Net emissions from the AFOLU sector are in the form of negative balances in both the BaU and LC scenarios, which means that removals are always greater than emissions over the entire trajectory, and therefore more than offset emissions. The Low Carbon (LC) scenario, however, presents a net balance 58% better than that of the BaU scenario. The net additional absorptions achieved thanks to the LC scenario compared to the BaU net absorption level, would be of the order of 2.5 MteCO2 by the year 2030.
net emissions from the afolu sector are in the form of negative balances in both the bau and lc scenarios, which means that removals are always greater than emissions over the entire trajectory, and therefore more than offset emissions. the low carbon (lc) scenario, however, presents a net balance 58% better than that of the bau scenario. the net additional absorptions achieved thanks to the lc scenario compared to the bau net absorption level, would be of the order of 2.5 mteco2 by the year 2030
What adaptation/mitigation/net-zero targets/objectives are provided for the LULUCF/Forestry Sector ?