The 71-year-old ex-police officer accused of shooting dead a man inside a Florida movie theater won't get the chance to go home -- at least for now -- after a judge Friday decided not to grant him bail. 

Judge Pat Siracusa made his decision after two days of wrenching, evocative, at times seemingly contradictory testimony inside a Dade City, Florida, courtroom. 

"The state did, in fact, meet their standard," Siracusa said of prosecutors argument that Curtis Reeves shouldn't be allowed to post bond. "And I am going to detain Mr. Reeves, pretrial. He will remain in custody." 

Reeves' lawyer signaled his intention to appeal a decision that -- while not unexpected, given this is a homicide case -- he believes is unwarranted. The attorney, Richard Escobar, said that he's optimistic about not only the appeal on bail, but that a jury of six citizens will side with his client. 

"Mr. Reeves is truly an innocent man," Escobar told reporters. "And we look forward to proving that at a jury trial at some point." 

The widow of the man that Reeves killed, meanwhile, applauded Siracusa's decision. 

"I'm just very happy and relieved," Nicole Oulson said. "... I have no doubt in my mind that it was the right decision." 

No threats before shooting, widow says 

Was it self-defense or an overreaction? 

As Siracusa took pains to point out, his opting not to grant bail has nothing to do with his or others assessment of Reeves' guilt or innocence. That won't happen until trial.  QUESTIONS:

Q1:
1. What was the name of the judge on the ex-police officer's case?
2. The ex-police officer's case was being conducted by which judge?
3. 
Q2:
1. What crime is the officer accused of doing?
2. What is the officer's supposed crime?
3. 
Q3:
1. Where did the shooting take place?
2. What was the location of the shooting?
3. 
Q4:
1. What is the name of the officer's prosecutor?
2. What is the name of the prosecutor in this case?
3. 
Q5:
1. What is the location where the judge gave his verdict?
2. The judge's verdict was given in which location?
3. 
Q6:
1. What is the officer's name?
2. What is the name of the ex-police officer that is being charged?
3. 
Q7:
1. What is Curtis Reeves' lawyer's intention subsequent to the given verdict?
2. What does Curtis Reeves' lawyer intend on doing now that a verdict has been given?
3. 
Q8:
1. Why does Curtis Reeves' lawyer wish to appeal the case?
2. Why does Curtis Reeves' lawyer believe that it is necessary to ask for an appeal regarding the verdict of the case?
3. 
Q9:
1. What is the name of Curtis Reeves' lawyer?
2. What is Curtis Reeves' lawyer called?
3. 
