Question: For a Phase 1 mobile station replying to a Short Message Service (SMS) as per 3GPP specifications, what is the implication of ignoring the TP-Reply-Path parameter?
Option 1: Guaranteed delivery of the reply MO SM to the originating SME.
Option 2: Automatic selection of an alternate Short Code (SC) for the reply.
Option 3: Prevention of manual selection of the original SC for the reply.
Option 4: Possibility of improved delivery, especially when the originating SME is not a Mobile Station (MS).
Explanation: Ignoring the TP-Reply-Path parameter may improve delivery possibility, particularly when the message originates from a non-mobile station entity, aligning with nuanced SMS handling and delivery optimizations in telecom networks.