Kishore Kunal, based on his interpretation of Verse 5 and Verse 27 (which refers to Ravana), argues that the temple described in the inscription was a Rama temple constructed by Anayachandra, a feudatory of the Gahadavala king Govindachandra. According to him, the temple deity is called Vishnu-Hari in this verse for poetic effect: Vishnu alliterates with the preceding word Vyuhai, while Hari alliterates with the succeeding word Hiranya. Kishore mentions that several texts composed around the 10th century mention Rama as Vishnu and Hari, presenting the Agastya Samhita as an example. M. G. S. Narayanan also considers the Vishnu-Hari inscription as clear evidence that a temple was built at the site of Babri mosque during the reign of Govindachandra.