The Nobel Prizes in physiology or medicine, physics and chemistry are the most respected prizes in science. But talk to scientists in private, and many will complain why (besides jealousy, perhaps) are some scientists unhappy with the Nobels? 

One reason is that the committees can often be slow to recognize achievement. Alfred Nobel specified in his will that the prizes should reward work done in the previous year. But experience soon showed that this was risky, as medals were given out for discoveries that later proved questionable. So a degree of caution is probably advisable. Sometimes, though, it can lead to strange results. Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, for instance, had to wait until 1983 to win a prize for work he had done in the 1930s on the structure of stars. However, Albert Einstein never won a prize for his theory of relativity. Even though some pretty suggestive evidence had been produced by Arthur Eddington in 1919, relativity, which has later passed every experimental test ever thrown at it, was still considered somewhat risky and obscure. 

Another criticism concerns the tradition that no more than three people can share a prize. Science is rarely this clear-cut. Take this year's physics prize, which recognised Peter Higgs for predicting the existence of the mass-bestowing particle that now bears his name. Dr Higgs was only one of several people with a claim. Two other teams---- Rober Brout and Francois Englert, as well as Gerald Guralnik, Carl Hageh and Tom Kibble----- submitted papers on the same idea to the same journal that published Dr Higgs's work, all within a few months of each other. Science often works like this, with different people coming up with similar ideas at similar times. In the event, the committee decided to honour Dr Engler (Brout is dead, therefore unqualified), whose paper was earlier than Dr Higgs's but did not explicitly predict a particle, over Dr Guralnik and his collaborators, who were more comprehensive but published a few weeks later. QUESTIONS:

Q1:
1. Why do scientists feel frustrated with the Nobels?
2. What's one reason scientists are fed up with the Nobels?
3. 
Q2:
1. Was a Nobel Prize ever given out to Albert Einstein?
2. Was Albert Einstein a Nobel Prize recipient?
3. 
Q3:
1. How many people can have a Nobel at one time?
2. What is the maximum amount of people that a Nobel Prize can honor?
3. 
Q4:
1. When did Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar receive his Nobel?
2. In what year was a Nobel Prize awarded to Subra   Chandrasekhar?
3. 
Q5:
1. What discovery got someone their Nobel this year?
2. What was this year's Nobel Prize awarded in recognition of?
3. 
Q6:
1. Who got this year's Nobel along with Peter Higgs?
2. Who in addition to Peter Higgs was this year's Nobel Prize given to?
3. 
Q7:
1. Name the people that make up the two additional teams that got the Nobel this year?
2. Who specifically in addition to Peter Higgs was this year's Nobel Prize given to?
3. 
Q8:
1. Who besides Peter Higgs, Rober Brout and Francois Englert got a Nobel this year?
2. Who did the Nobels honor this year in addition to Peter Higgs, Rober Brout and Francois Englert?
3. 
Q9:
1. Who made the same discovery as this year's nobel winners but earlier?
2. Who had previously discovered the thing that won the Nobel this year?
3. 
Q10:
1. What award garners the most respect?
2. Which award is the most prestigious one?
3. 
Q11:
1. What comes with lots of risk?
2. What isn't a sure thing?
3. 
Q12:
1. Is anything besides relativity risky?
2. Is there something else that's not a sure thing, like relativity?
3. 
Q13:
1. What occurred in the 1930s?
2. What was an event from the 1930s?
3. 
Q14:
1. What were the names of the people that did the most comprehensive report?
2. Whose report was the most all encompassing?
3. 
