Question: Under what condition(s) will a CS-MT-LR/PS-MT-LR/EPC-MT-LR be allowed for a UE subscribed to the call/session-unrelated class, when LCS client identities match and the UE user subscribes to 'location with notification and privacy verification'?
Option 1: The CS-MT-LR/PS-MT-LR/EPC-MT-LR is allowed following notification to the UE if the UE user either responds allowing location or doesn't respond but has a default subscription for location in absence of a response.
Option 2: The CS-MT-LR/PS-MT-LR/EPC-MT-LR is automatically allowed without requiring any response from the UE, as long as GMLC restrictions are met.
Option 3: The CS-MT-LR/PS-MT-LR/EPC-MT-LR is only allowed if the UE user actively responds to the notification by explicitly allowing the location request each time.
Option 4: The CS-MT-LR/PS-MT-LR/EPC-MT-LR will always be restricted in this scenario, regardless of the UE's response or default settings.
Explanation: This is because, according to the specified conditions for 'location with notification and privacy verification', the location request (CS-MT-LR/PS-MT-LR/EPC-MT-LR) can proceed if the user either gives explicit consent after being notified or if there's no response but the user has a pre-set subscription that allows for location sharing in the absence of a response. This balances user privacy with the need for location services under agreed-upon terms.