Might it not be possible to interpret all references to ontological existents along Platonist lines in terms of references to species of one kind or another, and the characteristics of species; thereby providing a proof that the basic ontological existents are, in fact, species, and that the " problem of individuality ", in the final analysis, reduces to the problem of species (or quite generally: qualitative) identity?
Might it not be possible to interpret all references to ontological existents along Platonist lines in terms of references to species of one kind or another, and the characteristics of species; thereby providing a proof that the basic ontological existents are, in fact, species, and that the " problem of individuality ", in the last page of the report, reduces to the problem of species (or quite generally: qualitative) identity?