If by " meaning " is understood the objective content of linguistic utterances, or what might also be called their " objective thought - content " (I shall discuss later the " historical ", performative aspects of such utterances), then, on the face of it at least, there seems to be nothing odd or improper in making identifying cross - references to meanings.
If by " meaning " is understood the objective content of linguistic utterances, or what might also be called their " objective thought - content " (I shall discuss later the " historical ", performative aspects of such utterances), then, Encountering at least, there seems to be nothing odd or improper in making identifying cross - references to meanings.