia, whereas Time Warner Cable's subscribers are mainly grouped around its New York headquarters, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, and Dallas.
While the move is a blow for Comcast, with the industry experiencing a decrease in subscribers and video customers, cable companies are likely to keep merging as costs rise for shows, sports programmes and film rights.
However, the collapse of this deal has knock-on effects for other players in the US industry.
Charter Communications, the fourth largest cable operator in the US, will no longer acquire some of the Time Warner Cable markets that Comcast was planning to divest.
Charter had previously tried to buy Time Warner Cable in a hostile takeover in January 2014.
When Comcast first announced its intention to merge with Time Warner last year, the move was met with a largely negative outcry from a crucial contingent: subscribers of both cable companies.
The Federal Communications Commission - one of the regulators tasked with approving the deal - received more than 100,000 public comments on the merger, many of which were from individuals concerned about the impact it could have on prices and quality of service.
The two firms are notorious for a perceived poor handling of customer service complaints.
Last summer, a customer service call with Comcast, in which customer Ryan Block tried to cancel his internet service, went viral - which many took as a symptom of widespread customer frustration with US telecommunications providers.
Even in Comcast's home city of Philadelphia, sentiment against the firm has soured.
In December, the city published a report on Comcast's offerings in which the most common words among subscribers who were surveyed about their customer experience were "terrible", "better", "poor", "horrible", "awful", "lacking", "bad" and "horrendous".
Although Comcast has disputed the Philadelphia report - and chalked up Mr Block's viral call to the power of the internet - the widespread customer complaints couldn't have helped the firm in its negotiations with the government.
Certainly, that public sentiment influenced US politicians. This week, six US Senators wrote a letter to regulators arguing against the merger.
But with increasing number of consumers "cutting the cord" and foregoing cable subscriptions entirely in favour of internet streaming options, the question is whether or not the US cable industry, as it is currently structured, can survive.
That would leave very little to complain about.

Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence

The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that AT&T could announce this weekend a deal to buy Time Warner.
On Thursday, Bloomberg reported that the telecoms and entertainment giants had discussed business strategies, including a possible takeover.
With Time Warner worth $73bn (Â£60bn), it would be the biggest this year.
Time Warner shares closed up almost 8% to a near 15-year high, having gained about 5% on Thursday. AT&T shares lost 3%.
Other media company shares, including Discovery, AMC, Netflix and CBS, rose as investors speculated that a deal could spark a fresh wave of takeovers and mergers among media and technology companies.
AT&T, which has a market value of about $238bn, has already made moves to turn itself into a media powerhouse, buying satellite TV provider DirecTV last year for $48.5bn.
Time Warner chief executive Jeff Bewkes has, however, resisted selling in the past. The company rejected an $80bn offer from Twenty-First Century Fox Inc in 2014. Last night, Fox reportedly ruled itself of any plans to renew its interest in Time Warner.
The WSJ said that any deal by AT&T to buy Time Warner was likely to be paid via a mixture of shares and cash.
A deal would give AT&T access to a major producer of content as it seeks to diversify away from its core telecoms business. Rival Verizon is currently in negotiations to buy Yahoo and has already bought AOL, owner of Huffington Post.
Some analysts, however, question whether AT&T needs to mount a complete takeover of Time Warner.
Cowen and Co analyst Doug Creutz said: "What does it get them that they can't get by licensing Time Warner content and at a much cheaper price than buying the whole company?"
He said it was unclear what savings could be gained "from stapling distribution and content together. It's been tried. It never works".


Question: represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: The Welsh Government has been offered a chance to help shape the UK's EU negotiations.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

A new Brexit forum bringing together the UK and devolved governments met on Wednesday.
Finance Secretary Mark Drakeford represented the Welsh Government at the meeting, attended by UK Brexit Secretary David Davis.
Mr Davis asked for the governments to present their analysis to help shape negotiation priorities.
In return, he would share the UK government's "latest thinking".
Mr Davis also offered a commitment to hold Brexit meetings monthly.
"Naturally, there are different standpoints around the table, but the meeting was constructive and amicable. We will meet regularly and share our latest thinking as the UK shapes its negotiating strategy," he said.
The new forum was set up following an earlier joint ministerial committee meeting on Brexit in October.
At the time, leaders of the UK's devolved governments were told not to "undermine" Brexit negotiations.
Mr Drakeford said: "We have to be fair that today was a genuine opportunity to put our point of view."
He said the Welsh Government needed to understand how the content of such meetings was having an influence "elsewhere".
The finance secretary said he spelled out the Welsh Government's position on Brexit, calling for "full and unfettered access" to the single market.
Last week, First Minister Carwyn Jones told the Senedd the Welsh Government "will be a reliable partner" in the committee process.
He had said it was "disappointing, and damaging to confidence, that the UK government has been unable, so far, to offer a coherent outline of its broad approach to EU negotiations".
Mr Jones added: "The excuses for not doing so are running thin, and the credibility of the UK is not helped by prevarication and, it must be said, confused and mixed messaging."

this is part of a news article. represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

Meurig Raymond, president of the National Farmers' Union, said UK farmers could be globally competitive and played vital public roles.
The union has launched a month-long consultation of its members on the shape of post-Brexit farming policy.
Chancellor Philip Hammond has promised to maintain EU-levels of funding for farming at least until 2020.
Mr Raymond said: "The vote to leave the European Union means that food security must drive a new, bold ambition for UK farmers and growers.
"This is an historic opportunity the NFU is determined to seize."
He claimed farming was worth Â£108bn to the UK economy, and also played an important role in areas of public policy such as the environment, renewable energy, education, health and nutrition.
"Brexit is also about building bridges, building the industry's influence," he added.
"The NFU's aim, once our members have spoken, is to provide a strong and united voice for the food and farming industry, to ensure that agriculture is seen as strategically and politically important in all future trade negotiations."
Union leaders will appeal directly to NFU members at a series of 50 roadshow meetings, ending on 14 September, designated as Back British Farming Day.
In July, Wales' Rural Affairs Secretary Lesley Griffiths said Brexit offered the chance for a "made-in-Wales" approach to farming, a policy area which is devolved.
Under the current EU Common Agricultural Policy, Wales receives approximately Â£250m per year in direct payments to farmers in addition to more than Â£500m between 2014-2020 to run a rural development programme.
Speaking at the Royal Welsh Show, Ms Griffiths said she expected some form of subsidy to continue, but was aware that many farmers supported leaving the EU because of "red tape".
On Monday she was holding a private meeting with officials from the Farmers' Union of Wales to discuss the importance of agriculture to the economy, as well as the impact of bovine TB.
Welsh Conservative leader Andrew RT Davies welcomed the NFU's consultation, along with the chancellor's promise on funding.
But he added: "Here in Wales farmers want reassurances from the Welsh Labour Government that the money will still find its way to farmers.
"Just last month, Labour MP Ian Lucas called for cuts to the money allocated to farmers and the Welsh Government must allay those concerns at the earliest opportunity."


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: Manchester United have signed Newport County's 17-year-old defender Regan Poole for an undisclosed fee.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary.

The Wales Under-17 international joined United after passing a medical at the club's Carrington training ground.
Poole, who had been on trial at United and Liverpool, was the subject of a £60,000 bid plus add-ons from Championship side Hull.
"It's a wonderful opportunity for him to progress at such a magnificent club," Newport boss Terry Butcher said.
"In the past few days a number of clubs have shown an interest in Regan, but as soon as Manchester United came in there was only really going to be one outcome."
Butcher says Poole has also achieved something the former England star did not.
"He's still very young at 17. He's got the perfect stage to go and perform and the perfect place to learn," said Butcher..
"He'll love it, I'm sure.
"I nearly made it to Manchester United, but never quite so he's done something I've never done, which is brilliant."
The fee for Poole is believed to be £100,000 in a deal that could rise to £400,000.
Butcher says some of that cash will go into his playing budget.
And Kevin Feeley's departure by mutual consent also leaves Butcher with "a nice little pot to work with".
Brighton had also shown an interest in signing the young centre-back, who became Newport's youngest ever player in 2014 when he made his debut against Shrewsbury Town aged 16 years and 94 days.
Meanwhile, Newport rejected an improved £65,000 transfer deadline-day offer from Championship club Burnley for teenage striker Aaron Collins.
Newport have signed former Dagenham & Redbridge centre-back Matt Partridge on a deal until the end of the season.
Defender Kevin Feely has had his contract terminated by mutual consent. The 23-year-old is to return to his native Ireland after deciding not to pursue a career in football.
"The decision I made was a completely personal one, based on where I wanted to go with my life, at the moment I don't think football is where I want my future to be," he said.
For all the latest on transfer deadline day, click here.

The former Manchester United trainee, 23, scored five goals in 46 appearances in all competitions as the Clarets won the Championship title last season.
When contacted, Burnley declined to comment on the story.
The Foxes signed Sporting Gijon defender Luis Hernandez on a four-year deal on Tuesday.


Question: Represent the text to find a corresponding news article that continues the story

Question: A former soldier from Edinburgh has been jailed for 12 years for a "horrifying" series of offences against children including rape and allowing a child to be raped.

Thomas Nelson, 54, abused four young children over a 10-year period beginning in the mid 1990s.
The offences happened at houses in the Granton, Broomhouse and Wester Hailes and at an address in Clackmannanshire.
Nelson was put on the sex offenders' register.
A judge told Nelson at the High Court in Edinburgh: "The course of conduct in which you indulged towards the children in question was quite appalling."
Lord Uist said two of the six charges he was found guilty on were "particularly despicable".
The judge said: "They involved you providing on several occasions a girl aged between four and six to other men so they could have sexual intercourse with her and on one occasion you had sexual intercourse with her yourself."
Lord Uist told ex-chef Nelson: "You no doubt are aware that the offences of which you were convicted are of such a grave nature that they must attract a long prison sentence."
Nelson, formerly of Pilrig Street, Edinburgh, had denied two charges of raping the girl in 2002 and 2003, a charge of assaulting her by permitting and encouraging other males to have sex with her and rape her between 2001 and 2003 and a charge of physically assaulting her.
He was found guilty of all the offences apart from one rape charge on which the jury returned a not proven verdict.
He was also found guilty of assaulting two young boys, one of whom had a gun put to his head and hot spoons put on his skin. He was also convicted of an indecency offence against another girl when she was 13 or 14 in 2006 and 2007.
During his trial he admitted a further four charges of neglecting children who were exposed to drugs and weapons.
Lord Uist told jurors at the conclusion of the trial that it had a "particularly unpleasant and distasteful case".
The jury was played footage of the rape victim, who is now 19, being questioned earlier about her experiences at the hands of Nelson who she said terrified her.
Defence counsel David Nicholson told that court that Nelson had formerly served in Northern Ireland with the Army.
He said: "He struggled having left the Army and he thinks his addiction to drink started at that point. He has had serious alcohol problems ever since."

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article!

David Williams, 57, was sentenced to life in prison and Pauline Williams, 53, was jailed for 12 years plus four years on extended licence.
The couple, from Bradninch, Devon, became friends of the Wests in Gloucester in the 1980s.
They were found guilty of a string of sex attacks in October.
The court heard David Williams boasted of his connections with the Wests, who drank at the Prince Albert pub he ran in Gloucester.
The couple started abusing children in the late 1980s when they were running the pub. One victim was seven years old.
They ran the Victoria Inn in Exeter after moving to the city in the 1990s, where they went on to abuse a string of teenagers.
They denied a total of 46 charges of sexual and physical abuse dating between 1989 and 2004.
David Williams was found guilty of 10 rapes, 13 indecent assaults, five counts of gross indecency, two of cruelty and one of sexual activity with a child.
Pauline Williams was found guilty of two rapes and five indecent assaults. They were found not guilty of eight other allegations involving two other complainants.
Det Con Debbie Dow, from Devon and Cornwall Police, said: "David and Pauline Williams carried out a string of sickening and callous sexual attacks on children and teenagers without remorse over a 15-year period.
"These victims, both men and women, had their childhoods stolen by David and Pauline Williams and all have suffered difficulties throughout their adulthood following this abuse as they struggled to live normal lives."


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details!

Question: A man who survived an attack by cows in which his brother was killed has told an inquest it appeared the herd wanted to "deliberately trample" them.

represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

------

Examples:

"['represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary', 'At a conference in London, Sir Michael Fallon confirmed the Britain was, for the first time, conducting what he called "offensive cyber" against IS.\nHe refused to give any further details.\nMosul has been in the hands of IS, also referred to as Daesh, since 2014 and is the militants\' last major Iraqi stronghold.\nWhen asked if the UK was launching cyber attacks in the bid to take the northern Iraqi city from IS, Sir Michael said: "I\'m not going into operational specifics, but yes, you know we are conducting military operations against Daesh as part of the international coalition, and I can confirm that we are using offensive cyber for the first time in this campaign."\nIraqi forces said on Thursday they had recaptured the town of Bartella, less than 10 miles (15 km) east of Mosul and Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said the operation to retake Mosul was progressing faster than planned.\nThe Iraqi army is moving from the south, as Kurdish fighters launch a large-scale operation east and north of the city.']" == "['Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details.', 'The UK is using cyber warfare in the fight against Islamic State militants for control of the Iraqi city of Mosul, the defence secretary has said.']"

John Porter said he and his brother Mike, 66, from Edinburgh, had been walking dogs on leads when they were attacked in a field in Wiltshire.
He told Salisbury Coroner's Court they picked themselves up after being trampled only to be knocked over again.
There had been three previous cow attacks nearby, the inquest heard.
The fatal attack happened on a public footpath through Elbow Field in Turleigh in May 2013.
Mr Porter told the inquest that attempts to shoo the cows away failed and they were surrounded.
Mr Porter, from Monkton Combe, near Bath, said the cows seemed to "deliberately trample" on them "as if it was something they really wanted to do", adding that it was "extraordinary".
His brother, who lived in Edinburgh with Adrienne Sillar and their two sons, died at the scene.
The inquest heard there had been one previous attack in the field, in 2008, and two in a neighbouring field in 2011.
David Billington, from Winsley, described how he had been walking home one evening in October 2011 when he heard "thundering hooves". He was knocked unconscious and suffered a broken neck.
The farmer, Brian Godwin, 81, said the cows in the field were continental and British cross-breeds, which were "more excitable" than other cows.
He said he had put in place safety measures after previous incidents - including signs warning people to keep dogs on a lead and some electric fencing. Mr Godwin has since sold his cattle and is trying to establish a new herd, the court was told.
The inquest continues.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

Ephraim Norman, 24, of Thornton Heath, fatally attacked Andrew Else, 52, in Croydon in April 2014 and continued to stab him after one of the knives bent.
The Old Bailey heard two weeks before he had stabbed a teenager in the neck.
Norman, who has paranoid schizophrenia, pleaded guilty to manslaughter and attempted murder on the grounds of diminished responsibility.
The court was told that Norman attacked the teenager and Mr Else after he stopped taking his medication and claimed it made him impotent.
The 15-year-old was on his way home after visiting a friend when Norman hit him from behind and stole his mobile phone before fleeing the scene.
Prosecutor Alan Kent QC said the teenager was "lucky" to survive after the blade was completely buried in his head with the tip poking out the other side.
Weeks later, Norman went out armed with two weapons and stabbed Mr Else, of Forestdale in Selsdon Park Road, Croydon, after following him when he got off a bus.
Scotland Yard said the two men who had reported the attack to police had caught a glimpse of "Norman raising the knife above his head repeatedly stabbing Mr Else".
When he was arrested, Norman told police that he did not trust himself in public and that he did not feel sorry for Mr Else or his family because he was being driven by voices in his head.
He told officers: "It is just my madness, it is just like how my mind is.... I know I could do that again. It is not a big thing for me to do ... I wanted him to die so much I just kept on stabbing him until he was dead."
Judge Anthony Morris QC described Mr Else as a "perfectly respectable man" who was savagely attacked because he happened to be "in the wrong place at the time".


Question: Represent the following document

Question: Former Arsenal, Fulham and Aston Villa defender Philippe Senderos is training with Rangers.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

Ibrox boss Mark Warburton is keen to add a defender to his squad before the transfer window closes this month.
Swiss international Senderos, 31, most recently played his club football with Grasshoppers in his homeland.
"He is training for a week with us," Warburton told the Rangers website. "He is a very talented player with a very impressive CV."
Capped 57 times, he has played in three World Cup finals and a European Championship.
His spell with Grasshoppers last season followed an injury-hit 18 months at Villa.
Senderos, an FA Cup winner with Arsenal in 2005, has made over 200 senior club appearances.
"It is a case of he has not been training with a team so he is in for a week with us and nothing more than that," added Warburton.
"He looks very good technically from his background and physically he looks in good shape so we will have him in for a week and then see what that leads to."

The Liverpool-born 31-year-old, who has three caps for Scotland, ended a two-year spell with the Blades this summer.
McEveley played 42 times for the English League One club last season.
The left-back started his career with Blackburn Rovers and was transferred to Derby County in 2007 before joining Barnsley, but he also played for six other clubs on loan.
He has had short-term spells at Burnley, Gillingham, Ipswich Town, Preston North End, Charlton Athletic and Swindon Town during his career.
McEveley becomes the fourth defender signed by County manager Jim McIntyre this summer.
In addition of Christopher Routis from Bradford City, Kenny van der Weg from Breda and Erik Cikos from Slovan Bratislava, former Wolverhampton Wanderers goalkeeper Aaron McCarey agreed a deal with the Scottish Premiership club.
Find all the latest football transfers on our dedicated page.


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article

Question: Air pollution in some parts of London has been so bad recently, that the Mayor of London has decided to use the highest pollution level alert for the first time.

Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence.

29 January 2017 Last updated at 14:18 GMT
Students at a school in the heart of London tell us what it's like living in a place where the pollution levels are so bad...

The four-day "pea-souper", while worse than usual, was a familiar experience for Londoners.
Visibility was so poor buses and taxis ground to a halt, forcing commuters to hurry underground to use the Tube.
In the Isle of Dogs in east London, the fog was reported to be so thick people could not see their feet and animals dropped dead at the Smithfield Show.
According to the Met Office "the smoke-like pollution was so toxic it was even reported to have choked cows to death in the fields".
A Ministry of Health comparison between the excess of deaths registered in the weeks ending 13 and 20 December and those occurring in the preceding weeks produced estimates of the number of deaths caused by the smog ranging from 3,412 to 4,075.
By Peter CockroftMeteorologist, BBC London
Winter arrived early in 1952 and very cold snowy weather in November continued into December.
Londoners tried to keep warm by burning lots of coal on their home fires. This extra domestic smoke added to that belched out by power stations and factory chimneys.
As an area of high pressure arrived over the capital, the skies cleared and the wind fell light. On 5 December fog started to form.
In a "high" the air is pushing down - exerting a higher pressure. So, anything in the lowest part of the atmosphere becomes trapped; in this case the noxious combination of smoke and fog - smog.
Because the winds remained light there was nothing to blow it away.
Thousands of tonnes of soot and carbon dioxide were pumped into London's air, made worse by some of the fog droplets turning into harmful acids.
Little wonder then, at the time, Londoners described "gasping for air".
According to the General Register Office, respiratory diseases alone accounted for 59% of the increase in deaths registered in the week ending 13 December and 76% in the following week.
The main pollutant, sulphur dioxide, was linked to coal burning which was said to have reached exceptional levels.
The legacy of the Great Smog was the Clean Air Act of 1956 which introduced a number of measures to reduce air pollution.
Furnaces could no longer emit "dark smoke" and households were offered grants towards the cost of converting their coal-burning grates to smokeless fuel.
A broad consensus believed the legislation had a major impact on improving public health.
But new pollution threats are causing concern as air pollution mortality figures remain almost the same.
Lawyer Alan Andrews, of environmental organisation ClientEarth, said an estimated 4,300 Londoners now died each year as a result of air pollution (29,000 UK-wide, according to the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs).
This is no longer because of coal fires but is put down to nitrogen dioxide caused mainly by traffic fumes, he said.
"The UK is failing to meet European Union (EU) air quality standards.
"London is thought to have the highest levels of nitrogen dioxide of any capital city in the EU, with levels on some of London's busiest roads, such as Brixton Road and Putney High Street, currently more than triple legal limits," he said.
ClientEarth says the government's own plans show 16 regions and cities will not achieve legal limits for air quality until 2020, and London will have "illegal levels of air pollution until 2025".
Dr Frank Kelly, professor of environmental health at London's King's College, said legislation worked in the 1950s to deal with pollution but new laws were needed now.
"There's been a dramatic increase in car ownership and traffic, more taxis and buses,  so it's a new type of pollution. Legislation is once again required," he said.
He said the introduction of the Congestion Charge in 2003 and the Low Emission Zone (LEZ) in 2008 had only made a "tiny difference" to air quality in the capital.
Dr Kelly said air quality was known to be a key factor in the UK's biggest health problems - heart disease, strokes and diabetes.
"We've known this for the last decade but politicians are only just waking up to it. We need to clean the air up," he said.
Under EU air quality laws daily pollution levels must not be above the legal limit on more than 35 days in a calendar year.
But air pollution levels in London had already exceeded EU daily limits 36 times this year by April.
A Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) spokesperson said: "We want to keep improving air quality and reduce the impact it can have on human health and the environment.
"Our air quality has improved significantly in recent decades and is now generally very good, and almost all of the UK meets EU air quality limits for all pollutants.
"London, like many of our big cities, is one of the limited areas where air pollution remains an issue.
"However, air quality plans outline all the important work being done at national, regional and local level will ensure we meet EU limits as soon as possible."


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article

Question: Referee Craig Joubert's run from the pitch at the end of Scotland's defeat by Australia may have been prompted by crowd "hostility", says World Rugby chief executive Brett Gosper.

Joubert, 37, awarded a controversial penalty that gave the Wallabies a 35-34 win in the quarter-final at Twickenham.
At full-time, he ran from the field without shaking hands with the players.
"When you have a hostile 82,000 people, for whatever reason, who knows how that affects behaviour?" said Gosper.
"I'm sure as a referee he sensed a bit of hostility."
Former Scotland captain Gavin Hastings described Joubert's swift exit from the field as the "the worst thing I have seen on a rugby field in a very long time". Matt Dawson, part of England's World Cup-winning side of 2003, said it was "disrespectful to the game".
"Maybe he was keen to get to the bathroom, who knows?" joked Gosper to BBC Radio 5 live.
"Craig Joubert is a superb referee and has been for a long time and he's a good man. There will be reasons for whatever Craig did.
"We do a full review of the referees post-game, and that process is under way at the moment."
Media reports in New Zealand and Australia have claimed a bottle was thrown from the crowd at Joubert as he left the field.
Scotland led Australia 34-32 with two minutes to go when Joubert ruled Jon Welsh was deliberately offside, awarding a penalty that Bernard Foley kicked to earn the Wallabies a place in the last four.
However, replays suggested Australia's Nick Phipps touched the ball back to Welsh and Joubert could have awarded a scrum rather than a penalty.
Scotland coach Vern Cotter and captain Greig Laidlaw believe Joubert should have consulted the television match official, although tournament regulations only allow the officials to use video replays to rule on foul play, or whether tries and kicks at goal are legitimate.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

Media playback is not supported on this device
Slimani had already been taken off but referee Wayne Barnes allowed him to return after France's team doctor said Atonio needed a head injury assessment.
Slimani's return coincided with a series of scrums on the Wales line, and France finally won in the 100th minute.
The tournament's Untoward Incident Review Group is to review the matter.
Feature: Was this match the day rugby lost its head?
Organisers said: "Six Nations Rugby will send the file to the UIRG [review group] later this week and it is anticipated that the review process will begin shortly thereafter."
After the defeat, Wales interim head coach Rob Howley said: "There is evidence to suggest the integrity of the game has been brought into disrepute."
Following a chaotic and controversial finish to the game, Wales wing George North claimed he was bitten by an opponent, but citing commissioner John Montgomery said available video footage was inconclusive and no action was taken.
France forward Yoann Maestri was also fined 30,000 euros (£26,000) after accepting a misconduct charge for critical comments he made to the media about Barnes after the game.


Question: represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: The leaders of the UK's main political parties are using the last weekend of the election campaign to try to win over wavering voters.

represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary

David Cameron urged people to choose their "preferred PM" rather than vote tactically for the Lib Dems or UKIP.
Labour leader Ed Miliband said the election was a clash of two visions "about how our country succeeds".
Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg argued that it was unlikely either Labour or the Conservatives would win outright.
£7,000-a-year basic pension
Mr Cameron said people needed to vote Conservative if they wanted to stop Ed Miliband entering Downing Street on 8 May.
"In the end only one of two people can walk back through that door in Number 10 and be the prime minister on Friday," he told BBC's Breakfast programme.
"If you want your preferred prime minister, vote for your preferred prime minister.
"Don't take a risk thinking 'I'll vote Liberal Democrat and hope I get the prime minister I want' or UKIP and hope somehow it emerges."
In other election news:
Mr Cameron made his appeal ahead of a visit to Didsbury, Greater Manchester, to promote the party's "pensioners' manifesto".
He met a group of pensioners and highlighted his party's commitment to the "triple lock" on state pensions, which means they rise by whichever is higher out of inflation, average wages, or 2.5%.
He said the triple lock - which Labour says it is also committed to - would take the annual basic state pension to £7,000 a year by 2020.
He also outlined other previously-announced proposals, including the protection of benefits such as free bus passes and TV licences, and giving people more freedom to invest and spend their pensions.
He earlier insisted there would be no cuts to child benefits as part of his pledge to make £12bn in welfare savings.
Meanwhile, on a visit to the marginal seat of Hastings on Saturday, Mr Miliband hit back at Conservative claims that the only way Labour could get a majority was with the SNP.
Instead he accused the Conservatives of using the SNP to distract voters from their own record.
"What this election really comes down to is not a clash of two nations but a clash of two visions," he said.
"Two different plans ideas about how our country succeeds."
He said the Conservatives offer "huge tax cuts" for the "rich and powerful", whereas Labour thinks "Britain succeeds when working people succeed".
What are the top issues for each political party at the 2015 general election?
Policy guide: Where the parties stand
But Labour former Scottish first minister Henry McLeish said Mr Miliband may have little choice but to negotiate with the Scottish Nationalists.
"At the end of the day, Ed is not going to exclude himself from being prime minister by not talking to anyone," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme
Mr Miliband also used the East Sussex hustings to outline his party's plans to introduce bills for 10 of his manifesto proposals by the end of May.
These would include a "strong economic foundation bill" which would implement a mansion tax and tobacco levy; freezing energy prices until 2017; banning recruitment agencies from hiring only from overseas, and cutting university tuition fees from £9,000 to £6,000 in England.
Addressing party activists in his Sheffield Hallam constituency, Mr Clegg set out plans to bring down youth unemployment "to its lowest level ever" by doubling the number of businesses that offer apprenticeships and creating 100,000 new work experience places.
He also said either Ed Miliband or David Cameron would walk into Number 10 after the election, but the question was "who is going to be there alongside" as neither of them would win outright.
Only the Liberal Democrats stood between UKIP's Nigel Farage, the SNP's Alex Salmond "and the door to Number 10", he said,
Later, he told reporters he would not enter "any arrangements, any pacts, any deals" with either UKIP or the SNP.
This was "for the simple reason that we fundamentally disagree with Nigel Farage's view that he wants to pull one union apart - the European Union - as we also fundamentally disagree with the SNP's will to pull another union - the United Kingdom - apart," he said.
He added: "In an election where no one wins a majority, it's really pretty simple: give the party which has nonetheless got more wind in its sails, a greater mandate from the British people, the opportunity to try and form a government.
"If they fail to do so, or choose not to do so, then alternative arrangements might need to be arrived at."
The best of BBC News' Election 2015 specials

That is what I have set out to examine in my Election Takeaways - a chat over a bite to eat with different groups of voters to discover what is on their minds and how they are going about deciding who, if anyone, to vote for.
This week, I shared a Thai takeaway with seven people who voted Remain in the EU referendum in the Tory marginal of Bedford.
Like the Leavers I spoke to last week in Halifax, they were chosen for us by the pollsters Ipsos Mori.
When Theresa May strode out of the door of Number 10 to call this election she claimed it was all about Brexit and not, as many believed, about her desire for her own mandate and a bigger Commons majority.
My conversation revealed a fascinating split in the attitudes of Remainers. All seven still believed we should have stayed in the EU and shared their unhappy memories of the moment they realised that Brexit would win, but they are deeply divided in their views about what should happen now.
Four of our seven Remainers told me that they thought the debate about our membership of the EU is now over and it is time to "just get on with it".
Fiorella has lived in Britain all her life but until recently had an Italian passport.
"The reason why Theresa May called a snap election is because she is asking us to choose who we believe is the best person to stand for us all and select the best deal for us," she says.
And Abhijit agreed.  He moved to Bedford from Italy seven years ago and works for a local engineering firm.
"The election is an opportunity to vote for somebody you think will get the best deal after Brexit," he says.
Builder James also supported this view: "This is the situation we're in and it's important now to look forward and come together and get the best deal we can," he says.
Leela, who works with a local housing association, worries that a second vote might cause more division within society: "I think the majority of us who voted remain have accepted it and we just want to get on with it now."
The other three felt just as strongly that the public should have another say once the terms of any Brexit deal are known. They do not want to give Theresa May - or indeed, any prime minister - a blank cheque to negotiate with the EU.
"Why can't we vote on the settlement? It seems to be a lot of, 'I'm the leader to do this but you won't be able to vote on what I do,'" says Alastair, who fixes bikes.
"It's a bit like finding a fire going in your house and saying, 'Well it's going now'. I'd like to think it could change. I'm an optimist," says Maria who's in the music business.
Jen, a secretary in an estate agents, also remains sceptical. "We're voting in the general election but we're still going to be voting on something that we've not seen or had an opportunity to have a say on."
The Financial Times has dubbed this a split between Hard Remainers and Re-Leavers - those who voted Remain but now accept we are leaving. Working with the pollsters YouGov they have shown how the 48% who voted to stay in the EU are now split down the middle about what to do next.
This split means that parties like the Liberal Democrats, which have promised a second EU referendum, have a far smaller pool of voters to fish in than many suggest - just 22% of Hard Remainers to be precise.
They have another problem too if my group in Bedford is representative.
Those who wanted a second referendum had no idea that that was Lib Dem policy, and not one of them could name the Lib Dem leader - "I don't know who he is," says Leela.  And yet three of my group had voted for the party in an election for the local mayor.
Jen voted for Dave Hodgson. "Obviously he's Liberal Democrat. I voted not necessarily because of the party he's with but because of the candidate."
No wonder the polls suggest that we are seeing a squeeze on the smaller parties and a return to two-party politics - at least in England.
Now you might think that you cannot draw any meaningful conclusions from such a small group of voters. Of course, you would be right to think that they cannot predict the result in any constituency let alone in the country as a whole. What they can do is add flesh to the bones of opinion polls.
My takeaway from this week's Election Takeaway is that if - and with three weeks to go it is still a mighty big if - Theresa May can attract the support of both those who voted Leave, whether they previously voted UKIP or Labour rather than Conservative, as well as those who voted Remain but now want the country to get on with leaving, she will have built an unstoppable coalition.
There is one thing that I heard that might limit the size of that coalition however, and that is whether Labour can successfully change what this election is seen to be about.
All the voters I spoke to in Bedford expressed their deep concern about the pressure on, or future cuts to, the NHS - an issue that has yet to really take off in this campaign.  If Jeremy Corbyn is to have any chance of stopping a Tory landslide let alone winning outright he needs to persuade the sort of voters I have been speaking to that traditional domestic concerns matter as much, if not more, than Brexit.
Next week, I'll be in another town talking to those Theresa May has dubbed the "Just About Managing" getting their views on which policies, party and politician might do most to help them.
You can watch more of Nick's Election Takeaway on the BBC News Channel this weekend at 14:30 and 20:30 BST on Saturday and 10:30 and 16:30 BST on Sunday.
Get news from the BBC in your inbox, each weekday morning


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article

Question: Another major cyber-attack could be imminent after Friday's global hit that infected more than 125,000 computer systems, security experts have warned.

Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary:

UK security researcher "MalwareTech", who helped to limit the ransomware attack, predicted "another one coming... quite likely on Monday".
The virus, which took control of users' files, spread to 100 countries, including Spain, France and Russia.
In England, 48 NHS trusts fell victim, as did 13 NHS bodies in Scotland.
Some hospitals were forced to cancel procedures and appointments, as ambulances were directed to neighbouring hospitals free from the computer virus.
UK Home Secretary Amber Rudd said on Saturday that the problem was largely resolved but that "there's always more" that could be done to protect against computer viruses.
NHS trusts that appear to still be experiencing IT difficulties are:
After taking computers over, the virus displayed messages demanding a payment of $300 (Â£230) in virtual currency Bitcoin to unlock files and return them to the user.
BBC analysis of three accounts linked with the global attack suggests the hackers have already been paid the equivalent of Â£22,080.
MalwareTech, who wants to remain anonymous, was hailed as an "accidental hero" after registering a domain name to track the spread of the virus, which actually ended up halting it.
The 22-year-old told the BBC: "It's very important that people patch their systems now.
"We have stopped this one, but there will be another one coming and it will not be stoppable by us.
"There's a lot of money in this. There's no reason for them to stop. It's not really much effort for them to change the code and then start over.
"So there's a good chance they are going to do it... maybe not this weekend, but quite likely on Monday morning."
On Sunday he warned hackers could upgrade the virus to remove the "kill switch" that helped to stop it.
"Version 1 of WannaCrypt was stoppable but version 2.0 will likely remove the flaw. You're only safe if you patch ASAP," he tweeted.
Fellow security researcher Darien Huss, from tech firm Proofpoint, echoed MalwareTech's view.
"I highly suspect that, with the amount of coverage that this incident is getting, there are probably already people that are working to incorporate the exploit that was used for spreading," he said.
He said his research experience on targeted attacks made him doubt a nation state was involved here.
"This attack was so simple and unsophisticated, that leads me to believe the people or person involved, even though they are quite capable, they're more along the lines of an amateur," he said.
Investigators are working to track down those responsible for the ransomware used on Friday, known as Wanna Decryptor or WannaCry.
The virus exploits a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows software, first identified by the US National Security Agency, experts have said.
Europol described the cyber-attack as "unprecedented" and said its cyber-crime team was working with affected countries to "mitigate the threat and assist victims".
Oliver Gower, of the UK's National Crime Agency, added: "Cyber criminals may believe they are anonymous, but we will use all the tools at our disposal to bring them to justice."
In the UK, critics said the government had known about the threat of a cyber-attack for some time, but hospitals had not made the right upgrades to protect themselves.
A security update - or patch - was released by Microsoft in March to protect against the virus, but it appears many NHS organisations had not applied it or were using an older version of the operating system no longer supported - namely Windows XP.
NHS Digital said that 4.7% of devices within the NHS use Windows XP, with the figure continuing to decrease.
But Kingsley Manning, a former chairman of NHS Digital, said several hundred thousand computers were still running the out-of-date operating system.
Mr Manning told BBC Radio 4's PM programme: "Some trusts took the advice that was offered to them very seriously and acted on it and some of them may not have done.
"If you're sitting in a hard-pressed hospital in the middle of England, it is difficult to see that as a greater priority than dealing with outpatients or A&E."
The Liberal Democrats and Labour have both demanded an inquiry into the cyber-attack.
Get news from the BBC in your inbox, each weekday morning

The creation of a single file can stop the attack from infecting a machine.
However, researchers have not been able to find a so-called kill switch that would prevent the crippling ransomware from spreading to other vulnerable computers.
Experts are still unsure about the attack's origins or its real purpose.
Given that the ransom amount - $300 - was relatively small, some are speculating that the attack may be a front for causing wider disruption or making a political statement.
Among the victims of the attack were the Ukrainian central bank, Russian oil giant Rosneft, British advertising firm WPP and the global law firm DLA Piper.
Also caught up in the attack was at least one hospital in the US city of Pittsburgh.
But for those concerned about the attack there appears to be fix, albeit one with limited effectiveness.
By creating a read-only file - named perfc - and placing it within a computer's "C:\Windows" folder, the attack will be stopped in its tracks.
An explanation of how to do this has been posted by security news website Bleeping Computer and has been backed up by several other security experts.
However, while this method is effective, it only protects the individual computer the perfc file is placed on. Researchers have so far been unable to locate a kill switch that would disable the ransomware attack entirely.
"Even though it will make a machine 'immune'," explained computer scientist Prof Alan Woodward, "It is still a 'carrier' (to use the biological analogy).
"It will still act as a platform to spread the ransomware to other machines on the same network."
For the vast majority of users, simply running an up-to-date version of Windows will be sufficient to prevent the attack taking hold, were it to infect your PC.
The spread of this new ransomware is likely to be much slower than last month's WannaCry attack, researchers predict, as code analysis showed the new attack did not attempt to spread itself beyond the network it was placed on.
Because of this, several experts are predicting that the attack will not spread significantly further than it did on Tuesday, unless it is modified.
"There is low risk of new infections more than one hour after the attack," suggested the MalwareTech blog.
So how did it spread? Experts from Cisco's Talos intelligence unit said it believed the attack may have been carried out by exploiting vulnerable accounting software.
"We believe it is possible that some infections may be associated with software update systems for a Ukrainian tax accounting package called MeDoc," the company said in a blog post.
MeDoc initially posted an update to its website on Tuesday saying, in Russian, "Attention! Our server made a virus attack" - though this was later removed, and the company has since denied its software was exploited.
As reported on Tuesday, the method by which victims can pay the ransom fee has been rendered useless. An email address provided by the criminals has been shut down by the hosting provider, while the Bitcoin wallet - where ransoms are deposited - has not been touched.
At the time of writing, the wallet contains approximately $8,000-worth of Bitcoin, not a large return for such a significant and widespread attack.
These factors contribute to a now-prevailing theory that this was a politically motivated attack on Ukraine, coming as it did just as the country is set to celebrate its Constitution Day.
"This looks like a sophisticated attack aimed at generating chaos, not money," said Prof Woodward.
___________
Follow Dave Lee on Twitter @DaveLeeBBC
You can reach Dave securely through encrypted messaging app Signal on: +1 (628) 400-7370


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: The funeral of the Irish woman raped and murdered in Goa last month has taken place in her native Buncrana.

represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence

Fewshot example: "['Represent the news article to find a single sentence that could be used as a summary', 'A surveillance system launched in 2007 by the US National Security Agency (NSA).\nA leaked presentation, dated April 2013, states that it allows the organisation to "receive" emails, video clips, photos, voice and video calls, social networking details, logins and other data held by a range of US internet firms.\nIt names the companies as: Microsoft and its Skype division; Google and its YouTube division; Yahoo; Facebook, AOL, Apple and PalTalk - a lesser known chat service owned by AVM Software.\nThe presentation says the programme costs $20m (Â£13m) a year to run and is designed to overcome  earlier "constraints" in the NSA\'s counterterrorism data collection efforts.\nDetails of the initiative were first published by the Guardian and the Washington Post newspapers on 6 June.\nLater that day the US director of national intelligence confirmed the initiative\'s existence and declassified some information about it.\nA 1978 law - the Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act (Fisa) - had set out the conditions under which a special court would authorise electronic surveillance if people were believed to be engaged in espionage or planning an attack against the US on behalf of a foreign power.\nFollowing the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration secretly gave the NSA permission to bypass the court and carry out warrantless surveillance of al-Qaeda suspects among others.\nAfter this emerged in 2005, Congress voted to both offer immunity to the firms that had co-operated with the NSA\'s requests and to make amendments to Fisa.\nThe relaxation to the rules, introduced in 2008, meant officials could now obtain court orders without having to identify each individual target or detail the specific types of communications they intended to monitor so long as they convinced the court their purpose was to gather "foreign intelligence information".\nIn addition they no longer had to confirm both the sender and receiver of the messages were outside the US, but now only had to show it was "reasonable" to believe one of the parties was outside the country.\nDetails of the programme were leaked by Edward Snowden, a 30-year-old who had formerly worked as a technical assistant to the US Central Intelligence Agency.\nHe has since been charged in the US with theft of government property, unauthorised communication of national defence information and wilful communication of classified communications intelligence.\nAs of 1 July, unconfirmed reports in the Russian media said that Mr Snowden was at or close to Sheremetyevo Airport, north-west of Moscow.\nOfficials say that Prism cannot be used to "intentionally target any US citizen, any other US person, or anyone located within the United States".\nAccording to the Washington Post, the NSA identifies suspect communications using search terms designed to give it a 51% confidence rating that the target is foreign.\nThe paper says the queries are then checked by the FBI to ensure no US citizen is named as a target.\nOnce this is done and a suspect identified, it says that anyone that person has contacted or been contacted by can also become subject for review and then, in turn, everyone in the inbox and outbox of this extended group may also be targeted.\nOn 20 June the Guardian published a document spelling out the precautions the NSA is supposed to take to minimise the risk of inadvertently examining data about US citizens and residents.\nIt says that if officials discover details about US persons they should either pass them onto domestic law enforcement or destroy them "at the earliest practicable point".\nSome security experts have questioned whether the NSA\'s 51% confidence rating is high enough.\nThe safeguards do not cover citizens from other countries, and critics suggest this poses a major threat to their human rights.\nInitial reports suggested that the NSA did in fact extract the data via special equipment they had installed on the companies\' computers which acted as a "back door".\nHowever, the tech firms denied they provided "direct access".\nThe New York Times then reported that the companies had created the digital equivalent of "locked mailboxes" - secure areas on their networks onto which they copied the requested files for the agency to inspect.\nHowever, Google later denied this in an interview with Wired magazine.\nIt said it had complied with court-ordered requests by either sending data over secure FTP (file transfer protocol) - an encrypted transmission sent from its computers to the authorities\' - or by physically handing over the information "in person".\nOther tech firms have not been as specific.\nOn 29 June the Washington Post published additional slides which it said showed the NSA obtained at least some of the information from the FBI, adding that the bureau had indeed placed "government equipment" on the private property of participating companies.\nThe newspaper added that as a result the NSA was able to carry out real-time surveillance through Prism. It said this included live notifications of when a target logged on or sent an email as well as the ability to monitor a voice or text chats as they happened.\nMicrosoft, Apple, Yahoo and Facebook have all published figures giving a rough indication of the total number of requests they have received from law enforcement agencies over a period of time.\nHowever, they say they are not able to provide a figure for Fisa-related requests alone as this data remains classified.\nBy contrast, Google declines to provide an aggregated figure saying this would mark a "step back" for its users.\nThe firm already sub-divides the different kinds of government requests it receives into different groups - including the number of national security-related letters received from the FBI.  Its figures do not include requests from the NSA.\nSecurity researcher Ashkan Soltani has posted a blog saying there are still five key unanswered questions about Prism:\nNSA director Keith Alexander says that his agency\'s communication surveillance programmes have helped prevent more than 50 "potential terrorist events" since 9/11.\nPresident Obama adds that: "You can\'t have 100% security, and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience."\nThe Guardian says it has obtained official documents that state "special programmes for GCHQ exist for focused Prism processing" - suggesting that spies at the UK\'s Government Communications Headquarters are making use of data sourced from the US tech firms.\nThe newspaper says that in the year to May 2012, the British agency was able to generate 197 intelligence reports as a result. These would normally be passed on to the MI5 and MI6 intelligence agencies, it says.\nForeign Secretary William Hague says that law-abiding citizens have "nothing to be worried about".\nBut Labour\'s shadow defence secretary Douglas Alexander says the government needs to be more open about the subject, and some security experts suggest there should be explicit time limits on how long the data is held for.\nParliament\'s Intelligence and Security Committee says it will receive a full report on the matter from GCHQ shortly.\nThe EU\'s justice commissioner, Viviane Reding, says she has concerns that firms complying with Prism-related requests might be handing over data in breach of European citizens\' data privacy rights.\nAs a consequence the US has agreed to set up a joint working group to examine the issue.\nChina\'s government says it is "gravely concerned" by other recently disclosed US "cyber attacks" on its citizens.\nHowever, Russian President Vladimir Putin says that this kind of surveillance is a  practical way to fight terrorism.\nFreedom Watch, a Florida-based activist group, is suing various government agencies and the tech companies involved, claiming that Prism violates the US constitution.\nBut the White House says that the programme is legal under the Fisa amendments first passed by Congress in 2008 and then renewed in 2012. These are not due to expire until 2017.\nThere have, however, been suggestions that US firms could face lawsuits in the EU for complying with the requests.\nFar from it.\nThe Guardian has published details of another Fisa-sanctioned programme which demanded US phone network provider Verizon hand over phone records belonging to millions of its customers to the NSA.\nThe leaked Powerpoint slides also point to a separate effort to collect "communications on fibre cables and infrastructure as data flows past", in other words as it travels across the internet. The Guardian has reported that GCHQ is doing something similar.\nReuters has also reported that the US government is now the biggest buyer of malware.\nSeveral websites have published advice on how to avoid Prism\'s reach. Suggestions include:\nHowever, security experts point out that the NSA can still overcome such measures if it manages to identify suspects and put malware on their equipment']" == "['Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details.', 'It has been described by its critics as a spying scandal and by its supporters as a justified and effective effort to head off the threat of terrorist attacks.']"

Danielle McLaughlin, from County Donegal, was found dead in a field close to tourist resorts in the western state of Goa earlier this month.
A post-mortem examination concluded that brain damage and constriction of the neck caused the 28-year-old's death in Canacona.
Ms McLaughlin's remains arrived home in Donegal on Monday evening.
Hundreds of people attended her funeral at St Mary's Church in Buncrana on Thursday.
Family and friends presented four symbols of Ms McLaughlin's life, including a guitar, a holy medallion from one of Mother Teresa's care homes in India, a family photo and a poem.
During requiem mass, Father Francis Bradley said Danielle McLaughlin had made a huge impression on people's lives.
"She was disarmingly kind and forgiving; her warm nature and open heart drew people into her ever-widening, extensive and international circle of friends," Fr Bradley said.
"A brief glance at the vast array of tender messages for Danielle's mother Andrea, her family and friends, shows the immense esteem in which she was held.
"She had a gentle but powerful way with her - for it seems that just one encounter with her was enough to change someone's life."
Danielle McLaughlin had travelled to India in February on a British passport.
The former Liverpool John Moores University student had been staying in a beach hut in Goa with an Australian female friend.
The pair had been celebrating Holi, a Hindu spring festival, in a nearby village.
She left the village late at night and her body was found the next day, unclothed, with injuries to her head and face, police said.
A 24-year-old man, whose name has been reported as Vikat Bhagat, appeared in court two weeks ago charged with murder, and will also face rape charges.

The 24-year-old from Omagh, County Tyrone, was killed alongside County Londonderry man Gerard Bradley.
A concrete slab fell on them at a construction site in Perth. An investigation into the accident has begun.
Mr McDermott's funeral is taking place at Sacred Heart Church in Omagh.
Mr Bradley, who was 29 and from Ringsend, was buried after Requiem Mass in St Malachy's Church in Coleraine on Saturday.


Question: Represent the next text

Question: Highland Council has said it must save more money in 2016-17 than it had previously thought.

This is part of a news article. Represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article

The local authority was expecting to have to tackle a funding gap of more than £21m, but that figure has been revised up to £40m.
The council said the figure was reviewed following last week's UK government Autumn Statement.
Senior councillors said they wanted to protect education from cuts and avoid compulsory redundancies.
Council leader Margaret Davidson said the Autumn Statement had included a 4-5% cut to Scotland's budget and this would filter down to local authorities in terms of less funding from the Scottish government.
She told BBC Alba that trying to find savings of £21m, which was on top of £10m of cuts already agreed for 2016-17, had been "bad enough".
She added: "Now we are being told the gap could be up to £40m, almost double what we had been expecting."
Ms Davidson said Highland Council would be calling for an end to the council tax freeze, as it has done in the past, to allow it to generate more revenue.
Budget leader Bill Fernie described the savings local authorities were having to make as the hardest since World War Two.
Last week, Highland Council said it was looking at closing all its offices and schools from lunchtime on Fridays to help it save money.
Views have been sought from the public on the plan and other ideas to help the council tackle a hole in its budget.
Reducing the working and school week to 4.5 days would result in significant savings, the council has said.

this is part of a news article. represent it to retrieve the first (missing) sentence of the article.

The cuts include a reduction, but modernisation, of the local authority's gritter fleet and the loss of 45 secondary school teaching posts.
Cutting 15 other secondary teaching jobs and reducing the time P4-7 pupils spend in class have been delayed.
The public sector union Unison has said the savings will lead to the loss of 700 jobs across council departments.
Councillors voted on the package at a meeting of the full council in Inverness on Thursday.
It involves £17.4m savings in 2015/16, £10.2m in 2016/17, £6.3m in 2017/18 and £8.9m in 2018/19.
The council said 312 full-time posts will be lost over the four years. It will seek to avoid compulsory redundancies.
The council had been trying to find savings of £64m over four years, but adjusted that figure to about £55m ahead of Thursday's meeting.
Following the meeting, it said that it still had to identify £14m of savings.


Question: Represent the summary to retrieve the rest of the news story with more details

Question: As the outbreak continues to spread, the fear of catching the disease is rising.

Experts are learning more about how to contain the virus that has infected around 7,500 people in West Africa.
The race is on to stop this deadly disease that kills more than half of those it infects.
Here's what is known.
Ebola is spread by direct contact with contaminated body fluids. Blood, vomit and saliva can all carry and spread the deadly virus.
The relatives of sick patients and the healthcare workers who care for them are at highest risk of infection, but anyone who comes into close proximity potentially puts themselves at risk.
For that reason, contact should only be for essential medical care and always under the full protection of the right clothing.
The virus can't breach protective gear, such as gloves, mask/face shield, a full body suit and tough rubber wellington boots, but too few have access to state-of-the-art kit.
Those who do get to wear it should keep changing it every 40 minutes to be safe. Inside the suit it can get up to about 40C. Getting into the kit takes about five minutes. Taking it off again takes the wearer and a designated helper "buddy" about 15 minutes.
This is one of the most dangerous times for contamination and people are sprayed with chlorine as this happens.
Surgical cap
Goggles
Medical mask
Scrubs
Overalls
Apron
Double gloves
Boots
Respirator
The cap forms part of a protective hood covering the head and neck. It offers medical workers an added layer of protection, ensuring that they cannot touch any part of their face whilst in the treatment centre.
Goggles, or eye visors, are used to provide cover to the eyes, protecting them from splashes. The goggles are sprayed with an anti-fogging solution before being worn. On October 21, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)  announced stringent new guidelines for healthcare personnel who may be dealing with Ebola patients. In the new guidelines, health workers are advised to use a single use disposable full face shield as goggles may not provide complete skin coverage.
Covers the mouth to protect from sprays of blood or body fluids from patients. When wearing a respirator, the medical worker must  tear this outer mask to allow the respirator through.
A respirator is worn to protect the wearer from a patient's coughs. According to guidelines from the medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), the respirator should be put on second, right after donning the overalls.
A surgical scrub suit, durable hospital clothing that absorbs liquid and is  easily cleaned, is worn as a baselayer underneath the overalls. It is normally tucked into rubber boots to ensure no skin is exposed.
The overalls are placed on top of the scrubs. These suits are similar to hazardous material (hazmat) suits worn in toxic environments. The team member supervising the process should check that the equipment is not damaged.
A minimum two sets of gloves are required, covering the suit cuff. When putting on the gloves, care must be taken to ensure that no skin is exposed and that they are worn in such a way that any fluid on the sleeve will run off the suit and glove. Medical workers must change gloves between patients, performing thorough hand hygiene before donning a new pair. Heavy duty gloves are used whenever workers need to handle infectious waste.
A waterproof apron is placed on top of the overalls as a final layer of protective clothing.
Ebola health workers typically wear rubber boots, with the scrubs tucked into the footwear. If boots are unavailable, workers must wear closed, puncture and fluid-resistant shoes.
If an infected droplet does get on to your skin, it can be washed away immediately with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitiser.
The eyes are a different matter. A spray of droplets from a sneeze directly into the eye, for example, could let the virus in.
Similarly, the mucous membranes of the mouth and inside of the nose are vulnerable areas, as is broken skin.
One of the most shocking symptoms of Ebola is bleeding. Patients can bleed from the eyes, ears, nose, mouth and rectum. Diarrhoea and vomit may also be tainted with blood.
A big infection risk is cleaning up. Any laundry or other clinical waste should be incinerated. Any medical equipment that needs to be kept should be decontaminated.
Without adequate sterilisation, virus transmission can continue and amplify.
Minute droplets on a surface that hasn't been adequately cleaned could, in theory, pose a risk. And it's unclear how long the virus could sit there and remain a threat. Flu viruses and other germs can live two hours or longer on hard environmental surfaces like tables, doorknobs, and desks.
The nurse who recently became infected while caring for two Ebola patients in Spain had twice gone into the room where one of the the patients was being treated - to be directly involved in his care and to disinfect the room after his death. Both times she was wearing protective clothing.
Soap and water or alcohol-based hand sanitisers readily disrupt the envelope of this single-stranded RNA virus, and decontamination with dilute bleach is effective and readily available even in remote settings.
Generally, once someone recovers from Ebola and they have the all-clear, they can no longer spread the virus.
But according to the World Health Organization Ebola can be found in semen for seven weeks and some studies suggest it can be present for up to three months.
For this reason, doctors say that people who recover from Ebola should abstain from sex or use condoms for three months.
*In all cases but two, first in Madrid and later in Dallas, the patient was infected with Ebola while in West Africa.

Healthcare workers are visibly struggling, the response to the outbreak has been damned as "lethally inadequate" and the situation is showing signs of getting considerably worse.
The outbreak has been running all year, but the latest in a stream of worrying statistics shows 40% of all the deaths have been in just the past three weeks.
So what can we expect in the months, and possibly years, to come?
Crystal-ball gazing can be a dangerous affair, particularly as this is uncharted territory.
Previous outbreaks have been rapidly contained, affecting just dozens of people; this one has already infected more than 3,900.
But the first clues are in the current data.
Dr Christopher Dye, the director of strategy in the office of the director general at the World Health Organization, has the difficult challenge of predicting what will happen next.
He told the BBC: "We're quite worried, I have to say, about the latest data we've just gathered."
Up until a couple of weeks ago, the outbreak was raging in Liberia especially close to the epicentre of the outbreak in Lofa County and in the capital Monrovia.
However, the two other countries primarily hit by the outbreak, Sierra Leone and Guinea, had been relatively stable. Numbers of new cases were not falling, but they were not soaring either.
That is no longer true, with a surge in cases everywhere except some parts of rural Sierra Leone in the districts of Kenema and Kailahun.
"In most other areas, cases and deaths appear to be rising. That came as a shock to me," said Dr Dye.
The stories of healthcare workers being stretched beyond breaking point are countless.
A lack of basic protective gear such as gloves has been widely reported.
The charity Medecins Sans Frontieres has an isolation facility with 160 beds in Monrovia. But it says the queues are growing and they need another 800 beds to deal with the number of people who are already sick.
This is not a scenario for containing an epidemic, but fuelling one.
Dr Dye's tentative forecasts are grim: "At the moment we're seeing about 500 new cases each week. Those numbers appear to be increasing.
"I've just projected about five weeks into the future and if current trends persist we would be seeing not hundreds of cases per week, but thousands of cases per week and that is terribly disturbing.
"The situation is bad and we have to prepare for it getting worse."
The World Health Organization is using an educated guess of 20,000 cases before the end, in order to plan the scale of the response.
But the true potential of the outbreak is unknown and the WHO figure has been described to me as optimistic by some scientists.
The outbreak started in Gueckedou in Guinea, on the border with Liberia and Sierra Leone.
But it has spread significantly with the WHO reporting that "for the first time since the outbreak began" that the majority of cases in the past week were outside of that epicentre with the capital cities becoming major centres of Ebola.
Additionally one person took the infection to Nigeria, where it has since spread in a small cluster and there has been an isolated case in Senegal.
Prof Simon Hay, from the University of Oxford, will publish his scientific analysis of the changing face of Ebola outbreaks in the next week.
He warns that as the total number of cases increases, so does the risk of international spread.
He told me: "I think you're going to have more and more of these individual cases seeding into new areas, continued flows into Senegal, Cote d'Ivoire, and all the countries in between, so I'm not very optimistic at the moment that we're containing this epidemic."
There is always the risk that one of these cases could arrive in Europe or North America.
However, richer countries have the facilities to prevent an isolated case becoming an uncontrolled outbreak.
The worry is that other African countries with poor resources would not cope and find themselves in a similar situation to Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone.
"Nigeria is the one I look at with great concern. If things started to get out of control in Nigeria I really think that, because of its connectedness and size, that could be quite alarming," said Prof Hay.
It is also unclear when this outbreak will be over.
Officially the World Health Organization is saying the outbreak can be contained in six to nine months. But that is based on getting the resources to tackle the outbreak, which are currently stretched too thinly to contain Ebola as it stands.
There have been nearly 4,000 cases so far, cases are increasing exponentially and there is a potentially vulnerable population in Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea in excess of 20 million.
11,315
Deaths - probable, confirmed and suspected
(Includes one in the US and six in Mali)
4,809 Liberia
3,955 Sierra Leone
2,536 Guinea
8 Nigeria
Prof Neil Ferguson, the director of the UK Medical Research Council's centre for outbreak analysis and modelling at Imperial College London, is providing data analysis for the World Health Organization.
He is convinced that the three countries will eventually get on top of the outbreak, but not without help from the rest of the world.
"The authorities are completely overwhelmed. All the trends are the epidemic is increasing, it's still growing exponentially, so there's certainly no reason for optimism.
"It is hard to make a long-term prognosis, but this is certainly something we'll be dealing with in 2015.
"I can well imagine that unless there is a ramp-up of the response on the ground, we'll have flare-ups of cases for several months and possibly years."
It is certainly a timeframe that could see an experimental Ebola vaccine, which began safety testing this week, being used on the front line.
If the early trials are successful then healthcare workers could be vaccinated in November this year.
But there are is also a fear being raised by some virologists that Ebola may never be contained.
Prof Jonathan Ball, a virologist at the University of Nottingham, describes the situation as "desperate".
His concern is that the virus is being given its first major opportunity to adapt to thrive in people, due to the large number of human-to-human transmissions of the virus during this outbreak of unprecedented scale.
Ebola is thought to come from fruit bats; humans are not its preferred host.
But like HIV and influenza, Ebola's genetic code is a strand of RNA. Think of RNA as the less stable cousin of DNA, which is where we keep our genetic information.
It means Ebola virus has a high rate of mutation and with mutation comes the possibility of adapting.
Prof Ball argues: "It is increasing exponentially and the fatality rate seems to be decreasing, but why?
"Is it better medical care, earlier intervention or is the virus adapting to humans and becoming less pathogenic? As a virologist that's what I think is happening."
There is a relationship between how deadly a virus is and how easily it spreads. Generally speaking if a virus is less likely to kill you, then you are more likely to spread it - although smallpox was a notable exception.
Prof Ball said "it really wouldn't surprise me" if Ebola adapted, the death rate fell to around 5% and the outbreak never really ended.
"It is like HIV, which has been knocking away at human-to-human transmission for hundreds of years before eventually finding the right combo of beneficial mutations to spread through human populations."
It is also easy to focus just on Ebola when the outbreak is having a much wider impact on these countries.
The malaria season, which is generally in September and October in West Africa, is now starting.
This will present a number of issues. Will there be capacity to treat patients with malaria? Will people infected with malaria seek treatment if the nearest hospital is rammed with suspected Ebola cases? How will healthcare workers cope when malaria and Ebola both present with similar symptoms.
And that nervousness about the safety of Ebola-rife hospitals could damage care yet further. Will pregnant women go to hospital to give birth or stay at home where any complications could be more deadly.
The collateral damage from Ebola is unlikely to be assessed until after the outbreak.
No matter where you look there is not much cause for optimism.
The biggest unknown in all of this is when there will be sufficient resources to properly tackle the outbreak.
Prof Neil Ferguson concludes: "This summer has there have been many globally important news stories in Ukraine and the Middle East, but what we see unfolding in West Africa is a catastrophe to the population, killing thousands in the region now and we're seeing a breakdown of the fragile healthcare system.
"So I think it needs to move up the political agenda rather more rapidly than it has."


Question: This is the first sentence of a news article. Represent it to easily retrieve the remaining few sentences of the article:

Question: The parents of Paul Quinn, who was beaten to death in County Monaghan almost six years ago, have met the Northern Ireland commissioner for victims and survivors.

Represent the news to retrieve its missing first sentence

Stephen and Breege Quinn met Kathryn Stone in Belfast on Thursday.
Paul Quinn was 21 when he was murdered. No-one has been charged.
His family said he had been involved in a dispute with individual IRA members. His mother said the family were being kept up-to-date with the investigation.
She said the commissioner had been very sympathetic towards them.
"She could not believe when she read up on him, the lies that were told about Paul," his mother said.
"She said she will be there to help us. There will be no end till we get justice.
"Every day there's something new comes in and the gardaÃ are very, very good.
"They will keep going and we'll keep fighting."
Mr Quinn's family claimed he had been "ordered to leave the country" but refused to do so.
Sinn FÃ©in has denied republican involvement.
After the meeting, Ms Stone said it was a privilege to meet the Quinns and to "witness their strength and tenacity in the pursuit of justice".
"The commission fully supports their search for justice," she said.
"It is my role to advocate for all victims and survivors, and I hope that this meeting with the Quinn family and representatives of the Quinn Support Group, will go some way in reassuring them that they are not being ignored and that the commission is here to help them in any way it can."
Nearly three weeks ago, the Police Service of Northern Ireland released a man in his 20s and Irish police released three other men who were all being questioned about the killing.

The 15-year-old from Castlederg disappeared after a night out in County Donegal in 1994.
Former Chief Superintendent Eric Anderson is to be asked to attend in what the coroner described as a "belt and braces" approach.
Arlene's body has never been found.
It is believed she was murdered by convicted child killer and rapist Robert Howard, who died in custody last year.
The inquest into her death has been delayed a number of times.


Question: Represent the natural language

Question: A transgender man has won his case for unfair dismissal at a court in China.

Mr C, who was born female but identifies and dresses as a man, was working at a health centre in Guiyang last year when he was fired.
The court said he had been illegally dismissed, but said there was not enough evidence to rule he had been fired due to discrimination against transgender people.
Mr C told AFP news agency that he was "quite happy" with the outcome.
But he said that the court's decision to reject discrimination as the cause showed that "legislation in this field requires greater attention".
Mr C had only worked at the Ciming Health Check-up Centre for a week when he was told to leave. He says it was because he wore men's clothing.
A news report at the time quoted a manager as saying that his appearance "really didn't fit our standards".
The court awarded him a month's wages, reports said. Mr C took the case to court after losing a complaint at a labour tribunal.
Speaking to the BBC last year, Mr C said he had received a lot of support from China's LGBT community. But he said trying to find a job as a transgender person was hard.
"Within the LGBT community, many people have experienced this after they revealed their sexual orientation," he said. "So you either hide it, and wear their uniforms, or you get rejected."
Conservative attitudes to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender issues hold sway in China, which does not allow same-sex marriage. But activists have become more vocal in recent years.
Last year, a court in Changsha city ruled that two gay men could not register as married. Supporters said the fact that the case was heard at all constituted progress.
When Mr C's wrongful dismissal case was first accepted by a district court, activists were pleased that his complaint was being taken seriously. That was a victory unto itself, they said.
There was talk that the case could be a legal landmark; a decision that Mr C experienced unfair bias based on his transgender status could set a precedent to protect the labour rights of gay, lesbian and transgender people in China.
In the end the court's ruling was a limited victory - awarding Mr C compensation but not ruling that he was dismissed because of his transgender status.
China's courts are not independent, and a politically sensitive case like this would have attracted the attention of the country's central authorities.
The decision effectively takes the steam out of Mr C's battle. If he had lost, he probably could have appealed, bringing the case to a higher court and gaining even more attention.
Mr C said he was pursuing the case to gain recognition rather than compensation. He and his supporters say the decision will allow hidden discrimination to persist.

Their stories are all different, but the landmark case centred on whether religious principles had a place in the modern British workplace.
It culminated in a ruling in favour of British Airways worker Nadia Eweida, but dismissal of the legal actions in the other three cases.
Ms Eweida - a Pentecostal Christian of Egyptian descent - went home from a job as a check-in worker for British Airways (BA) at Heathrow Airport after she refused to conceal her silver cross necklace.
The 59-year-old from Twickenham, south-west London, left work in October 2006 after she was told her necklace breached BA's uniform code.
At the time, the airline had banned the wearing of any visible item of adornment around the neck, but this was changed in 2007 to allow staff to display a faith or charity symbol with the uniform.
Ms Eweida did not return to work until February 2007, after the policy was changed, and was not paid for the time she was absent from work.
She decided to sue BA on the grounds of religious discrimination, but lost her case at an employment tribunal in January 2008.
After the tribunal she expressed her disappointment, saying: "I'm speechless really because I went to the tribunal to seek justice."
She appealed against the decision, but lost the case at the Employment Appeal Tribunal in January 2008.
The judge ruled the wearing of the cross was not discriminatory, because Christians "generally" do not consider it to be a requirement of the religion.
Ms Eweida then took her case to the Court of Appeal, but was again unsuccessful at overturning the ruling in February 2010.
In January 2013, European Court of Human Rights judges found in her favour.
Marriage registrar Lillian Ladele worked for Islington Borough Council in London.  When civil partnerships were legalised in 2004, Miss Ladele refused to conduct them, saying it was against her religious beliefs.
In December 2007, the local authority changed the rules governing their registrar's working conditions.
Miss Ladele went from effectively working on a freelance basis, which allowed her to swap civil partnership ceremonies with colleagues, to a system which granted her far less flexibility.
Miss Ladele argued she was being forced by the north London council to chose between her religious beliefs and her job.  She claimed she was shunned and accused of being homophobic for refusing to carry out the ceremonies.
In July 2008, an employment tribunal ruled in Miss Ladele's favour, agreeing that she had been harassed.
At the time, Miss Ladele hailed the decision as a "victory for religious liberty".
But in December that year the Employment Appeal Tribunal reversed the ruling, and it was upheld for a second time by the Court of Appeal in 2009.
The Supreme Court refused to allow Miss Ladele to appeal again, prompting her decision to consider taking her case to the European Court of Human Rights.
But the European judges rejected her action in January 2013.
In a similar case to Ms Eweida, former nurse Mrs Chaplin was also asked not to display her cross necklace by her then employers, the Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation NHS Trust.
They also claimed during the case, in 2009, that the 56-year-old's necklace breached health and safety guidelines, because it could be grabbed by a patient and potentially hurt Mrs Chaplin.
She had worn the cross on the wards for 30 years without incident, and offered to have a quick-release magnetic clasp fitted, which the hospital refused.
Hospital officials said they discussed several ways the ward sister could wear the cross, including concealing it under her clothes, but when the nurse refused she was asked to work behind a desk instead of with patients.
Her discrimination case was heard by an Employment Appeal Tribunal in 2010, but they failed to uphold her complaint.
When Mrs Chaplin, from Exeter, decided to pursue the case at the ECHR in March 2012, she told the BBC she did not realise the strength of her faith - until it was questioned.
"It was a case of my job or my faith - and I chose my faith," she said.
She took early retirement last year in response to the row.
In their ruling in January 2013, European judges rejected Mrs Chaplin's legal action.
Relationship counsellor Mr McFarlane was sacked by his employer, Relate Avon, after saying he objected to giving sex therapy guidance to same-sex couples.
Employed by the national counselling service in May 2003, the former church elder from Bristol claimed his religious beliefs meant he could not promote gay sex.
The 51-year-old was suspended in October 2007 after meeting with his manager to discuss the issue, and was eventually dismissed for gross misconduct in March 2008.
Charity Christian Concern said Mr McFarlane "never refused" to provide sex therapy to a homosexual couple, but had told his managers if such a situation arose he would discuss it with them.
His case was dismissed by both an internal appeal at Relate and an employment tribunal.
In November 2009, the Employment Appeal Tribunal again refused to uphold Mr McFarlane's claims of unfair dismissal.
His application to appeal the tribunal's decision was turned down twice by the Court of Appeal in April 2010.
Speaking after the ruling, Mr McFarlane said: "There should be allowances taken into account whereby individuals like me can actually avoid having to contradict their very strongly-held Christian principles."
ECHR judges agreed with earlier rulings and dismissed the case in January 2013.