Which is sillier: denying we ever went to the moon or trying to convince the true nonbelievers? 

Once upon a time - July 20, 1969, to be specific - two men got out of their little spaceship and wandered around on the moon for a while.Ten more men walked on the moon over the next three and a half years. 

Unfortunately, not quite.A fair number of Americans think that this whole business of moon landings really isa fairy tale.They believe that the landings were a big hoax staged in the Mojave Desert, to convince everyone that U.S.technology was the "best" in the whole wide world. 

Which is the harder thing to do: Send men to the moon or make believe we did? The fact is the physics behind sending people to the moon is simple.You can do it with computers whose entire memory capacities can now fit on chips the size of postage stamps and that cost about as much as, well, a postage stamp.I know you can because we did. 

However, last fall NASA considered spending $15,000 on a public-relations campaign to convince the unimpressed that Americans had in fact gone to the moon.That idea was mostly a reaction to a Fox television program, first aired in February 2001, that claimed to expose the hoax.The show's creator is a publicity hound who has lived up to the name in more ways than one by hounding Buzz Aldrin, the second man on the moon.Mr.X (as I will call him, thereby denying him the joyous sight of his name in print) recently followed Buzz Aldrin around and called him "a thief, liar and coward" until the 72-year-old astronaut finally lost it and hit the 37-year-old Mr.X in the face. 

Anyway, NASA's publicity campaign began to slow down.The nonbelievers took the campaign as NASA's effort to hide something while the believers said that $15,000 to convince people that the world was round -- I mean, that we had gone to the moon -- was simply a waste of money.(Actually, the $15,000 was supposed to pay for an article by James E.Oberg, an astronomy writer who, with Aldrin, has contributed to Scientific American.) 

If NASA not paying Oberg, perhaps it could put the money to good use by hiring two big guys to drag Neil Armstrong out of the house.Armstrong is an extremely private man, but he is also the first man on the moon, so maybe he has a duty to be a bit more outspoken about the experience.Or NASA could just buy Aldrin a commemorate plaque for his recent touch on the face of Mr.X. QUESTIONS:

Q1:
1. Is the article describing a manned mission to the planet Mars?
2. Does the article discuss astronauts travelling to Mars?
3. 
Q2:
1. What does the article discuss?
2. What is the subject of the article?
3. 
Q3:
1. Who runs the US space program?
2. What organization is in charge of the United States' space program?
3. 
Q4:
1. What channel aired a story denying that we landed on the moon?
2. What media outlet featured a story saying that man did not land on the moon?
3. 
Q5:
1. When did astronauts first go to the moon?
2. When was the first time that astronauts landed ont he moon?
3. 
Q6:
1. Who was the second American to set foot on the moon?
2. Which American walked on the moon second?
3. 
Q7:
1. Where do moon-landing deniers believe that the landing was staged?
2. In what location do conspiracy theorists thing that the moon landing was faked?
3. 
Q8:
1. Who was the first person to set foot on the moon?
2. Who walked on the moon before any other human?
3. 
Q9:
1. Is Neil Armstrong an extrovert?
2. Is Neil Armstrong a social butterfly?
3. 
Q10:
1. How many people eventually walked on the moon?
2. What was the total number of people to have walked on the moon?
3. 
