Former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue on Tuesday rescinded punishments against four players in the New Orleans Saints bounty scandal. 

The ruling overturned a decision made in October by Roger Goodell, the current commissioner, against Jonathan Vilma, Anthony Hargrove, Will Smith and Scott Fujita. 

SI: Goodell the big loser here 

Under the bounty program, Tagliabue wrote, Saints players were given incentives during the 2009 through 2011 seasons to render opposing players unable to play. They were called "cartoffs" and "knockouts." 

In addition, it was alleged that the Saints offered a bounty for injuring Minnesota Vikings quarterback Brett Favre during the NFC Championship game in January 2010. 

In October, after he upheld suspensions, Goodell appointed Tagliabue to review player appeals. 

In his 18-page order, Tagliabue found that Fujita's actions "were not conduct detrimental" and vacated a one-game suspension imposed by Goodell. 

Tagliabue wrote that Fujita "did not participate in the program including cartoffs and knockouts and that his participation in a 'non-injury' pay-for-performance pool is typically subject only to club discipline." 

Tagliabue found that Hargrove, Smith and Vilma engaged in "conduct detrimental to the integrity of, and public confidence in, the game of professional football," but ordered their punishments also be rescinded. 

Read Tagliabue's ruling (PDF) 

Hargrove had been suspended for seven games but was credited with having served five. Goodell found that Hargrove falsely answered an NFL investigator's questions about the misconduct. 

But Tagliabue said it was not clear Hargrove lied about the program and noted that he was "under tremendous pressure to follow the chain of command in order to keep his job." Tagliabue concluded that there was insufficient evidence that Hargrove's alleged misconduct merited a suspension.  QUESTIONS:

Q1:
1. What team was given incentives to render opposing players unable to play during 2009-2011?
2. During 2009-2011, what team was given incentives to render opposing players unable to play?
3. 
Q2:
1. What is the surname of the person that the story considers to be the big loser?
2. What is the big loser in this story called?
3. 
Q3:
1. What were the saints accused of doing on top of rendering opposing players unable to play?
2. On top of rendering opposing players unable to play, what were The Saints accused of doing?
3. 
Q4:
1. How many paged was Tagliabue's ruling?
2. What is the total number of pages that were in Tagliabue's ruling?
3. 
